All posts made by DaRude in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread



1. Post 3621312 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Kinda glad GOX doesn't have the market now, with China we might have a chance



2. Post 3621469 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: thetopham on November 18, 2013, 09:18:46 AM
so what happen? some whale sold with buy orders down below current price and bought back in?

Kinda curious myself, can't explain it. Doubt it was a n00b how many noobs you know who throw few mil worth of coins around?



3. Post 3648788 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Well the only reason i can think of why someone would try to sell BTC10k around midnight US east coast time (and 0500 - 0600 in Europe) is to manipulate the market. Think we can all agree that if he wanted to cash out he could slowly sell of in smaller chunks and get MUCH more $ out. The sell brought gox down from 590 to  500 and subsequently to 475 on lower volume following up. If the goal was to induce panic so the whale could reenter at lower position think it's safe to say that so far he failed as the market held out pretty reasonably so far, and i feel will recover soon. Now if Gox had 70% of the market as in April this would've been much uglier. So unless the price drops down to $400s that manipulation stunt will cause our whale A LOT of $, and hopefully will deter other a$$holes from trying to manipulate the market (and we can get back to a more natural mass panic snow ball effects instead of one person instigating the avalanche) just my 2c



4. Post 3648989 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: tHash on November 20, 2013, 08:12:57 AM

Yes, I agree. In my opinion, this kind of dump could be explained by one of the follows
1) failed manipulation
2) desperate for cash in urgent (doubt it due to the withdraw problem there)
3) insider trading (I don't know which news can dramatically crash BTC market now)
4) stolen BTCs (I heard Gox needs identification?)
5) arbitrage (are there some big buys that time in other exchanges?)
6) ... just crazy. Smiley

Any more explanations?

7) Someone who missed a chance to sell at a profit after the April correction, and thinks it is happening again and panics.
8 ) Manipulation that didn't fail, causes doubt about the market, follows up with more dumps, waits for full on panic.


1-Yepppp
2-Desperate for 5MM? Happens to be at the time when most banks around the world are closed? Extremely unlikely
3-Possibility, but it's already been few hours after the market sell and no news, so he could've at least spread it over few hours. But a day or two should show for sure
4-Yeah, but again why dump all at once like that at odd hours coincidence?
5-No way to move such amount across exchanges, and highly doubtful that he had the same amount at other exchanges to cover. And arb been there for some time no reason to do a market sell
6-always an option, but how many crazy multi millionaires do you know who throw money out like that
7-Timing just makes this too unlikely.
8-True, but if i tried to pull this off i'd be betting on instantaneous panic, plus that wall BTC1.5k wall was a BTC1.7k wall at $533 and got moved back once people started to go at it. Smells like intimidation tactic.

9-FBI cashing in on those confiscated SR coins? 10k down 40k to go?



5. Post 3654973 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Can't help but feel that someone is really trying to force the market down and throwing a lot of $ at it i286 showing wall going up to BTC5k at $620 so far they've been unsuccessful at instilling panic lets see if the market will hold



6. Post 3676948 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Satoshi Huh
But yeah stuff like this keeps me awake at night

Quote from: mccorvic on November 22, 2013, 05:27:36 PM
https://blockchain.info/tx/1c12443203a48f42cdf7b1acee5b4b1c1fedc144cb909a3bf5edbffafb0cd204

Thoughts?



7. Post 3700746 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Someone is really trying to cash out at GOX before monday. He's doing it right in steps though. Probably thinks there'd be a bloodbath on monday during banking hrs when all other bears will start dumping at max liquidity.



8. Post 3700814 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: barbs on November 24, 2013, 09:25:22 PM
wow some whale just got owned

Is BTC200 considered a whale now?



9. Post 3700917 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: macsga on November 24, 2013, 09:30:21 PM
wow some whale just got owned

Is BTC200 considered a whale now?
It's $160,000 worth of BTC... But not yet. In a few weeks though...

True, still thinking at two weeks ago price. Plus this is like his 4th BTC200 order, at least he's just feeding it off instead of just doing one market sell



10. Post 3700972 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: windjc on November 24, 2013, 09:33:53 PM
Someone is really trying to cash out at GOX before monday. He's doing it right in steps though. Probably thinks there'd be a bloodbath on monday during banking hrs when all other bears will start dumping at max liquidity.

This is ridiculous.

"All the bears."

Right. Yeah, there's soooooooooo many bears in Bitcoin right now. Thats why the price went from 200 to 900 and then corrected back to 800.

Reptiela is a bear because $800 just happens to be higher then his logarithmic chart suggest it should be. But thats just the chart he uses. It would have been much higher over his chart line in 2011.

I'd be the first one to admit that i don't know but feel that on Monday it's either gonna go up cause of new money coming in, or go down because of a sell off from people who couldn't cash out on the 18th (last monday). I tend to be bearish but feel like once it recovers past 900 we'd fly past $1000 (china already traded well over $1100 at its ATH)



11. Post 3701259 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: windjc on November 24, 2013, 10:00:35 PM
We have less than 5 1/2 days until we are at $1000.  My countdown continues. Smiley

So far, the last 4 days have gone almost exactly like I expected.


Would you be willing to put 5BTC on that?

Sure.

I can get a wallet going. And i charge 1% for my escrow services  Grin



12. Post 3701290 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

I am impressed at a a volume changing hands at GOX without moving a market almost at all kudos to the seller cashing out



13. Post 3701714 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on November 24, 2013, 10:54:11 PM
The wall and fall dance continues.

lots of $$ changing hands, just the passing of the hot potato



14. Post 3704503 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: crazy_rabbit on November 25, 2013, 05:20:48 AM
Somebody is using a lot of coin to keep the price suppressed on Gox. Once all the money on the sideline finally starts buying in, I don't see any stoping it (worth stopping). Buy in before the "suppressor" completes his plan. All signs point up.

Where is there alot of coins "suppressing" the price?  I'm not seeing it...

Looking at the bigger picture.

We haven't even had enough volume to say "alot".  In the past three weeks we have had an average of roughly 40,000 coins going back and forth between hands.  Liquidity is low, atleast in the high end segment.  When we have 20,000 bids above 1,000$ and a million coins change hands in the course of a day, then I will see the volume, until then.. a few coins tossed around here and there for 5-10% here and there is not practical volume.. Rome wasn't built in a day but it certainly can be destroyed in that time.

Considering there will only ever be 21 million coins, I'm not so sure I like the idea of 1 million of them trading each day....

That'd be pretty dumb and would only enrich the exchanges. exchanges would have all the bitcoins at 1% commission in like 5 years



15. Post 3714255 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

That was kind of awesome but eventually uneventful. Will keep sliding back down unless another whale comes in throwing lots of $$$

If BTC6k didn't get bulls running how much would it take?

And so much for all of that TA, all useless when on person can move a market 10%



16. Post 3714516 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

All of a sudden i get a feeling that it's only a handful of people with shitloads of coins battling it out between each other, and everyone else is just on a sidelines watching.

Kudos to the bull whale it takes balls to drop $4.8MM like that



17. Post 3717505 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: el_rlee on November 26, 2013, 06:43:30 AM
Is btc-e finally catching up? What's wrong with the price on that exchange anyways?

Gox is leading some whale has been throwing a lot of money at it. btc-e just follows blindly stamp is resisting a bit



18. Post 3718166 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: explorer on November 26, 2013, 08:11:30 AM
sombody just took a chomp out of 875 on gox


Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this $875 wall!



19. Post 3723418 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Boxman90 on November 26, 2013, 04:25:28 PM
absolute massive dumps on bitstamp, yet the price is quite stable. someone tried to force it down, betting on a dual-top (and trying to self-fulfill this)?

Rather some big whale at Gox wants dollars he can actually transfer back to his account, and is thus cashing out at Bitstamp. Added benefit: heavy buying will create upwards pressure on Bitstamp, meaning he can sell >2000 BTC there between 830 and 850 - which is exactly what's happening now.

 Shocked Huh didn't think of that. Interesting theory but i tend to think that there are cheaper ways  to cash out at gox, especially for a whale.



20. Post 3726850 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

So you're on btc forum betting on btc price, but the bet is in fiat?

Quote from: windjc on November 26, 2013, 08:48:40 PM
Countdown update: less than 3 1/2 days to 1000.

$50 away Smiley





21. Post 3729774 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Is bitstamp completely out of money? They can't keep their head above $900. Is that cause everyone is cashing out?



22. Post 3732723 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Bitstamp needs to pull up a bit, people need to reload at gox and get that warm feeling that stamp got their backs (and not trailing $100 behind) and start climbing to $1k of course the dragon would help too but they're doing they're own thing



23. Post 3745264 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Watching bitstamp is painfull, stampers need to hurry those deposits  Grin



24. Post 3747897 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: Voodah on November 28, 2013, 06:37:19 AM
omg who gives a fuck about litecoin. this is a bitcoin forum, we need Adam up in here to stop these posts.

Well those LTC you don't give a fuck about gave me +20% btc in the last couple hours alone.

Good for you do you want a pat on the head? Can you go back to the troll box with this stuff?



25. Post 3747914 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: vps15 on November 28, 2013, 06:36:04 AM
does anyone know where i can find a graph of btc bid orders/ ask orders.  $35m vs BTC19,000 looks pretty bullish to me, but i want to see it on a chart

You can zoom out here http://trading.i286.org/



26. Post 3748188 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on November 28, 2013, 07:11:45 AM
It's almost humorous to hear long-term Bitcoiners using the same arguments against Litecoin, as many did against Bitcoin.  I mean let's get real here.  Bitcoin may have a far superior infrastructure to all other alts, but that's not really saying much either.  Bitcoin is mostly speculation too.  This isn't people buying Bitcoin to go shopping, this is people buying Bitcoin to make money.  I'm not saying any alts do or don't offer advantages over Bitcoin but who cares.  Right now, it's all speculation and the more money coming into the crypto currency space, is less money being circulated through government fiat.  Try to remember, this is about changing our global monetary system FIRST, getting "rich" off your favorite little currency is a distant second.  I say, the more the merrier.

BTW-Litecoin just broke $1 Billion market cap so call it what you want, but it was pretty serious when Bitcoin accomplished it.  Not sure why it would be any less significant in this case.  I call it a big win for the entire space.  Deal with it.

I don't have an issue with people talking LTC in terms of its effect on BTC. But bragging how much you made with LTC is just pumping and belongs to a troll box with the fontas crowd



27. Post 3767225 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: jballs on November 29, 2013, 03:27:45 PM

My forecast... channel breakdown suggests a correction back to around 1090. Then probably sideways for a few days. Charts need to be a lot more flexible, anyone have better chart space let me know!



There was one that i liked a week back showing that we were entering a pterodactyl pattern



28. Post 3771031 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Weeeeeee choo choo ?



29. Post 3771100 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Someone running away from LTC to safe heaven?



30. Post 3789082 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Any clue what's going on over there at BTCChina? can't be just lag on Sunday



31. Post 3790054 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: ablewasiereisawelba on December 01, 2013, 05:59:59 AM
The drop is over.



LOL statisticly you guys should be 50%/50% on your call how do you manage predict less than 50% correctly is beyond me  Tongue



32. Post 3790344 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Gordonium on December 01, 2013, 07:00:58 AM
I sold all my Bitcoins couple of hours ago! This is The Great Crash!

How do you have any left over from two weeks ago?

I bought everything back.

NM unless you bought back in within 30 seconds of typing this up you lost $$$



33. Post 3790403 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: gizmoh on December 01, 2013, 07:31:37 AM
i smell crash


They tried to crash it, but a 6% drop is a Big Fail.
Now many will panic buy at a loss. Goxbux is worthless.

Gox clearly followed BTCChina on this one, think it's clear that it wasn't someone at Gox trying to manipulate anything. Now why would someone in China decide to drop so much BTC on sunday is another question



34. Post 3790488 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Holliday on December 01, 2013, 07:37:25 AM
Now why would someone in China decide to drop so much BTC on sunday is another question

To make money off of the poor trading decisions made by others.

Doesn't make much sense to me. If that person tried to manipulate the market i think he lost out. Plus why would a whale even try to manipulate BTC at this point when it's so much easier and much higher chance of success of doing that with LTC? There's enough volume to discourage manipulation of BTC now think we already observed few "wales" getting their ass smacked trying to do something similar.



35. Post 3800972 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: windjc on December 03, 2013, 01:15:18 AM
i thought it was a worthless coin and wanted to maybe double my btc. i got right after the start when the hype went away and everyone forgot. just got so much cuz i was making profit day trading.


was starting to do that with xpm then got too busy. more or less no ppc now but i still hold most of my xpm (and its only like 3,000 xpm)

What year did you buy the ppcoin? I'm trying to figure out why someone as wealthy in btc and ltc as you would spend their time trading ultra cheap alt coins.

Silly question. No idea if goat is wealthy at all, but i'm assuming diversification, and if he did get wealthy jumping on a coin in the initial stages (BTC LTC) the question would be why NOT do it on other alt coins?



36. Post 3809337 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: sedric398 on December 03, 2013, 04:45:33 PM
I'm not sure this has been posted - I tried a search and didn't find it. Some comments on facebook are saying this is fake....

Anyone have access to the full article?

http://online.barrons.com/article/SB50001424053111903302604579234163250372446.html?mod=BOL_da_is
Full report here - http://www.scribd.com/doc/188644617/Bitcoin-Intrinsic-Value-Wedbush-Report-December-2013
Also an article about it - http://www.streetinsider.com/Analyst+Comments/Bitcoin+Could+Be+Worth+10-100x+Current+Price+-+Analyst/8936836.html

Wedbush wiki page - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedbush_Securities


This looks huge from my perspective.
I remember a similar report 1-2 months ago, I hope this kind of thing becomes the norm.

First sentence from streetinsider "After reaching an all-time high of $1242 last week, bitcoin is feeling gravity today and the virtual currency is trading down 7.8% to $998." Umm i'm not a mathematician but those numbers don't add up



37. Post 3813631 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: kurious on December 03, 2013, 11:36:23 PM
Now some Very Bad News for the Bulls:

Why would this be bad news in any situation? Was the SR shutdown bad news for bulls? We all know the answer.

By the way, we are about to go up (for some other reasons), just watch Wink


In the SR  episode the bitcoins were safe , the FBI won't sell them for a few years until the trial ends.
In the sheep case , we have one fugitive trying to run with money , and the scenario he might try to dump them .

He will have to lie low - any fiat that turns up in large quantities will be noticed...

It's not like he needs to sell all of them at once - 1% will fund hiding away for a year - assuming he hasn't already got some money to keep him for a while.

He's only at risk when he shows up with fiat or large coin movements....

We have a guy , previously running a drug market , running away with 90 Millions , trying to make them vanishing but seeing his efforts nuked , with people threatening him (and not normal people) with a media fuss around. Do you think he can keep calm and act by the book ?

He calmly stripped the accounts over DAYS and left fake balances in them so no one would notice until he took the lot.

Pretty well-planned - he must have thought through an exit route - at least a personal one.  And he still controls the wallet... for now....

Yeah but the fact that he tried to tumble 96k and then put it together back in one wallet doesn't give him much hope. How many wallets with 90k+ balance do you think there are



38. Post 3817119 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Vycid on December 04, 2013, 07:22:43 AM
All right.  I'll accept that as pumping me up.  Somewhat.

I've just about blinded myself looking at the charts.  I'm starting to see wedges and waves when I close my eyes.  So, I'll just wait for consensus.

This is how bad it's gotten for me. I don't even know what I'm drawing.


Is it... a dragon??? It's a dragon spitting fire isn't it?



39. Post 3831833 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

I can see it being useful if someone wants to play with altcoins but i wouldn't hold much money in there. When btc-e will go down it wont be pretty



40. Post 3846910 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Wow BTC-e is just 6$ from stamp  Shocked what's going on with that? People stopped buying altcoins? Or started to trust btc-e more? Or it's just a bitcoin world where nothing makes sense



41. Post 3846974 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Someone trying to crash btc-e? look at btc orders



42. Post 3853729 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Look at those half a mil sell walls, huge volumes wild wild west. I'm not a conspiracy theorist but looks to me like a HUUGE coordinated manipulation attempt on Friday at Gox. These are not a bunch of sell orders where the market is panicking. It's few huuuge multi million sell orders.



43. Post 3853831 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

http://trading.i286.org/ showing a sell going into BTC6.5k and keeps going is it a loop or for real?



44. Post 3854633 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Went all BTC, no cash left to buy up should be an interesting weekend



45. Post 3855581 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: niothor on December 06, 2013, 08:35:49 PM
All fiat just now, I think I'll give this one a day or so till the dust settles.

At what price did you sell??

I'd like to know too  Grin but somehow feel the response would be oh i jumped back in 2seconds later before prices went up  Roll Eyes



46. Post 3856280 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Well looks like so far the biggest looser are the BTC5k sells from 900-800 within 15min, so far with no option of reentry without a loss. Clearly another manipulation attempt at Gox, As much as i disagree wiith Gox's "security feature" that stops the trading at huge sell drops, can't argue that it prevented the panic this time around. It'd really hate it if i was the one placing that BTC624 sell order from 810 to 800 , 30min later there are BTC2k coins waiting to be bought between 920 and 850



47. Post 3856446 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on December 06, 2013, 09:32:52 PM
Lol @ The bug at MTGox hasn't "saved" the crash. WTF. Having an insecure big exchange will lead to a lower overall price. So we'd be higher now without Gox' fuck up.

I bet if you had few millions, and wanted to manipulate the market you would think twice now before dumping at Gox. Or be crazy enough to trust such huge sums in other exchanges? Not saying that it's good thing and i'm afraid to think what would happen if there was a more natural huge sell off and this feature kicked it preventing Gox users from exiting, but you can't argue that it's a not huge deterrent for massive manipulations



48. Post 3858602 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: sumantso on December 07, 2013, 01:09:17 AM
Why are btc-e and mtgox so close in price now?

At some points Btc-e may end up being the highest. Hows that for crazy? Grin

BTC-E was the highest at one point. And still is higher than stamp, no idea why Huh



49. Post 3860290 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: pokerman on December 07, 2013, 03:12:53 AM
As you may notice the pumping bulls are starting to get scared, we aren't going to see all time highs ever again. Bitcoin will level off and media attention will die off since we're the only reason it was there to begin with was because we were in a period of expontential growth.

People will look back in 3 years time and laugh about how a virtual currency with so many intrinsic flaws managed achieve a market cap of over 12 billion.

Cryptocurrencies may be the future, but it will not be bitcoin.
You need to work on your trolling. C-

Early adopters of BTC hold such a large percentage of the overall wealth, the top 50 BTC holders have over 30% of the total bitcoins ever mined. That is the equivalent of the top 50 richest people in the world all being worth well over 100 billion usd. Is this fair?

Satoshi alone is estimated to have in the region of 5-7% of all the bitcoins ever mined, are we just to accept that he will be our overlord when bitcoin becomes mainstream?

The idea behind bitcoin is good, there are definitely a lot of upsides to a decentralized currency, but bitcoin was built by one man, satoshi isn't a god (despite what a lot of you here may think) and bitcoin isn't perfect.



I for one, welcome our new cryptogenius overlord.

This is the kinda sentiment I'm talking about, but this will not fly in the real world.
Satoshi might not be perfect, but he would definitely be better than the people that are currently in charge of the world.

I don't think anyone really understands, this can not happen, it doesn't matter how benevolent a person is believed to be, we can not have someone who controls that much wealth, and its not only Satoshi.

Have a look at this list and reevaluate your opinions.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=321265.0


Someone having a BTC1mil or a group having BTC1mil (AHA) bothers me more than BTC crashing to $200. Hopefully this is them cashing out and not manipulating to rebuy even more



50. Post 3861307 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: Vigil on December 07, 2013, 06:21:55 AM
might not be too fast, coz what looks like to me is more of slow exit than trying to induce panic selling... was observing btcchina and i see small but steady sales as if someone or some investors genuinely want out but without hurting price too much...
 
Quote from: Vigil
We could be seeing another flash-crash soon.
Yeah. I am really thinking this whole rise to $1250 was induced by a Great Whale - he pumped the price with his BTC100,000 bot and has been unloading. The real crash happened weeks ago when we hit $900 and dropped to $450 - he picked it up and carried it to $850 and then beyond. Totally rigged game. IMO.

No, just no, unless of course it was a retarded great whale who decided to loose few million dollars



51. Post 3863859 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: Zangelbert Bingledack on December 07, 2013, 11:14:15 AM
A moment of silence for all the panic sellers who will have lost in this most recent, but oft repeated bitcoin ride.  We've all been there.  Your initiation is complete.  Welcome to the club.



This is becoming to sound more and more like troll box where everyone claims to have bought in at 580!



52. Post 3868786 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Huh yeah that ASK wall was just eaten. Think people saying the price should be higher, unless of course it's the manipulator eating his own wall  Huh



53. Post 3869067 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

And the biggest winners in these bubbles/corrections are... EXCHANGES no higher risks, but probably sky high profits on shit loads of volumes when sheep panic not knowing what to do constantly buying and selling few cents apart.



54. Post 3870385 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: kurious on December 07, 2013, 10:01:05 PM
Tumbleweed time... very quiet - big money waitin' for us to sleep before it moves again?

Bitcoin is never this quiet for long....

Looked at chart and saw a 500 sell order right  after i read this. Are you trying to anger the BTC gods?



55. Post 3871961 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Kinda crazy to think that they guy with the wall at 650 is the only thing that's holding us up now



56. Post 3872251 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 08, 2013, 02:18:19 AM
price appears to be stabilizing.

bears failed to leave any wall behind their panic selling

tomorrow will be fun.


also 2k waiting to buy till 650 seemed to stop the last attempt



57. Post 3872266 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

plus china pulling out seems to give more confidence to bulls. If it'll hold tonight tomorrow might be fun



58. Post 3873826 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: TERA on December 08, 2013, 06:15:56 AM


I'm not sure if I can bring myself to buy big at this moment, but you guys go ahead...
What is this chart saying according to you?  (If I am not mistaken, you've made some pretty good calls so far)
It is a strong downtrend on a 4 hour chart. The two bulltraps look identical. Right now is just like the one before the crash when gox was trading ~$1000. Once we are rejected from the 4 hour moving average, it should begin another high volume capitulation. This should be like the second capitulation drop in april that occured a few days after the crash.

Load the boat at 500-550.

Or never see it and enjoy those pics of guys running behind the train  Roll Eyes



59. Post 3874596 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: OldGeek on December 08, 2013, 08:07:03 AM
Okay.  I'm officially sick of Gox.  This last few days have been awful.  I'm thinking of moving to BTC-e.  Anything in particular I should watch out for?

Just the Russians closing their doors and leaving with your BTC a la Sheep Marketplace style. Or someone closing their bank account etc... with the same results, without any known person or company to follow. People bitch about Gox (and for good cause) but there's a reason that it's the only place where all of the big whales play at and every other exchange follows. Even after stopping all USD withdrawals, and a month SEPA withdrawals they're still like #1 (or so) exchange, think about it



60. Post 3874925 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: hmmmstrange on December 08, 2013, 08:57:37 AM
Okay.  I'm officially sick of Gox.  This last few days have been awful.  I'm thinking of moving to BTC-e.  Anything in particular I should watch out for?

Just the Russians closing their doors and leaving with your BTC a la Sheep Marketplace style. Or someone closing their bank account etc... with the same results, without any known person or company to follow. People bitch about Gox (and for good cause) but there's a reason that it's the only place where all of the big whales play at and every other exchange follows. Even after stopping all USD withdrawals, and a month SEPA withdrawals they're still like #1 (or so) exchange, think about it

Do you know if there have been any accounts of this sort of thing (people's money being stolen by the exchange), or is the concern that btc-e will just up and leave some day?

I'm not calling DaRude an idiot, but Derp...

Umm i'm an idiot for not wanting to trust my money to some unknown entity with zero liability? Ok i'll take that. At least if Gox decides to do something stupid we all know that Mark will end up in jail that's a good incentive not to get hacked. With btc-e ...? Not saying that they're defrauding now, and that they're Russian have little to do with anything, i like to know who i hand my money to. With that said i do trade there now and then but withdraw often and try not to accumulate any significant amounts there which is a PITA



61. Post 3874933 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: beetcoin on December 08, 2013, 09:13:10 AM
if the price on mtgox is about the same as bitstamp, wouldn't it be a better idea to transfer your BTC account to bitstamp, coinbase, or any other exchange, and then cash to fiat?
If you want USD that's the ONLY way to get it out of Gox



62. Post 3887019 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: tHash on December 09, 2013, 06:11:58 AM
Exactly what is going to happen to make 10's of millions of dollars suddenly run away from bitcoin?   Which is what would have to happen to see the price slide.   Other than wishful thinking, I can't wrap my mind around what you bears think is going to destroy bitcoin.   Can any of you read an order book?   After the April crash, the order book collapsed.   It is building like crazy right now.

well for starters.. governments could start shutting down or regulating exchanges. that or government might announce that it will pursue tax evaders who hold bitcoin. i'm not bearish, i'm "idontknowish."


And we might have another Carrington event, etc.   Of course there will eventually be a push to find tax evaders using bitcoin, but the best way to get caught would be to sell on an exchange . . .   Regulating exchanges? Having to abide by KYC?   That would certainly kill bitcoin.  Roll Eyes  

I was talking about the next few weeks anyway.   Sure there could be bad news, but in my opinion the odds are greater that we have good news than bad.

You're delusional if you think there are no bad news that could bring btc down. 90% of it's value is speculation. Things like exchanges going down/getting hacked (looking at btc-e), protocol issues (big hard fork), any news of some retards getting busted for something illegal and getting paid with BTC (think child pornography rings, some dictators funneling funds to repress ppl) negative press, one of those BTC100k wallets getting hacked and dumped with one market sell (sheep), some senator in US decides to make a career by fear mongering against BTC etc...etc...etc... Hell look at the catalyst of this crash apparently it was the not so bad news from Chinese. I'm long on BTC but don't fool yourself thinking there aren't any risks  



63. Post 3887183 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: windjc on December 09, 2013, 06:28:48 AM
Exactly what is going to happen to make 10's of millions of dollars suddenly run away from bitcoin?   Which is what would have to happen to see the price slide.   Other than wishful thinking, I can't wrap my mind around what you bears think is going to destroy bitcoin.   Can any of you read an order book?   After the April crash, the order book collapsed.   It is building like crazy right now.

well for starters.. governments could start shutting down or regulating exchanges. that or government might announce that it will pursue tax evaders who hold bitcoin. i'm not bearish, i'm "idontknowish."


And we might have another Carrington event, etc.   Of course there will eventually be a push to find tax evaders using bitcoin, but the best way to get caught would be to sell on an exchange . . .   Regulating exchanges? Having to abide by KYC?   That would certainly kill bitcoin.  Roll Eyes  

I was talking about the next few weeks anyway.   Sure there could be bad news, but in my opinion the odds are greater that we have good news than bad.

You're delusional if you think there are no bad news that could bring btc down. 90% of it's value is speculation. Things like exchanges going down/getting hacked (looking at btc-e), protocol issues (big hard fork), any news of some retards getting busted for something illegal and getting paid with BTC (think child pornography rings, some dictators funneling funds to repress ppl) negative press, one of those BTC100k wallets getting hacked and dumped with one market sell (sheep), some senator in US decides to make a career by fear mongering against BTC etc...etc...etc... Hell look at the catalyst of this crash apparently it was the not so bad news from Chinese. I'm long on BTC but don't fool yourself thinking there aren't any risks  

The market crashed this time because it was weak and looking for any excuse. There has been worse news that the market shrugged off.


Catalyst - an agent that provokes or speeds significant change or action.
Yep agree, in fact the market didn't start crashing tell well into what like the 2nd day of the news



64. Post 3887431 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Somehow i think all those TA with triple bottom cups didn't account for one dude just coming out and buying up everything in sight at BTC3k



65. Post 3887598 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Can't say that i'm not happy but it bothers me how young and iliquid (not liquid?) the market is when one order can swing it like 12%



66. Post 3887935 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):


Kinda bothered but these swings  Undecided



67. Post 3888103 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

I fail to see the point in these huge market buys, sure it could be to trap some sellers but why not to follow up with support there are like 900 coins till 970 now, if you wanted reentry surely it could've been done at a cheaper rate. Why just throw so much $ can't make sense of it Huh



68. Post 3929411 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

did bitcoincharts.com pull btc-e from their list of USD markets?!?!



69. Post 3934899 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on December 12, 2013, 03:32:55 PM
Think ChartBuddy is going to take a holiday until Gox gets its shit together.

Hmm. Those incomplete ones may have been on me. Let's see what happens at the top of the hour.

WTF it can talk!?!?! Now i've seen everything  Shocked



70. Post 3952065 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Nike 1k wall @ 920 on Gox, Intimidation or just trying to cash out  Huh hope he doesn't do a market order



71. Post 3955025 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: rpietila on December 13, 2013, 09:19:17 PM
To spice up a little: Is anyone willing to accept a $10,000-$100,000 escrowed bet that Bitstamp will hit $500 before hitting $1,000?

What odds? I am thinking that $1,000 is much more probable but I am willing to take the other side if odds good enough.

Really no one is jumping on this?



72. Post 3955472 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: rpietila on December 13, 2013, 10:51:48 PM
china will go thru 5500 soon, they already punctured it and now they are oversold

Having seen my magic, perhaps you can now publicly acknowledge that I have 10,000 bitcoins, apologize, stfu and gtfo. OK?  Grin

Which page was the magic on? Seemed to have missed it?



73. Post 3956926 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Hmm i was just doing the math on his initial btc hitting $500 before $1k offer. I guess goat spooked him off before that Grin



74. Post 3957035 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: rpietila on December 13, 2013, 11:38:55 PM
...I also have friends with many BTC and they know that it is going down....
I'm just curious why those friends hold many BTC if they know that it's going down Huh



75. Post 3957228 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 14, 2013, 01:41:31 AM
...I also have friends with many BTC and they know that it is going down....
I'm just curious why those friends hold many BTC if they know that it's going down Huh

its really not that hard to believe someone would hold on to his bitcoin even tho he knows it might go down.

I'm doing it!

and i really do have 10K looking to buy cheap coins, IF i'm lucky enough. ( please no one tell my wife )

Well yeah everyone here knows with a 100% certainty that it will go down at some point in time. But i read that as rpietila implying that they're bears, and expect it to crash below $500, but yet for unknown reason still horde many BTC



76. Post 3969396 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.38h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on December 14, 2013, 11:46:26 PM
The FBI was somehow able to get DPR's private keys for at least part of his stash.  The FBI moved these coins to an address they control with a series of 324BTC transfers (324 = FBI on telephone keypad).  So they already have the private keys needed to auction the coins off.  

Why would they do it that piecewise, rather than all at once?

how is this different than auctioning off rare art or expensive cars that were proceeds of crime?  

I don't know.

Suppose that instead of bitcoins he had the money deposited as Swiss francs in a Swiss bank account, and the FBI got hold of the bank account number and password.  Could they just transfer the francs to another account in the same bank and auction them, or convert them to USD?

Or suppose that he had placed a large bet on the outcome of World Soccer Cup 2018.  Would the FBI auction his betting ticket?


As someone has already posted they'll most likely just auction it off. It'd be very interesting to see what price it'll go for. And probably in one big transaction



77. Post 4003943 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.40h):

Wait a second a communist country with the  firewall of china blocking facebook, youtube, twitter etc... Has two different currencies (CNY CNH)  for mainland and others, and only allows their citizens to withdraw $50k a year out of the country didn't embrace a revolutionary free currency it cannot control with open arms?!?! No way!!! Although to be fair i expected it to be a bit further in the game



78. Post 4004262 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.40h):

Quote from: stan.distortion on December 17, 2013, 04:39:10 AM
Wait a second a communist country with the  firewall of china blocking facebook, youtube, twitter etc... Has two different currencies (CNY CNH)  for mainland and others, and only allows their citizens to withdraw $50k a year out of the country didn't embrace a revolutionary free currency it cannot control with open arms?!?! No way!!! Although to be fair i expected it to be a bit further in the game

They use 2 currencies to keep their internal economy separate from their external economy, its hard to make your books balance when the stuff goes out and doesn't come back, you have to keep printing more just to keep buying. I doubt there's much stopping anyone taking bucket loads of the internal cash over the border but it wouldn't be much use to them once its out. The currency for external trade would be easy to manage except there's some creative accounting with exchange rates, the only reason China has to go against bitcoin for that is it would make their own creative accounting more difficult.

I'm not sure maybe someone can answer how friendly communist border guards are, but i for one wouldn't want to be caught with over $50k on a Chinese border



79. Post 4004418 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.40h):

Quote from: User705 on December 17, 2013, 05:10:27 AM
Wait a second a communist country with the  firewall of china blocking facebook, youtube, twitter etc... Has two different currencies (CNY CNH)  for mainland and others, and only allows their citizens to withdraw $50k a year out of the country didn't embrace a revolutionary free currency it cannot control with open arms?!?! No way!!! Although to be fair i expected it to be a bit further in the game

They use 2 currencies to keep their internal economy separate from their external economy, its hard to make your books balance when the stuff goes out and doesn't come back, you have to keep printing more just to keep buying. I doubt there's much stopping anyone taking bucket loads of the internal cash over the border but it wouldn't be much use to them once its out. The currency for external trade would be easy to manage except there's some creative accounting with exchange rates, the only reason China has to go against bitcoin for that is it would make their own creative accounting more difficult.

I'm not sure maybe someone can answer how friendly communist border guards are, but i for one wouldn't want to be caught with over $50k on a Chinese border

That's the point, if you want something you can use outside China you need the external currency which is controled, the internal currency would be worthless because it cant be exchanged for anything outside China.
Exactly so Bitcoin won't help them with that since sellers still need to pull cny out of the country somehow and that's not possible.  I wonder if there's a way to use that currency to purchase goods for export.

Oh i'm sure it's possible and that's how it's been done for some time before BTC to get around currency controls. If there's enough arbitrage opportunity someone will take advantage of it. e.g. buy gold in CNY go to Hong Kong sell for CNH etc...



80. Post 4017153 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.40h):

Quote from: fr33d0miz3r on December 18, 2013, 12:12:50 AM
Sorry guys, but we now have an established downtrend, so I'm going to dump about ~30k coins this week.
I can't wait for the price rising anymore.

Even the Chaikin Money Flow indicator became negative today.



Awesome what luck that i was just considering picking up about 40k coins  Roll Eyes



81. Post 4021408 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Must...keep...above...500...to...keep...Risto...awaayyyy



82. Post 4022175 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Quote from: rpietila on December 18, 2013, 08:44:00 AM
It is all just luck, remember. Nobody can predict the future.  Grin

*clap*clap* nice play on top of the Chinese panic.



83. Post 4024071 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Off to bed can't buy anymore till the fiat makes it through the banks. All in, i wanna see 800s when i wake up. Where's that quote, step away from your computer go to sleep, and you'll thank me in the morning when you need one?



84. Post 4035630 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: Loaded on December 19, 2013, 02:19:49 AM
Hello from China.

So can you share the purpose of your trip there? Assuming you didn't just bring 5 suitcases of cash to Bobby Lee? Talk to your investors?



85. Post 4038651 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.43h):

Quote from: Loaded on December 19, 2013, 08:12:35 AM
Dead/dying now. Going to sleep for 15 hours. Expect some upside IF I had any successful.

Yes, I did specifically have to request a normal toilet in a five star hotel suite. They put it in the bathroom away from where I'm sleeping. I ruined a thousand dollar suit the last time I had to use one of those.

They got movable toilers there? Or is it just a chair that goes on top of the hole?




86. Post 4039305 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.43h):

Quote from: Mirsad on December 19, 2013, 09:47:06 AM
I can't believe I held on. I actually won over my less prudent self.

I think it helped to be on this forum. Holding out for another month.

No offense. But why hold? You could have sold @ 500-600 Euro (top was 900 Euro) and rebuy @ 320-350 Euro!
Much profit! So easy. Just place bids and wait for the panic sellers.

BTW:
We will go down at least 1 more! So don't cry if you rebuy now (after you sold below the actual price) and we drop again to a new low.

Pffft yeah i'm sure everyone in here sold at 1242USd and rebought at 455. Easy 272% profit! Sure market lost billions in cap but i'm sure everyone is a winner here. Now please do tell us of your TA/magic ball predicting tops and bottoms. Personally i just held and rebought a bit



87. Post 4067343 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.44h):

Quote from: windjc on December 21, 2013, 02:37:38 AM
So, this makes ALL THE SENSE IN THE WORLD.  BtcChina has $0 new dollars coming into its exchange. But STILL it goes up. Yeah, that makes total sense. Its like every BtcChina trader has agreed not to sell their coins (they can't even arbitrage now) and just have those that are left spend their remaining fiat on BTC to drive the price higher, one 5btc buy at a time.

Meanwhile, the fully functional, fully liquid exchanges just wait to see what China does.

Yeah, that makes perfect sense.

In Bitcoin World.

Think of what happened to gox with their goxbucks. Assuming most traders at btcchina were not from china and were there to trade on 0fees. Now the only way to get out of there is by buying up BTC and transferring it out



88. Post 4071254 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.44h):

Quote from: mmitech on December 21, 2013, 10:13:24 AM
good morning guys, so what happened last night ? I see a dump that brought us to 550 and it seems that this appeared only on stamp ....

Hmm yeah what's up with that 2.6k market sell that brought stamp to $550? Is that a glitch cause the market didn't react at all



89. Post 4071351 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.44h):

Quote from: TERA on December 21, 2013, 10:38:54 AM
good morning guys, so what happened last night ? I see a dump that brought us to 550 and it seems that this appeared only on stamp ....

Hmm yeah what's up with that 2.6k market sell that brought stamp to $550? Is that a glitch cause the market didn't react at all
It's typical Stamp behavior that started ever since the rally from 100. Someone dumps deep into the book and then nobody notices or cares, the bots fill in the space which never gets touched again, and it actually becomes something bullish that causes a small rally above where it started.

Interesting so someone eats up the order book with 2k coins and market doesn't react at all. Didn't see these before



90. Post 4083283 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.45h):

Quote from: seleme on December 22, 2013, 04:50:49 AM
Goat back when he was poor bastard...



His first lambo  Grin



91. Post 4098786 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.45h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on December 23, 2013, 03:20:36 AM

Could be many different things. The round value makes me think there is more where that came from.

Haha what a joke fontas. Half brained manipulation attempt, at least rpietila puts some effort in his, this just hurts my brain, usually i don't even like to mention him but this WOW



92. Post 4101528 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.45h):

Just like watching paint dry



93. Post 4105857 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.45h):

Quote from: macsga on December 23, 2013, 03:28:05 PM
New Cyprus plan is preparing as we speak on Eurozone (just a feeling that i have from mixing the puzzle )

Fiat holders have to enter as we speak or they will cry after...
Got more information about this?

He's right. Read here:
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/content/20131212IPR30702/html/Deal-reached-on-bank-%E2%80%9Cbail-in-directive%E2%80%9D


very good article thanks for that........ i wonder if the fiat holders have read that....
i might be wrong but most of the times i had a feeling was 100% right....

the same feeling i had before 2 years to enter BTC world.......




It says
"Press release - Economic and monetary affairs − 12-12-2013 - 10:16
Parliament and Council Presidency negotiators reached a political agreement Wednesday on the draft bank recovery and resolution directive, the first step towards setting up an EU system to deal with struggling banks. This directive will introduce the “bail-in” principle by January 2016, thereby ensuring that taxpayers will not be first in line to pay for bank failures."

I am a noob, but this sounds like: People have to fear LESS that their bank-money is taken away by them (therefore less interest to put money in bitcoin, not more). (?)

You didn't understand the whole thing I guess.
Bail-in basics

The directive establishes a bail-in system which will ensure that taxpayers will be last in the line to the pay the bills of a struggling bank. In a bail-in, creditors, according to a pre-defined hierarchy, forfeit some or all of their holdings to keep the bank alive. The bail-in system will apply from 1 January 2016.


Now is it clear?  Wink

Wonder what the pre-defined hierarchy of creditors is, and how high are peoples checking accounts are on that list. So as long as you don't own any bonds or have any money in any bank you're money will be taken last?



94. Post 4164326 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.47h):

Why is stamp below btc-e? Even china is above stamp wtf is going even with that lingering BTC3k sell wall on btce  Huh



95. Post 4164716 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.47h):

two whales humping each other on btce?



96. Post 4165704 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.47h):

Quote from: gizmoh on December 27, 2013, 08:35:30 AM
Right now the market wants to go up. Just deal with it. ATHs are much more likely before <380.

How much more likely? Smiley

Rpietila , Whats your insight for early 2014?


Let me take a stab at it. All gloom with a sprinkle of doom, 300ish or maybe 200 or maybe double/single digits



97. Post 4240405 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.49h):

Quote from: TERA on December 31, 2013, 03:45:14 PM
Bitstamp/Bitfinex is crazy. People will just randomly buy or dump 1000 coins at market and absorb massive slippage when they could have saved about $20 grand if they juat spent a little more time making their trade.

Could be just margin calls from finex



98. Post 4245577 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.49h):

Quote from: beetcoin on December 31, 2013, 11:02:15 PM
One question related to those funds is if some of them might belong to people who committed no crimes (or at least have not been convicted of them). I'm have little doubt (in fact, I pretty much know for sure) that there's precedent for the cops just keeping the whole lot but still.
I'm still wondering how they got the coins. If he's claiming them back, it suggests he didn't hand them over (i.e. as part of deal). So, weak password?

Maybe no password. If he didn't have the sense to have it distributed through multiple offline wallets with some kind of auto-drain for at least some of them...

Feds don't seem to be doing that either.

Didn't the feds capture him in a library while he was using his laptop? If they got the laptop while it was on, they could easily copy the wallet files. As for the password, maybe he had it stored in a txt file somewhere on his laptop?

if that is the case, then he's really really stupid for not using cold wallet storage.. or hiding it somewhere in the event of him being caught. can't believe such a reckless guy would maintain SR. you don't even need to be smart to realize that all your shit will be taken when caught.
He was pretty dumb, so wouldn't put it past him



99. Post 4245848 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.49h):

Quote from: Peter R on December 31, 2013, 11:35:08 PM
He was pretty dumb, so wouldn't put it past him

Ross Ulbricht is a clever dude, by any rational standard.  I conclude that you are not rational.  Sorry, but Aristotelian logic alone compels me.

You'd figure he have it setup so if he doesn't input a certain code every 24 hours, the BTC automatically transfers to another BTC address. Every single movie villain has a bomb that blows up without code or connected to heart beat monitor. Didn't wikileaks owner have the same kind of fail-safe plan.

A lot of people have been burning on DPR for being careless.  This may very well turn out to be the case, but let's remember that the trial is just getting started.  There may be some interesting plot twists in store...

True, jumping to conclusions but from what i read up so far i'm not impressed at all.



100. Post 4340791 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.51h):

Quote from: sir faps on January 06, 2014, 08:54:36 AM
As Hyphymikey's posts show, people can take what is said here seriously and base their investment strategies on users comments

I can't believe that people actually do that. Nobody has ANYTHING to gain by giving the world advance notice of their trading intentions. The best thing to do is either ignore, or do the opposite of what large holders claim they will be doing in the near future.

A fool and their money...


False. People have REPUTATION to gain. Never underestimate how powerful praise can be if you are deemed a demigod of trading (or predict anything ahead of time for that matter). I can give you a very specific, recent, and pertinent example:

 Rpietila said there would be a drop to low 400s in December. I held my fiat and waited. Sure enough, my phone started blowing up with notifications of falling BTC price. I waited, it hit 400, I bought, and it immediately rose hundreds of dollars. I said thank you to Rpietila for his advice. I am now up over 100%. Some fool I am...

Hope you didn't listen to his last prediction. So he's 50/50 by my count just like a coin



101. Post 4341174 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.51h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on January 06, 2014, 09:33:28 AM
Wow. Is this place ever dead.

Price surging upward and not a single CCMF?

I was expecting to see more missed trains pics myself



102. Post 4345405 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.52h):

Quote from: Ducky1 on January 06, 2014, 11:34:25 AM
no new wires at gox today, it's a holiday in japan

So the Stamp/ btc-e  holiday deposits will arrive today, starting in a couple of hours.

Gox won't have any new ones today because it's a holiday, what about tomorrow?

tomorrow should be fine again.

stamp/btce wires will start soon but i don't know how far we can go without gox.

that's ok .. we can just chill here for a while ... back to trend now, feels mellow





This can't be right! You are predicting $1mil by the end of 2014!

Since I made that chart, i'll say use it with caution. If you make any trading decisions based on that chart you are on your own. It only contains data for part of the period, after the first large bubble in 2011. It also has to be expanded with a S-kind of ending at the top since it will obviously flatten out when saturation is reached. But it gives the best fit to the data for that time period.





Whoa!!! Are you saying there's a chance of BTC not hitting 1mil in 2014?!?! I already mortgaged my house and my family based on your analysis!



103. Post 4365280 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.52h):

A bear whale is getting spanked by a bull whale on btc-e Smiley



104. Post 4368175 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.52h):

Quote from: mellowyellow on January 07, 2014, 03:08:42 PM

For anyone who hasn't seen the reason for this flash-crash.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=403499.new#new

Is there anything new in that 'news'? Isn't it the same situation as announced in December just clarified?

I didn't see a flash crash, I saw a correction.

I suppose we'll all know in 24hrs.

A bear wanted to manipulate the market in the early hours (and still trying on btc-e) just needed some kind of negative news to play on top of.



105. Post 4410481 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.53h):

I'd like to hear some theories why btc-e is higher than stamp? I can't make sense of it, at some point stamp was even higher than gox. People would sell BTC there to invest in shitcoins. Now... is there all of the sudden more trust in btc-e? Are their transfers easier then stamp? What gives



106. Post 4410998 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.53h):

Quote from: BitchicksHusband on January 09, 2014, 04:01:45 PM
I'd like to hear some theories why btc-e is higher than stamp? I can't make sense of it, at some point stamp was even higher than gox. People would sell BTC there to invest in shitcoins. Now... is there all of the sudden more trust in btc-e? Are their transfers easier then stamp? What gives

People want their money out of Slovenia now that the government took over the 2nd largest bank in the country and shafted Polish shareholders?  There was an article on here about that somewhere.

Just a guess.

EDIT: Here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=404872.0

Missed that one thanks. Still not sure how much of an effect that would have on stamp



107. Post 4411024 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.53h):

Quote from: [Default Trust] is Tyrannically Centralized! (goat) on January 09, 2014, 04:02:49 PM
Got pulled over for speeding in the Lambo (30 MPH over). Did not get a ticket:)

Sometimes life is win!

Care to share your tips on talking your way out of tickets?

I think he just really liked the car. Can had no plates on it either. I guess you need those in the USA :/     Will sort that out today.

Pretty sure he was just going to give me a warning when he pulled me over. I did not talk him out of it at all. Also I think he might have been following me :/ Unmarked car.

Right need plates so the cop can identify it from the thousands of other yellow lambos in Missouri?  Grin



108. Post 4414938 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.53h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on January 09, 2014, 07:44:04 PM
Unless they intend to hodl, major retailers accepting bitcoin is a bad sign (for bulls).

Let me see if i can make that ignore button glow  Roll Eyes



109. Post 4417477 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.53h):

Sucks for the bear who did a  BTC1.5k market sell down to 779 on stamp right before the news



110. Post 4428177 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.54h):

I must admit, i was expecting a more interesting reaction to a first major US merchant accepting BTC is it that the market doesn't care, or that 51% FUD and looming jan 31 china news offset the market by that much?



111. Post 4428510 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.54h):

Quote from: Jren on January 10, 2014, 12:39:02 PM


Not sure what will happen, but I'm quite sure something will happen before monday. (either >850 or <750 bitstamp).


Realistically, i think we will stay above 750 on stamp regardless.. support has been too strong to even break 765 and we struggle to go under 785 at the moment. People seem to think the train has set to the moon already because of the overstok.com news..

The train is coming with its shiny cars. With comfy seats and wheels of stars. So hush my little ones, have no fear. The man in the moon is the engineer.

*clap*clap*clap* BRAVO!



112. Post 4437787 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.54h):

Quote from: Chalkbot on January 10, 2014, 10:05:31 PM

So you got it's bigger brother, but you forgot about the big mom in front  Grin



113. Post 4438204 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.54h):

I come to a conclusion that this market is retarded (as in slow) it took it 2 days to react to china news and drop from 1200 and it took a day and a half to react to overstock news



114. Post 4440498 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.54h):


Need more pics of bears running behind a train



115. Post 4441695 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.54h):

Quote from: byronbb on January 11, 2014, 03:21:22 AM
Soon gox will break the 1,000 mark again  Smiley

We need to break out from 960 which we are testing for the 3rd time.

uhhh ohhhh

1k party try #247???



116. Post 4450809 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.54h):

Quote from: Eusebio on January 11, 2014, 04:51:32 PM
My sources from the future say we will break resistence soon and leave all the bears behind after they start panic buying.

and who will buy it above 1K?  one or two kids with daddys money?Smiley

Same people who bought it above 1K last time, and above 1.1 and 1.2k



117. Post 4452417 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.54h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on January 11, 2014, 06:57:45 PM

the plunge is coming, everyone must make the pledge!



Just remember, if you're in the US, everytime you execute orders on a market you restart the clock on long term capital gains eligibility.  That's ok, though, because short term capital gains is only like twice as much.

i'm not in the US



Just need one US lemming to foil the canadian plan  Grin



118. Post 4529991 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.56h):

Just had a thought of running a bear sanctuary foundation. Users can adopt their bear troll ran down by market rises and try to teach them how to hodl before releasing them back in the wild



119. Post 4549264 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.56h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 16, 2014, 02:53:04 PM
Levels of Enlightenment for market trading:

  * At Level of Enlightenment Zero, you buy or sell at current price based on what other people tell you.

  * At Level of Enlightenment  One, you draw lines, triangles and dinosaurs over the charts, look for trends and patterns, in an attempt to predict future prices from the set of past prices.

  * At Level of Enlightenment Two, you realize that the market does not give a damn for the past price history.  Any trends are due to the trading community's perception of external events. When the external conditions change (e.g. when the traded item is banned in Mongolia, or featured in a TV serial), the trends immediately change in ways and amounts that are very hard to predict.  The best one can say is that the price P(now + t), in log scale, is P(now) plus a random variable with zero mean whose variance increases linearly with t, irrespective of its past history.

  * At Level of Enlightenment Three you know more complicated formulas that use past prices to give predicitions for future prices that are significantly tighter than those of the Level Two model above. But I haven't got to that Level yet.

I suspect that there is a maximum Level of Enlightenment N-1, after which one's understanding of markets goes back to Level Zero.



  * At Level of Enlightenment N you HODL. Don't worry you'll get there



120. Post 4550254 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.56h):




121. Post 4558403 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.56h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on January 17, 2014, 04:43:37 AM
so um......

hodl?HuhHuhHuhHuh HELP

Reading this reply i'd say stay away from trading. It won't end pretty.

Think you're missing the whole point of hodling. Let's just say asking for help when someone (looks like just one person/group) moves market 4% is NOT holding



122. Post 4568160 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.56h):

Quote from: MatTheCat on January 17, 2014, 05:34:51 PM

You can tell the bears are getting panicky when all the triangles come out!  Pythagoras must be rolling in his grave!

 Cheesy

You are becoming more and more manic by the minute T.Stuart.

Having just read that it is possible to short Bitcoin on Bitfinex, I headed right over there to register and open an account. I then set about finding the option to short bitcoin. The Bitfinex site does not make this a very straightforward process, but I soon discovered the shorting option only to find that there is absolutely nobody interested in lending out Bitcoins to a short seller at this point in time.

Now what does that tell you?

(a big fkn queue of wannabe short-sellers and a distinct lack of mugs Bitcoin holders willing to loan out their Bitcoins to shorters chasing clear and obvious profits)

Umm i see 2114BTC offer available just at 0.0055% and to get a mil in USD would prob cost you around 0.6% that's a 100 fold difference in a rate. What does that tell you? Oh you were just trolling to get cheap coins from noobs sry then carry on



123. Post 4572097 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.56h):

Quote from: Tyson95 on January 17, 2014, 09:31:40 PM
Feels good to sit 100% fiat until the sleeping dragon awakes. I'm guessing selling should resume in about 3 hours.

What if they buy?
Option #1 Claim it's a bull trap
Option #2 Claim that you rebought at the (insert minimum price market hit after you claimed you sold)
Option #3 Go into the shadows and just watch all the CCMF posts
Option #4 Rebuy and HODL



124. Post 4582928 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.56h):

Quote from: pietje on January 18, 2014, 03:30:00 PM
No idea whats up with doge, massive buys keep getting in.

Huh i keep underestimating the stupidity of the masses.



125. Post 4586517 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.56h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on January 18, 2014, 05:31:17 PM
Yes, I expect Dogecoin funds in the next couple months to emerge. Perhaps Secondmarket will lead.

Is there a way to short dodge? Just askin'  Roll Eyes



126. Post 4649704 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on January 21, 2014, 08:01:12 PM

Explanation
denied



127. Post 4652896 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: dgarcia on January 21, 2014, 10:35:23 PM
Okay. There is Willy on the side of Gox, buying all the coins and even does not care for nothing more than buying no matter which price. That's one reason for the existing big price differences between the exchanges.

But to ask another time:

What the fuck is going on with stamp?

There are popping up sell offers for hundreds of coins, even below the price of BTC-E and Huobi, what is really abnormal. And it seems like there is no motivation to close the gap to BTC-E and Huobi.

Any idea?

Willy has little to do with the gap. Looks like gox is having some (unconfirmed) issues with JPY withdrawals. Haven't been processed in few days (they blame on holidays). Now it's much harder to arb thus the gap grows. When/If they fix their JPY withdraws the gap will close. Willy is just buying up coins for some fund not sure how many thousand BTC he bought up so far, but whatever price he gets now at 10-20BTC a pop is still MUCH cheaper than the slippage he'd get with one market buy. So pretty bullish i say, just takes forever to buy up those coins on btc-e and stamp with these low volumes. But one brick at a time the walls will fall...



128. Post 4660919 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: finder_keeper on January 22, 2014, 09:42:56 AM
And it is because of many people thinking that way that it might not happen when you want it to. Exciting times...

Almost nobody seems to be buying, I mainly see silly bot purchases on most exchanges. You can even move the price by 10 usd on btc-e with only a handful of btc at the moment. Just plain silly.

I have a feeling about this.

I believe that:

1. the get-rich-quick sheeple are silently dumping
2. the bots are from coinbase/bitpay (because they have a lot of interest in keeping the price really stable) and from some fiat whales who are silently getting in without slippage.
3. new get-rich-quick sheeple + early dumpers who want back in - they are not buying and waiting on the sidelines instead because April 2013.

It is a nerve grinding game. Anything could happen in the immediate.


You don't need whales or bots to explain the small trades. I did a bunch of them yesterday to buy ~2 btc over 2 hours, $20 at a time. It's a good way to accumulate at the spot price without eating up the very limited reserve of asks at the market price.


You were concerned enough about slippage on a 2btc order to spread it over 2hrs. I know volumes are low but really?  Roll Eyes



129. Post 4689986 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

It bewilders me to see such a stable price. BTC was $806 on Jan 9th when overstock made their announcement and now after tigerdirect goes the price is... still $806. We're going main stream acceptance from proof of concept, major retailers jumping on board. Oh well when i can't explain the bears i buy  Grin strapping in for the weekend (it's like XMAS can't wait for it to get here)



130. Post 4690009 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Waiting to see goats receipt from tigerdirect.com  Grin



131. Post 4690282 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on January 23, 2014, 06:00:55 PM
I used to think that the moment a company like Ebay or Amazon starts using Bitcoin the price would jump to crazy amounts. But not anymore.
It will only reach crazy highs by mass adoption and not because of news anymore imo. We're past that.

What does mass adoption mean for you? Or you just trollin'



132. Post 4690396 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on January 23, 2014, 06:11:50 PM
I used to think that the moment a company like Ebay or Amazon starts using Bitcoin the price would jump to crazy amounts. But not anymore.
It will only reach crazy highs by mass adoption and not because of news anymore imo. We're past that.

What does mass adoption mean for you? Or you just trollin'
everyone all over the world uses nothing but bitcoin to do anything money realated

1BTC = 1 million oz of gold.

Baby steps Adam. Think we're on a right path. Lets see how long bears can hold us down with China FUD



133. Post 4690535 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on January 23, 2014, 06:15:40 PM

Many Bitcoin users will just replenish their BTC when making a purchase on these sites too, if they are still wanting to hold as much coins as possible.

Overstock might be surprised at how much new business they get when bitcoin goes up significantly. Buying stuff may be the best way to take profits from a tax avoidance standpoint. I'm planning a whole bunch of purchases myself.

That, plus anyone knows how much coinbase/bitpay charge merchants to process btc? If it's lower than 3%? credit cards charge merchants will embrace it with both hands as it bumps up their profit margins. Once wall st sees that there's $ to be made and wider adoption they won't sit on side lines.



134. Post 4691268 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: virtualfaqs on January 23, 2014, 06:28:54 PM
There's always 2 things to watch for when a new merchant jumps on the bandwagon:

1. Are they using a 3rd party processor?
2. Are they advertising it on their homepage? Now the Tigerdirect.com one is absolutely huge. But is Tigerdirect.com get less traffic than Overstock? But if you don't take the time to understand the refund policies, you may just stick with credit card if you're not interested in BTC.

Frankly don't see why any major merchant would NOT use 3rd party processor right now? They can't pay their suppliers with BTC, and unless they're a bank they're not in the business of currency exchange. It's not their core business so why would they take on additional liability/risk of holding on to BTC? That wouldn't fly well with stock holders either.



135. Post 4691293 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: aminorex on January 23, 2014, 06:25:09 PM
[some dunning-kreugerish contemptuous nonsense]

and one more for the ignorance is bliss column.  bye bye

x2



136. Post 4692397 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: fonzie on January 23, 2014, 07:55:01 PM
We´re probably about to get the 5th red daily candle on Stamp in a few hours, that´s bullish isn´t it?
Aren't we still just working on the 4th red candle? At least according to wisdom



137. Post 4693155 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: T.Stuart on January 23, 2014, 08:09:13 PM
We´re probably about to get the 5th red daily candle on Stamp in a few hours, that´s bullish isn´t it?
Aren't we still just working on the 4th red candle? At least according to wisdom

However even if goes 5 deep it just means the slowest slide to 800 we ever saw.


Maybe I misunderstood something, but do people really still believe there is going to be a China crash now?





There's still that possibility. As far the chances of that happening is the current game. In a catastrophic even China would close Huobi and confiscating all the BTC holding, that surely would crash the whole market. Personally i think chances of that ever happening are moderately low (and partially already priced in). Chances of Chinese cracking down on the very first day the new law goes into effect are slim to none. So 31st/1st should be a good day. This weekend shouldn't be bad either.



138. Post 4699111 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

There ya go bears you got your 800 can we move on up now?



139. Post 4701510 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Someone at btc-e is definitely leading this crash. I'm just impressed that someone would trust btc-e with so much $



140. Post 4701631 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on January 24, 2014, 06:07:23 AM
looks like we're rebounding soon

That's what yer magik 8 ball told u, Newbie?

I don't see panic either, just some whale dumping a lot of coins. Every time huge sell stops market tries to move up on little orders. Lets see how much ammo he has. Still waiting for the weekend though. Can't explain the crash = stuff your coffers



141. Post 4701714 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Funny how these things always happen at 1amEST US 6am Europe time  Roll Eyes silly manipulators



142. Post 4701718 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on January 24, 2014, 06:26:18 AM
Haven't bought anything yet.  Still too expensive.  Just a little lower please.

Meanwhile Huoboi is on a tear back up ATM.  Fucking green candles.
how much lower what's your target?



143. Post 4701784 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: wendel on January 24, 2014, 06:29:04 AM
Funny how these things always happen at 1amEST US 6am Europe time  Roll Eyes silly manipulators

+1
and 01:00 pm Paris time

It's 0733 in Paris now



144. Post 4702028 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Where's Loaded? He usually drops by in times like these with his suitecases



145. Post 4702105 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: el_rlee on January 24, 2014, 06:59:49 AM
What's wrong? A lot of positive news....

Exactly but it's Friday the Bitcoin inverse day where good news = sell you didn't get the memo?



146. Post 4721872 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

When 1BTC = 80MM i for one would like to welcome Willy our overlord! CCMF weekend is here



147. Post 4723062 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: His Most Eminent Highness Grand Caesar Imperator Goat on January 25, 2014, 05:09:15 AM
Are we to $40,000 yet?
No too early wait till everyone goes to sleep.



148. Post 4744316 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Our soon-to-be-overlord Willy is back CCMF



149. Post 4759771 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Bitfinex becoming a bigger player every day 400BTC walls popping up there now



150. Post 4761900 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Quote from: His Most Eminent Highness Grand Caesar Imperator Goat on January 26, 2014, 09:57:07 PM
what is this about drug dealers and money laundering? is this all hearsay or what? links please. Cheesy

one of the reasons why he had his funds frozen in the usa and the banks wont work with him. it was silkroad money and at the time they did not say that was the reason because they were still trying to close down silkroad. i dont have a link handy so take it with a grain of salt i guess.

Linking SR to Gox? I can see the feds trying to pull it off just because the coins might've touched gox (the only major exchange at that time think they claimed like 70% volume). But anyone else with basic knowledge of BTC would need more than a grain of salt to swallow this one  Roll Eyes

Edit: Oh and yeah gox sucks



151. Post 4767570 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Quote from: OldGeek on January 27, 2014, 03:16:00 AM
I've seen the pictures. He's not running anywhere.

lol

Maybe a power walk at best  Grin but i loled



152. Post 4767633 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Quote from: DaRude on January 27, 2014, 03:31:30 AM
I've seen the pictures. He's not running anywhere.

lol

Maybe a power walk at best  Grin but i loled


Oh sh*t i just cracked his plan. So there was a reason for that ball after all!!





153. Post 4768019 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Quote from: hmmmstrange on January 27, 2014, 03:52:16 AM
So the Gox premium is now over $200...

Gox premium is 24%-25% above stamp. Nothing to worry about until it gets to 60%-70%.

Sarcasm? That's HUUGE well over the normal 10%. Issues with SWIFT, SEPA. And now with JPY, so the only way out is through BTC and even is experiencing issues. 25% and growing hope they can fix something fast



154. Post 4768620 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

That 200BTC ask wall is starting to get annoying

Edit: On finex



155. Post 4769113 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Quote from: windjc on January 27, 2014, 05:42:45 AM
That 200BTC ask wall is starting to get annoying

Edit: On finex

What are you using to look at bfx wall?  Or just looking at order book?

There is no 200 wall on Bitfinex that I can see.

But it seems many are chasing unicorns tonight.

Using wisdom Markets/BitFinex

It's down to 180 now and split up to 110 and 69



156. Post 4769152 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Quote from: windjc on January 27, 2014, 05:47:22 AM
bfx ask walls are pretty common these days, and they are real.  bfx is the real reason for the name 'bearstamp'.

Theres not wall at Bitfinex. Although 200 is hardly a wall.

It was 400 before not sure where you're looking at. bfx doesn't have that much volume so it's pretty significant for them. But they can unload it to stamp



157. Post 4769792 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

A better question would be why Huobi is higher than bearstamp (well that's kind of self explainatory) and btc-e

Chinese think that their own risk on Jan 31st is lower than what everyone else thinks?!?



158. Post 4770836 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Quote from: TERA on January 27, 2014, 08:23:23 AM

Some troll just got a raging choo choo on his own.

Only if stamp would follow



159. Post 4788599 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 28, 2014, 01:02:03 AM
Some statistics about MtGOX BTC withdrawal delays by one heavy user (rpietila) : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=179586.msg4786238#msg4786238

His name can't be mentioned than 3 times on one page or he'll return!



160. Post 4828343 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

fonzie do you short BTC if so at what price? Else if you got 0 btc why are you here again?



161. Post 4828481 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: fonzie on January 29, 2014, 11:03:11 PM
fonzie do you short BTC if so at what price? Else if you got 0 btc why are you here again?

Only hodlers and faithful people allowed in here? Cheesy  I ´shorted 8-9 days ago @~844
So you didn't cash in when it dropped to 725? Well keep us updated when you cash it in



162. Post 4834562 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Did i miss something? Whats up with a 1k sell at bearstamp?


err btc-e



163. Post 4834666 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: Peter R on January 30, 2014, 08:07:29 AM
Did i miss something? Whats up with a 1k sell at bearstamp?

I don't see it.

By 1k he means 100 BTC.  

Ahh  i was zoomed out to 15min never mind not as big as i thought. Regardless and reason for this that i'm missing or just FUD?



164. Post 4849716 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Has anyone seen Willy lately? Wondering when he's coming out to play



165. Post 4849997 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: medialab101 on January 31, 2014, 01:38:41 AM
Has anyone seen Willy lately? Wondering when he's coming out to play



I think he may be back. Several 20+bc buys in the last few minutes.

Nah that's not him



166. Post 4862971 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: BitcoinAshley on January 31, 2014, 05:06:03 PM
Get your tinfoil hats on! Whomever is manipulating the price to keep it in this narrow range is going to run out of bitcoins eventually ;-)

I hear bitcoin days destroyed is goin crazy so maybe it's some of the early adopters at work... trying to keep the financial apocalypse at bay for just a little while longer...  Grin Grin Grin

Close but not quiet there. So Winterflosss' have how many BTC? How about the SecondMarket (think i remember BTC70K been throwing around). That's a lot of BTC. At the meeting IIRC someone from the panel asked where they get their BTC, answer was muffled early adopters and other sources. I doubt early adopters are business people and what price do you offer them? If it was me to entice i'd offer some % on top of current exchange rate who would pass that up? And dump say 10% of the acquired BTC on the market. 70k bought, 7k BTC are dumped on market to guarantee the lower buying price. Small price to pay so you get as many coins and hold it from CCMFing. It'll continue as long as they'll be major trades off the market while relying on the exchange rates (what else would you use).

Edit: and for early adopter why sell on exchange and loose on slippage when you can sell for a premium and without slippage



167. Post 4883963 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

I like how these seemingly random 100+BTC dumps release the buy pressure that builds up



168. Post 4921478 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: monger on February 03, 2014, 10:10:45 PM
no significant movement on btc-e, so our russian+bulgarian+cypriotic friends not impressed of that fud

they understand all things correctly. It's normal and pretty usual for Russian businesses to be legally registered outside of fucking Pootie's house.

 There is not much difference about company jurisdiction. It`s not a big secret that btc-e owners/operators are russians, guess why russian LE are first one to pay attention to them with real legal case? Because they know it.
 Those news are really bad for btc-e. The case was started by prosecutors of Volgograd city where 2 terror acts taken place before the NY. Right after that we see pushing the law for limiting of anonymous payments which immediately caused huge losses to payment companies like QIWI (NASDAQ:QIWI) stock dropped 20%. Next we have a letter from russian central bank calling bitcoin a money surrogate and basically outlawing any kind of it`s exchange, noting that this might be suspected as financing of terrorism. The new legal case just take those words as a rule and now we have it. In Russia any mention of terror is being taken very seriously, so i have no doubt the idea is clear - they have to shutdown btc-e. I give alot of respect to those guys who operate this exchange that they are still keep working and didnt shutdown like metabank.ru did, but they are playing very dangerous games. If owners are captured, there is no guarantee that anyone will see their funds because the way they do business is illegal and there`s a big chance of seized coins/funds are being "lost" as it usually happens in Russia. I'm not about a spreading FUD here but those are all facts and country specific things you can confirm with anyone who did business in this country. I personally feel very disappointed about such actions taken place but this all gives a clear message that there`s no bright bitcoin story in Russia at least in nearest time.

Show me where it says that owners are Russian? Then even if they're Russian, show me that they're located/operate out of Russia? Stop spreading FUD or on ignore list you go.

Did all the trolls from btc-e got scared that their trollbox will close so they're running to here?



169. Post 4962062 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 05, 2014, 10:43:26 PM
i just bought a bitcoin derivative that SO FAR has been paying out dividends of 15550.51%/yr  Cheesy

BTC.sx bump?



170. Post 4967902 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.03h):

Quote from: hyphymikey on February 06, 2014, 07:03:43 AM
Someone is hacking Bitfinex!

With the sell price being $10,000 you can deposit 1 coin and your "balance" will show $10,000. Meaning you can now use $10,000 (1 bitcoin) as leverage and take a loan out for $25,000. Buy LTC on margin, and play the swings margin trading. Use the cash you just made trading to buy LTC and withdraw automatically to your wallet….. Do this with many coins and profit.

Have you not noticed the LTC volume? 135,000LTC just now.

Well that answers for some of the drop. But would assume effect stamp more than gox.



171. Post 4968055 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.03h):

Huh well didn't see that coming 1.5k dump on stamp and countung



172. Post 5049049 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

We got a BTC5 lil Willy at Gox now?



173. Post 5071975 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Billy (Willy's bigger evil brother) is playing at Gox now. ~BTC50  every 10min or so interesting to see if others will follow  or just cut gox's lifeline and let it flow into oblivion as it should



174. Post 5103928 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: elasticband on February 12, 2014, 05:26:52 PM
I would not be surprised if Doge coin marketeers were not behind the attack
I KNEW IT

Bitcoin spammed, while alt coins thrive.

Wouldn't say altcoins, most of them are down. Just the retarded unspeakable one is being pumped. The higher they get the...



175. Post 5114688 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: F-bernanke on February 13, 2014, 06:46:48 AM
Just a guess:
If the big exchanges start btc Withdrawals again, we will spike back up.

If gox allows btc withdrawals again, I would not be surprised to see goxBTC go as high as 1k in that cage, people want out.

Right because people want out, and where will those BTC flow? How many of those BTC will end up with a sell market orders on stamp?



176. Post 5125523 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Got to my entry point, started buying with buy orders staggered down. Trolls (fonzie, mah87) start doing the dirty work and herd those sheep in.



177. Post 5125664 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on February 13, 2014, 07:45:36 PM
When GOX re-enables BTC withdrawals, BTC price on GOX goes up, right?
The price premium should invert again, yes.

Oh, go look at all the fees emptygox is making right now. Just lock up all USD, lock up all BTC, and voila, you will eventually have 100% of all assets. Cheesy

That's one thing i don't get, and people still trade there?



178. Post 5146979 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: fonzie on February 14, 2014, 06:58:55 PM
People laughed at me when i started shortin @ 840$ . I can live with that.

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Yeah but it snapped back on your ass. You finally sold your shorts for a meager profit before buying back. While you were out you went silent like a slug.  Now you are short again, except this time you are going to sell for a loss or stop out soon as Gox reopens withdrawals and we bounce again. You'll probably give up a fiat bit of the profits you made on the first trade.

Well i stated a few hours ago that i closed my shorts @ 580$ , which have been opened @ 840$, i also stated that i will short again between 650-690$, when the price was@630 which might have not been the worst  idea as it looks like. Do you have any kind of personal agenda with me? I´m pretty pleased with my profits, thanks again for askin?
Just keep on actin like a dick.

Wait wait wait, so you actually went bullish at 580$ and closed your shorts and were expecting the price to shoot up to 650-690?!?! But yet at the same time continued to troll saying that the price will go to $300? Haha at least keep your stories straight and don't claim to cover your shorts that make you sound bullish



179. Post 5147215 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: fonzie on February 14, 2014, 07:49:51 PM
People laughed at me when i started shortin @ 840$ . I can live with that.

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Yeah but it snapped back on your ass. You finally sold your shorts for a meager profit before buying back. While you were out you went silent like a slug.  Now you are short again, except this time you are going to sell for a loss or stop out soon as Gox reopens withdrawals and we bounce again. You'll probably give up a fiat bit of the profits you made on the first trade.

Well i stated a few hours ago that i closed my shorts @ 580$ , which have been opened @ 840$, i also stated that i will short again between 650-690$, when the price was@630 which might have not been the worst  idea as it looks like. Do you have any kind of personal agenda with me? I´m pretty pleased with my profits, thanks again for askin?
Just keep on actin like a dick.

Wait wait wait, so you actually went bullish at 580$ and closed your shorts and were expecting the price to shoot up to 650-690?!?! But yet at the same time continued to troll saying that the price will go to $300? Haha at least keep your stories straight and don't claim to cover your shorts that make you sound bullish

Huh?

I closed my shorts, which put me into the postion that i could short more @  a higher price.
I am aware of the fact that it doenst fall total vertical. I still beleive that it goes in the 300´s.
I don´t see any contradiction? Sometimes you have to close your shorts for a few hours, to short more after the inevitable bull trap.
MAX SHORTAGE ! ULTIMATE PROFIT! Smiley

Closing short = expect price to go up (however short term)
expect price to go up = bull
Closing shorts "that i could short more @  a higher price." implies that you want the price to go higher.

Continue to troll while covering shorts = troll

Next time let us know when you turn bull again and cover your shorts  Grin

That's alright you're still my #1 troll kinda like keeping you around doing the dirty work



180. Post 5154701 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: medialab101 on February 15, 2014, 05:38:43 AM
no gox btc sells of 10 or more for 40 minutes

New fiat is probably just showing up on Gox now to take advantage of the fire-sale. Should be back in a reasonable range in a few days time. Especially if there is any indication that withdrawals will resume.

On Saturday?



181. Post 6048376 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on April 03, 2014, 08:16:17 AM
And there we go. People are about to panic that 400 might fall so they are starting to sell.
It's a matter of waiting for the first 500+ sell and down we go. The sheep will go nuts.
350 within 12 hours is my worthless prediction.

Yes the $400 wall is likely to be tested to see if it's fake, real or there's hidden support we can't see. This would be a huge opportunity for a billionaire to accumulate a large position without slippage, but there may not be one or he's lurking in the depths. Retreat to $400 and hold the line, people. $401 if you want to make sure you get all your coins back. Sell any bounce and build that fucking wall. It's going to be a battle and we need every man we can get. If it breaches, the next stop is $266 and the next ATH will be delayed by months.  90% probability we'll drop to at least $401 at least once before trend reversal. 50% chance we'll hit $400 and 50% chance we'll go lower.


Maybe I need a definition of terms; however, my understanding is that a billionaire does NOT gain a position by selling into a buy wall but instead by buying into a sell wall.  So, I must be missing something, here.

Either could happen if the wall is real.

$400 is where you'll start seeing the spread growing more and more and exchanges stop following chinese. So in a total Chinese collapse i don't see it going much bellow $400 on healthy exchanges



182. Post 6152268 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: sickpig on April 10, 2014, 07:20:37 AM
Wall at $400 was chewed up nicely.  It will be interesting to see if what's left holds.

The timing was weird, stamp usually follows huobi a lot, this was kinda out of place

unrelated question: who's buying at houbi? How they do think to eventually monetize theirs assets?

You do know that lots of Chinese travel, have relatives and own property outside of China right?



183. Post 6582047 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

Quote from: lemonte on May 06, 2014, 08:10:00 PM
How is Huobi higher than Stamp!??  Huh

Interesting hopefully it's the start of flow of bitcoins out of CNY



184. Post 6586068 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

Quote from: windjc on May 07, 2014, 12:40:56 AM
If it makes you bulls happy (and I am sure it will) I'm a little annoyed that the Chinese markets actually responded bullishly to such crap PR released yesterday. And I won't be surprised if we get follow through today based on the size of the green candle yesterday.

I guess my predictions of a large fall may have been pushed back 2-7 days. It seems like its not going to happen until the exchanges (particularly Houbi) admit that accounts have been closed. And they may never actually do that. We will probably only here from outside sources.

The Chinese exchanges are all about framing the narrative. They are also all about prolonging the unavoidable.


So you predict a large fall this week or wait no, next week, wait no maybe week after next when that big announcement comes out. You are good  Roll Eyes can i give you all my money so you would manage it?



185. Post 7033238 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.48h):

We're above 590 and there are still 2k+ coins to 600. Half way mark to ATH just doesnt want to go down



186. Post 7034966 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.48h):

Quote from: lemonte on May 30, 2014, 12:21:29 PM
600

So close!!
And over, where's the it's happening gif?



187. Post 7069037 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.49h):

Hmm looks like Chinese are buying up coins again. Not sure how i feel about that  Undecided



188. Post 7075114 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.49h):

Ahh 666 recall seeing you on a way down



189. Post 7104811 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.50h):

Quote from: Wandererfromthenorth on June 03, 2014, 08:34:03 AM

We are at lower prices.

I will wait for cheaper price under 550 seems OK.. Its bound to test 600 soonish..Yes shroomy i've seen the future Cheesy

Still waiting?

That dude is smokin da crack pipe ..and dropping too much acid for his 600 retest  Cool

The future is still ahead, this is just one big whale pushing with borrowed money paying high rates to me Smiley ( $1.5m borrowed yesterday) , $21.5 million in longs currently, the fall gonna be epic.. I hereby revise my prediction: 500 in 2 weeks  Roll Eyes
If you can't see a double top formation, then you are a greedy delusional bull  Grin
Funny that nobody on leverage thinks like you apparently.
Shorts (which are dirt cheap right now) are at a record low
http://charts-bfxdata.rhcloud.com/bitfinexLiquidityPriceCombinedBTC.php

no reason for a long squeeze in the first place.


No shorts to cover - Check
Longs pretty much maxed out paying high rates - Check
No huge inflow of USD, Bid Sum remaining unchanged on stamp (around $11m ,maxed out to only $13m) - Check
New: Bulls cheering all over: contrarian indicator  Cheesy - Check

What will happen when market stalls and shorts finally open, this rally is not sustainable so far.
these are conditions for a long squeeze in case of a MASSIVE panic sell occurs. if there are no reason for a panic sell in the first place there is no point in considering it at all. Only catastrophic news would get us there, but these are unpredictable so what's the point.

Bid Sum is not an indication of inflow of new USD.
And besides, there is still a lot of fiat in exchanges accumulated from the bear market waiting, also because this trend reversal rally from 450 was done mostly on people raising the asks (that explains the not so huge volume). after the breakout less and less people were willing to sell BTC. Until this wave of predictable profit taking at 680 that is.


Anyway, we have your prediction, in 2 weeks we will see who was right Wink

Would 4k BTC be MASSIVE?

Cause someone can borrow 4k BTC at 0.01% dump it all, start a cascading margin calls from tight margins from the likes of ChrisML's and pick up cheap coins  Grin do it at the lowest volume time to lower your risk of a greater whale swallowing you...Profit



190. Post 7147830 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.50h):

What i miss? Oh we're still at 666 ok going back to sleep



191. Post 7268865 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.52h):

Am i the only one that sees this as simply Finex decoupling from Stamp? Spread maxed at like $20 or like what 3%



192. Post 7269298 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.52h):

Quote from: dreamspark on June 12, 2014, 11:29:31 AM
Am i the only one that sees this as simply Finex decoupling from Stamp? Spread maxed at like $20 or like what 3%

Can they reconnect it please? Tongue

No please don't, my coins are worth more since I moved from Stamp  Tongue

Spread between gox and btc-e was at like 10% back in the "normal" days. I'm speculating that Finex owners will keep spread at 3% max for now, then once panic calms down bump it to 5% at which point it should be profitable enough for arbers to take over. They only wrote that exact thing on their reddit  Angry i know shocking!!!  Roll Eyes



193. Post 7281223 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.52h):

Did anyone find out if the price of the auction is public info and if it'll be released?



194. Post 7628384 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.56h):

Quote from: okthen on July 01, 2014, 10:27:26 PM
Well if all the coins were indeed bought by a single entity, is that good news?
It means they bought high, so they're probably not dumpers.
On the other hand, lots of btc in one basket...

Makes perfect sense, the more BTC you want to buy the more it'll cost you. That's why i didn't care much about that syndicate, just a bunch of low ballers, why would you pay above market to get 25k worth of BTC when you can buy it on the market without much slippage. Now if you want to buy 18MM worth of BTC your options are pretty limited, and the more you want to buy the more it'll cost you simple supply and demand. So that's definitely a good news, someone with deep pockets is moving in.



195. Post 7628460 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.56h):

Quote from: relm9 on July 01, 2014, 10:40:39 PM
One buyer is very bullish.  It means the sale price was likely higher than most anticipated.
It means only that one buyer with deep pockets was less greedy than all the others.  They may all have bid at 475$, and he bid 480$  Grin

EDIT: typo, 460 --> 480


It is unlikely that this buyer bid just $5 higher than the rest and won *all* the blocks. My guess is they bid at least $100-200 higher than market across the board.

What makes you think that $475 was the second highest bid?



196. Post 7631877 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: jl2012 on July 02, 2014, 03:57:24 AM
So today we had two major retailers announce that they're taking bitcoin and we're now lower value than we were 24 hours ago. This market is brutal.
As many people have pointed out already, those major retailers announced that they are taking dollars -- that will come from the sale of bitcoins, mostly by bitcoin enthusiasts.  So those news may give bitcoin more visibility, but it is questionable whether they will expand the number of bitcoin owners, and they imply more coins moving from hoards into the market.

And, anyway, those news are irrelevant to the Chinese traders -- who seem to be leading the current drop.


Merchant adoption is the next step towards global acceptance after the initial investment / speculation phase. It's the next logical step and it's a good sign.

They are not taking dollars, they are taking Bitcoins. And not all of the merchants are selling 100% of the Bitcoins back to dollars by the way.

When people start to realize how easy crazy is to buy things in locally and the internet without the need of giving credit card or bank information to anyone acceptance is going to increase. It's the next natural / logical step, credit cards are a thing of the past and obsolete.



Interesting points. However I still cannot understand why someone would pay with bitcoins if rewards credit cards offer bonus cashback + services and features.
eg. many companies add an extra year warranty + some have purchase protection if item gets stolen/breaks within 90 days + protection from sellers who dont send quality goods and refuse to make good on the purchase and many more features.

Some of these benefits coupled with extra cash back (eg. I have a card that gives 2% cashback on all purchases) wont exactly make people flock to bitcoin unless they have something to hide or are paranoid and want to be "anonymous" (as if the nsa cant track you anyway...).

P.S. Of course there is a use for someone who cant get their hands on a credit card with features like those mentioned above (most people probably can though).



Do you truly believe all these bonus cashback, services, features, extra year warranty, purchase protection, and ability to charge-back are FREE? YOU are the one paying for all these crap, and even you don't want these you have no choice


I sort of agree with that. Point being if merchants credit card costs are 3.5%, perhaps provide a 2% discount for payments in BTC



197. Post 7632619 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: cosmicapex on July 02, 2014, 05:07:36 AM
What the heck are you talking about, ive been getting all these benefits "for free". I have never paid a dime to any credit card company. No annual fees, no charges, nothing... I have all the above "totally free". If you have never heard about these things you should do some research.

You absolutely have, you just aren't aware of it.  Merchants are charged fees by the CC processors and those are passed onto you, the customer.  Don't think you're not paying for that shit one way or another just because you don't see the charge first hand.

You could argue that everything costs 3% more because credit cards, but it's not hard to earn more than that with rewards, so it's kind of a YMMV situation.

I do hate the fact that all my rewards-based trips are basically paid for by other consumers with massive amounts of credit card debt, though.

Huh show me a free credit card the gives 3% cashback which is not a set time or category promo.



198. Post 7633068 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: lay785 on July 02, 2014, 05:39:39 AM
What the heck are you talking about, ive been getting all these benefits "for free". I have never paid a dime to any credit card company. No annual fees, no charges, nothing... I have all the above "totally free". If you have never heard about these things you should do some research.

You absolutely have, you just aren't aware of it.  Merchants are charged fees by the CC processors and those are passed onto you, the customer.  Don't think you're not paying for that shit one way or another just because you don't see the charge first hand.

You could argue that everything costs 3% more because credit cards, but it's not hard to earn more than that with rewards, so it's kind of a YMMV situation.

I do hate the fact that all my rewards-based trips are basically paid for by other consumers with massive amounts of credit card debt, though.

Huh show me a free credit card the gives 3% cashback which is not a set time or category promo.

Highest ive seen is 2.2% cashback. Certain rewards points are thought to be worth 5-15cents each eg. starwood amex points if you intend to stay at hotels and compare the price to what the hotel normally costs. Theres an annual fee on that card but some people get it waived. Was just giving an example of how depending on how you use your points you can get much more than 3%.

I know someone who has an amex gold and sells amex rewards points for like 5cents or so. although that has an annual fee as well. if you spend enough you negate the annual fee and can still get like 3.5-4%.


IF you spend enough and IF you want to stay in that specific hotel IF that hotel is available on that date IF your points don't expire ...  bottom line credit companies are for profit and are making money (lots of it) off transactions. There can be no argument that cutting them out is beneficial, to both merchants and their customers, a more valid argument should be how those savings should be split between two



199. Post 7706196 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: gentlemand on July 06, 2014, 07:03:37 PM
And while the tumbleweed was rolling past, we so very nearly saw the $10,000 bitcoin, albeit only in one wee corner of the internet and presumably because someone was drunk, misinformed or pushed the wrong button.



It wasn't such a long wait after all.

Pfft wake me up when it's above 10k



200. Post 8504399 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Quote from: techman on August 23, 2014, 07:49:26 PM
Is there any free programme that I can see signal like buy/sell. Which programme do you use guys? I am not using this kind of programme and I am bitcoin trader like 1 year, I won lot of money but just I want to know, any programmen do you use? Thank you.

If you must ask for a program to WIN a lot of money, do yourself a favor and save your money. Ask yourself if anyone had a magic program that can guess the market why would they share it with you?



201. Post 8634785 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.10h):

Quote from: razorramon on September 02, 2014, 07:09:07 AM
someone desperate to sell on bitfinex

if it isn't fake you'll soon have your 420$ bitcoins

2k ask wall after 1k bid wall was pulled? from Huobi. I for one welcome volatility, let there be blood



202. Post 8855847 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.13h):

Quote from: relm9 on September 17, 2014, 06:38:39 AM
Honestly there is NO REASON why BTC will rally from this area.

Huge trendlines are against it

There have been GREAT news regarding bitcoin but every rally gets sold off

Seems most of the coins entering the market are being dumped by multipools

I maybe be wrong but it doesn't look like this area will hold, it might go to $1000 one day but it will probably break $400 or lower.

Not selling as coins, as I'm a long term hodler. However, I feel like it's going to keep going down until some of these large scale mining operations are driven out of business. With the lack of buying pressure, whales are forcing miners to sell lower and lower. This isn't like the early days where miners could recoup their losses easily by selling off hardware (GPUs) either, as the BTC price slides their equipment gets increasingly worthless since it only has one purpose. Some of these larger operations must be scrambling to sell off coins.

This is  the only logical explanation that makes sense to me. Leveraged longs on finex were off the charts, a prime target to get squeezed and so they were. Now hash rate is through the roof yet the price is falling. And those huge mining farms that have HUGE daily expenses and need liquidity, so it'll only make sense for them to get squeezed to cause a domino effect. Putting up such walls is not a way to exit position.



203. Post 8878113 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.14h):

Quote from: Loaded on September 18, 2014, 05:17:09 PM
For better or worse, no funds available until tomorrow, possibly monday. It'd be faster to fly cash to the exchange in person.

Hope you're not flying to Japan this time  Grin you're like beetlejuice only pop up when people mention your name? Or is it the price opportunity?



204. Post 8878869 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.14h):

Last dump was a desperate shorter. BFX shorts went up by about 1k looks like someone a bit too late to a party, calling a bottom



205. Post 8909479 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.15h):

Quote from: grappa_barricata on September 21, 2014, 06:25:53 AM
Interest on btc swaps is 10X higher than for USD swaps.   Back up to 9100 shorts.

There are almost no BTC swaps left on bitfinex!!!


Good, i don't have an issue with the price dropping while shorts are going up. It's the never ending dumps while the short are dropping that bother me



206. Post 9100174 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.20h):

Few options as i see them:
1-He's an idiot/doesn't like money
2-He's a robin hood trying to spread wealth
3-It's manipulation in which case he has to have many more coins to drive the price even lower for rebuy (very risky and highly unlikely at these levels).

Market wants to go up. For 1 & 2 it'll shoot up once the wall is gone. Oddly enough leaning towards #2



207. Post 9100191 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.20h):

Quote from: mooncake on October 06, 2014, 06:16:51 AM
But why are people buying instead of dumping?

We went all the way down from $1,200 to $300. We are in a bear market.

Just because a 30,000BTC sell wall appears out of nowhere, everyone needs to buy into that wall?

Makes no sense to me!

Because we can now see the reason for the bear market. One entity with deep pockets who finally showed itself. Market doesn't like unknown. Looks like the 30k wall is it's last hooray...



208. Post 9100264 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.20h):

Quote from: nanobrain on October 06, 2014, 06:30:53 AM
Few options as i see them:
1-He's an idiot/doesn't like money
2-He's a robin hood trying to spread wealth
3-It's manipulation in which case he has to have many more coins to drive the price even lower for rebuy (very risky and highly unlikely at these levels).

Market wants to go up. For 1 & 2 it'll shoot up once the wall is gone. Oddly enough leaning towards #2


Why do you discount 3?

Last night he market sold 8K.  another move like that would trigger and extreme panic (8K alone gets us into 210 region before everyone else panics).

He then buys up new coins at whatever new low we sink to using the 5MUSD he's just accumulated in the last 5 hours at 300.

The more I consider this the more likely I think it could be....he's exhausted buyers.

He hasn't exhausted the buyers. He exhausted what little liquidity was at stamp. No sane person would keep millions on btc exchange for long time. Look at other exchanges even btc-e is above. Even arbs are getting exhausted. There's a lot of people waiting for banks to open to initiate wires. LOADED and goat are probably on the plane to Slovenia as we speak. Again it's possible but i don't think probable for someone to expect to be able to buy 30k coins bellow $300.

The other options i left out is front running the news. Like ETF not being approved or something of that nature.



209. Post 9100326 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.20h):

Quote from: porcupine87 on October 06, 2014, 06:41:26 AM
Few options as i see them:
1-He's an idiot/doesn't like money
2-He's a robin hood trying to spread wealth
3-It's manipulation in which case he has to have many more coins to drive the price even lower for rebuy (very risky and highly unlikely at these levels).

Market wants to go up. For 1 & 2 it'll shoot up once the wall is gone. Oddly enough leaning towards #2


Or he just thinks the price will go down to 2 digits. If he would have sold at $500 or $400 wouldn't you said the same? The good thing is we are still at $300. Let's see if it gets eaten.

Just thinking the asset will loose 60% of its market cap? Without knowing something that everyone else doesn't that be a gamble which would put them at #1.

I expect the buying to pick up once the wall get smaller



210. Post 9100400 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.20h):

Quote from: rb1205 on October 06, 2014, 06:59:02 AM
Wall is being chomped slowly but steadly, around 100 btc/min. At this rate it will be bought in a couple of hours. Shocked

Nope buying will escalate towards the end, look at the other exchanges pulling aead



211. Post 9100456 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.20h):

Quote from: FNG on October 06, 2014, 07:04:03 AM
Funds coming in..or buyers figured it's time before the sale is over.

Could go rather quickly from here

Europe is waking up.

Now i can say it, last chance to get cheap coins lets get pics of trains ready  Grin



212. Post 9133841 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.21h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on October 08, 2014, 09:00:46 PM
Those finex shorts are just asking to get slaughtered. On the other hand, the dollar value of the BTC in margin longs is obviously much greater, but much less so than it used to be pre long squeeze and shorts loading up.

Right, i'd be more excited if shorts were higher then longs. Longs will start taking profit when we go up, which might cancel out the short squeeze.



213. Post 9134484 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.21h):

Quote from: zoinky on October 08, 2014, 09:55:31 PM
Bitcoin looking mighty bullish. What gives? Tongue

$ deposits finally hitting the exchanges, shout see more of this till the weekend then .... Huh



214. Post 9138610 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

He won't get those coins that cheaply without slippage, people starting to front run him. Someone needs to use the market buy option  Roll Eyes Grin



215. Post 9151389 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: FNG on October 10, 2014, 10:30:40 AM
Free money on bitfinex for anyone with deep pockets and a large pile of BTC.

Place a very high ask..market buy 10k. Margins calls will make you several million $'s and a pile of btc

50 people who are prepared to risk 30btc (to open position 3:1 = 90btc) can turn this around... Who is in?  Grin

would be amazing to see...could ignite a temporary chain reaction with a ping pong over a huge price range
indeed. Could send the price over 5k on finex and have a ton of liquidated butt hurt shorts.

Other exchanges would move up at least $100 probably more temporarily

Hate to burst your bubble but take a look at longs. They just sucked up all available swaps no more free money. And $ wise they outnumber the shorts by far. Or you can just disregard this and keep looking at shorts



216. Post 9151430 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: FNG on October 10, 2014, 10:36:27 AM
Free money on bitfinex for anyone with deep pockets and a large pile of BTC.

Place a very high ask..market buy 10k. Margins calls will make you several million $'s and a pile of btc

50 people who are prepared to risk 30btc (to open position 3:1 = 90btc) can turn this around... Who is in?  Grin

would be amazing to see...could ignite a temporary chain reaction with a ping pong over a huge price range
indeed. Could send the price over 5k on finex and have a ton of liquidated butt hurt shorts.

Other exchanges would move up at least $100 probably more temporarily

Hate to burst your bubble but take a look at longs. They just sucked up all available swaps no more free money. And $ wise they outnumber the shorts by far. Or you can just disregard this and keep looking at shorts
?

Free money would be setting an ask of several thousand btc above $1000 and then buying 10k btc on market.  Forced liquidation sends the price stratospheric filling your asks. You then get btc plus several million $'s. Free money

Great theory...assuming longs wont be closing...



217. Post 9159255 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Looks like we have bear sitting on a lot of coins who wants to get rid of them so he keeps dumping. The good thing is market is trying to go up and it looks pretty organic



218. Post 9169700 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.23h):

Quote from: Boxman90 on October 12, 2014, 12:44:32 AM
So, not unlike a few days ago with the 30k sellwall, we're now hovering around a considerable buywall.

IIRC, in the first case, we hovered close, nibbled, and finally bought and this was hella bullish and BTC went up in price.

Now, we're hovering around the buywalls and it looks like they will be sold into. Can some cultists in here spin this into bullish sentiment for me?

So there are few million dollars waiting to be exchanged for BTC (with no sellers yet) and you need something else to spin this into bullish sentiment?



219. Post 9169914 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.23h):

Quote from: Boxman90 on October 12, 2014, 01:01:33 AM
So there are few million dollars waiting to be exchanged for BTC (with no sellers yet) and you need something else to spin this into bullish sentiment?

There won't be 3-5K BTC  exchanged for fiat then?

Right, so there are always two sides to the transaction, the question is the price that they settle on.



220. Post 9180707 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.23h):

BFX has Billy going at .2



221. Post 9194179 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.23h):

Are we at 666 yet? No, ok going back to sleep



222. Post 9195224 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.23h):

Feels like one entity is buying up coins while trying to minimize the slippage. Buys few thousand coins then backs off for asks to refill and then buys again...



223. Post 9195290 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.23h):

Quote from: YogoH on October 14, 2014, 08:58:42 AM
Wtf is that guy on bitfinex thinking?  Its going up now better dump my coins

He quickly ran away once that buy wall popped up. Wall wars are fun



224. Post 9216316 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.24h):

Where's the buy pressure  Huh poor bear at stamp has been trying to sell ~2k coins with no takers



225. Post 9287941 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.25h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on October 22, 2014, 08:00:45 AM

Explanation


This doesn't feel natural to me. Bids are building up and up across all exchanges but no market orders and VERY low volume and stable price what gives  Huh conspiracy theorists ...



226. Post 9290321 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.25h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on October 22, 2014, 12:45:57 PM

Hold on to your butts.

Meh just some shorts closing



227. Post 9300072 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.25h):

There are actually a lot of bitcoins trading hands. Good volume so there is resistance/buyers at this lever. But where are the damn dumped coins are coming from  Undecided and how many are there left



228. Post 9300201 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.25h):

Quote from: janos666 on October 23, 2014, 08:33:42 AM
There are actually a lot of bitcoins trading hands. Good volume so there is resistance/buyers at this lever. But where are the damn dumped coins are coming from  Undecided and how many are there left

Well, Mt.Gox managed to make some 500k BTC disappear without a trace and some others also ran on that race, scoring 10k-50k here and there... Roll Eyes

bitcoin will not go that low. At the most it will drop to $360 and then spike back up.

You forgot to go all-in with a short during the freefall from 380$, I see. Cheesy

Right, these dumps are done in a way to liquidate A LOT of coins. Market wants to go up but every time it builds up it gets slammed with huge dumps (usually starting middle of night in US). Smells fishy, the 30k bearwhale fishy. This is not manipulation as with there's no panic and no chance to rebuy lower. This is just dumping tons and tons of coins



229. Post 9301098 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.25h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on October 23, 2014, 10:17:51 AM
...
I kept my coins because I figured I can mitigate the possible losses by some conservative margin trading (ride the big waves only but do ride those) and I can easily take the remaining risk because the potential is very high. But it's have the potential to get too hectic.



Fun activities, everyone!

I tried my best but I give up.



Great Job janos!
The best thing about the interweb is there's alway plenty more where that came from.


Lol think Thomas the tank is another cartoon



230. Post 9308778 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.26h):

Quote from: dakota neat on October 23, 2014, 10:50:12 PM
I bet at least one of our beloved exchanges is running on fractional reserve and flood the market with virtual coins. Not even the dumbest noob traders can be that dumb, seriously wtf.


the one with 20 mil in USD swaps?

14,000 more bitcoin were market sold than market bought so far today on Bitfinex alone. Where do all this coins come from?

Good question, even shorts are covering and cashing in at these levels yet the dumping continues. Lots and lots of coins being liquidated. Think that's the downside of being criminals favorite currency, lots of coins were stolen, and those stolen coins get dumped at whatever price.

As a solution somehow need to convince hackers to be hodlers



231. Post 9310034 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.26h):

Shorts are down to 9k and we're still going down...not good



232. Post 9320526 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.26h):

Quote from: tarmi on October 24, 2014, 11:45:23 PM
or both. Cheesy

never liked bitfinex.

Why? I can see small exchanges with little volume being scammers but BFX has a good business model and should be (very) profitable (unlike whoboy, how do they make $ again?). Why screw with fractional reserves and kill the golden goose? I think Gox's Karpeles was just (criminally) incompetent/negligent, he had everything going for him market share, name recognition etc... no sane person would intentionally sabotage that.  



233. Post 9320650 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.26h):

Quote from: Newbie1022 on October 24, 2014, 11:40:36 PM
http://fortune.com/2014/10/24/bitcoin-fraud-scam/

This. It is actually a decent commentary in that it calls out some scams but is supportive of blockchain technology. A bit vapid, but pretty practical and on point.

So he's bull on crypto currency just not BTC. Which i feel is the sentiment around. I think it's still bullish for BTC, with that logic BTC should still keep going up until something better starts to replace it then we should see the market shifting over to new coin. Then the argument becomes how much is BTC's early market share/adoption is worth, and how adoptable will BTC be. But that just doesn't seem to be the case now, the market cap for ALL crypto currencies is going down. Can we get some graphs of total market cap of ALL cryptos and how much of that is in BTC? I'll bet it's hovering around 95%



234. Post 9322940 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.26h):

It's unhappening, but right like clock work around 0400 New York time on Friday night



235. Post 9323061 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.26h):

Quote from: simmo77 on October 25, 2014, 07:57:45 AM
It's unhappening, but right like clock work around 0400 New York time on Friday night

Which exchange, Stamp? Is it the same amount of coins each time and same exchange?

The dumping is coordinated across all exchanges. And i've noticed usually starts around the same time. Think BFX held up like a champ, has the healthiest bid side and it's not running. Looks like lots of people moved fiat there in anticipation of a long squeeze



236. Post 9323802 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.26h):

Think we're entering the era of industrialized mining, this will be a cut throat competitive market with slimmer profit margins leading to most of 3600btc mined being dumped DAILY
A kid in a dorm/garage is exponentially more likely to hodl but industrialized mega farms simply just can't afford that. Just need to find a price point where there's enough demand to absorb 3600coins daily

http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2014-10-21/bitcoin-miner-ditches-clients-to-chase-2-billion-coding-prize.html



237. Post 9323865 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.26h):

Quote from: redsn0w on October 25, 2014, 10:11:01 AM
I'm waiting the $250 value , is it possible or not   ? What do you think guys ?

Because you are gonna buy all those cheap coins at 250 and then the price will magically go up and you will be rich. Correct?

No , I don't want to be rich . I would like only to buy some bitcoin at $ 250 , is it a problem ? I don't think.


Everything is possible, how probable is the question. No one knows, but if you feel 250 "range" is the bottom the smartest thing would probably be to spread your bids out. Buy some now and put bids all the way down to say 225. Unless you really believe you will hit the bulls eye with this all or nothing $250 approach.



238. Post 9330789 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.26h):

Quote from: Newbie1022 on October 25, 2014, 10:55:36 PM
Ok, so I am a bear, but what the f--- are these maniac shorters doing? The shorts have been around 13,000 on BFX for several hours, the price has stabilized or gone up slightly, and the price on BFX is $3 below that of BTC-e. For a while I thought there might be a chance for a flash crash on manipulation, but we've stabilized. I can understand being wary to buy in at this point, but to have a short right now is pure f---ing madness. Who the hell wants to be in a line with 13,000 BTCs trying to close out the shorts? That's f---ing nuts.

As a bull that's a welcoming sight. Shorts going through the roof without price budging.

But yeah that's pretty suicidal. Don't know what would drive someone to short when we're down like 70% from ATH



239. Post 9331183 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.26h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on October 26, 2014, 01:55:14 AM
Bitfinex is going a little dump happy isn't it

Short are going crazy. Make them pay for it  Grin



240. Post 9331627 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.26h):

Annnd BFX shorts are at ATH. This...should...be...goood (or really bad)



241. Post 9331751 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.26h):

Quote from: jonoiv on October 26, 2014, 03:17:48 AM
Annnd BFX shorts are at ATH. This...should...be...goood (or really bad)

It's bullish imho.  they will close the shorts now or get squeezed.

For sure unless they're front running some negative news/insiders. It's crazy to short 6k BTC on a feeling, but again honey badger...



242. Post 9331953 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.26h):

Quote from: BitChick on October 26, 2014, 04:12:10 AM



every time I buy BTC goes down at least $50 3 days later...beginning to think it is ME...sorry guys...best I not buy....the btc karma guys hate my ass

(besides you all will likely hunt me down if I continue such actions!)

so maybe I will just sit on hands for a bit....



Last time I bought the price plummeted $200.  So ... ya .... sitting on hands here too.

When I sell it goes up!  Sold one coin today.  Had to because too many bills to pay.  But it should help the price at least! Wink

Then don't stop keep on selling think it's working



243. Post 9340899 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.26h):

Quote from: btcisreal on October 27, 2014, 12:29:05 AM
Adam etc, when will we see 390 again hehe..?

Also, how is it possible that if someone starts to dump on let's say Bitfinex. Bitstamp for some reason follows instantly (or the opposite)?

If you're selling you want to minimize your slippage, so you need volume. Instead of dumping on one exchange you split the dumping across multiple exchanges. And of course the other part (like with Mr 30k bearwhale on stamp) is arbitragers (sp?). Bots buy on cheaper exchanges and sell on higher for profit.



244. Post 9341684 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.27h):

Quote from: robyone on October 27, 2014, 02:41:27 AM
...what bothers me is weak ask walls, which might cause so called "to the moon"...

Hope you can sleep at night with these kind of thought Grin



245. Post 9342582 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.27h):

Shorts are doubling down about 9k coins shorted in 2days  Shocked while longs are only up about 1MM



246. Post 9342801 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.27h):

Quote from: Omikifuse on October 27, 2014, 06:27:19 AM
Meanwhile, the total amount of BTC swaps (read: shorts) at Bitfinex has reached a historic high of 16.2k BTC.

17,254


and growing.

Guess something big going to happens

Hmmm but i don't see the corresponding volume on BFX! As if they're borrowing but not opening short positions? Or possibly just accumulating to dump all at once? Shocked



247. Post 9343229 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.27h):

Quote from: edwardspitz on October 27, 2014, 07:41:55 AM
Meanwhile, the total amount of BTC swaps (read: shorts) at Bitfinex has reached a historic high of 16.2k BTC.

17,254


and growing.

Guess something big going to happens

Just thinking... how will all that shorts close their positions? I see only two options: short or long squeeze.

Could this be some form of manipulation? Maybe they are already covered?

Annnd we're at 18k shorts with no volume on BFX someone is doing something funny



248. Post 9343266 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.27h):

Quote from: cbeast on October 27, 2014, 07:50:54 AM
Meanwhile, the total amount of BTC swaps (read: shorts) at Bitfinex has reached a historic high of 16.2k BTC.

17,254


and growing.

Guess something big going to happens

Just thinking... how will all that shorts close their positions? I see only two options: short or long squeeze.

Could this be some form of manipulation? Maybe they are already covered?

Annnd we're at 18k shorts with no volume on BFX someone is doing something funny
Ding ding ding! Winner winner, chicken dinner!

Place your bids low cause someone is about to unleash a huge dump on bfx?  Huh



249. Post 9344864 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.27h):

Quote from: tarmi on October 27, 2014, 11:17:56 AM
22.2 mil vs 17 k

longs going up nicely too.



apples to oranges? USD to BTC

$22.2MM longs vs $6.2M shorts gives a better picture. But we got almost BTC10k new longs opened in the last two days that's like 120% growth (although i don't think i saw all of those borrowed funds hit the market yet! Undecided) so ATH short with 120% growth in two days while market is moving against them VS a typical long volume with maybe 10% rise over the same 2 days period ...



250. Post 9355186 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.27h):

Quote from: noobtrader on October 28, 2014, 10:18:44 AM

Based on my fairly quick perusal, whatever point(s) your making, those points do NOT seem to be based on very complete cost calculations.... that's my main point in responding to your posts.

yes, there are too many  variable to look at.

So you're admitting that your calculation are useless?

What if we could make gold out of steel and fly unicorns to work?



251. Post 9355754 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.27h):

Quote from: Wandererfromthenorth on October 28, 2014, 11:19:52 AM
Fools.   

Good luck shutting down future decentralized marketplaces like OpenBazaar lol

Next they'd want to stop illegal online file sharing, oh wait...



252. Post 9391532 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.28h):

Quote from: cbeast on October 31, 2014, 08:43:06 AM
Because Bitcoin is dying, people are throwing more money into mining.

Huh  Huh i kept rereading this but it still makes no sense. Sarcasm?



253. Post 9432714 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.29h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on November 04, 2014, 09:00:26 AM

Explanation


^^^ That is not normal/organic  Undecided



254. Post 9442494 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.29h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on November 05, 2014, 06:05:06 AM
China just loves unleashing high volume positions about mid day there. Sooo not cool.

Good, real exchanges are digging in at ~$300. China keeps showing dumps with huge volumes, but no one is following and instead we're finally getting decoupling. I wanna see that gap grow!!!!



255. Post 9443584 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.29h):

Quote from: DeadCoin on November 05, 2014, 09:20:57 AM

Spot on, this guy say how it is. As I can see by the comments here, delusional cultist weren't even able to watch the video to the end. Truth is too painful

There are actually many somewhat valid arguments against BTC, he hit on none of them



256. Post 9461839 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.29h):

God i hope at least this new Silk 2.0 idiot at least encrypted his wallets. He was bragging about his security so that'd be rule #1.

I wonder how many time people had to rebuy their own coins. Buy BTC keep them on SR...have in confiscated by FBI purchase that coin again at FBI sale, store that coin at Gox...buy that same coin from "hacker", transfer it to SR2...wait for FBI sale to buy your coin yet again.  



257. Post 9483933 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.30h):

Quote from: ssmc2 on November 09, 2014, 01:07:42 AM
Why the pooolll still about the Halloween price?

Adam's MIA

He finally got busted for operating SR 2.0 </conspiracy theory>



258. Post 9504856 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.30h):

Quote from: Wary on November 11, 2014, 05:32:15 AM
Dissappeared. Just like Satoshi. Maybe he is Satoshi?

should we start a reward fund  Undecided dead or alive  Grin



259. Post 9521796 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

What happened saw dead bears and  Shocked porn. Ohh pfft still under 600. Back to sleep i go



260. Post 9526370 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

Quote from: ImI on November 13, 2014, 12:34:56 AM
OkCoin @ 2800
Huobi @ 2700

Da fak?

arbitrage not happening??

It does. More OKcoin users sell to the invisible buy wall rather than buying on ask price.
But they are feared to buy more on other exchanges (cheaper) because this increase feels unsustainable.

thats not arbitrage. thats trading what you are talking about.

Now China is diverging up dafaq!?! When will we finally be free of our Chinese overlords.  Angry



261. Post 9533955 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

WTF now longs went full retard  Roll Eyes



262. Post 9555798 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.32h):

15kBTC were closed on Finex (down to 5k from the top of 20k) that takes a lot of choo choo off the train  Cry



263. Post 9556609 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.32h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on November 16, 2014, 01:01:18 AM

Explanation


ChartBuddy refuses to accept price bellow 395  Grin it'll pick right up once we go above that



264. Post 9557302 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.32h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on November 16, 2014, 03:05:32 AM

and what the hell is up with the posting bot ?
that looks weird

I am now no longer including the old crappy data that stamp is putting out. When they start putting out real data, it will be included.

The prices at the top are wrong on that one (they were still being taken from the stale data) but they will be correct in the next one.

It started to talk again  Shocked send it back to hell with fire



265. Post 9566166 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.32h):

Quote from: hyphymikey on November 17, 2014, 02:19:06 AM
Glad I bought in with what I had left at stamp. Too bad this rally didnt wait until my fresh fiat arrives. Already maxed my Circle account out lol.

 Wink That's the whole point. This is in anticipation of fresh fiat hitting exchanges on Monday after that $475 run up.



266. Post 9583296 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.33h):

Quote from: mah87 on November 18, 2014, 05:32:30 PM
This user is currently ignored.

Why do you keep saying "This user is currently ignored."? Can't you say something different for once. Ohhhh riighhttt  Embarrassed



267. Post 9586078 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.33h):

Quote from: dreamspark on November 18, 2014, 09:00:38 PM
Anyone posted this yet?

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-11-18/bitcoin-auction-winner-draper-to-bid-again-in-december.html

Everyone knows not to try low ball bids this time  Wink
My man Draper



268. Post 9665990 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.35h):

Quote from: lyth0s on November 26, 2014, 09:39:59 PM
they never hacked into his computers, and whether or not they can follow them on the blockchain is irrelevant.

Perhaps I am mis-remembering about the hacking.  But, from day 0, the police can buy stuff on the site, pay in bitcoins, and follow them on the blockchain.  That tracing could reveal if there were other wallets beyond those that that they seized (~30'000 on the server and ~150'000 on his laptop). 

Whether they know about them or nor still does not give them access to the coins.

Unless he'll volunteer to release them for a plea bargain. Pretty sure prosecutors are not idiots to let 150k BTC slide away



269. Post 9685470 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: cech4204a on November 28, 2014, 09:02:04 PM
i'm here to bother you, can i?

it's about reality that BTC is dead, 5 years it was working just fine, i agree, but last year is showing that there is no more developement going on, no more new people addopting it, so fuck it, it's lost in history, believe it or not.

Can you explain your reality that BTC is dead and why you think that there are no more development/adoption? Oh you just trolling never mind then do continue



270. Post 9687094 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on November 29, 2014, 04:59:29 AM


Whether I know what i am doing or NOT, I have outlined a plan and I have invested according to the plan and then I made various adjustments along the way and I continue to have a plan.  I have also communicated various aspects of my plan as I had been investing, sometimes looking for feedback in order to figure out my strategy.  In the end, I own my own plan and I take full responsibility over it.  In various ways things have gone better than expected, and yet with 20/20 hindsight, I can see areas in which I could have done better.. but I am NOT kicking myself over that because NONE of us really know where the market is going, even though some of the whale manipulators have better abilities to attempt to control the direction of the market... at least for short periods of time.

Otherwise, you are a dweeb for attempting to judge me and to denigrate my investment strategy or my intelligence when you really do NOT know my situation in detail.  You do not know my finances, my goals, my timeline and a large variety of other factors, but still you strive to make after the fact judgements and denigrations..  a true sign of someone or a bot that has a few screws loose.  sorry about that for you.   Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy   Tongue Tongue

 Angry Can you stop feeding trolls? Most of us have them on ignore.



271. Post 9711871 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

If entity wanted to buy 50kBTC how much would it cost with slippage? Can you trust any exchange with $19MM? Here you're guaranteed clean BTC directly from the US gov. Gotta pay some premium for that



272. Post 9723156 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: nicked on December 03, 2014, 12:00:04 AM
   Coinapult ?

BTC over SMS anyone?



273. Post 9725287 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on December 03, 2014, 05:52:42 AM
You think there will be a dip today because of the auction?
If so, how deep?

Guess, just for guessing:

To have a positive effect, this auction would have to repeat the outcome of the previous one: a single winner, who can convince the market that he bought for a "good price" and does not intend to dump the coins.

However, that seems a bit unlikely, because:

* There are almost twice as many coins being auctioned this time, and twice as many coming in a few months.

* There seems to be much less excitement this time about those coins. (Last time, some even argued that those coins would have extra value as collectibles -- "the" coins from "the" Silk Road -- and/or for having been blessed by the US government. I have seen no such claims this time.)

* Therefore, it is more likely that, this time, there will be several winners.

* There is even a small chance that some lots will be unsold. (AFAIK, the USMS can ignore bids for any reason, including them being too low.)

* If there are several winners, some of them may remain unknown.

* If there are several winners, or unknown winners, or unsold lots, the market will probably assume that the coins were bought below market -- suggesting that the big players are bearish;

* If the market thinks that some of the coins were bought below market, it will fear that they be dumped for profit.

Moreover, the price increase after the previous outcome was announced only reversed the drop that occurred when the auction was announced.  There was no such drop this time, so why should there be a recovery?

Thus, if I had to guess, I would guess "no effect, or a drop".


How much of VC's $ was injected in BTC related companies at a time of the first auction and how much is there now



274. Post 9725636 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: podyx on December 03, 2014, 07:59:57 AM
Wtf is going on with These dumps?

pre auction dumps??
Looks like china cashing out.



275. Post 9731015 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: madmat on December 03, 2014, 06:45:13 PM
i wonder when we will receive info about the auction Huh this market is killing me. no volume and flatlined price.

The winning bidders must make sure that the money is in the USMS bank account "by 2:00pm EST, on Monday, December 8, 2014." If a bidder fails to do so, the next one in line is notified and given a similar deadline to do the same.  Defaulting bidders lose their deposit, so there should be no defaults and the outcome will be defined by Monday afternoon.

Last time the auction was on a Friday, and the USMS revealed that "single buyer got it all" on the next Monday.

However, the announcement for this auction says "The USMS will not release any information to the general public pertaining to the auction process or results."  I don recall seeing this explicit statement in the previous announcement.  So perhaps they will not even tell us how many winning bidders there were, and whether all lots were sold.

http://www.usmarshals.gov/assets/2014/dpr-bitcoins/?m=1


so we wont have any info and bitcoin price at the mercy of the unknown buyer...  Cry Cry


We will be able to see from the transfer of the BTC if there was more than one winner. If they all go to one address ... one winner, or one consortium winner. If they are split from that address, likely a consortium, but not certain obviously - one bidder *could* choose to split them into different wallets
If the USMS send out to multiple addresses, likely more than one group won ...

Do you have the address to watch ?

Ughh don't buy into all this trolling "On Friday, December 5, by 5:00pm EST, the USMS will notify the winning bidder/bidders that their bid/bids has/have been selected." http://www.usmarshals.gov/assets/2014/dpr-bitcoins/?m=1
Meaning all those that bid will know if they won. Meaning if i low ball bid
1-i get a small chance to get discounted coins bellow market which i can dump profit $$$
2-i'd be the first one to know if my bid wasn't selected then i can front run the new and buy coins on the market. Or better yet run the syndicate so you're now risking your own money, be the first one to get the news, act on it, distribute news to your syndicates(?) let them act on it, post on tweeter that your bid wasn't selected and watch the buying frenzy profit $$$

Bottom line everyone should get a feel whether the coins were bought bellow/above market by Friday so watching the coins move from that address a week later is pretty useless



276. Post 9731083 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: 600watt on December 03, 2014, 08:01:28 PM
i have enough of waiting, i'm gonna dump my coins in exactly 1 hour on stamp. Bitcoin is history for me.


have a safe trip home and tell your friends we said "hi"

bye


So we can assume once you dump in 1hr you'll leave and we'll never hear from you ever again?? Please???



