All posts made by ImI in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread



1. Post 4376728 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.53h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on January 07, 2014, 11:34:25 PM
Hodling is stupid right now. Nothing but negative news on the horizon from China. Why wait until the end of the month?

LOL! i remember you shithole! you were stating the EXACT SAME BULLSHIT back in July at Bitcoin prices around 70$. "why not sell at 70$ when you know that 50$ will be reached?"

The SAME WORDING! LOL! Except of course the China part. Go f---- yourself.



2. Post 4376866 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.53h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on January 08, 2014, 12:08:59 AM
Hodling is stupid right now. Nothing but negative news on the horizon from China. Why wait until the end of the month?

LOL! i remember you shithole! you were stating the EXACT SAME BULLSHIT back in July at Bitcoin prices around 70$. "why not sell at 70$ when you know that 50$ will be reached?"

The SAME WORDING! LOL! Except of course the China part. Go f---- yourself.

Check my posts. I was one of the few screaming BUY BUY BUY last summer.

i remember your exact wording, your name and your dumb avatar. and YOU KNOW IT.






3. Post 7630522 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: Whtwabbit on July 02, 2014, 01:20:40 AM
Dumps are getting harder..

You need more fibre in your diet!


i lol'ed



4. Post 7637679 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):


is there any date/timeline when the FBI plans to public the auction results???




5. Post 7646300 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: ChrisML on July 02, 2014, 09:20:52 PM
Meanwhile.. people are selling. LMAO

volume is very dissapointing lately

a trustworthy us-exchange is needed imo, the gox desaster really hurt in that regard



6. Post 7665298 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on July 03, 2014, 10:48:22 PM
http://bgr.com/2014/07/03/bitcoin-exchange-mainstream-analysis/

I noticed a lot of positive media the last 7 days. It completely changed compared to even a month ago.
Everyone feels like now is the time. Everyone is excited. Everyone but the sellers.
It's probably the best week this year and the selling pressure is sky high.
So odd.

i think one problem that bitcoin faces is the bad exchange situation / not much confidence in the exchanges

alot of new folks get attracted to bitcoin everyday, but other than last year, they have no idea where to buy bitcoin in a safe way. the gox desaster has shocked basic confidence and that still is a factor imo.
i talked to some guys that are interested in bitcoin but the bullshit that went on at gox is keeping them from sending $s to some east european exchange.

thats a big problem imo.



7. Post 7665384 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: stan.distortion on July 03, 2014, 11:03:11 PM
http://bgr.com/2014/07/03/bitcoin-exchange-mainstream-analysis/

I noticed a lot of positive media the last 7 days. It completely changed compared to even a month ago.
Everyone feels like now is the time. Everyone is excited. Everyone but the sellers.
It's probably the best week this year and the selling pressure is sky high.
So odd.

i think one problem that bitcoin faces is the bad exchange situation / not much confidence in the exchanges

alot of new folks get attracted to bitcoin everyday, but other than last year, they have no idea where to buy bitcoin in a safe way. the gox desaster has shocked basic confidence and that still is a factor imo.
i talked to some guys that are interested in bitcoin but the bullshit that went on at gox is keeping them from sending $s to some east european exchange.

thats a big problem imo.

Not sure about the rest of the world but the ATM here has a solid turnover. Then there's other outlets, there's been a lot of talk of voucher/card systems and you hear mentions of country based operators regularly.

yes, luckily there are multiple ways to get some BTCs. nevertheless it would be such a boost in confidence if some known big player would enter the exchange market.



8. Post 7665738 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: dgarcia on July 03, 2014, 11:26:51 PM
i think one problem that bitcoin faces is the bad exchange situation / not much confidence in the exchanges

alot of new folks get attracted to bitcoin everyday, but other than last year, they have no idea where to buy bitcoin in a safe way. the gox desaster has shocked basic confidence and that still is a factor imo.
i talked to some guys that are interested in bitcoin but the bullshit that went on at gox is keeping them from sending $s to some east european exchange.

thats a big problem imo.

So what?
You should ask them how much, sell them with interest from your stack and re-order for yourself, of course. A safe way has it's price.

So you'll be this new confident Exchange ;-)

lol

yeah thats the way to go, nevertheless who takes care of all the other lost souls? Cheesy



9. Post 7672017 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: atoni on July 04, 2014, 11:04:52 AM
Maybe this has something to do with dumping?

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-07-04/eu-banks-must-shun-bitcoin-until-rules-in-place-eba-says.html



imo its more about this




10. Post 7672519 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: gizmoh on July 04, 2014, 11:51:14 AM
Bye Bye Institutional Money  

http://www.coindesk.com/eba-financial-institutions-avoid-bitcoin-pending-regulation/

Will SEC follow EBA and reject Winkle's ETF  Roll Eyes



no, the US is much more open-minded when it comes to innovation and new opportunities than europe



11. Post 7675567 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 04, 2014, 03:25:56 PM
Bye Bye Institutional Money  

http://www.coindesk.com/eba-financial-institutions-avoid-bitcoin-pending-regulation/

Will SEC follow EBA and reject Winkle's ETF  Roll Eyes



no, the US is much more open-minded when it comes to innovation and new opportunities than europe

Yeah, right....  Cheesy   Is this a joke?

erm....no. the US is two,three steps ahead to europe when it comes to legalisation, regulation and law.




12. Post 7677125 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: keithers on July 04, 2014, 05:26:15 PM
Funny btw how nobody cares anymore about the biggest event this year that completely controlled the market for 2 weeks: the price of the sold coins.
100's of posts. It was the most important thing ever. It was the only thing people talked about.
3 days later and nobody gives a shit anymore.


I think its because at the end of the day, the thing that most people care about is the price per BTC. If it would have massively changed the price (positively or negatively), then everyone would still be talking about it. The attention span for events in the crypto world is super short obv.

Happy 4th of July everyone!!

reason is pretty simple imo. we won't get any price details anytime soon. so its basically a non-event. of course there are good signs like one bidder got it all, but in the end its now just a non-event.



13. Post 7681768 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: CEG5952 on July 04, 2014, 11:49:04 PM
look like LTC moves btc now :-D

Too much panic surrounding ltc now, i couldnt resist to buy some

Hmmm, not sure. I keep some lowball bids in now after seeing that $2 spike the other day. But I think LTC might have a slow slide down to retest that level, or at least much lower than here. Good luck....

ltc -> marketcap of 50mio$ imo



14. Post 7797343 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.58h):

Quote from: spooderman on July 11, 2014, 11:57:21 PM
A lot of nice sentiment around today. And one big 2k buy is what we get on stamp to show for it?

ATH please. August/September shouldn't disappoint.

End of this year I can haz house plz.

Whats a house worth in your world?



15. Post 7797608 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.58h):

Quote from: BitChick on July 12, 2014, 12:07:19 AM
A lot of nice sentiment around today. And one big 2k buy is what we get on stamp to show for it?

ATH please. August/September shouldn't disappoint.

End of this year I can haz house plz.

Whats a house worth in your world?

I am sure it just depends on the house, no matter what "world" he is in.  Wink



Yeah, i know.  Cool Wanted to know what amount he his hoping for 100k$, 200k$, 1Mio$...  Grin



16. Post 7913830 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.59h):

Quote from: mmitech on July 18, 2014, 07:05:45 PM
Dell accepting Bitcoin is bad sign for the short term price

it seems to be a non-event at the moment. the market doesnt care much about that news.



17. Post 7923656 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.59h):

Quote from: blatchcorn on July 19, 2014, 01:49:47 PM


Who thinks we will have a weekend rally?

ron paul



18. Post 7952649 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.59h):

Quote from: Voktar on July 21, 2014, 01:48:54 PM
After the GOX collapse, anyone with fiat or Bitcoins on any exchange has balls of steel. Gox did a lot of harm, and it will take time to recover.

This is why we are seeing so little volume in general, no selling and no buying, sorry but no more bubbles until 2015...

A good and trustable exchange is way overdue. Its time the big boys start to enter this business.



19. Post 7953292 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.59h):

Quote from: giveBTCpls on July 21, 2014, 02:35:06 PM
After the GOX collapse, anyone with fiat or Bitcoins on any exchange has balls of steel. Gox did a lot of harm, and it will take time to recover.

This is why we are seeing so little volume in general, no selling and no buying, sorry but no more bubbles until 2015...

True, but what could possibly happen in 2015 to change this? Are you implying we'll have a trusteable exchange? What constitutes a trusteable exchange? Of course anything is more trusteable than some manchild that used to play Magic the Gathering, but im just saying, what would the ideal scenareo be on there?

Ideal szenario in terms of mainstream-trust? Some big US-stock-broker that starts a bitcoin exchange.



20. Post 7994498 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.00h):

Quote from: Richy_T on July 23, 2014, 11:29:45 PM

support looking strong, market is clearly getting ready for something big, but patience is key.




HEHEHEHE.... That is a picture of a cow, NOT a bull..  Cheesy

A cow taking us to the moon is just as crazy as a bull taking us there.

There is evidence in the literature that the cow jumped over the moon.

there is evidence in the literature that cows are the better bulls.



21. Post 8002018 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.00h):





22. Post 8120173 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.02h):

Quote from: Richy_T on July 31, 2014, 02:34:32 PM
Argentina defaults.

Ultimately that kind of news should be bullish for bitcoin; however, the way the bitcoin markets respond to news does NOT always seem to make logical sense...

To be fair, Argentina is a basket case anyway, has been for decades and will continue to be so until and unless they dump the Marxist BS.

OT Funny thing is, they will sell it to the argentinnian people as "evil capitalism" that is guilty for that mess and not their bullshit system as a strange mixture of socialsm and nationalism./OT



23. Post 8129135 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.02h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on August 01, 2014, 02:03:26 AM
The Stamp chart is forming a perfect last supper. Is that bullish?

Only if its salted and peppered enough.



24. Post 8137670 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.02h):

Quote from: mooncake on August 01, 2014, 03:19:49 PM
Does anyone think the 600 sell wall will hold?  Roll Eyes

Thats no wall mate.



25. Post 8179982 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.02h):


Btw they have a twitter account:

https://twitter.com/GABIjersey



26. Post 8181252 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.02h):

Quote from: fonzie on August 04, 2014, 02:13:21 PM
No really, everyone should wait until September until the hedgefonds "officially" start buyin up the market....
It makes no sense at all to buy before them....  Wink Cheesy


Edit: You know what they say about rumors...

Sell the rumor, buy the news.



27. Post 8238392 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.03h):

Quote from: keithers on August 07, 2014, 08:44:00 PM
Not too bad of a day so far for both BTC and LTC...it would be nice to see both build back a little momentum Smiley

LTC will go nowhere imo. Maybe shortterm, but longterm its dead.



28. Post 8245952 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.03h):


Huobi is on fire



29. Post 8305209 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.04h):

Quote from: Dotto on August 12, 2014, 02:07:31 AM
In the meanwhile, LTC flashcrashing to 4.85 and no obvious rebound... you need have stainless steel balls to keep hodling that bag

and it has still a marketcap of 180Mio$. some way to go for ltc imo.



30. Post 8328255 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.04h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on August 13, 2014, 10:46:41 AM
By the end of the year nobody will even talking about Bitcoin anymore. I sold hours ago.

Exactly. And now plz leave. Nothing to be seen here anymore.



31. Post 8328351 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.04h):

Quote from: Wolf Rainer on August 13, 2014, 10:51:36 AM
Fucking Ethereum, why the fuck are they dumping the ipo coins.

Etherum dinied dumping yesterday.



32. Post 8349752 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.04h):

Quote from: oda.krell on August 14, 2014, 02:09:37 PM
Not really, huobi and okcoin have mostly fake volumes. Biggest platform are bitstamp&bitfinex then btcchina. Not saying that huobi and okcoin has to be ignored (we are adding them very soon ) but their volumes has to be taken as half fake.

I avoid calling it "fake" volume, but I agree. The current (daily) leg of the capitulation is, in my opinion, mainly driven by Bitfinex - not really a surprise, given the huge built-up leveraged long positions that Blitz highlighted in his post ages ago. Despite their daily volume still being dwarfed by the Chinese exchanges.

So that's further evidence for those of us who believe that, while CNY volume might be "real", it is simply less relevant, per dollar, being largely automated, zero fee volume.

Is there a way to see Bitfinex long/short positions?



33. Post 8444844 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):

Quote from: shmadz on August 20, 2014, 12:25:47 AM
I dunno

exactly  Cool



34. Post 8445734 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):


backwards



35. Post 8458689 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):

Quote from: Wandererfromthenorth on August 20, 2014, 07:37:13 PM
lets see a nice short liquidation cascade!


Can anyone make an educated guess at what point the shorts could get liquidated?

I'd think it would be alot higher than this, but I have no idea how to properly calculate


It's all stop losses, it would require a lot more upside to actually trigger the majority of shorts to get margin called.

educated guess = 640+ 



36. Post 8458942 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):

Quote from: Wandererfromthenorth on August 20, 2014, 07:41:35 PM
At this point there is only THE catalyst that could really put BTC is real bull mode: and that is the Winklevoss ETF.
Until then, rises might be short lived  Sad

You are aware of that the market wont wait until the ETF is trading at Nasdaq? Its not like we see a big jump at that day and thats it. Obv the ETF will have some impact well before they go online at Nasdaq and well before they make the official announcement when they will do so.

Its called market wisdom. Markets dont wait to price something in until the very last trader has understood whats going on. They start way ahead of the actual news...



37. Post 8459151 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):

Quote from: dropt on August 20, 2014, 07:59:20 PM
Its called market wisdom. Markets dont wait to price something in until the very last trader has understood whats going on. They start way ahead of the actual news...

So then, it's plausible that our dumper friend is inside to these ETF's and has learned that they'll (Wink) not be approved?

Haha! Nice interpretation.  Wink

I expect Winklevoss to come out with some sort of announcement at Nov/Dez. I remember to have read some interview with some Wallstreetguy who said that he expect results about the ETF in 2014.
Markets usually start to price in news way before the event itself. So that would lead to sep/oct/nov as some nice pre-movement.




38. Post 8459155 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):

Quote from: Alley on August 20, 2014, 08:00:11 PM
Could the price increase be because of the jump in difficulty yesterday?

no



39. Post 8527572 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):




40. Post 8533662 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on August 26, 2014, 12:22:18 AM
I hear some chick called Gabby is coming to town in 5 or 6 days..  and apparently she likes to party, minted too from what I hear...

.... there is talk of a $200 million "six month" bender to warm up.... (not "that much" in the grand scheme of things I know.. but still some added buying pressure, if they bought the same amount every month at the current price that would work out at 400,000 coins in total, and 66,666 coins per month - and there are around 108,000 mined a month and they are just one buyer) I realise that they are more likely not going to, or necessarily be able to buy the same amount of coins each month for the same price.. unless they are rather smart about it, and I also realise that sellers will supply some of those coins , as opposed to freshly mined coins... however as I said... it will increase buying pressure snapping up some coins (for now) for a while.... and it is just one playya.

Creating a bitcoin fund is a way to sell a large stash of bitcoin without immediately depressing the price, and without making it seem that the holders have lost faith.  GABI will probably buy the coins initially OTC from the GABI creators.  It may even remove buying pressure from the markets, if some people who would have bought raw bitcoins will choose to buy GABI shares instead.

I wonder if GABI will have a lock-in period, like SMBIT (i.e. the client can liquidate only after N months).

bullshit detected



41. Post 8543474 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Quote from: TheJuice on August 26, 2014, 05:25:18 PM
Where we heading these days? Up?


Backwards.

Btw LOVE that avatar.



42. Post 8548361 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Quote from: xyzzy099 on August 27, 2014, 12:23:00 AM
Any of you market-smart guys want to comment on this?:

http://www.coindesk.com/citi-miners-merchants-keeping-bitcoin-prices-check/

Sounds pretty dire, at least for the short term.


citi? lol! i wouldnt give a shit...

ever followed stock market analysts? most is just BS.

also why should all those miner sell all their mined coins? i am a miner too and i dont sell mined coins. that wasnt my intention form the beginning.



43. Post 8563992 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Quote from: oyvinds on August 28, 2014, 02:06:35 AM
The Nail In The Petrodollar Coffin: Gazprom Begins Accepting Payment For Oil In Ruble, Yuan
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-08-27/gazprom-begins-accepting-payment-oil-ruble-yuan

EUR is rallying, USD is dropping like a stone.

bullshit

dollar is in fact rising against the euro, gained about 6% the last weeks. euro is nearing a one year-low.



44. Post 8592183 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.09h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on August 30, 2014, 01:03:33 AM
1w chart



Well okay, but can this be the last delay please? Otherwise it might coincide with the shipping date of BFL or the date that MtGox will add LTC.

Wait a second? I thought MtGox meanwhile has LTC trading? At least thats the last i heard.



45. Post 8611410 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.09h):

Quote from: empowering on August 31, 2014, 03:43:34 PM
One last design added to my store


All sales commission (a lousy 10%) goes towards replacing the coins stolen by Brewster et al.

Bitcoin not to be associated with a murdering c*nt pleasethankyou.

a symbol  of liberation.. depending on perspective.

I'm considering the perspective of all the innocent people he murdered. Not a liberating experience, I'm lead to believe.

I hear you.. but then I feel the same way about Bill Clinton tbh.

i cant remember of any clinton tshirts at festivals...

also you may "feel" the same about bill clinton, but that doesnt lead to them being the same in a historic point of view.



46. Post 8658324 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.10h):



THIS is the alltime favorite best Bitcoinvideo ever....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2ku1A5Ox8U&feature=youtu.be

LOVE IT



47. Post 8727080 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.11h):

Quote from: grappa_barricata on September 08, 2014, 11:57:54 AM
Apple will announce a mobile payments solution tomorrow.

I heard that... it will be like having a credit card in the phone. Not a big deal. Can't be used to pay people-to-people.

nevertheless that could indeed be the reason for recent drops.



48. Post 8727153 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.11h):

Quote from: SFHere on September 08, 2014, 12:03:43 PM
Honestly this looks a lot like april-may all over again... Expecting some serious sideways for the next couple of months.

Honestly i dont expect any sideways anymore. Its more like going to 300$ or 650$ imo.



49. Post 8729302 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.11h):


to me it looks like its the apple thing that will get going tomorrow



50. Post 8729729 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.11h):

Quote from: franckuestein on September 08, 2014, 03:05:55 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pF7HxLCFMeY
PayPal featuring Bitcoin in his app, "We can spend Bitcoin with a tap"

Take a look to the video, second 9  Cheesy Cheesy

spooky but nice



51. Post 8736729 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.11h):

Quote from: BitChick on September 08, 2014, 11:37:03 PM
Ponzi Scheme is over! Bitcoin is doomed now the inventor lost all his bitcorns!!!
  
There is 0 buying pressure, even though PayPal announced to accept it!

Bitcorn is done, over with!  

Better sell now to cut loose!

      

Expect $3xx minimum soon!  

I think people are still waiting on the Apple news release tomorrow.  Then when Apple says that they are integrating Bitcoin in their payment app I can't imagine how that would not trigger a rally of some sort!

Apple will never ever integrate BTC. I expect mobile payments integration with Visa etc and lower fees than usual with CCs. Apple has enough power to bring Visa etc to lower their fees just for Apple integration.

But it wot be THE big BTC-killer some market-members seem to expect right know. Its just NFC with loweres fees Visa. Thats about it.



52. Post 8749441 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.11h):

Quote from: Schickeria on September 09, 2014, 07:08:18 PM
Uh! Momentum out of nothing. That could get really interesting this time....

lets see if we can break it this time...




53. Post 8763658 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.12h):


where are the trollfuckers now?

its so pathetic...




54. Post 8763915 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.12h):

Quote from: Torque on September 10, 2014, 05:10:41 PM

where are the trollfuckers now?

its so pathetic...



Their silence is deafening.

Actually, they're silent now because they feel they accomplished their goal.  And they did, for 4 days depressed price down to $460.  Now up to $480 and climbing.

Expect another dump within 24 hrs.  After that, I guarantee the trolls will return again.

i think its grotesque to think that those trollfucks have any influence at BTC/USD. they think they have, of course, but nevertheless its rediculous.

only a fraction of all investors are reading BTCT reguarly and of those who do only a very tiny fraction finds this specific thread. and of those who find this specific thread only again a very very very very tiny fraction actually sells BTC cause of one of those trollfucks.

if i would have to guess the effect i would say maybe 1 BTC a day that is sold more through those trolls.

its just a perfect example of wasted time imo.



55. Post 8764037 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.12h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on September 10, 2014, 05:21:37 PM

where are the trollfuckers now?

its so pathetic...



Their silence is deafening.

Actually, they're silent now because they feel they accomplished their goal.  And they did, for 4 days depressed price down to $460.  Now up to $480 and climbing.

Expect another dump within 24 hrs.  After that, I guarantee the trolls will return again.

i think its grotesque to think that those trollfucks have any influence at BTC/USD. they think they have, of course, but nevertheless its rediculous.

only a fraction of all investors are reading BTCT reguarly and of those who do only a very tiny fraction finds this specific thread. and of those who find this specific thread only again a very very very very tiny fraction actually sells BTC cause of one of those trollfucks.

if i would have to guess the effect i would say maybe 1 BTC a day that is sold more through those trolls.

its just a perfect example of wasted time imo.

I agree. This forum has no effect on price. ( at least, forum sentiment and whatnot )

and its so funny that those fucks seriously try day in day out. its so dumb it reminds me of this little guy...  Grin




56. Post 8767577 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.12h):


trolls incoming in 3,2,1,.....



57. Post 8767731 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.12h):


you know, timing is everything in these markets.  Grin



58. Post 8769148 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.12h):


hey folks, what leverage is actually doable at bitfinex? x5 or x10 or x20.....??



59. Post 8769238 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.12h):

Quote from: grappa_barricata on September 11, 2014, 01:14:25 AM

hey folks, what leverage is actually doable at bitfinex? x5 or x10 or x20.....??

i hear its only 2.5

It is 3.3x, it has changed recently.

thx



60. Post 8783836 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.12h):


oh, no more newbiejail? didnt know that. but it explains alot.



61. Post 8808991 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.12h):

Quote from: fonzie on September 13, 2014, 09:32:28 PM
You all should have better invested in some solid crypto!

you dont say?




62. Post 8876206 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.13h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on September 18, 2014, 04:05:54 PM
I feel dumpers running out of ammo, and shorts will have to cover soon.

This thing could bounce like a Mofo.

Also one of the things i've been reading for months and months.

Dumpers out of ammo.
Weak hands shaken out soon.
We're near the bittom.
Etc.

one has to admit that's true



63. Post 8877042 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.13h):


Looking backwards i think the Goxdesaster layed the ground for the ongoing downtrend.

