All posts made by Vycid in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread



1. Post 3517661 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: gat0r on November 08, 2013, 08:09:31 AM
some heavy trading engine throttling to prevent lag on gox..

Will gox EVER stop being a massive shitshow?

Unbelievable. At least we're ready for their inevitable failure this time.



2. Post 3554613 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: mb300sd on November 12, 2013, 02:00:43 AM
I think I was one of the last ones to successfully withdraw from gox, thankfully pulled out all I needed to buy my house before the withdraw problems started.

Although it was at an average of $120/btc, missed the 266 bubble and this runup... Would have been way better off with a mortgage.
You can talk about sellers remorse in a couple of years.

Still got plenty more.

Besides, remorse is the 5000btc wallet lost to a corrupted bitlocker partition, or close to that lost to pirate.

Jesus Christ, I can't imagine.

Truly no way to recover that partition?

In other news, new 24h high on btcchina.



3. Post 3554652 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: mb300sd on November 12, 2013, 02:16:12 AM
I think I was one of the last ones to successfully withdraw from gox, thankfully pulled out all I needed to buy my house before the withdraw problems started.

Although it was at an average of $120/btc, missed the 266 bubble and this runup... Would have been way better off with a mortgage.
You can talk about sellers remorse in a couple of years.

Still got plenty more.

Besides, remorse is the 5000btc wallet lost to a corrupted bitlocker partition, or close to that lost to pirate.

Jesus Christ, I can't imagine.

Truly no way to recover that partition?

Sent it off to 4 data recovery companies. Almost all datas intact, but the bitlocker metadata (including master key) are corrupt... 256 bit AES key

I wouldn't give up if I were you.

Obviously you can't brute force a 256 bit AES key. But you MIGHT be able to brute-force an algorithm to fix whatever corruption happened to the metadata... I'm not an expert but at the very least it seems plausible.

For 5000 bitcoins, I'd hire an expert and get a few Amazon GPU clusters going. If you're not into the idea of trying out of pocket, maybe you'd be willing to crowdfund to give it a shot? I'd be interested.



4. Post 3554698 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: mb300sd on November 12, 2013, 02:22:33 AM
I think I was one of the last ones to successfully withdraw from gox, thankfully pulled out all I needed to buy my house before the withdraw problems started.

Although it was at an average of $120/btc, missed the 266 bubble and this runup... Would have been way better off with a mortgage.
You can talk about sellers remorse in a couple of years.

Still got plenty more.

Besides, remorse is the 5000btc wallet lost to a corrupted bitlocker partition, or close to that lost to pirate.

Jesus Christ, I can't imagine.

Truly no way to recover that partition?

Sent it off to 4 data recovery companies. Almost all datas intact, but the bitlocker metadata (including master key) are corrupt... 256 bit AES key

I wouldn't give up if I were you.

Obviously you can't brute force a 256 bit AES key. But you MIGHT be able to brute-force an algorithm to fix whatever corruption happened to the metadata... I'm not an expert but at the very least it seems plausible.

For 5000 bitcoins, I'd hire an expert and get a few Amazon GPU clusters going. If you're not into the idea of trying out of pocket, maybe you'd be willing to crowdfund to give it a shot? I'd be interested.

Metadata dosen't matter too much, the key is part of whats corrupt. Would me far more cost effective to attempt to brute force the silk road coins

I'm just speculating that most of the information is still there, that maybe only a few bits are wrong, or that something is bit-shifted, or whatever (again, not an expert). It seems much, much less computationally intensive to try to repair the key than crack a wallet blind.



5. Post 3554750 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: Vycid on November 12, 2013, 02:25:40 AM
I'm just speculating that most of the information is still there, that maybe only a few bits are wrong, or that something is bit-shifted, or whatever (again, not an expert). It seems much, much less computationally intensive to try to repair the key than crack a wallet blind.

The first few entire sectors of the drive are unreadable.

Shit, sorry man. Some kind of nasty hardware failure? I'd have thought the recovery guys could extract the data.



6. Post 3554794 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: chriswilmer on November 12, 2013, 02:37:23 AM
Recovery key doesn't help. The master key is encrypted with your recovery key and bootup usb. Thats the key used to decrypt the data, and its not stored anywhere except the drive itself.

I think I was one of the last ones to successfully withdraw from gox, thankfully pulled out all I needed to buy my house before the withdraw problems started.

Although it was at an average of $120/btc, missed the 266 bubble and this runup... Would have been way better off with a mortgage.
You can talk about sellers remorse in a couple of years.

Still got plenty more.

Besides, remorse is the 5000btc wallet lost to a corrupted bitlocker partition, or close to that lost to pirate.

Jesus Christ, I can't imagine.

Truly no way to recover that partition?

Sent it off to 4 data recovery companies. Almost all datas intact, but the bitlocker metadata (including master key) are corrupt... 256 bit AES key

I wouldn't give up if I were you.

Obviously you can't brute force a 256 bit AES key. But you MIGHT be able to brute-force an algorithm to fix whatever corruption happened to the metadata... I'm not an expert but at the very least it seems plausible.

For 5000 bitcoins, I'd hire an expert and get a few Amazon GPU clusters going. If you're not into the idea of trying out of pocket, maybe you'd be willing to crowdfund to give it a shot? I'd be interested.

Metadata dosen't matter too much, the key is part of whats corrupt. Would me far more cost effective to attempt to brute force the silk road coins

I'm just speculating that most of the information is still there, that maybe only a few bits are wrong, or that something is bit-shifted, or whatever (again, not an expert). It seems much, much less computationally intensive to try to repair the key than crack a wallet blind.

The first few entire sectors of the drive are unreadable.

Heh, one more order of magnitude in price and it will be worth getting your drive under a magnetic force microscope. Maybe you should just donate it to an MIT (or Northwestern University) materials science lab and  tell them they can keep half of the profits.

(I did my PhD at Northwestern - they are a top materials science research university, let me know if you need a connection)

5000 BTC is already approaching $2M USD... I doubt those labs charge that kind of money for consulting?

Hell, I bet a lot of schools would reciprocate in-kind if you donated an MFM module.

http://www.asylumresearch.com/Products/VFM2/VFM2.shtml



7. Post 3554813 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: mb300sd on November 12, 2013, 02:46:18 AM
I'm way beyond messing with it anymore, if I ever find the drive, if i even still have it, its for sale to the highest bidder. I don't even know if I still have the recovery keys anymore, threw out a lot of papers when I moved.

PM me if you find it. You may have written off those 5000 coins, but I'm up for a challenge. Maybe we can make it a community thing.  Smiley



8. Post 3555138 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on November 12, 2013, 03:39:24 AM


Double top or plow right through?

Instinctively I want to say it's a double top. But the demand from China is unmistakable. Look at the order book trend...

We're going through.




9. Post 3555158 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on November 12, 2013, 03:52:34 AM
Ya.. if wasn't for China, I'd say a lot of resistance again.  If China plows through though it'll prob be pretty uneventful.

I believe before this last "correction", China went as high as like $430 USD at one point.

The btcchina ATH is 2630¥, currently worth $431.75. Absolute insanity.

I've never seen arbitrage opportunities this big. You could drive a truck through bitstamp/btcchina. It's all so surreal.



10. Post 3555210 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: solex on November 12, 2013, 04:00:48 AM
Ya.. if wasn't for China, I'd say a lot of resistance again.  If China plows through though it'll prob be pretty uneventful.

I believe before this last "correction", China went as high as like $430 USD at one point.

The btcchina ATH is 2630¥, currently worth $431.75. Absolute insanity.

I've never seen arbitrage opportunities this big. You could drive a truck through bitstamp/btcchina. It's all so surreal.

The massive and persistent arbs between the btc markets is proof positive that the fiat system is a dinosaur.

True, though I think China's draconian remittance rules also have something to do with it.

It's also proof positive that big players with eyes on the Bitcoin ecosystem would prefer to hold the coins than exploit the enormous arbs.

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on November 12, 2013, 04:05:49 AM
Man, wish Bitfinex APRs weren't 200+% now..  insane.

We should tell so Bitcoin haters about Bitfinex, and how they can deposit some fiat and loan it to us idiots and make 50% APR easy..  They wouldn't need to ever even touch bitcoins!

Is Bitfinex truly considered trustworthy? 50% APR sounds good but it seems like every kind of financial market or scheme yet invented for Bitcoin has imploded one way or another.



11. Post 3555234 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: BitPirate on November 12, 2013, 04:10:06 AM
Ya.. if wasn't for China, I'd say a lot of resistance again.  If China plows through though it'll prob be pretty uneventful.

I believe before this last "correction", China went as high as like $430 USD at one point.

The btcchina ATH is 2630¥, currently worth $431.75. Absolute insanity.

I've never seen arbitrage opportunities this big. You could drive a truck through bitstamp/btcchina. It's all so surreal.

It went from 2100 to 2600 within a couple of hours though. Absolutely crazy. Everyone was screaming "sell". You know tops when you see them.

We're getting quite a bit of arbitrage from Westerners too; overseas wires are cheap and fast, but a limited resource.

Could you share an effective strategy for Westerners?

I'm still under the impression that if I was to sell on btcchina, I'd be unable to recover my money. I have considered selling and waiting for the bubble to subside (and the arbs to trend back to zero), then exchanging back to BTC and into USD, but I'd much prefer a more direct system.



12. Post 3555566 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on November 12, 2013, 05:11:29 AM

well, i dont really hate them, but i do hope they all get aids and die in fire.


I wonder how you feel about people you actually hate  Shocked



13. Post 3555987 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: Voodah on November 12, 2013, 06:00:13 AM
I'm just speculating that most of the information is still there, that maybe only a few bits are wrong, or that something is bit-shifted, or whatever (again, not an expert). It seems much, much less computationally intensive to try to repair the key than crack a wallet blind.

The first few entire sectors of the drive are unreadable.

Shit, sorry man. Some kind of nasty hardware failure? I'd have thought the recovery guys could extract the data.

Yep, physically unreadable, even with cleanroom work. I've accepted the loss... If I really needed coins, it would be alot easier to hire someone to go beat the stolen ones out of pirateat40.

At this point I'm just holding onto the 5k I have left with an iron fist.

Would you mind publishing the address(es)? So I can add them to my provably lost bitcoin list: https://docs.google.com/a/ij.hk/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ahdy3Je_nYdOdFVocm4yTzhZOW1waWd6SFJIVHUwYUE&usp=drive_web#gid=0

FFS did someone really lose a wallet with 27000 BTC Huh

I would never leave my bed again.

One word.

Pizza.



14. Post 3556498 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

I just had a bit of a "holy shit" moment.

Bitcoin will break China's control over CNY outflows.

It is very hard to get CNY out of China - the cap is 50k CNY per Chinese citizen per year. This is a big reason why there is a huge arb between USD and CNY Bitcoin exchanges: Westerners can't just wire yuan out of the country. However, as this bubble settles down and the arbitrage market does its thing, more and more individuals in China will cash in on their 50k CNY limit, since it is an easy profit opportunity. They will wire their money to Western exchanges, buy bitcoins there, and sell them domestically. The Chinese markets will drift closer in price to the Western markets.

This means you will be able to move money in and out of China freely, by buying bitcoins on one end and selling them on the other. Chinese citizens will act in rational self-interest to effectively "sell" their 50k CNY export limits.

If wealthy Chinese people would like to buy lots of expensive things directly from the West... now they can, by purchasing the import limits of others by proxy.

Of course, China will not like this.



15. Post 3564384 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: paratox on November 13, 2013, 12:31:50 AM
Anything to stop a westerner opening and trading on a BTCChina account?

You will need a working phone number. Other than this, no verification process.

Also keep in mind that it might be complicated to get (fiat) money out from there.

"Might be complicated" is an understatement. Chinese citizens are limited to 50k CNY remitted per year. Considering you're probably not a Chinese citizen, you're going to have difficulties.



16. Post 3565066 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: hlynur on November 13, 2013, 02:15:58 AM

*checking chinese subforum*
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=329534.0
Remember how BTC-E has always had low prices? There's a reason for that: hard to get money in.

And you know how now BTCCHINA has really high prices? There's a reason for that, too: hard to get money out.

If it was easy to do, people would already be doing it and we wouldn't see as large a gap as we do. China is a Communist country, and they have a strong hold on their currency. Just doing some quick Googling, Chinese residents can only send $50,000 per year overseas.

So, let's say you put up $45,000 to buy 150 coins. Send them to China, sell for $340 each, split the $6,000 profit with your Chinese partner, and have them wire back $48,000 (while also possibly paying taxes and bank fees, etc).

Oh, and don't forget to add in your trip to China  Cheesy

So you might make $3,000 for the year. You could exceed the limit by having your Chinese contact's friends and relatives send you transfers in their names, but it seems like that would require even more trust.  And if the price of bitcoins goes way up and the price difference stays the same, you'll hit your limit earlier and make less profit.

It's a nice idea in theory, but I don't think it will pan out as well as it looks. Please let us know if you do try it, though!  Smiley



But I don't understand why CHINESE people don't do this. You don't need an American partner or a trip to America to open a USD-denominated bank account.

Pretty much every Chinese Bitcoiner should be cashing in on their 50k right now...



17. Post 3571492 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

I believe btcchina is down.



18. Post 3571858 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on November 13, 2013, 06:39:31 PM
We are close to having a new ATH in terms of amount of USD on the books @ Gox.

Maybe i should sell my massive amount of coins into that?

Well, nobody ever went broke taking profits, but you might be premature in doing so.

The longer it takes for us to go parabolic, the higher the peak on this thing is ultimately going to be.



19. Post 3572031 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: BowieMan on November 13, 2013, 07:05:57 PM
The longer it takes for us to go parabolic, the higher the peak on this thing is ultimately going to be.
we haven't gone parabolic yet?


I thought we had, on the last runup before the correction to $300. But if you look closely at the most recent curvature, no.



20. Post 3572103 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Somebody better let Bitstamp know there's a rally going on.



21. Post 3572687 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: haightst on November 13, 2013, 08:09:14 PM
...

After a quick check of your posting history: congratulations, you've become the first person ever on my ignore list.



22. Post 3573030 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Has anyone seen my jaw?



23. Post 3573160 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Anyone see $500 by the end of the day?



24. Post 3573227 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: billington.mark on November 13, 2013, 08:59:43 PM
What's the countdown?

I think he's counting down the Bitstamp $400 wall, although it doesn't look like he's on target.



25. Post 3573617 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: Ivanhoe on November 13, 2013, 09:33:17 PM
Hate to say it, but your count-down is a bit of a anti-climax Adam.

I don't know how he managed to miss something eventful either. There's a record dropping every 10 minutes  Cheesy



26. Post 3575460 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: vps15 on November 14, 2013, 12:54:37 AM
ok, so, as far as i can see you have been correct a grand total of 0 times! well done! whats your secret? why dont you give another fucking prediction you dumb cunt

Chill out.



27. Post 3583471 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: InwardContour on November 14, 2013, 06:32:28 PM
With big money coming in to Bitcoin now, plus China, I think a $300/$400 price tag is quite reasonable.

Most importantly, public perception is much different than 6 months ago.  Bitcoin is no longer viewed as "the popped bubble" that clearly was a scam and dismissible.  Bitcoin has surpassed the previous "bubble pop" in under 1 year.  The technology is actually taken more seriously.  People are taking the time to actually understand Bitcoin.  This is easily observable in just the media's presentation of Bitcoin over the past few weeks.  It's hard to think of a more powerful and motivating outcome, than something that fully recovers and surpassed a previous ATH in such little time.  That is a serious statement to people on the outside.  Public perception, when there's so much usage to gain, is most important.  To dismiss it as so insignificant is, I think, a mistake.

Thoughts in context.
sure, this is true, to an extent, but much of this is perception in the context of a bull market. but this is how it should feel in a strong bull market. that's the exuberance. good news is that much better and bad news is that much less important.

.....until reversal.

I think he's got a fair point about bad news being downplayed.

If we were in a downtrend, there'd probably be an outright panic about coin blacklisting. "The end of Bitcoin!" "Fungibility is dead!".

Anyway.



28. Post 3583502 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: TERA on November 14, 2013, 07:29:26 PM
Why do people assume that this is going to be another march/April style 800% bubble? You are forgetting that back then the time in between the last ATH of $32 was an entire 2 years of consolidation. This time it was only 6 months. Were likely to see a 2012 style increase instead.

Uh, because it's already quite clearly proven itself not to be 2012 style. Look at a graph again.




29. Post 3583652 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: BarkinTree on November 14, 2013, 07:42:57 PM
Why do people assume that this is going to be another march/April style 800% bubble? You are forgetting that back then the time in between the last ATH of $32 was an entire 2 years of consolidation. This time it was only 6 months. Were likely to see a 2012 style increase instead.

Uh, because it's already quite clearly proven itself not to be 2012 style. Look at a graph again.



youre not actually illustrating what you are saying. can you show us why it is not like 2012? you can't see price action in 2012 on that graph.

You should know I slaved away in Paint to bring you this.




30. Post 3586414 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: 2_Thumbs_Up on November 14, 2013, 11:10:42 PM

If you actually followed the source wikipedia links to, it says the following:

Quote
I use the term fiat or abstract paper money interchangeably to stand for a government supplied means of payment of no intrinsic worth.

So not even your own source actually supports your claim. It's just Wikipedia messing up.

Not sure why this bothers some of you so much.  There is government fiat, now digital fiat, clam shell fiat, etc, etc.  As freethink just said, fiat isn't necessarily a bad thing.  It's not bad that USD is fiat in that sense.  What's bad about USD is that it is debt based.  It enters the system as debt.  It would actually be nice if the treasury would just issue sovereign money and break capital holders grip on our economy.  But they can't/won't because they are in debt to the capital holders.  Some of you worry about the small things and don't really see the big picture at work here.
Because it is muddling language. When you add meanings to words, the words actually get less meaningful. This serves a good purpose in politically charged topics as you can become more vague about what you mean without people even realizing it a lot of times. The etymology is fairly clear in this case, fiat means by decree.

Relevant:
https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/orwell46.htm

Listen, guys. English is a living language. The definition of "fiat", in the context of money, has also come to mean "unbacked currency with no utility", despite its root meaning of "decree". Therefore it's not unreasonable to say bitcoins are fiat.

This really shouldn't bother anyone, since it's semantic and doesn't imply anything about the nature of bitcoins except that they have no backing. And they do have no backing.

"Artificial" used to mean 'artful' or 'skillful in construction''.
"Awful"? 'Evocative of awe'.
"Doom"? 'Lawful decree'.
"Passenger"? 'Foot traveler'.



31. Post 3586475 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

We're moving again.



32. Post 3586898 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on November 15, 2013, 12:54:21 AM
We're moving again.
Looks pretty darn stable to me.

Check again, there was a volume spike and a $15 drop.

Quote from: Adrian-x on November 15, 2013, 01:44:51 AM
Sentiment seems terrible today.  We are hovering around an all-time high, and a lot of people are acting as if we just had a crash, or that this is definitely the top....

Agreed! Today got me feeling like I wanted out!
I'm with ya on that one.

The last time I acted on that feeling we were around $9
Now I wait and in another 6 months and the feeling will subsidie.

I think you're right about the sentiment. We have a way to go yet before we top out. Despite all the doom-talk about Coin Validation, the price hasn't moved much. Very bullish.

Recent Google Trends, for those curious: http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=bitcoin&date=today%207-d&cmpt=date

Quote from: CryptStorm on November 15, 2013, 01:13:48 AM
Much of the talk here is noise, no offense to anyone (and I spend hours here lurking, reading, and now, finally, joining the fray, so I don't dismiss the conversation), but truth be told, Google trends ('bitcoin") is the Magic 8 Ball.

This thread is all in good fun, as far as I'm concerned. I don't think anyone gets much better than 50% accuracy on technicals.



33. Post 3588380 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: gambitv on November 15, 2013, 05:55:33 AM
...
don't worry she will never get the bitcoins! i made sure of that  Cool

lol

This brings up an interesting point. What will the courts say when a divorce involves a substantial horde of bitcoins.

Be interesting test case, anyone want to volunteer?

EDIT: Reading the last few pages tells me the night had very little action, as all I see is a drawn out conversation over a word, and welcoming a new member.

We should have a "don't check the Bitcoin price for 3 days, then attempt to reconstruct the chart from this thread" challenge.  Smiley



34. Post 3594904 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: bassclef on November 15, 2013, 08:08:20 PM
Another leg down on Stamp, momentum drying up as selling pressure increases.

"Captain, I don't like the look of the mist."

Stamp always gets dragged up, kicking and screaming, by gox/btcchina. Neither seems particularly interested in Stamp's flashcrash right now. I thought the arb was a little on the low side anyway.

I'm getting increasingly bullish for every one of these aborted crashes. Shakes some weak hands out of the tree. Accumulation is happening.



35. Post 3595720 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: freethink2013 on November 15, 2013, 09:01:47 PM
Was just about to start a thread with a prize for picking the low but then I realised we can go back and edit posts and no "edited at xx:xx dd/mm/yyyy" gets added to the post. That's a pity.

Um, yeah it does. If you wait more than 10min to edit then your datestamp gets a little underline. If you hover your cursor over it, the last date of edit pops up.

I'll illustrate this in 11 minutes or so.  Smiley

Edit, November 15, 2013, ~09:51:05 PM



36. Post 3596005 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: cfrm on November 15, 2013, 10:04:37 PM
Was just about to start a thread with a prize for picking the low but then I realised we can go back and edit posts and no "edited at xx:xx dd/mm/yyyy" gets added to the post. That's a pity.

Um, yeah it does. If you wait more than 10min to edit then your datestamp gets a little underline. If you hover your cursor over it, the last date of edit pops up.

I'll illustrate this in 11 minutes or so.  Smiley

I do a thread then once we clear this up. You'll have to explain this to me exactly though so I can avoid cheats.

Basically what I was going to do is this:

Thread title: Guess the low 16-17th november

rules:
1. low time period refers to 16th 00:00:01 to 17th 23:59:59 and the lowest price at gox in that period.
2. Only one entry per person and no edits to your post except within the forum defined 10 minutes
3. In the case of two identical predictions the first posted will be accepted.
4. Predictions after 17th 06:00:00 are invalid.
5. All times are gmt.
6. Predictions to have 4 decimal places
7. In the case of two predictions one higher, one lower but equidistant from the low the lower will be the winner.

Any other gotchas I've left out? Any changes? I'm only gonna put .1 on the line but it's better that a kick in the hole.



I guess you need to establish the time zone.

Yup, beyond clearly establishing the time zone it looks good to me. Nevermind, you said GMT.

If you have concerns about smurfing you might want to ensure accounts are registered before today in order to be eligible to win.



37. Post 3596027 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Alright folks, fasten up.



38. Post 3596059 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: keewee on November 15, 2013, 10:11:13 PM
My guess is that it won't go lower than $420 Wink

413 and dropping  Smiley

Back to 420




39. Post 3599471 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: seleme on November 16, 2013, 05:07:46 AM
If these buy and hold smartasses could have it on their own someone would still trying to buy a pizza with 10 000 coins.

What a load of bullshit.

lol no.

Lol, yes. If absolutely all people would just hold like some are giving "smart" advices here, nobody would be able to buy a coin as nobody would selling them, so those coins would be absolutely worthless as Satoshi and 100 others would know about them.

"Buy and hold" gang (who would they buy from if everyone would do that..) are the biggest enemy of the Bitcoin. They're just too greedy twats to understand that.

Are you stupid? That would make the Bitcoins more valuable if there was less supply.

There CANNOT be zero supply because coins are being mined all the time.

Hello?



40. Post 3600498 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

No rest for the weary.

$500 soon?



41. Post 3600905 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: gambitv on November 16, 2013, 11:48:35 AM
Speaking of trapped GoxBux.... there may be no Tokyo if this happens....


"The Earthquake Research Institute at the University of Tokyo said earlier this year that there’s a 70 percent chance a 7.0-magnitude or higher quake will strike Tokyo, near Fukushima, by 2016. Should the fourth reactor collapse, Suzuki said, it would be “bye bye Japan,” and “everybody on the west coast of North America should evacuate. Now if that isn’t terrifying, I don’t know what is.”

Source: http://billmoyers.com/2013/11/15/what-you-need-to-know-about-fukushima/.

Hmmm... glad most of my coins went a little further away from Japan.

Extreme hyperbole.



42. Post 3601207 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: ardana123 on November 16, 2013, 12:28:15 PM
I don't trade on traditional markets, so I'm just wondering the following. Take for instance Google stock, right now it's floating around 1000$. I can't imagine the Google stock has the same shitty market depth bitcoin has, e.g. 1000 bitcoins (or 1000 shares) dropping the price by 40$. Why is it that bitcoin has such bad market depth? The price keeps going up but a few big dumps could drop the price back to the low 300's. I can't imagine the same thing happening to Google stock.

Volume. GOOG averages 2,085,000 shares. That's per day. That means a total transaction value of 2085000 * $1033.56 = $2.155B/day. Bitcoin's total market cap is barely twice that, and its daily volume pales in comparison.

This is a big reason why Bitcoin doesn't behave like a traditional market - it's thinly traded.

The addition of something like the Winklevoss ETF would likely introduce a lot of that traditional market volume into the Bitcoin ecosystem and things would start looking more like Google pretty fast.

Also, Google has metrics like revenue, intellectual property, and so forth that give analysts a reasonable idea of what the company (and thus the stock) is worth. Bitcoin has no clear path to valuation and that means we run on sentiment. We humans are fickle creatures, so running on sentiment alone doesn't do much for price stability.



43. Post 3608401 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: nanobrain on November 17, 2013, 03:01:00 AM
Just had an interesting discussion about bitcoin with a guy I just met. Fascinating. He's well versed and seems to get it fully, yet thinks governments won't allow it. No "oh, you out smarted us!" or such. He may be right. Yet he  acknowledged it couldn't be shut down, just outlawed.

Who else is ok with bitcoin being "just" an underground thing, eh?  Grin

I tend to agree with him.  

As much as I would like to see crypto be the catalyst for a new, fairer economic system I think the 'fiat is dead' crowd is somewhat deluded.  Power traditionally comes from the point of a knife/barrel of a gun and the idea that govts will just let their economic authority be undermined flies in the face of human history.  

Of course, what has happened in Germany, with BTC adoption there, is a counter for this argument.  

It will boil down to "what's in it for us" and "can we control it".  If the current global hegemony can continue their control, they will let the masses use fava beans for currency for all they care.

I think it's an issue of political capital. The government won't be interested in fighting crypto unless they're convinced the "harm it will bring" exceeds the difficulty of cracking down on it, AND that they can convince the general public that it is indeed worth fighting.

Theoretically an autocratic government shouldn't like a free internet, but that's been broadly permitted. Arguments against it are very weak in what is at least supposed to be a free society.

As long as Bitcoin moderates its appearance, it can be a powerful tool toward decentralization of money. It doesn't attack the existing system; it creates a new one. It is much harder for government "reprisals" to appear justified if there is no violation of the standing rules.



44. Post 3608424 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: vps15 on November 17, 2013, 03:10:44 AM
not even 5000 coins till 500, can we please start tonights panic buying to get these last coins "cheap"

"only 5000" coins means roughly 2.5M these days, so let's manage expectations.



45. Post 3610048 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: hmmmstrange on November 17, 2013, 08:09:31 AM

Panel II

    Ernie Allen
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    The International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children


I think there is a chance the bitcoin representatives may have to walk out on this hearing. Nothing good can come of this if they have already decided bitcoin is directly associated with child porn.

I don't think that's the case. I think they've decided Bitcoin has the potential to enable child porn networks to flourish, and they're right. Just look around the Deep Web.

That doesn't mean Bitcoiners have to stand around and say, "yeah, whatever, it's gonna be used for child porn, dollars are used for child porn too". We're claiming to have a superior currency, it should be harder to abuse children with it (or just as hard, at the very least).

It makes sense for this guy to come and discuss ways to combat child porn. I'm on board with that.



46. Post 3610100 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: LightRider on November 17, 2013, 08:42:15 AM

Panel II

    Ernie Allen
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    The International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children


I think there is a chance the bitcoin representatives may have to walk out on this hearing. Nothing good can come of this if they have already decided bitcoin is directly associated with child porn.

It wouldn't surprise me if they try create a slander campaign and bait the media. Thats all we need is the media saying bitcoin is associated with child pornography. seems to me the feds are playing dirty as usual on this one

If bitcoin were so closely tied to child pornography, wouldn't the Catholic church have already endorsed it by now?

You seem like a rational, reasonable person.



47. Post 3610124 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: CryptoMinter on November 17, 2013, 08:47:15 AM

Panel II

    Ernie Allen
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    The International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children


I think there is a chance the bitcoin representatives may have to walk out on this hearing. Nothing good can come of this if they have already decided bitcoin is directly associated with child porn.

It wouldn't surprise me if they try create a slander campaign and bait the media. Thats all we need is the media saying bitcoin is associated with child pornography. seems to me the feds are playing dirty as usual on this one

It's not likely. This isn't the first time this guy has appeared on a bitcoin-esque panel.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=232950.0

The USGOV approach to crime fighting is highly financial in nature, and just like with the NSA, the Senate et al want to drum up policy that suits these objectives. This guy is mainly a scumbag from what I can tell, but he's not going nuclear on bitcoin, he just wants to be able to track transactions to discourage or prevent child exploitation.

Pretty much what I figured. They'll be pleased to know that Bitcoin is technically not anonymous.

We'll conveniently forget to mention that there is a lot of work currently going on to make it anonymous, of course.



48. Post 3610235 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Volume is very thin on Gox and very heavy on btcchina. Interesting.

Looks like China may break 3000 CNY before Gox breaks $500.



49. Post 3610491 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on November 17, 2013, 09:46:16 AM
CoinValidation is long-term bullish, the NWO wants to make Bitcoin their currency of choice. Cheesy
Seriously, guys. You should have a look who this Matthew Mellon from CoinValidation is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mellon_family

The ultra rich are getting involved, and they want their piece of the pie before it shrinks by another tenfold.

I'm a little concerned that their plan is to make their piece of the pie the only 'valid' piece.

Hopefully not.



50. Post 3610522 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: justusranvier on November 17, 2013, 09:50:06 AM
I'm a little concerned that their plan is to make their piece of the pie the only 'valid' piece.

Hopefully not.
How would they get the Chinese to go along with that?

Coins that aren't good for international trade will be worth less, no matter what country their owner is in. You're right that they won't be worth zero, but they certainly wouldn't be fungible whether or not China participated.

Anyway, it sounds like the focus is on addresses, not coins, but it's unsettling it's under discussion at all.



51. Post 3610899 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: Taxidermista on November 17, 2013, 10:42:42 AM
Wow, incredible volume on China: 62,036 -> 47.41 %

I have my doubts the rally will correct at 500, so much buying pressure there.

I guess sundays are not special days for them.

I think sundays are the one day they get off.

Stamp appears to have decided to join the party.



52. Post 3611122 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on November 17, 2013, 11:26:28 AM
What will we see first: 500goxusd or 3000btccny? And what will fall first?

My bets are on the chinese.
I think so too.
Ask wall after 3000 CNY is very low by the way, but hey, looking at walls is like reading tea leaves i guess.

I thought you were short?



53. Post 3611248 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

CONTACT!

MtGox did it first, for the record (with 20s of trading lag, bless their hearts)





54. Post 3611386 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: BitchicksHusband on November 17, 2013, 12:00:50 PM
Now the question becomes:

Is this the vertical of the Sigmoid curve or are we ahead of it and due for a major correction like in April?

We are nowhere near the inflection point of the adoption curve. You will know we are getting close if you can order off of Amazon with Bitcoins.



55. Post 3617815 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: byronbb on November 18, 2013, 12:48:31 AM
I can honestly see this going to 1000$. And once it hits 1000$, mainstream media wil go CUCKOO.

The Gold Bitcoin parity meme will be the obvious discussion. Advantage bitcoin.

Well, a satoshi has been worth more than an atom of gold for a long time already...  Smiley

The only sensible comparisons between the two are the cost of their smallest unit (Bitcoin is much greater) and their total market cap (Gold is much greater).



56. Post 3618189 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

What the hell happened to Chinese volume? What's going on?



57. Post 3619569 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Aaaaand we're hitting fever pitch, I'm selling some.



58. Post 3620854 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: TERA on November 18, 2013, 07:31:10 AM
I'd say it is safe to sell some here temporarily. At the very least you will get a correction to this level (or lower) if not the crash. Btc has entered full parabolic mania mode, it has not tested the short daily ema since $280 and has not tested the long daily ema since $175. On gox it takes 2000btc to drop the price 20% to $500.

Yep, we're parabolic. I've started unloading on btcchina already... time shall tell.



59. Post 3621390 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Bitcoinity appears to be very, very broken. Btcchina is showing about 400 CNY higher than it actually is right now.



60. Post 3621582 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Well, I guess I'm not very good at this. I bought back in maybe two hours after starting to sell...

Just can't part with my bitcoins.  Wink

Quote from: rpietila on November 18, 2013, 08:12:08 AM
I dont need the money ive invest in BTC, my plan is to keep it some years. The question is if the price crash and drops 50% i would win the double selling and buying at smaller price. I would have 2x BTC when the price rises again..

Tell me when you have it. Dreamer. There is no one in the whole forum who has succeeded in that, however easy it sounds.

I started online trading 15 years ago and have twice in my life been able to increase the number of BTC by more than 2%. Even that beats the average.

For the record, I made about 0.5% just now... do not recommend.



61. Post 3621675 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: Rampion on November 18, 2013, 09:44:52 AM
Buy on the dips, hold and just sell 10% when you already made a x100 unrealized profit. Forget about risk management, only sound strategy with BTC is "invest everything you can afford to lose". By constantly day trading you will end up with less coins, guaranteed.

It's true.

I came to realize I don't WANT to cover my initial investment, because I still believe Bitcoin is a good one. I'm going to be in the audience for this crash.

100x sounds good.



62. Post 3621849 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: Rampion on November 18, 2013, 10:09:45 AM
Just half an hour ago, the whole ask orders are around 1000 BTC in BTCChina, but now there're 1600BTC up to 3990 CNY now. It seems a quick small correction attracts quit a lot sellers.

Just wait to see what happens when 60k coins are rapidly dumped as it happened on April, 10th.

Across all exchanges we saw about 18k coins in 20 minutes for that little flash-crash we just experienced.

Keep in mind that the coins are trading for more than double what they were on April 10.



63. Post 3621856 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: Rampion on November 18, 2013, 10:11:42 AM
Im scared lol

been at this 1 month mining 21 coins....hmmm......may have to take any coin I get put in paper wallet USB and place far away in
safe deposit box in a bank......if I plan to just hoard.....this is like trying to take a break from women at the playboy mansion....restraint man
restraint.....

crap its only been 1 month of this for me no wonder everyone on here is insane



damn 21 coins... here I am sitting with 1 coin lol


got a KNC Jupiter I expected to make ROI in a lesiurey fashion in say 9 months to 1 year...as I expected hype to slow down etc more equip etc.....mad ROI in 25 days
started mining oct 18th I think coin then was around $150

to say I'm noob and confused is an understatement

ah hell its only money (or not depending on what the u.s. house says on Monday about all this)


Very confused indeed. Your ROI is negative because you bought a BTC minting machine, and you would have bought more coins with your fiat that coins your machine will ever mint.

Not true, the Jupiters did in fact ROI against purchasing coins.



64. Post 3621982 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: Nemesis on November 18, 2013, 10:23:46 AM
Im scared lol

been at this 1 month mining 21 coins....hmmm......may have to take any coin I get put in paper wallet USB and place far away in
safe deposit box in a bank......if I plan to just hoard.....this is like trying to take a break from women at the playboy mansion....restraint man
restraint.....

crap its only been 1 month of this for me no wonder everyone on here is insane



damn 21 coins... here I am sitting with 1 coin lol


got a KNC Jupiter I expected to make ROI in a lesiurey fashion in say 9 months to 1 year...as I expected hype to slow down etc more equip etc.....mad ROI in 25 days
started mining oct 18th I think coin then was around $150

to say I'm noob and confused is an understatement

ah hell its only money (or not depending on what the u.s. house says on Monday about all this)


Very confused indeed. Your ROI is negative because you bought a BTC minting machine, and you would have bought more coins with your fiat that coins your machine will ever mint.

Not true, the Jupiters did in fact ROI against purchasing coins.
\

You must suck at math.... sorry for your lost.


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=317838.0



65. Post 3628185 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Holy shit.

US Gov is bullish on Bitcoin.

Anyone think Carper bought up a bunch?



66. Post 3628317 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: maz on November 18, 2013, 08:44:58 PM
Am I the only one that isn't seeing this senate meeting as bullish?

maybe, i think it is very bullish indeed!

It's going to have the shit regulated out of it. Coinvalidation won't have nothing on what the Gov will force American bitcoiners to comply with.

As someone already pointed out, the American government doesn't miss business opportunities.

They'd just hamstring the domestic market relative to the world if they over-legislate.



67. Post 3628492 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: gandhibt on November 18, 2013, 08:56:14 PM
How much WIN? Is this even possible? This is like the "euphoria" stage, but this isn't fake! =D

It's not fake, just overblown. Don't worry, we will crash eventually.



68. Post 3628583 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: rampantparanoia on November 18, 2013, 09:04:00 PM
Worrying about tax now.


Sell only when you need the cash. Or, use BTC for payment for goods & services.

Can't tax purchasing of BTC, only the revenue when transferred back to USD

Unfortunately this is wrong.



69. Post 3628605 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: Parazyd on November 18, 2013, 09:05:38 PM
Worrying about tax now.


Sell only when you need the cash. Or, use BTC for payment for goods & services.

Can't tax purchasing of BTC, only the revenue when transferred back to USD

Unfortunately this is wrong.

Care to elaborate?

Yeah, it's still taxable as if you'd sold it. If you bought a bar of gold for $200 and then bartered for something worth $1000 with it a couple years later, you're liable for $800 in capital gains.



70. Post 3628732 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

That chick sitting behind Calvery wouldn't be looking so bored if she had some Bitcoins.



71. Post 3628764 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: CryptStorm on November 18, 2013, 09:16:43 PM
Has anyone heard them say "Bitcoin" or just "virtual currency"?

Yeah, they've name-dropped it a few times. "Silk road... using exclusively Bitcoin" is one that comes to mind.



72. Post 3628837 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: kurious on November 18, 2013, 09:20:08 PM
"Virtual Currency is not ILLEGAL.... WE are not stopping INNOVATION !"

FCK YEAH!!!!


Rather good, in summary - speaking from the UK the US is being remarkably more grown up than we feared.

And may I add a little understated, British "Choo Choo!"



We've still got another panel to go. This is halftime.



73. Post 3628860 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Oh shit, environment / mining talk?

NOPE



74. Post 3628892 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

LOL

Mtgox trading engine lag: 20m 11s



75. Post 3628946 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

5000 CNY, $750 Gox. I just had to pinch myself



76. Post 3628957 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: Nemesis on November 18, 2013, 09:27:12 PM
Hearing is OVER?!!!

NOOO. I want them to say.... BUY BITCOIN NOW!


Not over. Back for round 2 soon



77. Post 3629075 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Child Porn is a real and serious issue and I really don't mind that they figure out how to fight it.



78. Post 3629129 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Oh my god. The Child Porn guy said to make sure the regulation isn't so draconian as to shut down or push Bitcoin startups out of the US.

The CHILD PORN guy!



79. Post 3629181 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: seldon on November 18, 2013, 09:41:50 PM
Asian lady approves

She's about to be a Bitcoin meme, I can feel it.



80. Post 3629266 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):



Exploitable:

http://i.imgur.com/WDPNl1K.jpg

Give me credit when you put it on reddit



81. Post 3629405 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

How you like dem apples, Joe Wisenthal?



82. Post 3629523 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

"... there is broad-based agreement about the potential for social good from digital currencies..."

"... this is an emerging technology that needs to be protected..."

- Child porn guy



83. Post 3629766 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: wildbud on November 18, 2013, 10:16:09 PM
Ernie Allen is honestly really helping our cause. I am very surprised but very happy to see how he is well educated and reasonable in this situation.

I feel like a lot of people in this thread are reconsidering their attitudes toward government.

It's been said before in this thread, but it bears repeating: the problem is the system, not the individuals. Many of people in government are there to make a positive impact, but they're stuck in an ineffectual system.

Bitcoin is part of the replacement.



84. Post 3629851 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: batcoin on November 18, 2013, 10:19:52 PM


LOL



85. Post 3629914 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: maz on November 18, 2013, 10:25:22 PM
HAHAH 'tell me about who created it'

NOBODY FUCKING KNOWS

Oh my god this is going to be great



86. Post 3629979 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

OK, it's in the hands of the newspapermen now.

I can't wait to see how the news networks spin this tonight... BUCKLE UP FOLKS.



87. Post 3630471 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: ZoSo15 on November 18, 2013, 10:55:39 PM
Turns out our very pretty lady in the background is with the foundation.

https://twitter.com/jinyoungenglund

Unfortunately, she is married.  Sad

Ah, that's disappointing. I was hoping that random people in the audience were becoming engaged with Bitcoin, looks like they were just Foundation members.



88. Post 3630496 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: wopwop on November 18, 2013, 11:00:01 PM

who fapped to her?

Can we not do this? Seriously guys, on one hand we bitch about how all Bitcoiners are male and then we objectify the women that ARE engaged with Bitcoin on the other.



89. Post 3630601 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: freethink2013 on November 18, 2013, 11:04:32 PM

Can we not do this? Seriously guys, on one hand we bitch about how all Bitcoiners are male and then we objectify the women that ARE engaged with Bitcoin on the other.

Yep finding a woman attractive is racist and sexist. Seriously what are you on. Do you think woman don't think [insert name of hollywood star] is a sex object.

I actually think what you are saying is more sexist that people saying "oh wow there's an attractive woman"



The statement wasn't "she's hot". That's cool.

It was "who fapped to her?".



90. Post 3630702 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: Loozik on November 18, 2013, 11:10:30 PM
Who is this hot asian chick?

Bitcoin Foundation policy director of some kind, and Bitcointalk's newest sex object.



91. Post 3630768 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: justusranvier on November 18, 2013, 11:15:18 PM
You're only succeeding in drawing more attention to the comment in question. Just ignore the poster and move on.

Fair enough.



92. Post 3630803 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: justusranvier on November 18, 2013, 11:17:35 PM
Is there no one left to predict an impending crash to single digits any more?

I don't think anyone even seriously believes we will see double digits again.



93. Post 3630971 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: rebuilder on November 18, 2013, 11:29:19 PM
Boy will I be glad when the hammer finally falls and we start correcting. I don't care what price it happens at, I just want to stop giggling at these charts. This is getting positively Lovecraftian.

Agreed. My awareness is taking on a surreal feeling right now.



94. Post 3631057 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: mb300sd on November 18, 2013, 11:36:02 PM
Beware of the euphoria, guys.

I'm feeling it... this is better than any drug.

How much have you made this month?

We need to get the Bitcoin millionaires together and talk about ways to incentivize adoption, maybe offer bounties to businesses that start taking Bitcoins.

This thing should be self-powered at this point.



95. Post 3631219 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on November 18, 2013, 11:52:04 PM
The weird thing about the current "bubble", is that is going up so fast so soon.  Percentage-wise, if it is like previous "bubbles", we could still have quite a way to go, but the daily percentage gains are just off the chart, very reminiscent of a blow-off top.
Let's hope it's just an indication of the incredible demand, and there is a mega-bubble to come  Smiley.

I'm worried about the increase in market cap. Before we were talking about adding hundreds of millions a day during the bubbles; now we're adding BILLIONS in implied value per day to the Bitcoin ecosystem. If a lot of people panic sell on the pop, there's no way there's that kind of money to back up the price. The correction may be brutal.



96. Post 3631416 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: RooKIED on November 19, 2013, 12:09:54 AM
Meet the Parents - Puff the Magic Dragon  Grin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFCwtoxX60g

Excuse me people!
Can we please join forces and discredit this article written on ABC news website?
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/bitcoins-virtual-currency-explained-idiot/story?id=20926230

It's the first result on google trends today. The writer is a total douche, the article is crap, he doesn't know the faintest idea of what he writes about or he maybe conveniently talks shit about bitcoin, misinforming.
If we politely write comments below the article dissing what he wrote and explaining all the positives that have been left aside, I think it would be a real contribution to the community.
Please, take 1 minute and leave a positive, polite and productive comment in favor of bitcoin!
Everybody will appreciate this. Quote this message in your replies here so everybody reads and helps

Stop giving it pageviews.



97. Post 3631461 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on November 19, 2013, 12:13:33 AM
WTH are Chinese taking?

They're certainly taking it high. We're nearly back in single digits ($1 a mBTC)

Clearly Bitcoin isn't the only thing high over there.



98. Post 3631650 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: 600watt on November 19, 2013, 12:26:48 AM


I'd laugh and say,

"Fool me once, shame on you

fool me twice, shame on me

if I don't realize it's a bubble the third time, I need my head checked"



99. Post 3631678 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

There it is, $1000 equivalent on btcchina.

Someone pinch me.



100. Post 3631698 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on November 19, 2013, 12:30:43 AM
There it is, $1000 equivalent on btcchina.

Someone pinch me.

No, that's 6092 Yuan.

high: 6100.00



101. Post 3631744 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: byronbb on November 19, 2013, 12:32:52 AM
Time to take a run at gold parity. Feel bad for goldbugs who have been waiting for THE MOON their whole lives only to see it happen in a digital gold. LOL.

You're telling me, man. I put $5000 in a gold mining stock a couple months ago. That'd be 50k now if I'd put it in Bitcoins



102. Post 3632010 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on November 19, 2013, 12:50:08 AM
I don't see how we don't have another "bubble pop" with this parabolic rise, but I'm starting to think it might not be till ~$2k, and probably only a brief flash crash.  So much risk associated with gov't seems to have gone up in smoke today.  That's huge.

You're right. What do you think a positive regulatory environment is worth, on a per-coin basis?



103. Post 3632508 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: BroodAap on November 19, 2013, 01:34:10 AM
Can someone tell me wtf is going on?  Huh

All the exchanges are lagging and everyone is panicking, because the bubble is popping.

Now we find the bottom.