277. Post 9731163 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: cech4204a on December 03, 2014, 06:59:33 PM
i have enough of waiting, i'm gonna dump my coins in exactly 1 hour on stamp. Bitcoin is history for me.

That was said at 19:59:33 UTC at 20:59UTC stamps volume was BTC1.42  at 21:00UTC volume is BTC0.0147 with a price around $379
Glad you cashed out your 1BTC. Don't let the door hit your ass on your way out



278. Post 9732030 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on December 03, 2014, 08:40:18 PM


Ughh don't buy into all this trolling "On Friday, December 5, by 5:00pm EST, the USMS will notify the winning bidder/bidders that their bid/bids has/have been selected." http://www.usmarshals.gov/assets/2014/dpr-bitcoins/?m=1
Meaning all those that bid will know if they won. Meaning if i low ball bid
1-i get a small chance to get discounted coins bellow market which i can dump profit $$$
2-i'd be the first one to know if my bid wasn't selected then i can front run the new and buy coins on the market. Or better yet run the syndicate so you're now risking your own money, be the first one to get the news, act on it, distribute news to your syndicates(?) let them act on it, post on tweeter that your bid wasn't selected and watch the buying frenzy profit $$$

Bottom line everyone should get a feel whether the coins were bought bellow/above market by Friday so watching the coins move from that address a week later is pretty useless

(1) is zero risk for a winner clearly, and is risk free, if intention was to arb and not hold (I am assuming you mean selling the 'about to be received' coins, not buying more ... that makes no sense)
Not seeing how (2) works for a low-ball loser. Might work for a high bid loser who thinks market will adjust to the (unknown to him) winning price or is desperate to buy. Depends on risk appetite.
But I agree with your conclusion that some participants will have possible valuable information on Friday that will likely be reflected in the price.

EDIT: Actually, unless you win them all, there is very little to discern as you will not know the range of winning bids, so unless you only intended to arb and got a few low enough to do so, or bid very high for a few lots and lost and want coins at a price they have been available for for some time (duh), anything else is pretty much guesswork, much as all of this is Wink

Right depends on your definition of low-ball and high-ball looser. Clearly not winning with a bid at $1 BTC brings you little useful info. But if i don't win at say $370 and ALL lots sold above that, that'd be enough insider info to go long at market $375



279. Post 9745867 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.37h):

Guy who was periodically dumping on finex ran out when china decided to go up. Did China get CCed about the auction? Looks like they dont give a faq



280. Post 9753300 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.37h):

Quote from: fonzie on December 05, 2014, 07:59:00 PM
Wall Street Journal:

"Tim Draper: I am pretty impressed that my bids that were 15% above the current market weren´t successful. However i am going to market buy those 50k on BTC-E, like NOW!"

http://online.wsj.com/articles/tim-draper-dissapointed-that-he-lost-the-second-auction-1417471759

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/12/05/venture-capitalist-tim-draper-wins-small-piece-of-bitcoin-auction/?module=ArrowsNav&contentCollection=Business%20Day&action=keypress&region=FixedLeft&pgtype=Blogs

“I will have to buy some more Bitcoin on the open market to fulfill my commitment to the new batch of Boost companies,” Mr. Draper said in an email.



281. Post 9770459 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.37h):

Quote from: jaberwock on December 07, 2014, 09:05:19 PM
Satoshi has been found...again! and arrested, too! SELL! SELL! SELL!

http://nationalreport.net/bitcoin-satoshi-nakamoto-arrested-identity-revealed/


It is a joke article made for a joke site.


Just in case some people don't read the full article

I did read it but couldnt find any of these jokes!

Article has been posted in the main forum:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=885254.0

It is fake



"“FBI agents just stormed the building, came in here without a search warrant or anything,” Fappy The Anti-Masturbation Dolphin, a mascot for the group, told CNN."
sounds legit to me



282. Post 9772551 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on December 08, 2014, 03:37:03 AM
That's more like it. OK, now they are cheaper. Buy some more! Still green moving averages and bullish order books.

Are you bulls pussies or something? Gimme a fight. I'm bored counting my money.

This is starting to get annoying  Angry getting into troll territory



283. Post 9773550 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

whoboy is trying to drag everyone down, lets see that divergence



284. Post 9774039 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

 Shocked Long squeezed  Huh Huh



285. Post 9782784 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

Quote from: shmadz on December 09, 2014, 03:51:37 AM

The only effect that can really drive a declining network hash rate is bitcoin price dropping at a rate that efficiency increases in hardware cannot meet.

Just imagine what might happen when the block rewards get cut in half...

Something's got to give.

Can't wait. BTC3,600/day is a lot for market to absorb. Especially with commercialized mining which i expect dump them like hot potato  



286. Post 9782981 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on December 09, 2014, 05:19:11 AM
china is banning bitcoin again

Link?

Show me a link for a day where they aren't banning btc



287. Post 9783007 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on December 09, 2014, 05:22:28 AM
Perhaps someone who placed a rather low bid at the USMS auction got it filled, and warned his friends. 

They knew the results last friday



288. Post 9793724 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

Think that was the last of Finex dumpers coins, now can we go up?? Roll Eyes



289. Post 9793766 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on December 10, 2014, 05:47:21 AM
the bitcoin network currently costs ~3600 BTC/day = ~1.2 million USD/day, or over 10 USD/transaction.
Source?

Miners get paid 25 BTC per block mined.

At 1 block every 10 minutes, that is 144 blocks/day, hence 3600 BTC/day.

At 350 USD/BTC, that is 1.26 million dollars per day.

Last time I looked there were about 100'000 transactions per day.  Hence 12.6 dollars per transaction.

Transactions seem free now because the network is paid with newly issued coins (there is an ugly word for that, but let's not rub that in).

Who pays that cost are the people who buy those 3600 new coins per day; whether small investors at the exchanges, or bigger investors over-the counter or by contracts with miners.  Those people give 1.26 million dollars per day, that they earned elsewhere, to the miners of the world; that goes into equipment, buildings, personel, electricity bills, and miners' profits.

Wow do you consider USD inflation when calculating mastercards transaction costs too? Roll Eyes



290. Post 9793886 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

Quote from: DaRude on December 10, 2014, 06:35:59 AM
Think that was the last of Finex dumpers coins, now can we go up?? Roll Eyes

 Shocked Angry  Or not he still has at least 500BTC more



291. Post 9794657 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on December 10, 2014, 07:06:26 AM
Oh great even more money floating over to China!

Yes, China is an exporter of bitcoins, and that transfers wealth from the West to China.

I don't know where the main mining ASIC manufacturers are (China, taiwan, Korea?) but that is a major industry too.

Wow do you consider USD inflation when calculating mastercards transaction costs too? Roll Eyes

Not sure I get your point.  1.2 million per day is the cost of the bitcoin network in dollars. I did not consider the dollar inflation there, why should it be considered for MasterCard?

But anyway, Bitcoin inflation is 1.3 million bitcoins per year over 13 million existing bitcins, or 10% per year.  How much is the dollar's?

Because the intent of block reward is also a method for distribution of BTC. That's why it's only temporary



292. Post 9794671 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

Interesting, instead of trying to liquidate coins that BFX wall looks like it's just following Chinese rate. i.e. floats up when china goes up even if there's no volume/bids on BFX and vise versa.



293. Post 9801338 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on December 10, 2014, 08:49:31 PM
thanks to DPR's stupidity browsing his Silk Road admin panel in a public library and not encrypting his Bitcoin wallets.

The FBI says that they got to him because SilkRoad used a captcha link in a way that exposed its real IP.   After that, I would guess that they followed him for a while, and haced into his computers, until they felt that they had enough evidence.  They got his email, for instance, where he allegedly discusses the murder of some blackmailer.  So, even if he encrypted the wallet, they may have captured the password.  The library may not have been a mistake, it may have been just the place that the FBI chose for the arrest. 

Anyway, as others pointed out, he made a deal with the gov to have the coins auctioned now.

Not encrypting wallet that has around BTC200k is as stupid as you can get. Emailing password to BTC200k wallets is just as stupid. Guy was an idiot



294. Post 9813829 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Quote from: janos666 on December 12, 2014, 01:28:27 AM
End of pump. We are back to pre microsoft announcement levels.

I would better not imagine how dumps will be like if the microsoft pump happened to be so insignificant

I think this BTC->FIAT relay kind of adoption is still regarded as neutral or slightly bad news. It has a possibility to mobilize some sleeping coins (~get them dumped on the markets) while doesn't create instant demand. It won't be the case forever but it seems to be clear that it still is (at one point, it will start to build demand and the mobilizing power will descend). May be this was the last one of this kind (though I guess it wasn't).

Only for people with limited brain power.

BTC adoption is great news. Period. Anyone who argues otherwise is an idiot or a troll.
WTF are people really that stupid? By that logic if newegg, overstock, and dell stopped accepting BTC it'd be great cause now people can't spend their BTC so we go to moon  Huh Oh how terrible it would be if BTC is widely adopted think of all the places to spend it   Roll Eyes
Adoption is the best thing that can happen to bitcoin the protocol that it's whole purpose. And good for bitcoin currency in the long run, maybe not as great for minute chart speculators



295. Post 9814469 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on December 12, 2014, 04:27:39 AM
...
By that logic if newegg, overstock, and dell stopped accepting BTC it'd be great cause now people can't spend their BTC so we go to moon  Huh...

Most people who "invest" in BTC don't do it to shop at Dell & NewEgg.
They might want to believe that others buy BTC to shop at Dell & NewEgg, but they themselves don't.
Because after the novelty of buying with BTC wears off, the sheer stupidity of it begins to sink in.  Imagine:

1. Spend fiat to buy BTC
2. Send BTC to a payment processor, who'll
3. Sells your BTC for fiat &
4. Sends fiat to the merchant that "accepts BTC".
5. Re-buy BTC you spent, probably from the same payment processor but at a premium, because "investment."

Funny as hell, doubt it happens too much tho.  Now for someone with a BTC stash from way back...  Nah, that would only create sell pressure, so won't happen Smiley

I think it's been hammered to the ground that that's not a great use case for BTC. Would i go through those steps to buy something from MS? Unless merchant offers incentives like 2% off btc payments probably not. (And i don't see anyone arguing that so can you stop spamming that?)
I know that you keep coming back to that as your main trolling point.

Right now from what i see, the best use for BTC is
-worldwide illegal markets (and i think that's more than enough to justify current market cap)
-money transferrer (pay someone in Asia, send money home to Africa, pay with BTC when traveling to save on currency conversion/foreign transaction fees) etc...
-micro payments/tipping (look at reddit/changetip etc.. how's their volume going)

Would i spend fiat and buy BTC for that? You betchya.

MS acceptance, brings huge endorsement to BTC. Means the protocol is mature enough, getting out of proof of concept phase and into big guys putting their weight to support it (even through BitPay). Think of all the advertisement, shifting people opinions from bitcoin being magical online money for druggies at silk road to now a blue chip accepting it. MasterCard is trying very hard to put a negative PR spin on bitcoin, this turns it around.

And of course there's speculation. MS needs to counter Apple Pay, is this the first step? How about integrated BTC wallet with the new Windows release? To find more use cases that make sense you need more awareness and this definitely does it.

TL;DR it's positive endorsement, free advertisement. Finally know MS stance on BTC and it's positive, so they won't try to fight it, opens huge potential for all new financially viable use cases. Bullish for these reason NOT that people start buying BTC to pay MS.



296. Post 9814966 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on December 12, 2014, 05:37:57 AM
...  ~Derp!
...

You are a bit slow today aren't you or not even trying. Let me help you out here, i know that following two threads back can be challenging. I said that "BTC adoption is great news" you brought up an irrelevant point that "Most people who "invest" in BTC don't do it to shop at Dell & NewEgg." as if someone remotely argued otherwise but no judgment here, so i naively followed that with explanation how your case is irrelevant and pointed out other cases to support my initial argument that "BTC adoption is great news" you got confused and started posting pictures of ponies. Can you follow that or would you like me to explain that with pictures?



297. Post 9815190 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Good point. Although i would find "i know you are but what am i" reply from newbie just as intelligent but more entertaining. Don't let me stop you continue with your trolling...

On ignore you go, i really did try not to all this time, posters of ponies and Chinese propaganda will be missed



298. Post 9815921 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Quote from: Elwar on December 12, 2014, 08:40:34 AM
Good point. Although i would find "i know you are but what am i" reply from newbie just as intelligent but more entertaining. Don't let me stop you continue with your trolling...

On ignore you go, i really did try not to all this time, posters of ponies and Chinese propaganda will be missed

NotLamchop is useful in this thread by being so ultra troll/bearish that all other bears/trolls do not bother trying to compete.

This allows for a simple ignore of only one user making it easier on everyone thus turning this thread into the most bullish thread on bitcointalk.

But I don't mind bears at all, as song as they have valid points. It's the "XYZ is why this event is bullish, no it's bearish because I like color yellow" trolls that are just annoying to talk to.



299. Post 9852379 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Someone is cashing out big time on finex



300. Post 9854340 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Over 2kBTC new shorts on Finex at least bulls got that going for them



301. Post 9864796 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

22MM in longs is starting to bother me  Undecided, luckily shorts are almost out of cheap coins



302. Post 9865121 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Quote from: mrkavasaki on December 17, 2014, 09:48:25 AM
I have  Sold all my 160btc and i think the btc Experiment has failed Undecided

It is over guys BTC will die by 2015

How much did you sell it for?



303. Post 9865136 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on December 17, 2014, 09:42:45 AM
Longs vs shorts... It is turning around. Longs down for  3.5mil$, shorts up for 7k (last 15 days).
USD   0.0633%   0.0753%   21,903,885.08 USD
BTC   0.0157%   0.0277%   15,380.11 BTC

http://bfxdata.com/swaphistory/totals.php

Still got a long way to go ~$22MM in long vs ~$5MM in shorts



304. Post 9865175 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Quote from: Thomas-s on December 17, 2014, 09:25:11 AM
BTC keeps going down
Ripple keeps going up

What the fuck... Huh
Ripple actually got a usecase.

Which is ...



305. Post 9865607 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

If 320 will fall on Finex this will sting a bit  Shocked



306. Post 9865723 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Well that's one way to stop the dumper. Stop processing blocks  with over 1hr between blocks we should have 6hrs of breathing room before he'll get more coins to BFX Grin



307. Post 9865997 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Leveraged longs are being squeezed



308. Post 9866024 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Quote from: mrkavasaki on December 17, 2014, 11:55:08 AM
I am a troll

Shooo on ignore list you go



309. Post 9876464 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.40h):

Quote from: Kroepoek on December 18, 2014, 09:51:23 AM
Shill1
shill2

A noobs very first post is to pump ripple. Do they not even try anymore?  Roll Eyes  Angry



310. Post 9876760 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.40h):

Quote from: Elwar on December 18, 2014, 10:40:53 AM
There are a lot of newbies on here today telling me that Bitcoin is doomed. Should I sell all of my bitcoins and buy fiat or buy ripples?

Which newbies to trust?

Go by the lowest activity, and registered time. Those are the freshest  Grin



311. Post 9876932 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.40h):

Quote from: oda.krell on December 18, 2014, 11:08:36 AM
Fun thought: The Ripple market now is like the Bitcoin market before shorting was possible on a substantial scale.

Yes, I mean that as: Ripple is in bubble mode and the burst will be spectacular, but I'm sure you can also derive the other implication Cheesy

^^ that. Need an option to short that turd



312. Post 9887509 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.40h):

Quote from: Globb0 on December 19, 2014, 10:30:15 AM
Capital is fleeing Russia right now and all of the non-oligarchs have only one way to evade capital controls. Care to guess what that one way is? Every day the ruble sinks against the dollar, and Bitcoin stays more or less stable in dollar terms, bitcoin goes up in value relative to the Russian currency.


Again, doesnt that depend on someone being prepared to accept rubbles for bitcoins? if ruble is becoming worthless why would they swap their perfectly good bitcoins for it.





There's always a buyer at the right price. Plus they might arbitrage. Look at btc-e and how it's above Finex now



313. Post 9961796 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.41h):

Quote from: tarmi on December 27, 2014, 09:13:05 PM
Shitfinex leading, China still hasnt moved

This is either the best time to buy or the worst time to buy....


China is sleeping and the west is trying to move the market with some pathetic buys that are actually shorts that are closing. We are seeing this every day. 

You monitor is upside down or you trollin'?



314. Post 9966065 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.41h):

Quote from: kenji on December 28, 2014, 03:55:54 PM
do you guys think it is a good idea  to sell all my 200btc for ripple Undecided

will ripple replace bitcoin soon?


No i think that's not enough, you should use that 200BTC to leverage short BTC 1:3 and market dump 600BTC then buy other poop coins and then umm profit  Roll Eyes



315. Post 10092919 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.45h):

Quote from: galdur on January 09, 2015, 03:40:06 PM
If anyone believes that rampant and unchecked criminality in a marketplace

inspires confidence in what is being traded there

have fun buying as long as you last.



If anyone actually believes that it's possible to have a free market without people trying to exploit it
have fun living in this unfair world.

Guys guys i thought we all agreed to sit in circles and sing Kumbaya. So who took my sandwich out of the fridge?



316. Post 10098683 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.45h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on January 10, 2015, 01:57:29 AM


That actually made me lol. On a separate note, is bitstamp going full retard like china with their volume on 0 fees



317. Post 10116179 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Hmm i've expected a much higher demand at these levels  Cry seems like no one wants to trade at these prices. Looks like China is dragging everyone down, over 2% spread between Hooboy and Finex. Well the good part is these low prices should fuck up the centralized miners who i'm guessing are behind these daily 2k dumps trying to stay afloat. Free market at it's best



318. Post 10116272 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 11, 2015, 06:07:39 PM
Ultimately I think the only way to stop the constant crashing is if the international buyers find enough interest in bitcoin to buy a large chunk of the coins back from China.

Independently of whether the Chinese exchanges are solvent or fake or whatever, I still believe that lots of coins (at least 500 000 BTC, perhaps a couple million) went from "Western" hand to Chinese hands last November.

And I also believe that those coins have been coming back to the West since then (via arbitragers), as the Chinese are gradually losing interest in "bitcoin gambling".  But the Chinese day-traders still have enough coins in the exchanges to set the price.

And I believe that the price has been generally dropping since then (apart from the two mini-bubbles I mentioned earlier) because there aren't enough people in the West willing to buy those coins that the Chinese want to sell -- plus the 3600 coins that are mined each day, plus the unknow number of old cheap coins that early adopters may be cashing out.

This chart shows that each day about 4 million bitcoin-days are destroyed, considering only coins that have not moved in the past year.  That could man people moving 11'000 coins that were not moved for 1 year, or 5500 coins that were not moved by 2 years, etc.  

It is hard to interpret these numbers, because "coins moving" does not mean "coins changing hands".  Even so, it seems quite possible that early adopters are cashing out 1000 BTC/day.  In that case, the people who are starting or increasing their BTC holdings would have to give 270'000 US$/day to those early adopters, in addition to the 1 M US$/day they must give to the miners, in order to maintain the price.



Selling BTC1k is not sustainable, you must have coins to sell coins, sooner or later that source will dry up. Supply of BTC3.6k/day will drop 50% in one year as intended. Both points suggest that bear market will end at certain time even if demand doesn't rise but stays constant, where these points will meet is the true question.



319. Post 10116337 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Quote from: samsonn25 on January 11, 2015, 06:27:25 PM
Ultimately I think the only way to stop the constant crashing is if the international buyers find enough interest in bitcoin to buy a large chunk of the coins back from China.

Independently of whether the Chinese exchanges are solvent or fake or whatever, I still believe that lots of coins (at least 500 000 BTC, perhaps a couple million) went from "Western" hand to Chinese hands last November.

And I also believe that those coins have been coming back to the West since then (via arbitragers), as the Chinese are gradually losing interest in "bitcoin gambling".  But the Chinese day-traders still have enough coins in the exchanges to set the price.

And I believe that the price has been generally dropping since then (apart from the two mini-bubbles I mentioned earlier) because there aren't enough people in the West willing to buy those coins that the Chinese want to sell -- plus the 3600 coins that are mined each day, plus the unknow number of old cheap coins that early adopters may be cashing out.

This chart shows that each day about 4 million bitcoin-days are destroyed, considering only coins that have not moved in the past year.  That could man people moving 11'000 coins that were not moved for 1 year, or 5500 coins that were not moved by 2 years, etc.  

It is hard to interpret these numbers, because "coins moving" does not mean "coins changing hands".  Even so, it seems quite possible that early adopters are cashing out 1000 BTC/day.  In that case, the people who are starting or increasing their BTC holdings would have to give 270'000 US$/day to those early adopters, in addition to the 1 M US$/day they must give to the miners, in order to maintain the price.



Selling BTC1k is not sustainable, you must have coins to sell coins, sooner or later that source will dry up. Supply of BTC3.6k/day will drop 50% in one year as intended. Both points suggest that bear market will end at certain time even if demand doesn't rise but stays constant, where these points will meet is the true question.


Assuming demand doesn't drop.

Meaning that there still has to be more buyers than sellers for price to rise.

Well yeah think it's basic supply/demand problem. Supply is pretty much guaranteed to drop. So
demand goes up=price up
demand constant,=price up
demand drops less than supply=price up
demand drops more than supply=price down.
Place your bets accordingly. I for one would love to see centralized miners go out of business and start closing farms.



320. Post 10117315 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Quote from: Son0fLamb on January 11, 2015, 06:56:03 PM
...
Cryto-currencies are not like fiat...if everyone just accepted that I think there would be a lot less pain.

If by "survival" you mean one neckbeard with two netbooks continuing to mine Bitcoin, I agree.  If. OTOH, you mean "not making everyone holding for more than a day poor," that's sorta iffy...

Let me spell this out:

Survival = i can send any amount i want anywhere in the world and get 3 confirmation at around 30min for few cents
Survival != $ X



321. Post 10117338 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on January 11, 2015, 08:18:25 PM
time to test the theory that the price doesn't matter (It doesn't) but still. Hurts.

I'm more interested in the theory about how mining is dead... Doesn't look like.

Hash rate is tied to $ It's hard to get good estimates but i believe that the consensus is that it becomes unprofitable right about this price point.



322. Post 10117546 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Quote from: octaft on January 11, 2015, 08:36:35 PM
Am I the only one to find it humorous that permabulls only think price matters on the way up?

Trader mentality.

Microsoft doesn't care about BTC price, neither does immigrant sending money back to his/her country, or the people dealing on silkroad 99.0, nor the tippers (well to small degree). Non of them carry the currency risk. At what point the demand for these use cases will meet supply who knows, but it's hard to argue that there won't be any new use cases.

Traders and miners are getting slaughtered though.



323. Post 10117632 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Quote from: Eamorr on January 11, 2015, 08:49:48 PM
Am I the only one to find it humorous that permabulls only think price matters on the way up?

Trader mentality.

Microsoft doesn't care about BTC price, neither does immigrant sending money back to his/her country, or the people dealing on silkroad 99.0, nor the tippers (well to small degree). Non of them carry the currency risk. At what point the demand for these use cases will meet supply who knows, but it's hard to argue that there won't be any new use cases.

Traders and miners are getting slaughtered though.

I don't think seasoned traders are getting slaughtered to be honest. When there's blood on the streets, there's money to be made. The biggest risk is, in the event of a panic, getting your gains out and trusting the exchanges not to shut down with your dividends.

Pretty sure mostly everyone would agree that with an asset losing around 75% of it's ATH market cap you can safely say that traders lost money. Of course i'm sure you can find exceptions with shorters and super elite/lucky traders successfully riding waves but pointing out exceptions doesn't help anyones case.



324. Post 10117744 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Quote from: Gyrsur on January 11, 2015, 09:05:40 PM
...
Pretty sure mostly everyone would agree that with an asset losing around 75% of it's ATH market cap you can safely say that traders lost money...

Not those who shorted BTC over the past year.  Bears love tanking prices.
logs or it didn't happen.  Grin

Lol was my quote just truncated and made into troll food? It's still on the same page. I'm offended by such low quality trolling  Angry

Full quote with emphasis.
Quote from: DaRude on January 11, 2015, 08:57:38 PM

Pretty sure mostly everyone would agree that with an asset losing around 75% of it's ATH market cap you can safely say that traders lost money. Of course i'm sure you can find exceptions with shorters and super elite/lucky traders successfully riding waves but pointing out exceptions doesn't help anyones case.



325. Post 10119213 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Huh a quick glimpse shows all Chinese exchanges having bigger ask side than bid, and  they're all trailing even behind btc-e  Shocked finally the dragon is exiting



326. Post 10120370 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Quote from: Richy_T on January 12, 2015, 12:57:48 AM
Yeah. Would say that many are mining with loss by now. They simply mine and hold hopping the price will go back up.

That would be silly. It would be better to switch off their equipment and buy bitcoin at that point (and arguably better just to switch off their equipment)

Not if you bought your equipment which is a sunk cost. At which point you already down on your investment and just keep running as long as cost of electricity < mined BTC.



327. Post 10128214 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Quote from: inca on January 12, 2015, 06:27:55 PM
Assuming that the mining hardware is paid off and have no added overhead than we are at a point that many miners will decide as to the usefulness of continued operations. .

Thank you.

So should we expect more bear market until the unprofitable miners are out and the leaner big players are all that remains? Then the next pump?

Edit: growing walls on both sides on finex.

NO. The supply will continue to be BTC3600 new coins generated daily, which will have to find its demand until halving in 2016. Regardless of hashrate and profitability of miners.



328. Post 10131276 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Quote from: GaliX on January 12, 2015, 11:52:26 PM

we have stop this "We don't like Ripple it's stupid, GTFO" in our community. We have to start to talk about problems instead of just trying to not talk about anything. The reddit sub is horrible when it comes to talk about controversial things.



Umm talking about nipple != discussing problems with BTC



329. Post 10131385 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Quote from: Thomas-s on January 13, 2015, 12:17:16 AM
So, one of the biggest mining pool stopped mining.
This is actually good news™?

Hell yeah lets see those centralized farms pop. I got popcorn



330. Post 10132011 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Quote from: Eamorr on January 13, 2015, 01:40:04 AM
What the hell is happening?

I understand a coordinated anti-terrorism announcement on Bitcoin is imminent.

I'm guessing Chinese mining farms are folding liquidating everything in a fire sale



331. Post 10132915 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Quote from: Beanie Baby Coin on January 13, 2015, 03:30:09 AM
blah blah please ignore me

Wow you're the first person on my ignore list due to your very first post CONGRATS!



332. Post 10133103 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Quote from: diabLEEca on January 13, 2015, 03:51:35 AM
Whoa, BTC-E is taking the lead! :O

Yeah BTC-E has gone full retard



333. Post 10133251 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.47h):

Quote from: poncho32 on January 13, 2015, 04:04:22 AM
Could a good TA expert tell us what the price is going to do?

It'll do the same thing it does every time, trace a pterodactyl  Roll Eyes



334. Post 10133592 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.47h):

Quote from: samsonn25 on January 13, 2015, 04:44:39 AM
what exchanges have a stop loss feature?  seems dangerous with whales and a thin market.


Why  are people  even  trading btc?

Some people just bought thousands of BTC for under $260. And somebody cashing out huge most likely at a loss



335. Post 10133652 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.47h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 13, 2015, 05:06:14 AM
This is like $1000 but in complete opposite. Cry

In a sense it is.  Everything indicates that the Nov/2013 bubble was the opening of the Mainland Chinese market, specifically the Chinese amateur and semi-professional commodity day-traders, through Huobi, OKCoin and other little-known Chinese exchanges.

I believe that what we have seen through 2014 and now is those Chinese traders are gradually getting disappointed with bitcoin and dumping the coins that they bought during that rally, which then come back to the "West" through arbitragers.  My guess is that those coins included the ~700 kBTC that went missing from MtGOX, and an unknown amount from other sources.  Perhaps 1 or 2 million BTC in total.

Normally I would expect an exponential decay than slows down with time, as in the Feb/2013 and Apr/2011 bubbles.  However, in the last couple of months the decay seems to be linear, or even faster than linear.  Perhaps the Chinese speculators are moving their money to the Chinese stock market, which has been booming in recent months.

Or BTC farms are getting insolvent and being liquidated causing a domino effect. Guessing hardware providers will be getting squeezed too now



336. Post 10139837 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.47h):

Quote from: fonsie on January 13, 2015, 03:25:43 PM
supply/demand

Why buy if supply is willing to dump for cheap, it's not as if bitcoin is going away... so just wait patiently until the bears/trolls have gone home.

It however saddens me that so many people who do not believe in something, have such a sad life that they can get joy out of making fun of others believes. That's just sad.

Welcome Newbies, for an education on trolling, have a look at @JorgeStolfi and @NotLampchop(aka silverspoon) their post history.
If you prefer dull never ending lines of text, go for Jorge's posts.
If you prefer the "Picture Edition", go for NotLambchop's posts.

Greetings


EDIT: CCMF, I'm first on page 10748.

That's the reason why buy. No clear reason for this dump, bitcoin not going away. So if it doesn't die it has to rebound. Buying to lower cost average, think it's rather simple, people been on this ride many many times, smart ones pick up on patterns. Of course non of this applies if you believe that BTC has died once again



337. Post 10140132 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.47h):

http://www.coindesk.com/cex-io-halts-cloud-mining-service-due-low-bitcoin-price/
 CEX chief information officer Jeffrey Smith told CoinDesk that operations would resume if the price of bitcoin climbs above $320

And farms got unprofittable at around $320 and we're at 240 looks like blood on streets to me



338. Post 10140458 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.47h):

Quote from: psjw4450 on January 13, 2015, 06:00:54 PM
Is it possible bitstamp is driving the price down to purchase the coins they lost?

NO to "drive" price down they have to buy up a lot of btc and credit people fiat which would be suicide, on top of that it only has like half the volume of Finex or a bit over BTC-E. By the looks of it this is China cashing out big time. Seeing how farms are starting to shut down speculating that it's the mine farm squeeze of 2015.



339. Post 10140477 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.47h):

Quote from: Blazin604 on January 13, 2015, 06:15:41 PM
Buy?..or buy?

Stagger buys down to $175 or so and walk away



340. Post 10145612 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

Any prevailing theories for this dump? Can't keep up with all the posts. I'm guessing the terrorism and the proposed crack down on cryptography in UK/EU served as a catalyst?



341. Post 10145692 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on January 14, 2015, 02:24:35 AM
Any prevailing theories for this dump? Can't keep up with all the posts. I'm guessing the terrorism and the proposed crack down on cryptography in UK/EU served as a catalyst?

I think Russia super banned Bitcoin

Except for Btc-e, most Bitcoin related sites are now blocked

Meh been in the works forever plus it wasn't that big of a market to start with. HA they blocked informative websites but not the Russian exchange, politics at its best



342. Post 10147011 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

Holy sh*t. Cry Wouldn't have called this. All why no FIAT will make it to western exchange for another day or two. We better get some news soon about China closing all exchanges or something to substantiate this madness



343. Post 10147051 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

Quote from: Richard Branson on January 14, 2015, 06:19:24 AM
I'm telling you... the next GOX is very close

When People start to withdraw fiat, some will collapse. Scamchanges :-) better get coins and money off exchanges ASP.

That'd be crazy they must be making 100's of thousands on this volume. Never understood why they'd kill the goose that lays the golden eggs



344. Post 10147141 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on January 14, 2015, 06:24:59 AM
I'm telling you... the next GOX is very close

When People start to withdraw fiat, some will collapse. Scamchanges :-) better get coins and money off exchanges ASP.

That'd be crazy they must be making 100's of thousands on this volume. Never understood why they'd kill the goose that lays the golden eggs


If they invested all profits into BTC, or even customer funds into BTC, it's possible that scam exchanges (if they exist) could shut down.

That'd be killing the goose the lays golden eggs. But i guess never underestimate someone's greed/stupidity



345. Post 10147233 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

So we're back to pre China levels?
Finex is putting up a fight, while stamp is dry out of fiat



346. Post 10147419 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

Finex not budging MY MAN *SLOW CLAP* lets see that divergence



347. Post 10147555 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

160 where gox with their market cool down period when you need it. Guessing that's what happening at finex with their short managing protocol



348. Post 10147833 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on January 14, 2015, 07:51:21 AM
Anybody buying or are we too scared that we are going to 0?

Someone just bought all those bitcoins that were traded soo umm yeah



349. Post 10148207 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

Surely there must be better way to liquidate BTC250k btc then on the market in a 2day period  Undecided



350. Post 10153670 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on January 14, 2015, 03:18:42 PM
just a question to pass the time..

Do some of you "true believers" sometimes log out on this forum, just to peek at the posts of those you have ignored?
Do you feel guilty after? Like you have committed a sin? Do you wish to harm yourself after?

No, cause that would mean that my trading decisions are influenced by some random people on the internet which in itself would make me want to harm myself.



351. Post 10158113 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.49h):

Quote from: rpietila on January 14, 2015, 11:30:50 PM
BTC is only 50x my entry price (about 3 years ago). Like now, that was a major bottom. Should I buy more? Thoughts?

Risto asking Wall Observer for advice !?!?  Huh Shocked we must've hit the bottom



352. Post 10160303 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.49h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on January 15, 2015, 02:51:37 AM
THIS IS ALL MANIPULATION from the Four Punch Raiders


C'mon- all these posts from new accounts like who in the hell would be just now getting into BTC? This is all part of the FPR's plan. It's gonna shoot up to maybe $240, then crash back down to under $200 before the real short squeeze reversal up to even $350.

I'm thinking of even playing the pause selling at over $240 and then buying back in below $200.

the problem is that after the short squeeze and the second bounce, it will again go into free fall. I guess that's good because I will have made so much $$$ that I can load up, but damn, this is not good for Bitcoin.

It's just someone HUGE cashing out (thinking Chinese exchanges) looks like they still have coins left which they're feeding off to the market. You'll know ince they'll run out of coins (guessing we're getting pretty close)



353. Post 10172070 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: chopstick on January 16, 2015, 05:00:23 AM
MARK KARPELES is Satoshi.. I mean think about it. It fits perfectly.

If anything he'd be Satoshi's evil twin



354. Post 10172320 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on January 16, 2015, 06:19:27 AM
https://www.bitfinex.com/pages/announcements/?id=31

What do you guys think about this "tether" thing ?

it seems to be a US nubits

Quote
Transparent

Tether currency is 100% backed by actual assets in our reserve account and can be viewed and verified in real-time.

might be really interesting Smiley

Well it reintroduces the trusted third party, the elimination of which was the main innovation of Bitcoin. How it can be 100% transparent is something I'll have to look into more carefully before I can comment on.

Not sure how it works myself but you can't use exchange without trusting 3rd party. Now if these "tethers" are on transparent "blockchain" and i can hold a multisig private key, that would make an audit a no brainer. They literally just have to show that they bank account holds the outstanding amount of tethers. Which is leaps and bounds above current audit options



355. Post 10180575 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: colour on January 16, 2015, 10:16:12 PM
All deposits from people who want to buy the dip should have arrived by now. Buying pressure still seems ridiculously low compared to what we saw after the drop to $275 last year. I'm expecting another large drop this weekend. Will probably go short here. Maybe good news revealed during the Miami conference could save us though.

Yeah kinda interesting the "invisible hand" kept us bellow 200s, the question is if they overestimated the demand at this level. They let the price rise above 200 so that's kinda bullish. Guess that's a better way to dump then post one BTC500k btc wall  Undecided



356. Post 10181209 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: inca on January 16, 2015, 11:51:39 PM
I personally picked up a lot of coins at the bottom and sold them again at 210-230. All that money now is going into silver and gold, just like the last few months. I'm already seeing crazy profits there.
Only a few delusional bulls are still buying coins because they think we will go up again. Poor guys.

So you have sold and now want the price to drop.

Delete your account if bitcoin is over.

He's on my ignore list so Shroomsy turning bull price point is around $175??



357. Post 10181459 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: psjw4450 on January 17, 2015, 12:24:19 AM
Besides Bitcoin Wisdom, what are some good sites for looking at the order books on the major exchanges?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=288450.0


Awesome. Thanks!

Thanks also.  Is there an actual thread where there is serious talk about trading this crazy market.  This thread is great for entertainment only.  

Try troll box on btc-e.com  Grin i kid i kid



358. Post 10182186 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: WeltMaster on January 17, 2015, 01:45:42 AM
Of cause, anything changed in recent days? nothing, the world is still always not interested in bitcoin,
Exchanges hacked,lost coins,bad pr,10% inflation,etc still happen and getting worse,
So you tell me, why should the price magically goes up while the reasons of the crash remain and getting worse? just because bulltards dream for it?

This question is being asked though all these 10900 pages of the thread. And no has an argument to answer it. Ever.

You can't argue with opinion,


>anything changed in recent days? nothing

I see a million coins being swaped in a day.

>world is still always not interested in bitcoin

I see some pretty rich folk talking about it, maybe they're onto something  Huh

>why should the price magically goes up

Why should it magically goes down?

Exactly, fundamentals are still strong. It's in proof of concept stage every day it functions it gets stronger.



359. Post 10183459 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on January 17, 2015, 06:35:28 AM
STFU and fill my bids.  Grin

Yeah that sums it up



360. Post 10183836 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: gkv9 on January 17, 2015, 07:57:39 AM
So, finally Friday went down and we have nothing so far... It seems it was all a myth that's exposed now...

I can't even trust a random troll on twitter! What is the world coming to? Roll Eyes



361. Post 10191645 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

And BTC2k till 200 on Finex  Sad



362. Post 10191873 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Trolls aren't trying. People are actually trying to explain why buying drugs with CC is a bad idea   Roll Eyes



363. Post 10192295 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: twiifm on January 18, 2015, 03:54:44 AM
Most credit cards and banks cover for unauthorized losses, which BTC does not have this insurance.

But they pass this cost of fraud onto the consumer, effectively raising the price of everything you buy. BTC insurance could become a fairly large industry.

Citation please?  People here say that a lot but I've never seen any proof that fraud is a line in COGS

Trolling? In US gas stations in some states list prices in cash and credit card. Credit card fraud costs millions each year, doesn't take a genius to realize that someone is paying for that, guess who that someone is  Roll Eyes



364. Post 10192553 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: twiifm on January 18, 2015, 04:16:47 AM
Most credit cards and banks cover for unauthorized losses, which BTC does not have this insurance.

But they pass this cost of fraud onto the consumer, effectively raising the price of everything you buy. BTC insurance could become a fairly large industry.

Citation please?  People here say that a lot but I've never seen any proof that fraud is a line in COGS

Trolling? In US gas stations in some states list prices in cash and credit card. Credit card fraud costs millions each year, doesn't take a genius to realize that someone is paying for that, guess who that someone is  Roll Eyes

Wow Only one example without citation.  They don't do that in my state or any states from NY to VA.  By your idiotic logic, I can claim that merchants are passing all their costs to the consumer including rents and payroll insurance, etc..




Try broadening your horizons and getting at least out of your state for starters. Yes they do that's basic business. Covering from their margins lol and where do those margins come from? Ok ok have it your way credit cards cover fraud from their margins, which they get by charging the retailer, who pays it from their margins which they get by charging customers. That's why retailers charge higher fee for credit card use (err give discount when you DON'T use CC) where allowed heres one of the first google results http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/17/business/merchants-consider-credit-card-surcharges-or-cash-discounts.html?_r=0 i didn't really read the whole thing don't have time to entertain every troll



365. Post 10192572 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: BitThink on January 18, 2015, 05:02:16 AM
Most credit cards and banks cover for unauthorized losses, which BTC does not have this insurance.

But they pass this cost of fraud onto the consumer, effectively raising the price of everything you buy. BTC insurance could become a fairly large industry.

Citation please?  People here say that a lot but I've never seen any proof that fraud is a line in COGS

I assume the merchants are subsidising that in the fees they pay.

Mainly is the " interchange fee" the Visa and MC and AMex, Disc pays to the middle merchant banks to promote their cards,which includes interest 2-3% and per transaction fees.

Yes merchants pay a cc fee.  But any proof they pass this onto consumer?  I think they just eat it in their margin.  I know my business did

The intermediary bank and association pays for it.

But the "interchange" association will reimburse some of the loss to the final merchant if they used rules like i.d. verification  and physical swipe of transaction  them from the buyer, online sales are much higher risk than physical location, therefore the higher interest and swipe charges for online merchants.

Thank you.

I also think the claim that bitcoin is cheaper than CC is bogus.  Cost per transaction is all time low and it's still around $8-9.  A year ago it was almost $80 per transaction

https://blockchain.info/charts/cost-per-transaction



What does this "cost per transaction" mean? The price of 0.0001 BTC? The Btcpay or coinbase fee? I think maybe mining cost / transaction count? Then it has nothing to do with the merchants or customer.

"Cost per Transaction A chart showing miners revenue divided by the number of transactions."

Build in process to distribute decentralized currency taken as a transaction cost, i guess when someone is on the mission to disproof something facts don't matter



366. Post 10192627 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: samsonn25 on January 18, 2015, 05:11:27 AM
IN a perfect world, retailers hate credit cards as they lose some profit from the sale.

But in reality and mostly in practice they are willing to give up this small percentage and surcharge as credit cards enable easier funds transfer than cash for many customers.

The result of this may be an increase of sale of 200-1000% for the retailer.  So in the end they make more sales to make up for the smaller profit.

The worst example is gas stations which may only make 5-8 cents per gallon of gas, and may lose money when the price of gas is expensive because of the credit card surcharges.  But in fact they dont make much from gas sales they make most of their money from the sales inside the market and convenience store.  Like cigarettes, candy, soda, chips.  The gas is to lure them to the shop.

Sure can't argue with that, but why should it be cost averaged between all payment methods when i pay cash? Apply a convenience fee on the purchasers with credit card. Oops "credit card surcharges are prohibited in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, New York, Oklahoma and Texas." http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mybanktracker/that-credit-card-convenie_b_4956839.html but they can give discounts on non credit card transactions. And you can't use cash over the internet oh wait...



367. Post 10192639 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: twiifm on January 18, 2015, 05:15:12 AM
Most credit cards and banks cover for unauthorized losses, which BTC does not have this insurance.

But they pass this cost of fraud onto the consumer, effectively raising the price of everything you buy. BTC insurance could become a fairly large industry.

Citation please?  People here say that a lot but I've never seen any proof that fraud is a line in COGS

I assume the merchants are subsidising that in the fees they pay.

Mainly is the " interchange fee" the Visa and MC and AMex, Disc pays to the middle merchant banks to promote their cards,which includes interest 2-3% and per transaction fees.

Yes merchants pay a cc fee.  But any proof they pass this onto consumer?  I think they just eat it in their margin.  I know my business did

The intermediary bank and association pays for it.

But the "interchange" association will reimburse some of the loss to the final merchant if they used rules like i.d. verification  and physical swipe of transaction  them from the buyer, online sales are much higher risk than physical location, therefore the higher interest and swipe charges for online merchants.

Thank you.

I also think the claim that bitcoin is cheaper than CC is bogus.  Cost per transaction is all time low and it's still around $8-9.  A year ago it was almost $80 per transaction

https://blockchain.info/charts/cost-per-transaction



What does this "cost per transaction" mean? The price of 0.0001 BTC? The Btcpay or coinbase fee? I think maybe mining cost / transaction count? Then it has nothing to do with the merchants or customer.

"Cost per Transaction A chart showing miners revenue divided by the number of transactions."

Build in process to distribute decentralized currency taken as a transaction cost, i guess when someone is on the mission to disproof something facts don't matter

The only reason the cost went down is because the price went down.  When price is was higher it was way more expensive than CC.  Somebody has to pay for that.  It's not low cost as many claim



Huh what are you talking about? Do explain why i as a consumer or a merchants care how much miners are getting?



368. Post 10192653 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):


For reference



369. Post 10192738 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: twiifm on January 18, 2015, 05:30:12 AM
...
Yes merchants pay a cc fee.  But any proof they pass this onto consumer?  I think they just eat it in their margin. I know my business did
...
If you pay a merchant directly with Bitcoin the transaction fee goes to miner.  So who pays for that?  If the merchant pays for it what incentive do they have over CC?  The whole argument that merchant have incentive to choose Bitcoin over CC and pass the savings to consumer has no legs

First that bolded statement is misunderstanding of the basic business principals.

Second of all, the chart that you quoted shows the cost of the transaction ON the whole network, and not on parties doing the transaction they couldn't care less about mining rewards their cost is only a cent or so.

As far as miners, this is more of a build in mechanism to fairly distribute bitcoins. I guess you can say that people who hold bitcoins ultimately pay that "fee" by having their bitcoins diluted sort of like inflation, which will halve in 2016 and keep getting reduced to nothing once all coins are mined  



370. Post 10192756 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Bottom lineis if i pay you $100 in BTC you'll get $99.99 worth of BTC. If i pay you $100 via credit card you'll get about $97 and it'll come with additional risk of chargeback if i decide to dispute that transaction as a bonus



371. Post 10192821 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: BitThink on January 18, 2015, 05:54:16 AM
Bottom lineis if i pay you $100 in BTC you'll get $99.99 worth of BTC. If i pay you $100 via credit card you'll get about $97 and it'll come with additional risk of chargeback if i decide to dispute that transaction as a bonus
why  $0.01 less? I suppose you will pay the miner's fee. Smiley normally buyers pay it. So merchants pays nothing unless they want to convert to fiat.

Errr ok if $100 leaves my wallet $0.01 will go to miners and $99.99 to receiver, or to put it another way if i want merchant to receive $100 it'll cost me $103 with credit card or $100.01 in BTC. Ok ok BitThink 103.09278350514 in CC geeze  Cheesy



372. Post 10192838 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Better question from all of this is why are there laws in some states that prohibit credit card surcharge  Huh Lips sealed Roll Eyes



373. Post 10192881 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Ohh Found some good stuff here:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/10/03/creditcard-surcharges-lawsuit-idUSL1N0HT18B20131003

Quote
"Even beyond the informational content of surcharges, sellers' inability to effectively inform consumers of the true costs of credit has the effect of artificially subsidizing credit at the expense of cash, increasing overall credit-card usage and consumer debt,"

Quote
"The card industry wants to perpetuate the myth that using a credit card is free, or priceless. But the cost is baked into the price of all the goods and services we buy."

Quote
argued that the state law protected shoppers by enabling them to rely on advertised prices, rather than be surprised at checkout with surcharges.

tl;dr blah blah blah creditcards companies should get tons of $$$ because we're afraid that dumb people can't grasp the concept of paying 3% more if they want to pay with their credit card



374. Post 10192970 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: twiifm on January 18, 2015, 06:26:55 AM
Ohh Found some good stuff here:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/10/03/creditcard-surcharges-lawsuit-idUSL1N0HT18B20131003

Quote
"Even beyond the informational content of surcharges, sellers' inability to effectively inform consumers of the true costs of credit has the effect of artificially subsidizing credit at the expense of cash, increasing overall credit-card usage and consumer debt,"

Quote
"The card industry wants to perpetuate the myth that using a credit card is free, or priceless. But the cost is baked into the price of all the goods and services we buy."

Quote
argued that the state law protected shoppers by enabling them to rely on advertised prices, rather than be surprised at checkout with surcharges.

tl;dr blah blah blah creditcards companies should get tons of $$$ because we're afraid that dumb people can't grasp the concept of paying 3% more if they want to pay with their credit card

Most consumers prefer to use CC because of cash back incentives and an easy way to itemize their spending record.  By surcharging it'll just irritate the majority of consumers.  Seems like only the small shops care about this.  The big shops like Target rather just have one price

Ok i can buy the argument that Creditcards are more convenient than cash, and creditcard companies are willing to provide that convenience for a certain fee of course. And they hate for you to know that you're actually paying a 2-3% fee, instead why not give you a 0.5%bonus points and make you feel smart like you're actually making money while at the same time lobby to pass the law that prohibits merchants to directly pass that fee to you and instead just cost average their fees on people who don't even use that "convenience"



375. Post 10193118 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: twiifm on January 18, 2015, 06:57:24 AM
Ohh Found some good stuff here:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/10/03/creditcard-surcharges-lawsuit-idUSL1N0HT18B20131003

Quote
"Even beyond the informational content of surcharges, sellers' inability to effectively inform consumers of the true costs of credit has the effect of artificially subsidizing credit at the expense of cash, increasing overall credit-card usage and consumer debt,"

Quote
"The card industry wants to perpetuate the myth that using a credit card is free, or priceless. But the cost is baked into the price of all the goods and services we buy."

Quote
argued that the state law protected shoppers by enabling them to rely on advertised prices, rather than be surprised at checkout with surcharges.

tl;dr blah blah blah creditcards companies should get tons of $$$ because we're afraid that dumb people can't grasp the concept of paying 3% more if they want to pay with their credit card

Most consumers prefer to use CC because of cash back incentives and an easy way to itemize their spending record.  By surcharging it'll just irritate the majority of consumers.  Seems like only the small shops care about this.  The big shops like Target rather just have one price

Ok i can buy the argument that Creditcards are more convenient than cash, and creditcard companies are willing to provide that convenience for a certain fee of course. And they hate for you to know that you're actually paying a 2-3% fee, instead why not give you a 0.5%bonus points and make you feel smart like you're actually making money while at the same time lobby to pass the law that prohibits merchants to directly pass that fee to you and instead just cost average their fees on people who don't even use that "convenience"

That's how the world works.  I didnt like it when they banned indoor smoking.  But that's what the majority wants

Yeah i didn't like you smoking next to me, how did that work out? Now i don't like paying your convenience fees lets see how that'll work out that's why i'm here. Cut out middle man but still keep the conveniences



376. Post 10193706 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Who pressed the red button  Grin



377. Post 10193765 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: MelMan2002 on January 18, 2015, 09:06:45 AM
Gotta be some piece of news...can't seem to find anything  Huh

The only news is that Bitcoin was vastly under-priced and is correcting.

No big deal. It's still far too early to post trains and rockets.

Sinking ships, exploding rockets and derailing trains are equally silly.

What, so everyone suddenly realized at the same time that it is under-priced??  Brilliant deduction there..

Probably not, but the reason is bitcoin. Just as the reason why it suddenly dropped.



378. Post 10202020 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.51h):

Quote from: outahere on January 19, 2015, 03:21:23 AM
Now that free trading on Stamp is over there is nothing to feed the Finex bears. Nowhere to go but up.

Ahh that explains the volume drop and kinda that huge purchase 



379. Post 10202450 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.51h):

Quote from: betterangels on January 19, 2015, 05:40:07 AM
210 buyer is starting to despair

If you really really REALLY want it, close your eyes repeat it 10 times and it just might come true. Now in the real world someone is flashing a BTC1.1k buy wall at 216 on stamp. With such low volume there, he'll have to pay for a lot of slippage



380. Post 10209117 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.51h):

Quote from: 4ever on January 19, 2015, 07:47:32 PM
Support really looks good for the past 2-3 days. If not increase, I would hope to see it stable in the next few days.

Yeah order book looks great but it's known to be manipulated so hard to tell



381. Post 10212176 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.51h):

Quote from: Specular on January 20, 2015, 01:25:57 AM
Bitfinex flat on Bitcoinwisdom - is the API just down or has trading ground to a halt?

Oh no it's the end of the world!! Aliens i say. Or just press F5



382. Post 10212809 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.51h):

Quote from: Swordsoffreedom on January 20, 2015, 03:01:56 AM
...
trolling trolling making up quotes
...


Now that was one interesting highlight article
Kind of curious about this if the dealers can't handle the volatility and want to move to another coin that would be sort of a surprise
Not a total one though because as mainstream moves in to replace origins drugs sex booze gambling sites etc they would move somewhere else where their is less spotlight.

Really a hero member quoting a troll? Don't even mind the fact that the DOGE quote is made up



383. Post 10213857 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.51h):

Quote from: Blavatsky on January 20, 2015, 06:38:10 AM
One week ago the big dump started

What surprises will we see today?

Im guessing lots of posts from YourMother and a bunch of noob acounts  Roll Eyes wait no that wouldn't be a surprise at all



384. Post 10215824 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.51h):

Quote from: aztecminer on January 20, 2015, 11:25:25 AM
Stop crashing Bitcoin, or even the last real world usage for Bitcoin beside child porn and terrorism will be gone!
 Angry

http://uk.businessinsider.com/bitcoin-crash-drug-dealers-2015-1

“Out a couple of thousand over this,” writes one dealer. “Bad f---ing time to start up. I really hope it bounces back and stays there. I can’t believe how fast they’re dropping. $330 to 280 to 220 in just a few weeks. Bye bye profit.”

“I am losing losing 10-20% on all orders in escrow now!” says another. “Make that 30%!!! There goes all profit! FML.”

One deep web cocaine dealer spoke to Business Insider about the price crash. “It’s pretty damn sad,” they said. “We have worked so hard over the past 3 months, and for profits to get halved? It’s hard to swallow, simple as that, but what can you do. It’s a gamble, whether you hold or sell.”

They'd cashed out and had a massive payday during the bubble in November 2013, so they weren't immediately hurt by the dropping prices. But it’s still “hard work down the toilet.” And other, newer dealers don't have that luxury: they’ll be forced to sell reserves at a loss just to keep going (and potentially forcing the price down even more in the process).

"It´s a death spiral! If it it doesn´t end soon, we (the vendors) will have to switch to something more solid and reliable, like DOGE!"






these guys are morons to sell drugs using something that is traceable.  the usd is much better to use since it is totally untraceable if using cash like a normal drug dealer.

Think you're missing the point of silkroad 99.0 and all the other ONLINE market places.



385. Post 10224235 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.51h):

Whats the story with 'four punch raiders'  Huh



386. Post 10224485 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.51h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on January 21, 2015, 05:07:08 AM
Whats the story with 'four punch raiders'  Huh

they switched sides

Huh  Huh that didn't help. Who are "they".



387. Post 10232399 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.51h):

WTF happened  Huh I couldn't trade without all the trolls so i was hitting F5 for the last 24 hrs



388. Post 10245195 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.52h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on January 24, 2015, 08:46:14 AM
Why is everybody so excited?

The price hasn't changed that much in 3-4 days.

We seem to have broken the downtrend, and a bunch of good news recently. And price was ~$212 3/4 days ago now it's $234 ~10% bump in 3days is better than a 20% drop in a day



389. Post 10245357 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.52h):

Quote from: BayAreaCoins on January 24, 2015, 09:27:31 AM
Why is everybody so excited?

The price hasn't changed that mu ;Dch in 3-4 days.

Sounds like you need moar leverage then Smiley

$30 price jump isn't much with .1 eh?

I'm a HODLER who is about 50% down on his entire investment.
I wouldn't wipe my ass with a 30 USD price jump.

If I was a HODLER I'd be counting my lucky stars every penny up, but w/e  Grin

Throw some cash at it and if you don't have some then make some.  Leverage can be a great tool as well.

Easiest way to increase it.

...or to loose it all  Undecided

I'd prefer a health steady sustainable growth rather then these pump/dumps. I'll take 10% up in 3 days any day regardless of your average buy in, not even sure if that's sustainable but you know honey badger...



390. Post 10245451 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.52h):

Quote from: BayAreaCoins on January 24, 2015, 09:42:38 AM

...or to loose it all  Undecided


Scared money don't make no money good sir! Tongue

Don't bet more than you can loose. People got margin called on that last downswing to 166. Personally thought that $300 was low few days before that and it dropped like 40%.  Make sure you know your margins and your liquidating price points



391. Post 10252709 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.52h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on January 25, 2015, 09:01:52 AM
I ain't gonna kill myself. I'm here to help you not get ruined by this pump and dump replaceable currency. You need me more than you think.

Edit: Fuck fonzie!

Pump & dump? Fonzie?



LOL so it's a PSA that they think they're doing?

YourMother is there a certain price point at which you admit that you're wrong and stop trolling? Say will you STFU if BTC hits $500, $1000, $5000?? Or if not price IS THERE ANY SCENARIO AT ALL at which you'll stop trolling?  



392. Post 10261051 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.52h):

Quote from: camolist on January 26, 2015, 01:28:05 AM
someone put some btc up for sale asap! bitfinex and bitstamp books are running out!

^ THAT lets not go full retard just yet. Ask sides starting to look anorexic



393. Post 10263213 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: findftp on January 26, 2015, 07:39:51 AM
Where are the rockets?



Not till 600s



394. Post 10263328 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Someone is setting the floor and buying up all the coins in sight. Order book is getting emptied out, this can turn full retard rather quick. Monday should be interesting



395. Post 10265677 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

All coins are washed out at 300, need to go higher to get people to let go



396. Post 10265979 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: sherbyspark on January 26, 2015, 12:46:31 PM
All coins are washed out at 300, need to go higher to get people to let go

Why do you want people to let go ? If that happens price goes down again.

Didn't say i want it. Just an observation, seems like someone is buying up a lot of coins. Feels like that someone is getting those coins pretty cheap, and should be paying a lot more



397. Post 10266362 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Anyone else is expecting a troll face once that spaceship reaches the moon? That'd be epic.

But on a serious note i'm guessing the leaked news about exchange is THE news



398. Post 10266472 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on January 26, 2015, 02:02:16 PM
WTF?? coinbase.com/luna just says "to the moon".  Have we been punked?
Seems like an unprofessional thing to do for a supposedly neutral exchange.

https://exchange.coinbase.com/


looks like market was expecting more



399. Post 10266513 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Guessing 9am is when someone was allowed to dump some coins  Angry  Lips sealed



400. Post 10266608 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Can we get a "oh no my BTC are only 13% up today" crying pictures?



401. Post 10266690 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: gkv9 on January 26, 2015, 02:16:07 PM
Remember kids, you are supposed to buy the actual breaks or resistance, not the tops after ridiculous parabolic rises, that's when you are supposed to GTFO  Smiley


Alternatively, you buy the rumour and sell the news. Work every time.

Is it just the Coinbase Exchange news that created all this mess? If it did, what's so wrong in it? If they opened a "Regulated" exchange, then what's wrong with others and why this dump is happening?

Higher expectations. People were expecting McDonalds to start accepting BTC. And this is only a knee jerk reaction, lets see what will happen by friday.

On a separate note I kinda feel for the Wrinklefloss twins. Got facebooked again with their Gemini. At least this should pave the way for their ETF



402. Post 10272618 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

I can't help but question the mentality of people who are selling under $300. Essentially BTC just got an official approval from US. Kinda hard to claim that an asset is a ponzi or a pyramid when it's licensed, trading in NY, and backed by NY stock exchange  Huh



403. Post 10272680 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: ajaxmoor on January 27, 2015, 12:15:32 AM
I can't help but question the mentality of people who are selling under $300. Essentially BTC just got an official approval from US. Kinda hard to claim that an asset is a ponzi or a pyramid when it's licensed, trading in NY, and backed by NY stock exchange  Huh

When the price was over 300, then a small dump happened, which wasfollowed by a panic dump to 270 .
I think, that keeps people worried about then having holding the entire day without any worry.

Only for daytraders trading on emotions who are less stable than a teenage girl with ADHD?

Fundamentally this is huge and a good news. Refuse to believe that it's already correctly priced in at bellow $300. I think only china dumping can hold this back (which currently already has a ~$9 3% spread with finex)



404. Post 10273660 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

The BTC700 ask wall flasher is starting to get annoying  Angry



405. Post 10273741 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: DaRude on January 27, 2015, 02:47:28 AM
The BTC700 ask wall flasher is starting to get annoying  Angry

There he goes



406. Post 10274942 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: jaberwock on January 27, 2015, 06:33:47 AM
what is the flat coin graphic Huh
Coinbase

Add coinbase with no volume but ignore all chinese exchanges?

Seems right

Valid data from a regulated exchange vs. a random number generator



407. Post 10281132 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 27, 2015, 07:30:25 PM
The recent "flash-bubble" created by the Coinbase announcement shows that the "West" can lift the price by at least +50 dollars (~250 to ~300) with suitable rumors.

I am assuming that the Chinese did not pay attention to the rumor, as they have not paid attention to other similar news in the past.  I am also assuming that the gentler upward trend that started around 2015-01-15 comes from China,  not from the "West"

I still don't know what caused the mini-bubble that started on 2014-05-20.  If it was created in the West, too, then it would imply that the "West" can pump the price by +200 $/BTC (modulo the possibility that the increment may depend on the starting price level).  

Chinese exchanges are consistently lower than western. That tells me that China is cashing out and is arbed to west. When you see Hooboy's price higher than stamp thats when China would be leading the uptrend



408. Post 10283814 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

Bid side doesn't look good at all  Undecided



409. Post 10284979 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on January 28, 2015, 04:12:19 AM
$250 is the new $350...we will again just trickle down to $200.

Then over the next 3 months we see more bankruptcies and etc.  Not really effecting the price.

At $200, will the next BIG STORY be down to double digits or $450....nobody knows.


Place your bets and have fun.



I've recently become less bullish on price. Previously I was buying set amount of CAD per month that we stay below 400 CAD.

Moving forward I will be only buying a set amount of BTC per month so if this thing does indeed keep going south, I'll be losing less and less each month.

That makes no sense. You should stick to you original plan. You get more for your money. What if it goes up? Are you then going to start buying thousands of dollars worth every month?

That ^ so if BTC goes to $10k how much will you be dropping a month on BTC Grin



410. Post 10286244 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

Low volume, not much on the bidside at finex till 250, looks like dragon is running the show tonight



411. Post 10286400 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

Quote from: shmadz on January 28, 2015, 08:10:32 AM
Low volume, not much on the bidside at finex till 250, looks like dragon is running the show tonight

pretty picture

If this trendline is broken to the downside, then I'll worry.

Btw, "In order to dump coins one must have coins" this is true, except in the case of any exchange that operates an off-chain overbook. Which is pretty much all of them at this point.

Please maintain control of your own keys people... that's pretty much the whole point of this whole thing!

Meh never like silly lines. Think coinbase proved that 99.999% of this market is run on sentiment

Never got that about exchanges, judging by volume they should be making a killing, why kill the golden goose. But in any case having an option of a regulated exchange should help alleviate that problem a bit



412. Post 10293608 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

Whoever is taking this mega dump is not doing a good job refilling the ask side. Spread your buy orders and watch them get filled. But the amount of BTC someone is dumping is amazing



413. Post 10293825 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

Quote from: itod on January 28, 2015, 10:37:09 PM
But the amount of BTC someone is dumping is amazing

What's amazing about it? Sell high, buy low, classic bear strategy. Rarely fails since November 2013.

I don't see the avalanche effect needed to rebuy at the bottom. It springs back up right when someone stops dumping 1000s of BTC. It's just someone cashing out thousands of BTC that's all. If this was a manipulation attempt (not sure if it's over) it has failed



414. Post 10293969 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

Quote from: itod on January 28, 2015, 11:01:34 PM
But the amount of BTC someone is dumping is amazing

What's amazing about it? Sell high, buy low, classic bear strategy. Rarely fails since November 2013.

I don't see the avalanche effect needed to rebuy at the bottom. It springs back up right when someone stops dumping 1000s of BTC. It's just someone cashing out thousands of BTC that's all. If this was a manipulation attempt (not sure if it's over) it has failed

You don't get it, there's no cashing out and no "manipulation", just bears increasing their BTC stack. If (when) price goes up in thousands (or 10's of thousands) of US$ the only thing that matters is how much BTC you have at that moment. If the price went <$100 in the meantime, or if that moment will be in 2015 or 2020 is completely irrelevant.

To increase your BTC stack you need to sell high buy low. There was like 2500BTC sold roughly from 230 to 226 (sell high?). But there was no volume or opportunity to rebuy lower or even at same rate. That person either just cashed out or sold low and now rebuying higher. Which i doubt



415. Post 10294893 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

Quote from: itod on January 28, 2015, 11:25:11 PM
But the amount of BTC someone is dumping is amazing

What's amazing about it? Sell high, buy low, classic bear strategy. Rarely fails since November 2013.

I don't see the avalanche effect needed to rebuy at the bottom. It springs back up right when someone stops dumping 1000s of BTC. It's just someone cashing out thousands of BTC that's all. If this was a manipulation attempt (not sure if it's over) it has failed

You don't get it, there's no cashing out and no "manipulation", just bears increasing their BTC stack. If (when) price goes up in thousands (or 10's of thousands) of US$ the only thing that matters is how much BTC you have at that moment. If the price went <$100 in the meantime, or if that moment will be in 2015 or 2020 is completely irrelevant.

To increase your BTC stack you need to sell high buy low. There was like 2500BTC sold roughly from 230 to 226 (sell high?). But there was no volume or opportunity to rebuy lower or even at same rate. That person either just cashed out or sold low and now rebuying higher. Which i doubt

They are buying now, not selling, that's what is confusing you. Let me try to explain through example of yesterdays and today's traders action: Massively dumping @ 300 yesterday bringing the price down, buying back at $265 yesterday. Again dumping @ $250 today, obviously buying back as we speak. As long as they can dump enough to start the price movement, there are weak hands continuing the trend until there's no force in the dump action, they start to buy back. The cycle is repeated at the next sign of market weakness. Everybody happy, weak hands liberated from the burden of holding BTC. Eventually the market will drive the price to expected high US$ dollar value when usefulness of the coin builds up in the years to come.

So by that logic the 2500BTC sold from 230 to 226 that never had a chance to be rebought are sheep  Huh  i don't buy this theory



416. Post 10296899 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

Quote from: Totscha on January 29, 2015, 07:55:58 AM

no, thats ripple


BTW i may have fonud why we are sinking..
Mark Karpeles still wondering around this forum: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2134
Quote
Last Active:   January 28, 2015, 07:54:14

 Shocked Grin Cheesy

And apparently still working on new MtGox features Cheesy

Think he's about to announce that LTC will now be traded on Gox



417. Post 10304192 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on January 29, 2015, 10:00:02 PM
Coin
Explanation


Its refreshing to see coinbase being the bull. Was kinda expecting it to be a safe cash out exchange instead



418. Post 10306448 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

Quote from: D05GTO on January 30, 2015, 04:16:45 AM
Way to start off Arpeggio.. Straight to the ignore list Cheesy

x2 another lambchop



419. Post 10306851 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

Quote from: medialab101 on January 30, 2015, 06:14:46 AM
I wonder why Stamps is acting so bullish. Looks like they're leading this little rally.
Well they are short like BTC19k  Roll Eyes



420. Post 10312893 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.55h):

Quote from: tarmi on January 30, 2015, 07:16:58 PM
no one wants to test those walls on bitfinex.

smells like another bull trap in the making.

I just noticed that USD swaps on bitfinex never went under 10 millions since the november 2013. bubble.

Unless those walls get tired of waiting  Wink



421. Post 10314087 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.55h):

Quote from: thresher on January 30, 2015, 07:49:52 PM
no one wants to test those walls on bitfinex.

smells like another bull trap in the making.

I just noticed that USD swaps on bitfinex never went under 10 millions since the november 2013. bubble.

Unless those walls get tired of waiting  Wink

They were there yesterday so don't count on it Sad

Yeah and no one took them for two days now. If you want to exit and have few thousand BTC here's your perfect opportunity to do so without much slippage on Finex. Now if you want to buy BTC10k you either have to pay for slippage or just put up a wall and hope someone will bite



422. Post 10325029 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.55h):

So someone borrows like BTC5k (BFX shorts) and market sells them moving the price by few dollars and that's suppose to be bearish?  Cheesy



423. Post 10325247 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.55h):

Quote from: chopstick on February 01, 2015, 04:10:24 AM
GUYS IM OUT FUCK THIS TIME TO PUT EVERYTHING INTO RIPPLE

just kidding i'm not a fucking retard

made me lol never go full retard



424. Post 10326283 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.55h):

Quote from: Ezmoneyezlife on February 01, 2015, 07:35:29 AM
How low can this possibly go?  I'm thinking 160ish

I would speculate 180'sh . Because if it goes to 160, then we are definitely going to see a more lower point after that.
Yep. Tons of stops are placed at 200$, market is still in despair phase, testing of even 140$ is highly possible now.

Yes lets totally ignore the fact that the dumped coins were borrowed (levereged shorts) and even if they could come up with just another 30% downpayment to dump again, they can't cause there are only about BTC3k left total on finex. Oh i'm sorry another newbie predicting the doom and gloom of BTC without anything to back it up, on ignore list you go



425. Post 10328502 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.55h):

It's like a national park here with all these cute bears roaming around while there's a BTC3k buy wall on Finex. Shocked

Right Right manipulation  Grin



426. Post 10328598 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.55h):

Quote from: dreamspark on February 01, 2015, 07:42:23 PM
20k worth of shorts gonna get squeezed real good.

Those finex walls are the guy who shorted 4k at 220 yesterday getting rekt.

Hope not, hope that's the market squeezing him so we're yet to see those 4k coins.



427. Post 10340236 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.55h):

When will that 5k short be squeezed Tongue



428. Post 10343616 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

BTC5k till $250 on finex Shocked looks like someone really doesn't want BTC to go up



429. Post 10343640 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Quote from: Starving_Marvin on February 03, 2015, 08:24:49 AM
Sorry for off topic, but so many here are talking about hired trolls so... could anyone tell me (or send a private message) how can one get money by trolling? Sounds more like a myth but...

Are you ready to work for 50c an hour? If so i'll pay you 1BTC to troll all the trolls (lambchop yourmother etc...) here gotta stock their every post at least 10hrs/day 7days a week for a full year . Payment upon completion  Grin



430. Post 10343703 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Quote from: macsga on February 03, 2015, 08:30:58 AM
Sorry for off topic, but so many here are talking about hired trolls so... could anyone tell me (or send a private message) how can one get money by trolling? Sounds more like a myth but...

Even though it's an urban myth among us, there's a strong possibility for some of them doing that just for their amusement. This board consists of persons with high dedication, [relatively] high IQ and the trolls may enjoy being here facing strong arguments which is something different than usual spits & curses happening elsewhere. I don't know if you can find someone to pay you for trolling, but I can point you here just in case you want to make some BTCs with your posts.

Cheers.

I'd think everyone would have them on ignore by now but it's hard to imagine that someone would dedicate 600+ post + a bunch of other nicks https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=347792;sa=showPosts;start=600 just to say that BTC is dooooomed. There are no strong arguments here or IQ, it's a same broken record DOOOOOMED. Now i'd feel just sad for them if they're not getting at least 50c/hr for all that work



431. Post 10343715 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Quote from: Ducky1 on February 03, 2015, 08:32:05 AM
BTC5k till $250 on finex Shocked looks like someone really doesn't want BTC to go up

BTC6K to $230 on finex Shocked looks like someone really doesn't want BTC to go down

The BID side has been strong for a while now. Takes days to bring fiat to exchange but only 30min to add BTC. There's clear demand now and sellers are willing to take on more risks and keep more coins on the exchanges not to miss an opportunity  

EDIT: BTC3.5k to $250 on finex now  Shocked  Grin



432. Post 10343813 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Quote from: macsga on February 03, 2015, 08:52:11 AM
Sorry for off topic, but so many here are talking about hired trolls so... could anyone tell me (or send a private message) how can one get money by trolling? Sounds more like a myth but...

Even though it's an urban myth among us, there's a strong possibility for some of them doing that just for their amusement. This board consists of persons with high dedication, [relatively] high IQ and the trolls may enjoy being here facing strong arguments which is something different than usual spits & curses happening elsewhere. I don't know if you can find someone to pay you for trolling, but I can point you here just in case you want to make some BTCs with your posts.

Cheers.

I'd think everyone would have them on ignore by now but it's hard to imagine that someone would dedicate 600+ post + a bunch of other nicks https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=347792;sa=showPosts;start=600 just to say that BTC is dooooomed. There are no strong arguments here or IQ, it's a same broken record DOOOOOMED. Now i'd feel just sad for them if they're not getting at least 50c/hr for all that work
I've always thought that YourMother is totally mental. I know him from the Cloak thread and I was glad that I didn't ignore him (though I still lost money).

Thanks for the services link (had missed that one)


You're welcome. Just be sure you keep an eye there everyday so that you enter a legit campaign.

@DaRude: I strongly believe he's on a payroll. I can't prove it though. If he's not, he surely has some effect to the price (ie: posting on short crashes to cause further panic etc indicates insider info and/or being a whale). Otherwise it wouldn't make sense.



I highly doubt that he has any noticeable effect on the price (can't imagine how equating bitcoins to beaniebabies or posting ponies for the 500th time could effect anything) in fact i'd be very surprised if 90% of people didn't already have him on ignore that's why they create new accounts. Him being a whale is out of the question too, as i'm sure whales have better things to do with their time then to troll on a forum.



433. Post 10349909 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Ohh bitcoin you unstable psycho



434. Post 10359350 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Any pump and dump that ends higher than when started is ok by me  Wink



435. Post 10373759 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Quote from: macsga on February 06, 2015, 07:01:51 AM
Seems we're moving up slowly. That wall on coindesk though... Grin

That is impressive. A good sign, this is the exchange where the big money from US will enter so it's healthy to see the price there at a premium



436. Post 10373773 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

On a separate note why isn't btcoinwisdom showing BFX or Stamp data? Huh



437. Post 10373861 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Quote from: macsga on February 06, 2015, 07:21:13 AM
On a separate note why isn't btcoinwisdom showing BFX or Stamp data? Huh
Works fine here... Undecided
https://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/bitfinex/btcusd

Huh getting "
Quote
Load failed, retry after 5 seconds.
Probably Reason
    BitcoinWisdom is temporary down
    Domain is not bitcoinwisdom.com
    Network issue

but hooboi and other chinese exchanges load just fine maybe i'm blacklisted



438. Post 10373989 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Quote from: mavericklm on February 06, 2015, 07:26:51 AM
~9 days and ~same price!  c'mmon! hit 300 or hit 150! Cheesy

That's 9days closer to the halfing  Wink



439. Post 10374129 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Quote from: dropt on February 06, 2015, 08:02:13 AM
RIP Coinbase buy wall.

D'oh well as far as i know there's no leverage in coinbase. Lets hope someone didn't just transfer $1MM to coinbase just to flash walls



440. Post 10381277 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Quote from: fonzie on February 06, 2015, 11:16:42 PM
1. Exchange gets hacked, loses coins
2. Exchange claims everything is OK
3. Exchange has "banking problems" after the incident
4. Trading activity seems somehow dead since a few weeks (insiders have already left...)

Sounds familiar?  Cheesy

Banking deposits are being auto returned by the intermediate bank. Meaning before they even reatch bitstamp. Pretty easy to see by tracing the wire. You need to troll harder



441. Post 10383270 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on February 07, 2015, 04:59:56 AM
Coin
Explanation


Finex is starting to look tsunami like again



442. Post 10383944 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: cheekychap on February 07, 2015, 07:52:43 AM
It's Huobi the anchor chain again. Must be the big Chinese mining pools still dumping coins. Don't they know the rest of the world is revving for the next bull run?

I think that you should explain it to them, that instead of selling bitcoins, they should sell their and their loved ones kidneys. That's how they could pay off some of the loans and electric bills, that have been accumulating throughout 2014.

Are these mining places even profitable any more ? I thought after the price fell, then even people getting free electricity aren't profitable.

If they're still profitable at $200 i can't imagine the parties they threw when BTC hit $1200



443. Post 10393539 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 08, 2015, 09:01:44 AM
Who said there always has to be a weekend pump or a weekend dump?
A lot of people. Grin (At least for this weekend.)

People know nothing Roll Eyes

Are you implying that i SHOULDN'T trust random people on the internet  Shocked

Quote from: WillyBTC on February 08, 2015, 09:17:04 AM
Little pop up here, but looked a bit more explosive at first than it does now....

Bid side is getting heavy on Finex. Bulls are used to just putting up the bids and someone dumping on them, when that stopped happening first bulls are starting to break rank. It's like watching the migration of wildebeest  across river



444. Post 10393585 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 08, 2015, 09:32:23 AM
To be honest you are assuming that they are not keeping a % of the payment in BTC with their payment processor.

Some merchants may do that (just as some merchants actuall accept bitcoin directly, without BitPay's intermediation).  But I am pretty sure that Dell, Microsoft, Wikipedia, etc. do not.  Handling bitcoins requires extra work from accoutants, which is not worth the amount of payment received.  Losses from bitcoin price variations (as Overstock and Fortress suffered) would have to be reported in the quarterly reports, and would be hard to justify to stockholders.

Quote
Also what is important to note is that BTC like USD,CAD,YEN,CHY,GBP and any other currency is being accepted for payment Cheesy

SIgh.  No, it is not the same thing.  Dell USA does accept USD, because you can wire USD to their bank account directly. They do not accept CAD,YEN,CHY,GBP nor BTC, and you cannot send them any of those currencies directly; you must send them to some other company, that converts them to USD and sends the USD to Dell.

Jorge, can't you see that we are arguing about what 'accepting' means?  Everybody agrees about the model, the underlying chain of events that takes place during and after a payment (if a company chooses to get paid fully in fiat).  It's just that when a company allows you to pay for products in BTC, I call that "accepting BTC", whereas for you "accepting" apparently means whatever you are getting paid by the payment processor at the end of the process.  

I didn't follow the discussion leading to this, so maybe I'm out of line, but strangely it seems I'm siding with Stolfi on this. If we're talking about what it means to accept BTC I think we have to ask why we want companies to do that. In the end we'd like to see a purely Bitcoin-based economy with the companies using the BTC they're being payed with for their products to cover their cost (machinery, marketing, salaries, consulting, raw materials, insurance, taxes,...). In case of a company 'accepting' BTC through bitpay and converting 100% to fiat, this is clearly not the case.

So no: Dell is not accepting bitcoin. They're using it as a marketing tool.


If you or others can't see the significance of Dell, Microsoft and Paypal saying not only that they are interested in Bitcoin but that they consider it a sufficiently mature and legitimate medium of exchange that they are willing to accept it through their payments processors; then.... it doesn't matter because others will. We CAN get every business on the planet to accept and legitimize Bitcoin in this way, but we CAN'T get most companies to be bagholders.

There is no conceivable reason why Dell or Microsoft should accept Bitcoin directly. Even when Bitcoin is established enough for companies to transfer large sums between each other and internally, it wouldn't necessarily be very prudent to do that with bitcoins from customers. That would still go through payments processors and the management of their own bitcoins would be handled separately. Accepting payments through BitPay or Coinbase is to accept Bitcoin. Get over it!

Feel like the same arguments keep popping up over and over. Bitcoin currency vs bitcoin protocol. They're using bitcoin protocol to transfer wealth. This is good. Good news for protocol will (eventually) result in good news for currency.



445. Post 10393595 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

My favorite one is the argument against adaption as a lot of people accepting bitcoins will bring more sell pressure on the currency as people will use their BTC to actually buy stuff  Shocked those cute fuzzy trolls  Kiss



446. Post 10393721 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: elasticband on February 08, 2015, 09:45:48 AM
My favorite one is the argument against adaption as a lot of people accepting bitcoins will bring more sell pressure on the currency as people will use their BTC to actually buy stuff  Shocked those cute fuzzy trolls  Kiss

Unless there is reason for normal none BTC holding joe blogs to go out and buy bitcoin to then buy his online product, then yes more BTC business accepting adoption just equates to more ways for BTC hodlers to cash out and a downward sell pressure. without creating a demand for really using BTC in the real world, we are just creating more sell pressure.

Compared to last year, i can dump bitcoins so many different places now.

i've still yet to met a person who has wanted something online, then used their bank account to buy BTC, then his btc to buy the product, when they could have just used his bank account and skipped a step. people want seamless easy transactions, BTC - BTC provides that, fiat - BTC - fiat does not.

All in due time. Blue chips giving their stamp of approval and deciding that bitcoin protocol is stable and safe enough for them to adopt is a major reinforcement. The more bitcoin gets accepted the more people start looking at it the more use cases it will find. Buying stuff you don't want traced back to you, gambling (where illegal), tipping, paying in different currency, unbanked, transferring wealth outside of currency controlled states, and vendors offering discounts are all good enough of incentives for me to go fiat -> btc ->transaction.



447. Post 10393798 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 08, 2015, 10:05:50 AM
What are the specific benefits to a customer of using bitcoin?

Say Amazon take bitcoin tomorrow, it would still be an extra step and an extra conversion charge for the general public to use bitcoins. Unless they got paid in bitcoin and they would be pretty sick now if their salary was set at the value of 1200$/b.

Buying things from overseas? it simplifies I guess. But you lose any protection.

Sending money to someone far away. Not an everyday thing for general p.

Imagine if you have fairly grown up kids, but not grown up enough that you want to let them loose on the net with a credit card, but old enough that the amount of internet purchases they make far exceeds what you want to have to deal with. Bitcoin.

Imagine if you're a respectable mum or dad in a conservative neighborhood, but you just happen to love spending Sundays in your basement busting your whatever to german scheisse movies. Bitcoin.

Imagine that you found this marvelous doohickey that costs next to nothing on a site you don't trust. Bitcoin.

Imagine if you have a cousin somewhere in Africa or Asia who needs to get out of the country ASAP because shit's going down, or simply suddenly ran into some economic dire straits. Bitcoin.

Imagine.... use your imagination!

For crying out loud...

Now imagine that worldwide.
And after all that explain why it's market cap should be less than say western union alone?

I think the problem in valuation is the initial distribution (aka the inflation of 3600 new mined BTC daily). That's a lot of coins looking for a holder even on a slow day. So BTC will be a wild ride, but it's a necessary evil and only temporary can't wait for (76 weeks, 5 days, 22 hours, 20 minutes) http://bitcoinclock.com expecting it to have a huge effect on valuation once we'll start getting closer to that



448. Post 10393908 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

I think it's mostly accepted that cryptocurrency is here to stay. It's really hard to argue against a system that charges pennies for transaction. Think the only argument that i can sort of understand against bitcoin protocol are the alts. You know yes cryptocurrency is the future but is bitcoin myspace and facebook is about to come up. That one is a bit harder to argue against, but i think people would value maturity of a protocol when trusting it with their savings vs. the latest marginal improvement. So betting on maturity to be a determining factor against alts



449. Post 10393976 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 08, 2015, 10:24:21 AM
What are the specific benefits to a customer of using bitcoin?

Say Amazon take bitcoin tomorrow, it would still be an extra step and an extra conversion charge for the general public to use bitcoins. Unless they got paid in bitcoin and they would be pretty sick now if their salary was set at the value of 1200$/b.

Buying things from overseas? it simplifies I guess. But you lose any protection.

Sending money to someone far away. Not an everyday thing for general p.

Imagine if you have fairly grown up kids, but not grown up enough that you want to let them loose on the net with a credit card, but old enough that the amount of internet purchases they make far exceeds what you want to have to deal with. Bitcoin.

Imagine if you're a respectable mum or dad in a conservative neighborhood, but you just happen to love spending Sundays in your basement busting your whatever to german scheisse movies. Bitcoin.

Imagine that you found this marvelous doohickey that costs next to nothing on a site you don't trust. Bitcoin.

Imagine if you have a cousin somewhere in Africa or Asia who needs to get out of the country ASAP because shit's going down, or simply suddenly ran into some economic dire straits. Bitcoin.

Imagine.... use your imagination!

For crying out loud...

Now imagine that worldwide.
And after all that explain why it's market cap should be less than say western union alone?

I think the problem in valuation is the initial distribution (aka the inflation of 3600 new mined BTC daily). That's a lot of coins looking for a holder even on a slow day. So BTC will be a wild ride, but it's a necessary evil and only temporary can't wait for (76 weeks, 5 days, 22 hours, 20 minutes) http://bitcoinclock.com expecting it to have a huge effect on valuation once we'll start getting closer to that

Hopefully liquidity is such, by that time, that we won't even notce.

Well, i don't have the stats but i imagine that by far the majority of coins is not traded. And i doubt those early adopters been increasing their stashes by 10% yearly. Now 10% is a lot in itself. But when you consider that only 50% are traded, now 20% of asks would come from new coins, if you think only 30% are traded whopping 33% of sell pressure would be new minted coins. BTC liquidity is proportional to price too, when it was $1 it was normal to see BTC25k BTC walls when it was $500 or so people still draw pictures of a BTC30k bearwhale. The higher price implies higher demand, thus the higher the price the more effect THE HALVING of supply will have.



450. Post 10399505 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: hknews on February 08, 2015, 10:39:31 PM
...long logical explanation of how a small exchange that was dying for over half a year finally closed down...

Well that'd explain why it made no effect on a market



451. Post 10400316 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

What's up with the big market buys directly followed by big market sells. Stop orders? Huh



452. Post 10404751 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: brg444 on February 09, 2015, 12:33:04 PM
so the scam was..
give me money and i will mine bitcoin for you...
ran off with money...
bitcoin never got mined...
-> there will be no dump

Correct that far.  However, an academic (ahem!) in Hong Kong called for tighter regulations on bitcoin.  That by itself does not mean anything, but it is noteworthy that the news arrticle closed with his opinion.  There may be repercussions on exchanges.

And then we have the current dump.  Just a coincidence, or triggered by the mycoin.hk news?

Let´s hope that the PBOC put´s an end to this scam and finally protects it´s citizens. I already wrote them 3 mails in the last 7 days.

 Cheesy

LOL even PBOC put fonzie on ignore that should tell something to the rest of you



453. Post 10444773 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: damiano on February 13, 2015, 06:28:34 AM


Shorts gonna get squeezed sooner than later

Only a matter of time before it all comes crashing back down...

Better to enjoy it while it lasts I guess.

Not many coins available to short so it's gonna get interesting

Not that many shorts, and easily offset by some of those 15MM longs taking some profit but still might provide a little bump. Looks like China is leading this...again  Undecided



454. Post 10444783 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: podyx on February 13, 2015, 06:36:07 AM
Of course, because I sold at $219, the price will go up...

I should of seen that coming... Only problem is that price would go down if I didn't sell Roll Eyes


And we all thank you for that. Sell some more go ahead  Grin



455. Post 10454289 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Now longs are starting to go full retard  Angry yay roller coaster



456. Post 10462102 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Someone is surely buying up lots of coins



457. Post 10462535 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: Xiaoxiao on February 14, 2015, 10:03:49 PM
Or so you hope.  So funny watching all the "Oh BTC dead crowd" go quiet and make dumb comments.

Cheesy

When did I become part of the BTC is dead crowd.  I am just saying that it will likely continue to follow the long term trend until we see a real reversal, but its gotta go sideways for a long long time before a reversal of the long term trend.

And what would that real reversal look like?



458. Post 10471179 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Start at 222 go up to 268 settle at 240, rinse and repeat i don't see what the problem is, i'll take couple more of these



459. Post 10472196 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

LOL anyone looking at the ask side on the exchanges   Shocked wheres the chartbuddy



460. Post 10473292 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 15, 2015, 10:39:52 PM
BTER was a known altcoin exchange.

It also traded BTC/CNY, but its volume was very small (~200 BTC/day, or 1/1000 of Huobi and OKCoin...)


Meh if you keep coins on some shitty exchange you don't deserve those coins



461. Post 10475003 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Hmm about 2mil in longs have been added in few days  Shocked



462. Post 10475493 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: edwardspitz on February 16, 2015, 05:53:18 AM
...i'm spending a lot of time to undermine bitcoin...

There is nothing to suggest they got hacked, but you can make stuff up if you want. Also have a look here: https://twitter.com/OKCoinBTC/status/567194742283202560

Don't quote trolls everything is working for me now



463. Post 10487520 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: saatana on February 17, 2015, 08:52:33 AM
Look at what is just happened in btcchina

what happened?

LOL shows the real depth of their orderbook. Someone fat fingered a market buy amount and ate through the whole ask side with just 500BTC Grin



464. Post 10487589 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: Phillis on February 17, 2015, 08:58:00 AM
Look at what is just happened in btcchina

just a bug in the chart

No it was an actual order look at their order book. Even 30min later there are still only 243BTC till 1600CNY



465. Post 10508886 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Can we get the shorts above BTC20k and longs bellow $15M kthnxbye



466. Post 10529756 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: explorer on February 21, 2015, 01:55:15 AM
http://bitcoinist.net/coinbase-exchange-passes-bitstamp-btc-e-trading-volume/

And they only serve 25 of the 50 US states although I imagine it is significantly greater than 50% of the population.

And yet, (see ChartBuddy above) Their book remains relatively flat.  Still, not bad for what, a month?

Do they still have 0 fees



467. Post 10541264 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: DieJohnny on February 22, 2015, 04:09:12 AM
We are 18 months from halving, when will we start to see the halving bubble start to build???

I am thinking it is a year out.... languish around 300 for another 12 months....

Not soon enough. 18months is an eternity in BTC world. Probably not till 3-4months before the halving.



468. Post 10541365 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: 12345mm on February 22, 2015, 04:53:29 AM
re: dissent on bitcoin quiet for a few pages ... why bother constantly reminding you bunch of fanatics that bitcoin has been in a death spiral downwards for over a year ever since karpeles used a billion non existent dollars to falsely manipulate the price to the highs we saw while robbing the planet of 650,000 bitcoin ? or remind you of any of the other dozens of intentional exchange thefts ? of any of the other obvious extremely bad aspects of what bitcoin fundamentally is or has become ? you greedy and desperate fuckwits just cry bullish bullish bullish blah blah blah good buying opportunity to the moon oooo look at this line it says buy now etc etc etc ad-nausea-um even to the point of constantly making new threads in a fairly obvious concerted attempt to bury negative posts regardless of what anyone says and regardless of facts in front of your faces meanwhile actively encouraging people to ignore anyone who doesn't also praise bitcoin like it's the fucking messiah and a bunch of you have presumably actually put everyone else on ignore who doesn't praise bitcoin like you do ... those of us with our heads not firmly up our assess only have so much energy and time to expend trying to inform people of your lies and delusions ... i know i'm sick of it ...


From signature
Coinbase Is THE Place to Buy Your Bitcoins! https://coinbase.com/?r=528a0de17f383142df00040c&utm_campaign=user-referral&src=referral-link Sign Up For Cryptsy! Trade Alts! https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=15696
BTC:   1Mrr2cPbZc4nmV236AS31vdCP24J9TbJpo   LTC:   LV5UoExrVxU3ddrCKCMZ2Wx5odbkUf7JhT
I Like Free Magic Internet Money! Smiley My Cryptsy Trade Key: ad89bb4885a1f92eb7efd5db30412676673ded0e

Ohh the irony. How did you get away from my ignore list? You funny i like that



469. Post 10541573 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: 12345mm on February 22, 2015, 05:21:11 AM
re: dissent on bitcoin quiet for a few pages ... why bother constantly reminding you bunch of fanatics that bitcoin has been in a death spiral downwards for over a year ever since karpeles used a billion non existent dollars to falsely manipulate the price to the highs we saw while robbing the planet of 650,000 bitcoin ? or remind you of any of the other dozens of intentional exchange thefts ? of any of the other obvious extremely bad aspects of what bitcoin fundamentally is or has become ? you greedy and desperate fuckwits just cry bullish bullish bullish blah blah blah good buying opportunity to the moon oooo look at this line it says buy now etc etc etc ad-nausea-um even to the point of constantly making new threads in a fairly obvious concerted attempt to bury negative posts regardless of what anyone says and regardless of facts in front of your faces meanwhile actively encouraging people to ignore anyone who doesn't also praise bitcoin like it's the fucking messiah and a bunch of you have presumably actually put everyone else on ignore who doesn't praise bitcoin like you do ... those of us with our heads not firmly up our assess only have so much energy and time to expend trying to inform people of your lies and delusions ... i know i'm sick of it ...


From signature
Coinbase Is THE Place to Buy Your Bitcoins! https://coinbase.com/?r=528a0de17f383142df00040c&utm_campaign=user-referral&src=referral-link Sign Up For Cryptsy! Trade Alts! https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=15696
BTC:   1Mrr2cPbZc4nmV236AS31vdCP24J9TbJpo   LTC:   LV5UoExrVxU3ddrCKCMZ2Wx5odbkUf7JhT
I Like Free Magic Internet Money! Smiley My Cryptsy Trade Key: ad89bb4885a1f92eb7efd5db30412676673ded0e

Ohh the irony. How did you get away from my ignore list? You funny i like that

*disclaimer
i have made thousands of dollars with bitcoin and do hold bitcoin in the double digits today and actively trade it - my signature i haven't bothered to change in well over a year ... probably i should ... huh ?

Nah keep it, your trolling is not as fun without parallel subliminal support of BTC  Grin



470. Post 10551054 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: samsonn25 on February 23, 2015, 01:48:32 AM
If this bear market has been largely caused by Chinese miners that can do nothing with bitcoins except sell them, then it is likely to end when one of two things happen: Either they run out of stockpiled coins to sell over and above coins they are mining, or when the Chinese economy gets so bad that they realize that the killer app is to sneak out of the country with them.

Right now Bitcoins seems to be an answer in search of a problem: Most obviously capital controls in a world where capital is still largely mobile. When this situation changes, it is likely to be sudden and swift although the time frame is difficult to predict with any accuracy.

Mined coins are not that much, 3600 per day and the Chinese probably only have less than 35% share of that so thats only 1200 coins per days assuming they sell all of them every day.  

There is more belief of short traders and options sellers using leverage.

BTC3600 is not that much  Huh that's like additional $850,000 sell pressure every single day. BTC is not that liquid to easily sustain that.

But some relief will come in 18months



471. Post 10551123 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: rolling on February 23, 2015, 02:13:49 AM
If this bear market has been largely caused by Chinese miners that can do nothing with bitcoins except sell them, then it is likely to end when one of two things happen: Either they run out of stockpiled coins to sell over and above coins they are mining, or when the Chinese economy gets so bad that they realize that the killer app is to sneak out of the country with them.

Right now Bitcoins seems to be an answer in search of a problem: Most obviously capital controls in a world where capital is still largely mobile. When this situation changes, it is likely to be sudden and swift although the time frame is difficult to predict with any accuracy.

Miners aren't the ones selling in this market. It's pure speculative manipulation. A miner would never dump coins and cause the price to decline. They would sell the minimum number of coins necessary to cover costs at the best price possible and stock the rest for a much higher price.

Lets put this one to bed, miners are not dumping coins and they are certainly not doing them as a market order.

Best... Post... Recently.

Gotta agree with rolling. Miners are among the most optimistic of the bulls as a group.

It doesn't matter how optimistic miners are. Miners have to service their debt and to meet expenses just like everybody else. If you postpone selling because of a bear market, you can end up NEEDING to sell more rather than less because the price is lower, the loan payments are higher and all your other expenses remain the same.  It doesn't matter one bit if it's market orders or limit orders creating more overhead resistance.

Partially true. Miners may have to start selling at some point if they are no longer able to service debt with other income streams but a market order has a huge difference in this market compared to a limit order. A miner would NEVER dump 5k coins in single market order. It causes too much slippage and the market seems to stabilize at a lower price after a big downward movement. It's not miners causing these major movements.



If a miner has BTC20k to push he'd prob put a sell wall and if no one is biting he has to dump. On a separate note oh look there are over BTC2k on finex till 240, recall there were about that much till 250 a day ago. But at least looks like people are nibbling at 240



472. Post 10551261 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: rolling on February 23, 2015, 02:23:31 AM
...

A miner isn't going to dump BTC20k at a time, they are going to sell some fraction of BTC3600 per day. Even the biggest miner out there isn't selling more than a couple hundred per day. The vast majority of miners are holding. The current price is laughable. I'll say it one more time and then I'm done. The miners aren't causing the decline in price.




If they're holding and paying for electricity out of pocket then they're becoming investors instead of just miners



473. Post 10551369 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 23, 2015, 02:52:57 AM
It would take the largest Mining Cartel a month to mine 20k coins

Or a big mine holding them for 14 months, waiting for the price to recover. More probably the net sum of many miners doing the same, but also speculators who need to liquidate some of their holdings for similar reasons.

Unless they have triple deep pockets, im sure they have to pay back the capital expenditure, ultility (electricity a HUGE expense) company, rents and employees salary weekly or monthly.

Well yes, but if they thought the price would recover quickly, they would borrow the money and plan to pay back the loan when the price went back up, but that didn't happen, so they borrowed more...and more. If they are close to maxing out their credit, they could be in deep trouble, particularly when it looks like the next ATH (if it ever happens) could still be a year away.

UPDATE: BTC swaps on BFX now at 21,425.  ~ 3,500 to go before the trap swings shut.  Leveraged bears are taking the bait.

I don't think they're hitting the market yet. There's barely any volume on finex



474. Post 10572157 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Leveraged longs are going full retard on finex  Angry think it's a full cycle, shorts going up they turn more bulish and leverage more, shorts see longs going up and short more ...



475. Post 10572303 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: bassclef on February 25, 2015, 12:01:22 AM
Leveraged longs are going full retard on finex  Angry think it's a full cycle, shorts going up they turn more bulish and leverage more, shorts see longs going up and short more ...

What makes you think being long is a poor choice? With a couple of big crashes in the background, who is left to sell?

Less selling = less supply to stop rallies = rallies gain steam = bull market
Less buying = less demand to stop crashes = crashes gain steam = bear market

When 10k coin market sells doesn't do much to the price, it's time to rethink being a bear.

Not that it's a bad choice per se, just like to see lower leveraged longs in total. Plus they usually put close stop losses so any minor move is greatly amplified by leverage and i prefer to see that to shorts



476. Post 10572326 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Hey my activity is 420 time to celebrate  Grin



477. Post 10572948 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

No one talking about BTC421 market buy on finex closely followed by a BTC438 market sell? Is someone just generating income for finex?



478. Post 10586222 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: buddhamangler on February 26, 2015, 08:04:50 AM
https://www.bitfinex.com/pages/stats

It now shows the amount used, this is helpful.

Total sum of active swaps   Total amount used in margin positions
USD   16,652,318.73 USD   16,583,217.30 USD
BTC   24,434.66 BTC           24,041.24 BTC

Sweet didn't know that. I knew there was a reason i still drop by this thread



479. Post 10596086 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 27, 2015, 04:15:18 AM
I max leveraged short all my funds 3 hours ago


what do i do? what do i do!?!



Double down and short some MOAARR or learn your lesson and never short BTC either will work



480. Post 10596786 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Instead of taking some profit and closing their positions longs are starting to push to $17MM  Angry



481. Post 10596988 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

Bear trap? Not many coins left on the ask side



482. Post 10606618 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

Longs went beyond full retard $17.5MM  Shocked guessing they're trying to make a quick buck leveraging Kim Dotcom news? Had a short squeeze now time for a long squeeze?



483. Post 10606919 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 28, 2015, 03:19:53 AM
Strange ass candle on OKCoin on wisdom, what happened there?

a leveraged position blew up.

On such a low volume? prob. just a glitch



484. Post 10607211 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

Quote from: gkv9 on February 28, 2015, 04:01:21 AM
Think weekend will correct.... Volume is up which is always nice.

Seems that the fiat's being adjusted as it's years end...
Who knows what's cooking behind?

Ask side is looking thin but again those $17.6MM (and growing) in longs had A LOT to do with that. If not for that i'd be really bullish



485. Post 10616984 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

Quote from: dunchy on March 01, 2015, 01:48:57 AM
btc-e has indeed been run properly for years now as far as i can tell , heck i've traded there myself and never had a problem either , but as compared to exchanges in china (government doesn't fuck around) and exchanges in the u.s. (government doesn't fuck around) it would presumably be a lot easier for the btc-e exchange which is run out of croatia if i remember correctly (a not long ago war torn country) to simply disappear eventually whenever they get to X millions goal to run off with ... my rationale for trusting coinbase is that (presumably) the folks who invested 75M into it know who they gave their money to / have a few extra M to hire bounty hunters / assassins / would be able to call upon the u.s. law and financial enforcement agencies should they attempt to pull any funny business (same goes for the major chinese exchanges , as far as difficulty evading chinese law and financial agencies)

- btc-e is not run from Croatia
- Croatia was never torn by war

BTC-E uses Ceska Sporitelna bank, Czech part of the ERSTE bank group that sucks money from mostly eastern part of Europe. Account holder is Mayzus financial from London, that's behind OKPAY as well. The guys are supposedly Bulgarians, website was never fully and properly translated from Russian and support speaks extraterrestrial english. Legit bussiness.

Well depends on your definition of torn by is but they were definitely in war up till like '96 still a lot of bullet holes in buildings there



486. Post 10633798 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

Finex longs are closing in on $18.5MM that's from $15MM a month ago. That's around BTC12k btc bought on leverage. And only seem to continue to creep up  Huh



487. Post 10634635 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

Quote from: KryptoFoo on March 02, 2015, 08:34:02 PM
Still no squeeze. But it must start to hurt soon.

btc swaps still ~20K on finex, they still waiting to cover.

Do you not look at long swaps at all?



488. Post 10645751 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

US lost keys to their BTC and now trying to buy them up at open market? Can we start this rumor cause i like where this is going.



489. Post 10645755 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on March 03, 2015, 07:10:48 PM
I like how everybody disregarded that 50000 BTC auction that is about to happen in approximately 48 hours.

isnt it on the 9th?

you would think its obvious that second market is going to buy up the lot if possible..

Exactly, and if they do win I expect Barry to say so.

is this the last batch to be auctioned off? if so, id also expect them to announce that they payed way over market price for them.. 1) because we are in the middle of bull run 2) btc will sky rocket so when they launch trading on their new pink sheets exchange, they will get way more for the bitcoins.. easy money..

there's one last batch of ~44K after this 50K

after that we can all buy a fcking boat!

Then gox distributed coins (if there are any left that is)



490. Post 10646174 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: Norway on March 03, 2015, 07:25:31 PM
...

Like this?  Cheesy

Guess she didn't make the audition to Disney's Ariel The Little Mermaid



491. Post 10646738 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: thefunkybits on March 03, 2015, 08:35:12 PM
Shorts getting squeezed out...still 17 K left though  Grin

If we pass $300 look out  Roll Eyes






I think a reasonable top (in an epic short squeeze) is $350 and most likely to happen in the next 3 days

Great plan (if we totally ignore longs and just assume that they'll never cash out)



492. Post 10649498 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: lyth0s on March 04, 2015, 12:39:04 AM
We should all stop selling for just 10 minutes and see what happens for shits and giggles.

Seriously though the largest growth keeps happening in single large 15 minute candles. Is this coincidence or is it perhaps 1 person accumulating large amounts of BTC over short periods of time and then letting the market re-equilibrate to not run up prices too fast?

say you are group of private equity that wanted to take a $50 mill position in BTC, how would you do it? (assume you managed to secure ~60% of that off the market already)

Well technically I would try to contact a large mining company and get an OTC deal with them to acquire the bitcoins. BUT that could potentially take a lot more work to setup and if a mining company decided to no longer sell for cheap OTC, then I'd have to take my business to the exchanges.

Maybe that's what has happened.....a few large OTC mining deals were stopped due to the coins being too low and now the miners would rather just hold them until the coin price gets bumped up to a more profitable level for them. Large buyer then flocks to the exchanges to slowly buy up the coins.

By the way you were pretty specific about a private equity wanting $50 million position in BTC, do you have any other specifics you'd like to share?

I don't believe that large miners operators can afford to just hodl for few months. In fact i don't believe in large mining farms operating without some contract in place already. Hey lets dump few mil in this run up thousands in electricity bills daily/weekly and we'll worry about how to liquidate our product (BTC) after.  Most likely all those coins are already spoken for for some duration of time. Things to consider if you want to open large position, you're not the only player scavenging miners for some coins so there's surely competition, the bigger the competition the more premium miners might want, you might want more volume than they can provide, or your contract with miners calls for premium of BFX*1.0X so miners turn around and just buy coins on market  Grin, etc, etc, etc... Now if you've exhausted all your other options and are left with buying on market with minimum slippage i'm guessing it'd look like what's happening right about now. Big buy let things settle put up some weak support, rinse and repeat. Until someone picks up on that and start going ape shit crazy on leverage to buy up coins so you don't get them



493. Post 10649710 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: Morecoin Freeman on March 04, 2015, 01:19:44 AM


This is it, the chicken formation. Get ready for some epic conclusions!

That's hilarious dude.
When we'll see the eggs? Grin

Finally, some sensible TA
That is one huge cock formation.

I like this one even more than the pterodactyl formation  Cheesy



494. Post 10664791 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on March 05, 2015, 04:36:59 AM
Seriously guys, you think that $5k by end of 2016 Is possible?



 Smiley Smiley Smiley

I wrote that a long long time ago. 2011 I think. It's been quite a ride so far. The problem with being ahead of your time is that you never know when (if ever) the rest of the world will catch up.

Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.
-John Maynard Keynes



495. Post 10664803 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: Chef Ramsay on March 05, 2015, 05:54:57 AM
I think all of us should just go to Vegas for a week, get drunk, party, gamble, and settle all these differences of opinions in person. It would be fun. I'll room with LampChop.

Sos no room, lamp chop has to book a whole floor suite for all his sock accounts.

i have a feeling LampChop can really party hard.

i'm in, lets do this next year when price is 9K and climbing

 Cheesy
She'd like to be fucked real hard, yes, I'm sure we can all agree on that point. Otherwise, it's curtains.

If LampChop is a 21yr old blond chick with blue eyes i call dibs otherwise ehhh have fun



496. Post 10673532 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: uhoh on March 05, 2015, 09:44:26 PM


^ that x2



497. Post 10676129 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Ah the longs are up almost 1MM over 19MM again that explains the last bump. Either someone knows something no one else does, or someone is rolling a dice big time



498. Post 10676162 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on March 06, 2015, 03:55:30 AM
Ah the longs are up almost 1MM over 19MM again that explains the last bump. Either someone knows something no one else does, or someone is rolling a dice big time

You don't know? Are you paying attention?

I do have a life outside this thread don't wanna end up like Adam



499. Post 10677241 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

How much do you think is needed to start a $19.25MM long squeeze  Undecided that last $1MM in longs must already be under  Cry



500. Post 10687590 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on March 07, 2015, 03:36:14 AM
Usually the bid end is a lot bigger.. that's the problem

Quote from: damiano on March 07, 2015, 05:07:38 AM
20million longs now


1+1 is...no wait don't tell me 1+ one , carry over five, use the fraction, find a common denominator, now integrate both sides of the equation ummm | | <-this many Huh

speculating that someone betting huge that those auctioned coins went at a high premium. But the fact that we have $20MM in longs and the price is only $270 is insane harder and harder to stay a bull with these retarded leveraged longs



501. Post 10707914 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on March 09, 2015, 03:56:14 AM
A new batch of retards just flooded the market...

Retards with apparently more funds than you could put up to short moar coinz.

I quit trading this volatile leftover descending trash that was resulted from the biggest ponzi scheme that ever happened since the old days of tulip bulbs and beanie babies
... a long time ago.
You sound butthurt.

You sound like you don't know how to use the ignore button  Roll Eyes and i thought he was gone didn't he gave up his nick? Or some other troll picked it up?



502. Post 10715596 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: hyphymikey on March 09, 2015, 07:00:07 PM
So who is going to be foolish enough to provide liquidity on the ask side now? The ones selling on every rise over the weekend should have learned by now, right?

Liquidity on the ask side is coming from the longs closing their position. And we still got a lot of them to close



503. Post 10719936 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Now it's starting to get interesting  Grin



504. Post 10732839 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: Richy_T on March 11, 2015, 02:30:04 AM
Why exactly is Bitcoin rallying? Nothing has changed.

Exactly. Nothing *has* changed. In my opinion, all Bitcoin has to do to succeed is not fail.

Yep. Everyday it doesn't fail it proves that monetary system can exist backed solely by algorithm and of those with faith in that algorithm. Everyday it gets more attention and spreads (like a virus  Cool ) and every day the system absorbs BTC3600 newly minted BTC and gets one day closer to the halving  Grin



505. Post 10733259 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: freedomno1 on March 11, 2015, 04:14:32 AM
Why exactly is Bitcoin rallying? Nothing has changed.

Exactly. Nothing *has* changed. In my opinion, all Bitcoin has to do to succeed is not fail.

By what metric? And what do you mean when you say Bitcoin, the Software, the Community or the use as a Payment Infrastructure?
Because I think it ultimately failed on the latter two accounts with The Goxxing. (or if you believe GOX the former one....)

It is still here, still being traded at a decent price and still has growing infrastructure and investment. Gox was an incident but was far from Bitcoin failing.
Indeed the recent news about additional venture capital around 120 million from 21jobs shows that the system is still growing strong
Gox did hurt but it definitely did not kill bitcoin
We have a long way to go yet and it's constantly moving.

Actually i think gox was literally the case of what doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Gox was pretty much THE BTC exchange, and sort of had a monopoly and could (did) even set the price. It was ironic to have one centralized exchange thus one point of failure. And it did fail, BTC price took a hit, but now we're up to what like 5 "major" exchanges, and now no one exchange failure can (stamp  Roll Eyes ) can have such catastrophic effect...growing pains



506. Post 10758301 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Long squeeze incoming?



507. Post 10816292 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Huh all while leveraged longs keep creeping up. This cant be good



508. Post 10818906 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

If it was an attempt at squeezing longs think it's safe to say that so far it's a failure (to my surprise as well was expecting more closed longs)



509. Post 10819052 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: dreamspark on March 19, 2015, 03:29:05 AM
Well, I only lost 15 bitcoin today...

 Cry

Sad that not good. Did you sell to realize those losses?

I had a 5 btc long that got margin called on futures, and lost 10 from taking losses on a long I had open since 286.

Feeling sick, worst loss in my 3 years of trading bitcoin Sad

Sorry about your losses, 2 words though, risk management. Never let yourself get margin called.

Luckily it appears there weren't that many people like you going leveraged longs with really tight margins who get called once position moves 15% against you. Hopefully you learned your lessons. Now can we get same people piling up on shorts, love seeing those getting squeezed.



510. Post 10819092 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: dreamspark on March 19, 2015, 03:53:18 AM
Well, I only lost 15 bitcoin today...

 Cry

Sad that not good. Did you sell to realize those losses?

I had a 5 btc long that got margin called on futures, and lost 10 from taking losses on a long I had open since 286.

Feeling sick, worst loss in my 3 years of trading bitcoin Sad

Sorry about your losses, 2 words though, risk management. Never let yourself get margin called.

Luckily it appears there weren't that many people like you going leveraged longs with really tight margins who get called once position moves 15% against you. Hopefully you learned your lessons. Now can we get same people piling up on shorts, love seeing those getting squeezed.

Everyone on okcoin futures will be margin called if the market moves 15% against you. Even at 10x.

Don't you lot understand how bad it is that there are as many longs now as there were when this drop started.

Not familiar with okcoin was going by finex. Believe they require 30% to open and 15% to margin call minimum. Honestly I am a perplexed why more didn't close. On one side it's good as they have fatter margins hoping for more mature traders who know what they're doing but on the other side there's still potential of them getting squeezed causing a domino effect



511. Post 10819810 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: dreamspark on March 19, 2015, 04:28:12 AM
Quote
...

Not familiar with okcoin was going by finex. Believe they require 30% to open and 15% to margin call minimum. Honestly I am a perplexed why more didn't close. On one side it's good as they have fatter margins hoping for more mature traders who know what they're doing but on the other side there's still potential of them getting squeezed causing a domino effect

He clearly says he had 5btc margin called on futures.

All it means is there is going to be a huge amount of resistance going back up as these people who have been looking at their negative p/l for days or weeks sell off. The whole rally was built on margin and now we're 50 bucks down with the same amount of margin longs. Put it this way, I'd put a higher weighting on visiting $220's before we see $290's again.

Think it's obvious that leveraged longs will need to be closed thus adding to supply/sell pressure. Just saying that something felt odd when we drop 15% and most longs don't close or in some cases i saw longs going up as price dropped  Huh



512. Post 10826342 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: inca on March 19, 2015, 08:42:15 PM
People told tarmi that he better should close his shorts near 280$ when he shorted @ 295$ coz short squeeze incomin..... They still call him a troll....

 Cheesy

You are a troll.

Tarmi just posts his winning trades and talks his book. He gets angry when the price rises and never mentions his losing trades..but we know the truth

No way!?! You mean like every other troll?  Roll Eyes he's not on my ignore list just yet, but i hovered over it few times



513. Post 10826471 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on March 19, 2015, 08:58:58 PM





Well that turned quickly. There's enough coins in that wall to bring us back to 290s



514. Post 10830504 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: Searing on March 20, 2015, 08:34:54 AM
Not looking good... Sad

The ways of Bitcoin ...esp price ...are 'mysterious to me'  FML

Wink



Yeah longs have gone full retard on finex @ $23,5MM and they brought up the price to like 0.15%/day so longs are paying $35.250 daily just to leverage. And they didn't close or get squeezed as we were going down to $250 but instead were adding to their position. Then shorts jumped up.  Huh i'm at a loss as to wtf is going on but feel like the pressure cooker is only getting hotter and something got to give sooner or later judging strictly by longs most likely down. But in the mean time seems like Finex is the only one making serious money now, leveraged longs buying from leveraged shorts  Undecided



515. Post 10846431 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: camolist on March 22, 2015, 02:14:57 AM
500 bid at 260 400 sale at 260.06 who will win  Huh

There's like no volume at all. Bears can smell low volume and come running



516. Post 10852499 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on March 22, 2015, 05:34:20 PM
...
No, you are literally the only person on here that keeps banging on about pedophilia, you seem to love talking about it, poor you.

---

Wow. It's becoming clearer and clearer that you were victimized as a little girl, Jeannie.

Perhaps you should consider professional help.

How about instead of quoting you learn to use ignore and "Report to moderator" buttons on lambchops



517. Post 10852891 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on March 22, 2015, 07:43:51 PM
Sounds like you know who she is...  Just sayin.

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/TheIslanders/conversations/messages/3223

Not sure if you're too slow to see that you're talking to NLC or just playing along. In any case on ignore list you go too



518. Post 10853665 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: tarmi on March 22, 2015, 08:36:42 PM
That was a pretty weak pump


wait till they borrow another million on bitfinex. I think we can touch 278.

then short the fuck of it. 

Yeah longs are about to hit $24MM  Undecided either someone knows something we don't or they'll get squeezed. So far longs have been doubling down raising the price



519. Post 10853801 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on March 22, 2015, 09:18:47 PM
That was a pretty weak pump


wait till they borrow another million on bitfinex. I think we can touch 278.

then short the fuck of it. 

Yeah longs are about to hit $24MM  Undecided either someone knows something we don't or they'll get squeezed. So far longs have been doubling down raising the price


Wow.
What are we expecting the price to rise to in the short term?

Short answer no clue  Grin cost of longs keeps going up as more is borrowed. We were trading in $240 range on finex when longs were at $16MM. Now after $8MM infusion from longs (~BTC30k) we're only at $265. Either it's some gambler going full retard on longs, or an ingenious way to buy up cheap coins. But think someone already tried to squeeze longs, they dumped 10s of thousands of BTC brought us bellow $250 but longs didn't flinch and instead just went up  Huh . So they're not your typical weak longs with tight stop losses/small margins.



520. Post 10855672 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Wonder if there's a limit on number of people on ignore list



521. Post 10856592 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: coinableS on March 23, 2015, 03:36:30 AM
I still wonder why almost all of the recent price increases are based on small time frame large 2-3 thousand volume candles. And I still wonder if some sort of institutional investor is buying the coins, waiting for the next dip and rebuying in order to cause less of a price hike. If you look at the finiex 15 minute candles you will see two large 3k volume boosts in price followed by a decline back to the baseline ~300 volume. Looks like a single person buying to me.



interdasting


I think some people are in the know and there will be news next week.

Hope so otherwise it'll be brutal



522. Post 10865982 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: electerium on March 23, 2015, 11:35:42 PM
Im sick of reading you people post about the swaps on bfx.


It

means

nothing



Until you are in a middle of a massive dump/spike either way, where a squeeze literally occurs, the past few months have told us that it means nothing. Someone has been eating USD at .11% and the overall market doesnt care.

China controls 75% of the trading market, and until Gemini or Coinbase begin operating in NY, CA, TX, VA, MA we are going to see a lot of pump and dumps.

Au contraire, at these prices every million is BTC4000 even with china it'd be foolish to disregard it. Market is not that deep/liquid



523. Post 10877518 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

So we drop over 10% from 270s to 240s and zero f*cks were given by leveraged longs  Undecided not complaining cause if it was like before we'd probably be in 100s by now with finexs "circuit breakers" kicking in but something doesn't smell right



524. Post 10888766 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.07h):

Quote from: abercrombie on March 26, 2015, 02:23:24 AM
Looks like another dark market might go down?  

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/304rhd/why_the_fck_are_we_dropping_faster_than_a_fat/

Code:
"Evolution market just exit scammed, and now if you head over to /r/darknetmarkets you
can see that Agora, the second largest market (now largest), has just said they're going offline for
24-48 hours for a "security update." People are extremely nervous to say the least. If Agora runs off
too then that's basically the entire real economy of bitcoin going poof."

Per the Whale Club, Agora is back up and running.

They pretty much unchallenged now and got the monopoly. Would be just dumb to run at this point.