Talked to interested noobs about Bitcoin one day, they all were initially interested and some even had 50k+$ to invest in Bitcoin.
But none of them wanted to transfer any money to any obscure easteuropean exchange just to see his coins/money gone the next day.

That's basically a big underlying problem. No trustable, big and known exchange.



64. Post 8877247 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.13h):




65. Post 8877257 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.13h):

Quote from: Stankia on September 18, 2014, 05:19:36 PM
Barely above 400 on BTC-e. I see 300s in the near future.

a real wizard you are  Grin



66. Post 8879008 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.14h):

Quote from: bigdave on September 18, 2014, 06:59:55 PM
Inching closer to 410. Roughly 860btc to that point. Get your cheap coins.

But i was told at 600 those were cheap coins. And at 500. And at 900. Now you're telling they are cheap at 410? So confusing this.

410 is cheaper than 500, 600 and 900. Not sure how simple math can be confusing.

So at 600 they weren't cheap and i was lied to?

Once again 600 was cheaper than 900 so no you wasn't lied to.


sorry dave, but that just deserves a big facepalm.



67. Post 8887413 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.14h):

Quote from: AirFlame on September 19, 2014, 11:20:02 AM
When this shit happens (large dumps) i always talk to myself what goes down must come up.

Ahmmmm....no.




68. Post 8887952 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.14h):

Quote from: Malin Keshar on September 19, 2014, 12:29:27 PM
379.99 Sad

Here we go again

340 incoming



69. Post 8887962 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.14h):

Quote from: macsga on September 19, 2014, 12:30:25 PM
342 actually...

right



70. Post 8889247 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.14h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on September 19, 2014, 02:07:47 PM
Testing: Not sure what's going on.


Explanation

ok this is it.

its obv the end as all can see clear now.



71. Post 8889475 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.14h):

Quote from: inca on September 19, 2014, 02:26:06 PM
Testing: Not sure what's going on.


Explanation

You are late bro

Interestin chart. The orders are of a normal magnitude, but the asks are much lower than normal.
Presumably there are few asks as the price has fallen so much, so historic asks are off the chart.
The price appears to have stabilised at 400.
Perhaps there was some significant sellers have now exited.

Every weak hand who wanted to sell has. No point selling now. The price is down a lot sure, but a lot of coins have moved hands, we can potentially go up after some meandering round.

no more "weak hands" talk plz

thats just a bogus kind of explain movements in markets, i can tell ya that after trading for 20+ years at nymex,nasdaq etc

its just a misleading way of interpreting movements and costs you alot of money in the end



72. Post 8889505 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.14h):

Quote from: inca on September 19, 2014, 02:29:02 PM
Blitz any chance you or the other mods could get newbie jail reinstituted. The proliferation of annoying trolls is ridiculous.

there should be a bann option just for threads. so a self-moderated thread could simply keep troll-fuckers out of their threads by a single klick.



73. Post 8942864 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.15h):

Quote from: exocytosis on September 23, 2014, 06:22:50 PM
Tiny dead cat bounce up to 425 before we crash to sub 350.

Trader Rule #1 Don't lie to yourself.



74. Post 8945428 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.15h):

Quote from: Chuckee on September 23, 2014, 08:56:29 PM
What the hell is going on? This shouldn't be happening.

<3



75. Post 8946573 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.15h):

Quote from: Post-Cosmic on September 23, 2014, 10:20:34 PM
whining

said little whiner that just took a 0.075BTC loan and took a run.... LOL MF just LOL.



76. Post 9008486 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.17h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on September 28, 2014, 08:56:49 PM
Whales want cheap shares.

Been hearing that for 9 months. When exactly are they gonna buy?


Is this gif real? wtf

The video seems to be a fake.

https://www.google.com/search?q=obama+kicks+door&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=sb

But it is funny as fuck.. I LOL , every time I see it.

i lol'ed



77. Post 9016246 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.17h):

Quote from: Oblodo on September 29, 2014, 01:38:51 PM
I hope, that like me, a lot of ppl will jump at the opportunity to buy with a CC... I just added 2 cards to Circle with good amount of credit. (over $50.000) and I am going to buy BTC. This has been the biggest hurdle for me and my Scandinavian friends. I have at least 10 friends that now are going to buy. Even if they just buy a couple of coins, it is going to be good. The whole SWIFT bank transfer and waiting days for it to show up on an exchange was to slow and lost me money. If Circle works, I bet you this is going to be big. Setting up something in the middle, and selling coins should also be easier. I now think I will put up that ATM in Oslo after all...

Scandinavians, especially Norwegians have shit loads of fiat, and will react if they see this as a good thing. Most ppl I know, have been waiting for this. So a good day. Now if I could only deposit via the cards...

i thought thats whats circle all about??



78. Post 9019592 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.17h):

Quote from: criptix on September 29, 2014, 06:22:25 PM
Not sure if its wise to share, but my friends that never used btc before are right now buying   Shocked Shocked Shocked

This could be the reversal?

via circle?



79. Post 9069744 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.18h):

Quote from: njcarlos on October 03, 2014, 06:14:01 PM
I'm actually, legitimately, nervous. If we significantly breach $350 or $300, there's no telling how low we can go before the mass selling ends. Perhaps it's just a momentary paranoia speaking.

tbh same here

low 100s possible imo

its a shame but apart from the etf i cant imagine any impulse which could turn this ship around. pretty bearish view i know. maybe its a good sign that bulls like me get bearish idunno.



80. Post 9069764 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.18h):

Quote from: AirFlame on October 03, 2014, 06:16:22 PM
I'm actually, legitimately, nervous. If we significantly breach $350 or $300, there's no telling how low we can go before the mass selling ends. Perhaps it's just a momentary paranoia speaking.

No paranoia my friend i am nervous too. But i think bitcoin will survive as technology

bitcoin could easily survive as technology with price being 10$ and lower....



81. Post 9072206 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.18h):

Quote from: MoreFun on October 03, 2014, 10:00:46 PM
I haven't heard much about the Bitcoin ETF lately.  There seemed to be some consensus that it would open by the end of 2014.  Maybe an "entity" of some sort knows something the rest of us do not know yet?  This would explain a lot about why the price is being desperately pushed down.



i think they keep filling it and it keeps getting rejected, someone posted a link the other day and you could see them filling it every few months.

not sure if legit or even how these things work tho...

maybe regulators are waiting for the "bottom" to open it up to the public?

idk.


SEC rejects application for Winklevoss COIN ETF due to Bitcoin's apparent slide toward death.  More news at 11.

/sarcasm

Now that would depress me!  But things were looking good, especially with the hiring of  Kathleen Moriarty, a lawyer that has had great success in getting ETFs pushed through, even ones that are not as valid as a Bitcoin ETF would be.  Just my thoughts.  Patience people.

You are expecting too much of the news and some minor events (spotted multiple times). This market is not run by the news.

True.  News hasn't seemed to effect the price much lately, and perhaps you are right that my expectations are unrealistic.  

But I think that the ETF will be a little different in that it opens a door for a different kind of investor to get involved with BTC and there are millions of dollars that could very easily be thrown into BTC in a matter of days or weeks.



Why you think so? Others said so about ETF right... ? Look at my post about ETF few days ago. ETF could bring higher prices, but not because of ETC, but because of usage, performance and traction of BTC. ETF can also bring even lower prices if Bitcoin is not doing well (all these millions can short it).

wrong, an etf like that winklevii are trying to get accomplished cant be shorted. in other words no btc could get sold that werent bought by the trust before. NO naked short selling!



82. Post 9072306 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.18h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 03, 2014, 10:10:56 PM
Wasn't Gabi supposed to take us to the moon? What usernames were repeating that every day? Why do i never see anyone here saying they were completely wrong and delusional?

Doesn't GABI allow for a lot of the same things that the COIN ETF would allow for?

no

a etf means anyone who could buy some stocks at NASDAQ can buy BTC easily as much as he like. pretty big step for bitcoin.

GABI is a hedgefund that only a fraction is allowed to invest and that has high minimal orders. also GABI lets you enter or leave only once a month.

-> completely different game as an ETF



83. Post 9082517 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.19h):

we are fucked



84. Post 9147219 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):


ETF another year? not good.



85. Post 9147356 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: empowering on October 09, 2014, 11:44:59 PM

ETF another year? not good.


wytaw? (anything specific I mean)

http://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/2i7bfn/has_anybody_tried_simply_calling_the_lawyer_in/

looks credible to me.

she isnt exactly confirming one year but i would interpret it as that.

edit: at least it doenst look like late 2014 imo.



86. Post 9147396 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):


on the other side i read that miners like knc and other jerks sold tons of unmined BTCs in advance. that would make perfect sense as they give a shit about bitcoin and bitcoin-price. so the coming months could have some smaller supply of mined coins as those coins have already been sold.



87. Post 9147448 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: fonzie on October 09, 2014, 11:56:54 PM

on the other side i read that miners like knc and other jerks sold tons of unmined BTCs in advance. that would make perfect sense as they give a shit about bitcoin and bitcoin-price. so the coming months could have some smaller supply of mined coins as those coins have already been sold.

Do you have a link or anything for that? KNC shorting BTC? Never thought about that but it could be possible.

http://bitcoinblog.de/2014/09/30/bitcoins-werden-verkauft-bevor-sie-erzeugt-sind-aber-der-pessimismus-der-trader-ist-ubertrieben/

that's all i have. but i also think that would make perfect sense. KNC sells big chunks of unmined coins OTC.



88. Post 9150999 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: tarmi on October 10, 2014, 09:35:48 AM
Bitfinex spikes to a new high.  14,384 btc short


 Grin

Going to be epic



did to anyone occur that he who is opening those short knows what is he doing?

If they know what they're doing they've got way bigger balls than me

What happens if a large buyers steps up and forces margin calls?


they dont need to have bigger balls -> just insiders info.

Wink


insiders info directly from the CEO of bitcoin?

Wink



89. Post 9151044 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: tarmi on October 10, 2014, 09:42:07 AM
Bitfinex spikes to a new high.  14,384 btc short


 Grin

Going to be epic



did to anyone occur that he who is opening those short knows what is he doing?

If they know what they're doing they've got way bigger balls than me

What happens if a large buyers steps up and forces margin calls?


they dont need to have bigger balls -> just insiders info.

Wink


insiders info directly from the CEO of bitcoin?

Wink


no, directly from mr 30 k guy who is btw raping stamp's order book since july.

so holding a big stack makes you an "insider"? if i buy a big stack of apple shares that makes me an insider??



90. Post 9166985 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

cc..



91. Post 9179629 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.23h):

Quote from: gnode on October 12, 2014, 11:38:16 PM
Those that aren't buying are on the wrong side of the technology curve,

http://blogs.wsj.com/accelerators/2014/10/10/weekend-read-the-imminent-decentralized-computing-revolution/

You can play daytrader all you want but you will get burned.

Buy and Hodl!

decentralized computing revolution, yes. but not necessarily bitcoin.



92. Post 9186336 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.23h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on October 13, 2014, 03:26:51 PM
Huge ass ask wall on Huobi! HOLEEE SHIEET

4000BTC ask on Huobi @2320

beat me!

Its actually more though: 5006.2419

omg, this is the end! it has to be the end, doesnt it?



93. Post 9186434 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.23h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on October 13, 2014, 03:33:07 PM
Ask wall on huobi splitting and moving down! She's real!

Huobi is freakin the fuck out. 1k bidwall appeared on 2300 and its getting eaten




94. Post 9186993 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.23h):

Quote from: inca on October 13, 2014, 04:20:20 PM
FUD at maximum on here. Pathetic!
Did you even look at the link? Pathetic!

Why would anyone base their trading decision on 2000 coins from 2011 moving. Its FUD.

###



95. Post 9196748 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.24h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on October 14, 2014, 12:16:16 PM
I can't handle this shit anymore. I'm out. I just sold all my coins. Fuck it.

lol

you are such a joke. its ok that you sold, no problem with that. but wasnt that you who just complained like "Who the fuck is selling?"



96. Post 9203656 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.24h):

Quote from: Pala_00 on October 14, 2014, 10:28:24 PM


i have to lol every fckn time



97. Post 9215704 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.24h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on October 15, 2014, 09:05:09 PM
Everyone ready for today's pump and dump? Remember, don't be that guy who buys at the top.

whats wrong with that? my first coins i bought at 50$ and that was indeed a new top. i was still buying when we hit 340$ and that was also a new top at that time.



98. Post 9323823 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.26h):

Quote from: redsn0w on October 25, 2014, 09:32:24 AM
I'm waiting the $250 value , is it possible or not   ? What do you think guys ?

possible? of course. sub 150$ also possible.



99. Post 9324851 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.26h):

Quote from: cbeast on October 25, 2014, 12:31:19 PM

Chinese yuan.
Get used to saying that if Bitcoin dies. China will claim to have defeated Bitcoin and will then point at the dollar. The USD will crumble faster than Bitcoin.

lol! china will face internal collapse rather sooner than later. economy overheating and chinese people sick of injustice etc...



100. Post 9423033 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.28h):

Quote from: tarmi on November 03, 2014, 01:16:40 PM
I miss rpietila.

he was funny too.

what happend to him? no more coins?



101. Post 9423146 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.28h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on November 03, 2014, 01:31:21 PM
I miss rpietila.

he was funny too.

what happend to him? no more coins?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=285771.msg8655491#msg8655491

o.O

i kinda like it tbh



102. Post 9458130 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.29h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on November 06, 2014, 04:14:27 PM
Oh look. Already a new wall at 350. Because no matter what we just have to go down. That apparently is the only thing that counts for traders. We just must go down. No other option. Down down down. Only way to make money.

you should seek psychological advice my friend, sounds like serious bitcoin-bull-fuckedmania



103. Post 9521978 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

Quote from: GaliX on November 12, 2014, 05:45:19 PM
time to short at 420 and buy back lower?  Cheesy

yes, go ahead



104. Post 9526137 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 13, 2014, 12:06:28 AM
This means nothing, and probably not true. If you control $3 Billion why are you going to lose your time trading in OKCoin...? Makes no sense at all. You don't have enough market depth to even move some millions...

Just to be clear, what I think that the OKCoin guy meant is that the fund has licensed OKcoin's trading software, and perhaps is using their IT infrastructure, for their own shares.

you understand it wrong and and you know it. not that this hedgefund has to be the ultimate news for bitcoin, but to desperately look for alternative interpretations of this obv interview is just pathetic.



105. Post 9526327 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

Quote from: janos666 on November 13, 2014, 12:24:15 AM
OkCoin @ 2800
Huobi @ 2700

Da fak?

arbitrage not happening??

It does. More OKcoin users sell to the invisible buy wall rather than buying on ask price.
But they are feared to buy more on other exchanges (cheaper) because this increase feels unsustainable.

thats not arbitrage. thats trading what you are talking about.



106. Post 9526332 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):


china is serious it seems.



107. Post 9565916 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.32h):

Quote from: nrd525 on November 17, 2014, 01:41:43 AM

Fiat is designed to lose value, 2 percent in some countries, 2 1/2 in others. Bitcoin not.

Bitcoin too, until the year 2150 or something !  Although you are right that bitcoin has monetary mass inflation until then, while many central banks have price inflation targets.  The difference between both is (at constant velocity) given by economic growth.  



The danger is altcoins. Altcoins = infinite inflation potential for crypto-currencies as a class.  Though so far they aren't catching on.

###

absolutely correct

i expected them to gain ground in 2014 and to take a big bite out of bitcoins marketcap. but they didnt. with sidechains in the making innovations could eventually build into the bitcoin protocol in the future.

but generally speaking altcoins could act as the inflation that bitcoin was trying to avoid.



108. Post 9571993 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.32h):

Quote from: Bittings on November 17, 2014, 04:57:43 PM
http://www.usmarshals.gov/assets/2014/dpr-bitcoins/

THIS SEALED BID AUCTION IS FOR A PORTION OF THE BITCOINS CONTAINED IN WALLET FILES THAT RESIDED ON CERTAIN COMPUTER HARDWARE BELONGING TO ROSS WILLIAM ULBRICHT, THAT WERE SEIZED ON OR ABOUT OCTOBER 24, 2013 (“COMPUTER HARDWARE BITCOINS”).

Anybody want 50000 BTC?

Not this shit again. Let me guess, this is gonna control the market till the auction again? Like the "deadline" last time. It was the only thing people talked about and when they were sood nobody cared anymore and moved on.


Well at least the actual auction takes place on December 4th, so its not that far away.

and btw we still dont know the price of the last auction...



109. Post 9572332 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.32h):

Quote from: podyx on November 17, 2014, 05:45:15 PM
Maybe this is the shakeout before the bubble

no, i think its the end of our late bull run. expect 266 to be tested again.



110. Post 9572466 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.32h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on November 17, 2014, 05:54:11 PM
Shake the weaklings out.

The more I hear this, the funnier it gets.

true




111. Post 9635698 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.34h):

Quote from: BuildTheFuture on November 24, 2014, 12:56:16 AM
price is not moving until after the auction

Actually prior to the previous auction the market rallied quite a bit into it and also after it.

exactly. auction will be a non-event.



112. Post 9709497 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: riiiiising on December 01, 2014, 05:51:20 PM
I heard we were in the early adopter phase last year when price was $1,000/BTC, so does that mean we've regressed back to the super early, Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak in mom and dad's garage phase?

its more like the mom and dad are having sex phase



113. Post 9709920 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: bitebits on December 01, 2014, 06:06:40 PM
I heard we were in the early adopter phase last year when price was $1,000/BTC, so does that mean we've regressed back to the super early, Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak in mom and dad's garage phase?

its more like the mom and dad are having sex phase

Steve Jobs got adopted.

and that equals there was no sex involved? lol



114. Post 9711868 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on December 01, 2014, 10:27:40 PM
If there is no volatility, then we have done our job. Bitcoin has no central bankers so the money supply is determined by day traders. We profit from volatility by eating it. This is the time for the successful day traders to take a well-earned break.

This is a superior system to central banking because day traders only get paid when we do our job well. Not only that but we lose money when we do it poorly. Eventually the poor traders give all their money to the good traders.and the good traders make the system more stable, buying when there is too much liquidity and selling when there is not enough.

In the free market, every problem is an opportunity for someone.

########

qft!



115. Post 9748309 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.37h):

Quote from: dEBRUYNE on December 05, 2014, 02:34:54 PM
https://twitter.com/barrysilbert/status/540865242801405952

Quote
Bids received - 104
BTC quantity bid - 124,127

ähhh...what? i dont get it...somebody care to explain?



116. Post 9748354 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.37h):

Quote from: Kupsi on December 05, 2014, 02:44:08 PM

Quote
Bids received - 104
BTC quantity bid - 124,127

ähhh...what? i dont get it...somebody care to explain?


Barry Silbert / Secondmarket collected 104 bids for a total of 124,127 coins. They merged the bids and made new bids for the 50,000 bitcoins on the auction.

thx!

Quote
no time for explanations, just buy buy buy.

ok, understood! move move move!!!



117. Post 9752450 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.37h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on December 05, 2014, 10:04:54 PM
So for 2 weeks everybody waited for the auction to end.

It ended. Now what?
Nothing?

How many more times is this nonsense gonna happen?

Are other markets also this retarded? I find that hard to believe.


live and learn


Quote from: ImI on November 24, 2014, 12:58:05 AM
price is not moving until after the auction

Actually prior to the previous auction the market rallied quite a bit into it and also after it.

exactly. auction will be a non-event.



118. Post 9786234 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

Quote from: noobtrader on December 09, 2014, 01:37:39 PM
I don`t understand this dump, what are your theories men, an uptrend breakdown?

What do 't you understand exactly. This is the same thing that's been going on since earlier this year. A bunch of people doing everything they can to take the price down. As if their life depends on it. And they won't stop till we reach 0.
And why will they do this?

I have no idea.

These non stop dumps have been going on for so long now and hurt the Bitcoin economy so much that i doubt it's because they simply want to buy more. Everything points to trying to make it completely worthless.

it conspiracy...

no doubt about it, its all conspiracy

exactly. it cant be sellers right? cause sellers have to be a conspiracy while buyers (like those that drove us above 1000$) are obv never such a "conspiracy".

seriously shroomsie you are one of the most pathetic posters in this thread and i am saying that as a perma bull who bought at 40$ and is still holding...

edit: the only manipulation that we know about that it happend, was actually a manipulation to the UPSIDE. as willybot should have done a rather big part in that rally end 2013.



119. Post 9800081 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on December 10, 2014, 07:38:33 PM
When is the ETF expected to be approved if ever at all?

ETF conference in Jan 2015 will eventually bring some news.



120. Post 9800098 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on December 10, 2014, 07:50:29 PM
We already have another looming 100k (or was it 90k?) auction on the horizon thanks to DPR's stupidity browsing his Silk Road admin panel in a public library and not encrypting his Bitcoin wallets.

afaik he encrypted. he just entered a deal thats it.



121. Post 9830371 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):


imo ripple is hurting btc big time

500mio marketcap right now and keeps rising. if it goes to 1000mio the liquidity has to come from somewhere...



122. Post 9852687 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):


thats obv Ripple taking liquidity out of BTC.

https://poloniex.com/exchange/btc_xrp




123. Post 9852727 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Quote from: thefunkybits on December 16, 2014, 03:29:56 AM

thats obv Ripple taking liquidity out of BTC.

https://poloniex.com/exchange/btc_xrp



I dont understand this argument

daily volume is nothing...a handful of altcoins have more volume than XRP

poloniex is just a small exchange for ripple

have a look. ripple does 3 mio a day. thats enough to hurt bitcoin. it sucks liquidity out of bitcoin.

nobody really cared about ripple but as it stands it could get a real threat imo.

http://coinmarketcap.com/



124. Post 9852772 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):


ripple fucks bitcoin, that's what's happening here imo.



125. Post 9852879 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Quote from: dakota neat on December 16, 2014, 03:46:17 AM

ripple fucks bitcoin, that's what's happening here imo.

You mean that premined centralized scam? Then buy in.

it doesnt matter whats your or mine opinion on ripple. observing the recent events its obv that the market favours ripple at the moment and that it is a very bad moment to dump bitcoin further.



126. Post 9852885 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 16, 2014, 03:52:47 AM

ripple fucks bitcoin, that's what's happening here imo.

ripple is fuel that powers a network, a seemingly useless, centralized, closed source, network that no one actually uses, you might be right that its current pump is " taking liquidity out of BTC " but i can't believe these effects will be long lasting. idk who in their right mind would touch ripple after they double the supply overnight. i can't understand why its being pumped, or how the pump has managed to stick...

makes no sense! i dont get it! dont try to explain it to me, I don't wanna hear it.


yes, you maybe right. i am not here to argue about if ripple is better or bitcoin or whatsover. just sayin ripple is hurting bigtime at the moment.

can it last? idk.......