104. Post 3632546 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Smart money will be buying back in within another couple hundred dollars.



105. Post 3632576 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

btcchina site working for anyone, or is it 100% down?



106. Post 3632627 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

I know I just lost a spectacular amount of paper money, but for some reason I'm having a really good time.



107. Post 3632860 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: marcelus on November 19, 2013, 02:00:46 AM
The fact that it didn't capitulate there means we could be in for sky high figures this week now. That was a test. The market stood up to it.

We're not out of the woods yet. When Gox crashed in April it took hours to discover the low.



108. Post 3632903 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 19, 2013, 02:02:42 AM
The fact that it didn't capitulate there means we could be in for sky high figures this week now. That was a test. The market stood up to it.

We're not out of the woods yet.

oh shut up you dumb bear!

Look at the charts from April, dude.



109. Post 3632917 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: marcelus on November 19, 2013, 02:06:20 AM
The fact that it didn't capitulate there means we could be in for sky high figures this week now. That was a test. The market stood up to it.

We're not out of the woods yet. When Gox crashed in April it took hours to discover the low.

I think it's done and dusted mate. April was pandemonium. It only took hours because Bitstamp and Gox went AWOL (which of course added to the panic). Stamp didn't even blink through that.

Sure, you could be right, but I'd give it an hour before declaring that was the bottom.



110. Post 3633770 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: BitPirate on November 19, 2013, 03:40:22 AM
More and more am I starting to believe that BTCChina is (for a large part) fake.

- Their volume reports are ridiculous. On the 3 minute chart they have almost exclusively 300 btc per candlestick.
- The whole rise-up at BTC-China seems orchestrated. Every sharp rise is nicely crafted into a short dip which then recovers in order to make others believe that it's safe to buy

And most compellingly

- During the crash the volume stays _THE SAME_ throughout. There is a sharp drop, but no panic selling at all! The volume is constant. This does not make any sense to me.
- Notice how every downward candle towards is also attempted to be caugt immediately - many many intermittent recoveries during a crash. It just doesn't make sense.

It's almost as if the whole exchange is scripted to make fake orders to amplify any movements seen on Gox. Zero trading fees would allow this.

=== I'm just speculating here ===

It seems more reasonable to believe that chinese people want to extract fiat from their currency, that could explain the huge difference in price, this is more reasonable for me considering how strict the chinese government is regarding international transfers.

I don't think it is orchestrated, but I think you are underestimating how the 0 fee changes behaviour. You buy, wait for a tiny rise, sell, wait, buy... etc.... you can make money but tend to want to lock it in very quickly. As a result ,the "volume" is massively exaggerated, when in fact it is relatively little BTC changing hands.... but makes for a very exciting and addictive game of pass the bag.

This is single-handedly responsible for the "China effect".

It's funny, but I think btcchina has taken the crown away from SatoshiDice / JustDice.



111. Post 3634589 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: pera on November 19, 2013, 05:38:56 AM
Everything I read is literally bullshit, still nobody can explain why we went from 3000 to 7000 in 26hs

its funny i predicted this exact market behavior would happen, months ago.

i should dig up that post..

i call it " the dash for digital cash "


you have to understand that USD can still buy things and their are early adopts....

that's your explanation?

Can you do a better job of explaining why that SHOULD NOT have happened?

We just had a US Senate meeting that basically legitimized Bitcoin.



112. Post 3634689 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: pera on November 19, 2013, 05:56:57 AM
Everything I read is literally bullshit, still nobody can explain why we went from 3000 to 7000 in 26hs

its funny i predicted this exact market behavior would happen, months ago.

i should dig up that post..

i call it " the dash for digital cash "


you have to understand that USD can still buy things and their are early adopts....

that's your explanation?

Can you do a better job of explaining why that SHOULD NOT have happened?

We just had a US Senate meeting that basically legitimized Bitcoin.

Yes I can: Bitmit went bankrupt, Silkroad seized, Wordpress silently stopped accepting bitcoin, some revelations about how nasty is part of the Bitcoin Foundation, BitInstant still and forever down, more banks freezing accounts

The US Senate didn't legitimize anything, what are you talking about??

Nobody really cares about Bitmit or Wordpress, Silkroad turned out to be a positive thing, the Bitcoin Foundation may be nasty but they know how to make Bitcoin more attractive to the average investor, and BitInstant is just an exchange.

Did you even watch the Senate meeting, or are you another uninformed bear?



113. Post 3634715 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: CryptStorm on November 19, 2013, 06:04:45 AM
Everything I read is literally bullshit, still nobody can explain why we went from 3000 to 7000 in 26hs

its funny i predicted this exact market behavior would happen, months ago.

i should dig up that post..

i call it " the dash for digital cash "


you have to understand that USD can still buy things and their are early adopts....

that's your explanation?

Can you do a better job of explaining why that SHOULD NOT have happened?

We just had a US Senate meeting that basically legitimized Bitcoin.

Are you seeing a double top, or am I losing my mind? Still momentum in your opinion?

No idea, but I certainly don't see 3000 CNY in the near future.



114. Post 3634924 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: rampantparanoia on November 19, 2013, 06:34:13 AM


http://imgur.com/QrBlwaC

only 'shopped my blog's name out.

Wow, bears are getting desperate.



115. Post 3635152 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: bnjmnkent on November 19, 2013, 07:03:56 AM
with a 60% arbitrage i guess some serious people will look into possibilities to get into all 4 big exchanges simultanously
btcchina has not been reachable for me for 5 days.
goxbux are an issue of its own.

What do you mean by "not reachable"? I just traded on it yesterday.



116. Post 3635371 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: molecular on November 19, 2013, 07:27:16 AM
What ended up on that US Senate discussion?

I second this. Can someone wrap it up. The building my office was in burned down yesterday (~10-15 BTC in casascius coins lost in the fire, among other things)... so I wasn't able to follow.


I like how a whole building burned down, and the primary concern is the Casascius bitcoins  Cheesy

They weren't series 1, were they?



117. Post 3636080 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on November 19, 2013, 09:01:28 AM


 Undecided



118. Post 3642089 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: pera on November 19, 2013, 06:58:15 PM
Hmm it seems we still need a final capitulation?

There is no final capitulation in Bitcoin: there is no physical bottom! Wink

What the hell does that mean? What's the "physical bottom" for gold?

Speaking of which: does anyone know if it's workable to cash out on btcchina, buy gold bullion, and get it shipped to the States? Could a company be started to do that to exploit the huge arbitrage in the exchanges?



119. Post 3642184 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: jojo69 on November 19, 2013, 07:16:15 PM

What the hell does that mean? What's the "physical bottom" for gold?


the cost of pulling it out of the ground,  it can undershoot below that, but it can't stay down there for long

That assumption is incorrect, it doesn't matter how much it costs to produce if people don't want it that much and there's tons of it in existence.

You know it costs money to mine a bitcoin, right?



120. Post 3642349 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: ardana123 on November 19, 2013, 07:35:12 PM
sub 500 prices tomorrow

You might be the worst trader ever.



121. Post 3642407 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: ardana123 on November 19, 2013, 07:38:44 PM
sub 500 prices tomorrow

You might be the worst trader ever.

How so?

Yesterday you thought the bubble would never end, today it's doomsday. You panic in either direction.

Anyone that susceptible to emotion has no business trading.

No offense, really, but you're going to lose your money.



122. Post 3642546 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: Wekkel on November 19, 2013, 07:51:20 PM
Another sell off developing.

Yup, typical "ringing" pattern after the overshoot blow-off. Same as April.




123. Post 3642630 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on November 19, 2013, 08:01:48 PM


This is so awesome.



124. Post 3642968 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: jojo69 on November 19, 2013, 08:31:16 PM
why is Hillary still blathering on?

Eh, it wasn't a bad talk.



125. Post 3642998 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Oh my god, they're namedropping Bitcoin everywhere... this could be even better than yesterday.

Quote from: wilfried on November 19, 2013, 08:35:37 PM
here´s the withdrawal options, anyone know what teenpay is ??



It's like Chinese PayPal.



126. Post 3643031 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: wilfried on November 19, 2013, 08:37:27 PM
Oh my god, they're namedropping Bitcoin everywhere... this could be even better than yesterday.

here´s the withdrawal options, anyone know what teenpay is ??



It's like Chinese PayPal.

does it bring my money to my european bank account?

Nope.



127. Post 3643060 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

He seriously said "not yet widely accepted"?

PANIC BUY



128. Post 3643085 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: CryptStorm on November 19, 2013, 08:41:12 PM
D-bag said ripple.

Quote from: mccorvic on November 19, 2013, 08:41:17 PM
Psht, he mentioned Ripple like it is a real thing.

Chill, everything should get a fair shake. Bitcoin is so far ahead it doesn't matter.



129. Post 3643206 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on November 19, 2013, 08:50:13 PM
Remember when people cared about Bitcoin being mentioned in "the good wife" ? Grin

I know... This feels fucking surreal, man.

This is the US SENATE.



130. Post 3643259 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

I don't like the tone so far...



131. Post 3643279 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: NewLiberty on November 19, 2013, 08:54:43 PM
We really need to come up with a drinking game for these things...

Awesome idea!

Take a shot for "terrorism", "laundering"
Take two shots for "ripple"

For Ripple, you have to drink.... ripple.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ciR7Fq2tqJ0

LOL

That shit isn't suited for a hobo



132. Post 3643291 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Why the fuck is the Senator explaining this to the panelists?



133. Post 3643321 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

I like how she had to read off all the three-letter agencies from a cheat sheet  Cheesy



134. Post 3643442 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Round 2 with the Bitcoin entrepreneurs is going to be exciting



135. Post 3643490 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: NewLiberty on November 19, 2013, 09:09:00 PM
The bank guy seems kind of worthless. Maybe there to defend the status quo?

Cotner bank guy wants to "protect" us.
Chilling thought.
Keep your consumer protections in your pants mister.

Just wait till he learns you can get Bitcoin donations.



136. Post 3643549 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: CryptStorm on November 19, 2013, 09:13:03 PM
Satoshi has a nice smile.

Pic or didn't happen.



You're welcome.

LOL

Euphoria coming back



137. Post 3643684 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: jatajuta on November 19, 2013, 09:22:55 PM
What defines going mainstream? I think the US senate dedicating 2 afternoons on the topic is enough for saying that it is going mainstream.

No doubt. Next bubble ETA 3 months.



138. Post 3643821 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: bassclef on November 19, 2013, 09:34:08 PM
Nice comments from Hughes, neat that her dad was a cryptographer in WWII. She emphasized the importance of digital currencies as groundbreaking.

Yeah, she's old yet she seems to 'grok' Bitcoin. I'm hopeful for the future. People seem very open-minded.



139. Post 3643920 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Go Gallippi!



140. Post 3644044 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Can you guys hear all the money being wired to exchanges today?



141. Post 3644361 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: maz on November 19, 2013, 10:14:04 PM
Gallipi just tanked the price... He crapped his pants and did not answer to the last question, what a fail, Shasky and the indian lady yesterday have kicked everybody's butt Cheesy

Much better to reply with a better answer that you have had time to reflect on, than a rushed one.

Agreed. The focus of this is on the senators, not the audience. The senators are going to be the ones drafting the legislation.



142. Post 3644494 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on November 19, 2013, 10:26:56 PM
All in all some mixed feelings about this hearing.

I was more impressed by the senators than some of the panelists.  


Some of their remarks about the profound implications this could have on the economy, banking industry and central banks were absolutely incredible.
On the other hand, I really didn't like much of the regulation stuff.  And redhead lady was just f-ing awful.

Know what that means?

Friendly legislation.

I'll be a buyer if the prices go much lower.



143. Post 3645277 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: Vycid on November 19, 2013, 07:52:27 PM
Another sell off developing.

Yup, typical "ringing" pattern after the overshoot blow-off. Same as April.





Yawn. Predictable.



144. Post 3645440 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 20, 2013, 12:00:54 AM
this always happens, poeple get crazy excited and buy buy buy

but its all good, they're really good news behind us, money will come flowing in like never b4.

 we are looking to forum a cup and handle, while we wait for the money flow.



Probably a stupid question but i've heard the phrase 'cup and handle' here a few times before... What exactly am I looking for?



Just to be clear, this is not at all what is happening. We had a much milder bubble this time, moderated by understandable skepticism with the last one so fresh in our minds. It popped, driving Gox briefly below 600, and we're going to oscillate a bit more before stabilizing for the very short term somewhere in the 600-700 range. Then over the next 2-3 weeks we'll likely lose another $100 as the impatient pull their money, and then we wait for the next hype cycle.

It will be soon; the cycles are accelerating. I'd give it 3 months. The bubble will be even more controlled next time.



145. Post 3645501 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: barbs on November 20, 2013, 12:09:42 AM
of course, i just sent my coins out of the exchange - literally 10 seconds later it dumps

Fortunately for you, you kept yourself from panic selling.

You've got a lucky star or something.

Just watch, this'll settle at 650. The damped sinusoidal pattern is unmistakable. It's exactly like a PID control loop.



146. Post 3645526 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: barbs on November 20, 2013, 12:13:08 AM
of course, i just sent my coins out of the exchange - literally 10 seconds later it dumps

Fortunately for you, you kept yourself from panic selling.

You've got a lucky star or something.

I bought in with the rest of my fiat and missed this, so its debatable (10 seconds before)

If you got coins for less than $650 I think you're gonna be OK.  Smiley



147. Post 3645574 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: barbs on November 20, 2013, 12:16:30 AM
of course, i just sent my coins out of the exchange - literally 10 seconds later it dumps

Fortunately for you, you kept yourself from panic selling.

You've got a lucky star or something.

I bought in with the rest of my fiat and missed this, so its debatable (10 seconds before)

If you got coins for less than $650 I think you're gonna be OK.  Smiley

694 Smiley

oops Smiley

thanks though, don't worry be happy and all that.  Need a break from this, why did i think it would be different this time

Look on the bright side, you could've dumped below 600. Now you can walk away from it and let Bitcoin do its thing.



148. Post 3645685 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on November 20, 2013, 12:33:53 AM
I think we have a trend reversal.

so, no bear traps anymore, only bull traps.


Nope, bear trap.  May sit here for a week though first.   Cool

I'm just amused by people freaking out about the "bear market". Has anyone taken a gander at the 1-year chart? Sometimes I wonder.



149. Post 3646250 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Weird, Bitstamp and Gox are on a collision course.



150. Post 3646304 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on November 20, 2013, 01:43:10 AM
What can we expect in the morning (european time), when the fresh money hits bitstamp? It's know that they didn't get deposits since friday... and as we can see on their FB page could be alot of fiat on the way Smiley
Jump back to 700$?

$650 gox.

Temper your expectations. This is not a get-rich-instantly scheme, it's a get-rich-quick scheme.  Wink

Afford Bitcoin the same patience as you would any stock and you'll do just fine.



151. Post 3646375 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: worldlybedouin on November 20, 2013, 01:51:14 AM
Alright its time I jump in and ask my obligatory "worried guy" question:

Bought 1BTC @ $717USD.  Do I hold or sell?

I have no strategy, no system, and most definately not a day trader...

FYI, I've "bought in" at a couple of diff price points so my weighted average cost per BTC is about $475...so that combined with my "greedy" nature is telling me to hold even though I'm staring at the blood-red candle sticks on this graph.

Help!  Talk this wanna-be Bull away from the Bear ledge! Cry

Hold. Hold, hold hold. Do you have a bot? Then forget about trying to trade for profit, you're going to get steamrolled by people who know what they are doing.

The market may bleed money over the next days or weeks. Do not worry about it. Look at the 1-year chart and take a deep breath.

Thank me in six months.



152. Post 3646427 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: worldlybedouin on November 20, 2013, 01:57:04 AM
Alright its time I jump in and ask my obligatory "worried guy" question:

Bought 1BTC @ $717USD.  Do I hold or sell?

I have no strategy, no system, and most definately not a day trader...

FYI, I've "bought in" at a couple of diff price points so my weighted average cost per BTC is about $475...so that combined with my "greedy" nature is telling me to hold even though I'm staring at the blood-red candle sticks on this graph.

Help!  Talk this wanna-be Bull away from the Bear ledge! Cry

Hold. Hold, hold hold. Do you have a bot? Then forgot about trying to trade for profit, you're going to get steamrolled by people who know what they are doing.

The market may bleed money over the next days or weeks. Do not worry about it. Look at the 1-year chart and take a deep breath.

Thank me in six months.

I've got several bots but sadly I'm not "smart" enough to quite get them configured right. I bought the HaasOnline bot and the Butter Bot.  The various configs I've tried the past couple of times on each have ended up costing me -- so clearly I'm not getting the right variables configured in these to capitalize on the swings.  

I've got 7BTC left...after my bot misfortunes...of which 5BTC is "frozen" in my freezer into an block of ice.  The remaining 2BTC is what I planned to try and work with if it makes sense to try again wth the bots or just to manually trade for myself...

I think you should probably cut your losses, man, especially if you're new to trading. I've been doing this successfully in the real world for years and I still don't like technical trading.

But it is fun to watch.

The block of ice is hilarious, BTW. Laminated paper wallet? I might even do that.  Cheesy



153. Post 3646539 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: worldlybedouin on November 20, 2013, 02:05:45 AM
Alright its time I jump in and ask my obligatory "worried guy" question:

Bought 1BTC @ $717USD.  Do I hold or sell?

I have no strategy, no system, and most definately not a day trader...

FYI, I've "bought in" at a couple of diff price points so my weighted average cost per BTC is about $475...so that combined with my "greedy" nature is telling me to hold even though I'm staring at the blood-red candle sticks on this graph.

Help!  Talk this wanna-be Bull away from the Bear ledge! Cry

Hold. Hold, hold hold. Do you have a bot? Then forgot about trying to trade for profit, you're going to get steamrolled by people who know what they are doing.

The market may bleed money over the next days or weeks. Do not worry about it. Look at the 1-year chart and take a deep breath.

Thank me in six months.

I've got several bots but sadly I'm not "smart" enough to quite get them configured right. I bought the HaasOnline bot and the Butter Bot.  The various configs I've tried the past couple of times on each have ended up costing me -- so clearly I'm not getting the right variables configured in these to capitalize on the swings.  

I've got 7BTC left...after my bot misfortunes...of which 5BTC is "frozen" in my freezer into an block of ice.  The remaining 2BTC is what I planned to try and work with if it makes sense to try again wth the bots or just to manually trade for myself...

I think you should probably cut your losses, man, especially if you're new to trading. I've been doing this successfully in the real world for years and I still don't like technical trading.

But it is fun to watch.

The block of ice is hilarious, BTW. Laminated paper wallet? I might even do that.  Cheesy

I would have laminated it but I dont' have a lamination machine.  I just got the paper double bagged in two ziplocks.  That is then folded and put into a small tupperware container...which is water tight...and then frozen.  My bank was asking too much for even their smallest safety deposit box.  I'm actually thinking of thawing it out and sending a copy to my family as a backup...  ONe thing I hadn't thought of is if my apartment building burns down or somethign...or if we have another Hurricane Sandy, I might lose the private keys...so I guess i know what i'm doing this weekend.

Remember, if there are two copies it's twice as easy to steal the coins. Make sure your family knows how to keep it safe, and NO CAMERAS EVER.



154. Post 3646575 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: zero3112 on November 20, 2013, 02:15:54 AM
Its very obvious at this point that BTC is back in a upwards trend.

No it is not.

Leave your emotions behind. This bounce back up is no more meaningful than the drop to $600 was.

Most likely we will correct back toward $650 before we hit $700. If that doesn't happen I will be pleasantly surprised.  Smiley



155. Post 3646640 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: zero3112 on November 20, 2013, 02:23:18 AM
Its very obvious at this point that BTC is back in a upwards trend.

No it is not.

Leave your emotions behind. This bounce back up is no more meaningful than the drop to $600 was.

Most likely we will correct back toward $650 before we hit $700. If that doesn't happen I will be pleasantly surprised.  Smiley

Its correcting right now not long before we hit $700

I mean it will not make it to 700, it will pass 650 and then come back.



156. Post 3646704 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

I'm making a cup of green tea.

Anyone trading should do the same. There's some psychoactive stuff in green tea leaves that tends to calm you down, make you more composed and rational. I've found it very useful for technical trading.

I remember reading that anthropologists suspect that it's the psychoactive qualities of green tea that led to the development of the Japanese tea ceremony and Zen Buddhism.

But I digress...



157. Post 3646726 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on November 20, 2013, 02:37:31 AM
I'm making a cup of green tea.

Anyone trading should do the same. There's some psychoactive stuff in green tea leaves that tends to calm you down, make you more composed and rational. I've found it very useful for technical trading.

I remember reading that anthropologists suspect that it's the psychoactive qualities of green tea that led to the development of the Japanese tea ceremony and Zen Buddhism.

But I digress...

Sleep once a day is also very effective

Can't watch the market when your eyelids are closed.  Smiley



158. Post 3646765 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: BitPirate on November 20, 2013, 02:41:51 AM
Alright its time I jump in and ask my obligatory "worried guy" question:

Bought 1BTC @ $717USD.  Do I hold or sell?

I have no strategy, no system, and most definately not a day trader...

FYI, I've "bought in" at a couple of diff price points so my weighted average cost per BTC is about $475...so that combined with my "greedy" nature is telling me to hold even though I'm staring at the blood-red candle sticks on this graph.

Help!  Talk this wanna-be Bull away from the Bear ledge! Cry

Hold. Hold, hold hold. Do you have a bot? Then forgot about trying to trade for profit, you're going to get steamrolled by people who know what they are doing.

The market may bleed money over the next days or weeks. Do not worry about it. Look at the 1-year chart and take a deep breath.

Thank me in six months.

I've got several bots but sadly I'm not "smart" enough to quite get them configured right. I bought the HaasOnline bot and the Butter Bot.  The various configs I've tried the past couple of times on each have ended up costing me -- so clearly I'm not getting the right variables configured in these to capitalize on the swings.  

I've got 7BTC left...after my bot misfortunes...of which 5BTC is "frozen" in my freezer into an block of ice.  The remaining 2BTC is what I planned to try and work with if it makes sense to try again wth the bots or just to manually trade for myself...

I think you should probably cut your losses, man, especially if you're new to trading. I've been doing this successfully in the real world for years and I still don't like technical trading.

But it is fun to watch.

The block of ice is hilarious, BTW. Laminated paper wallet? I might even do that.  Cheesy

I would have laminated it but I dont' have a lamination machine.  I just got the paper double bagged in two ziplocks.  That is then folded and put into a small tupperware container...which is water tight...and then frozen.  My bank was asking too much for even their smallest safety deposit box.  I'm actually thinking of thawing it out and sending a copy to my family as a backup...  ONe thing I hadn't thought of is if my apartment building burns down or somethign...or if we have another Hurricane Sandy, I might lose the private keys...so I guess i know what i'm doing this weekend.

A properly encrypted wallet stored on a few LUKS encrypted USB keys is the best bet IMO. Higher up the priority list is obviously, using a secure operating system, and only doing sane things on the computer you use for encryption.

I don't like USB keys because they're not a permanent storage solution (data will start to degrade in ~10 years). Otherwise I agree.



159. Post 3646831 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: zero3112 on November 20, 2013, 02:50:56 AM
I think Goat called it when he observed that the bull run isn't over, it is just being throttled by fiat constraints.

So lots of people are waiting on bank transfers which is creating a huge influx of money?

I think this is an oversimplified view of things. More money is coming in, but people are also getting nervous and jumping ship the longer this thing takes to get moving again.

Furthermore, a lot of people who sent their money in to exchanges may change their mind now that the rally is over and things are slipping.

I'd be pleased to see another move upward but I have no expectation of that.



160. Post 3646934 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

The Chinese exchange is still trading at 821 USD equivalent.

I'm honestly at a loss to explain this. Sure, you expect SOME arbitrage differences, but why aren't people selling into the Chinese exchange with the intention of waiting for the arbitrageurs to bring the exchanges closer together, THEN flip back into Bitcoin and cash out through the Western exchanges?

Very weird.



161. Post 3646970 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: jojo69 on November 20, 2013, 03:12:43 AM

Japanese green teas like sencha and gyokuro are especially full of L-Theanine,

and isotopes...don't forget the isotopes

Isomers...?



162. Post 3647360 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: CryptStorm on November 20, 2013, 04:18:08 AM
I think Goat called it when he observed that the bull run isn't over, it is just being throttled by fiat constraints.

So lots of people are waiting on bank transfers which is creating a huge influx of money?

I think this is an oversimplified view of things. More money is coming in, but people are also getting nervous and jumping ship the longer this thing takes to get moving again.

Furthermore, a lot of people who sent their money in to exchanges may change their mind now that the rally is over and things are slipping.

I'd be pleased to see another move upward but I have no expectation of that.

Agreed, it's not this simple. Of course the bubble didn't run out due to lack of fiat! People need to have logical consistency. During the rise everyone was proclaiming "We can't crash, there are too many exchanges, they can't all fail!". Now the same group of people are shouting "All the exchanges are out of fiat!". It doesn't make any sense.

Look at China: Fiat to the exchanges in under 5 minutes, but buying is subdued. The crash isn't because of "lack of fiat", it's because "areyoumotherfuckinginsaneitjustrose1700%"!

Boring period incoming. Thank Bitcoin -- chance to focus on your family over Christmas instead of checking the price every 20 seconds.

This is it guys. ^^^^

I've been saying that since we reached the old ATH (266) we were at DEFCON 1, DEFCON 2 started at 2X, and DEFCON 3 was when the whale thumped 900 in our faces, and it still plays out into the blood on the street, that, really, is only *just* beginning. I studied the shit out of the trades in April, knew the patterns, and slept *very* little in the last several days, sometimes getting multiple texts at 2, 3, and 4, and was up by 5 the last 2 days. I've probably checked the prices, on average, every 6 minutes of being awake. DEFCON 3 is only 3 or 4 days, and the whole parabolic cycle (20-40 days) is just exhausting.

What did I learn-- that trading is fucking tough; yeah, I made some money, but I could have done a lot better... wait for it... if I had just bought and held. Perhaps, I, too, will pass through the circle of fire that is n00b.

I made 0.5% total.

It was not worth it.

Never again. I'm a firm believer in buy-and-hold now. My position has gotten big enough that I am unlikely to have cash to significantly add to my bitcoin position in the future, but I'm not looking to sell.

This is how it is: I've got a lottery ticket that matches up with everything but the powerball, and it's coming down the chute.

I could sell now and retire a couple years earlier, or I can grow some balls and get my shot at total independence. If it doesn't work out I'll be no worse off than I was last year.

I'm in for the long haul. My dream house is bought in Bitcoin or not at all.



163. Post 3647380 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on November 20, 2013, 04:27:54 AM
Welcome to 2011 Reloaded.

You too will learn about risk management.

Did you miss US Senators talking about Bitcoins today?

Doesn't seem much like 2011.



164. Post 3647491 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

MARK KARPELESSSSSSS!!! Angry Angry Angry



165. Post 3647581 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Thank God Mark put some "security" in his trading engine!



166. Post 3647594 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: CryptStorm on November 20, 2013, 04:52:45 AM
Shows there is still dissonance between the market and the technology - as the market expands this is going to et worse unless ALL the exchanges ensure they have their shit together (technical term that).

tl;dr Current Exchanges = Shit

Why haven't real forex exchanges gotten on board? Where is Oanda?



167. Post 3647616 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on November 20, 2013, 04:56:45 AM
Crazy shit always happens at the end of bubbles. That is just the nature of stresstesting the shitty infrastructure we have.

What's your strategy for bubbles, typically?



168. Post 3647804 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: CryptStorm on November 20, 2013, 05:21:06 AM
you can say whatever you want about him but RealSolid is genius for all other exchange operators.

Forgive my ignorance, who is RealSolid?

MCXNow owner

Cool, thank you-- nice site. And, historically, he wrote exchange software for BTC, or was part of Gox, or ...?

It's probably a scam, actually.



169. Post 3647840 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Why is China still at ~$750? Do they even give a shit?



170. Post 3647882 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: jojo69 on November 20, 2013, 05:31:45 AM
there is always undershoot

Yep.



171. Post 3647897 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: CryptStorm on November 20, 2013, 05:35:02 AM
I HATE TO SHOUT BUT I JUST GOT GOXED OUT OF THE WHOLE RANGE FROM 500-600... fuck. Damn. Finally, just went Market back to fiat. I'm not holding all the way down.

I transferred to BTCChina, their still partying over there!

How'd the transfer go, how long did it take to put your account together, and is it tied to a bank account?

It's quite nice. No bank account.

Except the part where their DDoS firewall is preventing me from using their site, trapping my funds there.



172. Post 3647932 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: CryptStorm on November 20, 2013, 05:37:32 AM
I HATE TO SHOUT BUT I JUST GOT GOXED OUT OF THE WHOLE RANGE FROM 500-600... fuck. Damn. Finally, just went Market back to fiat. I'm not holding all the way down.

I transferred to BTCChina, their still partying over there!

How'd the transfer go, how long did it take to put your account together, and is it tied to a bank account?

It's quite nice. No bank account.

Except the part where their DDoS firewall is preventing me from using their site, trapping my funds there.

Can you Tor in, or get a proxy??? Zoinks.

I could try. Think that's safe?

Alternatively I could use my phone, since for some reason that IP is not blocked.



173. Post 3647968 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on November 20, 2013, 05:43:47 AM
yep, thank god that we have stamp and china, otherwise this would be like april
Agreed, this is not April.

This is June 2011.

So, $2 then?  Smiley



174. Post 3648053 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: CryptStorm on November 20, 2013, 05:43:31 AM
I HATE TO SHOUT BUT I JUST GOT GOXED OUT OF THE WHOLE RANGE FROM 500-600... fuck. Damn. Finally, just went Market back to fiat. I'm not holding all the way down.

I transferred to BTCChina, their still partying over there!

How'd the transfer go, how long did it take to put your account together, and is it tied to a bank account?

It's quite nice. No bank account.

Except the part where their DDoS firewall is preventing me from using their site, trapping my funds there.

Can you Tor in, or get a proxy??? Zoinks.

I could try. Think that's safe?

Alternatively I could use my phone, since for some reason that IP is not blocked.

I wouldn't begin to be knowledgeable enough to really advise you.

Tor worked. I gave it some thought and 2FA means it's probably fine.

Anyway, I'd reccomend btcchina, it's excellent. Make sure to have Tor installed though.  Wink



175. Post 3648106 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: nanobrain on November 20, 2013, 06:01:34 AM
Make sure to have Tor installed though.  Wink

Why would you recommend TOR...it works fine via normal ISP for me.  
Or are the Chinese BTC police gonna arrest all gweilo users  Wink

Because it worked fine for me too, then they locked me out for no discernable reason. Too many F5s?  Smiley

Fortunately it appears to have been an honest mistake.



176. Post 3648297 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

I don't want to imply that this Starbucks thing is real, because I don't know, and I'm going to continue acting as though there was no "leak".

But it does make sense. Starbucks has a lot of small transactions and they probably don't enjoy the credit card fees. And it's becoming a big deal; we just saw Senate hearings this week. I can barely believe that's all real.

eBay didn't make sense. It competes with PayPal, which is a major revenue stream for them.

So, we'll see.



177. Post 3649252 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

If this was a full-blown bubble collapse btcchina wouldn't be trading at $712 USD equivalent.



178. Post 3649846 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: maz on November 20, 2013, 10:29:36 AM
It cant crash anyway, Gox have their 'anti-crash-security' system in place, so if the price is going too low they will freeze bitcoin, literally, until you agree to become a bull again.

Apparently Gox also has a feature where if the price is going too high, it'll lag until you agree to become a bear again



179. Post 3649949 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

SON OF A BITCH

I put in a sell market order at the 4000 CNY wall.

"Pending" popped up, everything looked good.

Some motherfucker dumped right ahead of me and I filled at 3900...

Ah well.



180. Post 3649978 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: jl2012 on November 20, 2013, 10:49:21 AM
SON OF A BITCH

I put in a sell market order at the 4000 CNY wall.

"Pending" popped up, everything looked good.

Some motherfucker dumped right ahead of me and I filled at 3900...

Ah well.

You shouldn't make a market order, especially during the volatile period

Better to get it filled low than completely get screwed when the wall fell. I'm already up 200 CNY/bitcoin... just would've been 300 CNY each if I'd been 5 seconds faster.



181. Post 3650002 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: gandhibt on November 20, 2013, 10:52:25 AM
SON OF A BITCH

I put in a sell market order at the 4000 CNY wall.

"Pending" popped up, everything looked good.

Some motherfucker dumped right ahead of me and I filled at 3900...

Ah well.

You shouldn't make a market order, especially during the volatile period

Better to learn to never ever do a market order =) That's the button just for big manipulators.

Would've been much worse to do a 4000 CNY limit, somebody dumped about 230 coins right ahead of me I believe



182. Post 3650025 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: rpietila on November 20, 2013, 10:53:59 AM
Despite having accounts in all exchanges, havent been able to trade a coin today. Perhaps there would be an opportune moment to fix the root of the problem, since otherwise it will not get better, no matter how big bitcoin becomes.

This is not the correct way about it, sorry.

We should encourage established forex companies to adopt Bitcoin pairs. If Oanda, for example, adopts Bitcoin (they already track the exchange rate on their site), we will not have these problems again.



183. Post 3650037 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: fluidjax on November 20, 2013, 10:57:21 AM
@To the people who are using BTC-China:
As I understand it you can't get money out of china? So is the intention to repeatedly create panic selling and increase your BTC holding?
Do you think the panics in China will be greater than on Gox?



You can get money out of China with fiat, it's just hard and questionably legal.

You can always get money out with Bitcoin, and there's zero exchange fees, so I'm just using it to speculate, and if that doesn't go well, I'll arb and avoid losses.



184. Post 3651612 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: Nightowlace on November 20, 2013, 02:25:04 PM
Every time it's a bigger bubble, bigger losses, and more negative publicity. Which is why they won't buy in.
Which is why they will never buy. Which is why there will never be mass adoption. Which is why Bitcoin will never become all of the things we had hoped it would.

What are you talking about? The 2011 bubble was the biggest bubble of all and those who bought at the top would be sitting on huge profits right now. This drop from $900 to $453 is also peanuts compared to the crash in April, so the bubbles are only getting smaller and the losses as well. There is no such thing as negative publicity for bitcoin.

The only people who bought in 2011 are people who understand Bitcoin.
Again my point is take yourself to a normal person thinking strategy. Okay let me spell it out for you.
You now only have a high school diploma. You work at a factory, walmart, you're a waiter bartender whatever.
You have 3 kids, a tiny house, and a minivan.
You live paycheck to paycheck.
You took your savings ($10,000 or so) you put it into this Bitcoin thing.
Now you have $5000 worth of Bitcoin/savings.
You think they are still holding and hoping?
You think they haven't sold and are screaming and cryin at the top of their lungs I lost half of my life savings Bitcoin is the devil to everyone they know?

This is why it is bad. Because the people investing in bubble rises are people who think they will get rich quick (99% of the population which is why lottery is the most profitable thing for states) and when "healthy corrections" happen it's devastating to the reputation to Bitcoin and the bigger they get and the harder they fall the more negative news and I promise you the 99% don't know, care or believe in BTC technology they believe in their dollar and you Bitcoin took it from them.

This argument applies to every stock, which explains why nobody invests in the stock market.



185. Post 3651681 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Looking an awful lot like that was a bull trap.



186. Post 3651692 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: Nightowlace on November 20, 2013, 02:34:13 PM
$900 to $453 is a healthy correction?

Ask anyone in investments if a 50% crash in price is healthy. Good for business.

SMH only in Bitcoin.......

Yeah.

I think nobody is ever going to drive a Tesla again. They should file for bankruptcy.



187. Post 3651870 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: CryptStorm on November 20, 2013, 02:50:13 PM
Looking an awful lot like that was a bull trap.

Yes, before ema 30 hours crosses ema 7 hours, no reason to think the trend is turned around.

I'm sorry, what?

I agree (down trend), but let's take a peak at mutiple Commodity Channel Indices, with the top one being the shortest term. So, yes, we are bouncing, but there is a great downward force, in general (bullet holes in a water tank!?). Not that the lower index can't rise to the occasion, but, will it?



what is this I don't even



188. Post 3651920 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on November 20, 2013, 02:55:28 PM
I smell 2011.
It's really too bad for people who can't imagine how 2013 could possibly be like 2011 because they weren't here at the time.

Yes you're so smart Blitz you were there back in 2011 and you know exactly how history will repeat itself right now in November 2013. Even though you thought the same thing after the April 2013 crash, but this time it will really really be just like 2011. It has to be.  Roll Eyes

After some of the claims this clown made i can't believe he still posts here at all. Some people have no shame whatsoever.

Protip: he's the subforum moderator.



189. Post 3651989 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: Nightowlace on November 20, 2013, 03:01:55 PM
If your life savings is only $10,000

you're doing something wrong.

You're an average middle class working family man.

You know for all you guys that scream mass adoption you're sure quick to call out "weak hands getting shaken out" those weak hands are your mass adopters.

You guys should really hear yourselves

You sound like you leveraged long at the peak



190. Post 3652038 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on November 20, 2013, 03:05:46 PM
My intention is to warn you guys to practice proper risk management because inevitably, even with a small investment, your Bitcoin allocation will be the main source of your wealth. Marginal utility of wealth dictates that it's more important to secure your first million than to make another.

I've seen it go down from 32 to 2 and it was a really bullish environment too until about 14. Don't fool yourself thinking it can't happen again today. That's just the nature of humans.

I really do appreciate you saying this, honestly, even if my reaction is to disagree. It gets really group-thinky around here sometimes and I'm glad you're thinking independently.

I'm sure you deserved your fortune.



191. Post 3652102 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: San1ty on November 20, 2013, 03:13:56 PM
I find it strange that bitstamp is so close to gox now. There used to be a 100 points gap. What changed?

Seventh circle of hell opened up, we're going to $2. At least that's what I gathered from the last few pages

 Wink

I'm very tired and should not be trading this much money



192. Post 3652183 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: San1ty on November 20, 2013, 03:21:41 PM
Lower-classed systemic risks: in high-yield markets, be sure not to restructure them.

Say this again, but this time could you pretend you're talking to a smart 6 year old, please?

(or: How would one errantly restructure a lower-classed systemic risk, if I got that right)

The wise trader these days will always cover subordinate-rated asset pools.

Exatly, combine that with Fibonacci Retracements based on a refactoring of the singularity in a quantum matrix!

But don't forget to apply the ladder operator to the oscillation in that Hilbert space!



193. Post 3652521 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: FCTaiChi on November 20, 2013, 03:54:52 PM
Quote
...
And solve everything for 42
How many roads must a man walk down?

... before you can call his wavefunction entangled?



194. Post 3652628 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 20, 2013, 04:10:09 PM
sea shells VS gold

paper money VS bitcoin

goxbux vs bitcoin



195. Post 3652642 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

China isn't buying it, apparently.



196. Post 3652974 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on November 20, 2013, 04:38:09 PM
come on bears

DUMP YOUR COINS!!

pretty sure they ran out,


if you have not bought back in, bye bye train says

ch000 ch000 m0ther f0k0rz!!!

Slightly bloodier for the ride but I'm back on board.

Keep it on the tracks this time.

I'm going to bed.



197. Post 3668496 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

So what's the thinking right now? Have we changed regimes and departed permanently from the long-term trend, or is this latest uptrend just dragging out the inevitable bubble pop?

Those of you in the "bubble" camp, what's your price target?



198. Post 3668691 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: chriswilmer on November 21, 2013, 10:42:26 PM
So what's the thinking right now? Have we changed regimes and departed permanently from the long-term trend, or is this latest uptrend just dragging out the inevitable bubble pop?

Those of you in the "bubble" camp, what's your price target?

Heh, well, this didn't turn out to be the damped oscillation we thought it would be Smiley

No it did not.  Smiley

I lost coins making what appeared at the time to be no-brainer trades... I think I'm a buy-and-hold type from now on. So it goes.



199. Post 3668705 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: ardana123 on November 21, 2013, 10:58:49 PM
So what's the thinking right now? Have we changed regimes and departed permanently from the long-term trend, or is this latest uptrend just dragging out the inevitable bubble pop?

Those of you in the "bubble" camp, what's your price target?

IMO the people who wanted to take profits or cash out during the run up to 900 already did causing the correction (or crash if you will). The fact that it didn't crash completely shows there are a lot of people in it for the long haul. Now we need fresh money to come in so we can work on getting to 1000$. One should also expect a massive correction at this point since this will be the magical number for a lot of people to cash out for good.

Weren't you extremely bearish, like, a day ago?



200. Post 3692871 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Every aborted crash is extra confidence in the $800 level.



201. Post 3692965 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: chriswilmer on November 24, 2013, 04:10:23 AM
Every aborted crash is extra confidence in the $800 level.

I agree, but this is also confusing for me. It feels like we are "burning in" the $800 price... and yet it is so high above the exponential growth trend line.

*shrugs* I am just a buy & hold kind of guy, but my friends keep asking me if they should buy bitcoins, and I'm not sure what to tell them at these prices (... I always say yes, but I hesitate!)

The exponential trend line is a myth. Media awareness may grow at an exponential rate at first, but there is a "hype" effect that will cause it to eventually depart the exponential trajectory.

I believe we are seeing that now: all time Google Trends high, it is showing up regularly on network news, etc. It's not reasonable to assume that we can go from occasional web journalism to news networks without departing the trend.

Also, the amount invested by every individual joining the ecosystem will grow over time, since there's an intangible measure of "trustworthiness" Bitcoin gains by surviving each successive bubble.

Trend lines are fantastic predictors of the past, but their predictive power for the future is not so simple; you are drawing this trend, then assuming that the trend is created by some fundamental mechanism of growth. Unless you are correct in the assumption of some fundamental mechanism which will continue into the future, the trend will fail to accurately predict.

So really, without thinking about what the mechanisms of growth really are, it's just a blind guess.



202. Post 3693073 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: justusranvier on November 24, 2013, 04:31:38 AM
The exponential trend line is a myth. Media awareness may grow at an exponential rate at first, but there is a "hype" effect that will cause it to eventually depart the exponential trajectory.

I believe we are seeing that now: all time Google Trends high, it is showing up regularly on network news, etc. It's not reasonable to assume that we can go from occasional web journalism to news networks without departing the trend.

Also, the amount invested by every individual joining the ecosystem will grow over time, since there's an intangible measure of "trustworthiness" Bitcoin gains by surviving each successive bubble.

Trend lines are fantastic predictors of the past, but their predictive power for the future is not so simple; you are drawing this trend, then assuming that the trend is created by some fundamental mechanism of growth. Unless you are correct in the assumption of some fundamental mechanism which will continue into the future, the trend will fail to accurately predict.

So really, without thinking about what the mechanisms of growth really are, it's just a blind guess.


This is a great illustration of how well an exponential trend line can predict the past.

Could you get me a plot without data from the last month, with a trend superimposed (just like this one), so we can compare?



203. Post 3693081 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: justusranvier on November 24, 2013, 04:37:22 AM
This is a great illustration of how well an exponential trend line can predict the past.
That's not an exponential trendline.

What is it? Equation would help.



204. Post 3693128 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: Vycid on November 24, 2013, 04:16:48 AM
Every aborted crash is extra confidence in the $800 level.

I agree, but this is also confusing for me. It feels like we are "burning in" the $800 price... and yet it is so high above the exponential growth trend line.

*shrugs* I am just a buy & hold kind of guy, but my friends keep asking me if they should buy bitcoins, and I'm not sure what to tell them at these prices (... I always say yes, but I hesitate!)

The exponential trend line is a myth. Media awareness may grow at an exponential rate at first, but there is a "hype" effect that will cause it to eventually depart the exponential trajectory.

I believe we are seeing that now: all time Google Trends high, it is showing up regularly on network news, etc. It's not reasonable to assume that we can go from occasional web journalism to news networks without departing the trend.

Also, the amount invested by every individual joining the ecosystem will grow over time, since there's an intangible measure of "trustworthiness" Bitcoin gains by surviving each successive bubble.

Trend lines are fantastic predictors of the past, but their predictive power for the future is not so simple; you are drawing this trend, then assuming that the trend is created by some fundamental mechanism of growth. Unless you are correct in the assumption of some fundamental mechanism which will continue into the future, the trend will fail to accurately predict.

So really, without thinking about what the mechanisms of growth really are, it's just a blind guess.

An addendum: there ARE ways to model growth in dynamic systems (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_dynamics). By no means do I have the technical background for this - but it CAN be done. I wonder if someone is already profiting from a model.

Projecting an exponential curve in Excel on old data does not create new information.



205. Post 3694164 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: mb300sd on November 24, 2013, 07:21:58 AM
Dear bitcoin, can we please rspect the most important, sacred day of the week, college gameday, and not make tese moves while we are out hammered drank, thank you.

I love you. Best millionaire ever.



206. Post 3706118 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Hmm, Gox does appear to be following.

Has anyone attempted to do time-lagged correlation between exchanges?



207. Post 3706861 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: San1ty on November 25, 2013, 11:01:45 AM
Too many people are waiting till the price drops. So the price never drops. And also never gets up. If you look at the order book on bitstamp, there are order with middle range five figures at 770$. And nobody is buying because they hope the price will go down. We will last in the 800´s forever  Cheesy

I sold at 820$ yesterday, bought back at 800$... You can play this game since 2 days. But the fees are ruining it. As I made 340$ with 17 coins and the price difference of 20$, they charged 140$ on fees. 200$ win is may be not bad but the risk is very high that something happens after you sold.

How do you have such a high fee? To trade about 20 BTC I pay a MAXIMUM of 30 Dollars...

I trade on stamp and they charge me 70$ for selling and 70$ for buying. Fee´s are 0,5% even though on the landing page of Bitstamp they say 0,2%.

Where do you trade? I need some alternative.

Bullshit-Bingo

Code:
Fee % 30 days USD volume
0.50% < $500
0.48% < $1,000
0.46% < $2,000
0.44% < $4,000
0.42% < $6,500
0.40% < $10,000
0.38% < $15,000
0.36% < $20,000
0.34% < $25,000
0.32% < $37,500
0.30% < $50,000
0.28% < $62,500
0.26% < $75,000
0.24% < $100,000
0.22% < $150,000
0.20% > $150,000

I'm at bitstamp and I'm at the 0.2% ratio.