525. Post 10927994 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.07h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on March 30, 2015, 08:10:31 AM
Longs increasing.
Things could get interesting this week.
My advice is to buy before we surge upwards.

I agree. Buy so my bitcoins will be worth more.


x2 but with real money think we got enough leveraged longs



526. Post 10986317 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.09h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on April 05, 2015, 05:35:54 AM
So Trolfi thinks the miners might want to delay the halving in order to have more coins to sell. Ridiculous. A delay would mean a precedent. If there is one delay, there may be more. I would immediately divest myself of my entire holdings and I wouldn't be alone. The miners know this and they won't do something that will crash the price and destroy their livelihood.

Incentives work. The success of this project demonstrates that and it is why the Statist are so rabidly opposed to it.  People have an overwhelming tendency to do what is in their INDIVIDUAL perceived best interest, including the supposed angels who control which way government guns are pointing.




Pretty sure that 99% doesn't want to fork just to delay the halfing.



527. Post 10986749 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.09h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 05, 2015, 06:35:25 AM
Pretty sure that 99% doesn't want to fork just to delay the halfing.

That is why the "proof" that "a majoritary mining cartel can't change the protocol" is subjective.

I don't know whether the miners will try to delay the halving (or do some other "sacrilege").  But, if they were to try, my estimate is that less than 10% of the bitcoiners would be furiously opposed to the halving delay, the other 90% will not care, and only the 4-5 miners with 60% of the hashpower will be in favor.  Then these miners will do it anyway; and 99.9% of the bitcoiners will accept the change, including most of those who swore that they would abandon bitcoin if that happened. Because their greed will speak louder than their ideology.

Bitcoiners are incredibly easy to fool if they are told what they want to hear.  They believe that adoption is booming, that the exponential price trend is built-in, that Satoshi was an anarcho-libertarian, that governments cannot stop bitcoin, that Greece may adopt it, that the banks are secretly investing in it, that sidechains will solve all problems of the protocol, that Wall Street whales are holding the price down, that China is irrelevant, that Willy created the last bubble...  

If Antonopoulos tells everybody that postponing the halving will not delay the Apotheosis, and Roger Ver posts a video where he promises that it will be the first and last change to the protocol, and Gavin tweets that he supports the change, and Coindesk and Bloomberg and Forbes and the WSJ assert that it will be a positive development for bitcoin, then 90% of the bitcoiners will believe that it is a good thing, and the rest will pretend to believe it in order to preserve the value of their coins.  Tongue

Huh  Huh so there's incentive for miners to delay the halving, and if they decide to do it they will do it anyway and be successful  Roll Eyes

Do you seriously think that there's over a 50% chance that the halving will be delayed??



528. Post 11093492 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.11h):

Is that you Willy back eating invisible wall on finex? I for one was waiting for you...



529. Post 11102291 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.11h):

Quote from: Torque on April 16, 2015, 04:37:02 AM
Why do I get the feeling that everyone on this thread is an obsessive gambler, but no one ever wants to be truly wealthy?

For all the fkn around with bitcoin you guys do day trading (and mostly losing), I could have pointed you to at least 5 stocks that in 2014 would have doubled your money going long and holding.

Do you also predict lottery numbers??



530. Post 11113163 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.11h):

Hmmm why does it feels like China giveth, and China taketh Away. Undecided



531. Post 11122786 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.11h):

Quote from: shmadz on April 18, 2015, 04:40:46 AM

Well, isn't that cute. First wall I ever remember seeing at coinbase.  Shocked


Was non-existent just a few short hours ago... Not sure if bullish.

WOW coinbase is growing up



532. Post 11131853 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on April 19, 2015, 06:58:42 AM
Coin
Explanation


UM ~BTC4k ask wall on finex  Shocked no bueno



533. Post 11208209 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on April 27, 2015, 02:53:04 AM
Blythe Masters... goddess of doom.

11.7k to 200 finex

and 12k to 265 finex....



534. Post 11208312 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Quote from: darlidada on April 27, 2015, 05:17:48 AM
cant you guys see we are making lowers highs and higher lows ? we are 100% going sub 200. every good trader knows that. what we dont know is when.

Then you need to leverage short more, about 12.6k more just on Finex



535. Post 11317164 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on May 08, 2015, 02:18:15 AM
Sorry to interrupt again, but I ran into this "bullish" prediction that I made back in 2014-03-27, when China was bouncing up or down at every PBoC rumor and counter-rumor:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg5940459#msg5940459


The 70 $/BTC did not happen, of course; but please check what that plot says about May 2015...  Grin

Huh i leave for a while and Prof. Stolfi becomes a bull?? Exponential growth from now on? What else did i miss?



536. Post 11317725 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: Chef Ramsay on May 08, 2015, 03:07:22 AM
Seriously, who are the 11 buttfarts that are spacing on sub-180s? I hope they went short on heroin leverage and the fix will never come. I'm just here to say that people should no longer swap coins for current crap interest rates on tha Fin any longer.

HUH? Huh



537. Post 11326697 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on May 09, 2015, 02:05:45 AM
what do we want?

MOON!

when do we want it?

2014  Roll Eyes



538. Post 11335316 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: BayAreaCoins on May 10, 2015, 05:04:59 AM

Good pics look as well as they should and aren't very clean. Can anyone give us a site for sore eyes better than this crap? I don't think so




Yes, yes, yes think we got a winner! Grin



539. Post 11372277 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: Fiat_Hodler on May 14, 2015, 07:11:09 AM
how many coins have been dumped at bfx?
Around 14,300 coins were dumped on bitfinex.

If that many coins were bought, price would be 300+ .



Hmm true, but the lack of volume and buys after the drop is a bit surprising for me. Definitely aligns with the theory of few whales cornering the market  Undecided



540. Post 11389568 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on May 16, 2015, 03:45:32 AM
Absorbing $800k of mining payments (and real associated costs) per day, flat is good.



^ that! Where is that halfing clock



541. Post 11428072 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: vrzo on May 20, 2015, 08:43:50 AM
I sold some bictoins. If the price falls and stays low until autumn - I'm happy because I'll buy the same amount cheaper. If the price rises, I'll be happy because I still own much more than I sold.

No way I could lose unless highly unlikely things happen (bitcoin goes to zero, spikes to $1000 and goes back to $200 before autumn...)

Challenge accepted



542. Post 11437997 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

http://bitcoinclock.com/
Damn THE halving  is still 62 weeks, 19 hours, 10 minutes.
-Oh how about now
Still (62 weeks, 19 hours, 10 minutes)
-Hmm how about now
Ohhhhh (62 weeks, 19 hours)

Now to freeze myself for 62weeks



543. Post 11439355 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: Asrael999 on May 21, 2015, 10:40:04 AM

Its not bullish for bitcoin - it is bullish for crypto adoption. Lawsky knows that the financial services industry will seek to create a replacement for the payments network , ideally (from their perspective) a quasi-walled garden which only authorised participants (banks and payments agents) can access


So the future of crypto is as an inter bank payment network only accessible by a few hundred or thousand players?

I think he'd be out of a job pretty rapidly then. Once it's ticking away nicely that's that.


and as a seperate blockchain for use by a global decentralized stock exchange, and as a tax collection mechanism with tax collection and point of transaction, and a lot of other uses. But there does not need to be one only, and it does not need to be bitcoin, and it does not need to exist yet or be invented in the wild. You think the finance industry doesn't have as many or more smart people than the bitcoin community and cannot see the advantages of the tech, and of the potential competitive threat?
Plenty of places for Lawsky to pocket outrageous consultancy fees before he retires to various board positions with various financial firms advising them how to make a blockchain that is more fit for payments purposes than bitcoin, or for asset management, etc etc.


They surely can hire, do you really think IBM MS Oracle etc... couldn't think of a distributed blockchain before Satoshi? They most probably did but the problem is coming up with a way to monetize on it. Satoshi was the first one to give it up to the public mostly free (minus the blocks he mined at the start).
Step 1 Create blockchain
Step 2 Huh
Step 3 $$$money$$$



544. Post 11451947 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: Wandererfromthenorth on May 26, 2015, 03:33:51 AM
...If you ask me...it's gonna eventually go to double digits...to hold something that is free falling...

Good thing that no one asked you  Roll Eyes And WTF free falling? Have you even looked at the charts, we've pretty much been at the same price point for half a year. Go back in your corner  Angry



545. Post 11461395 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.16h):

Quote from: greenlion on May 27, 2015, 07:22:30 AM
The separation of exchanges into two categories seems to already be starting because of KTC regulations. The most compliant exchanges require so much official paperwork that it's difficult to register at them. The other less scrupulous exchanges are easier to register at but are often accused of running fractional reserves because they are never audited.

bitfinex was audited a year or so ago by a trusted community member (it's about time to do it again).

Just because an exchange doesn't do KYC/AML doesn't mean it can't (or shouldn't) be audited.

I don't think this practice is remotely acceptable for the kind of volume these exchanges go through.

They undoubtedly have the money to hire a proper auditing firm, and I think the only reason they get away with these kinds of substandard practices while still keeping customers is the fact that a meltdown has not happened yet, and regulated exchanges are extremely slow to emerge in the US.

Mt. Gox anyone?



546. Post 11538954 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.16h):

C-C-c-combo break



547. Post 11539038 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.16h):

Quote from: mavericklm on June 05, 2015, 05:15:45 AM
belowe 220$ this weekend? and back up to 225 Huh Huh Huh Huh
 Roll Eyes


BFX hack was pretty limited. OKcoin didn't go belly up (yet) either all those shorters will get squeezed soon, not many cheap coins left for shorting



548. Post 11547166 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.17h):

Quote from: BayAreaCoins on June 06, 2015, 01:30:13 AM

Glad I have all my coins safe at OKcoin Wink Smiley


Haha yep, kinda pointless when you're being warned about EVERY exchange, sooner or later one of them will pop



549. Post 11553927 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.17h):

Quote from: spud21 on June 07, 2015, 12:19:44 AM
What are those huge random buys every once in a while on Finex these days!? It just looks as if someone knows something... The bid side is also fatter than most times.

I noticed brief spikes a few times today on finex, but the bids didn't follow them and the price quickly crashed down after each buying spike. It's like someone was attempting to pump the price but failing.

Looks more like accumulating to me. They're thinning out the ask side, not many coins left for sale at this price point, while bid side is only building up



550. Post 11563350 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.17h):

There goes the green flag? Go go go go...



551. Post 11563694 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.17h):

Quote from: Elwar on June 08, 2015, 08:25:21 AM
What's going on!""?!

I go to sleep and the price is $223 and wake up to $224!!??!!

I will never go to sleep again, this is so exciting!!!?!

Na damn it go back to sleep for another yr or so!! Do you not see a pattern!!?!



552. Post 11571942 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.17h):

Quote from: matt4054 on June 09, 2015, 07:34:54 AM
short term is:
[  ] bullish as fuck
[  ] bullish
[  ] bearish
[  ] bearish as fuck
[✓] boring as fuck

i like watching green candles



553. Post 11580787 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.17h):

Someone is throwing a lot of coins for $230 at Finex. Guess they're looking for that bull that's been known to show up around this time



554. Post 11585988 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.17h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on June 10, 2015, 08:01:00 PM

Let's have some damn progress Winkle twins, I don't want to count donuts on your instagram page boys, I want to count 4 extra zero's at the end of my bitcoin wallet balance.
They're pretty vocal lately, surely this means they're close to announcing something at least mildly positive.


Pretty sure not many people want to see extra zero's n bitcoin balances more than them. Guessing they have a lot of riding on this....



555. Post 11588236 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.17h):

Plz hold your itz happening pics at least until we're back over $1k k? thnx!



556. Post 11780223 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on July 03, 2015, 12:01:46 PM


This looks ... normal



557. Post 11805400 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):

Is it time for a $1k party yet? No? Pffft wake me up when it is...



558. Post 11867217 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: Wolf Rainer on July 13, 2015, 10:34:16 AM
Not sure who is selling now in the low 280's after a 35 dollar drop.

The orderbook and the ferocity of the sell off tells the whole story.

Bottom line if bitcoin holds in the 275-300 range for the next few days then the bull is still ON! Smiley




That does look familiar  Grin



559. Post 11867653 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: herzmeister on July 13, 2015, 11:42:15 AM
yea i think we had exactly those phaces once already

nice, looks like i can sell a bitcoin for ~$1,000,000 in ~2018 and buy one for ~$10 in ~2019

Yeah on second though this implies that we'll go bellow current levels in the future, which i don't foresee



560. Post 11873866 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

That whale that stacked the ask side of the finexs orderbook to 18k hasn't gone anywhere, so there's at least that bitcoin must overcome



561. Post 11890023 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: coinpr0n on July 15, 2015, 10:24:34 PM
What's up with BTC-e being more than $5 below the other USD exchanges? I've been absent a couple days. Did I miss something or are they just ahead of the game? Appreciated.

Spread is actually much bigger now almost $9, think the consensus is that when it happened few days before, someone was cashing out BTC for LTC pump



562. Post 11894701 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: lorylore on July 16, 2015, 02:01:33 PM
going under 200$ Shocked Cheesy Grin

Need to go under 280 first Smiley

EDIT: let's see if the ask walls are real.

Well it just went under 277.12$ - 2.36% from past 14 hours i think. This is a bad thing what is happening ?

The same thing behind every BTC move starts with "Ch", and ends with "na", oh and there's an "i" somewhere in there



563. Post 11912738 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

is btce going under or just recovering from that fat finger market sale?



564. Post 11942271 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: aztecminer on July 22, 2015, 12:39:57 PM
Every day is one day closer to the halving. One day closer to the next ATH. I've started banking my trading profits in BTC instead of dollars. We'll never see $220 again.


please explain.. what is keeping bitcoin from seeing 220 again ?? what is your idea why that is ?? just the halving is the reason why u think that ??

Think halving is huge and undervalued as no currency out there have done anything like that (minus ALTS). Will we see $220 in the meantime is anyone's guess....



565. Post 11981172 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

Quote from: Morecoin Freeman on July 27, 2015, 10:25:49 AM
49

Can you come back at 3? Or better yet 1? Don't think we really need 5 pages of coundowns



566. Post 11990212 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

Quote from: luckygenough56 on July 28, 2015, 09:55:19 AM
where is 300  Huh

pffft where is 3000 that's what i want to know



567. Post 12521398 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Why hello Mr Friday Wall, weekend should be interesting



568. Post 12611666 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

Quote from: findftp on October 05, 2015, 10:55:29 PM
WOW 2.5k wall at 240 on BFX. Prepare moon suits.

Moon suit has been ready for 2 years now

My moon suit is partially eaten by moths...

Damn it can't fit into mine



569. Post 12675052 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

And 250 on Finex. I'll just put a bottle of champagne in the fridge just in case...



570. Post 12739738 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

I want to start seeing those BTC5k market buys Grin



571. Post 12754517 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on October 22, 2015, 10:48:04 AM
I am what I would consider a Bitcoin fanatic. Beyond the idealistic reasons that I choose to use Bitcoin, I have plenty to lose (financially) if Bitcoin drops in value (and plenty to gain if it increases in value). If I am concerned about my ability (as a Bitcoin fanatic) to run a full node with the current anti-spam (has spam been fixed by the way?) 1MB block size limit in place, what is going to happen when the data I need to share with my peers doubles (or increases 8-fold, wtf!)? When Bitcoin fanatics have doubts about running a full node, I would imagine that the robustness of the decentralized network has been harmed.

Yes, I am of the opinion that I absolutely must run a full node to take full advantage of Bitcoin.

The price of bitcoin has been, and still is, determined by the expectation of its demand being high in some future time.  

Until recently, that high future demand was supposed to come from its use as a currency for internet payments.  The current level of use (maybe 5 million USD/day, by optimistic estimates) is too low to produce that demand, by orders of magnitude.  To justify a price of 2500 USD/BTC (say) one would need 100 to 1000 times as much use.  

The current "normal" traffic T, ignoring the recent "stress tests", is about 120'000 tx/day, or about 0.45 MB/block on average; and has doubled in the last 12 months.  That is too close to the effective capacity C of the network, currently ~200'000 tx/day or ~0.80 MB/block. (C is not 1.00 MB/block because of the inevitable empty blocks).

Granted, much of that traffic is not payments (bitcoins changing hands in exchange for other goods and services).  Lots of it is gambling, wallet housekeeping, tumbling, notarizing, testing, and possibly fake traffic meant to give the illusion of increasing adoption.  How much of T is due to those "non-essential" uses?  Guesses vary; my own guess is 90% or more.

But even if 90% of T was "non-essential" and could be eliminated, to get to 2500 USD/BTC one would still need 10 to 100 times more traffic than there is today.  If running a full node is not viable for home users today, it will be quite impossible by then.  In other words, if the proper working of bitcoin depends on home users running full nodes, then bitcoin is not a viable competitor for PayPal or Apple Pay, much less for VISA.

Back to the present, the block size limit would not be such a pressing issue if that "non-essential" traffic were excluded.  IMHO, the best way to do that would be to set a significant fee and a significant minimum transaction value -- say, 0.001 BTC (~0.25 USD) per output.  That is how Charlie Lee solved the spam problem in Litecoin; but his suggestion to the Bitcoin devs to do the same fell on deaf ears.  (So much for the old claim that "Bitcoin will not be superseded by a better altcoin because it can itself incorporate any good features of the latter".)

By my guess, a significant fee and value threshold would reduce T to 1/10 of the present value.  It would also make stress tests and spam attacks much more expensive to the attacker, hence much less likely. (We still haven't seen a real spam attack, but it is estimated that an effective one could be sustained for a couple of days for maybe 100'000 USD/day, or less.)  Note that 0.25 USD/tx is still less than 10% of the per-transaction cost of mining.  On the other hand, it would not prevent the hoped-for 100x or 1000x increase in adoption that would be needed to drive the price up.

Unfortunately, raising the fee is politically impossible, for several reasons.  "No fees" has been a pillar of the "marketing" of bitcoin since the drive for general adoption started in 2013, and is still part of the discourse of important players like Coinbase and BitPay.  A fee raise would probably break gambling compaies like SatoshiDice, and several other companies that are politically powerful in "bitcoin space" (e.g. by sponsoring the "bitcoin media", events, and avertising in mainstream media.)  A large drop in T would also expose the fact that adoption for e-payments is not growing, and probably declining.

A large minimum fee has been opposed also on "ideological" grounds, because it would need some governing body to decide the proper value, and change it from time to time based on the current market price and the state of the economy.  Thus, the small-blockians claim that letting the "fee market" define the fees would be an "ideologically pure" solution.  But the 1 MB block size limit was not chosen for that purpose.  "Market" fees that result from an arbitrary block size limit would be just as arbitrary as fees set directly.  A governing body would still be needed to impose a block size limit, and revise it from time to time, to achieve the best fee and volume numbers.

So, what is the solution?  In my view, there is none; hence my signature.  As most of you know by now, I think that bitcoin should never have been marketed to the general public. It was started a technical experiment to test whether the protocol worked in practice, as it seemed to work in theory; and should have remained such.   The protocol mostly works, but the result is not a viable currency for several problems that were not foreseen.  Fixing those problems seems to require another couple of brilliant inventions, like the PoW blockchain.

Your first mistake (of many) is your assumption that value of assets is based on it's current use, where in actuality especially for small caps 99% of it is based on potential think WhatsAp, twitter etc... The other point is just because you can't think of a solution doesn't mean no one else can. In my opinion raising transaction to 0.25 USD/tx would be equivalent of shooting a fly with a bazooka. But the funny thing is, even in that worst case, I think bitcoin can still prosper.



572. Post 12765367 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: aminorex on October 23, 2015, 03:11:28 PM
won't make 255 on this run, but will continue to trend up for 8-12 days, to a big test at 270.  fails the test.  retraces to 240, then continues up.
Seems legit.  Should make another run past 270 before any drop, though.

Okay, going out on a limb here.  I expect it to decline starting today.  Top is in for the next few weeks, if so.  My 40% alternative scenario is for 3 more weeks going up, touching 300.  I am playing both of these scenarios, with 60/40 allocation, personally.


So you're saying we either go up or down from here? Pure genius



573. Post 12768892 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

There are definitely a lot of coins for sale 



574. Post 12798809 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Sure lots of coins for sale around $300. Didn't see any mining profitability analyses lately but might be the point where mining turns green so they dump all their reserves on open exchanges.   

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on October 27, 2015, 09:25:20 AM

Ok, I'm back.

Let the rally continue!

It's that magic 300 we can't seem to break. I mean in the bigger picture 300 is f**k all but we just can't seem to break it & stay above it.



575. Post 12800913 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Meh looks like it's coming from a finex long swap  Undecided



576. Post 12808286 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Spread between Huobi and finex is growing, China dragging us up again



577. Post 12820924 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on October 29, 2015, 02:18:28 PM
Bears being ridiculed - check
Predictions of 30,000usd btc - check
Feelings of Euphoria - check
Train pics - some what lacking?

Conclusion : not yet time to sell but close

Euphoria is far away, i think we are seeing hopefulness, a renewed sense of optimism could catapult bitcoin much higher IMO. once the trend has seen a few good corrections but is still trending up ( 3 months away? ) we could see a real DASH for Digital Cash. then the world might take a second look, and they will see a different picture than when they first heard about it that's for sure.
we are all set gentleman



We only hit like a 30% of all time high, i think euphoria is far far away



578. Post 12822604 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Wow some bear just went full retard on finex! Shocked Time to squeeze them shorts?? Grin



579. Post 12822697 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: hdbuck on October 29, 2015, 05:00:25 PM
Wow some bear just went full retard on finex! Shocked Time to squeeze them shorts?? Grin

15k dump for roughly a 7$ spread.

You mean someone just bought BTC15k with just a $7 spread?? And China doesn't care, very balls unless you have some insider info.



580. Post 12822781 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: ImI on October 29, 2015, 05:06:53 PM
ltc, lol..

 Shocked

any reason?

Probably used as a tool to arb



581. Post 12822973 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Not sure if there're enough coins on Finex's ask side to cover the short burning. This has potential to be fun



582. Post 12829747 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Just wanted to point out that that BTC5k short hasn't been covered yet. Rates are going up and the price too how long can he last... Grin



583. Post 12838966 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: xxxxxzzzzz on October 31, 2015, 08:59:47 AM
Just thought I'd point out the current CNY USD rate , per today according to http://www.bloomberg.com/quote/USDCNY:CUR , to dispel any notion that the chinese exchanges are not running at a +$25 differential to the western exchanges as a result of a not updated exchange rate on bitcoinwisdom and whatever other btc price trackers are being used - yes it's true the CNY has devalued somewhat the past couple days/weeks , but , they are indeed trading at ~$350 USD per current spot rate (2215 / 6.3174 = $350.62) at time of this post. The CNY would have to be devalued by roughly 9% additionally VS USD (a rate of 6.8154) to be considered to be trading at an equivalent price. Since a 9% devaluation overnight of the CNY is highly unlikely to say the least , it's up to the western exchanges to catch up at this point to their $350 (or at least we should have pretty good justification not to dump alongside the chinese exchanges , which are in fact most certainly already trading at a significantly higher rate).
Despite this, the exchanges seem to move in lockstep, which is weird.

Agreed - very very strange to have such a huge discrepancy , at almost a double digit % difference , and yet still each $ amount up or down on the huobi and okcoin rate seems to instigate an immediate same $ amount up or down difference elsewhere. Think I'll now bother to get around to go ahead and setup an account with either huobi or okcoin , figure out the most efficient means of changing CNY to USD and getting it back into BTC (btce? another forex exchange? suggestions on best way to change cny to usd?) , and slush as much arbitrage back and forth as my funds will allow for (and frankly I'm baffled as to why everyone isn't doing this already - surely such a discrepancy is far greater than exchange rate fees to convert CNY to USD and move it back into an exchange to buy more BTC at current USD rates per stamp finex coinbase btce). I would have expected the gap to be closed much faster with a loss on the chinese exchanges and gain on the western exchanges by now , resulting in a "true" rate of something like $340 from where we are now after ~$10 down ~$10 up respectively.

That's called an arb and a lot of people are doing it. If there's a large spread between exchanges that means either 1) The difference is the cost of getting the money into higher exchange or 2) temporary anomaly e.g. when arber's funds run out due to fast moving market. It usually take few days to move fiat back, i say wait till next week the gap should close.



584. Post 12856063 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

FYI the BTC6k finex short from Thursday is in red and paying ~BTC4 or $1300 DAILY to maintain it  Cry



585. Post 12861918 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

The finex BTC6k short still hasn't been covered. Ask side looks very thin need more coins on exchanges or this can go full retard  Shocked



586. Post 12863054 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 02, 2015, 10:42:26 PM
Do you have a better explanation?  I don't see any news or rumor that could explain it.

I just posted the explanation Stolfinator.  When something like 70% of coins have been mined, price has already hit the bottom as evidenced from the last year, and the upside potential is listed below, we haven't witnessed anything close to a bubble yet:

Incoming $163,000,000,000 market cap and $7700 coins

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1235466.0

Well, six months ago 68% of the coins were already mined.  Why wasn't the price ~$340 back then? 

Didn't investor know then that, within six months, 70% of the coins would be mined?

Whatever the cause for the rally, one thing you should keep in mind: every penny of profit that a bitcoin investor makes can only come from the pocket of another bitcoin investor...

Pretty sure that's how gold works too and looks it's been around for ages



587. Post 12869138 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: gentlemand on November 03, 2015, 01:08:50 PM

But what then? At Bitstamp is looks very less resistants after $400.

401?

402?

That's crazy talk.

Exactly it's $400.01 Duhh



588. Post 12873788 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on November 03, 2015, 08:10:19 PM
this shorter is going all in
What shorter? There's only 9300 BTC swaps on BFX. It's just a seller. 

BTW, thanks bulls. I just made so much money shorting today, that I can dump again if you wanna take another swipe at $420.



That's funny i can say the same thing about shorters. Thanks for that 400+ bump  Grin



589. Post 12875807 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Pretty sure China wants to keep going up



590. Post 12881080 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Huh just realized that Whoboy (whoboye Hunday Huobi  Huh) already hit $500 at that 3188 spike



591. Post 12881267 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: yolalanda on November 04, 2015, 11:35:29 AM
Bitcoin price doubles

Bitcoiners cheer as Humanity mourns

I expect an updated Wile E Coyote gif out of you in 5..4..3..2..



592. Post 12881559 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 04, 2015, 12:27:45 PM
new money (MMM) doesn't care about altcoins.

Then could anyone explain why Litecoin is rising too?  it went from 20 to 35 CNY (+75%) in the last week, while bitcoin rose from 2100 to 3150 (+50%).

From August to mid-October the two were almost in lockstep at first. LTC seems to lag behind at times, but overall it is still tracking BTC.

It's hard enough to guestimate BTC moves are you seriously asking for explanation on as asset that has a market cap of only $200MM



593. Post 12946224 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: Swordsoffreedom on November 11, 2015, 10:29:55 AM
BTCChina slightly below Bitfinex, if someone said this to me few days ago, I would not believe it Cheesy


they are all united now. epic launching pad in the making.  Cheesy



What the Chinese exchanges finally are trading at similar trading ranges to Finex
That is a bit surprising considering the variances for so long, must be that ponzi had to say it lol.


Just means that Chinese are cashing out now



594. Post 12948638 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on November 11, 2015, 03:45:28 PM
Imagine if you bought in at 500 thinking 'this is it'.
I imagine some of us have to do less imagining than others Cheesy
I've been investing for just under 6 months & have so far amassed 8.75 BTC, I bought most of my coins when the price was around £350 (GBP)

That was a long time ago.

It got a lot worse than that when I was buying at those kind of prices.
I just about broke even on average with my whole stash when we hit £240 GBP the other week because I've been buying all the way down.
Now it's down to £205 GBP so we're talking thousands of pounds down again.
(I usually talk in USD as most people here do but I am British).

Sigh

Thinking about selling some (for the 1st time ever) next time we have an upwards move.

Imagineif you bought in at $1200 and are still hodling...



595. Post 12992457 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: TReano on November 17, 2015, 12:36:33 AM
The extreme opposite viewpoint is that there is demand for 25BTC/block * 6block/hr * 24hr/day * $320/BTC = $1,152,000 worth of BTC per day. This $1.15 M demand may stay the same across the halving. This would indicate an equal value. In such a case, the new equilibrium price would be $640.

Granted, the truth will likely be somewhere in between.

Of course, I am of the opinion that BTC is drastically undervalued today. But that's just, like, my opinion, man.

No way is the price going to double at the point of the having though. It will climb in the leadup to the halving which will result in more hashing power being brought online which will cause the difficulty to increase. Now, it's possible that the price will climb enough, faster than hashing power is added that there will be enough profit to not encourage miners to switch off and there may be some other factors as well but there's nothing solid.

also what most people don't know is, the current price always contains ALL information currently available. This includes the next reward halving, the current possibility of mass adoption, the current possibility of current total failure etc. etc.


The price does not reflect the current price of something it is always reflects the speculation of future prices which drives it. This is the same for all Forex / Commodities / Stock-Markets...

Halving is just a reason to be a reason to pump&dump BTC just like it happened everytime at the altcoin market / btc / ltc halving in the past.

Well no, not true, the possibility of bitcoin blowing up before the halving is also priced in. As is China banning bitcoins tomorrow, or NSA cracking crypto, or Satoshi coming back and starting dumping his stash etc, etc, etc. This is still a low cap asset so at this stage as we see by high volatility short term events have much greater impact on the price. (Arguably) BTC's future is still uncertain. So everyday that passes where BTC doesn't spontaneously combusts and holds value is another negatively priced event that's chipped off.



596. Post 13023551 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: aztecminer on November 20, 2015, 03:20:46 PM
how is the big EU 'lets pretend we are against bitcoin' meeting going ?? i think that exchange that is not allowing withdrawals might be about to collapse .. if it collapses then there may be potential the collapse could trigger other weak exchanges to collapse in the dominoes of 'too big too fail' bitcoin exchanges implosions .. this could cause the chinese to panic and Huobi to shut down so it can drop its bags. the next 24 hours is critical! BTC


Are you saying that bitcoin might die Shocked ... again?



597. Post 13023704 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: cbeast on November 20, 2015, 03:26:16 PM
Are you saying that bitcoin might die Shocked ... again?
Bitcoin price is barely over the 2013 high now that we are going into 2016 soon. Aside from some gasps and fraudulent manipulations, it looks like it's going down for good.

So if you think that BTC is dead for good now at $320, you must of thought that it was REALLY REALLY really dead 101% for sure when it was trading at $230 for like a year before that.  Roll Eyes



598. Post 13025442 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: ssmc2 on November 20, 2015, 07:17:37 PM
Test of $310 incoming

Lots of support in China dunno we saw what they could do leading us up to 500



599. Post 13062625 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: chesthing on November 25, 2015, 03:24:36 AM
3500 new bitcorns being created every day. Who's gonna buy this shit over the next few months at $300+? I'm gonna sit on the sidelines and watch for awhile.

Maybe same people who've been buying them for past few years  Roll Eyes



600. Post 13062925 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: chesthing on November 25, 2015, 03:39:21 AM
3500 new bitcorns being created every day. Who's gonna buy this shit over the next few months at $300+? I'm gonna sit on the sidelines and watch for awhile.

Maybe same people who've been buying them for past few years  Roll Eyes

Ah, so those who bought these coins at pennies are now buying them at $300+. Thanks Einstein, I get it now.

BTC didn't cost pennies for over few years now. How often do you experience this time loss?? Perhaps a visit to a doc is in order?



601. Post 13075644 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Wonder what made those BTC5k shorts to close so soon  Huh wasn't time to burn them just yet



602. Post 13088659 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: vibroking on November 28, 2015, 12:00:18 AM
http://bitcoinclock.com/

bitcoin cost of production doubles on or around 23.07.2016 ... the floor price will get raised in proportion, one way or another.


Bitcoin cost of production just went up 10.44% on the 24th, and will go up by 12.18% in just 9 days. That's almost half of what the block reward halving will do Smiley

@shorts will be homeless: stop being such a rude faggot.

difficulty and average (network-wide) cost of production is not directly related, but it is closely related ... tech. advances and cost of tech. development come into it also.

Given the same specific processor hardware, yes, cost of production and difficulty are directly related.

Reward halving  is no different from doubling hashrate. If you disagree, feel free to explain the difference.

@shorts will be homeless: Remember making you my bitch a while ago. I see you still haven't taken that coke bottle out of your ass, why is that?

For real?? Didn't ignore this nick yet but let me entertain this.
Halving = supply is reduced by half, thus with constant demand basic laws of economics suggest upward pressure.
Doubling hashrate=improvement in technology and has no effect on supply of BTC whatsoever. Any more Qs?



603. Post 13105974 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on November 29, 2015, 11:00:17 PM
Bitfinex swaps are up a lot in last 2 days... Same is with swaps rate.

Yeah bothers me too, money is coming from leveraged longs



604. Post 13152694 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Hmm weekend should be interesting



605. Post 13161488 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: ImI on December 06, 2015, 01:30:48 AM
Remember boys sell at a gain, don't get caught with your pants down cause this will bust.



Lol yeah my thoughts are exactly



606. Post 13161929 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Well, cmon finx 401 you can do it...



607. Post 13162502 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

China's buying up all the coins again  Angry
And Finex longs are going full retard  Shocked



608. Post 13168161 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: Frost on December 06, 2015, 07:59:15 PM
Woke up and see the price still near 400, that's insane.  Roll Eyes

I know wtf was expecting $450 by now



609. Post 13168430 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: croxx on December 06, 2015, 08:42:30 PM
bitcoin really looks bullish to me.
will be much higher (600 dollar plus) before the halfing in my opinion.

Yeah looks like they shook out all the coins they could at $400 even bearstamp is catching up



610. Post 13175634 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: nioc on December 07, 2015, 04:17:45 PM
Why cant it break the $400 finally?

do you have any doubt that it will?

Problem is when everyone thinks that it'll go up they start going full retard on leveraged longs as evidenced on finex. When longs go full retard you gonna have a bad time



611. Post 13176712 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: simon28 on December 07, 2015, 06:13:42 PM
Why cant it break the $400 finally?

do you have any doubt that it will?

Problem is when everyone thinks that it'll go up they start going full retard on leveraged longs as evidenced on finex. When longs go full retard you gonna have a bad time

How does that work? Does a whale wait until there are 90% leveraged longs and 10% leveraged shorts, then put a giant short on, then dump so hard it calls all the leveraged longs? Is that why there was a massive spike down by $20 on bitfinex last night?

Short answer is nobody knows and those spikes could be caused by many things.
In the last two days people borrowed ~ $2MM on finex and bought BTC with it. So roughly BTC5k were bought on borrowed funds which needs to be repaid back. So what seems like a natural growth and a rise in demand (to a degree) is just someone speculating. Speculators have to pay interest on borrowed funds, and the more they borrow the higher the interest gets. Market knows this and when leverage gets out of control the domino effect causes a (usually a violent) correction. As far as what are those break points or even how much effect that leverage has on say Chinese volumes is the name of the game



612. Post 13176761 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: urpapersplz on December 07, 2015, 06:41:31 PM
How does that work?
It doesn't work.
The problem with retarded dumpsters and dollar cultists is that they can't buy same amount of bitcoins they've dumped without triggering panic buy and a new top! They simply can't print bitcoins in the way they print fiat.

So what you're telling me is shorters are actually Good For Bitcoin?

Leverage should provide more stability...until it doesn't then we get fireworks and leverage acts as fuel for a bomb or afterburners for the moon rocket depending on your perspective. And everyone likes rockets. So yes i enjoy watching shorts burn, wish there'd be more of them lately  Cry



613. Post 13190001 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

The fact that someone's throwing walls @ 420 shows how mature BTC is  Cheesy yeah we got a lot of growing to do



614. Post 13190938 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: gentlemand on December 09, 2015, 03:54:59 AM
And here's why it pays to stay under the radar, kids - http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/dec/09/bitcoin-founder-craig-wrights-home-raided-by-australian-police

Whoa that's messed up on many levels. Hope he didn't really put it all in a trust controlled by a lawyer friend, who might be obligated to give up trust assets to the state? Or plot thickens of the elaborated hoax



615. Post 13212540 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Ahh just like good old times  Grin



616. Post 13218929 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

That BTC6k green 1min candle on Hooboy  Shocked !!  waiting for a BTC22MM candle one day



617. Post 13221651 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: Chalidore Phoenix on December 12, 2015, 03:47:21 AM
2 million $ worth of longs added on bitfinex in the last 12 hrs, total near $26.5 mil . Shorts below 8k btc.

If that isn't a recipe for a crash, I don't know what is. When the price starts dropping, there will be margin calls.
I will admit, I shouldn't have sold at 450. I should have waited for 465-470. That doesn't change the fact that this leverage fueled rally is not sustainable, and will end with a massive move downward. Get out now, or lose all your gains.

What exchange are your bids on?

finex
Why do you ask?

Oh ffs. That's just rude. Did you do that?
Give an old soldier a fucking break already!
Fuck you guys. I'm gonna smoke a joint, drink some whiskey, and decide on my next move. I really don't want to eat this loss.

Yes yes best way to trade. Or will it collapse right after you cover?!?  Shocked Am i in your head yet?   Cheesy



618. Post 13221724 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Weeeeee



619. Post 13221801 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

BTC you psycho good to see you back. Someone wake up Adam



620. Post 13222095 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on December 12, 2015, 04:45:37 AM
Ok, all BFX longs wrecked, now we proceed to $10,000.
all $25 million  in longs? Not even close. not yet. What's more, there were only 7K BTC shorts to cover. We're flying blind until bfxdata.com is back up, but there's no way all those longs got rekt or we'd be in the $200s.

Hate to disappoint everyone but longs are still at $26MM hard little critters to squash
https://www.bitfinex.com/pages/stats



621. Post 13222674 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on December 12, 2015, 05:37:36 AM
Ok, all BFX longs wrecked, now we proceed to $10,000.
all $25 million  in longs? Not even close. not yet. What's more, there were only 7K BTC shorts to cover. We're flying blind until bfxdata.com is back up, but there's no way all those longs got rekt or we'd be in the $200s.

Hate to disappoint everyone but longs are still at $26MM hard little critters to squash
https://www.bitfinex.com/pages/stats

That's not disappointing at all! More longs to get squeezed. Forced liquidation in the middle of a crash causes a margin call cascade and i get cheap coinz. 20K more to dump is all it would take.

We went from $475 to $402 and barely any longs were squeezed!!  Shocked Shorts are so tight they burn when we move up $10 feel something else is at play here.

I am surprised someone didn't dump the remaining $2 to put us under $400 would maybe see some cascades then  Huh



622. Post 13222762 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: TERA on December 12, 2015, 07:30:50 AM
...

bfx longs aren't exactly at an all time high. In Jul 2014 they were all the way at $32M, and this was back when bfx did ONE TENTH of the volume that it does now. Just this is suspicious to me.

Yeah odd don't see much volume happening at that time too. Maybe something funny inside finex



623. Post 13241113 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Where did that ~$1.5MM in BFX longs go!?!? Did i miss something?



624. Post 13241230 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on December 14, 2015, 04:24:42 AM
Where did that ~$1.5MM in BFX longs go!?!? Did i miss something?

Borrowed doesn't necessarily mean used...?

That dump earlier was pretty underwhelming.

Currency    Flash Return Rate    Total sum of active margin funding    Total amount used in margin positions
USD    0.0531%    25,395,106.54    24,946,110.62

https://www.bitfinex.com/pages/stats

It was only $400k in unused longs



625. Post 13251074 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

http://hypron.net/bitcoinwisdom.html

This Domain Name Has Expired - Renewal Instructions.

da faq? Where else can  i view 4 exchanges on one screen?



626. Post 13252504 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: TERA on December 15, 2015, 06:51:40 AM


I'm sorry. How can anyone be comfortable with the walls looking like THIS? Before the last rally from $375 to $475, a huge wall base built up and the bids looked 3x bigger than the asks. Now it just looks like it could go for another Friday. Longs are also even higher than before at $27.1M

One word China. $27MM longs at ~24%/yr with only BTC6k in shorts! Yet we keep going up... It's not a one exchange player anymore. That's not to say Finex won't flash crash to shed those longs :/



627. Post 13264791 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Whoa that was beautiful on finex



628. Post 13359305 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Is bitcoin dead?  Shocked



629. Post 13481980 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: DieJohnny on January 08, 2016, 05:01:02 AM
can anyone get onto btce?
afaik this is the longest its ever been offline.

Nope been trying....

Was about to ask if they went full gox  Huh any news from them at all?



630. Post 13482050 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on January 08, 2016, 05:11:09 AM
can anyone get onto btce?
afaik this is the longest its ever been offline.

Nope been trying....

Was about to ask if they went full gox  Huh any news from them at all?

They provided detailed reassurance 3 hours ago.




Cool. Thnx



631. Post 13554487 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: Andre# on January 14, 2016, 10:35:55 PM
I'm not sure if you guys have read this yet but it's crazy...

Mike Hearn's exit mic drop

I find it tough to dispute his arguments. It's getting close to fork or die time...

https://medium.com/@octskyward/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-experiment-dabb30201f7#.m7ipd85nk



The Bitcoin Believer Who Gave Up

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/17/business/dealbook/the-bitcoin-believer-who-gave-up.html?_r=0


Good that should keep the pressure on the price a tad bit longer till the halfing



632. Post 13555388 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: tomothy on January 14, 2016, 09:42:51 PM
I'm not sure if you guys have read this yet but it's crazy...

Mike Hearn's exit mic drop

I find it tough to dispute his arguments. It's getting close to fork or die time...

https://medium.com/@octskyward/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-experiment-dabb30201f7#.m7ipd85nk

Quote
"...if decentralisation is what makes Bitcoin good, and growth threatens decentralisation, then Bitcoin should not be allowed to grow.

Honestly it's hard to disagree with this statement. Growing now at a cost of centralization is very short sighted. I do believe that centralization is Bitcoins' Achilles' heel. Now how much centralization would a 2MB or an 8MB block cause that can be debated. Don't really get the end of the world catastrophe just yet. Lets get SegWit in there, and bump blocks to 2MB to be extra conservative, and have a sidechain do 0 confs, then we party!



633. Post 13555489 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on January 15, 2016, 01:38:56 AM
If you double the blocksize, you also double the fees miners get paid without increasing the rate at all!
This might increase the cost of mining by some tiny fraction but nowhere near 100%. So let's be generous and say 2MB blocks will cost miners 110% of 1 MB Blocks.

So how about this calculation:

scenario A: 12.5BTCblockreward+3BTCxactionfees=15.5 BTCminerreward

scenario B: (12.5BTCblockreward+6BTCxactionfees)/1.1=16.818BTCminerreward

And that doesn't even factor in the very likely probability that BTC exchange rate will go up significantly due to the added utility.

So why do miners object? Could it be that they will get no reward at all because they are mining over a slow internet connection (through TOR or behind the Great Firewall) that means they cannot compete with miners with faster connections?

All the other objections are just to obscure this one. The real one. Forget the decentralization argument. Forget the "any hard fork is too radical" rationalization. These are not honest people and they are taking wealth, not making wealth.



Maybe cause they want to show solidarity and are hoping for an organic growth of the core without intensifying the fighting and splitting in pro/against camps  Roll Eyes  imagine what would that do to a price



634. Post 13555696 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on January 15, 2016, 02:12:38 AM
If you double the blocksize, you also double the fees miners get paid without increasing the rate at all!
This might increase the cost of mining by some tiny fraction but nowhere near 100%. So let's be generous and say 2MB blocks will cost miners 110% of 1 MB Blocks.

So how about this calculation:

scenario A: 12.5BTCblockreward+3BTCxactionfees=15.5 BTCminerreward

scenario B: (12.5BTCblockreward+6BTCxactionfees)/1.1=16.818BTCminerreward

And that doesn't even factor in the very likely probability that BTC exchange rate will go up significantly due to the added utility.

So why do miners object? Could it be that they will get no reward at all because they are mining over a slow internet connection (through TOR or behind the Great Firewall) that means they cannot compete with miners with faster connections?

All the other objections are just to obscure this one. The real one. Forget the decentralization argument. Forget the "any hard fork is too radical" rationalization. These are not honest people and they are taking wealth, not making wealth.



Maybe cause they want to show solidarity and are hoping for an organic growth of the core without intensifying the fighting and splitting in pro/against camps  Roll Eyes  imagine what would that do to a price

They are showing solidarity with each other, but open hostility to their customers, the users, the holders, the companies and the people that have done the most to promote Bitcoin. That is not how successful business is done.

"organic" growth is a stalling term. There's nothing organic about an arbitrary cap imposed by a cabal of sidechain peddlers and miners with slow connections.  The DDOS attacks and censorship wasn't decreasing the fighting.  Those tactics were used EXCLUSIVELY used by smallblockers.  

Again still think that's better than two (or more) waring factions trying to convince more people to stick to their chain



635. Post 13555717 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 15, 2016, 02:29:37 AM
If you double the blocksize, you also double the fees miners get paid without increasing the rate at all!
This might increase the cost of mining by some tiny fraction but nowhere near 100%. So let's be generous and say 2MB blocks will cost miners 110% of 1 MB Blocks.

So how about this calculation:

scenario A: 12.5BTCblockreward+3BTCxactionfees=15.5 BTCminerreward

scenario B: (12.5BTCblockreward+6BTCxactionfees)/1.1=16.818BTCminerreward

And that doesn't even factor in the very likely probability that BTC exchange rate will go up significantly due to the added utility.

So why do miners object? Could it be that they will get no reward at all because they are mining over a slow internet connection (through TOR or behind the Great Firewall) that means they cannot compete with miners with faster connections?

All the other objections are just to obscure this one. The real one. Forget the decentralization argument. Forget the "any hard fork is too radical" rationalization. These are not honest people and they are taking wealth, not making wealth.



Maybe cause they want to show solidarity and are hoping for an organic growth of the core without intensifying the fighting and splitting in pro/against camps  Roll Eyes  imagine what would that do to a price



Maybe also there is a sense that "if it's not broke, then why fix it?"







Not broke ... yet. Don't think anyone can argue that 1MB 3tps is sustainable.



636. Post 13556737 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: lottery248 on January 15, 2016, 04:08:52 AM

i guess the collapse from the cryptsy led to this kind of the bitcoin price decrease. anyone? would you sell your bitcoin right now? it could be an effect of the bitcoin price, beware.
FYI regarding the cryptsy, there are some of the probable phishing site like cryptsy refund.

Nope just a Finex long squeeze. They try to time it with some bad news to magnify the effect.



637. Post 13557958 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-14/goldman-says-it-will-settle-u-s-mortgage-probe-for-5-1-billion

Do tell me how you feel that bitcoin is overvalued



638. Post 13559172 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: flagpara on January 15, 2016, 10:12:48 AM
Can't he say what he thinks?
I don't see anything wrong in what he's saying. BTC is really shady he's right on that. Users don't have any correct informations you can't deny that.
So after spending countless years of his life working with Bitcoin, a few months after his departure Bitcoin is dead? Please.  Roll Eyes If you defend such a person you are not any better than him. Bitcoin is not that shady, especially not since there's no Silk Road equivalent. Stop your gibberish.

I don't understand the hate, he's someone who worked on btc and thinks it's a failure and warned people about it, is it a reason to hate him?
Because he's a paid bulldog who backstabbed the community with this article. Should we love him for it?  Roll Eyes

not really news ... we already knew hearn is a bitcoin hater and saboteur, except for the NYTimes readers who will no doubt lap up Hucksters Hearn's soundbites for the sheeple
That is the problem of this story, NYTimes and the sheep that are going to believe this nonsense or defend him. It has already reflected itself on the price (incl. news about Cryptsy).

Seems we won't be able to discuss. You don't seem to understand the position of someone who is not informed. Most people don't have the time to spend hundreds of hours to understand exactly how everything works and who's in charge of what.

"You're not better than him if you defend Hearn" You don't understand. I don't know who he is, he just doesn't seem like somebody bad.

Bitcoin IS incredibly shady in the sense that normal people have no idea of what's happening, what's currently developped, who's in charge of what, what can or can't be done etc...
I'm not talking about drugs or anything that something else. I'm talking about how btc works and will evolve. You're all talking about "bitcoin core" "bitcoin XT" "forks" and things like that. I've no idea of what it is, and I'm an engineer which means i got some basis in science... So btc IS shady in the sense that a small percentage of users actually understand it.

He shouldn't have declared bitcoin as dead. And should NOT have said that he's selling all his bitcoins. There are good reasons why people in control are not allowed to do that on exchanges. Everything else he can vent as much as he wants



639. Post 13565302 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: becoin on January 15, 2016, 08:08:43 PM
Price is dropping because Bitcoin Classic hardfork is being priced in.
Market is telling us what is good for bitcoin and what is bad.

Consenus = good, disagreement = bad. It is quiet that simple, just the nature of open project makes things much more over blown and should not be priced in as much as say a disagreement between the CEO and the board, as i feel it is now.



640. Post 13565607 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: Post-Cosmic on January 15, 2016, 08:26:08 PM


...blah blah large font...


...To save Bitcoin we must execute a benevolent, temporary 51% attack on Chinese pools and/or vote to change Core to blacklist them (or use any similar method, I don't know - I'm not a programmer ;3) to 'force' Chinese monopolistic miners OUT OF THEIR DDOS'ING, SELF-INTERESTED, CHINESE-WALL+AUTHORITARIAN-REGIME-PROBLEMATIC MAJORITY.

...If Bitcoin is to succeed, CHINA MUST GO.

...even if that concedes a certain unfortunate 'central planning' cost for the greater good of safeguarding Decentralized Trustlessness...


Your logic and use of large fonts in attempt to further your point makes me think you're 16? Not sure where to even start on this but i'll just say that vigilante can be a solution to an international payment system as much as 'central planning' can be a solution to decentralization. Thankfully the badger doesn't care.



641. Post 13567356 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: rolling on January 16, 2016, 12:17:58 AM
This block thing needs to be solved once and for all now and never addressed again. "The Last Hardfork".

Anything less than that and Bitcoin will fail.

It's this kind of thinking of getting a silver bullet rather than an ongoing  process that gets us in trouble



642. Post 13570415 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: podyx on January 16, 2016, 08:07:31 AM
Anyone worrying?

HODLED through $230s so just enjoying the show



643. Post 13700632 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: dropt on January 28, 2016, 05:24:45 AM
Who has been holding from $502, $475, $465, and $428? 

You have.  How are those losses treating you?  Cheesy


Pffft been holding since 1200 beat that



644. Post 13700848 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 28, 2016, 05:46:21 AM
Who has been holding from $502, $475, $465, and $428? 

You have.  How are those losses treating you?  Cheesy


Pffft been holding since 1200 beat that


Hahahahaha..

I'm really curious about your personal situation, because many times when people attempt to describe the existence of $1,200 hodlers, I frequently argue that such a creature does not exist except in a hypothetical form. 

My argument, in part is that no one would really buy bitcoins at $1,200 and then sit on them for more than 2 years and still be holding BTC averaging $1,200.

Take my case, for example, the very first coin that I bought was $1,200 (that is 1.24BTC at $1,500).  That was the most expensive BTC that I have bought, to date.  Surely, hypothetically, my 1.24 BTC has never been sold, but I continued to buy and sell btc and today, my average cost per BTC is considerably lower than $1,200 and my BTC holdings is considerably higher than 1.24.


Anyhow, I would appreciate if you would elaborate a little bit about your $1,200 BTC holding(s), if you don't mind.






Well yeah i'm being a bit dramatic. I didn't say my average is 1200, just like you bought a coin for $1200 and its been sitting in cold storage since then  Grin



645. Post 13708699 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on January 28, 2016, 10:56:12 PM
let me say it again


 less than 380, NEVER AGAIN.



Still stand by that call?  I think there is a one hundred and eleventeen percent chance that you are wrong.  I will bet my last satoshi on it.


There you go... not making sense, again....  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Huh?  He was right, though? went to 379 briefly about 10 mins later....

Now Stamp is under as well. My last satoshi is safe.

Thought everyone is following btc-e now  Cheesy



646. Post 13710226 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

BFX looks confused  Undecided



647. Post 13746665 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Were all 6 of the last blocks found by F2Pool  Shocked



648. Post 13748007 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 01, 2016, 11:32:36 PM
You've been Four Punch Raided, boys and girls.

Google turns up four results for "four punch raid". Wanna ELI5?

Is it SFW?

Just something that Billy came up with
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=956051.0



649. Post 13748084 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: coins101 on February 02, 2016, 12:35:45 AM
I opened a big leveraged short at 394.  I don't see how things are going to go up until the block size debate is resolved.  Or at the very least there is no longer a looming threat of a hard fork.  

This isn't JUST a hard for but a reshuffling of the powers that be in core who are being paid by a private company to fund bitcoin (imo this entire debacle can be traced back to the foundation going belly up on funding development).

Until the two camps are united, core compromises on 2mb blocks or everyone in the community (exchanges etc) change their mind I see the drift downward as inevitable.

I do live in eternal fear of core announcing 2mb blocks and losing it all.  But I'm betting that if they haven't done it yet they aren't going to until hard fork is inevitable.





jk
I actually laughed  Grin



650. Post 13857114 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: cbeast on February 12, 2016, 04:04:49 AM
Monkey reports in: Monkey thinks the next week could be uppish, but is generally skeptical out until mid-March, then bullish on the multi-month scale.

This time, I think I agree, but whatevs.


year of the monkey hasn't officially started yet has it?


What am i looking at here?



651. Post 13878955 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Hidde ask wall on Finex at $400. Let's see how big it is  Grin



652. Post 13911810 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Is it starting? We still got 5 months to go



653. Post 13924723 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: craked5 on February 18, 2016, 09:29:25 AM

EVERYONE wants bigger blocks, except for these guys, and it's not because they are all knowing gods and know what's best for us. there are many poeple that understand the nitty gritty details who agree bigger blocks is safe.


From what I saw it seems like bigger block is at least canted by all users. It's the miners who don't want it?

A split at fork (having two blockchains) would be detrimental to the price. Miners know that and will try to avoid a full out war unless they're 99% confident that majority will follow. But portion of miners profit comes from the fees and with the halfing coming up that portion will get even more significant. So naturally they're bias for bigger blocks, as that means more profit from fees.

Coinbase and the like already have their business plan set up and want to show returns yesterday. So they want everything and right MEOW!!

Majority of users are also too short sighted. They want to be able to send $0.05 of internet magic money to each other and feel that BTC in the current implementation must be able to support it. Since it's coming to it's capacity the "logical" thing is to upgrade to new bigger capacity version like they do with their phones and computers.

Core devs are the geek engineers and are the ones that need to be 99.9% sure that updates don't introduce more attack vectors, make BTC more centralized etc... Mining pools are driven by market profits so it's not something  that can easily be tested in the lab.

tl;dr
Engineers-we need more time to make sure it won't blow up.
Managers-we have delivery deadlines, this beta release should be good enough and we'll just patch it later.
Early users/consumers-WTF my iPhone 19c is out of memory, oh apple just released 20s with double the space time to buy more.    



654. Post 13924800 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Boom BTC3K market buy on Finex. Been too long since i've seen those.



655. Post 13939149 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: bargainbin on February 19, 2016, 03:45:40 PM
[...] Visa, Paypal and the Banks, charge ridiculously high amount of money for fees, in what actually cost them peanuts due to the efficiency of centralized databases.

For example Paypal charges 0.35 fixed plus 2-3% of the amount. Their cost for making the tx happen is ridiculously low because they have a centralized database, not an inefficient P2P / Decentralized implementation. [...]

This is where confusion comes in. Visa & PP aren't charging you for sending a verifiable, difficult-to-counterfeit digital packet. They're charging you for their services -- mediating disputes, chargebacks when enlightened counterparty fails to send you the stuff you've paid for, etc. Shit BTC simply can not, and thus doesn't, offer.

True but what if you're just sending a gift or don't need/want their added services? If i buy a coffee i don't really care to pay 3% for a possibility to chargeback, if i'm buying a house i'll be relying on contracts to make sure i get what i want. if i'm buying something off the ebay maybe i can find a cheaper escrow service than 3%



656. Post 13952497 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 20, 2016, 07:02:38 PM
anything below 460 1200 is pure GOLD

There, fixed



657. Post 13957856 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

No many coins for sale left on finex. If China breaks 3000 this could turn in a firework



658. Post 13957871 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 21, 2016, 08:12:26 AM
Shmadz, BJA: to comment on double spend risks. You both seem to have missed some details.

Yeah, but China has ~75% hashpower, not 50%.  winning three bets in a row with 75% odds is a 42% chance, a heluva lot higher than 6.25%

If you have 75% of the hashrate, your success rate with double-spends is 100%, since you are guaranteed to be building the longest chain. Sure, 25% of the blocks will not be built by you, but you have the power to discard those from the blockchain. I'd guess a double-spend in this kind of scenario would probably be best achieved by willingly orphaning the blocks containing the tx  you want to re-spend. So the situation, if you assume Chinese miners are all in collusion, is actually worse than BJA is saying.

OTOH, honest miners aren't the only protection against double spends. simple race attacks can be detected by any sufficiently connected node. That won't help against dishonest miners, but the kind of attack a majority miner could pull off seems pretty problematic in terms of financial gains. The attack would be detected too quickly for the miner to exchange their BTC for other assets and take delivery of said assets, so any profits would be counted in BTC. And what do yout think happens to the BTC price if a majority miner goes rogue?


I'm not suggesting miners are or could be or want to collude. It's in their best interest not to do that unless...they are coerced by the government, Communist Party or central bank.  My concern is that 75% hashpower in the same POLITICAL jurisdiction (not where most people live) threatens censorship resistance.
Nothing anyone has said changes that.

I know the U.S. has suppressed voices of dissent, but in modern times we've had nothing like the Tienanmen Square Massacre. There are levels of Statist evil. Still, I don't want to defend myself or my country, both of whom merit legitimate criticism because it changes the subject.
The issue, no matter how badly everyone wants to ignore it is the Bitcoin is centralized now, not in a way we predicted or worried about, but centralized all the same.  

If we can at least agree on that, we can talk about what to do about it, but ignoring it, changing the subject, making personal attacks is not constructive. This is a real problem.




Scmadz seems to think I'm an agent or something, but i usually don't respond to reficulous attacks. This one has been repeated many times, so no Dude. It's still me.  

Keep creating bigger blocks 16MB make things less centralized right?



659. Post 13990662 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Can't keep doing this, people will start running out of weed. Then this thread will be complete crap



660. Post 14015391 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: AlexGR on February 26, 2016, 08:00:55 AM
...It's a slidebar situation, not a binary one. The more you push the slidebar higher, the more problems you create. And pushing it just to satisfy the need for spam is irrational.

Yes, why others can't see it is beyond me.  Angry How much of centralization are you willing to sacrifice in order to support more dust transactions?  



661. Post 14072751 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: 8up on March 02, 2016, 02:59:41 PM
Decision point comes closer. And it doesn't look good for Bitcoin.

Transferred 100% out of cold storage into several exchanges.

Hodler for 4 years no more.

Yes sell all before the halfing in supply, sound strategy  Roll Eyes



662. Post 14189462 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

WTF is going on here. Now Adam is gone?  Huh Says he was online today? Adam?Huh



663. Post 14243538 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Odd ChartFriend is absent too



664. Post 14252172 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Does this mean that lambie and all of the other trolls are gone too? Maybe it's not such a bad thing after all



665. Post 14254612 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: bitebits on March 19, 2016, 09:50:36 PM
omg sell now price going to $1  Shocked  Cry

You are not in the Monero speculation thread Wink.

Some speculation: Now that Adam and most other high volume posters left (by getting banned or voluntarily), this topic's (and subsequently website) traffic has dropped drastically. This could be an unintended irreversible trend towards other places. What does this cost the owner of this website in loss of ad revenue, and will he stick to his guns after realizing what has actually happened?

Never a dull day in Bitcoinland, that's for sure.

Define sticking to his guns? Doubt revenue would effect Theymos much



666. Post 14255110 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Don't see why everyone cares so much about Theymose? So they now there's a competing forum and reddit. Good decentralize... just stop spamming them



667. Post 14263267 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: European Central Bank on March 20, 2016, 01:11:29 PM
The halving is priced in or we will see a huge pump? How many percent are your bets?

My bet is nothing much happens. There's a whole lot of noise taking up attention elsewhere.

I'll be VERY surprised if we'll have this stable market all the way up to the halving in supply. I mean how accurate do you think they price these things in?



668. Post 14263976 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 20, 2016, 09:43:03 PM
The halving is priced in or we will see a huge pump? How many percent are your bets?

My bet is nothing much happens. There's a whole lot of noise taking up attention elsewhere.

I'll be VERY surprised if we'll have this stable market all the way up to the halving in supply. I mean how accurate do you think they price these things in?


Who is they?

 You are talking about the overall BTC market price? 

BTC's Market price is determined by a large number of diverse people and entities with diverse agendas, and likely a lot of them consider what others are doing in order to decide their own behaviors (whether buying, selling or holding), and at the same time, some individuals/entities follow formulas based on their own perspectives and risk tolerances in order to front-run what they believe others are likely to do. 

I will concede that some "they s" are more powerful and influential than other "they s" in moving BTC's market prices, but even so, those they s likely do not determine with any kind of precision BTC's price movements.


They = market makers. Whoever that might be.



669. Post 14264043 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: pleaseexplainagain on March 20, 2016, 09:46:22 PM
The halving is priced in or we will see a huge pump? How many percent are your bets?

My bet is nothing much happens. There's a whole lot of noise taking up attention elsewhere.

I'll be VERY surprised if we'll have this stable market all the way up to the halving in supply. I mean how accurate do you think they price these things in?

by now not only should all the halving be built into the price but so should each persons views on consensus, centralisation of mining etc.

So I see it staying the price it is now ie $400+/- 5%.

However it seems many posters have confused the halving issue - its not reducing potential 'supply" much at all ie the ability of people to buy coins. We already have millions you can buy and we are just halving the rate new coins come to the market.

So once these people see after the halving there is no price rise a share will sell so the price will fall a little. I guess it will take  1 month after halving for them to all sell off some/all of their holdings and it will drop the price about 3%. so the price will then be $388+/-5.

So sell some of your coins about mid June and and buy them back mid August for less. A 3% gain is not much in bit coin terms but it is virtually guaranteed. Who does not love free money.

Right now someone is buying up* BTC3600 every single day. Come july only BTC1800 in new coins will be available for sale. With so much unknown your 3% math makes me laugh.

*Someone doesn't mean one entity. Even if miners decide to carry BTC on their balance sheets then they're doing the buying themselves.



670. Post 14264187 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on March 20, 2016, 09:53:07 PM
The halving is priced in or we will see a huge pump? How many percent are your bets?

My bet is nothing much happens. There's a whole lot of noise taking up attention elsewhere.

I'll be VERY surprised if we'll have this stable market all the way up to the halving in supply. I mean how accurate do you think they price these things in?

Based on your sig, If Bitcoin is not allowed to grow, won't price decline? I mean it seems impossible to have price appreciation without growth. There is no way to stop growth that won't also stop appreciation.

Quote
"And it leads to an obvious but crazy conclusion: if decentralisation is what makes Bitcoin good, and growth threatens decentralisation, then Bitcoin should not be allowed to grow." -Mike Hearn
Yes, yes, and again yes. Until better solution is found, growth should not be achieved simply at the cost of centralization!

Quote is from Hearn's rage quit. By growth he's talking about giving free access to something that is limited in supply by design. Think it's obvious that it won't work. Make a block 80MB and if it's free (or almost free) to fill up someone will. Utilization can continue to grow even if it costs few cents extra for a space in a block.



671. Post 14264428 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: pleaseexplainagain on March 20, 2016, 10:45:55 PM
The halving is priced in or we will see a huge pump? How many percent are your bets?

My bet is nothing much happens. There's a whole lot of noise taking up attention elsewhere.

I'll be VERY surprised if we'll have this stable market all the way up to the halving in supply. I mean how accurate do you think they price these things in?

by now not only should all the halving be built into the price but so should each persons views on consensus, centralisation of mining etc.

So I see it staying the price it is now ie $400+/- 5%.

However it seems many posters have confused the halving issue - its not reducing potential 'supply" much at all ie the ability of people to buy coins. We already have millions you can buy and we are just halving the rate new coins come to the market.

So once these people see after the halving there is no price rise a share will sell so the price will fall a little. I guess it will take  1 month after halving for them to all sell off some/all of their holdings and it will drop the price about 3%. so the price will then be $388+/-5.

So sell some of your coins about mid June and and buy them back mid August for less. A 3% gain is not much in bit coin terms but it is virtually guaranteed. Who does not love free money.

Right now someone is buying up* BTC3600 every single day. Come july only BTC1800 in new coins will be available for sale. With so much unknown your 3% math makes me laugh.

*Someone doesn't mean one entity. Even if miners decide to carry BTC on their balance sheets then they're doing the buying themselves.

when I buy a bitcoin post halving I am not competing with others to buy the 1800 just minted. I am competing with others in a 15 million bitcoin market. The lessening of supply by 1800 is peanuts and will not move the price.

yes if miners keep their coins they are in effect buying them but at what price? Or rather what price do they wish to sell to pay for electricity etc. I understand alot of minors sell off market to big buyers at much lower prices than the "going' retail bitcoin price.

you are right my 3% is just a guess. But there is no way of being accurate - all i know is the price rise as a result of halving is very very unlikely.
what is your guess for the price in mid july? Post it and we will see who is more accurate then.

No you're not competing with the other 15mil bitcoin market, as most of those bitcoins are NOT for sale. That's basic economics. I don't think we can go any further if you don't agree with basic supply vs. demand concept

As far as predicting the price, i have 16 coins, and one of them will predict correct up/down market moves 4 times in a row!!!!!!  Shocked



672. Post 14264785 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on March 20, 2016, 10:56:44 PM
The halving is priced in or we will see a huge pump? How many percent are your bets?

My bet is nothing much happens. There's a whole lot of noise taking up attention elsewhere.

I'll be VERY surprised if we'll have this stable market all the way up to the halving in supply. I mean how accurate do you think they price these things in?

Based on your sig, If Bitcoin is not allowed to grow, won't price decline? I mean it seems impossible to have price appreciation without growth. There is no way to stop growth that won't also stop appreciation.

Quote
"And it leads to an obvious but crazy conclusion: if decentralisation is what makes Bitcoin good, and growth threatens decentralisation, then Bitcoin should not be allowed to grow." -Mike Hearn
Yes, yes, and again yes. Until better solution is found, growth should not be achieved simply at the cost of centralization!

Quote is from Hearn's rage quit. By growth he's talking about giving free access to something that is limited in supply by design. Think it's obvious that it won't work. Make a block 80MB and if it's free (or almost free) to fill up someone will. Utilization can continue to grow even if it costs few cents extra for a space in a block.

I know damn well where it's from, but you didn't answer my question.  Utilization can only grow until it hits the limit, at which point it can't continue to grow.  In the process, of course I understand that low value transactions will be replaced by relatively higher value transactions that merit higher fees, but there is still a limit and because of the correlation between price and utilization, there is a limit on price. We can debate what that limit is, but it's there.  There is a price beyond which a network congestion failure is an inevitable certainty if capacity is constant.  This should be so obvious, it bewilders me that I even have to say it. What is the cognitive disconnect of smallblockers who think capacity limits aren't also price limits? 

Look, if price keeps going up, it's going to attract new users, traders, speculators etc. This is obvious. There is no way to stop it. The growth will continue to come until something prevents them from participating, like a physical inability to get their transactions processed. What else could stop them? The ONLY thing that I think would do it is if the price stopped rising. Do you have another idea?

So either we will eventually get a network congestion failure or a complete halt in price appreciation without additional capacity.  This is not an opinion. This is a logical certainty. 

Quote
If Bitcoin is not allowed to grow, won't price decline?
Well yes at it's very basic can't argue against this.

The flaw in your logic is that currently even with 1MB block we can technically reach 100% utilization in every single block. i.e. all of BTCs (15MM) can fit in a single block (if all of BTCs are transfered to few input addresses). Here's one transaction for BTC195K that only took up 7kb https://blockchain.info/tx/1c12443203a48f42cdf7b1acee5b4b1c1fedc144cb909a3bf5edbffafb0cd204

It bewilders me that i have to explain to you there there can't be a network congestion failure, just a fee market economy. If you send a transaction now with 0 fees and it doesn't confirm is that a network congestion failure too?

Again there is no such thing as a "physical inability to get their transactions processed" just a fee might be prohibitive and not worth it for a particular transaction.



673. Post 14264822 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: becoin on March 20, 2016, 11:59:49 PM
... No you're not competing with the other 15mil bitcoin market, as most of those bitcoins are NOT for sale. That's basic economics. ...

Nah, that's not basic economics, that's Beanie economics. If Exxon gasoline is in short supply, it doesn't mean it's suddenly more valuable & you can charge more at your Exxon gas station. There are alternatives -- people will simply switch to Shell.
Tacking on "That's basic economics" at the end only shows that you're yet to grasp basic economics.
Learn the difference between money and commodity and you'll know something about "basic economics".

NLC 'tis you? And couldn't have answered it better than becoin



674. Post 14264891 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: blunderer on March 21, 2016, 12:08:56 AM
... No you're not competing with the other 15mil bitcoin market, as most of those bitcoins are NOT for sale. That's basic economics. ...

Nah, that's not basic economics, that's Beanie economics. If Exxon gasoline is in short supply, it doesn't mean it's suddenly more valuable & you can charge more at your Exxon gas station. There are alternatives -- people will simply switch to Shell.
Tacking on "That's basic economics" at the end only shows that you're yet to grasp basic economics.
Learn the difference between money and commodity and you'll know something about "basic economics".

This thread is about Bitcoin, the shit-tier asset subnormals *spend* money on.

>couldn't have answered it better than becoin
Because you're no brighter than he is?

Ah personal attacks. Well, he very well might be, haven't talked to him? much. Think this convo is over thanks for playing. Good bye.



675. Post 14266232 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: notme on March 21, 2016, 03:40:18 AM
Quote is from Hearn's rage quit. By growth he's talking about giving free access to something that is limited in supply by design. Think it's obvious that it won't work. Make a block 80MB and if it's free (or almost free) to fill up someone will. Utilization can continue to grow even if it costs few cents extra for a space in a block.

It will never be free to fill up a block.  There is always a cost.  However, when the block is 1 MB and it is already close to full with normal transactions, the cost to fill it is affordable to some.  If the block is much larger, it would be much more expensive to fill it and cause transaction delays.  Miners will always set a minimum price/kb to include data in a block.

The argument is not that more space is bad. The argument is that at certain point the cost (in centralization) outweighs the benefit of trying to keep transactions few cents cheaper.

1mb is already filled up (arguably by spam but nevertheless) how long will it take to fill 2mb? Then 4mb if bitcoin will start to take off? Do you think that 8mb is viable? What about 16mb? At what size do you feel the size of the block will centralize the network to the point where you start to get worried and thinking that maybe letting satoshidice pay 2 cents per transaction is not worth it?



676. Post 14266632 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: AlexGR on March 21, 2016, 05:37:29 AM
Imagine bitcoin trades at $1,000,000/BTC next month for some reason. Would not millions, tens of millions of people want to jump in on that?  How are millions going to do it with a capacity of a half million xaction/day? They would try. You know how crazy people get in a mania.

Tens of millions, assuming just 1 x "tens" (=10 million), is ~40 times than the current 250k txs/day.

Allowing for 90% fullness, and not all blocks at 100% (if some miners opt to mine less), you'd need ~44.5 mb blocks.

For two tens (=20 million), you need ~89mb blocks.

For some reason people fail to see that. And think raising a block to 4mb will solve all the problems



677. Post 14274170 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: bargainbin on March 21, 2016, 06:57:31 PM
Don't worry, it's one of the many exciting new functions present in the million-dollar forum software that's been in development since January 2014. The one that's going to be out "when it's ready", according to the most recent staff declaration. You can check out the beta!... Which is behind a Bad Gateway error indefinitely.

Try forum.epochtalk.org

Nice! Another $2.5 million US, a couple more years of testing & development, and that baby will be on par with circa 1990 BBS software! Smiley

Were you actually one of the people that donated to Theymos? Or you just like to complain about all of the injustices on the internet?



678. Post 14297773 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on March 23, 2016, 07:47:09 PM
I"M BACK BABY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Send it back to hell with fire!!!!

Wait you were gone???



679. Post 14298291 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: sinner on March 24, 2016, 03:27:51 AM
Anyone mind explaining why ETH has not crashed and burned yet?

well it just broke down from a rising wedge, which is forming the right shoulder of a massive h&s...

to answer your question, vitalik spoke at coinbase today, so if coinbase does ether there will be a pump from that.

vlad and vitalik have both admitted they don't actually know how to scale ethereum and scaling is still a "research project"  Wink. (they've admitted that this year)  pretty soon they'll figure out their "idea" for scaling violates the cap theorem.  even with zero use their blockchain is already bloating.  beyond 'hello world' prototypes theres gonna be a lot of problems and a lot of drama with insiders selling off before announcing their failures to handcuff a bunch of dapps (which are not decentralized) to their platform in any way that scales.

With all that they managed to amass almost $1B i market cap. Amazing



680. Post 14298296 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Adam can we get a new poll? May i suggest. Should this poll me censored? Option: Yes or Definite Yes



681. Post 14319125 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on March 26, 2016, 03:51:44 AM
All the in fighting and trolling is getting a bit too much lately. The way things are currently it looks like we don't all want the same thing which is bitcoin's price to rise right.

I hope to see some kind of consensus soon.
There will never be consensus. There will always be fighting and trolling. You'd better get used to it because this is the future of bitcoin. There will always be some minority like current big blocktards that want to take over bitcoin and ruin or cripple it. Bitcoin's price will rise despite all this!

Rise based on what exactly? a permanent conflict between users, miners and coders? a 100% chance of a network congestion failure before we get to the point we were at 27 months ago? the ability of the PRC to nationalize Chinese mines and execute as many 51% attacks as they want? SegWit TestNet results? What the hell makes you think it's going up and who is supposed to be doing the buying?


Pump it, and they will come.



You can pump anything and get momentum riders, but you have to keep it up indefinitely because as soon as the momentum is lost, they ride it the other way.  Sustainable appreciation has to be based on fundamentals.  

15 out of the last 20 days were green candles, but the price has only recovered about 2/3 of what it lost in the five days prior to that. That's an enormous amount of pumping, but everybody knows that some spammer can crash the market again by filling blocks any time he wants.  


Are you saying that bitcoin is dead??



682. Post 14473854 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: beastmodeBiscuitGravy on April 09, 2016, 01:00:52 AM
Just shaking out the weak hands.  Cool

Some serious shaking going on



683. Post 14507387 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Ahh finally some action  Grin and i see NLC is back too



684. Post 14517186 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: USB-S on April 12, 2016, 07:47:35 PM
Sergei needs to start another ponzi asap. Then we'll get the price moving for sure.


How can MMM ponzi #3478 can still somehow be relevant is beyond me. Just rebrand it as a lottery and let it go



685. Post 14522299 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 13, 2016, 05:34:01 AM
I just can't see a moonshot until after SegWit because we're hard up against the blocksize limit.
it must happen before....
what will market do when segwit has been out for weeks and it its hit an impasse not able to gain more the 19% hashing power supporting it?
CRASH!
we must PUMP before we DUMP.


Are you against segwit now? Wouldn't bet on network NOT supporting it once its out.



686. Post 14534368 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on April 14, 2016, 05:20:58 AM
Lightning network is a bunch of sidechains. It will almost certainly not be economically viable until Bitcoin's market cap is orders of magnitude higher than it is now. To achieve that, we need on-chain scaling and we need it before another cryptocurrency diverts the resources necessary to make it happen. This is urgent.

Bitcoin is becoming more and more like a premined coin with the existing monetary base large and growing. Coins are more distributed, but that is a limited advantage because hodlers have less individual incentive to promote adoption due to free riders benefiting who don't participate in that promotion.

Before average blocksize approached the 1 MB limit, something else prevented blocks from filling up besides fees. xactions were effectively free and blocks still did not fill up. That something was orphan risk. Large blocks propagate slower and are at a higher risk of getting orphaned. That is why fears of spam-filled blocks is overblown. That risk is always present. That is a reason why some miners mine empty blocks.

SegWit is riskier than a 2MB hard fork because it is a more radical change to the protocol.  I hope it works, but there is uncertainty that needs to be factored in.  In my opinion, it is reckless to attempt such a radical change instead of a simple 2MB hard fork because it may prevent the rally that would otherwise occur at the halving in July.  Markets hate uncertainty.  The more complicated the upgrade, the easier it is for bears and trolls to spread technobabble FUD. The more complicated the upgrade, the more things that can go wrong, similar to a machine with more moving parts. 

We are not out of the woods yet. We are just getting to the woods. 



Exactly, that's why we need to knock out the "complicated" segwit right now before mass adoption  Grin



687. Post 14552283 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: RealBitcoin on April 15, 2016, 06:01:29 PM
Folks, looks like the price is heading back to 400 €

It is getting exciting, i would like to see 3000 € /BTC by the end of the year

China needs to get on board



688. Post 14554736 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on April 15, 2016, 10:32:16 PM
4

Just to confirm we're all ignoring this count down and no one to ask what it's about right?



689. Post 14557505 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

BAM i guess Finex wants to go up



690. Post 14597894 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: BitUsher on April 19, 2016, 04:08:47 PM
Segwit pull request in main repository -

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7910

April ETA Deadline Met!

I expect Segwit to remove from segnet testnet to the bitcoin testnet this month and enter mainnet early may for activation in June/July depending upon the miners hitting 95%



Yes yes, lets time it to the halfing  Grin

Can see the headlines rolling with something like "BTC block limit solved while BTC is about to get more scares as supply halves"



691. Post 14601816 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Not many coins showing on Finex after $440  Roll Eyes



692. Post 14602011 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

...and right about...



693. Post 14608054 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

I checked ">450" on the poll so dont make a lier out of me!!  Angry



694. Post 14612142 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on April 21, 2016, 01:19:28 AM
Should the low volume be concerning?  Huh

.. for the shorts who are running out of bitcoin supplies?

There are plenty of BTC available to shorters, so they're far from running out of bitcoin supplies.

Might be running of funds to cover those shorts though  Grin



695. Post 14612581 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 21, 2016, 02:56:34 AM
one moon pic on the previous page and one rocket on this page.
IT's STILL GOOD
buy Buy BUY!

We agreed on a moratorium banning CCMFs, moons, rockets etc... until after (yet another) $1k party, then it's game on



696. Post 14620902 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Damn it was off on the poll by one day! Can we get a new poll now? We need a new target  Grin



697. Post 14653494 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: luckygenough56 on April 24, 2016, 08:18:00 PM
i sold 2/3 of my stash at 465 am weak Smiley

Is this when you say, but i bought back in at (insert min price) $461 ?



698. Post 14653631 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

~BTC4800 on Hooboy till 3000cny what's wrong with that exchange



699. Post 14653791 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

BTC-e going stupid with BTC1K ask wall now



700. Post 14664271 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Hmmm to buy dips or OMFG THE BTC IS DEAD!!!!



701. Post 14687912 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Well $1.5MM was shacken from longs but still over $29MM to go. Bunch of shorts covered too so not many of those to burn so dunno. On another hand no flash crashes on Finex is always a plus



702. Post 14688873 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

I'm calling a bottom (famous last words Smiley )



703. Post 14690635 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: Searing on April 28, 2016, 05:47:09 AM
I'm calling a bottom (famous last words Smiley )


So was it just whales at play on a mini-pump? (ie the whales tipped their hand and moved too soon and too fast on their tango of the rest of us in the dust) Sad

Must be nice to play with BTC price like it is your personal 'angry birds' game Sad



Bid sides are looking healthier at these levels. No flash crashes. Longs are huge but it wont be cheap to shake them and there are BTC10k till $420 on finex ready to catch them. Getting close to halfing, too much uncertainty so i'm speculating that sides are more likely to dig in then start dumping too much. We raised on little volume and thin bid side so were due for a smack down. But as i write this BTC400 ask wall comes up on stamp and there're BTC1k to $444 on finex



704. Post 14699466 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Oh i wanna play. I think you should go on a crusade against wire transfers and how they should be replaced by credit cards. Next time you're buying a car/house etc... ask if they'll take your VISA. Or are you in US and still write those silly cheques?

Quote from: whored on April 28, 2016, 11:28:20 PM
...
-Currently, bitcoin WIRE TRANSFERS can handle a sustained rate of roughly 3 transaction per second, the average transaction volume generated by one mid-sized US shopping mall. *Amazing*
-A few days ago EVERY DAY, someone paid $136,000 millions to send $0.05 billions to Nigerian prince and other scams. *Ahahahamazing* (SFYL)
-An average bitcoin BANK user is functionally illiterate. Sad, yet *AMAZING*
...

Or we can continue comparing bitcoin to credit card, toasters, and TVs  Roll Eyes



705. Post 14699492 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: whored on April 29, 2016, 01:57:55 AM
What does someone accidentally sending a $100,00 transaction fee have to do with anything?  It's the same thing as someone accidentally typing an extra zero or two and buying up the entire wall in stocks/commodities.
Taking into account that math ain't your strong suit (you're more of a scurrier sort of a guy, best described by Wikipedos as, and I quote: "a competitor of humanity"), I'ma gonna give you a hand. Lemme give you a little helping hand...

The difference between $.05 and $136,000.00, friend cockroach, is not "an extra zero or two." Or three. Or even four. If God, in all of His wisdom, erred as much as that hapless bitcoiner, you would weigh as much as an average African elephant, cockroach Shocked Could you imagine?! Of course you couldn't, your brain is little more than angry ganglia, you rely on it so little that it's nearly pointless: you can stay alive for a month without it, shit you not.

And that's weight, cockroach. Real life elephants are much denser (and less repulsive) than icky Blattodea, so you'd be one humongous motherfucking monstrosity, you crawly abomination!
Now where was I?
Quote
 Failure to understand how to use a keyboard is not a Bitcoin issue.
Lol sure, user error. As i said before, Bitcoin's like a  fleshlight that turns into a meat grinder if you don't program it just right.
SFYL & ouch ouch ouch ouch!



http://thenewdaily.com.au/money/2014/10/02/historys-biggest-fat-finger-trading-errors/

Quote
A Japanese branch of Swiss bank UBS mistakenly ordered 30 trillion yen of bonds from Capcm instead of the intended 30 million yen.

Quote
According to a report by BBC, the trader mistakenly sold 610,000 shares in recruiter J-Com for 1 yen, rather than selling one share for 610,000 yen...The mistake cost Mizuho Securities at least 27 billion yen ($282 million).

How many 0's is that???




706. Post 14705110 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: whored on April 29, 2016, 04:24:44 AM
Oh i wanna play. I think you should go on a crusade against wire transfers and how they should be replaced by credit cards. Next time you're buying a car/house etc... ask if they'll take your VISA. Or are you in US and still write those silly cheques?
I'm in the States. When I buy a car, I pay by check (we spell it c h e c k here, sans flowery que *lifts pinky* Britishisms), or use cash, like any normal human being. Zero wait/zero problems.
But you, you actually wire money when buying a car? Anything else you do? Weird ceremonial dances with blood sacrifices? Just to complicate things a bit more?

Though I'm not sure why we're discussing this, you can't buy a car or a house with bitcoins around here. I mean, maybe there is some hipster willing to sell one somewhere in US, it's a huge country, but normally? Lol, I'd have better luck trying to buy a car with BTCeanies Cheesy

Re. "How many 0's is that???": Fewer than the Bitcoin blunder. And remember, friend: Fiat has been around for centuries, with BILLIONS of people using it, and that's the worst you came up with.
Bitcoin has been around for 7 years, and a good chunk of it has already been lost due to hilarious fuckups Cheesy

Cute how you totally left the house part and just concentrated on a car.
You need guaranteed funds to buy a car or back up your silly checks (that take up to 5days to settle) with your credit history. Try going to your used car dealership, or a Ferrari dealership with your silly check book and driving out with a car without giving them your social security#, cash probably will still fly more likely under $10,000, anything after that might get IRS and other 3 letter agencies involved.

For a house closing agents won't accept cash, and most won't even take guaranteed checks on the settlement date. Wire is THE only way.

Quote
I'm not sure why we're discussing this
Umm well, because you're trying REALLY HARD to troll a 7yr old GUARANTEED payment system by comparing it to a 70yr+ old NOT guaranteed payment system. And your bellow average reader might actually think your BS might make sense for a nano second before his/her logic kicks in or they read the replies  Grin



707. Post 14705483 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: whored on April 29, 2016, 05:19:33 PM
Oh i wanna play. I think you should go on a crusade against wire transfers and how they should be replaced by credit cards. Next time you're buying a car/house etc... ask if they'll take your VISA. Or are you in US and still write those silly cheques?
I'm in the States. When I buy a car, I pay by check (we spell it c h e c k here, sans flowery que *lifts pinky* Britishisms), or use cash, like any normal human being. Zero wait/zero problems.
But you, you actually wire money when buying a car? Anything else you do? Weird ceremonial dances with blood sacrifices? Just to complicate things a bit more?

Though I'm not sure why we're discussing this, you can't buy a car or a house with bitcoins around here. I mean, maybe there is some hipster willing to sell one somewhere in US, it's a huge country, but normally? Lol, I'd have better luck trying to buy a car with BTCeanies Cheesy

Re. "How many 0's is that???": Fewer than the Bitcoin blunder. And remember, friend: Fiat has been around for centuries, with BILLIONS of people using it, and that's the worst you came up with.
Bitcoin has been around for 7 years, and a good chunk of it has already been lost due to hilarious fuckups Cheesy

Cute how you totally left the house part and just concentrated on a car.
You need guaranteed funds to buy a car or back up your silly checks (that take up to 5days to settle) with your credit history. Try going to your used car dealership, or a Ferrari dealership with your silly check book and driving out with a car without giving them your social security#, cash probably will still fly more likely under $10,000, anything after that might get IRS and other 3 letter agencies involved.

For a house closing agents won't accept cash, and most won't even take guaranteed checks on the settlement date. Wire is THE only way.

I stand by my Beanies comparison, the Beanies point is sound.
The number of US realtors accepting BTC as a form of payment is roughly the same as for those accepting Beanies, which is to say zero.

I know of exactly one house that was sold for BTC, was posted on this forum. Visionary OP doesn't post anymore, because BTC was ~$650 at the time. Yeah, he still had to pay taxes. Yeah, the legal bullshit of transferring property title was likely lengthier/more involved than with conventional means of payment. Yeah, OP jumped through a lot of hoops to wind up as the brokeass laughing stock he is today.
Otherwise, seamless :8

@Fatman3001: Obsolete, olde timey English. An anachronism, much like legacy finance Cheesy

P.S. But if you think that people will start using your bit-tokens as money because they could save a few minutes the one or two times in their lives they buy a house, don't let me spoil your morphia dreams.

It's amusing that the best of your trolling is used to compare bitcoin to credit cards, yet there's literally not a single person on here who claims that bitcoin (in itself and in it's current form) can replace credit cards. Oh well carry on



708. Post 14705503 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

BTC2k buy wall on stamp @ $452 would wipe out ask side till $480 Grin if this is not the right thread to post this mods please move  Roll Eyes



709. Post 14705919 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Did whoboi turn off their 10x volume multiplier something seems odd



710. Post 14706392 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: luckygenough56 on April 29, 2016, 07:38:23 PM
am 100% in btc u jokers

Pfft i'm 101% in



711. Post 14724915 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 01, 2016, 07:00:20 PM
Geez, everyone knows we're going to $600.

Get us up there already... Roll Eyes

Mostly we know; however, we need to make it passed the $467 to $475 price range first.  

Accordingly, we should not be getting too excited about going to $600 until we make it passed that resistance, which better case scenario could take hours to days to break or alternatively, a worser case scenario, could take another year to break...


At the moment, we have a lot of decent indicators that are pointing towards breaking the $467-$475 resistance within the shorter end of the range... with seemingly decent probabilities of within less than a month... but personally, I would not bet my house on it or leverage such a bet because it is not that "for sure" of a scenario.  On the other hand, if you don't own any bitcoin, this would not be a bad time to buy some and even take a decent stake in such purchase.

Longs are down $2MM in finex (29MM from the high of 31MM) but shorts are down as well. We need more fuel...



712. Post 14743065 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

I didn't keep up with all of the drama, but did we dump from $450 to $436 on the news that Satoshi was found? Or did that happen before the "news"



713. Post 14756509 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Don't see why people care this much  Huh short of some religious fanaticism. I mean it'd shake his hand and thank him for creating BTC and all but am i really the only asshole who only really cares if someone has private keys to Satoshi's stash?

At this point the idea is way more important than the person/entity creating the idea. I mean the team who created Internet/first protocol must've been awesome but how many people know/care who they are?



714. Post 14756557 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on May 05, 2016, 01:26:33 AM
Don't see why people care this much  Huh short of some religious fanaticism. I mean it'd shake his hand and thank him for creating BTC and all but am i really the only asshole who only really cares if someone has private keys to Satoshi's stash?

Care?

I would say it doesn't matter, but people are interested because, well...  it's difficult to make this stuff up.  Especially after so many failed "discoveries" of Satoshi.  The more you dig into this one, the more insane the it becomes.  It's also possible, if there's any validity to what several parties are saying, that it could offer some finality to the uncertainty around those 1.1M or so coins.

Frankly, strictly from the volatility perspective this is the best way for Satoshi to be revealed. Instead of sending a massive shock by suddenly moving BTC1.1M coins. First spread rumors of it, let market price it in, then give some questionable proof, let market price in the chance that those coins are not lost, assure that coins are in trust and won't be dumped on market, finally give concrete proof.



715. Post 14756786 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: AlexGR on May 05, 2016, 02:11:21 AM
Id say the only reason we care is because of the 1 million coins.

I've been hearing this for so long that it doesn't even make sense because such an uncertainty should always be priced-in. I mean if Satoshi tomorrow sends the coins to the bitcoin-eater address then that would be perceived as a "positive" move, raising the market, which would indicate that the market had already priced-in the uncertainty (otherwise it would not move at all). So it is priced in already - at least to some extent.

Besides, we know for a fact that PoW mining is going to "dump" on us another 6 million coins in the future. What difference would 1 million coins do - that already exist and are already priced-in in terms of market supply and scarcity? Not much.

Market "prices in" an event by the probability of that event happening and estimated effect. Sometimes market overestimates it and sometimes it underestimates.

I.E. I'd estimate that chances that PoW will dump another 6MM coins are 99.9% everyone expects it so it's pretty much fully priced in
Chances that someone has private keys to Satoshi's stash before this news was lets say 25% (making up numbers) so only 25% of it was priced in. Now that we have some questionable proof i'd say chances go up to say 60% so market has to adjust, then finally once he moves the coins market will adjust again and it'll be 100% priced in.  



716. Post 14762888 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: poncom on May 05, 2016, 04:26:50 PM
I was hodling no matter what happened to the price, then Gavin announced Craig Wright had proved he is Satoshi. I panic dumped right at the bottom, then had to buy back after it became clear it was all bull. I'd never have panic dumped if it wasn't for all the Satoshi lies.

Seriously, what was your rationale for dumping?

Come on, if Satoshi really was Craig Wright it would have started a dump down to the pits of hell. You could see it starting, then stopping when people started to digest all the information and realise there was no proof.

LOL silly humans, how can you not see that this is the EXACT REASON why he just didn't move BTC1MM. Don't know if he is/not Satoshi but he's at least smart enough to prevent a bunch of people reacting like poncom. Give out news one cryptic bit at a time and let the market digest it. Also, some people gain notoriety by discovering planets, and some by burning churches. His life would probably change dramatically.  



717. Post 14764222 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Yakamoto on May 05, 2016, 05:18:41 PM
I was hodling no matter what happened to the price, then Gavin announced Craig Wright had proved he is Satoshi. I panic dumped right at the bottom, then had to buy back after it became clear it was all bull. I'd never have panic dumped if it wasn't for all the Satoshi lies.

Seriously, what was your rationale for dumping?

Come on, if Satoshi really was Craig Wright it would have started a dump down to the pits of hell. You could see it starting, then stopping when people started to digest all the information and realise there was no proof.

LOL silly humans, how can you not see that this is the EXACT REASON why he just didn't move BTC1MM. Don't know if he is/not Satoshi but he's at least smart enough to prevent a bunch of people reacting like poncom. Give out news one cryptic bit at a time and let the market digest it. Also, some people gain notoriety by discovering planets, and some by burning churches. His life would probably change dramatically.  
Well it would be nice if he didn't back out of giving his "cryptic" news out, and decided to carry through. He's backing out saying "He's not strong enough" and we can assume he has no evidence to support his claims if he starts to exhibit this sort of behaviour. It would be easy enough for him to send a signed message from the wallet and verify himself that way, and he wouldn't have to back out and leave his claims.

it'll only be nice because you/and most people, like the drama, and feel the need to resolve this riddle. But what's the point? Do you know or care who created Internet?
So for better or worse Wright is milking that need to know feeling as much as he can. Personally think it's better because it gradually confirms the fact, rather than the alternative of suddenly seeing those coins moved, you are satisfied and feel good about yourself, other like poncom short the hell out of BTC, and many will feel a need for guidance from THE Satoshi on all current issues.



718. Post 14764858 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: becoin on May 05, 2016, 08:00:56 PM

Vint Cerf and Bob Kahn? Or because they worked for DARPA, the guy who started ARPA, Dwight Eisenhower?
Wrong. ARPA created the TCP protocol and DNS to a certain extend. The rest (what people use now as Internet or WWW) - HTML, web browsers, web servers all that stuff was created in CERN Switzerland. Educate yourself!

http://timeline.web.cern.ch/timelines/The-birth-of-the-World-Wide-Web

What about Cisco creating routers? Or people who created BGP? Or the guy that was single handedly running DNS for the longest time? All good people but how many people who use internet now know or care about them? And how much weight do they have on current RFCs?



719. Post 14766569 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Walls! I'm seeing ask walls everywhere  Angry damn bears go home



720. Post 14767689 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Hunyadi on May 06, 2016, 05:57:35 AM
Someone has huge ask-wall (stairs) @ Finex  Shocked



Yeah  Undecided those ask stairs can eat the bid side down to $100. Someone wants to cash out big time. Think those walls can only be taken down by the dragon  



721. Post 14767842 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Well that just happened BTC1500 ask wall @ $450 on finex was eaten. Finally some volume in the right direction



722. Post 14767856 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

As expected coming from the dragon. OKCoin is 11yuan above huboi, haven't seen such spread



723. Post 14768353 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Holliday on May 06, 2016, 08:05:57 AM
Someone has huge ask-wall (stairs) @ Finex  Shocked

...and they have huge balls of steel to send that much money to Finex.

Yep lots of faith that it won't gox over. Are we getting ready for Round#2?



724. Post 14790182 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: AlexGR on May 08, 2016, 10:57:34 AM
Can't they bypass USA regulatory resistance and go to the UK -or elsewhere- to launch the ETF?

If an ETF wants to do business with customers in the USA it has to go through the USA regulatory procedure.

Let's say I launch an ETF in London. You live in the States. Can you create an "investment company" in the UK which then buys from my ETF in London?

Can US law get involved with the internal processes of a company that operates abroad? Shouldn't the regulatory barrier extend only up to the level where you own the shares to your company and get profits or added value which might be taxable in the States?

Sure can, but you're limiting your owner base if you have no exposure in US, and thats where a lot of money is. So most will list on US exchanges, or do an ADR  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Depositary_Receipt then it's a fair game for US law.



725. Post 14799283 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

And just like that 3000CNY is behind us



726. Post 14820998 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: AlexGR on May 11, 2016, 05:48:32 PM
Have we destroyed the Satoshi coins yet? Just checking...

I've seen some recent discussion of such.. ..

Whoever came up with that....Huh

   Dumb idea...

If he really wanted there to have been confidence in the economics of a deflationary currency he ought to have done it himself. The fact he didn’t leads one to believe he wants the dough. And I suppose he’s entitled to it. Either way it’s an ungodly hoard of coins that’s impossible to ignore.

I don't think that's what the discussion is about.

At some point old pubkey coins might be easily hackable. At that point, millions of BTC can be looted for the lolz by those having the tech to do it. The question is what can you do about it so that they can be moved to safety, locked, etc. Otherwise you'll have millions of BTC looted AND a PR fiasco like "ohhh Bitcoin got HACKED AND PEOPLE LOST THEIR MONEY!!! ITS UNSAFE, RUN FOR YOUR LIVES". So you have hackers dumping, people panicking, etc etc. It's a complex issue.

That call should be in the hands of the individual priv key owner and not some entity deciding that your coins are not safe enough so we'll just destroy them for you.



727. Post 14823916 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 12, 2016, 01:48:07 AM
any second now price will rise.



What scares me is that there are about $32.5MM on Finex in longs thinking the same way.



728. Post 14824857 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Huh around BTC4k sell order on Finex and market barely moved maybe something is afoot



729. Post 14850058 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: kehtolo on May 14, 2016, 03:18:57 PM
I'm looking at tradeblock and it is showing blocks being made with average 4 minutes apart!!
That's crazy.. difficulty is supposed to keep re-targeting for a time of 10 minutes.

That is an unimaginable increase in hashing power to get down from the target of 10 min.
 Huh

https://tradeblock.com/bitcoin/

Are you saying the halfening will be sooner than we're expecting?



730. Post 14871951 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on May 17, 2016, 04:11:14 AM
^^ you are assuming that adamstgBit is not lampchop ... or facilitating lambchop by selectively neglecting moderation, maybe someone paid adamstgBit to allow miscreant shitlords to run amok here whenever they felt like it? He does seem to wallow in the swine muck they regularly serve up, like he's benefiting from it or somehow or another.



WHOOAt Adam is NLC  Shocked !?!? *tam*dam*dam* say it ain't so



731. Post 14882811 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: ImI on May 18, 2016, 02:46:25 AM

BTC looks sooo fucking weak right now and that only few weeks apart from Halving, not the best sign imo.


You really have not substantiated your claim in the above post...

you are right, i havent. its just an impression based for biggest parts on the complete lack of any volume and "action". BTC seems so bloodless right now it should be somehow vibrant right beneath such an important resistance and just weeks before the Halvening, but instead it seems sleeping.
another bad sign imo is that we have basically a very good sentiment, everybody is lookin forward with positive expectations to the Halvening. if nothing happens or the weeks before price might even start to decline we might see a big move south just out of disappointment.



The actual reduction of supply probably won't be felt for some time after the actual halfening. Seeing how it's mostly driven by speculation the fundamentals still have little to do with the price. So the hype should start ramping up soonTM and peak at the halfening price should reflect the "expected" volume of hype



732. Post 14906643 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Andy777s on May 20, 2016, 07:04:00 AM
Great! Maybe Gox will add LTC soonish as well  Cheesy

Yep heard they're almost ready to roll out Midas too so no more 3.5hr lag.



733. Post 14906688 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: DARKHOLDER on May 20, 2016, 05:41:32 AM
Ether can potentially revolutionize the crypto landscape, BUT it is currently in an "experimental stage", and you should not invest more then you can afford to lose.

 Grin

Really ?! Grin
WHY BTC CRASHING??? Anyone have some explanations? ?

In one word Ethereum. It's taken a $1B bite of the crypto market or like 15% of BTC. All the cool kids on the block are huffing it now so stealing BTC spot light too. Can't wait till it reverses, should be violent if they time their dump to the halfing  Shocked



734. Post 14913625 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: dumbfbrankings on May 20, 2016, 08:35:46 PM
2) I don't believe I get chicken little excited about it, don't know how you came to that conclusion... 

That’s just JJG being an insufferable twat, as per usual. He’s really concerned with keeping decentralization intact by crippling the throughput of the network… while keeping all his coins in a centralized exchange. You’d have better results explaining your position to a brick wall.

Yes, i couldn't have said it better. NLC how many captchas do you go through each day to create new accounts? Are you trying to see if there's a limit to my ignore list?



735. Post 14916521 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Wow someone really wants out on finex. Only the dragon can take us up now $10 spread



736. Post 14922801 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: yefi on May 21, 2016, 03:47:05 PM
They used to (pretend to?) like us when Bitcoin was popular and doing well, starting to feel like everyone has abandoned us.

If it's any consolation, Eth will grow old too.

There were many before Eth to contest for BTC's place... And i'm sure there will be many more to try



737. Post 14925779 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

I'm surprised that so many regulars entertain ETH trolls. Their amount is a good indicator of things peaking



738. Post 14932184 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Ha Finex shorts are up 50% from 9.5k to 14k+ in 3 days. Almost there, getting my torch ready  Cheesy 



739. Post 14932257 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: ahpku on May 22, 2016, 07:51:23 PM
Ha Finex shorts are up 50% from 9.5k to 14k+ in 3 days. Almost there, getting my torch ready  Cheesy  

Of course shorts are up, why would anyone go long on BTC now?

 Grin You must be new

Even BTC-e is over finex now, spread with China is coming close to $10 (according to bitcoinwisdom exchange rate) but please do go on a bit more  Kiss



740. Post 14935119 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Finally a green candle with some volume



741. Post 14936446 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 23, 2016, 07:13:43 AM
...blah blah troll blah blah possibly NLC??

...blah blah NLC answering to him(her?)self?

..blah blah you're feeding...

You do know of the existence of the ignore button right?



742. Post 14937038 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Denker on May 23, 2016, 07:56:05 AM
ETH is more of a hedge at the moment. BTC seems very unstable.

OMG!!!
Are you really serious about that?
How can Eth, a crazy overhyped and pumped to oblivion something, be a hedge against THE coin which is growing in terms of infrastructure, innovation and legitimacy?
You must be kidding!

Yeah i recall similar stuff that was said about LTC, ripple etc... silver to bitcoin's gold ... lets check how all of that ended  Roll Eyes on second thought better not



743. Post 14946134 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on July 24, 2015, 02:15:13 AM
4

That looks familiar



744. Post 14947163 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: DaFonz on May 24, 2016, 05:45:32 AM
http://www.gdax.com/

COINBASE ETH COUNTDOWN!


Ahh perfect, we all remember how the last moon count down worked out. Now can you make yourself useful and tell me where i can watch the chart of ETH live like bitcoinwisdom before you go on the ignore list?  Grin



745. Post 14948219 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on May 24, 2016, 08:39:34 AM
My guess is ETH will get dumped to shit & never recover, I'm almost certain of it to be honest.


My money is on this option



746. Post 14960771 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 25, 2016, 05:24:24 AM


Why you pumping Alts here?

Are we over ETH already and trying to pump LSK the next big thing now? Silly alts



747. Post 14960812 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: AlexGR on May 25, 2016, 01:50:17 AM
Small blockists are killing Bitcoin.

https://bitcoinfees.21.co/

Which fee should I use?

The fastest and cheapest transaction fee is currently 40 satoshis/byte, shown in green at the top.
For the median transaction size of 226 bytes, this results in a fee of 9,040 satoshis (0.03$).



Stop with your math gibberish, if i just close my eyes and believe it really really hard i know that it'll be true



748. Post 14962809 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

There...goes...3000 on whoboi followed by $450 on fines ... oh wait few minutes too soon



749. Post 14963006 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: BldSwtTrs on May 25, 2016, 09:26:53 AM
Small blockists are killing Bitcoin.

https://bitcoinfees.21.co/

Which fee should I use?

The fastest and cheapest transaction fee is currently 40 satoshis/byte, shown in green at the top.
For the median transaction size of 226 bytes, this results in a fee of 9,040 satoshis (0.03$).


It's short-sighted.

What is important is not today but the future.

VC and price speculator think ahead and they don't like what they see.

Currently block space is perfectly inelastic, that's scary. In due time, this will cause a dramatic rise in fees and delays, and a decrease in demand. That's how the market deal with shortage: prices, delays and lowering of the demand.

Already see a shop in a communist country? Well the same will happen in Bitcoin.

The future is bleak. Everyone with an economic focused brain understand that. Meanwhile small blockists congratulated themselves because fees are low today.

What's important is to keep it as decentralized as possible without F'ing up. The true use case is still pretty low and adoption has slowed a bit. Segwit and 2mb fork are in the works, even if we have an explosive natural growth next few months worst case i'm willing to pay $0.06 for a transaction instead of $0.03 when the blocks get crowded



750. Post 14963100 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: BldSwtTrs on May 25, 2016, 09:49:15 AM
Small blockists are killing Bitcoin.

https://bitcoinfees.21.co/

Which fee should I use?

The fastest and cheapest transaction fee is currently 40 satoshis/byte, shown in green at the top.
For the median transaction size of 226 bytes, this results in a fee of 9,040 satoshis (0.03$).


It's short-sighted.

What is important is not today but the future.

In the future there'll be more capacity to satisfy actual txs (not spammy near-zero cost txs). That much is a given.


Yeah... frequently there are these quasi abstract criticisms suggesting that core is not looking into the future enough... but really?Huh

You gotta walk before you run, and segwit seems to be the next best step, and there seems to be no real question that there will be timely scaling.. and yeah, if there were a real and actual emergency, some kind of actual blocksize limit could be implemented.  

The assertion of  emergency has been exaggerated.
"quasi abstract" Cheesy

Yes some people are thinking while other are just parroting what their superior in the engineering pecking order told them.

Gee lets see technological fuck up could be catastrophic on a $6B market, but sure lets rush it in to solve that non yet existing problem that may potentially come a bit sooner than expected through this explosive organic growth in next few months, and make everyone pay few cents more  



751. Post 14963170 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: BldSwtTrs on May 25, 2016, 09:52:22 AM
Small blockists are killing Bitcoin.

https://bitcoinfees.21.co/

Which fee should I use?

The fastest and cheapest transaction fee is currently 40 satoshis/byte, shown in green at the top.
For the median transaction size of 226 bytes, this results in a fee of 9,040 satoshis (0.03$).


It's short-sighted.

What is important is not today but the future.

VC and price speculator think ahead and they don't like what they see.

Currently block space is perfectly inelastic, that's scary. In due time, this will cause a dramatic rise in fees and delays, and a decrease in demand. That's how the market deal with shortage: prices, delays and lowering of the demand.

Already see a shop in a communist country? Well the same will happen in Bitcoin.

The future is bleak. Everyone with an economic focused brain understand that. Meanwhile small blockists congratulated themselves because fees are low today.

What's important is to keep it as decentralized as possible without F'ing up. The true use case is still pretty low and adoption has slowed a bit. Segwit and 2mb fork are in the works, even if we have an explosive natural growth next few months worst case i'm willing to pay $0.06 for a transaction instead of $0.03 when the blocks get crowded
On what data relies your assumption that an increase in blocksize will decrease decentralization?

Why decentralization is more important than network survival?

Why do you think you will be able to defeat an economic shortage by paying more?

So much question that you won't be able too answer.

How about first you prove me that pushing that lever will NOT fuck things up? You know stuff that engineers do, and not, well, we can't conclusively prove to a 100% that it will blow up so fuck it lets try it and see what happens.

Silly whabit because if there's one thing everyone (except for you?) can agree on is that there is no survival without decentralization. This would be a horrifically ineffective paypal#2

Think i was able TO answer no?



752. Post 14963207 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: BldSwtTrs on May 25, 2016, 09:56:25 AM
Small blockists are killing Bitcoin.

https://bitcoinfees.21.co/

Which fee should I use?

The fastest and cheapest transaction fee is currently 40 satoshis/byte, shown in green at the top.
For the median transaction size of 226 bytes, this results in a fee of 9,040 satoshis (0.03$).


It's short-sighted.

What is important is not today but the future.

In the future there'll be more capacity to satisfy actual txs (not spammy near-zero cost txs). That much is a given.


Yeah... frequently there are these quasi abstract criticisms suggesting that core is not looking into the future enough... but really?Huh

You gotta walk before you run, and segwit seems to be the next best step, and there seems to be no real question that there will be timely scaling.. and yeah, if there were a real and actual emergency, some kind of actual blocksize limit could be implemented.  

The assertion of  emergency has been exaggerated.
"quasi abstract" Cheesy

Yes some people are thinking while other are just parroting what their superior in the engineering pecking order told them.

Gee lets see technological fuck up could be catastrophic on a $6B market, but sure lets rush it in to solve that non yet existing problem that may potentially come a bit sooner than expected through this explosive organic growth in next few months, and make everyone pay few cents more  
Technological fuck up?

2MB increase is safer than SegWit (way less complexities).

On the contrary an economic fuck up is looming. All small blockists are in deny regarding that's problem. The clock is ticking but no need to panick, it's already too late.


Ohhh no!! Are you saying that bitcoin is dead? http://bitcoinobituaries.com/



753. Post 14963408 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: BldSwtTrs on May 25, 2016, 10:13:07 AM
Small blockists are killing Bitcoin.

https://bitcoinfees.21.co/

Which fee should I use?

The fastest and cheapest transaction fee is currently 40 satoshis/byte, shown in green at the top.
For the median transaction size of 226 bytes, this results in a fee of 9,040 satoshis (0.03$).


It's short-sighted.

What is important is not today but the future.

VC and price speculator think ahead and they don't like what they see.

Currently block space is perfectly inelastic, that's scary. In due time, this will cause a dramatic rise in fees and delays, and a decrease in demand. That's how the market deal with shortage: prices, delays and lowering of the demand.

Already see a shop in a communist country? Well the same will happen in Bitcoin.

The future is bleak. Everyone with an economic focused brain understand that. Meanwhile small blockists congratulated themselves because fees are low today.

What's important is to keep it as decentralized as possible without F'ing up. The true use case is still pretty low and adoption has slowed a bit. Segwit and 2mb fork are in the works, even if we have an explosive natural growth next few months worst case i'm willing to pay $0.06 for a transaction instead of $0.03 when the blocks get crowded
On what data relies your assumption that an increase in blocksize will decrease decentralization?

Why decentralization is more important than network survival?

Why do you think you will be able to defeat an economic shortage by paying more?

So much question that you won't be able too answer.

How about first you prove me that pushing that lever will NOT fuck things up? You know stuff that engineers do, and not, well, we can't conclusively prove to a 100% that it will blow up so fuck it lets try it and see what happens.

Silly whabit because if there's one thing everyone (except for you?) can agree on is that there is no survival without decentralization. This would be a horrifically ineffective paypal#2

Think i was able TO answer no?
Even Maxwell have said that 2Mb is safe for the network. You seem ill-informed.

As been mentioned countless times, it's not a binary GOOD/BAD outcome, but a sliding scale. Bigger blocks lead to more centralization, that's a fact. Thus the argument is not if it's safe or not but rather how much worse will it be, that's the part that's debatable. And like you said worst case if BTC all of the sudden becomes a world currency reserve and banks are fighting for a space in a block i'm thinking it wouldn't take too long to swap a 1 for a 2 in the code



754. Post 14963440 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: mymenace on May 25, 2016, 10:21:53 AM


Wall Observer

http://bitcoincharts.com/markets/bitstampUSD_depth.html

that's a nice wall, I like that wall








Huh where? The BTC200 order Huh



755. Post 14971015 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 25, 2016, 11:35:43 PM
Small blockists are killing Bitcoin.

https://bitcoinfees.21.co/

Which fee should I use?

The fastest and cheapest transaction fee is currently 40 satoshis/byte, shown in green at the top.
For the median transaction size of 226 bytes, this results in a fee of 9,040 satoshis (0.03$).


It's short-sighted.

What is important is not today but the future.

In the future there'll be more capacity to satisfy actual txs (not spammy near-zero cost txs). That much is a given.
So why the price is stagnating and VC investment is decreasing? Sure you computer geeks folks are cleverer than all the economic minded people on the planet.

"Economic minded people" = the only model they understand is one of centralization, trust and counterparties. Trustless peer to peer economy is a foreign concept.

Well no, economic models tend to account for centralization, trust, and counterparties. Amongst other things. The most discriptive/predictive ones tend to get complex, with maths and stuff.
You, of course, reject them because
1. Decentralization itself is your objective (as opposed to maximizing wealth, knowledge, hippy stuff, etc.). If a model leads to solutions which do not require decentralization, into the trash it goes. Like rating cake recipes by the amount of Drano used. Angel food cake doesn't use Drano decentralization? Bad cake!
2. You simply don't understand conventional economics.

I do not "reject" them. Bitcoin's success *depends* on them.

We are in a town where there are 100 ice-cream shops (bank wires, western union, paypal and paypal clones, mobile payment systems, credit cards etc) but all these shops are offering just one flavor (=centralization).

Arguably, not having "decentralized" doesn't mean those 100 shops are offering "just one flavor."
Cherry Garcia and Chunky Monkey aren't "just one flavor," even though neither one contains chewy gizzards or rusty bolts. I'll even tell you why none of the hundred stores offer Gizzards 'n Bolts flavor: because it's a shitty flavor that no one in his right mind ever buys, that's why.

Quote
A new ice-cream shop opens and provides a new flavor, breaking the 100% "monopoly" of the previous flavor.
Again, there is no monopoly, people simply don't like Gizzards 'n Bolts.

Quote
This creates a booming market for the new entrant which starts at 0% and has enormous growth potential.
No. The reason a few quarts of Gizzards 'n Bolts got sold is not because it's a flavor the world has been waiting for, but because those quart containers were a convenient way to deal dope and launder money, in plain daylight. Unfortunately, the jackboots are on to that shit, hence dropping sales Sad

Quote
Even if the new entrant captures ...just 1% of the pie of the centralized system, booom.
Please trust me when I say this: Gizzards 'n Bolts ice cream is kill, is not gonna catch on, not gonna capture 1% of the market.
Taste it FFS!



hahahahaha   Somalirebel.. the fact that you answered with bullshit irrelevance shows that either you do not understand the concepts presented therein or that you had no answer to the substance of AlexGR's points...

A sad day for you paid shill trollers..   Cry Cry

So you're here trolling to prevent people from trying "Gizzards 'n Bolts ice cream" instead of letting them try it and make up their own mind? The public will vote regardless how hard you try to prevent them from eating ice cream



756. Post 14983034 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Huh and just like that whoboi is out of coins for sale



757. Post 14983520 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Little coins for sale across all exchanges now  Grin stamp just looks sad



758. Post 14984044 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: Torque on May 27, 2016, 04:04:01 AM
You guys are all wrong, it's clearly ETH getting dumped for BTC.  Go look.

If that was the case than Finex would be leading the pack, where what's happening is the dragon is eating up all of the coins, ETH is just an after thought



759. Post 14984266 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Dragon is still hungry  Grin



760. Post 14984346 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on May 27, 2016, 01:12:56 AM
hmmm, maybe that HK hedge fund rumour wasn't just another bunch of total BS?

What rumor? Got a link?



761. Post 14985099 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

And according to wisdom's FX rate Whoboi just broke $500  Shocked

Half way to the second $1k party?



762. Post 14994976 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: TeeBone on May 28, 2016, 04:30:33 AM
Where da friggin rocket pics at ?

Rocket and it's happening pics have officially been banned till we cross $1k



763. Post 14994981 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

$32 spread between finex and whoboi arbs can't keep up with the dragon? He's swallowing everything in sight



764. Post 14995151 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: shmadz on May 28, 2016, 04:45:57 AM
Where da friggin rocket pics at ?

Rocket and it's happening pics have officially been banned till we cross $1k

I agree with both the assertion that celebration should be postponed until over 1000

 and also with your signature about decentralization , that thing which ensures the survival of bitcoin , should not be sacrificed in the pursuit of adoption'

 fucking let them eat cake

It's funny how most people don't realize that about BTC. That advantage is too easy to loose and it's amazing that we got so far, yet too many are willing to sacrifice it for the latest and greatest or for a quick advantage to make a quick buck. We should be VERY conservative in regards to BTC technology not to loose the very thing that makes bitcoin bitcoin, and use the test bed (aka alts) to test new ideas for few years if it works, gradually merge into BTC



765. Post 15002849 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Trolls are back...Check
Nazi posts...Check
Initiating stage 2?



766. Post 15002975 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

And whoboi breaks $550when stamp touches $500  that's a 10% spread  Shocked



767. Post 15003029 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Ask sides look anorexic. The dragon ate everything in sight now over $60 spread between asia and stamp/coinbase



768. Post 15006627 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: AlexGR on May 29, 2016, 01:56:19 AM
OMG Huobi $589, the west $530, still a big gab but im delighted  Grin

I'm looking at

Bitstamp 521
BTC-e 501.7
Bitfinex 532.09
Huobi 589.87

...which means we have spreads like 6% between btc-e and finex, 11% between finex and huobi, and 17% between huobi and btc-e.

If anything, these spreads show how broken legacy banking is and the difficulties of global mobility of funds between countries and markets, in terms of feasibility and speed.

Bitcoin is simply light years ahead of problematic and slow legacy banking and it shows in how legacy banking is creating arbitrage opportunities with vast spreads in the (much-faster-moving) btc market.