127. Post 9857105 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Quote from: BitThink on December 16, 2014, 02:45:35 PM
sorry if already answered, but do you care to share why you think @220 will be the "real" bottom? (serious question)

It's because the triangle cult has blind faith in their trendlines. Of course if the lines fail, they will have a crisis of faith, which leads to dumping.



It's how markets work.
So current price is determined by the price of 2 to 3 years ago?

yes. not determined but influenced.



128. Post 9857174 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Quote from: BitThink on December 16, 2014, 02:55:57 PM
sorry if already answered, but do you care to share why you think @220 will be the "real" bottom? (serious question)

It's because the triangle cult has blind faith in their trendlines. Of course if the lines fail, they will have a crisis of faith, which leads to dumping.



It's how markets work.
So current price is determined by the price of 2 to 3 years ago?

Since some people from 2 or 3 years ago are still around, I think it have some influence.

Also the TA people use the same technique, so it in certain sense influence them too, even if they are not here since 2 or 3 years ago
To me 2,3 years to bitcoin is like 10 years, and the price of 2 to 3 years ago ($1 to $10) cannot have any influence to current price. Therefore, to draw a such line in such a scale is meaningless. This is not TA in my understanding.

if that line get broken? better watch out. in no way "meaningless".



129. Post 9858930 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):


Ripple solved a problem Bitcoin had since the Gox-Fuckup. People can buy Ripple directly at their bank. No shady east-european exchanges, no problems of trust.




130. Post 9859225 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):


and what do you make out of the falling price and falling volume???



131. Post 9860429 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 16, 2014, 08:48:01 PM

Ripple solved a problem Bitcoin had since the Gox-Fuckup. People can buy Ripple directly at their bank. No shady east-european exchanges, no problems of trust.

yeah, solving the trust problem was what ripple did ...  Roll Eyes

... and even in the worst prisons the guards are trusted.

lol

we speak of different kinds of "trust". in a bigger scale you are right, nevertheless means buying your crytocurrency at your local bank for the average customer obv a BIG advantage against bitcoin. since the gox-fuckup the inner-bitcoin-circle wasnt able to rebuild the lost trust. as the complete management of the gox-fuckup was a disaster in terms of PR.



132. Post 9860549 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 16, 2014, 09:24:07 PM

Ripple solved a problem Bitcoin had since the Gox-Fuckup. People can buy Ripple directly at their bank. No shady east-european exchanges, no problems of trust.

yeah, solving the trust problem was what ripple did ...  Roll Eyes

... and even in the worst prisons the guards are trusted.

lol

we speak of different kinds of "trust". in a bigger scale you are right, nevertheless means buying your crytocurrency at your local bank for the average customer obv a BIG advantage against bitcoin. since the gox-fuckup the inner-bitcoin-circle wasnt able to rebuild the lost trust. as the complete management of the gox-fuckup was a disaster in terms of PR.

Let's keep things in perspective shall we? 2008 banking and financial crises were a PR disaster for the fiat centralised banking scam ... Mt. Gox was a japanese kabuki comedy routine, sucks if you got caught up in the pantomine but there was plenty of warning.

agree again. nevertheless i am just explaining the rise of ripple and thats one part of its success. you can obv say that ripple is centralized or whatsoever. only, it doesnt matter. in the end all what matters is which system gains mainstream-trust and gets track in the financial world and which system gains markets trust.

if ripple succeeds and outperforms bitcoin you can tell yourself whole day long that bitcoin is theoretically the better system and that this shouldnt have happend.

i am not a ripple fanboy and am still in btc for the biggest part, nevertheless to ignore the needs of the average customer/user wont help bitcoin.



133. Post 9877917 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.40h):


at least do it right...




134. Post 9879208 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.40h):


run forrest! run!



135. Post 9997772 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.42h):

Quote from: serpicodk on January 01, 2015, 12:54:38 AM

Is Zerohedge not reliable?

no



136. Post 10037020 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.43h):

Quote from: p4n on January 04, 2015, 06:04:12 PM
people posting this is an amazing time to buy makes me think that the panic/despair zone is to come yet



its not that easy. i have seen several "despair zones" in my life in stock markets and bitcoin and there was never a situation where everybody screamed "sell!". remember 60$ after the 2013 bubble? even then we had alot posts like "this is the bottom!" there simply is no situation of united "sell!" panicing. if you wait for it you will wait in vain. does this mean we have seen the bottom. idk of course.



137. Post 10045506 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.44h):


terrible timing for any exchange issues



138. Post 10045856 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.44h):


MULTISIGNATURE HAS TO COME!



139. Post 10047687 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.44h):

Quote from: kenji on January 05, 2015, 04:54:18 PM
after stamp is dead which exchange do you believe will become the mainexchange?

stamp



140. Post 10051852 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.44h):

Quote from: celebreze32 on January 05, 2015, 11:29:09 PM
It seems like the $5M question is whether Stamp has spare BTC to cover the loss, or do they have to buy some of those 18K btcs in the market to return back to their users.

If they make everyone whole and swallow the loss, I wonder how Stamp users will feel? Do you switch because they were hacked, or do you stay loyal because they made everyone whole even after they fucked up. I mean shit happens, its nice to know that they are willing to take a hit to preserve their users' funds (like Blockchain did when some of their wallets were hacked).

How much do they make each day on average? Bitstamp's a ripple gateway in addition to a bitcoin exchange, so it makes money off the ripple system and people trading bitcoins.

The article link below is about the first day OKCoin.com beat Bitstamp by transacting nearly 16,000 BTC, compared with Bitstamp’s ~14,700 BTC and Bitfinex’s ~15,100 BTC.

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/okcoin-com-had-higher-daily-bitcoin-volume-than-bitstamp-and-bitfinex-today/

I cannot remember exactly what fees Bitstamp charges, but if it's trading volume is ~14,700 BTC daily, then it must have earned far more than $5 million this year.

they also could get some venture capital in exchange for businessshares



141. Post 10072720 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.45h):

Quote from: grappa_barricata on January 07, 2015, 06:59:12 PM
Stamp is done: once you lose client's confidence it is over. Probably will run away with the rest of the money once they realize this.

watch and learn



142. Post 10133219 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Quote from: dnaleor on January 13, 2015, 04:07:36 AM
i'm broke

crypto is just in its infancy and other chances will be seen.



143. Post 10133250 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Quote from: mikeh2 on January 13, 2015, 04:03:51 AM
bitcoin has too much backing to be scared of it dying.

yes, nevertheless. bitcoin wouldnt be "dead" at 50$ also, right?



144. Post 10137502 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.47h):

Quote from: bobboooiie on January 13, 2015, 12:35:18 PM
I dont want to see what happenes when reminder of gox coins hit the market

you mean in middle of 2016?



145. Post 10138306 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.47h):

Quote from: fonsie on January 13, 2015, 01:37:14 PM
These price crashes sure attract a lot of Newbies to this thread, saddly they haven't got anything meaningfull to say.  Grin

neither have the old timers. Grin



146. Post 10138458 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.47h):

Quote from: JamesBrown on January 13, 2015, 01:50:47 PM
These price crashes sure attract a lot of Newbies to this thread, saddly they haven't got anything meaningfull to say.  Grin

as a newbie myself I mainly have questions, however pple seem to come here for the memes instead.

yeah, thats the meme-thread. information is gathered elsewhere.



147. Post 10138660 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.47h):

Quote from: JamesBrown on January 13, 2015, 01:57:45 PM
These price crashes sure attract a lot of Newbies to this thread, saddly they haven't got anything meaningfull to say.  Grin

as a newbie myself I mainly have questions, however pple seem to come here for the memes instead.

yeah, thats the meme-thread. information is gathered elsewhere.


Already on the news sites and few newsletters. Got any recommendations?

depends on the info you are looking for. reddit is ok. bitcointalk has also some to offer. news are gathered here pretty well: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=77.0



148. Post 10139073 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.47h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on January 13, 2015, 02:38:08 PM
Hilarious how people are putting up walls the push the price down even lower. Because it isn't bad enough yet. The best tech invention in ages completely destroyed by a bunch of traders.

you are aware of that traders dont pull bitcoins out of their ass? every coin they sell had to be bought before, so that leaves you in the end in +/- 0 situation were traders dont influence the longterm price of bitcoin at all.



149. Post 10144279 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.47h):

Quote from: _javi_ on January 13, 2015, 11:36:18 PM
Stamp hacked coins have been on the move recently.

https://blockchain.info/address/1L2JsXHPMYuAa9ugvHGLwkdstCPUDemNCf

19.000 coins being dumped can easily help this mess...

nevertheless stamp had to buy the exact same amount somewhere



150. Post 10144430 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.47h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on January 13, 2015, 11:55:30 PM
Can't decide whether to take the last of my savings and buy cheap coins.  Can someone plz confirm the next bubble is just around the corner?  Thx in advance.

 Embarrassed Embarrassed Embarrassed

no bubble to see here. just stay in poland and keep calm.



151. Post 10144577 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.47h):

Quote from: coinableS on January 14, 2015, 12:14:34 AM
Bears are fucking ruthless creatures aren't they?


why?
it's not bears who dump now
those are bulls that bought cheap coins at 700,600,500,400,300,250

Yea it could be longs closing their position... Best not to use margin in such a volatile market.   Real bulls never sell. Ever.

just like bears. they never buy. ever.



152. Post 10151495 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

Quote from: AmazonStuff on January 14, 2015, 01:54:43 PM
I'm sure that it's good that this drop is happening. Drop is caused by large influx of stolen coins (probably from Gox theft) to exchanges. In some way, scammers are returning stolen coins to community. When they are done, community will control those coins and things will be more stable and optimistic, unless some other bitcoin company is hacked, but I'm sure that they got more mature by now.

agree, theft is a big issue in this downtrend and resulting crash. nevertheless i am not so sure about exchanges being safer today. only stamp has implemented multisig for example.



153. Post 10166282 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.49h):

Quote from: superresistant on January 15, 2015, 05:30:33 PM

I don't understand. At around 200 USD, mining is not profitable at all but the difficulty doesn't crash !

How can mining company still be running right now ?


just a question of energy-costs.

bitcoin would have to fall at sub 20$ to get the first big mining companies to quit mining cause of energy-cost problems.



154. Post 10247648 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.52h):

Quote from: findftp on January 24, 2015, 02:40:57 PM
I love the smell of panic buying in the morning.


Damn it, it's already afternoon.
Ah,.. what the hell. Just enjoy the smell.

lol! these posts are the reason i keep reading this wrecked thread.

<3



155. Post 10249443 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.52h):

Quote from: dillpicklechips on January 24, 2015, 05:58:33 PM
Big spike in the new users on bitcointalk. New members per day is closer to what the forum was getting late 2013.

where can one see that?



156. Post 10249562 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.52h):

Quote from: dillpicklechips on January 24, 2015, 06:02:58 PM
Big spike in the new users on bitcointalk. New members per day is closer to what the forum was getting late 2013.

where can one see that?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=stats



thx



157. Post 10260586 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.52h):

Quote from: mobmob on January 26, 2015, 12:10:37 AM
The bottom is not in, 10% inflation problem remains

a.) its not a huge problem at this marketcap
b.) we are just 16 months away from the next halving



158. Post 10260989 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.52h):




159. Post 10261957 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: damiano on January 26, 2015, 03:39:31 AM
I'm so shocked, I've never pulled a profit on leverage like this before

Yeah I'm tempted to take some profit here. Not bad going for just over 24 hours work.



Nice

I'm up a shitload

Went in at 230 20x leverage  out at 254 back in at 246 still holding controlling about 800 contracts.

There is another guy here who got in sub 200 with 3k contracts 20:1.  He must be in heaven.

trading at bitfinex?



160. Post 10274056 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: megadeth on January 27, 2015, 03:47:48 AM
the twinklegoss' give us a timeline:  http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/26/us-winklevoss-exchange-idUSKBN0KZ2N220150126

for the exchange

there is a good probability that they will announce both at once, the exchange and the ETF. both will work hand in hand.



161. Post 10346774 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):


mum just confirmed she will be buying at sub 100 again  Grin




162. Post 10380999 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Quote from: Morecoin Freeman on February 06, 2015, 10:41:05 PM
Friend on Wall Street says pump to ~250 today or tomorrow.
Then it will drop to around 230 and stick there for a bit.
My neighbor says the great rally of 2015 will push bitcoin to $700.

mum said 1055$ in august 2015



163. Post 10417252 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 10, 2015, 04:00:10 PM
7 days until the Euro crashes. Can't wait.

I'm assuming you are referring to the troika's demand that Greece submit a bail-out plan that they will not submit, prompting a Greek Gov't shutdown and a massive bank-run. 

What non-senses are you people writing here? What Gov't shutdown? Bank-run?!? I have a feeling you know the situation as you are from Mars. There's 0 chance of Government shutdown, they have a brand new Gov't less then a month old which got elected with massive support announcing that it will do exactly what it is doing now. If Greece leaves the Euro-zone it will be better both for the Greece and the Euro.

Greece is out of money because the fools who got elected promised tax breaks and the fools who elected them stopped paying their taxes, hoping to get a better deal. So now it's not just the banks that are out of cash, but the government as well.

confirmed



164. Post 10517555 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: lyth0s on February 19, 2015, 11:31:39 PM
With the next auction of DPR's 50,000BTC coming up in March I expect most of the coins to be sold much lower than market price and I also expect a huge dump after the coins from the auctions are dispersed. We may even see sub $150 coins at that time. I highly doubt any good positive gains until at least a few weeks after the auction. Most people won't take that chance of getting dumped on.

auction will be a non-event. nothing will happen at all.



165. Post 10624521 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

https://archive.today/G5R1Z



166. Post 10624584 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

Quote from: Artoodeetoo on March 01, 2015, 09:46:39 PM
Shorters could be in for some big pain...

mucho risk at the moment to be short



167. Post 10633845 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

bum



168. Post 10635475 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

Quote from: 12345mm on March 02, 2015, 09:45:23 PM
pretty hard to maintain a negative perspective making like $500 per hour gain on these pumps while not pushing more money in myself ... i want a yacht too afterall ... it's just going to take me a few years of constant trading i figure ... or a valuation of 5K per coin i guess would do it ...

depends on what you call a "yacht"



169. Post 10635699 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

Quote from: 12345mm on March 02, 2015, 09:58:21 PM
ehhh i figure 1/4 million can buy me a decent 50 footer ... most people would consider that a yacht and not a simple boat ... some may argue only 100 foot + counts as a true luxury yacht ...

i have no clue about boats/yachts but for me yachts start at 1-2mio upwards...  Grin



170. Post 10635799 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

Quote from: barbs on March 02, 2015, 10:11:03 PM
when i see people talking about what they're going to spend their money on, and train pics, it is always, always the right time to sell

exactly! i would sell the shit out of myself if i were you. seriously tomorrow we will be back at 220$ sureasf***



171. Post 10636576 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):




172. Post 10641498 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: Plazma on March 03, 2015, 09:45:24 AM
Trolls back in the cave. they will come out once the price drops 3$.

and here they are.

so pathetic.



173. Post 10642424 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: Dump3er on March 03, 2015, 01:43:41 PM
Trolls back in the cave. they will come out once the price drops 3$.

and here they are.

so pathetic.

Yeah, you mean like on each suckers-rally permabulltards starting to party hard, posting moon pictures, rockets and dead bears. And a few weeks later suckers rally has ended and permabulltards are waiting for the next suckers rally to party hard on lower price level. Rinse and repeat.

You permabulls know that we are at 270 and not on 30,000?

Oh dear, call me a troll, call me an asshole, but never call me a permabull - that's really offensive shit.

Edit: This suckers rally will end in the midst 300st.

i got no problem with that. what i find so pathetic is the complete disappearance of trolls in any little mini-bull-run and the first second we get a small correction they suddenly reappear and go on with the usual bullshit-trash-talk.

you can be a (perma-)bull and you can be a bear, i dont care. but bulls in here at least have the balls to stay in this thread even if things doesnt work out for them as they hoped.

maybe you see now what i meant with "pathetic"...



174. Post 10642774 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: Dump3er on March 03, 2015, 02:23:33 PM
Trolls back in the cave. they will come out once the price drops 3$.

and here they are.

so pathetic.

Yeah, you mean like on each suckers-rally permabulltards starting to party hard, posting moon pictures, rockets and dead bears. And a few weeks later suckers rally has ended and permabulltards are waiting for the next suckers rally to party hard on lower price level. Rinse and repeat.

You permabulls know that we are at 270 and not on 30,000?

Oh dear, call me a troll, call me an asshole, but never call me a permabull - that's really offensive shit.

Edit: This suckers rally will end in the midst 300st.

i got no problem with that. what i find so pathetic is the complete disappearance of trolls in any little mini-bull-run and the first second we get a small correction they suddenly reappear and go on with the usual bullshit-trash-talk.

you can be a (perma-)bull and you can be a bear, i dont care. but bulls in here at least have the balls to stay in this thread even if things doesnt work out for them as they hoped.

maybe you see now what i meant with "pathetic"...

Trolls have very different motivations from permabulls. A lot of them disappear since they are not creative enough to fuck up permabulls with something more than falling prices. So they wait for the next leg down.

For myself it's a lot more amusement to keep on bitching all the suckers rallies.

no problem with that



175. Post 10646015 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: fff13 on March 03, 2015, 07:35:19 PM
Price is $284 right now and the trolls have been silenced for now. I think a move to $350 will put them away for some time.

i think a move to $270 will be enough to bring them back on track



176. Post 10647371 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: Hfertig on March 03, 2015, 09:27:53 PM
buying volumes are declining. Over bought territory. I believe it is time for bulls to take profit and bears to start shorting

go ahead



177. Post 10647422 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: Hfertig on March 03, 2015, 09:40:10 PM
buying volumes are declining. Over bought territory. I believe it is time for bulls to take profit and bears to start shorting

go ahead

I am surely taking profits now...

nothing to complain about



178. Post 10648432 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: damiano on March 03, 2015, 10:48:43 PM
Shorts down to 15k now

that was a nice little shortsqueeze



179. Post 10648964 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on March 02, 2015, 06:20:33 PM
Likely unsustainable. I wouldn't bet on this going anywhere but down in short term (1week)

serious business we have got here



180. Post 10656114 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: HarmonLi on March 04, 2015, 02:36:39 PM
btc-e is dragging down the average, but 281 is pretty decent. I predict it's going to rise to about 295 then drop down to 285 again. Then it should repeat that but in increasing numbers.

BTC-E seems to be pretty laggy all this time. Is it only because it is difficult to get money into it or because the fees are high? I always thought everyone considered them kind of shady, yet they haven't had any hacks or outages... Funny, eh?

who says there havent been any hacks? gox was most probable hacked twice in 2011. it lasted over 2 years until it got a problem and became public.



181. Post 10671782 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: petahashminer on March 05, 2015, 06:58:08 PM
auction is over?

sell or buy?




182. Post 10672467 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: ImI on February 19, 2015, 11:34:54 PM
With the next auction of DPR's 50,000BTC coming up in March I expect most of the coins to be sold much lower than market price and I also expect a huge dump after the coins from the auctions are dispersed. We may even see sub $150 coins at that time. I highly doubt any good positive gains until at least a few weeks after the auction. Most people won't take that chance of getting dumped on.

auction will be a non-event. nothing will happen at all.

###



183. Post 10691383 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: tarmi on March 07, 2015, 02:19:58 PM

Sometimes I really wonder if theymos was paid by somebody for closing - and keeping closed - newbie jail...

I mean, I and many others repeatedly asked to re-open the "probation period" so that, at the very least, the number of utterly useless new troll accounts is *limited*, even if it doesn't get rid of the problem entirely.

Mods respond to that request by "only theymos can change that", and he seems unwilling to do so. Really beyond me why he feels that way, which is leading me to come up with paranoid theories (see first line) Cheesy



yes, people often raise questions about theymos collecting donations, closing newbie jail, letting run obvious scams and ponzi securities threads open...

but guess what libertards...that's free market of yours.

lol, just another balkan-fascict.



184. Post 10692942 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

boom



185. Post 10716439 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on March 09, 2015, 08:23:14 PM
295 on Finex.
Where are all the pictures of trains?

No bears to piss off

oh they are here. they are just to scared to speak.



186. Post 10730425 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):


lol! it took exactly 18h of standstill to get beartards back on the table.



187. Post 10742583 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: dannyspk on March 11, 2015, 09:36:17 PM
Finex is not following China. Don't think we can proceed without testing 280s once again.

lol china



188. Post 10744227 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on March 12, 2015, 12:36:03 AM
Well, someone wants to hold under 300.. What's with all the walls everywhere?

Or they know a breakout results in their asks being eaten in full, so walls at critical values are logical..

Not everything is a conspiracy

in fact 99,99% aren't



189. Post 10750726 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):


breakout imminent



190. Post 10751409 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: tarmi on March 12, 2015, 03:51:13 PM

breakout imminent


again?  Roll Eyes

again



191. Post 10751464 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: tarmi on March 12, 2015, 04:43:14 PM


I smell bacon again.

this crash is gonna be epic.

hope you shorted enough?  Kiss



192. Post 10751683 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: podyx on March 12, 2015, 04:58:28 PM
tarmi is even more evident evidence that people that get left behind by the train grows to become pure poison later in life.

Take care of yourself and buy and hold bitcoin so you don't become one of these toxic motherfuckers... (even if you were to lose it all, it's a cheap price.)

nope i think he should short the sh** out of this motherf****.

he gets a little respect as he at least has the balls to come here at the moment as obv permabear. the other beartards are hiding and waiting until we drop 10$ to come out and start celebrating.



193. Post 10751846 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: aztecminer on March 12, 2015, 05:15:02 PM
tarmi is even more evident evidence that people that get left behind by the train grows to become pure poison later in life.

Take care of yourself and buy and hold bitcoin so you don't become one of these toxic motherfuckers... (even if you were to lose it all, it's a cheap price.)

nope i think he should short the sh** out of this motherf****.

he gets a little respect as he at least has the balls to come here at the moment as obv permabear. the other beartards are hiding and waiting until we drop 10$ to come out and start celebrating.


go up or down... doesn't matter..... that is just how i roll .

interesting technique you got there. so you say you win no matter if btc goes 330$ or 270$?



194. Post 10814179 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: camolist on March 18, 2015, 05:23:14 PM
down $15 and margin shorts are down and longs up

 Huh



stolen coins are being dumped



195. Post 10870117 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: 12345mm on March 24, 2015, 12:11:40 PM
well ... someone just sold $2,000,000 worth of coins in the span of 10 minutes across all the exchanges ... nicely done ...

i smell evolution  Wink



196. Post 10870791 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: WeltMaster on March 24, 2015, 01:29:23 PM
hi guys!

you are not able to break 250.  Cry

Cry


Time to ignore this shitposter

just another balkantard



197. Post 10871054 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: magicmexican on March 24, 2015, 02:04:28 PM
Why its going to the dumpster once again? Any news?

evolution coins imo



198. Post 10871362 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: sAt0sHiFanClub on March 24, 2015, 02:28:41 PM
Down we go gents, another hack!

https://cryptoine.com/

Code:
"Unfortunately, cryptoine was hacked.