If you trade 20 BTC (16000 USD) Your fee should be:
32 USD To Buy or Sell...

You just haven't traded enough yet.

Exchange commissions: the new way to indirectly brag about how much money you have



208. Post 3707152 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Looks like we may be in for some action, folks.



209. Post 3707242 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: Vycid on November 25, 2013, 11:40:48 AM
Looks like we may be in for some action, folks.

Looking more and more like a breakout on Stamp.



210. Post 3726606 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on November 26, 2013, 08:40:37 PM
i told you about the ltc train, who got on?

Missed that one, wish I would have invested all in litecoin at 9$ so it would have been doubled.

half a cent each was a better time to get on Wink

Damn.... i thought my $50 for 8000btc was good.

Did you get 500k ltc? lol



just under 500k and lol at racetractor r and d  Grin Grin Grin

sigh

Start feeling pleased that I'd decided to "diversify" into 100 LTC, and along comes Goat...  Wink

Just promise me you'll be a sane and accountable force for political good in the world.



211. Post 3726695 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Nemesis on November 26, 2013, 08:49:04 PM
i told you about the ltc train, who got on?

Missed that one, wish I would have invested all in litecoin at 9$ so it would have been doubled.

half a cent each was a better time to get on Wink

Damn.... i thought my $50 for 8000btc was good.

Did you get 500k ltc? lol


Do you still have 8k BTC? Tongue

And nice going Goat. You guys make me feel piss poor.

I double it back in April . Dont bother trading since.


Yeah? So what was all that business about your "walls", then?



212. Post 3726759 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Has anyone thought that if Bitcoin (or similar) becomes a world currency, there will be historians and anthropologists crawling all over the backups of these forums 200 years from now, understanding how the crypto revolution happened?

Weird to be in the middle of history.



213. Post 3727035 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on November 26, 2013, 09:13:21 PM
So you're on btc forum betting on btc price, but the bet is in fiat?

Countdown update: less than 3 1/2 days to 1000.

$50 away Smiley



No.

4 days ago I told everyone that judging by the correction in March, that this correction would break out and hit $1000 by Friday night. And I've just been reminding people to get on the north train ever since.

We are going to FLY through $1000 like butter.  Wake me up at $1300-1400.  
(then again, I might just be getting overconfident)

No sleeping! We need you piloting the rocket!

Holding the yoke and throttle down with rubber bands doesn't count.



214. Post 3727960 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Let's make $1000 soon guys. I wanna see it on cable news tonight.



215. Post 3728114 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):




216. Post 3728142 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Vigil on November 26, 2013, 10:43:34 PM

I sold at $800 on the fist bubble.

Yeah, that's been obvious for a while mate.
The rest of this movement is manipulation by one or a few big players. Its right there for anyone to see in the Gox charts.

And?
And... this recent price increase to $950 is not representative of true growth in Bitcoin, it is being artificially pumped up.

Welcome to financial markets, man. There's always a bigger fish.

If you're right, stick to your bets and you'll be vindicated.



217. Post 3728172 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: pera on November 26, 2013, 10:46:34 PM
All aboard the train! choo choo





Pretty accurate actually. If we make it to $1000, it's probably smooth from there.



218. Post 3728193 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: notme on November 26, 2013, 10:48:10 PM
If you're right, stick to your bets and you'll be vindicated.

Be careful with that.  Sometimes, the market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.

I'm under the impression he just sold, not that he actually went short.

Anyone who shorts Bitcoin has a screw loose.



219. Post 3728368 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: CryptStorm on November 26, 2013, 10:57:19 PM
Has anyone thought that if Bitcoin (or similar) becomes a world currency, there will be historians and anthropologists crawling all over the backups of these forums 200 years from now, understanding how the crypto revolution happened?

Weird to be in the middle of history.

Very cool thought-- I agree, we are in the midst of something spectacular (and historic). I can't help feeling both proud of and a little jealous of the guys sitting on thousands of coins (my mind almost implodes thinking about Loaded's 200k.

Also, when we attend the 10K/coin party (didn't they move it to 10K?), we need to wear name tags with pictures of our Avatars so I can recognize you guys. I gotta say I'm grateful to be here. Fucking p2p is the shizo.

btw choo choo  Grin

I'm afraid I'll be at the 100K/coin party. But I promise to wear the carebear rainbow if that happens.



220. Post 3728396 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on November 26, 2013, 11:02:01 PM
Has anyone thought that if Bitcoin (or similar) becomes a world currency, there will be historians and anthropologists crawling all over the backups of these forums 200 years from now, understanding how the crypto revolution happened?

Weird to be in the middle of history.

Very cool thought-- I agree, we are in the midst of something spectacular (and historic). I can't help feeling both proud of and a little jealous of the guys sitting on thousands of coins (my mind almost implodes thinking about Loaded's 200k.

Also, when we attend the 10K/coin party (didn't they move it to 10K?), we need to wear name tags with pictures of our Avatars so I can recognize you guys. I gotta say I'm grateful to be here. Fucking p2p is the shizo.

btw choo choo  Grin

Nice party to visit for some criminals with a few armed buddies Smiley

I don't see the point. I don't carry paper wallets on my person.



221. Post 3728512 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on November 26, 2013, 11:11:02 PM
Has anyone thought that if Bitcoin (or similar) becomes a world currency, there will be historians and anthropologists crawling all over the backups of these forums 200 years from now, understanding how the crypto revolution happened?

Weird to be in the middle of history.

Very cool thought-- I agree, we are in the midst of something spectacular (and historic). I can't help feeling both proud of and a little jealous of the guys sitting on thousands of coins (my mind almost implodes thinking about Loaded's 200k.

Also, when we attend the 10K/coin party (didn't they move it to 10K?), we need to wear name tags with pictures of our Avatars so I can recognize you guys. I gotta say I'm grateful to be here. Fucking p2p is the shizo.

btw choo choo  Grin

Nice party to visit for some criminals with a few armed buddies Smiley




I don't see the point. I don't carry paper wallets on my person.



besides, any such gathering would be spectacularly well armed itself, personally I think a brace of model 94 carbines would be appropriate

In Germany? That's not legal dude.

Plus kidnapping and torture are always nice options to have.

I don't think most of us would be targets, and the people who would be targets know it and would have security teams. They'd certainly be able to afford it at 100K/coin  Wink



222. Post 3728576 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: hyphymikey on November 26, 2013, 11:16:58 PM
New 800btc bid wall at $951

Holy crap.



223. Post 3728667 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: humanitee on November 26, 2013, 11:23:18 PM
Vigil tears == delicious like chocolate

Don't gloat just yet, the $1000 milestone is a tough nut.



224. Post 3728686 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: jojo69 on November 26, 2013, 11:24:44 PM
Germany?  guess I missed a few pages

If I can't bring the Winchesters you can count me out

I'm sure we can work out a parallel gathering in Vegas

In all seriousness, does it really make sense to bring a bunch of firearms to a party lots of alcohol and people who definitely don't like each other? If there's going to be professional security I'm not seeing the point.



225. Post 3728743 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: DougTanner on November 26, 2013, 11:28:18 PM
Ok whale-Santa, I've decided what I want for Christmas, but it'll have to be an early Christmas present. I want us to breach $1 per mBTC in the next 2-3 hours. Thank you, and merry Christmas!  Kiss

Your avatar looks like a bored Walter White at a birthday party.



226. Post 3728947 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

wow                          such rally
          
                                                               much milestone
so value                    
                                                       amaze
                          choo choo





227. Post 3729306 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Bitstamp/MtGox diverging. Will Bitstamp bounce back up, or will MtGox follow down?



228. Post 3729767 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on November 27, 2013, 01:01:03 AM
Someone create a radio show from this thread please! Cheesy

I know right?  most fun I ever had in a message board...I love you folks
You know, bitcointalk is probably one of the message boards with the largest number of new rich people as well. Laughs like this helps cheer everybody up  Cheesy

Yeah, I doubt anyone here who's been registered more than a couple months is currently in the red on their Bitcoin investments.



229. Post 3729802 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: DaRude on November 27, 2013, 01:03:50 AM
Is bitstamp completely out of money? They can't keep their head above $900. Is that cause everyone is cashing out?

Eh, there's usually a Gox/Stamp gap. It was weirder that they were so close than that they're $100 apart, I think.



230. Post 3733668 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Rampion on November 27, 2013, 09:15:55 AM
Be cheerful guys, we just came out from a parabolic growth phase unharmed and without a bear market following a pop. On the contrary, we resumed a healthy upswing at a sustainable pace.

Now we need the infrastructure to catch up. Bitstamp and Gox cannot manage world exposure. I never thought I would say this, but best thing would be a big player buying Gox to build a serious and solid exchange.

Calling WU.


Western Union? It would be so good. Karpeles all set for life (and his kids and the kids of his kids), and finally a serious and liquid exchange that can manage this insane exponential growth we are witnessing.



Ugh, of all things, Western Union? Are your heads on straight? We are the competition to WU.

No, what we need is a trusted name in forex, a traditional trading platform that does trillions in exchange a year. I'm thinking Oanda.



231. Post 3734487 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on November 27, 2013, 09:59:12 AM
STAMP:

9k coins to $1k
5k coins from $1k to $8k

All the newborn millionaires want to cash out at $1k

They do not realize that we will go up to 5 digits like a hot knife through butter once that the $1k resistance is broken.

Dude, do you ever sleep?

You seem to be compatible with about 3 different time zones!!

Judging by his overall posts he gets some healthy 4-6 hours of sleep.
Most of us won't make it till 80 anyhow Smiley))

Look at mine: I never sleep! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18158;sa=statPanel

2 hours.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=89504;sa=statPanel



232. Post 3735033 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: alexeft on November 27, 2013, 11:55:43 AM
Any update on your current stance since breaking ATH last night? if you don't mind sharing it with us.


Hoping for some more bearish insight? Wink

Did you buy back in yet?

This market is going to a $1000 and beyond. We are getting resistance as expect. Buying is trepidatious as expected. And what is the result? More consolidation right near ATHs. Very very bullish. All this talk of these schools of whales sweeping in to ruin the party is just urban legend. 10ks of coins are being sold off everyday and here we are still right under 1k.

Lol, funny enough but I find 'bearish insight' to be more sensible and plausible than bullish insight. I haven't bought back in yet no, certainly not at these prices, a crash is only round the corner, it's a fact, a law of the universe even, we both know it. That's when I'll be waiting with QtTraderbot to munch all the cheap coins.

With bitcoin what we "know" becomes lack of knowledge. It's a totally different animal, at least at this time.

How can an asset pushing so hard against its ATH be bearish?



Agreed. We don't know.

It's a "law of the universe" because the last two major Bitcoin rallies ended in crashes? OK.



233. Post 3740231 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Time for some wild speculation.

Gox bottom is $900. $1000 reestablished quickly.



234. Post 3740689 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: Ivanhoe on November 27, 2013, 07:06:45 PM
Nice Fibonacci retrace if we look at the rise on the 1H chart from from 796 to 1073 and then to 913. Beautiful.

The trend is strong indeed...

Quote from: Vycid on November 26, 2013, 10:42:32 PM





235. Post 3743334 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: macsga on November 27, 2013, 10:18:37 PM
After the $1K mark today; I've been -literally- bombarded with questions about the "roof" the price will be "landed". I know that bitcoin is nothing like anything we know up until today; but still; we can estimate a projected value regarding something similar. Gold.

This is a rough estimation I did back in March (before the April crash). I think it remains pretty accurate to give you an idea. It's also posted at www.bitcoinvest.eu for Greek readers.
The money in circulation today ($USA) is 1,18 trillion dolars (data 20.03.2013, Federal Reserve). Gold minted during our presence here is now 171,300 metric tons. Therefore there's $6,888.5 per kilo of gold. The current (27.03.2013) gold value per kilo is $51,267 (http://goldprice.org/) which means this is overpriced about a factor of circa 7.5. That's because NOT ALL of gold is available for trading.
If the total lot of bitcoins reaches 21M (it comes @ 2140) and NO EXTRA DOLARS are being "cut" (unlikely, but say it is so), the projected theoretical value is 1,18 trillions of $ /21 Million Bitcoins= $56,190.47 per bitcoin.
If you now take in mind the overpriced hypothesis of gold; then you get the idea...

PS:
It's also posted here answering (guess) the same question...  Grin
http://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1rloww/serious_question_do_we_have_any_reasonable_idea/

If you have any objections; please let me know.

Sorry, what? This doesn't make sense. You can't derive the value of gold by dividing M1 by the total gold "minted during our presence" (Huh). You know the gold standard is LONG gone, right?

I like the $56k number, but the method is BS.

Here's a cheery alternative: Bitcoin grows to displace the current value of all extant gold, which is $6,389,389,447,193 at the last spot price.

$6,389,389,447,193/21M = $304,256/coin.



236. Post 3743393 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: alexeft on November 27, 2013, 10:30:48 PM
The money in circulation today ($USA) is 1,18 trillion dolars [...] the projected theoretical value is 1,18 trillions of $ /21 Million Bitcoins= $56,190.47 per bitcoin.
How about the us debt + the rest of the world currencies?
We're talking about circulation (aka: the $ that can buy gramms of gold). Debt is not in circulation (or it may as well is - who knows Tongue )

About the only thing that is in circulation is debt, as even cash is debt. Someone took a loan for it to be around!!!  Grin

Not necessarily true. Governments pay people for stuff all the time.



237. Post 3743471 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: alexeft on November 27, 2013, 10:34:02 PM
The money in circulation today ($USA) is 1,18 trillion dolars [...] the projected theoretical value is 1,18 trillions of $ /21 Million Bitcoins= $56,190.47 per bitcoin.
How about the us debt + the rest of the world currencies?
We're talking about circulation (aka: the $ that can buy gramms of gold). Debt is not in circulation (or it may as well is - who knows Tongue )

About the only thing that is in circulation is debt, as even cash is debt. Someone took a loan for it to be around!!!  Grin

Not necessarily true. Governments pay people for stuff all the time.

They do, but they become indebted to central banks or others to do so.

Also generally not true, most government outlays come from taxes. Only a small portion of expenditures in a given year are from borrowing.

In the US, at least, M1 is larger than the internal debt, so cash is not debt.



238. Post 3743523 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: alexeft on November 27, 2013, 10:40:30 PM
The money in circulation today ($USA) is 1,18 trillion dolars [...] the projected theoretical value is 1,18 trillions of $ /21 Million Bitcoins= $56,190.47 per bitcoin.
How about the us debt + the rest of the world currencies?
We're talking about circulation (aka: the $ that can buy gramms of gold). Debt is not in circulation (or it may as well is - who knows Tongue )

About the only thing that is in circulation is debt, as even cash is debt. Someone took a loan for it to be around!!!  Grin

Not necessarily true. Governments pay people for stuff all the time.

They do, but they become indebted to central banks or others to do so.

Also generally not true, most government outlays come from taxes. Only a small portion of expenditures in a given year are from borrowing.

In the US, at least, M1 is larger than the internal debt, so cash is not debt.

If the only one allowed by law to issue dollars, euros etc are banks (central and/or peripheral), and they only issue it as loans, then all money has to be debt, old or new.



Not if that debt is settled without removing the cash from circulation.



239. Post 3750303 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Seriously?

Bitcoin wut r u doin.

Bitcoin stahp.



240. Post 3750349 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: Rampion on November 28, 2013, 11:21:12 AM
No more triple digits for 2013.

Goodbye, triple digits. See you 2015.

Noone buys the triple digit lie anymore.

Hell yeah. You were right from the very beginning.

Godspeed to you my friend!

Hey, leave Blitz alone. He has PTSD from the 2011 crash.



241. Post 3750377 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: seriouscoin on November 28, 2013, 11:23:05 AM
I'm excited as everyone else and want to see this going to 10k but people seem to forget that all it takes it one whale dumping 30k coins and we're back at 400 and then panic selling will bring us even lower. And all confidence will be gone if such a thing happens.
It might take months to go up from there again.
And there are still quite some people who have the coins to do such thing.
Let's just hope that whale won't do it this way. Let's hope he won't want to crash the market while selling.

He would be EXTREMELY stupid to do it.

And i dont believe stupidity makes you a whale (rich) in the first place.



Unfortunately all it takes to be a Bitcoin whale is $50 in 2010.

Sooner or later some chucklefuck will remember they have 10000 coins, or the FBI will market sell.



242. Post 3750402 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: seldon on November 28, 2013, 11:25:48 AM
What do you think will happen at 999.99 on stamp:

1: Wall eaten in 10 seconds
2: Wall slowly eaten
3: Wall withdrawn
4: Bouncing for several hours from wall

Make your guess quick!

5. Wall eaten in 10min



243. Post 3750473 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: seriouscoin on November 28, 2013, 11:28:40 AM
I'm excited as everyone else and want to see this going to 10k but people seem to forget that all it takes it one whale dumping 30k coins and we're back at 400 and then panic selling will bring us even lower. And all confidence will be gone if such a thing happens.
It might take months to go up from there again.
And there are still quite some people who have the coins to do such thing.
Let's just hope that whale won't do it this way. Let's hope he won't want to crash the market while selling.

He would be EXTREMELY stupid to do it.

And i dont believe stupidity makes you a whale (rich) in the first place.



Unfortunately all it takes to be a Bitcoin whale is $50 in 2010.

Sooner or later some chucklefuck will remember they have 10000 coins, or the FBI will market sell.

WOW it flew right over your head didnt it?

A whale that you said is no longer a whale because they already cashed out.

Whoever still keeps their stash of coins now dont cash out like that. They probably understand bitcoin and not stupid as you think they are.


Lol, say it flew over my head while failing to comprehend my comment.

Quote
will remember they have 10000 coins

This happens all the time. There have been some boring stretches in Bitcoin's history,  some people moved in with their lives in the interim. They may see it on the news and remember.



244. Post 3750563 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: macsga on November 28, 2013, 11:39:17 AM
Nobody -read again- NOBODY who owns a 3 or 4 digit amount of BTCs is selling nowadays. It's all what they were looking for and patiently waiting, all this time. It will simply won't happen (unless they want to convince some weak hands to sell their stash to them in panic sells)... Wink



rpitiela has been cashing out regularly for a while. And I wonder where you think these 3k walls come from.

I'm not bearish,  you guys are just delusional.



245. Post 3750584 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: Rampion on November 28, 2013, 11:42:59 AM
Nobody -read again- NOBODY who owns a 3 or 4 digit amount of BTCs is selling nowadays. It's all what they were looking for and patiently waiting, all this time. It will simply won't happen (unless they want to convince some weak hands to sell their stash to them in panic sells)... Wink



Well, you have somebody selling 3k coins at $1k on Stamp Cheesy

Do not forget that there are quite a lot +3k BTC holders that mined back in 2010, 2011 and 2012, and that never in their lives have seen more thant $50k at the same time. The sensible thing to do for those guys is to sell 1k coins and bring home their first million. They won't be "all set for life", but their life will VASTLY improve for the years to come.

You see, money has a marginal utility once you reach a certain spot. Securing the first million is much more important than making the second one. Sensible guys know this.

Yep. If I woke up and realized I had 3k BTC I would sell 1k immediately.

The interesting thing is, a smaller and smaller amount of these rediscovered early stashes actually needs to be liquidated to provide financial security.



246. Post 3750718 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

So there was a reddit thread about adopting "bits" as the new unit (1 bit = 1 microBTC).

What's general sentiment?  I rather like the idea. Current exchange: $0.001145 per bit. Sounds much more attractive psychologically. We really ought to choose a unit we're not gonna have to replace in a couple years anyway.



247. Post 3750761 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Jesus. 953.6 BTC buy order.



248. Post 3750855 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: Vycid on November 28, 2013, 11:27:20 AM
What do you think will happen at 999.99 on stamp:

1: Wall eaten in 10 seconds
2: Wall slowly eaten
3: Wall withdrawn
4: Bouncing for several hours from wall

Make your guess quick!

5. Wall eaten in 10min

Looks like I was pretty much dead on. There's this weird phenomenon where the feeding frenzy only starts when the round number gets hit...



249. Post 3750900 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: nesevis on November 28, 2013, 12:07:52 PM
This is the wrong thread. But 'gosh dang', what the hell is up with altcoins? My where worth aprox. 0.3 BTC three days ago, now they are closing in to 2.5 BTC!

Speculative bubble driven by big players. It's happened before. Look at he volume.

Congrats for holding so long, but get out before it implodes.

http://www.cryptocoincharts.info/period-charts.php?period=alltime&resolution=day&pair=ltc-btc&market=btc-e



250. Post 3750947 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Bull is outta the cage.



251. Post 3750971 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: Rampion on November 28, 2013, 12:15:25 PM
This is the wrong thread. But 'gosh dang', what the hell is up with altcoins? My where worth aprox. 0.3 BTC three days ago, now they are closing in to 2.5 BTC!

Speculative bubble driven by big players. It's happened before. Look at he volume.

Congrats for holding so long, but get out before it implodes.

LOOOOL, surf the forums, you are just saying the same thing some stupid things that were repeated over and over when we hit $22 at the end of January 2013.

It will at least double again before crashing. And it might very well implode for good at some point, but not before 5 figures.

Mark my words.

ALTCOINS.

Chill your titties.



252. Post 3761629 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

It's been too long since the last picture of a flaming train.

Someone deliver please.



253. Post 3761711 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: FCTaiChi on November 29, 2013, 05:11:15 AM
Closing in on the good old gold..
How much is an ounce of bitcoin?   Wink

Haha, yeah, the units don't really make for  fair comparison.

Certainly a lot more than 11M oz Au have been mined.



254. Post 3761756 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Gold is currently $1242.20/Oz, but that is of course a moving target. Equivalent is 7568 CNY.



255. Post 3761908 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

That's it folks. For the first time in history 1,000,000 bits sold for more than an ounce of gold.

$1242.00



256. Post 3761925 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

PS. Goodbye Litecoin, choochoo is leaving without you.



257. Post 3761932 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: MahaRamana on November 29, 2013, 05:46:07 AM
That's it folks. For the first time in history 1,000,000 bits sold for more than an ounce of gold.

$1242.00

Not yet, when bitcoin hit 1242, Gold was at 1242.5 USD

Gold is now below 1242 but bitcoin has still never traded above gold at the same time

Hrm, I read exactly 1242.00 on Kitco.



258. Post 3761963 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: OldGeek on November 29, 2013, 05:50:02 AM
That oughta make headlines tomorrow.

BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL! Just 1 troy ounce of gold for 1,000,000 bits!



259. Post 3761985 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: macsga on November 29, 2013, 05:53:22 AM
Coming Soon...
=1 BTC

That was... predicted urm.. Yesterday???


That's a kilogram of gold.



260. Post 3762062 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: vps15 on November 29, 2013, 06:02:40 AM
China Telecom is accepting Bitcoin.

http://js.189.cn/w2014

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1roulj/china_telecom_accepts_bitcoin/

Third largest telecommunications provider in China, state-owned company...



I believe it's happening, gentlemen.



Edit: From reddit:
Quote
Also, this is an ad for a special offer, if you spend 500rmb in BTC, you get 1000rmb in subsidized crap or something...(probably the phone)

holy fucking shit we are going to hit $10000 way sooner than expected. the world is turning to btc faster than anyone could have thought, fiat really may become redundant in the not so distant future

Dude, chill. You cannot reasonably expect to go from $1B to $100B market cap in a couple months, it isn't sustainable.



261. Post 3762095 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

LOL.

On the the schedule today:

1) Gold parity

2) Seppuku



262. Post 3762150 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

That dump reminded me of this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVJqBSr_FEs



263. Post 3762255 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: vps15 on November 29, 2013, 06:25:38 AM
China Telecom is accepting Bitcoin.

http://js.189.cn/w2014

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1roulj/china_telecom_accepts_bitcoin/

Third largest telecommunications provider in China, state-owned company...



I believe it's happening, gentlemen.



Edit: From reddit:
Quote
Also, this is an ad for a special offer, if you spend 500rmb in BTC, you get 1000rmb in subsidized crap or something...(probably the phone)

holy fucking shit we are going to hit $10000 way sooner than expected. the world is turning to btc faster than anyone could have thought, fiat really may become redundant in the not so distant future

Dude, chill. You cannot reasonably expect to go from $1B to $100B market cap in a couple months, it isn't sustainable.


look im just saying, the only reason why people think btc can go to $10000 is because if enough people start using it so much that it becomes accepted everywhere, such that the only reason why it would be worth $10000 per BTC is because fiat would become essentially redundant or worthless.  With another huge Chinese company, especially a state owned one, shows that this can happen sooner than people expect.

basically fuck the speculators, fuck the greedy assholes that think it can just be a get rich quick scheme and dont fully understand btc.  The move to $10000 is irrelevant of them.  what will get us to $10000 is real people converting their fiat because btc is better

(ps i know this has been said before but your comment suggests that you dont understand the way to $10000)

Utter shite.

If gold can be worth 7 trillion without anyone spending it, Bitcoin can be worth 500 billion without anyone spending it.

Repeat after me. Bitcoin is a new asset class.



264. Post 3762305 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: vps15 on November 29, 2013, 06:36:55 AM



look im just saying, the only reason why people think btc can go to $10000 is because if enough people start using it so much that it becomes accepted everywhere, such that the only reason why it would be worth $10000 per BTC is because fiat would become essentially redundant or worthless.  With another huge Chinese company, especially a state owned one, shows that this can happen sooner than people expect.

basically fuck the speculators, fuck the greedy assholes that think it can just be a get rich quick scheme and dont fully understand btc.  The move to $10000 is irrelevant of them.  what will get us to $10000 is real people converting their fiat because btc is better

(ps i know this has been said before but your comment suggests that you dont understand the way to $10000)

Utter shite.

If gold can be worth 7 trillion without anyone spending it, Bitcoin can be worth 500 billion without anyone spending it.

Repeat after me. Bitcoin is a new asset class.

mate if you are such a bear and have no hope for btc then why are you even here

Are you slow or something?



265. Post 3763456 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: philip2000uk on November 29, 2013, 08:40:40 AM
It says it right on the bar: 'fine gold'.
LOL but if i was a noob and i was buying it, who would i trust? how would i check quickly for myself Smiley

portable XRF



266. Post 3763533 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: Ducky1 on November 29, 2013, 09:00:55 AM
It says it right on the bar: 'fine gold'.
LOL but if i was a noob and i was buying it, who would i trust? how would i check quickly for myself Smiley

Here is a way:

You weigh it (on an accurate scale), than you measure the volume by putting it into a finely graded  measuring cylinder with some water. Note the increase in volume when adding the gold bar. The volume for one kg gold should be 51.86 cubic centimeters (ml).

This method is easily defeated with gold-coated tungsten alloy. Like I said, portable XRF.

Edit: damn it justusranvier, you're quick on the trigger  Smiley



267. Post 3763605 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: seanneko on November 29, 2013, 09:05:25 AM
...then cut it in half to make sure it's not gold-plated tungsten.

Beat me to it. This is why I'd never buy a precious metal, especially gold. How can you ever be sure it's real?

Fairly simple XRF + thermal conductivity + resistivity tests will completely guarantee that a bar of gold is what it says on the face. For extra paranoia there's more complex ultrasonic testing.



268. Post 3763691 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: TiagoTiago on November 29, 2013, 09:15:48 AM
Would a fake bar of gold ring different than a real one when tapped with a little hammer?

Tungsten bulk longitudinal speed of sound: 5220 m/s
Gold bulk longitudinal speed of sound: 3240 m/s

I'm going with "yes".



269. Post 3764476 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: rpietila on November 29, 2013, 10:36:21 AM

Wow, that was a fast ignore. Generally I ignore only after 30 days in the forum but this was an exception.

I'm honestly not sure if he's a troll or a 13 year old that desperately needs Ritalin.



270. Post 3772946 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: OldGeek on November 29, 2013, 11:25:04 PM
Not that I know anything... but I'd think $800/$850 support would be very strong (assuming there even was a "major" dip).

Of course, "never say never" in Bitcoin.  

It's obv that I agree with you.  Heh.  When I first bought (way, way, back in Sept lol)  I thought I had fallen for the old 'buy at the top' trick at $122.

I'm pretty jelly. I got most of my coins in April and my cost basis is probably not much better than $122 each.

Good timing  Smiley



271. Post 3773736 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 30, 2013, 12:37:07 AM
Cool

He returns!



272. Post 3773747 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: seldon on November 30, 2013, 12:44:51 AM
How many would you buy if the price leveled off at 800?  How many would you buy today?

Once we move to mBTC this won't matter.

Would you actually say to someone --->  how many would you buy today at $1.2 and how many would you buy if the price leveled off at .80 cents?

No, I doubt you would ask that question. Smiley
Is that indented to peg bitcoin to Feathercoin which trades at $ 1.13 at moment. so if bitcoin raises to 1.5 feathercoin should raise too

Interesting thought.. will nominating btc in mbtc make them seem less valueable to ltc?

Anyone that knows about Litecoin understands that mBTC is just BTC/1000 and that LTC is in no way more valuable.



273. Post 3775935 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on November 30, 2013, 05:40:04 AM
^

Sorry but that Graph makes me really, really uncomfortable. Or maybe too comfortable so its not a nice feeling Smiley

Can you imagine the next one and we don't even know when or if it comes to this again.

Haha yes i'm aware of that. BC is a long time Bull with some flies(bears) on his tale.
You do realize that "the guy" who bought at the previous peak (Gox: $266) is up almost 400% to date, assuming he held and didn't immediately panic sell.

Hint: Patience.  Don't panic sell !    Cheesy
I wont. I mined a few Coins 2 years ago with my amd gpu. Sitting tight and only sold some because i needed it really. Bought back in when i saved some money.
I'm not even a small fish (more of a fish egg).  Smiley

SOmeday it will pay out or it wont. If it wont, it was a nice ride but i lost nothing (except time and seat here and on bitcoinwisdom) and i'm good if it breaks trough.

Please excuse my bad english. i've never been teached. I hope you can understand what i try to say Smiley


Yes, yes.. I completely understand what you're saying.  Cool story!

I don't know any other languages, so I can hardly talk..  Very impressive in fact for having never been taught.   Cheesy

If Bitcoin enables my early retirement I will make it my mission to learn a few.



274. Post 3776187 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on November 30, 2013, 06:03:25 AM
If Bitcoin enables my early retirement I will make it my mission to learn a few.

I'll go in with you on that.    Grin

I'd guess you're a lot closer to that point than I am.  Smiley

I took a few mandarin classes in grad school... I think a year or two in China would be an experience.

Quote from: bnjmnkent on November 30, 2013, 06:17:54 AM
China moves down a bit, gox follows. Stamp's orderbook bids a bit thin.

Looks fine to me.



275. Post 3776333 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: windjc on November 30, 2013, 06:34:06 AM
China moves down a bit, gox follows. Stamp's orderbook bids a bit thin.

btw, why don't they just close the exchanges on the weekends like the stock market?


Simple, really... there are a bunch of competing exchanges with a global client base. If you shut down your exchange, even for a few hours a day, you're losing customers to your competition.

So no exchange will ever be the first to limit their hours of operation, and therefore the other exchanges will never limit their hours either.

Prisoner's dilemma.



276. Post 3776517 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: justusranvier on November 30, 2013, 07:12:32 AM
Get ready ladies... Gox is about to take off.
Which way?
Up, but slowly over the next day or two.
You misspelled "down, very suddenly".

Yeah, that was interesting. Bitstamp didn't even react, there was a brief moment where Gox was trading lower.



277. Post 3776570 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

This is how these "dumps" have me feeling lately...




278. Post 3776618 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: kajigger on November 30, 2013, 07:24:34 AM
This is how these "dumps" have me feeling lately...


Do you wish for it or do you see morpheus as bitcoin and neo as whale or bear? Wink

I hope not but for others it will be good to get a lower entry point but i'm mor into holding.
I love holding things Smiley

The latter.

A crash (more like a deep correction, honestly) is inevitable sooner or later, but the dumps are getting more and more laughable, they're barely even denting the market.



279. Post 3777243 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Kj1 on November 30, 2013, 08:44:28 AM
noticed a pattern, just before the april correction, there was a huge LTC pump. (from .05 to .5 in 2 days).
Then a steady selloff; like one increased their btc stash significantly.
After huge LTC dumps at higher prices, the selloffs at gox started (like one day later).

Now, LTC was pumped from .08 to .5, now steadily dropping with huge (several times >5K btc) selloffs.
Pattern? Bad sign?  Or just coincidence?

It looks logical to increase your BTC amount by playing altcoins, if you have a decent amount of btc you can really manipulate the altcoin market. Then cash out the profit using btc (gox), causing a drop and hopefully a panic sell.  Then buy back low.  I guess you'd be able to make at least x10 using this in a few days, if you are lucky and have the balls.  Anyway, by only gambling with profit from the altcoins the gambler doens't risk anything...
 

Gambling with profit doesn't amount to "not risking anything", that's silly.

Anyway, I think the manipulation thing is overblown. If one player could crash the market to get cheap coins, that would have happened already. April happened because we all got goxxed.

The wise trader waits for cheap alts and holds until he can flip them for a profit. Only idiots are piling in right now, it's nothing but gambling - and don't be fooled, there IS a house (BTC-e takes a cut, and so do the algo-traders and manipulators). I'll be taking another look at LTC when it's back below 0.01.



280. Post 3777547 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Hey folks, a PSA -

If you did any mining earlier this year (or even earlier than that!  Shocked), check all the pools you used. You may have balances in quite a few of them, and those pools have probably decreased their minimum withdrawal amount.

I just found $100 worth of LTC and BTC dust. Not bad for sofa cushion money.



281. Post 3777652 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: rpietila on November 30, 2013, 09:40:19 AM
Crash, crash CRASH

Are you also in the habit of shouting "FIRE!" in theaters?  Smiley

The more interesting data for comparison, I think, is actually what volume tends to be during calm periods. It makes no sense to compare the present volume to what the volume was at the beginning of a giant price spike.

I should also point out that this hypothesis horribly fails backtesting, considering that we did indeed have a "crash" less than two weeks ago and nevertheless continued upward movement on increasingly thin volume.



282. Post 3777737 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Vycid on November 30, 2013, 09:41:23 AM

Are you also in the habit of shouting "FIRE!" in theaters?  Smiley

The more interesting data for comparison, I think, is actually what volume tends to be during calm periods. It makes no sense to compare the present volume to what the volume was at the beginning of a giant price spike.

I should also point out that this hypothesis horribly fails backtesting, considering that we did indeed have a "crash" less than two weeks ago and nevertheless continued upward movement on increasingly thin volume.

As an afterthought, the most obvious external factor: MtGox has zero fees right now, of course bitstamp volume will drop.



283. Post 3777908 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: gandhibt on November 30, 2013, 10:04:18 AM

Bitcoin is a store of value. It's only natural that when the market cap rises, higher % amount goes to long-time saving. Volume in USD has staid nearly the same.

(Seems like you desperately want to buy back in, doing anything for the USD win)

Mmm, no, I disagree. I do think it is reasonable to expect some proportionality between market cap and volume.

There are two things working behind the scenes: one is that I believe volume is ALSO proportional to volatility, and since there's been extreme volatility in the past weeks (and it's calmed some recently), it's not surprising volume has dropped quite a bit.

The other is that MtGox is offering 0% fees, which I suspect has drawn all the trade volume away from Bitstamp, where rpietila has gotten his volume data.

Anyway, the exchanges have drifted closer together on this comparatively tranquil leg. I suspect we will be moving again soon, but I'm not at all convinced it will be downward. The trend is unbroken and I have learned not to believe I can outsmart the market.



284. Post 3778092 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on November 30, 2013, 10:29:11 AM

You are starting go look desperate now. Sad.
Not saying it won't crash but we all know why you are making these posts.

Check this out.

Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Quote
you're hoping for a crash to get back in  Wink

Pros don't hope. They adjust the bets so that they win regardless. (If they are in the position to move the markets, they will)

And what about the pros who have taken the opposite position and also would like to win?

It's my observation that the most successful traders are not usually given to hubris.



285. Post 3778344 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: rpietila on November 30, 2013, 11:07:42 AM
Dude, enough, just man-up and accept the hit when you buy back in, some you win, some you lose.

OK, finally I got it. Everybody is just envious because I have $millions and they don't, and I did it in the very coordinated way that never risked the majority of the position, in fact at current prices the remainder of the position is already worth more than the whole of it before divestment.

When you cannot argue against operational excellence, you whine. No whiners will be invited to the inauguration ceremony of my castle, however.

Sorry to be so blunt about it but this seems to be the only realistic explanation for the whinery, am I not right?

The reason is that you are a narcissist.

I hold no ill will toward those who have found their fortune in Bitcoin; in general I am happy for those individuals. I can tell you that if Adam's cryptic message today means he's sold out and is enjoying his retirement, I can wish him only the best.

However, you are a different case. You throw 13 BTC at a forum troll because you can't bear the idea that people might think you're not super rich?

You wave your wealth around like something we're supposed to respect. But you need to face facts: you're one of many people who made a very fortunate investment. That doesn't make you somehow superior, and that's ever more clear now that you've gone and made a fool of yourself.

Shape up, I really do appreciate your numerical approach and the time you spend collating data.

By the way: trend lines can only predict within the region of data points they envelop. Extrapolation requires fundamental knowledge about the growth mechanism. This is taught in undergraduate statistics classes.



286. Post 3778449 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: cfrm on November 30, 2013, 11:18:33 AM
I tried elsewhere with no result, so can someone here explain how this can happen -> https://blockchain.info/da/address/1CMMBYkiB3AVXbysaYuFEepSJTVRggFaNm

A friend sent 0.9 BTC to my brain wallet by scanning the QR code in my Blockchain wallet app. Exactly 10 sec later a transaction is made from my brain wallet to an address I cannot identify. As if it automatically forwarded the BTC's. What the heck can I do? It's quite a lot of money just laying on some random address now..

I'm afraid you've been robbed.



287. Post 3778619 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: psychrepublic on November 30, 2013, 11:35:06 AM
agreed with niothor.

This is just a reminder to those who might have forgotten or those who are new to bitcoin.

Rpietila is shouting doom and gloom all over the forum, but until the beginning of the year he was predicting a bitcoin valuation of several hundred thousand USD. That was whilst he was in a manic phase, during which his behavior on these forums, as well as in real life caused much sensation and is well documented for those interested in using the search function.

He was subsequently involuntarily hospitalized in a psychiatric facility, diagnosed with Bipolar Affective Disorder, with multiple delusions of grandeur. He now seems to be in a depressive phase of his illness and is spreading doom and gloom on the speculation forums. Either that, or he has sold just before we hit 1000 and is now regretting his mistake.

Either way, thread carefully with him

Dude, enough, just man-up and accept the hit when you buy back in, some you win, some you lose.

OK, finally I got it. Everybody is just envious because I have $millions and they don't, and I did it in the very coordinated way that never risked the majority of the position, in fact at current prices the remainder of the position is already worth more than the whole of it before divestment.

When you cannot argue against operational excellence, you whine. No whiners will be invited to the inauguration ceremony of my castle, however.

Sorry to be so blunt about it but this seems to be the only realistic explanation for the whinery, am I not right?

You know , not everybody is envious of you.Not with your past!

Second as you may know since you started two topics around here , there are people with more bitcoin than you.
Also there are people with more money than you , even if your bits go over 10 000.

This bragging after a fwew weeks of real posts with essence makes me wonder if its time for a week of cold showers Wink




I did not realize rpietila suffers from a clinical illness.

Rpietila: Please accept my public apology. I hope you find effective treatment.



288. Post 3778839 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: cfrm on November 30, 2013, 12:00:23 PM
I tried elsewhere with no result, so can someone here explain how this can happen -> https://blockchain.info/da/address/1CMMBYkiB3AVXbysaYuFEepSJTVRggFaNm

A friend sent 0.9 BTC to my brain wallet by scanning the QR code in my Blockchain wallet app. Exactly 10 sec later a transaction is made from my brain wallet to an address I cannot identify. As if it automatically forwarded the BTC's. What the heck can I do? It's quite a lot of money just laying on some random address now..


Brainwallet? If you have a easy password , it might be a bot who scans those addresses.
Also , low chance of getting them back.

Oh wait, bummer. It is not a brain wallet. For some reason I labelled the address "Brain Wallet" a long time ago, but it is not. It's a completely normal address in my wallet. So it does not have a specific password that differs from the rest of the addresses in my wallet, which still holds bitcoins. Only makes it weirder.

If we remove the possibility of collision , I'm afraid I have no clue on this.
You should post in the technical section ....edit - you did that.

Just sent 0.0001 to the same address to check if it would still automatically forward to the other address. It didn't: https://blockchain.info/da/address/1CMMBYkiB3AVXbysaYuFEepSJTVRggFaNm.

Well, 0.0001 is the tx fee so it's reasonable that a bot would wait for a larger sum to sweep the address.

Is there any way your wallet.dat may have been compromised?



289. Post 3786634 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: rpietila on November 30, 2013, 11:00:04 PM
When the crash comes, I think not many in the forum is buying. After going to $2k and crashing to $1k, would you really buy? Everybody is shitless by then. It is completely at the mercy of the new money then.

I think you're not understanding the situation of the average forum-goer.

For me (and I would assume many others on this forum) Bitcoin has made itself the majority of my portfolio.

Considering you are the one that goes on about "80%" investment in Bitcoin, you should understand why I am not inclined to continue buying with fiat beyond 90% (although I have considered it).

As always most of the money coming into the system is not from individuals already on the forum, simply because we do not have much more money to spend in relation to our bitcoin holdings!



290. Post 3786712 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: windjc on November 30, 2013, 11:38:19 PM
When the crash comes, I think not many in the forum is buying. After going to $2k and crashing to $1k, would you really buy? Everybody is shitless by then. It is completely at the mercy of the new money then.

I think you're not understanding the situation of the average forum-goer.

For me (and I would assume many others on this forum) Bitcoin has made itself the majority of my portfolio.

Considering you are the one that goes on about "80%" investment in Bitcoin, you should understand why I am not inclined to continue buying with fiat beyond 90% (although I have considered it!).

As always most of the money coming into the system is not from individuals already on the forum, simply because we do not have much more money to spend in relation to our bitcoin holdings!

I agree. The argument that most or a large part of the new money is "additional" investment is probably his weakest argument.

LOOK AROUND - bitcoin news is one of the largest trending financial news story of the last month IN THE WORLD. Yes, the entire world. Probably top 10 financial new stories this last month.

A small % of the 6.5 billion humans on the planet that were not early adopters are investing in bitcoin. That is where the new money is coming from.

More new money is coming in next week by the way. Which is why the market will continue to go up next week too. This is not rocket science guys.

Right. The point has been made - Bitcoin can hit 10k per coin without passing Facebook's market cap.

Ask yourself which one has more potential and you will start to see things a bit more clearly. Everyone understands what Facebook is; not everyone understands what Bitcoin is (or has even heard of it)!

This is changing. Rapidly. Today or tomorrow there will be a big news story about that kid with the "Hi Mom! Send Bitcoin" sign on ESPN game day - and the thousands of dollars that poured in from all over the world from just a QR code on TV.

That will be the first realization for most folks of what Bitcoin is capable of.

Rpietila can afford to sell some coins, because if Bitcoin leaves him behind he has a fucking castle. The rest of us cannot afford to sell.

Mark my words, this is just starting.




291. Post 3787009 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: seanneko on November 30, 2013, 11:59:09 PM
Right. The point has been made - Bitcoin can hit 10k per coin without passing Facebook's market cap.

Ask yourself which one has more potential and you will start to see things a bit more clearly.

So very true. I think this every single time I hear about the "value" of some of these companies.

Instagram was sold not too long ago for many billions of dollars. How the fuck can they possibly expect to turn over a profit? By advertising to 14 year olds who think a grainy photo is cool?

Sometimes I think another dot com bubble is on the way. This is exactly what happened 13-14 years ago - people were throwing insane amounts of money at companies with no real business model (I realise that some bears will probably say the same thing about Bitcoin. It has legitimate potential. So, whatever).

I just hope Bitcoin doesn't get hurt when it all comes down. Maybe the stock market crashing would actually strengthen Bitcoin.

Bitcoin doesn't need to turn a profit, though. The model is entirely different. The network just needs to spread in order to increase demand for the currency units. In order to spread, it needs to offer an advantage over traditional systems. And it is unmistakable what is happening.

As has been repeated many times, Bitcoin is subject to a network effect; every new user that enters the network causes an exponential increase in the value of the network. Sooner or later (sooner, at this rate) we will hit a critical point and the true value of the network will exceed the current speculative value.

The growth trend is unmistakable and increasingly unstoppable. More and more people are looking long enough to realize that. The more unstoppable the network growth appears, the higher the speculative value should be.

Oh yeah, and there's a positive feedback loop between speculative value and network growth.

Honey badger don't give a shit.

This is the address of the "Hi Mom" kid, for those curious (vanity address and everything, brilliant). https://blockchain.info/address/1HiMoMgBaAikFHgAt3M4YJtetp4HrnsiXu



292. Post 3787093 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on December 01, 2013, 12:15:15 AM
I think early 2014 will actually be an exciting time.

Naval (video below) stated that Bitcoin would become more and more relevant to the start up space when the market cap reached the ~$3-5B range.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jl-HZWfxUFw

We've blown through that quickly, and we're now sitting at ~$12B.  I imagine (though I'm far from an insider) things are really developing quickly now in that space.  

When the market cap was $1B, if you were to invest $10M into a Bitcoin startup, you'd want to capture at least 10M/1B (1%) of that market cap as it grows.  Otherwise, you'd be better off simply investing in the underlying currency.  With a market cap of $10B, that same investment would only need to capture 0.1% of the growing market cap to be better than purchasing Bitcoin outright.  Clearly added incentive now.

This is another good point. Institutional money is coming, and when that hits everything changes.

If you don't recognize Bitcoin crossing $10B as a huge welcome mat for the big money then you're not paying attention.

Don't sell your coins unless it is to get out of debt (the bad kind, not college loans or mortgages).

Oh yeah, and don't invest in mining stocks, because Samsung is probably 6 months away from offering its own product.