BTC trading in particular seems to be the "vehicle" of exposing legacy banking for its inadequacies...

Indeed the 17% spread is very bothersome. Either China is so hot they're buying everything in sight with no regards to other markets and arbs ran out of funds on western exchanges, or there's an outflow of capital from China and they're cashing out on western exchanges. Or maybe a bit of both



769. Post 15016469 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on May 30, 2016, 05:12:29 AM
Bearstamp bot has totally rekt their trading engine ... price jumping between 456 and 522 lol!Q!!

get out of there, looks busted

I don't believe that stamp is manipulating the market by selling tons of coins that they don't have. Their daily volume is into BTC10k (finex is BTC50k) it's just a shadow of itself, low volume so not many people keep $ on it, and it's much easier to transfer BTC in there for sale then get $ in



770. Post 15023388 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: yefi on May 30, 2016, 06:09:49 PM
Look how time flies, down $10 since that was posted.




LOL yes only if they were trolls would be even funnier



771. Post 15024235 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: becoin on May 30, 2016, 07:00:38 PM
Wow... Bitcoin haters troll fest. What a bunch of losers panicking because of bitcoin appreciation?


Yeah over half of the comments is from ignored users  



772. Post 15024526 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: soullyG on May 30, 2016, 07:58:53 PM
Wow... Bitcoin haters troll fest. What a bunch of losers panicking because of bitcoin appreciation?


Yeah over half of the comments is from ignored users  


the quoting quote of ignored users is too damned high.  Angry

I'm surprised my ignore list hasn't crashed the BCT server yet

First they took away the glowing ignore indicator, then they took away the noob jail, what's next taking the captcha out at at registration  Angry



773. Post 15025571 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: becoin on May 30, 2016, 10:01:24 PM
This is not good for Bitstamp. They're desperately trying to make money by expanding their business but they should stick to bitcoin only. Trading EUR/USD during weekend days and holidays is a recipe for disaster. They will have nobody to unload/hedge their positions during that time. EUR/USD pair is quite stable now but this was not always the case, nor it'll be in the future. Sometime gaps between Fridays and Mondays are so big that even a middle size broker can easily be bankrupted in a single day.

Huh i'm not following. They're only letting users trade between each other to set the rate. They're not pegging the rate over the weekend. I don't see the fx risk exposure that needs to be hedged here



774. Post 15025936 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: becoin on May 30, 2016, 11:00:56 PM
This is not good for Bitstamp. They're desperately trying to make money by expanding their business but they should stick to bitcoin only. Trading EUR/USD during weekend days and holidays is a recipe for disaster. They will have nobody to unload/hedge their positions during that time. EUR/USD pair is quite stable now but this was not always the case, nor it'll be in the future. Sometime gaps between Fridays and Mondays are so big that even a middle size broker can easily be bankrupted in a single day.

Huh i'm not following. They're only letting users trade between each other to set the rate. They're not pegging the rate over the weekend. I don't see the fx risk exposure that needs to be hedged here
If they really and strictly are letting users trade between each other to set the rate then I'm not following them. If you trade BTC/EUR and BTC/USD  then you effectively trade EUR/USD as well. Why would you deliberately introduce EUR/USD if you're not tempted to take advantage of some arbitrage 'opportunity'? With the opportunity, however, comes the risk especially if you don't know what is the EUR/USD exchange rate.

I believe they process SWIFT deposits in EUR faster and cheaper than wires in USD, and there seem to be a disconnect between BTC/EUR and BTC/USD pairs. You're right it's effectively USD/BTC BTC/EUR conversion just cuts out one step and exchange fees for arbs to be more effective. btc-e had eur/usd pair for a while now



775. Post 15026742 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 31, 2016, 01:20:48 AM
what the hell caused the climb out of the 400's? i'm so out of touch it's ridiculous...


Demand was greater than supply.
And supply is about to get cut in half  Grin



776. Post 15029969 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on May 31, 2016, 08:45:19 AM
http://www.coindesk.com/kncminer-declares-bankruptcy-cites-upcoming-bitcoin-subsidy-halving/

... so this is the real reason behind the rise, or rather the reason why bitcoin was being held down and now allowed to rise.  KNC miner was going broke and the chinese miners got wind of it so conspired (probably in cahoots with some notorious shorts) to hold price below cost of production until KNC was bust.  As soon as that happened they let the price go up to a new level ... where they think they can manage it.

These shennanigans have released some important information into the market, givn some of the game away so-to-speak.  Cost of production is somewhere around $480 at current difficulty so after halving that will be around ~$960, by a simplistic 1st order estimate.  Bitcoin price has never spent large amounts of time significantly below cost of production so it is a good bet that 3-6 months after halving bitcoin price is going to be ~$960.

BTC price doesn't depend on the production cost. Market sets the price at which one is willing to purchase BTC not miners at which they're willing to sell BTC. Market couldn't care less how much in electricity it took to produce 1BTC, simple supply and demand, where supply is fixed



777. Post 15036945 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

We're finally back to normal $10 range spread between Asia and west, this one was overdue, $60 spread was crazy



778. Post 15037125 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Now that we're back in sync, no we go up? Jusdging by a BTC666.66 buy order on whoboi @ 3523.93 dragon might just not be done



779. Post 15044106 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Spread closed, west stopped giving up cheap coins to the dragon. And might actually want some of them back (at a premium)



780. Post 15051642 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: Riddikulo on June 01, 2016, 10:27:29 PM
Only 5 weeks to halving. The price will stay at this point below $600, but in August o September it will go up hard pushed by miners.

If you rush, you lose. Stay calm and follow the market, never fight against it and you will earn money.

It amazes me how many still think that miners set the price for BTC. Miners have no control over the price OR supply, they can't produce less, and when some go out of business supply still doesn't get reduced. The difficulty is the element that adjusts to miners profitability (i.e. when some go out of business due to costs, hashrate drops and difficulty adjust  not supply!!!)



781. Post 15066217 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: Andre# on June 03, 2016, 07:06:38 AM
The plan for a HF is officially off the table. HK agreement breached.

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/4ma3gh/whats_the_current_status_of_cores_2mb_hf/d3tto83

Popcorn time!

And so it was. Guess market liked that news, or the west at least  Grin



782. Post 15066231 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on June 03, 2016, 09:16:31 AM
551 on Stamp, keep going my beauty. Hope this doesn't get dumped on.

Better they dump now



783. Post 15066342 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: becoin on June 03, 2016, 09:18:11 AM
btc dump incoming btw.... Tongue

Ok, so now you've provided something solid. Let's see if it pans out.
Ah, okay. I thought he'd say something different this time.

He managed to fail at a 50/50 outcome BRAVO, or given the lack of time frame you can always try to claim one of the corrections



784. Post 15073938 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on June 04, 2016, 12:14:39 AM
I thought the polls here had a history of being insanely inaccurate? Still, I guess it's gonna come at some point kinda soon.

they are often not properly posed: <100 is also <500 and <1000.
Intervals should be like: 500-600, 600-700, with extremes open like <100 and >1000.   

Shhhh as long as we're under $1000 i'm always right



785. Post 15077602 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

$600 soonish?



786. Post 15077996 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: Dotto on June 04, 2016, 10:14:07 AM
Correction... lets see how much time it takes

With some volume too



787. Post 15089680 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

 Shocked Well that was interesting. West doesn't want to move up without a fight



788. Post 15089758 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: Tzupy on June 05, 2016, 12:59:36 PM
Breakout denied! Grin

Only the first attempt



789. Post 15089831 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

LOL at OKCoin chart the dump from 3829 to 3780 was only on BTC364 volume/min and then they ramp up the volume. They need to adjust their fudged volume algorithm



790. Post 15094768 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

The market is behaving funny. It's as if someone is trying to corner in  Undecided



791. Post 15095057 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on June 05, 2016, 10:12:47 PM
The market is behaving funny. It's as if someone is trying to corner in  Undecided

O.k.  I will bite.  What is "corner in"?

Is that another way of saying manipulation?   Or is that a way of saying inability to get passed resistance?

We already realize that sometimes consolidation involves an attempt at a kind of holding pattern until such point that it cannot be held in the consolidation range.  That's no kind of new phenomenon.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornering_the_market

Someone is digging their feet in? Playing both sides of the market to keep the price in a certain range?



792. Post 15095382 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on June 05, 2016, 10:31:29 PM
The market is behaving funny. It's as if someone is trying to corner in  Undecided

O.k.  I will bite.  What is "corner in"?

Is that another way of saying manipulation?   Or is that a way of saying inability to get passed resistance?

We already realize that sometimes consolidation involves an attempt at a kind of holding pattern until such point that it cannot be held in the consolidation range.  That's no kind of new phenomenon.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornering_the_market

Someone is digging their feet in? Playing both sides of the market to keep the price in a certain range?


O.k. thanks for that explanation..

Hey DaRude.  What's an overview of your personal bitcoin related story?    Did you start buying bitcoins around the time of your registration in March 2013?  What kind of view did you hold?  Did your thinking evolve over the past few years?  Did you own any bitcoin's during either or both of the 2013 price surges?

No, started buying before that sometime in 2012. Hodled and accumulated since then through all the bubbles, gox, BTC26k bearwhale etc... Was inspired by user Loaded Grin As far as view, kind of surprised that the price is where it's at now. I do see it as a binary outcome, it clearly hasn't reached its critical mass, but yet not gone under even with BTC3600 daily supply. Almost lost faith when adoption slowed down and we were trading in $240 range, but hodled through it and now think outlook looks as bright as ever, and gets brighter every day. Buy some BTC and forget about it for 6months, market is way too thin and easily moved to pretend you can trade the patterns



793. Post 15095542 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: TReano on June 05, 2016, 11:37:20 PM
Bitcoin Block Reward Halving Countdown:
Only 35 more days!


I don't think it will matter much... If anything it well be sell the "news" .. If you can call it news at all since everybody knows about it for years.

It should generate a lot of buzz and coverage, on the other hand finex's longs are at $32.5MM (although how much of that is in etherpoop is unknown?) while shorts are pretty modest. Think we should see some swings next 2-3months on speculation and then true effects should be start settle in after that.

Lambie can you post that Wile E Coyote gif and add $580 to it? We need a target



794. Post 15096302 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on June 06, 2016, 01:23:55 AM
The market is behaving funny. It's as if someone is trying to corner in  Undecided

O.k.  I will bite.  What is "corner in"?

Is that another way of saying manipulation?   Or is that a way of saying inability to get passed resistance?

We already realize that sometimes consolidation involves an attempt at a kind of holding pattern until such point that it cannot be held in the consolidation range.  That's no kind of new phenomenon.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornering_the_market

Someone is digging their feet in? Playing both sides of the market to keep the price in a certain range?


O.k. thanks for that explanation..

Hey DaRude.  What's an overview of your personal bitcoin related story?    Did you start buying bitcoins around the time of your registration in March 2013?  What kind of view did you hold?  Did your thinking evolve over the past few years?  Did you own any bitcoin's during either or both of the 2013 price surges?

No, started buying before that sometime in 2012. Hodled and accumulated since then through all the bubbles, gox, BTC26k bearwhale etc... Was inspired by user Loaded Grin As far as view, kind of surprised that the price is where it's at now. I do see it as a binary outcome, it clearly hasn't reached its critical mass, but yet not gone under even with BTC3600 daily supply. Almost lost faith when adoption slowed down and we were trading in $240 range, but hodled through it and now think outlook looks as bright as ever, and gets brighter every day. Buy some BTC and forget about it for 6months, market is way too thin and easily moved to pretend you can trade the patterns

Oh... thanks for providing that.  It is nice to hear real individual perspectives from time to time.  Of course, we do not need to agree or even share the same view, exactly, but there still may be some aspects of our history that we have in common.

Regarding your last point about trading... especially, if we may experience some kind of exponential growth period or two, I believe that there are ways to structure such trading, and really investors should consider approaches beyond the buy and HODL approach.

Certainly, I am not going to advise anyone or to suggest that anyone attempt to do anything that is outside of his/her comfort zone.


Even though I don't agree with the extensively mathematical approach of Rptiela, nonetheless, I think that he provides a good start for conceptualizing going beyond a buy and HODL approach.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=345065.0

More or less the concept is that from time to time investors in BTC need to have a plan for taking some profits off the table from time to time.

In the end, probably, you are correct with a suggestion that either reinvesting or any kind of trading has too many screw up potentials, and so just removing some profits, from time to time, could be an intermediate compromise approach, for some folks.
 









How's Rptiela doing haven't heard from him since he started pushing monero too hard and left this sub, does he still have that castle? As far as trading it's a wild wild west, you tell me how much of your strategy accounts for a major exchange going under, or Dell announcing that they'll start accepting BTC, or China banning BTC, or BTC170k sale by US masrshals, or BTC24k sale by E&Y, or 10% spread with Chinese exchanges, or China banning BTC again, or some trader just putting up a sudden BTC26k ask wall, or Adam getting drunk and leaving this sub etc etc etc fundamentals can only be traded very long term on such thin market and long term fundamentals say HODL  Grin



795. Post 15096565 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: fichtn12345 on June 06, 2016, 02:01:15 AM
4000 CNY and especially 4444 will be huge psychological resistances in the middle kingdom. 4 in chinese is "sì" (四) and it sounds a lot like "sî" (死) which means death... The chinese people don't like it and try to avoid using it. In elevators for example you might find floor 3a and 3b and floor 5 but no floor 4. Not really comparable to 13 in the west but you can get the idea. ( Most of the airplanes i have been flying with did not have a seat with that number). So there could be some trouble if we do not get past that cursed number quick... On the other hand we might just overshoot it to 5000 cny which would be really great if the western exchanges just follow. My next target is +760$.

Now you can enjoy the rest of the nlc show i guess. kthxbye

i can't imagine dragons being so superstitious. On the other hand a ton of coins on finex for sale till $600 it'll take some volume to push through



796. Post 15097662 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: Chef Ramsay on June 06, 2016, 05:57:02 AM
Complete degenerate page. Bullish! There's psychiatric help available if you so choose. Adam won't even show up here because he's embarrassed at what "the help" has to say at this point.

After BMB yours is the next post that's not ignored on this whole page, i figured trolls are having a blast trolling each other



797. Post 15113414 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: AZwarel on June 07, 2016, 12:08:00 PM

It is just so many hooked up with this myth that mining costs somehow influence bitcoin prices. They are not.


... all empirical evidence to the contrary.

Just keep telling yourself whatever myth you like to keep yourself inside your comfort zone. Regardless, money is what does and if you aren't well enough informed with the money markets you'll most likely lose 'money' speculating on bitcoin.

Start here http://szabo.best.vwh.net/shell.html for some insight to get rid of all that bullshit confusion you just spread everywhere

Good morning:)

Thanks, i have read it like a year ago, it is a fascinating read(!), i think i even linked it somewhere in a reply long ago. Still, i think Szabo's whole point is that money is an abstraction, a creation of the human mind for "...to solve problems of cooperation that other animals cannot.." and cryptos are the ultimate proof, that this abstraction can exist purely as information, completely detached from the physical form.

That is precisely why i am saying that it can not have a traditional production cost, because it is pure information, a number only - actually, more like an entropic state.

The empirical evidence is this: buyers/sellers on the market does not care, how much computing went to the same bitcoin units of 2010, or 2016, 1 bitcoin= 1 bitcoin, regardless of electricity burned to "compute" it - as i have written here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg15108324#msg15108324, there is no production, every new block will enable a new UTXO in the coinbase transaction, DESPITE the computational power used - the same with 1 laptop humming on the desk, or a gigantic asic farm factory, 1 block will release the same amount of BTC/as defined by the blockheight as unspent transaction output.

Saying that "production costs" - whatever that would mean to generate a random number basically - reflecting in the market value of BTC is saying people are checking price tags in a supermarket by calculating how much it cost the producer to make a bottle of milk. They do not care. They will check the competing MARGINAL UTILITY of the goods satisfying their needs, they could not care - or has the ability to calculate - about production costs.

Same with bitcoin. Does anyone care, if that bitcoin was mined with 100 Ghash/sec machine, or 1,4 Exahash/sec gigafarm? Does that by itself make bitcoin more $value in the open market? It does not.


Yep understandably people are struggling with the concept of fixed supply. In real life if production costs are much less than the market price of the item, you got a huge profit margin so either you or someone will increases the supply, considering constant demand, this will cause the price to go down. Works the other way around too, it's not sustainable if production costs are greater than the market price, so business will go bankrupt thus decreasing the supply, with constant demand price goes up.

In bitcoin land, instead of supply we adjust difficulty. If mining is very profitable, noobs will start buying USB miners at the retail stores cause a rise in hashrate which will increase difficulty. When mining costs are greater than price, electricity bills pile up, business with higher production costs go bankrupt causing the hashrate to drop and difficulty to adjust down.



798. Post 15117344 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: zimmah on June 07, 2016, 03:04:05 PM
Cost of production is doubling in less than a month ... that will set the new floor for bitcoin price to the $840-960 range (at the minimum without difficulty increases) in the medium term.

Cost of production for a monetary good is the economic defence against counterfeiting.  While gold is money, and sometimes attracts a monetary premium substantially above it's cost of production, for someone to produce gold "from nothing" they need to expend an equivalent amount of resources to the cost of production.  Over long terms the price of the monetary good may be attracted to its cost of production but ultimately that is as cheap as you can acquire it for, as long as it is still desirable as a monetary good.  For the same reason the lowest value of fiat paper money is the cost of the paper it is printed on and the ink, i.e. it's cost of production (about a few cents for a $100 bill).

While bitcoin is still valued as a monetary good, that can be transported in minutes across the internet as a final settlement for bearer instruments exchanged on a censorship-resistant network, it still needs to defend against counterfeiting.  The cost of production defends against counterfeiting since this is as cheap as you can produce bitcoin.  If bitcoin becomes more desirable for other reasons of its utility, such as store of value, medium of exchange (network effect increasing), etc., then it may easily attract a monetary good premium on top of the cost of production, but the cost of production has invariably set the floor for the lower bound on bitcoin prices, as long as it has remained a monetary good.

Bitcoin is still monetising.

agreed, the lower boundary of the rpcie is the production cost.

It could accidentally be below this value for a short time, but never for long.

The upper boundary is pretty much unlimited (limited only by the amount of value we can exchange for it). So the absolute upper value would be everything in the world divided by the amount of bitcoin in circulation. Of course we would never quite reach that value, but that would be the absolute upper limit it could never go above.

Ughh ingenious  Roll Eyes following that logic lets
Step 1: Increase difficulty 10x fold, thus increasing cost of production for all miners 10x
Step 2: Huh
Step 3: Bitcoin to da moon???

Just have to somehow get the note to investors for them to check the current productions costs before they decide the utility value of BTC and how much they should be willing to pay for BTC



799. Post 15118048 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: zimmah on June 07, 2016, 06:22:25 PM
Cost of production is doubling in less than a month ... that will set the new floor for bitcoin price to the $840-960 range (at the minimum without difficulty increases) in the medium term.

Cost of production for a monetary good is the economic defence against counterfeiting.  While gold is money, and sometimes attracts a monetary premium substantially above it's cost of production, for someone to produce gold "from nothing" they need to expend an equivalent amount of resources to the cost of production.  Over long terms the price of the monetary good may be attracted to its cost of production but ultimately that is as cheap as you can acquire it for, as long as it is still desirable as a monetary good.  For the same reason the lowest value of fiat paper money is the cost of the paper it is printed on and the ink, i.e. it's cost of production (about a few cents for a $100 bill).

While bitcoin is still valued as a monetary good, that can be transported in minutes across the internet as a final settlement for bearer instruments exchanged on a censorship-resistant network, it still needs to defend against counterfeiting.  The cost of production defends against counterfeiting since this is as cheap as you can produce bitcoin.  If bitcoin becomes more desirable for other reasons of its utility, such as store of value, medium of exchange (network effect increasing), etc., then it may easily attract a monetary good premium on top of the cost of production, but the cost of production has invariably set the floor for the lower bound on bitcoin prices, as long as it has remained a monetary good.

Bitcoin is still monetising.

agreed, the lower boundary of the rpcie is the production cost.

It could accidentally be below this value for a short time, but never for long.

The upper boundary is pretty much unlimited (limited only by the amount of value we can exchange for it). So the absolute upper value would be everything in the world divided by the amount of bitcoin in circulation. Of course we would never quite reach that value, but that would be the absolute upper limit it could never go above.

Ughh ingenious  Roll Eyes following that logic lets
Step 1: Increase difficulty 10x fold, thus increasing cost of production for all miners 10x
Step 2: Huh
Step 3: Bitcoin to da moon???

Just have to somehow get the note to investors for them to check the current productions costs before they decide the utility value of BTC and how much they should be willing to pay for BTC

 A transaction has 2 sides, a buyer and a seller

Let's assume some people sell for less than the cost of production, eventually they will run out of coins to sell, and the only new coins on the market will be either coins that were bought before and resold (usually t a higher price, because no one would like to sell for less than they bought for, unless forced to do so). Or freshly mined coins, that well sell at least at the price of production, unless the miner is forced to sell for lower to cover his expenses, but if a miner continually sells at a loss, mining will be unprofitable for him, so eventually he'll be forced to quit.

Therefore, over time, the price will reach at least the price of production, because those who sell for less than that will run out of coins to sell.

I don't know how I can explain it any simpler.

No no and again no, seller doesn't set the price buyer does. Market couldn't care less what seller likes or doesn't like. Here's the price someone is willing to buy the BTC you produced if that's not profitable for you, you go out of business, you go out of business there's less hash power dificulty adjust all other miners are that tiny bit more profitable. Rinse and repeat.

On a separate note, everyone ignoring that BTC5k sell wall @ $576



800. Post 15122028 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: zimmah on June 07, 2016, 07:16:16 PM
Cost of production is doubling in less than a month ... that will set the new floor for bitcoin price to the $840-960 range (at the minimum without difficulty increases) in the medium term.

Cost of production for a monetary good is the economic defence against counterfeiting.  While gold is money, and sometimes attracts a monetary premium substantially above it's cost of production, for someone to produce gold "from nothing" they need to expend an equivalent amount of resources to the cost of production.  Over long terms the price of the monetary good may be attracted to its cost of production but ultimately that is as cheap as you can acquire it for, as long as it is still desirable as a monetary good.  For the same reason the lowest value of fiat paper money is the cost of the paper it is printed on and the ink, i.e. it's cost of production (about a few cents for a $100 bill).

While bitcoin is still valued as a monetary good, that can be transported in minutes across the internet as a final settlement for bearer instruments exchanged on a censorship-resistant network, it still needs to defend against counterfeiting.  The cost of production defends against counterfeiting since this is as cheap as you can produce bitcoin.  If bitcoin becomes more desirable for other reasons of its utility, such as store of value, medium of exchange (network effect increasing), etc., then it may easily attract a monetary good premium on top of the cost of production, but the cost of production has invariably set the floor for the lower bound on bitcoin prices, as long as it has remained a monetary good.

Bitcoin is still monetising.

agreed, the lower boundary of the rpcie is the production cost.

It could accidentally be below this value for a short time, but never for long.

The upper boundary is pretty much unlimited (limited only by the amount of value we can exchange for it). So the absolute upper value would be everything in the world divided by the amount of bitcoin in circulation. Of course we would never quite reach that value, but that would be the absolute upper limit it could never go above.

Ughh ingenious  Roll Eyes following that logic lets
Step 1: Increase difficulty 10x fold, thus increasing cost of production for all miners 10x
Step 2: Huh
Step 3: Bitcoin to da moon???

Just have to somehow get the note to investors for them to check the current productions costs before they decide the utility value of BTC and how much they should be willing to pay for BTC

 A transaction has 2 sides, a buyer and a seller

Let's assume some people sell for less than the cost of production, eventually they will run out of coins to sell, and the only new coins on the market will be either coins that were bought before and resold (usually t a higher price, because no one would like to sell for less than they bought for, unless forced to do so). Or freshly mined coins, that well sell at least at the price of production, unless the miner is forced to sell for lower to cover his expenses, but if a miner continually sells at a loss, mining will be unprofitable for him, so eventually he'll be forced to quit.

Therefore, over time, the price will reach at least the price of production, because those who sell for less than that will run out of coins to sell.

I don't know how I can explain it any simpler.

No no and again no, seller doesn't set the price buyer does. Market couldn't care less what seller likes or doesn't like. Here's the price someone is willing to buy the BTC you produced if that's not profitable for you, you go out of business, you go out of business there's less hash power dificulty adjust all other miners are that tiny bit more profitable. Rinse and repeat.

On a separate note, everyone ignoring that BTC5k sell wall @ $576

Ok, I'd like to buy all your bitcoins for $1 each.

Also, if you happen to have any gold, i offer $0.01 per gram of gold.

I'd also like to buy both your house and your car for a combined price of $3

You see? Nobody would accept such offers because they're complete garbage offers, way below the price the seller wants for them, So the seller chooses not to sell.

The price has to be agreed between buyer and seller, if one of them does not agree, the trade is off.

If you don't even understand this, don't bother replying, because i'd be better of talking to a banana peel.

The demand doesn't come from one buyer but from market as a whole, as a seller obviously i choose the highest bidder. Why would i sell it to you for $1 when someone else is willing to pay $575? Now i'd prefer to sell it for $10,000 each because i bought a bunch of these USB miners from my local retail store and my cost of electricity is sky high, but somehow i doubt that any buyer cares much about that. Miners must sell, and don't have an option not to because they don't like the price. Otherwise they become investors and carry additional FX exposure risk on their "inventory" (assuming utilities, salaries, equipment, is purchased with other currency). They're not kids mining in parents garage that can choose not to sell if they don't like the price, and somehow get a consortium going where everyone other miner does the same.

Your line of though only works if all (or majority) of miners collaborate together in kind of an oligopoly (think OPEC) and agree to artificially restrict supply bellow certain price, and even that probably won't work for long.

Or to use your example: I want to buy BTC from you for $575, you want to sell it for $1000 and explain how your cost of production is so high. I wish you good luck finding an idiot that cares, and just wait after you lower the price to my buy range or invest in something else. After spending few days trying to convince people to buy it for $1000 because of your high production cost you give up or get hungry or need to pay the electricity bill and sell it to the highest bidder. The fall in your logic is that it doesn't account for difficulty adjustments and that it can scale down.



801. Post 15124882 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on June 08, 2016, 04:54:30 AM
yes, any day now difficulty will be dropping and my 2 netbooks will make me a fortune again ...



Ok i give up. Yes you figured it out, hash rate = $price CCMF   Cry



802. Post 15125776 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on June 08, 2016, 10:54:45 AM
I guess you cant read so I'll repeat it for you:

cost of production forms a soft lower bound for price, an 'elastic' floor if you will.

Cost of production is related to difficulty but not directly or in a definite proportional relation since it is complicated by many other factors like cost of rig development, software development and operational labour overheads, electricity, etc. So now I've opened it up to the total complexity (that really just complicates with enlightening) this is the bit where you try to wriggle out and lead the conversation into the weeds, minutiae, thread-trashing and scatological references to obfuscate the central premise that doesn't fit your permabear, anti-bitcoin case.
I am wildly bullish, but your statements don't seem logical to me.
There is nothing theoretically preventing the price from dropping and miners going bankrupt, inducing lower difficulty.   
I am not saying that is what I expect to happen in the near future, just that it can happen.

Please try reasoning with arguments instead of resorting to aggressive end statements.

I'm not being aggressive, I'm just explaining how it goes every time I lay it out as simply as I can. Look I don't have time to go through it all again so I can't really help you anymore if you don't get it yet, sorry.


Bravo, that sums it up nicely. And i'm a anti-bitcoin permabear now  Huh

Dragon is pushing again, but ask side is pretty steep on finex plus i'm sure Mr BTC5k ask wall is still lurking somewhere



803. Post 15125834 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: becoin on June 08, 2016, 11:00:36 AM
There is nothing theoretically preventing the price from dropping and miners going bankrupt, inducing lower difficulty.  
Theoretically everything is possible but not always!

I'd even accept this argument over marcus's logic where miners can't go bankrupt. Yes spacetime continuum and we're all holograms in some blackhole's matrix.



804. Post 15125869 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on June 08, 2016, 11:06:02 AM
There is nothing theoretically preventing the price from dropping and miners going bankrupt, inducing lower difficulty.  
Theoretically everything is possible but not always!
I think this has actually happened before for brief periods.

Anyways, looks like we are heading up again.  Go BTC  Grin

Reassuring to see a little nibble but will need lots more, still BTC15k are stacked till $650 on Finex someone cashing in big time



805. Post 15125959 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

..and longs a LOT lower. But it'll probably only go higher as speculation peaks before the halvening, hope a lot of those longs are in etherpoop too



806. Post 15126046 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on June 08, 2016, 11:22:23 AM
..and longs a LOT lower. But it'll probably only go higher as speculation peaks before the halvening, hope a lot of those longs are in etherpoop too
True, but I doubt most are in etherpoop.  The thing is, most of the time big long positions are a recipe for disaster, which is why I was reluctant to jump into the breakout at first, but if speculators can correctly predict an influx of new money, then we are A-OK, and I think this has been happening.  People who were interested in bitcoin before, and have been following it a bit are deciding they don't want to miss the train, and jumping on.  The real bubble starts when we reach the people who haven't seriously considered investing yet.

The bull in me agrees, think(hope?) market is underestimating the effects and coverage of the halvening, expecting some wild swings during this month

Kinda scared me when longs went full retard and ate up all the swaps causing the daily rate on finex to jump to  above 0.5%. If it'd held that would squeeze a lot of them



807. Post 15126790 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on June 08, 2016, 12:31:26 PM
There is nothing theoretically preventing the price from dropping and miners going bankrupt, inducing lower difficulty.  
Theoretically everything is possible but not always!

I'd even accept this argument over marcus's logic where miners can't go bankrupt.

Listen you lying, slippery little piece of shit ... no part of my argument ever said " ... miners can't go bankrupt..." ??

Do not try and put words in my mouth again. If you don't want to learn then just stfu and stop making the world a worse place for others who might want to learn.

BTC price can't fall below cost of production = miners always make profit
Miners make profit = miners won't go bankrupt

And seems like i'm not the only one who can't follow your logic, maybe we're all dumb here and can't learn from you? And one more name calling and on ignore you go, you'd be the first "legend"



808. Post 15129756 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: zimmah on June 08, 2016, 02:51:18 PM
..and longs a LOT lower. But it'll probably only go higher as speculation peaks before the halvening, hope a lot of those longs are in etherpoop too
True, but I doubt most are in etherpoop.  The thing is, most of the time big long positions are a recipe for disaster, which is why I was reluctant to jump into the breakout at first, but if speculators can correctly predict an influx of new money, then we are A-OK, and I think this has been happening.  People who were interested in bitcoin before, and have been following it a bit are deciding they don't want to miss the train, and jumping on.  The real bubble starts when we reach the people who haven't seriously considered investing yet.

The bull in me agrees, think(hope?) market is underestimating the effects and coverage of the halvening, expecting some wild swings during this month

Kinda scared me when longs went full retard and ate up all the swaps causing the daily rate on finex to jump to  above 0.5%. If it'd held that would squeeze a lot of them

the halving is already priced in

/s

seriously though i think we will see a serious rise 3 to 6 months after the halving.

It's no surprise that it's coming so in that sense it is priced in, the BIG question is how much trust do you have in ability of current BTC investors to price something accurately and not over or under estimate an event. I'm guessing there's 0% chance of that happening



809. Post 15133941 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on June 08, 2016, 06:16:20 PM
There is nothing theoretically preventing the price from dropping and miners going bankrupt, inducing lower difficulty.  
Theoretically everything is possible but not always!

I'd even accept this argument over marcus's logic where miners can't go bankrupt.

Listen you lying, slippery little piece of shit ... no part of my argument ever said " ... miners can't go bankrupt..." ??

Do not try and put words in my mouth again. If you don't want to learn then just stfu and stop making the world a worse place for others who might want to learn.

BTC price can't fall below cost of production = miners always make profit
Miners make profit = miners won't go bankrupt

And seems like i'm not the only one who can't follow your logic, maybe we're all dumb here and can't learn from you? And one more name calling and on ignore you go, you'd be the first "legend"


Can't we all just get along?Huh   Rodney king said that, no?    And, Britney Spears had her own rendition of that, too?

 I don't really see big differences in the speculations that have been going on regarding various miner incentives.  Surely some of those speculations make more sense than others, and we all should realize that sometimes miners have a complex set of incentives based on the fact that they are both engaging in businesses and speculating regarding future price.  Accordingly, sometimes their speculation may cause them to operate at a loss for a considerable amount of time, in a kind of gambling way, expecting that the speculation aspect of their BTC holdings is going to cause them to move from the red to the black (and with any gambling, such speculation may or may not pay off), but the bitcoin community as a whole will frequently benefit from such ongoing speculations and investments into bitcoin.




Once miner decides to hoard coins instead of selling it's not the mining side of business that handles it but the investment/trading side so. For all purposes at that point it's an investment. Which just muddies up the argument if price follows the hashrate (indirect cost of production), or hashrate follows the price.



810. Post 15133947 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Dumping is strong on finex. Think we found some whales cashout point, or a price some miner is better of selling on market rather than OTC. $600 won't be easy. The dragon doesn't seem to care much though, $13 spread between finex and whoboi



811. Post 15134426 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on June 09, 2016, 02:17:13 AM
583. Buy high sell at 32,000 in < 2 years  Grin

Adam? Is the pump still on?
Getting a little nervous here Sad

Tell me everything will be alright. Hold me, bitbros.                                             

                             
lol

Wait till we hit 666.66 on the way down lots of walls popped up at that price



812. Post 15134430 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on June 09, 2016, 02:18:02 AM


Are you saying that Chinese are throwing large brown dildos in space?



813. Post 15135265 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on June 09, 2016, 04:03:25 AM
There is nothing theoretically preventing the price from dropping and miners going bankrupt, inducing lower difficulty.  
Theoretically everything is possible but not always!

I'd even accept this argument over marcus's logic where miners can't go bankrupt.

Listen you lying, slippery little piece of shit ... no part of my argument ever said " ... miners can't go bankrupt..." ??

Do not try and put words in my mouth again. If you don't want to learn then just stfu and stop making the world a worse place for others who might want to learn.

BTC price can't fall below cost of production = miners always make profit
Miners make profit = miners won't go bankrupt

And seems like i'm not the only one who can't follow your logic, maybe we're all dumb here and can't learn from you? And one more name calling and on ignore you go, you'd be the first "legend"


Can't we all just get along?Huh   Rodney king said that, no?    And, Britney Spears had her own rendition of that, too?

 I don't really see big differences in the speculations that have been going on regarding various miner incentives.  Surely some of those speculations make more sense than others, and we all should realize that sometimes miners have a complex set of incentives based on the fact that they are both engaging in businesses and speculating regarding future price.  Accordingly, sometimes their speculation may cause them to operate at a loss for a considerable amount of time, in a kind of gambling way, expecting that the speculation aspect of their BTC holdings is going to cause them to move from the red to the black (and with any gambling, such speculation may or may not pay off), but the bitcoin community as a whole will frequently benefit from such ongoing speculations and investments into bitcoin.




Once miner decides to hoard coins instead of selling it's not the mining side of business that handles it but the investment/trading side so. For all purposes at that point it's an investment. Which just muddies up the argument if price follows the hashrate (indirect cost of production), or hashrate follows the price.

They can establish their business model in any way that they want, whether that means cashing out on a daily basis or holding coins for years.  It does not matter, and the whole bitcoin infrastructure does not give a shit about what they decide to do on an individual basis.  If those coins are not available for circulation, then the bitcoin community will use whatever coins are available. 

In the end if the behavior of the miners causes there are not enough coins, the price of bitcoins will go up, and if there are too many coins the price of bitcoins will go down... so who gives a shit whether miners hoard coins or liquidate them immediately.. the market will adapt to whatever the supply is... and for the most part, bitcoin works the same, if the price is $1 per bitcoin or $1million per bitcoin, even though the interaction with other financial systems is going to differ whether there is a $20 million market cap or a $10 trillion market cap. 

Ultimately, each of the miners decide for himself/herself how many coins s/he is going to sell, if any, and the miners are a diverse of enough of group, at least so far, that they are likely not coordinating their decision(s) regarding selling/holding.  If for some reason, the bitcoin market creates a space in which miners are able to coordinate their decisions, then likely the space is going to need to be reconsidered at that time.


Right i'm sure most of them carry some inventory or sell them OTC at some preset price. But how does it matter if i as investor obtained those coins from mining them or buying them on the market? The minute the coins are mined i own them and carry the coins on my balance sheet, and the only thing that matter is the spot price and my perception of the market whether i feel it'll go up or down and the risk i associate with it. Portfolio new worth is evaluated on a daily if not by the minute for publicly traded funds. I don't care what my base price was (or my production price if that's how i obtained them), my decision doesn't depend on whether i got those coins at $10 in 2011 or $1200 in 2013 at least it shouldn't if emotions are not involved.

JJG are you also saying that BTC price depends on the hashrate (production costs) and not the other way around???



814. Post 15138232 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: Karartma1 on June 09, 2016, 08:56:47 AM
I don't believe in oracles that much but I don't think what you posted is oracle-related. It is indeed reality-related, it is related to facts. If people will start recognizing the true lie they live in, oh man, what a fun!
And then popcorns

Did someone say orcas? Ohh neverminf Lips sealed



815. Post 15139367 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: AZwarel on June 09, 2016, 12:36:23 PM
The future is finally here.
Of course, it is. People must finally understand that blockchain space is a limited and valuable resource. You have to compete to get included. And compete even more to get included fast!

I can not believe these stories about transactions going unconfirmed for days. Bullshit. Very unlikely (like less than 0.0001% chance). I never had a transaction which did not get included at the next block, ever - of course i let my wallet software calculate the actual fee pressure and pay it, still highest fee ever paid was 0,0005, when the backlog was like 10k+ transactions, still got in the first block, np.

Even if they send a zero fee transaction, they will be included in hours, from one of those "lucky block streaks". Also, bitcoins can not be in a limbo. They are either at the original address until moved in a BLOCK, or at the new address after included in a BLOCK. If these mythical "2 days in limbo" are real, they just have to import the WIF to another wallet (or resend if the wallet has that option), and resend the same transaction with more (or non-zero) fees, the miners will accept, since the bitcoins are still at the original address when checked on the blockchain (coins are "on blockchain", not in the wallet software "it is known!") the old address until confirmed in a block not to be).

This "problem" is a FUD, any technically knowledgeable person will laugh on it...ps.: my message to these unicorn people: use a proper wallet with fee adjustment, and do not be a super cheap whiner on a 0.04$-0.08$ cost...

EDIT: some actual math: for 2 days without confirmation, someone needs to show me a 48 hours period with an average of 288 consecutive blocks, which are: all 100% full, with EVERY SINGLE transaction above the minimum 0,0001 fee paid. Come unicorns, show me such a period. They can not, that's why it is either BS, or they actually did not send the transaction (broken SVP maybe?) to the network, but too dumb to check if it is in the MemPool...

Please help i've been stuck here for 5 days, i keep offering $1 to get in a taxi but so far no one has picked me up!!! WHAT DO I DO?HuhHuh

I also been sitting in front of western union for those 5 days asking them to transfer my money to someone else for $0.25 (that's like 5x what i'd pay in BTC fees) they're also yet to accept me. Any advise??



816. Post 15139521 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: Assmaster2000 on June 09, 2016, 01:01:28 PM
Please help i've been stuck here for 5 days, i keep offering $1 to get in a taxi but so far no one has let me in!!! WHAT DO I DO?HuhHuh
I like your taxi analogy, only you don't pay taxis in advance -- you pay when you get out. Turns out she forgot her purse, doesn't have the fare cabby wants her to pay, and the cabby won't let her out without paying. So she's gonna live out her days in the back of the cab Sad

Ahh cute analogy almost convinced me too, if not for AZwarel post above  Roll Eyes but that's ok don't let that discourage your little heart. You just keep on trying.

The damn bus system is completely rigged though WTF bus driver wants me to pay when i get on?? Let's both get on bus forum and troll them to death who da f*ck they think they are!?! Subways, trolleys, and don't get me started on those damn airplanes  Angry



817. Post 15139825 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: DaRude on June 09, 2016, 12:55:08 PM
The future is finally here.
Of course, it is. People must finally understand that blockchain space is a limited and valuable resource. You have to compete to get included. And compete even more to get included fast!

I can not believe these stories about transactions going unconfirmed for days. Bullshit. Very unlikely (like less than 0.0001% chance). I never had a transaction which did not get included at the next block, ever - of course i let my wallet software calculate the actual fee pressure and pay it, still highest fee ever paid was 0,0005, when the backlog was like 10k+ transactions, still got in the first block, np.

Even if they send a zero fee transaction, they will be included in hours, from one of those "lucky block streaks". Also, bitcoins can not be in a limbo. They are either at the original address until moved in a BLOCK, or at the new address after included in a BLOCK. If these mythical "2 days in limbo" are real, they just have to import the WIF to another wallet (or resend if the wallet has that option), and resend the same transaction with more (or non-zero) fees, the miners will accept, since the bitcoins are still at the original address when checked on the blockchain (coins are "on blockchain", not in the wallet software "it is known!") the old address until confirmed in a block not to be).

This "problem" is a FUD, any technically knowledgeable person will laugh on it...ps.: my message to these unicorn people: use a proper wallet with fee adjustment, and do not be a super cheap whiner on a 0.04$-0.08$ cost...

EDIT: some actual math: for 2 days without confirmation, someone needs to show me a 48 hours period with an average of 288 consecutive blocks, which are: all 100% full, with EVERY SINGLE transaction above the minimum 0,0001 fee paid. Come unicorns, show me such a period. They can not, that's why it is either BS, or they actually did not send the transaction (broken SVP maybe?) to the network, but too dumb to check if it is in the MemPool...

Please help i've been stuck here for 5 days, i keep offering $1 to get in a taxi but so far no one has picked me up!!! WHAT DO I DO?HuhHuh

I also been sitting in front of western union for those 5 days asking them to transfer my money to someone else for $0.25 (that's like 5x what i'd pay in BTC fees) they're also yet to accept me. Any advise??

I do wonder why big mining pools just don't give an option like hey for all those people who tried to get on a bus without paying the fare send us your transaction ID (tell us where you are) and pay fees (fine) to this new address and we'll try to include your non paying butt on the next bus we run

Should put an end to all these stupid posts. Oh you didn't want to pay for the ticket? Well go to this site to pay your $0.25 fine and it should be included in the next block they mine



818. Post 15140138 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: Assmaster2000 on June 09, 2016, 01:48:01 PM
I do wonder why big mining pools just don't give an option like hey for all those people who tried to get on a bus without paying the fare send us your transaction ID (tell us where you are) and pay fees (fine) to this new address and we'll try to include your non paying butt on the next bus we run

Should put an end to all these stupid posts. Oh you didn't want to pay for the ticket? Well go to this site to pay your $0.25 fine and it should be included in the next block they mine
This what you're talking about?
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction_replacement
TL;DR: the problem with beetcoin is not that the fees are high, but that you don't know if you have enough money with you to be able to get off the bus, because, unlike a bus, beetcoin doesn't ask for your fare to get on. It lets you on, but if you don't have enough change on you? Have fun riding the bus. For the rest of your life Smiley

I am surprised that blockchain.info allows 0 fee transaction at all or at least without popping up a bunch or red warnings. That's the bus companies (wallets) fault, not surprised as i haven't heard anything good about their wallet for a while. You're trolling too hard transaction will eventually expire out of mempool but you probably already knew that (if you tried to get in without paying you might be stuck on the bus until they take you to the police station)



819. Post 15140400 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: soullyG on June 09, 2016, 02:16:54 PM
@DaRude if you really have to talk to the trolls (Lambie) please don't quote them, the stupid hurts so much Kiss

Fare enough. Online wallets that still allow 0fee transactions to general public should be chastised though. Damn it she/he got me again



820. Post 15150970 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: Assmaster2000 on June 09, 2016, 10:46:00 PM
and when I pay for a beer, I don't want to worry about fat-fingering an extra digit or including unconfirmed inputs.
If you're an idiot you'd better let your government take care of you and your money.
You wanna be your own practologist, banker and brain surgeon, you go right ahead.
Something tells me you did try your hand at self-brainsurgeoning, and it worked out ...well, let's just say you tried Cheesy

Seriously tho, I don't want to be my own ditch digger, bankster or ass surgeon, for basically the same set of reasons: I'd rather pay someone else to do it, someone who's good at it.
It is like saying you'd rather pay someone to fuck your wife, someone who's good at it.
Seriously tho, you can't pay if you can't pay because you don't know how money is used.
Nah, I like fucking, so to have time for it & not have human females run away from me because covered in poo from my last attempt at being my own ass surgeon, I pay people to do the shit I don't like to do/ain't good at.
See?
It's as if I'm explaining basic earthling stuff to a martian, ffs Roll Eyes
Most people do. And that's the point. Most people also like to personally take care of their own money.
Saying that you don't have time to take care of your money because you're too busy working to make money is extreme stupidity.

I can only tell you that you're mistaken. I like having money, but I'm as tempted by the prospect of becoming my own bank as I am by digging through my bloody poo to lovingly suture my own rectum. Which is to say I can take it or leave it.

Think i'm becoming a troll too cause i'm starting to agree with lambie more and more. People who don't have enough brain power to NOT put a 0 in the fees section probably should not be trusted with their own money. (And they should probably be kept away from sharp objects, and eating soup for the risk of drowning). But that's OK world needs people serving them food, cleaning streets, working cashier registers (no wait not this one they might push an extra 0) etc... If you figuring out how to turn on a computer, is equivalent to building a rocket ship to you, just give your money to me and i'll set your daily allowances to make sure you don't push an extra 9 when buying a pack of cig s because you like how the number 9 looks

Probably shouldn't have access to a bank account either for the fear of wiring all of your money to Nigerian prince who wants to make you rich



821. Post 15152325 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

 Roll Eyes

Yeah very deep thoughts. So to sum it up if you feel something is outside of your competence, don't do it. Being a surgeon, and building space rockets is outside of my and majorities competence. Eating soup, operating a vehicle, pumping my own gas, running a wallet software is not. Welcome to 20th century, times-a-changing. We'll try really hard to dull the edges and make it as idiot proof as possible so 90% of population can use it, but if you still fall in the 10% and are so incompetent that you're afraid of pocking yourself in the eye with a fork,  you probably shouldn't use forks and bitch about fork manufacturers



822. Post 15152576 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):


Don't worry lambie in due time we'll try to cover your special case too, you'll get a spork



823. Post 15155121 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: petahashminer on June 10, 2016, 04:19:40 PM
so weekend has come,  Grin do you think another nice pump will occur? or now  is it bearish time. the volume has decreased significantly in the last few days.

Bid side is forming up nicely on finex, BTC3k till $570 if that's any indicator now-a-days. Longs went down a bit too, so stocking up on popcorn for the weekend



824. Post 15155802 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: tomothy on June 10, 2016, 07:10:52 PM
How would you describe the last 3-4 days of market trading? Does it look like accumulation? Been staring at charts to much today. Just wondering.

Someone big is accumulating, yet someone big is dumping as well. Looks like the selling whale is easing up but he's still lurking. Need lots of volume to push through 600, i wouldn't rule it out over the weekend though as $580 is not getting dumped on. The dragon is still a nice big unknown with the $6 spread



825. Post 15155814 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: podyx on June 10, 2016, 07:34:11 PM
Protip: Short ETH/BTC

Shhhhhhh don't give away all of the secrets  Wink



826. Post 15161880 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Ok ok fine i'll be that guy. Willy is back !!!!!!  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin And he's on finex now. BTC1 every 15sec. Accumulation phase 1 started. Or do we not talk about it as to not to spook him? I didn't get the last memo



827. Post 15162085 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: dloghwak on June 11, 2016, 10:05:10 AM
Ok ok fine i'll be that guy. Willy is back !!!!!!  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin And he's on finex now. BTC1 every 15sec. Accumulation phase 1 started. Or do we not talk about it as to not to spook him? I didn't get the last memo
That's rule 1, do not talk about Willy goddamn.

But there are only few things people can look at forever, fire, water, sky, and Willy in action. Plus they're not even trying to hide him at least randomize the amounts and times a bit



828. Post 15162524 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

And Willy has been unplugged. Knew i shouldn't have said his name out loud. WTF is going on above ?? Roll Eyes



829. Post 15168195 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Is it me or both whoboi and okcoin turned down their random volume generators? Only seem to multiply volume on actual trades vs. constantly generating volume



830. Post 15168843 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: Tzupy on June 11, 2016, 10:58:07 PM
The train is leaving. Where is everybody?

Waiting for China?

Pffft dragons need no trains, they can fly.



831. Post 15168925 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

I'm sorry this is the express train, there will be no stop at $600



832. Post 15169049 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

OKCoin is going full retard, 20yuan above whoboi  Shocked

Oh and a nice 900 bid wall at $605 on Finex



833. Post 15169921 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

$4.8MM in new longs on finex over last 24hrs  Cry that's the only thing that can stop us $35MM long squeeze



834. Post 15174468 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: Wandererfromthenorth on June 12, 2016, 11:22:45 AM




For what it's worth I think we all owe him/her a thanks. S/he helped buy those cheap coins for as long as he/she/it could



835. Post 15175025 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

IS whoboi down? IS this what's causing this slow down? Was expecting 700 by now



836. Post 15175037 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: toknormal on June 12, 2016, 12:31:48 PM

Huobi telemetry lost...


Froze at 666.08 on me



837. Post 15175349 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: yefi on June 12, 2016, 12:49:41 PM

Ha ha, someone should have told lambie about the slaughterhouse.  Cheesy


Nah we just told him/her that there were a lot of noobs to troll so he ran into that slaughterhouse in front of everyone else



838. Post 15175783 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Did OkCoin just go down to 4300 while whoboi is at 4400? I'll never understand asian ways



839. Post 15178199 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on June 12, 2016, 04:27:43 PM

Worldwide banking crash must be imminent.

Public about to get disarmed following that Orlando thing I imagine. Troops on the street.



lol nobody is about to get disarmed

but the US may very well stop all muslim immigration into the country

Looks like Trump will be President

Not gonna happen. Non of the dems will vote for him, and half of the GOP won't vote for him



840. Post 15179808 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Is it me or someone intentionally holding whoboi at $666?

Keeping it at 4375CNY or $666.66 cute 



841. Post 15180715 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Running out of coins across exchanges  Cheesy

OKCoin only has BTC1890 left till 4780, whoboi BTC4185, finex BTC5400 to 720



842. Post 15180987 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: gentlemand on June 12, 2016, 08:45:50 PM
What is the all time high daily VOLUME ?

That depends on whether you want to include China or not. That's going to ruin any statistician's day.

You mean you don't trust that there were BTC19.8MM traded on whoboi in one week when there are only BTC15MM in existence and most of them didn't even move?

Edit: oh and BTC17.3MM were traded on OKCoin that same week. So BTC37.1MM traded just between two Chinese exchanges in only one week  Grin



843. Post 15181399 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Bitfinex is almost empty after $680 might go full retard Shocked



844. Post 15181649 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: toknormal on June 12, 2016, 09:39:24 PM
Bitfinex is almost empty after $680 might go full retard Shocked

Howd'you know it's not empty of fiat as well.

Thats the problem - fiat is such a slow mover that when the exchange reserves dry up, demand dries up as well.


Running low as well, that's why we see the spread of $50 or 8% between finex and east. There's still about $3.5MM available in longs though as a short term loan till your wire clears, or to leverage long



845. Post 15181684 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on June 12, 2016, 09:55:30 PM
wow, that bull is strong.

welcome to the show, take a seat   Cool Cool

Welcome Back My Friends to the Show that Never Ends by ELP

Your avatar hunts me when i close my eyes



846. Post 15183873 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: yefi on June 13, 2016, 02:10:16 AM
it's only up because they measure the eth/btc pair and BTC is mooning.  It's not because demand for Eth is up.  You'd know that it you weren't a fkn moron.  Wink

It's up because it dropped some 10% yesterday vs. BTC and Bitcoin's rise today pushed it above its dollar-denominated ATH causing fomo. It needs to do more work to snap the ETH/BTC downtrend it's been in since 0.034.

It might be just capital from people who cahsed out their BTC. Some are just reinvesting in alts hoping to get a little run up over there. Little do they know



847. Post 15183896 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

On a separate note west is going up while east stands still. The spread is closing. Arbs?, or fresh fiat hitting Finex (11.00 in hong kong time)



848. Post 15189368 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: toknormal on June 13, 2016, 11:58:38 AM

Edit: but feel free to explain to me how "Ethereum's gain (against $USD) is because people are buying BTC, not Ether" works Cheesy

Certainly.

Ever taken a train ride ? Well if the train's travelling at 80 MPH and you take a stroll to the buffet car for a coffee, you'll actually be doing around 82MPH - 2MPH faster than the train.

There's a reason that every exchange expresses all alt-coin values in one denomination only and thats because one coin serves as the front door for this entire market.

(And it ain't no Lego-Coin)  Grin


What if it's a BTC train and i'm in a first car, and etherpoop is a buffet car, which is trailing all the way in the back of the train? Then i'll be moving slower than the train. I like this analogy



849. Post 15189518 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: DaRude on June 11, 2016, 11:18:36 PM
I'm sorry this is the express train, there will be no stop at $600

Just wanted to quote myself here



850. Post 15192197 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

WEEEEEEE it's like good old days only now with a $10B market cap so these games becoming more and more expensive



851. Post 15192590 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

No longs were squeezed  Undecided
Looks like the support held up nicely lots of volume. Cue in my BTC are only worth what they were worth 12hrs ago meme?



852. Post 15193298 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: nioc on June 13, 2016, 04:26:11 PM
Bitcoin Soars Above $700 As Chinese Buying Shows No Signs Of Slowing  Shocked Shocked

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-13/bitcoin-soars-above-700-chinese-buying-shows-no-signs-slowing
I still don't get why the Chinese are very involved. Can anyone explain like I'm five?

You will understand when you grow up.

Oh that's mean  Grin

Let me try. Your parents become rich and start giving you a very good allowance. The only problem is that they pay that allowance in "parent tokens" which you can only use around your house for things like extra TV time, or paying your sister to pick up your toys for you, or paying your other brother to do your homework. Life is good you saved up a bunch of these "parent tokens" but suddenly your dad looses his job and you're afraid that your "parent tokens" will become useless, plus you wanna buy ice cream but the store only accepts real dollars. Now your parents are going bankrupt and won't exchange those "parent tokes" for real dollars themselves, so you go to your older brother who said he can change those "parent tokens" for bitcoins, and you know once you got those you can spend them anywhere in the world. Now you have a huge family so you tell it to all of your other 15 brothers and sisters and they all come running to that one big brother to change all of their "parent tokens" to bitcoins.
How did i do?  



853. Post 15195248 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Was hoping for a bit of a long squeeze and shorts to start piling up, but it's not happening. Everyone is holding on tight not sure if it's a good thing or bad



854. Post 15195787 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Ask yourself this, how likely is it for the whole market turning bearish before the halvening? People are not sure how halvening would effect the value, what true demand is etc.. So i think extremely unlikely. The possibility of buying the rumor and selling the news is different and won't happen till a day or two before the event (if at all) and will depend on how retarded the price will get.



855. Post 15196384 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: inca on June 13, 2016, 08:55:02 PM
Invisible buy wall at 685 on finex.
Should be interesting to see if we pullback at all or hold for more moon after whoever is filling their boots is happy to go up again.


Good call, i noticed that someone was putting up good size walls all the way down during the mini dump. Bid size was thin so that BTC10k sell should've brought us down to low 600s without those buy walls. Think we got a bull lurking around setting the floor



856. Post 15196683 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

And we're back to your regular scheduled program?



857. Post 15196867 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: thrax on June 13, 2016, 09:50:42 PM
Invisible buy wall at 685 on finex.
Should be interesting to see if we pullback at all or hold for more moon after whoever is filling their boots is happy to go up again.


Good call, i noticed that someone was putting up good size walls all the way down during the mini dump. Bid size was thin so that BTC10k sell should've brought us down to low 600s without those buy walls. Think we got a bull lurking around setting the floor

How do you find out if there's an invisible buy wall on finex if it's invisible on the order books? Can you post a link to wherever you find out about those invisible orders please?

You see an empty order book, then someone sells BTC1000 but the price doesn't move. Thus there's an invisible buy wall that just ate up that ask order. Works the other way too. Not used as often as i thought, guessing because there's no trust in exchange not front running it



858. Post 15198711 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on June 14, 2016, 01:05:34 AM
...etherpoop shill...
feeding and quoting etherpoop troll

If you feel the need to feed the troll at least take the etherpoop shilling out of your own quotes, or go discuss it in the alts section



859. Post 15204788 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: Elwar on June 14, 2016, 11:38:22 AM
I think you'll find that any widely used currency will see a substantial amount of it being spent on criminal shit, obviously, so that points invalid really imo.

Most currencies aren't used *primarily* for khrymez. Bitcoin is an unnoticeable fraction of a fraction of 1% of world's currencies, yet it's already responsible for 40% criminal to criminal payments (c2c) on the interweb.
Only 40% really?? wow I thought it would be way more than that, plus the media has spewed alot of bs demonizing BTC on behalf of the government and central banks etc. to add to that. Anyway you have to respect BTC if you have any respect for crypto currency cos it is and always will be the daddy, so pay homage little pheasant to the daddy of all crypto currencies. Also idc if you can buy drugs over the web, using BTC or not, people will always purchase and abuse drugs, at least this way they can do it safely without having to deal with shady ass street dealers and anonymously cos were not all shameless and think it looks good to be seen buying drugs or some shit.

bullshit. it is about 4 or 5%.

Europol: Bitcoin accounts for over 40% of criminal-to-criminal online payments

Stay in denial.

Who in their right mind would use PayPal for trackable criminal activity on the Internet?

Criminals are apparently ahead of their time in realizing the best online payment method.

That makes me wonder how the other 60% of online criminals make online payments? Did drug dealers started to accept credit cards or wires or paypal??? Oh i know maybe the other 60% are using ripple doge etherpoop lsk? Can't keep up did something new came out in the last hour or are we still on List?



860. Post 15209828 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: Tzupy on June 14, 2016, 06:30:46 PM
ok week hands Its your turn to shine

DUMP!

looks like weak hand be holding fiat  

bears are fucked.

  Kiss

Adam remember that bear are always fucked with BTC!

Look I found a photo of Tzupy:



F U !!! Angry

 Grin that does look very similar

But yeah if you're going to short before the halvening and brexit you're gonna have a bad time



861. Post 15210014 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

BTC4k ask wall on finex @ $692 or do we only talk about how great etherpoop is?



862. Post 15210030 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: DaRude on June 14, 2016, 06:50:01 PM
BTC4k ask wall on finex @ $692 or do we only talk about how great etherpoop is?

and it's gone the second the dragon moved up



863. Post 15211408 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: Mrpumperitis on June 14, 2016, 08:36:53 PM
[edited out]
cmon m8, enough of the scam crap,lol  what if Dr Craig Wright was Satoshi and he had 1mill BTC, does that make BTC a scam?

The scam crap is real when it comes to ethereum, so even if there has been nearly a 6 month long pump of ethereum, and there have been a lot of innocent folks piling onto it, that does not take away from it's scam fundamentals.  Merely because I am calling ETH a scam does not mean that it is not contributing to the crypto space in a variety of ways.  For example, it has drawn considerable interest, and there are likely some very creative people attempting to figure out innovations.  Furthermore, it likely provides a kind of vehicle in which government and financial institutions can invest and attempt to denigrate bitcoin through such ploys, but in the end, Bitcoin is very likely to continue to grow stronger.

Regarding your hypothetical point about Craig Wright being Satoshi.. such a what-if is nearly pure fantasy land.. yeah it was in the news, and yeah it got a lot of attention, but the mere fact that such a ridiculous claim got a lot of attention, and even temporarily caused negative price movement should not seriously be considered to be some kind of event that we should take into account.  But, yeah, if some goofball, such as craig wright had access or appeared to have access to 1 million bitcoin, that would surely be a bearish kind of fantasy world outcome.. but it is just that fantasy world...   At this time, there are no tangible, material and/or convincing facts to back up such ridiculous speculation.









if its not wright...its someone else...there is a gun on btc head as we all know somebody holds 1million BTC.
Also ask why did big exchanges add ETH..it is so crypto can survive if btc fails. Do you know btc must be $600+ after halving, if it goes below for a while, miners, network, hashrate..drops , Sad and i hope it doesnt happen, but id rather be safe than sorry.
ltrs dude

Wait what's wrong with hashrate adjusting down??



864. Post 15214095 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

5,4,3,2,... and



865. Post 15221379 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: DARKHOLDER on June 15, 2016, 01:52:46 PM
Did anyone sell at the bottom? Tongue
At that time I was therefore at work did not sell...now I am angry Angry

No worries, the bottom was at what $656 i'll still gladly buy BTC from you at that price, but it's a one time offer and you have to ACT NOW!!!



866. Post 15221423 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: ww388 on June 15, 2016, 02:14:46 PM
Thanks for the cheap coins Lambie  Kiss

Where does The Lamb keep getting these coins? While you bulls are magical, and keep "buying back in" without ever having to sell, The Blameless One chooses to conform to the immutable laws of the cosmos, thus not selling the coins He ain't got Sad
P.S. The Risen One is probably swimming in an ocean of money He made on ETH poop, while you gentlemen have been holding your dicks Cheesy

poop chart removed

Nah s/he can't possibly be that stupid as to spend years of his/her life on BTC forum without owning some BTC. He's just trolling noobs to keep the market from going full retard



867. Post 15221488 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Lambie you need to get more organized. Posting same charts from different newbie accounts!?!? C'mon get your sh*t together  Cheesy



868. Post 15221864 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: slap on June 15, 2016, 02:46:36 PM
Skimming the first 50 posts of this thread is just fun. Wish I was here back then, I would have loaded up like a shovel. Instead, I'll order a pizza tonight I guess.

Yeah the good old times

Quote from: Loaded on April 17, 2013, 07:18:40 AM
This has been one wild week... I've been dealing with calls and emails nearly 24 hours a day. Managed to keep most of the panic sells between old and new clients and off the market.

So has the panic stopped?  Are we going to see more upwards activity again? Wink

Fundamentally nothing has changed, it is my opinion that the crash was caused by gox and those who sold into the lag, only to see their market orders execute much lower than expected. I currently have >$15M waiting to buy, however the vast majority will be off exchange. Many of these private trades are at individually negotiated prices, sometimes significantly different from market.



869. Post 15224894 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

BTC7k ask wall on whoboi @ 4650CNY  Shocked that's whats slowing the dragon, west is taking the wheel?



870. Post 15238003 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

BTC5K is a lot of coins to be intimidating with. Can't imagine an idiot handling $3.7MM



871. Post 15241610 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: SnokkomBTC on June 16, 2016, 07:55:18 PM
I just came to say WOWOWOW

I still remember NotLambChomp ( or something like that ) posting Willie Coyote gif hitting $380..  Grin Grin Grin
LOL  Grin

I asked him to make one for $680 but it's too late now  Angry NLC do one for $780 you know strike that, just do one for $1280 that should give you some time



872. Post 15244241 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Dragon is angry bears better start running



873. Post 15244993 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Hate to be the bearer of bad news, but finex longs gone full retard off deep end and are at $42.5MM now, while shorts are relatively unchanged. If they're squeezed everyone is going to have a bad time



874. Post 15252054 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: Pseudo-Random on June 17, 2016, 06:29:34 AM
Hate to be the bearer of bad news, but finex longs gone full retard off deep end and are at $42.5MM now, while shorts are relatively unchanged. If they're squeezed everyone is going to have a bad time

Well.. Nostradamus! Impressive Cool


Unreal how there are no real pullbacks, In the end this is going to cause a violent snapback at some point.

Such accuracy, much clockwork *_*

 >>



Doesn't look like it effected longs at all. Guessing most of them are too into green to be squeezed that easy. So we go back up until another try further up.



875. Post 15252697 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

I speculate that the fallout from those other things that are not going up  Roll Eyes will come back to BTC and create support walls.


Speculate and wall was mentioned, does this pass the censorship?



876. Post 15253006 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Finex is down for scheduled? maintenance. Upgrade will last 45-60min  Undecided

* on topic speculative comments



877. Post 15265933 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: DeathAngel on June 18, 2016, 01:14:42 PM
Pump starting again tomorrow when china wakes up?

Hopefully although we may have to wait until fresh fiat hits the exchanges on Monday?

That's exactly the reason the dragon bought everything in sight on weekends. I believe transfer of CNY to exchanges are pretty much instant. Not so much with usd.
Buy everything in sight in east on weekend, west and arbs run out of funds to keep up, there's a huge gap. When the gap is 10% and asia is already trading at a premium people start worrying and dumping more in east. Dragon gets more coins without moving the market as much.

Vs buy on a weekday, and there's a chance that west will keep up or even out run the east like we've seen few times lately = more expensive coins for dragon

Only works when dragon wants A LOT of coins like BTC15k+



878. Post 15267568 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: Tzupy on June 18, 2016, 01:45:07 PM
Pump starting again tomorrow when china wakes up?

Hopefully although we may have to wait until fresh fiat hits the exchanges on Monday?

No, pump must start today, or... Wink

Does this count?  Grin



879. Post 15270478 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: Tzupy on June 18, 2016, 06:31:37 PM
Heavy resistance, especially in China. If this goes sideways for another hour, it will start looking corrective...

One of these times you're bound to be right. until then... CCMF



880. Post 15270692 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

And China rejected the dump. Feels good having more than one exchange



881. Post 15270766 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Higher lows? Last one went down to $702



882. Post 15270998 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: Tzupy on June 18, 2016, 08:19:36 PM
Heavy resistance, especially in China. If this goes sideways for another hour, it will start looking corrective...

One of these times you're bound to be right. until then... CCMF

How about now? Grin

Now we're back where we started  Cheesy



883. Post 15271052 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: aztecminer on June 18, 2016, 08:48:32 PM
with this latest dumps: i'm sure you all finally realize the inevitable... that bitcoin is done ... crypto is finally dead .


Your foresight into future is amazing  Grin

Quote from: aztecminer on April 20, 2016, 07:33:03 PM
the 3k Wall on 440 on bitfinex is a good chance to get cheap coins.


really ?? 440 is cheap coins ??



884. Post 15271468 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: aztecminer on June 18, 2016, 09:44:06 PM
with this latest dumps: i'm sure you all finally realize the inevitable... that bitcoin is done ... crypto is finally dead .


yeah right..  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes   Looks who is back?  Gimpy himself...   Bitcoin is gimpycoin right?    Remember your strong and repeated prediction that bitcoin is stuck in a channel between $350 and $500 and never going to go above $500, EVER?  Remember that nonsense  that you were spewing earlier in the year... ?  Yeah, this year... so I guess your prediciton of never does not count for less than 6 months later?

You are a goofball, and I surprised that you or your buddy, BJA ( oh where is BJA) want to stick in your shilling.. just in case there could be a trend reversal...   Currently, not looking so good for you doomers and gloomers?


u must forgot, anything over $??? and i'm in the green.. $350 to $500 was horrible with that "scaling issue" overhanging bitcoin. finally it did something.. is about time!


Naw... $350 to $500 was not a bad place to be floating for several months, especially compared with being stuck largely in the lower $200s for 3/4 of a year, and also the whole bear market that seemed to play out for nearly 2 years.

By the time we reached $350 to $500, it was beginning to become quite clear that the bear trend had reversed, even though there were a bunch of rage quitter wanna bees, bitcoin nayspreaders who seemed intent on either causing a neutralizing of the reversal of the bull trend or to resume to a bear trend (or minimally flat).  And, if you do not forget, you were contributing to that nonsense FUCD spreading... and difficult to give you any benefit of the doubt regarding the extent of your fantastical nonsense.

We are in a very great place right now, even if we were to get a correction into the upper $500s, which does not seem too likely at the moment... Currently, in spite several corrections over the past couple of days, we are experiencing a considerable amount of upwards price pressures on BTC.  I don't know if we are going to break $850, but at the moment, the current market conditions are looking pretty good for such a break.  At the same time, we are getting some resistance in this upper $700s and such resistance can continue within the $750 or so to $850 price range, and accordingly either bears or bulls could win such a price battle, but either way, bitcoin still is in a very decent place, even if we get a significant price correction from here.


By the way, whether you are in the green or not (significantly) seems to be quite irrelevant to this whole topic.  Why does it matter whether you are in the green?  Do you think that we are competing against each other regarding who is in the green or not and by how much?  It does not matter, and the main thing is whether you have set up your various investments in accordance with your own financial circumstances and your views about bitcoin and your risk profile, no?



u the one who said it wasnt looking good for doomers and gloomers .. just because i fud u doesn't mean i'm not HODLing the entire time . i still don't trust bitcoin to buy at these prices. did the scaling issue get fixed yet ?? if it hasn't, really have to wonder why not . i'm NOT fudn u right now.. i'm just saying .

We all got together and realized that it's not really an issue. And the less you F' with it the better look at etherpoop



885. Post 15272970 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: AlexGR on June 19, 2016, 12:55:52 AM
Quote
The next day, he sent me an email. It linked to an article headlined ‘UK Law Enforcement Sources Hint at Impending Craig Wright Arrest’. The article suggested that the father of bitcoin might be liable, under the Terrorism Act, for the actions of people who used bitcoin to buy weapons. Under the link, Wright had written an explanation: ‘I walk from 1 billion or I go to jail. I never wanted to be out, but if I prove it, they destroy me and my family. I am the source of terrorist funds as bitcoin creator or I am a fraud to the world. At least a fraud is able to see his family. There is nothing I can do.’

So he went to the UK to make a revelation that would target him with the local UK-antiterrorism law, and despite already having one similar experience in Australia where he started being chased down by the authorities after some press articles, he pretended that this was not an issue (is he a total idiot?), until he was asked to sign something for the public when he "remembered" that he would be ...targeted for revealing his id so he had to ...back off.

Seriously? Roll Eyes

I dunno but it's too crazy for me not to be true. Plus with all of the psychos (even just in this thread) i'm sure they'll be a lot of people who would love to never see the BTC1MM of Satoshis BTC moved. Guy has a key to $1B which possibly be lost with him, his life would never be the same. Plus effect on the market would be devastated short term unless the first move is to some burner address



886. Post 15273167 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Portion of that last dump was ~$3MM in longs closing on finex. Now $10MM more to go to get to normal levels Undecided



887. Post 15273178 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: TERA on June 19, 2016, 01:59:07 AM
If the unknown Satoshi would have such trouble with the law, what about Vitalik Buterin and all the known altcoin creators?

I think right about now Vitalik has a bunch off pissed off investors he should be worrying about rather than the law



888. Post 15273269 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: Mrpumperitis on June 19, 2016, 02:08:50 AM
If the unknown Satoshi would have such trouble with the law, what about Vitalik Buterin and all the known altcoin creators?

I think right about now Vitalik has a bunch off pissed off investors he should be worrying about rather than the law
tis is a mere hiccup..
hes not on his own..we are behind him and the ETH team...not only through the gd but the bad too just like i was/am with nakamoto

Cool i'll just watch




889. Post 15279770 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: Torque on June 19, 2016, 11:24:30 AM
A pump followed by a bigger pump less than a couple of hours?

What is happening?

Whale warring each other?


Well when you're the only whale in the market, essentially dumping into your own bid walls, it's easy.


Nonsense.  


The one whale theory is total baloney, but you keep on with it for months and months and months...

do you really believe such nonsense?  Is there actually any evidence or logic for such an extraordinary claim?  Remember the saying that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence... ?  Where is it?

The thing is ... that there is a "whale" ... but .. it is not a person!

It is an entity / company / group of people / communist party ... that have between 80.000BTC - 150.000BTC coins!

And they work 24/7 in 3-4 shifts maybe.

Do you imagine just dropping dumps then leaving the poker table? ... Someone must stay behind and level the plain, to keep things afloat! ... till the next time the "whale" comes to pump & dump!

This x 1000.  It may be a conspiracy theory to many, but I believe it is completely plausible, especially if such a whale group was formed in the early days of Bitcoin.  They could have accounts open on every exchange, and work together 24/7.  They could write a bunch of coordinated bots on every exchange that work together. Not to mention if they have way more funding to back them than what is currently in the exchange markets, then they will control each and every local market. They would be able to control the rise and timing of bitcoin fairly precisely.  And if they are connecting to powerful/wealthy people, then they will have insider trading knowledge/info many months or years ahead of the public, and will be able to time pumps/dumps on major news announcements.

And no, of course there's really no way to provide proof of such.  Just like there is no definitive proof that the Russian Mob is behind the U.S. Stock market (and every other major world market). So let's all just stick our heads back in the sand keep saying its the Chinese that are pulling all the strings and providing all the volume, 'cause that's what you all want to believe.  Roll Eyes

Well, apart from all of the conspiracy theories, i think the real reason is much simpler and doesn't involve aliens or Russian mob.
Some history, back in the day Finex was new and didn't have much volume especially for leverage products that they offered. Stamp was #1 by volume so they made some arrangements with them and pretty much were shadowing stamp. That provided Finex much needed liquidity. As Finex grew, on big volumes we often saw Finex price decouple from Stamp price (that was when Finex ran out of money on Stamp). At certain point Finex outgrew Stamp, they completely decoupled and Finex took the lead.

What we're seeing here (i believe) is well... CHINA CHINA CHINAx100. Their fake volume was great but now there's a genuine bullish run there, and they need coins from somewhere. It would only make sense to make some arrangements  with Finex who's in Hong Kong (like Finex did with Stamp in their day) for liquidity. West is bearish so there's little to no bid support, but China is on a bullish train so they don't care and just keep charging ahead. That's why we don't see much bid support on Finex (arbs don't like risk exposure to catch falling knifes), yet we see those BTC1k market buys, west gets panicy from no/thin bid support and starts dumping. So we get heavy ask side, thin bid side, and a lot of volume.

TL;DR as long as whoboi is above Finex by around $10 or 1.5% we're riding the Chinese made rocket.



890. Post 15280198 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: toknormal on June 19, 2016, 03:03:54 PM

back in the day Finex was new and didn't have much volume especially for leverage products that they offered. Stamp was #1 by volume so they made some arrangements with them and pretty much were shadowing stamp.

Very interesting - thanks for posting. I didn't know about that background to the growth of the exchanges.


It was like 2yrs ago. Now i feel old.

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-trading-platform-bitfinex-distancing-bitstamp/

Quote
“I’ll try to answer here. We used to include the Bitstamp order book into our own order book for liquidity purposes. In other words, we were arbitraging between our own platform and Bitstamp. However, as we continue to grow we decided to slowly, and I insist on slowly, withdraw this arbitraging program to let people do the arbitraging themselves..."



891. Post 15294878 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: Elwar on June 20, 2016, 02:43:03 PM
Did any of you made even made a small thinking exercise, on the matter: What happens when BTCitcoin actually costs too much fiat paper to be bought?!?!!

Wow...I never thought of that. Whenever I purchase anything with bitcoins I must always use a full bitcoin.

I know that's exactly how i feel when i want to buy a piece of gum but all i have is a 500€ note. That gum suddenly became was very expensive, damn inflation!



892. Post 15297979 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

WTF only BTC880 on Finex till $700  Huh and BTC785 till $850 where did the order book go?



893. Post 15298118 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: strawbs on June 20, 2016, 09:04:27 PM
WTF only BTC880 on Finex till $700  Huh and BTC785 till $850 where did the order book go?

Something strange happening there, I think. The depth chart has been all over the place too.

And they stopped updating altogether



894. Post 15299876 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

https://bitfinex.statuspage.io/

Quote
Update - Updated trading restart time. We restart trading at 00:15 UTC. From now to 00:15 UTC users can cancel active orders. New orders will be accepted after 00:15 UTC
Jun 20, 23:56 UTC

It's 1:18 UTC now  Undecided



895. Post 15300699 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote
Monitoring - Trading will resume at 4:00 UTC. Order cancels can be submitted now, but they will not process until 4:00 UTC. Please note: When trading resumes there will likely be wide spreads. We caution users to be cognizant of this fact and warn against using market orders. As trading goes on, the order book will fill in and this will become less of an issue. Please be aware of market conditions when placing your orders.
Jun 21, 03:49 UTC

https://bitfinex.statuspage.io/



896. Post 15300795 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Huh so the world didn't end and we're still trading in $700s and only BTC2600 till $750



897. Post 15306897 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: Torque on June 21, 2016, 01:11:00 PM
Phil Potter of Bitfinex last night talking about the outage:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXBnd0uPuWs&feature=youtu.be

This sounds like a legit network issue. So bear trap.   Grin

Of course we have redundancy ... it just didn't work. Love it Kiss



898. Post 15309767 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Silly kids it's just longs taking profit, fallout from the Finex network meltdown. I'm not glad that it's going down. But i'm ecstatic that $5.6MM in longs have closed  Wink if we keep above $650 when $3MM more close that would be gentleman.



899. Post 15320936 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on June 22, 2016, 02:47:34 PM
Buy some broken shitcoins? Hmm. Sounds like a great idea! Of course I’m the kind of guy that sticks screwdrivers in his ears for sport. But still, excellent advice from Bitcoin News Magazine. Everybody game?

I'm the kind of guy who once he sees a bunch of people sticking screwdrivers in their ears and then fall in agony, thinks it's a good idea and does it himself. So yeah where can i buy these shitcoins, looks like people are having fun over there i wanna join



900. Post 15321199 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: Torque on June 22, 2016, 01:09:30 PM
So this all makes perfect sense, eh?

Weeks and weeks of excitement and price rise on all exchanges.  People were saying China was leading, providing 90% of the volume, and couldn't get enough.

Then an auction ends.

Then an exchange has network problems and goes offline for a bit.

Meanwhile price plummets.

Exchange comes back online.

But now we're at -130/btc, and all trading has essentially come to a complete halt.

Makes perfect sense, right?  But...but.. China demand?? Right??  Fellaz??

I just put bitcoinwisdom on 6h so it shows from the beginning of the run up and I don't see volume going down.  Not at 4h, 2h or 1h either.

BTW I'm not used to anything making sense.

High selloff volume is not the same as high buying volume.  If China buying demand was really there and accounted for 90%, they'd just steamroll over this sell off, actually they would look at it as a huge buying op.

I'm getting sick of people still touting that 'China' is somehow responsible for all the supposed demand.  They aren't, because the whales that ran this up are not Chinese, they simply have open accounts on all worldwide exchanges include the Chinese ones.  That's the dirty secret that the whales don't want you to know.

Huh and here i was thinking that each transaction has a buy and a sell side. So who's buying the coins during those high selloff volumes? And who's selling them at high buying volume?

I wouldn't say they account for 90%, but even 30% in NEW demand would shift this thin market dramatically. It's clear to the casual observer that the previous rallies started on Chinese exchanges (i.e. trading in CNY) true that whale can be anyone just trading on a Chinese exchanges, but due to trades being in CNY we can conclude that not many westerners would trade $ into CNY before purchasing BTC



901. Post 15321748 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: Torque on June 22, 2016, 04:06:39 PM
Huh and here i was thinking that each transaction has a buy and a sell side. So who's buying the coins during those high selloff volumes? And who's selling them at high buying volume?

Whales can massively short with leverage, dumping coins back down into their own bid walls, making money the whole way down.

You do know how markets work, right?

Apparently not. But sounds like you've figured it out. You must be a billionaire who figured out how markets work?

Ultimately that money has to come from somewhere for those magical whales to profit, by leverage shorting (even though shorts on finex have been stable for a year now)



902. Post 15322562 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: strawbs on June 22, 2016, 04:57:49 PM
Ya'll think 4k will hold?
Don't think so

No chance

I think it should hold. West is starting to lead. Bid order books looks ok to $600. But can never rule out flash crashes and long squeezes short term



903. Post 15324344 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: jofus87 on June 22, 2016, 07:50:59 PM
Angry FML I was this close to getting out at $780. But noooo, I had to be at work on Friday only to find out after I get home the price had plummeted below $700. This action is like a sick joke, taunting me. Oh well, I waited a few years, what's another few weeks (assuming the halvening affects the price positively)?

You're delusional if you believe of a rapid price change on the day of the halvening



904. Post 15325588 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: nioc on June 22, 2016, 09:48:36 PM
Angry FML I was this close to getting out at $780. But noooo, I had to be at work on Friday only to find out after I get home the price had plummeted below $700. This action is like a sick joke, taunting me. Oh well, I waited a few years, what's another few weeks (assuming the halvening affects the price positively)?

You're delusional if you believe of a rapid price change on the day of the halvening

Just like passing the event horizon of a black hole you will feel nothing yet what will happen afterwards is inevitable.

I thought you'd get burned up by all the light that's suspended there that cannot escape?



905. Post 15327099 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Ahh good old bitcoin is back



906. Post 15327412 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on June 23, 2016, 02:01:57 AM
I don't see how the shorters can profit much from this. They have to buy back in, to close their positions, and there are not too many coins for sale.

Yeah can't imagine anyone profiting much here. Unless we hear that China banning BTC tomorrow, i'm a bit baffled by this move



907. Post 15327783 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: bitjanja on June 23, 2016, 03:04:08 AM
all these speculation, eth being a cause, conspiranoia, cia, illuminati... so lol.

i like a lot btc, but from reading this forum i realize most ppl here are real fanatics on a promised winning lottery ticket. (scary shit)

i dont know if this huge ath will happen before halving, or in 5 years 30k, or never, but seems to me the ones reallly making profit are the ones doubling their money from pump to dump. and this is the reason behind this volatility, not complicated theories about 3 guys on ether and secret illuminati agendas. just profit, a huge power indeed!


and those with the "btc will save us all" thing... nah i dont buy it, seems to me u are just for the lottery big price thing too (just not realizing)

meantime, ill be sure not to get hypnotized with this folks btc church and quickly pump n dump like the smart ones.. at least il try. On the other side, after i do that ill be buying in again, for now.   Wink

There's a lot of fanaticism around BTC, but beyond that, the pump was lead by China and so was the dump. If anyone can explain how buying a bunch of coins in $700+ range and dumping them under $600 can get you rich i'm all ears. From what i've seen it didn't cause havoc and there was no chance to rebuy lower, a basic factor for profitable pump and dump



908. Post 15334147 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on June 23, 2016, 07:43:12 AM
I think 540-555 might have been the bottom, the only thing bothering me is the fact that BFX longs are still so high...

That bothers me more than anything else. We're back at $42MM longs and the price crashing to $570. Longs going up as price goes down  Huh If they're squeezed it can turn bloody really fast



909. Post 15335444 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Ha that's why we hodl



910. Post 15337013 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

LOL someone is having fun with few millions on Finex. Ahh only in bitcoinlandia



911. Post 15337333 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: 600watt on June 23, 2016, 07:38:55 PM
LOL someone is having fun with few millions on Finex. Ahh only in bitcoinlandia

played lottery this week. friday´s jackpot @34 mio €. promised myself that i would sink half of the jackpot into a bitstamp market order in case i win. what would an $18 (or so) mio market order do?   

Ok i'll make sure to place some ask orders at $32k in case you win



912. Post 15340370 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

If not for that premature dump we'd be over $1000 easy now. Someone got spooked way too soon.
can't believe that brexit might actually happen. This will not end well for EU



913. Post 15340584 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on June 24, 2016, 03:26:14 AM
What are the standings??

51.5 for Brexit
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36612368



914. Post 15340694 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: petahashminer on June 24, 2016, 03:45:33 AM
skynews projection says that , their projection is OUT.

now it is time to skyrocket. thx britain.

BBC forecast: UK votes to LEAVE the EU
too



915. Post 15341239 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on June 24, 2016, 05:00:34 AM
Yup, UK over. Just England now.  Shocked Shocked Shocked

The Kingdom of England? Really Huh

Yeah bet Irish/Scotts are not too happy about this. Time for another referendum for Scotland to leave GB and join EU?



916. Post 15349027 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Shorts are finally up if not for $43MM in longs that'd be super bullish



917. Post 15352682 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Weekend pump from the west? Now i've seen everything



918. Post 15353069 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: BitUsher on June 25, 2016, 01:59:09 AM
Fortunately , some of my comrades are helping swing these number up by selling thousands of "gun factories"
which make it impossible to really know how many unserialized AR15s are in texas and worldwide.

Great company and people(and they sometimes depend upon bitcoin because constantly have merchant processing problems) -

https://ghostgunner.net/  
https://defdist.org/

Will the cops bother you if you use these lowers in a public shooting range? I understand it is legal to make your firearms as long as you don't sell them, but I've always wondered what the practical issues are related to possessing a gun with no serial number.

Its fine at ranges. Just cannot resell these.

But hypothetically, what amount of guns would have been enough to stop what happened in Orlando?

Impossible to prevent knife or gun murder , and obviously you dont want a bunch of drunk bar patrons armed either , but 1-2 armed and trained security guards could have brought down the 50 murdered/50 injured rate down to 5 -10 murdered / 5-10 injured ... gun free zones are the most dangerous and where almost all these mass shootings occur. Gun regulation doesn't stop them either -- France.

Right, so since we're on topic how many gun related deaths happen in US and how many in France? 



919. Post 15353108 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on June 25, 2016, 02:23:29 AM
It's hard to argue with a gun culture stretching back to the wild west. The new world is hairy. But I don't really approve of this.  Embarrassed



There's culture, and there are BS statics trying to justify your cultural view poins



920. Post 15371728 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Can't wait till the halvening so these pumps and dumps by mining traders will get cut in half. Feels like majority gets traded OTC and they manipulate the shit out of open market and their shallow order books



921. Post 15372124 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: Chainsaw on June 26, 2016, 04:59:14 PM
Support broken! Shocked
Didn't expect this... Waiting for a long entry, but this is getting bearisher... Huh

Sometimes, if it looks too bearish, it's actually bullish

Or it's all just noise.

Back to fundamentals

There are about $43.7MM swaps borrowed just on finex. At current daily rate of 0.06% That's $26k just in daily fees only on Finex
For the last month the conservative daily average trade volume on finex is BTC50000 assuming exchange fee of 0.2% on each trade that's BTC100 daily in fees or $62k. Plus about $10k that shorts are paying in fees. Or in total about $100k in daily fees just on Finex

In 13days there will be only $1.1MM worth of new BTC daily at current spot. So people are paying close to 10% just in fees only on one exchange of all of supply will be worth in 13 days  Huh

But i still enjoy watching people try to momentum trade this or find those short term patterns. Time to stock up on more popcorn and HODL

maths are hard. Couldn't count that high on crazy daily interest



922. Post 15372451 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

There fixed  Grin what's a few million here or there in BTC the point still stand.

BTW shorts are over BTC20k again. Getting close to one year high of BTC23.8



923. Post 15373230 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: foggyb on June 26, 2016, 06:23:26 PM
biggus dickus, Right. Brits will forget that USD exists, and buy BTC.
In other news: New (sub-4000CNY) daily low Sad

You people had such promise; with all the benefits afforded you by history, America somehow still manages to be the worst country in the developed world. Your mug of a would-be world leader regularly incites political violence and is a serial liar, rampant xenophobe, racist, and misogynist who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims — 1.6 billion members of an entire religion — from entering the US. What happened to you?  


America has the constitutional right to ban whomever they feel is a threat to national sovereignty. Deal with it son.

EDIT: I'm not even from the US and I still stand up for America's sovereignty, not because America or Americans are flawless, but because I stand opposed to all liberal whiners who push an agenda to have us all pledge allegiance to global 'kumbaya club' steeped in self-loathing, political correctness and spinelessness.

Actually they constitutionally NOT allowed to ban based on whole religion. First Amendment



924. Post 15373541 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: Ibian on June 26, 2016, 07:14:18 PM
biggus dickus, Right. Brits will forget that USD exists, and buy BTC.
In other news: New (sub-4000CNY) daily low Sad

You people had such promise; with all the benefits afforded you by history, America somehow still manages to be the worst country in the developed world. Your mug of a would-be world leader regularly incites political violence and is a serial liar, rampant xenophobe, racist, and misogynist who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims — 1.6 billion members of an entire religion — from entering the US. What happened to you?  


America has the constitutional right to ban whomever they feel is a threat to national sovereignty. Deal with it son.

EDIT: I'm not even from the US and I still stand up for America's sovereignty, not because America or Americans are flawless, but because I stand opposed to all liberal whiners who push an agenda to have us all pledge allegiance to global 'kumbaya club' steeped in self-loathing, political correctness and spinelessness.

Actually they constitutionally NOT allowed to ban based on whole religion. First Amendment
They can, and have in the past, banned anyone they goddamn well felt like for any reason or no reason. Read up on your history.

Nope. I mean they wiped out whole populations in the past that doesn't mean they had constitutional right to. The fact that it happened in the past doesn't mean it can be achieved now. Stop changing arguments.



925. Post 15373966 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: Ibian on June 26, 2016, 07:33:47 PM
biggus dickus, Right. Brits will forget that USD exists, and buy BTC.
In other news: New (sub-4000CNY) daily low Sad

You people had such promise; with all the benefits afforded you by history, America somehow still manages to be the worst country in the developed world. Your mug of a would-be world leader regularly incites political violence and is a serial liar, rampant xenophobe, racist, and misogynist who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims — 1.6 billion members of an entire religion — from entering the US. What happened to you?  


America has the constitutional right to ban whomever they feel is a threat to national sovereignty. Deal with it son.

EDIT: I'm not even from the US and I still stand up for America's sovereignty, not because America or Americans are flawless, but because I stand opposed to all liberal whiners who push an agenda to have us all pledge allegiance to global 'kumbaya club' steeped in self-loathing, political correctness and spinelessness.

Actually they constitutionally NOT allowed to ban based on whole religion. First Amendment
They can, and have in the past, banned anyone they goddamn well felt like for any reason or no reason. Read up on your history.

Nope. I mean they wiped out whole populations in the past that doesn't mean they had constitutional right to. The fact that it happened in the past doesn't mean it can be achieved now. Stop changing arguments.
The constitution is literally a piece of paper.

That doesn't mean you can say something that's in there, that is not.



926. Post 15376458 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: WhatsBitcoin on June 27, 2016, 01:23:03 AM
biggus dickus, Right. Brits will forget that USD exists, and buy BTC.
In other news: New (sub-4000CNY) daily low Sad

You people had such promise; with all the benefits afforded you by history, America somehow still manages to be the worst country in the developed world. Your mug of a would-be world leader regularly incites political violence and is a serial liar
So what did your Lumber Colony Vice Admiral Blacque Jacque Shellacque (honestly don't know who King Canuck is, I bet you you don't either) ever do?
Come to think of it, what did *any* Canadian ever do?

Quote
rampant xenophobe, racist, and misogynist who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims — 1.6 billion members of an entire religion — from entering the US. What happened to you?  
Easy to be all hippy and accepting of other cultures when you're a frozen shithole no one in his right mind would ever set foot in. Not even a suicide-vested Muslim.
Seriously tho, who you gotta protect yourself from? You got superior, wealthy Americans on one side (who only go to Canada for sex tourism & you still worship and try to emulate), and superior polar bears (who would be embarrass to be *seen* with you people) on the other.

TL;DR: Envy is not sexy. Get in shape, stop shopping at Walmart, and we might let you sit with us at lunch.

Actually they constitutionally NOT allowed to ban based on whole religion. First Amendment
Are those would-be suicide bombers are our citizens? Because *our* Bill of Rights gives *us*, the citizens of the United States of America, *our* rights. You, foghat foreigner, do not have these these rights, because OUR Bill of Rights doesn't apply to the entire world Cool

Edit:
  |* * * * * * * * * * OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO|
  |* * * * * * * * * * :::::::::::::::::::::::::|
  |* * * * * * * * * * OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO|
  |* * * * * * * * * * :::::::::::::::::::::::::|
  |* * * * * * * * * * OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO|
  |* * * * * * * * * * :::::::::::::::::::::::::|
  |* * * * * * * * * * OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO|
  |:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::|
  |OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO|
  |:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::|
  |OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO|
  |:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::|
  |OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO|

Stop shooting black people. You animal! Angry

I got him/her on ignore so only saw this cause of your reply.

Hey ignoramus your constitution and bill of rights applies to ALL THE PEOPLE in US as in "We the People..." not just citizens. Does it hurt to be that dumb or you just failing at trolling?



927. Post 15377802 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

 Roll Eyes

This must be the rock bottom for this thread. Wait no no, geezer porn from NLC was probably it, so this is a step above that.

On separate note, someone was flashing a BTC500 buy wall on Finex



928. Post 15391685 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: Mrpumperitis on June 28, 2016, 06:00:39 AM
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/27/bitcoin-gains-validity-as-digital-gold-after-brexit-vote.html

Jesse Powell, CEO of digital asset exchange Kraken, said that the volume of bitcoin trading on his company's site doubled in the 24 hours following the Brexit vote. Since June 10, there's been a five-fold increase in bitcoin to euro trading as of late Friday.

Amazing how price can stay relatively stable when volume doubles  Undecided



929. Post 15391698 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: NewLiberty on June 28, 2016, 04:16:48 AM
A few thing people here don't seem to understand:

Most buying is done off exchanges and OTC. By a wide margin too.

China is not leading this market.

No fee Chinese exchanges are being used to "control" the market, because bots are linked and people think China is leading the market.
...
The rise to nearly 800 was one entity

...

If you figured this much out, then you probably also figured out that the one entity is not done yet either.

If one entity managed to corner BTC already, we have bigger issues



930. Post 15398958 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on June 28, 2016, 05:13:23 PM
Most buying is done off exchanges and OTC. By a wide margin too.

I always suspected this. I'm curious if you have any figures or links related to this fact.

P.S. Welcome back.

Jimbo... You need to take that notion with a grain of salt. Because... it might be less likely to see that happening in the West, and more likely happening in the East.

That "off exchanges" notion is mostly related to the mentality of nations and cultures. And basically in Ukrain / China / Russia / Mongolia / India .. it would be more likely to see "hand to hand" = "black market" transactions going on. All this compared to the West, where people would be more scared and paranoid of doing this sort of transactions. Also... in the East, people tend to not do business with strangers! Usually they need to be family, they need to live in the city, you need to know where they live, you need to consolidate the trust. Because I'm from the East(even if I live in Central Europe)... and I can tell you as a weird notion out there... I live in a small city of 50.000 people and I know where everyone lives, what part of the city if I don't know their exact address or who they are related with, and especially if I want to make transactions with them! And I would expect to be invited in their home or something like that if they want me to sell me something (like bitcoins), and in rest... everyone knows everyone! And you don't do business without knowing someone. No strangers allowed!

Off exchange transactions is neither an east or west phenomenon, but merely a prudent practice for someone who is able to establish such connections.

If prices can be driven down on exchanges with 10k coins, and those same 10k coins can be bought back at a lower price off the exchanges, without moving the price back up, then conducting off chain transactions makes sense for those individuals with a large number of coins whether they are in the east, west, weast or in the snourth.   Tongue Tongue

The logic seems reasonable, but it'd still prefer to see some facts. You would have to do it across all exchanges simultaneously. Split BTC10k only puts like BTC2k on each major exchange and then market sell? How much slippage will that get you? What will you do with all those yuans after that? What are the chances that another whale gets you and market actually moves against you? Now you sold your coins for cheap and got to buy them back at higher rate OTC? I'm sure it does happen, but would probably take more than BTC10k What's most likely is someone cornering the Chinese miners, wouldn't be surprised if one broker contracted them all, and all mined coins have been already presold with futures. Luckily that funny business would be cut in half in about 10days



931. Post 15491764 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: Paashaas on July 06, 2016, 04:50:31 PM
Jezus people, learn to spot a troll.  The only question is whether Bulgarian is Lambie again or not.  My money is on yes.




Haha that was actually funny. Wondering if people engaging NLC are really that dumb or just clones/NLC talking to him/herself  Undecided

prostitutka Nika  Grin me English no good yeah?



932. Post 15496327 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: RubberBaronette on July 06, 2016, 10:33:07 PM
LOL I'm gonna laugh so hard when the price gradually goes down after halving.

People think it's just gonna shoot up on halving day lmao

Why would it gradually go down when the reduced supply of coins restricts the miners to only dumping half the coins they could beforehand? Most posts here expect a gradual increase in the price, not a huge price spike on halving day.

Good thing major players don't understand how this price rise is a sure thing. More cheap coins for us!

It's all about expectations. If market over estimated the effects of the halving, people borrowed say $10MM  Roll Eyes to leverage long and pay $5k a day, expecting BTC to go to da moon on the halvening day. Then halvening comes, and the price is stable (or worse some short decided to dump and it goes down) now you're disappointed and have to cover your long, by selling $10MM in BTC which squeezes other leveraged longs. It shouldn't be gradual though but rather sudden, and then the bigger market forces come in play and if true demand goes up (or even stays constant) BTC will gradually crawl up



933. Post 15504151 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

We go down and longs go over $42MM someone doubling down big time, the one positive is shorts smelling the blood and are up BTC5k which should offset and bring some volume



934. Post 15504909 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: toknormal on July 07, 2016, 05:49:46 PM

Halving being priced out.

I wonder what effect "actual halving" will have (as opposed to speculative halving).


Come back in 2 months, considering the state of current economy most likely creeping up after we settle this mess of speculations



935. Post 15509726 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: Hunyadi on July 08, 2016, 04:43:05 AM
IT DOESN'T LOOK GOOD!

If you want to have any gains from bitcoin or avoid further losses, then you should sell all your bitcoins now. We are in a clearly confirmed long term downtrend toward historical analysis lows based on all confirmed forum data and databases confirmed by all government sources. These are just the facts.

No way, is proudhon saying that ... bitcoin ... is ... dead?? NO WAY!!! Yes it's been confirmed!



936. Post 15520078 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: toknormal on July 09, 2016, 02:12:46 AM

The thing is this.

At the moment, we've got speculative traffic in both directions. Fundamental traffic in none.

After the halving:

Speculative traffic on one direction and fundamental traffic in one.

...since we have 1 known direction (the fundamental), the worst that can happen is the speculative traffic cancels it and we go horizontal. On the other hand if the speculative trading follows the fundamentals, well.... Shocked



Problem being is that currently there are $40MM in longs that went full retard and paying $24k/day in fees, and i don't think they're expecting to go horizontal. Luckily shorts are starting to creep up so that might help canceling it out  Huh



937. Post 15653659 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on July 20, 2016, 10:57:29 PM
https://blockchain.info/charts/miners-revenue?timespan=2year

idiot miners will be forced to stop selling or buy in the market ... revenue hasn't been this low since Dec. 2015

What do miners have to do with how much buyers are willing to pay per btc again?



938. Post 15653917 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: respawn2 on July 20, 2016, 11:32:42 PM
The miners get their block reward (12.5 BTC) whether they include transactions or not. Transactions are a pretty insignificant percentage on top of that (bouncing between .3 and .5 BTC, here: https://www.smartbit.com.au/charts/transaction-fees-per-block).

If the miners come to an agreement among themselves not to include any transactions, the impact on their bottom line would be pretty small (12.5 BTC per block solved, vs. 12.9 BTC).
But the bargaining power that gives them...

Yeah they're so profitable especially now, what's another 4% cut from their profit margins  Undecided and another 25%+ cut due to price tanking because of this retardedness



939. Post 15654075 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: respawn2 on July 21, 2016, 12:20:30 AM
Don't we have a not-so-top secret algo change from hell in case of emergencies?

You can start mining a worthless alt with a new algo. Have fun.

This is no different than a typical business/labor dispute, the sort that happens when bosses make promises they don't keep.
Really.
And the slimmer the miner's (it's, like, 9 pool operators, who are we kidding?) current margin is, the more incentive they have to "Unionize" and "strike."

Only when IRL workers strike, they don't get to draw 96% of their paycheck, as the miners will (because block reward).

Step1: Grind BTC to a complete stop
Step2: ?? Huh
Step3: Profit  Grin

Think there's a flaw in your logic somewhere



940. Post 15654515 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: respawn2 on July 21, 2016, 12:31:20 AM
Don't we have a not-so-top secret algo change from hell in case of emergencies?

You can start mining a worthless alt with a new algo. Have fun.

This is no different than a typical business/labor dispute, the sort that happens when bosses make promises they don't keep.
Really.
And the slimmer the miner's (it's, like, 9 pool operators, who are we kidding?) current margin is, the more incentive they have to "Unionize" and "strike."

Only when IRL workers strike, they don't get to draw 96% of their paycheck, as the miners will (because block reward).

Step1: Grind BTC to a complete stop
Step2: ?? Huh
Step3: Profit  Grin

Think there's a flaw in your logic somewhere

How do you think strikes work?
Step1: Grind BTC to a complete stop
Step2: "Your coin isn't worth dick until you let us have what we want. While we're on strike, we're making only 4% less than when we're working for you. Think about it. Take your time."
Step3: Profit  Grin


You're delusional or trolling if you think this will work. I'm speculation that majority of miners are also hodler, what will that do to the price of BTC and their investment? Good luck trying to find idiots to sign up to that. Here's a shovel start digging your own graves for the greater good  Roll Eyes



941. Post 15654878 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: respawn2 on July 21, 2016, 02:15:34 AM
Don't we have a not-so-top secret algo change from hell in case of emergencies?

You can start mining a worthless alt with a new algo. Have fun.

This is no different than a typical business/labor dispute, the sort that happens when bosses make promises they don't keep.
Really.
And the slimmer the miner's (it's, like, 9 pool operators, who are we kidding?) current margin is, the more incentive they have to "Unionize" and "strike."

Only when IRL workers strike, they don't get to draw 96% of their paycheck, as the miners will (because block reward).

Step1: Grind BTC to a complete stop
Step2: ?? Huh
Step3: Profit  Grin

Think there's a flaw in your logic somewhere

How do you think strikes work?
Step1: Grind BTC to a complete stop
Step2: "Your coin isn't worth dick until you let us have what we want. While we're on strike, we're making only 4% less than when we're working for you. Think about it. Take your time."
Step3: Profit  Grin


You're delusional or trolling if you think this will work.

Let's try to be civil. I'm not gonna call you a faggot and you're not going to call me delusional or a troll. Shall we give that a try and see how it goes?

Quote
I'm speculation that majority of miners are also hodler, what will that do to the price of BTC and their investment?
What makes you think that most miners are hodlers? Do you think the guy who works at the gas station is also a gasoline aficionado, and spends his paychecks on 55-gal drums of Premium?
Quote
Good luck trying to find idiots to sign up to that. Here's a shovel start digging your own graves for the greater good  Roll Eyes
Remember what I said about acting civil?

There's a pretty huge gap between calling someone "delusional or trolling" and a faggot. Drawing a parallel between miners and a guy working at the gas station is a pretty dumb weak argument borderline trolling. If you weren't trolling, a more appropriate comparison would be between a miner and an oil drilling company, and arguing how the later doesn't hold any inventory? Or has a trade desk that speculates on oil price  Huh

But yeah keep pushing the idea of miners shooting themselves in a foot



942. Post 15654943 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on July 21, 2016, 02:57:17 AM
think we're due for a matching uptick to maybe 70, before going below 60?

idk probably not... you've forced me to remember just how discontent i am with the direction core has forced upon us, and how i do believe it will ultimately kill bitcoin by ensuring minning can never be sustainable long term.
...
suddenly i feel depressed, i'm going to bed.


One day it'll become clear, and you'll be thankful that core has some sane people that resisted the pressure to bend over backwards to Chinese miners  Wink



943. Post 15655391 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: respawn2 on July 21, 2016, 03:13:40 AM
Don't we have a not-so-top secret algo change from hell in case of emergencies?

You can start mining a worthless alt with a new algo. Have fun.

This is no different than a typical business/labor dispute, the sort that happens when bosses make promises they don't keep.
Really.
And the slimmer the miner's (it's, like, 9 pool operators, who are we kidding?) current margin is, the more incentive they have to "Unionize" and "strike."

Only when IRL workers strike, they don't get to draw 96% of their paycheck, as the miners will (because block reward).

Step1: Grind BTC to a complete stop
Step2: ?? Huh
Step3: Profit  Grin

Think there's a flaw in your logic somewhere

How do you think strikes work?
Step1: Grind BTC to a complete stop
Step2: "Your coin isn't worth dick until you let us have what we want. While we're on strike, we're making only 4% less than when we're working for you. Think about it. Take your time."
Step3: Profit  Grin


You're delusional or trolling if you think this will work.

Let's try to be civil. I'm not gonna call you a faggot and you're not going to call me delusional or a troll. Shall we give that a try and see how it goes?

Quote
I'm speculation that majority of miners are also hodler, what will that do to the price of BTC and their investment?
What makes you think that most miners are hodlers? Do you think the guy who works at the gas station is also a gasoline aficionado, and spends his paychecks on 55-gal drums of Premium?
Quote
Good luck trying to find idiots to sign up to that. Here's a shovel start digging your own graves for the greater good  Roll Eyes
Remember what I said about acting civil?

There's a pretty huge gap between calling someone "delusional or trolling" and a faggot.
No, it isn't. Both are meaningless, empty verbiage meant to insult and belittle the person you're talking to. Both carry no information, both are childish and rude.

Quote
Drawing a parallel between miners and a guy working at the gas station is a pretty dumb weak argument borderline trolling. If you weren't trolling, a more appropriate comparison would be between a miner and an oil drilling company, and arguing how the later doesn't hold any inventory? Or has a trade desk that speculates on oil price  Huh
Do you think oil drilling companies own oil? Do they store it in their wine Oil Cellars too? In 55-gal drums, and the best in Mason jars, labeled "Sweet Crude"?
We live in different worlds.
Quote
But yeah keep pushing the idea of miners shooting themselves in a foot
Again: Stop trying to provoke me and start reading. I'm not a Miner's advocate. I'm not a big blocker, I'm simply trying to play things through. Now what's the point of turning neutral bystanders into enemies? Why do it?

But back on topic: tell me how a mining equivalent of a walkout would hurt them?
Or do you think workers who strike never get what they want?

For one, BTC is still an experiment, mining has been getting more and more competitive, profit margins are getting thinner. Miners are heavily invested in BTC and their survival depends on the BTC price, to a point where if BTC goes down say 10% they may never see a return on their investment. We've already seen few mining operators closing their doors because of thin margins. Now, one of the worst things for any market is uncertainty. So since their survival depends on BTC price, contributing any uncertainty to the market would be suicidal for them. They're well aware of this this is exactly why they're staying quiet and trying not to breath to hard for a fear of effecting anything.

Another aspect of this, is the main reason why we (small blockers?) are against bigger blocks. We feel that centralization is bitcoin's Achilles' Heel and is the #1 cause what might bring BTC down. As such it must be protected at all costs. Right now what is/(should) keep a bunch of devs awake at night is the centralization of miners in China. (Who would've thought that bitcoiners are a paranoid bunch?). Thus any proposed change must above all answer whether it helps security/(decentralization), if not it goes on a risk/benefit analysis and again being a paranoid bunch we tend to err on a side of caution. I don't believe i heard a single serious argument how bigger blocks help decentralization, best case you get is that the benefit outweighs the increase of centralization.

With that said, now imagine what would happen to the price when a group that we foresee as the biggest threat to BTC comes out and tries to force a hostile fork that would cause further centralization around them?? I for one say they can keep their inefficient paypal tokens and stick to less centralized chain or switch to alt.

tl;dr decentralization is THE REASON why people trust $10B in BTC. Best case for an entity that tries a hostile fork that gives them more centralization might end up being their worst case as they end up with a bunch of worthless ledger entries.



944. Post 15655579 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on July 21, 2016, 05:03:11 AM
.... segwit will incress node cost and have the EXACT same "centralizing" effect as a 2MB HF.

segwit's "2MB effective block size".... idk why they didnt just call it  segwit's "Magical capacity incress."

lol wake up poeple you've been lied to and manipulated.



True, but segwit enables LN and other off chain solutions that bump all micro payments one layer up.

Where 2MB HF just buys short period of time until people start bitching about 4MB HF, then 8MB... how big should the blocks be to match PayPal? Visa?



945. Post 15655697 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: hv_ on July 21, 2016, 05:20:21 AM
.... segwit will incress node cost and have the EXACT same "centralizing" effect as a 2MB HF.

segwit's "2MB effective block size".... idk why they didnt just call it  segwit's "Magical capacity incress."

lol wake up poeple you've been lied to and manipulated.



True, but segwit enables LN and other off chain solutions that bump all micro payments one layer up.

Where 2MB HF just buys short period of time until people start bitching about 4MB HF, then 8MB... how big should the blocks be to match PayPal? Visa?

The potential of on-chain scaling is not restricted to the block size, but keeping limited in discussion politically.

Again, the only relevant limit is the 21Mio!

Not sure what you mean  Huh

But assuming O(n) or leaner scaling, if with 1MB we can handle 7tps, then we'll need 16MB blocks to handle 115tps (PayPal 2014), and 285MB blocks to handle 2000tps (Visa) thats where i loose majority of big blockers   Undecided



946. Post 15655925 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on July 21, 2016, 05:52:33 AM
.... segwit will incress node cost and have the EXACT same "centralizing" effect as a 2MB HF.

segwit's "2MB effective block size".... idk why they didnt just call it  segwit's "Magical capacity incress."

lol wake up poeple you've been lied to and manipulated.



True, but segwit enables LN and other off chain solutions that bump all micro payments one layer up.

Where 2MB HF just buys short period of time until people start bitching about 4MB HF, then 8MB... how big should the blocks be to match PayPal? Visa?

poeple can bitch for GB blocks all day long, miners have orphen risk to worry about they can't won't make blocks that the network can't quickly digest.
the TX malleability fix required to allow LN to work properly is another magical piece of code only segwit can deliver....



Meh, let's give them a big red button and hope they don't press it, cause it would negatively effect them as well, just doesn't give that warm fuzzy feeling for a multi billion dollar currency.

So you're suggesting just a fork for TX malleability fix? Why does the rest of segwit code bother you so much? Because of HF? Seems like a separate argument from the big blocks



947. Post 15661269 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: souspeed on July 21, 2016, 06:53:26 AM

I don't believe i heard a single serious argument how bigger blocks help decentralization, best case you get is that the benefit outweighs the increase of centralization.


Bigger blocks will decrease potential transaction congestion, enabling a faster user base growth.
A bigger user base with more use cases will create a bigger and stronger network, attract more businesses and lead to faster innovation, which will increase bitcoin valuation. This in itself, besides more mining fees from additional transactions, will attract new mining farms.

Furthermore; any new mining farms outside of China will not be in a disadvantage because of bigger blocks and the Great Chinese Firewall, since miners can always opt to mine smaller blocks. They will only loose out on some of the additional transaction fees as revenue, but these will be the smaller fees anyway.

So yes, bigger blocks, faster network growth, stronger network, more businesses, more use cases, faster innovation, better competitive position against other blockchains, and more farms including farms outside of China, hence more decentralization.

In the end it should be the market to dictate where to put a mining farm based on characteristics such as energy prices and optimal block size, and not a coding restriction.


A lot of assumptions there, where pretty much ever point can be argued (and has been to death). Like current block size = slowing user base growth. It's all just speculation.

How will they not be at disadvantage if new 248MB block will propagate in X seconds in China but X+Y outside?

And you lost me on how "bigger blocks...more farms including farms outside of China" then you say "market to dictate where to put a mining farm based on characteristics such as energy prices"

So if energy prices are the cheapest in north korea, china, sudan, or russia (due to government subsidies) let all the mining concentrate there? Don't think you'll get a lot of support on this one.

Beauty of BTC is that it doesn't care about the vocal minority blowing up forums and reddit on how the world is falling. Most of these are speculators concerned with short term price appreciation on their magical internet money. And they might actually be right, and centralization will be marginal and price will go to da moon, if we put 8MB block in, but even a 10% risk of things blowing up is not acceptable. A basic business vs engineering decision.



948. Post 15668204 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Bitcoin sticking to $666 just says how mature the market is. Or how much more we have to grow  Wink



949. Post 15676801 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Need to shed about $10MM in those pesky longs, who went full retard for the halfening before we can resume uptrend



950. Post 15678281 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 22, 2016, 11:18:29 PM
Need to shed about $10MM in those pesky longs, who went full retard for the halfening before we can resume uptrend

How far down will BTC prices have to go in order to achieve such an objective?  will $610 do it, or do we need to go below $580 in order to shed that quantity of longs?

They are some resilient buggers, it'll be pure speculation on my part but wouldn't be surprised to see $560 again. The short term halfening speculators need to give up hope and exit their position



951. Post 15718012 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: JeremyPlew on July 26, 2016, 04:29:49 PM
oh come on mods even coindesk can't help but talk about the forbidden coin(s)

Do you 5think the price is stagnating due to dropping hashrate? It says here https://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficulty the next difficulty adjustment is gonna be -6.77%, is this something to worry about? Does that mean that Bitcoin is going to be 6.77% less valuable?

Yeah, your probably right, just go ahead and sell your coins now before it's too late. K champ?

I shouldn't wait a little bit longer? I held my bitcoins like a champ all through the halvening, and then people told me it takes a while for marginal supplies to egress exchange trading pool due to slowlyness of the legacy banking cartel, and the heightening of the demand vis-a-vis the lowering of the marginal supply will begin exponentially escalating the value of Bitcoin space in a couple of short weeks...
Don't you think I should wait for another two weeks, when the price will double for sure?

We almost regained last night's losses, so I'm trying to remain cautiously optimistic.

Nope NLC, bitcoin has officially died (once again) please sell all your coins, and close all your accounts (including your sock puppets) now back to your regularly scheduled program



952. Post 15721217 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Eth Classic Market Cap is now about 20% of ETH  Shocked

This is interesting, someone with a lot of money wants to punish ETH.Guess that dude couldn't 51% it with all of his hashing power or is it ongoing?



953. Post 15741298 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: White sugar on July 28, 2016, 07:19:45 PM

Have patience friend, Bitcoin ETF's will come.

in 6months?

Just before the new forum software is finished and running

Will that be before "Midas" and LTC will start trading on gox?



954. Post 15744142 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on July 28, 2016, 11:46:24 PM

Any news about wtf is going on with scaling? Any thoughts on Bitcoins lacklustre performance lately?

https://bitcoinfees.21.co/

Scaling is so "bad" that in the last 24hr

125 txs were conducted with zero fees
48k txs were conducted with 1-10 satoshi /byte
11.5k txs were conducted with 11-20 satoshi /byte
19.5k txs were conducted with 21-30 satoshi /byte

If there was a capacity issue the above would be impossible at such dirt-cheap levels.

Furthermore, the attempt to pin "scaling" and "price" together has failed at levels like 200-300-400 etc when people were saying "oh it will never go beyond 200 because ...scaling".... and then the same at 300, 400, etc.


I didn't ask whether it was a problem. I'm asking how it's going with the solutions.

Of course the chain won't stay saturated forever. Nobody "needs" Bitcoin now.

When it doesn't work properly people stop using it.

Hence the price.

Have you noticed that what is happening is exactly what Gavin said was going to happen?


I just wanted to quote this. That is all
In other news, development of prosthetic wings for sharks is right on schedule



955. Post 15751773 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on July 29, 2016, 06:29:17 PM
pushing 2MB block into the protocol now, failed.
and now segwit is close to completion ( *completed* but needs to be fully tested / adopted? idk )
i think most will agree we need to stick to the plan, segwit now and we revisit 2MB later.
so we are arguing about this for no reason, we're more or less all on the same page now.

Why do people think that blocks won't be full even after segwit + 2MB  Huh
Think the same people miss the whole argument



956. Post 15754291 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on July 29, 2016, 10:39:56 PM
pushing 2MB block into the protocol now, failed.
and now segwit is close to completion ( *completed* but needs to be fully tested / adopted? idk )
i think most will agree we need to stick to the plan, segwit now and we revisit 2MB later.
so we are arguing about this for no reason, we're more or less all on the same page now.

Why do people think that blocks won't be full even after segwit + 2MB  Huh
Think the same people miss the whole argument

why would you think that if we suddnly double or quadruple block space, it would fill up right away ?

the fullblockcalypse creeped up on us, i mean it took years to get to the point where 1MB block were full why would the next MB get filled up over night?

I don't think 0 or 1satosh/byte fee transaction will ever stop. Too much incentive starting with the bears. Double we'll ever see empty mempools ever again



957. Post 15784824 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

So how was everyones weeken... ohhhhh  Shocked

Just gonna quote myself there.

It is frightening that we went into $500s and 0 f*cks werer given by longs, still above $38MM on finex  Cry we might have more room to fall, at least shorts are creeping up BTC25k or $15MM

Quote from: DaRude on July 23, 2016, 04:12:52 AM
Need to shed about $10MM in those pesky longs, who went full retard for the halfening before we can resume uptrend

How far down will BTC prices have to go in order to achieve such an objective?  will $610 do it, or do we need to go below $580 in order to shed that quantity of longs?