The hacker found some race condition bug in our trading engine. Manipulation of orders gave him false balances.

Soon we reveal more details."

Another minor exchange discovers that their mongodb doesn't handle acid very well. whats that got to do with the big exchanges?

it got alot to do with market-psychology



199. Post 10871539 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: abercrombie on March 24, 2015, 02:57:58 PM
Looks like another dark market might go down?  

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/304rhd/why_the_fck_are_we_dropping_faster_than_a_fat/

Code:
"Evolution market just exit scammed, and now if you head over to /r/darknetmarkets you
can see that Agora, the second largest market (now largest), has just said they're going offline for
24-48 hours for a "security update." People are extremely nervous to say the least. If Agora runs off
too then that's basically the entire real economy of bitcoin going poof."

M-U-L-T-I-S-I-G ASAP!



200. Post 10898229 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.07h):



bids at 500$ per bitcoin...

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/GBTC/quote



201. Post 10898431 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.07h):

Quote from: Morecoin Freeman on March 27, 2015, 02:14:34 AM
Why would anyone bid $50 for one tenth of a bitcoin while bitcoin is trading at < $250  Huh

a.) because they dont want to buy at any (shady) exchange

or

b.) because they are not allowed to buy assets that arent listed at NYSE/Nasdaq/OTC ...



202. Post 10898492 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.07h):

Quote from: tarmi on March 27, 2015, 02:36:04 AM
no, they are just being stupid, that is all.



price doesn't care if someone is stupid or smart



203. Post 11014888 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.09h):

Quote from: Norway on April 07, 2015, 10:42:49 PM
Some very big investment banks on the GBTC bid list. I wonder if they will try to short bitcoin to the ground when they get shares to play with. What do you think, guys?

whats the deal? they would have to BUY EVERY SHARE FIRST that they wanna go short with. so go ahead and BUY 10000 shares in this low volume market just to push the price up and go short. LOL! best way of burning $ fast.



204. Post 11094424 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.11h):




205. Post 11104881 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.11h):

Quote from: CoinRocka on April 16, 2015, 11:47:19 AM
There's much to be said about the delayed GBTC, Gemini, COIN and Ethereum launches lately.  Everyone is waiting for the impending hype cycle.  It is coming....but when?!?

OTC-bid is at 370$, but no one is selling for 370$.

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/GBTC/quote



206. Post 11197577 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 26, 2015, 01:51:17 AM
wow shorts are up like 2.5K from a few mins ago  Grin

fyp

its obv a good sign. would you like it better if shorts were down 2.5k?



207. Post 11203027 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):




208. Post 11212250 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Quote from: 8up on April 27, 2015, 03:14:27 PM
am I the only one not giving a single fuck about that action on btc-e?

now bids popping out on bitfinex and stamp - yaaaawn.

No. Nothing to see here. Bitcoin is still heading down for sub -$80.

fyp



209. Post 11216231 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: tarmi on April 27, 2015, 09:39:52 PM
time to open new shorts on bitfinex.

Cheesy




210. Post 11216462 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on April 27, 2015, 09:58:36 PM
When do the Chinese wake up?
How will they react to this?




211. Post 11225054 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: tarmi on April 28, 2015, 05:26:56 PM
smart bears are waiting for double digits like I do.

you are not scaring anyone with fake bid walls and buys on illiquid exchanges.  




212. Post 11228773 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: minerpumpkin on April 29, 2015, 12:23:24 AM
Back to normal really isn't behind us. I think it's best practice to assume that the bubbles of 2013 were more or less caused by Gox and, thus, heavily inflated. We have to ignore them and extrapolate the "regular" exponential uptrend from the remaining data. That way we might get a more reasonable idea of what's "normal" or should be assumed to be it.

Gox started to manipulate summer 2013, so i would talk just of the later 2013 bubble not the April bubble. April bubble could have been sparked by the halving that took place end of 2012.



213. Post 11243848 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on April 30, 2015, 01:11:43 PM
When does GBTC go live?
I'm not sure if Barry himself even knows?

what i dont get: what can possibly be so hard to know when a fckn equity starts trading?



214. Post 11243929 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: oblox on April 30, 2015, 01:26:00 PM
When does GBTC go live?
I'm not sure if Barry himself even knows?

what i dont get: what can possibly be so hard to know when a fckn equity starts trading?

Because no one knows when someone will bring their shares to their broker to sell. For all intensive purposes, it is trading with buy offers, just no sellers--thus, no matches and no volume.

afaik the problem are not missing sellers but missing "green light"



215. Post 11248977 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on May 01, 2015, 12:28:02 AM
ATTENTION BITCOIN PURISTS!!!

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-30/first-blythe-masters-now-goldman-investing-bitcoin
Quote
The bad news is that any hopes and aspirations of making a libertarian statement against the status quo by transacting with a monetary medium that now has the full backing and endorsement not only of the biggest commercial banks, but the Fed itself, is now history.
Oh noes!! Bitcoin doomed!
* seriously though, one could get almost 500 Monero per bitcoin right now, if one was so inclined...


ZH idiots had the one chance in their lifetimes to front-run wall st. ... and they squandered it on running around with their tinfoil-hatted heads chopped off and hating on a tech. they clearly didn't understand, nor deserve to as it turned out.

ZH is basically run by russia. So they are absolutely inline with their top dogs opinion.



216. Post 11249002 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: gentlemand on May 01, 2015, 12:38:57 AM

ZH is basically run by russia. So they are absolutely inline with their top dogs opinion.

My favourite quote describing that joint is -  It has accurately predicted 200 of the last 2 recessions.

 Grin



217. Post 11249264 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: (Lithium) on May 01, 2015, 01:21:39 AM
We are going nowhere but up

Until the weekend, when we will go nowhere but back to sub 220




218. Post 11272205 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: inca on May 03, 2015, 01:44:04 PM
Price up into the 240's.

Shorts slowly covering.

Going to plan. Thanks for your money tarmi.

lol tarmitard is online but says no word




219. Post 11314299 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on May 07, 2015, 06:51:31 PM
Ahhhhh just logged in to see a small pump.
Let's hope it continues, it seems so long that I can't even remember what 300 USD feels like.
Would be nice to get upto 250 by the end of the week.
So many positive things for bitcoin being held up by regulators etc atm.
I think we'll look back on this price after the halving next summer & laugh.

The only way is up now people, the bear market will be over soon.

bear market is over since 152$ imo



220. Post 11320879 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: bad trader on May 08, 2015, 01:18:52 PM
The GBTC market is about to open. I'm not surprised if it continues crashing toward BTC parity.






221. Post 11322111 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):


where is tarmifart and the other fuckers?



222. Post 11322270 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: lowerlowlow on May 08, 2015, 04:09:36 PM

where is tarmifart and the other fuckers?

Leaving any potential monetary incentive aside, I relish these moments for the brief respite from the incessant droning of the trolls.

Enjoy it while it lasts everyone. Cheers!

 Smiley

we are always here watching you get excited at every fake recovers:





OMFG!!??  Shocked Shocked ARE WE AT -200$ SOON!?? O M G! THATS SOO SAD......  Cry



223. Post 11322419 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: blacky90 on May 08, 2015, 04:29:22 PM
WE ARE GOING NOWHERE BUT DOWN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DONT FALL FOR THIS TRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!





224. Post 11322481 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: rmbku on May 08, 2015, 04:34:22 PM
Worst time to buy.

Do you know what "worst" means ? If so, then why was when the price was above 1k a better time to buy ?

He means that the pump is over, time to dump. <==feel free to quote me.




225. Post 11350225 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: Hfertig on May 11, 2015, 09:43:11 PM
Microbears are relentless, we must be on the brink of getting their shorts called.

you are right, the shorts in bitcoin are micro compared to the leveraged longs... Cant wait for the cascade 😂
Theyre still fairly high.. also we don't have data for OKCoin leverage AFAIK.


apart of OKCoin, btc-e and bitfinex there is not many venues to borrow bitcoin to go short, hence shorting is limited. Lots of opportunities to borrow fiat... loans, mortgages, credit cards, parents and so on...
and still more than 100.000 coins borrowed on bfx.

this is a house of cards...


A house of cards held up by hundreds of thousands of coins used for collateral for long positions. A house of cards which didn't collapse at 160 last time.

How much are you short hfertig?

I am probably less coins short than you are long... and compared to you I made a shitload of money in the last 18 month.
just wait until your collateral continues to devaluate by high interest and decline.

define "shitload". most bears here start sucking nuckels with 5-digits wins and think its the best shot. its obv a matter of discussion but imo "shitload" of money starts 100.000+



226. Post 11378244 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: Flyskyhigh on May 14, 2015, 08:48:01 PM
$130 soon. Then what?

$13.




227. Post 11385844 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: nxxnh on May 15, 2015, 05:34:34 PM
[]


^Bitcoin in a nutshell. Three different-sized wheels. Special road. Exact path must be followed.

All for what?

To go around in circles, while people point fingers & laugh.

Undecided

i see no one laughing



228. Post 11392444 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):


Afaik KNC dumped most of their coins as soon as they were mined and were one of the many reasons for the bearmarket imo.



229. Post 11409521 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: Norway on May 18, 2015, 12:46:12 PM
Impressive. 6th most active ETN.

http://www.nasdaqomxnordic.com/etp/etn

Agreed. And now the price is climbing a little too Wink

Whats the ratio? 1:200?



230. Post 11409590 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: Norway on May 18, 2015, 12:53:53 PM
Impressive. 6th most active ETN.

http://www.nasdaqomxnordic.com/etp/etn

Agreed. And now the price is climbing a little too Wink

Whats the ratio? 1:200?

Yes. 200 notes equals 1 BTC.

1800$ ??

What are the aribtrage-possibilities? As bad as with GTBTC?



231. Post 11409635 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: Alley on May 18, 2015, 12:57:01 PM
Impressive. 6th most active ETN.

http://www.nasdaqomxnordic.com/etp/etn

Agreed. And now the price is climbing a little too Wink

Whats the ratio? 1:200?

Yes. 200 notes equals 1 BTC.

1800$ ??

What are the aribtrage-possibilities? As bad as with GTBTC?

Price is in sek not USD.

Ahh...OK. Makes sense.



232. Post 11409784 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: Norway on May 18, 2015, 01:12:57 PM
Impressive. 6th most active ETN.

http://www.nasdaqomxnordic.com/etp/etn

Agreed. And now the price is climbing a little too Wink

Whats the ratio? 1:200?

Yes. 200 notes equals 1 BTC.

1800$ ??

What are the aribtrage-possibilities? As bad as with GTBTC?

The cool thing about this ETN is that there is no limit of "matured shares". The issuer buys more real bitcoin on exchanges if the players want more ETNs. No limits on either bid or ask side!

OK, that makes its a "real" ETF then.

Lets see what the volume brings!



233. Post 11439870 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on May 21, 2015, 12:30:34 PM
why are we not at 150 yet
Because the bears have failed to push us below 230 USD for any prolonged period.
Every time a whale puts coins up for sale they get eaten up.
We've found the bottom & the only way is up now.
The bear market is over.

bear market is over since 152 imo. nevertheless its not clear if a bullrun has started or sideways is the name of the game.



234. Post 11439912 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on May 21, 2015, 12:42:46 PM
why are we not at 150 yet
Because the bears have failed to push us below 230 USD for any prolonged period.
Every time a whale puts coins up for sale they get eaten up.
We've found the bottom & the only way is up now.
The bear market is over.

bear market is over since 152 imo. nevertheless its not clear if a bullrun has started or sideways is the name of the game.

Bull runs aren't subtle

yes, may i correct myself: bear markets. they can be subtle.



235. Post 11636779 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.17h):

Quote from: Norway on June 16, 2015, 09:28:50 PM
Someone told me "All your base are belong to us".
For one memorable night, all our us are belong to Base.
All your coin are belong to base? Sad



what game is that?



236. Post 11636793 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.17h):

Quote from: gentlemand on June 16, 2015, 09:45:31 PM

what game is that?

Zero Wing from 1991.

thx! best age of gaming.



237. Post 11644336 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):


lol! FED bankers never promise anything. in fact they stay most of the time as indifferent as possible.



238. Post 11732000 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

greeks have no idea of bitcoin imo.

no idea and no means to buy bitcoins.



239. Post 11742445 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):


captal-controls and BTC stays more or less the same. thats kind of disappointing tbh.



240. Post 11742547 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):

Quote from: Elwar on June 29, 2015, 09:16:44 AM

captal-controls and BTC stays more or less the same. thats kind of disappointing tbh.

It was around $240 before Greece basically walked out on negotiations.

yes, a 4% rise,and thats it? i mean seriously, a euro-zone-state getting capital controls was one of the big things to look ahead. compare that to 2013 when cyprus had problems...



241. Post 11743100 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):

Quote from: Elwar on June 29, 2015, 10:19:21 AM
I am surprised that the Euro has only gone down by 1 cent over the weekend vs the dollar.

Grexit would let the Euro skyrocket.



242. Post 11743350 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):

Quote from: AlexGR on June 29, 2015, 10:21:36 AM
Quoting myself from another thread:

-I was trying to buy something online (costing just 2-3$) with my greek visa, and the charge was getting rejected.
-Gas stations take only cash.
-Suppliers of stuff, take only cash as they are afraid of the consequences of accepting digital payments, and with that I include bank payments (they are afraid they will not be able to withdraw it, or their money could be bailed-in / converted to drachma etc etc).

There is in a sense a fungibility issue with the euro in Greece right now. Digital euros / bank euros "suck" as they are useless to transact. Cash euro is what counts for most people, even companies.

Times like these, you *realize*, not theoretically, but by living it, that you wouldn't trade your crypto for fiat and that crypto is immensely more useful (ie you can actually transact, when with digital cash / banks / cards etc you can't).

The sense of value increases in a way that is unexpected: I wouldn't trade a single BTC even if I was offered >1000 euro in the bank in these conditions. The euros in the bank are useless.


Thats true, but you have to acknowledge the fact that BTC at the moment is just as useless for you as euros in your bank account. Who accepts BTC in Greece? Are you able to buy gas, food, taxi etc with BTC? Paying your rent with BTC?

You see i dont wanna be overly pessimistic here but as long as nobody actually accepts it its basically as useless...



243. Post 11743528 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):

Quote from: Elwar on June 29, 2015, 11:26:04 AM
Quoting myself from another thread:

-I was trying to buy something online (costing just 2-3$) with my greek visa, and the charge was getting rejected.
-Gas stations take only cash.
-Suppliers of stuff, take only cash as they are afraid of the consequences of accepting digital payments, and with that I include bank payments (they are afraid they will not be able to withdraw it, or their money could be bailed-in / converted to drachma etc etc).

There is in a sense a fungibility issue with the euro in Greece right now. Digital euros / bank euros "suck" as they are useless to transact. Cash euro is what counts for most people, even companies.

Times like these, you *realize*, not theoretically, but by living it, that you wouldn't trade your crypto for fiat and that crypto is immensely more useful (ie you can actually transact, when with digital cash / banks / cards etc you can't).

The sense of value increases in a way that is unexpected: I wouldn't trade a single BTC even if I was offered >1000 euro in the bank in these conditions. The euros in the bank are useless.


Thats true, but you have to acknowledge the fact that BTC at the moment is just as useless for you as euros in your bank account. Who accepts BTC in Greece? Are you able to buy gas, food, taxi etc with BTC? Paying your rent with BTC?

You see i dont wanna be overly pessimistic here but as long as nobody actually accepts it its basically as useless...

But if he wanted to leave the country and take his wealth he could.

True.



244. Post 11799664 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):

Quote from: v0tK1C on July 05, 2015, 09:50:01 PM
How many of you have forgotten the $300 scam happened at just few months ago?

All i remember is the 152$ scam sometime in the past.



245. Post 11802288 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):

Quote from: hdbuck on July 06, 2015, 08:53:41 AM
lol so yanis varoufakis do quit after all..

EUsters finally got his head on platter.

http://yanisvaroufakis.eu/2015/07/06/minister-no-more/

*drumroll for teh next goldman-central-mole-banker that will take the finance office.. Roll Eyes


Obv Tsipras kicked him as he would be an obstacle in the coming negotiations.



246. Post 11802325 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):

Quote from: hdbuck on July 06, 2015, 09:13:55 AM
lol so yanis varoufakis do quit after all..

EUsters finally got his head on platter.

http://yanisvaroufakis.eu/2015/07/06/minister-no-more/

*drumroll for teh next goldman-central-mole-banker that will take the finance office.. Roll Eyes


Obv Tsipras kicked him as he would be an obstacle in the coming negotiations.

yea obviously.. but who told tsipras he would be an obstacle? euSTERZZZZZZ!!1 Grin

common sense told him



247. Post 11855655 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.20h):

Quote from: Wary on July 12, 2015, 01:11:11 AM
Don't you remember the "general market behavior" of bitcoin from November 2013?


What if this time it's *not* different?
There is no Willy this time.

Were you watching OkCoin a couple days ago?
We are talking of fake trades that make 30-80% of all trades, continues for months, totaling on 570,000 BTC purchased for non-existing dollars. Is there something of such scale happening on OkCoin? Is there are reasons to suspect that most of fiat on OkCoin customer's accounts does not really exist?

willy....those were fun times.  Roll Eyes



248. Post 11855859 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.20h):


stamp is the most important exchange. they have to cross 300.



249. Post 11855923 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.20h):

Quote from: gentlemand on July 12, 2015, 02:02:28 AM

stamp is the most important exchange. they have to cross 300.

Why do you consider it the most important? It's withered considerably since its hack and all that juicy leverage has enticed traders elsewhere.

observation. often huobi/okcoin/finex are moving but stamp doesnt move one inch and after a short period of time they all come back to stamps price level.

finex and especially the chinese exchanges have so much meaningless trading volume that i think even after the stamp hack they are still the leaders.

edit: you see? just like this time. finex went to 308 and stamp didnt move one dollar and finex had to come back to 302$ again. stamp is still the boss.



250. Post 11855976 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.20h):


all exchanges wait for stamp.

i would say 310 in the coming 30min



251. Post 11856002 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.20h):

Quote from: shmadz on July 12, 2015, 02:25:20 AM

stamp is the most important exchange. they have to cross 300.

Why do you consider it the most important? It's withered considerably since its hack and all that juicy leverage has enticed traders elsewhere.

observation. often huobi/okcoin/finex are moving but stamp doesnt move one inch and after a short period of time they all come back to stamps price level.

finex and especially the chinese exchanges have so much meaningless trading volume that i think even after the stamp hack they are still the leaders.

edit: you see? just like this time. finex went to 308 and stamp didnt move one dollar and finex had to come back to 302$ again. stamp is still the boss.

Hmmm, what happens if stamp breaks over 300 also?

buying frenzy to 310-320 on stamp



252. Post 11858460 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.20h):

Quote from: GaliX on July 12, 2015, 10:46:22 AM
So who really expects downward pressure?

if this shows any signs of weakens at this point I am short.

This pump was leaded by LTC and will likely follow the pattern for my understanding...
The squeeze potential is quiet big right now..

Squeeze of what? The majority of the leveraged long position has been locked in since the low 200's, probably a huge BTC stash from an early adopter / miner. In fact the long position is falling as the price rises.

Profit taking is natural. But shorting every rise would have stung traders very badly for the last 6 weeks. If the price really starts moving then literally anything could happen and shorting without risk management is cray cray.
 
Technical traders are looking to get in at a decent entry. I am just enjoying the 3 at the beginning of the price Smiley


Well, this is not going to go up forever like this. That's not how markets behave.

who said "forever"? we had a 1.5 year bear market and you start to criticise in the first month of an eventual bull market? just 150$ away from recent selloff-low? lol!

i have seen bull runs in stock-markets that lasted DECADES.



253. Post 11858692 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.20h):

Quote from: cryptasm on July 12, 2015, 11:51:58 AM
just a quick question...what news of greece would make the btc price go up or down? i heard they come with news about greece today Grin

grexit = rise

no grexit = no influence on btc



254. Post 11877437 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: Elwar on July 14, 2015, 01:20:09 PM
I think we jumped over $300 just because so many people wanted it.

We need to cross it with some more stability behind it like we are building now.

The most important part was 260-270.



255. Post 11885061 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on July 15, 2015, 11:41:22 AM

Horrific news for the Greek public. Banks closed until mid August so that 60 euro a day withdrawal limit will stay in place then. It must be a nightmare, absolute nightmare. Imagine not being able to get access to YOUR money.

I suppose the financially clued up people would have seen this coming months ago & acted as necessary.

What i dont get: The greeks are still able to send money from Greece to Greece. So why they dont send money to BTC-exchanges and use BTC to get a grip to their funds?

I mean i here nothing about that. Obv Tsipras would immediately forbid BTC in Greece, nevertheless it would be a sign of peoples power. But they dont do it! Why?



256. Post 11885117 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: Lincoln6Echo on July 15, 2015, 12:01:19 PM

Horrific news for the Greek public. Banks closed until mid August so that 60 euro a day withdrawal limit will stay in place then. It must be a nightmare, absolute nightmare. Imagine not being able to get access to YOUR money.

I suppose the financially clued up people would have seen this coming months ago & acted as necessary.

What i dont get: The greeks are still able to send money from Greece to Greece. So why they dont send money to BTC-exchanges and use BTC to get a grip to their funds?

I mean i here nothing about that. Obv Tsipras would immediately forbid BTC in Greece, nevertheless it would be a sign of peoples power. But they dont do it! Why?

Well, I think the answer is easy: There is no BTC Exchange in Greece.

Are you sure about that? I thought i read it somewhere.



257. Post 11894356 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: Elwar on July 16, 2015, 12:47:46 PM
thinking of leaving bitcoin, i think there is more money to make it in the stock market



may i ask: whats her name?



258. Post 11895159 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: TerraMaster on July 16, 2015, 02:57:28 PM
Its really going to suck if BTC only rises when there is a country on the brink of collapse or something.

It has got to find its way into everyday use. I think it is still very difficult for most average people to even comprehend BTC let alone, go thought the motions of actually using it to buy something. Until that hurtle is crossed I see it floundering up and down with little spikes here and there.

We all thought at one time, well when online retailers begin excepting it,,, it will go tot the moon etc. Well, many big ones do now and yet still no new demand. Others thought well, when more laws are written and it becomes legal" to use then it will moon then.. we have guidelines now....Still no impact.

The use and movement of BTC is confined to a very small select group of people. many like us in here or miners simply generating and dumping. Until that changes no one is going to get rich very fast or at all. The price will continue to be flat. There is nothing I am aware right now that would cause BTC to really go much higher than we just saw.  Roll Eyes

-> Halving



259. Post 11902888 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: inca on July 17, 2015, 01:40:35 PM
aaaahhh. will short all the way down to 190. feels good to watch the true believers eating cock.