293. Post 3787236 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Bitcoines on December 01, 2013, 12:28:01 AM
what would you be able to trade bitcoins for if the dollar/euro crashed first?
or if it gets stronger by that time, would it replace them?
or if its not ready for the colective conciusness would it crash as well?
or what would you be able to trade it for?


btw cant see no big wall, its only day trading, bots and traps atm it seems, looks like it will continue steadly rising .

I'm going to step away from the uber-bullishness for a minute to say that the dollar/euro aren't going to be immediately swept away by Bitcoin. That simply won't happen.

It's not to say that Bitcoin can't rapidly achieve a trillion-dollar-plus market cap - I believe it can - just that the role of inflationary currencies will continue to be a large and important one for the foreseeable future. Beyond the fact that tax obligations have to be paid in state-issued fiat, banking will be difficult in Bitcoin, and financial markets will certainly not be switching anytime soon - most "wealth" is in equities or derivatives, priced in dollars.

Then there's the fact that oil can only be purchased with dollars.

Gold, silver, and fiat have been coexisting for many years now, and I do not expect Bitcoin will upset that balance. We're looking at a timescale of decades before we can expect fiat to go away.

Frankly, I much prefer it that way. A functional alternative to fiat is actually better than a giant upheaval.

Some people still get the paper in their driveway every morning. And sometimes even I enjoy the experience.



294. Post 3787500 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Bitcoines on December 01, 2013, 12:54:03 AM
what would you be able to trade bitcoins for if the dollar/euro crashed first?
or if it gets stronger by that time, would it replace them?
or if its not ready for the colective conciusness would it crash as well?
or what would you be able to trade it for?


btw cant see no big wall, its only day trading, bots and traps atm it seems, looks like it will continue steadly rising .

I'm going to step away from the uber-bullishness for a minute to say that the dollar/euro aren't going to be immediately swept away by Bitcoin. That simply won't happen.

It's not to say that Bitcoin can't rapidly achieve a trillion-dollar-plus market cap - I believe it can - just that the role of inflationary currencies will continue to be a large and important one for the foreseeable future. Beyond the fact that tax obligations have to be paid in state-issued fiat, banking will be difficult in Bitcoin, and financial markets will certainly not be switching anytime soon - most "wealth" is in equities or derivatives, priced in dollars.

Then there's the fact that oil can only be purchased with dollars.

Gold, silver, and fiat have been coexisting for many years now, and I do not expect Bitcoin will upset that balance. We're looking at a timescale of decades before we can expect fiat to go away.

Frankly, I much prefer it that way. A functional alternative to fiat is actually better than a giant upheaval.

Some people still get the paper in their driveway every morning. And sometimes even I enjoy the experience.

I guess i agree with you, you make valid points, and true i prefer it that way as well, i was just thinking it becuase as i see it works kind of like this way the backd up   Gold/Silver --->>> Currencies --->>> Bitcoin value?,   *correct me if im wrong

while the direct backup for bitcoin is the hash number of each?

or am i just tripping

Not really sure what you're talking about.

Nothing is backed by anything but faith these days. Gold is backed exclusively by people who want it. Silver is backed exclusively by people who want it. The dollar is backed exclusively by people who want it. And naturally, Bitcoin is backed exclusively by people who want it. "The Economy" is a collective hallucination.

With that in mind, the people who cry "tulip!" at Bitcoin are really just not thinking very hard about the way the world ticks. Gold is the biggest tulip of all time, and that doesn't keep it from a 7 trillion dollar market cap.



295. Post 3787907 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: OldGeek on December 01, 2013, 01:37:07 AM
Not listening to me.  Ratz

Well, somebody dumped 21 coins. That's some money now, right?  Cheesy



296. Post 3788320 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: oroboras on December 01, 2013, 02:17:47 AM


That's hardly backing...it's more the mechanics of btc...backing surely means a promissory equivalence:  you can't approach the blockchain and ask for an equivalent weight of gold, as you might with a GBP...."I promise to pay the bearer".

 

Except the UK did away with the gold standard years ago. The GBP is based on nothing now, like with all (or most, at least) other currencies.

You try going into the bank and demanding 5lbs of Gold for your £5 note Tongue

Even that is meaningless, since gold is not backed by anything.

I can imagine a currency backed by a basket of commodities with utility - oil, wheat, farmland - but I'm not sure such a thing is necessary.

Perhaps someday titles to goods and property will be exchanged in colored coins, and derivative currencies will exist that are convertible to a basket of those colored coins. That would be an interesting future.



297. Post 3788508 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: OldGeek on December 01, 2013, 02:41:44 AM
Now I suppose it's more of the straight line BS.

Technically that's what currencies are supposed to do.  Smiley



298. Post 3788554 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

/r/Bitcoin is now a top 50 subreddit.

That college game day QR code address has now netted over 22 BTC. Can you hear the editors sending the story to press?



299. Post 3788592 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: aminorex on December 01, 2013, 03:04:30 AM
I am amazed to still find people posting about currency deriving its value from "faith".  That is a  preposterous  big lie which gains currency only from its constant repetition.  A currency per se derives its value from its use.  Not from faith orconfidence or backing in quatloos or fairy dust.  This is accurately and adequately described by the quantity theory of money:  PQ=MV.   The value thus derived is kept connected to the currency by the faith or confidence that the utility conditions described in this equation will persist over the users discounting horizon.

Bitcoins have uses other than use as currency, i.e. a medium of exchange, and therefore the fundamental value of  bitcoin is greater than the total M might naively imply,  but of course the quantity theory adequately accounts for this in the V factor.



Bitcoin is not predominantly a currency, not yet.

It is currently a commodity that has value because of its potential to become a revolutionary currency (with even greater per-unit value).

Any attempt at valuation based on velocity of money is doomed to failure.

If you attempted to value a tech startup based on its discounted cashflow you'd come up with a rather misleading figure  Cheesy



300. Post 3789068 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

I'd now call the move on BTCChina "significant". Coming 24h should be interesting.



301. Post 3789092 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Heh, it's always funny to see "6888.88" on the ticker. The Chinese are nothing if not superstitious.



302. Post 3789108 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: OldGeek on December 01, 2013, 04:21:42 AM
Fairly impressive downdraft on gox not too.  Hmmm.

Zzzz.

I hear weak hands falling out of the tree.



303. Post 3789287 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: beetcoin on December 01, 2013, 04:48:27 AM
i'm going go out on a long shot and claim that on monday or tuesday next week, we're going to get a big announcement that some retailer is going to accept BTC  Wink

I do agree it gets more and more likely every day, but the announcement will probably be for "sometime in 2014".

The great thing about Bitcoin is that the people who adopt it are monetarily rewarded, and it costs merchants nothing to accept it (actually it tends to save them some money and get them free community attention).

It's a win-win situation. This train lacks brakes.



304. Post 3789299 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Kleptoid on December 01, 2013, 04:50:15 AM
Cup. Handle?

All I see is noise.



305. Post 3789390 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Holliday on December 01, 2013, 05:06:10 AM
i'm going go out on a long shot and claim that on monday or tuesday next week, we're going to get a big announcement that some retailer is going to accept BTC  Wink

Ebay or Starbucks? LOL  Grin


IRS. ;0

The IRS is already quite happy to accept your money.



306. Post 3789411 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Holliday on December 01, 2013, 05:08:47 AM
You could say that.  It's a DYI job.  The main components are an empty soda can, a length of mono filament fishing line*, and a used paint brush.

* I only use 20 lb test.  If you are after bigger fish you need stronger line.

A true fisherman can catch bigger fish with a lower test line. I use 4 myself.

If you epoxy enough of them together you can get a fishing line composite with a weibull failure load distribution  Smiley



307. Post 3789431 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Holliday on December 01, 2013, 05:11:56 AM
You could say that.  It's a DYI job.  The main components are an empty soda can, a length of mono filament fishing line*, and a used paint brush.

* I only use 20 lb test.  If you are after bigger fish you need stronger line.

A true fisherman can catch bigger fish with a lower test line. I use 4 myself.

If you epoxy enough of them together you can get a fishing line composite with a weibull failure load distribution  Smiley

So... I could probably catch a bear with something like that?

Even a manbearwhale.



308. Post 3789444 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on December 01, 2013, 05:14:03 AM
You could say that.  It's a DYI job.  The main components are an empty soda can, a length of mono filament fishing line*, and a used paint brush.

* I only use 20 lb test.  If you are after bigger fish you need stronger line.

A true fisherman can catch bigger fish with a lower test line. I use 4 myself.

i dont even use a line, i use dynamite.

Only hillbillys and rednecks use dynamite. Why am I not surprised, GOAT? Wink

i use a 22 for catching catfish sometimes Smiley

I hope it's an automatic .22, that'd be spectacular.

The crossbows with fishing line attached are great also.



309. Post 3789483 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: OldGeek on December 01, 2013, 05:19:02 AM
XKCD strikes again.

Seriously, Goat, you would use a catch 22 to catch catfish.  Shame on you.

Yeah, shame on you, I'd use a .50 BMG. That way I wouldn't have to spend time prepping fishsticks.



310. Post 3789505 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Crazy on December 01, 2013, 05:22:47 AM
What the hell are you people talking about Cheesy

The use of tools hilariously inappropriate to the application  Smiley

In particular using guns to go fishing.

I'm going to stick this on the bucket list...

37) Learn Mandarin
38) Shoot a catfish with a rifle chambered in .50 BMG, then attempt to filet the remainder



311. Post 3789551 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on December 01, 2013, 05:31:55 AM
lol

And here I thought I was trolling.

Well... if you have a boat, why not?

...but it's a train, not a boat!

we all know its a rocket Smiley




312. Post 3789581 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Nolo on December 01, 2013, 05:35:30 AM
Can someone explain to me in simple terms for this trading simpleton what the green and red lines that extend past the chart on the right on bitcoinwisdom represent?

For example, right now the green line is much taller than the red line.  The red line is almost flat extending out to the right.  If you don't know what I'm talking about, I'll get a picture and circle it.  

Green line is the bids on the order book, red line is the asks on the order book. Basically the height of those curves at any particular price represents the cumulative sum of the bids or asks above or below (respectively) that price.

So the "flatness" means nobody is trying to sell coins above a certain price (red line), but lots of people are trying to buy them for cheap (green line).



313. Post 3789606 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Nolo on December 01, 2013, 05:39:12 AM
Can someone explain to me in simple terms for this trading simpleton what the green and red lines that extend past the chart on the right on bitcoinwisdom represent?

For example, right now the green line is much taller than the red line.  The red line is almost flat extending out to the right.  If you don't know what I'm talking about, I'll get a picture and circle it.  

Green line is the bids on the order book, red line is the asks on the order book. Basically the height of those curves at any particular price represents the cumulative sum of the bids or asks above or below (respectively) that price.

So the "flatness" means nobody is trying to sell coins above a certain price (red line), but lots of people are trying to buy them for cheap (green line).

Excellent.  Thank you very much.  

Correction: Actually, I just took a look at Bitcoinwisdom - they've got it configured differently than Bitcoinity. That "flat line" would actually be a vertical line on Bitcoinity - it implies a bid/ask wall at that price.

Sorry for the confusion, I'm used to the price being the x-axis and the cumulative depth being the y-axis.



314. Post 3789705 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

DISASTER STRIKES!

72 whole hours of gains wiped out!



315. Post 3789746 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: OldGeek on December 01, 2013, 05:57:11 AM
DISASTER STRIKES!

72 whole hours of gains wiped out!

Stop loss @ 10 below your top saves the day sometimes.

Yeah.  Panic is recommended.  Sell quick.

No, once the panic sets in you're too late.



316. Post 3789756 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

MtGox says nomnomnomnom.



317. Post 3789767 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

A+ correction, would scoff again.



318. Post 3789801 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on December 01, 2013, 06:03:15 AM


It's funny how this was already out of date when it was posted.

30d log scale including the drop.




319. Post 3790120 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: OldGeek on December 01, 2013, 06:51:03 AM
I'll be the first to admit that I don't have a good sense of the market right now.  If you care at all about market watching, there are more, and larger, red candles than green.  What that might mean is the question.

Seems that the market wants to go some lower.  Wonder if we'll test 1000.

I never have a good sense of the market. If I feel I have a bad sense of the market I make a trade.



320. Post 3790175 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Gordonium on December 01, 2013, 06:59:24 AM
I sold all my Bitcoins couple of hours ago! This is The Great Crash!

Oh yes indeed, fire and brimstone.

How do you have any left over from two weeks ago?



321. Post 3790280 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Gordonium on December 01, 2013, 07:15:58 AM
BOUGHT EVERYTHING BACK! WE ARE GOING UP!

Quality entertainment.



322. Post 3790405 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

24h sanity check:

Bitstamp -7.79%
Mtgox -5.73%
BTCChina -10.11%



323. Post 3790495 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: DaRude on December 01, 2013, 07:44:49 AM
Now why would someone in China decide to drop so much BTC on sunday is another question

To make money off of the poor trading decisions made by others.

Doesn't make much sense to me. If that person tried to manipulate the market i think he lost out. Plus why would a whale even try to manipulate BTC at this point when it's so much easier and much higher chance of success of doing that with LTC? There's enough volume to discourage manipulation of BTC now think we already observed few "wales" getting their ass smacked trying to do something similar.

Why are we assuming that this was a whale and not simply sell pressure that was unsupported by buying action since the fiat system is closed down for the weekend?



324. Post 3790558 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Holliday on December 01, 2013, 07:54:18 AM
Now why would someone in China decide to drop so much BTC on sunday is another question

To make money off of the poor trading decisions made by others.

Doesn't make much sense to me. If that person tried to manipulate the market i think he lost out. Plus why would a whale even try to manipulate BTC at this point when it's so much easier and much higher chance of success of doing that with LTC? There's enough volume to discourage manipulation of BTC now think we already observed few "wales" getting their ass smacked trying to do something similar.

Why are we assuming that this was a whale and not simply sell pressure that was unsupported by buying action since the fiat system is closed down for the weekend?

Because, we can justify our losses if it is an evil manipulator beating us instead of our failure to time the market!

Disclaimer: I only post, I do not trade.

But how will Mark Karpeles profit off of you if you do not trade???



325. Post 3790589 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

MtGox trading engine shitting the bed.

Again.



326. Post 3790655 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: rpietila on December 01, 2013, 08:03:37 AM
Why are we assuming that this was a whale and not simply sell pressure that was unsupported by buying action since the fiat system is closed down for the weekend?

Can't you just believe that people are coming in droves? One such came in last month. Now everybody is waiting, counting their coins. If no drove comes, everybody sells, newcomers and old ones alike.

I know the magnitude of droves grows on average 1140% per year. It's a lot, but you cannot draw the conclusion that each month the USD flow is bigger than last month. Because it isn't.

It's not so simple. Selling pressure is dynamic also.

People who have been holding for months and are used to $140/BTC as a "fair price" are probably going to think $1100 a coin is ludicrous when we first arrive at that price. This may induce selling.

If strong support materializes and we stay above $1000, long-term impressions change and long-term holders may re-evaluate their concept of a fair price.

I believe sell pressure is strongest during the hike up. Even if cashflow in begins to taper I expect we can stay in this price range.

Of course, cash in naturally drops during the weekend and we see minor selloffs.



327. Post 3790703 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Vycid on December 01, 2013, 07:34:56 AM
24h sanity check:

Bitstamp -7.79%
Mtgox -5.73%
BTCChina -10.11%

30 minutes later, another 24h sanity check:

Bitstamp -5.07%
Mtgox -4.53%
BTCChina -7.11%



328. Post 3790761 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Burt on December 01, 2013, 08:19:07 AM
Why are we assuming that this was a whale and not simply sell pressure that was unsupported by buying action since the fiat system is closed down for the weekend?

Can't you just believe that people are coming in droves? One such came in last month. Now everybody is waiting, counting their coins. If no drove comes, everybody sells, newcomers and old ones alike.

I know the magnitude of droves grows on average 1140% per year. It's a lot, but you cannot draw the conclusion that each month the USD flow is bigger than last month. Because it isn't.

It's not so simple. Selling pressure is dynamic also.

People who have been holding for months and are used to $140/BTC as a "fair price" are probably going to think $1100 a coin is ludicrous when we first arrive at that price. This may induce selling.

If strong support materializes and we stay above $1000, long-term impressions change and long-term holders may re-evaluate their concept of a fair price.

I believe sell pressure is strongest during the hike up. Even if cashflow in begins to taper I expect we can stay in this price range.

Of course, cash in naturally drops during the weekend and we see minor selloffs.

i actually sold my coins because i thought 10$ was the normal price for them. i come from 2011 lel

If you actually thought your coins were worth $10 you would have sold them in April.



329. Post 3790852 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: beetcoin on December 01, 2013, 08:29:08 AM
at the rate we are going, we need new events every 4 or 5 days to prop BTC up. what was the last major news event anyways? the senate hearing weeks ago?

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1roulj/china_telecom_accepts_bitcoin/

There's also been the news articles about the guy that lost 7500 BTC in a landfill, and shortly there will probably be some news articles about the kid on ESPN that made 22 BTC by holding a QR code up to the camera.



330. Post 3790970 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: rpietila on December 01, 2013, 08:35:26 AM
It is possible that we are entering in the same kind of phase now, but if that happens, everybody is just so rich anyway that I rather hedge my bets and do comfortably in both scenarios.

This is entirely reasonable. I've spent many years trying to beat the traditional markets and diversification is not lost on me.

Besides, if you can guarantee financial security without significantly diluting your position, that is always the correct decision.

Quote from: rpietila on December 01, 2013, 08:35:26 AM
Now there should be selling, because the price is objectively high, but many delay the selling until bubble has popped, steepening the decline.

I disagree with this. By no means is the price "objectively high", especially if we're using early 2013 data. The run-up started at ~$15 in January, and the bubble terminated around ~$130 in March. This most recent movement started around ~$140 and we are now around ~$1160.

On a comparative basis that makes $1160 seem fair, if not a little on the low side.

It's true that the timescale is compressed as compared to January-March, but the newscycle is compressed also.

My wild speculation is that we're going to camp out somewhere near this price into early 2014, and then we'll have another wild ride around February.



331. Post 3791084 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Crazy on December 01, 2013, 08:56:11 AM
Did you guys hear about the kid who showed the bitcoin sign on ESPN? He just received 26 000 $ worth of bitcoins! This is perfect material for a viral news story!
Look at this -- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6826653

Quote
It's worth noting that a very large percentage of these donations are coming from a very small number of parties. Notably over $10,000 each from https://blockchain.info/address/1F8UFEeVJGXUzR9TWfBMkyqbipjM...

and

https://blockchain.info/address/1JSDMMDybTZ9nEZgMUtTXQSW4hGR...

Not sure how valid it is, but if it's true it sounds orchestrated.

Honestly, I think it was probably an early adopter (or several) that realized how big a news story it'd be.

They should've split up the donations into believable chunks.



332. Post 3791175 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Crazy on December 01, 2013, 09:02:29 AM

Not sure how valid it is, but if it's true it sounds orchestrated.

It's true that there were some very large donors. But my guess is it went like this: Some whales quickly realized that they could buy huge publicity for bitcoin by sending large amounts to this kid. I do not believe the kid himself was involved in any orchestration.
Nah I don't think he is either, I just mean someone with some money to spare saw an opportunity to manipulate the media and they capitalized. Not exactly ethical, and if the media does any research (I know, laughable), they might reveal the news as such. That'd play into their "pump & dump" rhetoric quite nicely.

I believe the kid promised to donate everything beyond 2 BTC to Sean's Outpost, so it's not hard to spin those big transactions as donations.

Here: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1rs2zf/on_college_gameday_this_morning_new_way_for/cdqjazp

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1rtcql/over_26000_was_donated_to_the_kid_that_held_up/cdqpbpg



333. Post 3791220 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Crazy on December 01, 2013, 09:10:12 AM
I believe the kid promised to donate everything beyond 2 BTC to Sean's Outpost, so it's not hard to spin those big transactions as donations.
Ah I see, didn't know that. Definitely softens the story. Will be interesting to see how it plays out nonetheless. I have a feeling it'll be buried in the shuffle of other news or marginalized to tech-related outlets, though.

We'll see. Most editors are sporting a raging Bitcoin boner right now, if the number of articles about that "$7.5M hard drive" is any indication. This is probably an even better story: college kid shows QR code on national TV, money gets sent from all over the country, he donates it to charity.



334. Post 3792324 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Looks like a double bottom just printed on all 3 exchanges.



335. Post 3799327 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: kurious on December 02, 2013, 10:16:31 PM
Been trying to trade up and down all weekend, and largely (since it has always sung back at some point) it's been OK.

That said, I have hardly slept and been too scared to risk BTC in fiat to really risk more than two or three coins at once.

All weekend I watched the screens for fart too long and I think I made less than half a BTC wile risking thousands of dollars at a time.

I have (almost) given up - as one stupid trade would probabaly wipe out what meager money I have made thus far!

You've hardly slept to make half a Bitcoin on some trades? Hardly seems worth it, does it?

No - I meant on a whole weekend - maybe 20 hours of red-eyed watching candles - altogether!

EDIT: So, no it wasn't worth it- I am not a great trader, even after studying this stuff since earlier this year - anyone smarter than me might have...

I find watching Parabolic SAR to be rewarding... That said, I feel your suffering, as this week-end left me for an emotional wreck, and only about a bitcoin to show for the suffering.


That makes you twice as smart as me - but equally drained!

The only saving grace - was in the wee small hours I remembered (I confess, and yes - I know!) I bought some 'ripples' ages ago, and assumed they were worthless - but checked in and with BTC tanking they had shot up, so I flogged most of them for coin.  

Last time I looked it was about 80,000 per BTC, but it suddenly went to 15,000 on Saturday - so cashed 'em out for a few coins - they have tanked again now, so that was a lucky break - made me feel stupid about watching the candles after that, went out and had a good drink and left my phone behind so I couldn't check Bitcoinwisdom - the forum was down too, it was good idea to get out....   There is life outside - really!




SHIT! I got 10,000 of those for free. If only I knew they were trading at 15,000...



336. Post 3799363 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: niothor on December 02, 2013, 10:32:46 PM
/\

How many alts does this person have?

Wasn't there once a lockdown on new accounts to the noob-section?

There is the ignore jail Smiley better than newbie jail.

Not really. I don't like ignoring people, since I don't know if it's the temporary or permanent type of stupidity.

Newbie jail was very important.



337. Post 3802012 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on December 03, 2013, 03:25:17 AM


I'm still dumbstruck.


it took me literately 3 mins to figure out 3 x 6 in my head after i saw what it was priced at. i dont get shocked or stunned at anything but that was just insane. i still have no idea how in the hell people could think ppc is worth anything close to that. its either crazy hype there is something huge im missing.

Insane. So let me get this straight..

During this crazy alt pumping month, you had shitload of LTC, PPC, some NMC annnd XPM?Huh?

What % did your BTC stash grew after it all settled?

I sold almost all my ppc. Almost no ltc.


Ltc is solid stuff.

Well, let me know when you're going to make your next trade. If you can make $2MM on accident you're doing something right.

If I can end up with $2MM after years of effort I'll consider it a success  Cheesy



338. Post 3802785 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Bitcoines on December 03, 2013, 05:34:28 AM
bulltrap in progress?

No, looks like we're seriously testing resistance at 1100.



339. Post 3802849 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Bitcoines on December 03, 2013, 05:49:35 AM
bulltrap in progress?

No, looks like we're seriously testing resistance at 1100.

Shocked i c, possible breakout you think? or we stay here for a while

Hard to say. We've been running in the 1000-1100 channel for a while, but I don't think that'll be long-lived. At the moment an upwards breakout from that channel appears more likely.

24h high is at 1117.80, so that's the number to watch if we do break resistance at 1100.



340. Post 3803064 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: CryptStorm on December 03, 2013, 06:24:21 AM
bulltrap in progress?

No, looks like we're seriously testing resistance at 1100.

Shocked i c, possible breakout you think? or we stay here for a while

Hard to say. We've been running in the 1000-1100 channel for a while, but I don't think that'll be long-lived. At the moment an upwards breakout from that channel appears more likely.

24h high is at 1117.80, so that's the number to watch if we do break resistance at 1100.

Hmmm, I'm thinking it's not so much 1117.80 as the fact that we are now trading under the slower moving average, and have not yet been able to break back through. So, it may just be a moving target, careful. I'd love for us to break through it, but, who knows, and, it's been one helluva a spike.

My brother asked me over the holiday (Thanksgiving) if Bitcoin goes up faster or down faster, and I replied it comes down faster (thinking about the crashes). Checked it, I was wrong. It comes down slower than it goes up, over the long haul. So this run-up is going to take several months to unwind. There's time to close out your positions, and then, take a trip somewhere nice. I'll be going to Bali for the winter  Grin

I'm honestly not convinced that the bull market is through. This time around has behaved differently than the last two bubbles and it may yet surprise us further.

I have not divested at all.



341. Post 3803191 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: TERA on December 03, 2013, 06:41:55 AM
If the rally continues on, then the level where it bounced off the ema (840) is the new FLOOR when it actually crashes.

This is important. I would agree.



342. Post 3803813 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: rpietila on December 03, 2013, 07:50:30 AM
We could not take it down any more (-30% was not enough). I think that the odds for an immediate crash have greatly diminished.

Now it is sideways from here, or up (with the possibility of crash from higher levels).

Turned bull. Ugh.

Welcome back.

And, like clockwork, the 1100 resistance is now 1100 support...



343. Post 3803897 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on December 03, 2013, 08:27:48 AM
the fact that max has mentioned quark coin has pretty much convinced me that he's in the game for the sole purpose pumping and dumping. i'll watch his videos, but fuck him.. i don't think he's some sort of angel.

true, I noticed he follows a pumper on twitter.. https://twitter.com/fontase


Keiser is a pumper allright, no surprise there.

I'm gonna go on record that Keiser is a shitstain.

I don't care how much you dislike Joe Weisenthal, you don't insinuate he should blow his brains out for having a bad opinion.

Frankly I think he has found profit in regurgitating a combination of intellectual diarrhea and what we want to hear, and is part of the community to exploit that fact. He is not our friend.



344. Post 3804131 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: bitcodo on December 03, 2013, 08:35:32 AM
Fluid mechanics reminds me of my chemical engineering days.

Levenspiel:
Quote
Snake-Eyes Magoo is a man of habit. For instance, his Friday evenings are
all alike-into the joint with his week's salary of $180, steady gambling at
"2-up" for two hours, then home to his family leaving $45 behind. Snake
Eyes's betting pattern is predictable. He always bets in amounts proportional
to his cash at hand, and his losses are also predictable-at a rate
proportional to his cash at hand. This week Snake-Eyes received a raise
in salary, so he played for three hours, but as usual went home with $135.
How much was his raise?

Looks fun... I'm assuming the rate of loss is all that matters here, not the bets size. So we get a differential equation for the rate of loss related to the amount of cash...

dC/dt = -qC where q is some constant.

Integrating we get delta t = -(ln(Cend)-ln(Cstart))/q

Solving q for 2hrs, 2 = (ln(180)-ln(135))/q

q = 0.14384103622

Now 3h,

3 = (ln(Craise)-ln (135))/.14384

Craise = 207.845

207.845 - 180 = $27.845

Was I even close?  Grin



345. Post 3804172 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: philip2000uk on December 03, 2013, 09:01:31 AM
the fact that max has mentioned quark coin has pretty much convinced me that he's in the game for the sole purpose pumping and dumping. i'll watch his videos, but fuck him.. i don't think he's some sort of angel.

true, I noticed he follows a pumper on twitter.. https://twitter.com/fontase


Keiser is a pumper allright, no surprise there.
Are you talking about max keiser? what is this twitter? are they manipulating the market?
yes, Max Keiser, I don't follow his twitter.  I doubt Keiser is big enough to sufficiently manipulate "the" market in a huge way, but I nevertheless think he buys before he start going in full-on hype mode, and then sells.  And he probably has enough followers that it might make a difference.
Thanks for explaining, i thought he'd have enough money to not even be bothered about bitcoin but wanted to preach it for the good.  So now i have to look at him as a profiteer and not for the good of bitcoin?  
That is my view yes.  I am pretty darn sure he buys the stuff with his own money.  To what degree he tells himself that he is in it for the right reasons, or whether he truly sees himself as a pumper, that I am not so sure of.  Some people can be very good in deluding themselves with all kinds of rationalisations while taking the route that benefits them the most money-wise.
So should we still be supporting bitcoin then?  He's against the banks isn't he? That's the main reason i liked him but now i'm confused.  I guess bitcoin can't be any worse than the banks

Bitcoin itself is not a pump-and-dump, only the self-serving copycats like quarkcoin are. If they were intended to be honest competition they'd be mined fairly.

As rpietila shows us, even the biggest players have trouble with Bitcoin manipulation these days.

That burgeoning stability is an extremely good sign for its future as a currency - a future quarkcoin lacks.



346. Post 3804302 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: macsga on December 03, 2013, 09:12:42 AM
Looks fun... I'm assuming the rate of loss is all that matters here, not the bets size. So we get a differential equation for the rate of loss related to the amount of cash...

dC/dt = -qC where q is some constant.

Integrating we get delta t = -(ln(Cend)-ln(Cstart))/q

Solving q for 2hrs, 2 = (ln(180)-ln(135))/q

q = 0.14384103622

Now 3h,

3 = (ln(Craise)-ln (135))/.14384

Craise = 207.845

207.845 - 180 = $27.845

Was I even close?  Grin

I'd try with 3 Dt's
- one for 15m period
- one for 30m period
- one for 60m period

Then I'd solve the same equation and see what happens... Wink
What do you think it means?
Is it linear?

I feel like I'm back in undergrad  Tongue

Unfortunately I'm on my phone so somebody else is gonna have to finish this problem.

In other news: Gox says WHEEEEEEE!

Edit: I think I can speculate on the answer. With dt limiting to zero you get a maximum for the raise, decreasing to a minimum possible raise for a 60min dt period.

In other words it's not possible to establish a single value for Mr. Magoo's raise, just a function dependent on the number of bets he placed.

Or, perhaps the constant bets size permits you to establish the period...

Damn, now I'm going to have to do this properly when I get some pen and paper. Nerdsniped.



347. Post 3809603 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: micalith on December 03, 2013, 05:55:00 PM


Recently, Bitcoin market cap (i.e. total value of all Bitcoins issued) reached the $2 billion mark, surpassing small countries like Liberia and Guinea.
This should have been obvious.



isn't it $20 billion?
It is $12 billion.

so many statements. So few explanations!

I get $21 billion from 21million BTCs worth ~1000 each, thus 21 billion  . . .   yawn

edit: OK, I see

There are about 12M BTC currently in circulation.



348. Post 3811603 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: bitcodo on December 03, 2013, 08:28:08 PM
Look at Proudhorn. He got song and he started posting here again. A legend. He will be in economics books.

He is already.

I knew it. It is conspiracy. We are not in 2013. It is French Revolution of 1848. Or just revolution?

The growth in power of multinational corporations is already signaling change. If Bitcoin becomes the medium of international exchange, nations will become increasingly irrelevant in the coming decades. Eventually it will be all about the sphere of influence of the largest multinationals, with many smaller client corporations operating in that space.

If I am paying income income tax to Google instead of Uncle Sam in 40-50 years, I will not be surprised.



349. Post 3811759 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: rocks on December 03, 2013, 09:00:36 PM
The growth in power of multinational corporations is already signaling change. If Bitcoin becomes the medium of international exchange, nations will become increasingly irrelevant in the coming decades. Eventually it will be all about the sphere of influence of the largest multinationals, with many smaller client corporations operating in that space.

If I am paying income income tax to Google instead of Uncle Sam in 40-50 years, I will not be surprised.

This already happened at a more national scale in the late 1800's, ever heard of standard oil? The people finally woke up and voted to tame the largest corporations back down in influence. As long as governments provide the people at least a pretense of a democracy then it is possible to bring the corprations in check.

Whether people will wake up in reality is debatable, the red team blue team pretense has fooled many for a long time....

This is different. Before, companies operated within the bounds of nations and were at the whims of those countries.

Now, multinationals can just threaten to pack up and leave if they are legislated against. For really big companies, that could devastate a country's economy.

These companies might end up either propping up friendly puppet states, or simply abolishing them and raising their own police forces and militaries,  laying their own roads, etc.

This future isn't a foregone conclusion but the trends do point clearly clearly in that direction.

I sorta want to write a novel about it...



350. Post 3811765 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: gizmoh on December 03, 2013, 09:04:05 PM
Now some Very Bad News for the Bulls:

It is still to be confirmed, but apparently 92,000 btc has been 'stolen' from sheep marketplace ( SilkRoad replacement).
Besides the larger bad press to come, many might be tempted to sell before the thief does or in anticipation of negative repercussion that black market still thrive in bitcoinland and the biggest bitcoin heist hits major press ( 15th largest loot in the world at current btc rate)

Will this be the bad news that ends this current growth/bubble trend?

News here:
http://www.newstatesman.com/future-proof/2013/12/theres-%C2%A360m-bitcoin-heist-going-down-right-now-and-you-can-watch-real-time

Discussion about the hesit:

http://www.reddit.com/r/SheepMarketplace/

The Address in question:

https://blockchain.info/address/1CbR8da9YPZqXJJKm9ze1GYf67eKAUfXwP

Old news, it's priced in.



351. Post 3811899 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: thezerg on December 03, 2013, 09:11:21 PM
Recently, Bitcoin market cap (i.e. total value of all Bitcoins issued) reached the $2 billion mark, surpassing small countries like Liberia and Guinea.
This should have been obvious.
isn't it $20 billion?

The authority for this is
http://www.coinometrics.com/bitcoin/bmix

Go to the bottom of the page and select Full Data Table
Bitcoin is currently 71 in the world (out of 191 countries) between azerbijan and lithuania

burma at 12 million?


okay, who wants to go in with me and buy burma?

Hmm, you know what, that's actually an interesting proposition. It's probably hard to buy a country using national fiat currencies, no matter how rich you are, but with bitcoins... you just might be able to do it (i.e., pay out the government + military to leave the country / hand over control). Maybe we will see a brave new world of corporations taking over nations now that they have a financial vehicle with which to do it.

I know these comparisons are tongue-in-cheek, but just for those who are confused as far as I can figure you couldn't buy a country for its GDP.  I mean, even if you COULD buy a country... you couldn't buy it for its GDP.   It wouldn't cost that little.  That would be like buying a company for its earnings.  But as we all know stocks trade for a PE multiple.  Makes sense because you are buying ALL future earnings output, not just one year.  So I think a PE of 10 would be ok esp. for these underperforming countries...

So Burma could go for 120million... that's way too... well... hmm...





So, what... ~100,000 BTC?  Cheesy

How 'bout we rename it Bitopia?



352. Post 3811951 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: maz on December 03, 2013, 09:13:55 PM
Now some Very Bad News for the Bulls:

It is still to be confirmed, but apparently 92,000 btc has been 'stolen' from sheep marketplace ( SilkRoad replacement).
Besides the larger bad press to come, many might be tempted to sell before the thief does or in anticipation of negative repercussion that black market still thrive in bitcoinland and the biggest bitcoin heist hits major press ( 15th largest loot in the world at current btc rate)

Will this be the bad news that ends this current growth/bubble trend?

News here:
http://www.newstatesman.com/future-proof/2013/12/theres-%C2%A360m-bitcoin-heist-going-down-right-now-and-you-can-watch-real-time

Discussion about the hesit:

http://www.reddit.com/r/SheepMarketplace/

The Address in question:

https://blockchain.info/address/1CbR8da9YPZqXJJKm9ze1GYf67eKAUfXwP

Old news, it's priced in.

What a load of nonsense, priced into what? The price in your head? The effects are when it's cashed out and the ramifications to the market as 96,000 coins sold either in bulk, or bit by bit, its going to be noticed.

Quote from: ElectricMucus on December 03, 2013, 09:13:43 PM
it's priced in.
4.5% of all bitcoins ever to exist are acquired by a single scammer and prices are 93% of the ATH.
That's not priced in.

Do you even informational efficiency, bro?



353. Post 3812654 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on December 03, 2013, 10:09:04 PM
it's priced in.
4.5% of all bitcoins ever to exist are acquired by a single scammer and prices are 93% of the ATH.
That's not priced in.

What's price in is that he might be able to dump. All bets are off if/when it is determined that he can and will.

What's not priced in is that a scam of this magnitude sends a sign that Bitcoin hasn't evolved out of the scummy clusterfuck it was two years ago at all.

What's not priced into Bitcoin the dollar is that a scam bank bailout of this magnitude sends a sign that Bitcoin the dollar hasn't evolved out of the scammy clusterfuck it was two years ago a decade ago at all.

Surely it is about to crash.

Your turn to make another comment about how you're right and the market lacks informational efficiency.

It reminds me of all the people who declared Bitcoin dead when Silk Road got taken down. "The market hasn't caught up yet!". Lolno, the market caught up before you even heard the news.



354. Post 3812742 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: maz on December 03, 2013, 10:20:16 PM
it's priced in.
4.5% of all bitcoins ever to exist are acquired by a single scammer and prices are 93% of the ATH.
That's not priced in.

What's price in is that he might be able to dump. All bets are off if/when it is determined that he can and will.

If he's going to sell then he will probably sell them in small chunks at market value without crashing the market, why would he want to get any less for them? And he'll probably try to sell them outside of the exchanges.

lol.

why should he care? I would dump them just for fun. People do crazy things just for fun.  


Suppose, he's dead anyway by the looks of it.

What makes you say that?



355. Post 3812756 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Voodah on December 03, 2013, 10:23:05 PM
Do you guys really think Putin would allow the Feds to come in and close BTC-e?


Are you for real?

Unless Putin is buddies with the BTC-e guys he will fail to give a solitary fuck what happens to them, considering they aren't Russian.

Even if he would care he'd probably be too busy killing bears with his hands to notice.



356. Post 3812828 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: maz on December 03, 2013, 10:27:53 PM
Do you guys really think Putin would allow the Feds to come in and close BTC-e?


Yes, they could kill two birds with the one stone and pick up Snowden while their there.

Of course not, America is shit scared of Russia, they wouldn't dare.

It's in Bulgaria.

But you know, besides that minor detail, totally.



357. Post 3812862 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Voodah on December 03, 2013, 10:29:51 PM
Do you guys really think Putin would allow the Feds to come in and close BTC-e?


Are you for real?

I am, yeah.

The Russian take pride in those kinds of things. They will never allow a full US operation and shakedown in their turf.

If it were to happen (through cooperation), the Russians themselves would be doing all the arresting and sequestering. But meh.. who knows..  BTC-e might be helping them right now with some occasional laundering..

I don't see it happening. At least not until another big big round of alt pumping & dumping.  

BULGARIA IS PART OF THE EUROPEAN UNION.

Sorry, I feel like there's some communication difficulty here. I will reduce sarcasm levels accordingly.



358. Post 3813493 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Voodah on December 03, 2013, 11:13:11 PM
Do you guys really think Putin would allow the Feds to come in and close BTC-e?


Are you for real?

I am, yeah.

The Russian take pride in those kinds of things. They will never allow a full US operation and shakedown in their turf.

If it were to happen (through cooperation), the Russians themselves would be doing all the arresting and sequestering. But meh.. who knows..  BTC-e might be helping them right now with some occasional laundering..

I don't see it happening. At least not until another big big round of alt pumping & dumping.  

BULGARIA IS PART OF THE EUROPEAN UNION.

Sorry, I feel like there's some communication difficulty here. I will reduce sarcasm levels accordingly.

So what Huh

They work with russian banks, russian payment systems and russian credit card processors.

You think anyone really cares where the company is founded?

Where's the money is what matters.

CoinDesk has learned that BTC-e does not use a bank account with a company name, instead choosing to use a third party to provide banking services.

Depositors send money to UK company Mayzus Financial Services Ltd’s Deutsche Bank account in the Czech republic who use OKPAY, an e-currency provider to transfer users’ funds directly to the exchange.

Other than rumors , nothing Russian in it.

You're chasing the rabbit. It's the same story:

OKPay is another Russian company registered  abroad (British Virgin Islands) for fiscal purposes.

They operate through a network of banks in Cyprus, Czech Republic and Russia, so that should tell you something...

CoinDesk may have gotten the pretty side of the story. Russia and Cyprus sound a lot worse than just saying you operate in Czech Rep.


OK, here's what's going to happen, assuming anything does happen (it took 7 years to take down Liberty Reserve).

1) Bulgaria, under pressure from the EU or acting alone, will issue a cease and desist / refuse to renew the business license.

2) BTC-e will disband formally and continue to operate.

3) A multi-international task force will form to lead the investigation. This will include Russia, just like it did for Liberty Reserve.

Understand that Russia is not a rogue state. Just because they sheltered Snowden in order to give the US a political black eye does NOT mean they interfere with financial investigations. They're not North Korea.

4) Legal jurisdiction for the prosecution of the individuals will almost certainly go to Bulgaria, who will extradite them at their discretion. As Bulgaria is part of the EU, that means they're fucked.

Some other things to keep in mind: Russian banks and payment services comply with US or international requests to freeze money. They like having the ability to transfer money internationally.



359. Post 3813552 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: niothor on December 03, 2013, 11:33:22 PM
Now some Very Bad News for the Bulls:

Why would this be bad news in any situation? Was the SR shutdown bad news for bulls? We all know the answer.

By the way, we are about to go up (for some other reasons), just watch Wink


In the SR  episode the bitcoins were safe , the FBI won't sell them for a few years until the trial ends.
In the sheep case , we have one fugitive trying to run with money , and the scenario he might try to dump them .

He will have to lie low - any fiat that turns up in large quantities will be noticed...

It's not like he needs to sell all of them at once - 1% will fund hiding away for a year - assuming he hasn't already got some money to keep him for a while.

He's only at risk when he shows up with fiat or large coin movements....

We have a guy , previously running a drug market , running away with 90 Millions , trying to make them vanishing but seeing his efforts nuked , with people threatening him (and not normal people) with a media fuss around. Do you think he can keep calm and act by the book ?

If he does something dumb and gets killed - THAT'S a film script, right there...



360. Post 3814989 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Dabs on December 04, 2013, 02:26:36 AM
I don't know. I'm not a dev. 10 cents per transaction is still cheap, but it was a lot cheaper before. Since the price went up 10 times, maybe the transaction fee should lower about 10 times.

But that requires all the miners to upgrade, all the pools to upgrade. ... otherwise anyone who makes a transaction with less than 0.0001 won't get relayed, and won't get confirmed in a timely manner.

If miners are ignoring tx with .00001 fees instead of 0.0001, for example, that is an issue with block size, NOT the standard fee. Miners are incentivized to cram all the fee-paying tx they can into a block, up to the point when it's totally full. THEN - and only then - does it make sense to discriminate by fee amount.

If miners are ignoring tx with non-standard fees for blocks that aren't full, that's ridiculous. They're throwing money away.

Also, totally on board with Comboy's mBTC switch. Love it. Hope the community follows his lead.



361. Post 3815340 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Vigil on December 04, 2013, 03:17:48 AM
Whatever the unit is for daily transactions it should just be called "Coin". That seems to be a fairly popular way of referring to bitcoins.

I'm actually a fan of "bits", referring to a millionth of a bitcoin.

So at a $1000/BTC exchange rate, a $3.50 cup of coffee is "3500 bits" instead of 3.5 mBTC.

Seems more suited to everyday life than "millibitcoins" anyway. Especially considering that by the time we're paying for coffee with it, it's gonna be closer to 35 bits for the coffee.



362. Post 3815570 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Dabs on December 04, 2013, 03:59:46 AM
If miners are ignoring tx with .00001 fees instead of 0.0001, for example, that is an issue with block size, NOT the standard fee. Miners are incentivized to cram all the fee-paying tx they can into a block, up to the point when it's totally full. THEN - and only then - does it make sense to discriminate by fee amount.

If miners are ignoring tx with non-standard fees for blocks that aren't full, that's ridiculous. They're throwing money away.

I don't know, but from what I understand, if it's lower than the current minimum transaction fee (which happens to also be the minimum relay fee) then it's not counted, or it is considered as essentially zero.

Now, if you have aged unspent outputs such that your transaction does not require a fee, but you make so that you have at least the minimum, that will be considered or counted. (if your transaction is 2kb and you put 0.00005 as the fee, it will use a total 0.0001 as the total transaction fee.)

This is a bug.

Why isn't the market determining its own transaction rates? It's absurd that the devs are deciding what a "fair" transaction fee is. Look where it's gotten us...

Is the issue that the bitcoin-qt clients simply do not propagate anything below the "minimum" fee, so the miners don't even get to decide whether to include them in blocks? If there are any threads about this I'd be curious to read them.



363. Post 3815728 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on December 04, 2013, 04:10:26 AM
Wow, big buy on Gox (17 btc).

Oh, who am I kidding.  It's dead out there..

TIL I'm a whale.  Smiley



364. Post 3815828 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Richy_T on December 04, 2013, 04:33:28 AM
Is the issue that the bitcoin-qt clients simply do not propagate anything below the "minimum" fee, so the miners don't even get to decide whether to include them in blocks? If there are any threads about this I'd be curious to read them.

I've made several zero fee transactions. Am I missing something?

Yeah, that's because your tx met 3 conditions:

1) smaller than 10,000 bytes
2) All outputs were 0.01 BTC or larger
3) Its priority was large enough (priority = sum(input_value_in_base_units * input_age)/size_in_bytes)

This is basically because you have old coins.



365. Post 3815961 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: windjc on December 04, 2013, 04:55:09 AM
It's funny. I've been one of the biggest bulls on here the last few weeks.  Now, I look at the poll in this thread and see over 90% bulls.

Am I really one of the few that is feeling a little bearish right now?  

I agree, if we flatline for a few weeks, I will expect an explosion right before heading into the new year.

But I must admit, I don't have full confidence this market doesn't want to try another sell off in the next few days or this coming weekend.

I just can't imagine that we are going to have a better bitcoin news month than the last month for at least a while. I mean Bitcoin was everywhere. But soon Christmas is going to be everywhere. And people are not as likely to hassel about investments going into the holidays.

Of course, maybe the sellers are happy just holding now. Letting the buyers catch their breath before we head north again. But, to me, it kinda feels like this rally might be over.

The people that wanted out are out, I think. There's no reason they would have kept holding... the past few days would have been very scary to a weak hand.