They are some resilient buggers, it'll be pure speculation on my part but wouldn't be surprised to see $560 again. The short term halfening speculators need to give up hope and exit their position



958. Post 15792237 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote
some of our users have had their bitcoins stolen

Quote
The theft is being reported to — and we are co-operating with — law enforcement.

Quote
Any settlements will be at the current market prices as of 18:00 UTC.

Quote
the breach was limited to bitcoin wallets; the other digital tokens traded on Bitfinex are unaffected.

F'ing retards. They had so much volume, don't tell me they went the gox way



Quote
zanetackett: We haven't used the hot/cold wallet setup since our implementation with bitgo as each user has their own wallet that the funds are stored in.
Not sure if that's a good or a bad thing  Undecided



959. Post 15792598 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: criptix on August 02, 2016, 07:08:58 PM
how much has been stolen?? please infos now!!!


Quote
zanetackett: We have segregated customer wallets, not hot/cold as each user has their own wallet. We can't release details about the breach at this time as we're still investigating, but no, we did no lose all or nearly all of the bitcoin.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4vtuxo/bitfinex_security_breach_trading_will_be_halted/d61d2qq



960. Post 15792756 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: criptix on August 02, 2016, 07:19:45 PM
but no, we did no lose all or nearly all of the bitcoin.

So ...half?

looking at how they are reacting i bet it is a substantial amount.

He said the hack happened today. So not sure how many coins they could leak :/ but the starting point is from 0% to 49% which is already better than gox



961. Post 15792862 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: yugo23 on August 02, 2016, 07:38:23 PM
I don't really understand the reason of the down...

That's what bothers me the most, the unstability of the market and the lack of reasons for the change, or at least the lack of visible changes.

Major exchange got hacked and completely stops trading. Scale of hack is less than 50% but otherwise unknown. Do you think this helps ETF? Stoli is probably writing another letter to SEC as i type this.

Plus Finex had $38MM in longs with some presumably are being under margin now



962. Post 15794407 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on August 02, 2016, 10:47:54 PM
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4vtuxo/bitfinex_security_breach_trading_will_be_halted/d61oelu

Quote from: zanetackett
I can confirm that the loss from the hack stands at 119,756btc.
son of a bitch

That's more than i was hoping for. Any estimates how many coins they held?



963. Post 15796594 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 03, 2016, 03:42:17 AM
Quote
each user has their own address, so when we were hacked the bitcoin came from segregated customer wallets. Some users can see that their bitcoin was part of the theft, others can see that theirs wasn't. That's the only way to describe it.

You can check if your addresses were involved.

its worth a look if you have a address with them but...

Quote
Quote
Also how can you justify that some users get their balances marked as "stolen", while others don't?
We haven't said this is what we're going to do. In fact we haven't said what we're going to regarding this situation as we still don't know.

It's a little bit unclear for me.

I see one address that I have with Bitfinex, and it shows a couple of recent transactions on it, but they do not really add up to my balance, and it looks like there was a movement of my coins in that address about 7 hours before the Bitfinex shut down, but that does not necessarily mean that my coins were stolen....   

I think that it is really difficult to determine without Bitfinex confirming some of these matters and maybe even opening their site back up... but it's quite possible that the Bitfiinex site could be closed down for a week or longer.. who knows.. the sooner that they can get back up and running the better or at least if they can make some kind of clarifying statement in the coming days, that would probably be helpful, too.

Although I recall that sometimes in the past, they had made some pretty vague and quasi-nonsensical clarifying statements - but they had not had a breach as large as the current rumors are suggesting (if there is any semblance of truth in the current rumors).

they lost too much, i dont see them relaunching ever. i'm not being pesimitic...

this will go to court.
1-2 years later you'll get back some % of your BTC/Fiat.
i doubt anyone will come out of it with 100% money back while other lose 100%


Think you somehow need to know your bitgo address? where funds are settled daily?

Estimating Finex's weekly volume at around BTC134k so about BTC6,968k/yr traded on finex. At ~ 0.25%fee on each trade Finex makes BTC17.5k/yr in fees. Depending how much BTC they held, and how much they have in assets, probably the best thing would be to try to run it as a fractional reserve with 50% in finexcoins.



964. Post 15796754 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 03, 2016, 04:16:44 AM
Estimating Finex's weekly volume at around BTC134k so about BTC6,968k/yr traded on finex. At ~ 0.25%fee on each trade Finex makes BTC17.5k/yr in fees. Depending how much BTC they held, and how much they have in assets, probably the best thing would be to try to run it as a fractional reserve with 50% in finexcoins.

they also make BIG profit when long and short get liquidated ( i would assume? )
and/or fee for swaps.
I think if they the lose represents <50% of their total holdings, maybe they could survive and work on a fractional reserve for like 10 years.

idk why but this seems like a pipe dream.

poeple will demand their deposits the first chance they get, and when bitfinex cant do that, they will take'm to court

Yeah the rep said that the majority wasn't hacked so must be <50%

Didn't some smaller exchange do this? Before they got hacked again and then finally gave up and went belly up?

Yes i didn't include their profit from alts trading or their swaps (i'm estimating about $650k/yr profit just from USD longs)

They have huge volume and brand recognition so there's a chance of someone buying them up, if they won't/can't run fractional? Winterflosses? Full out bankruptcy would be the very last option.



965. Post 15796767 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: spiderbrain on August 03, 2016, 04:17:15 AM

!!!!!DO NOT LEAVE YOUR COINZ ON EXCHANGES YOU FUCKING MORONS!!!!!

This.

Very naive, asset needs to be liquid to have value. To be liquid we need a place to exchange it for other assets, and that exchange place needs to be able to handle needed volume, and to do that someone needs to hold a lot of cash and assets on said exchange



966. Post 15797210 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 03, 2016, 05:13:12 AM
[edited out]


Think you somehow need to know your bitgo address? where funds are settled daily?

Estimating Finex's weekly volume at around BTC134k so about BTC6,968k/yr traded on finex. At ~ 0.25%fee on each trade Finex makes BTC17.5k/yr in fees. Depending how much BTC they held, and how much they have in assets, probably the best thing would be to try to run it as a fractional reserve with 50% in finexcoins.

I'm not sure from where you are getting the average of .25% fees, but in the regular exchange, I had written down maker fees as .1% and taker fees as .2%.. (so .3% total on both sides of the trade). and then fees scale down for volume, and there are the other services too.... but o.k... rough estimate of 17.5k per year in fees.

Exactly, highest volume maker fee is was .04% on finex, taket .2%, so conservatively guesstimated total at .25% fees



967. Post 15797307 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 03, 2016, 04:40:33 AM
Estimating Finex's weekly volume at around BTC134k so about BTC6,968k/yr traded on finex. At ~ 0.25%fee on each trade Finex makes BTC17.5k/yr in fees. Depending how much BTC they held, and how much they have in assets, probably the best thing would be to try to run it as a fractional reserve with 50% in finexcoins.

they also make BIG profit when long and short get liquidated ( i would assume? )
and/or fee for swaps.
I think if they the lose represents <50% of their total holdings, maybe they could survive and work on a fractional reserve for like 10 years.

idk why but this seems like a pipe dream.

poeple will demand their deposits the first chance they get, and when bitfinex cant do that, they will take'm to court

Yeah the rep said that the majority wasn't hacked so must be <50%

Didn't some smaller exchange do this? Before they got hacked again and then finally gave up and went belly up?

Yes i didn't include their profit from alts trading or their swaps (i'm estimating about $650k/yr profit just from USD longs)

They have huge volume and brand recognition so there's a chance of someone buying them up, if they won't/can't run fractional? Winterflosses? Full out bankruptcy would be the very last option.

dont they all do this to some degree?
expect for kraken http://www.coindesk.com/krakens-audit-proves-holds-100-bitcoins-reserve/  Grin

the rep said that? ok maybe its not so bad, maybe they hold 1million coins worth of BTC + LTC + ETC + the fiat
and the lose only represents like 10% of their total holdings.

right maybe a deal will be struck, who knows.


Well that was the whole point of Finex's bitgo design. So each individual account holder could verify their balance, so they weren't running fractional reserve before. Of course it be f'ing nice if they could implement it correctly with some failsafes that wouldn't allow BTC120k withdraw in one day, but you know details.

If it's only 10% then it'd be a moot point, afraid that it's probably more than that    



968. Post 15797342 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: fichtn12345 on August 03, 2016, 04:51:50 AM

!!!!!DO NOT LEAVE YOUR COINZ ON EXCHANGES YOU FUCKING MORONS!!!!!

This.

Very naive, asset needs to be liquid to have value. To be liquid we need a place to exchange it for other assets, and that exchange place needs to be able to handle needed volume, and to do that someone needs to hold a lot of cash and assets on said exchange

imho we need decentralized exchanges.

Still not 100% how those would work??? Still need cash on ramps and some third party holding it



969. Post 15797631 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

http://www.wsj.com/articles/bitcoin-sinks-after-exchange-reports-hack-1470195727
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-08-03/bitcoin-plunges-after-hackers-breach-h-k-exchange-steal-coins

Major news media are starting to pick up on it



970. Post 15808558 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on August 03, 2016, 10:21:02 PM
The moral of the story: got internet monies? Keep them off the internets. Done and done.

The only reason people keep coins on exchanges is because they want to be able to sell them instantly, instead of waiting 10-40 minutes for confirmations.

.... ah no, this is complete bullshit. People were keeping coinz on finex so they could lease them out for shorting or so they could gamble with 10x leveraged (on margin) trades on sometimes very short terms ... casino speculation aka day-trading.

Think/(hope?) we'll be slowly moving into a two tier exchanges system. Tier 1 will be your fully licensed insured exchanges for big boys that pretty much set the rate, and the fly by night shady exchanges that don't ask too many questions. Should make everyone happy. Not having exchanges is not really an option the bigger the market cap gets



971. Post 15812375 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Interesting how Coinbase trading at a premium, almost touched $600. Wall st types are more bullish then the rest??



972. Post 15824502 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 05, 2016, 01:19:47 AM
https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/4vtv1m/bitfinex_down_due_to_bitcoin_security_breach/d64ow17

socialized losses for bitcoin and loans to btc/usd positions. guess we'll know the full facts in a few hours.


Thanks for that link ECB...    The post pretty much states that Bitfinex is going to make a more official update tomorrow, but in the meantime, like you said, Bitfinex is considering a way to socialize losses amongst Bitfinex BTC holders.

 I don't really have a problem with socialized loss in the sense that Bitfinex would later pay back those "losers"... yet, I believe that they are not considering paying back the "losers"...

 I think that it is a bit irresponsible to cause the users to hold the bag... and even though we are finding out some details, we still have to wait for more specifics, which seems to be scheduled to come out tomorrow.

Really the best option for everyone. Other option is to go belly up and then after 4yrs and a bunch of attorney fees you might see some distributions (see Gox). Assuming there'd be a full investigation and it wasn't internal job etc...



973. Post 15831289 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 05, 2016, 05:05:53 PM
https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/4vtv1m/bitfinex_down_due_to_bitcoin_security_breach/d64ow17

socialized losses for bitcoin and loans to btc/usd positions. guess we'll know the full facts in a few hours.


Thanks for that link ECB...    The post pretty much states that Bitfinex is going to make a more official update tomorrow, but in the meantime, like you said, Bitfinex is considering a way to socialize losses amongst Bitfinex BTC holders.

 I don't really have a problem with socialized loss in the sense that Bitfinex would later pay back those "losers"... yet, I believe that they are not considering paying back the "losers"...

 I think that it is a bit irresponsible to cause the users to hold the bag... and even though we are finding out some details, we still have to wait for more specifics, which seems to be scheduled to come out tomorrow.

Really the best option for everyone. Other option is to go belly up and then after 4yrs and a bunch of attorney fees you might see some distributions (see Gox). Assuming there'd be a full investigation and it wasn't internal job etc...


We are likely a bit too much speculation regarding various details at the moment because Bitfinex has only provided a rough outline of their intentions - and they also provided one side of the balance sheet without providing some kind of indication of the other side of the balance sheet, which would likely be disclosed in more detail later today.

I guess part of what I am saying, here, is that in order to attempt to achieve more confidence from current account holders and future account holders, they have to disclose enough details in order to inspire some confidence that they are being reasonable.  

I don't think that we can come to any kind of conclusion regarding what is best if we do not have some more disclosure, and likely, since they are not a public company, they are going to be somewhat sparse with the level of their disclosure... in other words, they will be disclosing mostly from an attempt to retain business rather than any kind of actual obligation to disclose.

One last point, Bitfinex is already somewhat known for being a bit shady; however, so far (at least up until this latest incident), their shadiness had not prevented them from accumulating a lot of bitcoins in their trust and to build a large volume of USD/BTC trade.  Maybe some of that trade is fake, but it is likely a lot more representative of reality than some of the other chinese exchanges (Ok coin and Huobi, for example).  So, their known shadiness causes me to speculate that they are continue to be less than fully transparent, and so no matter what there are going to continue to be theories and speculation regarding whether some of this is an inside job, and perhaps if they do not propose some kind of publicly acceptable plan forward with sufficient details, their history along with this latest incident and perhaps inadequate plan will contribute towards their demise.  I remain with my proposition that the most likely appropriate plan forward is to at least attempt to show that they are coming really close to fully compensating all affected users - otherwise they will lose credibility from the big investors.  They don't actually have to carry out such plan, merely just put forth such plan to create such an impression that they plan to fully compensate (or close to fully compensate) everyone who was negatively affected.

They really don't have many option. Coins are gone, either they make everyone whole, compromise, or declare bankruptcy. Those are really all your options.

As far as compromise need to find a thin line between appeasing pissed off investors and staying solvent. They were THE LARGES BTC/USD exchange by volume so all that talk about loosing trust is irrelevant/FUD sure some trust was lost but clearly not enough to have much effect judging by their volume which i believe to be pretty accurate.

As far as giving everyone a haircut without issuing IOUs or finexcoins with a plan to repay is also suicidal, that's pretty much a definition of being insolvent. So naturally come to the same conclusion as cryptsy in the similar situation. Everyone gets an IOU coins



974. Post 15831568 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: aztecminer on August 05, 2016, 06:07:08 PM
What the hell... Finex is bankrupt and now they want a ''Cyprus'' style haircut for all there users  Angry

That must be a easy fix isn't it? Passing the bill to there users to save there own skin.

A lot of people wanted to avoid this kind of corruption, and now it arrives in Bitcoinland. Monkey see monkey do, so others will see how this ''hack'' heist occurs and bail them out = easy money!

Why no press conference? i only see a freaking smokescreen on both sides. I just dont believe it they have been hacked, by-passing privatekeys and 2-3 multi-sigs...yhea right!



did bitstamp haircut their users ?? this will be a new precedence that users take haircuts... i don't really know, but bitfinex says it will be business as usual .

nothin going on here.. just another 120k coin 68M hack. this actually good for bitcoin .

Believe stamp covered the losses internally. Cryptsy is the one that did the haircut



975. Post 15831952 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: Gyrsur on August 05, 2016, 06:30:00 PM
What the hell... Finex is bankrupt and now they want a ''Cyprus'' style haircut for all there users  Angry

That must be a easy fix isn't it? Passing the bill to there users to save there own skin.

A lot of people wanted to avoid this kind of corruption, and now it arrives in Bitcoinland. Monkey see monkey do, so others will see how this ''hack'' heist occurs and bail them out = easy money!

Why no press conference? i only see a freaking smokescreen on both sides. I just dont believe it they have been hacked, by-passing privatekeys and 2-3 multi-sigs...yhea right!



did bitstamp haircut their users ?? this will be a new precedence that users take haircuts... i don't really know, but bitfinex says it will be business as usual .

nothin going on here.. just another 120k coin 68M hack. this actually good for bitcoin .

Believe stamp covered the losses internally. Cryptsy is the one that did the haircut

BitStamp was able because of Pantera Capital behind and it was "just" the hotwallet.

Read a story somewhere™ that hotwallet theft is so common exchanges don't even report it, but just write it off as cost of business. Which kinda makes sense if you only keep say 5% of coins hot.



976. Post 15831981 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: poncho32 on August 05, 2016, 06:48:31 PM
https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/4vtv1m/bitfinex_down_due_to_bitcoin_security_breach/d64ow17

socialized losses for bitcoin and loans to btc/usd positions. guess we'll know the full facts in a few hours.


Thanks for that link ECB...    The post pretty much states that Bitfinex is going to make a more official update tomorrow, but in the meantime, like you said, Bitfinex is considering a way to socialize losses amongst Bitfinex BTC holders.

 I don't really have a problem with socialized loss in the sense that Bitfinex would later pay back those "losers"... yet, I believe that they are not considering paying back the "losers"...

 I think that it is a bit irresponsible to cause the users to hold the bag... and even though we are finding out some details, we still have to wait for more specifics, which seems to be scheduled to come out tomorrow.

Really the best option for everyone. Other option is to go belly up and then after 4yrs and a bunch of attorney fees you might see some distributions (see Gox). Assuming there'd be a full investigation and it wasn't internal job etc...


We are likely a bit too much speculation regarding various details at the moment because Bitfinex has only provided a rough outline of their intentions - and they also provided one side of the balance sheet without providing some kind of indication of the other side of the balance sheet, which would likely be disclosed in more detail later today.

I guess part of what I am saying, here, is that in order to attempt to achieve more confidence from current account holders and future account holders, they have to disclose enough details in order to inspire some confidence that they are being reasonable.  

I don't think that we can come to any kind of conclusion regarding what is best if we do not have some more disclosure, and likely, since they are not a public company, they are going to be somewhat sparse with the level of their disclosure... in other words, they will be disclosing mostly from an attempt to retain business rather than any kind of actual obligation to disclose.

One last point, Bitfinex is already somewhat known for being a bit shady; however, so far (at least up until this latest incident), their shadiness had not prevented them from accumulating a lot of bitcoins in their trust and to build a large volume of USD/BTC trade.  Maybe some of that trade is fake, but it is likely a lot more representative of reality than some of the other chinese exchanges (Ok coin and Huobi, for example).  So, their known shadiness causes me to speculate that they are continue to be less than fully transparent, and so no matter what there are going to continue to be theories and speculation regarding whether some of this is an inside job, and perhaps if they do not propose some kind of publicly acceptable plan forward with sufficient details, their history along with this latest incident and perhaps inadequate plan will contribute towards their demise.  I remain with my proposition that the most likely appropriate plan forward is to at least attempt to show that they are coming really close to fully compensating all affected users - otherwise they will lose credibility from the big investors.  They don't actually have to carry out such plan, merely just put forth such plan to create such an impression that they plan to fully compensate (or close to fully compensate) everyone who was negatively affected.

They really don't have many option. Coins are gone, either they make everyone whole, compromise, or declare bankruptcy. Those are really all your options.

As far as compromise need to find a thin line between appeasing pissed off investors and staying solvent. They were THE LARGES BTC/USD exchange by volume so all that talk about loosing trust is irrelevant/FUD sure some trust was lost but clearly not enough to have much effect judging by their volume which i believe to be pretty accurate.

As far as giving everyone a haircut without issuing IOUs or finexcoins with a plan to repay is also suicidal, that's pretty much a definition of being insolvent. So naturally come to the same conclusion as cryptsy in the similar situation. Everyone gets an IOU coins

Bter gave everyone IOU coins to cover the losses from its hack. Unfortunately it only made one or two tiny repayments then stopped paying people back. It's still running but it has very low volume now. Finex might find it can't afford to buy back IOU coins if it loses volume. It could become a zombie exchange like Bter.

True, there's a chance of this happening if they over estimate customer loyalty. But honestly what's the cost of running an exchange? Minimal staff, and renting an server rack? It was the biggest BTCUSD exchange out there. And even in that case, assuming no bad intent from Finex's side, people would still be better off than bankruptcy where you maybe get those same coins 4yrs later after attorneys are done getting as much as they can from it   



977. Post 15834102 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 06, 2016, 12:54:30 AM
i'm starting to loss confidence in that bearish prediction

can't be too long now.

Finex should announce their plan sometime in next 3hrs



978. Post 15834175 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 06, 2016, 01:14:59 AM
i'm starting to loss confidence in that bearish prediction

can't be too long now.

Finex should announce their plan sometime in next 3hrs
good to know.

i can't help but think "whatever they say it would stop the class action law suite."   or idk... i guess it all depends on how big the loss will be their customers and how bitfinex chooses to handle it.

Think unless they make everyone whole there will be legal actions regardless which path they choose.



979. Post 15834606 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

5..4..3..2..  Huh



980. Post 15840306 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: Torque on August 06, 2016, 04:59:21 PM
Update;

After much thought, analysis, and consultation, we have arrived at the conclusion that losses must be generalized across all accounts and assets. This is the closest approximation to what would happen in a liquidation context. Upon logging into the platform, customers will see that they have experienced a generalized loss percentage of 36.067%. In a later announcement we will explain in full detail the methodology used to compute these losses.


So their total fiat/crypto assets are in the range of ~330k BTC. Hmmm...

Now "all accounts and assets" also include ETH, right? So dumping time for ETH? Roll Eyes

The announcement bullish?

So they only lost BTC, which translates 36% across all of their assets. They had $38MM in cash just offered for longs. So looks like idiots pretty much lost all of the BTC they held   Shocked  . But BitGo functioned correctly  Angry



981. Post 15844074 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on August 07, 2016, 04:10:34 AM
its really TO BAD, that bitgo didnt have some stupid logic saying if bitfinex asks for >1000Coins to be moved reject it.

It seems like a very obvious thing to do. Suspicious activity should trigger a lockdown and require manual intervention to OK it. The system shouldn't just go "yeah, no problem" when somebody asks to empty out half the Bitcoin vault.

But the vault contained separate lockboxes. They were cleaned out one after another after another.

All lock boxes "belong" to single entity, the if >X% accounts get emptied and if overall > X% gets taken out go into lock down mode should be the basic thing for any kind of security company 



982. Post 15844259 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: Holliday on August 07, 2016, 04:03:56 AM
but if bitgo auto signs every time BFX signs.... then all you really need is BFX keys and you can move the coins.

is this infact the reality of what was going on with this "shared key model." ? idk.. idk shit...

From everything I've read, that seems to be the case Adam. BitGo and BitFinex are both very keen to point out that none of the blame lies with BitGo. Finex apparently had a custom setup with BitGo, unlike any other BitGo customer.

Either BitGo simply signed everything requested by Finex, or the hackers were able to bypass/avoid any kind of security precautions that BitGo had in place.

In either case, it looks to me like BitGo is shit when it comes to security, which is supposed to be their job. They provided Finex with a system that had no security or their system was easily bypassed. Fail or fail.

Perhaps there is something else going on and I haven't read about it or it isn't public knowledge?

So far sounds to me like it's an implementation error. BFX forgot to check the "Limit maximum daily withdrawals to 5%" checkbox during account set up with BitGone 



983. Post 15844813 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on August 07, 2016, 06:37:59 AM
but if bitgo auto signs every time BFX signs.... then all you really need is BFX keys and you can move the coins.

is this infact the reality of what was going on with this "shared key model." ? idk.. idk shit...

From everything I've read, that seems to be the case Adam. BitGo and BitFinex are both very keen to point out that none of the blame lies with BitGo. Finex apparently had a custom setup with BitGo, unlike any other BitGo customer.

Either BitGo simply signed everything requested by Finex, or the hackers were able to bypass/avoid any kind of security precautions that BitGo had in place.

In either case, it looks to me like BitGo is shit when it comes to security, which is supposed to be their job. They provided Finex with a system that had no security or their system was easily bypassed. Fail or fail.

Perhaps there is something else going on and I haven't read about it or it isn't public knowledge?

So far sounds to me like it's an implementation error. BFX forgot to check the "Limit maximum daily withdrawals to 5%" checkbox during account set up with BitGone 

It's because I was under the impression the boxes (addresses) were all drained individually. What kind of daily withdrawal limit woulda prevented that?

The addresses were all in 2/3 multisig. Hacker got BFX's key, signed the transaction (got 1/3), and then forwarded it to BitGone, and then BitGone said yep transaction looks valid i'll sign for this so you got your (2/3). In essence Bitgone signed off on BTC120k of BTC withdrawals from BFXs controlled accounts in 3hrs and didn't see anything wrong with it to stop it.
Or at least how i understand it.



984. Post 15844836 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: Holliday on August 07, 2016, 07:09:32 AM
So far sounds to me like it's an implementation error. BFX forgot to check the "Limit maximum daily withdrawals to 5%" checkbox during account set up with BitGone 

Well, BitGo's website states that they are "The leader in blockchain security" along with "100% secure". If their job is to secure bitcoins, it shouldn't matter how badly the customer tries to screw up, they should still secure the coins!

If I take my car to a garage and tell them to replace the brake pads with eight blocks of sharp cheddar cheese, they had better talk me out of it or refuse entirely. Especially if they are "The leader in automotive safety" and "100% safe".

Why would BitGo, a company which prides itself on securing bitcoins, let one of their customers choose a solution with no security at all? They should have either had precautions in place or, if they couldn't provide the kind of service that Finex desired, they should have turned them away as a customer explaining that their proposed solution is insecure.

It's because I was under the impression the boxes (addresses) were all drained individually. What kind of daily withdrawal limit woulda prevented that?

The one where one customer isn't allowed to withdraw 1%ish of all the bitcoins in existence without some kind of flag going up. LOL!

Even if they were individual addresses, they all belonged to the same customer: Finex.


Agree, there should have been some baseline security implementation which cannot be overridden before they slap their name on it. And the maximum daily % should be on the top of that list



985. Post 15845015 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on August 07, 2016, 07:35:04 AM
Do we know if the process was totally automated? Was no one looking at a screen at BitGawn?
No official word, but looks like it was totally automated and they were just rubber stamping everything that they got from finex.

Wounder if hax0r knew that ahead or was surprised as everyone else when BitGone just kept signing off on everything s/he threw at it and no withdrawal limits kicked in  Roll Eyes

2% of BTC gone oh they probably have it set at 5
5% huh high withdrawal limit
10% are you kidding me BitGone is still signing transactions
25%  i must be on testnet  Huh
50% LOLs
60% That's just sad, it's like kicking a person on the floor, i'm just gonna stop here.



986. Post 15853325 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

I don't see a single valid point in anyone arguing against BFX enabling withdrawals of 60% of user funds  Huh



987. Post 15853362 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 08, 2016, 01:32:36 AM
So, who is going to be stupid enough to lay a finger on their BFX tokens?

i'm a sucker for a sweet deal that no one wants to touch.

But ...you don't even know what the deal is... Hey, listen, remember how I said you'll never see your money if you send it to me? I changed my mind. Got this sweet deal in the wings that can doulble our money in a week. No time to explain, you in?

all i'm saying is ill consider the tokens

i see this as a unique opportunity to own shares in a bitcoin exchange.

but obviously the deal has to be priced right...

BFX tokens != BFX shares, just an IOU. In the future (soon™) some users (non US?) might even be able to switch them for shares, thus setting up a secondary market for BFXtoken trading. But everyone should get distribution of BFX profits (if they'll ever occur) according to the amount of owned BFXtokens. Or at least how I read this.



988. Post 15853511 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 07, 2016, 05:09:59 AM
shes growing

https://blockchain.info/address/35emx395afKAKAr72VoePVbu3FJvxLPVny

there is somthing strangely satisfying about watching unconfirmed TX accumulate

She's still growing up to almost BTC92k. Thought they lost ~60% of BTC ? Looks like they're already rebuying BTC with other assets somehow/somewhere?



989. Post 15853771 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 08, 2016, 04:59:23 AM

I would value bitfinex the company anywhere from 198,000BTC ($117,728,820)   up to  1,190,000BTC  ($707,562,100)
so IMO a fair deal would be that all these BFX tokens put together represents shares equal to 10-60% of bitfinex inc.


very rough numbers.


Hacked BTC exchanged with negative equity and legal liabilities up to their necks is worth 7.5% of ALL btc created so far? Lately you've changed  Roll Eyes



990. Post 15854443 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: Karartma1 on August 08, 2016, 06:33:06 AM
Yes exactly but that's truly annoying though. Basically the security page on their site is pure and simple advertising. Whatever they say there revealed itself untrue.

They have a long way before recovering from this story, if they ever will.






Yeah but it's business after all, kinda sucks but do people expect them to put, we're incompetent and somehow managed to loose $70MM? That'll go well with prospective traders if they ever want to recover



991. Post 15861172 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: savetherainforest on August 08, 2016, 07:48:15 PM
So, who is going to be stupid enough to lay a finger on their BFX tokens?

i'm a sucker for a sweet deal that no one wants to touch.


That poll... so judging by the 36% haircut, we can assume that 20% - 25% of the total was thieved!... And by that we can assume it is more than 250$ million if it was the total...  But keeping in mind the current rate and the imminent bitcoin potential rise, we can say for the short term(30days) 500$ million would have sufficed, with the adjustment to inflation. But they don't have 100% ... because part of that was erased with the theft. So 250$ million would have been more appropriate and a good deal for the exchange price we have now on hand.

What you are saying makes little sense.

I don't know how a company could be valued based on the amount of customer funds that they supposedly hold, as that same value.  Let's say that they held approximately $500 million in customer funds, that does not make them worth $500 million, but maybe (best case scenario) holding value (and being able to profit from the trading of that value) could make them worth 10% of the value that they hold?





I don't know exactly what fees they have for as a theoretical... Bitcoin has the history on its side... Meaning that it will go in to a inflation period... And now to the numbers... If they have a 0.1% fee from the amount of each order. And if they have a 100-10$ million volume per day... That means 100k$ - 10k$ per day ... And if someone pays for something like this they don't pay for what is worth, but what it could be worth, they pay for the name, for the publicity, for the recognition... Meaning that in 10 years it could be bigger than the 250$ million they paid. But you are right, they should not be valued more than 150$ million... But on the other hand... They already have money! And they can probably make 100$ million or more in 10 years... And people with money need to be overpaid to budge and roll over!

Yeah that's not how company valuation works. Right now their balance sheet is in red by ~$120MM (meaning they have $120MM more in liabilities more than assets)
Also if you think this "incident" will have no effect on their market share (their daily volume) or their "goodwill" you're delusional



992. Post 15981284 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: Karartma1 on August 20, 2016, 08:59:25 AM
JayJuanGee I traded on Bitfinex happily for two years: it seemed to me the best exchange around and the most advanced too.
As you suggest probably the truth about what happened is in the middle even though I'm more oriented on the dirtier version of the story.

I was lucky enough to have moved all of my coins out of that mess before the theft.
Everybody would love to see a sort of silver lining for this story but it will not probably happen.

A serious business would have never created such a bfx coin to repay its customers. To me that's called QE
 Wink

Market is pricing their tokes at almost $0.40 so the haircut is around 21% which is apparently better than what market priced in. Also their ask side just vanished only BTC800 till $650  Shocked



993. Post 16078784 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: Unacceptable on August 29, 2016, 10:36:31 AM
the price is wrong!

like for real we should be pushing 800.

Uh,nooo....BTC mining corps gotta dump coins to pay bills....ya'll don't think bout that do ya??

They can't stop selling coins  Cheesy

Corps or hackers? Come on, we all know who is dumping these coins and why.
People are panic selling just because we are losing trust after these big mamas getting hacked even with the best security possibly implemented in them.

Hackers can't sell all they steal,soo ain't them.........BTC is born to lose to the average joe at least......there is no way as of yet to do a refund or a redo if you send coins to the wrong addy,or if you get hacked at home on your PC,so no,it ain't goin as mainstream as us techies think,so get over thinkin any of the crypto currency is going to take over anything  Cheesy

Yeah that's why no one in the world is using wire transfers, you know cause "there is no way as of yet to do a refund or a redo if you send coins wire to the wrong addy,or if you get hacked at home on your PC"  Roll Eyes



994. Post 16136861 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Hello what happened here  Shocked



995. Post 16219763 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: AZwarel on September 12, 2016, 12:27:18 AM
Now that i have analyzed the time at where the selling started at different exchanges (huobi, finex, stamp), it is obviously coordinated. No way that random people start to sell on 3 major exchanges at the very same 1-3 minute time frame (21:12 UTC, on a Sunday evening, riiight). Organized dump, nothing to see here.

They probably been preparing for this for hours/days. (You need to load up btc on different exchanges, than start selling at the very same time on those exchanges, for an obvious loss i might add - i would just use an OCT service for unload large amount of btc, less hassle, better price - clear manipulation.)



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitrage



996. Post 16228326 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: chopstick on September 12, 2016, 04:38:20 PM
insight for the day:




 Cheesy that actually made me laugh. Not sure where it's from but it's genius  Cheesy



997. Post 16239680 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: Elwar on September 13, 2016, 06:37:07 PM
Finex spike to 640 and no one cares.



Dafaq  Huh glitch? or did ask side get refilled instantly?



998. Post 16468851 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

So there are only BTC1.8k new BTC mined daily. Volume wise we got about:
BTC4k @ Bitfinex USD/BTC
BTC4k @ Btc-e USD/BTC
BTC3k @ Stamp USD/BTC
BTC3k @ Coinbase USD/BTC
BTC3k @ Kraken EUR/BTC
BTC1.8k daily Gemini auction
BTC1k @ LocalBTC USD/BTC

or about BTC20k/day volume from somewhat believable sources

+BTC21MM CNY/BTC

and that's with a stable price in last 3months. Where is the volume coming from?  Huh can't be same people selling to themselves just to pay exchange fees 



999. Post 16470454 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: Karartma1 on October 06, 2016, 06:39:06 AM
So there are only BTC1.8k new BTC mined daily. Volume wise we got about:
BTC4k @ Bitfinex USD/BTC
BTC4k @ Btc-e USD/BTC
BTC3k @ Stamp USD/BTC
BTC3k @ Coinbase USD/BTC
BTC3k @ Kraken EUR/BTC
BTC1.8k daily Gemini auction
BTC1k @ LocalBTC USD/BTC

or about BTC20k/day volume from somewhat believable sources

+BTC21MM CNY/BTC

and that's with a stable price in last 3months. Where is the volume coming from?  Huh can't be same people selling to themselves just to pay exchange fees 

I think it is one thing only: fractional-reserve
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=945881.0

Read that thread and most of your questions will be answered. At first I would not believe that was happening but it is.

But that's exactly why Finex implemented the the multisig with BitGo for easy auditing.. right?  RIGHT?? Roll Eyes



1000. Post 16520878 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Guess that BTC1k ask wall on Finex was eaten



1001. Post 16555002 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Bravo Professor Stolfi i see you have gained some notoriety


Quote
...Thus, bitcoins are more like "penny stock", shares of a company with no assets, no products, and no staff; or shares in a pure ponzi schema, like Madoff's fund...

Is this is all he got?? Clearly he doesn't know what a penny stock is, thus can't tell the difference between a "penny stock" and a "ponzi schema" as he's not even sure what to equate bitcoins to  Huh Might as well write that bitcoin will eat all your children or start a war!!, you know one of those barely relatable, but most importantly, VERY BAD THINGS!!

I say let him troll moar i'll get popcorn  Grin



1002. Post 16723723 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: GreekGeek on October 29, 2016, 02:44:29 PM
Are we having the 1000 USD/BTC party this time?
last time I was this close in buying the tickets but...

Due to recent development it has been moved to a $10.000USD/BTC party



1003. Post 16723734 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on October 29, 2016, 04:12:05 PM
Are there even enough coins for sale on the exchanges?

Don't get fooled by the order book depth. Coins can get to an exchange within an hr. People got smarter (for now) and don't store (as many coins) on the exchanges



1004. Post 16725802 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Does gemini still doing their daily auctions? Lost the site where they tracked the daily volume, anyone has it handy?



1005. Post 16732891 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Under $700 is BTC dead?



1006. Post 16746504 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: spooderman on November 01, 2016, 02:52:33 PM
well i miss those old guise. glad you're still around molecular.

this is some serious old school moonage we got going on here.

At least NLC is gone too...for now (or is s/he?)



1007. Post 16767328 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: huanglui on November 03, 2016, 08:05:09 PM
I buy today 9.735.843,65351333 BTC . What is the total BTC supply. I want buy all coins. Thanks

Market cap is BTC16MM and Whoboi, and OKCoin already do that much volume in a week each, and now you too!?!



1008. Post 16767470 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: huanglui on November 03, 2016, 08:21:10 PM
I buy today 9.735.843,65351333 BTC . What is the total BTC supply. I want buy all coins. Thanks

Market cap is BTC16MM and Whoboi, and OKCoin already do that much volume in a week each, and now you too!?!

When I will buy the remaining 6 million coins BTC will be the best decentralized crypto.

Why only 6MM? If you buy on Chinese exchange they'll probably sell another BTC16MM to you, you know as long as you don't try to withdraw it  from their exchange



1009. Post 16770245 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: TERA on November 04, 2016, 04:54:19 AM
I could see the next ATH being preceeded by something like a "Silk Road Flash Crash" to $400 where China completely outlaws Bitcoin and all the Chinese exchanges shut down but then BTC bounces all the way back to $700 anyway within days or weeks. I'm not saying it's going to happen but it would be amusing.

After the Finex fuck up, China became more of a leader than before, and can take us any in direction they want. If you thought previous price manipulations from the dragon was something you haven't seen anything yet.

No idea where all USD traders went since clearly they're not on Finex anymore



1010. Post 16785436 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: ImI on November 05, 2016, 05:17:42 PM
The US elections should be pretty irrelevant to what BTC does: The policies are typically unaffected by the puppets elected, no matter what they've promised.

Please spare us your religious views.

BTC is just another investment and will act like the rest of the market. When Hillary wins BTC might actually go down a tiny bit as the remote chance of Trump winning is finally removed. And if Trump wins all hell breaks loose  Grin

EDIT: In very short time, when Hillary wins trump will most likely challenge the outcome, and Russia and other countries will jump on the opportunity to f*ck things up (i.e. go into Syria hard core)



1011. Post 16786319 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: strawbs on November 05, 2016, 07:05:45 PM
Bitcoin is still not large and mature enough yet to be a safe haven. It's still a high tech science experiment mostly supported by the permissiveness of banks and governments. It is going to follow the markets - not go against them.

I wish more people here would realise this. When has btc ever shown any signs of acting as if it were a safe haven? Outside of these forums, basement dwellers and tech nerds, hardly anyone even knows what btc is. They might have heard of it once or twice. Wall Street is hardly likely to suddenly flock to crypto.

The US election result will probably have about as much impact on btc price as the much awaited halvening a few months ago - nil.


It's not a safe heaven asset per se, but the assertion that it could be, the publicity, and coverage that it gets as such in itself turns things bullish. Like the haircuts at Cyprus, doubt many Cypriots turned to BTC but the coverage that BTC got woke up some minds to its potential.



1012. Post 16789252 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: TERA on November 05, 2016, 07:17:54 PM
The tech nerds have all contributed a negative amount of money towards bitcoin E.G. they got bitcoin very cheap and dumped most of them at a high price, making money for themselves. The people who are buying Bitcoin now are the friends and relatives of the tech nerds as well as some investors and fintech startups who are betting on a proliferation of Bitcoin within the existing system of banking and commerce, and traders playing the rally. One of the best uses of Bitcoin is to have them on Poloniex to trade altcoins.


Ahhh that's the TERA i remember



1013. Post 16806461 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: DeathAngel on November 07, 2016, 05:46:01 PM
I just asked for posters opinions in a gambling thread re: the election but you guys are a lot more knowledgable normally so I'd like to ask the following -


Do you think the price will be directly affected as a result of the election (whatever that ends up being - most likely Hillary imo)


Already been through this. Why not ask about general market, rather than specific asset like BTC? Yes market prices in the election, and if the outcome differs from what's priced in market adjusts. BTC is considered a hedge so more volatility in general markets is bullish for BTC price.

Market doesn't like uncertainty either. Hiller is considered to be the winner, that why market moved up once FBI said they don't have anything on their latest emails investigation.

Quote
...Wall Street analysts agree that the S&P 500 will likely sell off if Donald Trump wins, and at least hold gains if Hillary Clinton wins...
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/11/07/market-predictions-sp-500-to-sell-off-if-donald-trump-tops-clinton-and-more-from-wall-street.html


TL;DR
Trump wins: market goes down, BTC up
Hillary wins Trump accepts the loss: not significant effect on BTC
Hillary wins, Trump doesn't accept and starts riots on the streets. BTC up



1014. Post 16806821 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on November 07, 2016, 07:29:02 PM

Hillary wins, Trump doesn't accept and starts riots on the streets. BTC up

hahahaha... I like the way you outline the various scenarios.  Surely, this third scenario is an interesting one, but really does not seem that likely.  Surely, it seems likely that Trump could create  a little drama to the extent that he considers it helpful to his brand, but really it may seem a bit counter productive (to his Brand) to attempt to continue in any kind of persistent manner with this, if it were to play out in that third scenario direction.

Which part of his speeches make you think that he's capable of graciously accepting defeat? It might create a temporary chaos with others trying to exploit the opportunity (i.e. Russia going all out in Syria, China grabbing more islands, Texas trying to secede from US etc...)



1015. Post 16806827 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: bitebits on November 07, 2016, 07:22:39 PM
@JJG So you had a plan (10%), and stuck with it (buying more) when the dollar value of your investment went down.
But now when it is 30%, you don't stick with your plan by not selling down to 10% (not judging, just summarizing).

My plan was to own a certain percentage of the Bitcoin network which got easier over time because of the declining price. Now I have it, and like you can't seem to sell them for fiat or s(t)ocks I don't need. A bitcoin is just too damn precious.

Ehh just about $707 per BTC1



1016. Post 16809655 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: criptix on November 08, 2016, 02:16:57 AM
Rasmussen polling accidentally releases report showing landslide Trump victory:



ooh boy we are in for a ride

This time i will short like there is no tommorow.

Pinky promise! Gonna grab them by their pussy. 100%

How about building a wall around the polling places to prevent Hillary voters? And make Muslims pay for that wall?



1017. Post 16809700 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on November 07, 2016, 11:53:52 PM
Election set-up feels a lot like Brexit, with weeks of indecision and the confidence of establishment-supporting morons holding the line, then a stock rally (risk off trade) up into the polling day erasing large losses accrued over uncertainty ... might even be a further rally on the day of election and then the massive dumps begin when poll surprise numbers start rolling in.

...and then even the leadership is so surprised that they win that everyone quits cause no one wants to captain that titanic?

Only chaos is actually good for BTC so from that standpoint  Roll Eyes  Grin



1018. Post 16819554 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: hv_ on November 09, 2016, 02:34:25 AM
Due to BBC Trump in front.

USD and oil down sharply

Gold, Yen and Euro up...

Bitcoin?

Euro up due to Trump being in front? Now that makes a lot of sense  Undecided



1019. Post 16820053 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: fallinglantern on November 09, 2016, 03:47:53 AM


 Grin



1020. Post 16820588 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: luckygenough56 on November 09, 2016, 05:36:05 AM


Just for you Smiley

thanks i really needed that lol

Think the bunker one would be more appropriate



1021. Post 16821321 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

"Temporarily Unavailable"

I'm not a violent person but I sweat to God Finex ...



1022. Post 16850850 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Adam is back!?!?! And he kidnapped some kids this time  Shocked



1023. Post 16859586 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Is bitcoin dead?  Cry



1024. Post 16886874 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Bearstamp is higher than finex  Shocked



1025. Post 16897723 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Hard to deny who's leading this rally. All hail our new overlords  Shocked



1026. Post 16897904 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: Fakhoury on November 16, 2016, 07:54:47 PM
wait the china wake-up now ... or India ?









Isn't current volume for all of India like BTC500/day doubt it'll make a dent.



1027. Post 16899184 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

West ran out of cash. Longs are going full retard  Angry  Cry



1028. Post 16899534 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: Wolf Rainer on November 16, 2016, 11:42:15 PM
WTF is going on???

Segwit should be voted in by end of year, then Lightning Network will solve all of out problems. Oh yeah and China devaluation also helps out with the price.

Make Bitcoin Great Again Cheesy



1029. Post 16900355 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

LOL at whoboy's BTC14k 1min btc candle without moving the market at all too funny



1030. Post 16910369 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on November 18, 2016, 02:16:24 AM
I have to admit I'm surprised most of you are still here. Nobody thinks this is the top yet? Really?

Not if segwit gets voted on, right away. Popcorn time



1031. Post 16911217 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: yefi on November 18, 2016, 05:11:20 AM
Nonetheless, despite a multitude of vocal opposition to seg wit, I really think when push comes to shove, these folks (such as mining nodes) are not going to be so stupid as to sabotage their own prosperity and to continue to support any kind of opposition to seg wit, with stupid-ass, contradictory, technically inadequate, fundamentally dangerous and largely baseless objections to a largely non-controversial implementation.

Relying on folk to not be stupid doesn't sound like a great formula for success. Forces in war have continued fighting long after it was obvious to everyone they had lost - and they were staking not merely their money but their lives.

We don't need you elitist logic.

MAKE BITCOIN GREAT AGAIN!!!!


T -17



1032. Post 16917242 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: coins101 on November 18, 2016, 04:27:54 PM
What's happened to the OP?

Quote from: adam last seen
September 14, 2016, 11:30:17 PM


Hi kidnapped two kids and is now being hunted by the feds*

*Or so i heard



1033. Post 16918111 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: synthgauge on November 18, 2016, 05:51:42 PM
I have to admit I'm surprised most of you are still here. Nobody thinks this is the top yet? Really?

Not if segwit gets voted on, right away. Popcorn time

It will but it has the time left in till september 2017 to gather confidence in what the collectivity may wish to view it as. Judging by how the industry and markets love extremes, Id make an assumption that consensus will come within the last days if not hours of the activation window. If not supported by 90 percent of miners within a 14 d timespace sometime between now and early fall 2017, then RIP.

I'm speculating that if we don't get say 50% in first weeks, the market will be disappointed



1034. Post 16940557 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

China currency keeps devaluing. So i guess Trump was better for BTC.


Make Bitcoin Great Again!!!!



1035. Post 16941242 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: unknown04 on November 21, 2016, 07:23:07 AM
China currency keeps devaluing. So i guess Trump was better for BTC.


Make Bitcoin Great Again!!!!

not until I see bitcoin price up

price up = price>$1200

fine i agree



1036. Post 16948053 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Hello Mr BTC2500 ask wall @ $740 on Finex. Wait are we still doing this wall thing?



1037. Post 16948218 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: Chef Ramsay on November 21, 2016, 10:38:05 PM
Hello Mr BTC2500 ask wall @ $740 on Finex. Wait are we still doing this wall thing?

Currently, I see 2,611 BTC at $740 on bitfinex.  Will be interesting to see how long that wall lasts, and whether it gets eaten into, pulled or causes a price reversal.
Most likely will be pulled once refueling expectations have been met.

POOF aand pulled



1038. Post 16969999 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: GreekGeek on November 23, 2016, 08:58:38 PM
This frustrating  Embarrassed

I know for sure that if I sell it will go up
and if I hold the price will go down

 Grin Grin
 

Then sell damn you. Take a bullet for the rest of us. We promise to remember you as the geekiest sacrifice



1039. Post 16974340 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on November 24, 2016, 09:44:39 AM


End of the world wall. Demon wars.

Funny thing about walls...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1512965.msg15222331#msg15222331

Nah 2012 passed and we all lived through it



1040. Post 16979793 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: ImI on November 24, 2016, 03:07:29 PM
The bear is coming. Run for your lives.

unfortunately i agree

market understands now that segwit wont come

If it doesn't come because of opposition from the bigblockers, then this makes it apparent that they are not really interested in scaling and they probably never were. They just used scaling as an excuse for attempting a governance coup. So when scaling solutions were presented they didn't go with it and instead pretended to be dissatisfied opting for something else.

the explanation is much easier than this: pride.

the chinese miners have been humiliated in public with the breach of the HK-2MB-agreement and now maxwell and others expect them to cooperate? it would be seen as a public bowing infront of folks that insulted and betrayed them publicly for the last 12months. i remember here especially LukeJr that said some pretty nasty things about the chinese mining operators. so even if you look at it from an western perspective you should be easily able to understand why after all this fuck-up they refuse to cooperate. and if you go one step further and are able to understand asian culture you will even more be able to understand why (after the breach of the HK-agreement and the open insults) they are basically not able to activate segwit.

pride is some strong motivation.

even in greece.  Grin


yeah that might be a problem. People digging in their feet for their agenda instead of what's good for BTC. Yeah segwit is great but we won't let it happen because we're upset, i doubt they'll get much empathy from the community that way



1041. Post 16993872 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: kurious on November 25, 2016, 05:44:40 PM

.....

its a very complex issue.... with no clear cut right answer.

+1

This I can agree with.  I have read and read as much as I can, but all I can conclude is that I don't know the right answer.

Try to see if you can find a single good argument against SegWit or LN. Free instant transactions sound terrible right?
Now put yourself in the miners shoes, where you just invested millions in these mining farms and the only way you make money is by mining blocks. Bigger blocks = more money. Now i wonder why would miners want unlimited blocks hmmmm  Angry



1042. Post 17024886 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: cmacwiz on November 29, 2016, 01:42:32 AM
This is it, time is up. rewards have been halved, hype is brewing. Bitcoin always going to be bummin' around, and paper $$$ only gets less useful by the day.

In 1 week we will be pushing 800

In 1 year we will be pushing 2400

In 10 years, global economic unity.

Liquid fucking bits


I like your optimism.

I don't know why, when I read Cmacwiz's post, I felt it's really true and it will happen.

You better hope that BTC won't become the "global economic unity". If so even one BTC would be worth hundreds of millions US$ and every current holder would be haunted.

We can decide to just distribute our wealth and fund programs of art, athletics and academics. Maybe invest in renewables research, desalination, etc... We don't all have to Scrooge McDuck our BTC forever.

With regards to my oracle sh!tpost: I hardly can find anything to say, but I'm trying to get that fourth coin next to my username!

I do believe what I said.



Hmm already talking about islands and body doubles. The inverse theory says we must be going down soon?!?!
Plus i'd venture a guess that most here would OD on hookers and blow, way before private islands would get in range



1043. Post 17029945 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: DonQuijote on November 29, 2016, 12:43:52 PM
Is Ether good for btc price?

Huh straight to the point. I'm kinda split on that. From the investment stand point, it's a competitor so it takes market cap away from BTC and has a theoretical potential to dethrone BTC. But currently it's only like 6% of BTCs market cap so not much to worry about yet (if ever). On another hand it's a cryptocoin so it gets publicity to the space, and technically can be seen as a testbed for new proposals to see how technology/market will behave and the good ideas can be cherry picked into BTC  and for the bad ones they can just hard fork and roll back like twice a day and no one cares  Grin

Probably good now, but can start turning bad if they'll start picking up market share say above 25% of BTC



1044. Post 17035693 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Mr Bear Dolphin is back on finex ? BTC618 ask @ $730
BTC618 is a wall for finex nowadays right?



1045. Post 17035726 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: DaRude on November 30, 2016, 07:09:32 AM
Mr Bear Dolphin is back on finex ? BTC618 ask @ $730
BTC618 is a wall for finex nowadays right?

*Poof* and it's gone. Well he moved it up to $735



1046. Post 17037079 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

I'd feel much more bullish if segwit was getting activated



1047. Post 17043336 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on November 30, 2016, 12:12:32 PM
I'd feel much more bullish if segwit was getting activated


... member when one coin was 15 cents ? 

oooooh, I member!



I don't member 15c exactly, but i member mining it on my CPU for one night, then realizing that i didn't mine a single block for the whole night it was running so I gave up on BTC for a year or so. Damn this ADHD generation



1048. Post 17054978 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Whoboy is at $790 just $10 more ... push baby push  Grin



1049. Post 17054990 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 01, 2016, 04:44:59 AM
something nasty brewing ... wouldn't want to be leveraged right now  Shocked

Did someone's shorts caught on fire?  Tongue



1050. Post 17055227 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 02, 2016, 02:23:23 AM
something nasty brewing ... wouldn't want to be leveraged right now  Shocked

Did someone's shorts caught on fire?  Tongue

imagine if all your undeclared profits were from shorting bitcoin for 3 years and held in fiat at a bitcoin exchange that just got a federal court summons from IRS ... wouldn't that suck worse than your shorts blowing up in your face?!

A fiat meister's hell on earth.


Who trades on coinbase? Especially in 2014? I'm guessing those number are marginal at best. And market is showing how much it cares for it right now



1051. Post 17055385 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on December 02, 2016, 02:45:53 AM
something nasty brewing ... wouldn't want to be leveraged right now  Shocked

Did someone's shorts caught on fire?  Tongue

imagine if all your undeclared profits were from shorting bitcoin for 3 years and held in fiat at a bitcoin exchange that just got a federal court summons from IRS ... wouldn't that suck worse than your shorts blowing up in your face?!

A fiat meister's hell on earth.


Who trades on coinbase? Especially in 2014? I'm guessing those number are marginal at best. And market is showing how much it cares for it right now

Looking at a report apparently they show any coins deposited at what the value was at that specific time, meaning they have no knowledge of how much you paid unless you bought the bitcoin on their site.

Yep plus people who bought and HODLed are once again not effected



1052. Post 17085190 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

And as usual BTC does the inverse of what the wall observers expect... honey badger?

On a separate note, if my math is right about BTC12.600 (12.5*6*24*7) BTC are mined every week. Finex is showing about BTC40.000 weekly volume but i guess most of that can be attributed to speculation even with their fees? Not even going to talk about Chinese exchanges  Roll Eyes But


https://coin.dance/volume/localbitcoins/ALL

shows that there have been sustained volume of around BTC24.000/week for pretty much two years now, since the begging of 2015 on LocalBitcoins. That's about twice the volume of all BTC mined traded just on LocalBitcoins. Which is not a great platform for speculations. Which leads me to believe that either
1-Volume is fake
2-Majority of acquired BTC are used for transactions and are quickly traded back into fiat
3-Someone is selling their reserves to meet the demand Huh



1053. Post 17090670 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: logictense on December 05, 2016, 05:10:33 PM
Or maybe, y'know, not everyone out there is a foaming anti semite? There are people out there with different points of view.

It looks like you might be a:



Scarey conclusions ya make. Why in hell do u talk about Jewish mental health establishment on the speculation-nebulation topic?

Meet our local nazi. He's been trying to rally up people to start another holocaust. Something about murdering innocent children that somehow purifies you. No one knows wtf he's talking about, but there's an Ignore button that makes him stfu for good



1054. Post 17106614 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Any updates on the Winterfloss twins and their ETF? What is the totally guaranteed 100% supercereal last deadline date for the ETF decision?



1055. Post 17137493 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on December 10, 2016, 06:51:50 AM
i want to go on a bit of a rant.
its not price related but here's the chart anyway.

what would be best for bitcoin right now is unity.image core devs and bu devs and Gavin! coming out of the wood work all collaborating to give us segwit + free market BlockSize. that IMO is gold. that will yield small reasonable blocks size increases along side a LN network cooking to perfection. this outcome would yield 32,000$ a coin.. admit it. fight for this outcome. run a BU client if for no other reason as to express your desire for more diversified set of bitcoin BIPs on the table at any one time.
anyway you look at it bitcoin is a buy right now, if it go segwit if it goes bu if it dose both in short order and then some.
time is now.
buy.


Nope. Having no restriction on a size of a block chain is suicide! If core goes full retard and actually try that i'm shorting BTC getting some popcorn and will watch that dumb ass idea collapse on itself in fireworks.

But don't let that discourage you. You go ahead and keep on shilling, BTW i like the rebranding from unlimited blocks to "free market BlockSize" how about "BestFlexibleBlocksThatSaveChildrenAndEndWars BlockSize"TM  Grin you too funny, but you try too hard



1056. Post 17198899 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

My spidey senses are tingling, and weekend is upon us  Shocked



1057. Post 17247520 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Woo hoo $800 now i'm only $400 down  Grin wake me up when we're past $1200 Grin



1058. Post 17259652 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: piramida on December 22, 2016, 02:03:47 AM
In this article they state that 4/5 banks will be using blockchain tech (not bitcoin) in 2017. But if they have their own blockchain it'll be centralized and not have the "bitcoin network." Is it inevitable that they will turn to bitcoin in the end?


Who really cares? Horse renting companies will not be using gasoline engines, instead they will train horses to drink gasoline because it's hip and everybody does that. Will they turn and replace all their horses when they start to explode spontaneously? I really do not know, but I am sure by that time they will be completely irrelevant anyway Smiley

Nah they still use horses to give rides around parks. I'm sure we can find some niche for them



1059. Post 17271232 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):



Oh it's only $900 sorry mistook it for $1900, cancel all the memes



1060. Post 17271834 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Is that $1k party still on? Or everyone died of old age there?



1061. Post 17271983 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: proudhon on December 23, 2016, 04:12:04 AM
Ok, fine. I'm here. Now what?

Really hoping you didn't practice what you preached or what you were getting paid for



1062. Post 17272277 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: Loaded on December 23, 2016, 04:41:29 AM
Soon.

Whoa it is like 2013, just need rpietila and his castles now



1063. Post 17272564 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: spooderman on December 23, 2016, 05:54:18 AM
i don't either. all i can verify from his btc signature is that he probably owns at least 40,000 coins.

Does it really matter at that point whether it's 40k or 100k  Roll Eyes
Plus i'm pretty sure he's managing some of that



1064. Post 17281291 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Does anyone remember when BTC was worth in $800s? I member like it was yesterday



1065. Post 17476946 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Is BTC dead? again



1066. Post 17484758 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: chopstick on January 12, 2017, 04:29:46 PM
The big-blockers need to fork off already so that we can get on with Project Bitcoin, Satoshi's Vision and not this twisted Kore-Coin crapola.

If we don't, price will continue to stagnate.

Bitcoin has the potential to benefit in infinite ways from the global economic turmoil that is around the corner. In this way, BTC's price could spike to unimaginable highs. But it will never happen with no scaling solution, BTC simply could not handle an increase in 100 million+ users. There is no time to wait 5 years for this imaginary "Lightning Network" to suddenly manifest from vaporware into reality.

FORK IT ALREADY.

Ahh those bloody idiots are back  Undecided

Can you do no maths? How big will the blocks need to be to "handle an increase in 100 million+ users"  Huh yeah maths are hard. Please fork off already to your alt and have fun just don't call it bitcoin to confuse people



1067. Post 17485031 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: chopstick on January 12, 2017, 05:40:31 PM
The big-blockers need to fork off already so that we can get on with Project Bitcoin, Satoshi's Vision and not this twisted Kore-Coin crapola.

If we don't, price will continue to stagnate.

Bitcoin has the potential to benefit in infinite ways from the global economic turmoil that is around the corner. In this way, BTC's price could spike to unimaginable highs. But it will never happen with no scaling solution, BTC simply could not handle an increase in 100 million+ users. There is no time to wait 5 years for this imaginary "Lightning Network" to suddenly manifest from vaporware into reality.

FORK IT ALREADY.

Ahh those bloody idiots are back  Undecided

Can you do no maths? How big will the blocks need to be to "handle an increase in 100 million+ users"  Huh yeah maths are hard. Please fork off already to your alt and have fun just don't call it bitcoin to confuse people

Stop pretending that the present technology couldn't handle large blocks.

Perhaps the solution is to do both (blocksize increase and off-chain LN type deal)

But you can't just do one, or the other. Core has refused to compromise over and over, they refuse to raise the blocksize to even 2mb which pretty much everyone agrees could be very EASILY handled.

Core has shown they have no leadership skills, no vision and are motivated primarily to their own self-serving egos. They do not serve the greater whole. Furthermore, they engage in a deceptive campaign of censorship and other shady tactics to force their own side to "win", this has needlessly damaged the Bitcoin community itself by refusing to even allow certain discussions. The community has been effectively divided in this way. Can you even quantify the damage that has been done to all of us as a result of this?

You can ignore it all if you want, but it will hurt you in the end.

Again no maths on blocksize that can "handle an increase in 100 million+ users". Sound like a butthurt miner shill.

PS: I'm all for a 2mb blocks + segwit. Let's just enable it already. Only something telling me that miners won't be happy with that either  Roll Eyes



1068. Post 17485755 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on January 12, 2017, 07:08:33 PM
The big-blockers need to fork off already so that we can get on with Project Bitcoin, Satoshi's Vision and not this twisted Kore-Coin crapola.

If we don't, price will continue to stagnate.

Bitcoin has the potential to benefit in infinite ways from the global economic turmoil that is around the corner. In this way, BTC's price could spike to unimaginable highs. But it will never happen with no scaling solution, BTC simply could not handle an increase in 100 million+ users. There is no time to wait 5 years for this imaginary "Lightning Network" to suddenly manifest from vaporware into reality.

FORK IT ALREADY.

Ahh those bloody idiots are back  Undecided

Can you do no maths? How big will the blocks need to be to "handle an increase in 100 million+ users"  Huh yeah maths are hard. Please fork off already to your alt and have fun just don't call it bitcoin to confuse people

Stop pretending that the present technology couldn't handle large blocks.

Perhaps the solution is to do both (blocksize increase and off-chain LN type deal)

But you can't just do one, or the other. Core has refused to compromise over and over, they refuse to raise the blocksize to even 2mb which pretty much everyone agrees could be very EASILY handled.

Core has shown they have no leadership skills, no vision and are motivated primarily to their own self-serving egos. They do not serve the greater whole. Furthermore, they engage in a deceptive campaign of censorship and other shady tactics to force their own side to "win", this has needlessly damaged the Bitcoin community itself by refusing to even allow certain discussions. The community has been effectively divided in this way. Can you even quantify the damage that has been done to all of us as a result of this?

You can ignore it all if you want, but it will hurt you in the end.

+1!

LN is inevitable and desirable ( very desirable )
and same goes for bigger blocks...
the solution is so obviously "both" its not even funny.
segwit softfork is a magic trick, if you dont know how its done you're amazed, if you do you're unimpressed.
we need simple incress and simple segwit.
we need these things hardforked in, and we need to utilize synthetic forks to do that gracefully.
we need a to foster an dev environment which enables free choice, not free to use core0.12.1 or core0.13.1
the devs are here to service the network, not the other way around.

what the world wants the world gets. only question is who will provide.

 Roll Eyes Is that the latest keyword for BU? Or would you be happy with 2MB block+segwit?

Edit: Or why not get your nick back and put up a new poll? For or against 2MB HF + segwit



1069. Post 17488258 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: jbreher on January 12, 2017, 10:21:42 PM
The big-blockers ...

Ahh those bloody idiots are back  Undecided

I don't know who you are referring to as 'idiots', but we 'big blockers' have been here the whole time, and don't plan on leaving. Deal with it.

Quote
How big will the blocks need to be to "handle an increase in 100 million+ users"  Huh

Do you run a node? Do you ever stream video content? Are you aware that hypothetical 100MB blocks are no more resource intensive than SD video content?

Quote
yeah maths are hard.

Arithmetic ain't hard. It appears, however, that for some, thinking through the implications of the arithmetic calculations are out of their grasp.

Are you seriously trying to imply that 100MB are sustainable? Or just randomly stating propagation bandwidth of one 100MB block while ignoring all other effects on the network for no apparent reason and not trying to sway anyone?



1070. Post 17489521 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on January 13, 2017, 04:40:18 AM
if we assume a government has "banned bitcoin traffic" ( not sure how feasible that is )
then we should limit blocksize such that we can smuggle blocks in and out of that country?
we need to keep blocksize such that it can be carried on some hypothetical "internet de la resistance"

idk... sounds nutty.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_packet_inspection

i think you have reason to want small blocks, but you have no good reason to not allow the network of nodes to determine what "small" is.
BU effectively limits block size to whatever the vast majority of nodes consider acceptable, and allows for nodes to continue to protest bigger block while staying synced and not forked.
let it go, you can't impose your view of bitcoin onto everyone else even if you believe "its for there own good"

you should however keep running core if you like the idea of segwit and static blocksize.

I don't know where you get the idea that I want to "impose" anything on anyone since I've been asking big blockers to make a block bigger than 1MB for ages. The two sides of this debate will never see eye to eye. A hard fork is the only solution where both sides end up happy. As soon as BU makes a block bigger than 1MB this debate will end.

the point of the debate is to make that >1MB block with a majority backing, preferably a vast majority.
many poeple are on the fence or just dont care either way.
but i think we're getting close to the day where mostly everyone will have made up there mind either way and bitcoin is forever altered.

Why not just call it as it is??

Think majority can probably agree to a >1MB block...as in a 2MB block. The problem is that's not enough for a BU crowd and really never was. They want their Unlimited block size. Think at the minimum it's misleading to say you just want a >1MB block when in reality you want a whole new system for a "dynamically adjustable blocksize". And that will never happen



1071. Post 17504976 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on January 14, 2017, 05:21:41 PM
if you care about bitcoin miners continuing to provide a high level of power to mine and secure bitcoin...
then give them the means to control blocksize
with some control over blocksize miners can balance the fee pressure to maximize fees.

And if we don't? If we think of them as a tool, sort of like hiring people and asking half of them to dig holes and the other half to cover those holes up just to prove some work was done. If too many line up willing to do that you reduce their compensation, if not enough show up you raise the salary. But now these people keep showing up and asking that they control how many holes they dig. And then hire shills to run ads and try to influence your decision  Angry
if you dont care about maximum fee revenue for miner, which in turn provides a greater incentive to secure bitcoin.
...
another blockchain will.

Yes finally!! We are fine with that. Please start another blockchain as soon as you wish, let us know if you need any help in the alt section of this forum.



1072. Post 17538046 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

So China's back at it with it's shenanigans i see



1073. Post 17572093 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

We still in triple digits? That was like so 2016



1074. Post 17592048 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Did we lose feed from Whoboi? Did China finally ban BTC?



1075. Post 17601379 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on January 23, 2017, 07:01:59 AM
Did we loose lose feed from Whoboi? Did China finally ban BTC?

Here you go. https://cryptowat.ch/huobi/btccny



thnx



1076. Post 17602524 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: droizs on January 24, 2017, 02:20:08 AM

the prices delay on that site thought...

You got a better source?



1077. Post 17603502 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: molecular on January 24, 2017, 07:14:16 AM
BTC is under attack! ===> http://bitcointicker.co/networkstats/

 Shocked

by a difficulty increase and people making transactions?

Wait this looks normal to you? Going from 10k unconfirmed transactions to 65k in under 12hrs? Or you just trolling?
https://blockchain.info/charts/mempool-count?timespan=24h



1078. Post 17608708 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: molecular on January 24, 2017, 09:59:09 AM
BTC is under attack! ===> http://bitcointicker.co/networkstats/

 Shocked

by a difficulty increase and people making transactions?

Wait this looks normal to you? Going from 10k unconfirmed transactions to 65k in under 12hrs? Or you just trolling?
https://blockchain.info/charts/mempool-count?timespan=24h

No, I'm not trolling. Some simple math:

Say the network capacity is 15000 transactions per hour before the difficulty increase.  Now the difficulty jump reduces capacity by 17%. So now capacity is 2550 transactions per hour less. Now assuming transaction demand remains the same, in 12 hours you'll amass 30k transactions above capacity which go into the mempool.

So that alone explains more than half of the effect. No need to postulate a "spam attack". Any slight (10%) increase in demand at the same time would account for another 18k transactions making that 48k transactions, almost your measure 55k.


Wait even with you math, a sudden consistent spike of 10% in volume across the board right at the time of difficulty adjustment looks normal to you?
Now just a hypothetical, if you had limited resources and were to trying to spam the blockchain how exactly would you approach or perhaps time your attack?  Roll Eyes



1079. Post 17610866 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: molecular on January 24, 2017, 09:05:01 PM
BTC is under attack! ===> http://bitcointicker.co/networkstats/

 Shocked

by a difficulty increase and people making transactions?

Wait this looks normal to you? Going from 10k unconfirmed transactions to 65k in under 12hrs? Or you just trolling?
https://blockchain.info/charts/mempool-count?timespan=24h

No, I'm not trolling. Some simple math:

Say the network capacity is 15000 transactions per hour before the difficulty increase.  Now the difficulty jump reduces capacity by 17%. So now capacity is 2550 transactions per hour less. Now assuming transaction demand remains the same, in 12 hours you'll amass 30k transactions above capacity which go into the mempool.

So that alone explains more than half of the effect. No need to postulate a "spam attack". Any slight (10%) increase in demand at the same time would account for another 18k transactions making that 48k transactions, almost your measure 55k.


Wait even with you math, a sudden consistent spike of 10% in volume across the board right at the time of difficulty adjustment looks normal to you?
Now just a hypothetical, if you had limited resources and were to trying to spam the blockchain how exactly would you approach or perhaps time your attack?  Roll Eyeswe might be sending real users away to altcoins/paypal/...

I'm not ruling out a spam attack, what you say is correct.

I just don't like the going from "woah, there's 50k tx in the mempool" to "it must be a spam attack" when any 10% fluctuation in demand would explain it because this "jumping to conclusions" is really diverting the view from the actual problem we have here: namely that we might be sending real users away to altcoins/paypal/....

I don't want that happening, but I'm pretty sure it is.

Postulating a spam attack (because it doesn't look "normal") everytime we hit the usage ceiling negates the existence of this problem and effectively diverts energy from solving it. I offered a different view that explains what's happening as quite "normal" so we can focus on the problem at hand: not enough capacity.




That's funny cause actions like these cause the exact opposite reaction in me. Like every time there's blatant spam attack some BU supporter hilariously attempts to claim that it's normal organic growth. To a point where they lose all credibility and i find myself automatically starting to assume that it's shilling. Not that it can't be organic growth just because there's so much attempt at disinformation as if someone is trying too hard



1080. Post 17636877 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Finex is getting some volume back? Shorts are at 1yr high too, grab your torches?  Grin



1081. Post 17642127 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on January 27, 2017, 05:43:38 AM
Finex is getting some volume back? Shorts are at 1yr high too, grab your torches?  Grin


Do you think that when there are that many shorts, then the price is more likely to go up?

I have no real clue, except that I do understand the motive to push the price in the opposite direction to force those shorts into being called.

shorts are not at 1 year high, the 1 year high is 25,345 BTC August 1 2016 03:00



Not seeing shorts crossing BTC25k on Aug 1st



1082. Post 17642290 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on January 27, 2017, 07:36:14 AM
Finex is getting some volume back? Shorts are at 1yr high too, grab your torches?  Grin


Do you think that when there are that many shorts, then the price is more likely to go up?

I have no real clue, except that I do understand the motive to push the price in the opposite direction to force those shorts into being called.

shorts are not at 1 year high, the 1 year high is 25,345 BTC August 1 2016 03:00

I was not really so worried about whether DaRude was technically correct, only whether there was some kind of significance in the quantity of change that he was witnessing... and whether that quantity of shorts would be some factor that would influence our insights concerning probabilities of the price moving in one direction or another.

I do understand that it means that a lot of folks are appearing to be betting that the price is going down - but it does not necessarily mean that they are correct - but it does mean that we have had a significant amount of time in a price range that may cause some folks to believe that prices are going to be going down - even though they may not be going down..

Also, if the price went up to $950 or $990, would many other those shorts either be forced closed and sure some folks may chose to close them early or they may have taken certain stop loss measures... even at prices lower than $950.

Ultimately, these matters can be a bit complicated, but still some folks may bet on shorter ranges without really appreciating that the price had been suppressed for about 2 years.. and we are likely still in a bull market and still in the process of rebounding from nearly two years of bear market.  


Edit:  I just noticed the August 1, 2016 date that you mentioned  - and yeah, what a coincidence, one day before the supposed "hack"...



Well, those people that are betting are not doing it at BitFinex according to the pic below.





I see longs being more or less constant but shorts going up, are you seeing something else?



1083. Post 17701226 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Is $1k party #3 still planned?? Or is everyone waiting for $10k party now?  Grin



1084. Post 17703260 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on February 02, 2017, 04:45:44 AM


A week before

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on January 26, 2017, 12:38:07 AM
I will get my 860 coins
I WILL!





1085. Post 17727945 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

No, take off the hard block limit and leave BTC exposed to miner's will, you can trust us err them, you have nothing to worry about. Centralized miners are nice guys we ahem they wouldn't do anything bad with that.  Angry

Quote
tl;dr: Centralized Chinese miners are threatening to spend $100 million to kill off Bitcoin if it tries to fight miner centralization.
https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/827697817154052096

*EDIT



1086. Post 17728449 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: lemmyK on February 04, 2017, 07:28:21 AM
centralised from chinese are much better than "centralise" from usa or un or satan eu-nato!!!!
you have short memo or iq "boy"

i don´t get your point. please let your iq enlighten me.
if chinese not work ,bitcoin is now = 0


Yeah bitcoin wasn't 0 before chinese got in so...



1087. Post 18138982 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

And how's the market doing tod  Shocked whoa what did i miss?



1088. Post 18140104 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Bam! cheaper go cheaper ...  Grin



1089. Post 18144086 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

ETF failed and we're still at the price we were in Feb? I was told there would be a crash  Angry is it still coming once the BU decide to fork?



1090. Post 18144466 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 11, 2017, 07:35:46 AM
this is way overbought dont you think.
i mean wtf, tomorrow 1200 as if nothing happened?
really?



Yeah it seems like its acting in inverse logic, seems like everyone was actually expecting for ETF to fail and were expecting to buy the dip. Melt down didn't happen so all these money on exchanges got to go somewhere  



1091. Post 18229928 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Is BTC dead???



1092. Post 18239388 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: boyshx on March 18, 2017, 05:05:52 PM
This question might sound stupid but I have been an investor never a miner .

If the fork would damage the price that much why would the miners go massively to it ? Wouldn't it affect their revenue? Or does people like Vinny Ligham overreact to the effects of an eventual HF?

tl;dr Power grab, and miners are hoping for short term losses over long term control.

People invested substantial amount of money in BTC, well, because it's a honey badger, and these people consider that centralization to be the Achilles heel of BTC. Right now the blocksize limit is governed by the hardlimit in the code. Now miners (where majority of them are in China) want to remove that hardcoded limit and instead saying that they should be the ones to set it as they please (and it so happens that miners profits are directly related to the block size as well as large mining farms also stand to get an advantage in mining, the bigger the blocks get. Where core gains no direct benefit from 1mb block). Now anyone with any basic coding experience can see that this would introduce a huge attach vector, but the miners are the ones that control the hashrate and are starting to get some traction. But what not many people are talking about, and admittedly is very hard to gauge (and what i believe miners are underestimating) is investors perception. Many people are willing to invest millions of $$ because of the code, but once the code is replaced with "you can trust us, because we wouldn't do anything bad" people are not so willing to invest in ChinaCoin.



1093. Post 18322566 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

BU Logic

Step1: Conglomerate of miners corner the hash rate and fork to allow themselves to decide the size of the block.
Step2: Huh
Step3: People invest int BTCINA COIN  Secured by code your friendly conglomerate of Chinese miners  PROFIT $$$

Sure Wall St, Come over here, invest billions and approve your ETFs. You can trust us™ Angry Angry

Is BU crowed seriously so we-tar-ded that no one considered that convincing the 50% + 1 of miners of something that is directly related to their short term profits might be the easy part?

Miners need to be forced to realize that they might be left with their tokens to themselves. There will be blood, Loaded, once again, i applaud you!  



1094. Post 18322691 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 25, 2017, 12:56:06 AM
BU Logic

Step1: Conglomerate of miners corner the hash rate and fork to allow themselves to decide the size of the block.
Step2: Huh
Step3: People invest int BTCINA COIN  Secured by code your friendly conglomerate of Chinese miners and PROFIT $$$

Sure Wall St, Come over here, invest billions and approve your ETFs. You can trust us™ Angry Angry

Is BU crowed seriously so we-tar-ded that no one considered that convincing the 50% + 1 of miners of something that is directly related to their short term profits might be the easy part?

Miners need to be forced to realize that they might be left with their tokens to themselves. There will be blood, Loaded, once again, i applaud you!  

Core logic

free the market free the world.

right?

Core's logic is security (decentralization falls under that) is above all. And people could stand behind that idea, you start f'ing with that and watch people vote with their feet, it really is that simple. The first stage will be the blame game, bring in the blood on the streets, decline in hash rate, lets see them start shutting down their plants, that's the only way for them to realize that they can't force investors as easily as trolling reditors!



1095. Post 18324423 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

This is not over, not until miners back off. Only one way to get miners to stand down, and this is it. Let's see how long they'll be able to keep their trolls going before public perception will turn against them, sheeple need to realize that investors don't want anything to do with their BTCINA coin.



1096. Post 18410304 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

lol wtf is Waves?



1097. Post 18413072 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

well, didnt see this coming



1098. Post 18435371 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: chopstick on April 03, 2017, 03:17:56 AM
Blockstream are aiming to be the Federal Reserve Planners of Bitcoin and you guys are bitching about BU, which is all about returning to Satoshi's original scaling roadmap of on-chain scaling.

Jesus, is there any hope left for Bitcoin at this point?

The community is grade-A retarded.

Nope no hope, community is retarded, but even retards have enough math skilz to realize that on chain solutions won't work. i.e. you can have 200MB blocks and not even cover the transaction volume that Visa handles, and still have to wait 10min to get to a next block but at least you finally got rid of that decentralization thing  Roll Eyes

mathz are hard



1099. Post 18774101 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

We designed a feature, that would allow us (or cloudflare or our nameserver registrar or anyone hacking them or any court/law enforcement with jurisdiction over any one of them) to effectively shut down BTC (bring it to a halt) with one line of code. And then unintentionally merged it into production code, siwwy us, its only a bug and the decentralized crypto currency community should not be upset.  Cheesy Grin when is the damn movie coming out?Huh



1100. Post 18774250 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: steelboy on April 27, 2017, 05:32:15 PM
We designed a feature, that would allow us (or cloudflare or our nameserver registrar or anyone hacking them or any court/law enforcement with jurisdiction over any one of them) to effectively shut down BTC (bring it to a halt) with one line of code. And then unintentionally merged it into production code, siwwy us, its only a bug and the decentralized crypto currency community should not be upset.  Cheesy Grin when is the damn movie coming out?Huh

Eh? Care to explain?

Gee do i have to spell it out? https://blog.bitmain.com/en/antminer-firmware-update-april-2017/

In BTCina miners we trust!!!



1101. Post 18781131 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: Paashaas on April 28, 2017, 02:27:14 AM
Bitcoin is just like a good tv show, we're now at episode 234.

Jihan Ver VS the users.

In this episode Jihan Ver installs a secret kill switch "feature" in majority of bitcoin mining hardware, and spins it alike a feature on your smart phone that enables you to remotely wipe your data. You know so when someone steals your antminer they won't have access to your nudes and private data that you were storing on it  Huh non of this makes any sense to a person with IQ higher than a rock, but will users buy it? Stay tuned to find out after these commercials...



1102. Post 18819447 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Wish this would happen with finex trading for real dollars



1103. Post 18826757 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Full retard mode engaged? It'd be so much better if not for damn finex



1104. Post 18847388 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: yefi on May 03, 2017, 02:36:31 AM
Thx Lauda, unfortunately the pic doesn't work anymore, i think the price is to high with all those extra zero's Cool



I like this one more over the previous version



1105. Post 18861777 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: jbreher on May 04, 2017, 12:34:51 AM
Wow- 1 MB transaction with 273 BTC in fees:

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/69318u/save_the_chain_enclosed_1_mb_transaction_with_273/

I wonder who is behind this??

Fascinating. From OP -

Quote
This transaction:
is 1 MB in size,
has 273.99971476 BTC in fees,
contains 99,940 zero-value anyone-can-spend outputs,
can only be included on the blockchain if the maximum block size limit is raised,
creates a direct incentive for miners to upgrade bitcoin.
(emphasis in the original)

Life just gets more and more interesting.

On another note, I thought nChain was just Wright's company. I didn't realize it was also the name of a competing blockchain.

For all that matters miners can include BTC20k BTC and it still won't make a difference. We all get it miners stand to win big on bigger blocks don't have to shove it in our faces



1106. Post 18885627 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: Denker on May 05, 2017, 03:41:53 PM
The price rise from 1200==>1600 was mainly artificial, thanks to the liquidity squeeze from bitfinex, which the other exchanges chose to follow like lemmings.

True, there are a lot of new institutional investors and overseas investment. But not enough to raise the price that high.

I don't know how you could call this anything but a mini-bubble based on artificial bitfinex prices.

Look for a correction down to 1400ish

And what you call the shitcoin rise then? Natural? Sustainable?
In terms of finex their will be an announcement coming on the weekend or monday at the latest.
1400 would still be a very good level for a bottom.


Agreed. It's naive to think that largest exchange stop processing withdrawals in USD doesn't have any effect on the market.They retired their BFX token, introduced a ton of liquidity in people's account and then made BTC the only way to get out. Otherwise why would there be a $100 spread? Shitcoin rise is dumb people "traders" calling tops and thinking of alt coins as diversification just parking money there instead of USD waiting for a "correction" to jump back in BTC.


Or those are my 2c

Edit: But the good thing is, the gap between Finex is starting to close before announcement. Maybe someone front-running an announcement 



1107. Post 18913157 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on May 07, 2017, 05:12:26 PM
Who here is old enough to remember BTC dominance?

Drop in BTC dominance, should wake up the miners and cause them to loose a lot of sleep, but seeing how short sighted they are with their BU push they're probably celebrating the recent rise and will continue with their power grab.



1108. Post 18920362 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: xinzark on May 08, 2017, 06:33:14 AM
What is happening with Btc-e ? Used to be behind every exchange
Any idea ?

Yes. They used to lag behind because it was extremely dificult to make deposits there.

What has changed?

Well, now there is a LOT of money coming from other coins (eth, dash, ltc, ...) so trader there are faster reducing the spread.

If it is coming from other coins then the price of other coins should have been dumped but that isn't the case here

True, but BTC-e's order book is so thin it wouldn't take much to move it. They only have like BTC500 till $1800
But if i had some shitcoins i wanted trade for BTC i'd probably go with the best rate too



1109. Post 18935868 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Weren't we suppose to get some kind of an announcement from Finex by Monday? oh and on a separate note they're about to cross 1750



1110. Post 18967483 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Someone big is moving in and sucking all of the liquidity out of the markets. $2k is on the radar on Finex and only BTC1400 away. People are hodling on to their coins, and the weak hands a running for the Alts.

 btw any word on when if ever they'll be fixing their withdrawals?



1111. Post 18967683 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on May 10, 2017, 10:42:28 PM
Good morning, gentlemen.  Still at it I see?



The good ole days.

I hope we can laugh about it now. He really was a professional.

I member, 280 and bellow did hurt...for a bit. Not sure if i'd say s/he was a professionally but s/he was definitely something. Where did Stofi go is he still around here?



1112. Post 18967755 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: dloghwak on May 11, 2017, 06:01:12 AM
Good morning, gentlemen.  Still at it I see?



The good ole days.

I hope we can laugh about it now. He really was a professional.

I member, 280 and bellow did hurt...for a bit. Not sure if i'd say s/he was a professionally but s/he was definitely something. Where did Stofi go is he still around here?
Jstolfi is active on r/btc, the BU crowd loves him.

Huh so he finally found his crowd. Thought he'd get bored singing to a choir there. On a side note, Segwit on LTC is a major win for core, r/btc will need bigger guns to put a negative spin on that



1113. Post 18968619 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: TeeBone on May 11, 2017, 07:18:35 AM
Blow-off top incoming.....could stretch out to 1900's. i still say we retest the 1300 breakout zone, but who da fak knows...it could launch.

There just no coins left for sale across most exchanges. This bullwhale ate it all Finex got BTC646 till $1990 stamp got like BTC1k



1114. Post 18968759 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: TeeBone on May 11, 2017, 07:27:41 AM
Blow-off top incoming.....could stretch out to 1900's. i still say we retest the 1300 breakout zone, but who da fak knows...it could launch.

There just no coins left for sale across most exchanges. This bullwhale ate it all Finex got BTC646 till $1990 stamp got like BTC1k

So, straight to 10K ?  Cool

It wouldn't take much to create hysteria, and Bitcoin hodlers are an odd ideological bunch so many won't sell at any price. Under right conditions i wouldn't rule anything out. At this point we broke through the resistance of market makers and their bands and are now just free floating.



1115. Post 18968771 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: podyx on May 11, 2017, 07:32:42 AM
Now gotta wake up every morning and pray the price hasn't crashed.



Simple, just don't sleep  Grin



1116. Post 19009558 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

I guess the demand was under estimated upidy up we go again.



1117. Post 19012712 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: MinermanNC on May 14, 2017, 02:40:08 AM
Notice over the last few months BTC may hit a pot hole or 2 or a dip in the road, but what's different these days, is it gets quickly back up to speed and carry's on. Didn't used to do that.  Shocked

I think that change is because now there is more "fast funds" available. There are many more exchanges available and also LOTS of funds on the alts markets. Before, it was needed some delay for funds to be transferred from banks to exchanges, now it's just a matter of switching coins when Bitcoin "gets cheaper".

Also there is a giant pressure upwards fueled by the crazy rise alts have had in the last couple of months that almost make Bitcoin be incredibly stable (and undervalued) in comparison. Ie: Ripple 1/4 of Bitcoin's market cap? What sort of joke is that?

Ya you pretty much nailed it. Lots of cash in alts and which I have always felt is an underlying stability factor for BTC. And ya fast funds has to be some of it too, I hadn't weighed that factor yet lol,  and then there's ripple  Shocked

Yep all that money in shitcoins is waiting for a "correction" to jump back in. So what will happen if they don't see that correction   Roll Eyes



1118. Post 19075078 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

lol now NEM added $800MM in market cap over night (literally like over last 24hrs) srsly wtf is NEM?? Is my screen broken?

Or is every shitcoin being pumped to delude BTC's dominance  Shocked

This is indeed an interesting ahem critical time



1119. Post 19075487 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: bitserve on May 18, 2017, 06:48:54 AM
lol now NEM added $800MM in market cap over night (literally like over last 24hrs) srsly wtf is NEM?? Is my screen broken?

Or is every shitcoin being pumped to delude BTC's dominance  Shocked

This is indeed an interesting ahem critical time

When XRP started dumping Ripplers ran out to the next shitcoin, mostly NEM and DOGE.

Everything is ok, don't worry. They are already drying out of coins to pump and eventually a good chunk of those funds will come back to daddy.

Thats fine, i actually prefer them $$ in shitcoins, acts as a hedge against big dumps



1120. Post 19101561 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Bearstamp caught up to Finex  Shocked. Guns are loaded for the weekend



1121. Post 19105529 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on May 20, 2017, 04:31:36 AM
If we need a reason to feel bad, half a dozen alt coins went up 800%. And most of us missed out.

FYI I think this might be the best write-up of the alt situation so-far.

JPY volumes feel too high are they real or they add few zeros like CNY before the crack down?



1122. Post 19113507 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

nice BTC1k ask wall on bearstamp, lots of people cashing out spreading the wealth



1123. Post 19117334 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

https://www.coinhills.com/market/currency/
is this correct over 51% traded in BTC is in JPY  Shocked Huh



1124. Post 19117797 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: ImI on May 20, 2017, 11:51:20 PM
https://www.coinhills.com/market/currency/
is this correct over 51% traded in BTC is in JPY  Shocked Huh

zero fees

That's what i was asking. Thnx



1125. Post 19135801 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

LOL stamp is about on par with finex, and btc-e is trading at $30 premium  Cool

Rats jumping shitcoin ship for segwit  Kiss



1126. Post 19151959 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Someone on Finex is cashing out big time around $2200 Finex's USDT are more valuable then Stamps and BTC-e USD???



1127. Post 19170780 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit_Disgrace on May 24, 2017, 08:19:11 AM
Imagine when the alts crash and that money come to btc. We'd already be at $5k

What would make the alts crash? I can't see it myself.

Well, this is what I see. A lot of people are psychologically unstable when they see new ATH for bitcoin. They can't resist and sell part of or all of their bitcoins in anticipation of the "imminent and unavoidable" correction. But correction doesn't happen or is too shallow. Bitcoin keeps breaking new ATHs. People hate to recognize their mistakes and buy back at higher price. They can't handle the fact that they'll end up with less bitcoins. They also can't look at their fiat dumb holdings depreciate every day. This is why they throw all of it into some alt of their choice hoping that some day they'll sell it and recoup their bitcoin. This is all the "logic" behind alt boom. Of course, there are some players with different agenda that are riding this wave.

You can throw all your bitterness towards altcoins, but the truth is that whoever invested in alts (lets say any of the top10) 3months ago, has made much money than others just investing in BTC. And the fact is that we are here for the moneys, aren't we?  Wink

Again with the logic that we should all listen to financial advise from lottery winners? After all they did make a ton of money right, that must mean something right? right  Huh



1128. Post 19187045 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on May 25, 2017, 05:28:45 AM
Appears we are well into the exponential phase of the bull run. The doubling in the last 30 days means it is well advanced, without a significant correction around these levels (anywhere from here up to 3600) the blow off from here may be only a matter of 3-4 weeks of insane bull left, culminating in somewhere near $9588-10k target of luc's for the blow-off top for this adoption wave. Huge volumes of new money will keep flooding in until the doubling time-scale gets less than the time-scale for new entrants to enter the market (exchange delays, transfer processing delays will all be factors in limiting the ultimate flow rate of new money into the market that sets the lower limit on the final doubling-time scale) .... and then the infrastructure will receive it's best new market signal of what scale of hardware/software/support capacity roll-out it will need to sustain the next adoption wave (circa 2020 halving plus 9-12 months?), given that the size of the market demand is still relatively infinite compared with the current in situ infrastructure necessary to cope with the burgeoning growth of demand now being witnessed.

In the alternate case of a significant correction in the next 2-3 weeks then a new assessment will be warranted.

tl;dr $9588-10k target got it



1129. Post 19187057 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Stamp crossed $2600  Shocked



1130. Post 19187122 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Exchanges running out of coins. Paging bears (are there any left alive?) please come and deposit your coins



1131. Post 19201946 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: ImI on May 25, 2017, 11:57:14 PM
RIP to the shorts who lost it all.

remember?  Grin




I member. Can we update it to $2200 ? Oh nooos is BTC dead now?



1132. Post 19215555 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Hopefully bitcoin antichrist aka Roger Ver, is selling some of his BTC300k (or whatever his last claim is)  stash

In fact BTC is still way too concentrated amongst the few elite, they need to start spreading BTC, the sooner the better
https://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses.html (and yes some of these are exchange cold wallets)

Funny how people start to panic when i still can't get over the fact that we crossed $2k and it even held...for now



1133. Post 19220216 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

I'm waiting for NLC to pop in, any time now... you know because BTC is dead  Cry



1134. Post 19221193 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

On a bright side BTC dominance is back over 50% now



1135. Post 19221256 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: SnokkomBTC on May 27, 2017, 06:58:04 AM
has anybody concluded why alts and btc do not behave in inverse correlation? e.g. btc dives, alts dive more!
lol, if history always repeat you would be a billionaire man ;p

Frankly i was expecting them to drop more, any alt is more volatile than BTC, so in good time sheeple run to ALTs for bigger swings, in bad times sheeple run back to BTC for more stability.
Higher market cap = less volatility



1136. Post 19221353 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: Chevas Regal on May 27, 2017, 07:04:06 AM
Higher market cap = less volatility

Can you explain a bit what you just said. I feel that it contradict between BTC and ETH right now though the market cap is far different.

Ehh well a $10MM market sell would probably devastate a small market cap company, AAPL (apple) would barely notice it



1137. Post 19234566 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: nanobtc on May 28, 2017, 04:16:51 AM
If I keep pressing F5, this is almost like IRC.

 Huh why did you have to press F5 in IRC?



1138. Post 19235040 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Bottom line is there are only about BTC1.2 generated total every minute. Now look at the 1min volume of any exchange, that means all other coins on all other exchanges are just changing hands ... draw your own conclusions  Shocked



1139. Post 19286007 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: Elwar on May 31, 2017, 02:46:20 AM

Rootstock opened there testnet yesturday, ETH will be replaced by RSK in time. All alt-coins will be replaced by sidechains.


Boom.gif

I look forward to using Rootstock on Bitcoin.

The caveat being that their initial implementation will be slightly centralized due to a token being required and it will rely on several trusted actors to convert back and forth to bitcoins. This will change once Bitcoin gets upgraded with the code necessary to implement it in a decentralized way.

You mean there's $42Bil (54% of crypto market) who's survival depends on keeping rootstock away from BTC? Food for thought



1140. Post 19370928 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Got a hidden ask wall on Finex @ $2501



1141. Post 19389761 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on November 24, 2014, 02:58:12 PM
This goes here.

Bitcoin

Where dreams come to die
Can we take this moment and member the one who did all that hard work just so you could buy those cheap coins? I imagine s/he is somewhere in the restraining jacket trying to draw pictures of ponies on the wall with own feces.



1142. Post 19390449 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on June 06, 2017, 05:45:19 AM
NotLambChop sock spotted ^^

Lol. How many times do I have to tell you it wasn't me? He was a professional, a brilliant wordsmith, and a sociopath. I'm none of those things.

... precisely what NLC would say ... i'm just doing the math.  Grin

One of us here is NLC, it's like the hunt for satoshi, it will never end

Yeah almost, except for no one really cares about NLC, we just like to make fun of trolls that is all



1143. Post 19547888 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

When BTC "nose dove" on decent volume ETH stopped its uptrend and traded sideways on fairly decent volume as well, which leads me to conclude that some of the capital left ETH to prop up BTC.  What do you think will happen with BTC when ETH nose dives?



1144. Post 19568930 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: MNDan on June 15, 2017, 04:55:12 AM
So the maths happened.. parabolic has to complete its cycle before.. moving upward.. it will surely cross 3000 usd level but after completing this parabolic cycle... and it has to come down to anywhere between 1300 to 1500 usd level... which is 61.8% to 78.8% retracement of this parabolic move ... over 8 weeks.



I like your chart, but it's never hitting $1500. Ever.

You know what they say, never say never, Finex longs are around $70MM all time high, shorts are down to BTC15K  more than half from all  time high in April. If longs will start getting squeezed it won't be pretty  Cry



1145. Post 19784188 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: DanielRamos1 on June 26, 2017, 12:10:21 PM
sacrificial lamb is needed to feed the wolves ~ or bitcoin will freefall ===> bittrex why you do us dirty? :\  meh


 Roll Eyes

Oh i can't wait for this  Grin oh noes BTC crashed to $2k = BTC is dead  Grin



1146. Post 20401040 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: bitserve on July 26, 2017, 02:04:43 PM
Apparently the name of the guy who was arrested is Alexander. Same name as one of the admins of BTC-E.

My guess is the other founder got wind of it and took the cold storage and started mixing it right away. 66,000 BTC at least.

Additional hints:

Also BTC-e was founded in 2011, while bitmixer in 2014
The guy behind bitmixer doesn't looks like russian from his posts
Most of the Bitcoin ramsons were exchanged on BTC-e
And they havent even twitted anything new since yesterday, not even to counter the rumours
...

I think it is already nearing certainty that it is BTC-e.


Why does every one rule out the option that bitmixer and btc-e was ran by the dame guy?



1147. Post 20451080 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Is there a way to short the BTC cash futures?



1148. Post 20644170 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

i see a bunch of memes what did i miss ...  Shocked ohhh  Grin Cool



1149. Post 20821731 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Bam guess this is an express train i guess we won't be stopping at the $3k station
https://youtu.be/gkime9M4z34



1150. Post 20829758 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

I love the smell of $4k in the morning



1151. Post 20911894 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: Torque on August 16, 2017, 02:18:42 AM

A shittily cast bronze rendition of Slender Man for 140 mn? Wow, high end art is so weird.

I've seen Egyptian hand sculptured/painted statues and other relics that are far more worthy of that kind of money. At least many of them reflect the actual amount of tedious and detailed work effort that went into making them.

You can always get this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Square_(painting) for just 60mln



1152. Post 20915082 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: Olivious on August 16, 2017, 05:55:23 AM
Bitcoin = $3970? Did just somebody dump for a lambo? that guys heart is weak for bitcoin over his lambo. Anyways when will we see $4500 again?

There was enough volume for few dozen lambos. loaded already had few so if he's selling its not for lambos maybe an island?



1153. Post 20969154 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Are there any online wallets that can sweep BiCH coin? I don't want to wait weeks for full client to load



1154. Post 20975788 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Looks like someone is betting big on BCC, good riddance. Now back to finding at least one f'ing BCC online wallet



1155. Post 20993735 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: becoin on August 18, 2017, 05:48:27 PM
However it turns out, I think we'll all be worse off than if the forks had been avoided altogether.

Yes, but this is a fallacy.

Bitcoin forks can be created by anyone, at any time. Trying to change rules to appease some vocal subset wouldn't stop or block such ability. In fact it is a feature by design. There is no "avoiding it" and there's no one that Bitcoin should have to appease or answer to except for the majority of it users, and to implement/include things that insure it's own long term survival. The existing attributes and rules do just that. They can also be tweaked as time goes on.

A 2MB blocksize increase by Core would've preempted any need for Segwit2X. It may have even have avoided the BCC fork.ave it's way with OPEC.

No. If 2mb blocksize increase would've been accepted then big blocktards would've needed Segwit4X.


The fork at this stage is the best thing that could've happened. BCChina forgets a little fact that it's the market that moves the miners and not the miners moving the market. They can even have their higher hash rate (most of it is in China anyway), but can they attract capital for people to invest in that turd? I think the fundamentals are strongest they've been in a while and this  BCChina pump is hilarious. Kudos to them for actually following up with their savings (and trying to corner the market) but the market will ultimately win, it always does.



1156. Post 20994032 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on August 18, 2017, 07:13:31 PM
I really hope Roger is burning some major holdings during this silliness.

Dump on Friday before the weekend? It's like good old days, only now we have multiple exchanges with multiple players. I foresee someone loosing a lot of money in this attempt, things aren't as they were before



1157. Post 20994280 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: Torque on August 18, 2017, 07:30:21 PM
The only question that remains:

What will be the BTCottom final bch/btc trade ratio  Grin

FTFY  It's like free money from heaven. Thanks, Roger Wink

if he's throwing his money at me, who am I not to take it  Grin



1158. Post 21002253 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: jojo69 on August 19, 2017, 01:16:08 AM
If bitcoin and bcash reach parity I will sell both and wait.

Doesn't holding what BCH you have just make things worse? Pumpers depend on people not dumping on their heads.

ahhh, but if we all dump into their deep pockets they control the entire float

Let them  Cheesy they can have their China tokens  Grin



1159. Post 21003786 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: AlexGR on August 19, 2017, 05:53:18 AM
I just want to use Bitcoin as a currency. I honestly do not care too much about the small differences between the two chains. They both have SegWit which will allow the Lightning Network which will allow for fast, cheap microtransactions.

Not really. BCH doesn't have Segwit, doesn't fix tx malleability and obviously LN can't play with tx malleability without other workarounds (?). It's just "bigger blocks".

Didn't BCH fork off after the Segwit lock in? Or did they fork with a version that did not include it?

It doesn't include it at all. He forked-off prior to Segwit activation so there are no Segwit transactions in BCH.

Why on earth BCChina support Segwit or god forbid LN? Think people are missing the whole point of this fork. Miners don't make money on LN transaction = miners don't support LN 



1160. Post 21003981 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: bitserve on August 19, 2017, 06:04:54 AM
I just want to use Bitcoin as a currency. I honestly do not care too much about the small differences between the two chains. They both have SegWit which will allow the Lightning Network which will allow for fast, cheap microtransactions.

Not really. BCH doesn't have Segwit, doesn't fix tx malleability and obviously LN can't play with tx malleability without other workarounds (?). It's just "bigger blocks".

Didn't BCH fork off after the Segwit lock in? Or did they fork with a version that did not include it?

It doesn't include it at all. He forked-off prior to Segwit activation so there are no Segwit transactions in BCH.

Why on earth BCChina support Segwit or god forbid LN? Think people are missing the whole point of this fork. Miners don't make money on LN transaction = miners don't support LN 

Miners don't make money either if fees are very low... Oh, now that I think about it.... Are those calculations about profitability of BCH vs BTC include tx's fees per block? Don't think so....

Think long term global scale. This is just an attempt at a power grab 8MB blocks will be full too. Miners only make money on on-chain txs.



1161. Post 21004010 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Looks like wave 2 is incoming, BCChina is going full retard while BTC staying above $4k. This weekend should be interesting, gotta grab some popcorn



1162. Post 21495005 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.19h):

Shouldn't capital from Etherpoop be escaping to BTC right about now
 



1163. Post 21646636 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: gentlemand on September 08, 2017, 07:20:06 PM
The end of the Cryptocurrency Exchange era in China (translation) - Google Doc

So they're really going for it according to that. I wonder what measures miners have in place to sell. I assume the proper ones have OTC deals but there must be some stragglers who'll have to get something in place.

I can't say I'll be too sad if China checks out.

It'd be a great irony if China forces Chinese miners out  Grin that'd be awesome, unfortunately I don't think they're that dumb, they more likely to subsidies BCC



1164. Post 21650507 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: gentlemand on September 08, 2017, 10:24:23 PM
it is bizarre that 9 hours after the beginning of this fuck up, it is not even known for sure what is really going on. even by bitcoin standards.
I mean, all participants are digitally interconnected in multiple ways, and yet we have no fucking clue what is really true.

I seem to remember it took multiple months before anyone knew what the score was with the China Ban in 2013.

Welcome to unregulated market. There's nothing to prevent someone from front running the news. Looks like currently China is trading at deep discount, which brings some validity to the rumors. BTC is priced for its potential and not current utilization, as such market is very emotional and will react violently to any news. Money always brings smart people who will pick up on these things and try to exploit it. So yes it will continue for foreseeable future, now the game is to wait for actual news to hit and figuring out if the market over or underestimated it.



1165. Post 21650623 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: kurious on September 08, 2017, 11:04:15 PM
it is bizarre that 9 hours after the beginning of this fuck up, it is not even known for sure what is really going on. even by bitcoin standards.
I mean, all participants are digitally interconnected in multiple ways, and yet we have no fucking clue what is really true.

I seem to remember it took multiple months before anyone knew what the score was with the China Ban in 2013.

Welcome to unregulated market. There's nothing to prevent someone from front running the news. Looks like currently China is trading at deep discount, which brings some validity to the rumors. BTC is priced for its potential and not current utilization, as such market is very emotional and will react violently to any news. Money always brings smart people who will pick up on these things and try to exploit it. So yes it will continue for foreseeable future, now the game is to wait for actual news to hit and figuring out if the market over or underestimated it.

i'd wager...  overestimated it.

HoneyBadger don't give a shit.

If you zoom out, you'll see historically this has always been the case  Roll Eyes



1166. Post 21703763 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

BTC1k ask wall on finex flashing  Shocked



1167. Post 21822319 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

The volume (denominated in USD) is truly impressive. Looks like asia is dumping but there's a ton of demand ready to pick up at these prices. This should be interesting once the tide changes



1168. Post 21822533 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: Elwar on September 14, 2017, 09:38:42 AM
At some point the regulations on Bitcoin exchanges will make it increasingly difficult for people to get their hands on fiat for whatever reason they might have (momento? wallpaper?).


Provided the market cap continues to grow, thats obviously inevitable.  That's the part that i agree with Jamie Dimon on, thinking that govt will play nice is naive. Where we disagree is i'm hoping with all of the bureaucracy and global nature, we'll continue to fly under the radar long enough to get too big for one govt to do anything about.



1169. Post 22578881 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.22h):

Quote from: jbreher on October 05, 2017, 03:07:54 AM
This is Bitcoin sub forum, not a BCH sub forum. You have the coin with big blocks that you so desperately wanted, and you got it. So again, why do you repeatedly keep coming back here? Why aren't you off with your little tribe?

Oh, I know why. Because you are a troll. Because only a troll keeps coming back to a sub forum thread after they supposedly got what they wanted. Quit trying to 'save' anyone here from anything. We don't need saving. Everyone here knows what Bitcoin is and what BCH is. And people here want to discuss Bitcoin, not BCH. Nor want to discuss how to turn Bitcoin in BCH.

I am discussing Bitcoin. I am discussing Bitcoin Segwit Core, Bitcoin Segwit 2M, and Bitcoin Cash.

Life is a game of probabilities. While I am confident that BCH will eventually be recognized as the One True Bitcoin, only a fool would ascribe 100% to any such outcome. As such, if there is a case for improving Segwit, I am going to make it.

I am decidedly not a troll. Are you a troll? Is Segwit Core 'what you wanted'? Then why do you return to this sub forum?

Yes, we all (most) probably know what Bitcoin is. I doubt, however, that everyone here was complicit with you appointing yourself arbiter as to what may or may not witness being discussed here.

Regardless, it is quite clear that at least some have not yet heard the fact that onboarding the world will take decades at 1MB, and that neither segwit nor LN ameliorates this issue, while block size increases do. If you really want to wallow in willful ignorance, feel free to ignore me. I'd be a little sad -- I seem to remember us having cordial conversations in the past -- but I'd live.

"While I am confident that BCH will eventually be recognized as the One True Bitcoin..." with that logic it's definitely good to diversify so you don't loose all of your money. In due time you'll look back and realize how you were taken for a ride, and thank people who stood up to it  Wink

oh oh do tell how block increases helps on boarding the world? Would you mind doing a simple math on how big your blocks should be for every person in the world to do just one transaction on chain per day? I'll wait



1170. Post 22579277 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.22h):

Quote from: notme on October 05, 2017, 03:59:14 AM
This is Bitcoin sub forum, not a BCH sub forum. You have the coin with big blocks that you so desperately wanted, and you got it. So again, why do you repeatedly keep coming back here? Why aren't you off with your little tribe?

Oh, I know why. Because you are a troll. Because only a troll keeps coming back to a sub forum thread after they supposedly got what they wanted. Quit trying to 'save' anyone here from anything. We don't need saving. Everyone here knows what Bitcoin is and what BCH is. And people here want to discuss Bitcoin, not BCH. Nor want to discuss how to turn Bitcoin in BCH.

I am discussing Bitcoin. I am discussing Bitcoin Segwit Core, Bitcoin Segwit 2M, and Bitcoin Cash.

Life is a game of probabilities. While I am confident that BCH will eventually be recognized as the One True Bitcoin, only a fool would ascribe 100% to any such outcome. As such, if there is a case for improving Segwit, I am going to make it.

I am decidedly not a troll. Are you a troll? Is Segwit Core 'what you wanted'? Then why do you return to this sub forum?

Yes, we all (most) probably know what Bitcoin is. I doubt, however, that everyone here was complicit with you appointing yourself arbiter as to what may or may not witness being discussed here.

Regardless, it is quite clear that at least some have not yet heard the fact that onboarding the world will take decades at 1MB, and that neither segwit nor LN ameliorates this issue, while block size increases do. If you really want to wallow in willful ignorance, feel free to ignore me. I'd be a little sad -- I seem to remember us having cordial conversations in the past -- but I'd live.

"While I am confident that BCH will eventually be recognized as the One True Bitcoin..." with that logic it's definitely good to diversify so you don't loose all of your money. In due time you'll look back and realize how you were taken for a ride, and thank people who stood up to it  Wink

oh oh do tell how block increases helps on boarding the world? Would you mind doing a simple math on how big your blocks should be for every person in the world to do just one transaction on chain per day? I'll wait

Assuming an average transaction size of 600 bytes and 7.5 billion people:
31.25 GB

But that's still less than unlimited right? Hmm maybe BU was actually on to something  Grin



1171. Post 22580258 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.22h):

Quote from: Gab0 on October 05, 2017, 04:51:34 AM

He got lucky and made some money on the internet.  Now he thinks he's a fucking genius.  It's a common problem around here.

No, apparently the real geniuses are the accounts on this thread that want to convince everyone that that Bitcoin core developers are completely and woefully incompetent, that Bitcoin still sucks and if it just had bigger blocks it would take over the whole fkn world.

See BCH and their dev team for complete fail.

Why does it make you so upset that other people see the world differently than you do?  If they are as wrong as you believe, you should just let time prove you right.  Instead, you get your panties in a bunch whenever someone says anything you disagree with.

I have no problem at all with the exchange/sharing of ideas and non-confrontational debate. It's healthy and should be applauded.

But c'mon, this whole block size thing? FFS, it's getting really old guys. Like for years and years now has this topic been discussed and debated ad nauseam. By internet armchair warrior geniuses who have no computer programming or blockchain coding expertise, but somehow think they know better than the very people involved with the project, the Bitcoin Core dev team. The block size debate is a dead horse that has been beaten so much over the years, it's been pounded into complete dust.

And then these same people, after years and years of flooding the forums with teeth gnashing, circular and confrontational debate, FINALLY get what they want (BCH w/ 8MB block limit) and their own dev team separate from Core, and then they have the audacity to dismiss it lightly and come back and continue the debate around shoving bigger blocks into Bitcoin? Like now BCH wasn't somehow good enough, wasn't what they wanted after all? I thought that bigger blocks was the answer to all of Bitcoin's problems? Wasn't BCH supposed to solve everything?

These people aren't just debating and discussing ideas. They are trolling.

Oh! I get it; and since it was already discussed to the point of exhaustion, we'd better discuss the Las Vegas conspiracy, right?.

Out of sarcasm, there is a pink elephant in the room and you don't want to see it.
Now, more than 90% of hash power signaling part x2 of the NY agreement, and you're pretending there's nothing to discuss here?

90% of people are asking for a pay raise? No way!! STOP THE PRESSES!!!!!!! Or are we assuming what's good for miners is good for the environment as a whole?

Miners are a tool, they don't get to make the rules, they just need to follow them or fork off



1172. Post 22588722 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.22h):

Quote from: ivomm on October 05, 2017, 07:49:26 AM
Your BTC transaction will be replayed on BTC2X.
That's by design, for maximum disruption. A hostile takeover attempt by any reasonable standards.

I think splitting BTC-B2X will require mixing freshly mined coins into one's transactions. The landing chain of the transaction will be the chain where the fresh coins were mined. I still have to figure out how to do that.

There seems to be a different way invoving timelocked transactions - but I won't have a clue about this bit of magic until I research the matter. BTW, for the technically knowledgeable: pointers would be welcome  Wink

There is going to be opt-in replay protection. (Why opt-in and not strong, see https://bitcointechtalk.com/how-segwit2x-replay-protection-works-1a5e41767103)

To split your coins
On BTC chain you have some coins in address (A), you send your coins to another address you own (B), and include a further special recipient address 3Bit1xA4apyzgmFNT2k8Pvnd6zb6TnwcTi  to whom you send a few satoshis. (You have to use send to many option in your wallet, to send them at once).
Any transactions that contain this special address will be ignored by 2X miners.
Once this is successful, you will have your BTC in an address(B) you own.

Now you switch to the 2X chain, and send again from your first address (A), this time to a different addresses (C) you own this time omitting the special recipient address.

After this:
A is empty on both chains
B contains BTC coins
C contains 2X coins

Huh WTF!?!?



1173. Post 22740395 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.22h):

It does seem that BCH efforts are being redirected in what i can only assume is anticipation of seg2x but  they kinda shot themselves in the foot and now have to keep two fronts open. They're spreading thin and can't go in either direction without pissing off their support base. It's ironic that they undermined themselves with a BCH, as without it it'd be much easier for them to rally troops behind 2x



1174. Post 22742330 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.22h):

Quote from: notme on October 09, 2017, 02:17:34 AM
It does seem that BCH efforts are being redirected in what i can only assume is anticipation of seg2x but  they kinda shot themselves in the foot and now have to keep two fronts open. They're spreading thin and can't go in either direction without pissing off their support base. It's ironic that they undermined themselves with a BCH, as without it it'd be much easier for them to rally troops behind 2x

If they were smart, they would have forgot about 2x and just did a soft fork of segwit onto bch.  Segwit 8X FTW.

They were too committed yelling that segwit will blow up and burn in flames. No turning back now. I'm guessing they're in disarray now just like their user base without a clear signal on what to do next. They have limited resources and can't support 2x without taking some out of BCH



1175. Post 22742406 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.22h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on October 09, 2017, 02:24:06 AM
Nope. I don't like it. I can't properly celebrate when alt coiners suffer like this. They're degenerates, but they're our degenerates.

Also, because rotation.

Nah as someone else mentioned they need to find their use case, otherwise they'll find themselves redundant when side chains come in



1176. Post 22744738 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.22h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on October 09, 2017, 03:39:05 AM
Nope. I don't like it. I can't properly celebrate when alt coiners suffer like this. They're degenerates, but they're our degenerates.

Also, because rotation.

Nah as someone else mentioned they need to find their use case, otherwise they'll find themselves redundant when side chains come in

They're already redundant, but all of crypto has been trading as a kind of twisted index for a while now. Unless this really is the unpeggening, a bunch of this honey will eventually flow out of BTC and back into alts.

Innit?


Screw it. Moon.



Just noticed that BTC is back over 50% of all alts   Roll Eyes



1177. Post 22788292 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.23h):

If we can just go up to $6k and then btc2 can be worth $4k at split before it crashes, that'd be great. Mkkaaaaayy!?!?!



1178. Post 22894489 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.23h):

Are we at $10k yet? Bah, going back to sleep



1179. Post 22973971 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.23h):

WTF down to $5500  Shocked is BTC DEAD!?!?



1180. Post 22976547 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.23h):

Quote from: jbreher on October 13, 2017, 08:34:15 PM
CoinJoin, JoinMarket, Shuffle-what-ever-thingies. ... taint is pretty much useless if someone knew to mix or premix bitcoins. Granted, it's not being done by "normal" people yet, only those in that irc chat room or something that do these transactions. But it will catch on.

We still don't have a usable technology to mix transactions that does not consume even more on-chain block space. Which is, of course, space we don't have on the 1MB4EVAH chain.

#justsayin'

Well this might come to a surprise to you (or you're well aware of this and just trolling  Roll Eyes), but BTC was never meant to be fully anonymous. So yeah it you want to anonymize your coins you have to pay, or wait for sidechains, or if you can't wait use an alt.

But, BTC doesn't make me breakfast for free!!! #btcfail



1181. Post 23030853 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.23h):

Quote from: jbreher on October 15, 2017, 12:47:21 AM
.
As another user mentioned in this thread, it would take 30 years for each person on the planet to open and close a lightning channel. And although maybe bitcoin will never use it all, eventually 1MB will not cater.

In the interest of accuracy, 30 years for every human to make one on chain transaction. This could be opening a channel, or it could be closing a channel. If you want everyone to be able to both open and close a channel, you are looking at 60 years.

Well, S2X could drop this down to 30. Go S2X! /s

Why da faq would every user on earth need to open and close an LN channel?

(When 3 lanes are taken) It would take 60yrs for every single car in the world to go through this one 4 lane highway, demolish it and rebuild it so it would handle every single car in this one spot  Huh



1182. Post 23033075 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.23h):

BTC8k ask wall @ $5700 on Finex. The whale has returned  Undecided



1183. Post 23046668 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.23h):

Quote from: Higher Altitude on October 15, 2017, 02:37:28 PM

Dimon is a fool & hasn’t got a clue about the path that bitcoin is taking. Anybody who reacts to comments by him is an idiot.

I totally agree. What an ignorant comment. Not everyone has a $30 million annual salary that they can just "not care" about Bitcoin. Such arrogance in his uneducated opinion.


Quote
My formerly smart daughter.
why he keeps busting on his daughter? Not sure which one owns BTCs




They all made it to Introducing Wall Street's Hottest Offspring http://www.businessinsider.com/introducing-wall-streets-hottest-offspring-2010-2



1184. Post 23289104 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.23h):

Wtf still under $10k?? bah  Angry



1185. Post 23293693 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.23h):

BTC Dominance: 57.3%  Grin



1186. Post 23330681 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.24h):

Quote from: gembitz on October 21, 2017, 04:49:47 PM
https://twitter.com/SatoshiLite/status/921701035491573761

Quote
Charlie Lee [NO2X]‏
@SatoshiLite

My trade with Roger Ver is all set. Here are the terms we agreed to. Let the chips fall where they may! 🚀


i'm going to laugh when 2mb blocks start printing :-D weeeee

WTF how can i swap 1:1 BTC:SEG2x with Ver?? I guess he's already abandoning BCrASH?



1187. Post 23603599 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.24h):

Quote from: Heater on October 27, 2017, 02:45:22 AM

It looks to me like the idea of "seasteads" is to get together among rich people and not pay taxes to a state, but instead pay for everything (defense, law enforcement, etc.). So you'd end up with two classes of people, the rich, and the people who work for the rich.

Yes, because when everything is blockchain based, only the rich benefit.

Better get rid of your bitcoin now because it's just something for rich people to not pay taxes. Only the rich can use a currency that the government doesn't distribute. It already costs over $5k, only a rich person can afford that.