I relented for a while but it's time for you go in the ignore box.

watching his post history its just 99% bullshit. poor soul seems to believe he can move the market by writing "sell now!" or "bear market is over. get in!"



260. Post 11910395 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: abercrombie on July 18, 2015, 03:02:47 PM
is crypto done??   Huh



she is so cute <3



261. Post 11961222 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: BitcoinNewbie15 on July 24, 2015, 04:01:59 PM
Looks like Bitcoin did have a very small move up today, although I am not sure what caused it. I didn't expect to see a change in price today, mainly because it has been stable these last few days. It is a pleasant surprise to see that the price rose by $10 though.

reason is gemini



262. Post 11963403 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on July 24, 2015, 10:46:49 PM
The winklevii already have investors ready to buy as soon as they go live.  They know alot of high power people.


I don't doubt they know powerful people but powerful people are "usually" powerful as they are fairly intelligent.

Now, I am mildly semi intelligent and I know if I were them I'd buy before Gemini is launched and the price potentially rises.

Why wait for the winkles?

I am not sold on this Gemini exchange doing much at all to the price. Not moon bound anyway but............

I really hope I am wrong and everyone points and laughs at me.

There is nothing new anymore about a regulated exchange. And with the swedish ETN the Twinkletossers ETF has lost much of it's novelty. But they somehow get all the media and all the fat cats to listen to them. Often just to point and laugh, but listen they do.

Don't get me wrong. I still think a fully regulated ETF listed in NY is a big deal, just not as big as it was. And with the other exchanges, the ETN and general acceptance of BTC in financial circles, we don't need the Facepalm Bros to launch this mofo.


The ETF is another animal than the ETN.

Nevertheless the biggest pricedriver will be the halving and the months before halving.



263. Post 11963543 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):


Gemini is a neccessary requirement for the ETF as it will be the connection to the market.



264. Post 11963627 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: Fakhoury on July 24, 2015, 11:56:01 PM

Gemini is a neccessary requirement for the ETF as it will be the connection to the market.

How is that ?

The ETF has to buy every BTC that is bought at Wallstreet in the "real" BTC markets. Every share of the ETF has to be underlaid by BTCs. In their proposal at the SEC they explained that those BTC will be bought at the usual BTC markets. Given Gemini is their own exchange its obv that they will likely use Gemini to fill orders from Wallstreet.

So you see? Gemini is an important requirement for the ETF.



265. Post 11963636 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: natewelt on July 24, 2015, 11:56:59 PM
The winklevii already have investors ready to buy as soon as they go live.  They know alot of high power people.


I don't doubt they know powerful people but powerful people are "usually" powerful as they are fairly intelligent.

Now, I am mildly semi intelligent and I know if I were them I'd buy before Gemini is launched and the price potentially rises.

Why wait for the winkles?

I am not sold on this Gemini exchange doing much at all to the price. Not moon bound anyway but............

I really hope I am wrong and everyone points and laughs at me.

There is nothing new anymore about a regulated exchange. And with the swedish ETN the Twinkletossers ETF has lost much of it's novelty. But they somehow get all the media and all the fat cats to listen to them. Often just to point and laugh, but listen they do.

Don't get me wrong. I still think a fully regulated ETF listed in NY is a big deal, just not as big as it was. And with the other exchanges, the ETN and general acceptance of BTC in financial circles, we don't need the Facepalm Bros to launch this mofo.


Sorry, but you are completely wrong here saying that the Swedish ETN ruins the COIN ETFs novelty. ETNs do not = ETFs, not even close

ETNs are not nearly as secure and transparent ETFs. ETFs actually hold the underlying asset being tracked and ETNs simply follow the price. This gives people much more confidence in using ETFs to earn returns versus ETNs. If the company that runs the ETN goes out of business the ETN would become worthless (ETN = unsecured debt), but with an ETF there are actual assets backing the investors purchases so they have much more security.  




Exactly, if the price goes lunatic and makes new ATH the company issuing the ETN could go bankrupt as they eventually have to pay those gains out of their own pockets.



266. Post 11963672 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: natewelt on July 25, 2015, 12:07:25 AM
The winklevii already have investors ready to buy as soon as they go live.  They know alot of high power people.


I don't doubt they know powerful people but powerful people are "usually" powerful as they are fairly intelligent.

Now, I am mildly semi intelligent and I know if I were them I'd buy before Gemini is launched and the price potentially rises.

Why wait for the winkles?

I am not sold on this Gemini exchange doing much at all to the price. Not moon bound anyway but............

I really hope I am wrong and everyone points and laughs at me.

There is nothing new anymore about a regulated exchange. And with the swedish ETN the Twinkletossers ETF has lost much of it's novelty. But they somehow get all the media and all the fat cats to listen to them. Often just to point and laugh, but listen they do.

Don't get me wrong. I still think a fully regulated ETF listed in NY is a big deal, just not as big as it was. And with the other exchanges, the ETN and general acceptance of BTC in financial circles, we don't need the Facepalm Bros to launch this mofo.


Sorry, but you are completely wrong here saying that the Swedish ETN ruins the COIN ETFs novelty. ETNs do not = ETFs, not even close

ETNs are not nearly as secure and transparent ETFs. ETFs actually hold the underlying asset being tracked and ETNs simply follow the price. This gives people much more confidence in using ETFs to earn returns versus ETNs. If the company that runs the ETN goes out of business the ETN would become worthless (ETN = unsecured debt), but with an ETF there are actual assets backing the investors purchases so they have much more security.  




Exactly, if the price goes lunatic and makes new ATH the company issuing the ETN could go bankrupt as they eventually have to pay those gains out of their own pockets.


Which is why you should never invest in an ETN unless you know the company has a good credit rating and that the chances of bankruptcy are almost non-existent.



Exactly.  Grin And thats why no "big money" will ever flow into such an ETN.



267. Post 11963741 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: Fakhoury on July 25, 2015, 12:13:24 AM

Gemini is a neccessary requirement for the ETF as it will be the connection to the market.

How is that ?

The ETF has to buy every BTC that is bought at Wallstreet in the "real" BTC markets. Every share of the ETF has to be underlaid by BTCs. In their proposal at the SEC they explained that those BTC will be bought at the usual BTC markets. Given Gemini is their own exchange its obv that they will likely use Gemini to fill orders from Wallstreet.

So you see? Gemini is an important requirement for the ETF.

Perfect, thank you.

Now, what about the volume from the Wallstreet, will we have a big volume from Wallstreet jumping into bitcoin using the COIN ETF ?



Thats the big question. Some expect tiny volume some expect hundreds of Millions if not Billions flowing into the ETF.



268. Post 11963750 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: poncho32 on July 25, 2015, 12:20:20 AM
The winklevii already have investors ready to buy as soon as they go live.  They know alot of high power people.


I don't doubt they know powerful people but powerful people are "usually" powerful as they are fairly intelligent.

Now, I am mildly semi intelligent and I know if I were them I'd buy before Gemini is launched and the price potentially rises.

Why wait for the winkles?

I am not sold on this Gemini exchange doing much at all to the price. Not moon bound anyway but............

I really hope I am wrong and everyone points and laughs at me.

There is nothing new anymore about a regulated exchange. And with the swedish ETN the Twinkletossers ETF has lost much of it's novelty. But they somehow get all the media and all the fat cats to listen to them. Often just to point and laugh, but listen they do.

Don't get me wrong. I still think a fully regulated ETF listed in NY is a big deal, just not as big as it was. And with the other exchanges, the ETN and general acceptance of BTC in financial circles, we don't need the Facepalm Bros to launch this mofo.


Sorry, but you are completely wrong here saying that the Swedish ETN ruins the COIN ETFs novelty. ETNs do not = ETFs, not even close

ETNs are not nearly as secure and transparent ETFs. ETFs actually hold the underlying asset being tracked and ETNs simply follow the price. This gives people much more confidence in using ETFs to earn returns versus ETNs. If the company that runs the ETN goes out of business the ETN would become worthless (ETN = unsecured debt), but with an ETF there are actual assets backing the investors purchases so they have much more security.  




Exactly, if the price goes lunatic and makes new ATH the company issuing the ETN could go bankrupt as they eventually have to pay those gains out of their own pockets.


Which is why you should never invest in an ETN unless you know the company has a good credit rating and that the chances of bankruptcy are almost non-existent.



What if the Wink's Bitcoins get stolen? Does insurance cover the loss, and is there no way an insurance company could possibly wriggle off the hook of paying? I know it's not likely but nothing's impossible, no matter how good the Wink's security is there is always a risk of theft.

Good question. I am sure the SEC asked that question also. Its basically the same as the Gold ETF. Gold could get stolen also so there should be an insurance also, right?



269. Post 11963803 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: Fakhoury on July 25, 2015, 12:38:02 AM

Gemini is a neccessary requirement for the ETF as it will be the connection to the market.

How is that ?

The ETF has to buy every BTC that is bought at Wallstreet in the "real" BTC markets. Every share of the ETF has to be underlaid by BTCs. In their proposal at the SEC they explained that those BTC will be bought at the usual BTC markets. Given Gemini is their own exchange its obv that they will likely use Gemini to fill orders from Wallstreet.

So you see? Gemini is an important requirement for the ETF.

Perfect, thank you.

Now, what about the volume from the Wallstreet, will we have a big volume from Wallstreet jumping into bitcoin using the COIN ETF ?



Thats the big question. Some expect tiny volume some expect hundreds of Millions if not Billions flowing into the ETF.

You as ImI, what do you think and what are the logical reasons that backs your reasons ?

I think the halving and the ETF could build the "perfect storm". At the moment there is no safe and comfortable way to buy and sell Bitcoin via Wallstreet so it will definitely bring some extra cash. Given how tiny the BTC-marketcap is compared to the financial markets, BTC needs to "convince" only a very small fraction of Wallstreet to go vertical. Just 0.001% would be enough.

The halving will spur a lot of buzz and with the ETF as an easy way to participate in such a situation next spring could go crazy imo.

But lets wait and see how it unfolds.




270. Post 11963925 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: Fakhoury on July 25, 2015, 01:03:51 AM


Quote
The halving will spur a lot of buzz


Why ?

Markets love dates and events they can speculate onwards to. The halving is an perfect event to start a hype cause its a.) very easy to understand for everybody and it has b.) an obv bullish undertone as supply gets smaller. This will definitely get picked up by the mainstream media in spring 2016. CNBC and others love such stories.

Quote from: Fakhoury on July 25, 2015, 01:03:51 AM
Why "Just 0.001% would be enough." ?


Given the Billions that are moved at the financial markets every day BTC needs just a very tiny amount to get pushed in one way or another. The BTC markets are moved by single Millions at the moment.



271. Post 11963986 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: Fakhoury on July 25, 2015, 01:26:22 AM


Quote
The halving will spur a lot of buzz


Why ?

Markets love dates and events they can speculate onwards to. The halving is an perfect event to start a hype cause its a.) very easy to understand for everybody and it has b.) an obv bullish undertone as supply gets smaller. This will definitely get picked up by the mainstream media in spring 2016. CNBC and others love such stories.

Why "Just 0.001% would be enough." ?


Given the Billions that are moved at the financial markets every day BTC needs just a very tiny amount to get pushed in one way or another. The BTC markets are moved by single Millions at the moment.

So overall you are Bullish if I'm not mistaken ?

Yes. But there are obv problems also imo. Adoption isnt going forward as smooth and fast as expected. Bitcoin seems to be at this moment more a tool of speculation than a real life device.



272. Post 11983139 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):


earth



273. Post 11983216 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):


yes, we will moon



274. Post 11983287 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):


moon is 3500$



275. Post 11985208 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

Quote from: GaliX on July 27, 2015, 07:22:49 PM
I have to say I find it pretty stupid how many people behave so childish when the price pumps a bit...

lol! what do you expect? this is the "speculation" board and the "price movement" thread, if you are looking for elevated conversation you should look elsewhere.



276. Post 12018162 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

Quote from: inca on July 31, 2015, 02:42:11 PM
Dutch bank ABN AMRO: "The financial world is going to flip upside-down."

LoL my own home bank in my country is making a -U- turn LoL.

''Blockchain technology is out there, tested, proven and operational. However, the context in which Blockchain operates is still quite immature. If we compare this moment to the early days of the Internet, we are in the ‘just before Netscape arrived’ moment''

Get youre position, buy youre coins now before it's to late!

https://www.abnamro.com/en/newsroom/blogs/the-next-big-thing.html



But but but..double digits!

blockchain ≠ bitcoin



277. Post 12018378 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

Quote from: Karpeles on July 31, 2015, 03:47:36 PM
Dutch bank ABN AMRO: "The financial world is going to flip upside-down."

LoL my own home bank in my country is making a -U- turn LoL.

''Blockchain technology is out there, tested, proven and operational. However, the context in which Blockchain operates is still quite immature. If we compare this moment to the early days of the Internet, we are in the ‘just before Netscape arrived’ moment''

Get youre position, buy youre coins now before it's to late!

https://www.abnamro.com/en/newsroom/blogs/the-next-big-thing.html



But but but..double digits!

blockchain ≠ bitcoin


But Bitcoin has the biggest operational blockchain at the moment, don't?   

Of course it has and there is good reason to believe that it will play his role in the upcoming "Revolution of Decentralisation". Nevertheless its not a given and governments, banks, etc could very well establish there own blockchains.



278. Post 12052643 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

Quote from: dEBRUYNE on August 04, 2015, 04:57:01 PM
Satoshi's coins are on the move -> https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3frht4/satoshi_nakamoto_moved_today_for_the_first_time/

seems to be a blockchain.info glitch



279. Post 12078793 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

Quote from: Theano on August 07, 2015, 03:18:22 PM
if you guys really think ETH is overpriced you can actually short sell it on Kraken... good Luck Smiley

with a marketcap of 250mio, it could very well be overpriced. 125mio would still be reasonable in such an early stage.



280. Post 12090244 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: AmericanInternational on August 08, 2015, 11:32:19 PM
CCMF?  G..guys?

CCMF



281. Post 12090867 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: Alley on August 09, 2015, 01:49:31 AM
Is this crash due to all New York customers cashing out due to being dropped by every exchange because of bit license deadline?

bitlicense could very well be a reason here... 



282. Post 12094578 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on August 09, 2015, 01:30:48 PM
Kraken says goodbye to New Yorkers too.

http://blog.kraken.com/post/126244351097/farewell-new-york

That only leaves Bitstamp out of the large Westernish exchanges who intend to apply.

What about itBit?  Has anyone tried to use it? 

What will Gemini have that itBit doesn't have?

Publicity.



283. Post 12095482 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: TerraMaster on August 09, 2015, 03:22:55 PM
Until bitcoin can be used at the grocery store or at the gas pump its not going to get too far anytime soon. People buying/mining and holding surely isn't going to help its value. So I look for more of the same as we have seen the past year or so.

Not to say some new found value for the block chain could potentially boost price or another larger economic collapse,,, but would have to be much bigger than Greece and in a more technically advanced place like the U.S. economy collapsing, or China ..... Germany etc.

Glad to see BTC still fighting back this morning Smiley

if you see bitcoin being used at the gas pump and the grocery price would already be in the thousands.



284. Post 12134166 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):


Gemini starts inviting.




285. Post 12134559 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3gvw44/gemini_invite_just_arrived/cu225wv



286. Post 12151847 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):


if public gets notice of this fork-thing we could easily go double digits.



287. Post 12151886 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on August 15, 2015, 11:54:43 PM
if public gets notice of this fork-thing we could easily go double digits.

Why?


public doesnt understand those technical details. all that is noticed is that there i a turmoil going on and we have suddenly two versions of bitcoin. thats EXTREMELY irritating!



288. Post 12151934 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on August 16, 2015, 12:07:21 AM
if public gets notice of this fork-thing we could easily go double digits.

Why?


public doesnt understand those technical details. all that is noticed is that there i a turmoil going on and we have suddenly two versions of bitcoin. thats EXTREMELY irritating!

Not sure if public even cares about fork thing.

They dont care as long as Cnbc etc dont start to headline: "Bitcoin divided! Is the war of developers destroying the Virtual Currency?"

This can seriously bring us down to double digits in no time. Pretty naive to start such a public nerd fight imo.



289. Post 12151967 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: relm9 on August 16, 2015, 12:12:02 AM

if public gets notice of this fork-thing we could easily go double digits.

Will it even get attention on mainstream news outlets?

Probably not...

I think it will.

Also imagine, a fork means you are basically not able to receive money anymore in a safe way, as if you happen to be on the wrong fork you are pretty much fucked.
That would lead to public warnings, turmoil and BIG damage to Bitcoin.

What an silly and egoistic way to ruin this project...



290. Post 12155769 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: Andre# on August 16, 2015, 10:01:00 AM
I woke up to see the mess in https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/. I agree with Gavin and Mike, let the community decide.

How? In the end its just the handful of pools who will decide.



291. Post 12158596 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: Richy_T on August 16, 2015, 07:15:53 PM
what's the blue thing below explanation in the chartguy's posts?

It's a protest at the censorship going on over on Reddit.

i thought its a protest against this whole fork-mess



292. Post 12158671 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):


one is for sure, bad publicity has just getting started.



293. Post 12158884 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: dreamspark on August 16, 2015, 08:30:14 PM

one is for sure, bad publicity has just getting started.

Yep and thats the main take away from all of this.

With all the bullshit going on r/bitcoin

All the chatter here it makes the whole project look amateurish, none of the big btc publications have picked up on it yet either. Will be interesting to see what happens when they do.

in germany one big newspaper has already picked up the story. http://www.welt.de/wirtschaft/webwelt/article145288223/Bitcoin-spaltet-die-Software-der-eigenen-Waehrung.html



294. Post 12168993 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: criptix on August 18, 2015, 01:05:21 AM
did the main exchanges in the west and china comment on core/xt fork situation?

i dont think they will run both core and xt when the times comes or?

what a mess zz

most likely there will be no mess cause 75% miners acceptance won't be reached



295. Post 12173467 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: dreamspark on August 18, 2015, 01:56:49 PM
The media shit storm has begun. All in 20x short people.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-33974826

Imo Gavin and Hearn are to blame for this. The way of dealing with this issue is the problematic and harms BTC.



296. Post 12173552 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: chmod755 on August 18, 2015, 02:06:21 PM
Imo Gavin and Hearn are to blame for this.

Blame for what?

For the PR desaster that is unfolding at the moment and that could cause harm to the adoption of BTC as much as Goxfart did.



297. Post 12177295 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 18, 2015, 08:34:33 PM
there's FUD today, price has been going down for a month, its time to buy.

not sure what bitcoin Core will look like when all the infrastructure quickly upgrades to the lastest version of bitcoin which now fucking SCALES.



i disagree. with all this nerd fight going through the media i expect 1xx$



298. Post 12177353 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: inca on August 18, 2015, 08:59:56 PM
there's FUD today, price has been going down for a month, its time to buy.

not sure what bitcoin Core will look like when all the infrastructure quickly upgrades to the lastest version of bitcoin which now fucking SCALES.



i disagree. with all this nerd fight going through the media i expect 1xx$

You are short, of course you do.

+8k new shorts today. Seems legit Smiley

no, i am not short and i never was. i think you are underestimating the damage that is done by this kiddy fight.



299. Post 12178557 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):


i would say thats a proper long squeeze we see there at bitfinex



300. Post 12178695 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on August 19, 2015, 12:03:16 AM
I have to admit, this bothers me.

told ya this fork shit will get ugly



301. Post 12178938 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 19, 2015, 12:24:21 AM
it all happend so fast

imo its not over

edit: the forking mess destroys the last trust bitcoin had in public



302. Post 12178958 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):


lol @ reddit/bitcoin




303. Post 12179003 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 19, 2015, 12:30:23 AM
Bitcoin Core - XT war is priced right now. Sell expensive coins, buy cheap coins. I'm waiting for sub-220$ now.

190 is GOLD!

..imo

190 incoming.

...imo



304. Post 12179065 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: solitude on August 19, 2015, 12:40:07 AM

lol @ reddit/bitcoin



This is why reddit is shit and any vote system / democracy is shit.

You don't see anything about this crash on bitcoin reddit, and you never will.  They're too busy being liberal faggots circle jerking each other.

its not the vote system or "democracy" its thymos censoring his ass off



305. Post 12179189 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: cyclotronmajesty on August 19, 2015, 12:55:31 AM
Just because of the forking?  Huh



yes



306. Post 12179208 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 19, 2015, 12:59:27 AM
yup

http://arstechnica.com/business/2015/08/op-ed-why-is-bitcoin-forking/
http://www.economist.com/news/business-and-finance/21661404-spat-between-developers-may-split-digital-currency-forking-hell

they said dont trust your money with those script-kiddies. how right they were.  Cool



307. Post 12213637 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):


190-180 incoming.



308. Post 12215471 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):


2MB is the way to go.



309. Post 12215797 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):


I would like to test the effects of Blocksize increases first by doing smaller steps. An self-adjusting algorithm would have to be safe in terms of manipulation.



310. Post 12226824 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):


sub 200 means 170



311. Post 12226997 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):


why?



312. Post 12227735 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):


to be honest, linear chart looks massively oversold to me.




313. Post 12227867 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on August 24, 2015, 01:13:31 PM
the last bubble was fueled by goxmoney that didn't actually exist.

true.

nevertheless its interesting to watch it from a TA point of view.




314. Post 12228047 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):



stock markets feel like bitcoin today  Wink



315. Post 12232873 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):


Wasteland is right, confidence is one major "selling point" of Bitcoin. This kiddy nerd fights are for sure not helping in that regard. It seems like several billions have been handed to some teenagers.



316. Post 12233109 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):


175$ could get tested. but with the looming nerd-fight until january 2016 there maybe not enough interest for a reaction.



317. Post 12233361 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: nexern on August 25, 2015, 12:27:13 AM
http://blog.blockchain.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Industry-Block-Size-letter-All-Signed.pdf

block size has to be increased. thats for sure! its just a matter of HOW. XT is the bullys way of forcing things. better is BIP100 or 102



318. Post 12233412 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 25, 2015, 12:35:23 AM


i'd pick bip100 but i really don't give a shit who wins as long as someone wins.

and exactly thats the important point. there will most likely be no end to this until dec/jan.



319. Post 12233435 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: nexern on August 25, 2015, 12:37:46 AM

block size has to be increased. thats for sure! its just a matter of HOW. XT is the bullys way of forcing things. better is BIP100 or 102

without XT we wouldn't even talk about it, would we?

afaik there were discussions going on before XT. but yes it wouldnt have been a discussion in this thread and in general "public", but that would have been the better solution and way dealing with this.