The rally could be over - although that's too early to call - but the bear case isn't very strong, IMO.



366. Post 3815979 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: spooderman on December 04, 2013, 04:57:35 AM
Is the issue that the bitcoin-qt clients simply do not propagate anything below the "minimum" fee, so the miners don't even get to decide whether to include them in blocks? If there are any threads about this I'd be curious to read them.

I've made several zero fee transactions. Am I missing something?

Yeah, that's because your tx met 3 conditions:

1) smaller than 10,000 bytes
2) All outputs were 0.01 BTC or larger
3) Its priority was large enough (priority = sum(input_value_in_base_units * input_age)/size_in_bytes)

This is basically because you have old coins.

If my transaction were to not meet all these conditions, and I made the transfer without a fee, would it ever get processed?

If you issue a non-standard transaction then most network nodes won't relay it. If it manages to work its way through nodes that rebroadcast non-standard tx to a miner that includes non-standard transactions in their blocks, then it might get processed.

If you add Eligius to your node list manually that will pretty much guarantee it gets processed whenever Eligius mines a block.

I'm not really an expert, though, so maybe there's something more to this.



367. Post 3816086 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Dabs on December 04, 2013, 05:08:12 AM
Quote
If your tx doesn't get to a miner it will never be included in a block.

I saw it here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=344405.100

Quote
What specifically happens if you send a transaction without fees blah blah blah?
Quote
It is a very high probability it will simply be dropped (deleted) by all of your peers and nobody on the network will even know about it.


Also:
http://eligius.st/~gateway/faq/following-applies-transactions-being-processed-our-blocks

Quote
Will include transactions in its blocks if the sender pays a fee of at least 0.1 TBC (0.00004096 BTC) per 512 bytes.

Is Luke-jr still pushing TBC? Wow.

He must be stinking rich though, he can do whatever he likes these days.



368. Post 3816351 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on December 04, 2013, 05:38:48 AM
Quote
If your tx doesn't get to a miner it will never be included in a block.

I saw it here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=344405.100

Quote
What specifically happens if you send a transaction without fees blah blah blah?
Quote
It is a very high probability it will simply be dropped (deleted) by all of your peers and nobody on the network will even know about it.


Also:
http://eligius.st/~gateway/faq/following-applies-transactions-being-processed-our-blocks

Quote
Will include transactions in its blocks if the sender pays a fee of at least 0.1 TBC (0.00004096 BTC) per 512 bytes.

Is Luke-jr still pushing TBC? Wow.

He must be stinking rich though, he can do whatever he likes these days.


yeah thats crazy. he told me about that one day on irc...


wonder if he still has the 1337 ltc i gave him.

Of all people to get a huge Litecoin handout, it's Luke-jr...



369. Post 3816380 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on December 04, 2013, 05:53:57 AM

wonder if he still has the 1337 ltc i gave him.

Of all people to get a huge Litecoin handout, it's Luke-jr...


i thought it was funny:)      he was a huge ltc hater and now has like $40,000 worth of LTC, hahahhahahaha

It is kind of a conundrum. He can't win: if he destroys the private key, he's shrunk the money supply and increased the value of the other LTC in circulation. If he sells them he's hypocritical. If he sits on them he's a major LTC holder  Cheesy

Why'd he even have an address in the first place?



370. Post 3816796 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Potential upward breakout from the channel we've been in for 12+ hours (gox)? Anyone else watching?



371. Post 3816962 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

I cannot believe how stable Bitcoin has been acting in the past couple of days. It feels almost like a fiat exchange.

It's boring, but it's an amazingly good sign for the future of Bitcoin.



372. Post 3817045 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: OldGeek on December 04, 2013, 07:17:18 AM
All right.  I'll accept that as pumping me up.  Somewhat.

I've just about blinded myself looking at the charts.  I'm starting to see wedges and waves when I close my eyes.  So, I'll just wait for consensus.

This is how bad it's gotten for me. I don't even know what I'm drawing.




373. Post 3817617 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: jojo69 on December 04, 2013, 08:23:24 AM
Quote
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Quote
Oh, the 60GH single is blowin' on my feet

the $45 a day is also pretty neat

posting on the forum makes me feel very 1337

I never heard that tulips gave away free heat

blow me mods, seriously

Wasn't that in this thread?

If that deserved to get deleted my entire post history is about to disappear.



374. Post 3817666 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: KieranJones1 on December 04, 2013, 08:42:04 AM
It seems Bitstamp is the "bottom" and Gox is the "top". The last settlement (as in, the last time the price came close to settling, given how volatile this market is), it was when Bitstamp and Gox prices came to the closest I've seen them since I started following the market a few months ago.

Experienced, wise speculators, does this make sense or am I talking out my ass?

I think it's an effect, not a cause. Arbitrage gaps close when volatility decreases.

Stamp appears to be on the move.

Quote from: solex on December 04, 2013, 08:42:40 AM
bitcoinity just switched to mBTC by default - awesome!

so dumb, switched it right back.

I'm not convinced that mBTC is a good idea. Seems like some people just want to fool the market and noobs into thinking that bitcoins are cheaper than they are. One thing about Bitcoin is that it is the first 100% honest moeny. If it costs $1100 each, then so be it!


Do you feel that using grams as a unit of exchange for gold is a bad idea?

Some people don't understand that a bitcoin is divisible (I think everyone understands it's possible to buy less than a TOz). This solves that problem. I don't think it's fooling or defrauding anyone.

It's not entirely their fault for thinking that, either. BitCOIN does make it sound like an indivisible whole.

I am strongly in favor of the change. There's always the option to switch back - if you like it like that, the change isn't aimed at you anyway.



375. Post 3817722 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

This does not look like noise anymore. We are moving up.



376. Post 3824563 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: zoinky on December 04, 2013, 07:10:10 PM
Wow... People here are so gullible.

Kind of scary.

Yes.

But it's fine as long as the average person is so gullible.

All of you bulls who have been flip-flopping the past few days: shame!

CH00 CH00 ATH incoming!



377. Post 3824588 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on December 04, 2013, 07:14:49 PM
Wow... People here are so gullible.

Kind of scary.

Are you scared of clowns too?

Clowns are fucking terrifying, man. Shit's not natural.



378. Post 3827944 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: User705 on December 04, 2013, 10:17:14 PM
Capital Gains.

god damn it, i should of never sold anything  Angry

i need to learn how to hide my Capital Gains, should i dump it in BTC?  Cheesy

Dude, we have a $750k capital gains personal exemption here in Canada....use it.  

I'm going to move to New Zealand (from Australia) for a year when I sell mine. Fuck giving 45% of my BTC to the government.

If anyone wants to throw out a good tax strategy for an American, I'm all ears.  I'm dreading having to pay on my BTC profits.  


There isn't one.  You either cheat or pay.  Oh and moving won't help you.  Americans are taxed on their worldwide income and you can't give up citizenship for tax reasons.  You have to pay an exit tax on your entire holdings.

Wrong!

Live in Puerto Rico for 183 days out of the year and you do not pay captial gains tax, OR federal income tax.

We see another month like November and I'll be moving there.  Cool

Maybe we can get a Bitcoin economy going in Puerto Rico?



379. Post 3827996 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: CEG5952 on December 04, 2013, 11:38:27 PM
Capital Gains.

god damn it, i should of never sold anything  Angry

i need to learn how to hide my Capital Gains, should i dump it in BTC?  Cheesy

Dude, we have a $750k capital gains personal exemption here in Canada....use it.  

I'm going to move to New Zealand (from Australia) for a year when I sell mine. Fuck giving 45% of my BTC to the government.

If anyone wants to throw out a good tax strategy for an American, I'm all ears.  I'm dreading having to pay on my BTC profits.  


There isn't one.  You either cheat or pay.  Oh and moving won't help you.  Americans are taxed on their worldwide income and you can't give up citizenship for tax reasons.  You have to pay an exit tax on your entire holdings.

Wrong!

Live in Puerto Rico for 183 days out of the year and you do not pay captial gains tax, OR federal income tax.

We see another month like November and I'll be moving there.  Cool
can you point me to a source for this? i have family in PR and this interests me greatly. Smiley

https://www.kpmg.com/us/en/issuesandinsights/articlespublications/taxnewsflash/pages/puerto-rico-tax-benefits-incentives-available-for-us-citizens.aspx



380. Post 3828020 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: User705 on December 04, 2013, 11:40:12 PM
Ah yes I forgot about that one.  Although their debt is so huge and they might become a state then who knows.
Capital Gains.

god damn it, i should of never sold anything  Angry

i need to learn how to hide my Capital Gains, should i dump it in BTC?  Cheesy

Dude, we have a $750k capital gains personal exemption here in Canada....use it.  

I'm going to move to New Zealand (from Australia) for a year when I sell mine. Fuck giving 45% of my BTC to the government.

If anyone wants to throw out a good tax strategy for an American, I'm all ears.  I'm dreading having to pay on my BTC profits.  


There isn't one.  You either cheat or pay.  Oh and moving won't help you.  Americans are taxed on their worldwide income and you can't give up citizenship for tax reasons.  You have to pay an exit tax on your entire holdings.

Wrong!

Live in Puerto Rico for 183 days out of the year and you do not pay captial gains tax, OR federal income tax.

We see another month like November and I'll be moving there.  Cool
Wasn't that a one time

No. See KPMG guidance above.



381. Post 3828134 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on December 04, 2013, 11:48:57 PM
Isn't tax only 15% capital gains after 1 year?

Quote
Hugh Hendry: Bitcoin Could Hit 1 Million

omgomgomgomgomg circle jerk

CJ Commencing.

Approaching ATH on Gox!

CHOO2 = CHOO
                    H
                    O
                    O




382. Post 3828459 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: Syke on December 05, 2013, 12:19:08 AM
Isn't tax only 15% capital gains after 1 year?

In the US, if you are in the two lowest tax brackets, long-term capital gains are taxed at 0%. That's how you legally avoid paying taxes on your bitcoin cash-outs.

So...

I gotta quit my job to cash out?



383. Post 3828691 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: fred1111 on December 05, 2013, 12:48:16 AM
The frontpage here is bullish I'd say.
http://www.businessinsider.com/

Holy crap.

Front page, big picture.

I know I saw the US Senate talking about Bitcoin, but it just hasn't sunk in yet.

Also, "I guess it's a bubble". Nice.



384. Post 3828767 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

I'd say we hit the ATH in anywhere from 2-5 hours.



385. Post 3828950 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on December 05, 2013, 01:15:26 AM
The twitter reactions almost make me smell the blood on the street after the selloff though. I don't think it will be for another two weeks but still.

Because some 120 yr old said something about technology?  



"I think these cell phone things are a bubble."

Edit: "I guess."



386. Post 3829294 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: Erdogan on December 05, 2013, 01:47:10 AM
Re Greenspan. Does anybody here still believe that they know how to regulate the money supply to optimize the output of the economy?

This is the wrong place to ask that question if you want a serious discussion.

I'd actually suggest "yes, it is possible to beneficially regulate the money supply" but that needs to be qualified with "it's also possible to predict the markets and make billions of dollars".

I don't think we've had a billionaire Fed chairman.

Quote from: windjc on December 05, 2013, 01:54:06 AM
Does this rally not look tired to anyone here?

We are just slowing down in this altitude. There is no real upward momentum.

Wednesday is almost over and we have retraced most of the highs. But what happens now? We just shoot up into the stratosphere?

I still have my doubts. Becoming a more modest bull at the moment.

You're about to become a victim of the sentiment cycle. Strong hands become weak hands and sell to the next round of strong hands. So it goes.

You can't see all the people getting their first bitcoins. If you could you'd be more bullish.



387. Post 3829357 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on December 05, 2013, 01:58:54 AM
It's quite common to see some pullback when you hit a potential double top.

Yeah, agreed. The ATH is a serious resistance level and there's going to be a dip before we take a run at it.

Quote from: Vycid on December 05, 2013, 12:59:02 AM
I'd say we hit the ATH in anywhere from 2-5 hours.

My tea leaves say we're still on schedule to break through in 1-4 hours.  Smiley



388. Post 3829401 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=bitcoin%2C%20dollar&cmpt=q

Yup. Only twice as many searches for "dollar" as "Bitcoin".



389. Post 3829571 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on December 05, 2013, 02:19:35 AM
This is The Great Crash!

I WAS RIGHT!!!

Yep, crashed right back up to 1230+  LOL

Someone (or a few people) dumped over 1000 coins and we are almost back to where we started on GOX.  That seems impressive to me.  I don't know.  I think in the past a dump like that would have caused more panic.

Absolutely. I think the market is starting to grow up.

I think it has serious implications for Bitcoin as a currency. The size of the market seems to be reducing volatility.

If it's large enough to demonstrate a resistance to manipulation and crashes, that makes big holders less likely to dump. That further stabilizes the currency.

At some point that positive feedback makes things stable enough that the general public feels good about sticking a couple toes in the water to try this thing out as a medium of exchange... and from there who knows where we go.

The only problem is that the ecosystem has to finish the massive deflation before anyone will want to spend in any quantity. (This "problem" is of course making us all very wealthy.)



390. Post 3829655 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: windjc on December 05, 2013, 02:26:36 AM
This is The Great Crash!

I WAS RIGHT!!!

Yep, crashed right back up to 1230+  LOL

Someone (or a few people) dumped over 1000 coins and we are almost back to where we started on GOX.  That seems impressive to me.  I don't know.  I think in the past a dump like that would have caused more panic.

Absolutely. I think the market is starting to grow up.

I think it has serious implications for Bitcoin as a currency. The size of the market seems to be reducing volatility.

If it's large enough to demonstrate a resistance to manipulation and crashes, that makes big holders less likely to dump. That further stabilizes the currency.

At some point that positive feedback makes things stable enough that the general public feels good about sticking a couple toes in the water to try this thing out as a medium of exchange... and from there who knows where we go.

Ummm, I'm not sure but it seems like 100s if not 1000s of businesses are signing up daily to accept bitcoin. I think more than a few are braving more than a few toes.

Honestly it's mostly hype, Bitcoin isn't a serious transaction medium yet. I remember seeing an article proclaiming 6000 or 7000 sales through Bitpay on Bitcoin Black Friday as proof that we're a real ecosystem.

No, a couple sales per minute on a special day does NOT make a payment system worth $12-13B. That's like a fucking Girl Scout cookie stand.

We've passed Western Union at ~$9B market cap, and they process 28 transactions per second, every day.

Right now Bitcoin is a store of value. The value comes from Bitcoin's future potential as a currency and payment system. Lots of businesses will sign up because it's free and it saves them money; the hard part is convincing people to buy and spend bitcoins if:
A) it's going up constantly and they'll have more money if they wait, and
B) if the currency is extremely volatile.

We know A) will eventually resolve itself if the system grows to maturity. There is a limit to all growth.

The doubt was about B), and my doubts are disappearing.



391. Post 3829787 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: I_bitcoin on December 05, 2013, 02:39:40 AM


No, a couple sales per minute on a special day does NOT make a payment system worth $12-13B. That's like a fucking Girl Scout cookie stand.


Only thing you might want to add is that this is not just a payment network.   We are in the midst of a land grab for real estate in a protocol that creates more opportunities than we can possibly fathom.   

I swear to all that is holy I am not a fan boy.   Smiley

That's true. Smart contracts, autonomous agents... the potential is vast. And investors can't own shares of it, so they own bitcoins.



392. Post 3829951 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: CEG5952 on December 05, 2013, 02:57:57 AM
http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=bitcoin%2C%20dollar&cmpt=q

Yup. Only twice as many searches for "dollar" as "Bitcoin".
doesnt really say anything. the dollar is ubiquitously recognized, why would people be googling it?

It's a benchmark for comparison. The dollar may be old news, but that ubiquity means there are lots of people that could search for it.



393. Post 3830130 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: dwdoc on December 05, 2013, 03:23:07 AM
http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=bitcoin%2C%20dollar&cmpt=q

Yup. Only twice as many searches for "dollar" as "Bitcoin".

Count me a skeptic unless and until "bitcoin" passes "kardashian."

http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=bitcoin%2C%20Kardashian&cmpt=q


Looks like an easier milestone than "dollar". Similar volatility though  Smiley

We're lining up the putt... crystal ball says we're closing in on the ATH.



394. Post 3830414 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: spooderman on December 05, 2013, 04:05:25 AM
This board has done exactly 900 pages in less than 1 month.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.38840

How do we rank that? Is this a posting bubble?

No doubt. The collapse of this thread is imminent. Any time now

EDIT: Maybe we'll just have a correction and be set back 325-375 pages imo

Stupid bear. This thread is set to go to teh m00n. I am bullish as ever.

We should have a pagecount predictions market.



395. Post 3830533 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: solex on December 05, 2013, 04:18:00 AM

Honestly it's mostly hype, Bitcoin isn't a serious transaction medium yet. I remember seeing an article proclaiming 6000 or 7000 sales through Bitpay on Bitcoin Black Friday as proof that we're a real ecosystem.

No, a couple sales per minute on a special day does NOT make a payment system worth $12-13B. That's like a fucking Girl Scout cookie stand.

We've passed Western Union at ~$9B market cap, and they process 28 transactions per second, every day.

Right now Bitcoin is a store of value. The value comes from Bitcoin's future potential as a currency and payment system. Lots of businesses will sign up because it's free and it saves them money; the hard part is convincing people to buy and spend bitcoins if:
A) it's going up constantly and they'll have more money if they wait, and
B) if the currency is extremely volatile.

We know A) will eventually resolve itself if the system grows to maturity. There is a limit to all growth.

The doubt was about B), and my doubts are disappearing.

Exactly how much aggravation, eye-gouging fees, delays, noise, fuss, AML rubber-gloving would someone get from WU if they tried to send $147 million on a Sunday night, across the planet, person-to-person, and wanted it to arrive in seconds, irrevocably confirmed in an hour?

WU is Dead Man Walking right now.


You're right, WU has lost 100% of the market share for wiring $147M at once.  Tongue

But, yes; Bitcoin has the short term potential to take the wire and remittance market, just as soon as we get some decent exchanges.



396. Post 3830547 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: dwdoc on December 05, 2013, 04:26:20 AM
At 22:23:19 CST Gox Bitcoin (1237.889) passed the spot price of gold (1237.82) for the first time.


No, we did that already.

Quote from: Holliday on November 29, 2013, 05:51:39 AM




397. Post 3830642 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: NewLiberty on December 05, 2013, 04:33:54 AM
At 22:23:19 CST Gox Bitcoin (1237.889) passed the spot price of gold (1237.82) for the first time.


No, we did that already.

That's it folks. For the first time in history 1,000,000 bits sold for more than an ounce of gold.

$1242.00


Not true. We came close but Gold was a little over 1242 at the time.

Sort of... you don't get an ounce at spot unless you have a desperate seller.

And you couldn't buy gold with GoxBux anyway.



398. Post 3830705 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: I_bitcoin on December 05, 2013, 04:43:13 AM
Completely legit beating of gold would be to take the global weighted average when all major exchanges are reporting/working.

https://bitcoinaverage.com



Wtf?

That says BTC-e has the most volume.



399. Post 3830819 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: I_bitcoin on December 05, 2013, 04:54:52 AM
Completely legit beating of gold would be to take the global weighted average when all major exchanges are reporting/working.

https://bitcoinaverage.com



Wtf?

That says BTC-e has the most volume.

Huh, good point.   I never paid much attention.   Do you think BTC-E is Faux volume of trades or perhaps just crazy bot trade?


I honestly don't know.

MtGox is well known to be a clusterfuck of incompetence but I'd expect their business to go to Bitstamp, not BTC-e.

Maybe it's bot-trade, the alt currencies have been going nuts.



400. Post 3831188 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on December 05, 2013, 05:40:25 AM
Completely legit beating of gold would be to take the global weighted average when all major exchanges are reporting/working.

https://bitcoinaverage.com



Wtf?

That says BTC-e has the most volume.

why does this shock you?

its the only exchange i will even use...




You withdraw cash from BTC-e? Why not stamp?



401. Post 3831261 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on December 05, 2013, 05:45:32 AM
Completely legit beating of gold would be to take the global weighted average when all major exchanges are reporting/working.

https://bitcoinaverage.com



Wtf?

That says BTC-e has the most volume.

why does this shock you?

its the only exchange i will even use...




You withdraw cash from BTC-e? Why not stamp?


oh no, i don't use any exchange to get fiat.


fuck that

Forums/large individual sale only? You must have sold for fiat at least once...



402. Post 3832082 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: windjc on December 05, 2013, 07:08:59 AM
Is no one else here seeing the possibility of a correction or down turn here??


I said 3 days ago I was bearish. Based on basically 1 thing - the correction looked like real market tiredness and the ensuing recovery looked weak.

Then yesterday when we caught fire, starting to go up on higher volume. I said I was a bull again.

But here we are again, on Thursday, and the top is stalling out below ATHs.  Look at the weekly and 3 day chart and they look suspicious. Just look at those charts. It 85% angles.  And where are those red candles?

If we dont break ATHs in the next 24 hours I think the rally may have topped out.

I know, I know, that's crazy talk.  But that's also one huge massive bear wedge on the 1 and 2 hour charts.

For how long, though? A week? A month?

How could you possibly know when it'd move again? Unless you're expecting a serious bear market, or that you will be able to accurately read the signals before things pick up again, it doesn't make sense to get out.

If we are about to experience our first period of extended stability near a high, that is very exciting for Bitcoin as a currency.

What you see as "market tiredness" I see as "increasing confidence".



403. Post 3832442 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Eh, this really doesn't seem like a big deal. China is cautioning financial institutions not to mess around with Bitcoin.

If China didn't like Bitcoin they'd have taken much stronger action.

Guess we get to find out where the support is though  Smiley



404. Post 3832471 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Was that it? Feels a little like a bottom.

SR dump was way scarier.



405. Post 3832488 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: pdawg on December 05, 2013, 08:34:56 AM
this is what happens when the algos are reading the headlines....

If this was algo interpreted we'd have had a much more sudden reaction.



406. Post 3832524 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Hold on a second:

Bloomberg Twitter - "BREAKING: China bans financial institutions from Bitcoin transactions"

Reuters - "China's central bank warned on Thursday that financial institutions should not trade the digital currency bitcoin, saying that while it does not yet pose a threat to China's financial system, it carries risks."

Uh, so... financial institutions banned, or warned?



407. Post 3832566 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on December 05, 2013, 08:41:31 AM
So, did we have a double top?

bulls will call it cup and handle, bears will call it double top

Stop saying the tea leaves look like tea leaves, it's against the rules.



408. Post 3832587 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: Shermo on December 05, 2013, 08:44:40 AM
Bitstamp under $1000 now. Lame

Hardly. Good chance to nab another couple coins.

Looks like China's ticker is still bleeding red



409. Post 3832645 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: electronistul on December 05, 2013, 08:48:31 AM
well, it seems its going into uncharted teritory
http://www.pbc.gov.cn/publish/goutongjiaoliu/524/2013/20131205153156832222251/20131205153156832222251_.html

Quote
"Notice" clearly the nature of Bitcoin that Bitcoin is not issued by the monetary authorities, such as not having sex with mandatory legal tender currency property, not the true meaning of money.

Thanks, Google Translate.



410. Post 3832684 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: pdawg on December 05, 2013, 08:54:14 AM
140,000 BTC dumped inside 15 minutes.   I am impressed that it's only down this much.

140k?! Are you serious?

Damn Bitcoin, you scary.



411. Post 3832697 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: MicroFi on December 05, 2013, 08:55:47 AM
As I know I can't act fast enough in these kind of situations

Wiser than most.



412. Post 3832782 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Well.

An outright ban in a major country will be ugly, we know that now.

Anything else and we're fine.



413. Post 3832816 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: Voodah on December 05, 2013, 09:05:29 AM
The last candle on China has the biggest volume of them all and keeps growing.

Idk if this is over yet.

I just wish I had fiat over there. Damn.



414. Post 3832840 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: Kazimir on December 05, 2013, 09:09:43 AM
Gox climbing back towards $1100

So what the f*ck is up with this panic BS on the China news? It's not even bad news, is it?

It's definitely not good news.



415. Post 3832864 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: seanneko on December 05, 2013, 09:11:07 AM
Gox climbing back towards $1100

So what the f*ck is up with this panic BS on the China news? It's not even bad news, is it?

Stupid people and weak hands. They must have this idea in their head that if Bitcoin isn't immediately accepted as the new world currency then it's already failed.

I hope they all lost a lot of money just now. We don't need people like that damaging the markets.

Yeah, I see these events as positive for the long run. The panicky retards get burned really bad and either exit or have a little more confidence for next time.

If we just went straight to $10,000 we'd have way too many panicky retards in the system.



416. Post 3832885 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: pokerman on December 05, 2013, 09:13:42 AM
I dont think its over yet, there are a lot of reasons to be afraid, this is just a bull trap, we are back on our way to double digits.

lol ok



417. Post 3832950 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: pokerman on December 05, 2013, 09:18:21 AM
The only thing sustaining this bubble is the media attention, once it plateaus, which I believe it has now, there will be a huge crash. This may be it...

You'd better short ASAP.



418. Post 3833029 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

No! The choo choo!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edfYEaJo2UA

Lawrence has to tell the panic sellers to stop being retards.



419. Post 3833157 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: Rampion on December 05, 2013, 09:34:01 AM
People are still panicking over 57000 BTC coming to exchanges ? waiting for the 3-6 confirmations, this means the price could crash even more


These people could also very well calm down, read the news fully and formulate their reaction after seeing the initial sell off. Most of these people don't want to sell at the bottom either so there are no guarantees right now.

How do you know that money is going to the exchange?  The "total sent" is pretty low for the last days standards.

Isn't there some tool trying to launder 96k BTC right now?



420. Post 3833204 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: seanneko on December 05, 2013, 09:37:19 AM
BitcoinWisdom and Bitcoinity are not showing the real price at BTCChina. Real price now is 5900. http://bitcointicker.co/# this might work.

Nice! I've never seen that one before.

Gox is on the way back up. $1100 and rising.

Yeah, show's over folks.

Quote from: Rampion on December 05, 2013, 09:37:57 AM
I love the sound of weak hands shaken out.

Really. I love it.

Me too.

Quote from: pokerman on December 05, 2013, 09:38:14 AM
BTCCHINA @ 750 and dropping fast. It was nice while it lasted, hopefully we can hold triple digits...

Plonk.



421. Post 3833698 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

NO! Stamp, go back down! I didn't get my coins under $900!



422. Post 3833735 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: CryptStorm on December 05, 2013, 10:25:34 AM

"no doubt" it will reach 10k. gotta love reading that



Quote
Investment Expert Nick Hodge ... the investment director of the Outsider Club investment newsletter

We just had a mild endorsement from Bernanke a couple of weeks ago, this is what we're coming up with now?



423. Post 3833801 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: MahaRamana on December 05, 2013, 10:27:52 AM
Just tried to buy one BTC on GOX @ market price and it does not work.
Status pending.

Does it mean too much volume for the platform to handle ?

The BIG BUTTON IS BROKEN!!!! Gox fails at critical moment... per usual.  Huh

My order just got filled on GOX : it took almost 4 minutes for a BUY Market Order !!



Karpeles drinks your tears. He says they taste delicious.



424. Post 3833945 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: kurious on December 05, 2013, 10:43:14 AM
Interesting to see the LTC/BTC ratio holding on surprisingly well to all this hype.
When BTC gets back to 1200 - 1300 (today ?  Roll Eyes ), some people will have actually benefited from all this if they just held.

LTC was appreciating by % more against BTC than the dollar yesterday, been buying more this morning - it did not crash as much as BTC (on BTC-e).

It seems to be getting away with the 'If BTC is gold, LTC is silver' tag.

At 0.035 ish, I think it's a buy.   BTC will rally back up and at the very least LTC does not like losing against BTC, so it is no a stupid thing to do.

You really ought to look at the BTC/LTC historical charts.



425. Post 3833956 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Wheeeeee...



426. Post 3842660 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: micalith on December 05, 2013, 10:46:44 PM
China rallying all on its own   Huh

Chinese saw that this was no big deal an are buying back....

I am all BTC for the night. Let's see what tomorrow will bring...

I thought screw it and sold my return of investment, which was about an order of magnitude more than I could afford to lose.

How could you possibly have an order of magnitude more wealth in bitcoins than you could afford to lose? Suppose you originally could afford to lose $10,000 and put all of that into Bitcoin at $100/coin. Having $110,000 at $1100/coin doesn't mean you can't afford to lose only $10,000 of that - it means you can now afford to lose $100,000 more than you could before.

It's better to think about it as, "When I bought my coins, I could afford to lose 100 BTC. I can still afford to lose 100 BTC."



427. Post 3842702 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: dwdoc on December 05, 2013, 10:52:11 PM
China rallying all on its own   Huh

Chinese saw that this was no big deal an are buying back....

I am all BTC for the night. Let's see what tomorrow will bring...

I thought screw it and sold my return of investment, which was about an order of magnitude more than I could afford to lose.

How could you possibly have an order of magnitude more wealth in bitcoins than you could afford to lose? Suppose you originally could afford to lose $10,000 and put all of that into Bitcoin at $100/coin. Having $110,000 at $1100/coin doesn't mean you can't afford to lose only $10,000 of that - it means you can now afford to lose $100,000 more than you could before.

He must have been in a deep hole to start with.

He had debt in excess of 10x his assets, then, and decided it was prudent to purchase Bitcoin.



428. Post 3843035 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Ho hum.

Excitement is over I guess.

Where to now? Are we going to move back toward the ATH, or is this dip more permanent? What's the sentiment?



429. Post 3843275 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: Teslaza on December 05, 2013, 11:45:22 PM
Off topic:  Nelson Mandela passed away

http://mg.co.za/article/2013-12-05-nelson-mandela-dies


Yeah, big loss for the world. That was a rare man.

He lived to 95 though.



430. Post 3846463 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: traderCJ on December 06, 2013, 06:13:59 AM
Word on the street: India.
And they hate being out done by China.
$1300 next week


Source please.  Hell, you can't even legally import gold into India.  I don't think Indian regulators will take too kindly to Bitcoin, but I could be wrong.  I don't know why India didn't jump in earlier .. compared to China, they have a much higher English literacy rate so you'd think they'd already be all over the existing exchanges.

They will not take kindly to Bitcoin at all. India's balance of trade has been suffering due to their gold imports, and since I'm guessing most Bitcoins are outside Indian borders, a Bitcoin craze will just worsen that problem.

However, Indian regulators are breathtakingly slow to act, and often ineffectual when they do. It is conceivable that India will "come online" before their government even grasps the concept.

The important difference between India and China is that China has experienced much, much greater recent growth in its middle class. It's only rich and middle class folks who have the disposable income to buy bitcoins with, and so there are many more potential buyers in China than India.

It's not reasonable to expect a second "China effect" out of India. Our attention now should be focused on Wall Street.



431. Post 3846540 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: Nemo1024 on December 06, 2013, 06:48:24 AM
So, guys, is this a welcome correction or a turn to bear market?
I must admit that my call of going all BTC (Bitstamp:$1030) yesterday evening was wrong. I thought about placing a margin order @ 955, but then thought: almost a whole day of sideways, I've seen it before, there were outbreaks up after that...



Less than a week ago we double bottomed on Gox, then bounced up again.

We found the same support level this time (under even higher volume) and we're trading above $1000. I don't see any reason for concern unless you leveraged at $1240.

For most people it comes down to this: if you're constantly second-guessing your long position you just have too much money invested.



432. Post 3846595 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: MahaRamana on December 06, 2013, 06:57:14 AM
So, guys, is this a welcome correction or a turn to bear market?
I must admit that my call of going all BTC (Bitstamp:$1030) yesterday evening was wrong. I thought about placing a margin order @ 955, but then thought: almost a whole day of sideways, I've seen it before, there were outbreaks up after that...



Less than a week ago we double bottomed on Gox, then bounced up again.

We found the same support level this time and we're trading above $1000. I don't see any reason for concern unless you leveraged at $1240.

We might have good support at 900 with a double bottom but it can also be argued that we have a double top at 1240.
I think we probably go to find more support a third time before attacking ATH.

Yeah, we may be establishing a 900-1240 channel. Thing is, that comes off to me as extremely bullish. The idea that Bitcoin can more-or-less convincingly park itself in the four digit range after such a massive runup is building confidence. And for a store of value, confidence is everything.

All of Bitcoin's history has featured a crash after the meteoric rises. If it fails to crash this time, that alone may set off another rally within a few weeks.

Things are clearly different this time. Bitcoin is taking the market panics in stride. I am much more concerned about missing the potential upside than the potential downside.



433. Post 3847058 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: thoughtfan on December 06, 2013, 07:49:40 AM
Word on the street: India.
And they hate being out done by China.
$1300 next week


Source please.  Hell, you can't even legally import gold into India.  I don't think Indian regulators will take too kindly to Bitcoin, but I could be wrong.  I don't know why India didn't jump in earlier .. compared to China, they have a much higher English literacy rate so you'd think they'd already be all over the existing exchanges.

They will not take kindly to Bitcoin at all. India's balance of trade has been suffering due to their gold imports, and since I'm guessing most Bitcoins are outside Indian borders, a Bitcoin craze will just worsen that problem.

However, Indian regulators are breathtakingly slow to act, and often ineffectual when they do. It is conceivable that India will "come online" before their government even grasps the concept.

The important difference between India and China is that China has experienced much, much greater recent growth in its middle class. It's only rich and middle class folks who have the disposable income to buy bitcoins with, and so there are many more potential buyers in China than India.

It's not reasonable to expect a second "China effect" out of India. Our attention now should be focused on Wall Street.
Seems like a reasonable assessment (I am no expert on India so I'm not really qualified to endorse or counter it) and I agree there is unlikely to be the same kind of proportion of middle class Indians as have been Chinese buying in as a speculative investment.  Where India does I think have greater shorter term promise is in remittances and as the cellphone revolution continues, as mobile money such as M-Pesa is doing in Kenya.

Just like I anticipate the David Woo comments yesterday are more likely to have a bigger impact on businesses considering adaption than on price I anticipate India in the shorter term to have a bigger impact on adoption than price - though there is a limit, especially with the latter, as to how much adaption can go on without impacting price.

I will repeat, as much as it may sound like I know what I'm talking about remember this is a speculation forum...


That's a good point. Remittances are a big immediate application for Bitcoin.

It's important to remember, though, that the asymmetry of international Bitcoin-to-cash transactions is the reason they're valuable in the first place. Once those Bitcoins leave the US (for example) and are sent to India, you can't really get them back out of India without wiring money to an Indian exchange. So it's not a closed loop and therefore you expect bitcoins to be cheaper in India if they're being used for remittance - unless there's more organic Indian demand for bitcoins than there is in the US or wherever.

To illustrate - imagine lots of expatriated Indians are sending bitcoins home. Lots of family members are cashing these out for their local currency (Rupees). The market in India is experiencing a glut in the supply of bitcoins, and the price drops.

Arbitrageurs will spring into action, buying up bitcoins for Rupees, selling them for dollars on Western exchanges, exchanging the dollars back into Rupees, and wiring them to India.

However, the price differential will never shrink (at equilibrium) below the costs of arbitrage. Unless it is somehow cheaper for the arbitrageurs to wire that money to India than it is for the expatriates, Bitcoin will not offer advantages except perhaps speed.



434. Post 3851979 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: macsga on December 06, 2013, 04:38:43 PM
Let's see if it can make a double bottom @ $841 on Gox...  Wink

Heh, that'd be a double double bottom.



435. Post 3852084 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: capsqrl on December 06, 2013, 04:43:55 PM
Once again we see resistance around 900. Is there such a thing as a triple bottom?

Look at the 7d, it would actually be a quadruple bottom.

If you are panicking still you are seriously retarded.



436. Post 3852614 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quadruple bottom?

Bullish as fuck.



437. Post 3853044 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: accord01 on December 06, 2013, 05:58:55 PM
Lol at people saying it's a triple bottom.  Those are a joke of a bottom.  It is a genuine double top right now.  Smooth tops, not sharp crappy vague bottoms.  The bears win when it comes to bubble pops.  The bulls are going to get slaughtered.

There was a double top and I expect it to establish a 900-1200 channel until the next big news break.



438. Post 3859084 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Going for half as much net worth as yesterday.

Quote from: vortex1878 on December 07, 2013, 01:59:56 AM
why is mark karpeles still alive?

Like... why didn't he forget how to breathe, or why hasn't anyone shot him?

They're both good questions actually.



439. Post 3859207 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: maz on December 07, 2013, 02:09:04 AM
Guys im disappointed at the lack of MEME's during this crash, there were far more during the rally, lets be fair now!

60% drop?




440. Post 3859286 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

I just got an SMS reminder that I had set a couple weeks ago for 4100 CNY so I'd wake up if we passed it in the middle of the night.

That put things in perspective...



441. Post 3859310 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: Krabby on December 07, 2013, 02:20:59 AM
Predictions?

Chaos, a brief bear market, then more exponential growth.

Cmon, ask me something hard.



442. Post 3859436 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Wow.

And I'm already letting myself imagine that I could've called the bottom on that if I'd been holding any fiat.



443. Post 3888815 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: rpietila on December 08, 2013, 11:15:28 PM
Breaking out of that triangle in a big way. Anyone want to place bets on recovery or bull trap?

You mean an actual bet? Yeah, sure. I feel we will go visit the exponential trendline.

I am game. 10 BTC that we don't touch your exponential trendline in December?

The one that projects $428, not one that incorporates data up to Dec. 9.



444. Post 3889772 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: Le Happy Merchant on December 09, 2013, 11:20:04 AM
TA foresaw this crash. It was a clear double top. And until we break through the neck, TA will tell us that this recovery is a bull-trap.

This 'crash' was triggered by real world events. TA may be right in retrospect, but if it was wrong, it would still be right in retrospect later.

Dead on... TA folks will take credit for predictions even if the outcome is triggered by news events - but if those events were to preclude the TA predictions, the TA folks would blame the news.

Not to mention there's a lot of flexibility in the way charts are read; if the crash hadn't happened we'd simply be focusing on elements besides the double top.

Let's face it - TA is not much better than 50% in terms of accuracy, and you can only expect better than random odds when the charts are read by experts.



445. Post 3889886 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: barbs on December 09, 2013, 12:00:44 PM

Man F that guy, for real

I don't think he gives a solitary fuck about any part of Bitcoin besides the price.



446. Post 3896724 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: sumantso on December 09, 2013, 03:21:56 PM
People sell but the price goes up  Angry

Cmon did one mistake by selling yesterday, can we please go back to 800 for a second  Cheesy

if we did, you'd think "why buy now? It'll go lower"

Probably Cheesy

But really, I regret it so much (again) that I speculated (once again wrong) and sold, even though I tell my self I will hold forever.

I've been there. The worst type of sell is the "damn, i could have sold at the top but didnt, lets sell now and hope it goes down"

Did exactly the same in this recent crash... got shook out at the bottom thinking it had further to go, then frantically bought back in at a $150 loss. Think I'm just going to hold for ever until the moon or zero :/

You say that now ....

Btw, whats moon or 0? If it goes to $1m you may still be thinking it will go to $10m and end up holding.

If it goes to $1m of course you'd keep holding it. If it didn't go any higher you'd just spend it like cash.



447. Post 3896832 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: Vycid on December 09, 2013, 10:06:31 AM
Breaking out of that triangle in a big way. Anyone want to place bets on recovery or bull trap?

You mean an actual bet? Yeah, sure. I feel we will go visit the exponential trendline.

I am game. 10 BTC that we don't touch your exponential trendline in December?

The one that projects $428, not one that incorporates data up to Dec. 9.

Hey Risto, I was serious about this  Smiley Not sure if it got buried and you didn't see it.

Escrow is OK if you don't trust me.



448. Post 3898072 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: MasterJumanji on December 09, 2013, 11:25:47 PM
ops i spaced out

512

wait, what is this count down for again?

Quick, keep giving him more numbers.   Maybe we can confuse him Smiley

that bitch put that wall again there
Tear down this wall!




449. Post 3898124 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: Dragonkiller on December 09, 2013, 11:32:23 PM
The great wall of Slovenia has defeated us?

Yes, obviously this means Bitcoin is over. Time to go home folks.



450. Post 3898151 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: crazy_rabbit on December 09, 2013, 11:33:30 PM
It's interesting to see only stamp really has a massive wall. Someone trying to cash out I suppose? Those are a lot of bids lined up at 900. Yet the other exchanges don't have it. I guess if you really want to hit $1000 on stamp people are going to have to be willing to buy this guy out- because this guy would be selling low compared to the other exchanges, meaning he's not arbitraging, just pocketing the cash.

Probably someone that promised themselves during the crash that if they ever had the chance to cash out $X again they'd do it.



451. Post 3898518 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 10, 2013, 12:08:55 AM
MY GOD LOOK AT THE PRICE

 Cheesy



Boy am I wishing Risto had taken my bet about now  Cheesy.



452. Post 3899303 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: cfrm on December 10, 2013, 01:24:52 AM
Oh ya were just going to go zag straight back into the bull market from 550 to >1250 and set a new ath after the downtrend from 1250 to 550 on the down MACD with all trend lines broken. That is exactly how this works...

Well, I think the way it is suppose to work was that this was all an obvious bull trap. We were suppose to go down after that huge pennant formed yesterday near the lows. But then we went higher. Then, we were suppose to go lower at the 4 hour resistance 200sma. But then we consolidated and went higher.

Now next resistance is 1000 and then the lower top before the last correction.

So, when does this bull trap end and the bear market continue?

Because right now it keeps going up when its not suppose to.

People who think Bitcoin is supposed to go either up or down at a certain point don't understand the principle of supply and demand.

Yep.

And the demand is driven by the media cycle, which does not play to the tune of the TA and has not subsided.

If you truly believe your TA is giving you a significant edge over random chance in this environment, you are delusional.



453. Post 3900128 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

I guess Bitcoin is too big to fail now.  Grin



454. Post 3900205 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: emanymton on December 10, 2013, 03:15:22 AM
Post deleted

It is perhaps a little disturbing, but even as an animal lover, I consider  bears to be somewhere between rats, seagulls and cockroaches... disgusting filthy vermin who feed in garbage dumps.

Stray dogs and cats also feed from garbage dumps , so do racoons , coyotes , jackals and even wolves.
Put a garbage dump in the middle of a safari park and you'll see even lions hanging around.
It's free food , and in the animal kingdom you'll be stupid to waste this.
don't forget stray humans  Smiley

Well , from the point of an "animal lover" , I would also hate stray humans.
Speaking of garbage , I just realized something funny.
If bitcoin is going to replace sometime cash , the days of hoping to find 10 dollars on the street are gone , right?
For a professed animal lover, you seem to harbour an unusual amount of hate.
Maybe it'll change to finding an old hdd with a wallet.dat on it  Cheesy

Yeah, right... rats, seagulls, and cockroaches don't have a right to exist because they inconvenience you?

Some animal lover.



455. Post 3900228 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 10, 2013, 03:18:37 AM
The train is burning all kinds of fuel and not going anywhere. How are you supposed to make any gains like this? Someone inform the conductor.

no one is trying to make gains in 2 weeks buddy, we are looking forward to the FUTURE!

Not going anywhere? I beg to differ. I'm seeing quite a lot of forward motion  Grin



456. Post 3900892 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: seleme on December 10, 2013, 04:31:13 AM
The fall is imminent  Grin

It would be great if it could do it butI just don't see enough steam to break through. Mind you, I am already proved very wrong though.
Did you already sell that position you had at $610 back during the "crash"?

I sold same day at about 700$ and had few small profit trades yesterday. Got out too early, I know, definitely didn't expect it to go as high on Sunday.
I did the same as I was prepared for just a bit more decline. Next time I will be satisfied with doubling my position and hold it for a bit longer.

Oh no!!! Here we go...

Yep, I don't usually trade btc vs usa, I trade mostly alts vs btc and with taking fast profit strategy, but this looked as such a good opportunity. I'd still be around the same btc position before the crash if I'd buy now but just don't feel comfortable to do it.

Buy back in at $750?


No, I'll bet for lower, 500 or so. I could buy some at any price if I see opportunity for fast swing though.

Bad.... decision.... you see the problem is you already missed one opportunity. You're gonna miss another one. Unless you dont sleep and watch the market 24/7


I'll risk. I'm happy if btc goes over 1k really even if I lose few coins. That gives me a safety to easy pay my bills with bitcoin profits, 2 BTC at 1000$ is enough to be very comfortable where I live, and I can make that easily monthly with trading.

But I'm not comfortable in buying now so I'll try my luck in getting much more coins than I could lose in some short term. Don't like fiat vs btc trading but when I already jumped on it, let's bebrave and try to make most of it Cheesy

Are you mining altcoins ? lol

No, I never mined anything in my life. Wish I did though, that's where easy money, without headaches is.

... "without headaches"

Yes it's obvious you've never mined anything  Smiley

Mining is pretty much the act of exchanging headaches for cryptocurrency.



457. Post 3902099 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: greenlion on December 10, 2013, 07:20:27 AM
Looking at the patent paperwork, is it possible there is something in here that JP Morgan Chase is expecting to be able to go after Bitcoin with on software patent grounds, particularly pertaining to future development?

http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=20130317984&OS=20130317984&RS=20130317984

Who are they going to sue?



458. Post 3902295 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: Erdogan on December 10, 2013, 07:51:42 AM
Wow. Someone's desperately trying to push the price down.  Cheesy

I can see 1500 in the horizon and its not a mirage.....

If the 4 major exchanges all hit $1100 to $1200 again then it will be the 3rd occasion and bullish for another leg up. How many bubble top peaks ever end in a triple header? None.

+1 Smiley

If we break the ATH, we will be heading to $10k.... fck all these bears!!!


If whe break ATH, we can go to $10K. If not, we can not.

Man, analysis like this is why I keep coming here.



459. Post 3903892 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on December 10, 2013, 10:39:00 AM
China and btc e falling by themselves over the last hour or so, gox barely any volume.
Can we trust the data posted by those exchanges?

Are those bids and offers real? Are the transactions real, or just being simulated to sustain a price that finds no real buyers?

During the crash, when the price was down to 800$ on its way to 550$, Mt. Gox stopped reporting the real data, instead looped the last 5 minutes over and over, at least 5 times.  Was that a bug, or were they trying to hide the crash?