I guess I should tell the many socialists working on this that their expectations of helping the environment and having self sustaining design, closed loop food systems, renewable energy, recycling systems, a solution for refugees, coral development, etc. is just going to benefit the rich.

A seastead will be a tiny speck on an ocean that is twice the size of all the countries in the world combined. Yet people will still be pissed off if there are rich people out in middle of nowhere being free rich.

The blockchain is not miraculous, it's a technology, it won't solve humankind's problems. And yes, greed is one of our problems. I don't pretend to be immune to it. I used to support communist ideals, but nowadays, I've become cynical, I don't see any way for such ideals to come about aside from being governed by some kind of benevolent AI.
Giving up one childish fantasy in favor of another is not much of an improvement.

Here is what is going to happen. A lot of people are going to die. After that, we may be able to build something better. But first people need to die.

Anybody here wonder how long before Ibian opens fire on a crowd of innocents and Torque calls it a false flag? Roll Eyes

lol

There are some scary people here. I often wonder what roach is like in real life...

It would be cool if we could somehow all post an anonymous self portrait and then have a game where we try to match the picture to the username by voting.


Wouldn't be fun, swastika tattoo would give roach right away



1188. Post 23724300 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.24h):

Well that escalated quickly  Grin



1189. Post 23727789 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.24h):

Quote from: Rosewater Foundation on October 29, 2017, 04:16:17 PM
Well a very good morning Bitcoinland.

I see I woke up just in time for a rally. It's moving so quickly there's almost no point in posting a price but it just hit $6017USD/$7709CAD at Bitcoinaverage.

AltCash is also up nicely at $456USD/$585CAD (Coinmaketcap). For those still holding both, that's a total of $6473USD or $8194CAD per old coin. Not bad.

Go Bitcoin go.

AltGodl is up too, currently $108

And for those that were smart enough to dump BCH coin for .16 of BTC you're already over $7k  Grin



1190. Post 23728006 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.24h):

Quote from: bitserve on October 29, 2017, 04:30:37 PM
Last few days BTC was oversold. The depth of the markets shows that the demand is rapidly increasing. Moreover at least 1/3 of the miners switched to BCH which is more profitable by 50%. I expected the price would hold during the weekend and probably go up in the next few days. Who knows, may be another ATH is coming?

Since Ver/Wu/Wright own 97% of BCH mining, they can do the following:

1. Mine BCH, wash trade, and accumulate BCH on the down low

2. Switch mining hashrate from BTC to BCH

3. Pump BCH, lock up mining blocks, trade BCH for BTC into the pump

4. Switch hashrate back to BTC, pump BTC

5. Sell traded BTC into the pump, or just hold on to it (making them wealthier).

6. Profit

I contend that BCH is still just a money making scam to them. Sad that anyone would fall for that garbage. They don't want BCH, they want your Bitcoin. You'll see all that here soon, when you see BCH drop and BTC start to rise again.

And don't think for a second that their little operation isn't being "subsidized" by outside elements.

The problem with your assessment is that the two major mystery miners(probably two farms run by Jihan Wu) have not moved any of the coins that they mined.

https://www.blocktrail.com/BCC/address/17Wk4GPKw9nZ9PbspzaxN3fv1L2m9NA9dg/transactions/out/0
https://www.blocktrail.com/BCC/address/1BgatB78WrFLdCgnPnBqiDcNFFA46jkPZe/transactions/out/0


That's very interesting. So they are accumulating and betting on some future pump.

Or, or, no one wants to put real BTC or $ for BCH coin, so the only way they can prop up the price is by removing the supply altogether. They're making some nice margins on BTC so unfortunately they should be able to keep that for some time now. Expensive hobby though...



1191. Post 23729862 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.24h):

Quote from: bones261 on October 29, 2017, 05:45:14 PM

Since Ver/Wu/Wright own 97% of BCH mining, they can do the following:

1. Mine BCH, wash trade, and accumulate BCH on the down low

2. Switch mining hashrate from BTC to BCH

3. Pump BCH, lock up mining blocks, trade BCH for BTC into the pump

4. Switch hashrate back to BTC, pump BTC

5. Sell traded BTC into the pump, or just hold on to it (making them wealthier).

6. Profit

I contend that BCH is still just a money making scam to them. Sad that anyone would fall for that garbage. They don't want BCH, they want your Bitcoin. You'll see all that here soon, when you see BCH drop and BTC start to rise again.

And don't think for a second that their little operation isn't being "subsidized" by outside elements.

The problem with your assessment is that the two major mystery miners(probably two farms run by Jihan Wu) have not moved any of the coins that they mined.

https://www.blocktrail.com/BCC/address/17Wk4GPKw9nZ9PbspzaxN3fv1L2m9NA9dg/transactions/out/0
https://www.blocktrail.com/BCC/address/1BgatB78WrFLdCgnPnBqiDcNFFA46jkPZe/transactions/out/0


That's very interesting. So they are accumulating and betting on some future pump.

They are accumulating because they have no choice. Nobody else is buying altcash shit.


Of course they have a choice. They could use their mined stash to do wash trades and give the appearance of high volume. But they are not doing that either. However, Bitcoin Cash is planning to do a hardfork around the time of the S2X hard fork. They are planning on coming up with a different difficulty adjustment algorithm to replace the EDA.
https://www.bitsonline.com/bitcoin-cash-hard-fork/
The developers claim that the timing of the hardfork has absolutely nothing to do with the upcoming S2x hardfork. (Right...I believe that.  Roll Eyes)


Did i miss the /s mark? Or there's seriously someone out there that thinks that $2.0B 24hr volume on a $7.9B market cab is normal trades... so every 4days every single coin should change hands? Then I have a bridge to sell you  Grin     



1192. Post 23736511 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.24h):

Quote from: bones261 on October 29, 2017, 06:57:20 PM
I'm not arguing against the obvious BCH market manipulation. I'm only pointing out the the magical mystery miner stash is not being used.  

You've been answered multiple times. This shouldn't be so hard to understand. They can't use it because nobody is buying this altcashit. To use it they have to sell it to themselves...

Selling it to themselves would be called a wash trade. It is a tactic that can be used to generate fake volume.  Roll Eyes Almost 92,000 extra BCH could be used to create dramatic effects in fake volume if used in wash trades. No?


It doesn't surprise me that their mined coins aren't going anywhere. And how could they with 4 hr block times? Lol


The blocks were coming in at about once a minute just yesterday. They have had plenty of opportunities to move those coins in supersonic times if they wanted to.  Cheesy The way the BCH blockchain moves, it is similar to the Goldilocks fairy tail. Too hot, too cold, just right. Too hard, too soft, just right. Only big problem with the just right blocks is at those times the two mystery miners are mining over 97 % of the blocks.

Nope you can generate 21M in volume just with a single BCH going back and forth 21M times. There's no need for huge stashes. Plus exchanges can always generate volume out of thin air and they don't need to have coins to back it up on paper. Look at OKcoin and whoboi volumes the day the hammer on wash trades came down



1193. Post 24275380 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

WTF no 20% airdrop?? This game sux



1194. Post 24374191 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: gentlemand on November 10, 2017, 10:45:41 PM
when you save money on tailoring so you can pump your shitcoin of the moment

He's working the 60s astronaut look. There's no one more patriotic, trustworthy and dependable than one of them.

This is his last effort, all or nothing time, so they're moving big funds from BTC>BCH good for them and good riddance. What's wrong with the suit, don't find it that bad.



1195. Post 24422036 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

All pumps are at full throttle on BCH it's very expensive to keep that up, next stage of this last ditch power grab is a sudden transfer of hash power from BTC>BCH ??



1196. Post 24422758 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: Hyperjacked on November 11, 2017, 09:22:10 PM
All pumps are at full throttle on BCH it's very expensive to keep that up, next stage of this last ditch power grab is a sudden transfer of hash power from BTC>BCH ??

No doubt that's coming and ppl will chase it higher  Cool


Disclaimer:I have no idea what I'm talking about


There's a reason why they still mine BTC, it's because they can't unload BCH. Higher BCH price > higher difficulty > costs going up on something you can't sell. I did think that that sudden canceling of  btc2 felt too easy, too much resources were spent to give up just like that. Guess now we're seeing their plan B in action



1197. Post 24422913 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: monsanto on November 11, 2017, 09:36:01 PM
today's top 5 volume leaders  Shocked



Looks like something has to give (just hope it isn't tethers  Tongue)


25% of the whole market cap is traded in last 24hrs while most of the coins haven't moved in ages  Grin how much money do you believe your audience that buys this has to prop this up? Roll Eyes

Edit: But don't let this discourage you keep pushing i wanna  see 101% of market cap traded in last 24hrs, i'll get popcorn



1198. Post 24426888 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: somac. on November 11, 2017, 11:42:51 PM

If I had sold some more than I did in the 7K now I would stack some bids between 4.5K and 6K. I expected a strong correction since the high 5K in October so this is nothing yet for the moment. But it's to be seen if the huge backlog in the mempool persists thanks to the ongoing spam attack and the halving of hashing power could start a panic as the bitches hope.

I wonder how much an effect the lowering of hashing power will have. let's face it, most people who buy btc do so to hold it, and the hash rate has no effect on transfering fiat to the exchanges to buy btc. I don't think slower blocks matter at all, might actually slow down the selling it it slows people from transfering from cold storage to the exchange.

edit:
and this confirms that BCH is a totally fake pump:

sure does

Unless significant hash power leaves all at once, no effect. On that note when is the next retargeting, most likely that's when they'll act



1199. Post 24431808 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: Hyperjacked on November 12, 2017, 12:45:24 AM
Unless significant hash power leaves all at once, no effect. On that note when is the next retargeting, most likely that's when they'll act

The thing is nobody is using BCH, their blocks are empty. But let's say that a significant amount of hashing power leaves for good (80% or so) and the users of bitcoin flee because of slow block times for the week or 2 before a difficulty adjustment. Why would they go to bitcoin cash, when they can go to other better and more established alts.

This BCH pump is being driven by only the few whales who support it. Their egos have got to them, they think they are smart, and only make correct moves because they are rich and successful. Because of these egos they believe that if they just build it (pumping the price) everyone will flock to them, its delusional, and borderline sociopathic. They are kind of like the leaders of small cult, the literally think they are gods and can do no wrong.

Delusional? Sociopathic... Small cult? Rotflmao

The ones with the egos should have been humble and they know who they are.

The ppl with the hash will decide...  Cool

https://fork.lol/pow/hashrate


This is exactly where you're wrong. And it will be an expensive lesson for you to learn. People decide with $$, people who understand it will find a way to make money on all of this silliness



1200. Post 24431917 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: ragnar0k on November 12, 2017, 03:08:43 AM
The strange thing here is that despite the massive volumes, crypto market cap is still mostly the same.

Latest move is caused by Wu and Ver selling their BTC stash and buying BCH trash. There is no fiat involved. This is why market cap measured in fiat is the same.


Seriously, how much f***ing bitcoins do they have?! If I had 20BN the last thing I'd do is play stupid crypto wars like this. Go figure.

Moving BTC around in anticipation of BTC bear mode. Look at big alts on 1 day candlesticks, including BCH, they grow after the ATH of BTC.
Take your positions. But these movements don't bother long time hodler.  Grin

Bear mode is possibly maximum 4.5k... So not too far away! Hodling steady alas a bit shaky Smiley

Better to sleep over this and see our neighbour ethereum relocating tomorrow Sad
I'll miss it.


We're talking about control of THE crypto currency, it's not a card game anymore. Lot's and lots of 0s at play here



1201. Post 24433092 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: Rosewater Foundation on November 12, 2017, 04:06:36 AM
Lol #2

503313   0000000000000000081819ff158d06e56c00845298eca6fd398fa32c81e20e5e   2017-11-12 03:59   BTC.TOP   BIP9NYA   15   3,699.06090444   4,864,265.09   0.00297455   3.91   0.95   4.380
503312   0000000000000000061b67746c9e3513698bdded041d2241e587915f12927715   2017-11-12 03:59   ViaBTC   BIP9   57   1,681.15484215   2,210,718.50   0.00966104   12.70   0.47   27.567
503311   000000000000000003380a4d26f053b7f203d8619917ef1321db2006b440ef66   2017-11-12 03:59   BTC.TOP   BIP9SWNYA   1   12.50000000   16,437.50   0.00000000   0.00   0.00   0.255
503310   00000000000000000382daa2888a98c2e3078b0466b8eae0771346b1c54e8254   2017-11-12 03:59   AntPool   BIP9   1   12.50000000   16,437.50   0.00000000   0.00   0.00   

4 blocks per minute... "Vision of Satoshi" Tongue

i don't mind that a broken shit coin is pumping. what bothers me is what will i say to the children?


That however hard you might try, and however deep your pockets are, you just can't go against the market  Undecided



1202. Post 24434702 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

They can pump BCH to sky and above, just keep buying while miners don't sell. But they cannot dump more BTC than they own



1203. Post 24434783 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on November 12, 2017, 05:14:40 AM
They can pump BCH to sky and above, just keep buying while miners don't sell. But they cannot dump more BTC than they own
Only a matter of time until the sandstorm settles.

Bravo, you get a cookie! Grin



1204. Post 24435188 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: somac. on November 12, 2017, 05:21:22 AM
They can pump BCH to sky and above, just keep buying while miners don't sell. But they cannot dump more BTC than they own

Yep, what they are doing is basically kicking themselves out of BTC. Once they have none left the can't manipulate anymore. What's more they can't pump BCH as effectively either, they better hope that there are other users out there that want BCH. Because to keep the price at these levels is going to require a lot of new money each day.

BTC will be stronger after this, because there will be no more Roger Ver and Co around trying to fuck things up. This is probably the end of BTC being played with by amateurs/early adopters like Ver, the professionals will now move in, for better or worse.

There are only 16.5MM BTC out there. Before you attempt to manipulate it, you'll have to gather a good chunk of it. It was easy for early adopters now, it just can't be done without pushing the price into 5 figure territory. And i do agree this is the last bang for Ver, he got to go all in here if he has any chance. Otherwise B2x is canceled and BCH would float into oblivion

Edit: Think of it as much needed distribution. Now if LOADED could RESPONSIBLY dump some of his stash  Grin his wallet scares me, how many island one would need



1205. Post 24436173 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: somac. on November 12, 2017, 06:00:26 AM
Looks like institutional investors are going to get cheap BTC. Go figure.
 

This is what Ver and Co don't understand. They are going to lose their power, like the amateurs they are. The pros are going to clean up, like usual.

Difficulty adjustment in under 16 hours, good luck to them.

The part that you don't understand that Ver is a very very wealthy man. At this point it's not about money but rather power. He was being squeezed out of BTC so he's been trying to clamp on to power any way he can, and this is his last all or nothing battle. Worst case he still walks away multi millionaire



1206. Post 24436832 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: Heater on November 12, 2017, 06:27:49 AM
Imagine if Satoshi comes out, dump all his Bcash to tell the world BTC is the real coins  Grin
Or we could just get Donald Trump to tweet that the Bitcoin Cash leaders are short and fat.

I'm not so sure about Trumps credibility, he might be causing inverse effect on this one



1207. Post 24437424 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

It's starting to go full retard now



1208. Post 24437630 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Calling it, Ver blew his load we're at $5575



1209. Post 24437698 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: promomei on November 12, 2017, 06:56:22 AM
Funny that lots of us sold BCH on the beginning and  im wondering who has it now ?  Wink

It can fly really high suddenly

That's why the cancellation of B2x,  Wink it'd be too much for them to absorb both. People already dumped their BCH and can't dump anymore



1210. Post 24438203 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Can we now rename BCH into Ver tokens?  Roll Eyes



1211. Post 24438497 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on November 12, 2017, 07:21:13 AM
No need to panic. This is good for Bitcoin (the real one -- BTC). Let them pump all they have on their AltCash. When you have cancer you either sit and wait for your death, or you take the knife and cut it out. You will bleed, but you'll survive. Let's cut it out and move on.

Has anyone done the maths on how much more ammo this animal can possibly have left?

Impossible to tell, it wasn't just Ver he also had the support of miners with lots of hash power, no telling how much they've been hoarding to dump for their Ver coin.



1212. Post 24439219 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: somac. on November 12, 2017, 07:27:48 AM
Looks like institutional investors are going to get cheap BTC. Go figure.
 

This is what Ver and Co don't understand. They are going to lose their power, like the amateurs they are. The pros are going to clean up, like usual.

Difficulty adjustment in under 16 hours, good luck to them.

The part that you don't understand that Ver is a very very wealthy man. At this point it's not about money but rather power. He was being squeezed out of BTC so he's been trying to clamp on to power any way he can, and this is his last all or nothing battle. Worst case he still walks away multi millionaire

that's exactly what I understand. and because of this last ditch effort he will lose his a power at a much faster rate. Serves the fucker right.

People were calling him bitcoin jebus at one point. Then he started to loose control, so it was either go quietly into the night or take a however small chance at becoming bitcoin god. In either case he's set for many lifetimes to come. We're looking at what he chose right now



1213. Post 24439509 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

And now Wall St sweeping up the residue BTC3k buys  Cry



1214. Post 24439814 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: ironhide0991 on November 12, 2017, 07:56:53 AM
Wow. Last few days have been like a hurricane. It's flying everywhere.
I decided to increase my BTC stash and bought in when it was around $7000.
Sold my BCH for BTC when it was aroudn $600.
Now I am confused. I will admit that I clearly do not understand what to do.
Should I hodl the BTC I bought @7000 or should I exchange it for an alt or BCH.
I need help.

Beautiful, just amazing how people lose their mind when they become greedy . Enjoy the dumpfest you deserve it

I need help.

No one can help you except yourself ,just NEVER buy at the top.. NEVER

Everybody wants some profit. That's why you invest in the first place. Secondly, if I was just "greedy" I would have already sold my BTC for BCH and jumped on the bandwagon. Instead I sold my BCH early on because I believed in the true Bitcoin.
7000 was never the top when 2x was in place. Then it was called off and everything went bonkers. All I am looking for is to understand what's going on.

Can you name one advantage BCH offers over LTC or other ALTs? If not, then it's never a good idea to invest into something that you don't know. Emotional trading will just get you in trouble and will just make exchange money on their fees. Trade fundamentals and what you understand.



1215. Post 24439857 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on November 10, 2017, 08:58:04 PM


Now we see the 2nd part of that plan



1216. Post 24444118 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

That BTC25k can still do a lot of damage, but could also be him covering hist shorts on finix to minimize 3rd party exposure i.e. if finex stop trades etc...



1217. Post 24446332 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: orpington on November 12, 2017, 10:24:11 AM
Ver, Wu, Gavin, all these BitCH shills here on bitcointalk wtf is the matter with you?

These people must have been bought out. But by who?

Shills were always here kinda miss NLC, but Gavin hurts the most. Et tu, Brute?



1218. Post 24608001 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.27h):

Quote from: Arriemoller on November 15, 2017, 02:26:45 AM
woah up up! Was Jihan arrested or something?

I think people are selling their BTG. I was about to, but almost 50 USD fee was too much.
I'll see if I can get a better fee later.

What exchange trades BTG?



1219. Post 24608384 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.27h):

Quote from: oblox on November 15, 2017, 06:40:09 AM
woah up up! Was Jihan arrested or something?

I think people are selling their BTG. I was about to, but almost 50 USD fee was too much.
I'll see if I can get a better fee later.

What exchange trades BTG?

...they are listed on coinmarketcap

On a 9th page? I gave up after 2. But thnx



1220. Post 24621931 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.27h):

Here. We. Go. Express train till 2020 now, the hard part is behind us  Grin



1221. Post 24666273 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.27h):

Quote from: Dakustaking76 on November 16, 2017, 07:11:23 AM
Guys Im on kraken holding my btc

How can i claim my bitcoin gold And bitcoin core???
Can someone help me..

For Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Kraken has already given its customers holding BTC the equivalent amount of BCH. For any other forks of BTC, like Bitcoin Gold, you can't. Not directly anyway, if at all. You'll have to wait for Kraken to give them to you (if they decide to do so). You should have transferred them out of Kraken and into a wallet for which you have access to the private keys or recovery seed, and all this had to be done before the time of each fork.

Hm Thanks, this pretty sucks kraken annouced couple of hours before the gold fork
That they wont support it.. But there saying they Will reevaluate it later...

That's why everyone always says If you don't own your private keys, you down own your bitcoins.

Side note why are we still under $10k!?!?



1222. Post 24666441 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.27h):

Quote from: jojo69 on November 16, 2017, 04:51:04 AM


the competition, don't know about y'all, feeling pretty confident here


Ewww yuck singles better put gloves on



1223. Post 24895032 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on November 20, 2017, 12:26:22 PM
Now this is a nice thing to wake up and see !



Still under $10k back to sleep



1224. Post 24989681 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: gentlemand on November 22, 2017, 01:16:27 AM
https://mobile.twitter.com/bitfinex/status/933134086289453056

Bitfinex now have a EUR BTC market. Dunno if it's a proper one with SEPA and real money and stuff.

They're also reopening USD wires for little people.

They need to disassociate themselves from that toxic tether crap  Angry



1225. Post 25124749 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Too much speculation for next retargeting, if it's a dud there will be a lot of CCMFs



1226. Post 25161584 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: Torque on November 24, 2017, 05:27:48 PM
Spit and shake hands as much as you want, brother, but only signature with your private key counts in the end!

Nope. Go ask a lawyer. No matter which party ends up with the asset at the center of a smart contract dispute, that said ownership can still be challenged in a court of law. Smart contracts will not alleviate or nullify this.

Riddle me this: Since you and me never signed which jurisdiction is recognized in case of the dispute, and we may be from different countries, do you really believe jurisdiction of my country has power over you?

Riddle me this: Why or when would I ever go into a smart contract with you, knowing this? Lol

HUH!?!! Because you both don't want lawyers to arbitrarily overwrite your smart contract? 



1227. Post 25167465 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: Agapios on November 24, 2017, 10:02:31 PM
Just wondering why are today so many unconfirmed transactions for BTC? almoust 45k


BCH has been pumped up, and BTC just re targeted so it's at its most vulnerable, spaming the mempool is just another angle of the attack. If Ver will start dumping whatever he has left in BTC it'll be  *soon*. If not there are a lot of people waiting for a "dip" to buy in, so they'd have to buy with market orders  Grin

tl;dr next 24hrs are critical



1228. Post 25168142 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on November 24, 2017, 11:34:29 PM
Well well well. I see the blocksize/scaling gridlock is STILL ongoing. Dash is now running 2MB blocks. needless to say, I'm rotating out of cripplecoin into the crypto more faithful to Satoshi's vision. Thanks for buying all those coins I bought for $12, suckers. I literally have so many hundred dollar bills in my pocket that I don't know how many there are. 



So now you'll have no reason to continue to post here, you'll delete your account and move on to dash forum??...Pretty please??

Or just stay here and continue to trolllololol



1229. Post 25169116 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on November 24, 2017, 11:52:40 PM
Well well well. I see the blocksize/scaling gridlock is STILL ongoing. Dash is now running 2MB blocks. needless to say, I'm rotating out of cripplecoin into the crypto more faithful to Satoshi's vision. Thanks for buying all those coins I bought for $12, suckers. I literally have so many hundred dollar bills in my pocket that I don't know how many there are. 



So now you'll have no reason to continue to post here, you'll delete your account and move on to dash forum??...Pretty please??

Or just stay here and continue to trolllololol

The dust left in my old BTC accounts is worth more than many portfolios here. I still have a vested interest.

"needless to say, I'm rotating out of cripplecoin" only i'm really not and still have some vested interest in it. How dumb is your target audience that you're trying to influence?  Roll Eyes



1230. Post 25173062 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on November 25, 2017, 03:05:09 AM
Well well well. I see the blocksize/scaling gridlock is STILL ongoing. Dash is now running 2MB blocks. needless to say, I'm rotating out of cripplecoin into the crypto more faithful to Satoshi's vision. Thanks for buying all those coins I bought for $12, suckers. I literally have so many hundred dollar bills in my pocket that I don't know how many there are.  
Look what the cat drug in!!!!     Shocked Shocked Shocked

I would say that technically all cryptocurrency holders are dumb money:



More like house money. I already cashed out more than 20X my buy in, so any additional profits from here are just gravy. I can't possibly loose.

Yeah.. great job.  You got yourself $3,100 plus some $20s that you don't want to count.  You made a "killing."

That's just literally my pocket money. You know, just in case I wanna fly to Europe without going to the bank first.

And yet you're still here. On a forum where you only have pocket money invested in?? Do you also go to chuck e cheese and troll others how it's all a sham?



1231. Post 25181016 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Just another ATH, Ver calling off the spam?



1232. Post 25222197 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

What's up with Finex?



1233. Post 25223526 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

BAM!! back with the vengeance  Grin



1234. Post 25232509 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: megadeth on November 26, 2017, 05:12:20 AM
Loaded is officially a billionaire. Needs to change his signature.

He needs to start giving out Lambo's Oprah style! You get a lambo, you get a lambo and you get one...



1235. Post 25233479 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Guessing there're no plans for $10k party? Or they couldn't find a place with enough private islands, and lambo parkings?



1236. Post 25239021 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: windjc on November 26, 2017, 09:36:15 AM
the most expensive forum software that doesn't exist yet. slickage Cool

Its just like I wouldn't expect Roger Ver to be able to build a seastead either. Most of these early adopters don't know the first thing about running a high tech professional operation. + most of them are at least semi socially awkward and have lower than average people skills. Some of the EXACT things you need to construct and LIVE ON a seastead.

Most of these seasteader types are:

1. Lone wolves
2. Anti-social
3. Stubborn
4. Eccentric
5. Nerdy
6. Drug and alcohol users/abusers
7. Entitled
8. Self righteous
9. Egotistical
10. Male

Yeah, please sign me up for this circle jerk in the middle of the ocean. Sounds like a plan.

I'm sure with all of the $$$ they can arrange for a daily boat transfers of hookers and blow



1237. Post 25279263 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.29h):

Quote from: AlcoHoDL on November 26, 2017, 11:13:08 PM
Bcash is pumping. Brace yourselves for battle...

Problem with that, is that they're creating a hungry monster that needs to be fed daily! By design, the cost of generating new coins should be close to the value of those coins plus a small profit margin. By chasing BTC and pumping BCH they're also indirectly pumping their difficulty, or the daily cost to run the chain. About 1800 new coins per day at $1700, thats over $3MM REAL costs that need to be absorbed daily. Expensive hobby, the big question is how deep are their pockets and how long are they willing to keep this up?



1238. Post 25295327 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.29h):

If you're still holding BTG congrats combined value of BTC+BTG is over $10k



1239. Post 25344064 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.29h):

Quote from: Rosewater Foundation on November 28, 2017, 12:13:27 AM
the owner of bcash doesn't like you calling it bcash. y u so disrespect the bcash?

To settle this once and for all, and be fair to both sides i propose from now on to call it Ver tokens! It has Ver's name in it so that should make that side happy



1240. Post 25350826 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.29h):

According to http://bitcoinity.org there are more bids down to $9k then asks up to $10k BTC4600 vs BTC4450 ...



1241. Post 25351478 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.29h):

Or, or ... everyone is sick of your trolling and no one wants to listen to you troll anymore  Roll Eyes
And we're past $9800 BTC3.2k till $10k



1242. Post 25356475 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.29h):

Quote from: TERA2 on November 28, 2017, 07:04:06 AM
Can someone explain exactly what gives BCH its value of $1600? Is that how much people think BTC will fail and revert to BCH or what?

That's how much Ver and Jihan are cashing out of BTC and feeding to their little BCH monster. Cost of trying to corner the market...



1243. Post 25365728 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.29h):

Quote from: Elwar on November 28, 2017, 10:27:36 AM


We're in one now! BTC has crashed to $9834  :oI 'm already calling my boss to apologize and ask for my job back, or soup kitchen it is for me  



1244. Post 25406435 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.29h):

Quote from: cofefeGandalf on November 29, 2017, 02:06:54 AM

Here's to Notlambchop, Fonzie, Kwukduck, and lest we forget, Proudhon.


Proundhon is no doubt exceedingly rich by this point!

Lets have some proudhon song https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7TuFy0fcuw to celebrate. Grin

It has been confirmed!



1245. Post 25449299 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.29h):

That's it BTC is dead. Back to work Cry



1246. Post 25483934 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.29h):

Quote from: soullyG on November 30, 2017, 11:02:38 AM
Is crypto dead?  Roll Eyes

Confirmed  Cry



1247. Post 25540916 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):

Quote from: vroom on December 01, 2017, 09:25:05 AM
I'm imagining this 10 year flag where it drops back to nothing after government bans and then 10 years later it finally breaks 10,000 (or whatever ath was) again as we struggle to watch what is going on in decentralized exchanges and hand to hand transactions.

how is your dogecoin doing?

Hilarious  Grin though very annoying that people still feed him/her



1248. Post 25545071 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):

Quote from: Rosewater Foundation on December 01, 2017, 11:07:00 AM
Is anybody here still buying? Huh


Of course.

If the price goes down, then buy, and if the price goes up then sell.

The price has been going up and down in the past two days... so just apply the formula.

That's day trading. That's madness. I'd get r0ached for sure.

Ha roached, last i heard he went full in on http://bitcoen.io wondering how he's doing now



1249. Post 25582396 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):

Quote from: David48l on December 01, 2017, 10:33:28 PM
The people, and without encouragement to offend, are very ignorant and manipulable. But it's not your fault if you only read censored forums and falsified threads. I encourage you to compare several points of view and draw your own conclusions. Do not let other people think for you

That's the kind of retarded banality Roger would come up with. Just sayin'. Wink

The answer to transactions without corfirming, is simply spam

But nobody is able to show me 10 transactions at a reduced rate, there are supposed to be thousands  Roll Eyes

https://bitcoinfees.earn.com/

Do you need me to explain this to think for you? Or can you figure it out on your own?

Very nice your page, but I still can not find spam transactions in blockchain info.
According to your link more than half are spam, maybe you should rethink trust in that page


https://blockchain.info/tx/a529965f386437e57224c83e5374fdee53f74a54f81d18b1b2b65b76c807a4b6
https://blockchain.info/tx/d8bda666491d6edd2a27bb895a285c67f1e6f85e3254f967965f7f8c3260c810
https://blockchain.info/tx/536de1a056601175bd3cf3aeb993831dded1133942e3c970b23a0f3d9c53aedb
https://blockchain.info/tx/a9af1a67f6e97260d8a7cc2d63f3091942672790c3fe5f0f8c7555e0f183764e

There is no way, but your page is very pretty indeed

All you have to do is visit https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#24h scroll down and easily see that over half the transactions in memory pool paid a miner fee of 0 - 5 satoshi/byte. Are those legitimate transactions or spam? Most likely latter.

Being more than half spam because I can not find a single transaction with a really low rate? Excuse my ignorance

I've been standing on a street offering drivers $0.25 to drive me 3km, so far i've been standing for 5 days and counting... Only one guy who was really nice agreed to drive me and for just $0.01!!!! Shocked but then he started to ask me for some other "favors" asked me to sign some paperwork about selling my soul and then started to drive me in the opposite direction   Angry he called himself bitch jesus too  Cry



1250. Post 25585589 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):

Quote from: btcbeliever on December 02, 2017, 02:16:18 AM


CAROLINA !!!
can someone please explain what carolina is about?  thanks

The first C in CCMF <insert train on fire>



1251. Post 25596189 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):

Quote from: jbreher on December 02, 2017, 07:01:10 AM
For anyone other than Bitmain to spam Bcash they'd have to buy it and kiss it goodbye forever as no one other than Bitmain is mining it.

https://cash.coin.dance/blocks/today

No one even bothers to spam them with 0 fee transactions?



1252. Post 25647767 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):

Quote from: AlcoHoDL on December 03, 2017, 07:34:35 AM
This could well have been written about me.

Quote
I'm not saying that it is always absolutely wrong to have 90% of your assets in BTC or whatever, but it should be because you are intentionally choosing to do so, not because the price got away from you and you never really considered that you now have 90% of your wealth riding on one thing.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/7gi55s/dont_invest_recklessly/

I'm spooked again.

So, theymos is now advising those of us who went 50% in on Bitcoin, and are now nearly 90% in due to a rising Bitcoin, to sell 45% of our BTC stash, in order to return to the initial BTC/total investment of 50%.

I respect him, but can't help but wonder if that is a good piece of advice, or a borderline FUD call...

Just a typical diversification advice. Don't invest more than you can loose etc.etc..etc...



1253. Post 25647955 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):

Quote from: TERA2 on December 03, 2017, 05:06:32 AM
I always wondered if I went back in time and bought 1,000,000 coins, what would happen and how it would change. Maybe btc would just fail altogether.

Do not f*ck with the past, it's working out perfectly ... well for the majority of us at least. Just continue doing whatever it is that you do. Cheesy



1254. Post 25686286 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):

Quote from: jbreher on December 03, 2017, 07:51:40 PM


I don't care who ya are... That there's funny.

 Grin  just need Bugs bunny to pretend to rip BCASH off only to see Daffy rip it off, now that would be hilarious!

Any updates on when core will start fully supporting Segwit (including GUI)? They're shotting themselves in the foot with adoption rate stalling at 10%-12% can't b*tch at others when core doesn't fully support it yet



1255. Post 25686563 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):

BTC3.2k bids till $11k vs BTC2.9k asks till $12k on Finex. So it begins



1256. Post 25690100 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):

Looks like a the Mr Wall at $12000 sodled some and more evenly redistributed his asks. Bcash costs around $2.8MM in real electricity costs to run daily  Roll Eyes wanna see them pump it again trying to keep up to BTC so their daily costs top $5MM  Grin



1257. Post 25908377 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.31h):

Is this the dip??



1258. Post 26018445 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.31h):

Quote from: Wekkel on December 09, 2017, 09:51:06 AM
Trading litecoin just isnt the same without a trollbox and fontas.

Fontas the pumper  Grin



Those were the days...




whatever happened to him/her



1259. Post 26192203 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.32h):

Quote from: jbreher on December 12, 2017, 09:08:15 AM

Quote
because otherwise you would sell all of your bitcoin and invest in bcash

Oh but I have. I hold much more Bitcoin Cash than Bitcoin Segwit. But that is really irrelevant. Do you hold any stocks? Bonds? T-Bills? Dollars? If you are so sure that Bitcoin Segwit is the be-all and end-all, why do you own anything but? Not that I find this a valid line of reasoning; I am just turning your words around on you.

Quote
and participate in the bcash discussions

I regularly participate in Bitcoin Cash discussions. What makes you think that I do not?
...
Quote
and you just want to complain about bitcoin,

No. I want to alert about the weaknesses of Bitcoin Segwit.
...

No, but see, it's very relevant, and this is exact point that you seem to miss or err pretend to not realize. So let me try to spell it out for n00bs that might be getting confused by all of this Bcash shilling, if JJG held minority of his assets in stocks/bonds/t-bills, yet spent MAJORITY of his time on those boards saying how they're all idiots and it will collapse, that would be, now say it with me, yes, trolling, and no, by saying that he's just trying to alert those stock/bond brokers of the weakness of their system wouldn't make it any less trolling. Now shoo under the bridge you go



1260. Post 26192568 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.32h):

Quote from: AlexGR on December 12, 2017, 09:32:06 AM
I keep reading about how precious metals are so much better than cryptocurrencies, and it saddens me to see so much anachronism and old-time mentality here in this thread (I wonder why those posts are posted here...).

They are the best form of money, but that would only be useful if governments recognized gold and silver as money - as they used to. However governments use fiat, and both PMs and crypto are better than fiat.

When fiat becomes 100% digital, with the banning of cash, at that point the entry/exit point from PMs will become problematic (not for institutional investors, but for the average joe - who won't be able to buy or sell even 1 ounce without big brother knowing it, taxing it, or preventing it). Cryptocurrencies will thus be complementary to PMs when fiat goes 100% digital. It'll be like this:

Metals <=> Cryptos <=> fiat

Why would i spend my crypto on those elements then? What's the confirmation time to transport it? What about security, how would i generate a seed from this pile of Au?



1261. Post 26516969 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.33h):

We're retargeting up by 18% in about 12hrs https://fork.lol/pow/retarget So frequency of mined blocks will go down by about that much. Meaning mempool and fees are going up short term. This is also the time when BTC is most vulnerable from that vector so if someone would start spaming this would be the time.

tl;dr next 24hrs are critical



1262. Post 26535560 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.33h):

Quote from: goggles on December 18, 2017, 10:01:31 AM
I'm still waiting on my gox withdrawal. That chart brings back bad memories.  Cry

i'm waiting on Midas to go online and put an end to all of this lag and thats when they'll list LTC too!!! Hear that they already got the LTC API ticker up  Angry Cry



1263. Post 26585854 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.33h):

Quote from: Paashaas on December 19, 2017, 02:48:27 AM
This seems legit, Coinbase made an ACE move with this.

Let's sink this in; Coinbase+Lightning. Cool





hxxps://www.lightningramp.com/

Cert provided by letsencrypt? Yeeah definitely scam



1264. Post 26593337 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.33h):

Quote from: Lopumbo on December 19, 2017, 09:16:50 AM
its altcoin season you know, because in its current state btc is unusable! in what intellectual bubble are you guys chilling? going long on mempool?

Or we are "seasoned" crypto investors, and are not ADHD kids that can't plan/see more than 6months in advance. You know...cause you want it riiight meow!



1265. Post 26593505 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.33h):

Quote from: RoomBot on December 19, 2017, 09:14:17 AM
They better pony up by 1-1-18.



Watching Roger and Co. attempting to keep Bcash at 10% of bitcoin when it's rocketing is almost as entertaining in itself. He'd be so much more dangerous now had he not jumped the gun.



1266. Post 26628245 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.33h):

This feels bottomish, are bcash pumps starting to run low?



1267. Post 26652372 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.33h):

Quote from: orpington on December 20, 2017, 07:41:39 AM
Who would actually be stupid enough to actually buy Bcash? lol

Some time ago, I traded a large percentage of my BTC for BCH. Since then, my BCH is up 12x. From that time, my BTC is up too. By a whole 6x.

Stupid indeed.

I'd ask you to do the math, but you may be too busy calling others stupid to be able to compute 6 into 12.

lol good one!

I meant stupid in the sense of it being a relatively useless and absolute dead end coin. In light of its inevitable future one would have to be stupid to actually have it and believe in it.

But nonetheless, congratulations on your short term profit. Dump that shit soon, though.

Some time ago, I  invested in dogecoin. Since then, my DOGE was up 20x when i sold. Can you please do the maths on how doge is superior to your bcash  Kiss



1268. Post 26656006 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.33h):

Quote from: 1982dre on December 20, 2017, 10:47:38 AM
Looks like the money of BCH is being moved to BTC again. Guess the pump is over.

Confirmed, seems like they stopped spamming the mempool too. Please put put your seats in the upright position and prepare for takeoff  Grin



1269. Post 26706128 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.34h):

Quote from: somac. on December 21, 2017, 06:58:53 AM


Speaking of forks, super bitcoin is done and trading, current value around $280 (coinmarketcap). These forks are kind of nuts, and what surprises me the most is that they all have a decent value. I was just looking at this page http://pieifo.com/pages/endefault.html and look how many are coming up. It's crazy, but, if they all have a decent value I won't be complaining  Grin

Da faq is super bitcoin  Huh



1270. Post 26744069 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.34h):

The trolls are out in full force, must be getting close to the bottom



1271. Post 26747591 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.34h):

Quote from: Peter R on December 21, 2017, 09:25:30 PM

[ ... ]

I have done all this to date as a volunteer because I love bitcoin and hope to see it change the world for the better.  

Do you honestly think that the motives of Jihan Wu and Roger Ver are to change the world for the better? Really? Have you followed their actions and their modus operandi? And you have decided to side with them and support Bcash? If that is true, then I'm afraid you are self-disrespecting your own achievements. It's sad, really...

I communicate directly with both of them, have met both in person and had lengthy discussions with each.  I believe they love Bitcoin for the same three reasons I do:

1. The technology behind bitcoin is interesting and novel; Satoshi solved a long-standing problem in computer science.
2. The adoption of Bitcoin would change the world for the better, by giving us a better form of money.
3. The potential to earn of a huge amount of money.

How does it feel to know that the whole Bcash one trick pony can loose most of its market cap the second Core feels that the benefit of raising the blocksize to 2mb outweighs the risk? That's their worst case scenario, and by the time 2mb is spammed to hell and people start bitchin' again LN should be right around the corner.



1272. Post 26748932 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.34h):

Quote from: Peter R on December 21, 2017, 09:42:59 PM
How does it feel to know that the whole Bcash one trick pony can loose most of its market cap the second Core feels that the benefit of raising the blocksize to 2mb outweighs the risk? That's their worst case scenario, and by the time 2mb is spammed to hell and people start bitchin' again LN should be right around the corner.

It is that fear that keeps me from shifting more of my BTC holdings to BCH.  

I believe that if BTC cannot raise the block size limit in the medium-term (3 - 12 months) then BCH will fully take its place as the dominant crypto.  

However, if BTC is able to raise the block size limit, I could see BCH dying.  But I think the political machine that BS/Core built to prevent the block size limit from being lifted will come back to bite them.  Why won't all the same arguments against a block size limit be used again?  If BTC tries to increase the limit, will this result in yet another fork and another form of Bitcoin (e.g., will this next fork have replay protection or not)?  Will that really work?  Or will people just decide that BCH is the solution for lower fees and more reliable confirmation times?

That would depend on Ver's pockets. If they're deep enough for BCH to come close to say ~40% and sustain it for meaningful period of time, that would put enough pressure on core to implement Segwit2x but on their terms and with their deadlines. If BCH stays at around ~10% they'll just hold out till the LN goes live. 2mb block would most certainly create another fork and with all of the money on the table you can be sure that there will be a well sponsored 1mb group to divide the community as much as possible. In any case i don't see any future for BCH once LN goes live, who would in their right minds pick a risky 0 block confirms over guaranteed instant LN?

TL;DR Whatever market share BTC looses now to people who want low fees right meow would come right back once LN goes live. If BCH manages to put enough pressure on BTC they'll just bump the blocks to 2mb to hold off until LN goes live. In no scenario i see BCH still being a significant player once LN is out.



1273. Post 26765182 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.34h):

Satoshi is this you? Have you been drinking with Loaded again? Where's Adam when you need him. Thinking now we're getting in the oversold territory blood is getting on the streets time to slowly start accumulating, set your bids gentlemen



1274. Post 26862138 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.35h):

Quote from: Torque on December 24, 2017, 02:05:30 AM
Explain how I can securely send gold or silver across the world for payment without any friction/transaction fee or middleman to have to trust, or GTFOOH you idiot.

Trolllololol

Lol. Not only did you NOT answer my question, you redirected it toward complete garbage. Classic straw man fallacy response.

You need to go back to Troll school. They don't even teach this stupid tactic anymore because people see right through it.

Trololol

No you didn't.

ANSWER. THE. FUCKING. QUESTION. IN. BOLD. ABOVE. OR. GTFO.

Why are you feeding trolls? Are you trying to get on ignore list too?



1275. Post 26863050 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.35h):

Quote from: arklan on December 24, 2017, 02:41:13 AM
Torque

When I first showed back up you gently, but firmly, advised me not to feed the troll.

I'm here to return the favor.

I'm done. By confronting the troll directly and him not directly answering my question, I think anyone else reading this thread will understand that he's just wasting people's time.

But I ask you this then in return, why has he not been perma-banned from the WO thread? Or at least his posts deleted, if we ALL can agree that he's just a troll? Why should we all suffer this idiot whilst he constantly spams the WO thread with his drivel?

i second that. infofront, ban him.

Why make the decision for the user, there's an ignore button that's just as useful, unless of course s/he manages to get another noob to quote him/her.



1276. Post 26863786 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.35h):

This doesn't have typical Ver and the Co. dumping feel. They're not doing huge market sells, but rather a stepped approach to maximize the profits Undecided Ver and Co. has unlimited funds as long as BTC continues to go up, if they already cashed out in this price range there are no more to sell perhaps this might be the reason mempool is going down  Huh



1277. Post 26865756 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.35h):

Quote from: criptix on December 24, 2017, 03:20:31 AM
Why make the decision for the user, there's an ignore button that's just as useful, unless of course s/he manages to get another noob to quote him/her.
This is why DaRude. This is why. I would have to put everyone that quotes him on ignore too, which would be like half the people here...

If you can abstract away all his PM shilling and antisemitism then it is not unusual that he brings sound arguments.
I think as a smart person you should be objective and open to sound arguments that go against your opinions.

You're giving him/her too much credit. When it's like a broker record with 50% of posts pushing PMs, 25% about how crypto currency is not decentralized, and 20% about killing jews, i really don't feel like sifting through all that crap searching for that remaining 5%



1278. Post 26874373 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.35h):

Quote from: TERA2 on December 24, 2017, 09:11:47 AM
So where are all the threads now about how it's going to $500K by new years?

Xmas time/holidays actual transactions are low and spam can't keep the blocks full. You might wanna ping your overlords to ramp up those spam bots. Otherwise, we'll see cheap transaction on the BTC again which would make Bcash redundant (and absorb its market cap) even before LN gets here (hopefully by end of '18)

tl;dr need more real money to pay electricity bills for those bcash miners, and to fill up BTC blocks with spam pronto! Otherwise BTC moons



1279. Post 26965278 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.35h):

Boom



1280. Post 26967804 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.35h):

BTC500 mini wall @ $15k is getting eaten on Finex



1281. Post 27084368 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.35h):

Quote from: NiceSoft12 on December 28, 2017, 07:37:32 AM
^ lol, why is this guy trying to sell before the fork? It can't be as profitable to sell now than say Friday morning EST....

Which fork are we talking about now? It seems they keep forking faster than i can sell them.



1282. Post 27191847 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.36h):

Are you not entertained? This is SPARTA cryptoland!! Just play fundamentals and make money on others stupidity



1283. Post 27193561 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.36h):

Well how much liquidity are there in the market to offset these kinda of moves on Friday night the NYE weekend. That's a lot of coincidences  Undecided



1284. Post 27326699 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.36h):

I feel like if Cripple could get to $87B, then BTC should be able to get to $870B with its eyes closed



1285. Post 27620081 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.37h):

BTC606 ask wall @ $17.500 on Finex oops OT



1286. Post 27720192 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.37h):

Someone decided to cash out in the most retarded way  Undecided



1287. Post 28159395 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.38h):

Quote from: RoomBot on January 15, 2018, 03:30:10 AM
I know this is off topic, but it appears someone spammed the BCH mempool, recently. It appears some of the pools are electing to only mine 1MB blocks, others 2MB blocks and a couple the full 8 MB blocks.  Roll Eyes

https://cash.coin.dance/blocks
https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/cash/#24h

What's the point of having big blocks when one of the mystery miners will only mine 1MB blocks? Cheesy

It's relevant, methinks!

BCH Peeps spamming the BTC mempool affect BTC price & movement, so turnabout is fair play.

Especially after enduring all the Bcash & other altcoin garbage posted on this BTC thread...

I'm waiting for them to remove the blocksize so i can store DVD of matrix in their blockchain forever!



1288. Post 28299854 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.38h):

Quote from: Higher Altitude on January 17, 2018, 04:16:47 AM
Bitcoin is the one and only original. If its price goes somewhere sub 3k it's probably game over. But it won't happen until all the knockoffs die first.

$18k -> $3k (6x) wouldn't be unprecedented.  In 2011, we fell from $30 -> $2 (15x), in early 2013 from $250 -> $50 (5x), and in late 2013 from $1200 -> $200 (6x).  

If we get away with a low of $9k (2x) I'd hardly even call that a crash!  

Here are projected lows compared to historical crashes:

2x: $9,000
3x: $6,000
4x: $4,500
5x (early 2013): $3,600
6x (late 2013): $3,000
10x: $1,800
15x (2011): $1,200

I'm not even saying Bitcoin didn't have worse days because it has certainly been going through a lot and came out on top. This past year has been a gold rush for Bitcoin and if it did crash back down to really low prices I think it would destroy a lot of confidence in the market. People might discard it again.

And I agree on another post that Bitcoin should be USED. It's the closest thing to digital cash I have ever owned. But the transaction fees have been way too high lately. That's why I like Litecoin.  Grin

That wouldn't be that bad. Get some attention off BTC and let the developers develop. Concentrate on the final product LN without all this BS that's going on now.



1289. Post 28457731 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.39h):

Quote from: explorer on January 19, 2018, 08:26:07 AM
What the hodl was that?

??

what did you see?
A $600 rise on bitfinex in under a second.
followed by steady volume for a few...

Meh bitcoin just being bitcoin. Honey badger...



1290. Post 28580429 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.39h):

Did spam faucet ran dry again? Someone ping Ver for a top up



1291. Post 28591404 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.39h):

Quote from: infofront on January 21, 2018, 06:47:37 AM
How do you guys compute your taxes when...

You mined 1 ETH with your GPU ....

You sold 1 ETH and bought BTC ....

You held that BTC for a long time and then sold for USD ...

The 1 ETH is business income?
The BTC is considered capital gains?

In the US:
The 1 Eth mined is taxed as income.
When you trade the ETH for BTC, assuming you held the ETH for <1 year, you'd pay short term capital gains tax on the amount the ETH appreciated since it was mined.
After you sold the BTC, you'd pay long term capital gains tax on the entire amount.

Hmm how about we throw some dates on this, this is how i understand it, but i'm not a tax professional:

1 June 2015 1 ETH mined (ETH spot price $1)
1 January 2016 sold 1 ETH for 0,01 BTC (ETH spot $10)
2 January 2018 sold 0,01 BTC (BTC spot $20000)

So first in 2015 income on mined ETH $1 is fully taxed as regular income (but can expense equipment costs and electric bills?)
2016 $9 ($10spot - $1base) is taxed at short term capital gains
2018 $190 ($200gross - $10base) is taxed at long term capital gains



1292. Post 28653360 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.39h):

Quote from: cAPSLOCK on January 22, 2018, 03:44:21 AM
On a tangentially-related matter, does anyone know why the forums got rid of the glowing ignore color, based on how many people have a particular user marked for ignore ?
Oooh.  I had never noticed this but would enjoy it.

Thought it's been gone fore years now



1293. Post 28653493 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.39h):

Quote from: muadib83 on January 22, 2018, 01:24:34 AM
This is bullshit - I bought at 11.300 - Sold 11.500 - still I am down 120$ because everyone sold ealier eh - what a crap

Look on the bright side, i'm sure exchanges are thankful for handing them your money. You'll become a good day traded any day now  Roll Eyes



1294. Post 33629531 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Hmm is the blood on the streets yet? Are these Gox coins being liquidated, MtGox coming back to Gox us one (last?) time



1295. Post 33817292 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: bakasabo on April 03, 2018, 07:32:16 AM
10,000 BTC were moved from Nobuaki Kobayashi (MtGox) wallet. I suppose this action is responsible for today green market.
https://blockchain.info/address/16rCmCmbuWDhPjWTrpQGaU3EPdZF7MTdUk

Stay focused and do not get caught. Todays growth can not be counted for 100% as a market recovery.

I was expecting hoping? for something like this, but what makes you say that 16rCmCmbuWDhPjWTrpQGaU3EPdZF7MTdUk is MtGox coins? Don't see address in his list or you just FUDing?

Edit: Ahh that address has BTC142k in it so calling FUD on MtGox link



1296. Post 34631630 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.52h):

Quote from: B1tUnl0ck3r on April 13, 2018, 05:26:18 PM

That's all women. All women hit the wall. Most of them hard.

I see, speaking about people maturing before dying is more interesting than the suffering of entire people under the boots of putin...

marx is right for most muppets, too dumb to realize what the rope just sold is for...

 Sad

and worst this tendency by the western ruling class to over plan... resulting in planning paralysis... what the fuck ask gary cohn !!! ACTION, mitigation on the fly. VISA BAN /ON !

Man i had to log in just to put you on ignore. The idiot gauge is just pegging with you



1297. Post 34651150 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.52h):

Quote from: jojo69 on April 14, 2018, 01:36:18 AM
oh shit

it's on

Well that explains the earlier bump



1298. Post 34655349 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.52h):

Quote from: jojo69 on April 14, 2018, 03:52:43 AM
carbs man, it's huge

the problem is beer

You bite your tongue!  Angry



1299. Post 34802791 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.52h):

Quote from: Icygreen on April 16, 2018, 02:26:16 AM
Even if parts of bitcoin were centralized, we'd still achieve trust and a degree of transparency which is light-years ahead of a legacy government controlled debt-slavery coin.  


Of course it's not 100% pure decentralization (whatever that would mean  Undecided) But currently bitcoin is the closest we can come to it



1300. Post 35364321 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.53h):

Ahh back to bcash i see, is Ver still burning transaction fees from the miners just so he won't have to buy them back when miners dump whatever they mine?



1301. Post 35440261 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.53h):

We only have 6 days left for my poll choice to be correct, can we step on it?



1302. Post 35442955 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.53h):

Quote from: Anon136 on April 24, 2018, 05:11:27 AM
Bcash is a fork. Bgold is a fork. These are forks of Bitcoin.
This is the least complicated thing ever. Roll Eyes

Let me be clear guys. I share your opinion. It is my opinion as well that bitcoin core is the real bitcoin. All I am arguing is that that is my opinion and not a fact that is in some way objectively valid.

In what fundamental sense is bcash different from bitcoin core that makes it the fork and not bitcoin core the fork of it? Bitcoin core has changed the consensus algorithm too just like bcash. We used to not have segwit enabled and bcash used to not have massive blocks. One isn't "the fork" they are each forks of the other.

#1 Ok, here is an argument for you then. When bcash forked, the market made a choice and declared bitcoin, bitcoin when the value stayed in bitcoin and did not transfer to bcash

#2 Here is another one, bcash changed the difficulty adjustment mechanism (block #478559) before bitcoin activated segwit (block #481824) and was therefore a fork of bitcoin at that instant. Then, even if you want to say segwit is not bitcoin, bitcoin forked from itself at block #481824 and then won the fork with itself and became bitcoin

Did I dumb it down enough for you?

I mean I hate doing this because it's getting really boring and I feel like everyone here should have just understood what I was saying by now but:

#1 So it's a democratic thing? Because I can tell you some of the value did go to bcash. So the fact that more went to core is what made it "the real bitcoin"? So if 51% had gone to bcash you would have reluctantly agreed that it was the real bitcoin? Even though ver's ideas are garbage? What if bcash slowly gains more and more and gets to over 50% in the future? Does it then become "the real bitcoin". If the value bounces back and forth back and forth between 49% and 51% relative to each other does the "real bitcoin" change every day as the value changes? Even if I don't go this route and accept your reason. Even if I allow that "the market decided" why does the market get to decide? You still have to say why. You can't just declare it. It just so happens that I agree with the markets decision however If ver's garbage vision for bitcoins future had won out in market capitalization after the fork I wouldn't have accepted it as "the real bitcoin" just because it had slightly more market cap. I would be here saying that core was the real bitcoin in my opinion even though it was slightly less capitalized.

#2 If that is a real reason, than you would have to say that you would call ver's version of bitcoin "the real bitcoin" if the roles had been reversed and core forked first instead of cash forking first. Are you really prepared to stand behind that?

Anyway I'm getting really tired of this and really annoyed that there isn't one single person to step forward to say that they understand what I mean. Even though I really do believe in what I am saying and I think that I have good arguments behind it even I am starting to feel like a troll at this point. So I think I am going to disengage from this pursuit.

On a lighter node. Screw lambos. I'm want one of these.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BsfgbHvuYRU



I think you have a valid argument, but you're arguing the wrong thing  Grin try changing the topic to defining what makes a chain "the real bitcoin" most likely you won't be able to agree on an objective definition of "the real bitcoin". If you can't define "real" you're wasting your time arguing which one is "real".

That brings me to my next point, i believe the concept of the "the real bitcoin" is subjective, i.e. my definition of ideal "real bitcoin" is most likely different from yours. For example, at this stage I tend to value long term decentralization exponentially higher above pretty much everything else, so my views align more with the core, thus for me bitcoin is the real bitcoin  Wink if i had 1 month to live with no heirs or Ver gifted me 1MM of those bcash things and i just had a concussion and was dropped on my head a dozen times as a kid and did wayyyy too many hard drugs and snorted glue and had brain damage and couldn't spell my name and (well, you get the idea) i might be yelling that bcash in the real bitcoin and try to pump it to the moon before cashing out at the fork.



1303. Post 35443629 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.53h):

Quote from: Icygreen on April 24, 2018, 06:05:24 AM
#1. Your scenario doesn't matter because that isn't what happened and it doesn't matter anymore, also, see #2
#2. If bcash had forked at the same block as bitcoin, you may have an argument as to which is which but it didn't so bcash is the fork. You can't change how it happened.

Jesus christ man. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socratic_method

Sure, I'll be that guy who says "Ok, I understand your line of questioning".  You want to debate hypothetically on events that did not occur and may never occur. What could usefully come of this debate? All I can see is it continues to create doubt and question in a seemingly decided market/community.  Although your questioning is very suspicious at the top of this BCH pump  Roll Eyes  I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and accept you may have been confused for a moment and aren't a troll.

Have you been listening to Vinny?  

Check out his registration date, if nothing else that deserves merit on its own! Seemed any opinion that even remotely questions the validity of bitcoin is aggressively attack. The short term daily price watchers can fuck off and let the Legendary account make an arguments, if he can't make hypothetical i don't know who can. And he's been around long enough that daily BCH pump timing shouldn't be a suspect  



1304. Post 35608712 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.53h):

Why hello Mr BTC2k bid whale at $8850 on Finex, you were missed



1305. Post 35851820 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.54h):

Quote from: bitserve on April 29, 2018, 06:47:09 AM
Are there bigger whales than Loaded?  I dunno.  You guys probably know.  

Yes... Suspected ones are the Winklevi, Barry Silbert, maybe even Ver (although I don't think so), maybe Josh Jones of Bitcoinbuilder, whomever is really behind Bitmain (probably not WU himself), etc....

Loaded could in fact be one of the above guys... who knows.

And if we look only at marketcap and also other coins, there's people like the Ripple guy, the other ripple+stellar guy (Jed McCaleb), etc...

Didn't Loaded get a lambo for BTC? And had his wedding on BTC? (not 100% on that) Ver dumped a bunch of his stash to prop up his bcash pet project that's constantly needs to bed fed 



1306. Post 36556787 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.54h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on May 07, 2018, 07:29:22 AM
Well, not seeing us testing $10k by mid-week at this rate.

Fuck.


Is BTC dead?



1307. Post 36937572 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.55h):

Quote from: TERA2 on May 11, 2018, 04:27:15 AM
So...where are we on the chart with the Swamp of Despair and such?

I want to see that we're past the worst at least Tongue
Yes. We could go to $1 now and it would still be bullish.

As long as the protocol is working its bullish



1308. Post 37020835 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.55h):

Quote from: bitserve on May 12, 2018, 12:29:31 AM
Notice Tim Draper begging CNBC for buyers hours before the dumps started? Thoughts?

Whales like Tim Draper can only sell OTC... If they would need to do it... which they don't because they are, well, whales.



OTC sales still hit the streets eventually. 8000 coins did this. Eight. Thousand. Coins. That's it. That's all it takes.

Yes, OTC sales indirectly influence the exchange price, of course. But I guess when one of those whales sell some significant part of their stash they do to someone they know it is in it for the long term. I don't think they just go to an OTC desk and blindly accept the first offer they get. I am just speculating though... but that is also how it works with high stakes in stock markets.

Also I don't think they usually sell during a more than 50% correction. They have all the time and money to wait for a better moment.

Kobayashi is a different story.... but he is not suppossed to sell any more BTC until after the civil rehabilitation issue gets decided on the court (september?).

Supply and demand, 'nuff said. Can't increase supply without moving the price and I don't care if you sell it OTC or to your neighbor's dog. Kobayashi was not supposed to have sold any more, but moving those BTC8k might indicate that he's not done selling yet. That spooked the market and now the possibility of all of the remaining BTC137k being sold is being priced in. Now have a beer and come back in 2021



1309. Post 37113358 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.55h):

Quote from: Torque on May 13, 2018, 01:11:28 AM

With a +7-10% buy premium, people will never use them though.


This is not true.  People will use them for the novelty of owning bitcoin, or for buying very small amounts.  Or because they don't have a better way to do it.

But I agree with the spirit of your post.  Until these things begin to become competitive they will stay in the general realm of being a novelty.

TBH I'm not sure what these Bitcoin ATM operators are thinking with having those premiums so high. I assume it's an attempt to recoup the cost of the ATM itself maybe? But they would do well to get those buy premiums down to at least 2-3%, otherwise people will just jump online to do it.

Guessing it's tailored for the silkroad crowd. That's still a thing right???



1310. Post 37222486 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.55h):

Quote from: realr0ach on May 14, 2018, 05:06:29 AM
I'm a bit salty so decided to make some Matzah balls


Matzah balls (Yiddish: קניידלעך‎ kneydlekh pl., singular קניידל kneydl; with numerous other transliterations) or matzo balls are Ashkenazi Jewish soup dumplings made from a mixture of matzah meal, eggs, water, and a fat, such as oil, margarine, or chicken fat. Matzah balls are traditionally served in chicken soup and are a staple food on the Jewish holiday of Passover.

The texture of matzah balls may be light or dense, depending on the recipe and the skill of the cook. Enthusiasts classify matzah balls as "floaters" or "sinkers".


Ummmm Roach you feeling alright? We're all happy that you finally decided to embrace your heritage but as usual i fail to see how it's relevant to this forum  Huh



1311. Post 37705855 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.55h):

Quote from: realr0ach on May 18, 2018, 06:03:11 PM
Psy Op.
Disruptor.
Divider.
'Tiss true rabbi botched it up so bad that i have to use girls bathrooms. But i switched my synagogues since then.

Wow well that definitely explains all of the hatred now!



1312. Post 37856233 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: TERA2 on May 19, 2018, 09:04:13 PM
This was one of the very first pumps I got burnt on in 2013 by Fontas.

Ha Fontas and the troll box. Whatever happened to him?



1313. Post 37880883 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: TERA2 on May 20, 2018, 03:29:26 AM
Ha Fontas and the troll box. Whatever happened to him?
In  late 2013 fontas' pumps kept getting shittier and shiiter. They degraded to a 2 hour period where he'd tell the troll box "pump starts now" and then "dump starts now" and you'd get this 2 hour bart chart. At some point he was selling memberships to learn about his pumps ahead of time for 25BTC each but by that time it was like a bad joke or a scam because his "pumps" were so terrible. He was supposed to make it up and have a super pump of litecoin on mtgox. Litecoin never opened on mtgox but then China took over and pumped it into the stratosphere way further than gox or fontas ever could have. I think he saw that with China on board with all the altcoins, he could no longer be in control, and he quietly disappeared. I saw him continue to make charts about other asset classes (like forex) on TradingView. I'm going to also guess that he wanted to distance himself from crypto for legal concerns and mixer his way out while he still could and the whole btce crime ring was still undercover and operational.

Ahh the old midas is coming with the LTC. Always thought that he was a scam, and the only one making money by offloading when "pumps are turned on". Oh well another page in cryptocurrency book



1314. Post 38126310 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: realr0ach on May 22, 2018, 05:26:48 AM
Donate to Keep Holocaust Memory Alive
https://give.ushmm.org/donate

Roach it'd be more relevant if you'd get them to accept donations in BTC. Why don't you start working on that?



1315. Post 38304612 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Fakoshi got upset and decided to liquidate?  Grin



1316. Post 38373636 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

 Shocked didn't realize that we crossed $1B in long leveraged on Finex back in December. And added $500MM around April. Now at $700MM  too aggressive those things can break a floor



1317. Post 38374983 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Oh https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-24/bitcoin-manipulation-is-said-to-be-focus-of-u-s-criminal-probe meh



1318. Post 38583945 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: bones261 on May 26, 2018, 04:44:14 AM

Interestingly, the first technology to be developed since the advent of fractional reserve banking that actually has a real chance of putting a stop to most of the double counting of reserve assets is... drum-roll... blockchain!

I'm sorry. I don't subscribe to your point of view either.  All I have seen in the 4 years in this cryptocurrency space is scam after scam and scheme after scheme. There is no salvation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPVpMxVn6mk


Ok what If I modify my statement a bit.

Quote
Interestingly, the first technology to be developed since the advent of fractional reserve banking that actually has a real chance is theoretically technologically capable of putting a stop to most of the double counting of reserve assets is... drum-roll... blockchain!

Would you disagree that it is a tool that is, at least in theory, capable of combating this in a meaningful way? If so, would you agree that it is the first technology that has ever been invented that is potentially capable of doing this?

The main reason that we see so much scamminess in this space is that blockchain is largely about censorship resistance, which is for the most part only needed by people who would be censored, and, big surprise, it turns out that a lot of the people who would have been censored are people who would have been up to no good. IMAGINE THAT! Anyway, just because that sort of thing is the lowest hanging fruit and so developed out first, I don't think this means that blockchain technology will never find legitimate use cases in safeguarding against scams (like the double counting of precious metals reserves).

4 years is not a long time, it is a flash in the pan.

Unfortunately, there is nothing to prevent someone from building a layer on top of a blockchain and issuing tokens that are supposed to be backed by deposits and then running a fractional reserve. (Many accuse Tether of doing just that.) Furthermore, blockchains have difficulty scaling. That is why BTC has resorted to the lightning network to attempt to address the scaling problem.

So BTC is a solution, but it's really not a solution because someone can come up with a different solution on top of BTC which wouldn't really be a solution at all, thus making underlying BTC not a solution. Think i got it. And then BTC is having problem scaling so that's why they introduced a scaling solution called LN. Did i get it right?



1319. Post 38587977 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: bones261 on May 26, 2018, 06:09:43 AM

Unfortunately, there is nothing to prevent someone from building a layer on top of a blockchain and issuing tokens that are supposed to be backed by deposits and then running a fractional reserve. (Many accuse Tether of doing just that.) Furthermore, blockchains have difficulty scaling. That is why BTC has resorted to the lightning network to attempt to address the scaling problem.

So BTC is a solution, but it's really not a solution because someone can come up with a different solution on top of BTC which wouldn't really be a solution at all, thus making underlying BTC not a solution. Think i got it. And then BTC is having problem scaling so that's why they introduced a scaling solution called LN. Did i get it right?

If the solution you want is to totally prevent people from running fractional reserves, then no, the blockchain is not the solution. Perhaps if you could cram all of the functionality onto the blockchain itself it may be a solution. However, when you try to cram all of the functionality onto the blockchain itself, you run into a scaling issue. You can get a blockchain to scale, but this always comes at the cost of the network being more centralized.

Oh ok i think you cleared it up now, but just to make sure, so it's impossible to cram every possible functionality in any system, and it's also impossible to prevent a derivatives market based on any underlying asset. And since BTC exists in our faulty universe BTC is burdened with the restrictions that apply to every other system. Thus we draw a conclusion that BTC is a failed experiment and will die? I believe the scientific name for this argument is 'R0ach logic'



1320. Post 38589107 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: bitserve on May 26, 2018, 12:12:17 AM

Oh please. the way banknotes started in the first place is merchants wanted to store their gold at a bank, rather than lugging it around themselves or setting up their own fort and small militia to protect it. Then they were issued a piece of paper, a banknote. When the bankers discovered people were using the banknotes like money, they discovered a way to loan people paper and run a fractional reserve. It doesn't matter what medium you use as money. Someone is going to find a way to put them self in the middle and exact their usurious fees. Or just plain use force or stealth and outright steal your bounty.

Interestingly, the first technology to be developed since the advent of fractional reserve banking that actually has a real chance of putting a stop to most of the double counting of reserve assets is... drum-roll... blockchain!

Except not even exchanges are currently using that "feature".

Thanks to blockchain exchanges could be already guaranteeing they don't run fractional reserve. It would be as simple as this:

- Every exchange user is given a "unique private identifier".
- Every day, the exchange publish a balance sheet that comprises a listing of all UPI's and its individual balances. The total is the minimum amount of reserves the exchange must control to prove absence of fractional reserve "banking".
- Simultaneously the exchange publish a listing of addresses which individual balances (can be checked on their respective blockchains for accuracy) sum, at least, the total needed. Obviously they sign a timestamped code with those addresses to prove ownership.

- Individual users could check their balances are included and accounted for in the balance sheet.

... But not a single one exchange is still doing this. Wonder why.....


Because since fiat reserves cannot be verified in this manner, you're going through all this trouble to only verify 50% of your reserves. Meaning they can still theoretically run 50% fractional reserve but now you'd have that warm comforting feeling that those number mean something that they really don't.



1321. Post 38589810 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: realr0ach on May 26, 2018, 12:20:49 AM
Did you guys know that now you can ask rabbi a question at https://www.chabad.org/asktherabbi/default_cdo/jewish/Ask-the-Rabbi.htm
and they also accept BTC donations at https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/2444289/jewish/Donate-Bitcoins.htm

Good roach it's like you're almost relevant in this form!



1322. Post 38590784 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: bitserve on May 26, 2018, 06:54:49 AM

Oh please. the way banknotes started in the first place is merchants wanted to store their gold at a bank, rather than lugging it around themselves or setting up their own fort and small militia to protect it. Then they were issued a piece of paper, a banknote. When the bankers discovered people were using the banknotes like money, they discovered a way to loan people paper and run a fractional reserve. It doesn't matter what medium you use as money. Someone is going to find a way to put them self in the middle and exact their usurious fees. Or just plain use force or stealth and outright steal your bounty.

Interestingly, the first technology to be developed since the advent of fractional reserve banking that actually has a real chance of putting a stop to most of the double counting of reserve assets is... drum-roll... blockchain!

Except not even exchanges are currently using that "feature".

Thanks to blockchain exchanges could be already guaranteeing they don't run fractional reserve. It would be as simple as this:

- Every exchange user is given a "unique private identifier".
- Every day, the exchange publish a balance sheet that comprises a listing of all UPI's and its individual balances. The total is the minimum amount of reserves the exchange must control to prove absence of fractional reserve "banking".
- Simultaneously the exchange publish a listing of addresses which individual balances (can be checked on their respective blockchains for accuracy) sum, at least, the total needed. Obviously they sign a timestamped code with those addresses to prove ownership.

- Individual users could check their balances are included and accounted for in the balance sheet.

... But not a single one exchange is still doing this. Wonder why.....


Because since fiat reserves cannot be verified in this manner, you're going through all this trouble to only verify 50% of your reserves. Meaning they can still theoretically run 50% fractional reserve but now you'd have that warm comforting feeling that those number mean something that they really don't.

Being able to verify they are not running fractional reserve on crypto alone would be a great advantage. Also, FIAT funds can be proved by a signed and stamped bank statement. It could be forged yeah.... but, anyways, the FIAT reserves of the exchanges, being stored in bank accounts, are ALREADY being subject to fractional reserve by the banks itself Wink

Do you really not think an exchange that proofs daily that they have all the crypto they are suppossed to have would not be a big improvement to current system?

I'm an exchange, you deposit BTC100 with me and r0ach deposits his 2643940 shekels. I buy a lambo i mean get "hacked" for BTC50. I go to another exchange and purchase BTC50 with roaches 1321970 shekels. And at the end of the day i can still provide verifiable proof that i hold BTC100 which corresponds to my balance sheet. Yay for false sense of security!! Partial audits are pretty useless. Now this possibly could work on those crypto only exchanges, that's the future we hope to have one day

Edit: Oh and i also go to another bank and take a loan out for 1321970 shekels, and deposit it in the first bank and provide a legit statement of the full 2643940 shekels in the first bank. Never mind my 1321970 shekel liability to the 2nd bank. Unfortunately fiat is untraceable thats why all the drug cartels, pimps, and war lords use it, would be awesome to replace it with something better 



1323. Post 38591509 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: bitserve on May 26, 2018, 07:07:07 AM
...
It's not only for "security". As soon as you are not running fractional reserve on crypto you are not lowering the price of it. It's ok to me if every (or any, for starters) exchange is forced to proof they hodl the real btc balance. And as I said, it could also be complemented with a bank balance certificate of FIAT funds in the "traditional" way.

See my edit above



1324. Post 38592648 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: bones261 on May 26, 2018, 07:10:21 AM

Unfortunately, there is nothing to prevent someone from building a layer on top of a blockchain and issuing tokens that are supposed to be backed by deposits and then running a fractional reserve. (Many accuse Tether of doing just that.) Furthermore, blockchains have difficulty scaling. That is why BTC has resorted to the lightning network to attempt to address the scaling problem.

So BTC is a solution, but it's really not a solution because someone can come up with a different solution on top of BTC which wouldn't really be a solution at all, thus making underlying BTC not a solution. Think i got it. And then BTC is having problem scaling so that's why they introduced a scaling solution called LN. Did i get it right?

If the solution you want is to totally prevent people from running fractional reserves, then no, the blockchain is not the solution. Perhaps if you could cram all of the functionality onto the blockchain itself it may be a solution. However, when you try to cram all of the functionality onto the blockchain itself, you run into a scaling issue. You can get a blockchain to scale, but this always comes at the cost of the network being more centralized.

Oh ok i think you cleared it up now, but just to make sure, so it's impossible to cram every possible functionality in any system, and it's also impossible to prevent a derivatives market based on any underlying asset. And since BTC exists in our faulty universe BTC is burdened with the restrictions that apply to every other system. Thus we draw a conclusion that BTC is a failed experiment and will die? I believe the scientific name for this argument is 'R0ach logic'

Did I ever state that BTC is a failed experiment? Or is that what is implied whenever someone dare states that the blockchain and BTC are not the end all be all solution to everything.  Cheesy

Well, since you kept using straw men logic i figured i'd throw an obvious one as well in case you cannot counter any other points i make. BTC has many valid attack vectors. Like centralization, why not use that and propose solutions to improve miner decentralization instead of your silly attempts at claiming that it can be used at running fractional reserve. Where bitserve literally just outlined how BTC part can be easily audited in few simple steps.

Edited



1325. Post 38837206 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: realr0ach on May 29, 2018, 04:52:27 AM
You can donate to Jewish National Fund here https://www.jnf.org/donate
Who thinks that i should take up a crusade and dedicate all of my free time to get them to accept BTC instead of trolling this forum?

Good for you roach something constructive to do with your free time and might help BTC



1326. Post 38837386 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: Robin,Hood on May 29, 2018, 04:50:26 AM
...going flat for expended period of time is not healthy...

That's not true. Nothing wrong with flat (or even declining) hashrate as long as decentralization of miners improves or at least stays constant.




1327. Post 38837600 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: RoomBot on May 29, 2018, 03:11:23 AM
By the time 9am NY time rolls in, we may be firmly below $7,000. The market is just shit right now.

BeeCash is already under $900   Grin

There's always a silver lining.

Yep high BTC prices is the only thing keeping bcash alive. When miners start cost cutting bcash would be first on the chopping block. Wish i shorted it at the 32GB blocks hype. The implosion and race to bag dropping should be spectacular!

Edit: BTC is at 40%



1328. Post 38838609 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: Anon136 on May 29, 2018, 05:29:51 AM
...going flat for expended period of time is not healthy...

That's not true. Nothing wrong with flat (or even declining) hashrate as long as decentralization of miners improves or at least stays constant.

Meh. A more decentralized high hash rate is more resistant to centralization pressures than an equally decentralized lower hash rate.

True but a major BTC miner going offline/bankrupt and its equipment being resold through the courts would cause a hashrate drop but potentially increase decentralization  Grin

But ultimately once the Moore's law hits ASICs i do foresee a flatter hashrate charts.



1329. Post 38845972 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

BTC2300 in bids till $7k on Finex, looks like its hodling for now



1330. Post 39020720 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.57h):

Quote from: nanobtc on May 31, 2018, 04:08:20 AM
Uh, realdoll.com has been around for over a decade. Not my cup of tea, and there's plenty of copies now.

Don't forget the repair kit.

I'd hate to be the guy providing on site support for this.



1331. Post 39192414 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.57h):

Quote from: FractalUniverse on June 02, 2018, 07:03:36 AM
Ok, which one of you ordered the large green dildo ?

I'll have two or three on weekly chart, please Grin

Well this is refreshing



1332. Post 39533457 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.57h):

Quote from: Torque on June 06, 2018, 03:37:41 PM
The Mining Hardware Wars... oh it's on like Donkey Kong!

https://twitter.com/ynakamura56/status/1003908868114509824

Finally some way overdue competition. Bitmain's monopoly coming to an end and hopefully so is the funding for their bcash side project.



1333. Post 39771071 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.57h):

Finex leveraged longs are still at $700MM Cry i wanna see them under $500MM. Can we absorb $200MM sell off?



1334. Post 40017196 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.58h):

BTC Dominance: 40  Grin

Can we get a new poll, at which price point will the miners run out of spare funds to support bcash?



1335. Post 40178686 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.58h):

Quote from: BitcoinOCD on June 15, 2018, 02:51:32 PM
Hi I’m new here . Who the fuck is this roach geezer . What a complete asshole. Why does everyone put up with his shit?
Edit:weeeee
our legendary troll.
did you just create new account for asking this here? or are you him?  Cheesy
Yes a new account . No I’m not him . I’m also known as bitcoinpsycho

There's an ignore button next to his/her name that's been clicked more times than google.com and also on anyone that quotes him/her



1336. Post 40196109 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.58h):

Quote from: gentlemand on June 15, 2018, 07:17:33 PM
https://www.omniexplorer.info/search/330e1d253fe93c44cd8c64635c8742cfe0bb4fe9b5435b4d22a02345d1c9f513

Looks like someone still believes in USDT, namely its creators.

I'm not following the whole USDT drama, to me it's just like another alt/shitcoin, i.e. if anything, people would try to escape into BTC when it crashes. Of course it can take down some exchanges, but if you keep your BTC on exchanges thats the risk that you're taking



1337. Post 40199200 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.58h):

Quote from: gentlemand on June 15, 2018, 08:11:11 PM
I'm not following the whole USDT drama, to me it's just like another alt/shitcoin, i.e. if anything, people would try to escape into BTC when it crashes. Of course it can take down some exchanges, but if you keep your BTC on exchanges thats the risk that you're taking

It may be unfashionable to think it, but I don't really believe there is one any more. Even if at one point it was money out of thin air, and there's no proof either way, they've likely earned it back now.

It's going to be a forever mystery I reckon that's rolled out every now and then for a quick scare.

Again, so if someone created some airTokens and managed to find someone else to sell their BTC for these tokens, i fail to see how crashing airTokens would effect anyone besides the airToken bag holders (not counting indirect effects of failing exchanges and overall negative publicity from people not capable of differentiating between airtokens and BTC)



1338. Post 40496832 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.58h):

Quote from: Searing on June 19, 2018, 05:07:42 AM
Just realized that Bitcoin's hash rate is up +100% since January 2018 and around +25% since May as well as +15% from two weeks ago.


That's a nice hashrate miners. Those are some nice ASICs.

It would be shame if someone...

changed...

the algorithm.

It's not going to happen, so I don't know what your point is except to bring up something that is not going to happen?

not to be an ass...but actual question...I read someplace a month ago, actually the claim that miners need about $6,600 usd to make profit mining ..this

was for the majority of big BTC miner halls...IF, the price dumps (see LTC) and there is an overabundance of ASIC miners (see LTC) is it not possible that

it could get so bad or centralized (see LTC Bitmain) that perhaps this could be the case? I used LTC as an example ..which is not exactly fair, in that they have

many pow-scrypt coins effected in this manner, not just Bitcoin forks....but there has to reach a point in price vs mining...where it could be you just could NOT

mine coin at a price without having to change algo?

anyway, probably not explained right, but you get the direction...what would it take to change algo on BTC? (if any)



The miner's break even price point speculation is as accurate as top/bottom calling. No one knows and it's different for each miner. As far as algo change, that's a nuclear option, and like the real nuclear weapon just having it is enough of a deterrent. That option was floated when Bitmain got too ballsy and tried to corner the market with their asicboost. Community responded with UASF and segwit to level the playing field. That worked to a degree, Bitmain went to spin off bcash, and we didn't have to use the algo change. Long term, Moore's law will hit and the playing field will level out. Until then it'll be a bumpy ride, but should get smoother with everyday.

As far as being forced to do it, that's very unlikely for BTC. That's how they used to kill shitty alts, throw a ton of hash power at an alt, wait for difficulty adjustment and then drop off, reducing the hash+increasing difficulty resulted in increased time between blocks to the point where alt was unusable, and rest of the network would have to mine at a loss until next difficulty adjustment. The insane hashrate of BTC makes it very unlikely and cost prohibitive. Plus this move would be offset by the market increasing their transaction fees which would make mining more lucrative  again.



1339. Post 41128089 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.59h):

Quote from: jbreher on June 29, 2018, 06:19:24 AM
So even if you have some skepticism of segwit, it might be prudent of you to support the actual (rather than hypothetical) direction of bitcoin by storing a portion of your coins on segwit, even if, you decide to follow through and store the vast majority in legacy addresses

All right, I'll bite...

What about storing some value on a segwit address is prudent?

Wait you're seriously one of those that are willing to pay higher transaction fees because you fear that segwit will be unraveled? I mean 30% of all of the transaction have been segwit for quiet some time now, i'm willing to bet that vast majority of coins touched segwit at some point in their life. Like it or hate it segwit is here to stay and you have to be next level delusional still trying to preach spend by any mantra



1340. Post 41758875 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.00h):

Ohh finally the supply is coming from longs deleveraging! Finex longs are down by 100mil in 1hr, won't be long now  Cool



1341. Post 42007403 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Is faketoshi going full billionaire at the mem pool?



1342. Post 42306042 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Quote from: jbreher on July 16, 2018, 05:33:56 PM
Looking forward to some quality Schnorr FUD from Jbear and crew.  

I don't know why you'd think that. I don't believe I have previously espoused an opinion on Schnorr sigs.

You basically said Schnorr signatures would do nothing to alleviate the scaling issue. That would qualify as an opinion.

Hmm. I guess you know more about my past postings than do I. Link?

Schnorr can obviously reduce the size of txs that have multiple elements. I wouldn't say that is 'nothing'. If this be shown to be a reversal of a previously held opinion, then so be it.

Of course, my final opinion would be driven by an analysis of not merely the benefits of Schnorr, but also its costs.

edit: Oh - I see you've added the link. Thank you. I shall quote:

Quote
Currently it would take over 30 years to send each person on earth a single Bitcoin transaction. Think about that.

Lightning does nothing to alleviate that.
Segwit does nothing to alleviate that.
Schnorr sigs does nothing to alleviate that.

True enough. If you wish to send every person on earth a single Bitcoin tx (e.g., perhaps to open an LN channel), it will take on the order of three decades. And Schnorr indeed does nothing to alleviate that. It is a true statement, and it is not identical to "Schnorr signatures would do nothing to alleviate the scaling issue".

Your assertion is shown to be false.

And if that each person wanted to make just 32 transactions to different people bcash would need 30yrs to process that. Think about that!



1343. Post 42321061 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Quote from: jbreher on July 16, 2018, 06:16:41 PM
And if that each person wanted to make just 32 transactions to different people bcash would need 30yrs to process that. Think about that!

I have thought about that. Today, that is indeed the case. Or even maybe longer - as 32MB is the currently supported max, which is subject to miners' decisions to create blocks smaller than max.

Which is, of course, why there has been discussion within the BCH development community -- for as long as there has been a BCH -- on other orthogonal approaches to scaling.

So while true today, it will be false for some value of 'tomorrow'.

In the meantime, BCH is not suiciding itself for the sake of some illusory benefit of 'decentralization' along some axis that is entirely irrelevant.

Orthogonal? You mean like side chains! WTF that wasn't in Satoshi's white paper!!!
Wait so you're saying that different solutions might come in the future so time and resources are better spent on near term issues rather than arbitrary usages cases for the whole population! You're so cute with your flawed logic, i bet your tears will taste sweet



1344. Post 42328988 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Quote from: jbreher on July 17, 2018, 04:06:09 AM
And if that each person wanted to make just 32 transactions to different people bcash would need 30yrs to process that. Think about that!

I have thought about that. Today, that is indeed the case. Or even maybe longer - as 32MB is the currently supported max, which is subject to miners' decisions to create blocks smaller than max.

Which is, of course, why there has been discussion within the BCH development community -- for as long as there has been a BCH -- on other orthogonal approaches to scaling.

So while true today, it will be false for some value of 'tomorrow'.

In the meantime, BCH is not suiciding itself for the sake of some illusory benefit of 'decentralization' along some axis that is entirely irrelevant.

Orthogonal?

Yes. Do you understand the term? In this case, meaning scaling in a manner unrelated to the max block size.

Quote
You mean like side chains!

Sidechainy things are within the universe of things being discussed, though certainly not exclusively, nor even leadingly.

Quote
WTF that wasn't in Satoshi's white paper!!!

Point?

Quote
Wait so you're saying that different solutions might come in the future so time and resources are better spent on near term issues

In a manner of speaking, yes. Time tested engineering principles focus on the bang-for-the-buck solutions. Always.

However, it is not 'might come'. We know of several scaling solutions orthogonal to increasing the max block size. The discussions underway are focused upon cost/benefit analysis. Or alternately risk/benefit analysis. You know - the essence of engineering.


Reread that ^ few times, and then read your initial troll post about it taking 30yrs to transfer BTC to every human on earth. And then try really really REALLY hard to continue to troll as if you don't see the parallels



1345. Post 42489284 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Quote from: fabiorem on July 19, 2018, 03:23:32 PM
This is... interesting. Updated once a day I guess.

https://tittyticker.com/

Human female udders clad in brassieres, displaying a daily price.

How revolting.


Should be bottoms when the price is falling.

Give this man a medal!



1346. Post 42714200 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.02h):

Well hello there $7700 hope you're not planning on sticking around for a while



1347. Post 42823536 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.02h):

Quote from: mymenace on July 25, 2018, 03:12:53 AM
Can't we all just get along? Or at least take it to IRC?

<Donut[AFK]> HEY EURAKARTE
<Donut[AFK]> INSULT
<Eurakarte> RETORT
<Donut[AFK]> COUNTER-RETORT
<Eurakarte> QUESTIONING OF SEXUAL PREFERENCE
<Donut[AFK]> SUGGESTION TO SHUT THE FUCK UP
<Eurakarte> NOTATION THAT YOU CREATE A VACUUM
<Donut[AFK]> RIPOSTE
<Donut[AFK]> ADDON RIPOSTE
<Eurakarte> COUNTER-RIPOSTE
<Donut[AFK]> COUNTER-COUNTER RIPOSTE
<Eurakarte> NONSENSICAL STATEMENT INVOLVING PLANKTON
<Miles_Prower> RESPONSE TO RANDOM STATEMENT AND THREAT TO BAN OPPOSING SIDES
<Eurakarte> WORDS OF PRAISE FOR FISHFOOD
<Miles_Prower> ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND ACCEPTENCE OF TERMS

Bring out the regulation and control to shut them the f#$k up  Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin
Imagine if it was a group colluding to do this to someone who is protecting children
that would be disgusting would it not
Future proves past


So how did it go everyone

does

Future prove past



Still under $20k  Angry so no lambos yet



1348. Post 42828050 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.02h):

Quote from: Anon136 on July 25, 2018, 04:21:27 AM

A scamming scumbag.

Roger emailed Bity threatening to remove them from their website (bitcoin.com) if they don't start offering Bcash.

Bity response; no one uses Bcash in Switzerland...

Gets a few hundred million and turns into an egomaniac. He may be a big fish in this pond but the dude is a guppy on the global game of thrones. He doesn't seem to have any idea just how small he is compared to people with, not just wealth, but wealth that comes as a byproduct of real power. If he did, he wouldn't act like such an arrogant asshole all the time. I wish he would just fall into the ocean or something so I would never have to see his smug face again.

*edit* I know it's stupid. I should say something more substantive. But the way he speaks and acts bugs me more than any other human being alive. That perfect mix of autism and narcissism is like a cheese grater on my senses. Angry

/rantoff

The players are known, the cards have been dealt and he doubled down. So at this point he has no option but to play out his hand i.e. continue doing what he's doing. The crappy part is bcash's funding (life support?) comes from Ver's BTC reserves and Bitmain. Unfortunately both benefit when BTC goes up, so unless BTC crashes hard or trades sideways for a very long time, the funding to prop bcash will continue to pour in.



1349. Post 42957318 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.02h):

Them poor poor bears  Cry



1350. Post 43688969 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.04h):

Quote from: mymenace on August 08, 2018, 05:32:12 AM
Looks like Dodgy Roger and his cronies is doing a runner

Some people are going to be pissed

Huge swings, willybot, fake news - Yep we seen this before

and the whales win, while everyone stands around arguing


Their ability to prop up bcash directly correlates to their profit from bitcoin.



1351. Post 43689368 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.04h):

Quote from: Searing on August 08, 2018, 04:39:29 AM
ah..sh*t and even 6600 for BTC.....

well, hell it is only $$$ right? FML (sob!)

but with August being lite on volume....the bots and such are gonna have a frigging field day....it seems....

(crypto...too much drama....want some plain boring news...it is like a crypto soap opera

gossip/anticipation of ill gotten gains (etf) ...sh*t....

still going with my original view on the next 2-4 years...EVERYTHING is going down 50% crypto, stocks, house, etc...I myself

see a pretty good recession coming down the pike..my only hope is 1) btc is dumping now rather than later when stock market

chokes 2) a normal recession is a 20% pull back..me I'm expecting 40% deep recession..thus my 50% it GONE viewpoint...

3) should really consider at this point in time being a 'minimalist' sell crap on ebay for btc low prices..if right SCORE...if wrong

hell less crap so its a win/win...


frigging silly hairless primate humans running around hooting and panic'ing and tossing 'poo' ...(metaphorically speaking with FUD)...

frigging amazing we have not blown ourselves back into the stone age yet....(get me off this planet!..I wish to defect!)

and now we are at 6,550..per btc ..the fun never ends here

brad

I know that you (Searing) and I have had several back and forth communications (both publicly on this thread and a few PMs, too), and currently, I am thinking that part of the explanation why you (and this seems to apply to a few others in this thread too, like Rosewater) tend to get more nervous about downfalls in the BTC price, as compared with me, is that you are looking at the downfall in BTC price as a loss of value to you, because you are focusing on the fiat value.

Of course, I understand that the fiat value is important, especially in the long term, but I think that I can distinguish myself from you partly based on my attempting to view the opportunities to increase the number of my BTC.  Yeah, I am not the only one like this, and there are a few of us who might still be a bit bummed out that the overall fiat value of our holdings is becoming less, but several of us attempt to make lemonade out of these lemons by buying BTC with the dips ... and really if we go to $6k or below $6k, this is going to be like the 4th time that BTC price is visiting these price territories.. .Sure, BTC price could break below $6k (and even below $5,777 which is currently the lowest price for this correction cycle), but nonetheless, we are doing good, no?

Can't we buy some more BTC?  Can't we attempt to appreciate buying opportunities (even if we are a little bit bummed out because our price direction preference remains, UP)?


yeah, just venting but for one point....there is NO legit reason I can see for the fall but FUD....usually, there was more to a fall then

FUD or upcoming 'supposed' stuff like the ETF...thus the bottom is not in yet...thus annoying....myself it is also 'bot city' I hope

due to August and low volume...kinda  prefer the days when an exchange would f*ck up ...at least i had the illusion of 'why' the price

dumped (or pumps) for that manner

on my side of the fence however I have more than enough ..even if btc hits $1k again to stay in my retired state till full retirement

at 65 years (my work IRA gets me the last way home till full 66 years....even if I have to eat all crypto...also 65 medicare kicks in)

thus I'm golden (compared to most folk) ....but again, up till Jan of 2018 ..I had the 'illusion', even as an expected bubble that I

had a grasp of what the heck is going on (mining/equip flips/etc) er...now NOT SO MUCH...not handling 'humility' well.

But again, above is a 1st world problem, I can deal with, no more working for someone no matter how this plays out moon or tulips.

so I bitch and moan....again, mostly on the 'illusion' of the past that I had a handle on something with BTC and crypto..er now

not so much Smiley

brad


Just people wanting to make a quick buck. Half a billion USD in leveraged longs just on Finex salivating for the moon while paying daily interest. Market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent.



1352. Post 44049798 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.04h):

Quote from: babanana on August 14, 2018, 04:20:35 AM
This is all Bitmain. The biggest whale. Can turn market wherever direction it wants to.

Feel the wrath of Bitmain!

Whale?  Undecided
According to their pre-IPO deck (has it been confirmed? proudhon??) they went from BTC36.877 in Dec to 22.082 in March. That's 3months or 90 days. That means they're burning through BTC164 per day ((36877-22082)/90) at this rate they'd have enough for 134 days (22.082/164)  that would last them till August 12th  Kiss thnx for playing



1353. Post 44051454 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.04h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on August 14, 2018, 06:50:07 AM
They have asic miners on almost all coins, disclosed and covert. I can only imagine the control they have on the entire crypto space.



Fuck em. History will show we broke Bitmain with UASF.  And we can do it again.  

We should all fire up our full nodes as a show of force.


<------ Just take another look at my "Personal Text"



1354. Post 44104872 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.04h):

Quote from: jbreher on August 15, 2018, 03:55:13 AM
Even more disappointed re: the drop in BCH value. Though I've been buying, so I have more net BCH.

How do you feel about Bitmain holding Satoshi-plus sized bags?

I'll admit, I am conflicted.

I worry about one entity holding that much value.

OTOH, it reassures me that Bitmain has such a large commitment.

I know the local narrative is that Bitmain shit the bed on this. I can see several ways, however, that this works out well for my position - in working out well for Bitmain. Time will tell.

 Roll Eyes

I know wouldn't it be 2x better if they held twice as much!? And 10x better if... That's how these things work right? A shame that they're running (ran?) out of BTC to sell in order to continue propping it up.



1355. Post 44104909 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.04h):

Quote from: goldkingcoiner on August 15, 2018, 04:41:27 AM

Fair enough that there is "speculation" involved, but there is a difference between gambling and investing and you seem to be very inclined towards the gambling side.

You can make a lot of money in bitcoin as long as you develop investment (rather than gambling) strategies that are likely to pay off quite well in the longer run 5 years plus (and maybe even less than that). 

No no, it was gambling at the start. That was a couple of years ago. After that I started learning about the indicators, self taught how to read candle charts and so on. And yeah I lost money like an idiot and that was not fun because it was gambling. But now I enjoy making money because its speculation. I prefer to keep an eye on RSI( Outdated I know- but if used correctly, still a good indicator)

My favorite tool is stochastics combined with bollinger bands. Basically I wait for the outbreak while securing a stop loss limit. And once the outbreak is in, I keep a close eye on MACD and MFI. Works like a charm most of the time. If you have any strategies to share I would appreciate it!

HODL, next question.



1356. Post 44105581 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.04h):

Quote from: mymenace on August 15, 2018, 04:47:01 AM

Anyone factor in what happens when btrash goes bust?

It's a chance to corner BITCOIN market, i'm sure it won't be hard to find some companies to throw few millions/yr at it to keep it at 1-5% of BTC. Kinda like playing lottery on a corporate scale, chances are practically non existent but payoff is h'UUGE!



1357. Post 44106790 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.04h):

Quote from: mymenace on August 15, 2018, 05:12:19 AM

Anyone factor in what happens when btrash goes bust?

It's a chance to corner BITCOIN market, i'm sure it won't be hard to find some companies to throw few millions/yr at it to keep it at 1-5% of BTC. Kinda like playing lottery on a corporate scale, chances are practically non existent but payoff is h'UUGE!

Yes but i believe Roger will fall before it happens, how quick he would have to gain more favours is lessening each day



Roger is a PR face that Chinese miners need, plus he also has his own vested interest in it so it's a win/win combo for them. Is 1-5% of BTC a fall? Think BITMAIN can sustain that and continue to cater to outliers, and position themselves as a "hedge" to diversify into for idiots whenever BTC rallies. China has deep pockets maybe they decide to go with 1GB blocks and China will bank roll them, who knows



1358. Post 44421462 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.05h):

Quote from: Anon136 on August 20, 2018, 05:51:18 PM
{hate speech} as per usual.
SPEECHLESS .. Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry SOBs..!!!!! and that was back on August 4th.. !!!!!!!!!!!! WOW  Angry Angry... Again, Speechless...

Quoting the roaches racists shit is a "ignorable" offense, FYI.

Using the lefts weaponized language isn't much better.

Only i'm pretty sure it is exponentially better.



1359. Post 44436367 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.05h):

Quote from: Anon136 on August 21, 2018, 01:26:23 AM
{hate speech} as per usual.
SPEECHLESS .. Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry SOBs..!!!!! and that was back on August 4th.. !!!!!!!!!!!! WOW  Angry Angry... Again, Speechless...

Quoting the roaches racists shit is a "ignorable" offense, FYI.

Using the left's weaponized language isn't much better.

Hah!, I don't even know what that is!

ADDED: Is that like the dark state or something?

I just don't read all that Q shit.

"hate speech"... it's a phrase cooked up by alinskyites to delegitimize and deplatform their political opponents without actually addressing the content of their message. It's like saying "conspiracy theorist" or "denier" instead of skeptic. It's politically weaponized language. I don't know if roaches claim is true or not, but if it is true than there certainly isn't anything wrong with speaking truth. Except for being off topic of course. So if you really wanted to attack it than you should attack it on the grounds of being either untrue, unimportant even if it were true, or off topic. Not on the grounds that it's "hate speech" which is basically saying "shouldn't be allowed because it makes me feel neggies" (coining that word right now, means like feeling negative emotions, but in a sarcastic making fun of snowflakes kinda way).

I'm not defending roach here. Just things like "hate speech" or "conspiracy theorist" are almost as annoying as euphemisms like "people of color" or "undocumented immigrant". Grinds my gears you know.

Anyway I don't want to go down a rabbit hole here in this thread so we should go elsewhere if anyone wants to pursue it further.

Some people are just beyond help and shouldn't be engaged. Flat earthers, scientologists, and roach are just going for publicity or trying to brainwash people. Engaging them just makes them feel more righteous and legitimizes them. Sort of like if i wanted to start spreading a belief that everyone who doesn't agree with me is a zombie controlled by squirrels that live deep deep underground. And don't you dare call it a conspiracy!



1360. Post 44485227 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.05h):

i see lots of green



1361. Post 44898561 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.06h):

Quote from: STT on August 30, 2018, 12:34:06 AM
The modem thing blows my mind because anyone who has been around longer then a decade knows the internet used to be slow as hell.   Australia especially, their internet sucks so I dont understand that exactly.
  All I guess there that makes sense is he just used university internet and didnt have much interest beyond that like the codec revisions to normal telephone usage.  But he is interested in crypto protocols somehow, seems a bit off.   How can he be the age he is and not recognise 27mb is a very big file to transmit for the old technology.   Thats not even a crypto question, how long has he used computers for


The BTC price is below 50% tracement level for the last peak to trough decline.  Lows are the 50 DMA area just beaten.   7500 area would be good resistance and 38% of the larger May to June peak into decline move

And never had a home DSL/cable lines back when speed was crap? So the guy who doesn't know the difference between bits and bytes convinced the idiot big blockers that big blocks are safe? Everything seems to check out, nothing to see here.

On a separate note, i agree with Vitalik's statement. If he somehow pulls a clown out of his ass and proves that he's real Satoshi, instead of thinking how great he is, at this stage, people will just realize how dumb Satoshi was. Which is good in a long run, BTC doesn't need saints In Math We Trust! not In Satoshi We Trust



1362. Post 44954916 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.06h):

Ryan X. Charles : "Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto"

https://twitter.com/ryanxcharles/status/1035322235983159296


Can we pretend that this is true, and realize that Satoshi (however great his initial vision was) is not a god, and currently has no influence over the current version of BTC.



1363. Post 44956475 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.06h):

Quote from: Ibian on August 31, 2018, 04:48:50 AM
Ryan X. Charles : "Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto"

https://twitter.com/ryanxcharles/status/1035322235983159296


Can we pretend that this is true, and realize that Satoshi (however great his initial vision was) is not a god, and currently has no influence over the current version of BTC.
Nope. We don't trust, remember? We verify.


The irony is that CSW becoming Satoshi would get more people to verify and not to trust Satoshi vs if say Pope came out as Satoshi then people would definitely just blindly follow.

So this is really ingenious, Satoshi proves himself to be a babbling idiot, and then come out as real Satoshi! An ultimate lesson that people shouldn't trust but verify even if it is Satoshi him/her/them/self



1364. Post 44958436 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.06h):

Quote from: Rosewater Foundation on August 31, 2018, 05:47:32 AM
It's a false dilemma. CSW doesn't have to be Satoshi to realize Satoshi wasn't a god. In fact, it's a really stupid thing to say. Who is this fuck-monkey anyway, and why are his twats relevant?

Well whether you like it or not that's pretty much how the world currently works for majority of people. They tend to follow whatever narrative person with perceived authority tends to say, cause you know verifying stuff yourself is like work and such.

In any case i'm just glad that they forked off, and now it's like watching a train wreck from the side. Regardless, whichever side looses would probably start dumping bcash first, which would kinda make them a winner as they'll at least be able to recoup some of their losses.



1365. Post 45097144 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.06h):

Quote from: crypmike on September 02, 2018, 05:05:33 PM


Where is this data coming from? Finex shorts are at BTC56k ($403MM @ $7200) 47% longs are $455MM or 53%

https://www.bitfinex.com/stats



1366. Post 45144357 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.06h):

Quote from: crypmike on September 02, 2018, 07:41:48 PM


Where is this data coming from? Finex shorts are at BTC56k ($403MM @ $7200) 47% longs are $455MM or 53%

https://www.bitfinex.com/stats

I dunno exactly, but https://blockchainwhispers.com/bitmex-position-calculator/

Looks like a random number generator by a site trying to sell financial advise.



1367. Post 45158989 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.06h):

Quote from: Osamede on September 03, 2018, 08:03:19 PM
There are currently a lot of shorts being placed on bitfinex at the moment, 50 percent increase after tether printed some 100m $ to bitfinex, I see these shorts being liquidated in the coming days and it's going to push the price of bitcoin to the 8500 to 9000 range before mid-month

Why are all of these new accounts start spreading FUD about highest shorts all of a sudden?  Undecided

Longs $467,971,392.10 ~53%
Shorts BTC56,544.60 $412,775,580 ~47%

https://www.bitfinex.com/stats



1368. Post 45159034 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.06h):

Quote from: Resumean on September 03, 2018, 10:23:26 PM
BTC vs ETH
 


So he took off his shirt but then still managed to get it in the water with him brilliant!



1369. Post 45159154 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.06h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on September 03, 2018, 05:37:53 PM

Really hope that’s true. It would definitely be bullish for the price of bitcoin.


Kinda checks out with my maths

Quote from: DaRude on August 14, 2018, 06:26:11 AM
This is all Bitmain. The biggest whale. Can turn market wherever direction it wants to.

Feel the wrath of Bitmain!

Whale?  Undecided
According to their pre-IPO deck (has it been confirmed? proudhon??) they went from BTC36.877 in Dec to 22.082 in March. That's 3months or 90 days. That means they're burning through BTC164 per day ((36877-22082)/90) at this rate they'd have enough for 134 days (22.082/164)  that would last them till August 12th  Kiss thnx for playing



1370. Post 45172010 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.06h):

Quote from: bones261 on September 04, 2018, 04:55:54 AM

Only ~280k BCH have been mined since the end of March. Plus, they have stopped only accepting BCH for their equipment. Also, they now have competitors that are putting out better equipment then they are putting out. I doubt that they have accumulated 1.2 million BCH. They are strapped for cash and it does not appear their IPO is going to go over very well. I really doubt that they are in any position to attempt to buy more BCH. However, BCH has a few more billionaires who probably do have the resources to bolster the price of BCH. I'm afraid antminer's days are numbered unless they can get something going their way ASAP.

Ok your math checks out.  So the increase in BCH from Dec 31 to March 31 is ~162,00 for mining.  214,000 - 162,000 leaves 52,000 acquired by other means.  Hardware sales of 52,000 x $1500 average price = $78 million in sales in first quarter?  I don’t know if that is realistic or not.

this is a good article on the topic. they made a good deal of BCH from sales of ASICs. https://medium.com/@btcWolves/a-bch-update-bitmain-bch-the-ipo-what-it-all-actually-means-354220b86ac3

Bottom line the trend is clear, their BTC reserves are going down and bcash reserves are going up. Only one of those two is sustainable. And trends point to their BTC piggy bank already being exhausted. I'd love to short that turd on day one if they actually find enough idiots to carry them into IPO with those books. (How about we dump $10MM into illiquid market that we control thus bringing up our pre-ipo market cap by few billions! genius! Now who wants to buy these?)

Can't wait for the news, first blockchain IPO flaps on the opening day and "bitcoin" will die one more time



1371. Post 45412047 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.06h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on September 09, 2018, 03:41:33 AM
I’m going long if we get under $6k.  


We will, and then subsequently below 5K, and then perhaps another rise before the next trap. Sub 2200-3K in our future. There will be many more short term trading opportunities during the next 5 months.

The major pattern relies on the halving. Reward-Drop ETA date: 22 May 2020 02:07:54 https://www.bitcoinblockhalf.com/
Bottom predictably in around Feb-March 2019.

By all means BTFD, but also plan on a longer accumulation time, you will have 12-13 months worth of accumulation time before we reach this level again. These are my opinions based on 5+ years studying the patterns of many crypto currency markets and understanding the math and fractal patterns associated with markets.
You could always just go with Roach's plan of Exter's Pyramid and place gold as the end all of investements; or was it silver now as the better investment strategy?



Meanwhile edityou can everyone else can stare at my balls...






Nope there's war in bcash land. Wars are expensive and all sides are sitting on sizable BTC stashes which they're liquidating to fund their little war. Get some popcorn enjoy the fireworks, BTC is just getting a bit of an aftershock from the nuclear blast that about to go off in bcashlandia, the silliness should end in November after they strangled each other, as in either case the looser will start dumping their bcash reserves



1372. Post 45413954 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.06h):

Quote from: sammy007 on September 09, 2018, 05:13:48 AM
Everyone has been extremely bearish. Could be a bullish sign, as Theymos mentioned.

At any rate, I can't imagine us going below $3K.

LOL, I am pretty convinced this shit is going sub 1K. Years from now and it will be remembered as a scam of the century, it actually is, admit already that all you are waiting for here is just new bunch of idiots with student loans. No difference with 2014-2015, but this time it will never hit even 10K.

But what if i'm waiting for retailers to start accepting bitcoin so i don't have to loose money on FX every time i go to starbucks outside the country i live in? Then your whole presumption kinda falls apart doesn't it?



1373. Post 45414320 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.06h):

Quote from: babanana on September 09, 2018, 05:25:37 AM
Everyone has been extremely bearish. Could be a bullish sign, as Theymos mentioned.

At any rate, I can't imagine us going below $3K.

LOL, I am pretty convinced this shit is going sub 1K. Years from now and it will be remembered as a scam of the century, it actually is, admit already that all you are waiting for here is just new bunch of idiots with student loans. No difference with 2014-2015, but this time it will never hit even 10K.

BITMEX IS AN SCAM EXCHANGE

We all thought bitfinex is evil and doing disservice to bitcoin, but Bitmex is worst. We should avoid bitmex.
It will be the end of bitcoin.
That exchange will squeeze every penny you have.
Hayes greed is insatiable. Look at that face. Damn greedy bastard.

Bitmex is scheming and scamming all traders there. Now it control significant amount of bitcoin and look at what its doing to the crypto community.
Even lunch money will be stolen from you by that greedy hayes.

We need to stop bitmex now. or else its death for bitcoin.

Ohh noes! You mean bitcoin will die?? Good thing we never had an exchange go under before, or bitcoin would be long dead!



1374. Post 45517728 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.07h):

56,1% dominance!  Grin



1375. Post 46209418 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.08h):

Quote from: kingcolex on September 26, 2018, 09:24:25 PM
The fuck does their Ipo have to do with a huge reliance on a complete shitcoin that can bankrupt them? Call me confused.

Bitmain has been bcash's life support from the beginning, and they started to run out of bitcoins to support bcash. Going IPO means they're raising more capital, which they'd undoubtfully burn to continue propping up bcash.



1376. Post 46819127 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.09h):

Quote from: Elwar on October 13, 2018, 04:32:32 AM
I'm not sure what is going on ATM. Something weird is afoot.

Bitcoin is crashing. We're all going to die. Time to start acquiring a taste for canned dog food. Practice this phrase: "do you want fries with that?".

Full billionaire mode is on  Huh stocking up on cash in preparation for that bcash fork in november, there's only one way they can fund their games



1377. Post 47132867 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.10h):

Quote from: xhomerx10 on October 21, 2018, 04:44:31 AM
I don't know how some of your guys stumble upon your avatars but it's getting really difficult to find the remaining few I need to complete the set. 
 
 Case in point: poolminor

https://pikabu.ru/story/seksologiya_dlya_detey_5245732

 I don't judge, I just make hats.

 


 Avatar-sized




And here i thought that his avatar can't get any more disturbing, i stand corrected



1378. Post 47268405 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.10h):

Quote from: xhomerx10 on October 25, 2018, 05:37:35 PM
yow  @XhomerX give roach a HAT to
one especially for him, we all know you can create something awesome SIZED TO ANYBODY ....... a HAT with donkey ears or something  Roll Eyes

 He probably wouldn't wear a hat with donkey ears and a silver hat didn't look right so...



 Avatar-sized




edit: fixed avatar image (forgot to flatten layers before exporting)


It'd be more appropriate on a yamaka or a rastafari hat



1379. Post 47413142 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.11h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on October 30, 2018, 06:03:05 AM
Standing on a jet ski, the horizon is 2.5 nm away.  

So 15 nm is 6x over the horizon.  You will want to be able to navigate in fog / dark / squall on both inbound and outbound.

Also you will need to be able navigate coral channels in fog / dark.


So why some places don't allow jet skis?



1380. Post 47448594 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.11h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 31, 2018, 02:02:58 AM
NYC subway. Nice advice, what is 'doors' though?



What is "crypto?"  Does it include bitcoin?  What percent?  Why not just say "invest in bitcoin"?  What would be defective about saying "invest in bitcoin"?  Sounds like misinformation and a distraction to me.

I can only guess that some biased media's (Republic in this case) already have an instructions on Bitcoin mentions as a 'brand' which could compete with some government(banks) blockchain future projects.

The similar case in China:



Anyway I think it's a good thing, random subway rider will search 'buy crypto' and Bitcoin will pop up first.

I am NOT saying that no advantages will come to Bitcoin from various kinds of general "crypto" advertising; however, I am NOT going to lower myself to that level of cowardice, and I am going to continue to rant and rave when I see folks using those kinds of general terms.  

An additional point remains, as well, that those of us who are investing in bitcoin, and not getting distracted by the general "crypto" and "blockchain" references are going to profit immensely from both the disinformation and the distractions that people continue to have in their investments into shit coins and shit "crypto" projects merely because they don't know how to differentiate the value of bitcoin.  

In other words, I am not going to participate in such bullshit misinformation, even though I (and other folks who are largely focusing on buying, HODLing and accumulating BTC) am very like to profit from all the dumb (or "mislead" may be a more charitable adjective) people out there.

Just the next phase in life petro, cryptoruble, cryptodollar (tether lol?), cryptoyuan, cryptorupee etc... are sure to follow. Think they call it the bargaining stage?



1381. Post 47477301 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.11h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on November 01, 2018, 05:49:18 AM
... in gentle loving way or a sick, perverted abusive kind of way?

 Perverted abusive and kinda kinky taboo fun type-of fucked with.

 Shits getting all weird with this sideways flatline this afternoon.

 I don't like it.

Two more weeks of this... bcash wars aren't cheap and we have lunatic BTC billionairs going after each other there.



1382. Post 47501586 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.11h):

Quote from: RivAngE on November 01, 2018, 09:34:25 PM

I can't even open it because it requires me to register an email so that they can brainwash me keep me informed of the economic situation!

Edit: Nevermind, for whatever reason it opens from PC but requires email in the mobile version of the page... Too lazy atm to check if I had done something stupid!

First fake email didn't work "You recently requested access to Morgan Stanley Research, but we were not able to verify your account using the email address you provided. To rectify this issue, or if you did not request access, please call our Client Services hotline at:" that's as much effort as i'm willing to put into it



1383. Post 47526896 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.11h):

Quote from: jbreher on November 02, 2018, 06:27:52 PM
WAY better than nothing. Though "portfolio cash value" is not the same as USD Fiat on deposit. It could be all on Tesla stock for what we know or any sort of high risk high yield investments.

The portfolio may even be in the form of Tether!

Quote
P.S.: Also one single signature from some UNIDENTIFIED person and not even an official bank seal..... It's almost comical when you are certifying almost 2 Billion USD.

For reals, dude.

"USD Fiat on deposit" is nothing if you don't know their debts. i.e. money could've been borrowed for a day and deposited to the account short term just for the letter. Bottom line, it's most likely illegal and will always require trust in 3rd party. Those that don't know history are doomed to repeat it.



1384. Post 47533901 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.11h):

Quote from: bitserve on November 02, 2018, 10:12:11 PM
WAY better than nothing. Though "portfolio cash value" is not the same as USD Fiat on deposit. It could be all on Tesla stock for what we know or any sort of high risk high yield investments.

The portfolio may even be in the form of Tether!

Quote
P.S.: Also one single signature from some UNIDENTIFIED person and not even an official bank seal..... It's almost comical when you are certifying almost 2 Billion USD.

For reals, dude.

"USD Fiat on deposit" is nothing if you don't know their debts. i.e. money could've been borrowed for a day and deposited to the account short term just for the letter. Bottom line, it's most likely illegal and will always require trust in 3rd party. Those that don't know history are doomed to repeat it.

Yes. It doesn't say anything about liabilities. That being said I don't think it is that easy for a shady crypto exchange to obtain a (nowhere near) 1.8Billion short term lending at *ANY* cost. The risk of those founds being frozen "in transit" are HUGE. So it must probably be theirs OR the bank is in it OR everything is fake.


What if it's a photoshoped document all together, don't think banks are legally allowed to confirm it to outside parties? Anything outside of full audit by big four is pretty useless, so why bother



1385. Post 47661847 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.11h):

Quote from: jbreher on November 07, 2018, 04:59:34 AM
On the other hand, if you moved your bitcoin from the old addresses, but you never claimed your bcash from those old addresses, then those old addresses would be bcash fork eligible.

Well, unless you've had those transactions replayed on the BCH chain. In which case: too bad, so sad.

'Youze been played, sucka!'

Then both coins would be at the new address. But BCH has replay protection so that wouldn't happen



1386. Post 47825459 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.12h):

Quote from: Elwar on November 12, 2018, 06:55:09 AM
Was roach right all along? Time to read Mein Kempf?
You should read Torah regardless. Those who don't learn from the past are doomed to repeat it.

You can skip Torah.  A much better, modern discussion of the 'The Jewish Question' and why i have my insecurities is a Tanakh by Kevin MacDonald. my penis is very very small too:


<img>What if I told you jpg</img>

That everyone who wants to manipulate a bunch of people to attack their enemy must first convince people that their enemy is not human.

It has happened throughout history with every culture that has gone to war.

Guess what? All humans are humans. Even <insert your leader's enemy here>

Except for r0ach, there's no way it's not a raspberry pi with a short list with jew hating PM pumping templates  



1387. Post 47825788 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.12h):

 Roll Eyes

I got him on ignore but betting there's an 80% chance there's jew hating rambling or 20% chance of buy silver bullion RIGHT MEOW! template above



1388. Post 47851120 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.12h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on November 13, 2018, 05:02:44 AM
I enjoy the bCash drama these days.

CSW owns more than 70% of the hash...ohh the irony Tongue

70% of 9% = 6.3%

Thinking bitmain owns a lot more which is currently on the bitcoin network. Plus doesn't bitmain own 1MM of bcash? Can't wait for them to start shit slinging and offloading each others bcash versions. But something is telling me that Jihan's finances are not as good as CSWs


PS: Is roach hating Jews or pumping silver above?  Roll Eyes



1389. Post 47871853 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.12h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on November 13, 2018, 08:23:50 AM
If anything I see the BCH fork as bullish for bitcoin. People are presumably going to either cash out their shit fork coin to fiat or/and convert it to bitcoin.

I think we’ll see the bitcoin price go up on the day or a few days after their fork.

Well bcashABC and bcashSV is a closed system, so them exchanging their alts for each other, from the outside, is a zero sum game. Now the big question is inflow/outflow from the outside capital. Do you expect the loosing side just simply watch as they're loosing or do you think they'll try to put up defense and prop up their side? Both sides have their reserves in BTC, so i don't think it's unrealistic to expect them to burn through their BTC stashes to support their side. That's why after the fork the sum value of both chains is usually higher than the initial chain, as both sides brought in outside capital to prop up their visions. I think CSW already proved that he's willing to burn money on hash rate when mining his useless chain, and i don't believe he's a complete idiot, so he'd also need to prop up the value of his chain at some peg as well. But i believe that was already going on as both sides were planning for this and have been gradually cashing out their BTC in preparations for this event. Thats why BTC has been trading sideways for last few months.