320. Post 12233446 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on August 25, 2015, 12:42:27 AM
If bitstamp breaks $200 I'll consider it final  Cry

final what? final, we will never see 200$ again or final now dump starts?



321. Post 12233512 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):


thank you gavin, thank you hearn and thank you maxwell. your kiddy shit has brought us here, better said your incompetence in finding compromises.



322. Post 12233553 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: Patel on August 25, 2015, 12:56:30 AM

thank you gavin, thank you hearn and thank you maxwell. your kiddy shit has brought us here, better said your incompetence in finding compromises.

but mostly the 2 paid shills

yes, but the "other side" was and is stubborn also and made this happen.



323. Post 12233593 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):


BIP100 could win and end this whole fuck

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3i9qdj/25_of_hashing_power_is_now_publicly_backing_bip100/



324. Post 12233630 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):


maybe the market wants to see 152$ again



325. Post 12233688 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: megadeth on August 25, 2015, 01:17:23 AM
Days destroyed: https://blockchain.info/charts/bitcoin-days-destroyed

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afBRj58PYSI

not much

https://blockchain.info/charts/bitcoin-days-destroyed?timespan=all&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=7&show_header=true&scale=0&address=

jan 2014 had really some dd



326. Post 12233855 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 25, 2015, 01:40:19 AM
this was the final push down, now it's becoming clear either BIP100 or BIP101 will win and SOON, with block limit raised we will finally stop talking about forking bitcoin and how this will lead to XYZ bad bad bad fud fud fud.

Mike and Gavin are set on pushing their version on us so the only option is two side by side chains ~ if you try to tell me there is lack of mining power to support both i'll laugh so hard ! :-)  ~good times bud

there's a lack of willingness to mine both.

also Mike and Gavin's XT version is the least popular vote.

implement bip100 or 8GB fixed and nobody gives a shit about mike and friends anymore.



327. Post 12233902 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

http://themerkle.com/news/current-state-of-the-blocksize-debate-bip-100-vs-bip-101/



328. Post 12237308 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: mattiadeabtc on August 25, 2015, 12:16:09 PM
The best thing 'amateur' traders can do is buy in at these low prices & HODL until the halving. Stop trying to play & guess the market, you will lose that game 9 times out of 10.

Do the sensible thing, buy in & HODL until the halving. I guarantee the price will be double what it is today at least. Why try & catch 20 USD pump & dumps now? If you're not a whale & able to manipulate the market you will lose unless you get lucky.

Solid advice, at least for me.

when bitcoin will have the halving?

ca. August 2016



329. Post 12237457 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: mattiadeabtc on August 25, 2015, 12:36:36 PM
The best thing 'amateur' traders can do is buy in at these low prices & HODL until the halving. Stop trying to play & guess the market, you will lose that game 9 times out of 10.

Do the sensible thing, buy in & HODL until the halving. I guarantee the price will be double what it is today at least. Why try & catch 20 USD pump & dumps now? If you're not a whale & able to manipulate the market you will lose unless you get lucky.

Solid advice, at least for me.

when bitcoin will have the halving?

ca. August 2016

one year from now, a lot of things can happen before this....

of course, but speculation will start months before the actual halving.



330. Post 12256680 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):


with bitfury and f2pool backing bip100, XT is basically dead.

time to move on.



331. Post 12257498 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: Fakhoury on August 27, 2015, 02:13:15 PM

with bitfury and f2pool backing bip100, XT is basically dead.

time to move on.

Good. I think it's a good thing, we get bigger blocks as & when the network demands it. Gavin & Hearn can go & take a jump, this isn't wall street, we don't want or need any CEO types.

The serious and full of fear question now is, if XT is officially dead, what will be the role of Gavin and Hearn, friend or foe ?

no reason for fear. everybody has the right to start his own altcoin.



332. Post 12266894 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):


ccmf



333. Post 12273846 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: hausfrau on August 29, 2015, 01:01:02 PM
The bitcoin is fighting for Higher price but couldn't carry it anymore ...... Be relax and waiting for see another crash very soon ............

Hey Monopoly! This isn't a game, you know.




Who killed my sister, hausfrau@home?  Was it YOU?!



trolls in here are german. now it all makes sense. germans are known for their notorious bitterness.  Grin



334. Post 12394350 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):


miners want bip100. case closed.



335. Post 12404198 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: Monopoly on September 12, 2015, 09:13:48 PM
IF we will reach to %75 XT nodes the fork will occur ...... Is there any solution for avoid the fork ? or Bitcoin project will fail ?

no, not 75% of nodes. 75% of blocks! thats a little difference. 75% will never happen as the biggest pools already voted against 101.



336. Post 12418434 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: gentlemand on September 14, 2015, 01:26:46 PM

Technically that's a gross oversimplification of the math and processes involved. It will tighten supply, which could send the price up tenfold. Unless it disrupts the mining industry in such a way that it sends BTC plummeting.


A tightened supply is only a factor if there's increasing demand. Right now there are more than enough existing coins for everyone and mined coins are only a fraction of daily volume. Maybe there'll be a psychosomatic boost but I hope people aren't pinning too much on it.

Substract all the trading volume which obv builds the biggest part of the daily volume and you will find find that per day 2 or 3 million less sold will make a tremendous difference.



337. Post 12590031 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on October 03, 2015, 01:06:13 PM
funny how the huge finex wall is unable to move the price up.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CMwWxY2UkAADSRJ.png:large

Finex is getting irrelevant.
When Gemini (with derivatives) goes live Finex will be history in few weeks.

Gemini will have pretty though KYC into place, i doubt that alot of traders switch from Finex to Gemini.



338. Post 12610494 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):


240 arriving farts



339. Post 12628785 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on October 07, 2015, 08:47:57 PM

The Northern Lights are insane today. This one is from yesterday. Today it's even better.


That looks incredible. Where do you live?

Tromsø, Northern Norway

wow! what a crazy place to live! definitely got my attention.



340. Post 12658555 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):


OT:

The issue with cars is: NOW is the time to buy the last real cars that were produced. Prices will skyrocket for those as now we will see even more downsizing, turbocharging, battery-driven, etc.... Take the 911 for example, there wont be any natural-aspirated 911s anymore! You dont have to be a genius to understand that the 997 and 991 will skyrocket in price soon enough.



341. Post 12675160 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

Quote from: yolalanda on October 13, 2015, 12:04:39 PM
Shit is going vertical!  Shocked Grin

20BTC buy on Gemini is why Cool

lol

where can one see gemini chart / orderbook?



342. Post 12675211 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

Quote from: yolalanda on October 13, 2015, 12:09:04 PM
...
where can one see gemini chart / orderbook?

https://cryptowat.ch/gemini/btcusd/5min
http://bitcoinity.org/markets/gemini/USD

thx



343. Post 12683888 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):


puh....gemini is pretty disapointing tbh. i thought they would at least install some kind of market maker or something, but thats a joke.



344. Post 12684290 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):


choo choo?



345. Post 12684324 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on October 14, 2015, 12:47:24 PM

choo choo?

Are you seeing something that I'm not? Cheesy I'm not sure what volume or what prices you're seeing buddy.

oh i am hearing it  Grin




346. Post 12685123 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):


choo......chooo.........chooo............................



347. Post 12685848 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on October 14, 2015, 04:05:11 PM

choo......chooo.........chooo............................

Choo....choo?Huh


Here's what I see.



clean your ears! can't you hear it?  Smiley



348. Post 12686192 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

Quote from: yolalanda on October 14, 2015, 04:44:26 PM
its around 240 when gemini start, and then rises every to 250 today. if you have other theory... pls inform

On the 1d-step Bitstamp chart I see a steady rising trend since 2015-09-22 (since 2015-09-14 at OKCoin).  There are some small $5 spikes on top of that trend, like the current one; but they have been short-lived. 

What is causing that trend?  Who knows...

There's no denying that Gemini's leading this rally, did you miss that 8BTC buy?!

that was me! i thought i push things a little...  Cool



349. Post 12701611 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: ImI on October 14, 2015, 12:50:43 PM

choo choo?

Are you seeing something that I'm not? Cheesy I'm not sure what volume or what prices you're seeing buddy.

oh i am hearing it  Grin



ch.... ch........



350. Post 12701888 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: magicmexican on October 16, 2015, 01:26:58 PM
What are the actual chances to break 300$ and stay there without crashing back to 230$ a week after?

72.54%



351. Post 12704386 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):


gemini volume is such a joke....



352. Post 12704817 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 16, 2015, 07:11:21 PM

gemini volume is such a joke....

Gemini is looking really good after less than two weeks in existence.  Too early to write it off, and the volume is picking up every single day.  I predict that by next week it's volume will be over 1500 BTC per day... and maybe in a month over 10,000 BTC per day...   

i dont write it of. its just kind of disappointing to see that they werent able to install some proper market maker. i thought they are the professionals entering this space? so i would have expected some big bank to take over the part of a market maker or something. as it stands now it will take some while to get even near some of the others...



353. Post 12706759 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):




354. Post 12706837 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):


gnom..gnom.....



355. Post 12712072 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):


lol china

seriously, nobody cares about china. if you substract the fake volume its as important as btc-e. at best!



356. Post 12713155 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on October 17, 2015, 04:12:01 PM
Prepare for the big price crash. I just bought back in so it should crash down to $200 now.  Undecided

we have been warned



357. Post 12713297 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):


miners have to unload their 3600 coins per day at some point...



358. Post 12713442 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: Lauda on October 17, 2015, 06:57:12 PM
People really need to stop being ignorant and childish. Every increase in price is not a 'pump' and every decrease is not a 'dump'.

miners have to unload their 3600 coins per day at some point...
Yes.

miners attitude has changed over the years. todays miners are not bitcoin-enthusiasts anymore, they sell their coins as fast as they can. therefore the halving will be a big fucking kick in their ass.



359. Post 12713468 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: brg444 on October 17, 2015, 07:06:29 PM
People really need to stop being ignorant and childish. Every increase in price is not a 'pump' and every decrease is not a 'dump'.

miners have to unload their 3600 coins per day at some point...
Yes.

miners attitude has changed over the years. todays miners are not bitcoin-enthusiasts anymore, they sell their coins as fast as they can. therefore the halving will be a big fucking kick in their ass.

Demonstrably false.

why?



360. Post 12713505 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: brg444 on October 17, 2015, 07:10:24 PM
People really need to stop being ignorant and childish. Every increase in price is not a 'pump' and every decrease is not a 'dump'.

miners have to unload their 3600 coins per day at some point...
Yes.

miners attitude has changed over the years. todays miners are not bitcoin-enthusiasts anymore, they sell their coins as fast as they can. therefore the halving will be a big fucking kick in their ass.

Demonstrably false.

why?

Because the largest solo miner, for example, has publicly said they don't sell their bitcoins.

"largest solominer" has a marketshare of?



361. Post 12713521 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: brg444 on October 17, 2015, 07:10:24 PM
People really need to stop being ignorant and childish. Every increase in price is not a 'pump' and every decrease is not a 'dump'.

miners have to unload their 3600 coins per day at some point...
Yes.

miners attitude has changed over the years. todays miners are not bitcoin-enthusiasts anymore, they sell their coins as fast as they can. therefore the halving will be a big fucking kick in their ass.

Demonstrably false.

why?

Because the largest solo miner, for example, has publicly said they don't sell their bitcoins.

There are numerous other instances where this has been proven wrong.  

and there are numerous other instances where this has been proven right. i remember knc selling their shit as soon as possible. i also remember a documentary about some chinese farm. they were also selling as fast as they could. giving a shit about what the actual underlying of their business was.

edit: i would love to do some analyzing here, were the fresh coins go. but so far i had no luck finding that out.



362. Post 12713986 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):


nice discussion we got going here.  Grin

no i don't know exactly were freshly mined coins are going. nobody knows. everybody has just hear-and-say informations.

i personally did some business some time ago with mining farm folks and my impression was they gave a shit about bitcoin. privately they held no more than a handful of coins maybe. for them it was just a better kind of investment as into high-yield-bonds or something.

but i accept that bitfury may keep them, quite possible.

nevertheless the market has to absorb 1 mioUS$ everyday, thats a fucking lot and halving will kick some ass.



363. Post 12715414 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):




364. Post 12715533 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: betterangels on October 18, 2015, 12:43:53 AM
this will end bad... like 2013?

2013 didn't end bad. price was around 800$ if i remember correctly.



365. Post 12715637 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: tarmi on October 18, 2015, 01:00:15 AM
keep dreaming, no fundamentals and no gox for another bubble of that scale. I think that after this comes final capitulation.

i am wondering that you are still posting here, last time we went to 300$ you disappeared for a few months and didn't dare to post again until we went under 230$.



366. Post 12719835 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: mexxer-2 on October 18, 2015, 02:16:26 PM
BTC at its low and going down, $267.3 . Is it time for the next dump yet?

just a little correction. Will go up upcoming weeks.
Tell that to the price that is keeping on going down, even as I speak. At 265 right now, I think it is safe to say that it is time for the pump to be over folks.




367. Post 12719994 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: natewelt on October 18, 2015, 02:40:24 PM
Looks like we might be in for a retrace from $273 on Stamp. In technical analysis, logic dictates a retest of the breakout area which is the upper trend line in this case. If that doesn't hold then we will likely go back into the channel. Either way, things look bullish unless we fall below the channel. 

260-265 seems like a great spot to load up on some more (depending on how quick, if any, pullback occurs), but trade at your own risk. Only time will tell....





I'm going to go ahead and bump this. I'd love to hear some feedback on my charts and whatnot.




368. Post 12720093 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: natewelt on October 18, 2015, 02:49:01 PM
Looks like we might be in for a retrace from $273 on Stamp. In technical analysis, logic dictates a retest of the breakout area which is the upper trend line in this case. If that doesn't hold then we will likely go back into the channel. Either way, things look bullish unless we fall below the channel. 

260-265 seems like a great spot to load up on some more (depending on how quick, if any, pullback occurs), but trade at your own risk. Only time will tell....





I'm going to go ahead and bump this. I'd love to hear some feedback on my charts and whatnot.




Thanks for confirming once again I am wasting my time on this forum.

ok, awesome chart you got there! you must be a TA expert or something?



369. Post 12720789 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: tarmi on October 18, 2015, 03:35:05 PM
panic will start @ 220.


Wonder who started this thread with a new account?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1212240.0

That's embarrassing


your buys @ 260 will be embarrassing very soon.



like your short at 235$ before we went to 314$?



370. Post 12727574 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: muyuu on October 19, 2015, 11:27:28 AM
Volume on Gemini down to almost nothing again.

i would blame the weekend for that. no fiat->no trade.



371. Post 12727863 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: yolalanda on October 19, 2015, 12:26:56 PM
Volume on Gemini down to almost nothing again.

i would blame the weekend for that. no fiat->no trade.
Wonder how the other exchanges manage? Perhaps by... but no, that's just crazy talk.

as far as i know the other exchanges are a little older than 2 weeks.



372. Post 12728113 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: yolalanda on October 19, 2015, 01:25:26 PM
Volume on Gemini down to almost nothing again.

i would blame the weekend for that. no fiat->no trade.
Wonder how the other exchanges manage? Perhaps by... but no, that's just crazy talk.

as far as i know the other exchanges are a little older than 2 weeks.

Fiat vanishes from Gemini over the weekends? Institutional Investors caught unawares by bank holiday? Again?
After a few months of this weekend thing happening every week like clockwork, they'll likely catch on.
I remain cautiously optimistic Cool

prices last week on gemini showed a big gap towards other exchanges. the reason is pretty obv, fiat pouring in immediately panic bought btc no matter what premium they had to pay. therefore no fiat at the weekend on gemini. pretty simple.

as the workweek at the eastcoast starts exactly NOW, it will be interesting to see the next hours if the volume starts to rise again.



373. Post 12728217 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: ImI on October 17, 2015, 02:29:31 AM




374. Post 12728252 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: yolalanda on October 19, 2015, 01:56:07 PM
Volume on Gemini down to almost nothing again.

i would blame the weekend for that. no fiat->no trade.
Wonder how the other exchanges manage? Perhaps by... but no, that's just crazy talk.

as far as i know the other exchanges are a little older than 2 weeks.

Fiat vanishes from Gemini over the weekends? Institutional Investors caught unawares by bank holiday? Again?
After a few months of this weekend thing happening every week like clockwork, they'll likely catch on.
I remain cautiously optimistic Cool

prices last week on gemini showed a big gap towards other exchanges. the reason is pretty obv, fiat pouring in immediately panic bought btc no matter what premium they had to pay. therefore no fiat at the weekend on gemini. pretty simple.

as the workweek at the eastcoast starts exactly NOW, it will be interesting to see the next hours if the volume starts to rise again.

>Institutional Investors
>panic buying bitcoin

And another 15BTC traded. BLAM!1!11one, bitches!

did anyone mention "Institutional Investors"?



375. Post 12728380 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: yolalanda on October 19, 2015, 02:11:01 PM
...
did anyone mention "Institutional Investors"?

Just about everyone, including Winklewoss bros.
Have you already forgotten all the Gemini hype? How Wall st. & Big Money are gonna swoop down and panic-buy all our Bit coins?

ok, just for you: nobody here mentioned "Institutional Investors".



376. Post 12728522 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: yolalanda on October 19, 2015, 02:30:57 PM
...
did anyone mention "Institutional Investors"?

Just about everyone, including Winklewoss bros.
Have you already forgotten all the Gemini hype? How Wall st. & Big Money are gonna swoop down and panic-buy all our Bit coins?

ok, just for you: nobody here mentioned "Institutional Investors".

Try this: Undecided

But I'm sure the brothers Wink simply misspoke while describing Gemini's core demographic. What they meant to say was 'Chinese gamblers and Indian ponzi enthusiasts.'

then why the fuck do you quote me?



377. Post 12728611 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: yolalanda on October 19, 2015, 02:42:07 PM
...
did anyone mention "Institutional Investors"?

Just about everyone, including Winklewoss bros.
Have you already forgotten all the Gemini hype? How Wall st. & Big Money are gonna swoop down and panic-buy all our Bit coins?

ok, just for you: nobody here mentioned "Institutional Investors".

Try this: Undecided

But I'm sure the brothers Wink simply misspoke while describing Gemini's core demographic. What they meant to say was 'Chinese gamblers and Indian ponzi enthusiasts.'

then why the fuck do you quote me?

To show you how wrong you are?
For lel?
To highlight the desperate apologia when, once again, all hopes of Big Business rescuing bitcoiners from their Bitcoin misadventures are hilariously shattered?

you want to show me "how wrong i am" with a phrase i never used? lol! and now go and talk to a wall or something.



378. Post 12736726 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on October 20, 2015, 11:53:23 AM
wall on itBit needs some observing.

true, seems like some volume to be seen there



379. Post 12741515 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: nioc on October 20, 2015, 10:44:07 PM
Every time I open bitwisdom I am reminded what the price was 18 months ago when it was the first thing I favorited on my new comp.  $445.75

lol! same here!



380. Post 12741568 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

458$ on my cellphone  Tongue



381. Post 12748141 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: ronald98 on October 21, 2015, 04:35:48 PM
Just something else I noticed on the chart

Compare the volume levels of summer/fall 2013 to this year.



Bitstamp was a low volume exchange back in summer/fall 2013. Gox was the highest volume exchange back then. Now Bitstamp is one of the highest volume exchanges for USD trades. That chart's not got enough valid cumulative data. You would need to get a cumulative volume chart for all exchanges to make any valid comparisons based on volume.

##

and you would have to filter out chinese fake volume



382. Post 12754530 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):


but.....but.......they said double top.



383. Post 12768942 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):


first time that gemini ask is lower than stamp



384. Post 12777073 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):


yes, we most likely will hit 300 the coming days, but china is just a non-event. thats basically all just fake over there. imo they have maybe 1/10 of the stamp volume at best.



385. Post 12777327 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: Andre# on October 25, 2015, 12:19:12 AM

yes, we most likely will hit 300 the coming days, but china is just a non-event. thats basically all just fake over there. imo they have maybe 1/10 of the stamp volume at best.


China doesn't even really exist. Everybody knows that.

Edit: $290 just broken.

no, no china does exist. i know somebody who was there.  Wink its just the volume at their exchanges that pure air. remember when stamp went offline last year for a month? that month we had NO movement at al until stamp came back. its fake and they even admit it.



386. Post 12777940 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):


ch..ch....ch....ch......



387. Post 12782700 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on October 25, 2015, 03:23:29 PM
I've been researching this MMM ponzi and it may have the potential to reach critical mass, soak up all liquidity and go supernova before collapsing into a black hole.  I can easily see how non-sophisticated investors could fall for something like this. 

I don't think we even have the ability to stop this by shorting. We might even make it worse if it goes too high by being force-liquidated into a margin squeeze.  I'm back in fiat, lending out dollars at ~30% interest and watching this thing play out. It will end in tears. 




link to this ponzi?



388. Post 12782813 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):


do they use just BTC or other payment options too?



389. Post 12782907 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: !! pop on October 25, 2015, 03:59:01 PM

do they use just BTC or other payment options too?
'As MMM is an international project, the Community members use electronic payment systems (Perfect Money and Bitcoin) to send and receive money. The amount of transactions is calculated in US dollars.' --http://mmmglobal.biz/faq/

as i see it the victims change fiat -> bitcoin and MMM changes bitcoin -> fiat to pay their other victims

its not that they are hoarding bitcoins or something. they just use it as a short-time carrier. that reduces the risk imo of a sudden drop cause of MMM. but lets see.



390. Post 12782991 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: !! pop on October 25, 2015, 04:08:21 PM

At least Sergei is smart enough to keep his share in BTC, where it's safe from snoopy government's prying eyes, so won't land him in jail (again).

yes, nevertheless thats just a fraction of the revenue of this ponzi and as you said he may be smart enough to keep his BTC.



391. Post 12783335 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: ImI on October 18, 2015, 02:24:35 PM
BTC at its low and going down, $267.3 . Is it time for the next dump yet?

just a little correction. Will go up upcoming weeks.
Tell that to the price that is keeping on going down, even as I speak. At 265 right now, I think it is safe to say that it is time for the pump to be over folks.





392. Post 12795937 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):


ch...........ch......................



393. Post 12796360 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):


as i understand it one new victim buys btc and sends them to MMM which takes some of the BTC and sells them to pay the older victims

so afterall it should lead to revenue but not necessarily buy pressure



394. Post 12800812 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: Patel on October 27, 2015, 02:38:41 PM
1500 MORE DOLLARS, CMON

fyp



395. Post 12800865 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: hdbuck on October 27, 2015, 01:48:39 PM
double top.

double fart.



396. Post 12801936 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: hdbuck on October 27, 2015, 04:24:15 PM
finex did not even reach 300.. big 3k wall there now.

putting some shorts on, see you at 280.



oldies but goldies  Grin



397. Post 12804578 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: brg444 on October 27, 2015, 09:45:50 PM
I'm looking at Nov. 2013 late rise and still can't shake out how quickly the price rose.