By now everybody who has looked into this market must have realized that, even if the bitcoin survives as a currency, its market is a pyramid schema (or, euphemistically, a zero-sum game): every profit one makes by investing in bitcoins must be the loss of someone else.  So, can we trust that operators of sites that serve a pyramid schema?

This just in: gold is a pyramid scheme! Can we trust the COMEX???



460. Post 3905000 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: granathus on December 10, 2013, 12:51:34 PM
That money is probably there in anticipation of a new visit down towards 600. China news hasn't been completely digested yet and we will have more volatility before stable 900+.

I think after dozens of copycat news saying China caused Bitcoin drop, people are now starting to understand news from China wasn't negative after all.

Long term: not necessarily negative. Short term: most definitely negative. We are still in short term, wouldn't you agree?

It's been over 5 days since the news. I think we've moved past it at this point.



461. Post 3905443 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: Vigil on December 10, 2013, 01:32:13 PM
Hey, guys! I have an idea. Lets try to break $1000 for the third time in 36 hrs. Third time's a charm.

Is it just me, or does this guy sound desperate?



462. Post 3905591 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: Carra23 on December 10, 2013, 01:44:41 PM
Can someone post IT's happening!! with ron paul

Please no.




463. Post 3912341 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: jones31 on December 10, 2013, 06:03:37 PM

Is it diesel or lpg for you?


Bwaahaha..   Cheesy

Nah.. seriously.. i was glad to have work to do today, because it was pretty boring in truth.

It's not funny man!!! It's a critical choice for us in Greece! Our all-knowing government (and the EU along with it) are at the brink of completely banning commuting!!!  Roll Eyes Shocked

How, huh? What?

I like to think I'm usually informed about European politics (EU uber alles! jk.), but what is this about? How can anyone "ban" commuting? Or are they cutting commuting subsidies?

Care to explain? (I have friends in Greece I could ask, but I'm too lazy to write Cheesy)

It's 1.63 per liter of gasoline here, or $8.44 per gallon of it! Do you need more explanation?

It's 1.3 here and you can't even go and compare the income of the average Greek with that of a Romanian.
And still people are driving like nuts all day.

Is gasoline smuggling a thing? Seriously - if you loaded up a tanker in Florida and sailed it to Greece you'd double your money. That's insane.

Quote from: Stevenrm87 on December 10, 2013, 09:06:14 PM
Just cashed out 7 BTC to pay for my GF to get big ass fake titties. Ill Probably regret selling one day but at least Ill have fun playing with something in the mean time. Thank You Bitcoin!

So which one is it? =))


Eh, easy, it's both!  Wink

I just had an wonderful idea , how about getting a bitcoin tattoo like this one: (well i meant the spot)

It should make lot's of people aware of... bitcoin Smiley))

Yea my GF would probably even do it shes so happy right now.

That is a really really bad idea.

I guess if your GF really wants it... but IMO, fake tits are better to look at than they are to play with. If you like her boobs the way they are and she's just insecure, you might wanna consider working on that insecurity instead. That approach is probably a lot healthier.

Anyway, back to Bitcoin; I want all the bears that insisted Bitcoin would never break 1k again to realize that the charts fucking lied. There is no way about that. Charts are a shitty crystal ball and you should always be highly skeptical of them in a commodities or stock market that isn't news driven, but in the Bitcoin world all bets are off.

I think the only way to really obtain better-than-random trading odds is to fit an algorithm to the parabolic rallies/crashes, since they usually have "ringing" behavior afterward that can be profitably traded.



464. Post 3912570 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: Sitarow on December 10, 2013, 10:47:39 PM

Anyway, back to Bitcoin; I want all the bears that insisted Bitcoin would never break 1k again to realize that the charts lied. There is no way about that. Charts are a shitty crystal ball and you should always be highly skeptical of them in a commodities or stock market that isn't news driven, but in the Bitcoin world all bets are off.

I think the only way to really obtain better-than-random trading odds is to fit an algorithm to the parabolic rallies/crashes, since they usually have "ringing" behavior afterward that can be profitably traded.

Charts never lie.... Its those that sell on rumor that suffer the consequences in this market.

Unlike traditional a trading platform, this market participants have matured to a point where just about everyone tends to get the news at the same time. NO heads up warning as to what the market will do.

"The old Buy on the rumor, sell on the news is a primary cause of technical price developments, and in many instances, the only “technical analysis”"

Edit: Lots of fun is expected over the next few days.

This is a really naive outlook. Why isn't everyone who can read a chart a billionaire?

"I'm not wrong, everyone else is"



465. Post 3913185 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on December 10, 2013, 11:36:58 PM
BOOM.. BEARS.. get out.. tha way.

 Cheesy



466. Post 3913338 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: John999 on December 10, 2013, 11:51:05 PM
My take: I don't buy it, epic bulltrap, next we go down. Maybe missing on a bull run but way too risky.

24h from now: "I still don't buy it, this is temporary, we're gonna go back down to the ATH"  Cheesy



467. Post 3913384 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: MAbtc on December 11, 2013, 12:08:02 AM
Hate to take the bears side but whoever did the dumping will be buying back to do it again. No idea when though, strong rises have often been closely followed by long downward pushes but interest has gone up a couple of orders of magnitude since then and the publicity just keeps on coming. Either way its likely bear coins will be running near empty unless there's some big movement on days destroyed.

Manipulation is something BTC will have to live with for the time being.  Weak hands are shed in the process, so it may not be a bad thing in the long run.
Weak hands get shaken out, more weak hands buy in.

Weak hands get shaken out, and a fraction of the buyins are weak hands.

Over time the system grows more confident.



468. Post 3913625 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):



Many Bothans died to bring you this image.



469. Post 3913673 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: MAbtc on December 11, 2013, 12:38:08 AM
I like that if you did sell, every upward movement becomes a bull trap.
No, bears are indicating that the move from 576 was a bull trap that they are waiting to see complete.

At what point does it stop being a bull trap and start being a normal upward movement? When the price doubles? Triples?



470. Post 3913739 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: pdawg on December 11, 2013, 12:45:35 AM
I doubt we see a triple top @ ATH, this consolidated at 50-61.8% fib levels form the start of the crash to 576, then took off, exactly what you would expect to see for a nice healthy continuation of the uptrend. I expect new ATH by next week or sooner.

Yeah, this looks a hell of a lot like the Nov 19th correction. Bears are myopic.



471. Post 3913836 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: MAbtc on December 11, 2013, 12:51:35 AM
I like that if you did sell, every upward movement becomes a bull trap.
No, bears are indicating that the move from 576 was a bull trap that they are waiting to see complete.

At what point does it stop being a bull trap and start being a normal upward movement? When the price doubles? Triples?
When the trend reverses.

Then can't you speculate that the entire Bitcoin trend up from $0.05 is a giant bull trap? It's meaningless.



472. Post 3913853 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: Holliday on December 11, 2013, 12:57:33 AM
I wish bitcoin exchanges would not be open 24/7.

If one (or all) decides to use "banker's hours" there will just be a new exchange to fill that gap and the "banker's hours" exchanges will get left behind.

The Bitcoin protocol is 24/7 and nothing is going to stop that. Trading will occur regardless.

You'd think that'd be the case for traditional financial markets, but it isn't...

I guess it's a product of just how frictionless Bitcoin really is (or maybe just a product of the fact that the Internet has never really had "hours" - can you imagine websites closing down for the night?  Cheesy)



473. Post 3913925 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: iarsenaux on December 11, 2013, 01:01:14 AM
do you think that it is possible that the president of paypal admitted that he have some bitcoins to pump up the value then he is going to cash out without telling the public?

I doubt he's hurting for money to the point that he'd seek out a bizarre way to manipulate markets like that.

Doing a good job as PayPal president pretty much precludes doing sketchy shit like pump/dumping new cryptos.

Imagine the fallout if he created a huge competitor because he'd been trying to make a quick buck for himself.



474. Post 3914071 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: stan.distortion on December 11, 2013, 01:15:21 AM
do you think that it is possible that the president of paypal admitted that he have some bitcoins to pump up the value then he is going to cash out without telling the public?

I doubt he's hurting for money to the point that he'd seek out a bizarre way to manipulate markets like that.

Doing a good job as PayPal president pretty much precludes doing sketchy shit like pump/dumping new cryptos.

Imagine the fallout if he created a huge competitor because he'd been trying to make a quick buck for himself.


thanks for your opinion. i had never been to other exchanges before i entered bitcoin trading and this whole ups and downs is driving me crazy. now i believe that bitcoin is like a drug -- hallucinogen, depressant and stimullant

Don't worry, you build up an immunity after a while Smiley

EDIT: For all we know paypal and others could already be testing Bitcoin as a means of settlement between currencies, it would probably save them a lot in bank charges alone.

I've heard rumors that paypal has been considering Bitcoin as a funding method.

Makes sense but I wouldn't trade on it.



475. Post 3914962 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: simonk83 on December 11, 2013, 02:54:29 AM
Here we go. Its crash-a-thon time.

Haha.  Lovely and quiet when things are heading up, then as soon as a slight dip happens it's back to full downramp, scaremonger mode.   Forgot to ignore you though so thanks for the reminder.

 Cheesy



476. Post 3915093 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: Vigil on December 11, 2013, 02:57:02 AM
http://btctrading.wordpress.com/2013/12/10/long-term-update-daily-view-bitstamp/

Quote
There will be probably a correction before moving above the all time high at $1163, that correction could be a nice buying opportunity for who is looking for a good moment to buy.


Pretty on point so far.
That blog has been wrong pretty-much on everything.

Yeah, because you've been totally nailing it.

Quote from: traderCJ on December 11, 2013, 03:08:03 AM
Mark it. $200 by Friday.

'nuf said.



477. Post 3915273 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: Vigil on December 11, 2013, 03:33:01 AM
"Mark it..." So no one in this thread mistakes my joke for seriousness...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BdT5mFAk-Y

This reference doesn't make any sense in context.



478. Post 3915996 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: Le Happy Merchant on December 11, 2013, 05:22:05 AM
Right now, on Mt Gox, if someone decides to buy 100 BTC at the lowest possible price, the price will shoot up tp 1020 USD.  If someone decides to sell 100 BTC at the highest possible price, the price will drop to 990 USD.  That is why it is jumping about like crazy.

Sure, if somebody dumps $100,000 on the market it moves 1%.

This would have been astounding less than a year ago.

Yes, but the market is that much bigger, making it that much more likely.



479. Post 3916323 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: beaconpcguru on December 11, 2013, 05:58:16 AM
Disinformation

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2013/12/10/this-finance-expert-thinks-bitcoin-will-fall-99-percent-by-june/

Anybody that would agree with this guy doesn't own Bitcoins, so they haven't got any to sell.

Hopefully the disinformation stops by the time anybody with a brokerage account can short.



480. Post 3916736 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: Holliday on December 11, 2013, 07:07:35 AM

I'm getting more and more concerned that no-one here seems to want to explore or even counter the 'negative' arguments around bitcoin or crypto...I don't mind reading erudite or informed denunciations of such arguments but everyone seems awful keen to dismiss any naysayers as idiots/fools without actually making a cogent defence.

After you've read 100 articles written by "journalists" or even "economists" who have refused to do even a few minutes worth of research, you get burned out. Making intelligent arguments to counter a ridiculous claim/outright lie is a waste of time. I'm glad there are some people who bother, but seriously... it's a never ending job with no gratification to be had for your efforts.

Yep. I was about to say exactly this.

The arguments have already been made, this is just the newest Johnny Come Lately to not understand what Bitcoin is.



481. Post 3917765 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: windjc on December 11, 2013, 09:16:53 AM
Latest thoughts, grain of salt advised:


Not dismissing these charts, but:

A. A lot of these charts just confirm each other.
B. We have not yet broken original trendline.
C. Why does it have to be $400 or $2000? Is it not possible we could range trade between $800-$1100 for a few weeks, months, etc.?

D. Have you seen the news outlets recently? http://edition.cnn.com/2013/12/10/business/will-bitcoin-replace-paypal/



482. Post 3918228 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on December 11, 2013, 10:13:54 AM
what was that? Sharp knife on all three major exchanges at the same time?

¯\(°_o)/¯



483. Post 3918516 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Hm, was that it?

Edit: Stamp/Gox diverging...

Edit2: Ah, there we go.



484. Post 3918571 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: UnDerDoG81 on December 11, 2013, 10:54:31 AM
WTF does everybody buy now, let the price go down a bit more  Angry

They want to get cheap coins as much as you do.



485. Post 3919483 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: nanobrain on December 11, 2013, 12:32:51 PM
3. General apathy ("we can't be bothered disputing this") is often the beginning of the end of the exploration of ideas, especially risk assessment...it smacks of arrogance and usually doesn't end well.

It smacks of arrogance that you think we should endlessly repeat ourselves instead of inconveniencing you by pointing you to the search function.



486. Post 3920014 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: magicmexican on December 11, 2013, 01:25:30 PM
No bad news atm to fuel any serious panic

Just a casual panic.  Smiley



487. Post 3920061 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: niothor on December 11, 2013, 01:30:30 PM
@ maz: Agree; but we may have a better chance off it than fiat.

Are you sure of that?

http://www.businessinsider.com/927-people-own-half-of-the-bitcoins-2013-12

What did you believed , that each of us will have 0.0x bitcoins and we could all be rich?
No more people starving , no more forests cut in the Amazon?

This ain't a tool to reach utopia and never was.


It's important to consider what kind of people those 927 individuals are, and how they're likely to spend their money.

To wit: are they more likely to steer the world in direction you'd like to see than today's global elite?

Besides, only about half of the total bitcoins are yet in circulation. Their holdings will be diluted and the coins will be better spread out going forward.



488. Post 3920096 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: seleme on December 11, 2013, 01:34:30 PM
It's going down people, no need for denial Wink

Yeah, whatever. Nobody's getting my coins.



489. Post 3920238 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on December 11, 2013, 01:38:32 PM
It's going down people, no need for denial Wink

Yeah, whatever. Nobody's getting my coins.

Wait till fear sets in and makes you and me and someone else want to defrost their cold storage...

I don't believe for a moment that I can profit from trading in this market on a statistical basis. Everybody thinks that but half of them will lose money. Any edge from TA (and I don't consider myself an expert) is pretty much overwhelmed by the insane news cycle and whale action. Not to mention that trading fees essentially give you a negative expectation value for trading.

So no, I'm holding regardless of where we go with the exception of some play money if I feel like trading for fun. And if it truly craters then I'll rid myself of some more fiat.

No point in selling, really. If bitcoin succeeds then I'll spend my coins.



490. Post 3920322 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: macsga on December 11, 2013, 01:52:23 PM
There's a strong support at 805-810 at stamp, I have a hard time believing it will break. But I'm not much of an fortuneteller.

OOhhhh THAT BITCOIN THIIIING... I FORESEE IT WILL GO TO DA MOON!!!





491. Post 3920533 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on December 11, 2013, 02:04:56 PM
No but I certainly didn't expect so many people to get fleeced in the not too distant future.

Bitcoin trading is a zero-sum game, each person's gain is someone else's loss.

If the ordinary money (USD,EUR,...) that you put in is less than the money you got out, consider yourself lucky; if you can make even more ordinary money by selling your bitcoins, better for you.

If the money you put in is more than you took out, then you are provisionally a loser. The only way you can avoid becoming a definitive loser is to find some other loser who is willing to take your loss by buying your bitcoins at a price that will clear your deficit (including bank and exchange fees and the interest you could have earned by investing your money elsewhere).

You may find that redeeming loser right away.  You may have to wait years for him to come up.  Or he may never come up.

The bitcoin market will crash once every sucker with money gets smart and realizes that all other suckers got smart too.

So, what you need to keep the bitcoin market from crashing is an ASIC miner that creates new suckers with money, rather than new bitcoins.


You don't understand Bitcoin.

This isn't a financial game of hot potato. This is a transaction protocol the likes of which has never before existed. There is plenty of real value here - there need not be a loser for every winner, not long-term.

If you don't get that, go to Vegas. There's more girls there anyway.



492. Post 3926414 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on December 11, 2013, 09:23:36 PM


yeah... that was me.

You're gonna get us a video or something, right?  Smiley

Gotta get my vicarious thrills.



493. Post 3926691 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on December 11, 2013, 09:53:17 PM


Honestly my wife bought it with her bitcoin. It is in her name.

I bought an XL 500 (not paid for with btc sadly) about 4 hours before. Was a long day.


And yes, once the Lambo gets here there will be all sorts of pics and what not. Hope to get the media on this and boost BTC. Once people know BTC can be used to buy things like Lambo's they might get a bit more interested in it.




 Grin



494. Post 3926794 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on December 11, 2013, 10:01:16 PM


Whenever I see this picture, for some reason I think Mark ate a bunch of bubble gum and then farted.



495. Post 3927028 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: CryptStorm on December 11, 2013, 10:13:53 PM


Honestly my wife bought it with her bitcoin. It is in her name.

I bought an XL 500 (not paid for with btc sadly) about 4 hours before. Was a long day.


And yes, once the Lambo gets here there will be all sorts of pics and what not. Hope to get the media on this and boost BTC. Once people know BTC can be used to buy things like Lambo's they might get a bit more interested in it.




 Grin

I'm kinda more excited about pics of a tractor. Still, welcome to the good life!

For some reason "first supercar bought with BTC" seems more historical than "first tractor bought with BTC".   Wink

Actually I recall someone bought a Porsche Cayman S for ~300 BTC back in April, so maybe it isn't the first... eh, I don't think I'd classify a Cayman as a supercar.

So, yes, history by my standards. Smiley



496. Post 3927193 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Has anyone bought a Virgin Galactic ticket yet?



497. Post 3927229 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: humanitee on December 11, 2013, 10:38:41 PM
Has anyone bought a Virgin Galactic ticket yet?


http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/nov/22/virgin-galactic-bitcoin-space-flights-payment

Quote
He said a female flight attendant from Hawaii purchased a Virgin Galactic ticket using bitcoin on Friday.

Huh. I wonder if that was a forum member.



498. Post 3927674 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: stan.distortion on December 11, 2013, 11:02:25 PM
No no no, its all wrong, he spent coins when the price was rising and he mustn't do that because that's not how deflatory currencies work. He can only hoard his coins if its going up or droves of economic experts will gang up to lecture him on why he mustn't buy new toys when he finds he has money spare.

Nobody denies you can spend a deflationary currency. It's just a stupid thing to do. That's all.

 Wink Cheesy Wink

That's probably right, I buy new toys when it goes up too, a choice between a bigger number to look at or beer and horsepower is a no brainer in my twisted mind Wink

He should have got one of these to go with the name instead Smiley :

(its called a Gamma Goat btw).

EDIT: Hey, it went up! Maybe pictures of fugly military antiquities causes upswings.

Hm, let's test the theory some more...




499. Post 3927737 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 11, 2013, 11:17:45 PM
whatsup with BTCChina?

Looks like an API problem. Site is up for me.



500. Post 3927997 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: mb300sd on December 11, 2013, 11:38:13 PM
If this means what I think it means... Have to consult a tax attorney.

Cash out enough bitcoins to become an accredited investor, place in IRA, put back into bitcoin, and keep taxable income under 100k...

the problem with this is, you dont get to hold your btc...

you have to trust someone else to manage it for you.

Its only a portion of my BTC, and having provable assets that could be used to back loans, etc, might be worth the costs. Have to look into it more, but its an option.

It's a good strategy for those with more than a couple million in BTC. Otherwise you will get the shit audited out of you if you cash out to any significant degree (or make big purchases).



501. Post 3928136 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Stamp/Gox gap closing, historically that means we're going to see some movement.

Situation is unclear but my bet is on 'up'.



502. Post 3928435 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: rpietila on December 12, 2013, 12:08:40 AM
My firm analysis is that bitcoin is overvalued:

I constructed a trendline based on daily prices, and calculated through the last and current bubbles.

It is helpful to know what a logarithmic scale means. Basically it means that every 0.1 difference equals to 26% (compounding). Ten times 0.1 compounds to 1.26^10 = 10.

We express the relative undervaluation/overvaluation in logscale, where 1.0 means that the actual value is 10.0x trend and -1.0 means that it is at 0.1x the trend. That extreme valuations we did not see, though.

Spring

At the low point in 14.1., we started the rise from -0.46.
The trendline was crossed in 21.3., at 0.00 (66 days later)
The peak was reached in 9.4., at 0.45 (19 days later)
The low was reached in 7.7., at -0.30 (89 days later)

Autumn

At the low point in 3.10., we started the rise from -0.34.
The trendline was crossed in 9.11., at 0.00 (37 days later)
The peak was reached in 30.11., at 0.46 (21 days later)
The low was reached in TBD

After spending the whole week so far pretty much with these calculations, I can say that I mostly subscribe to the scenario where bitcoin's exchange rate is currently overvalued by more than 100% (0.32 in log scale). Because the overvaluation is so gross and the delusion of fair value so pervasive (I even personally "turned bull" at the ATH after making my initial bearish call in 20.11. at a lower price), it will take 1-3 months to reach the healthy low in relative valuation. It is not guaranteed that the relative low coincides with the absolute low (the cheapest intraday opportunity to buy in April was only 2 days after the bubble pop, whereas the final capitulation happened at a little bit higher level).

Because I am now so sure of this, I will seek the opportunities to trade the downtrend, sell up to 50% of my bitcoins with the intention to buy them back at the trendline, and to instruct the ones in their bitcoin accumulation phase to buy only very limited amounts when there is still air in the price.

Bitcoin is going to the moon, but it is not going to the moon overnight. I watched it go as close as possible to the moon from 0.25 to 32 and then to 2, which was my entry point. Realistically the following 6 months will not see similar development (going from 1000 to 128,000 per bitcoin, without stopping). If they do, then the other half of my bitcoins is worth so much that it gives me enough to think about.

The trendline (which I constructed anew from daily data) is now at 420, indicating that there is not much point to buy anything over 500 from the flashcrashes that will certainly continue during the following days and weeks.

If we allow 60 days of downtrend from the bubblepop (30.11.) to the final capitulation (est. 29.1.), the trendline is approximately at 590. The characteristic of a low is about -0.20...-0.30 relative valuation. To be on the safe side, we take -0.20, which corresponds to the target price of 372. To add some safety margin, the highest bids should be at 450 or so.

So now it's the time to be right and sit tight (this time with the fiat of your choice). Objectively bitcoin is now expensive, and speculative selling at prices above 800 is a very good proposition. If you have been thinking where I've been the last few days, the answer is: selling. And running excel calculations. and selling some more.

I believe that bitcoin can reach 1 million dollars in 2016, but not now.

Selling now a large percentage of bitcoins with the intention to double the stash by buying at half the price 1-3 months from now has more than 50% probability of success, therefore is a +EV move. It would have been possible both in 2011 aftermath and at the top of the spring 2013 dcb. The only time it would not have been possible was after the 2010 "bubbles" that never popped and just went on. I think I have way better than 50% chances here - especially as the "negative" scenario is that I will be one of the richest people in the world Smiley

http://physics.ucsd.edu/do-the-math/2012/06/ruthless-extrapolation/

Once again, trend-fitting is excellent at predicting the past, but is useless for predicting the future unless your trend is a product of the analysis of fundamental growth mechanisms instead of past data. You are simply fitting data.

Look at these adoption curves: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_D9-JNTtRKgs/TBuFe2NvKHI/AAAAAAAABBE/Z3mDC6xW_aE/s1600/Picture+99.png

None of them were a perfect logistic, despite the fact that none were nearly so frictionless as Bitcoin adoption. The Internet, being the most recent and probably the most rapid, didn't pay much attention to exponential growth expectations.

It is not reasonable to expect that the adoption rate (and therefore the exponential trend) will remain constant throughout Bitcoin's rise. Media attention feeds off media attention in a self-reinforcing fashion that should logically accelerate the growth as a percentage of current users. Exponential growth is constant growth (in a percentage sense). It helps adoption, too, that the utility of a Bitcoin is increasing alongside the value - the much-vaunted "network effect".

This is more about predicting when and if the attention will slow than trying to force-fit exponential curves.

My bet stands, by the way, in case you really believe all this and aren't just trying to reverse the mistake you made by selling out at $700.

Quote from: Vycid on December 09, 2013, 10:06:31 AM
Breaking out of that triangle in a big way. Anyone want to place bets on recovery or bull trap?

You mean an actual bet? Yeah, sure. I feel we will go visit the exponential trendline.

I am game. 10 BTC that we don't touch your exponential trendline in December?

The one that projects $428, not one that incorporates data up to Dec. 9.



503. Post 3928564 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: Vycid on December 12, 2013, 12:25:00 AM
My firm analysis is that bitcoin is overvalued:

... blah blah blah ...
http://physics.ucsd.edu/do-the-math/2012/06/ruthless-extrapolation/

... blah blah blah ...

This is more about predicting when and if the attention will slow than trying to force-fit exponential curves.


From the statistics blog I linked, a visual aid to help people understand the dangers of exponential extrapolation. This is a logarithmic chart, the straight lines are exponential curves.





504. Post 3928752 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: rpietila on December 12, 2013, 12:50:15 AM
Quote
My bet stands, by the way, in case you really believe all this and aren't just trying to reverse the mistake you made by selling out at $700.

Breaking out of that triangle in a big way. Anyone want to place bets on recovery or bull trap?

You mean an actual bet? Yeah, sure. I feel we will go visit the exponential trendline.

I am game. 10 BTC that we don't touch your exponential trendline in December?

The one that projects $428, not one that incorporates data up to Dec. 9.

Ah, never saw that one. From the high point of the dead cat bounce, to the day that exponential trend is breached, last time it was 45 days. If we were to bet on similar terms, the bet would stand as follows:

- On or before 25. January 2014, the price is less than 573.

There is no much reason to bet 1:1 whether price goes to 428 in December. I am getting better odds by just selling at >2*428 Smiley


That's more than fair, there's a reason I tried to jump on that bet.  Wink More respect for not taking a -EV gamble.

I'd rather have access to my coins than bet on 573 though, especially since that doesn't prove anything about the exponential trend.


Quote from: rpietila on December 12, 2013, 12:50:15 AM
http://physics.ucsd.edu/do-the-math/2012/06/ruthless-extrapolation/

Once again, trend-fitting is excellent at predicting the past, but is useless for predicting the future unless your trend is a product of the analysis of fundamental growth mechanisms instead of past data. You are simply fitting data.

Incorrect. Phew. Understatement of the century. If you have read any of my threads, you know very well that I know a lot about many things, and actively use this knowledge to my advantage.

What comes to the predictive value, both of the previous big bubbles behaved nicely according to this model, with predictive value. We need to have jumped to something completely different, in order for this model not to continue holding true. The probability of this happening is well under 50%, even with Bitcoin Wink

I would argue we have jumped to something different. $70M in institutional money, pervasive and often positive mainstream media coverage... the rate that people are discovering Bitcoin is not growing at the same rate it has been. I've even started to see news articles that didn't start by explaining what Bitcoin is.

Institutional money is probably the most important thing in the short term. Even if the base of Bitcoin users grew at a fixed percentage rate, if the users coming in start to be financial institutions, that will have an outsize effect.

Up 'till now it's been mostly the spare money from nerds and ideologues. (I say this lovingly, being one.)

Quote from: rpietila on December 12, 2013, 12:50:15 AM
Quote
Look at these adoption curves: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_D9-JNTtRKgs/TBuFe2NvKHI/AAAAAAAABBE/Z3mDC6xW_aE/s1600/Picture+99.png

None of them were a perfect logistic, despite the fact that none were nearly so frictionless as Bitcoin adoption. The Internet, being the most recent and probably the most rapid, didn't pay much attention to exponential growth expectations.

Bitcoin price and adoption are different, and I have an article about this in store.

That's true, certainly, but what separates it from something like the dot-com bubble? That exceeded all of the expectations of exponential growth, and it made some people very rich on the way up before imploding. No trend could have predicted it before it happened, and any trends projected at the peak would have been horrendously wrong.



505. Post 3928919 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on December 12, 2013, 01:15:31 AM
I was bored....



EDIT: and apparently to drunk to make stupid graphs:

1.5 M Users = 0.5 % US Pop !!

i like this post... makes me all bullish inside Smiley

It's actually a global phenomenon though... 1.5M users worldwide, but how many are in the US? Half, tops?



506. Post 3931309 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on December 12, 2013, 09:56:09 AM
I seriously can't believe people are still trading on MtGox.
I use mtgox because I don't trust any other entity with much of my funds. We've seen many exchanges come and go (bitcoin24,bitcoin7,tradehill,bitparking etc) but mtgox has been here all the time.

Mtgox also has the highest price (and much volume/depth) and I am able to withdraw euro (or simply wait for price to equal any other exchange which happens occasionally). If I'm going to sell, it makes sense to sell for the highest price I can get.

In conclusion I like gox, and I feel that my funds are safe with them.

Goxxing doesn't bother me so much, yes it can be annoying, but trust is more important for me (but i don't trade a lot anyways). I think btc-e is great, low fees, many trading opportunities, but I don't trust them as much (or more precise I'm fearing that they will eventually be targeted by law enforcement).

It's time to start trusting Bitstamp. They've been around.



507. Post 3931422 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on December 12, 2013, 10:09:05 AM
I use mtgox because I don't trust any other entity with much of my funds. We've seen many exchanges come and go (bitcoin24,bitcoin7,tradehill,bitparking etc) but mtgox has been here all the time.
I see it the same. MtGox sucks, but at least they probably won't go away. Here is a relevant paper trying to quantify those risks: http://lyle.smu.edu/~tylerm/fc13.pdf

This is seriously great stuff.

You got any other papers on quantitative approaches to Bitcoin risk, Blitz?

Quote from: windjc on December 12, 2013, 10:10:01 AM
We are in a full bear market now and wishful thinking won't change a thing. Expect the price to go down for a long while (except the bounces here and there).

The best you can hope for is a sideways to downward movement lasting 2-6 weeks, but never going below $600. Thats best case scenario for you.

Money is flowing into the exchanges and massive amounts are accumulating on the sidelines.  When the market starts to go up again (after its found the new bottom its searching for now) that money is going to be forced back into the market and ATHs will be days away at that point.

I'm not eager to buy back, as it will take a really long time (several weeks to several months) to find a low. And yes I think it is going below $600. Anyway we will find out soon enough.

It took years to recover from 2011. It took months to recover from April 2013.  This rally will be even easier to recover from. Barring some bad news, it won't take several months before we start going up again. We might, MIGHT, dip below $600 but I really doubt it. I thought for sure we would go back to $50. So much so that I ignored the obvious fact that the bottom was in at $66.  People are staring at $600 now. Everyone knows the significance of that #.   Barring bad news, I don't think we go below it.  If we do then $500 will be the absolute bottom. But we will be headed north again, most bearish scenario, by February.

Agreed. The cycle is accelerating, all the signs are there. We're hitting the mainstream. Train is picking up steam, if you like.

Risto and the bears are myopically pointing to the meaningless trendline... look at the time lag between the April and November rallies compared to the behavior before, and tell me this thing isn't accelerating.

I'd be unsurprised to see the next rally inside of 3 months.



508. Post 3931471 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: gandhibt on December 12, 2013, 10:13:59 AM
I use mtgox because I don't trust any other entity with much of my funds. We've seen many exchanges come and go (bitcoin24,bitcoin7,tradehill,bitparking etc) but mtgox has been here all the time.
I see it the same. MtGox sucks, but at least they probably won't go away. Here is a relevant paper trying to quantify those risks: http://lyle.smu.edu/~tylerm/fc13.pdf

Gox had 80% share back when that was made.

And Bitfloor was still around. It was one of the "surviving exchanges".  Smiley



509. Post 3931517 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: solex on December 12, 2013, 10:16:41 AM
The markets look to be treading air for a leg down. HOWEVER, maybe this news will perk the price up!

http://blog.coinbase.com/post/69775463031/coinbase-raises-25-million-from-andreessen-horowitz



Son of a bitch.

I wanted Coinbase options so badly, but I didn't have the right skills for any of their open positions.



510. Post 3931714 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: rpietila on December 12, 2013, 10:33:43 AM
Quote
It took years to recover from 2011. It took months to recover from April 2013.  This rally will be even easier to recover from. Barring some bad news, it won't take several months before we start going up again. We might, MIGHT, dip below $600 but I really doubt it. I thought for sure we would go back to $50. So much so that I ignored the obvious fact that the bottom was in at $66.  People are staring at $600 now. Everyone knows the significance of that #.   Barring bad news, I don't think we go below it.  If we do then $500 will be the absolute bottom. But we will be headed north again, most bearish scenario, by February.

Agreed. The cycle is accelerating, all the signs are there. We're hitting the mainstream. Train is picking up steam, if you like.

Risto and the bears are myopically pointing to the meaningless trendline... look at the time lag between the April and November rallies compared to the behavior before, and tell me this thing isn't accelerating.

I'd be unsurprised to see the next rally inside of 3 months.

I have also had my first bubble, which is characterized by disbelief, and the second (first in which I was invested) characterized by euphoria and denial of bubblepop. Now in my third bubble I am wiser and know the trendline, and the value of pi() is still 3.14159... even in heaven, and some things just don't change, and even if they do, you can quantify then mathematically. This is analysis over emotion thing now. Some point in the next 3 months we will see 0.5, possibly lower, and afterwards I will tell you how much I made.

You(pl.) sound so much like me last April that I wonder if your investor cycle is one bubble behind me  Cheesy

You keep talking over and over about analysis, but the only analysis of substance that I've seen is the trendline, and you should know from undergraduate statistics that extrapolation cannot reliably predict the future.

Regression is great for predicting the impact of altering parameters in a controlled or otherwise constant system. But the Bitcoin system is different from how it was in April... and that means you cannot expect the same behavior, or even the same average rate of growth.



511. Post 3931893 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: macsga on December 12, 2013, 10:50:42 AM
Party is starting... Maybe TODAY we will see Risto's low before we see a new ATH (tomorrow)... forget months. We're talking days, maybe even hours here.  Grin Grin

Yes, CLEARLY this market is unstable and can't maintain support in the $800-$900 range.



512. Post 3931989 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: rpietila on December 12, 2013, 11:02:42 AM
And you're going to be eating crow AGAIN when your prediction (based on the past performance of bitcoin bubbles) comes up false.

How come I am so much richer than you if all I do is to handle money, and I do it so badly?  Roll Eyes How old are you, 22?

Quote
EDIT: In addition you say that 2011 left you in disbelief and 2013 in euphoria. Ummmm...notice that those 2 bubbles ended completely different. And yes, I am a bubble behind you, but I am aware enough to know that this bubble and the last will end completely different too.

What were the differences in the bubbles' endings?

I should clarify something about my own comments. When I question your abilities as a fortuneteller, I do not imply anything about your business acumen. If you started from nothing and built your own wealth, congratulations, that is a rare achievement. I would never argue that a good businessman cannot find wealth the hard way.

However, you are mortal and catastrophically overconfident in your ability to predict chaotic systems (and, as proven recently, even to manipulate them).



513. Post 3932181 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: rpietila on December 12, 2013, 11:15:21 AM
However, you are mortal and catastrophically overconfident in your ability to predict chaotic systems.

That is just plain misunderstanding. I know that probabilities add to 1 and I should not invest more than I can afford to lose Smiley

It is exactly the ordinary people who gamble with all their wealth daily (by taking a mortgage, for example). They are taking a serious financial risk. I am never taking any financial risk. By being risk-free I have been able to pursue the opportunities and grow our family wealth at about 51% APR over 11 years.

There is no earthly way to make 51% APR without the assumption of substantial risk. The best hedge funds don't manage 20%. Hell, trying to make 0% APR is still associated with nonzero risk. I think it'd do you some good to acknowledge the role luck has clearly played for you.

Anyway, we're in agreement about the gambling aspect. The difference - sometimes subtle - between gambling and investing is often lost on people, especially around here. It is never wise to have 100% of one's wealth invested in any one thing, even an apparent black swan such as Bitcoin. The outsize fraction of my portfolio that Bitcoin presently constitutes is largely of Bitcoin's own doing (and my ASICMiner derivatives trading).

I think it would be good to remind people here bent on making a quick buck - if you are gambling, there is always a house. If you aren't sure who the house is, one thing is clear: it isn't you.



514. Post 3932319 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Regarding the Coinbase Series B funding:

$25M is a substantial amount in the Bitcoin ecosystem. Very substantial. A couple of months ago, that would have constituted ~2.5% of the market cap; today it's still a very significant ~0.25%. This is for a startup in Series B.

These investors obviously see a long-term potential for Bitcoin far beyond $1000/ea or this wouldn't make sense at all. Venture capital expects exits at 10x profits or more for their successful ventures. That can't be reasonably expected in our current market.

The VC groups putting money into Coinbase are connected and influential. They know the sentiment in the big investment firms. This investment would not have been made if they were doubtful about the reception of Bitcoin.

Wall Street is coming, probably sooner rather than later.



515. Post 3932335 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: seleme on December 12, 2013, 11:42:46 AM
and removed...

Someone somewhere is feeling stupid.



516. Post 3932402 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: maz on December 12, 2013, 11:45:03 AM
I'm 40.

Ah OK, let's leave it there. I remember your entrance to the forum and was thinking oh sheez what a kid....  Cheesy

I appreciate your way of making money for you, and will tell when I have closed my trade, and how much I made. Peace? Smiley

Kid at heart maybe. Yes. But deadly serious about creating wealth.

I never trade more than 20% of my BTC. And its for short trades anyway. So I have no reason to argue with you really, we have difference of opinions from time to time but I think we both want it to go to the moo --- well, you know where I'm talking about.

Let's just allow ourselves to agree or disagree and not make it personal. I'm not an idiot. I understand all your charts and graphs (and all the others I see on this forum).  And I formulate my predictions based on the totality of information available. I've done pretty damn well so far.

I plan on having my own type of castle too. Wink

I have to admit, I would have taken you for less than <30 as well, just from your writing style. I started taking you a bit more seriously when you were willing to accept a 5btc bet that it was going to 1000 in 6 days, that was a good call, even though I had no intention to bet against you, it's nice to see someone stand behind their predictions with conviction.

Keep up the good post's, your amongst 1 in about 6 people I take seriously on this thread/forum!

Curious - how can you surmise age from writing style? I've never heard that before (except perhaps for people so young they haven't finished school yet).

Would you care to take a shot at mine?



517. Post 3932424 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on December 12, 2013, 11:51:53 AM
I seriously can't believe people are still trading on MtGox.
I use mtgox because I don't trust any other entity with much of my funds. We've seen many exchanges come and go (bitcoin24,bitcoin7,tradehill,bitparking etc) but mtgox has been here all the time.

Mtgox also has the highest price (and much volume/depth) and I am able to withdraw euro (or simply wait for price to equal any other exchange which happens occasionally). If I'm going to sell, it makes sense to sell for the highest price I can get.

In conclusion I like gox, and I feel that my funds are safe with them.

Goxxing doesn't bother me so much, yes it can be annoying, but trust is more important for me (but i don't trade a lot anyways). I think btc-e is great, low fees, many trading opportunities, but I don't trust them as much (or more precise I'm fearing that they will eventually be targeted by law enforcement).

How can you trust gox? How many times they have promised to do something and then just not done it? Only thing they have done is to be there, but that's only because people are willing to pay that outrageous fee and doesn't mind that they are ass raped in every major movement, Mark is doing a lot of money.

0.60% fee should be enough for everyone to fuck them off. It's scandalous fee.
I'd say 100% fee is much worse.  Wink (i wish mtgox would change their fee schedule to account for usd instead of btc though, but I have less than 0.5% fee at least)

You would have 0.2 on stamp and isn't stamp worth more trust?
I don't trust bitstamp more, I know they are located in the UK, but I don't know much about the owners. Did they apply for the appropriate licenses ? the reason gox is having withdraw delays (from what I understand) is that they are trying to get licensed, if bitstamp doesn't go that route it does come with a decent amount of legal risk. The price on bitstamp is very low compared to gox, but every now and then the price evens out, why sell at bitstamp when you can sell for $100 or even $200 more on gox? $100 extra makes the 0.6% fee looks like silly money.

Then there was a very critical security issue discovered in bitstamps trading engine , did that get fixed yet?

Another reason that doesn't really apply to their trustworthiness is that I can't use their 2 factor authentication atm, while with gox I have a yubikey. Not having 2 factor makes me feel more uneasy about keeping large sums on any exchange.



If I'm not mistaken, they are located in Slovenia, not the UK.

The owner is this dude, apparently: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/nejc-kodri%C4%8D/47/227/299



518. Post 3943010 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

My volatility senses are tingling.



519. Post 3943080 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):




520. Post 3943271 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: simonk83 on December 13, 2013, 02:28:47 AM
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1srdtz/jeopardy_tonight/

I wonder how many senior citizens across America were shouting something about scams/ponzis/pyramid schemes at their televisions when the Bitcoin clue came up.  Cheesy



521. Post 3943446 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: seleme on December 13, 2013, 02:52:54 AM
The only good thing right now is that DGC is rallying..

Ew.



522. Post 3943477 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: seleme on December 13, 2013, 02:55:21 AM
The only good thing right now is that DGC is rallying..

Ew.

200k+ in my wallet and it's 10 folds where I bought it  Kiss

Probably time to get rid of those.

Although I have no idea how, since 200k is more than the daily volume.



523. Post 3943509 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 13, 2013, 03:00:22 AM
The only good thing right now is that DGC is rallying..

Ew.

200k+ in my wallet and it's 10 folds where I bought it  Kiss

pump and dump....


buy FTC.
 

Isn't FTC dead by now?

I remember mining a bunch of FTC and CNC back during the post-April altcoin craze. Kept my GPU mining operation profitable for a while  Grin

Edit: China on the move.



524. Post 3943525 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 13, 2013, 03:03:11 AM
The only good thing right now is that DGC is rallying..

Ew.

200k+ in my wallet and it's 10 folds where I bought it  Kiss

pump and dump....


buy FTC.
 

Isn't FTC dead by now?

I remember mining a bunch of FTC and CNC back during the post-April altcoin craze. Kept my GPU mining operation profitable for a while  Grin

FTC is in 3rd place dude

Ahead of PPC/NMC? Wtf, time to short.



525. Post 3943550 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 13, 2013, 03:05:02 AM
The only good thing right now is that DGC is rallying..

Ew.

200k+ in my wallet and it's 10 folds where I bought it  Kiss

pump and dump....


buy FTC.
 

Isn't FTC dead by now?

I remember mining a bunch of FTC and CNC back during the post-April altcoin craze. Kept my GPU mining operation profitable for a while  Grin

FTC is in 3rd place dude

Ahead of PPC/NMC? Wtf, time to short.

its not about price

its about volume.

http://coinmarketcap.com/

Nevermind, it's in 10th place.

Man, I was about to head over to the alt sub and start offering FTC futures.



526. Post 3943570 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: Vycid on December 13, 2013, 03:06:01 AM
The only good thing right now is that DGC is rallying..

Ew.

200k+ in my wallet and it's 10 folds where I bought it  Kiss

pump and dump....


buy FTC.
 

Isn't FTC dead by now?

I remember mining a bunch of FTC and CNC back during the post-April altcoin craze. Kept my GPU mining operation profitable for a while  Grin

FTC is in 3rd place dude

Ahead of PPC/NMC? Wtf, time to short.

its not about price

its about volume.

http://coinmarketcap.com/

Nevermind, it's in 10th place.

Man, I was about to head over to the alt sub and start offering FTC futures.

OK, this quarkcoin shit... Is this a pure P&D or can someone justify real value to me?

I'm thinking that futures contracts will be easy money.



527. Post 3943648 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 13, 2013, 03:11:44 AM

go poke around in the quarkcoin (wtv coin) community, is it active? do you like their way of doing things?


It seems like Keiser's baby. I do not like him at all but that doesn't mean he won't convince people it's valuable for an indefinite period of time.



528. Post 3943684 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: seleme on December 13, 2013, 03:17:05 AM
The only good thing right now is that DGC is rallying..

Ew.

200k+ in my wallet and it's 10 folds where I bought it  Kiss

Probably time to get rid of those.

Although I have no idea how, since 200k is more than the daily volume.

Nope, I might get rid 16k over 200k I have if BTC continues to go against my position today, the rest is for long term.

what makes you think this coin has a future?

I dont know if it has a future but it is lulz.

I wish i had 200k

DGC has the best coin name of all out there, it can't get better than Digital Coin really, it's pretty fast, it has extremely active developer, it's own fiat exchange and merchant services coming in open beta n next week or two and it's extremely undervalued and non-hyped for it's worth. With all these things and only 11 millions coins mined so far they're sitting on 17th place of coinmarketcap, potential is huge.

I had big luck to buy 400k from two big asks on the very bottom for 18 BTC in last huge BTC rise, unfortunately I sold half when it doubled to cover my investment. That 400k would be worth 200 BTC at current price and probably million $ in few months.

Your value proposition is "it has a good name and an active developer"?

Even if it's in 17th place it's still got an implied value of $5M. Five million for a few months of a developer's time and a lot of wishful thinking. Is that reasonable?

Honest to god I think the best altcoin investment might be dogecoin.



529. Post 3943708 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on December 13, 2013, 03:20:12 AM
Why not Dogecoins?

Exactly.  Smiley

That really should be the standard for comparison. What does your coin do that dogecoin doesn't? Because it isn't funny, so if it doesn't have any advantages it's inferior.



530. Post 3943722 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: seleme on December 13, 2013, 03:22:26 AM
Why not Dogecoins?

Doge rulezz  Grin... I can't believe people are buying million of it for 0.1 BTC.

What's the total coin limit and current outstanding?



531. Post 3943731 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on December 13, 2013, 03:23:40 AM
The scamcoin craze is merely a byproduct of the larger bubble.

Unfortunately you have a good point.

If only there were ways to short sell anything besides LTC.



532. Post 3943782 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: seleme on December 13, 2013, 03:24:40 AM
Why not Dogecoins?

Doge rulezz  Grin... I can't believe people are buying million of it for 0.1 BTC.

What's the total coin limit and current outstanding?

100 billion total limit, not sure how much it is mined. But people mined 2 millions each 10-15 minutes first day.

OK. So a million coins is one hundred thousandth of the total possible supply, which in Bitcoin terms would 210 Bitcoins - meaning it trades at a 2100x discount per unit, comparable to DGC.