But in any case this is good news for BTC, the more those geniuses reduce their BTC stashes fighting each other the more irrelevant they become to BTC.

tl;dr  maybe a bit more short term sell pressure on BTC while both sides deplete their BTC reserves in the last battles of the bcash war



1390. Post 47901914 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.12h):

Quote from: theymos on November 14, 2018, 06:04:14 PM
"Craig Wright says he has an exploit to take down Bitcoin (BTC) by end of 2019. Does he? Or all talk?"

https://youtu.be/4TOnHAlI_Vg

WTF? I hope it's just Craig Wright talking out of his ass...

CSW's whole thing is to exploit how people tend to believe that things aren't total lies. So when he says he's Satoshi, people think "Well, I don't believe he's Satoshi, but maybe he knew Satoshi". Or "He failed to destroy BTC with mining power like he said he would last year, but maybe he still actually has a bunch of mining capacity hidden away somewhere." Or "There's no technical way for him to irrecoverably screw with SegWit transactions, but maybe he found some bug somewhere."

But really he's completely full of shit; the vast majority of claims he makes are complete lies from front to back. (And often just a tiny bit of research will make this obvious.)

He found a bug that no one has yet found and somehow he's confident that no one will find it in the next year so he can exploit it at the end of 2019? Anyone taking him seriously needs to get themselves checked. He's just doing a power grab and trying to make himself as power full as possible to minimize his losses and this retarded move. I mean you burn tons of BTC to CryptoRaid bcash  Huh congrat now you got bcash with even less of support than before  Undecided



1391. Post 47902199 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.12h):

Quote from: serveria.com on November 14, 2018, 06:14:06 PM
Uncle Craig is about to dump bitcoin to $1k!
https://twitter.com/ProfFaustus/status/1062751765601361923



At least he's a nice guy, wishing us all a nice day.


A nice day for mass suicides.


What he really was trying to say is that miners should avoid mining BCH or else... DOOM?  Grin Grin Grin WTF?

Anyhow, I see lots of cheap coins, stock up gentlemen and get ready for the inevitable launch soon  Cool



Just gonna leave this here

Quote from: DaRude on November 13, 2018, 06:24:51 PM
If anything I see the BCH fork as bullish for bitcoin. People are presumably going to either cash out their shit fork coin to fiat or/and convert it to bitcoin.

I think we’ll see the bitcoin price go up on the day or a few days after their fork.

Well bcashABC and bcashSV is a closed system, so them exchanging their alts for each other, from the outside, is a zero sum game. Now the big question is inflow/outflow from the outside capital. Do you expect the loosing side just simply watch as they're loosing or do you think they'll try to put up defense and prop up their side? Both sides have their reserves in BTC, so i don't think it's unrealistic to expect them to burn through their BTC stashes to support their side. That's why after the fork the sum value of both chains is usually higher than the initial chain, as both sides brought in outside capital to prop up their visions. I think CSW already proved that he's willing to burn money on hash rate when mining his useless chain, and i don't believe he's a complete idiot, so he'd also need to prop up the value of his chain at some peg as well. But i believe that was already going on as both sides were planning for this and have been gradually cashing out their BTC in preparations for this event. Thats why BTC has been trading sideways for last few months.

But in any case this is good news for BTC, the more those geniuses reduce their BTC stashes fighting each other the more irrelevant they become to BTC.

tl;dr  maybe a bit more short term sell pressure on BTC while both sides deplete their BTC reserves in the last battles of the bcash war

Translation he underestimated ABC's power and over estimated his. Now he needs to burn more BTC than he expected to prop up SV. Any day CSW cashes out of BTC is a good day!



1392. Post 47903032 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.12h):

Quote from: jbreher on November 14, 2018, 05:59:11 PM
So you back the SV camp?  

I have a slight preference for the SV branch of the fork, this is true. Emergent consensus on the block size, restore the original opcodes, eliminate churn of pie in the sky, dev driven, so-called 'innovation' with no proven value (more properly, 'lets throw it against the wall, and see if it sticks'). Check.

I could have lived with the ABC fork, probably. At least it would be free of The SegWit Omnibus Changeset trojan. But what with 'benevolent dictator' calling for preparing an emergency PoW change... just no fucking way.

Quote
Personally I think Monero is much closer to "Saatoshi's Vision" than anything CW has anything to do with...

I think you are way past cracked out. I like Monero as well. But I have no delusions of it being anything near closer to satoshi's vision. Make the case for me?




1393. Post 47903326 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.12h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on November 14, 2018, 07:03:33 PM
So all of this crash was because 2 guys and some more are fighting on twitter over hash power? Ridiculous market.

Can you explain why the whole market is dropping because of a coin that no one give a f about it? A coin in which two children are fighting lol

The children are selling vast amount of their many bitcoin’s to keep up their shit show

...which is long term great for bitcoin!



1394. Post 47911412 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.13h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on November 15, 2018, 02:05:58 AM
yep.....looks like Craig Wright has gotten his way and will soon be in control of Bitcoin Cash after taking over more than 51% of the BCH network.

Absolute fucking lulz.

I have to imagine Roger Ver is literally in tears at this moment.

Babies are dying, etc...

Unless he really has BTC1MM (or whatever will be left after fighting ABC) and is actually insane enough to believe he can take on BTC i really don't see his end game. So Bitmain will unload their 1MM in bcashSV to him, and if we to believe that he already has 1MM in bcashSV that'll put him at over 2MM+ in bcashSV. A shitcoin with even less support than bcash and a ton of enemies WTF is he planning on doing with that?



1395. Post 47911777 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.13h):

Quote from: ImI on November 15, 2018, 02:27:01 AM
yep.....looks like Craig Wright has gotten his way and will soon be in control of Bitcoin Cash after taking over more than 51% of the BCH network.

Absolute fucking lulz.

I have to imagine Roger Ver is literally in tears at this moment.

Babies are dying, etc...

Unless he really has BTC1MM (or whatever will be left after fighting ABC) and is actually insane enough to believe he can take on BTC i really don't see his end game. So Bitmain will unload their 1MM in bcashSV to him, and if we to believe that he already has 1MM in bcashSV that'll put him at over 2MM+ in bcashSV. A shitcoin with even less support than bcash and a ton of enemies WTF is he planning on doing with that?

His view is quite obv imo:

He builds a better product than the rest and therefore generates demand. If Reddit, Twitter or Bitcointalk like him or not won't be decisive for success or not.

Now you can obv disagree if the markets will agree with him or not or if he really will have a better product but you asked for his "plan" and here you go, that's his plan. 



Hmm so bcash needed those insane capital injections just to be at 7% after a yr. Even if he is so delusional, and believe that his product is so much better he must realize the resistance thats building up, the spam, the DDoS, pissing off a bunch of ABC devs etc... I mean he twitted himself that he'll have to dig into his BTC reserves just to take over 51% of bcash which is at 7% of BTC, he seems to be struggling to raise ~4% of BTC hash as is



1396. Post 47911897 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.13h):

Quote from: kingcolex on November 15, 2018, 02:38:14 AM
yep.....looks like Craig Wright has gotten his way and will soon be in control of Bitcoin Cash after taking over more than 51% of the BCH network.

Absolute fucking lulz.

I have to imagine Roger Ver is literally in tears at this moment.

Babies are dying, etc...

Unless he really has BTC1MM (or whatever will be left after fighting ABC) and is actually insane enough to believe he can take on BTC i really don't see his end game. So Bitmain will unload their 1MM in bcashSV to him, and if we to believe that he already has 1MM in bcashSV that'll put him at over 2MM+ in bcashSV. A shitcoin with even less support than bcash and a ton of enemies WTF is he planning on doing with that?

His view is quite obv imo:

He builds a better product than the rest and therefore generates demand. If Reddit, Twitter or Bitcointalk like him or not won't be decisive for success or not.

Now you can obv disagree if the markets will agree with him or not or if he really will have a better product but you asked for his "plan" and here you go, that's his plan.  


Step 1 pretend Satoshi, Step 2 buy big into fork while cheap step 3 use some of the personal funds to intimidate during fork, Step 4 control shitcoin and pretend it's new Bitcoin Step 5 be richer than at step 1

Nah this power move is definitely costing him a lot! In fact since he pretty much controls every aspect of SV it doesn't even makes sense for him to keep the value of it up and let Bitmain cash out. It'll be cheaper for him to keep the miners running but let the price crash, not much goodwill left to be lost to justify propping the price



1397. Post 47914951 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.13h):

Quote from: blacky90 on November 15, 2018, 05:08:49 AM
Is Craig Wright really satoshi nakamoto?
If so, he could send bitcoin price down to 1000usd Embarrassed

This is scary...


Whether he is or not is really irrelevant, no one really cares about him, what's important is if he has access to Satoshi's private keys. The thing is, the market would crash hard the second a single satoshi is moved, on top of that he'd probably drown in lawsuits the second he tries to move that satoshi. So assuming his alleged BTC1MM holdings (most likely much less -lawsuits -bcash fork costs), at $1k it would require $1billion to completely buy him out of BTC and let him go play in his SV sandbox. This would be the ideal solutions as it's better to take a hit now and remove the risk at this stage. Which sort of baffles me, because of such high amount he knows his holdings are illiquid so buying up another mil from Bitmain + other ABC holders would make bcashSV so toxic no one with brain would touch it, regardless how great his ideas might be.

If he has the keys the SV fork should go smooth and he should be able to take over ABC easily with little effort. But I'm expecting his SV to be a failure which would just burn through cash (he's already cashing in BTC just to fork bcash) so he won't be able to sustain it for much longer, without tapping into those reserves.
But the most likely scenario is he doesn't have the keys, in this case he'd try to drag this game out as long as he possibly can trying to create as many controversies as humanly possible to try and stay relevant in this space.



1398. Post 47915036 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.13h):

Quote from: r1s2g3 on November 15, 2018, 05:25:47 AM
Can't wait until BCash SV gets forked. Wonder what they'll name it?

Bitcoin Cash.

Nah, that name's been taken.

BCash DEF? BCash XYZ? BCash 123? BCash Phoenix?  BCash SS (Slim Shady... get it?)

But then what if that too gets forked? Oh noes...it could go on, and on, and on, and...

BCash Phoenix.. LOL  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy..

Bcash fork is maybe bad for BTC.
instead of one, now we need to deal with 2 impersonator of btc.

No that's not how things work. bcash fork is amazing for BTC. The more those players cash out of BTC now the better it is for bitcoin



1399. Post 47935310 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.13h):

Quote from: qwizzie on November 15, 2018, 06:18:54 PM
so...can we all go home now?   I'm cold

i kinda wanna know the price impact...

now SV will probably go into war of attrition mode



1400. Post 47944289 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.13h):

Quote from: jbreher on November 15, 2018, 10:56:36 PM
It is interesting how close to a BTC difficulty change the BCH fork and hash battle is occurring however. Provocative.

Yes.  What a coincidence.  Go figure.

Even more provocative - ABC seems to be kept alive due to a black_hat/white_knight act of Roger. He has redirected 4 EHash of power on the Bitcoin.com pool from BTC to BCH.

Spicy!

Wait, are you trying to tell me that CSW's whole plan relied on Roger sitting by idly looking at his pool mining BTC while all of his work and savings in Bcash are destroyed because there wasn't enough hash to support Bcash? Seriously? Plz tell me you can come up with something better, i'll even take "This was his plan all along and he's just trying to outspend ABC long term" at least that'd be something, but don't try to feed me this BS! You're gonna get fired if you don't pick up your game  Angry



1401. Post 47949903 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.13h):

Quote from: bitserve on November 16, 2018, 07:45:34 AM
It is interesting how close to a BTC difficulty change the BCH fork and hash battle is occurring however. Provocative.

Yes.  What a coincidence.  Go figure.

Even more provocative - ABC seems to be kept alive due to a black_hat/white_knight act of Roger. He has redirected 4 EHash of power on the Bitcoin.com pool from BTC to BCH.

Spicy!

Wait, are you trying to tell me that CSW's whole plan relied on Roger sitting by idly looking at his pool mining BTC while all of his work and savings in Bcash are destroyed because there wasn't enough hash to support Bcash?

Of course not, silly. I'm merely forwarding actual information not yet entered into discourse here. What is _your_ contribution?

Though an autocratic redirection of BTC pool power without assent of all participants is kind of interesting in its own right.

More info in the Bitcoin Cash thread.

The "small" hashrate redirected by ANTMINER is probably their own. Bitcoin.com can redirect the hashrate at will as stated on its TOS AND also clearly publicly announced its intention to do so. We could try to argue about the details, the ethics or whatever... but in the end he (Ver?) did it because he CAN.

Everything went as (probably) expected and there were no surprises... obvious suspected bluffs from Wright side became factual bluffs.

Only a blind wouldn't expect that. In other breaking news, the sun has came up from the east today and appears to be settling in the west, more details at your 10o'clock news hosted by jbreher!

Anyone can show some numbers on how much it's costing CSW per day to keep that hash power on SV chain?



1402. Post 47951799 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.13h):

Quote from: bitserve on November 16, 2018, 08:07:58 AM
It is interesting how close to a BTC difficulty change the BCH fork and hash battle is occurring however. Provocative.

Yes.  What a coincidence.  Go figure.

Even more provocative - ABC seems to be kept alive due to a black_hat/white_knight act of Roger. He has redirected 4 EHash of power on the Bitcoin.com pool from BTC to BCH.

Spicy!

Wait, are you trying to tell me that CSW's whole plan relied on Roger sitting by idly looking at his pool mining BTC while all of his work and savings in Bcash are destroyed because there wasn't enough hash to support Bcash?

Of course not, silly. I'm merely forwarding actual information not yet entered into discourse here. What is _your_ contribution?

Though an autocratic redirection of BTC pool power without assent of all participants is kind of interesting in its own right.

More info in the Bitcoin Cash thread.

The "small" hashrate redirected by ANTMINER is probably their own. Bitcoin.com can redirect the hashrate at will as stated on its TOS AND also clearly publicly announced its intention to do so. We could try to argue about the details, the ethics or whatever... but in the end he (Ver?) did it because he CAN.

Everything went as (probably) expected and there were no surprises... obvious suspected bluffs from Wright side became factual bluffs.

Only a blind wouldn't expect that. In other breaking news, the sun has came up from the east today and appears to be settling in the west, more details at your 10o'clock news hosted by jbreher!

Anyone can show some numbers on how much it's costing CSW per day to keep that hash power on SV chain?

As a ballpark figure straight from my ass (could be as much as one order of magnitude off) I would say around $1 million a day. Not much..... And it is probably coming from Calvin's pocket mostly not CSW.

Unlike CSW, Calvin already left the door open to join the largest chain. The most probable outcome is that he will announce defeat in the next hours/days if SV keeps dropping in price and become economically unsustainable for him.

I'm getting a bit less than that. Before the fork bcash was trading at ~$450 so mining 1800 bch/day puts it at around $810k, so to 51% would require $405k, but looks like the hash rate doubled since they started the race, so that puts him back at around $810k/day.

Or to go about it the different way whats the going rate per exahash?



1403. Post 48502163 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.19h):

Huh and bcash SV is up 16% i wonder what's going on...
CSW actually might be the best thing to BTC in last year. He's managing to get himself and bcash crew out of BTC! Pull that bandaid off!

Both sides have savings in BTC so now it's a race of who can sell first for top dollar to prop up their alts. The sell off will be rushed, but so will be the recovery



1404. Post 48511883 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.19h):

Quote from: bitserve on December 07, 2018, 11:40:56 AM


Credit where it is due that narcissistic psychopath chose a great timing for his evil plan.

And the only ones that could do some powerful move to fucking send him back to his cave are not doing anything yet.

They need to dump their BTC to support their shitcoins, so why cash them out at $20k per their coin. Let them dump



1405. Post 49149428 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.25h):

Quote from: podyx on January 10, 2019, 06:50:30 AM
Did anything happen?

Heard Bitcoin just died  Cry



1406. Post 49466441 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on January 28, 2019, 10:56:59 AM


https://twitter.com/SoundMoneyz/status/1089216802100572161

another FUCK you @rogerver, sorry couldn't cover this F*** word, I hope you guys understand.

bcash just dropped to 6th place on CMC. A bit lower and it'll go bellow litecoin. Feels like someone liquidating a ton of BTC for cash, CW has been kinda quiet lately could he be filling up for the final push  Roll Eyes



1407. Post 49466542 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on January 28, 2019, 11:27:16 AM

Africa (the unbanked) is where we really need to push adoption. I guess the issue is not having the internet (wifi or 4G). Imagine if even 1 in 1000 people had a mobile phone & a BTC wallet or something.

Need solid lightning set up in place before true adoption, otherwise it'll be killed off again once someone decides to bump the fees to $10+ again



1408. Post 49494194 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: HeSoCo on January 30, 2019, 01:10:15 AM


Yep, working as designed.



1409. Post 49946310 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.34h):

Quote from: vroom on February 27, 2019, 02:20:20 PM

there are already some people complaining about lost funds. I don't question that this google spell check is a stupid move, but I don't understand how this should leak the private key? the google spell check is (hopefully) a https requests, which is encrypted. and google will not leak the keys for sure. so what did leak the keys?

he claims that someone at Google extract and used the passphrase after HTTPS decryption and not in between as I understand it.

Recap
To recap the events for further investigation:

  • My first passphrase attempt was sent to googleapis.com through Coinomi wallet was on 14th February 2019
  • Google’s employee or whoever has control over the data that are sent to googleapis.com processed the data that had my passphrase and that was between 14th and 19th February 2019
  • My crypto assets were stolen on 19th February 2019 starting around 3:30 am UTC and the transactions continued for 15 minutes. At the end 90% of the assets were gone and remaining assets were only left because these assets were supported by Exodus wallet but NOT Coinomi wallet (what a coincidence you say!)

Please note that I took all the security precaution to keep my passphrase and wallet safe. I have a separate isolated virtual machine for it with Anti-Virus/Anti-Malware and firewall installed. I also had other wallets on the same virtual machine for years. Nothing was stolen except for the wallet which I recently used my passphrase in, which is Coinomi wallet!

That would be a very bad publicity for google if this is true. It's also possible that the anti-virus/anti-malware software is the cause of this leak. they "open" encrypted https requests and look inside to search for possible threats.

Since when is google a bank? Since when it's a good idea to store your private keys in a cloud? How is this a bad publicity for google and not the incompetent wallet?



1410. Post 50111744 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

Can someone translate what this tables says?

https://twitter.com/Excellion/status/1104635332274749446

Wondering how much more they have left to liquidate at $4k



1411. Post 50181593 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.37h):

Quote from: infofront on March 16, 2019, 05:01:43 AM
Our family doctor is a muslim. I've been going to him since I was a kid. He hasn't tried to kill me yet.
Which doesn't change that muslim terrorists are a result of their religion and that so-called "peaceful" or "moderate" muslims side with them over us when they are forced to make the choice.

Perhaps.
I have trouble declaring an entire group as an enemy when only some of them are clearly at war.

Kind of like the jews. We all know jews have started or are deeply involved with almost every evil institution to come out of the west in the last 500 years. However, most of them are just living their lives like the rest of us.  

OTOH, I'm reminded sometimes of the "Rwandan Genocide". Hutus and Tutsis lived next door to each other. They had each other over for dinner, watched each other's kids, etc. But when ethnic tensions boiled over, they were hacking each other's families up with machetes.

Ha and what is a Hutu and what is a Tutsi? Social groups defined by Belgian colonists by the amount of cows one owns? Ethnic tensions between social classes defined by Catholic Belgian? Wasn't Hilter born a Catholic? Funny how one can easily structure any argument pretty much any way they want to a typical low educated reader. Roach/Ibian have countless posts attempting to justify their baby killing propaganda...on a BTC forum. Anyone with half a brain cell ignored them a while back



1412. Post 50181647 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.37h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 16, 2019, 05:22:32 AM
Our family doctor is a muslim. I've been going to him since I was a kid. He hasn't tried to kill me yet.
Which doesn't change that muslim terrorists are a result of their religion and that so-called "peaceful" or "moderate" muslims side with them over us when they are forced to make the choice.

Perhaps.
I have trouble declaring an entire group as an enemy when only some of them are clearly at war.

Kind of like the jews. We all know jews have started or are deeply involved with almost every evil institution to come out of the west in the last 500 years, etc. However, most of them are just living their lives like the rest of us.  

OTOH, I'm reminded sometimes of the "Rwandan Genocide". Hutus and Tutsis lived next door to each other. They had each other over for dinner, watched each other's kids, etc. But when ethnic tensions boiled over, they were hacking each other's families up with machetes.
"Some of them" are a product of "all of them" and have the support of the majority, silent or otherwise.

We simply can not coexist with them within the same culture. They don't want to, even if we did. Which we don't, not when they become numerous enough to enforce their will as per the above link.

Whether you are correct or not (actually I am giving you too much benefit of the doubt with your hate filled phoney baloney), why the fuck don't you get back to talking about bitcoin or at least attempting to make some points in this thread that relate to bitcoin.  Did you know what thread you are in?    So, anyhow, based on your 20 pages non-topical focus and your pissing off of a lot of active on-topic participants in this thread, including distracting from the topic, I think that it would be good if infofront would delete your last 20 pages of myopic baby-penis non-acceptance focused hatred posts... just to teach you a lesson that a little off-topicness might be o.k. and tolerable, but you are on an emotional based obsession, which likely alienates a decent number of people who are involved in bitcoin.. believe it or not there are some muslims of various levels of belief and practices and some are involved in bitcoin... jewish peeps, too..

At least Adam used to delete Roach when he got too out of hand, for some reason infofront is providing a platform for them



1413. Post 50191196 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.37h):

Quote from: infofront on March 16, 2019, 07:08:05 PM
At least Adam used to delete Roach when he got too out of hand, for some reason infofront is providing a platform for them

Infofront's got more of a life probably, just that. Often busy with his day job and always with his newborn. Personally speaking, I like his relaxed style. He does have a go at cleaning up once in a while. I agree roach and others are a nuisance with their slavering rants, so when things become uncomfortable we have that useful ignore button.  Grin

Thanks. I've been staying up with the thread, but not posting much.

The boring BTC action tends to nurture these side conversations as well. I don't personally find the discussion of Muslims going on here to be any more off topic (or offensive) than the discussion of mathematics that's been going on for several days.

Also, one thing I look for when determining if someone is trolling is the amount of engagement. Is the person just shitposting, or engaging in conversation? With r0ach, for example, it's often a mix of both.

So we're cool with providing platform to proposals for murdering babies and wiping out this or that class as long as some PM pushing is sprinkled along the way? cause you know not allowing someone to push their propaganda on a BTC forum would be like communist censorship and such  Undecided

My ignore list of people quoting idiots got to a point where i just see full pages of ignored users



1414. Post 50206743 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.37h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on March 17, 2019, 09:10:22 PM
Who is holding most BTC from WO family?
a guy called realr0ach has more bitcoins than all of us put together
he's not close family, more like the retarded inbred mountains-dwelling second cousin

It's actually very impressive, i heard he dedicates about 10% of his resources to troll the hell out of BTC in order to suppress the price and shake out the weak hands while he quietly accumulates. He actually admitted  buying at $10k, $15k, $18k and hodling till $19k while trolling everyone else.



1415. Post 50206800 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.37h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on March 17, 2019, 09:30:06 PM

https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1107366947199639552

It's like watching two titanics run into each other



1416. Post 50237349 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.37h):

Quote from: xhomerx10 on March 19, 2019, 12:17:56 PM
Can anyone tell me what this is? Not really related to anything other than it says a trip to the Moon on the case it came in. Seriously though..what the hell is it? There is a ongoing debate around the house as to its function. A microscope, a telescope and or a sextant have all been postulated and tbh I have never seen anything like it. While not precision made, it is quite sturdy and appears to be made out of some sort of brass. Looking through the optic sight there is not much magnification so I doubt its a telescope. Same for being a microscope, and it lacks the typical features of a sextant so I am at a loss. Another theory is that its just a fake steampunk sort of thing. Can the great hive mind of the Wall rescue me from this predicament?



The book Twyla Tharp indicates dancing.
The device looks like a portable magnifying device.
No compass or measuring on device. No compass. So not a scientific device.

I assume this would be used to view dancing when stuck in a skybox...
Or for a choreographer....
Maybe correcting eyesight only... so pre glasses

My guess....

 I believe it's art.  Critical 2018 was an art festival similar to the burning man festival.  The theme for 2018 was "A trip to the moon".

https://www.criticalnw.org/


If it's their product why not just email them and ask?



1417. Post 50346054 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):

Hmm i was hoping to see Bitmain go belly up before the next bull run



1418. Post 50402695 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.39h):

Quote from: kingcolex on April 01, 2019, 02:57:41 AM
Verified!
Hope we get to read through the submitted forms when the inevitable "leak" happens.

I am 100% sure there are a few non westerners putting in real data. So this may not be for the best.

They gotta learn somehow



1419. Post 50418567 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.39h):

This can get dangerous quick



1420. Post 50418682 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.39h):

And so it begins...



1421. Post 50420778 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.39h):

Quote from: kenzawak on April 02, 2019, 07:00:57 AM
WTF happened last night ?
Fuck, I'm torn. I've been waiting for this for a looong time but... I was also going to buy today !
What to do, what to do...

 Cheesy

We started the uptrend, someone big picked up on that and pulled the trigger hard. Expect others to follow unless this get dumped on hard. Or someone front running good news from Bakkt/ETF etc... Or honey badger



1422. Post 50422303 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.39h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on April 02, 2019, 10:16:27 AM


We won't need any of that today for the shorts



1423. Post 50435901 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.39h):

Quote from: nutildah on April 03, 2019, 06:00:02 AM
...
Incidentally, while BTC is up 14+% in the last 24 hours, BCH is up over 27% in the same time frame.

Bitcoin's rising tide lifts all altcoins, which tend to go up higher because they are considered to be more risky investments. This has always been the case. BCH and SV aren't rising on their own merits. I suspect they will continue to lose positions in the CMC ranking because their primary marketing tactic continues to be confusing newcomers into thinking they are "the real bitcoin." Its been a failure for them so far and there's no reason to believe that will change in the future.

Put yourself in the shoes of the average business owner who is still skeptical of cryptocurrency and is only beginning to consider adopting BTC for their business... Then along comes this chatter about how BCH and SV are better, and they look into it, only to discover that now they have to learn how to use and install 2 more wallets that aren't compatible with BTC, in the hopes that they will have customers who want to pay in BCH and SV. Largely, nobody still wants to pay in BTC, so there's little chance they're going through the hassle of bothering with coins that are not _actually_ bitcoin.

With "low" stagnant BTC prices bitmain doesn't have the profits to prop up bcash, so bcash was being priced to go bye bye into the night. Unfortunately BTC going up gives bitmain fatter margins to continue keeping its pet project afloat, so bcash shorts got burned this time around. Gambling on shitcoins being leveraged BTC will burn a lot of "traders".



1424. Post 50452180 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

Quote from: kenzawak on April 04, 2019, 06:44:03 AM
Ginko has done it again :

https://twitter.com/martik/status/1113037703774396416
https://bitcoinist.com/russia-bitcoin-kremlin-economist/



Moscow bought over 10% of all of the BTC in circulation? What clown think tank he claims to work for?



1425. Post 50469020 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

Quote from: bitserve on April 04, 2019, 09:58:29 PM
Can we just not let the arguing with jbreher polarize sides as if there was no middle more reasonable field?

Bitcoin is scaling the right way. But that doesn't mean it won't have a moderate and reasonable block size increase in the (near?) future.

L2 is the way to go, but block size will also need some (linear, not exponential as that's what L2 is for) capacity upgrade sometime.

and are we really just giving blockstream inc. a pass?

I am not sure what you mean. Some say blockstream wants to focus on L2 (something that I consider extremely important for scaling) and also that they won't ever allow a block size increase (something that I am not sure if it is just FUD, because that sounds simply stupid).

My point of view is that Bitcoin needs both L2 and a gradual blocksize increase, being L2 responsible for most of the massive scaling and block size increase enough to support L2 and bigger/not so frequent tx's directly on-chain.

Also I am pretty sure whatever is done need to be done via CONSENSUS. Other than that would not be Bitcoin, but just a worthless copycat (and we already have enough of those, don't we?)

No, just no. If you want to even consider the idea of BTC being the scale of say settling world's oil trades, your priorities need to be decentralization and security above all else! That needs to be built into the core design from the ground up, and current developers seemed to be aligned with that vision. If you're willing to compromise on those fundamentals "just a tiny bit" so you could buy your bubble gum on the blockchain right meow  Angry or being manipulated by that logic to unknowingly exert pressure on the developers for said compromise, you're on a wrong train.



1426. Post 50477778 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

Lol at Finex walls. BTC1200 bid @ $5069, and ~BTC1000 ask @ $5150 someone trying to corner the market? Oops i might be in a wrong thread



1427. Post 50487594 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

Quote from: lightfoot on April 06, 2019, 04:59:54 PM
A nice alternative of BitcoinWisdom.com: Cryptowat.ch
Thanks for the link. I use the Cryptocoin price index site, but I liked the quick clean interface of BW more. However it's been falling apart for awhile, guess the last API links finally dropped dead.

Such is change.

As was posted before give https://bitcoinwisdom.io a try



1428. Post 50506238 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

Quote from: jbreher on April 07, 2019, 11:30:20 PM

Blah blah blah larger block blah blah


You have bcash and bsv with larger blocks, go there you have options. What part of we don't want larger blocks is so hard to comprehend



1429. Post 50506274 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on April 07, 2019, 11:48:58 PM
Everybody discussing walls and prices ... bear shows up and shit dumps a bunch of bcash shitposts  Roll Eyes

anyhooo .... but check out that 2000 btc wall on bitstamp, don't see those very often anymore!

Is it gone don't see it, was it a bid or ask wall?



1430. Post 50507508 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

Quote from: jbreher on April 08, 2019, 12:22:22 AM

Blah blah blah larger block blah blah


You have bcash and bsv with larger blocks, go there you have options. What part of we don't want larger blocks is so hard to comprehend

Yeah, I get it. But some here seem utterly oblivious to the consequences thereof.

And you feel that you grasp full consequences of bcash and bsv and their unlimited blocks that you're shilling? You're just trying to exploit novices by highlighting some of the challenges that BTC is working on solving in an attempt to steer them into your shitcoins that put a bandaid on it and claim that it solves everything.



1431. Post 50507763 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on April 08, 2019, 04:06:33 AM
I know people are worried about Roach and Gemtits so I went and checked on them today at the nocoiner homeless shelter. They are of course broken people but at least they have food and a bed to sleep together on, just no wifi right now.  Cry

I told them its not too late to get jobs and buy coins and I gave them copies of the Bitcoin Standard. Maybe they will come around, who knows. Tards are gonna be tarded, sometimes thats just how it is. Kiss

Did you get their blood types? You know just for the record



1432. Post 50584580 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.41h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on April 13, 2019, 08:54:04 AM

Must suck to be Roger. Always picks the wrong side. Gox wasn't fine, Craig neither. Bcash isn't too. I am waiting for his turn to be destroyed just like happened to Craig.

When driven by wrong thoughts then yeah probably his time will come Wink


Think Andreas said something along these lines, but this is not a cult and we don't have gods or dieties. If for some magical reason he has the keys to Satoshi's stash it would speak less of Satoshi than more of CSW. Not like people will turn to SV even if he could prove anything. His best case is people starting to believe that Satoshi got brain damaged and turned into CSW, oh well current BTC will live on...



1433. Post 50584808 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.41h):

Quote from: nutildah on April 13, 2019, 10:53:50 AM
Think Andreas said something along these lines, but this is not a cult and we don't have gods or dieties. If for some magical reason he has the keys to Satoshi's stash it would speak less of Satoshi than more of CSW. Not like people will turn to SV even if he could prove anything. His best case is people starting to believe that Satoshi got brain damaged and turned into CSW, oh well current BTC will live on...

My immediate reply was going to be "won't happen, not a problem", but then I remembered I felt the same way about Trump winning the election. I guess the point is anything is possible, though its more likely that Mark Zuckerberg will be the next president.

The timing kind of bothers me, didn't he claim that the keys were locked in some trust till 2019 or was it 2020? But yeah most likely a PR stunt so the goal would be to milk it for as long as possible while trying to keep relevant.  (you know sort of like i'll reveal my taxes *after the IRS audit which has been ongoing for 30 yrs now)



1434. Post 50596741 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.41h):

Quote from: Olegya199 on April 14, 2019, 08:37:00 AM
The victory of the community!!!  The money to protect Hodlonaut from Faketoshi's lawyers is raised.  And much more than necessary.


He's not even being sued yet, too soon, just gives publicity to that damn PR stunt. Now CSW can claim that due to feedback from cryptoverse and to be a nice guy he won't follow through with the suit. Kinda jumping through his hoops, he ends up getting publicity he craves without his idiotic lawsuit ever seeing the light of day. Maybe he isn't that dumb after all  Undecided

Am i the only one who actually wants to see him try to prove that he's Satoshi in court?



1435. Post 50627391 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on April 16, 2019, 07:48:21 AM
Either Ayre knows something we don't, got conned, or he's preparing to break ties with CSW.



"This industry needs to grow up and Craig proving he is Satoshi is the only way past this Troll attack that is so bad for the industries reputation. He now has a duty to set the record straight for us all. The Trolls all know he is Satoshi hence the fear."

https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1117706922415853569

If Craig managed to convince Gavin that he was Satoshi what chance does a judge have? Looks like he's doubling down on proving to judge (but not public) that CSW is Satoshi. Best case judge laughs at them and throws them out, worst case they convince the judge but keep the evidence sealed from public, so we'd have a ruling from some low level judge saying CSW is Satoshi



1436. Post 50641540 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: theymos on April 17, 2019, 02:12:53 AM
Calvin's relationship/partnership with Craig right now.

Ayre has reportedly been involved with CSW since at least Feb 2016. See this lengthy article, though note that it uses info from several highly unreliable sources, so you have to second-guess everything. Apparently, Wright worked in Antigua on gambling websites a long time ago, which is Ayre's residence and line of business, so they probably met directly or indirectly through this.

Wright first publicly made his appearance in the Bitcoin scene in Dec 2015, and apparently he was engaging in the "I'm Satoshi but down on my luck, plz give me a small loan of a million dollars" shtick from at least around mid 2015. The fact that Ayre was involved so early makes me a bit suspicious that he could be in on the con, but it's also possible that he's just fallen for it real deep.

I find Ayre's actions inexplicable. He appeared in this space suddenly, with a thin recent history. He's fixated on statist arguments, but his history makes me think that he should be biased against the state. (CSW has also been talking about this: which one is influencing the other?) He's stuck steadfastly by CSW for 3+ years with nothing obvious to show for it, and probably significant losses. (But is there something we don't know about? Does he somehow stand to profit from the current course of events, where SV & CSW fail in a loud and dragged-out way?)

If anyone has some connection to Ayre through a friend-of-a-friend or something, I'd really like to know what's actually going through his mind.

Ayre couldn't care less about BTC he's only the money man, but he's not an idiot and won't throw millions around unless he believe he could profit from it. If CSW could convince Gavin and Ayre, he might actually have some remote association to Satoshi. Now it's not bullet proof and he doesn't have access to the stash. CSW claimed that Satoshi's stash is locked up in a trust till 1/1/2020. Assuming that's the case, there's no way anyone is touching it without a ton of litigations. To raise his chances the first step is to get as much PR as humanely possible to associate himself with Satoshi. Create BSV fork, file lawsuits etc... Even if case is dismissed for lack of evidence he still gets a lot of coverage drumming it up as much as possible and gathering a following. Outcome of this lawsuit is irrelevant as its only there for PR, once he gets his TV time that's where the real war for the stash starts. It will be a long process which will require a ton of money, enter Ayre he bankrolls the process for a cut of a stash, his roll is to sponsor the games while cheerleading CSW from the sidelines as loud as he can. That's the only logic hypothesis i can come up with, outside of them just being lunatics that like to burn money.



1437. Post 50642265 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: gentlemand on April 17, 2019, 11:09:20 AM

There are at least 2 ways to prove that he is Satoshi:
Satoshi Nakamoto <satoshin@gmx.com>
He should have access to email Satoshi.
Satoshi Nakamoto in bitcointalk.org
Log in to your bitcointalk.org account
And leave a message: "Hello, this is Craig Wright and I am Satoshi Nakamoto!"

If this is done, there will be, almost, no doubt that Satoshi is him!
Let the judge accept this information!

Get with the times, youngling.

The gmx email address was compromised years ago and put up for sale.

The bitcointalk database has been compromised multiple times and satoshi's account has been long shut down.

Even if he signed from one of the known blocks all it would prove is that he controlled those private keys at that moment of signing.

No one can prove they're Satoshi without a shred of doubt. It's too late now.

There's no point in any of this if he had hard proof. Clearly if he had the keys to the stash all of this would be useless, and he wouldn't need Ayre. It appears as if he's building a case for himself to put a claim in if not for full amount then for a portion. And if before all that he manages to get some court to write something positive for his case his chances would improve significantly, if not at least he got publicity and recognition that should also help his claim and possibly silencing people (not good for a case if all of the internet is calling him a fraud)



1438. Post 50666009 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

New poll should be, if CSW starts suing the trust for keys to the stash, since he has his own chain would you support freezing Satoshi coins on the BTC chain.



1439. Post 50666338 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: kingcolex on April 19, 2019, 01:05:37 AM
New poll should be, if CSW starts suing the trust for keys to the stash, since he has his own chain would you support freezing Satoshi coins on the BTC chain.
What trust? Nobody knows who has Satoshi's keys or even if they still exist.

That's the only way i can explain their move. There's no money in CSWs defamation of character lawsuits, and we all know some Judge's ruling in some jurisdiction won't do much to anonymous comments on the internet. But there is also no way a trustee would distribute any funds if identity of the beneficiary is being challenged. Establishing identity during distribution would be exponentially more difficult with more challengers because the stakes are that much higher, but if he can get some low level Judge to "establish" the identity of Satoshi before that it would potentially pave the way to unchallenged distribution (or make challenging it that much harder). Of course billionairs being retards and burning millions for no logical reason whatsoever would be the best case scenario, but it'd would be really dumb to not plan for contingencies.

-McAffe stated on twitter that Satoshi still has access to the stash
-Ayre is hinting that CSW might be a group of 3
-CSW managed to bamboozle Gavin, and managed to convince Ayre to bankroll his cause



1440. Post 50666363 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: cAPSLOCK on April 19, 2019, 01:11:28 AM
New poll should be, if CSW starts suing the trust for keys to the stash, since he has his own chain would you support freezing Satoshi coins on the BTC chain.

No.

I can't stand CSW, I would be deeply saddened if he actually had ANYTHING to do with BTC, which I think he has not.  I think it is a very small chance that he could possibly end up with satoshi's private keys.

But if he did...

We would HAVE TO allow him to do as he pleases with them.  It would do terrible damage to BTC, and the crypto space as a whole.  It would likely set back BTC by 10+ years.

But forking away value on the blockchain is a central bank move.  WE CANNOT DO IT.

Regardless of how you feel about him, if he has access to the private keys he has the coins. But at this stage it's pretty obvious that he doens't have the keys, the problem comes from some  judge deciding that he's Satoshi and ordering the trust to hand the keys to him (or allocating a chunk to him)



1441. Post 50666452 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: gentlemand on April 19, 2019, 02:15:04 AM
-McAffe stated on twitter that Satoshi still has access to the stash

My guess is that Mr. Mcafee's reveal hinted at this week will be Satoshi as himself and then he'll tell us that you're Satoshi too and then we'll feel all warm inside and that.

Why he would have a clue who he is is beyond me. By 2009 he was well into his jungle freak phase and before that it was yoga and microlights for many years. And if he did have the vaguest hint why did he not pile in in 2009/10/11/12/13 and more? By the time he arrived Satoshi was long gone and no one else has ever claimed to know. I can't see anyone cheerfully telling him over a line of drain cleaner a few years down the road.


Regardless of how you feel about him, if he has access to the private keys he has the coins. But at this stage it's pretty obvious that he doens't have the keys, the problem comes from some  judge deciding that he's Satoshi and ordering the trust to hand the keys to him (or allocating a chunk to him)

I don't know or care what the endgame is but there's no evidence of this trust either.

CSW been claiming that the keys are in that Tulip Trading Trust not to be distributed before 1/1/2020. It's just too much of a coincidence that he's starting his lawsuit on establishing himself as Satoshi now.



1442. Post 50666655 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: Searing on April 19, 2019, 02:42:06 AM
-McAffe stated on twitter that Satoshi still has access to the stash

My guess is that Mr. Mcafee's reveal hinted at this week will be Satoshi as himself and then he'll tell us that you're Satoshi too and then we'll feel all warm inside and that.

Why he would have a clue who he is is beyond me. By 2009 he was well into his jungle freak phase and before that it was yoga and microlights for many years. And if he did have the vaguest hint why did he not pile in in 2009/10/11/12/13 and more? By the time he arrived Satoshi was long gone and no one else has ever claimed to know. I can't see anyone cheerfully telling him over a line of drain cleaner a few years down the road.


Regardless of how you feel about him, if he has access to the private keys he has the coins. But at this stage it's pretty obvious that he doens't have the keys, the problem comes from some  judge deciding that he's Satoshi and ordering the trust to hand the keys to him (or allocating a chunk to him)

I don't know or care what the endgame is but there's no evidence of this trust either.

CSW been claiming that the keys are in that Tulip Trading Trust not to be distributed before 1/1/2020. It's just too much of a coincidence that he's starting his lawsuit on establishing himself as Satoshi now.

yeah....the 3 theory with Dave Kleiman and Hal Finney as the other 2 in the group (who have passed) ...my worst nightmare is he is right and they did put all the 'test coins' into
a tulip trust, that the last man standing can access. Jan 1st, 2020...being the weak link of the trio and the last man standing..that is the nightmare scenario to me (1 out of 50 chance of true IMHO) ...so if Craig Wright does get access to all that BTC he could play the same game as Bitcoin Cash and  crash BTC into BSV or some other silliness if he drove the price down enough on selling massively..it would make the 'tulip mania' of the middle ages look tame by comparison.

Anyway, like all 'nightmares' it is extremely unlikely, but still, if BTC was gonna go 'tulips' at this point in time, IMHO, it would take some classic unlikely event like this to do so...

Craig Wright as a 'black swan event' ...sh*t just scared myself Smiley (Again, 1-50 chance..but damn that would suck) Sad



I don't think that the last man standing idea would stand in courts, plus i doubt that Hal was even thinking of not being with us in 2020, not sure about Dave. If we follow that train of thought, the more likely case is CSW just "being in the room" thus why he needs to establish himself as Satoshi now so he can put a claim on all of the coins, rather than having them distributed to Dave's Hal's etc??? estates.



1443. Post 50666759 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: Syke on April 19, 2019, 02:59:24 AM
New poll should be, if CSW starts suing the trust for keys to the stash, since he has his own chain would you support freezing Satoshi coins on the BTC chain.

No, there is no reason ever to freeze coins.

You just reminded me of ETC so to answer my own question if that would to happen we would most definitely fork to a CSW with BTC1mil coins chain and Satoshi's frozen coins chain. In any case to escape this worst case scenario the CSW's I am Satoshi claims must be feverishly challenged now, as it might be too late when/if the keys turn out to be in the trust.



1444. Post 50666934 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: JSRAW on April 19, 2019, 03:41:14 AM
Satoshi coins belongs to Satoshi. It's up to him whatever he wants to do with it. He can give it to anyone be it his granny or grandchildren or throw away all his keys it's his decision and freezing someone's coins is ridiculous thing to say.

That's another discussion,  if out of blue he starts to dump his coins on us which is very unlikely because he didn't touched his stash so far but if he does then arguably many of us fucked for sure.

And we can't blame him if he decides to dump his stash because at some point we all gonna sell our stash too.

You're missing the point. If Craig has the private keys he's free to spend them as he wishes regardless of who he is. The problem arises if Satoshi was Dave Kleiman and Hal Finney...and ?? locking the keys in the trust, and now CSW trying to establish himself as Satoshi so later he could get his hands on those keys unchallenged, since you know dead men don't talk.



1445. Post 50681440 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: JSRAW on April 19, 2019, 01:43:46 PM
Satoshi coins belongs to Satoshi. It's up to him whatever he wants to do with it. He can give it to anyone be it his granny or grandchildren or throw away all his keys it's his decision and freezing someone's coins is ridiculous thing to say.

That's another discussion,  if out of blue he starts to dump his coins on us which is very unlikely because he didn't touched his stash so far but if he does then arguably many of us fucked for sure.

And we can't blame him if he decides to dump his stash because at some point we all gonna sell our stash too.

You're missing the point. If Craig has the private keys he's free to spend them as he wishes regardless of who he is. The problem arises if Satoshi was Dave Kleiman and Hal Finney...and ?? locking the keys in the trust, and now CSW trying to establish himself as Satoshi so later he could get his hands on those keys unchallenged, since you know dead men don't talk.

May be I am missing the point or may be I am ignoring any conspiracy and fiction theory. When we use if if if that much time in any argument then it's just a assumption and we are shooting in a dark. Good for brainstorming or discussion but not worth it much IMHO.

Sometimes we should leave the all series of events to time and see how it goes.



I'm not sure if this would qualify as a black swan event (i know it wasn't you but someone else assigned this to a black swan event) if we have a billionair and a multi-millionaire (CSW?) going on record saying for years that this will happen. This is not purely hypothetical scenario, it's what the other side is claiming and so far all their action (and already millions spent) are pointing in that direction. Regardless of the likelyhood you assign to this scenario completely ignoring this might be at your own peril. I'm yet to hear another logical explanation for their moves and specifically trying to prove that CSW is Satoshi in court now. There is in no way this is a money lawsuit and he doesn't need a court to prove he's Satoshi.



1446. Post 50681684 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Is finex faking volume too now? Those huge volume spikes cannot look more like wash trades if they tried.



1447. Post 50716029 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: kingcolex on April 22, 2019, 03:10:42 AM
I am dumping this BSV and holy shit, jbreher this thing sucks, I have been waiting over an hour and a half for 5 confirmations. How slow are these damn blocks?

Hmm. Explorer shows only 3 txs in Unconfirmed Backlog set: https://svblox.com/unconfirmed-tx . What's your txid?
It just went through, it was fucking dreadful since I was trying to stay up to dump it on Binance but it went through.

Fun fact, binance splits your coins for you from a single bch deposit.

You had BSV  Cheesy wait in order to get BSV you had to have bcash  Grin , you all kind of special, no no i'm sorry carry on



1448. Post 50716046 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: kingcolex on April 22, 2019, 01:58:04 AM
Oh FFS, I was kidding!

 Apologies, brother. Did not read the sarcasm.

 I am a bit troubled with the world today, owing to the unfortunate events in Sri Lanka.

Yeah, me too actually, I wish the muslims would just stop killing innocent people.
If they keep this up it will end very badly for them.

Wait, how are we so sure this is rightly directed towards the Muslim community?
Although I'm not part of a religion, I find it somewhat offensive to see people blindly pointing fingers.

I'd wager that Muslims didn't even have a hand in this.  What could be achieved by a small group of 'terrorists' hurting the public like this? Do they think they'd somehow gain power or control from it, No, not even a small chance!
Now ask the same question: What could be achieved by the 'government' or 'TPTB' sending fear into the public?
Very simple, fear=submission
Ii believe its all power and control tactics used by the state or a globalists agenda.
Seems way to coincidental the past few weeks of religious connected events. NZ, Notre-Dame, and now Sri Lanka.
Comon' Nobody slips on banannas.  
But, but the news said it was the muzlums.  

Dude I'm going to have to tell you about this group of terrorist, it's going to blow your mind and it's a lot more plausible.
They're called ISIS, they're a bunch of fucks and are eating war on anyone that's not like them.
BS, ISIS is a outfit trained and funded by USA and Israel. They are being used as the publics' bogeyman to garner justification for endless war. ISIS, Al-qaeda and the Taliban are all the same puppets.  Further, these factions were created to fight each other and destabilize areas/governments.
Hopefully you were just joking, is that leftists humour?

Seriously some times this fucking rag tag group is just too fucking out there. Like I said in my earlier post I am more libertarian and I am pro Trump, I'll agree the US sucks at thinking through what happens after proxy wars but in no way do I think that ISIS is a continuously backed group  by the US and Israel. I think you fell down a rabbit hole and need to hop out.

First research how many Muslims ISIS killed in comparison to any other religion, and then talk about "Muslims"



1449. Post 50732169 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

CCMF!



1450. Post 50734357 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 23, 2019, 04:44:24 AM
New poll should be, if CSW starts suing the trust for keys to the stash, since he has his own chain would you support freezing Satoshi coins on the BTC chain.

You are assuming a lot, aren't you?

You are assuming that the trust story is actually true, and if it were true, then whoever has the keys can do whatever the fuck they want with the coins, including dumping them all.

We don't need to DAO hardfork in bitcoin.  This is not ethereum, and the mere fact that some goofball like craig might gain access to such coins should NOT worry anyone.

It's a hypothetical based on their claims, would it be better if it was reworded to: what if two billionairs are not completely insane and actually have some logic to their madness? I'm having a hard time explaining their actions and timing, so dismissing it off to their stupidity feels like an easy way out. To me that's the biggest risk holding BTC back right now, everything else seems to be going as planned. Trusts cannot do anything with assets they hold but beneficiary can do whatever the fuck they want, and in the wrong hands BTC1MM can do a lot of damage. But as i answered my own question, if that has any merit to being true their first step would be proving that he's Satoshi in the eyes of the government. And if that were to actually happen we would most certainly fork to original and Satoshi's frozen stash chains the next day and then market would assign risks appropriately.



1451. Post 50747091 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: jojo69 on April 24, 2019, 04:45:30 AM
First Amendment does not mean freedom from consequences.  

If you say “I declare sovereignty” to your cat and continue to pay your taxes, then no, nothing will happen.  

But I don’t think that was what seasteads were about.

And what exactly Elwar did? They just lived there.
You can live like that on a houseboat in the US and nothing will happen.

It's the rhetoric.  

I am quite certain that if you started erecting spars 15 miles out in the gulf of Mexico and posting on FB about your libertarianism and self sovereignty the reaction of the USCG would be swift and unequivocal.

Global enclosure is nearly complete.  I really think that, short of an orbital Lagrange platform, the aircraft carrier is the only way.

But if you were 200km away in true international waters and some nation abducted and wanted to put an American to death, i can see US navy paying a visit to that nation. Elwar just didn't get far enough



1452. Post 50748254 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Guess McAfee sobered up and had to backpedal



1453. Post 50748287 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Guess McAfee sobered up and had to backpedal



1454. Post 50748471 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on April 24, 2019, 07:36:41 AM
Guess McAfee sobered up and had to backpedal

Link?

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-23/john-mcafee-vows-to-unmask-crypto-s-satoshi-nakamoto-within-days

Quote
After previously telling Bloomberg he would expose Nakamoto “within a week,” he backed off the plan. McAfee said Tuesday on Twitter the controversy could hurt his efforts to fight an extradition to the U.S



1455. Post 50748514 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: kenzawak on April 24, 2019, 07:38:09 AM
It affects security and challenges the state power of Thailand and it is intolerable," he said.

Thailand has very specific laws and they can't be ignored ! The ones on men's clothing in particular are very strict.



P.S : got a bit scared reading the first words of that article.

Is that a literal case of the emperor not having clothes?



1456. Post 50761236 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: Hueristic on April 24, 2019, 11:50:48 PM
If there was an additional tax for each children you have instead of social benefits maybe they would have a second thought... or maybe not Sad

It's also ironical that the same people that complain there are not enough jobs are the ones making new babies... for which they can't even provide basic education and life advice.

Paying for other people to breed has always turned my stomach, that is one of the biggest faults of governments.

If you can't afford them don't fucking spit them out!


That's exactly what I am saying.


I've had 2 chicks get abortions (both on birth control : I found out later one lied about that) and one had a miscarriage (was gonna marry her).

And one told me I knocked her up and didn't tell me after the kid was born. I told her send me a hair sample and I'll support it and she never would.

I've supported myself since my teens and know what it means to be responsible so I have no respect for these shitbags.

Yep, think that's the dictionary definition of responsibility right here



1457. Post 50761295 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: jbreher on April 25, 2019, 12:08:02 AM

That's a pretty odd use of the term 'per capita'. Which, of course, is defined as 'per each person'. How can we have 3.54 Americans killed for every American that visits Pakistan?

Per x100,000 capita. It never ceases to amaze me how your troll senses are so keened on picking up any minute issue with the BTC, yet would fail to notice something obvious like SV scam even if CSW came in riding in on a tank which is positioned on the aircraft carrier with the word SCAM written on a side



1458. Post 50762548 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: jbreher on April 25, 2019, 01:52:42 AM

That's a pretty odd use of the term 'per capita'. Which, of course, is defined as 'per each person'. How can we have 3.54 Americans killed for every American that visits Pakistan?

Per x100,000 capita.
Per x100,000 capita. It never ceases to amaze me how your troll senses are so keened on picking up any minute issue with the BTC, yet would fail to notice something obvious like SV scam even if CSW came in riding in on a tank which is positioned on the aircraft carrier with the word SCAM written on a side

Obviously. But that is not what is says now, is it?

That's not what i said either now is it? Just impressed by your Sherlock Holmes skills when you really want it. Take the damn compliment  Angry



1459. Post 50778853 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Finex showing $6.746MM in 30 day volume, assuming 0,2% fee that $13,5MM they make in fees each month. And that doesn't include money they make on lending or interest on their stash. Tether market cap is $2.847MM NY OAG claims they lost $850MM (of their own and clients money) so 30% of all Tether max, i'm sure they'll survive *unless more shit comes up



1460. Post 50786433 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: Hueristic on April 26, 2019, 02:54:56 PM
Finex showing $6.746MM in 30 day volume, assuming 0,2% fee that $13,5MM they make in fees each month. And that doesn't include money they make on lending or interest on their stash. Tether market cap is $2.847MM NY OAG claims they lost $850MM (of their own and clients money) so 30% of all Tether max, i'm sure they'll survive *unless more shit comes up

Hmm... I don't think their liquidity will be doing well - looking at the price increase, people are dumping Tether to buy BTC and presumably trying to get out.

Also - not all clients will be paying 0.2% - so income may be lower and expenses are not zero, either.  Filling a hole of many hundreds of millions cannot be done without years of all that income going into replace 'lost' capital.

As GentlemanD said, the irony is Tether WAS backed up until they lost this large chunk of funds.  However, getting any new banking partner now will be nigh-on impossible.

Finex are in deep shit and probably in a total spin.  Maybe a death spiral.  Since they are (basically) profitable, I would think their best bet might be to try to find someone to buy 'em who does have banking sorted out and can float capital in to save the day. But who they gonna call..?  

Only a couple of candidates exist - and they might think the brand is too toxic.  Even at a sale price of $1, which is the likely price for Finex with a hole in the hundreds of millions of USD and a legal case on their back.

A bank could do it, but even if it makes financial sense, I can't see them risking running a crypto exchange.  Coinbase? Anyone else...?  With fast action needed and no time to do proper due diligence?  Doubt it.

First, Finex need to keep their customers to survive for long enough to find a solution.  

The chances of doing this with the run for the door already well underway is slim and all the Tethers coming back for redemption won't help.  But it's their only hope.

The Irony is that it was TPTB blocking them from reputable institutions to hold their reserves is what forced them to deal with a scam bank that ripped them off.

Almost like it was a plan. Smiley

ADDED:
Shit can't catch up today, gotta check out and I'm hitting the hottub rather than read this thread! Tongue

The irony of that Finex makes even more money on higher volumes. If maker and taker both trade under $500k/m Finex's fees are 0,3% in fact both sides must trade over $10MM/m for Finex's fees to drop to 0,18% so i think 0,2% is a pretty conservative estimate and the average is probably closer to 0,25% (both sides volume is under $2,5MM/m).

As long as they have the rest of the money they can cash out Tethers at a discount reducing their liability. I'm also having a hard time believing that a bank lost all of $850MM, you don't fuck with USD without the whole board going to jail.

Everyone knew that tether was a ticking time bomb and just a vehicle for gamblers to pump shitcoins by reducing friction of transfering in USD. That's why you see shitcoins dumping more than BTC. Finex should've invested in opening their own legit crypto friendly bank instead of killing the golden goose with tether. Oh well, still over $5k BTC holders are not affected, both tether holders and shitcoins holders will run for safety of BTC, just more negative publicity.



1461. Post 50803699 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on April 28, 2019, 01:04:59 AM
You don't have those kinds of options with traditional physical assets like fiat or PMs...  Even having $10 million in cash would not be easy to move around, like it is with bitcoin.  A billion dollars on bitcoin could be stored and managed a whole hell-of-a lot easier than the same value in cash or Pms.

You demonstrate a complete failure of economics 101 understanding.  It's not possible for something to qualify as "money" if it doesn't even qualify as a commodity first.  Nobody refers to video games on Steam as a "commodity" because it's blatantly obvious it's a state-run racket/scam called intellectual property and entirely based on artificial scarcity.  

Bitcoin is no different - another artificial scarcity scam/racket.  The hallmark trait of all currencies is artificial scarcity, while actual money is required to be physical commodity in the real world and not an artificial scarcity racket.  So, no, you are not "storing" $10 million of anything in bitcoin because it's not possible to store value in something completely imaginary based on artificial scarcity.  It's a currency and not money, and on a long enough timeline the value of a currency always goes to zero.  

All you're holding is a temporary pump and dump grenade or financial scam that you're attempting to pass off onto someone else before it explodes, not "storing value".  You need a physical commodity that doesn't expire to do that.

While your rationale works well for video games on Steam it does not hold for Bitcoin. While true that the scarcity is artificial by virtue of being programmed in it's not comparable to video games on Steam which can be sold without any limitations.

As soon as some malicious actor tried to remove scarcity by increasing the amounts of Bitcoins we'd simple tell them to fork off by forking off ourselves.


You could make an argument that this would be a democratic process and that the majority of humans is too fucking retarded to realize when they're being manipulated into believing that increasing the amount of coins is a non-issue. But that would still result in two chains, one with the idiots and one with the rest.

Now another argument that you could attempt would be to state that the scarcity was broken through the fork. But as we have already seen quite clearly forks only have a fraction of the original value and the more forks there are the less valuable each fork will be with a quick convergence towards value for erroneous forks. Hence irrelevant for both the Economy as a whole as well as the 21m Bitcoin chain.

His old brittle mind burned too many brain cells on nazi propaganda to see that there is no difference between natural and coded scarcity as long as it's truly scares. But that's alright many grandmas struggle with the concept of decentralized consensus, and that you can't copy and paste to get more BTC and it's not because of some DRM.



1462. Post 50806204 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: realr0ach on April 28, 2019, 03:31:39 AM
there is no difference between natural and coded scarcity

No difference in real world scarcity and artificial scarcity?  Okay, by your own statement there's no difference between bitcoin and any altcoin - both are "coded scarcity" - so supply is then infinite because there's no overhead to create them and thus no Schelling point.

This is the stupid world of shitcoiners where they just make up random nonsense to try to rationalize using shitcoins over metals.  Then every piece of propaganda they create to try and rationalize the use of digital shitcoins only rationalizes the use of fiat and an infinite number of altcoins too.  So they then backtrack and try to apply nonsensical double standards to attempt to not promote altcoins or fiats with their horrid, illogical arguments.


C'mon you're not even trying anymore, is that all that nazi glue huffing? Shitcoins make BTC infinite just as much as iron, aluminium and all of other metals make gold infinite. Put down mein kampf and try to come up with coherent replies.



1463. Post 50819308 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: realr0ach on April 28, 2019, 10:16:30 PM
there is no difference between natural and coded scarcity

Today in synagogue my rabbi explained it all to me after telling me how he butchered my circumcision. But then i sniffed some glue with my buddies and now my favorite food is i like yellow


C'mon you're not even trying anymore, is that all that nazi glue huffing? Shitcoins make BTC infinite just as much as iron, aluminium and all of other metals make gold infinite. Put down mein kampf and try to come up with coherent replies.

The reply is perfectly coherent.  If you accept ANY PM scarcity scam, you're putting forth support for all of them.  Silver, Gold, Platinum etc, they're all inflated shiny pretty things to wear around your neck to show off your wealth to others scams with no connection to their real world use prices.  All of those scams are in the exact same category whether you like it or not.  You're either pro-shiny pretty things scam with little correlation in price to their true value or pro-mathematically backed truly scares resources.

Why you keep on pulling sentences out of my quotes  Angry



1464. Post 50819460 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: infofront on April 29, 2019, 05:21:18 AM
This is under the assumption that the block size wouldn't grow when needed, blocks aren't full without outside attacks so there's no evidence that when the time comes we won't increase the block size to a common sense size.

Well, other than the evidence that blocks were kept small the last time they became persistently full. Which, in itself, is pretty strong evidence.

Once the need resurfaces (and it most certainly will), how long do you think it will take to implement the necessary change?

If it was urgent it could probably be done in 48 hours.   But it won’t be urgent.  

It ain't just a river in Egypt.

I would mostly agree with the bear here.
The last full block crisis resulted in inaction, to force people onto segwit. I presume the next full block crisis will result in inaction, to force people onto lightning.

Dude wtf you weren't supposed to tell them!!



1465. Post 50844536 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.44h):

Quote from: lightfoot on April 30, 2019, 10:45:16 PM
So Tether, the 100% backed by fiat 100% stable coin that no one can mine because it's SPECIAL is really only 74% backed by assets.

https://www.coindesk.com/tether-lawyer-confirms-stablecoin-74-percent-backed-by-cash-and-equivalents

Man what is it with people? Everyone falls for the infinite temptation of fractional-reserve banking. Everyone seems to just say the best intentions but really be full of 100% USDA horseshit.

Bitcoin is simply not going to succeed because you can't commit fraud with it. If you have a bitcoin you have a bitcoin. If you don't have a bitcoin you simply can't say you have a bitcoin.

Sad that the only thing which will work in this world is fraud.
I'm surprised to see how many people thought the tether folks wouldn't be fuck heads. No way did I expect them to not attempt to invest tether USD and profit off it while no one is aware.
Of course they would. The statement "This time it's different" was told to me when I walked from a dot.com in 2000. It has the same validity as "I won't cum in your mouth".....

I trust bitcoin for some weird reason. It's why I accept payment for work in it, and why I value it. Not for stupid shit like dollars, but because the idea behind it is a good one: "No, I actually will not cum in your mouth and here is the proof".



That's the problem with fiat, you're really not in control of it. Even if they did have customers best interest (and i do believe that to be the case, who would you kill the golden goose?) they had to work with banks to transfer a lot of fiat, and they have little control over that process. Best they can do is diversify and play whack a mole with banks freezing their accounts. It was obvious from the start i just can't believe that market didn't correctly price that risk in. In any case, look at it this way, they just had an audit and are confirmed to have 74% of their funds, which is much more than i thought they did.



1466. Post 50846222 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.44h):

Quote from: jbreher on May 01, 2019, 03:44:22 AM
Jbreher, when was the last time you even really cared about Bitcoins price movement and not just used this topic to defend Bcash or bsv?

I always care about BTC price movements, as my bags are heavy with it. If there wasn't any upside for me in this advocacy, do you think I'd be taking the continued abuse?

And in point of truth, if you hadn't noticed, my attempts to gain recognition of the flaws within LN -- at the cost of crippled onchain capacity -- have nothing whatsoever to do with BCH nor SV, as neither of these chains suffer from anemic block size caps.

Huh after all these years i figured you just liked the abuse. You mean you sincerely think that BSV is a good idea ?  Shocked i am soooo sorry 



1467. Post 50846273 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.44h):

Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on May 01, 2019, 04:52:30 AM
So Tether, the 100% backed by fiat 100% stable coin that no one can mine because it's SPECIAL is really only 74% backed by assets.

https://www.coindesk.com/tether-lawyer-confirms-stablecoin-74-percent-backed-by-cash-and-equivalents

Man what is it with people? Everyone falls for the infinite temptation of fractional-reserve banking. Everyone seems to just say the best intentions but really be full of 100% USDA horseshit.

Bitcoin is simply not going to succeed because you can't commit fraud with it. If you have a bitcoin you have a bitcoin. If you don't have a bitcoin you simply can't say you have a bitcoin.

Sad that the only thing which will work in this world is fraud.
I don't know how long it will take, but people are very slowly waking up. At least if liberals stop actively decreasing the average IQ by removing all responsibility from citizens in a charade of morals.

Fractional reserve has been working for banks for hundreds of years now, don't see why it can't for Finex. Even knowing what we know now people still hold their money there, it would take 75% of people to withdraw now for them to go belly up and it doesn't look like we're close to that happening, in fact they'd probably be "safe" running at 50% fractional reserve.



1468. Post 50848370 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.44h):

Quote from: alevlaslo on May 01, 2019, 08:22:31 AM

**blah blah blah lol BSV blah blah***

WTF is this, roach you finally found your calling, go get him, do us all a favor and troll him to death?

Welcome to my ignore list



1469. Post 50874092 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.44h):

Quote from: nutildah on May 03, 2019, 02:35:39 AM
zbefr pbqr vf bhgqngrq
bayl ryqreyl pna ernq
fubhyq hfr ebg13 vafgrnq


Vs lbh ernyyl jnag
gb fnl fbzrguvat va guerr yvarf
znxr vg n unvxh

Must be Welsh..

Saw 13 so guessing rot13 just too lazy to check



1470. Post 50874220 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.44h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on May 03, 2019, 02:42:26 AM
Activate Bitfinex Bank run panic mode. 10k by Monday night.  Grin

Regulators tried to fuck us and just pamped it on accident.


If you still have money on Bitfinex and are just too cheap to pay the spread and buy the overpriced BTC to pull out your money, well you deserve whatever happens to you for being an idiot. Get your coins off of there now!



People have $300MM and BTC43k locked up in swaps that they can't touch for up to 30days, taking into account the other swaps in shitcoins that might be enough to cover their missing funds right there. But the shitcoins implosion back into BTC has long been prophesied, tether just might be the first one. Repent, you'll have to pay dearly but BTC still loves you and will take your fiat back, you had your fun now come back to papa



1471. Post 50898482 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.44h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on May 04, 2019, 09:43:03 AM
https://twitter.com/wizsecurity/status/1124488827756634112
Craig Wright ordered by court to produce lists of owned bitcoin addresses along with details about his alleged blind trust:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/166/kleiman-v-wright/

show us the money, diptwat

wonder if he got any early wallets https://archive.is/1DMSI https://archive.is/hGTNB

I don't think this got the needed coverage. https://www.scribd.com/document/408636766/Wright-Motion

If this holds it might be the death blow to CSW.


Quote
It is therefore ORDERED that:
1. Dr. Wright’s Motion Regarding Production of a List of the Public Addresses of His Bitcoin as of December 31, 2013, [DE 155] which is deemed to be a Motion for Protective Order, is DENIED.

2. The Order to Seal [DE 153] is modified to allow for the filing of redacted copies of DE 155 and DE 162. The Court will provide copies of its proposed redacted pleadings to the parties, but will not yet file those redacted pleadings on the docket. The parties shall notify the Court by May 8, 2019, at 5:00 p.m. Eastern time if they seek additional redactions.

3. On or before May 8, 2019, at 5:00 p.m. Eastern time, Dr. Wright shall provide to Plaintiffs a sworn declaration identifying the name and location of the blind trust, the name and contact information for the current trustee and any past trustees, and the names and contact information of any current or past beneficiaries.

4. On or before May 9, 2019, at 5:00 p.m. Eastern time, Dr. Wright shall produce to Plaintiffs a copy of any and all documents relating to the formation, administration, and operation of the blind trust. The production shall be accompanied by a sworn declaration of authenticity.

5. On or before May 15, 2019, at 5:00 p.m. Eastern time, Dr. Wright shall produce all transactional records of the blind trust, including but not limited to any records reflecting the transfer of bitcoin into the blind trust in or about 2011. The production shall be accompanied by a sworn declaration of authenticity.

6. Dr. Wright shall execute any and all documents, or other legal process, necessary to effectuate the release of documents in the possession, custody, or control of the Trustee.

7. Any ruling on whether Dr. Wright’s deposition should be re-opened will be deferred  pending the production described in this Order.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers this 3rd day of May, 2019, at West Palm Beach in the Southern District of Florida.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE




1472. Post 50912110 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.44h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on May 05, 2019, 11:57:23 AM
via Imgflip Meme Generator

https://twitter.com/redditbtc/status/1124991417686855680?s=21

Thoughts on this Dutch Guy? I like him and his style but I wouldn’t be able to really live that way, still I love to see follow it up Cheesy

Watch the interview ....

It would be a perfect seasteading family I think.

Selfish idiot. His daddy passed him some money so he had a choice, the same choice he has taken away from his kids. I'd rather get knowledge so i can figure out how world works and make my own descisions, rather than being another idiot trust fund baby (and that's the best case scenario for his kids). They should do a follow up on the kids in 10yrs

Quote
Honey i know you can only count to 10, can't have that career in science you always wanted to, have anxiety, anti social, addicted to drugs, depressed, and a ton of other psychological disorders, but here's some bitcoins that finally mooned to make you feel better.



1473. Post 50913932 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.44h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on May 05, 2019, 06:31:49 PM
via Imgflip Meme Generator

https://twitter.com/redditbtc/status/1124991417686855680?s=21

Thoughts on this Dutch Guy? I like him and his style but I wouldn’t be able to really live that way, still I love to see follow it up Cheesy

Watch the interview ....

It would be a perfect seasteading family I think.

Selfish idiot. His daddy passed him some money so he had a choice, the same choice he has taken away from his kids. I'd rather get knowledge so i can figure out how world works and make my own descisions, rather than being another idiot trust fund baby (and that's the best case scenario for his kids). They should do a follow up on the kids in 10yrs

Quote
Honey i know you can only count to 10, can't have that career in science you always wanted to, have anxiety, anti social, addicted to drugs, depressed, and a ton of other psychological disorders, but here's some bitcoins that finally mooned to make you feel better.

So you say school is the only way for kids to learn how the world works or to gain knowledge?? Wauw.

The only, no, most likely yes. Its a numbers game, and as such there are always exceptions to every rule. There are reasons that the percent of flat earthers without education is much higher than those with PhDs from MIT. If they can mentally challenge their kids in multiple disciplines and surround them in such environment while they grow (in trailer parks) on their own, kudos to them they're the 0,000001% black swan even. Unfortunately the other 99.9% won't be that lucky. Don't think such behavior should be promoted or advertised with BTC. Wasn't there a guy a while back who leveraged BTC with his mortgage only to get wiped out few months later?



1474. Post 50919320 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.44h):

Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on May 06, 2019, 08:19:22 AM
guys, stop swearing, we need all three types of bitcoins at the same time: small blocks, medium blocks and large blocks
Maybe, maybe not.

But we certainly don't need CSW and his shitcoin.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5139844.msg50918896#msg50918896
Nobody needs BSV, period.

It's run by and associated with demonstrable human trash that deserves absolutely no spotlight.

I'm fine with jbreher advocating for larger blocks for technical reasons.


But CSW is obviously not interested in any technical argument. He isn't even competent enough to have one.
He's a filthy human scumbag that lies and deceives and can't produce a single original thought in his Master thesis.
His "winged" grades are worse than my grades with zero preparation or attendance.

And I'm certainly nowhere near capable enough to think up Bitcoin. So anyone south of me clearly isn't going to be either.

Add all the deception and plagiarism on top and you've got a piece of shit that should be ostracized by all of humanity, including any of his attempts to gain power.

For genius forgivable almost any behavior
1. No.

2. CSW is factually retarded, not a genius.

@alevlaslo lol who CSW??  Cheesy ok i'll engage, what would need to happen for you to admit that CSW is just a charlatan? That is, can you think of any outcome that would make you question your god (e.g. you'll disown him if he won't sign anything with Satoshi's keys by Jan 2020, or you'll disown him if Ayre's shill payment doesn't com in etc...)? So far you only put up a circular argument where CSW can do no wrong.
1-He doesn't want to prove that he's Satoshi because he's Satoshi
2-Every fart that comes out of his mouth is forgivable because he's Satoshi  
3-If you don't believe that he's Satoshi goto 1



1475. Post 50930325 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.44h):

Quote from: alevlaslo on May 06, 2019, 09:34:59 AM
guys, stop swearing, we need all three types of bitcoins at the same time: small blocks, medium blocks and large blocks
Maybe, maybe not.

But we certainly don't need CSW and his shitcoin.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5139844.msg50918896#msg50918896
Nobody needs BSV, period.

It's run by and associated with demonstrable human trash that deserves absolutely no spotlight.

I'm fine with jbreher advocating for larger blocks for technical reasons.


But CSW is obviously not interested in any technical argument. He isn't even competent enough to have one.
He's a filthy human scumbag that lies and deceives and can't produce a single original thought in his Master thesis.
His "winged" grades are worse than my grades with zero preparation or attendance.

And I'm certainly nowhere near capable enough to think up Bitcoin. So anyone south of me clearly isn't going to be either.

Add all the deception and plagiarism on top and you've got a piece of shit that should be ostracized by all of humanity, including any of his attempts to gain power.

For genius forgivable almost any behavior
1. No.

2. CSW is factually retarded, not a genius.

@alevlaslo lol who CSW??  Cheesy ok i'll engage, what would need to happen for you to admit that CSW is just a charlatan? That is, can you think of any outcome that would make you question your god (e.g. you'll disown him if he won't sign anything with Satoshi's keys by Jan 2020, or you'll disown him if Ayre's shill payment doesn't com in etc...)? So far you only put up a circular argument where CSW can do no wrong.
1-He doesn't want to prove that he's Satoshi because he's Satoshi
2-Every fart that comes out of his mouth is forgivable because he's Satoshi  
3-If you don't believe that he's Satoshi goto 1

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/166/kleiman-v-wright/

Case 9:18-cv-80176-BB Document 166 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2019 Page 1 of 4



                                   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                   SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

                                 CASE NO. 18-CIV-80176-Bloom/Reinhart


  IRA KLEIMAN, as personal representative of
  the estate of David Kleiman, and
  W&K INFO DEFENSE RESEARCH, LLC.

                 PlaintiffS,

         v.

  CRAIG WRIGHT

                 Defendant.

  ___________________________________/

   ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION REGARDING PRODUCTION OF A LIST OF
   THE PUBLIC ADDRESSES OF HIS BITCOIN AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 [DE 155]

         Before the Court is the Defendant’s Sealed Motion Regarding Production of a List of the

  Public Addresses of his Bitcoin as of December 31, 2013 (“the Bitcoin Holdings Motion.”) [DE

  155]. The Defendant filed a Motion to Seal the Bitcoin Holdings Motion, DE 151, which the

  undersigned granted. DE 153. Plaintiffs filed their Response under seal. DE 162. For the reasons

  stated below, the Court finds that redacted, unsealed versions of the Bitcoin Holdings Motion and

  the Plaintiffs’ Response to that motion can be filed in the public record. Nothing contained in the

  instant Order discloses material that remains under seal.

         The Court, sua sponte¸ has reconsidered its Order granting Dr. Wright’s Motion to Seal. It

  is this Court’s general policy that its proceedings are public and Court filings are matters of public

  record. SDFL Local Rule 5.4(a). A party seeking to seal materials related to a discovery motion

  must satisfy the burden for a Rule 26 protective order, that is, good cause. Chicago Tribune Co.

  v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. 263 F.3d 1304, 1312-13 (11th Cir. 2001); FTC v. AbbVie Products,
Case 9:18-cv-80176-BB Document 166 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2019 Page 2 of 4



  LLC, 713 F.3d 54, 63 (11th Cir. 2013). Having had the opportunity to review the party’s pleadings,

  the Court finds there is good cause to seal portions of the pleadings, but not the pleadings in their

  entirety.   Redacted versions of those pleadings can be filed in the public record without

  compromising the original purpose for sealing them. 1 The Court will allow the parties to be heard

  before finalizing its redactions.

          At issue is whether it would be unduly burdensome for Dr. Wright to produce a list of his

  bitcoin holdings as of December 31, 2013. This Court has held multiple discovery hearings that

  addressed issues relating to Dr. Wright’s current and past bitcoin holdings. DE 107 at 120-123;

  DE 122 at 61-63; DE 124 at 18-23. Ultimately, the Court ordered Dr. Wright to produce a list of

  his bitcoin holdings as of December 31, 2013, without prejudice to Dr. Wright filing a motion for

  protective order based on undue burden. DE 124 at 18-23.

          Thereafter, Dr. Wright filed an unverified motion in which he identified a number of

  bitcoin public addresses that he mined. Although not delineated as a Motion for Protective Order,

  that is what the pleading is. Dr. Wright asserted that he does not have a complete list of the public

  addresses he owned on any date, including December 31, 2013. He further asserted that in 2011

  he transferred ownership of all his bitcoin to a blind trust. Although he makes the conclusory

  statement that it would be unduly burdensome to produce a list of his bitcoin holdings as of

  December 31, 2013, this conclusion is not supported by facts. In essence, he does not argue undue

  burden, he argues impossibility. The argument that Dr. Wright is incapable of providing an

  accurate listing of his current or historical bitcoin holdings was never presented in any of the prior

  hearings before this Court, when the Court was crafting the scope of discovery. Notably, the



  1
   Remaining under seal are the names of non-parties and the identifying information for the amount
  and identity of certain bitcoin. In addition, discovery material attached to Plaintiffs’ Response as
  Exhibits 1 and 2 remains under seal.
                                                        2
Case 9:18-cv-80176-BB Document 166 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2019 Page 3 of 4



  Bitcoin Holdings Motion does not refute the obvious response to this argument – get the

  information from the trustee of the blind trust.

         In response to Dr. Wright’s Motion, the Plaintiffs ask the Court to order the following

  additional discovery: (1) make Dr. Wright produce the list of bitcoins owned as of December 31,

  2013; (2) make Dr. Wright identify all bitcoins he transferred to the blind trust in 2011; (3) make

  Dr. Wright produce documents related to the blind trust; (4) make Dr. Wright identify, under oath,

  the identity of the current and past trustees of the blind trust, the beneficiaries of the blind trust,

  and the manner in which the bitcoins were transferred to the blind trust; and (5) permit further

  deposition of Dr. Wright with regard to his ownership and control over bitcoins. DE 162 at 5-6.

  The Court finds that this additional discovery is warranted. The Court has already found that

  tracing Dr. Wright’s bitcoin holdings is relevant to the Plaintiffs’ theft claims. The order to

  produce a list of bitcoin holdings as of December 31, 2013, was a compromise; it was the Court’s

  attempt to provide Plaintiffs with relevant and material evidence without unduly burdening Dr.

  Wright. That Dr. Wright now argues it is not feasible for him to identify the bitcoin he held on

  December 31, 2013, does not diminish Plaintiffs’ entitlement to the pertinent evidence. That

  evidence can be obtained through other means, which the Court will authorize Plaintiffs to use.

         It is therefore ORDERED that:

         1. Dr. Wright’s Motion Regarding Production of a List of the Public Addresses of His

             Bitcoin as of December 31, 2013, [DE 155] which is deemed to be a Motion for

             Protective Order, is DENIED.

         2. The Order to Seal [DE 153] is modified to allow for the filing of redacted copies of DE

             155 and DE 162. The Court will provide copies of its proposed redacted pleadings to

             the parties, but will not yet file those redacted pleadings on the docket. The parties



                                                        3
Case 9:18-cv-80176-BB Document 166 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2019 Page 4 of 4



             shall notify the Court by May 8, 2019, at 5:00 p.m. Eastern time if they seek additional

             redactions.

         3. On or before May 8, 2019, at 5:00 p.m. Eastern time, Dr. Wright shall provide to

             Plaintiffs a sworn declaration identifying the name and location of the blind trust, the

             name and contact information for the current trustee and any past trustees, and the

             names and contact information of any current or past beneficiaries.

         4. On or before May 9, 2019, at 5:00 p.m. Eastern time, Dr. Wright shall produce to

             Plaintiffs a copy of any and all documents relating to the formation, administration, and

             operation of the blind trust.    The production shall be accompanied by a sworn

             declaration of authenticity.

         5. On or before May 15, 2019, at 5:00 p.m. Eastern time, Dr. Wright shall produce all

             transactional records of the blind trust, including but not limited to any records

             reflecting the transfer of bitcoin into the blind trust in or about 2011. The production

             shall be accompanied by a sworn declaration of authenticity.

         6. Dr. Wright shall execute any and all documents, or other legal process, necessary to

             effectuate the release of documents in the possession, custody, or control of the Trustee.

         7. Any ruling on whether Dr. Wright’s deposition should be re-opened will be deferred

             pending the production described in this Order.

         DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers this 3rd day of May, 2019, at West Palm Beach in

  the Southern District of Florida.




                                             UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


                                                       4



So you'll disown CSW if he doesn't provide the above court ordered information by May 15th? Did i understand you correctly? e.g. If CSW won't provide info for any reason (including claiming that court has no jurisdiction over him etc...) you'll admit that CSW is a fraud and STFU about BSV forever??



1476. Post 50962406 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Roach take your meds you'll pop a vein again. If that's how you react at $6k you'll have a heart attack at $10k, a stroke at $20k and will just become a deranged old man with an aluminum hat at $50k yelling at the kids next door to get off your lawn and to buy more PMs.

-Damn billy don't you see this is all a trick and you need to buy moar PMs right now!!!!
=But i'm just 5 Mr. Roach, can i have my ball back now?



1477. Post 50962415 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on May 09, 2019, 01:51:50 AM
This is borderline remarkable, $6000 was the strongest support in bitcoin history, when we fell through it should have been the biggest resistance. We essentially broke through it on the first try, we never bounced off of it hard at all. If we stay above this for a significant amount of time, it will be hard for Bitcoin to fall back through $6000........

What in the world.

Dumb ass shorts.

When long / short ratio at record lows on high volume, the only way the price can go is up.

This is the beginning of the bears’ capitulation - long / short ratio still below prior record lows at 0.58

“At first you go bankrupt slowly, then all at once.”



Where that long/short ration from? sauce?



1478. Post 50962593 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

CMC dominance is at 57.2%



1479. Post 50975181 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Almost smells like FOMO but halfening is not for another yr  Undecided



1480. Post 50987310 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Quote from: Gyrsur on May 10, 2019, 08:34:31 PM
Is John McAfee behind it? --> https://twitter.com/gotsatoshi

Countdown is active --> https://gotsatoshi.com/

Source: https://www.investinblockchain.com/satoshi-identity-to-be-unveiled-on-may-14th/



No, just no. Next question



1481. Post 50989152 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Quote from: rebal15 on May 10, 2019, 10:08:37 PM
So reversing transactions is possible to help some people recover their bitcoins.

The apology came fast and the reorg case was just hypothetical.

Given how much I talk, I sometimes say the wrong stuff, dirty words like “reorg”, for which I apologize. It is my strong view that our constant and transparent communication is what sets us apart from the “old way of doing things”, even and especially in tough times.

He said it because he think it is possible.


A reorg would require 51% hash power. I dont think Binance have so much influence over the miners for this.

I think It is not 51% attack in this case. It is reversing transactions.

Huh you should try to work on that "thinking" part of yours, cause so far it's not going too well for you.

Edit:

Ahh just catching up roach's mini me, ignored



1482. Post 50991471 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Quote from: alevlaslo on May 11, 2019, 05:18:46 AM
BCH has already grown 4 times, but bitcoin only 2 times, buy BSV before it's too late, it has not grown at all

Maybe you should get both of your brain cells together and task them to answer why is it that that shitcoin did not grow at all? Now go sit in the corner and don't talk until you figure it out



1483. Post 50991595 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Quote from: alevlaslo on May 11, 2019, 05:51:09 AM
Why do you think Bitmain transferred half of the capacity to BSV, if the yield there is 3 times less? That's right, control of an important and promising coin is important for China

Same reason they're propping bcash up, they like loosing money?



1484. Post 50991659 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Huh stamp is trading above Finex now, wtf is up with those tethers



1485. Post 50991878 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Quote from: Phil_S on May 11, 2019, 06:23:50 AM
What is going on, this is crazy.

Welcome to BTC you must be new



1486. Post 50999759 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Not many coins on Finex after $7k ask books are drying up



1487. Post 51000785 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

$1k bid wall flashed on Finex yeah we're not stopping till $10k on this one



1488. Post 51040929 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.46h):

Start the rockets



1489. Post 51050080 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.46h):

Quote from: toknormal on May 14, 2019, 03:52:03 PM

Right then, has Satoshi been announced yet ? I didn't sign up for the "unveiling" but the countdown is at zero I think.

Is it actually Barry Silbert promoting a new brand of honey coated oven chips ?

Gonna have to repeat myself

Quote from: DaRude on May 10, 2019, 08:43:32 PM

No, just no. Next question



1490. Post 51075641 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.46h):

Anyone got any updates on the CSW lawsuit? He was supposed to provide info on the trust trustee etc by now



1491. Post 51091044 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.46h):

Miners are collecting almost BTC2 in fees for every block. Soon that would be ~30% of their block reward. Financials incentives seem to be working as planned



1492. Post 51105132 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.46h):

People feeding roach, must be a slow day



1493. Post 51116197 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: Biodom on May 18, 2019, 07:17:40 PM
Quote
Bitstamp Starts Investigation After Large BTC Sell Leads to $250 Mln Liquidated on BitMEX

https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitstamp-starts-investigation-after-large-btc-sell-leads-to-250-mln-liquidated-on-bitmex

They need to investigate themselves as to why they accept a limit sell order 2000 points below the market price.
That kind of order (not a market sell) should be simply rejected by the trading system (as an error).

Wait an 100x overleveraged exchange exploited for its volatility? Stop the presses



1494. Post 51129292 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: Theoak* on May 19, 2019, 08:08:22 PM
Congrats... 3 or 4 obvious trolls / alt accounts of roach and... you, the only one being serious here and meaning what he says. I guess that makes you the village idiot.

I disagree about those new accounts being roach alts. It's probably just emulation.
I do agree about the village idiot bit, though.

While I disagree with roach in regards to bitcoin being a scam, I do enjoy alternate perspectives. How can you learn anything by simply ignoring someone you don’t agree with? Sounds like a fair few liberals in here who get triggered.

I do agree with roachs view on women and I worry for microgoosens future with a woman who has had such a promiscuous past.

His arguments been heard and shut down over and over again by overwhelming majority, yet he just keeps on repeating them like a broken record. He doesn't even believe in the historic price of silver charts. There's just no arguing with stupid. He sees that most people just ignore him, so as a last resort to grab any bit of attention he can, he started to create new accounts with the first comment like "well i don't fully agree with roach but..." you know the ones  Roll Eyes



1495. Post 51131413 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: Raja_MBZ on May 19, 2019, 11:12:05 PM
Almost at a new yearly high! Shocked

Where are all the Vegeta memes & fireworks?




1496. Post 51132173 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on May 20, 2019, 12:40:00 AM
You will not find anyone here who thinks that BCH will ever be $4k again ..even if BTC attains even the wildest predictions.

The trend BTC/BCH is very clearly lower.

It still has the support of Bitmain and another BTC bubble would presumably provide them a war chest with which to pump it. I mean, they're a million deep in that shit, so I'd certainly not rule it out.

No.  Bitmain has abandoned Bcash. Jihan is now bagholder extraordinaire

It'll go to 0 the second Bitmain abandons bcash, they'd be stumbling over each other to see who gets to get their sell order in first. They're too deep, too committed with really no good way out



1497. Post 51132428 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: gembitz on May 20, 2019, 01:16:15 AM
http://boards.4channel.org/biz/thread/13616424/paul-solotshi-calder-le-roux-the-real-satoshi

 Kiss

weeeee

 Shocked Wow CSW was an expert against TrueCrypt inventor Paul Solotshi Calder Le Roux case
From all the people who could've invented bitcoin TrueCrypt inventor (named Solotshi) would be near the top of the list (and CSW at the bottom)

Edit: who's been in jail since 2012



1498. Post 51135180 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: realr0ach on May 20, 2019, 06:03:13 AM
Why would I hate women?  I don't even hate black people or jews.  If a racoon gets into your garbage, you don't hate the raccoon.  Similarly, if one is aware of the predatory nature of the female, or the likelihood of a random colored person to steal your bicycle or try to kill you for no reason, it's pretty much the same thing.  You just recognize the problem, adapt and overcome.

Wait, so by that logic are you saying that we shouldn't hate you either? That we should just accept you for a retarded self hating jewish Nazi who's parents were brother and sister who just got too close to each other one night, and who can't stop parroting that BTC is somehow not decentralized because no girl would touch you? Thus we should just adapt and overcome that by just ignoring you? That's the deepest thing i've ever heard you say roach



1499. Post 51162964 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on May 22, 2019, 03:34:12 AM

::le sigh:: ...aaaand we're back to 'Aussie man bad!'


Truth is a defence to defamation

Yet, only in honest discourse is understanding to be reached.

You seem to be a lovely chap.  I don’t know why you persist in defending such comic book villains.

Lodging a copywright claim over the Bitcoin whitepaper which has an MIT open source license printed on the front page?  It’s both hilarious and pathetic.

Could be, or you just too naive to realize that you aren't the intended audience. These papers are not for you to consume, all of his actions can be easily explained if you think of him as a man preparing a case for litigation. He's just preparing documents that he'll be submitting to court. Probably will try to trademark "Bitcoin" next.



1500. Post 51163575 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: nutildah on May 22, 2019, 05:44:09 AM
These papers are not for you to consume, all of his actions can be easily explained if you think of him as a man preparing a case for litigation. He's just preparing documents that he'll be submitting to court. Probably will try to trademark "Bitcoin" next.

Then why the sensational coingeek article? It was a well-timed pump job / maneuver backed by a well-written propaganda piece. It ultimately proves nothing, other than there is no apparent correlation between somebody's ability to invest and intelligence.

BSV is so thinly traded a 500% pump wouldn't effect Ayre and CSW much



1501. Post 51201033 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: BitUsher on May 24, 2019, 06:25:02 PM
What a dumpster fire ... and this is further proof that the markets can remain irrational longer than expected as BCH should be dumping now.

As expected, Due to BCHs lack of hashrate miners are double spending and reorging on BCH blockchain. Here is when it occurred last time-

https://twitter.com/TheCryptoconomy/status/1131962447823278080

Quote
‼️#BCH /#bcash was hit by 51% attack from just 2 miners, http://BTC.TOP  & http://BTC.com
- & no one seems to be talking about it. 🤨 Thread 👇🏻
1/  What I've gathered from loose details:First, there was an unintentional split with the recent #BCH "upgrade."

2/Since the original split in 2017, there has been a significant number of coins accidentally sent to "anyone can spend" addresses (due to tx compatibility of sigs, but no #SegWit on #BCH), or possibly they've been replayed from #Bitcoin onto the #BCH network.

3/Because of this, tons of coins (#BCH) would essentially be "up for grabs." However, devs implemented a protocol rule called CLEANSTACK, making P2SH coins unspendable.
This was to be removed with May 15 fork, basically handing the coins to miners. https://github.com/bitcoincashorg/bitcoincash.org/blob/master/spec/2019-05-15-upgrade.md

4/During the unintentional fork, someone exploited a bug (details are really hard to find) to add invalid TXs to @Bitcoin_ABC's client mempool. To counter, http://BTC.TOP  mined empty blocks (the bad TXs made blocks impossible to produce) coinspice.io/news/unknown-attacker-fails-to-disrupt-bch-upgrade

5/Due to low hash rate of the network, http://BTC.TOP  actually controlled over half (~54%) of #BCH hash power. Putting them in a position to essentially dictate which blocks were accepted by the network. (we'll see the problem here in a sec) https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/is-bitcoin-cash-under-a-51-percent-attack-as-one-bch-mining-pool-nears-over-half-control/

6/ In the confusion, an unknown miner (possibly the attacker, but unconfirmed) tried to snatch a bunch of P2SH/#Segwit coins.  But http://BTC.TOP  & http://BTC.COM  were expecting, and/or preparing to recover SegWit coins themselves...https://honest.cash/kiarahpromise/sigop-counting-4528

7/According to discussions, http://BTC.top  and http://BTC.com  were working with another party to recover #SegWit coins to rightful owners (exchanges and/or users).
How they sourced the rightful owners I'm not sure, but this appears to be "reddit consensus.

8/ When the unknown miner tried to take the coins themselves, http://BTC.TOP  & http://BTC.COM  saw & immediately decided to re-org & remove these TXs, in favor of their own TXs, spending the same P2SH coins, + many others.  https://honest.cash/kiarahpromise/sigop-counting-4528

9/It apparently took hours to figure out what happened as none of this was public yet. It appears the 2 miners were ready & communicating with each other directly & possibly another party (exchange or devs) for coordinating the re-org. Cant find specifics from involved parties.  https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D7WMLRhXoAAzlEd.jpg

10/So just 2 miners, in secret & w/ no trouble, took it upon themselves to remove 2 blocks w/ another’s TXs, & replace with their own. Bizarrely, some are celebrating!
Some devs are quiet, but jtoomim (#BCH dev) called it “justice,” & “punishment” for “antisocial behavior.”  https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D7WM4hNXkAAfAsu.jpg
  https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D7WM5NGW0AALecm.jpg

11/One dev seems to be actually discussing how dangerous of a precedent this was & has the only write-up that I can find so far on what exactly occurred. #BCH
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D7WNXlnW0AACJqw.jpg

12/This is what everyone warned about of endless HFs. Its an attack vector, kills Lindy effect, & has turned #BCH into a political mess where private comms control what does/doesn't get in a block. I can’t tell if no one cares, or if they just want to ignore it?

13/There are at least a few people (maybe only partially) realizing that this basically kills any perception that #BCH is "decentralized, censorship resistant money."  And leaves them to fight over whether the miners are "good guys" or "bad guys" with their actions. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D7WOrXcWkAE2EA3.jpg

14/Very curious to see others who could dig further (& more thoroughly) into this, as details are not easy to find, & there seem to no articles about the 51% as far as I can tell. 😁
/fin
 

Rational people just don't own any bcash in the first place so no one can dump it. It's the same shitcoin that was burning part of the rewards by the pool cause they had too many of them.



1502. Post 51233122 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: Dakustaking76 on May 26, 2019, 07:33:39 PM
Jesus what a pump Shocked Shocked


Wake up hodlersss!!!!!

WHAT ARE WE OVER $20K !?!? Oh just $9k pfft back to sleep



1503. Post 51258534 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: fabiorem on May 28, 2019, 07:40:07 PM
Well....

1) I dunno. The pervasive narrative in this here space is that everything out of Craig's mouth is either: a lie, or; simply wrong. As such, how could anything he say undermine the legitimacy of the sector?
OTOH, if he has the capability to carry out such a threat, how would his huge advance warning not be a good thing?

2) I dunno again. Before vanishing, Satoshi revealed very little of his personal proclivities. I see no evidence therein to support the notion that he might not use his substantial war chest in order to tilt the market in favor of what he perceives as the more faithful rendition of his ideals. What exactly am I missing in his writings?


But if he crashes the market, BSV will also go down with it.

My guess is that he wants people to have some doubt and hedge in BSV just in case he crashes the market. But their fork war with BCH brought every coin down, including BSV.

No, if CSW has keys to Satoshi's stash BSV definitely will not go down. As far as the video, text is over 6months old, and looks like just FUD with no proof that CSW even said that. What the idiots that believe it fail to realize is that even if he has access to the private keys:
1-He can't cash in those coins because of the ongoing Kleiman lawsuit.
2-Once that lawsuit is over, the market will crash hard the second the transaction from Satoshi's stash is advertised, by the time he gets his first confirmation to the exchange, market would flash crash
3-He'd have 20 lawyers lined up at his door with lawsuits before he gets his second confirmation
4-Tax authority would be at his door before third confirmation
5-As far as destroying BTC I literally cannot think of a dumber thing to do for someone who has BTC1MM
6-If this would to happen, BTC would just fork, adjusting difficulty and freezing his coins (you gotta be pretty retarded to think that people who believe in BTC would just give up and switch to BSV to blindly follow the leader "Satoshi"). This is bitcoin, we trust in math not in deities.

This actually got me thinking of how a sane person would try to cash out while trying to maximize profits.
1-Create you own fork
2-Short BTC to the max
3-When interest is peaked (before halfening), announce that you currently only have access to 25% of the stash which will be auctioned off in 10 blocks. First auction being x months from now (what FBI did)
4-Profit  Huh



1504. Post 51259625 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: jbreher on May 28, 2019, 11:46:43 PM
6-If this would to happen, BTC would just fork, adjusting difficulty and freezing his coins (you gotta be pretty retarded to think that people who believe in BTC would just give up and switch to BSV to blindly follow the leader "Satoshi"). This is bitcoin, we trust in math not in deities.

Let me see if I have this correct. You think that, should Satoshi start cashing in some amount of his Bitcoins, that the community should fork to deny Satoshi the fruit of his labor?

Divorce the question from whether or not CSW has any relation to Satoshi - that's irrelevant. But I really want to know if you think such an action by the community is warranted.

You took the quote out of context, but let me see if i can spell this out for you "cashing in some amount" is different from crashing the price and then 51% attacking it to destroy the network. Did you watch the video at all? BTC is not a cult and has grown beyond Satoshi. If any entity attempts to destroy BTC, an appropriate action must be taken, even if that entity is "Satoshi". Personally i can live with the idea of Satoshi gone cuckoo or that he wasn't a perfect person (sold guns drugs etc...)

Now to answer your question as phrased, personally i don't have an issue with Satoshi responsibly cashing out and even endorsing BSV (I support ideas not people). But as i previously wrote on this topic, realistically speaking, it'll be very hard for someone to conclusive prove that they're Satoshi. Especially in case of CSW, who couldn't have distanced himself further from Satoshi if he tried. So if CSW has private keys, we would most definitely fork, and then market would decide (but if he kills off one fork [to force people to follow his new chain] he'd make everyone's decision that much easier)



1505. Post 51259841 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: jonoiv on May 29, 2019, 01:41:53 AM
This chart has some great info!


$BTC: Still waiting on that 30%+ pullback?
Bitcoin had eight 30%+ pullbacks last market uptrend but the average time between each pullback was 98 days
BTC had a serious 26.3% pullback on May 17th, which means the next major retrace could be a couple months away



https://twitter.com/Josh_Rager/status/1133371092175863808

It had that pullback on bitstamp only.   all the other exchanges were between 16 - 19%  average of 17.5%

It only went that low on bitstamp because of the 4000 sell wall.

It's going to dump slow but steady soon ending at $2500 before the year is out imho.

I hope you didn't mortgage your home to fund your short position.   There are way too many homeless folks already. 

my home is quite safe. 

and I don't think it's people going short that need to worry.
https://blockchainwhispers.com/bitmex-position-calculator/

Not sure where they source their data from but bitfinex has BTC32.200 over $280MM shorted
https://www.bitfinex.com/stats



1506. Post 51260124 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: jonoiv on May 29, 2019, 02:14:23 AM
This chart has some great info!


$BTC: Still waiting on that 30%+ pullback?
Bitcoin had eight 30%+ pullbacks last market uptrend but the average time between each pullback was 98 days
BTC had a serious 26.3% pullback on May 17th, which means the next major retrace could be a couple months away



https://twitter.com/Josh_Rager/status/1133371092175863808

It had that pullback on bitstamp only.   all the other exchanges were between 16 - 19%  average of 17.5%

It only went that low on bitstamp because of the 4000 sell wall.

It's going to dump slow but steady soon ending at $2500 before the year is out imho.

I hope you didn't mortgage your home to fund your short position.   There are way too many homeless folks already.  

my home is quite safe.  

and I don't think it's people going short that need to worry.
https://blockchainwhispers.com/bitmex-position-calculator/

Not sure where they source their data from but bitfinex has BTC32.200 over $280MM shorted
https://www.bitfinex.com/stats



it's from the BFX api, same as this site
https://datamish.com/d/000000004/btcusd?refresh=20s&orgId=1


the stats page on bitfinex doesn't seem to update, not sure if it's hourly, daily, weekly but the API is live afaik.

Umm try again, sorry to bust your "bear data source" which inflates longs and deflates shorts
Quote
Rates on Margin Funding

Average rates of the open funding (positions) as of May 29, 2019 - 02:34:49 AM UTC.
Currency    Flash Return Rate    Total sum of active funding    Total amount used in margin positions
...
BTC    0.0107%    33,873.90    32,230.27

From https://www.bitfinex.com/stats



1507. Post 51260578 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: infofront on May 29, 2019, 03:01:53 AM
6-If this would to happen, BTC would just fork, adjusting difficulty and freezing his coins (you gotta be pretty retarded to think that people who believe in BTC would just give up and switch to BSV to blindly follow the leader "Satoshi"). This is bitcoin, we trust in math not in deities.

Let me see if I have this correct. You think that, should Satoshi start cashing in some amount of his Bitcoins, that the community should fork to deny Satoshi the fruit of his labor?

Divorce the question from whether or not CSW has any relation to Satoshi - that's irrelevant. But I really want to know if you think such an action by the community is warranted.

You took the quote out of context, but let me see if i can spell this out for you "cashing in some amount" is different from crashing the price and then 51% attacking it to destroy the network. Did you watch the video at all? BTC is not a cult and has grown beyond Satoshi. If any entity attempts to destroy BTC, an appropriate action must be taken, even if that entity is "Satoshi". Personally i can live with the idea of Satoshi gone cuckoo or that he wasn't a perfect person (sold guns drugs etc...)

Now to answer your question as phrased, personally i don't have an issue with Satoshi responsibly cashing out and even endorsing BSV (I support ideas not people). But as i previously wrote on this topic, realistically speaking, it'll be very hard for someone to conclusive prove that they're Satoshi. Especially in case of CSW, who couldn't have distanced himself further from Satoshi if he tried. So if CSW has private keys, we would most definitely fork, and then market would decide (but if he kills off one fork [to force people to follow his new chain] he'd make everyone's decision that much easier)

We all knew what we were getting into with bitcoin. Satoshi could come back at any time and dump his entire stash. Most of us have made a calculated bet that this won't happen.

Forking away is not an option. We'd be no better than the cult of Vitalik forking away after getting butthurt about the DAO "hack".

Well first of all i think its important to differentiate between Satoshi coming back, and Satoshi's coins being dumped. i.e.
-If CSW can prove in some court that he is Satoshi but can't move a single coin, after a short BSV pump no one will care the world will move on
-On the other hand if BTC1MM gets dumped across exchanges, even with a signed message of "i'm not CSW", might bring BTC to its knees.

That would be a black swan event, but I can't imaging any person forcing me to abandon the idea of BTC for a unlimited blocks at BSV (its just too retarded).

if the option comes down to no BTC or fork BTC, i'd go with whatever name they choose and whoever will lead it as long as they alight with my idea/vision of BTC



1508. Post 51262719 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: Syke on May 29, 2019, 05:11:01 AM
-On the other hand if BTC1MM gets dumped across exchanges, even with a signed message of "i'm not CSW", might bring BTC to its knees.

BTC1M dumped wouldn't change the fundamentals. Bitcoin would bounce right back.


Purely theoretical but BTC1M + short leverage can do a lot of damage. Think of BTC10k dumps every single day for next 100 days. Despite the fake volume, market is pretty illiquid, blockchain would not be usable and not sure if we could get enough miners to mine at a loss long enough to get through this. Or just flood the mempool keeping cost of transaction at $50 for few years



1509. Post 51291531 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.49h):

Yeah an island of Puerto Rican girls sounds like a terrible terrible place to be


Fortunately there's hope for you roach




1510. Post 51296901 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.49h):

Quote from: kenzawak on May 31, 2019, 02:53:24 PM
If BSV was a scam, why would
@CalvinAyre
 invest $300 Million dollars into mining equipment that loses all its value in less than 2 years?

That’s $300 000 000. Take just 2 seconds to think about it.

Open your eyes people, the  train is full steam ahead, so get on board!

One fun recent rumour was that CSW somehow has an encrypted copy of Satoshi's wallets. He and Ayre are trying to bruteforce the passwords using this supposed "minng" equipment. They reckon it could take another year or three, at which point the "Tulip Trust" narrative will explain why CSW, nee Nakamoto, can now sign and spend...

Yep, that's the theory that says Paul Calder Le Roux is the real Satoshi and CSW was one of his bitches partners and he snitched on him.

Thought CSW was hired as an expert and given access to Paul Le Roux equipment after he was busted, not that they were partners.



1511. Post 51297491 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.49h):

Quote from: kenzawak on May 31, 2019, 03:58:52 PM
If BSV was a scam, why would
@CalvinAyre
 invest $300 Million dollars into mining equipment that loses all its value in less than 2 years?

That’s $300 000 000. Take just 2 seconds to think about it.

Open your eyes people, the  train is full steam ahead, so get on board!

One fun recent rumour was that CSW somehow has an encrypted copy of Satoshi's wallets. He and Ayre are trying to bruteforce the passwords using this supposed "minng" equipment. They reckon it could take another year or three, at which point the "Tulip Trust" narrative will explain why CSW, nee Nakamoto, can now sign and spend...

Yep, that's the theory that says Paul Calder Le Roux is the real Satoshi and CSW was one of his bitches partners and he snitched on him.

Thought CSW was hired as an expert and given access to Paul Le Roux equipment after he was busted, not that they were partners.

https://www.crypto-news.in/explainer/bitcoin-explainer/paul-le-roux-yet-another-satoshi-candidate/

"There are users on online cryptocurrency forums and message boards who theorise, Craig Wright may have been involved with Paul Le Roux from the day he started working on Bitcoin project. Wright became a snitch to US government leading to arrest of Paul Le Roux and used his friendship with Dave Kleiman to steal a hard disk of Le Roux which contains more than one million bitcoins which he has been using as basis to support his claims behind the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto.
...
There was also an anonymous user who theorised that Craig Wright’s hard dish with one million Bitcoin is actually hard disk stolen from Le Roux which was encrypted using his True Crypto software preventing Wright from accessing the bitcoins stored inside. The user also suggested that Calvin Ayre’s mining warehouse is just a front to hide true function of massive data centers which Calvin and Wright have so far been using to attempt decryption of true crypt volumes to plunder the bitcoins but have met with little success. "

They're setting January 2020 as the time they'll have access to the keys in the "tulip trust". Can't time brute force attack down to a month (and unlikely that they'll exhaust all permutations in such short time). Their actions don't align with someone with access to BTC1MM. At this point the most likely scenario (outside of them just straight up scamming) is CSW somehow geting his hands on one or few private keys (with no significant amount of BTC), but just enough to capitalize on "Satoshi" brand and fool Galvin



1512. Post 51312277 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.49h):

Quote from: MrFreeRoMan on June 01, 2019, 11:21:29 AM
Quote
People are going to wake up one day and not find that the value of their BTC investment is diminishing, but that it is zero. When such types of crime coins end, they don’t end slowly — they end in an instant. One moment you will be looking at US$8000 per coin, the next global trading will be suspended.

Caution! You can break your belly with laughter!
Another joke from Craig

https://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/satoshi-and-science/

Quote
Bitcoin acts without permission as long as you stay within the rules...

Faketoshi's appeal to authority is maddening in that post, other than that, as usual not a lot of real substance and just trying real hard to change the narrative as if it was always Satoshi's design. But he did open up his cards, he's somehow trying to make BSV pro government while he kills Bitcoin through courts. He's trying to positioning BSV to be a perfect platform for government friendly alternative crypto, nice niche to pitch to governments when they decide to try to ban guide public into more government friendly crypto. Since you know, outright banning all crypto is not an option anymore.



1513. Post 51312371 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.49h):

Quote from: jbreher on June 01, 2019, 08:23:46 PM
"fraudulent airdrop" wtf? its the SV you have to claim on a fork

No different than BTC. Any legacy (pre-fork) UTXO can be simply spent to the SV chain, just as simply as it can to the BTC chain.

Or did you not know that already?

Whichever chain the earliest client operates on is the original, others are airdrops, do i have to spell everything out for you? What's the earliest client that will still work on BSV chain? For some reason i never got any BSVs, oh that's right cause i didn't have any bcash. Maybe he meant that bcash was an airdrop, in which case we can at least agree on something



1514. Post 51312845 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.49h):

Quote from: jbreher on June 01, 2019, 08:59:59 PM
"fraudulent airdrop" wtf? its the SV you have to claim on a fork

No different than BTC. Any legacy (pre-fork) UTXO can be simply spent to the SV chain, just as simply as it can to the BTC chain.

Or did you not know that already?

Whichever chain the earliest client operates on is the original, others are airdrops, do i have to spell everything out for you? What's the earliest client that will still work on BSV chain? For some reason i never got any BSVs, oh that's right cause i didn't have any bcash. Maybe he meant that bcash was an airdrop, in which case we can at least agree on something

Well, if you had HAD any BTC on 2017 Aug 01, you would have been able to claim BCH on those same addresses. Still can, if you haven't moved those coins since. Even still able to claim SV, should that be the case. So if you never received any, that's on you.

And yes, you can simply spend those UTXOs to BCH and/or SV, just as easily as you can spend them to new SegWit addresses.

I did have BTC on 2017 Aug 01, and still have some that haven't moved since then, yet i don't have a single BSV

Let me draw you a chart

DateBitcoinBSV
2017_Jul_31YesNo
2017_Aug_01YepNope
2018_Nov_15Still hereNada
2019_Jun_01Here they areStill nothin

But yet BTC is an airdrop from BSV?? Are you always this confused? Do i have to bring out coloring pens?



1515. Post 51314700 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.49h):

Quote from: ssmc2 on June 02, 2019, 01:49:46 AM
no more local ads/cash ads on localbitcoins Angry

Wtf??? That sucks

Breaking News: No one will go to jail over your privacy! Now back to decentralization with bitcoin.



1516. Post 51315269 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.49h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on June 02, 2019, 03:00:22 AM
Australians entering the USA will be required to disclose their social media nicks

Quote
The US State Department is now requiring nearly all applicants for US visas to submit their social media usernames, previous email addresses and phone numbers.

https://www.news.com.au/travel/world-travel/north-america/strict-new-enhanced-vetting-of-people-trying-to-get-into-the-us-will-include-scrutiny-of-social-media-usage/news-story/30d89398b39996d5123dc5568c0b1b8e


How about go fuck yourself ?

Edit:  doesn’t apply to tourists under Visa Waiver Program so not quite as bad. Still. 


Thnx faketoshi



1517. Post 51316709 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.49h):

Quote from: jbreher on June 02, 2019, 05:21:46 AM
"fraudulent airdrop" wtf? its the SV you have to claim on a fork

No different than BTC. Any legacy (pre-fork) UTXO can be simply spent to the SV chain, just as simply as it can to the BTC chain.

Or did you not know that already?

Whichever chain the earliest client operates on is the original, others are airdrops, do i have to spell everything out for you? What's the earliest client that will still work on BSV chain? For some reason i never got any BSVs, oh that's right cause i didn't have any bcash. Maybe he meant that bcash was an airdrop, in which case we can at least agree on something

Well, if you had HAD any BTC on 2017 Aug 01, you would have been able to claim BCH on those same addresses. Still can, if you haven't moved those coins since. Even still able to claim SV, should that be the case. So if you never received any, that's on you.

And yes, you can simply spend those UTXOs to BCH and/or SV, just as easily as you can spend them to new SegWit addresses.

I did have BTC on 2017 Aug 01, and still have some that haven't moved since then, yet i don't have a single BSV

Yes you do. The funny thing is that you've not yet realized them. Note there are several definitions for 'realized' here which are applicable.

Huh i might've "realized" BSV?!? Mind telling me when BSV was forked?



1518. Post 51327356 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.49h):

Here we go



1519. Post 51328101 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.49h):

Quote from: kingcolex on June 03, 2019, 12:11:02 AM
New Evidence Suggests Satoshi Nakamoto Is Paul Solotshi, The Creator Of Encryption Software E4M And TrueCrypt

https://www.investinblockchain.com/new-evidence-suggests-satoshi-nakamoto-is-paul-solotshi-the-creator-of-encryption-software-e4m-and-truecrypt/

They have added to the rumor with solotoshi, so when is he expected to get out of prison? If ever

According to Bitcoinist.com:

...and he’s going to spend the rest of his life rotting in jail cell.
Cool, so who gives a shit then, same as if he was dead or not him, lets move on from this bad theory.

Nothing new, even solotshi name was reported a while back. So far this is much more plausible than faketoshi creating bitcoin. Rumor is that Paul Le Roux snitched to get reduced sentence, if that's the case i'm sure he'd love to hear about BSV's vision to appeal to authority.



1520. Post 51329088 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.49h):

Quote from: infofront on June 03, 2019, 03:44:45 AM
I have trouble getting out of the US, might make it into Canada, the Caribbean would actually be the easiest to pull off for me.

Canada supposedly bans anyone from the US with a DUI from entering, but millions of brown people from 3rd world countries who they have no idea the history of is okay.

What are your preferences for the 100K party, r0ach?

I'm guessing Auschwitz or perhaps Treblinka



1521. Post 51345809 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.49h):

Quote from: sandra_x on June 04, 2019, 09:36:43 AM
It seem today's crash was triggered by activities of whales on coinbase. Traders shifted their position when there was movement of 25,000 bitcoin to coinbase, after dumping, there was another movement of 14000 bitcoins from coinbase to another wallet. Traders are just being cautious and we will likely see some recovery as soon as the fears of manipulation is over.
https://www.ccn.com/bitcoin-price-plunged-14-to-7700-violent-spiral

Even if no one else traded that would result in BTC50k volume on coinbase which i do not see



1522. Post 51554369 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Half way there



1523. Post 52226225 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: GeoRW on August 21, 2019, 04:29:02 PM
Another last chance to buy at 4 digits  Cool
Wow, impressive registration date. I would love to hear your story. Wink
Quote
Date Registered:   November 09, 2010, 06:04:14 AM

Nothing spectacular.

Haha, the Pirate was a cool story indeed. I can’t remember the return but receiving the collateral back in time must have felt good afterwards.

Yeah, made a very nice profit there. As far as I remember it was like 6% a week.

And people going i'm sure he has a reasonable business plan for those kind of returns, where do i send my BTC



1524. Post 52278136 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on August 27, 2019, 12:34:52 AM
Blow by blow details here:

https://twitter.com/KatieAnanina/status/1166083984830410759?s=20

Yeah "all smart people already know that faketoshi is real satoshi", sucks for them that the judge wasn't smart just like the rest of us. What a clown



1525. Post 52278679 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: ðºÞæ on August 27, 2019, 06:01:59 AM

Can't sell something if you'll never get it.



Next up, Craig will say: "Whoops, can't access the trust no matter what."

Everybody (sans BSV muppets): "Why not, because it never existed?"

Craig: "No, because Dave implemented Shamir's Secret Sharing System improperly and the coins are lost for good."

Judge: "Tough noogies. You're still on the hook for $5 billion. And you're still not Satoshi."
One thing you can reliably relay on, State will get its share of taxes. They will not chase something they cant get hold of.
Unless Ira has 2 Billion of cash in his pocket he has to sell BTC.

No, just stop with your BS. You only have to pay taxes AFTER estate gets possession of the asset. And i thought bcash and bsv were both claiming to be original chain, look how fast bsv is backtracking, apparently 2014 bitcoins don't include BSV now?! The next goal for Ira is to get their hands on 500k BSV just to fuck with CSW Grin

In any case, i'm betting faketoshi will now claim that he destroyed they keys and saved all of the bitcoiners from the evil Ira



1526. Post 52278811 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: corporatist on August 27, 2019, 06:28:58 AM
wait, so is this true? Satoshi is a partnership and they have the 1mil btc wallet?

How he proved that Satoshi is a partnership?


No. Before there was a chance, say X%, that Faketoshi (guy who has been threatening BTC) has access to BTC1MM. This ruling has nothing to do with that chance, so X stays constant. Just now there's X% chance that he has access to only BTC500k.



1527. Post 52278900 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: ðºÞæ on August 27, 2019, 06:43:51 AM

Can't sell something if you'll never get it.



Next up, Craig will say: "Whoops, can't access the trust no matter what."

Everybody (sans BSV muppets): "Why not, because it never existed?"

Craig: "No, because Dave implemented Shamir's Secret Sharing System improperly and the coins are lost for good."

Judge: "Tough noogies. You're still on the hook for $5 billion. And you're still not Satoshi."
One thing you can reliably relay on, State will get its share of taxes. They will not chase something they cant get hold of.
Unless Ira has 2 Billion of cash in his pocket he has to sell BTC.