The idea of this repeating simply has me in awe. Especially if you consider the amount of money standing on the sideline at this point are straight out frightening



those were crazy times. litecoin was even more crazy nov/dez 2013.



398. Post 12805675 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):


lol tarmifart is online but doesnt dare to speak up  Grin



399. Post 12805697 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on October 28, 2015, 01:10:37 AM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=796276.msg12805414#msg12805414



negativity is strong in this one



400. Post 12805709 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on October 28, 2015, 01:14:44 AM

Bullishly negative?

negative negative



401. Post 12806048 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: tarmi on October 24, 2015, 01:59:26 AM
feeling toppish.

 

feeling fartish.



402. Post 12806095 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: tarmi on October 18, 2015, 03:35:05 PM
panic will start @ 220.


Wonder who started this thread with a new account?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1212240.0

That's embarrassing


your buys @ 260 will be embarrassing very soon.



 Grin

tarmifart at its best



403. Post 12810253 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):


310-320 = resistance



404. Post 12810393 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: Denker on October 28, 2015, 01:32:04 PM

310-320 = resistance

I would be ok with that. Important is not to drop significantly.

i like that we are not in panicbuying-mode yet. slow and steady looks good so far.



405. Post 12810723 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on October 28, 2015, 02:07:46 PM

310-320 = resistance

I would be ok with that. Important is not to drop significantly.

i like that we are not in panicbuying-mode yet. slow and steady looks good so far.

if there is no panic buying, then why am I getting 0.09% DAILY interest on my fiat at BFX?



i don't care about BFX rates. what i know is, thats not panic buying yet.



406. Post 12814898 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):



interesting pattern these days. taking a hit and crawling slowly slowly back up....



407. Post 12815879 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: natewelt on October 29, 2015, 12:16:39 AM
Am I the only one who sees the giant 2K BTC wall @ 310?

market was shocked for a moment and decided to move on.



408. Post 12819745 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):


china seems to wait for bitstamp

interesting to see how one tiny 1400 wall can easily stop them. i still think that china is 80% fake.



409. Post 12822641 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on October 29, 2015, 04:37:11 PM
I THINK someone just shorted ~5K bitcoin on bitfinex

extremely large green dilido is becoming incressingly likly

310-320 means resistance

its not the dumbest thing to do to short here, not comparable to tarmi and other bearfarts who shorted from 250 upwards



410. Post 12822700 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: SnokkomBTC on October 29, 2015, 05:04:40 PM
ltc, lol..

 Shocked

any reason?



411. Post 12823755 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):


gemini gets some traction




412. Post 12826741 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):


crazy



413. Post 12826844 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):


tbh it wouldn't be the worst spot to short right now



414. Post 12830772 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

correction to 300$ imminent?



415. Post 12830861 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: pleaseexplainagain on October 30, 2015, 12:33:15 PM
correction to 300$ imminent?

yes for whatever reason buying pressure stopped about $333. Its already down to $318 and nearly the $313 it opened at today. We may see a lot bigger drop than to $300 - as in low 200s as all those that rushed in rush right back out.




416. Post 12831056 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: ImI on October 25, 2015, 04:49:58 PM
BTC at its low and going down, $267.3 . Is it time for the next dump yet?

just a little correction. Will go up upcoming weeks.
Tell that to the price that is keeping on going down, even as I speak. At 265 right now, I think it is safe to say that it is time for the pump to be over folks.



 Grin



417. Post 12831068 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: ImI on October 27, 2015, 04:31:16 PM
finex did not even reach 300.. big 3k wall there now.

putting some shorts on, see you at 280.



oldies but goldies  Grin



418. Post 12835484 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):


this little rally wont stop until we see some final bear capitulation

maybe a runup to 360$ and following decline to 280$ ?



419. Post 12836037 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):


the return of the choochoo



420. Post 12836768 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):


speaking of bears, were is tarmifart? been pretty silent lately. i guess he is obv long and will go short at the very top.  Grin



421. Post 12843053 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):


miners have to unload at some time of the day



422. Post 12843251 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: chennan on October 31, 2015, 06:23:04 PM
Wow, did anyone else just see that 500 BTC sell on bitstamp?  This is going to get rediculous,  hopefully we can get a stable footing soon... just not so sure about this rise any more...

oh there were several 900 sells



423. Post 12843637 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):


funny to see how the volume at gemini completely dies at the weekend




424. Post 12843744 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: gentlemand on October 31, 2015, 07:14:19 PM

funny to see how the volume at gemini completely dies at the weekend


They're all celebrating at their Hamptons beach houses after making figures of up to $1000 this week trading BTC there.

they had nearly 2000 BTC  daily volume this week, not that bad.



425. Post 12844230 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: peonminer on October 31, 2015, 08:30:38 PM






426. Post 12845928 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):


whats now with this MMM thing? last rumor was its "paused" ...



427. Post 12845952 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: Wolf Rainer on November 01, 2015, 01:18:24 AM

whats now with this MMM thing? last rumor was its "paused" ...

It´s paused. The Monday the pump will continue.

thats all we need to know.



428. Post 12845981 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: gentlemand on November 01, 2015, 01:23:20 AM

whats now with this MMM thing? last rumor was its "paused" ...

According to this post - https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/3qxhkv/daily_discussion_saturday_october_31_2015/cwjrcyy

It's not from the original MMM account so could be a load of rubbish. My Russian has really gone down the toilet since I defected so I've no idea what the video is saying. It might be a mashup or something.

ok, so basically BS



429. Post 12849324 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):


if china is irrelevant (which is possible imo) then MMM is also irrelevant as the trades are being done on chinese exchanges



430. Post 12849440 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: tarmi on November 01, 2015, 01:00:11 PM

if china is irrelevant (which is possible imo) then MMM is also irrelevant as the trades are being done on chinese exchanges


fake trades maybe happen in china, but withdrawals happen in the west.

ahh i see so if MMM buys bitcoin somewhere its fake and if it sells its real. lol! remarkable logic you have there.



431. Post 12851407 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):


Quote
Lee said: "There is a lot of mining that goes on in China. However, I caution you: do not read too much into the high trading volumes. China has decent high volumes but unfortunately two of my competition exchanges - I never like saying this - but they are artificially inflating their volumes through the technique of wash trades.
Lee said Okcoin and Huobi are known for inflating trading volumes artificially, basically selling from left hand to the right hand.
"They use it for bragging purposes. They try to outdo each other. It's not regulated yet so they don't get slapped on the wrist for doing that. China does have big trading but we are not talking about orders of magnitude higher. If you were to believe the numbers you would think the world is 95% Chinese.

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/btcc-chief-bobby-lee-bitcoin-not-anti-bank-its-pro-innovation-1525964



432. Post 12853285 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):



380$ here we come



433. Post 12853411 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):


we got a serious choo here



434. Post 12854141 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on November 02, 2015, 12:23:23 AM
I highly doubt there will ever be a short squeeze.

The amount of BTC swap is low, and we don't know what price they sold the BTC at? It could of been at $1100 USD.

I also think a large portion of these BTC shorts is simply mining farms trying to get a future price for their mining revenues for the next few months.

Long squeeze is a different story.

We know about 5k were borrowed and (very likely) dumped around 315-320, probably in an effort to trigger a reversal.

Your point about mining farm hedging is a good one, and I agree that $24.5mil in longs dwarfs 20k borrowed btc.

If miners are selling short way ahead or using futures to hedge, the effect of the Halving will impact the market much earlier.



435. Post 12854356 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):





436. Post 12857679 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: Zarathustra on November 02, 2015, 12:55:59 PM
Prepare to sell Hearn just went nuclear on the XT FUD, Core bashing in extremis ...

https://medium.com/@octskyward/on-block-sizes-e047bc9f830#.366dmgcto


He is right.

Yes, and since there is an alt implementation on the market that is ready for the transaction explosion, the market turned bullish.
As soon as it is necessery to run a big block implementation, the miners will switch.

makes sense



437. Post 12858130 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):


still no buying panic

amazing!



438. Post 12862660 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

looks like panicbuying to me, usually the (shortterm) end of a bullrun



439. Post 12862812 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on November 02, 2015, 10:14:29 PM
This was really a violent move... Kinda unhealthy.

i am not a shorter. but if i were i would open a small short right now.



440. Post 12862882 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on November 02, 2015, 10:19:06 PM
This was really a violent move... Kinda unhealthy.

i am not a shorter. but if i were i would open a small short right now.

Good that you aren't. I like you.




441. Post 12862962 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: oda.krell on November 02, 2015, 10:32:29 PM
This was really a violent move... Kinda unhealthy.

i am not a shorter. but if i were i would open a small short right now.

Assuming you mean leveraged: Never quite understood this "shorting the top" or "going leveraged long at capitulation". Correct use of leverage should be a function of certainty, not maximal possible profit -- and the suspected tops or bottoms are very much the opposite of 'certain' moments. In other words, entering a leveraged position there seems to be a gamble. That said, if you just meant 1:1 short selling, I'd tentatively agree Smiley

interesting approach. i meant short in terms of going like 1:10 or something.



442. Post 12863085 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: Fakhoury on November 02, 2015, 10:47:38 PM
People, serious question here, aren't you afraid that we will crash really badly after this insane move ?

Didn't we always say, slowly and steadily better than this circus !!

I'm really afraid !!

you have to expect a setback to 300$ imo

nevertheless, who cares?

longterm outlook is very positive imo and i expect 1200$+ in 2016.



443. Post 12863202 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: spooderman on November 02, 2015, 11:03:44 PM
400 really? if we hit 420 you all know what to do

buying more?



444. Post 12864660 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

incredible how stable we are at 360+



445. Post 12865032 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: noobtrader on November 03, 2015, 03:48:43 AM
375....  Grin

i feel sad for tarmi...   Wink

he is online  Grin

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=81301



446. Post 12869432 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: BitofaN1 on November 03, 2015, 01:53:11 PM
Shorts still at 18k? Color me impressed.Say what you want about bears, but they're either really dumb or have balls of steel.
Edit: Really expensive attempt at stop hunting on BFX.  Cheesy

those 18k are definitely not holding since 250



447. Post 12869537 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: Wolf Rainer on November 03, 2015, 02:05:11 PM
Heh no point buying moar at this point.

Time for profit purging.

Come on, sell all you stack right now. I want to see you crying by the end of the week when bitcoin raises to $500.

stack? which stack?  Grin



448. Post 12869552 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: BitofaN1 on November 03, 2015, 02:06:33 PM
Shorts still at 18k? Color me impressed.Say what you want about bears, but they're either really dumb or have balls of steel.
Edit: Really expensive attempt at stop hunting on BFX.  Cheesy

those 18k are definitely not holding since 250
Well, they didn't open them at $395 either.The vast majority of the new shorts (7k) were opened on the 29th of october at $315 and currently only 3k of them closed.I REALLY think we will burn through them before we go down, so hang on to your seat belts.

wow! where do you find such detailed info?



449. Post 12873814 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

wow! shorts on finex back down to 9000. someone got a call i suppose...



450. Post 12874087 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on November 03, 2015, 08:34:45 PM
this shorter is going all in
What shorter? There's only 9300 BTC swaps on BFX. It's just a seller. 

BTW, thanks bulls. I just made so much money shorting today, that I can dump again if you wanna take another swipe at $420.

So you opened you're just when exactly? When we busted through 380? 400?  Roll Eyes

I call BS

I started shorting @ $399 and kept shorting the whole way up.  I could have shorted twice as much, but after covering @$380, I know have enough to safely short Three times as much if we come anywhere close to $420 again.  I also transferred in some coins I was using for arbitrage just so I have some extra margin.

Try it again, Bulls. I double dare you.  See if I'm bluffing.   




451. Post 12876725 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):


its a very calming thought that karpeles hasnt got his fingers anywhere in this anymore



452. Post 12876774 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: gentlemand on November 04, 2015, 02:37:41 AM

so a lot of people were just market buying constantly

And Mark Karpeles's little electronic friend. This could be the first rally without him there to ruin it for everyone.

RIP Willy  Cool



453. Post 12882550 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on November 04, 2015, 01:31:57 PM
Do you know why nuclear explosions don't blow up the whole planet? Because the chain reaction needs a certain amount of heat to continue.  Yes, it's an awesome event, but it doesn't last long.

why so grumpy?



454. Post 12882887 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: podyx on November 04, 2015, 02:07:42 PM
Now where to set the buy orders...

322$



455. Post 12883270 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on November 04, 2015, 02:32:45 PM
If you could buy enough coins @ $250 to dump at $500, then you could not only double your money in one day, but you could trigger a long squeeze of all you yahoos leveraged up 20 to 1 and then double your coin take.

If y'all want to reward the USMS for theft, fraud, and entrapment, then go ahead. I want no part of it.

it depends on the auction price. when you can easily buy auction coins and sell them with profit the same moment at finex etc then the price will more or less match the finex etc price. its a way of arbitrage.



456. Post 12883293 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on November 04, 2015, 02:38:47 PM
So BFXdata.com is offline for quite some time. Could it be perhaps that someone is taking a massive long or short position that they don't want the rest of the market to see?



relax! will you? you will get a chance to close your short soon enough.



457. Post 12884242 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: tarmi on October 31, 2015, 04:09:17 PM
the dip hasn't even started yet.

I sold for 258, then rebought, then sold again. yes. but I didn't short till 305+. I don't want to be an inca one day. fast longs, and slow shorts. winning strategy for me.

 Grin



458. Post 12884562 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: yolalanda on November 04, 2015, 04:19:45 PM


Sad (you know what comes next)

hey, yolanda please post that 280$ gif! will you?



459. Post 12884892 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: yolalanda on November 04, 2015, 04:43:46 PM

hey, yolanda please post that 280$ gif! will you?

Why not the original?



As relevant today as it ever was Cool


why not the original? take a wild guess.



460. Post 12885099 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: yolalanda on November 04, 2015, 05:06:58 PM
Because you'd be forced to take a sober, unflinching look at the time you've wasted 'investing' in BTCeanie BTCabies bit-coin, and be ashamed? Idunno, you tell me Huh

maybe because we broke through 280$ and 380$ with verve and left your little funny gif looking as moronic as it always was?



461. Post 12885757 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):


always a pleasure...




462. Post 12885773 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):


floor at 320$



463. Post 12885843 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):




464. Post 12885851 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: TReano on November 04, 2015, 06:14:43 PM
I am sooo glad I sold everything all the way above 450-500$ and even shorted a bit.

Fomo people are going to pay now for their fomo stupidity.

youmustbeawizard.jpg



465. Post 12885922 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: dloghwak on November 04, 2015, 06:20:28 PM
no fucks given in china.

if arbitrage with china is broken, we could very well dont give a fuck about china also



466. Post 12885985 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: tarmi on November 04, 2015, 06:27:01 PM
why do you keep your coins in places like ok ponzi? that place is a mt gox in the making.

lol, look who's here? just needed a 50$ drop to find his balls to post again.



467. Post 12886162 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):


hurry adam or you will be left behind!  Wink



468. Post 12886283 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):


ohhhhhh noo! how could you be so incautious?



469. Post 12886352 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: fonsie on November 04, 2015, 06:56:38 PM
Remember remember the 5th of November. The price will be 600$ tomorrow evening. Wink

explain do the chinese love 5s

No idea, but they do love chinese food.

 Grin



470. Post 12888222 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):


its like a hot day and you know its going to have a thunderstorm in the evening. and there you go! big drops.

nevertheless, even if we go down to 320$, that's a bullmarket that has started the last days.



471. Post 12888395 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: Globb0 on November 04, 2015, 09:56:08 PM





472. Post 12888415 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: noobbull on November 04, 2015, 10:07:38 PM
why such a buildup before the auction and dump right away? the auction is tomorrow isn't it?

i don't get it. unless the auction has zero influence here

there you go. auction is a non-event and has always been.



473. Post 12888759 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: rafanadal on November 04, 2015, 10:45:10 PM
WOW this looks pretty bad

no, it doesnt




474. Post 12888793 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: ImI on November 04, 2015, 06:10:50 PM

floor at 320$



475. Post 12888877 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: yolalanda on November 04, 2015, 10:51:20 PM
WOW this looks pretty bad

no, it doesnt



Can't remember, was it this Wile E. gif you asked for?



...or this one?



because seem to work nao Smiley

lol! you are so pathetic. coming now with your little funny 380 gif and before refusing to post it. lol!

whats with the 280 one? still not the balls to post it?



476. Post 12889325 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: +EV on November 04, 2015, 11:39:05 PM
Support got rekt and resistance is growing, we wont be able to stay in the $400s much longer, we're going down boys.




477. Post 12889384 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: hdbuck on November 04, 2015, 11:51:21 PM
Day candle closing GREEN? I'm ok with that then.

Being an HODLer is easy


stamp: 100k bTc on 1d chart, RED...

OH MY GOD

everybody panic! sell! quick!



478. Post 12889739 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: bButtercup on November 05, 2015, 12:44:17 AM
Over $100 drop in just a few hrs., nice!
I know many of you are expert at extrapolating from similar data, while I'm young, innocent, and in need of guidance. Please, kind Sirs, critique my prognostication:
At this rate, BTC will be worth ...-$100 (negative one hundred dollars) by tomorrow nigh.
Did I get my maths right?

A+



479. Post 12895413 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on November 05, 2015, 03:11:11 PM
Another question why was the price stale for so many months and then all of a sudden it goes ape shit??

Sometimes things are brewing and it needs just some media coverage to burst.



480. Post 12895428 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: koryu on November 05, 2015, 03:13:21 PM
no fomo today  Angry

today its FOLO



481. Post 12896291 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: hdbuck on November 05, 2015, 04:44:00 PM
last opportunity to sell @400 people.. Grin

i hope you shorted the shit out of that mofo  Grin



482. Post 12897149 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):


breakout




483. Post 12897252 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: bitcoinminer42 on November 05, 2015, 06:27:02 PM

breakout





psssssssst, not yet

ouch



484. Post 12899994 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):


everything until 320-340 is ok



485. Post 12904353 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):


if blocksize gets an issue it will be solved in 24h

its not a big deal, more a question of details



486. Post 12905764 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on November 06, 2015, 09:42:45 PM
Full blocks are not going to come early next year. They're here now.  If a transaction fee market develops, good luck in EVER getting the 1MB limit raised.  Miners will grow dependent on the extra revenue stream.



Yes, miners want more income through fees, but less transactions doesn't equal more income. You could have more transactions (more revenue) and less profit per transaction but in the end higher profit. Its a question of balance.

In other words the logic smaller blocks = higher mining profits doenst work. Otherwise you could choose a 50kb blocksize, but i am sure thats not what miners want.



487. Post 12924110 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):




488. Post 12924656 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):


what happend to adam? was he kidnapped or something?



489. Post 12925029 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 09, 2015, 01:48:04 AM





490. Post 12928113 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):


but......but.........bears said sell  Huh



491. Post 12939391 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: Divitiae miserae on November 10, 2015, 03:54:34 PM
Do you think there's an imminent dump also considering the auctioned coins?

nope

auction coins stay where they are. those buyers usually dont care about little gains and swings. they are in for the long haul.



492. Post 12941890 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):




493. Post 12941895 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: TReano on November 10, 2015, 09:32:56 PM
How silly are all the people who voted we would stay above 300$ ?

lol...

have we broken 300$ yet?



494. Post 12941899 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):


shorts on finex up 3000



495. Post 12941910 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: Turdarasorus on November 10, 2015, 09:36:19 PM
Bull trap Cool

Bear trap  Cool



496. Post 12941998 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: TReano on November 10, 2015, 09:47:21 PM
How silly are all the people who voted we would stay above 300$ ?

lol...

have we broken 300$ yet?


wait and see... or cry like most here...

no we havent broken 300$ yet



497. Post 12942488 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: ImI on November 04, 2015, 02:08:09 PM
Now where to set the buy orders...

322$

hmmm....maybe i should start trading.



498. Post 12942915 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 11, 2015, 12:24:22 AM
Quote
In just the first six months of 2015 $1.06 trillion in mergers and acquisitions of U.S. companies have been announced, says deal-tracker Dealogic.

It was the first time any country topped $1 trillion. And it breaks the previous six-month record of $964 billion set the first half of 2007, just before the start of the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.

there's a storm coming.

nope, debt is not an issue as long as you can print the currency the debt is nominated in.



499. Post 12948496 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):




500. Post 12951221 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):




501. Post 12959269 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: Tzupy on November 12, 2015, 08:30:54 PM


fyp

choose the correct gif!



502. Post 12960494 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

breakout




503. Post 12960541 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

hmmmmmmm.........ooooookay

i like how all exchanges are more or less inline at the moment



504. Post 12990594 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: galdur on November 16, 2015, 07:49:50 PM
Also, if the market anticipates the halving next year to be bullish, it should be starting to price that in about now. Markets try to be ahead of the curve after all.

i expect the halving-hype to begin in january



505. Post 12991946 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on November 16, 2015, 11:51:01 PM
GhostSec, a hacktivist off-shoot of Anonymous, has claimed to have followed a chain of transactions and found a Bitcoin wallet containing $3 million which they say is linked to the self-proclaimed Islamic State terror group and Friday’s Paris attacks.

Read more: http://sputniknews.com/europe/20151116/1030223381/paris-attackers-alleged-bitcoin-wallet.html#ixzz3rhXvubak


other source? sputnik is usually crap.



506. Post 12992147 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 17, 2015, 12:36:07 AM
GhostSec, a hacktivist off-shoot of Anonymous, has claimed to have followed a chain of transactions and found a Bitcoin wallet containing $3 million which they say is linked to the self-proclaimed Islamic State terror group and Friday’s Paris attacks.

Read more: http://sputniknews.com/europe/20151116/1030223381/paris-attackers-alleged-bitcoin-wallet.html#ixzz3rhXvubak


other source? sputnik is usually crap.
it's hard to believe they got 3million dollars of donations they must of been playing with bitcoins for years.
maybe they were selling their drugs on SR or something...

if the whole network agrees we can take their funds..

i think that would be cool to see.

I think some hardcore bitcoiners would go ape shit and maybe fork off.

hey that would be a good way to get rid of all the trolls

if that happens we would go 0 insta.  Grin

you see, if it becomes a political decision who can trust btc and who doesnt you have zero trust in bitcoin as a whole.



507. Post 12992588 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):


wtf?!




508. Post 13009777 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: r0ach on November 19, 2015, 01:07:26 AM
NO! Gawd  Sad

If every race is identical, why do races outside of Africa have Neanderthal DNA?  Why do blacks have 20% higher blood testosterone level?  Why do Asians seem to test lowest for psychopathic character traits?  Even men and women from the same ethnic group aren't similar.  Claiming people from different groups are identical is just hilarious.