Sounds like a pretty good deal, actually.



533. Post 3943786 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 13, 2013, 03:29:17 AM
The only good thing right now is that DGC is rallying..

Ew.

200k+ in my wallet and it's 10 folds where I bought it  Kiss

Probably time to get rid of those.

Although I have no idea how, since 200k is more than the daily volume.

Nope, I might get rid 16k over 200k I have if BTC continues to go against my position today, the rest is for long term.

what makes you think this coin has a future?

I dont know if it has a future but it is lulz.

I wish i had 200k

DGC has the best coin name of all out there, it can't get better than Digital Coin really, it's pretty fast, it has extremely active developer, it's own fiat exchange and merchant services coming in open beta n next week or two and it's extremely undervalued and non-hyped for it's worth. With all these things and only 11 millions coins mined so far they're sitting on 17th place of coinmarketcap, potential is huge.

I had big luck to buy 400k from two big asks on the very bottom for 18 BTC in last huge BTC rise, unfortunately I sold half when it doubled to cover my investment. That 400k would be worth 200 BTC at current price and probably million $ in few months.

well all i know is without a real community behind it, it will die.

does it have a real community behind it?


it has 4chan behind it... and i hear them crazy fuckers buy lambos with their crypto.

http://elitedaily.com/envision/cars/boss-move-4chan-user-just-bought-lamborghini-200k-bitcoin/

DGC has 4chan behind it?? pricing lambos in DGC??

Get off 4chan, Goat. It's bad for your brain.



534. Post 3943799 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on December 13, 2013, 03:29:15 AM
The scamcoin craze is merely a byproduct of the larger bubble.

Unfortunately you have a good point.

If only there were ways to short sell anything besides LTC.
I'd never risk that. Who's to say that scamcoin #19 won't replace scamcoin #1? And really, after having seen Blightcoins move to an alltime high of ~.052 BTC per which translates into a valuation of 20% that of BTC (both eventual supplies), who is to say it can't happen again?

I can only recommend to anyone even thinking about it, don't do it. Don't short Bitcoin either.

It wouldn't be a risk, Blitz.

We'd short raid the fuck out of those coins.

A bubble can be popped by enough short interest.



535. Post 3943841 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on December 13, 2013, 03:32:28 AM
The only good thing right now is that DGC is rallying..

Ew.

200k+ in my wallet and it's 10 folds where I bought it  Kiss

Probably time to get rid of those.

Although I have no idea how, since 200k is more than the daily volume.

Nope, I might get rid 16k over 200k I have if BTC continues to go against my position today, the rest is for long term.

what makes you think this coin has a future?

I dont know if it has a future but it is lulz.

I wish i had 200k

DGC has the best coin name of all out there, it can't get better than Digital Coin really, it's pretty fast, it has extremely active developer, it's own fiat exchange and merchant services coming in open beta n next week or two and it's extremely undervalued and non-hyped for it's worth. With all these things and only 11 millions coins mined so far they're sitting on 17th place of coinmarketcap, potential is huge.

I had big luck to buy 400k from two big asks on the very bottom for 18 BTC in last huge BTC rise, unfortunately I sold half when it doubled to cover my investment. That 400k would be worth 200 BTC at current price and probably million $ in few months.

well all i know is without a real community behind it, it will die.

does it have a real community behind it?


it has 4chan behind it... and i hear them crazy fuckers buy lambos with their crypto.

http://elitedaily.com/envision/cars/boss-move-4chan-user-just-bought-lamborghini-200k-bitcoin/

DGC has 4chan behind it?? pricing lambos in DGC??

Get off 4chan, Goat. It's bad for your brain.

4chan got me into bitcoin, and into a lambo!  fuck my brain, the rest of my is happy!

That makes me so sad. I spent a lot of time around 2004-2007 on 4chan but moved to reddit until around 2011, when I cut down on my unhealthy internet consumption and focused on other things.

I was oblivious to Bitcoin until earlier this year.

I'm so sorry I ever left you, 4chan...



536. Post 3943974 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

BACK TO THE TOPIC AT HAND.

$950 is broken at gox, $900 at stamp.

C H O O2 = C H O O
                   H
                   O    
                   O      





537. Post 3944109 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: seleme on December 13, 2013, 04:07:05 AM
It seriously doesn't look good for my btc short position now, looks like I'm going to get busted there heavily. Only some big dump could save me.

I should know better when I saw those big ask walls on Stamp and Bitfinex at 840-850 being eaten in no time. Big mistake.

Sorry it's turned out so poorly.

Why on earth did you decide to short? Or do you mean you sold part of your position when you say "short"?



538. Post 3944148 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: TERA on December 13, 2013, 04:09:28 AM
This is like the bounce from 120 to 145 in april, after the drop from 165 and before the drop to 80.



The symmetry.

Hmm, all I see is the post-overshoot ringing pattern, same as April. That tells me we're settling somewhere near this price, and the long-term aftermath of April would tell me we'd be in for a bear market after the price settles.

But the positive news cycle hasn't slowed ($25M for Coinbase in Series B? Are you kidding me?), so the bear market will probably be exceptionally brief, if it manifests at all.



539. Post 3944210 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: Vycid on December 13, 2013, 04:13:46 AM
This is like the bounce from 120 to 145 in april, after the drop from 165 and before the drop to 80.



The symmetry.

Hmm, all I see is the post-overshoot ringing pattern, same as April. That tells me we're settling somewhere near this price, and the long-term aftermath of April would tell me we'd be in for a bear market after the price settles.

But the positive news cycle hasn't slowed ($25M for Coinbase in Series B? Are you kidding me?), so the bear market will probably be exceptionally brief, if it manifests at all.

Here's what I'm talking about. Top is March-April. Bottom is prior 60d.





The ringing cycle is shorter (system is more highly damped) because the market is larger and confidence is greater.

Similarly I expect a shorter bear market, if it manifests at all.

On the other hand, bulls will be pleased to know that I said this a month ago at the giant beartrap, shortly before it established new ATHs.

Quote from: Vycid on November 19, 2013, 11:46:21 PM
Another sell off developing.

Yup, typical "ringing" pattern after the overshoot blow-off. Same as April.





Yawn. Predictable.

We can either look at this as me being wrong, or there having been two consecutive bubbles. I prefer the latter.  Smiley



540. Post 3945805 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on December 13, 2013, 08:00:15 AM
This is like the bounce from 120 to 145 in april, after the drop from 165 and before the drop to 80.



The symmetry.

Hmm, all I see is the post-overshoot ringing pattern, same as April. That tells me we're settling somewhere near this price, and the long-term aftermath of April would tell me we'd be in for a bear market after the price settles.

But the positive news cycle hasn't slowed ($25M for Coinbase in Series B? Are you kidding me?), so the bear market will probably be exceptionally brief, if it manifests at all.

Here's what I'm talking about. Top is March-April. Bottom is prior 60d.





The ringing cycle is shorter (system is more highly damped) because the market is larger and confidence is greater.

Similarly I expect a shorter bear market, if it manifests at all.

On the other hand, bulls will be pleased to know that I said this a month ago at the giant beartrap, shortly before it established new ATHs.

Another sell off developing.

Yup, typical "ringing" pattern after the overshoot blow-off. Same as April.





Yawn. Predictable.

We can either look at this as me being wrong, or there having been two consecutive bubbles. I prefer the latter.  Smiley

You don't really believe in all this stuff right? I mean you're just joking with all those lines and comparing charts etc right?

I absolutely believe a system seeking equilibrium will exhibit ringing behavior after a significant perturbation.

The lines are garbage, of course, but you should expect that pattern after a bubble has popped - just like it manifested in April. So I think it is indeed informative that we're seeing that pattern now.



541. Post 3946443 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: TERA on December 13, 2013, 09:09:25 AM
There are just too many negative indicators on the daily chart and eerily familiar trap patterns for me to go full btc now. I went 40% btc just so I could chill out and not "miss the train".

I know from experience the best thing I can do when I'm frustrated with the market direction is to take a position with it and then it'll probably reverse,

Guys! Guys! The tea leaves look super negative and today is Friday the 13th!

Sell!



542. Post 3946896 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: seleme on December 13, 2013, 09:58:11 AM
And millionth time, I don't care about holding bitcoin all the time, unlike permabulls who care only about usd dollar worth of their bitcoins I care about rising my Bitcoin value. That's why I trade and that's what I managed to do trading. Bad trade here and there is acceptable and perfectly normal.

I seek constantly to increase my bitcoin holdings, but it is even more unacceptable to have fewer bitcoins than I do now than it is desirable to have additional coins.

Therefore I do not even consider currency trading unless I genuinely have a larger edge on the market than the transaction fees will cost me (I do not believe this has ever been the case).



543. Post 3946927 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Half a million USD wall at $990? Pfffft.




544. Post 3946936 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: seleme on December 13, 2013, 10:12:36 AM
And millionth time, I don't care about holding bitcoin all the time, unlike permabulls who care only about usd dollar worth of their bitcoins I care about rising my Bitcoin value. That's why I trade and that's what I managed to do trading. Bad trade here and there is acceptable and perfectly normal.

I seek constantly to increase my bitcoin holdings, but it is even more unacceptable to have fewer bitcoins than I do now than to have additional coins.

Therefore I do not even consider currency trading unless I genuinely have a larger edge on the market than the transaction fees will cost me (I do not believe this has ever been the case).

No risk, no gain.

I would be scared to trade only if I would reach quantity of Bitcoin that would make me completely happy.

Til then I'll trade like there is no tomorrow, I'll be rich soon with this shit or I won't have any.

Something between is not acceptable.

Not true. I do not believe I ever took significant risk with my ASICMiner options strategy and I made a buttload of money. I would be a millionaire if there was any depth to the derivatives market.

Where irrationality rules, money is easy.

By the way, you obviously have 100+ coins. That means if Bitcoin succeeds, even marginally, you're rich. So at this point you should stop playing games with your money.



545. Post 3947054 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: seleme on December 13, 2013, 10:21:43 AM
And millionth time, I don't care about holding bitcoin all the time, unlike permabulls who care only about usd dollar worth of their bitcoins I care about rising my Bitcoin value. That's why I trade and that's what I managed to do trading. Bad trade here and there is acceptable and perfectly normal.

I seek constantly to increase my bitcoin holdings, but it is even more unacceptable to have fewer bitcoins than I do now than to have additional coins.

Therefore I do not even consider currency trading unless I genuinely have a larger edge on the market than the transaction fees will cost me (I do not believe this has ever been the case).

No risk, no gain.

I would be scared to trade only if I would reach quantity of Bitcoin that would make me completely happy.

Til then I'll trade like there is no tomorrow, I'll be rich soon with this shit or I won't have any.

Something between is not acceptable.

Not true. I do not believe I ever took significant risk with my ASICMiner options strategy and I made a buttload of money. I would be a millionaire if there was any depth to the derivatives market.

Where irrationality rules, money is easy.

By the way, you obviously have 100+ coins. That means if Bitcoin succeeds, even marginally, you're rich. So at this point you should stop playing games with your money.

Of course you took the risk, lol... The fact you think you didn't is irrelevant completely. Risk is sometimes smaller, sometimes bigger but as soon as you send coins from your wallet you're at risk Wink. I've had many trades that look like easy money that went bad or vice verse.

Yes, I do hold 100+ btc in various crypto investments. I do not think that is enough though.

Upon reflection, yeah, the counterparty risk was significant. I guess I knew that at the time, although I didn't really anticipate we'd lose both Bitfunder and BTCT before the end of the year.



546. Post 3947156 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: seleme on December 13, 2013, 10:30:19 AM
Of course you took the risk, lol... The fact you think you didn't is irrelevant completely. Risk is sometimes smaller, sometimes bigger but as soon as you send coins from your wallet you're at risk Wink. I've had many trades that look like easy money that went bad or vice verse.

Yes, I do hold 100+ btc in various crypto investments. I do not think that is enough though.

You should hangout with Risto then. I find 100BTC perfectly enough for anyone. My advice is "Don't be greedy". All you have to do is hold.

No, I won't hold as long as I think there is opportunity to trade.

100 could settle me for life only if BTC completely explode.

500 or 1000 could do it earlier. And I think betting with trading to reach 500/1000 is much safer option than to bet BTC will be 20-30k worth one day.

You understand you will still have the ability to invest your money AFTER Bitcoin, right? If you walk away with the equivalent of 4 million USD, say, you could anticipate hedge fund returns averaging $300,000-400,000 a year without touching your principal. Read: with $4M capital you could realistically have an income of $300-400k without lifting a finger.

300-400k sounds pretty damn set for life.

I think most of us believe that success for Bitcoin means a price above $30k-40k.



547. Post 3947178 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: maz on December 13, 2013, 10:36:21 AM
Even as a short-term bear I could see last night coming a mile away. It's a basic rule that the price crashes when everyones going to the moon, so with bitfinex totally shorted out last night and everyone expecting the drop, what was there left to do but buy back in when it didn't drop, now we're back up at the high 900's when we were almost finding a stable platform at high 800's low 900's. This bull/bear yoyo'ing could go on for weeks now because there wont be another rally for a while most likely.

I'd give it a day or two... THIS IS SPART... errr.. I mean Bitcoin. Grin

I honestly can't see it Macsga, I mean the kind of mentality we have just now is like 'well we're up at ~900 now, so we may as well just rally up to 2k! lets go!', but in fact the rally which brought us to ~1240 and thus ~900 was several months of built up pressure and many positive factors including China, regardless of whether China was exploiting the ability to make quick bux through arbitrage or criminals were using it for laundering or just people in China getting on board. I think we have squeezed all of the juice out of this current 'bitcoin bull period' and to take it to the next level will require a slow period of a month or two to let the pressure build up again before the next explosion.

Hey, I remember this argument... at $600 after the first correction.

We have no idea how much "pressure" is left.



548. Post 3947305 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: rpietila on December 13, 2013, 10:46:51 AM
So I am contemplating to reduce/leave the forum for a few months. I have also other projects. Thoughts?

I am certain that a man of your means has better things to do with his time than generate Excel trends through historical data and pretend it reveals secrets about the future.



549. Post 3947344 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: rpietila on December 13, 2013, 10:50:02 AM
you still have to set strict stop-losses and always follow them.

Are you willing to quantify this stop-loss approach, so that I could run a few simulations?

Eg. "always sell when price dips 10% from the ATH", "Buy back at ATH"

I'd be curious to see how that backtests, actually. I believe Quantopian has integrated some Bitcoin data.

Still, Bitcoin has only been at the ATH for a few brief periods in its history, so I don't know if the data set is large enough to establish anything with any certainty.



550. Post 3947378 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: rpietila on December 13, 2013, 10:52:13 AM
So I am contemplating to reduce/leave the forum for a few months. I have also other projects. Thoughts?

I am certain that a man of your means has better things to do with his time than generate Excel trends through historical data and pretend it reveals secrets about the future.

Especially as I reveal a secret to you: just yesterday I hired an excel-wiz to crunch the numbers, and he can even post the charts here! The ominous lack of visualization is just my inability to transmit the graphics Smiley

If you've hired a professional statistician on your dime for the community's benefit, we are obviously grateful.

You don't know any folks that know how to do system dynamics modeling, do you? I'd take that kind of analysis very seriously indeed.



551. Post 3947398 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: macsga on December 13, 2013, 10:57:24 AM

If you've hired a professional statistician on your dime for the community's benefit, we are obviously grateful.

You don't know any folks that know any system dynamics, do you? I'd take that kind of analysis very seriously indeed.

I can only *READ* those... remember this is a chaotic system.

This is a system driven by mass adoption of an invention, which has been modeled before and can be modeled here.

I should clarify: a system dynamics model won't help you with your daytrading, but it WILL provide the sort of signals rpietila is seeking about bitcoins being overbought/oversold.



552. Post 3947445 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: macsga on December 13, 2013, 11:00:06 AM

If you've hired a professional statistician on your dime for the community's benefit, we are obviously grateful.

You don't know any folks that know any system dynamics, do you? I'd take that kind of analysis very seriously indeed.

I can only *READ* those... remember this is a chaotic system.

This is a system driven by mass adoption of an invention, which has been modeled before and can be modeled here.

I don't want to play it the smartguy here; but do you really think this simplified model can cover bitcoin dynamics?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_dynamics

I SERIOUSLY don't.

I think it'd be so immensely superior to an extrapolated trendline as to be unworthy of discussion.

I repeat: this is not a tool for daytrading. This would be a tool to help indicate, in general, when bitcoins are overbought and oversold, so you can better identify the tops of bubbles and the bottoms of the following crash; and when there's significant possibility of another bubble in the near future, and when we're headed for an extended bear market.



553. Post 3947558 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on December 13, 2013, 11:08:47 AM
The only thing I don't like with being a bear is that posting in the forum is not fun anymore.

Don't put so much value in what other people have to say. I for one love it when I say something and no-one agrees, while at the same time I'm very certain of my opinion. I'm a contrarian at heart though Smiley

Contrarians are often lonely, but always win the biggest.



554. Post 3947791 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: maz on December 13, 2013, 11:34:24 AM



http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=buy%20bitcoin%2C%20buy%20bitcoins%2C%20what%20is%20bitcoin%2C%20bitcoin%20exchange&date=today%201-m&cmpt=q

Too early to glean anything meaningful from this. The number of searches per day is greater than it was in mid-november, but unsurprisingly the pace has slowed from the fever pitch it hit at the ATHs.



555. Post 3955468 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: rpietila on December 13, 2013, 10:50:28 PM
Everybody understands that *if* this maintains itself (or go better) next week will be rising like hell... right?

No. Math says that it takes 10x more everything to make the price rise from 10x higher level.

We do not have 10 times more anything, compared to last summer. 5 times we have, so the price is overvalued by a factor of 2, and will go down -50%.

I have thousands of lines of research on the subject but nobody reads it anyway so why even post...

Profoundly incorrect.

lrn2pricediscovery

Quote from: macsga on December 13, 2013, 11:12:14 PM
I really believe that Risto is seriously trolling in here. It's virtually IMPOSSIBLE to predict ANYTHING for sure into such a system like BTC. A serious prediction of ANY chaotic system (not one like we're observing here, which may as well be the mother of all chaotic systems) would have been in the timeframe of minutes or hours at max, not days; nor weeks.

ANY data provided and calculated may as well be proved as right, also as wrong. If he managed to make it based onto his calculations it's good for him and may as well define a brand new IQ entity by himself. I seriously salute him! But I don't think he did it only because of them. Luck is a special and important factor in this.

Just saying (if you want theoretical proof I can also support what I've just typed).


Again: system dynamics DOES have approaches for things like Bitcoin, where the model is simply of questionable accuracy instead of completely worthless.



556. Post 3955522 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: TERA on December 13, 2013, 11:16:11 PM


 Undecided




557. Post 3955588 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

CHUGGA CHUGGA

TOOT TOOT

STAY CLEAR OF THE TRACKS
PRICE DISCOVERY IN PROGRESS



558. Post 3955639 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: dgarcia on December 13, 2013, 11:28:30 PM
Of course with China anything is possible, we can all be wrong, and nobody knows what's going to happen. They have messed up all our TA and seem to have their own TA like 'the book of the path of the dragon'.

The Chinese dragon is ripping the faces off a few bears at the moment.


It has raised 3%!
It's going to outer space!

This guy gets it!

CH00 CH00!!!!1



559. Post 3955825 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: rpietila on December 13, 2013, 11:33:45 PM
I really believe that Risto is seriously trolling in here. It's virtually IMPOSSIBLE to predict ANYTHING for sure into such a system like BTC. A serious prediction of ANY chaotic system (not one like we're observing here, which may as well be the mother of all chaotic systems) would have been in the timeframe of minutes or hours at max, not days; nor weeks.

ANY data provided and calculated may as well be proved as right, also as wrong. If he managed to make it based onto his calculations it's good for him and may as well define a brand new IQ entity by himself. I seriously salute him! But I don't think he did it only because of them. Luck is a special and important factor in this.

Just saying (if you want theoretical proof I can also support what I've just typed).


I have a special kind of mind, it is quite simple, but it can calculate monetary probabilities very well. Somebody else may choke on his numbers, or shortcircuit and SHOUT that it is impossible to predict anything with certainty. Sure it is. Still some people win in poker and others don't.

I have a simple model that shows (among others) that after bubble pop, as long as the price is 0.2 or more log-units over the trendline, it is not possible to sell at a profit in 1-6 months timeframe. It is quite sobering: by selling at $628 today, the buyback at a profit is guaranteed for many months to come.

Chances that the model ends up faulty (that despite their mutual differences, 2 previous bubbles have something intrinsic in common that the 3rd does not have) are 20-30%, which means that the odds are way in favor. With this kind of odds it is Kelly optimal to risk about 40% of your net worth.

Any doubts I had that you might have been as knowledgeable as you claim to be have just been washed away in one stroke.

Sadly your mind apparently cannot grasp the concept that in a chaotic, dynamic system, what happened in the past cannot be used to predict the future unless the circumstances are exactly the same.

Not to mention: it was far more likely that the two bubbles would show some mutual similarity (both being bubbles) than no similarity at all. But just because those similarities exist does not mean should be understood as anything more than stochastic noise; it could have just as easily been any other of the countless possible permutations that you would now be using to "guarantee profit".



560. Post 3955900 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on December 13, 2013, 11:50:38 PM

you make a claim that btc will go down 50%. Then try to make a bet that has nothing to do with btc going down 50%?

What am I missing?

Probably that he's a little cray cray.



561. Post 3956212 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: Voodah on December 14, 2013, 12:16:24 AM
Don't do it guys.

It's ostentatious a la WallStreet. I can live off of 1 BTC for two or three months down here in Argentina.

Don't throw 50 away ! It makes me cringe..

They have ridiculous amounts of money, and the money won't be destroyed here, it would just change hands.

Goat's bet is more than fair (in contrast to mine, where I was seeking to troll a +EV bet out of rpietila). If rpietila doesn't accept this bet it is proof that he doesn't believe the things he says with any conviction, he's just trying to drive the price down.



562. Post 3956250 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: Voodah on December 14, 2013, 12:19:46 AM
Don't do it guys.

It's ostentatious a la WallStreet. I can live off of 1 BTC for two or three months down here in Argentina.

Don't throw 50 away ! It makes me cringe..

They have ridiculous amounts of money, and the money won't be destroyed here, it would just change hands.

I don't know man... it sure reminds me of the phone talks of Enron's traders (someone posted the documentary here yesterday, thanks btw!).

I'm pretty sure that's not the path our new BTC rich should take.

What?

Enron was cooking the books, this is a friendly wager.



563. Post 3956327 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: rpietila on December 14, 2013, 12:25:02 AM
$200 is easy as fuck, but i still dont get what this has to do with the claim btc WILL go down 50%

(good that I didnt close this yet) Wink

If you are willing to bet on the low point of BTC, I can do that also.

Do you pay me 2 to 1 in USD that Bitcoin will visit $450 in either Gox/Bitstamp in 3 months?

You lose, I get $50k.
I lose, you get $25k.


I will do it at 1 to 1 odds at your date  February 13th 24:00 UTC,  

Since you made the claim I think it is silly to give you odds. I will do $50,000 or $25,000.

Hack, and roll backs or other crazy stuff we need to rule out. Govt making BTC illegal or whatever and price crashes would be fine. But like errors on the charts, would not count.

This is cool?

Ah, a little bit too far from what I was thinking, and too tired to make a counterproposal. Let's check tomorrow if we still have a cockfight Wink

You made the claim today, if you don't want to back it up today that is fine. There will be no bet tomorrow.

Thanks

Fine.

This just in: rpietila is full of shit, doesn't believe in his Excel trends any more than anyone else does.

More at 7.



564. Post 3957445 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: Rampion on December 14, 2013, 02:11:17 AM
china will go thru 5500 soon, they already punctured it and now they are oversold

Having seen my magic, perhaps you can now publicly acknowledge that I have 10,000 bitcoins, apologize, stfu and gtfo. OK?  Grin

If you want to prove that just sign a message with an address holding 10k and put that signed message in your signature - no need for nobody to "acknowledge", that would be a hard cold proof.

That's pure non spoofable crypto, heart and soul of Bitcoin.

That's not hard cold proof. It's susceptible to Man in the Middle attack.

Care to elaborate that? How could rpietila perform "a man in the middle attack" and make bitcointalk.org users to believe he signed a message with an address holding 10k BTC if he is not in control of an address with such an amount?

Because there is nothing linking the Bitcoin address to his forum account. Hypothetically speaking, he could just ask a friend who has access to 10K BTC to sign a message and just post it. The difference is there is the possibility he can get 10K BTC account to sign a message, but he may not necessary control it.

But that's no man in the middle attack, in that case Risto would just be "borrowing" the coins for a specific purpose - signing the message, which is a proof he can have access (at least for that very purpose of signing the message) to 10k coins.

In any case, only a retard would accept to use 10k of his own coins to sign a message like "this coins belong to Risto Pietila", in practical terms Risto's "friend" would be handing to Risto the control of those bitcoins. That's like signing a contract, explain to a judge that "it was just a favor".

No.

The owner of those coins could sign the message for him, perhaps for a fee. Risto would never need to control them. Virtualfaqs is right.



565. Post 3957705 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: Rampion on December 14, 2013, 02:43:52 AM
china will go thru 5500 soon, they already punctured it and now they are oversold

Having seen my magic, perhaps you can now publicly acknowledge that I have 10,000 bitcoins, apologize, stfu and gtfo. OK?  Grin

If you want to prove that just sign a message with an address holding 10k and put that signed message in your signature - no need for nobody to "acknowledge", that would be a hard cold proof.

That's pure non spoofable crypto, heart and soul of Bitcoin.

That's not hard cold proof. It's susceptible to Man in the Middle attack.

Care to elaborate that? How could rpietila perform "a man in the middle attack" and make bitcointalk.org users to believe he signed a message with an address holding 10k BTC if he is not in control of an address with such an amount?

Because there is nothing linking the Bitcoin address to his forum account. Hypothetically speaking, he could just ask a friend who has access to 10K BTC to sign a message and just post it. The difference is there is the possibility he can get 10K BTC account to sign a message, but he may not necessary control it.

But that's no man in the middle attack, in that case Risto would just be "borrowing" the coins for a specific purpose - signing the message, which is a proof he can have access (at least for that very purpose of signing the message) to 10k coins.

In any case, only a retard would accept to use 10k of his own coins to sign a message like "this coins belong to Risto Pietila", in practical terms Risto's "friend" would be handing to Risto the control of those bitcoins. That's like signing a contract, explain to a judge that "it was just a favor".

No.

The owner of those coins could sign the message for him. Risto would never need to control them. Virtualfaqs is right.

Meatspace equivalent: I can sign a contract in which I transfer to you the ownership of my house, but without ever handing to you the keys.

Finally:

If I have to prove on a forum that I own a $10M mansion, how about uploading a valid and verifiable contract of ownership of such mansion in my name? Wouldn't you consider that a proof of ownership?

Justin Bieber could be my friend and he could have signed the contract as a favour, without ever handing to me the keys. But that's beyond retarded and plainly ridiculous. As retarded, ridiculous and unlikely as expecting someone to cryptographically sign a message such as "This 10k BTC belong to Risto Pietila" with an address holding 10k BTC that do NOT belong to Risto.

Probably you do not fully understand the strong implications of such a message - any cryptographically signed message is potentially binding, and that's why the QT client warns you about signing only messages to which content you fully agree. If Risto has such "friends" that sign those messages for him I congratulate and envy him.

Uh, no, that's not the meatspace equivalent. There's no practical significance to signing someone else's message with your address. The person with the private key maintains full and absolute control. Said owner could simply transfer those coins after a suitable amount of time passed to satisfy everyone.

The meatspace equivalent is telling Risto's buddies that he owns your house.



566. Post 3958220 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: Rampion on December 14, 2013, 03:14:12 AM
china will go thru 5500 soon, they already punctured it and now they are oversold

Having seen my magic, perhaps you can now publicly acknowledge that I have 10,000 bitcoins, apologize, stfu and gtfo. OK?  Grin

If you want to prove that just sign a message with an address holding 10k and put that signed message in your signature - no need for nobody to "acknowledge", that would be a hard cold proof.

That's pure non spoofable crypto, heart and soul of Bitcoin.

That's not hard cold proof. It's susceptible to Man in the Middle attack.

Care to elaborate that? How could rpietila perform "a man in the middle attack" and make bitcointalk.org users to believe he signed a message with an address holding 10k BTC if he is not in control of an address with such an amount?

Because there is nothing linking the Bitcoin address to his forum account. Hypothetically speaking, he could just ask a friend who has access to 10K BTC to sign a message and just post it. The difference is there is the possibility he can get 10K BTC account to sign a message, but he may not necessary control it.

But that's no man in the middle attack, in that case Risto would just be "borrowing" the coins for a specific purpose - signing the message, which is a proof he can have access (at least for that very purpose of signing the message) to 10k coins.

In any case, only a retard would accept to use 10k of his own coins to sign a message like "this coins belong to Risto Pietila", in practical terms Risto's "friend" would be handing to Risto the control of those bitcoins. That's like signing a contract, explain to a judge that "it was just a favor".

No.

The owner of those coins could sign the message for him. Risto would never need to control them. Virtualfaqs is right.

Meatspace equivalent: I can sign a contract in which I transfer to you the ownership of my house, but without ever handing to you the keys.

Finally:

If I have to prove on a forum that I own a $10M mansion, how about uploading a valid and verifiable contract of ownership of such mansion in my name? Wouldn't you consider that a proof of ownership?

Justin Bieber could be my friend and he could have signed the contract as a favour, without ever handing to me the keys. But that's beyond retarded and plainly ridiculous. As retarded, ridiculous and unlikely as expecting someone to cryptographically sign a message such as "This 10k BTC belong to Risto Pietila" with an address holding 10k BTC that do NOT belong to Risto.

Probably you do not fully understand the strong implications of such a message - any cryptographically signed message is potentially binding, and that's why the QT client warns you about signing only messages to which content you fully agree. If Risto has such "friends" that sign those messages for him I congratulate and envy him.

Uh, no, that's not the meatspace equivalent. There's no practical significance to signing someone else's message with your address. The person with the private key maintains full and absolute control. Said owner could simply transfer those coins after a suitable amount of time passed to satisfy everyone.

The meatspace equivalent is telling Risto's buddies that he owns your house.

We will have to agree to disagree: i) For you cryptographically signed messages have no significance, ii) for me they have a very strong significance.

You do not "own" the coins; the private keys "own" the coins. Using the private key of an addy holding 10k BTC of your coins to sign a message stating than the owner is an individual other than you has a very strong significance for me and I wouldn't do it. As a start, I would be worried about that individual claiming in the future that that priv keys were stolen from him. Sure no judge would understand nothing about this (yet), so you might be right about the lack of "practical" significances as there are no legal precedents on that sense - but I bet there will be a lot of practical significances in the futures. I believe we will see a lot of smart properties/contracts implemented on the blockchain and a lot of legally binding agreements based on message-signing with addresses privkeys.

In any case: I don't think rpietila has 10k BTC nor the access to someone with 10k BTC willing to sign on his behalf the following message: "these 10k BTC belong to Risto Pietila"

I can understand how you would come to that conclusion if you are of the opinion that the signed message is of great significance, and from a theoretical standpoint it's not unreasonable to think so.

My thinking is that you can currently make no practical legal claim based on a signed message for the reasons described, and therefore it does not represent any kind of transfer of ownership.

In any event, I would be willing to sign such a message for a relatively nominal fee, since I'd just transfer the coins afterward. I'm sure I'm not the only one that would, either, even if you wouldn't.

So I wouldn't accept it as evidence if Risto DID sign such a message, although it would go a long way toward making me believe he does control so many coins.



567. Post 3958596 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: TERA on December 14, 2013, 04:08:48 AM
A candle is forming.

That tends to happen on candlestick charts.



568. Post 3958893 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: kjj on December 14, 2013, 05:14:01 AM

We will have to agree to disagree: i) For you cryptographically signed messages have no significance, ii) for me they have a very strong significance.

Legally binding in USA
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/7001

And much of the world
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_signatures_and_law

Hilariously, what we think of as digital signatures (cryptographic) are pretty much just an afterthought to most of those laws.  Typically, those laws are about fax machines, and web buttons labelled "I agree" and other such nonsense.

Bullshit. If you made a website with the following elements:

"I own all your shit now" and a button stating "I agree"

A visitor clicking said button would not transfer ownership.

Similarly a "these are Risto's coins" message is not a contract and isn't binding.



569. Post 3974326 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.38h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on December 15, 2013, 09:31:44 AM
Still wondering who will nail what the grey line on Bitconwisdom is.  

My guess:

Imagine that the cumulative bid and ask plots are the sides of a valley. (Turn that part of the chart 90 degrees counter-clockwise)  Fill the valley gradually with water. At each level of the water, mark the midpoint between the left and right banks.

That plot would be read as follows: suppose that we pair up the highest bids with the lowest offers, at a price that halfway both.  As you do that, record the current price on one axis, and the total amount traded so far on the other axis,

Makes sense?

This "flooding valley midpoint" explanation reminds me strongly of the thermal expansion mechanism Cheesy




570. Post 3979189 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.38h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 15, 2013, 05:26:56 PM
ok i wana talk about the poll a little

1   - 4 (3.6%)
10   - 2 (1.8%)
100   - 17 (15.5%)
1000   - 27 (24.5%)
10000   - 14 (12.7%)
BUY BUY BUY   - 46 (41.8%)

i'm very disappointed....

41.8% of the bitcoiners are trolls.
12.7% have self esteem issues ( 10,000line of code for 1BTC wtf dudes! )
24.5% do not value their work very much
3.6% are crazy lazy
only 15.5% are hard working

a good programer thinks for 1 hour and then writes 1 line, so the correct answer is 10 lines of codes, 98% of the poeple got it dead wrong!



 Cheesy

Expecting ~$10 per line of code to do anything is pretty lazy, I think. Actual pay for a developer is probably closer to $1.

In my limited experience enterprise applications are made with shitloads of code, not this mythical "good programming".  Smiley



571. Post 3982506 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.38h):

Quote from: Erdogan on December 15, 2013, 09:31:31 PM
China's about to wake up in 3-4hrs.
I wonder what they've got in store for us!

I'm glad the price popped up above 900 again on Gox - wouldn't be fun to have Monday start with a downwards momentum into the low 800's.

This china-waking-up stuff is pathetic. Can you not imagine a chinese speculant staying up all nignt to speculate, just as you do yourself?

I didn't know they called them "speculants" in China. TIL.



572. Post 4020485 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Fuck's sake. I go abroad for a couple days and China decides to trigger the apocalypse.

And I have no access to my stash so I can't even trade this.

Bitstamp better not break $500 or we're gonna have Risto all up in our faces acting like this announcement was foreseeable.



573. Post 4020528 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Quote from: NamelessOne on December 18, 2013, 06:19:01 AM
This has nothing to do with a bubble.  The Chinese government is simply shutting down Bitcoin for all intents and purposes.  Calling this a bubble would be like saying Silk Road is a bubble or Liberty Reserve was a bubble.  They're things that once had value and no longer have value due to gov't intervention.

Agreed! The rest of the world doesn't exist!!  Roll Eyes  Tongue

Of course it does,  but most of the value added in the past couple months was due to China. It is totally unreasonable to call this a bubble if the government actually destroyed that value.



574. Post 4020567 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Quote from: keewee on December 18, 2013, 06:24:04 AM
Fuck's sake. I go abroad for a couple days and China decides to trigger the apocalypse.

And I have no access to my stash so I can't even trade this.

Bitstamp better not break $500 or we're gonna have Risto all up in our faces acting like this announcement was foreseeable.

Dammit, it's looking more and more likely too  Undecided

It may bounce off $266 and end up at $600 or so.



575. Post 4020612 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Quote from: CryptStorm on December 18, 2013, 06:27:05 AM
Fuck's sake. I go abroad for a couple days and China decides to trigger the apocalypse.

And I have no access to my stash so I can't even trade this.

Bitstamp better not break $500 or we're gonna have Risto all up in our faces acting like this announcement was foreseeable.

yeah, his math calculations saw it.  Grin

Oh NOOOOOOOOOOO VYCID!!!! Hope you're positions are OK!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I had no orders and everything in cold storage - wouldn't leave the country any other way.

But it also means I missed a huge chance to double my stash (or more - remains to be seen), since I knew what that announcement meant immediately after reading it.

Ces't la vie.



576. Post 4020660 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

$593 now on Stamp.

Even the full weight of the Chinese dragon could not save Risto.



577. Post 4020686 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Quote from: Searing on December 18, 2013, 06:34:39 AM
I'm curious .. what is the rationale behind people buying on BTC China right now?  Are they thinking "no inflow, legal outflow = priceless BTC" ?


yeah that was my thought ...dead locked up wheels screeching HALT on any purchases in China as people will probably sell or hoard what they have
depending on how they want to use btc internally

if 1/2 the btc purchase and such was china...well my fear is if say another gov't says hey.....lets lock btc down too!

China is China. The US Senate expressed no intention of neutering Bitcoin.



578. Post 4020706 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Alright, well. It seems to be bouncing. Hold the fort, Adam.

Good morning from Europe - promised myself I would be taking a break from BTC.



579. Post 4020839 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Quote from: Mirsad on December 18, 2013, 06:48:41 AM
my avg price is 588

fuck i'm good!

Don't blow your load too early, son!

and i'm only like 25% in

wtf

i need to check my sums, this is to good to be true.



We will drop at least 20-30% more. Europe wakes up. 7:45am here. Not all are up or @ computers.
Wait 2-3h for the next selloff.

I think it's adorable how people here imagine markets work.



580. Post 4020895 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Quote from: Sitarow on December 18, 2013, 06:56:17 AM


If history repeats itself then wait 3 months for the new ATH Smiley

Yeah, I expect this thing to accelerate. Despite Risto's bluster it was very unclear whether we'd get bad news or the next price discovery 'bubble' first. I was very surprised to see how fast China acted against Bitcoin.

Shouldn't have doubted Murphy's Law.



581. Post 4020914 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Quote from: mmitech on December 18, 2013, 07:00:12 AM
Good morning guys, what the hell is happening, I don't want to read all 20 pages !!!!!!



World is ending,  grab a chair.



582. Post 4021133 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Quote from: stan.distortion on December 18, 2013, 07:21:22 AM
How can people have so much faith in fiat? It's like seeing a horse and cart on a motorway :/

Say what you like about fiat, it doesn't crash 50+% in a day.



583. Post 4021152 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Quote from: nanobrain on December 18, 2013, 07:22:08 AM
Big walls on gox and btc-e, someone pulling levers behind the curtain.
That'll be the wizard of risto  Cheesy

Doubtful. Risto is a small whale with a big mouth.



584. Post 4021176 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Quote from: seleme on December 18, 2013, 07:25:37 AM
Risto to post in 3, 2, 1  Grin

"Durrhurr silly bulls, my exponential trend clearly predicted the Chinese government would curbstomp Bitcoin"



585. Post 4021229 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Quote from: seanneko on December 18, 2013, 07:31:06 AM
Say what you like about fiat, it doesn't crash 50+% in a day.

It does.  It will.

Zimbabwe's dollar crashed (inflated) by 2.4575342e20% in one day.

Pretty sure people aren't selling their BTC for Zimbabwean dollars.



586. Post 4021281 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Quote from: seriouscoin on December 18, 2013, 07:33:38 AM
Say what you like about fiat, it doesn't crash 50+% in a day.

It does.  It will.

Zimbabwe's dollar crashed (inflated) by 2.4575342e20% in one day.

Pretty sure people aren't selling their BTC for Zimbabwean dollars.

You think Yuan is any better ?  Roll Eyes

Um.

Yes.



587. Post 4021319 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Quote from: traderCJ on December 18, 2013, 07:39:04 AM
So this is the moment where we buy, right?  Grin

Based on how bad Chinese news was digested in the previous weeks, it will take a day or so to get priced in.  Be patient.

Unfortunately I agree.



588. Post 4022034 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Quote from: Hunyadi on December 18, 2013, 08:42:39 AM
Where is Mr. Risto?   Grin

Let him finish jerking off, jeez.



589. Post 4022077 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Quote from: MicroFi on December 18, 2013, 08:44:30 AM
It is all just luck, remember. Nobody can predict the future.  Grin
Hahahaha. There he is Grin

Alongside the insinuation he expected China to curbstomp Bitcoin (something he never mentioned).

Nice, very nice. Quality entertainment.



590. Post 4022311 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Quote from: saekki on December 18, 2013, 09:04:03 AM
Did Risto start buying or why are we going up? Wink

For the same reason any market goes up: because it went too low.



591. Post 4025675 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: crazy_rabbit on December 18, 2013, 01:45:19 PM
Rpietila should have made that bet with goat

I think people will stop making fun of him now.

Lol, hardly. The guy is mentally unstable and it took unbelievably bearish news to get us to even briefly touch his much-vaunted trendline.

The fact is that he refused to take Goat's bet, because he didn't really believe his assurances that a crash was certain any more than anyone else.

I am sure he will get as much mileage as possible out of his prediction, expecting us to forget he originally sold at $700 and flip-flopped back and forth from bull to bear on the way up to $1200. I suppose he's earned it, since he did stick his neck out to be contrarian; but as it is obvious that he would not have returned from his $500 exile without the aid of this Chinese clusterfuck - which I do not believe he ever predicted - it appears he is more lucky than he is clairovoyant. Thus his narcissism continues unjustified and he will continue to get his richly-deserved rash of shit from me.



592. Post 4025754 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: thezerg on December 18, 2013, 01:58:52 PM
Rpietila should have made that bet with goat

I think people will stop making fun of him now.

He's nowhere to be found!!! Predicting that something (especially bitcoin) will fall is nothing more than FUD! One must also predict when and where to! Don't you think?


I think he exited into CNY early... at about 4.100 per mBtC.  But that still equates to awesome returns at the current price of 2.500.

In other news, USA East coast woke up and said "We'll take those coins!!!"

Now, I'll just toot my horn a little...

My estimation is that this is the big one.  There may be a quick "return to normal" rise, but the Chinese companies dropping BTC acceptance is the interpretation of the Central bank ruling that we all didn't want.  It is going to be hard for BTC to take a significant amount of the international B2B trade if this major export country won't accept it.

Still, I haven't cracked my cold wallet so will be happy no matter what happens...

See you back at the L1 exponential line -- its still an AMAZING rate of growth!

Wow, you nailed it.

Why didn't you trade the drop? I suppose I don't feel so bad about being unable to trade if even the guys who DID predict the China thing didn't try to and still feel zen about it  Smiley



593. Post 4025902 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: maz on December 18, 2013, 02:07:21 PM
It amazes me how difficult some people find it in life to give credit where it is due. I guess it's just a lot of embarrassment kicking in now for the bulls who did nothing but mock bears for the past 2 months for attempting to be rational about the situation we were currently in. If anything this recent rally has taught me who in this thread is the day dreamers, the shit talkers and those who are blatantly blind based on their investment. Bitcoin does attract a strange group of folk, I must say.

There are some rational bears, but they are a minority and rpietila is not one of them.

Protip: Rational bears don't sell at $700, then buy back higher and start screaming that we're headed to the moon shortly before we top out.



594. Post 4025914 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Beware the damped oscillation kids, we're gonna kick back down hard pretty soon.



595. Post 4025991 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: seleme on December 18, 2013, 02:20:01 PM
It amazes me how difficult some people find it in life to give credit where it is due. I guess it's just a lot of embarrassment kicking in now for the bulls who did nothing but mock bears for the past 2 months for attempting to be rational about the situation we were currently in. If anything this recent rally has taught me who in this thread is the day dreamers, the shit talkers and those who are blatantly blind based on their investment. Bitcoin does attract a strange group of folk, I must say.

I'll mock bears trolls all the time. I am writing here as bull yet this crash caught me 100% in fiat except btc I have invested in some stuff where I couldn't sell, and I made nice profit today, both in btc and in dollars. So I am certainly not buy and hold type though extremely bullish for 2014.

But those 20 posts "Bitcoin is dead", "Ponzi is done" etc, etc bears as well as those trolls who post crap just to cause people to turn their minds and help them fill their bids will always get it from me.

And Rpietila will get it specially as one of the biggest manipulators and idiots here.

Well said.

I am maximum jelly that you were all fiat. Damn.

Quote from: Coma on December 18, 2013, 02:20:34 PM
I was a dead cat after all... Sad

Not a dead cat, just more of the same pattern we see with dramatic price discovery. Please see

Quote from: Vycid on December 18, 2013, 02:16:59 PM
Beware the damped oscillation kids, we're gonna kick back down hard pretty soon.



596. Post 4026063 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: seleme on December 18, 2013, 02:24:01 PM
I haven't sold on time though, could and should do it much earlier.

Pardon me while I fantasize about having sold at $1163 and then leveraging 4:1 short to $382.



597. Post 4026131 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: Nemo1024 on December 18, 2013, 02:28:45 PM
Damn, why did I sleep through all the action?
And more importantly, why didn't I place the low bids around $400 that I intended to put there?  Didn't see us go down this fast...

Welcome to the club. I did exacly the same mistake last week when it visited 550...

I can top both you guys.

I put my coins in a bank vault and left the continent less than 48 hours before China decided to go nuclear.



598. Post 4026197 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: seleme on December 18, 2013, 02:33:19 PM
I haven't sold on time though, could and should do it much earlier.

Pardon me while I fantasize about having sold at $1163 and then leveraging 4:1 short to $382.

Hehe, yeah, but I started leverage shorting at 870 and got scared and lost 4500$ while it turned away from me in one bounce. Than sold everything above 700, some even below but couldn't do those earlier as I haven't got them before selling DigitalCoins in it's pump.

Haven't done 4:1 shorting today though, traded only with my own money.

Leverage is always a bad idea (unless you have inside info).

That is, until after the fact - then it becomes "god why am I so dumb, I should've levered short".

... and you should've bought bitcoins at $0.05 each after levering long on gold bullion in 2008  Grin

I consider myself lucky to have any bitcoins at all at a cost basis very substantially less than the current price. I'll kick myself a bit for not having taken a more balanced position but ultimately the last couple of months have been very good to me, whereas a lot of people got burned.