No, just stop with your BS. You only have to pay taxes AFTER estate gets possession of the asset. And i thought bcash and bsv were both claiming to be original chain, look how fast bsv is backtracking, apparently 2014 bitcoins don't include BSV now?! The next goal for Ira is to get their hands on 500k BSV just to fuck with CSW Grin

In any case, i'm betting faketoshi will now claim that he destroyed they keys and saved all of the bitcoiners from the evil Ira
Tax are due as soon as Ira takes ownership.
Craig was the biggest and longest Hodler (1 million over 10 years)
Ira will dump the biggest load 2 seconds after receiving the BTC (he never had any interrest in bitcoin, only $$$)

Not sure why you keep on believing that proven fraudster and liar didn't lie and has access to those keys. You seemed to be confused

And wait, so now CSW was actually good for BTC? Just don't tell it to BSV bag holders, they'll be so pissed



1528. Post 52285320 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: bkbirge on August 27, 2019, 04:41:44 PM

https://cointelegraph.com/news/craig-wright-kleiman-estate-will-now-dump-2-billion-in-bitcoin
I'm not sure it would be a big deal either way. I mean, if they have to raise $2 billion USD to pay an estate tax, that's roughly 20,000 btc at recent prices. According to: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin/
Last 24 hour volume is: 1,557,163 BTC
20,000 BTC is a small fraction of that daily reported volume. So whether auctioned or dumped on the open market I guess it doesn't really matter.


Except...

CMC volume reports are %90 bogus.

The real 24h trade volume of BTC is only $1.2b which is ~120kBTC

Source: https://openmarketcap.com/

Sure, not small but certainly not enough to warrant the chicken littles running around in the crypto press.
Some reports recently claim volume of BTC is overblown by 95% on CMC:
https://www.crowdfundinsider.com/2019/03/145745-coinmarketcap-admits-it-has-data-accuracy-problems-regarding-crypto-exchange-reporting/

If that is true then that still leaves a daily volume of 77858 BTC
And 20,000 of that is 26% one day volume increase, not a small amount but also not something that would swamp the markets for more than a brief period.

That same report shows several exchanges that it does trust volume reporting on to be accurate, among them Coinbase, which just today has volume
https://data.bitcoinity.org/markets/volume/24h?c=e&t=b
… of ~10k BTC, so 20,000 BTC is 2 days worth of trading on Coinbase only.

Either way, these are numbers that can be absorbed easily by the market I think.

Left out a 0 there. Maths are hard



1529. Post 52286713 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: gentlemand on August 27, 2019, 07:31:10 PM
Left out a 0 there. Maths are hard

0 is the only number that counts. None of these coins exist. I can't believe anyone's wasting their time doing sums regarding pure fiction.

Nothing is a true 0, i consider it a black swan event, and this black swan just got halved  Grin



1530. Post 52286830 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Who i'd prefer to have BTC1MM:

1-Me
2-Burner address
3-Hal, Andreas, some core devs... (people who deserve it)
...
7.530.000.000 - Faketoshi / BSV camp
7.530.000.001 - Ver and Bcash camp



1531. Post 52289268 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: fillippone on August 28, 2019, 06:54:20 AM
Who i'd prefer to have BTC1MM:

3-Hal, Andreas, some core devs... (people who deserve it)
...

Hal is long time dead, sadly.

Know more about him: everyone should:
https://101blockchains.com/who-is-hal-finney-bitcoin/

Yeah i'm aware that Hal hasn't been with us for past 5yrs now, meant his descendants/whoever has access to his frozen brain



1532. Post 52307702 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: Saint-loup on August 30, 2019, 01:37:38 AM
China could launch its cryptocurrencyCBDC as soon as November 11...

Speaking under terms of anonymity, the source, who previously worked for the Chinese government, confirmed that the technology behind the cryptocurrency has been ready since last year and that the cryptocurrency could launch as soon as November 11, China’s busiest shopping day, known as Singles Day.

Paul Schulte, who worked as global head of financial strategy for China Construction Bank until 2012, says the largest bank in the world, the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, the second largest bank in the world, his former employer, the Bank of China, the Agricultural Bank of China; two of China’s largest financial technology companies, Alibaba and Tencent; and Union Pay, an association of Chinese banks, will receive the cryptocurrency.

At the time of launch, the recipient institutions will then be responsible for dispersing the cryptocurrency to 1.3 billion Chinese citizens and others doing business in the renminbi, China’s fiat currency, according to the source.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeldelcastillo/2019/08/27/alibaba-tencent-five-others-to-recieve-first-chinese-government-cryptocurrency/

Quote
Mu says, the DC/EP is being designed to replace the physical notes and coins in circulation, not the renminbi sitting in bank accounts in a digital form.
Oh how Europe would love to get rid of their dirty dirty fiat which is screwing with their negative interest rates

So the next stage finally begins! Big players will have to start their own cryptocurrency pretty soon, next will be cryptoRuble, cryptoEuro etc... Small players will have an option of going for BTC or get pwned to libra. Unfortunately by the time they react half of their population will already be holding libras.

Next stage would be when cryptoUSD/libra/renminbi/ruble/rupee/euro suddenly devalues and population realizes that they can preserve their buying power by switching to BTC. That's when the war against BTC will really begin. All in due time



1533. Post 52324653 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: becoin on August 31, 2019, 11:38:05 PM
hate the West and the US all you want but it's much more open and free than china

That doesn't correspond to facts, my friend.

Here is one:
The United States of America is home to 4% of world's population and home to 25% of the world's PRISON population. The US is the most totalitarian state nowadays!

Second fact:
Yellow vest movement in France. Many protesters were severely injured broken arms and legs. Some have lost eyes in result of the police brutality. How many protesters in Hong Kong have lost eyes or ended up in hospitals with broken arms and legs?

Facts are stubborn things, right?


How many in China have lost their lives for protesting? Tiananmen Square anyone? Youtube and twitter etc... might have issues but at least they're available. Are you seriously trying to argue that there's more freedom in China than the west? Hope your social credit will go up for this, and you can continue to enjoy chinese banking and their public transportation  Roll Eyes



1534. Post 52326227 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: Findingnemo on September 01, 2019, 05:50:41 AM
Anyone here feels this Sunday is going to bring the price of bitcoin into over 10K again?

I feels yes, anyone got analysis for this weekend?

price is irrelevant
Current price movement of bitcoin is not that much important to the long term holders(like you) but it is something always connected with holding bitcoin.

If the price of bitcoin go back to few cents then no one will be holding that right now.

If the price of Bitcoin went back to a few cents, the members of this board would likely buy all of them....   We are the buyers of last resort. 


If people buying the bitcoin when it reaches few cents means they feels that the price will increase in the future that is what I meant to say price is related to cryptos.

price is irrelevant, bitcoin is inevitable, in due time it'll become obvious



1535. Post 52327510 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: becoin on September 01, 2019, 10:18:07 AM
but I haven't seen any execution attempts

You haven't seen because there is no freedom of speech. What did happen to Assange when he exposed not only execution attempts but real executions?

In the land of the free you're free to be homeless and unemployed. You're free to talk whatever you want if nobody is listening to you. As soon as you apply logic and facts and gather some crowd around that is listening you're accused of using hate speech. To ask questions and be critical is already a synonym of hate speech. Your Visa and Mastercard are blocked, your Facebook, Youtube and Twitter accounts removed. Would be interesting to see what Alex Jones has to say about freedom of speech and freedom of press? This is not a democracy, this is a pure blend of hypocrisy!

It is amusing to see how brainwashed people react to reality, but lets not use this forum for political arguments. Lets stick to bitcoin!




WTF did roach get to you or you trolling? Even with all that i still miss the part where China is somehow better?? They do the same shit *100. Social scores, religious camps, missing prisoners and soon to be without fiat (replaced by cryptoCNY)



1536. Post 52354101 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: Negotiation on September 04, 2019, 07:28:41 AM
Blah blah blah XRP blah blah bcash shilling blah blah please put me on ignore



Bitconnect pulled bigger crowds. Your whole market cap is our hourly variance, now go away no one cares



1537. Post 52363752 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: Icygreen on September 05, 2019, 03:22:14 AM
They're coming!  
https://business.financialpost.com/technology/blockchain/the-future-of-money-is-here-canada-should-take-the-lead-and-launch-our-own-cryptocurrency

That's their only option to hold off against Libra. While BTC gets popcorn



1538. Post 52401822 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: jbreher on September 09, 2019, 04:36:40 AM
How could evidence of personal identity have anything whatsoever to do with evidence of protocol change?

Quote
I'm not sure if you're trolling or trying to be serious.

Back at ya.

See any evidence of SegWit in the white paper? No?

Explicitly in front of your face. Willful dereliction of truthiness.

SegWit was indeed an alteration of the Bitcoin protocol. Undeniably. There is really no way to argue otherwise.

I am pretty confident the white paper doesn’t say anything about Turing completeness, legally enforceable smart contracts, token protocols,  large data storage capability and all the other shit in Bitcoin SV marketing

Yet interestingly, all fully supported in the 0.1 version of the Bitcoin protocol. You know, before the Cripple Rangers took control of the codebase. SegWit, on the other hand...

Funny, eh?

So what's the point you are trying to make?

My mistake.  I couldn't see any evidence of them in the white paper.  Thank you for clarifying that it doesn't matter whether something is mentioned in the whitepaper.

That is not what I said at all. Are you really that blind that you do not see what I am getting at? Even with your introduction of demonstrably flawed sidebars?

The initial implementation of Bitcoin - 0.1 supports all the features you list. Without recourse to explicit enabling code.
The initial implementation of Bitcoin -- and including up to and through the SegWit Omnibus Changeset Release -- did not support SegWit. Neither explicitly nor as an external implementation. Indeed, the implementation of SegWit was predicated on the most egregious change to the Bitcoin protocol ever enacted.
The features you list did not / do not require a change to the Bitcoin protocol.
SegWit did / does require a change to the Bitcoin protocol.

So when you say "it doesn't matter whether something is mentioned in the whitepaper", you're neither right nor wrong. What matters is the protocol itself. SegWit was undeniably a change to that protocol. A rather significant one. Therefore, somewhat 'less Bitcoin-y' -- at least on this axis -- than other implementations which hew to the original.

On the other hand, if some element is decidedly counter to the white paper (chain of digital signatures, anyone?), then that indeed does matter.

It’s hard to keep track of what you were saying when you keep changing it. 

Bullshit. I've been consistent. You've been persistent in finding new words to stick in my mouth.

wtf these new planes have jet engines, and cars have airbags?!?! But but none of this was in the original design!!!



1539. Post 52409620 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: hv_ on September 09, 2019, 07:05:57 AM
How could evidence of personal identity have anything whatsoever to do with evidence of protocol change?

Quote
I'm not sure if you're trolling or trying to be serious.

Back at ya.

See any evidence of SegWit in the white paper? No?

Explicitly in front of your face. Willful dereliction of truthiness.

SegWit was indeed an alteration of the Bitcoin protocol. Undeniably. There is really no way to argue otherwise.

I am pretty confident the white paper doesn’t say anything about Turing completeness, legally enforceable smart contracts, token protocols,  large data storage capability and all the other shit in Bitcoin SV marketing

Yet interestingly, all fully supported in the 0.1 version of the Bitcoin protocol. You know, before the Cripple Rangers took control of the codebase. SegWit, on the other hand...

Funny, eh?

So what's the point you are trying to make?

My mistake.  I couldn't see any evidence of them in the white paper.  Thank you for clarifying that it doesn't matter whether something is mentioned in the whitepaper.

That is not what I said at all. Are you really that blind that you do not see what I am getting at? Even with your introduction of demonstrably flawed sidebars?

The initial implementation of Bitcoin - 0.1 supports all the features you list. Without recourse to explicit enabling code.
The initial implementation of Bitcoin -- and including up to and through the SegWit Omnibus Changeset Release -- did not support SegWit. Neither explicitly nor as an external implementation. Indeed, the implementation of SegWit was predicated on the most egregious change to the Bitcoin protocol ever enacted.
The features you list did not / do not require a change to the Bitcoin protocol.
SegWit did / does require a change to the Bitcoin protocol.

So when you say "it doesn't matter whether something is mentioned in the whitepaper", you're neither right nor wrong. What matters is the protocol itself. SegWit was undeniably a change to that protocol. A rather significant one. Therefore, somewhat 'less Bitcoin-y' -- at least on this axis -- than other implementations which hew to the original.

On the other hand, if some element is decidedly counter to the white paper (chain of digital signatures, anyone?), then that indeed does matter.

It’s hard to keep track of what you were saying when you keep changing it. 

Bullshit. I've been consistent. You've been persistent in finding new words to stick in my mouth.

wtf these new planes have jet engines, and cars have airbags?!?! But but none of this was in the original design!!!

OMG - but still TCP/IP ,  smtp, SWIFT, FIX  have not built in smart contracts - or did I miss u mix apples and crap?

Congrats you managed to fail on all levels, this is truly an accomplishment you should be proud of yourself

TCP/IP - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6
smtp - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_SMTP
SWIFT - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_for_Worldwide_Interbank_Financial_Telecommunication#SWIFTNet_Phase_2
FIX - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FAST_protocol



1540. Post 52409726 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Hey jbreher how would you spin EDA and bcash and BSv's current difficulty adjustment algos? what version did that come in?



1541. Post 52411962 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: jbreher on September 10, 2019, 01:49:18 AM
wtf these new planes have jet engines, and cars have airbags?!?! But but none of this was in the original design!!!

OMG - but still TCP/IP ,  smtp, SWIFT, FIX  have not built in smart contracts - or did I miss u mix apples and crap?

Congrats you managed to fail on all levels, this is truly an accomplishment you should be proud of yourself

TCP/IP - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6
smtp - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_SMTP
SWIFT - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_for_Worldwide_Interbank_Financial_Telecommunication#SWIFTNet_Phase_2
FIX - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FAST_protocol

Ha. Haha. Hahahahahhaaa. I should let this one go, but this is just too funny. Call me weak, I don't care.

I am intimately familiar with the contents of the underlying documents which officially define half of those protocols. I'm quite sure that neither rfc791, nor rfc793 nor rfc2460 nor rfc5321 nor any of their subsequent amplifications or revisions say doodly-squat about smart contracts.

But then again, I'm always up for learning something new. Where in each of those standards is the smart contract funcitonality hidden? Hmmmm?

You should be proud of yourself indeed. IOW, You managed to fail on all levels.

Ok let me spell it out. My simple argument was that no one cares about the original design, all things change and improve all the time, and even hv_ link proposed long standing standards have indeed went through few revisions as well. Apologies if it went over your had, didn't mean to make you look for smart contracts in IPv6 specs  Undecided



1542. Post 52412009 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: jbreher on September 08, 2019, 03:16:52 AM
How could evidence of personal identity have anything whatsoever to do with evidence of protocol change?

Quote
I'm not sure if you're trolling or trying to be serious.

Back at ya.

See any evidence of SegWit in the white paper? No?

Explicitly in front of your face. Willful dereliction of truthiness.

SegWit was indeed an alteration of the Bitcoin protocol. Undeniably. There is really no way to argue otherwise.

I am pretty confident the white paper doesn’t say anything about Turing completeness, legally enforceable smart contracts, token protocols,  large data storage capability and all the other shit in Bitcoin SV marketing

Yet interestingly, all fully supported in the 0.1 version of the Bitcoin protocol. You know, before the Cripple Rangers took control of the codebase. SegWit, on the other hand...

Funny, eh?
So what's the point you are trying to make?


Quote from: jbreher on September 10, 2019, 02:22:51 AM
Hey jbreher how would you spin EDA and bcash and BSv's current difficulty adjustment algos? what version did that come in?

Well, there's really no way to spin that. That's a change indeed.

Of course, SV is the project where the majority of vocal participants are stating a desire to return to the 0.1 protocol. So if this will come to pass, that will be rolled back. Of course there is no guarantee of future developments.

Meantime, that is a legitimate claim to a protocol change.

Wait so Bitcoin = bad because Segwit is "indeed an alteration of the Bitcoin protocol"
but bcash Bsv = good because their shitty changes are "legitimate claim to a protocol change"

That is indeed pretty f'ing funny. If not for your constant desperate shilling of shitcoins, you almost passed as an intelligent person, a shame really.




1543. Post 52412081 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: Sharon121212 on September 10, 2019, 06:50:58 AM
JayJuanGee, as the smartest person in the thread and the one we generally delegate all decisions to, do you believe women should be allowed to vote when they're genetically incapable of practicing utilitarianism - the foundation of modern civilization - and only exist to practice provider targeting, acquisition, and resource extraction?
Utilitarianism you say?  If it's an action that can bring joy to vast number of people, then let's base on the saying that charity beginnings at home, women(some are the opposite though) are the back bone of joy in the family trying had to make necessary changes to bring about joy and overall well being in the family.
This is 2019 and every individual irrespective of the gender, race, religion etc is qualified to Vote and be voted for. However every qualifications or criticism should be based on the individual not a general view of the person sect, race gender, background an so on.

We don't feed roach in here. He's never been the same since that accident with his boyfriend



1544. Post 52417731 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: jbreher on September 10, 2019, 04:43:04 PM
Wait so Bitcoin = bad because Segwit is "indeed an alteration of the Bitcoin protocol"

BTC is suboptimal not merely because SegWit is an alteration, but because the SegWit Omnibus Changeset is a net negative alteration.

Quote
but bcash Bsv = good because their shitty changes are "legitimate claim to a protocol change"

One of the things that makes BSV good is that it is being incrementally returned to the original Bitcoin protocol.

Do try to keep up.

Thus coming back to my comment about original design of planes not having jet engines and cars not having air bags etc... Can you provide any other technology which was not improved and is stuck at its original design? BSv's whole premise relies on cult thinking rather than logic. The design of first car, computer, TV etc etc etc have little to do with their current revisions and no one cares about ENIAC and steam powered cars.



1545. Post 52428896 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: hv_ on September 11, 2019, 07:10:28 PM
Wait so Bitcoin = bad because Segwit is "indeed an alteration of the Bitcoin protocol"

BTC is suboptimal not merely because SegWit is an alteration, but because the SegWit Omnibus Changeset is a net negative alteration.

Quote
but bcash Bsv = good because their shitty changes are "legitimate claim to a protocol change"

One of the things that makes BSV good is that it is being incrementally returned to the original Bitcoin protocol.

Do try to keep up.

Thus coming back to my comment about original design of planes not having jet engines and cars not having air bags etc... Can you provide any other technology which was not improved and is stuck at its original design? BSv's whole premise relies on cult thinking rather than logic. The design of first car, computer, TV etc etc etc have little to do with their current revisions and no one cares about ENIAC and steam powered cars.

U in principle say that original Bitcoin (pre alterations incl Segwit) didn't work, had no enjines, no proper script  whatsoever

But that is the cult, that core / BS created , i.o. to sell u 2nd layer and script 'engines' cause it s still on the cult ticker btc.

Take a step back, not Back, but back to the roots (yeah, it could get a cult)

Jackass

Guess this is a full agree in ur lang.

Cheers
I didn't say it didn't work for it's time, but all things change, and improve for the better, deal with it. Trying to stick to original design because it's somehow divine and refuse changes citing code v0.1 as some kind of bible is cult thinking, not engineering. Like i said no one cares about specs for ENIAC just as no one cares about BSv or bcash.



1546. Post 52429892 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on September 12, 2019, 01:26:03 AM
Wait so Bitcoin = bad because Segwit is "indeed an alteration of the Bitcoin protocol"

BTC is suboptimal not merely because SegWit is an alteration, but because the SegWit Omnibus Changeset is a net negative alteration.

Quote
but bcash Bsv = good because their shitty changes are "legitimate claim to a protocol change"

One of the things that makes BSV good is that it is being incrementally returned to the original Bitcoin protocol.

Do try to keep up.

Thus coming back to my comment about original design of planes not having jet engines and cars not having air bags etc... Can you provide any other technology which was not improved and is stuck at its original design? BSv's whole premise relies on cult thinking rather than logic. The design of first car, computer, TV etc etc etc have little to do with their current revisions and no one cares about ENIAC and steam powered cars.

Which, of course, brings me right back to the observation that the SegWit Omnibus Changeset is a net negative alteration. Degradation is not improvement.

Who cares about your qualitative assessment of segwit (and your attempt to change its name)?  Your opinion on such point does not matter.

What matters is that segregated witness was passed by overwhelming consensus in August 2017 and locked in and implemented all in that same month.  Ever since then, segwit has been built upon more and more and more.  Segwit systems have been embedded into the current workings of bitcoin as we know it.

Segwit is also an optional component, as you know.  You can participate in such new segwit systems that are offered within bitcoin or you can stay with systems that do not utilize segwit.  Many people are not going to know the difference between what part of the system they are using, and it is not going to matter to them, except that they will likely realize that fees and transaction times are lower through such useage of segwit.. which seems like a net positive, to me.  

Of course, you know that you can refuse to use bitcoin because of bitcoin's evolution in terms of better systems, such as segwit, and there are those dumbass bitcoin wannabe shitcoins that don't use segwit (yet), too, as you know.  They are not really doing too well, either, in terms of adoption, are they?  You dumbass  (I call you a dumbass in a kind of redundant way because you remain in support of such bitcoin wannabes, and even erroneously believe them to be bitcoin.. which fairly clearly shows that you to have fucked up conceptions regarding even what is bitcoin.. that is if even you believe that crap).  

I doubt your whining, the whining of BIG blockers or the whining of bitcoin naysayers is going to cause consensus on that segwit included in bitcoin topic to be undone.  Your lobbying does not seem to have much of any effect regarding perception about the benefits of segwit on bitcoin, but it does continue to cause you to appear as an ongoing lame-ass whiner...   a whiner about an issue that has about a snowball's chance in hell of changing in your stated preferred direction.

Also your ongoing whining on this segwit in bitcoin topic seems to be just another example to show that you like to focus on irrelevant issues and to attempt to describe such supposedly important issues in a way that exaggerates their actual affect on bitcoin - in other words, an example of your ongoing disingenuineness in regards to relevant and material facts in regards to bitcoin.

So jbreher vacated his argument about sticking to "original" and now he's back to Segwit = bad, which JJG covered in length above. All i'll say on that topic is it's been over 2hrs and it's not going anywhere, now get over it and get on with your life. Or continue trolling from a sideline, the choice is yours, we've made ours.



1547. Post 52436909 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: Searing on September 12, 2019, 04:29:59 PM
OT: This is a HUGE red alert flag if the U.S. is seriously considering this...

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/12/mnuchin-says-the-treasury-is-seriously-considering-issuing-a-50-year-bond-next-year.html

Zero interest rates in the U.S. soontm

BUY BITCOIN. BTFD.

I know that Trump via executive order on paper can ban Bitcoin. What if anything would it due to price and/or consequences of such idiocy

if he attempted such? Or would it just be a big yawn and ignored?

later

brad


Well you can't ban code, so realistically worst US can do is prohibit banks dealing with BTC and close US based exchanges. Price would instantaneously dump, and BTC market will go underground in US. But i'm a strong believer that current global financial system is a zero sum game, meaning what's bad for US would be good for the other side China, Russia, EU?, Iran etc... So the growth will just come from there



1548. Post 52455655 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: mindrust on September 14, 2019, 08:32:19 AM
Another thing, why do you think the network fees went nuts while the ATH was happening in 2017?

People were literally outbidding each other by paying more fees to send their coins faster to the exchanges so they could dump!

Umm for every sold coin, there is a coin that was bought. So 50% is people paying more fees to send their coins to exchange, and 50% of that is people paying more fees to take their coins from the exchange. Not your keys...



1549. Post 52494569 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Quote
According to the document, Wright’s lawyers and Kleiman’s estate have reached a non-binding agreement to settle the matter and are continuing to negotiate and finalize all relevant terms.
https://coinworld360.com/craig-wright-asks-for-30-day-extension-to-delay-500k-bitcoin-payout/

Plot twist, they settle for undisclosed amount, Ira praises CSW as real Satoshi and not a single Satoshi's satoshi is moved. Whole circus was orchestrated by court loving CSW/Calvin from the start, who's willing to do anything to add legitimacy to his fairy tale as long as it doesn't involve Satoshi's keys.



1550. Post 52506414 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Quote from: JSRAW on September 20, 2019, 06:57:45 AM
Bitches in the future  Grin Grin
Bitcoin is the Future

https://twitter.com/sarahaustin/status/1174862863841628162


Please tell me they guessed H next



1551. Post 52532728 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Quote from: mindrust on September 23, 2019, 05:43:05 AM
Contract Size
1 Bitcoin

I know they are not targeting plebs with signatures but what'll happen when BTC hits 100k? They'll be losing customers because there will be less and less people around with 1 btc and I am quite sure they won't be fucking around.

BTT still asks 50btc for a VIP membership. It used to be as low as $260 How many VIP's is Theymos getting lately?

This looks like self destruction to me. It was all air.

The only thing matters now is the charts and the game and whatever happened in WO... joke, its the charts and the halvening.

Berkshire Hathaway Class A is trading at over $313k per each share. It's a different league with institutional investors.
Ha BTC50 for "VIP" membership on a forum. Unless it comes with it's own yacht and island full of models i think i'll pass



1552. Post 52541126 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Quote from: Majormax on September 24, 2019, 12:35:57 AM
Current news about Googles Quantum Computer may be weighing on Crypto.

By 2021 , it is theorized that 256 bit encryption could be cracked by quantum computing.

##https://interestingengineering.com/google-says-that-they-have-just-reached-quantum-supremacy


Although Quantum Computing has a tangential application set to classical computing, the current breakthrough by Google indicates things could change ... uncertain.  

This is worth keeping an eye on, because it could become an existential threat to encryption.

I have read some discussion about this previously, and I believe that SHA256 hashing is not affected (by quantum calculations) in the same way as 256 bit encryption.

...might just cause a dip in prices for now.



Just don't reuse your address and you'll be fine. Or reuse it and you'll still be fine for next few yrs.



1553. Post 52549739 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Is BTC dead?



1554. Post 52550562 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Quote from: JSRAW on September 25, 2019, 05:45:59 AM
Now BFakkt - 216 BTC



Grow little one, grow. You'll need to get much bigger before ETF can have a serious chance.



1555. Post 52560318 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Today BAKKT traded BTC217, in 5yrs that'd take up almost 50% of the supply. Silly traders with their dinosaur charts and triangles.



1556. Post 52569133 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Quote from: infofront on September 27, 2019, 02:01:48 AM
Venezuela Has Bitcoin Stash and Doesn’t Know What to Do With It

I could think of a few things to do with it.

Awesome but too early, not the attention we need right now.



1557. Post 52569135 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Quote from: VB1001 on September 27, 2019, 05:20:29 AM

https://twitter.com/CoinSense101/status/1177161842482769920

 Cheesy

Fuck you!!!!



1558. Post 52973800 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Sep 17, 2019 Faketoshi
Quote
The parties have been engaged in extensive settlement negotiations and have reached a non-binding agreement in principle to settle this matter.

The parties are continuing to negotiate, finalize all relevant terms, and document the agreement appropriately.
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.284.0.pdf


Oct 8, 2019 Faketoshi
Quote
On September 17, 2019, the parties informed the Court that they had reached a non-binding agreement in principle to settle this matter

Since that date, the parties have worked diligently on reaching an agreement on all terms. In that effort, the parties’ counsel have met three times in person to go over the details of the final agreement and have made significant progress on reaching the form of what will become the final binding agreement. Due to the complexity of the settlement and associated documents, however, a bit more time is needed to finalize and memorialize the agreement.

Reaching a final binding settlement agreement is in the best interests of both parties, and an additional 30-day extension of all case deadlines (including the trial setting) will enable both parties to devote their full efforts to that goal.
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.287.0.pdf


Nov 1, 2019 Kleiman
Quote
Plaintiffs, at the time, believed to have been good faith settlement discussions. These discussions began at Craig’s request and due to the fact that Craig represented he had the means to finance a settlement.

On September 11, the parties reached a non-binding settlement in principle and then turned to drafting binding settlement papers. To facilitate these discussions, there were at least four in person meetings and numerous telephonic conferences. Plaintiffs hired both U.S. tax counsel and foreign counsel and incurred the cost of their participation in the settlement process. In reliance on these efforts and what seemed to be steady progress toward global resolution, Plaintiffs stopped active litigation, focused on settlement, and joined both of Craig’s motions to extend the case deadlines by 30 days

On October 30, without any advance notice, Plaintiffs were informed Craig could no longer finance the settlement and was “breaking” the non-binding settlement agreement.

He [Faketoshi] asked the parties to pause the litigation process and concentrate on amicably resolving this dispute, only to pull his consent with no advance notice, without good cause,
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.290.0.pdf

So much integrity, grace, and such strong moral compass. Why aren't more businesses sending him millions and investing in his shitcoin Huh  Where you at BSv shills? jbreher? Your false god could use a positive spin on this turd! Start shining, *tik*tok*tik*tok* his time is running out!!!



1559. Post 52973814 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: Dabs on November 03, 2019, 11:11:57 PM
In order to make this work, you have to make a deal.

Deal seems pretty clear as last time, you just have to state what you are going to deliver and when. I simply hold the coins until you make it happen. Or try to.

Since you understand escrow pretty well, then it's up to you to renege on the deal. I didn't make it. State the numbers and the target date. I sign a contract. Wait for it to be funded; which also carries a time limit. If they don't fund it, I guess no one wants to take you up on your offer.

To everyone else, that's the whole point of escrow, to prevent scams and scammers from directly taking your coins and disappearing. All conditions must be met. Sorry if it looks like I'm feeding a troll, I like this one a little better than the others.

Until then, I remain neutral.

I also have a bridge to sell, can i use you as an escrow? Obviously i'll need a small 35% distribution up front cause you know, it takes money to make money but 1000x return is guaranteed!



1560. Post 52982208 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: jbreher on November 04, 2019, 07:46:12 AM
Sep 17, 2019 Faketoshi
Quote
The parties have been engaged in extensive settlement negotiations and have reached a non-binding agreement in principle to settle this matter.

The parties are continuing to negotiate, finalize all relevant terms, and document the agreement appropriately.
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.284.0.pdf


Oct 8, 2019 Faketoshi
Quote
On September 17, 2019, the parties informed the Court that they had reached a non-binding agreement in principle to settle this matter

Since that date, the parties have worked diligently on reaching an agreement on all terms. In that effort, the parties’ counsel have met three times in person to go over the details of the final agreement and have made significant progress on reaching the form of what will become the final binding agreement. Due to the complexity of the settlement and associated documents, however, a bit more time is needed to finalize and memorialize the agreement.

Reaching a final binding settlement agreement is in the best interests of both parties, and an additional 30-day extension of all case deadlines (including the trial setting) will enable both parties to devote their full efforts to that goal.
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.287.0.pdf


Nov 1, 2019 Kleiman
Quote
Plaintiffs, at the time, believed to have been good faith settlement discussions. These discussions began at Craig’s request and due to the fact that Craig represented he had the means to finance a settlement.

On September 11, the parties reached a non-binding settlement in principle and then turned to drafting binding settlement papers. To facilitate these discussions, there were at least four in person meetings and numerous telephonic conferences. Plaintiffs hired both U.S. tax counsel and foreign counsel and incurred the cost of their participation in the settlement process. In reliance on these efforts and what seemed to be steady progress toward global resolution, Plaintiffs stopped active litigation, focused on settlement, and joined both of Craig’s motions to extend the case deadlines by 30 days

On October 30, without any advance notice, Plaintiffs were informed Craig could no longer finance the settlement and was “breaking” the non-binding settlement agreement.

He [Faketoshi] asked the parties to pause the litigation process and concentrate on amicably resolving this dispute, only to pull his consent with no advance notice, without good cause,
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.290.0.pdf

So much integrity, grace, and such strong moral compass. Why aren't more businesses sending him millions and investing in his shitcoin Huh  Where you at BSv shills? jbreher? Your false god could use a positive spin on this turd! Start shining, *tik*tok*tik*tok* his time is running out!!!

Dunno why you're summoning me. I ain't got no dog in this fight. Do you?

I considered it a black swan event, Faketoshi claimed that once he gives Kleiman the coins he'll have to dump a big chunk of them just to cover taxes Cheesy All appears just to be another lie on his way to becoming irrelevant, wanted to hear BSv shills comment on it so i summoned you, great bear/BSv supporter. But if even you can't put a positive spin on this/dropped your support for BSv, it might be the beginning of the end for them!
Quote
...the judge ordered me to send just under 500,000 BTC over to Ira. Let’s see what it does to the market. I wouldn’t have tanked the market. I’m nice.

I’m sorry, BTC, but that might be a problem. They might have to convince Ira not to dump it. I can’t convince him not to dump it. Ira has to do what Ira has to do

He doesn’t actually need it but he wants it. Everyone might want to start praying, because I complied with courts and that might get scary really, really quickly. The courts ruled that Ira inherited the $5 billion. Now he has to pay estate tax on that if he wants it.

...but now you’ll have to break the Tulip Trust to transfer the coins.
If the court makes an order, I will comply with the order. And the court has made an order. It’s that simple.
https://modernconsensus.com/cryptocurrencies/bitcoin/exclusive-interview-with-craig-wright-just-after-ordered-to-pay-5-billion-in-bitcoin/amp/?__twitter_impression=true



1561. Post 52993070 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: jbreher on November 05, 2019, 08:44:39 AM
Where you at BSv shills? jbreher?

Dunno why you're summoning me. I ain't got no dog in this fight. Do you?

I considered it a black swan event, Faketoshi claimed that once he gives Kleiman the coins he'll have to dump a big chunk of them just to cover taxes Cheesy All appears just to be another lie on his way to becoming irrelevant, wanted to hear BSv shills comment on it so i summoned you, great bear/BSv supporter.

You seem to be suffering the commonly-shared echo chamber delusion that CSW and BSV are one and the same. They are not.

Quote
But if even you can't put a positive spin on this

I have no reason to put any spin on this whatsoever.
Though I will point to this: https://coingeek.com/calvin-ayre-passes-on-buying-dave-kleiman-estate-because-it-holds-no-assets/
Yeah, it's CoinGeek. May or may not be true. But it is potentially relevant, if true.

I don't know why anyone is particularly astonished that CSW did not cough up half a billion bux to Ira. He has been consistent all along in stating that he will have no access to the Tulip Trust funds until such time as the keys become available to him - which I believe has been stated to be early 2020. Whether true or not, that has been the claim since years. He obviously can't transfer something he does not possess.

In the meantime, popcorn consumption is epic.

Oh, are they already in the cut Faketoshi off cause he's more of a liability than an asset stage?? Must've missed the memo, but if BSv separates from Faketoshi, they're just another shitcoin without even a claim to Satoshi, is it time for Faketoshi to start BSVclassic™?

That article was a good laugh. So after CSW reached a good faith non-binding agreement with Dave's estate and represented that he had the means to finance that settlement, in parallel, Ayre (the dude who's bankrolling BSv and CSW) commenced a separate good-faith negotiations to acquire that estate?!? Cheesy  Dave died alone and poor with no assets except for the judge's ruling that CSW hand him BTC500.000 and half of all of IP before Dave's death. After very thorough investigations by his lawyers Ayre realized that "legal analysis that concluded the estate holds no significant assets." Then oddly out of context Ayre's article felt the need to clarify that his own clown investigation is separate from CSWs non-binding settlement  Huh
Quote
Craig Wright was never a party to these negotiations and any suggestion that contradicts this is a factual misrepresentation.
It just gets more hilarious after that, and to finish off Ayre felt the need to once again drill in that his retarded negotiations are not related to agreement that CSW reached with the estate.
Quote
At no point was any agreement entered into in these negotiations by Ayre or anyone else. Any suggestion that there was a misrepresentation of facts and possibly libelous.
At this point i ran out of popcorn




1562. Post 52993371 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: ðºÞæ on November 05, 2019, 07:33:13 PM

Dave died alone and poor with no assets

Wrong, Dave had 350,000 BTC which his idiot brother disposed of.

half of all of IP
how much is half of 0, CSW has zero IP this days


First of all learn to use quotes, then if you want to be taken seriously and don't want to be with r0ach on the ignore list you got to cite you sources like the big boys do (and please no more coingeek, i already lost few IQ points from that site today)

Edit: Or is that BSv new stance? Ok you got us the whole tulip trust we were pushing for few years was a complete lie, but now check this out, what really happened is umm Dave had the coins the whole time, and Ira deleted them so Faketoshi doesn't owe him anything! And then aliens came and declared CSW Satoshi!! I love smell of desperation early in the morning  Grin



1563. Post 52995136 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: ðºÞæ on November 05, 2019, 08:29:46 PM

Dave died alone and poor with no assets

Wrong, Dave had 350,000 BTC which his idiot brother disposed of.

half of all of IP
how much is half of 0, CSW has zero IP this days


First of all learn to use quotes, then if you want to be taken seriously and don't want to be with r0ach on the ignore list you got to cite you sources like the big boys do (and please no more coingeek, i already lost few IQ points from that site today)

Not keeping track of all articles read over the years, here is a random one:
https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/bitcoin-craig-wright
Quote
It had been suggested, however, that as one of the founders of bitcoin, he actually passed away with some 350,000 bitcoins sitting on an encrypted USB drive he kept on him at all times.
Quote
Wright confirms Kleiman did indeed have 350,000 bitcoins.
January 1, 2013 BTC is $13,56
April 26, 2013 BTC =  $135,60

The whole court drama came about with CSW contacting Dave's father and told him to hang on to the hard-drive as it might be worth a lot of money. By that time the house most likely was cleared - cleaned and on the market. (Extreme case of saving the penny and throwing away pounds)
Let's remember Ira never visited his very ill brother once, not in hospital or at home.



It has been suggested? really that's your citation Angry So now we're trusting the guy who's been proven a fraud in court? ok let's look at the citation about mysterious encrypted USB drive, but let me help you by getting the context.

Quote
But many other claims by Wright in the story don't stand up to scrutiny. Take his story about his friend Dave Kleiman
...It had been suggested, however, that as one of the founders of bitcoin, he actually passed away with some 350,000 bitcoins sitting on an encrypted USB drive he kept on him at all times
...Wright confirms Kleiman did indeed have 350,000 bitcoins. Yet in explaining why he didn't sell, Wright says, "It wasn't worth much then. Dave died a week before the value went up by 25 times."
...This goes unquestioned, but it's not remotely true...It was baffling: why lie? What was being hidden here?

Faketoshi testified under oath that he had some proprietary HD algo (before HD wallets were even created) that all block rewards went to, but the master key was in a tulip trust that no one had access to, thus why he only listed first 60 or so public address and didn't know the rest. Are you saying that there is no tulip trust and he had access to those BTC? Are you calling Faketoshi a liar?

Best quote from the article though
Quote
When I call Kleiman's former colleague at Computer Forensics LLC, Patrick Paige, and let him know I'm working on a story about Craig Wright, the first thing he says to me is: "Is he on suicide watch yet?"



1564. Post 53008137 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote
Stock Markets (all three) hit another ALL TIME & HISTORIC HIGH yesterday! You are sooo lucky to have me as your President (just kidding!). Spend your money well!
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1192071660494565377

Don't worry, we are  Grin



1565. Post 53008250 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: jbreher on November 06, 2019, 09:42:25 PM
Where you at BSv shills? jbreher?

Dunno why you're summoning me. I ain't got no dog in this fight. Do you?

I considered it a black swan event, Faketoshi claimed that once he gives Kleiman the coins he'll have to dump a big chunk of them just to cover taxes Cheesy All appears just to be another lie on his way to becoming irrelevant, wanted to hear BSv shills comment on it so i summoned you, great bear/BSv supporter.

You seem to be suffering the commonly-shared echo chamber delusion that CSW and BSV are one and the same. They are not.

Quote
But if even you can't put a positive spin on this

I have no reason to put any spin on this whatsoever.
Though I will point to this: https://coingeek.com/calvin-ayre-passes-on-buying-dave-kleiman-estate-because-it-holds-no-assets/
Yeah, it's CoinGeek. May or may not be true. But it is potentially relevant, if true.

I don't know why anyone is particularly astonished that CSW did not cough up half a billion bux to Ira. He has been consistent all along in stating that he will have no access to the Tulip Trust funds until such time as the keys become available to him - which I believe has been stated to be early 2020. Whether true or not, that has been the claim since years. He obviously can't transfer something he does not possess.

In the meantime, popcorn consumption is epic.

Oh, are they already in the cut Faketoshi off cause he's more of a liability than an asset stage??

Who is 'they'?

Quote
Must've missed the memo, but if BSv separates from Faketoshi, they're just another shitcoin without even a claim to Satoshi,

I will merely repeat for the record (seeing ow your response indicates you have not yet seen it, despite being in the material you quoted): You seem to be suffering the commonly-shared echo chamber delusion that CSW and BSV are one and the same. They are not.



but now check this out, what really happened is umm Dave had the coins the whole time, and Ira deleted them

In point of fact, this claim was publicly surfaced back around the time of the Andrew O'Hagan piece.

DO try to keep up.


Got it, CSW too toxic of a liability now, is that why Ayre didn't cough up the dough for the estate? Is Ayre still good or should BSv separate from Ayre as well? I can't keep track of this.

Ohh and claims are facts now? That's your best source? At lease ðºÞæ had that funny article https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg52995136#msg52995136 so did Faketoshi gave private keys to Dave before or after he implemented his HD algo that generated the private keys for those block rewards? I really can't keep up, the amount of BS that comes out of BSv daily is overwhelming, do you still believe Faketoshi to be Satoshi or your flipped on that too?



1566. Post 53015811 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: jbreher on November 06, 2019, 09:42:25 PM
In point of fact, this claim was publicly surfaced back around the time of the Andrew O'Hagan piece.

Quote from: jbreher on November 07, 2019, 03:54:11 PM

so did Faketoshi gave private keys to Dave before or after he implemented his HD algo that generated the private keys for those block rewards?

Can’t say that I know. Once you work out the answer, why don’t you be a pal, and report back to me?

And thus lies the problem, a shill throws out some BS claimed by Faketoshi, another shill claims it as a fact, but there just so much BS that the claim cannot be substantiated without contradicting something else Faketoshi testified to under oath. At this point there are only two desperate options, ask someone else to verify your BS or, claim that Faketoshi is not important to BSv anyway.

Well, i read through all of the court docs and the only way that Dave could've died penniless, in his own piss, without private medical help while holding millions in BTC is...


Quote from: jbreher on November 06, 2019, 09:42:25 PM
I am ambivalent on the question of ‘is CSW Satoshi?’

Invest in this shitcoin, it was copied from original by a proven fraud in court, and i'm about 50% sure that their main investors (Ayre) developers (nChain) are all lying about him anything to do with Satoshi  Undecided
Bravo, where do i send money to?



1567. Post 53022791 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: hv_ on November 08, 2019, 10:27:32 AM
.. snip

.., it was copied from original ...


nope

It was SAFED to STAY ORIGINAL

 Shocked

This has been debunked multiple times, which chain has the original DAA designed by Satoshi?



1568. Post 53045769 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: bkbirge on November 10, 2019, 10:15:03 PM
Quote from: UnDerDoG81
I am just thinking of a scenario where wales decide to get out before halving

Brexit?

Brexit would be bullish AF.

Bears would be dancing if:
GOX will start liquidating/distributing coins (he'll probably try to time it to halvening too)
Bitfinex gets whacked with their Tethers
Major in-fighting on core's team
US/EU tries to ban BTC for realz
Bug in Bitcoin code effecting blockchain
Satoshi's coins move

Think that pretty much covers all of the negatives, as long as they don't happen ~ every 10min BTC grows stronger.

In summary, as long as there's no major bug that goes unnoticed until the whole blockchain melts, Bitcoin is inevitable!



1569. Post 53105572 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

Quote from: THX 1138 on November 17, 2019, 08:19:45 PM
Blah blah blah ...faketoshi shilling...
And if non of those predictions for 2020 come true (as non of his previous prediction came true) you can always create a new account and change the dates on those predictions to 2021!
You have to be special kind of retard to think that US/China/Russia who historically couldn't cooperate on anything (Snowden, Huawei etc..), all of the sudden will start cooperating on blocking transaction for tax purposes? And you have to be r0ach kind of special to think that it'll happen next year



1570. Post 53172265 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):

Is BTC dead? Blood on the streets yet?



1571. Post 53237497 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):

Quote from: Arriemoller on December 02, 2019, 05:32:50 AM
Actually Roach is right there.
Besides it's always the one who claims something who has to prove it, and right now the telecom industry is claiming that 5G is safe.

really? The idiot's whole argument is, i'm right and to prove me wrong you have to show me 50yrs of testing on humans. And then he'll state that it skips a generation so he'll want 100yrs of test cases. It's like Faketoshi claiming that private keys supposed to arrive by carrier in January, come jan31 he'll just come up with another reason to keep the fairy tale alive



1572. Post 53288387 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):

Quote from: nutildah on December 08, 2019, 03:49:44 AM



Happy Sunday, y'all. A little something for everybody.

Interest choice for a lambo. Roach is having a heart attack in 3..2..



1573. Post 53288394 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):

Quote from: infofront on December 08, 2019, 05:45:44 AM
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust stock in top 5 by millennials, while Gen X and Boomers....



https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20191204005172/en/Schwab-Report-Self-Directed-401-Balances-Hold-Steady

Very interesting

Can't wait till ETF



1574. Post 53333098 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):

Quote from: arklan on December 13, 2019, 02:23:40 AM
425k per btc to equal the ENTIRE gold supply in the market? honestly, i'm a little surprised it's that low.

but then, if i recall correctly, all the gold out there could fit in a cube 100 feet square or something insane like that.

Current estimates point to there being 190.040 tonnes of gold. So BTC1 is as rare as about 9kilos of gold.



1575. Post 53367019 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):

Quote from: xhomerx10 on December 17, 2019, 03:14:41 AM
Only 14 (+31) days until craig wright faketoshi will allegedly drive Bitcoin to $0 with his tulip trust stash. have to come up with the next lie to keep himself relevant.  Maybe Mr. Micg can rebuild his Bitcoin empire at really bargain prices.

Oh can't wait what intrigue he'll come up next, my money is on courtier will deliver the keys but some bits are ineligible but no worries his super brain will crack it, he just needs you keep believing until jan 2021



1576. Post 53373243 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):

Quote from: jbreher on December 17, 2019, 06:58:53 PM
We used to have a bot account that posted these literally every hour, on the hour.

‘ChartBuddy’

I can’t remember exactly why it stopped but I think it was managed by Adam or RichyT. Somebody like V8 will know what happened.

I miss it though.

CharBuddy's creator got tired of the stupid abuse. Left for more hospitable climes. Over on The Forum That Shall Not Be Named.

He was a big blocker, when it didn't go his way he left and took chartbuddy with him



1577. Post 53599653 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: soxxx on January 14, 2020, 04:50:05 AM
now

now it is our time
Bitcoin is inevitable.

That's my ™ That would be 100.000 satoshis thank you  Angry



1578. Post 53607040 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: Biodom on January 14, 2020, 08:15:05 PM
The Bitcoin SV pump is based on CSW's saying that the bonded courier actually showed up with the tulip trust keys. In other words, he says he's now in possession of 1 million or so BTC (half of which is supposed to go to the Kleimans).

https://beincrypto.com/bitcoin-craig-wrights-courier/

If only there were a way for him to prove that they keys arrived and that he truly is (along with Kleiman) Satoshi.

If only...


You mean prove, cryptographically that he is Satoshi Nakamoto by signing a message?

That’s asking for too much Wink

To be fair...he may not know how to do that.

Can someone explain that to him so he can prove he's Satoshi?

So when he subsequently fails to move any coins or sign any messages, how are the (what are we calling SV believers these days? Morons? Is it morons?) morons going to explain it?


how do you call a con that succeeds in making the con-artist gobs of money....

"The Sting"

Quote
Dr. Wright notifies the Court that a third party has provided
the necessary information and key slice to unlock the encrypted file, and Dr. Wright has
produced a list of his bitcoin holdings, as ordered by the Magistrate Judge, to plaintiffs today.

...there was also a note attached saying "Hi this is Dave and i'd like to say that CSW is real Satoshi and all of these BTC belong to him and i don't have a claim to any of it so my brother shouldn't even attempt to sue. Roll Eyes

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.376.0_1.pdf

Sounds like he took his time to come up with a list of possible Satoshi's public addresses. Hopefully they'll publish it, so internetz could scrutinize them. Don't hold your breath waiting for any proof that he actually has any private keys. He'll drag this out till the end of trial, even then when he looses and ordered to pay, he has about a year to transfer all of his IP under nChain and his assets under his wife, declare bankruptcy and good luck to Kleiman trying to collect on the judgement. He's job is to keep the myth alive as long as possible, without any proof that he has access to private keys



1579. Post 53607198 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

I don't think the irony is being fully appretiated here. On the day that someone who threatened to tank bitcoin supposedly got access to Satoshi's keys to BTC1MM, BTC goes up by 10%  Grin shows how much BTC cares about Faketoshi's shenanigans. The shitty part that it's in Kleimans interest to pretend that it's real, so they won't challenge it, might be negotiating on a nice check from Ayre to settle. Faketoshi wins in either case



1580. Post 53607337 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: soxxx on January 14, 2020, 11:21:49 PM
I wonder how stupid you have to be to be buying SV right now....

Jihan and Roger might be running dry, nothing on the horizon except for BTC halfening which would take away from the bottom line at bitmain. Ayre/Faketoshi smell blood and circling around bcash like sharks. If they manage to crush bcash they might keep this up till BSV halfening.
All this while BTC is just sitting at the top watching two idiots fight each other. It's goingto be a good year for popcorn companies  



1581. Post 53607392 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: bitserve on January 14, 2020, 11:35:57 PM

...there was also a note attached saying "Hi this is Dave and i'd like to say that CSW is real Satoshi and all of these BTC belong to him and i don't have a claim to any of it so my brother shouldn't even attempt to sue. Roll Eyes

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.376.0_1.pdf

Sounds like he took his time to come up with a list of possible Satoshi's public addresses. Hopefully they'll publish it, so internetz could scrutinize them. Don't hold your breath waiting for any proof that he actually has any private keys. He'll drag this out till the end of trial, even then when he looses and ordered to pay, he has about a year to transfer all of his IP under nChain and his assets under his wife, declare bankruptcy and good luck to Kleiman trying to collect on the judgement. He's job is to keep the myth alive as long as possible, without any proof that he has access to private keys

The note thing is an invention of you, right?  I would inmediately recognise that comment as irony/sarcasm but with that clown you never know whats the next bizarre thing he will come up with Tongue

I am wondering something... those high stakes trials are expensive... like a lot... what will happen to kleiman legal costs when CSW claims bankruptcy?

CSW is already on a hook for $658,581 in attorney fees to Kleiman. That might have to be settled before the end of the trial so at least they gonna get that much. Ayre is getting much more than that just in PR. Attorneys are not idiots and have a good idea how much they would actually be able to collect on. So they'll have a choice to do the right thing take this to the end and bankrupt CSW and get nothing, or get something from Ayre in form of a settlement. With settlement everyone wins, CSW can brag that judge ruled that he's Satoshi, nChain can continue to leverage that to pump BSV, Kleiman and his lawyers get few $millions, and Ayre gets a #4 cypto. Beauty is with all that, BTC continues to go up, badger gives 0 shits!



1582. Post 53607480 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: soxxx on January 14, 2020, 11:48:59 PM
I wonder how stupid you have to be to be buying SV right now....

Jihan and Roger might be running dry, nothing on the horizon except for BTC halfening which would take away from the bottom line at bitmain. Ayre/Faketoshi smell blood and circling around bcash like sharks. If they manage to crush bcash they might keep this up till BSV halfening.
All this while BTC is just sitting at the top watching two idiots fight each other. It's goingto be a good year for popcorn companies  
Faketoshi really thinks he can take down Bitcoin when he can't even take down Bitcoin Cash? He might have them today, but he will have to keep this up in order to sustain it.

If he backs out now he's guaranteed to get destroyed (Ayre probably made him sign his life away before saving his ass from the Aussie tax man), his only option is to continue this charade for as long as possible. If BTC doesn't moon to offset Bitmain's mining losses from halfening, BSV might be able to take down Bcash. POW coins are not cheap to keep at the top, halvening should relieve some pressure thus why Ayre is making a move now. Unless Faketoshi can prove he has the private keys, bitcoin has nothing to worry about (even then bitcoin will survive), sit back, relax and watch the idiots fight.

"Feeeeed me Roger!"  -Bcash "Feeeeed me Calvin!"  -BSv



1583. Post 53608528 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: AlexGR on January 15, 2020, 04:31:59 AM
Quote
I doubt that the 1/2 the court gave these 'supposed' the Klieman family estate will act in a irresponsible manner.

Courts don't have the technical know-how to determine crypto fraud, private keys, stuff like that. Heck, the Japanese court "resolved" the mtgox case by giving a low USD-equivalent on bitcoins that had multiplied their USD-value several times. In the meantime they left the rest of the BTC to the custody of third parties that were using these BTCs to manipulate BTC price... I think it was Kraken who said that the trustee was destroying the order book instead of opting for auctions (as suggested by Kraken).

In any case, the courts asked for something from CW and he has to deliver "something". I have no doubt he will deliver "something" because he needs to do it or else face possible sanctions, from what I read. Heck, he might have made enough money in the recent rumor-based SV pump that he can actually settle the case outside of the courtroom without losing face from a possible conviction Tongue

He already did, he was ordered to deliver his BTC holdings, and he just did exactly that provided Kleiman with list of addresses. Can't wait till they publish it and someone signs "CSW is not Satoshi" with one of them, we should start a bounty for the first one.



1584. Post 53609175 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote
The document produced by Craig is simply a list of 16,404 addresses. Craig, however, did not provide any information on the bounded courier, the company he/she worked for, when he/she came, or the message delivered.
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.377.0.pdf

 Cheesy now he's just trolling the court! Lets see them addresses!



1585. Post 53616051 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: AlexGR on January 15, 2020, 08:13:35 AM
Quote
The document produced by Craig is simply a list of 16,404 addresses. Craig, however, did not provide any information on the bounded courier, the company he/she worked for, when he/she came, or the message delivered.
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.377.0.pdf

 Cheesy now he's just trolling the court! Lets see them addresses!

Shortly after Judge Reinhart issued this Order, on September 11, 2019, the parties reached
an agreement in principle to settle the case. Discovery was abated for nearly two months as the
parties worked together to document their agreement. Then, on October 30, and without warning,
Plaintiffs were informed Craig could no longer finance the settlement
, and that he was terminating
the settlement efforts.



...no shit Grin


yep tl;dr
Faketoshi-let's settle i got this dude with big pockets
Kleiman-OK
Ayre-Ohh i wanted to settle but i investigated and found out that CSW is already my little bitch and i already own everything, oops silly me. good luck collecting on 50% of $0, i'm out
Kleiman-WTF you think we're idiots!?! Then lets drag you and nChain into the case, and see what Judge has to say about all this
Ayre-pooping his pants, and thinking how much more it'll cost him to settle

Quote
I was NOT negotiating a settlement as I am not a party to the case...I was investigating the potential to buy the assets of the estate.
-Calvin Ayre @ https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1191324328278863872

Quote
In August, a Florida magistrate issued a non-binding statement that Kleiman’s estate was entitled to 50% of the Bitcoin (BTC) mined by the Wright & Kleiman “partnership” up to December 31, 2013, as well as 50% of any intellectual property (IP) co-developed by Wright & Kleiman prior to Kleiman’s death in April 2013. There is no actual evidence of a partnership that could be found by lawyers researching on behalf of Ayre.

Following the statement, Ayre commenced good-faith negotiations to acquire the Kleiman estate based on public disclosures that the estate held valuable IP under U.S. law. Ayre’s attorneys have since determined that all of the IP claimed by the estate was created following Dave’s death and thus lies outside the scope of the non-binding statement.

Of the IP in question, Ayre’s attorneys concluded that the only IP on which Kleiman collaborated with Wright was the original Bitcoin code, which was released to the world as open source software in 2009.

-Calvin Ayre's blog @ https://coingeek.com/calvin-ayre-passes-on-buying-dave-kleiman-estate-because-it-holds-no-assets/

Quote
...revealed the extent to which nChain’s Chairman
Stefan Matthews and nChain investor Calvin Ayre participated in facilitating Craig’s unlawful
taking of, and capitalizing on, W&K’s (and Dave Kleiman’s) intellectual property. 4 They have
also revealed that Nchain has acquired, with full knowledge of Plaintiffs potential claims, much of
the IP at issue in this case. Furthermore, new documents produced in mid-December 2019 show
that Craig signed a power of attorney agreement in August 2016 that gave nChain the power to
“take any steps or do any thing” that nChain “in its absolute discretion considers desirable in
connection with” the IP nChain purchased from Craig, including controlling any litigation over
the intellectual property at issue in this case.

Everyone knows that CSW is broke and is on Ayre's life support, CSW has no private keys so best Kleiman's lawyers can hope for is to annoy Ayre and nChain enough to at least get some settlement.



1586. Post 53616867 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: DaRude on January 15, 2020, 09:00:59 PM
Quote
The document produced by Craig is simply a list of 16,404 addresses. Craig, however, did not provide any information on the bounded courier, the company he/she worked for, when he/she came, or the message delivered.
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.377.0.pdf

 Cheesy now he's just trolling the court! Lets see them addresses!

Shortly after Judge Reinhart issued this Order, on September 11, 2019, the parties reached
an agreement in principle to settle the case. Discovery was abated for nearly two months as the
parties worked together to document their agreement. Then, on October 30, and without warning,
Plaintiffs were informed Craig could no longer finance the settlement
, and that he was terminating
the settlement efforts.



...no shit Grin


yep tl;dr
Faketoshi-let's settle i got this dude with big pockets
Kleiman-OK
Ayre-Ohh i wanted to settle but i investigated and found out that CSW is already my little bitch and i already own everything, oops silly me. good luck collecting on 50% of $0, i'm out
Kleiman-WTF you think we're idiots!?! Then lets drag you and nChain into the case, and see what Judge has to say about all this
Ayre-pooping his pants, and thinking how much more it'll cost him to settle

Quote
I was NOT negotiating a settlement as I am not a party to the case...I was investigating the potential to buy the assets of the estate.
-Calvin Ayre @ https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1191324328278863872

Quote
In August, a Florida magistrate issued a non-binding statement that Kleiman’s estate was entitled to 50% of the Bitcoin (BTC) mined by the Wright & Kleiman “partnership” up to December 31, 2013, as well as 50% of any intellectual property (IP) co-developed by Wright & Kleiman prior to Kleiman’s death in April 2013. There is no actual evidence of a partnership that could be found by lawyers researching on behalf of Ayre.

Following the statement, Ayre commenced good-faith negotiations to acquire the Kleiman estate based on public disclosures that the estate held valuable IP under U.S. law. Ayre’s attorneys have since determined that all of the IP claimed by the estate was created following Dave’s death and thus lies outside the scope of the non-binding statement.

Of the IP in question, Ayre’s attorneys concluded that the only IP on which Kleiman collaborated with Wright was the original Bitcoin code, which was released to the world as open source software in 2009.

-Calvin Ayre's blog @ https://coingeek.com/calvin-ayre-passes-on-buying-dave-kleiman-estate-because-it-holds-no-assets/

Quote
...revealed the extent to which nChain’s Chairman
Stefan Matthews and nChain investor Calvin Ayre participated in facilitating Craig’s unlawful
taking of, and capitalizing on, W&K’s (and Dave Kleiman’s) intellectual property. 4 They have
also revealed that Nchain has acquired, with full knowledge of Plaintiffs potential claims, much of
the IP at issue in this case. Furthermore, new documents produced in mid-December 2019 show
that Craig signed a power of attorney agreement in August 2016 that gave nChain the power to
“take any steps or do any thing” that nChain “in its absolute discretion considers desirable in
connection with” the IP nChain purchased from Craig, including controlling any litigation over
the intellectual property at issue in this case.

Everyone knows that CSW is broke and is on Ayre's life support, CSW has no private keys so best Kleiman's lawyers can hope for is to annoy Ayre and nChain enough to at least get some settlement.


Oh this is just too good, so "W&K Info Defense Research LLC" that Faketoshi started with Dave, apparently is not even Faketoshi's but his ex's. This is just too much

Quote
In fact, plaintiffs’ trial strategy was illustrated last
Sunday during the deposition of Lynn Wright, defendant’s ex-wife, who testified that she is the
“W” in plaintiff W&K and that she is a shareholder of the company.
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.379.0.pdf

Faketoshi is getting rid of assets faster than Roger is loosing his mind.



1587. Post 53623250 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: fillippone on January 16, 2020, 02:31:05 PM
This is big:

A new Bitcoin boom?Grayscale reports record crypto investments for 2019

Quote
Digital currency manager Grayscale took in $607 million of investments in 2019, an amount that outstripped its collective inflows of the previous five years.

From their report:
Quote
Most significant asset raising year in Grayscale’s history: Investment for FY19, totaled $607.7 million, surpassed combined investment into all Grayscale’s products from 2013 through 2018.
Largest quarterly investment to Grayscale® Bitcoin Trust ever: With $193.8 in 4Q19, investment into Grayscale Bitcoin Trust exceeded the $171.7 million in investment raised in 3Q19.

The current situation is this one:



Please note the relative size of Bitcoin Investments comparet to shitcoins.

So back of the envelope calculations:

USD 607 millions@BTCUSD8,000 means roughly 75,000 bitcoins were bought this year.
After the halving each year 6.25*24*365 Bitcoins will be mined.
This means Greyscale alone more than 20% of Bitcoins.

How cannot be bullish?
This is Stock to Flow in full power!



Maths are hard
6.25*6*24*365

but yeah the point stands. Can't wait till ETF



1588. Post 53627363 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: jbreher on January 17, 2020, 07:02:31 AM

...blahblahblah...

I admit it could certainly be a rocky path. But I expect it to far surpass BCH, and in turn BTC.


When? And at which point you're willing to admit that it's a dumpster fire?

Edit: let me try to answer in Faketoshi's voice: soon and never



1589. Post 53634602 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on January 18, 2020, 12:31:34 AM
Confirmed: Craig Wright doesn’t have keys to $8 billion of Bitcoin
Craig Wright’s lawyer says he didn’t receive the private keys to $8 billion worth of Bitcoin and provides an update on the Dave Kleiman court case.


https://decrypt.co/16998/confirmed-craig-wright-doesnt-have-keys-to-8-billion-of-bitcoin

tl;dr: Craig is royally fucked in about 90 days.

Quote
But his lawyer said today that that was not the case.

“The file that he’s received did not include private keys,” Andres Rivero, partner at Rivero Mestre law firm, told Decrypt. However, Wright still expects that he will receive the keys at a later date. Rivero said the keys may come either whole or split into parts, but declined to discuss further the particulars around who has the keys and when they might arrive.

No way! This is a shock! BSVers are jumping off the bridges, markets are going crazy and no one knows how to react to this...oh wait, nope, no one with one brain cell and even jbreher expected Faketoshi to have the keys!

jbreher logic:
1-Satoshi was a genius who created perfect code, thus we must follow truest implementation of satoshi code!
2-It doesn't matter whether Satoshi is an idiot who can't code, a serial liar and a perjurer who looses every trail he starts
3-



1590. Post 53634621 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: jbreher on January 18, 2020, 01:30:09 AM
Confirmed: Craig Wright doesn’t have keys to $8 billion of Bitcoin
Craig Wright’s lawyer says he didn’t receive the private keys to $8 billion worth of Bitcoin and provides an update on the Dave Kleiman court case.


https://decrypt.co/16998/confirmed-craig-wright-doesnt-have-keys-to-8-billion-of-bitcoin

tl;dr: Craig is royally fucked in about 90 days.

Quote
But his lawyer said today that that was not the case.

“The file that he’s received did not include private keys,” Andres Rivero, partner at Rivero Mestre law firm, told Decrypt. However, Wright still expects that he will receive the keys at a later date. Rivero said the keys may come either whole or split into parts, but declined to discuss further the particulars around who has the keys and when they might arrive.

No way! This is a shock! BSVers are jumping off the bridges, markets are going crazy and no one knows how to react to this...oh wait, nope, no one with one brain cell and even jbreher expected Faketoshi to have the keys!

jbreher logic:
1-Satoshi was a genius who created perfect code, thus we must follow truest implementation of satoshi code!
2-It doesn't matter whether Satoshi is an idiot who can't code, a serial liar and a perjurer who looses every trail he starts
3-

Show me where I ever made that claim.

Fuckin' liar you are, DaRude. Which puts you squarely in the class that you accuse CSW being a member of.

That you shilling BSV because it follows truest implementation of satoshi's code? Or that you claim that it doesn't matter if CSW is Satoshi? Cause it's in like your every other post



1591. Post 53636510 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: jbreher on January 18, 2020, 04:10:46 AM
Confirmed: Craig Wright doesn’t have keys to $8 billion of Bitcoin
Craig Wright’s lawyer says he didn’t receive the private keys to $8 billion worth of Bitcoin and provides an update on the Dave Kleiman court case.


https://decrypt.co/16998/confirmed-craig-wright-doesnt-have-keys-to-8-billion-of-bitcoin

tl;dr: Craig is royally fucked in about 90 days.

Quote
But his lawyer said today that that was not the case.

“The file that he’s received did not include private keys,” Andres Rivero, partner at Rivero Mestre law firm, told Decrypt. However, Wright still expects that he will receive the keys at a later date. Rivero said the keys may come either whole or split into parts, but declined to discuss further the particulars around who has the keys and when they might arrive.

No way! This is a shock! BSVers are jumping off the bridges, markets are going crazy and no one knows how to react to this...oh wait, nope, no one with one brain cell and or even jbreher expected Faketoshi to have the keys!

jbreher logic:
1-Satoshi was a genius who created perfect code, thus we must follow truest implementation of satoshi code!
2-It doesn't matter whether Satoshi is an idiot who can't code, a serial liar and a perjurer who looses every trail he starts
3-

Show me where I ever made that claim.

Fuckin' liar you are, DaRude. Which puts you squarely in the class that you accuse CSW being a member of.

That you shilling BSV because it follows truest implementation of satoshi's code? Or that you claim that it doesn't matter if CSW is Satoshi? Cause it's in like your every other post

The following, you slimy bastahd: "even jbreher expected Faketoshi to have the keys!"

Was supposed to read as nobody with a brain cell (and jbreher) expected Faketoshi to have the keys. I can see how the wording can be confusing. My second bullet further makes the point by saying that you believe it's irrelevant if faketoshi is Satoshi (but BSvers for some reason still need to follow his truest implementation) 



1592. Post 53652408 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: vapourminer on January 19, 2020, 06:36:58 PM
you have no fear that CSWs insane mind will finish its decent into lunacy and utterly destroying whatever you think bsv is?

No. Users are not forced to accept new versions of SW. Anyone is free to continue using the previously existing version. This nullifies any threat.

Of course, it is likely that nChain is a significant miner, which does lead to some exposure in this regard. But Craig does not hold exclusive chains of power in that organization, and others there are not suicidal. So, somewhat mitigated.

does csw know about this?

he would most likely sue them and take his own devs to court if they ignore his decisions. or split from bsv if they dont listen. just extrapolating this on observed past behavior.

anyway as you say they dont have to follow so it will be intersting as to how long bsv puts up with him.



Seems like the writing is on the wall, CSW becoming a toxic liability and the new BSv directive is to pivot and try to separate BSv from CSW, shills are out in force trying to push this. We should all support CSW in his efforts to sue Ayre for libel. BOSSv (Bitcoin Original Satoshi Super Vision) sounds better too.



1593. Post 53660974 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: jbreher on January 20, 2020, 06:05:22 PM
you have no fear that CSWs insane mind will finish its decent into lunacy and utterly destroying whatever you think bsv is?

No. Users are not forced to accept new versions of SW. Anyone is free to continue using the previously existing version. This nullifies any threat.

Of course, it is likely that nChain is a significant miner, which does lead to some exposure in this regard. But Craig does not hold exclusive chains of power in that organization, and others there are not suicidal. So, somewhat mitigated.

does csw know about this?

he would most likely sue them and take his own devs to court if they ignore his decisions. or split from bsv if they dont listen. just extrapolating this on observed past behavior.

anyway as you say they dont have to follow so it will be intersting as to how long bsv puts up with him.



Seems like the writing is on the wall, CSW becoming a toxic liability and the new BSv directive is to pivot and try to separate BSv from CSW, shills are out in force trying to push this. We should all support CSW in his efforts to sue Ayre for libel. BOSSv (Bitcoin Original Satoshi Super Vision) sounds better too.

Where do you get this tripe?


Quote
Anyone trying to make the case that Craig was not part of the team that created Bitcoin is either a scammer or really really stupid...that is the only two categories given the evidence out there.  ABC conspirators are market manipulators and scammers:
3 Dec 2018 https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1069781857057812481

Quote
everyone smart in the industry already knows Craig was the primary member of the Satoshi team.Everyone saying this is not true is stupid or lying or both.  I know people who knew Craig when he invented Bitcoin BSV in 2009:
9 Feb 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1094198473484877825

Quote
yup...Dr Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto...and #BSV is the only real #Bitcoin.  All others are attacking Craig to sell their dysfunctional snake oil crypto products.  Craig has proven this to me directly in a number of ways.
29 Mar 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1111708680305721344

Quote
How do you know someone is a scammer...they are shouting at the top of their lungs that Craig is not Satoshi and they are supporting technology that does not work today.  Simple.
8 Apr 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1115368692366434304


Quote
I am still wrapping my head around the panic that is setting in among all the haters now that Craig has decided to prove his legitimate legacy.  They are all free to try to prove their points also, but trolling is not proof, nor is it legal.  :-)
11 Apr 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1116585402012323840

Quote
if you publish something that is not true and you are conflicted and have commercial gain to intentionally liable someone...this is illegal pretty much globally.   No amount of misguided "crowd support" changes this fact.  :-)
11 Apr 2019 https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1116296119758225409

Quote
This industry needs to grow up and Craig proving he is Satoshi is the only way past this Troll attack that is so bad for the industries reputation.  He now has a duty to set the record straight for us all.  The Trolls all know he is Satoshi hence the fear.
15 Apr 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1117706922415853569

Quote
this is something like Tesla Edison rivalry...except Craig is both of them and the other side refuse to even discuss technology and only want to censor.   #CraigisSatoshi and the world demands this be proven in court like he wants and the are trying to avoid.  :-)
16 Apr 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1118086289553801217

Quote
everyone who tries to stop Craig from proving the truth, by shouting Fraud, is engaged in a type of Fraud against humanity.   they are also clearly conflicted with association with technologies that do not work as good as real Bitcoin SV does.   You can easily see who is involved
17 Apr 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1118474455989149698

Quote
Imagine how the Catholic Church would react to Jesus showing up today.  that is how the high priests of the crypto world are reacting to Craig wanting to now prove in court that  he is Satoshi.   They are horrified about what he thinks of their stupid plans. :-)
#CraigisSatoshi
17 Apr 2019 https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1118430193562079234

Quote
lost in all the troll talking is the duty Craig has to prove he is satoshi. Duty to his peers, shareholders and customers of nChain, his family and friends and the world at large...all who are suffering damages from this horrible cyberbullying of Craig.
#CraigisSatoshi
18 Apr 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1118826411278635008

Quote
someone did a decent job pulling together publicly available information that all supports Craig being Satoshi. More will be presented in court to establish his legacy to the judge. Don't believe scammers believe your own eyes...#CraigisSatoshi.
2 May 2019 https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1124073715501797377

Quote
I am hoping to have significant proof of #CraigisSatoshi out no later than Tue May 21.  Why wait for Craig's libellous  scammers in court to have all the fun right? :-)
15 May 2019 https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1128613856866197504

Quote
everyone who knows me in the gaming industry and pretty much everyone who knows me in general knows that I would not say I had seen proof that Craig was Satoshi if this were not in fact true.
15 May 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1128651333446270977

Quote
For anyone new.  #CraigisSatoshi and everyone in the industry knows this.  They pretend it's not him so others outside the industry are confused so they can keep their scams going.  Everyone attacking Craig is a scammer of some sort.
19 Jun 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1141380359290085378

Quote
Boom! Proof that #CraigisSatoshi has been accepted by US government copyright department.
21 May 2019 https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1130809891550126080

Quote
Like I said before...everyone who knows me knows that I would not be saying something publicly unless it was true. #CraigisSatoshi and #BSV is the only real #Bitcoin.  Now we prove it to the world.
21 May 2019 https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1130861508357959682

Quote
#CraigisSatosh as I have told you...I know the entire story and since this is true and therefor permanent....I think the world just has to accept and adjust like we all have.  OH ya...BSV is the only real bitcoin also...massive scaling coming.
22 May 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1131217318577659904

Quote
My friend Stefan Mathews was working with Craig on a gaming project in 2008 when Craig was inventing Bitcoin and was given a copy of the white paper that did not include the Satoshi name on a USB and was a few generations before the one Craig published as Satoshi.
22 May 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1131218337332125696

Quote
Doing this if you are not Satoshi only makes you a fraud and in the US you go to jail...Craig is Satoshi so he is the only one that has standing and he is happy to prove it so this is over.
22 May 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1131173863608541185

Quote
This is hilarious. People are signing their names to a clearly libellous statement in the form of a petition. Is there such a thing as a reverse class action?
22 May 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1131200932916670471

Quote
by the way...#CraigisSatoshi and the only scammers are the guys attacking him so he will not expose their scams.  Since they all are promoting shite coins that do not scale, everyone smart is going through the same evolution Jason explains in his piece here.
24 May 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1131899445556187136

Quote
wonder what happens to  #Bitcoin (#BSV), Segwit Coin BTC and alphabet Soup coin (ABC/BCH/BAB) when #CraigisSatoshi gets his million coins once Tulip trust vests Jan 2020 and he dumps Segwit and Alphabet and buys Bitcoin?  Things that make you go hummmm? :-)
26 May 2019 https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1132660809652428800

Quote
I have had my lawyers dig through Craig's case.  It is air tight so this is nothing more than a great opportunity to get a UK judge to pronounce Craig Satoshi:
1 Jun 2019 https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1134894557315915776

Quote
More strong evidence to add to the overwhelming evidence already public that #CraigisSatoshi.   Anyone contesting this is involved in a scam of some sort that Craig would be against.
29 Jun 2019 https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1145009549407150080

Quote
I need to retweet this and add that my lawyers have reviewed all the material that is out there and can confirm it is beyond any doubt that #CraigisSatoshi.  There is a book coming out soon by a respected investigative reporter that comes to the same obvious conclusion.
29 Jun 2019 https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1145128312458682368

Quote
So just to try once again to help everyone.  I have had my lawyers review Craigs history and it is beyond any doubt that he is Satoshi.  I know two people personally that knew him when he invented Bitcoin and recall him talking to them about it.  There is NO controversy here.
8 Jul 2019 https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1148236768304685056

Quote
Craig has no interest in hurting segwit BTC market because of his massive position, my huge Segwit mining business and the  fact that the business models do not compete AT ALL anymore.   Buy and Hodl vs Earn and Spend.   However he still has to reclaim his legacy as Satoshi.
28 Aug 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1166701027632058368

Quote
yes...I have seen all the evidence that will be released in the court cases in UK.  Its coming quickly so you can digest there.  Kleiman case will likely settle so I don't expect much to come out there.
30 Aug 2019 https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1167390008577335296

Quote
Only two groups still insist Craig is not real . Those who know the truth and are  scamming and know Craig is going to call them out so demonise him to deflect and moronic Trolls, not smart enough to know the truth.
31 Aug 2018 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1035762939351982080

Quote
not following it as  am a bit busy, but they are putting the mountain of evidence together as I have seen some of the boxes of historical documents including old versions of the white paper in Craigs handwriting and printed and with his notes and coffee on them and rusty staples.
3 Oct 2019 https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1179752662713028609

Quote
everyone smart knows #CraigisSatoshi.  Only Satoshi could write the below and point out what SPV really means.  Another tech now only availble on origininal #Bitcoin #BSV and covered by nChain patents:
9 Oct 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1182067580607094786

Quote
The two guys I know who knew Craig when he invented bitcoin don’t know this person 🎃
6 Nov 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1192045813977042955

Quote
Agreed...however I know for a fact that #CraigisSatoshi and this is easily obviouse to anyone smart using publicly available info.
21 Nov 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1197518826142871552

Quote
a 6 year old can understand that #BSV is the original #Bitcoin protocol so is Bitcoin and no others are.  Yet for some reason no leader  on the other chains can.  I would suspect lying and a connection to why they also deny #CraigisSatoshi
28 Nov 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1199997467938492416

Quote
i will say this one more time.  I or my lawyers have confirmed #CraigisSatoshi beyond any doubt and Craig's lawyers say there is zero doubt in the evidence he is submitting to court next year.  Also to be clear, he has ALL the education he says he has.  He is a polymath.
30 Nov 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1200725734798635008  Huh wtf he's not even sure if it was himself or his lawyer who confirmed

Quote
its a great shot...#CraigisSatoshi is in a good spot these days...everyone smart accepts him as the only possible Satoshi and #BSV as original #Bitcoin.  He is allowed to goof off now a bit.  :-)
8 Dec 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1203728903187189760

Quote
yes, Craig is Satoshi.  I believe there is enough in the public domain for anyone smart to be able to see this but even dim witted folks will understand before 2020 is over so just wait my friend.
28 Dec 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1211003993914261509

Quote
I have seen most of the evidence and I know personally two guys working with Craig in 2008 in gaming who remember him talking about his creating Bitcoin.   there is all the evidence you need public now.  All deniers are scammers.
28 Dec 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1210909366657966080

Quote
thanks, I have proven beyond a doubt to myself and my team that #CraigisSatoshi and that #BSV is original #Bitcoin protocol and has special powers due to its economic model.  Anyone smart should be coming to the same conclusion now.
29 Dec 2019 https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1211272805259644928



*Notice Calvin's retweet https://twitter.com/MZietzke/status/1218611090373926919






tl;dr
13 out of 14 kindergartners can spot a pivot (one ate his crayon), but can jbreher?? Btw jbreher did you ever ended up taking sides on Faketoshi? Or still sitting on the sidelines to see how it turns out before jumping in?

So Ayre has proof that Fakeoshi is Satosh but is not showing it to the BSv holders because reasons. Fakeoshi will dump million BTC in january (without having private keys) but Fakeoshi has no interest in hurting segwit BTC. Fuck and apparently now i'm involved in fraud against Humanity. Oh well, guess it's time for a lobotomy so my logic can sleep at night. Ohh he still has these diamonds hanging, so yeah definitely credible

Quote
Anyone actively involved in trying to stop Craig from proving his legitimate legacy to the world is involved in this fraud against Humanity.  We need the Truth now!
The father of Bitcoin is Dr Craig Wright.
17 Apr 2019 https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1118478622510211073

Quote
I now operate entirely in BCH for everything globally.  I only use suppliers who accept BCH and I keep all my treasury only in Bitcoin BCH...no fiat or alt coins like BTC etc.  The infrastructure is all in place.
23 Apr 2018 https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/988548065576521729

Quote
Signature from Key 9?....Satoshi Lives...likely upset at Bitmain and http://Bitcoin.com  for attacking Bitcoin.
16 Nov 2018 https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1063513039989813248




1594. Post 53676818 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: StartupAnalyst on January 22, 2020, 08:38:40 PM
People seriously leave their BTC long term on a random centralized website where they don’t control the private keys just to get a reported 4% interest?

You can get over 100% profits quite regularly just by HODLING.

Fuck that!

Not your keys, not your BTC!
Those greedy will hear a news someday that the exchange got hacked.

I hope it does not happen though.
Whether you hope so or not, this news is gonna come out sooner or later anyway... Undecided

On the up side at 4% it'll take around 19yrs to double your bitcoin so you can take out your initial investment and continue collecting interest risk free. On the flip side you can loose everything at any point during those 19yrs. Do you feel lucky, punk? Do you?



1595. Post 53688323 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: jbreher on January 24, 2020, 06:29:19 AM
you have no fear that CSWs insane mind will finish its decent into lunacy and utterly destroying whatever you think bsv is?

No. Users are not forced to accept new versions of SW. Anyone is free to continue using the previously existing version. This nullifies any threat.

Of course, it is likely that nChain is a significant miner, which does lead to some exposure in this regard. But Craig does not hold exclusive chains of power in that organization, and others there are not suicidal. So, somewhat mitigated.

does csw know about this?

he would most likely sue them and take his own devs to court if they ignore his decisions. or split from bsv if they dont listen. just extrapolating this on observed past behavior.

anyway as you say they dont have to follow so it will be intersting as to how long bsv puts up with him.



Seems like the writing is on the wall, CSW becoming a toxic liability and the new BSv directive is to pivot and try to separate BSv from CSW, shills are out in force trying to push this. We should all support CSW in his efforts to sue Ayre for libel. BOSSv (Bitcoin Original Satoshi Super Vision) sounds better too.

Where do you get this tripe?


<snip regurgitation of scads of quotes of a single person>

Great. Yet none of the above supports your claim that "CSW becoming a toxic liability and the new BSv directive is to pivot and try to separate BSv from CSW". Nor that "shills are out in force trying to push this". Why don't we focus on your claim before diverting to an entirely different topic?

Ayre (the person who pretty much owns Faketoshi) is just a single person in BSv world? Right, so now you're going to argue how BSv is decentralized and not ran by one person and his cronies? Silly bear, see if it was anyone else i could've written this off to ignorance, but your depth of knowledge on this subject rules that out, which makes me think that there's something more sinister at play here.



1596. Post 53700528 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: jbreher on January 24, 2020, 06:24:53 PM
you have no fear that CSWs insane mind will finish its decent into lunacy and utterly destroying whatever you think bsv is?

No. Users are not forced to accept new versions of SW. Anyone is free to continue using the previously existing version. This nullifies any threat.

Of course, it is likely that nChain is a significant miner, which does lead to some exposure in this regard. But Craig does not hold exclusive chains of power in that organization, and others there are not suicidal. So, somewhat mitigated.

does csw know about this?

he would most likely sue them and take his own devs to court if they ignore his decisions. or split from bsv if they dont listen. just extrapolating this on observed past behavior.

anyway as you say they dont have to follow so it will be intersting as to how long bsv puts up with him.



Seems like the writing is on the wall, CSW becoming a toxic liability and the new BSv directive is to pivot and try to separate BSv from CSW, shills are out in force trying to push this. We should all support CSW in his efforts to sue Ayre for libel. BOSSv (Bitcoin Original Satoshi Super Vision) sounds better too.

Where do you get this tripe?


<snip regurgitation of scads of quotes of a single person>

Great. Yet none of the above supports your claim that "CSW becoming a toxic liability and the new BSv directive is to pivot and try to separate BSv from CSW". Nor that "shills are out in force trying to push this". Why don't we focus on your claim before diverting to an entirely different topic?

Ayre (the person who pretty much owns Faketoshi) is just a single person in BSv world?

Again - none of your Ayre quotes support the assertion that there is a pivot to 'unseat' Craig by the 'BSV powers that be'.

IOW you are completely misrepresenting the scant 'evidence' you presume to be bringing forth.

The main dude that's bankrolling the whole BSv clown show, owns CSW with all his patents etc..literally went from saying that if you think Craig is not Satoshi you're a scammer, to you shouldn't be supporting BSv because of CSW. Well, like i said "13 out of 14 kindergartners can spot a pivot (one ate his crayon), but can jbreher??" guess the answer is no to that. You're too smart to claim that you're in denial, so you must be shilling



1597. Post 53701497 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: Gyrsur on January 25, 2020, 07:16:26 PM
But this interview by Craig wright with cointelegraph a few days ago might get you triggered.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GS8DmU17E14
 Angry

it seems to me CSW's mental health condition becomes more worse from year to year.

#notsatoshi

Same shit different day.
China is very decentralized  Huh, I make no sense but everyone who calls out my BS (including judges, and people who wrote books on this subject) are just too stupid to understand. White is black and black is white, I'm working on 10 PhDs at the same time and have patents, so blindly follow me, magic will happen just don't ask what or when, have some more of this hopium and keep on waiting.

On a bright side looks like Andreas ripped him apart on deposition, he's still trying to piece himself together. Can't wait till they publish that.

Quote
I win or die trying
Well you didn't win so...



1598. Post 53703711 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: jbreher on January 25, 2020, 09:45:24 PM
you have no fear that CSWs insane mind will finish its decent into lunacy and utterly destroying whatever you think bsv is?

No. Users are not forced to accept new versions of SW. Anyone is free to continue using the previously existing version. This nullifies any threat.

Of course, it is likely that nChain is a significant miner, which does lead to some exposure in this regard. But Craig does not hold exclusive chains of power in that organization, and others there are not suicidal. So, somewhat mitigated.

does csw know about this?

he would most likely sue them and take his own devs to court if they ignore his decisions. or split from bsv if they dont listen. just extrapolating this on observed past behavior.

anyway as you say they dont have to follow so it will be intersting as to how long bsv puts up with him.



Seems like the writing is on the wall, CSW becoming a toxic liability and the new BSv directive is to pivot and try to separate BSv from CSW, shills are out in force trying to push this. We should all support CSW in his efforts to sue Ayre for libel. BOSSv (Bitcoin Original Satoshi Super Vision) sounds better too.

Where do you get this tripe?


<snip regurgitation of scads of quotes of a single person>

Great. Yet none of the above supports your claim that "CSW becoming a toxic liability and the new BSv directive is to pivot and try to separate BSv from CSW". Nor that "shills are out in force trying to push this". Why don't we focus on your claim before diverting to an entirely different topic?

Ayre (the person who pretty much owns Faketoshi) is just a single person in BSv world?

Again - none of your Ayre quotes support the assertion that there is a pivot to 'unseat' Craig by the 'BSV powers that be'.

IOW you are completely misrepresenting the scant 'evidence' you presume to be bringing forth.

The main dude that's bankrolling the whole BSv clown show, owns CSW with all his patents etc..literally went from saying that if you think Craig is not Satoshi you're a scammer, to you shouldn't be supporting BSv because of CSW. Well, like i said "13 out of 14 kindergartners can spot a pivot (one ate his crayon), but can jbreher??" guess the answer is no to that. You're too smart to claim that you're in denial, so you must be shilling


That's not a pivot. That is merely pointing out that if your focus is on Craig, rather than the protocol itself, u r doing it rong.

As I've been saying for, like, years now.




Damn bear did you go full retard, does everyone at BSv think that we're all stupid?? Ayre's whole online presence is nothing but an altar to Faketoshi

Quote
We look forward to working with Craig and others to ensure his original vision is recognized as Bitcoin and is realized through BSV
https://calvinayre.com/2019/05/21/press-releases/bitcoin-creator-craig-s-wright-satoshi-nakamoto-granted-us-copyright-registrations-for-bitcoin-white-paper-and-code/

Bitcoin SV price soars on Craig Wright’s Bitcoin copyright approval
Quote
As more court cases get settled in Wright’s favor, and the real decision makers of the world recognize what he’s built in his vision for Bitcoin, expect BSV to continue to soar.
https://calvinayre.com/2019/05/22/bitcoin/bitcoin-sv-price-soars-on-craig-wrights-bitcoin-copyright-approval/

Dr. Craig Wright brings his vision of freedom to Expo-Bitcoin International 2019
https://calvinayre.com/2019/06/27/bitcoin/dr-craig-wright-brings-his-vision-of-freedom-to-expo-bitcoin-international-2019/

Quote
hahaha...Dr Craig in full war mode for this interview.   In spite of the ranting, he is correct and supported by the majority of miners and #SatoshiVision will become the future of #Bitcoin.  
12/11/2018 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1061940780657508352

Quote
Bitcoin is poised to show the world what it can really do now that Bitcoin SV is back and solid.   this piece by Craig is only the start of what CoinGeek has planned for us and our friends like nChain.
23/11/2018 - https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1065959082413252608

Quote
this also makes these points|: Craig is leading this space vision wise with metanet. nChain is a powerhouse with its patents BSV is the only place this stuff is able to be used. BSV is the original bitcoin and scales.
05/01/2019 - https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1081652925540098048

Quote
And its nice to see Craig admit that #Bitcoin BSV was invented from the gambling industry not as as a reaction to the financial collapse of 2009.  Go Gambling! :-)
09/02/2019 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1094198804298059776

Quote
hahaha...Craig has patents and the Trolls have shite :-)
16/02/2019 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1096758693021003776

Quote
Craig invented real #Bitcoin #BSV...he did not invent Segwit BTC which is what he is calling a Ponzi and it is like that with its hodler culture and no utility. Are these guys really that stupid?
16/03/2019 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1106951280918974465

Quote
Craig has proven to me beyond a doubt numerous different ways that he was the central architect of original #Bitcoin which is now only #BitcoinSV  (#BSV).  Every-person who is saying he is a fraud is in fact trying to defraud Craig and the world of this truth.
08/04/2019 - https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1115367685628547073

Quote
Vitalik is in essence an ICO scam lord and a Craig Troll fraudster.  He is scared because he knows Craig invented Bitcoin and will now wipe out Eth with #BSV...if this is not true why does he froth on about Craig all the time?
08/04/2019 - https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1115369797427056640

Quote
2 GB blocks anyone...only on Bitcoin SV, invented by Dr Craig Wright!
17/04/2019 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1118544990311993344

Quote
here you go....recent interview I did here in London.  Craig has proven that he was right about original #Bitcoin Scaling.  Craig invented Bitcoin SV and its the best technology out there :-)
18/04/2019 - https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1118769079794524161

Quote
this is the real reason Binance and Roger Ver's Kraken exchange are delisting.  BSV is an existential threat to platforms that don't scale now that Craig has proven it scales.
18/04/2019 - https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1118838956341248001

Quote
Also...Dr Craig Wright has done nothing but good for this industry...he created it and is still the leading innovator....he has even left social media but is still being victimised there.
19/04/2019 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1119262873073659907

Quote
Definition of a scammer is anyone trying to fool you into thinking Craig is not the most knowledgable in this industry....that sorts them out with one issue as everyone attacking Craig is involved in a Scam and Craig is only inventing technology that kills these scams...simple.
22/04/2019 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1120386861208305664

Quote
remember you heard it here first....everyone calling Craig a Fraud will be proven to be involved in some kind of criminal activity that is threatened by his true legacy becoming common knowledge.
04/05/2019 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1124789675145740288

Quote
hahahaha...I have nothing more to add but that everyone saying Craig is a Fraud will be found involved in criminal activity.
05/05/2019 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1125127072559579136

Quote
correct and real #Bitcoin #BSV is the only platform that has a business model that saves mining as we know it since it scales to allow enough transactions for the fees to make up for the lost of revenues from the halving.  This was how Craig designed it.
07/05/2019 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1125861221700395013

Quote
with evidence out there..with law suits already filed..ask yourself why are these guys doubling down on liable?  It's clearly because of the magnitude of the criminal fraud scams they are involved in. Everyone calling Craig a fraud is in fact part of a criminal Fraud themselves.
08/05/2019 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1126108759946866688

Quote
hahaha...BSV doubled on Craig's copyright news.  This is only the start of him proving BSV is the only #Bitcoin.  Now is a great time to convert all your other shite coins to Bitcoin :-)
21/05/2019 - https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1130824957129306113

Quote
prove in court I mean...I will do weekly summaries of these cases every week or so on CoinGeek.  None of them has engaged as I expected...all guys trolling Craig are scammers especially including everyone he is suing.  The fraud against the father of our industry must stop.
24/05/2019 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1131950430542544896

Quote
100% of the creativity is now happening on real #Bitcoin #BSV now that Dr Craig Wright has re-created it.
30/05/2019 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1134195730103656449

Quote
Do not believe anything conflicted Craig deniers are saying.  Craig invented #Bitcoin and is reinventing it again as #BSV.    there is more than enough evidence out there to make this clear and the deniers all know #CraigisSatoshi, they don't want you to know.
09/07/2019 - https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1148560645559898112

Quote
to be fair...Craig has not turned against #Bitcoin as he invented it.  He is reinventing it as #BSV.  He is against the abomination altcoin that BTC has turned into that it still inaccurately and fraudulently using the Bitcoin name.
23/08/2019 - https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1164901421533282304

Quote
this is just so pathetic....#Eth just has no clue what they are doing at any level.   But they do know that they don't know how to scale and Craig does.
19/09/2019 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1174785528056766464

Quote
Funny...Craig invents #SPV, put it in the white paper, the morons at Core did not understand it, so 10 years later he recreates  original #Bitcoin as #BSV, files a bunch of patents for it, then explains how it all works now only on BSV.  Epic stupidity.
10/10/2019 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1182223532811587585

Quote
By the way...all the posts Bitmex made about Craig have already been proven false or will be when Craig gets his day in court in the UK.   I wonder what criminal activies they are involved with that is threatened by Craigs vision?
14/10/2019 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1183690943993544704

Quote
look #CraigisSatoshi and #BSV is #Bitcoin and they both won already. There is no path to victory for other platforms, Craig has them all blocked.
12/11/2019 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1194323287637217282

Quote
Craig and BSV have already won...there is NO legitimate path to any other chain being able to scale that anyone I have hear has.  They have eithor trapped themselves with bad technical decisions or Craig has patented the path.  Enjoy the BSV application wars...they be fun :-)
14/11/2019 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1195035443714244613

Quote
Just look at nChains patent portfolio and ask yourself who could doubt #CraigisSatoshi. And its a lie to say most doubt this as all the scammers attacking Craig do it because they know he is Satoshi and this threatens their scams:
21/11/2019 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1197464475231825921

Quote
Craig's patent portofolio make it impossible for other block chains to follow his invention of original #Bitcoin #BSV.  all critical to scaling ones are open only on BSV.  its the ONLY place you can build applications to scale.
21/11/2019 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1197464951297839105

Quote
I had an army of specialists comb through the science, the business model and Craig and #Bitcoins history.  After this I have invested well over Euro 100 M in the original #Bitcoin #BSV ecosystem. How much research or investment have trolls like McCormach and so many others done?
30/11/2019 - https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1200770924074749953

Quote
yes...in 2020, Craig will take over with BSV.  He has not made public his plan yet, but he has one.
15/12/2019 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1206175322128994307

Quote
morons...biggest winner of the year is Craig, he proved original #Bitcoin, now #BSV, is the worlds top utility platform just as he promised.
31/12/2019 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1211978363067392002

Quote
Morons all.  This is all about the tech and in that area, Craig has been all right and is kicking everyones ass.   Remember, the market price is influenced by all the intentional FUD these same morons are spreading and market manipulation by crime exchanges.
01/01/2020 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1212406037128589313

Quote
Its my opinion that one of the groups I am in discussions with had the light bulb moment and came in with $50M to get a position in the tokens before announcing their project.   However this is just my best guess.  Its not caused by Craig winning all his appeals recently.
Huh
11/01/2020 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1216090548026605568

Quote
The(y) lost the second I decided to back Craig as their road map does not compare to Craigs.
14/01/2020 - https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1217159364022325248

So after saying all that now "pointing out that if your focus is on Craig, rather than the protocol itself, u r doing it rong." is not a pivot? Will you have to pay them back and get sued if you admit that BSv is retarded? Is that why you must continue making an ass out of yourself by arguing this down to absurdity? At this stage you left with only two options: to claim that you don't know what "pivot" means or

Check and mate



1599. Post 53704702 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: jbreher on January 26, 2020, 08:35:59 AM
<spew>

You know what? You need a new schtick. Your old one has been worn out for quite some time.

(as a sidebar, which of those Ayre quotes -- specifically -- do you claim are a 'pivot'? <muttering under my breath: 'ya fucking idiot'>)

Got an original thought in your brain?

Huh, so you really are that deep in the BSv camp, i can see the tears from your logic and your brain begging for mercy. Anyone with 10min and half a brain cell can see the shit show that BSv really is, if someone still decides to invest after that, then they deserve to loose it. Natural selection



1600. Post 53719665 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: bitserve on January 28, 2020, 03:59:01 AM
Weird enough every time I read Wuhan I think about Jihan Wu. Seriously.

"Wuhan is the capital of Hubei province..."
Now Huobi exchange is involved? This is just too much of a coincidence where's my tin foil hat. Or i'm just a typical white person  Undecided



1601. Post 53737400 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: nutildah on January 30, 2020, 11:12:48 AM
Guys, can we please keep the conversation on topic???


I need to know if we are currently forming a BART (Bart) and headed back down to <9100. I'm trying to short BSV right now and want to know when to put in my next order. I found a place that lets you short BSV futures at 100:1 leverage and am currently practicing. I'm studying for an entry point.

So please, let's stick to hardcore TA only out of respect for our WO forefathers, who must be turning in their dormant accounts right now.

LOL

Where is this magical place?



1602. Post 53746701 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

Quote from: jojo69 on January 31, 2020, 04:51:40 PM
Is it really that hard to design a secure hardware?

Yes  

The only secure hardware solutions involve proprietary, non open source, chips which, of course, have their own set of drawbacks.

Just wait until we start experiencing supply chain attacks.

No need to recreate the wheel, but it won't be cheap until big boys get involved and start offering it on smartphones

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardware_security_module
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Criteria
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIPS_140



1603. Post 53768090 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

Quote
and in a patent attempt to avoid discovery, Craig has claimed that the bonded courier is an attorney and his communications are privileged. Def. Jan. 28, 2020
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.389.0.pdf

Wait, so now the mysterious bonded courier, who Faketoshi knew nothing about or when/if he'd even show up, showed up with a list of public keys and also a law degree? Do many couriers work as part time attorneys Huh You can't make this shit up! Bravo CSW! BRAVO!!



1604. Post 53772795 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

Quote from: bitserve on February 04, 2020, 10:07:29 AM
Quote
and in a patent attempt to avoid discovery, Craig has claimed that the bonded courier is an attorney and his communications are privileged. Def. Jan. 28, 2020
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.389.0.pdf

Wait, so now the mysterious bonded courier, who Faketoshi knew nothing about or when/if he'd even show up, showed up with a list of public keys and also a law degree? Do many couriers work as part time attorneys Huh You can't make this shit up! Bravo CSW! BRAVO!!

One have to acknowledge that the guy is a first class troll. None of that shit will hold in the end at the court. It is just a matter of time. Wonder what his plan is... if he really have one (probably don't). Sometimes I think he has a terminal illness (besides the mental one) and he think he will be dead by the time all his lies crumble catastrophically (jail/bankruptcy).

He has no plan, Ayre is running his life and he can't do anything about it. He already shielded all of his assets, he transferred all his patents to nChain and all the companies he was involved with are dissolved except for nChain. He owns nothing, so Kleiman can't collect. Ayre already tried to settle the case and "surprisingly" found out that no one owns anything except for patents in nChain which are already his. Now lawyers are trying to dig into nChain to make it as painful as possible for Ayre. Shitty part is ultimately they'll probably settle cause Kleiman lawyers are not idiots, they know Faketoshi doesn't have the keys and 50% of 0 is still 0, so it's better to settle for few mil from Ayre. Neither side has anything to gain by bringing the case to a trial, it's like neither of them want to question if Faketoshi is Satoshi


Calvin Ayre passes on buying Dave Kleiman estate because it holds no assets
https://coingeek.com/calvin-ayre-passes-on-buying-dave-kleiman-estate-because-it-holds-no-assets/



1605. Post 53773277 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

Quote from: Dabs on February 04, 2020, 08:01:27 PM
Add more RAM so you don't run out of memory. Can also use SSD / HDD as virtual memory, but that slows down stuff.

Just need to buy more from the MemoryDealers



1606. Post 53785502 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):


There's no long term plan here, at this point even if he somehow manages to prove that he owns Satoshi's private and gpg keys, i don't see how anyone would want to support a blockchain network with an "owner". BSvers can't be that dumb, or can they



1607. Post 53785884 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

Quote from: hv_ on February 06, 2020, 06:27:32 PM

There's no long term plan here, at this point even if he somehow manages to prove that he owns Satoshi's private and gpg keys, i don't see how anyone would want to support a blockchain network with an "owner". BSvers can't be that dumb, or can they

He likes what Satoshi did

He doesn't like what blockCore did to Satoshi 's BitCoin

He might be Satoshi and keeps the trolls running

So far that's cool

 Grin

The issue is that BSv idiots fail to see that no one wants a "decentralized" network with an "owner". The tech is out and people saw the benefit and value in the decentralized network. That's like if coca cola was still trying to force people to drink it to treat drug dependence, or viagra still insisted it was used to treat heart problems, or listerine to treat gonorrhea. No one cares what the original intent was, but i guess those that don't remember history are doomed...



1608. Post 53786323 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

Quote from: jbreher on February 06, 2020, 08:50:19 PM

There's no long term plan here, at this point even if he somehow manages to prove that he owns Satoshi's private and gpg keys, i don't see how anyone would want to support a blockchain network with an "owner". BSvers can't be that dumb, or can they

He likes what Satoshi did

He doesn't like what blockCore did to Satoshi 's BitCoin

He might be Satoshi and keeps the trolls running

So far that's cool

 Grin

The issue is that BSv idiots fail to see that no one wants a "decentralized" network with an "owner".

The issue is that anti-BSV idiots fail to see -- notwithstanding CSW's statement quoted above -- that BSV no more has an "owner" than does BTC.

Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain! He's only the chief scientist of the protocol and self proclaimed creator, a patent troll who copyrighted the whitepaper and trying to build a patent forest around the tech, other than that BSv is as decentralized as bitcoin. Keep trying to preach new n00bs in. Even in his best case scenario miners will just go behind tor, then who he's going to sue? But go ahead go fight the internet that always turns out well  Roll Eyes



1609. Post 53879690 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):

Quote from: cAPSLOCK on February 20, 2020, 09:21:05 PM
I think BTC is going to rise.

Look a ghost!

Someone hacked Risto's account?

Hmm there's only one way to know for sure, lets wait to see if it starts shilling monero again



1610. Post 53910322 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.16h):

Quote from: Tash on February 25, 2020, 02:48:00 PM
On average 650 000 people die every year from "the flu", millions if pandemic.
90 flu-related deaths where report in North Carolina so far this season and in Oklahoma 36 death, just 2 states.
There is no reported death from SARS-Cov-2 virus in US to date. The total death from any coronavirus in history is less than 5000.
HCoV-229E and OC43 the two common cold viruses give a running nose thats about it.

The flu (Orthomyxoviridae) is in another league.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5220206.msg53898245#msg53898245

Now get the number of people that get infected with flu in North Carolina and Oklahoma, then look up mortality rate for flu and coronavirus, and finally extrapolate how many deaths would there be if all those people were infected with coronavirus and not the flu. Don't talk until you have the answer, if you still need help just quietly raise your hand



1611. Post 53913638 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.16h):

Faketoshi/Ayre/BSv try to claim that they "own" all of the forked blockchainz. The result?...litecoin surpasses BSv  Grin



1612. Post 53924662 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.16h):

Quote from: bkbirge on February 27, 2020, 05:08:49 PM
LOL...
https://cointelegraph.com/news/steven-seagal-charged-by-sec-for-promoting-2018-ico
Quote
Seagal is a Buddhist, claiming in 1997 to have been given the title of tulku — the reincarnation of the Buddhist lama — by a Buddhist high priest. For this reason, he was announced by the B2G project as a “Zen master.”

Double LOL...
https://cointelegraph.com/news/courts-will-seize-btc-with-miners-help-self-proclaimed-satoshi-craig-wright
Quote
“Without keys, BTC will be confiscated. Code is law, and courts can mandate patching code. Bitcoin is not encrypted. It is economic.”

BSvers at their best. If you redefine BTC to mean BSv, and decentralized to mean Ayre owns 60% of miners, then i don't see why Ayre can't do whatever he pleases with that chain. Idiots that buy those tokens deserve whatever is coming to them. It's funny to hear about courts from the guy who lost all his court cases.
As far as having some court in some jurisdiction try to stop real honey badger yeah good luck



1613. Post 53927102 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):

Quote from: lightfoot on February 28, 2020, 04:42:37 AM
In which case Bitcoin will not go up. Fiat will simply go down.

In other news, watch out: Latest Mozilla update wants to route your DNS queries through cloudflare. Which since it's an internet provider means the Govt will be able to see all of your queries without a warrant.

(Run your own DNS servers ffs)

It's not a panacea, but exponentially better than clear DNS requests that your ISP can intercept. Running you own DNS won't stop ISPs from snooping your cleartext DNS traffic.

Quote
Privacy Requirements

Mozilla’s TRR is intended to provide better, minimum privacy guarantees to Firefox users than current, ad hoc provisioning of DNS services. As such, resolvers must strictly limit data collection and sharing from the resolver. More specifically:

        1. The resolver may retain user data (including identifiable data, data associated with user IP addresses, and any non-aggregate anonymized data) but should do so only for the purpose of operating the service and must not retain that data for longer than 24 hours.

                Only aggregate data that does not identify individual users or requests may be retained beyond 24 hours.

        2. The resolver must not retain, sell, or transfer to any third party (except as may be required by law) any personal information, IP addresses or other user identifiers, or user query patterns from the DNS queries sent from the Firefox browser.

        3. The resolver must not combine the data that it collects from queries with any other data in any way that can be used to identify individual end users.

        4. The resolver must not sell, license, sublicense, or grant any rights to user data to any other person or entity.

        5. The resolver must support DNS Query Name Minimisation as defined in RFC 7816.

        6. The resolver must not propagate unnecessary information about queries to authoritative name servers. In particular, the client subnet DNS extension in RFC 7871 must not be sent to servers unless the connection to the authoritative server is encrypted and only to authoritative name servers operated by the domain owner directly or by a DNS provider pursuant to its contract with the domain owner.

Transparency Requirements

The party operating the resolver must be transparent about any data collection and sharing that does occur in accordance with the above requirements. More specifically:

        1. Privacy Notice. There must be a public privacy notice specifically for the resolver service that documents the specific fields for data that will be retained for 24 hours and that documents specific fields for aggregate data that will be retained beyond 24 hours. The notice should also attest to requirements 2 - 4 above.

        2. Transparency Report. There must be a transparency report published at least yearly that documents the policy for how the party operating the resolver will handle law enforcement requests for user data and that documents the types and number of requests received and answered, except to the extent such disclosure is prohibited by law.
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/DOH-resolver-policy

Tell me how's that worse than what ISPs do now by redirecting unresolved domains to themselves?


Mozilla is the good guy here, It's not a perfect solution but leaps and bounds better than default DNS from ISPs. They're getting a lot of push back for it

Quote
ISPA Internet Villain

Mozilla – for their proposed approach to introduce DNS-over-HTTPS in such a way as to bypass UK filtering obligations and parental controls, undermining internet safety standards in the UK
https://www.ispa.org.uk/ispa-announces-finalists-for-2019-internet-heroes-and-villains-trump-and-mozilla-lead-the-way-as-villain-nominees/




1614. Post 53927167 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):

Quote from: Hueristic on February 28, 2020, 05:58:26 AM

Quote
ISPA Internet Villain

Mozilla – for their proposed approach to introduce DNS-over-HTTPS in such a way as to bypass UK filtering obligations and parental controls, undermining internet safety standards in the UK
https://www.ispa.org.uk/ispa-announces-finalists-for-2019-internet-heroes-and-villains-trump-and-mozilla-lead-the-way-as-villain-nominees/



I think the main issue is that they are defaulting Cloudflare.

Still fail to see how that's worse than current default DNS hijacking by ISPs?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNS_hijacking#Manipulation_by_ISPs



1615. Post 53931007 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):

Quote from: d_eddie on February 28, 2020, 04:22:58 PM
In which case Bitcoin will not go up. Fiat will simply go down.

In other news, watch out: Latest Mozilla update wants to route your DNS queries through cloudflare. Which since it's an internet provider means the Govt will be able to see all of your queries without a warrant.

(Run your own DNS servers ffs)

Doesn't Mozilla obey to your OS network settings?
Used to, but apparently there is a new "feature" where DNS lookups are passed to the "cloud" rather than going through your local resolver.


Thanks for the heads-up, guys. I went and found out it can be disabled.

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-dns-over-https
Quote
Manually Enabling and disabling DNS-over-HTTPS

You can enable or disable DoH in your Firefox connection settings:

    Click the menu button Fx57Menu and select Options.
    In the General panel, scroll down to Network Settings and click the Settings… button.
    In the dialog box that opens, scroll down to Enable DNS over HTTPS.

        On: Select the Enable DNS over HTTPS checkbox. Select a provider or set up a custom provider.
        Off: Deselect the Enable DNS over HTTPS checkbox.

    toggle doh

    Click OK to save your changes and close the window.

Ok so whats your DNS after you disable it? UK people won't get the feature by default and have to manually enable it because government complained with "but then it'd be hard for us to monitor them"
https://www.zdnet.com/article/mozilla-no-plans-to-enable-dns-over-https-by-default-in-the-uk/

But here you want to disable it? If you don't trust Cloudflare (and i don't) why not just point it to a custom DNS over HTTPS server that you do trust, surely anything would be better than your ISP?



1616. Post 53931583 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):

Quote from: serveria.com on February 28, 2020, 06:18:44 PM
Almost no virus in Africa and South America.

And why do you think that is?

Perhaps air travel is not very popular/developed in these regions compared to Europe/N.America? Also not many Chinese people live there...  Cool

A lot of Chinese travel to Africa, and i think Ethiopian air still has flights to China. Might be hotter climate, influenza/flu tend to like colder seasons/climates 



1617. Post 53932129 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):

Quote from: lightfoot on February 28, 2020, 01:01:30 PM
Still fail to see how that's worse than current default DNS hijacking by ISPs?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNS_hijacking#Manipulation_by_ISPs
Centralized. FBI just goes to one source (Cloudflare) for all their shopping needs.

Also remember the golden dot.com rule: If you're not paying for the product, you are the product. CF isn't doing this for the love coming from their warm hearts.

True, but how many ISPs are serving your area? At least Mozzilla has some kind of policy of record retention
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/DOH-resolver-policy

Think i'd rather have anything than default ISP like ATT  
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A



1618. Post 53937298 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):

Quote from: JSRAW on February 29, 2020, 04:48:03 PM
Sattire...........



Not so much of a satire for the BSvers

As usual, just replace BTC and bitcoing with BSv and you'll see that they only need one judge's order to do whatever they want on that shitchain.



1619. Post 53989082 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):

Is the blood on the streets yet? I can't tell the coronazombies are blocking my view.



1620. Post 53995336 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):


Time to buy corn



1621. Post 53995479 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):

Quote from: hv_ on March 09, 2020, 03:21:40 PM

Time to buy drink corn

buy toilet paper

Got enough fiat for that (the only advantage of fiat, it's multi use)



1622. Post 54017789 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Quote from: Ludwig Von on March 12, 2020, 11:37:54 PM
Can’t imagine myself being the complete moron of selling my coin as cheap as they are now....

The selling is not done by people who need the fiat now. This is different. I don 't know what it is though.

Over leverage, look at that volume though  Shocked bottom in ?



1623. Post 54018660 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Quote from: rolling on March 13, 2020, 03:05:44 AM
This is really shitty. There should be some consolation prize at least, like if most of the alts died right here and for good.

BSV is under LTC, corn is dirt cheap and in 8600 blocks there will only be 900 new BTC per day. Look at that volume and witness a beautiful redistribution happening in front of your eyes  Grin



1624. Post 54018794 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

It's a good day ... to own an exchange.



1625. Post 54024807 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Quote from: jbreher on March 14, 2020, 01:39:56 AM
Quote
A math meme that is funny rather than stupid:
Solve carefully!
     230 - 220 x 0.5 =

You probably won't believe it, but the answer is 5!

Maths iz hard.

Nope, I don't believe it.

It is 5! you better believe it



1626. Post 54028258 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Global markets will continue to go down, but at certain point bitcoin will stop sliding, and that moment will be beautiful, as next it will start going violently up



1627. Post 54029776 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

BTC1300 ask wall at Finex is flexing again, incoming



1628. Post 54035620 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: Biodom on March 15, 2020, 07:08:18 PM

What do we think about the potential price direction this week, guys?



first down, then up, then down  Undecided

more pertinent important questions:

will equity markets stay open: I hope that US and UK will, I doubt that they would stay open in EU

will banks stay open: they should, or SHTF

will credit cards work: I am reasonably confident that they would

If all super leveraged speculators have been weeded out, BTC should stay stable while markets crash on Monday. Once leveraged speculators with funny money are gone, BTC uncorrelates from the market and only has one way to go 



1629. Post 54041506 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: BHSMC on March 16, 2020, 06:47:24 PM
Guys,

Excuse my ignorance on this matter but is there a website that I can deposit fiat via wire transfer and can purchase some tether from the U.S?

It seems like I can only do BTC to Tether but any way I can get fiat to USDT?

Thanks a lot.

any help guys? Sad

Whats Tether? Is that a brand of toilet paper?



1630. Post 54043070 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: Searing on March 16, 2020, 11:59:46 PM
Come on Bitcoin - you know what to do. It's your time to shine.




Actually, maybe we are seeing some decoupling of BTC/Crypto prices from the US Stock Market..or at least, IMHO, not as much as I dreaded! Smiley

Come on Bitcoin, you know the rule, if you are running from Bears you don't have to run faster than than the Bears, just the other guy, er 'stock market' Smiley





Futures are up ~4% not observing decoupling just yet



1631. Post 54046751 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: xhomerx10 on March 17, 2020, 01:42:26 PM
Come on Bitcoin - you know what to do. It's your time to shine.




Actually, maybe we are seeing some decoupling of BTC/Crypto prices from the US Stock Market..or at least, IMHO, not as much as I dreaded! Smiley

Come on Bitcoin, you know the rule, if you are running from Bears you don't have to run faster than than the Bears, just the other guy, er 'stock market' Smiley





Futures are up ~4% not observing decoupling just yet

I am trying to 'reform' my image on WO and be 'hopeful' Smiley (I may have just tilted the Universe and made everything worse! Ack!)

Anyway, also I'd recommend watching a movie called 'Contagion' and a PBS show that is really good called "Alone in the Wilderness" if you have to cope like me.

Or hell everyone jumps on and revives their decade-old WOW account?

The old Chinese Curse comes to mind: May you live in 'interesting' times. Smiley





 Come on Searing!  You remember the good old days before internet, colour TV, cell phones, ATMs and dare I say modern plumbing? (at camp I mean)  You're going to have to stay positive - people are going to be looking to guys like us when they need to know how to set up a TV antenna, write a check, use a rotary dial phone and possibly the Sears catalogue as TP!


Huh brings a whole new meaning to Searing



1632. Post 54078064 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Quote from: Biodom on March 22, 2020, 05:59:39 PM
The fact is that Bitcoin has zero correlation with other asset classes.

Not a fact. Even @aantop recognizes the correlation:



There's other more mathematically sound ways of identifying increasing correlation but they are too cumbersome and boring to reproduce at the moment.


I would be ecstatic if all institutions drop off completely (well, maybe except a couple that were super-early) until bitcoin gets to $20-50K based on NEW users.
Then, institutions can re-join the game and panic at 300K all they want (as long as we don't drop below 50K).

Couldn't agree with Andreas more, but don't forget it'll work the other way too, once price gets super comfortable, they'll pile on like flies on shit.



1633. Post 54078074 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Sen. Rand Paul has tested positive for coronavirus
https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/22/politics/rand-paul-coronavirus/index.html

Shit, this is not how it was supposed to happen



1634. Post 54091751 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Quote from: jojo69 on March 25, 2020, 03:36:17 AM
so fucking bizarre

to have the mind of a god in this clock ticking, meat bag body




1635. Post 54097251 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Quote from: kellrobinson on March 25, 2020, 11:16:06 PM
Is there anything to this?
https://cointelegraph.com/news/why-todays-btc-difficulty-adjustment-may-cause-the-price-to-plunge


No, supply is set in algorithm, and demand couldn't care less about current difficulty level.



1636. Post 54101918 (copy this link) (by DaRude) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Quote from: Indymoney on March 26, 2020, 07:12:20 PM
UK Chancellor just said self employed people will get up to 80% of their earnings but we have to wait until June.
It’ll be a 3 month pay out back dated to now so 3 x 80% what you earn.

It’s a good thing I have a couple of streams of income.

What would, for example a self employed electrician do who isn’t getting any jobs now. ‘Don’t worry, we’ll pay you in June’.

All this whilst teachers are off work until September on 80-100% pay. Farcical by the UK Government.

Chancellor on the brink of another bailout?

Probably.

Thousands of lower earning self employed people aren’t going to be able to afford to live very soon.
May be we will survive from Corona but very hard from these tactics as most of peoples will think about suicide as they cannor afford to live on this planet.

I cannot afford my standard of living with my 75" flat screen! Good bye cruel world!

*First World problems?