599. Post 4026329 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: tarmi on December 18, 2013, 02:43:11 PM
I am so angry, I missed buying at 400, still waiting for my F$%#%$ deposit to be credited !!!!

dont worry, you will have your chance.



I doubt it, we'll probably stabilize around $500, if not higher. The insane volatility is done barring any more significant news in the short term.

Longer term looks more bearish now though,  as this definitely marks the end of the media cycle and we'll probably have a quiet couple months (thank god, really, I'm happy to temporarily trade some paper wealth for a couple months of not having to be constantly following Bitcoin).



600. Post 4026457 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: Nightowlace on December 18, 2013, 02:50:11 PM
It amazes me how difficult some people find it in life to give credit where it is due. I guess it's just a lot of embarrassment kicking in now for the bulls who did nothing but mock bears for the past 2 months for attempting to be rational about the situation we were currently in. If anything this recent rally has taught me who in this thread is the day dreamers, the shit talkers and those who are blatantly blind based on their investment. Bitcoin does attract a strange group of folk, I must say.

There are some rational bears, but they are a minority and rpietila is not one of them.

Protip: Rational bears don't sell at $700, then buy back higher and start screaming that we're headed to the moon shortly before we top out.

From $3 to $30, $30 to $90, $50 to $266, $150 to $1200, now we sit here at $550 give or take. You can say early adopters, you can say 2011, etc. etc. The fact is that if this is your first day investing in Bitcoin you are still an early adopter. As with investing in anything from the start you will have to be able to take the good news with the bad news. You will have to be able to watch it rise and fall. We are the center of attention in the financial world and every country is scrambling to voice their stance on Bitcoin. Some good, some bad. Some regulations will come in our favor, others won’t. We are growing, expanding, infiltrating, we will be met with resistance by some and embraced by others. Every Bear and Bull will be right every at one point or another and both will scream it from the top of their lungs when they are. You have to ask yourself am I day trader looking to make fiat, or am I a bitcoiner looking to make Bitcoin? If you are here to make fiat you are a bear, you want to see Bitcoin rise and fall and profit from its ultimate demise. If you are here to make Bitcoin you are a bull. You believe in what Bitcoin means and what it can do for the global economy of the world.

Last night I sold a Casascius 25B error coin for $21,000 cash. Camolist and I met the guy in person exchanged and left. We watched the market for a few seconds and I looked at him and said what do you think? He said could go either way. I said well I had a 25B coin worth 25B, now I can buy 32B with this cash. So we bought. When I woke up this morning I checked the price and for about 20 seconds I was frustrated, but then I stopped and thought I didn't lose $5,000, I made 7B.

I've gone back and forth between bear and bull many times. Sometimes our emotions get the best of us. Do what you believe in and follow your own path. Make the decisions that best suit your financial abilities and don't be swayed by others.


I'd be upset for 2 reasons: that 25B error coin will be priceless someday even if Bitcoin fails, and you could've made 30+ BTC instead of 7.



601. Post 4026507 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: Rampion on December 18, 2013, 02:56:14 PM
Shorting BTC is the most retarded thing one can do. Who the fuck is so clueless to short an asset that has historically grown multiple hundred % points per year?

Including leverage in the sporting equation is the cherry on the cake. We had a couple of guys bragging about how they were shorting with 5:1 leverage last summer and we know how they ended up: broke in just a few minutes, they couldn't even realize what the fuck was going on.

I just hope that some of the guys that fear Government retaliation already recouped their fiat investment so they can put their mind to rest. It helps. Then you will give zero fucks whatever the price does. This is game is about much more than just fiat profits.

Frankly, after BTCChina announced they were fucking with the ability to deposit and the government announced Bitcoin payment processors were banned, the direction was so clear that shorting was wise.



602. Post 4026524 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: Nightowlace on December 18, 2013, 02:58:37 PM
It amazes me how difficult some people find it in life to give credit where it is due. I guess it's just a lot of embarrassment kicking in now for the bulls who did nothing but mock bears for the past 2 months for attempting to be rational about the situation we were currently in. If anything this recent rally has taught me who in this thread is the day dreamers, the shit talkers and those who are blatantly blind based on their investment. Bitcoin does attract a strange group of folk, I must say.

There are some rational bears, but they are a minority and rpietila is not one of them.

Protip: Rational bears don't sell at $700, then buy back higher and start screaming that we're headed to the moon shortly before we top out.

From $3 to $30, $30 to $90, $50 to $266, $150 to $1200, now we sit here at $550 give or take. You can say early adopters, you can say 2011, etc. etc. The fact is that if this is your first day investing in Bitcoin you are still an early adopter. As with investing in anything from the start you will have to be able to take the good news with the bad news. You will have to be able to watch it rise and fall. We are the center of attention in the financial world and every country is scrambling to voice their stance on Bitcoin. Some good, some bad. Some regulations will come in our favor, others won’t. We are growing, expanding, infiltrating, we will be met with resistance by some and embraced by others. Every Bear and Bull will be right every at one point or another and both will scream it from the top of their lungs when they are. You have to ask yourself am I day trader looking to make fiat, or am I a bitcoiner looking to make Bitcoin? If you are here to make fiat you are a bear, you want to see Bitcoin rise and fall and profit from its ultimate demise. If you are here to make Bitcoin you are a bull. You believe in what Bitcoin means and what it can do for the global economy of the world.

Last night I sold a Casascius 25B error coin for $21,000 cash. Camolist and I met the guy in person exchanged and left. We watched the market for a few seconds and I looked at him and said what do you think? He said could go either way. I said well I had a 25B coin worth 25B, now I can buy 32B with this cash. So we bought. When I woke up this morning I checked the price and for about 20 seconds I was frustrated, but then I stopped and thought I didn't lose $5,000, I made 7B.

I've gone back and forth between bear and bull many times. Sometimes our emotions get the best of us. Do what you believe in and follow your own path. Make the decisions that best suit your financial abilities and don't be swayed by others.


I'd be upset for 2 reasons: that 25B error coin will be priceless someday even if Bitcoin fails, and you could've made 30+ BTC instead of 7.

Or the price could have risen to $850 and I could have wasted my evening and lost B. I made 7B. That's a great night.

You really think a 25B error coin wouldn't sell for 32B at the current price, or any other price?



603. Post 4026620 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: Nightowlace on December 18, 2013, 03:05:53 PM
You really think a 25B error coin wouldn't sell for 32B at the current price, or any other price?

Obviously It did. Check the link in my signature. It's what I do. My point was my view on things. You can't look at it as a $5,000 loss you have to look at it as a 7B gain. You're missing the point.

No, you're missing the point. The coin was worth 32B so it was and still is a 0B gain.

There is no reason I can see you couldn't have sold it today for 32B just as easily.



604. Post 4026896 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: Nightowlace on December 18, 2013, 03:15:04 PM
You really think a 25B error coin wouldn't sell for 32B at the current price, or any other price?

Obviously It did. Check the link in my signature. It's what I do. My point was my view on things. You can't look at it as a $5,000 loss you have to look at it as a 7B gain. You're missing the point.

No, you're missing the point. The coin was worth 32B so it was and still is a 0B gain.

There is no reason I can see you couldn't have sold it today for 32B just as easily.

Was it worth 32B yesterday? Today? Tomorrow? Next year? In 10 years?

Do you also know what the price of B will be today, tomorrow, in 10 years?

Maybe I should just consult you from now on prior to doing anything. How about this I paid $3,000 for the coin and sold it for $21,000 is that better? Do you work better with fiat numbers?

If Bitcoin goes to $100,000 each do you still think it will fetch a 7B premium?

If these coins have a dollar-denominated premium then it would be worth more than 32B today.

Anyway: yes, I absolutely think an original 25B misprint  would be worth $3.2M if Bitcoin goes to 100k. This is like the equivalent of an 1893 Morgan Dollar we are talking about. 100k made, face value $1, mint condition price as high as half a million.



605. Post 4026999 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: seleme on December 18, 2013, 03:31:11 PM
You really think a 25B error coin wouldn't sell for 32B at the current price, or any other price?

Obviously It did. Check the link in my signature. It's what I do. My point was my view on things. You can't look at it as a $5,000 loss you have to look at it as a 7B gain. You're missing the point.

No, you're missing the point. The coin was worth 32B so it was and still is a 0B gain.

There is no reason I can see you couldn't have sold it today for 32B just as easily.

Was it worth 32B yesterday? Today? Tomorrow? Next year? In 10 years?

Do you also know what the price of B will be today, tomorrow, in 10 years?

Maybe I should just consult you from now on prior to doing anything. How about this I paid $3,000 for the coin and sold it for $21,000 is that better? Do you work better with fiat numbers?

If Bitcoin goes to $100,000 each do you still think it will fetch a 7B premium?

If these coins have a dollar-denominated premium then it would be worth more than 32B today.

Anyway: yes, I absolutely think an original 25B misprint  would be worth $3.2M if Bitcoin goes to 100k. This is like the equivalent of an 1893 Morgan Dollar we are talking about.

1892 Morgan Dollar is few thousands at most and you are talking about 700k premium.

As someone who was smallish numismatic dealer 10 years ago, I can't remember any coin or banknote that comes close to that value. And I've sold a banknote that has only 26 known pieces circulation. It went for 5 000$.

http://cointrackers.com/blog/11/most-valuable-coins/

100k a coin of course means Bitcoin will have a money supply in the same ballpark as the USD, at a hypothetical market cap of 2.1 trillion.

We are talking about less than double face value for a coin that will be extremely rare - I think about 500 25 BTC coins are still funded.



606. Post 5173952 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.10h):

To anyone that's used Gox recently - how long did it take your international wire to deposit?

The prices are too good to ignore right now.



607. Post 5174005 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.10h):

Quote from: ChrisML on February 16, 2014, 09:20:25 AM
I am just wondering what the hell will happen next.

These prices are insane. If it enables withdrawles, than what?

I assume they have bought shitloads of cheap coins in themselves, will they rise the price back too $500 plus?

People will start taking out their Bitcoins, but some smart guys have bought in right now and are waiting for this price to double again.

But eh yeah, will this happen. Fuck knows.

The instant Gox opens withdrawals, every single coin in that fucking place will shoot out of there and prices will spike. Anyone still holding GoxBux will be unhappy. The GoxBux at MtGox have not disappeared, because nobody can get fiat out of there either.

This is the conundrum for me: can I get my USD into GoxCoins before they reopen withdrawals, or will I be left with GoxBux and an inflated price?



608. Post 5175153 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.10h):

Quote from: medialab101 on February 16, 2014, 10:49:57 AM
Put a buy in a $4 as its all the gox bux I have. Lets see if it gets filled.
However with these prices and residing in Japan with access to a "faster" deposit I am seriously considering injecting a little fiat.

Talk me out of it?

Having the same thought...

So talk us both out of it.

I'm very jealous of both of you. I would've deposited last week, sold the GoxBTC into real BTC and come around for round 2 by now.

Instead I'm waffling around trying to decide if it makes any sense to do an international wire.



609. Post 5189838 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.11h):

Quote from: Crunchies on February 17, 2014, 01:30:05 AM
might send a massive wire to gox tomorrow. it's hard to resist! fiat on gox though *shudder* this could go SO wrong.

I am 5 digits USD on Gox and stuffing all i can on BTC since yesterday.

This is the best buying chance we will see in years.

Makes sense to me. Either Gox is insolvent and you lose (almost) all. Or they get their act together and you'll get very cheap coins.

I wouldn't risk it, but once you're knee-deep in GoxBux you might as well try to make the most of it.

There's a GoxCoins/BTC exchange going on now, valuing them at roughly 0.7 each. If sold on Bitstamp, that'd be $635 per BTC as of now, so an effective GoxCoin value of $444.50.

The Gox price is ~$315 as of this post.

So it makes *absolutely* no sense to be holding GoxBux ATM, you can make over 50% on your USD instantly. In fact, if I could get an instant deposit on Gox, I would deposit all of my liquid assets tomorrow.

'Course, I can't.



610. Post 5189898 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.11h):

Quote from: jatajuta on February 17, 2014, 01:35:29 AM
might send a massive wire to gox tomorrow. it's hard to resist! fiat on gox though *shudder* this could go SO wrong.

I am 5 digits USD on Gox and stuffing all i can on BTC since yesterday.

This is the best buying chance we will see in years.

Makes sense to me. Either Gox is insolvent and you lose (almost) all. Or they get their act together and you'll get very cheap coins.

I wouldn't risk it, but once you're knee-deep in GoxBux you might as well try to make the most of it.

There's a GoxCoins/BTC exchange going on now, valuing them at roughly 0.7 each. If sold on Bitstamp, that'd be $635 per BTC as of now, so an effective GoxCoin value of $444.50.

The Gox price is ~$315 as of this post.

So it makes *absolutely* no sense to be holding GoxBux ATM, you can make over 50% on your USD instantly.

It does make sense if Gox is not bust and next week we see 900, that's way more than your 50%.

Also it is a money I can afford to lose, I mined and bought a good amount of coins in the beginning of 2011, all there is on exchanges is pure profit now.

It is a good bet on my view.

If Gox returns to $900 it still makes no sense to be holding GoxBux, since they'll be worth LESS than dollar parity at that point instead of 50% more.

There is a reasonable argument for holding GoxCoins, though.

What I want to know is: where the hell are all the GoxBux coming from? Considering it's been making no sense to hold them for a while now, there should be no one selling to drive the BTC price down.



611. Post 5190043 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.11h):

Quote from: niothor on February 17, 2014, 01:42:28 AM
Quote
In fact, if I could get an instant deposit on Gox, I would deposit all of my liquid assets tomorrow.

I just transferred money this morning and it showed up in my Gox account 15 minutes later (Japan Net Bank method). I would send more but I'm already balls deep... would be a big hit if they actually did run with our money (which I don't think is going to happen but...). If withdrawals haven't been restarted in a day or two and the price is down around $200 I may send more...

If withdrawals aren't restarted in two days , you could have a chance at some 50$ coins.

Wow, 15 minutes no shit?

Is there any way I could get in on that, have someone act as my agent? I'd be willing to use my Bitcoin holdings as payment or collateral or something.

PM if interested.



612. Post 5245893 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: Rampion on February 19, 2014, 10:08:41 PM
Anybody else noticed that Jorge is a sort of rpietila antagonist?

That would imply rpietila to be a protagonist of some sort.

They're just two guys that spend too much time writing on a Bitcoin forum, one of whom is bullish and one of whom is bearish.

Quote from: dreamspark on February 19, 2014, 10:08:43 PM
What do you think of this.

Gox is still sending fiat withdrawals, there have been people receiving them throughout this time they have halted btc withdrawals.

If they are insolvent, would that not be in breach of Japanese law ?


Are people seriously considering the possibility Gox is insolvent? As far as I'm concerned I just doubled the size of my bitcoin stash in exchange for them being held hostage for a couple weeks. Worst case I don't get 100% of my coins back, maybe 80-90% because Gox actually is insolvent.



613. Post 5245951 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: dreamspark on February 19, 2014, 10:14:35 PM
I just mean that with the situation as it is if they are doing fiat withdrawals still at all then are they not in breach of the law ?

Almost certainly.



614. Post 5246900 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: ArticMine on February 19, 2014, 10:53:55 PM
The more I look at the MTGox situation the more I am convinced they are in serious financial trouble. It has all the indicators of a company delaying the inevitable. By the way I find that the market valuation of MTGoxBTC in terms of BTC currently at 0.648 at https://bitcoinbuilder.com/ very high.

So your thesis is that MtGox is not only insolvent, they have less than 64.8% of their deposits?

One of two things is going on here: a wealthy insider knows Gox is totally empty and is selling at any price, or people are being irrational and stupid as usual. I'm going with the latter.

I picked up 39 goxcoin at 0.54 yesterday. No concerns.



615. Post 5247203 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: MAbtc on February 19, 2014, 11:25:06 PM
So your thesis is that MtGox is not only insolvent, they have less than 64.8% of their deposits?

In the case of shutdown by regulators and bankruptcy, where are trading account holders in the line of creditors? Legit question -- I do not know. This is assuming that customer funds are not held in trust -- obviously if Gox is insolvent, this is the case.

If Gox did have 64.8% of deposits in such a situation, do you think trading account holders would receive 64.8% of their money? I don't.

And how many years later would they receive compensation? This is not a matter of straight probability.

It's a fair point. I was assuming, considering that Gox has been printing an obscene amount of money for many months in a row now without any visible growth in their business, that they do not hold external debt.

If that's not true, I'm still pretty sure account holders are a senior debt class. So the investors get their money after we get our money. I'm almost positive that's how it works for banks, at least, and I'm guessing it works similarly for exchanges.

The part where it gets unclear is whether Bitcoin debt will get treated as legal tender. If Gox does have debt, and the court rules that Bitcoin isn't legal tender, then the investors will get their money after the cash depositors but before the bitcoin depositors.

Kind of a fascinating scenario, really.

In any event, I expect to eventually get most of my bitcoins back, in the worst case, and that's not really so bad since I just doubled my coins by buying into Gox. And I wouldn't consider it a particularly bad thing that I won't have the option to panic sell those coins for a couple years. Takes some stress off.

Oh, yeah, and I doubled my coins without triggering a taxable event.



616. Post 5247365 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: ArticMine on February 19, 2014, 11:39:25 PM
So your thesis is that MtGox is not only insolvent, they have less than 64.8% of their deposits?

In the case of shutdown by regulators and bankruptcy, where are trading account holders in the line of creditors? Legit question -- I do not know. This is assuming that customer funds are not held in trust -- obviously if Gox is insolvent, this is the case.

If Gox did have 64.8% of deposits in such a situation, do you think trading account holders would receive 64.8% of their money? I don't.

And how many years later would they receive compensation? This is not a matter of straight probability.

One more issue here for those holding MTGox obligations denominated in BTC is that BTC could easily sky-rocket with respect to JPY while MTGox is in bankruptcy. So the BTC MTGox obligation holder may just get a few millibits on the BTC.

That implies MTGox doesn't have any BTC holdings, which I don't think anyone believes. Their assets are frozen when they enter bankruptcy proceedings.



617. Post 5247522 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: ArticMine on February 19, 2014, 11:46:43 PM
So your thesis is that MtGox is not only insolvent, they have less than 64.8% of their deposits?

In the case of shutdown by regulators and bankruptcy, where are trading account holders in the line of creditors? Legit question -- I do not know. This is assuming that customer funds are not held in trust -- obviously if Gox is insolvent, this is the case.

If Gox did have 64.8% of deposits in such a situation, do you think trading account holders would receive 64.8% of their money? I don't.

And how many years later would they receive compensation? This is not a matter of straight probability.

One more issue here for those holding MTGox obligations denominated in BTC is that BTC could easily sky-rocket with respect to JPY while MTGox is in bankruptcy. So the BTC MTGox obligation holder may just get a few millibits on the BTC.

That implies MTGox doesn't have any BTC holdings, which I don't think anyone believes. Their assets are frozen when they enter bankruptcy proceedings.

it means the receiver liquidates the BTC for JPY during the bankruptcy

Why is this any more likely to happen than the receiver immediately acting to mitigate risk of BTC/JPY rate fluctuations for all BTC obligations (via options etc)?

I'm not a bankruptcy expert but that seems like something a receiver would do immediately upon assuming control of a multinational with obligations in multiple currencies.

It really seems like people are leaning toward expecting the absolute worst from MTGox, which is funny because Bitcoin itself could crater at any time. Holding bitcoin (of any type) takes a certain amount of faith.

(Speaking of which, Gox's issues could just as easily be solved by a drop in BTC/JPY.)



618. Post 5247671 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: MAbtc on February 19, 2014, 11:53:57 PM
So your thesis is that MtGox is not only insolvent, they have less than 64.8% of their deposits?

In the case of shutdown by regulators and bankruptcy, where are trading account holders in the line of creditors? Legit question -- I do not know. This is assuming that customer funds are not held in trust -- obviously if Gox is insolvent, this is the case.

If Gox did have 64.8% of deposits in such a situation, do you think trading account holders would receive 64.8% of their money? I don't.

And how many years later would they receive compensation? This is not a matter of straight probability.

One more issue here for those holding MTGox obligations denominated in BTC is that BTC could easily sky-rocket with respect to JPY while MTGox is in bankruptcy. So the BTC MTGox obligation holder may just get a few millibits on the BTC.

That implies MTGox doesn't have any BTC holdings, which I don't think anyone believes. Their assets are frozen when they enter bankruptcy proceedings.

it means the receiver liquidates the BTC for JPY during the bankruptcy

Why is this any more likely to happen than the receiver immediately acting to mitigate risk of BTC/JPY rate fluctuations for all BTC obligations (via options etc)?

I'm not a bankruptcy expert but that seems like something a receiver would do immediately upon assuming control of a multinational with obligations in multiple currencies.

That would seem unorthodox. Logically, all assets would be liquidated to JPY in bankruptcy. I see no reason why this would differ for BTC assets.

So my thinking is that Goxcoin holders in this situation risk being compensated years later for their Goxcoin holdings, denominated in JPY at the original liquidation price.

What will regulators do -- pour all the BTC into Mpex?  Cheesy

I'm sure there's large holders that would be willing to write up some off-exchange contracts. And as for reasoning: the obvious volatility of BTC assets. I am totally unsure of precedent though, especially in Japan (I just found a PDF of a Brazilian bankruptcy proceeding where the debtors were required to be paid in the original denomination unless they indicated otherwise, but I doubt that's helpful).

In any event, this ignores the bigger logical leap I'm not following: how did MTGox end up insolvent? They certainly appear profitable. Is the theory that they were totally wiped out by tx mutability?



619. Post 5248015 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on February 20, 2014, 12:16:58 AM
Wow last block cleared 40 minutes ago, it is taking so long for my XBT to arrive @ Gox.
https://blockchain.info/

 why is the network so slow?

You're sending your BTC to Gox?

Do you have a screw loose?



620. Post 5248137 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 20, 2014, 12:26:38 AM
"We will update everyone again by Thursday at the latest"~mt. Gox Team

Way to exceed expectations, Guys.

They'll wait until COB too.

Par for the course.



621. Post 5249306 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 20, 2014, 01:36:14 AM
here is a little blast from the past for anyone who wants us to have more "patience"

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=172991.0

That's stunning. monkey-fucking asshats. Had a billion dollar baby and didn't bother to change the diapers.


It's also why I have no problem believing this is incompetence.

You are all going to be kicking yourselves later for not loading up on GoxCoins.



622. Post 5251066 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 20, 2014, 04:48:14 AM
Thank goodness he and his irrelevant and annoyingly long posts are gone.

I did not say that.  Wink

Well, that's good to hear.

However, Windy, I truly believe kindness, trust and patience are the only way to change someone's behaviour, even their attitudes or beliefs.

But all you seem to do here is spread hate and ill-feeling -- it's very sad that a (supposedly) 40 year old (supposed) millionaire feels compelled to act like that towards strangers whose only 'sin' is to disagree with you.  

Look there are intelligent posters, there are trolls and then there is Jorge, who is obsessive compulsive about when Chinese people sleep and just pontificates on this point for thousands of words a day. He hasn't added Ny value to the forum.  He just uses this forum for his own amusement and is yet another clog in the forum wheel that is slowly driving people away. Just go read Ristos thread. So many feel the way I do. The joy here is gone.


Jorge,
Please ignore the trolls/idiots and keep posting your opinions/predictions about bitcoin. I for one appreciate the different perspective you have as compared to most people on this forum. Ignore the trolls and keep giving us insight we would not otherwise be exposed to. Anyone that thinks bitcoin has serious flaws will be derailed on a forum like this, but the keenest people will consider the criticism and accordingly be a little bit more cautious.

Yes, I am troll because I actually believe in the viability of the bitcoin technology. And because I don't consider Jorgi's continual price estimations any sort of real TA. They just seem to state the obvious. Here's the current price and we will probably stay within $20 north or south of that. And here are more stats about when Chinese people sleep.

I came to this forum for real substance and real charts and real TA and real speculation. We used to have a lot of that around here.  So that makes me a troll now. Since I don't think bitcoin has "serious flaws" and even though I recognize that there are no guarantees on its adoption and growth I am still a troll. By today's forum standards.  



Your comment is ridiculous.  If you feel that there is NOT very much valuable information here, then why DONT you help in that direction of providing valuable information and encouraging others to provide valuable information... rather than doing the opposite?  








Observing that something is of no value does not compel you to create something of value yourself.

Speaking of ridiculous comments... If I said "diamonds are enormously overvalued because of a global cartel" would you say "go mine some gold then, you piece of shit"?

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 20, 2014, 04:48:14 AM

 ... surely they are going to stall one more week, no?

Probably. That's totally different from insolvency, though.

I wish I was a fly on the wall in that office right now.



623. Post 5253397 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Well, those GoxCoins I bought seem to be proving to be an expensive lesson.

Ah well, capitulation time. Down with the ship.



624. Post 5253680 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: windjc on February 20, 2014, 08:45:41 AM
Why is everyone freaking out? They will fix the bug and continue business as usual... I don't see any reason for these conspiracy theories. MagicalTux can not steal the money as he is publicly known and has no place to hide... Except of that he had enough opportunities to run with the money already and hasn't done it.

You are watching an amazing social experiment in the power of group dynamics. Worry, fear and doubt can spread like a virus.

I wish I'd known the extent to which people were capable of panicking, I'd have held out longer before converting to GoxCoin.

This is truly amazing.

Seriously, $20000 in the hole and




625. Post 5253874 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: windjc on February 20, 2014, 08:53:52 AM

The greenest spike ever if that is true.




626. Post 5253965 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: 600watt on February 20, 2014, 09:03:34 AM
japanese police is investigating mtgox. that´s why mk is talking strange stuff. they were forced to move out. japanese government will declare bitcoin illegal in japan. insiders know it, dump their coins for any price, since they know they get the dollars after investigation/dissolving of gox is over.

confirmed.

Um, so... when they declare the bitcoins illegal, they're destroying the privkeys? Or what?



627. Post 5254020 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

This isn't tree shaking, it's a goddamn earthquake

EDIT: DAT GREEN CANDLE



628. Post 5254070 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):



I've seen this movie before.



629. Post 5254116 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: BitcoinBA on February 20, 2014, 09:14:51 AM
Just bought 13 btc for cheap - ready for the rocket Smiley




True contrarian here. Ballsy move. Good luck, you definitely waited for the right moment.



630. Post 5254150 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: 600watt on February 20, 2014, 09:18:02 AM
japanese police is investigating mtgox. that´s why mk is talking strange stuff. they were forced to move out. japanese government will declare bitcoin illegal in japan. insiders know it, dump their coins for any price, since they know they get the dollars after investigation/dissolving of gox is over.

confirmed.

Source?

http://www.newsonjapan.com/html/newsdesk/morenews/Economy_News/

THIS SOURCE DOESN'T SAY ANYTHING ABOUT GOX Smiley



see, it is illegal there JUST TO TALK ABOUT IT already    Shocked Shocked Shocked

I'll admit, I chuckled a little.

Seriously though, we're already at FUD critical mass, you can stop. We go supercritical, Karpeles will explode in a huge wave of creamy frappucino foam



631. Post 5254213 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

OK, when is the statement coming? 30 minutes? 1 hour?



632. Post 5254270 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: fluidjax on February 20, 2014, 09:23:20 AM
japanese police is investigating mtgox. that´s why mk is talking strange stuff. they were forced to move out. japanese government will declare bitcoin illegal in japan. insiders know it, dump their coins for any price, since they know they get the dollars after investigation/dissolving of gox is over.

confirmed. confirmed. confirmed. confirmed. confirmed.confirmed.

FTFY... we need 6 to be sure



No, no, it has to be a chain. Like this:

Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
japanese police is investigating mtgox. that´s why mk is talking strange stuff. they were forced to move out. japanese government will declare bitcoin illegal in japan. insiders know it, dump their coins for any price, since they know they get the dollars after investigation/dissolving of gox is over.

confirmed.
confirmed.
confirmed.
confirmed.
confirmed.
confirmed.



633. Post 5254348 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: electronistul on February 20, 2014, 09:30:24 AM
There is no fucking way in hell any kind of real positive update is coming this time
Oh yes there is:
"Dear MtGox customers,

We are delighted to announce that you can swnd any amount of BTC out of Gox at any time, starting from 7PM JST today.
Trade with confidence at the very very very best BTC trading platform there will ever be on this Earth,

[insert more blah blah blah here]

Thank you and good night,
your truly,
MK.
"

Just imagine what this will initiate, BTC/USD pricewise  Roll Eyes




634. Post 5254523 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

All Mark needs now is a fiddle.



635. Post 5254642 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

7 minutes to 7PM in Tokyo.

The silence is deafening.



636. Post 5254688 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

BitcoinBuilder bids increasing beyond 0.5, for whatever reason...



637. Post 5254731 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

At this point I half-expect they can't post an announcement because their announcement-poster lagged out.



638. Post 5254849 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Some really big goxcoin buys going on.



639. Post 5255203 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 20, 2014, 10:28:12 AM
How about some live quotes from Bitcoinbuilder?

Last trade 1:2

I'm feeling extremely bullish at this point. The insolvency fears are totally unfounded, it's just fear feeding fear.



640. Post 5255249 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: CryptStorm on February 20, 2014, 10:29:20 AM
How about some live quotes from Bitcoinbuilder?

Last trade 1:2

Yeah, 1:2 is shite. Wow.

I'm very jealous of people able to take advantage of the arb opportunity right now...



641. Post 5255272 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 20, 2014, 10:32:01 AM
How about some live quotes from Bitcoinbuilder?

Last trade 1:2

Yeah, 1:2 is shite. Wow.

I'm very jealous of people able to take advantage of the arb opportunity right now...

Really?  You do know you have to sleep with Mark first.

No longer jealous.



642. Post 5255308 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: CryptStorm on February 20, 2014, 10:32:38 AM
How about some live quotes from Bitcoinbuilder?

Last trade 1:2

Yeah, 1:2 is shite. Wow.

I'm very jealous of people able to take advantage of the arb opportunity right now...

You have coins at gox, no? You could do so. See above 'Edit' of my reply. :-)

I'd have to wire money to gox, that is not happening. It could be next year before the money showed up.



643. Post 5255375 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

I gotta say... upon reflection the update looks bad. The last person to use the "security concerns set us back" excuse was Yifu Guo.

I guess I deserve this, got greedy with the GoxCoins. Somebody probably had insider info.

I'm hodling. Good night folks.



644. Post 5256042 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: Mythul on February 20, 2014, 11:11:59 AM
What if MK just lost the main wallet back-up ?

That is so much scarier than insolvency.



645. Post 5268403 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

Well done to those that shorted BTC on the Gox news. Seems like an easy call in retrospect.

In the meantime: why is the BitcoinBuilder exchange rate ~0.5 while the true Gox/Stamp ratio is more like 0.2? Not that I'm complaining, since I bought in around 0.55, but that doesn't make sense. I thought people were able to arb through OKPay?



646. Post 5303831 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

That 410 BTC wall at 200 USD is artificial, I think. Someone is trying to keep us above $200, but there's no rational reason for the sudden price jump.

I don't really see it staying above 200 much longer, although I've gotta give credit to these manipulators for trying. They pulled out all the stops, including DDoS...

If I was gonna scare the market into believing that there was new insider info floating around, though, I wouldn't pick 3 AM in Toyko to do it.



647. Post 5304016 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: CryptoNames on February 22, 2014, 06:45:13 PM
That pump lasted a good hour.

Now comes the dump.
+1  Grin

I think I got whiplash.



648. Post 5304042 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

I feel bad for the folks that just spent $250+ on what are soon gonna be $100-$150 goxcoins...



649. Post 5304361 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Got a pretty clear descending triangle going on...



650. Post 5306941 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 22, 2014, 10:05:19 PM

NOTE: The 95% confidence interval for both predictions is [ 0, +∞ ].


LOL



651. Post 5307852 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 22, 2014, 11:09:28 PM
I forgot to mention one thing: MtGox has earned over 6k BTC the past two weeks.

If, when they locked the exit gates, the sum of all their client BTC accounts was X, then, in spite of all the trading that has happened there, they still owe X-6000 BTC to all their clients.  (Unless MtGOX itself has been buying BTC from their trapped clients, at their current panic price; which would be the closest think to armed robbery that they could do.)

Their trapped clients seem to think that Y, the amount of real BTC that MtGOX currently owns, is about 1/3 of X-6000.  Although that perception may change rapidly on faint echos of rumors.

Anyone dares to guess what was the value of X (basically, the total supply of goxBTC)?  (Note that the total volume traded at MtGOX over the last two weeks may not be a reliable estimate, since there may be many goxBTC that were not traded once in all that time, and many that got traded several times.)


This is ridiculous. How would Gox have only 1/3 of their obligations? Did 2/3 of the total Bitcoins on the exchange get stolen?

Keep in mind, this is a profitable exchange. It seems silly to suggest, without a large-scale theft or other compelling event, that they are so badly insolvent. There were some asset seizures in the past, but that comes nowhere near 2/3 of their deposits - in fact I am fairly certain those few millions have long since been made up by trading fees.

Further: If Gox had been stolen from so dramatically, wouldn't the evidence be in the blockchain? I'm sure someone would have noticed a huge spike in withdrawals.

Edit:

Quote from: Blitz­ on February 22, 2014, 11:16:22 PM
gmaxwell has done a blockchain analysis and wasn't able to find out, so I expect there is no way to know for anyone but MtGox management. If an attacker has exploited it only in recent weeks, then the upper limit was about 70k BTC (such a loss they could likely stomach with what I believe is a 6 digit BTC reserve of their own though).

70k IS pretty substantial, even if it's an upper bound, but I suspect that the internal accounting would have caught that long before then.

In any case, wasn't Bitstamp a target as well until recently? Why is nobody concerned about their solvency?



652. Post 5308017 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 22, 2014, 11:27:45 PM
I also thing the Xaction malleability hackers kept doubling down and got caught with a bunch of BTC in Gox's hot wallet when the music stopped. Those funds may soon be available to honest clients, buying Mark even more time. The network DDOS was an attempt to cover their tracks that probably didn't work. These are likely verified accounts and it's likely we'll know who the perpetrators were.

Like Churchill said of Americans, you can always count on Gox to do the right thing, after it has exhausted all the other options venti caramel frappuccinos.



653. Post 5308857 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 23, 2014, 12:36:11 AM
Quote
Their trapped clients seem to think that Y, the amount of real BTC that MtGOX currently owns, is about 1/3 of X-6000.  Although that perception may change rapidly on faint echos of rumors.

This is ridiculous. How would Gox have only 1/3 of their obligations? Did 2/3 of the total Bitcoins on the exchange get stolen?

Keep in mind, this is a profitable exchange. It seems silly to suggest, without a large-scale theft or other compelling event, that they are so badly insolvent. There were some asset seizures in the past, but that comes nowhere near 2/3 of their deposits - in fact I am fairly certain those few millions have long since been made up by trading fees.

Further: If Gox had been stolen from so dramatically, wouldn't the evidence be in the blockchain? I'm sure someone would have noticed a huge spike in withdrawals.

Er, that 2/3 (now more like 1/2) is not my estimate, it is what their clients apparently believe, given the price that they agreed at MtGOX.

That's not a reasonable conclusion, for four reasons (assuming Gox is insolvent):

1) There is always a discount on debt, even if the ability to repay is certain. Otherwise T-bills would have nearly 0 yield. People do not like the idea that they may not see their money for months - even years, if they go bankrupt.

2) There is the expectation that a court may give preference to fiat debt in bankruptcy proceedings, and so BTC would be a junior debt class.

3) If the receiver liquidates Gox's BTC holdings to fiat, and BTC/USD increases during the bankruptcy proceedings, Gox could become more insolvent.

4) Fear is running this market.



654. Post 5308931 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: Arcas on February 23, 2014, 12:47:48 AM
The mtgox problem isn't solvency, so much as it is competency.
Exactly. MtGox is either criminal, or extraordinarily incompetent.


Past history points towards the latter.

Remember the form Mark filled out where he said Gox isn't a money services business?



655. Post 5312349 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 23, 2014, 07:03:21 AM
Tinfoil hat time.

Let's assume for the moment that Gox has been completely manipulated since June (when USD withdrawals were stopped).

Did Gox lead the rally to $1000?  Was all price growth above $266 driven by people just trying to get their $ out of Gox?  

Since most of the price increase happened around the time of the Senate hearing, I think we can definitively say "no".



656. Post 5312378 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Gox/Stamp ratio is approaching BitcoinBuilder BTC/GoxBTC. Not sure what that means.

Before long it may start making sense for bears to move coins into Gox so they can sell for cash and wait for the drop.



657. Post 5312636 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: OldGeek on February 23, 2014, 07:33:38 AM
In other news, I think that I understand that a fudish post on reddit released the hounds of gox and Stamp and BTC-e  dutifully followed.  Correct?

If that is what happened, then I surmise that demand is sooooo pent up that any tiny spark is enough to set off the fireworks.  Or, perhaps it is just the fear of being left behind.  I'll go with the former until proven otherwise.

So now what?  Will the recent levels hold for long?

A lot of people have been making noise that this bounce back up is irrational... But that doesn't consider the possibility that Gox going to sub-$100 was the irrational thing.

The odds of insolvency can't be that high (6 to 1???), and besides, they can't be THAT insolvent, right? Even if they were insolvent you'd only need to get 1/6 of your coins back for the better decision to be not to sell at $100.

So maybe this is Bitcoinland waking up to the unbelievable deals at Gox after an irrational spell.

From that perspective - yes, this trend may very well be real. It's looking pretty solid on the charts.



658. Post 5312680 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: OldGeek on February 23, 2014, 07:40:02 AM
A lot of people have been making noise that this bounce back up is irrational... But that doesn't consider the possibility that Gox going to sub-$100 was the irrational thing.

The odds of insolvency can't be that high, and besides, they can't be THAT insolvent, right?

So maybe this is Bitcoinland waking up to the unbelievable deals at Gox after an irrational spell.

From that perspective - yes, this trend may very well be real. It's looking pretty solid on the charts.

I like rational comments like that.  I think sub-100 was irrational, so you may well be correct.  Let's watch.  

edit:  BitcoinWisdom is down for me, so I'm like a dopehead with no fix.   Cheesy

http://www.bitcoinity.org/markets/mtgox/USD

That'll tide you over.  Smiley



659. Post 5312724 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

BitcoinBuilder Last Trade Price: 0.50005 ฿ (Gox/Bitstamp: 0.446)

I have never seen it this close, it was trading at about a 50% premium in the past few days. Not sure what's up.



660. Post 5312771 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: LudwigW on February 23, 2014, 07:51:16 AM
BitcoinBuilder Last Trade Price: 0.50005 ฿ (Gox/Bitstamp: 0.446)

I have never seen it this close, it was trading at about a 50% premium in the past few days. Not sure what's up.
Fiat money entering Gox to arbitrage between BB and GOX.

On the weekend?



661. Post 5312865 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

New 24h Gox high. Thought it'd be a more substantial resistance level.



662. Post 5313005 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: podyx on February 23, 2014, 08:19:10 AM
okay! last tickets to the moon!! only $630!!

Third class $305



663. Post 5313033 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Smells a little like a reversal. 750 BTC back to $305.



664. Post 5313198 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: spooderman on February 23, 2014, 08:39:20 AM
MT Gox's green address used internally for customer BTC withdrawals is active for the first time in 2 weeks!

https://blockchain.info/address/1LNWw6yCxkUmkhArb2Nf2MPw6vG7u5WG7q

5 million bitcoins have gone through this address in the last 3 years, so it is very significant.


I like that your activity is 420, and that your avatar is someone breathing out smoke.

Also....about to break through an important psychological barrier....5000! (pages on this thread.)

Choo choo motherforum.

There should be a party when the BTC price is equal to the number of pages in this thread.



665. Post 5313787 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

5000 pages... has ANYONE read the whole thing from page 1?



666. Post 5324811 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

I just realized where I've seen patterns similar to this market.

http://www.twitch.tv/twitchplayspokemon



667. Post 5324978 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: cbutters on February 23, 2014, 10:09:30 PM
2012-08-16 Peak at 16.41
2012-10-26 Low before next runup at 9.50

71 Day Difference, 42% drop


2013-04-09 Peak at 259.34
2013-07-05 Low before next runup at 63.08

87 Days 75% Drop


2013-11-29 Peak at 1163
2013-02-20 Low before next runup at 530?

83 Days 54% drop?

I'd say that considering 530 the bottom before the next runup is well within reason... and if it isn't, its pretty darn close to the end of the bear market.
These numbers pulled using bitcoinwisdom, bitstamp Prices.
 

This ignores the 2011 bubble ratio (~1:16), which would have us back down to low double digits.

I don't think the "bubble projection method" is necessarily informative anyway.



668. Post 5325843 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.17h):

Quote from: SilverandBitcoins on February 23, 2014, 11:00:30 PM
Many on this thread and a couple of other forum threads have accurately called/predicted this price pull/back.  How do they do it?  Are they basing their forcasts on past performance of Bitcoin and charts?

Large sample size + confirmation bias

There are just as many bad calls around here as good ones, as would be expected.



669. Post 5326810 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.17h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 24, 2014, 12:20:33 AM

I won't comment on the selling of Bitcoin as a way to "escape volatility" of the Euro.  You already know my opinion on that,

I will just note that the video seems to have been produced for the already converted.  It uses the bitcoiner slang "fiat" to refer to ordinary money, for example; that will send frissons down the spine of the faithful, but should be lost on the common folk that the bank aims to (aehm) attract, no?

I was almost expecting it to end with "CCMF!"  Wink


I actually agree with you.

I was imagining some Cypriot granny watching this ad on her TV with a disinterested glazed-over expression.

It's slick, but the important thing Neo needs to develop is customer trust, because they want deposits. This seems too slick to inspire confidence - banks are supposed to be boring. Also: any existing Bitcoin users will see no benefit from using Neo, as far as I can tell, so they NEED to be converting those grannies.

Then again, I don't know the public attitude in Cyprus. Maybe people are fed up enough with the banks to deposit at an uninsured and unproven place like this.



670. Post 5326964 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.17h):

Quote from: empowering on February 24, 2014, 12:33:46 AM

I won't comment on the selling of Bitcoin as a way to "escape volatility" of the Euro.  You already know my opinion on that,

I will just note that the video seems to have been produced for the already converted.  It uses the bitcoiner slang "fiat" to refer to ordinary money, for example; that will send frissons down the spine of the faithful, but should be lost on the common folk that the bank aims to (aehm) attract, no?

I was almost expecting it to end with "CCMF!"  Wink


I actually agree with you.

I was imagining some Cypriot granny watching this ad on her TV with a disinterested glazed-over expression.

It's slick, but the important thing Neo needs to develop is customer trust, because they want deposits. This seems too slick to inspire confidence - banks are supposed to be boring. Also: any existing Bitcoin users will see no benefit from using Neo, as far as I can tell, so they NEED to be converting those grannies.

Then again, I don't know the public attitude in Cyprus. Maybe people are fed up enough with the banks to deposit at an uninsured and unproven place like this.

Do you think the cypriot granny would like this better ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kH2kihfdfk


That's a terrible commercial.

If I didn't know what Neo was, I'd assume they made rope shears or something.



671. Post 5326992 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.17h):

Quote from: empowering on February 24, 2014, 12:36:09 AM

Do you think the cypriot granny would like this better ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kH2kihfdfk


That's a terrible commercial.

All commercials are terrible  Wink  my point was a Cypriot granny , would prefer that , than te one with the dubstep , but they have both been made..

Sure... but it seems to me that the dubstep commercial had a much higher production value, so they've got their priorities all mixed up.

Quote from: empowering on February 24, 2014, 12:36:09 AM
ALSO they are teasers? so not finished and edited products yet?

Maybe, but a guy shrugging with a spool of rope doesn't strike me as a great teaser concept.

I think it's important to remember that there are a lot of people on these forums invested in NeoBee stock, so it's to their benefit to talk up how great the advertising campaign is.



672. Post 5327115 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.17h):

Quote from: empowering on February 24, 2014, 12:43:54 AM

Sure... but it seems to me that the dubstep commercial had a much higher production value, so they've got their priorities all mixed up.

ALSO they are teasers? so not finished and edited products yet?

Maybe, but a guy shrugging with a spool of rope doesn't strike me as a great teaser concept.

I think it's important to remember that there are a lot of people on these forums invested in NeoBee stock, so it's to their benefit to talk up how great the advertising campaign is.

I posted a link to 7 teasers I am assuming they are going to build a narative around them and edit them into a finished product?

Edit - I am not invested in Neo Bee- but I really wish I was, and I may still do so, will see what happens next.... I defo would like to give one of those Neo cards a go though !!

Did you watch the other 6 teasers?

#2 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6TIFY-lNTk) reminded me of a Scientology ad. The general message makes me think the Neo CEO has a serious Jesus complex.

I mean, what they're supposedly advertising here is a bank that works, but instead they've got a bunch of 'testimonials' that make it sound like they've found eternal salvation.

I wish the project all the best. But I worry there's going to be a HUGE amount of blowback for the BTC ecosystem if Neo defaults and takes the life savings of a bunch of unsuspecting Cypriots with it.



673. Post 5327711 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.17h):

Quote from: empowering on February 24, 2014, 01:11:28 AM
/snip: unintelligible garbage/

okey dokey ! good luck with that : )  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy







674. Post 5329849 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.17h):

Quote from: surfer43 on February 24, 2014, 04:43:55 AM
GOX: FIX UR LAG ALREADY
I'm losing because I don't know where the market is  Sad
now 230 and I didn't know Sad

lol gox fix something

good one



675. Post 5330010 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.17h):

Is anyone else struck by the irony that the community has been demanding Mark's resignation for weeks now, but when he actually resigns the market responds with a 50% drop?

Is that accurate, or is there some part I'm missing here?



676. Post 5330029 (copy this link) (by Vycid) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.17h):

Quote from: Holliday on February 24, 2014, 04:58:24 AM
People should announce before they move the market more than 50%  Roll Eyes

Gox isn't a market, its a joke. Why do you even care what is happening at the exchange that couldn't?
I have BTC there. To fail at taking advantage of the volatility  Cool
Really, more than 200% instant profits I can take.

Well I hope for your sake that you are someday able to claim any profits you've earned at Gox.

He's always got an out via BitcoinBuilder.