It's always the far leftists pulling this crap too.  A bias to support their ideology of collectivism.  Nevermind the fact that liberalism is inherently a mental disorder based on inferiority complex where you can only relate with groups deemed weak, inferior, or underdogs in general.  It's a shame the political and social narative of the modern world is shaped entirely by people with mental disorders.

oh, yes there are differences. just like there are differences between you and your neighbor there are also differences between you and some asian guy.

you know whats funny though? racist scumbags usually ignore one very important issue. kids of interracial couples are healthier than kids of couples from same origin! its basic genetics. nature uses the pool of genes to "build" the new human being. in interracial couples it has a wider rage of different genes to choose from and is therefore able to eliminate genetic defects and disorders far better than same "race" couples.

go ahead and ask somebody who breeds dogs for instance! he will contest that those dogs have often serious genetic diseases. or even better, go into some mountain village where they used to fuck each other for centuries. you will be astonished what happens after keeping your gene pool samesame.

 



509. Post 13009845 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: r0ach on November 19, 2015, 01:19:42 AM
... It's a shame the political and social narative of the modern world is shaped entirely by people with mental disorders.
*narrative
How is it that these mentally deficient inferior mongrel weaklings triumphed over your clearly superior [for a c0ckr0ach] genetic stock Huh

Probably the same reason the least useful members of civilization:  sports players, actors, hedge fund managers, make a million times more than people who produce food, clothing and shelter.

oh, yes there are differences. just like there are differences between you and your neighbor there are also differences between you and some asian guy.

you know whats funny though? racist scumbags usually ignore one very important issue. kids of interracial couples are healthier than kids of couples from same origin! its basic genetics. nature uses the pool of genes to "build" the new human being. in interracial couples it has a wider rage of different genes to choose from and is therefore able to eliminate genetic defects and disorders far better than same "race" couples.

You know what's more funny?  When Marxists try to push the agenda that everyone walking the earth is identical, then when caught out in an obvious lie, they try to claim that ok, you are right, but anyone that mentions it is a "racist scumbag".  No, you are the scumbag for trying to push collectivism on people then using the politically correct strawman fallacy of "raycism" when caught in lies.



lol! marxism, collectivism wtf are you talking about? i just explained you why interracial couples have healthier kids as same same couples. thats all! and thats basic biology knowlege. not more and not less.



510. Post 13012718 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: isvicre on November 19, 2015, 11:41:00 AM
I won't expect a mini rally for the rest of November but if we stay at 330-340$ I think that would be good enough.

http://uk.businessinsider.com/r-eu-clamps-down-on-bitcoin-anonymous-payments-to-curb-terrorism-funding-2015-11?IR=T

i think that could bring an end to hopes for a rally or whatvever

even 150$ and below



511. Post 13013414 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: isvicre on November 19, 2015, 01:23:19 PM
I won't expect a mini rally for the rest of November but if we stay at 330-340$ I think that would be good enough.

http://uk.businessinsider.com/r-eu-clamps-down-on-bitcoin-anonymous-payments-to-curb-terrorism-funding-2015-11?IR=T

i think that could bring an end to hopes for a rally or whatvever

even 150$ and below

And it's begun.

That's pretty stupid I believe. They don't use Bitcoin as a major currency and it has nothing to do with the price. Some whales want to get pressure in down.

you see, it might not matter if ISIS uses bitcoin or not. if France starts panicking they could go berserk on bitcoin even without any proof.



512. Post 13013596 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on November 19, 2015, 01:47:41 PM
I won't expect a mini rally for the rest of November but if we stay at 330-340$ I think that would be good enough.

http://uk.businessinsider.com/r-eu-clamps-down-on-bitcoin-anonymous-payments-to-curb-terrorism-funding-2015-11?IR=T

i think that could bring an end to hopes for a rally or whatvever

even 150$ and below

And it's begun.

That's pretty stupid I believe. They don't use Bitcoin as a major currency and it has nothing to do with the price. Some whales want to get pressure in down.

you see, it might not matter if ISIS uses bitcoin or not. if France starts panicking they could go berserk on bitcoin even without any proof.

Yup, terrorist attacks leads to finger pointing.

you see the public doesn't like bitcoin very much, for them its just some criminal thing that made some nerds rich and they ask for action, especially in france. so it could become ugly but not necessarily so.



513. Post 13014303 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):


folks don't like the bitcoin




514. Post 13019079 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: Morecoin Freeman on November 20, 2015, 02:16:04 AM
Bouncing off of $315 support again.
I.e. bottom is in.

i guess until G7 is telling us what they are up to it will be a rocky ride



515. Post 13031724 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on November 21, 2015, 01:42:56 PM
Here: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/bitcoin-giant-btcc-launches-priority-blockchain-transactions-its-customers-1529730

Two-tier services for the wealthy elite. Isn't it lovely?

Quote
The company said in a statement that BlockPriority provides expedited confirmations of bitcoin transactions sent through BTCC's services even when the bitcoin network is under stress or undergoing spam attacks.

that basically just means they are paying the fees for their customers. thats all.

pay the fees by yourself in case of a stress situation in the network and you will have the identical outcome. no big deal.



516. Post 13031765 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on November 21, 2015, 02:08:14 PM
Here: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/bitcoin-giant-btcc-launches-priority-blockchain-transactions-its-customers-1529730

Two-tier services for the wealthy elite. Isn't it lovely?

Quote
The company said in a statement that BlockPriority provides expedited confirmations of bitcoin transactions sent through BTCC's services even when the bitcoin network is under stress or undergoing spam attacks.

that basically just means they are paying the fees for their customers. thats all.

pay the fees by yourself in case of a stress situation in the network and you will have the identical outcome. no big deal.

That's not so bad then. Smiley

no  Smiley



517. Post 13031973 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: Divitiae miserae on November 21, 2015, 02:17:11 PM
More dust to clog the ridiculous transaction rate.





518. Post 13079093 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 26, 2015, 09:26:23 PM
i sold a bit.

hanging in there for more ups and downs.


i see painful lessons ahead of you  Wink



519. Post 13085851 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):


10.000 unconfirmed transactions. thats happening!

https://blockchain.info/en/unconfirmed-transactions



520. Post 13086707 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):


In memoriam of Willy.



521. Post 13102007 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: natewelt on November 29, 2015, 02:57:14 PM
Can someone start a new wall observer thread with ChartBuddy?

This thread is absolute shit.

To block r0ach and to install newbie-jail again would be enough.



522. Post 13106286 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):


shorts got burned hard and are down to 7000

some folks still dont know how to deal with a bull market.



523. Post 13106319 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: ssmc2 on November 30, 2015, 12:14:02 AM
I can envision a drop to around 315 or so at some point, then back up.  The question is how long will it stay that low and can you catch it.

nope, dont see 315 anytime soon

400 is way more likely the next days



524. Post 13106598 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: mtnsaa on November 30, 2015, 01:11:48 AM
$400 seems very attainable this week, not sure if it will go much higher than that though. I think we'll finish the year at sub-$500.

i think we will finish this year at 550-650



525. Post 13107227 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: ImI on November 26, 2015, 09:55:41 PM
i sold a bit.

hanging in there for more ups and downs.


i see painful lessons ahead of you  Wink

i told ya  Grin



526. Post 13107239 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on November 30, 2015, 03:23:21 AM
how i feel having sold at 345


buttrekt sold-out bull ... wait you could go short here and win it back when it drops back to 312 .. it must, tarmi said it would?

lol tarmi poor soul, his last posting was on 9th november  Grin

bearfarts go silent pretty fast when things dont turn out like expected, thats a difference to bulltards btw as we (the bulltards) stay active even if we go 150$. cause we are legion.  Grin



527. Post 13111029 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: TReano on November 30, 2015, 01:06:42 PM
So looks like 380-400$ is the place to take profits / scalp some shorts?  Wink

no, 500$ could be the place to go (shortterm) short



528. Post 13111127 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: Rev.Moon on November 30, 2015, 02:16:15 PM
Ouch. Blood on the Tracks Sad

hmm..no. no blood on the tracks.




529. Post 13111243 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: Rev.Moon on November 30, 2015, 02:30:53 PM
Ouch. Blood on the Tracks Sad

hmm..no. no blood on the tracks.

[deceptively ok gif]

Zoom out to $1200. See not just blood, but also bodies of suicides, glazed in feces [which those bodies shat out in terror], on the Tracks Sad
CCMF!

if i zoom out more i see a rise from 2$ to 365$  Grin



530. Post 13111924 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: bigfryguy on November 30, 2015, 03:03:38 PM
sell off after cyber monday is to be expected.





531. Post 13112404 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: peonminer on November 30, 2015, 04:46:52 PM
Where's the beaker running aimlessly .gif when you need it?

i have only that to offer




532. Post 13113631 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3uu3we/bitstamp_will_switch_to_bip_101_this_december/cxi370c?context=3

astonishing that we see this little bull run although we have this kiddy nerd fight going on at the same time



533. Post 13115135 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on November 30, 2015, 10:38:17 PM

He really does think that he, personally, is the one man standing between Bitcoin and utter chaos and destruction. It would be kinda cute if it wasn't so damned destructive.


Yup, he's a proper nutter.
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/27/42/cb/2742cb7adeb28d0106b713db6c179bca.jpg[/img]
Eventually, he will make himself irrelevant with this sort of crap.

Can't wait.

still on his forum tho.

kids these days.. Roll Eyes

I think he honestly thinks he's doing the right thing.

I don't even completely disagree with him on BIP101's increase schedule, and think abandoning Core for a Hearn dominated XT would be a bad idea.

Buuuuut... this banning of dissent and playing thought dictator is having exactly the opposite effect he wants it to.

just shows how immature alot of the bitcoin folks in charge are. its the same as with karpeles, such a guy never ever should have been in charge in such an important position.



534. Post 13121954 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):


cryinggirl.gif



535. Post 13126010 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: suda123 on December 02, 2015, 03:21:29 AM
lets see if the channel holds.

Naw it's going to keep dumping now.




536. Post 13144052 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):




537. Post 13160560 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):




538. Post 13161424 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: Tmdz on December 06, 2015, 01:01:22 AM
Remember boys sell at a gain, don't get caught with your pants down cause this will bust.




539. Post 13175381 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: Richy_T on December 07, 2015, 03:19:01 PM

What the forum needs is the option to restrict posting in moderated topics to an activity level set by the topic starter. This would at least require spam accounts to build up activity first and thus make the ignore button meaningful.

I wonder if Adam would be agreeable to a script that would auto-delete posts from users below a certain post count...

good idea imo!



540. Post 13175659 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: crypticalmoon on December 07, 2015, 04:38:07 PM

What the forum needs is the option to restrict posting in moderated topics to an activity level set by the topic starter. This would at least require spam accounts to build up activity first and thus make the ignore button meaningful.

I wonder if Adam would be agreeable to a script that would auto-delete posts from users below a certain post count...

good idea imo!

good~for the elites! ;-) ===> lets keep the n00bs out yo!

n00bs can open their own wallobserver-thread, nobody stops them!



541. Post 13179910 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):


yawn.gif



542. Post 13184456 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):


looks fuckin bullish to me




543. Post 13188892 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):


tzzzzzzzzzzzzz...........................wut!?



544. Post 13188898 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):


bum.gif



545. Post 13188902 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):


this fucker wants to move



546. Post 13188912 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):


who cares about that everlasting satoshi-bullshit?



547. Post 13188917 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):


better not to be short right now.....



548. Post 13188921 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on December 08, 2015, 11:25:41 PM


cramer going straight to "lala land"  Grin



549. Post 13188934 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):


btw tarmifart doesn't dare to speak up anymore  Grin

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=81301;sa=showPosts



550. Post 13188948 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):


choo choo......



551. Post 13188954 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):


435$ here we come



552. Post 13189008 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):


it has a certain beauty to it...




553. Post 13189047 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: suda123 on December 08, 2015, 11:42:14 PM

it has a certain beauty to it...



fake pump its going to crash, bulltrap




554. Post 13189097 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: suda123 on December 07, 2015, 04:47:24 AM


Here comes the drop boys

 Grin

pure genius we got here



555. Post 13189592 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):


the choo choo is strong in this one...



556. Post 13189691 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: Chalkbot on December 09, 2015, 01:16:52 AM

satoshi is some lone genius (albeit little-crazy eccentric (i mean he must have been)) versus he is NSA derp? I'd say crazy bullish.

I think the bullish part of the story is that the million+ Satoshi BTC stash is locked in a Trust until 2020. If this turns out to be true, (and I'm leaning toward yes) That means there is no risk of satoshi coin dump for the next 4 years at least, which is something that we couldn't say before.

the coins maybe hitting the market at 2020 would be a bearish outlook imo. a very bearish outlook.

i personally hoped that those coins got burned in the first place and may never seen selling cause the keys got destroyed.



557. Post 13189728 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on December 09, 2015, 01:26:55 AM
So you were previously bullish on some blind hope that such a man destroyed/lost his keys? The market hates uncertainty.

there are lots of reasons to be bullish imo, but i would prefer it to see those coins stuck vs seeing them in 2020...



558. Post 13189733 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: Chalkbot on December 09, 2015, 01:27:29 AM

satoshi is some lone genius (albeit little-crazy eccentric (i mean he must have been)) versus he is NSA derp? I'd say crazy bullish.

I think the bullish part of the story is that the million+ Satoshi BTC stash is locked in a Trust until 2020. If this turns out to be true, (and I'm leaning toward yes) That means there is no risk of satoshi coin dump for the next 4 years at least, which is something that we couldn't say before.

the coins maybe hitting the market at 2020 would be a bearish outlook imo. a very bearish outlook.

i personally hoped that those coins got burned in the first place and may never seen selling cause the keys got destroyed.

Right, but you have to compare that scenario with the one we had before it, which was that we knew nothing about the fate of those coins, and thus the market must assume that they could show up at any time. The new reality is that they could show up at any time after 2020, which is a more bullish scenario.

hope so



559. Post 13189823 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

i am starting to take this SN talk serious.........

edit: if so....how the fuck did they find him?!



560. Post 13190129 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: Torque on December 09, 2015, 02:08:53 AM
i am starting to take this SN talk serious.........

edit: if so....how the fuck did they find him?!

You really think Satoshi is one guy?

its possible

Or actually wants to be unmasked?

also possible


lets see. interesting times, thats for sure!

also he somehow reminds me of Charlie Sheen...  Grin




561. Post 13190249 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: Torque on December 09, 2015, 02:49:15 AM
PSA- Remember kids:

When some bogus news about some wannabe wank from Australia who claims to be SN, that's the sell signal.

allright chief! just sold all my stack. thx for your kind advice! that was close...  Kiss



562. Post 13190479 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

gnomgnomgnom....



563. Post 13194161 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: macsga on December 09, 2015, 12:54:54 PM
I'm surprised. It looks like this time, even some of the veterans in here tend to believe the Satoshi revelation story, that Wright = Satoshi.

Granted, the Wired/gizmodo article and research behind is somewhat better than that awful Newsweek "Look! Same last name!" story, but aside from that: whatever hard evidence Wired has (or has revealed so far) is rather flimsy as well. As far as I can tell, the major documents containing proof of identity either cannot be verified (cryptographically, say), or haven't been verified (by some indirect method).

All in all, I see very little strong evidence, and mainly just a man whose reaction to the Wired story is consistent with someone who could be Satoshi. But in that case, motivation matters, and it's rather funny how it only seems to cross a few peoples' minds that somebody might actually want to be believed to be Satoshi. The crypto nerds mainly seem to focus on the "He just wants his privacy!" angle, so somebody possibly trying to take credit for Satoshi's work doesn't seem to fit in.

Last observation: Wright's style doesn't pass the sniff test. From the soundbites and writing samples I've seen, there's a big difference between Wright's and Satoshi's style -- the latter's phrasing and argument development being rather modest sounding, never boasting -- which means I personally want to see a lot more hard evidence -- i.e. documents constituting proof of identity between the two, that also have been shown to be authentic and non-tampered with -- before seriously considering that Satoshi has been identified.


I concur; having this conversation with a friend today I rationalized my objections to this story with pretty much the same words. Believe me we will witness several similar "revelations" until BTC becomes what's destined to. Finally, I want to put a more "simple" thought in this.

Imagine you're Satoshi; you've invented an extraordinary digital currency that will revolutionize the whole planet. You've included -but not limited to- economics, forensics, cryptography, networking, mathematics, chaotic modelling, social engineering in order to make it happen, and insure it's gonna fulfill its destiny.

Undeniably, -if you're a single entity- and not a bunch of scientists, you're quite an extraordinary mind. What are the odds you didn't close all the links that lead to you? Didn't you foresee something like this coming?

http://gizmodo.com/reports-police-raid-home-of-possible-bitcoin-creator-c-1747025289

I rest my case.

My impression is that Wright (may he or may he not be SN) wanted to be found.



564. Post 13194165 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: dloghwak on December 09, 2015, 12:19:21 PM
Finally above 400USD again with a lot of buying support left.
Oh and we found satoshi again, what interesting times.

and still going slow and steady...

no buying panic in sight.



565. Post 13195078 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: suda123 on December 09, 2015, 02:34:15 PM
I'm surprised. It looks like this time, even some of the veterans in here tend to believe the Satoshi revelation story, that Wright = Satoshi.

Granted, the Wired/gizmodo article and research behind is somewhat better than that awful Newsweek "Look! Same last name!" story, but aside from that: whatever hard evidence Wired has (or has revealed so far) is rather flimsy as well. As far as I can tell, the major documents containing proof of identity either cannot be verified (cryptographically, say), or haven't been verified (by some indirect method).

All in all, I see very little strong evidence, and mainly just a man whose reaction to the Wired story is consistent with someone who could be Satoshi. But in that case, motivation matters, and it's rather funny how it only seems to cross a few peoples' minds that somebody might actually want to be believed to be Satoshi. The crypto nerds mainly seem to focus on the "He just wants his privacy!" angle, so somebody possibly trying to take credit for Satoshi's work doesn't seem to fit in.

Last observation: Wright's style doesn't pass the sniff test. From the soundbites and writing samples I've seen, there's a big difference between Wright's and Satoshi's style -- the latter's phrasing and argument development being rather modest sounding, never boasting -- which means I personally want to see a lot more hard evidence -- i.e. documents constituting proof of identity between the two, that also have been shown to be authentic and non-tampered with -- before seriously considering that Satoshi has been identified.


I concur; having this conversation with a friend today I rationalized my objections to this story with pretty much the same words. Believe me we will witness several similar "revelations" until BTC becomes what's destined to. Finally, I want to put a more "simple" thought in this.

Imagine you're Satoshi; you've invented an extraordinary digital currency that will revolutionize the whole planet. You've included -but not limited to- economics, forensics, cryptography, networking, mathematics, chaotic modelling, social engineering in order to make it happen, and insure it's gonna fulfill its destiny.

Undeniably, -if you're a single entity- and not a bunch of scientists, you're quite an extraordinary mind. What are the odds you didn't close all the links that lead to you? Didn't you foresee something like this coming?

http://gizmodo.com/reports-police-raid-home-of-possible-bitcoin-creator-c-1747025289

I rest my case.

My impression is that Wright (may he or may he not be SN) wanted to be found.
clap clap good read prof chaos

fyp



566. Post 13195483 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: philip2000uk on December 09, 2015, 03:20:59 PM
Question: Could i sell my bitcoin in wallet while being 1 year behind?
How large is 1 year 20 weeks to download?

i would guess 8h



567. Post 13195751 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: Cassius on December 09, 2015, 03:51:24 PM
The Craig Wright thing doesn't add up. There's supposed to be a tx of 1.1m BTC. Where is it on the blockchain and why are Satoshi's coins still where they always were?

https://bitscan.com/articles/something-about-the-new-satoshi-isnt-wright

I'm trying to find another explanation and the only ones I can come up with are
1) Someone else has 1m BTC
2) The doc is fake

possible offline transaction. just hand over the key.



568. Post 13200179 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: tarmi on October 18, 2015, 03:35:05 PM
panic will start @ 220.


Wonder who started this thread with a new account?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1212240.0

That's embarrassing


your buys @ 260 will be embarrassing very soon.



 Grin



569. Post 13200195 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: tarmi on October 16, 2015, 04:11:19 PM
securing profits. also 266+ for shorting is a no brainer.

going through bearfarts posthistory is fun  Grin



570. Post 13209238 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: ssmc2 on December 10, 2015, 10:20:48 PM
Breakout a'comin




571. Post 13210615 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: spooderman on December 11, 2015, 01:57:40 AM
hashrate is going nuts. this is a much better metric to gauge bitcoin's success than price!

daily tx's are an even better metric



572. Post 13210640 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

https://blockchain.info/charts/n-transactions?timespan=2year&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=7&show_header=true&scale=0&address=




573. Post 13210751 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: r0ach on December 11, 2015, 02:18:48 AM
Sorry if I offended your wannabe Nazi friend, Adam.
I didn't mean to.
Yea, let's all convert our Bitcoin into Jewish paper confetti and watch as it goes to 0

Zionism and Naziism are both identical, ethnocentric, racial supremacist cults.  Therefore, yes, you are a Nazi-wannabe since you're a pro-central banking, JIDF, Zionist shill account.




hey r0ach, you are from eastern-europe aren't you?



574. Post 13210778 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: r0ach on December 11, 2015, 02:28:17 AM
hey r0ach, you are from eastern-europe aren't you?

Since your insinuation implies that you disagree with my statement of factual, objective reality that exists, I can only assume you're a far leftist American, metrosexual, coward, brainwashed, or otherwise shell of a man that would likely die within 5 minutes of being placed in a timeline at any date before the 1900s.

i will take that as a yes.  Grin



575. Post 13210962 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: spooderman on December 11, 2015, 03:03:03 AM
420.

u know what to do Smiley

go short?  Grin



576. Post 13210986 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: spooderman on December 11, 2015, 03:10:09 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKl6EZShaaw

i like



577. Post 13211046 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: suda123 on December 11, 2015, 03:16:51 AM
Top comment on YouTube:
Quote
Space Woona 2 months ago
 If there was a radio station that played disco all day, i don't think I'd ever get any work done. I'd be too busy dancing.

Sorry, boss. I can't get those reports done today. Maybe tomorrow.
Grin Grin Grin *hits repeat*

dumped at 422$ 80% of my bitcoins




578. Post 13211082 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: suda123 on December 11, 2015, 03:25:38 AM
Top comment on YouTube:
Quote
Space Woona 2 months ago
 If there was a radio station that played disco all day, i don't think I'd ever get any work done. I'd be too busy dancing.

Sorry, boss. I can't get those reports done today. Maybe tomorrow.
Grin Grin Grin *hits repeat*

dumped at 422$ 80% of my bitcoins



D:< stahp

found a better one  Cool



579. Post 13214513 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: Alley on December 11, 2015, 12:41:29 PM
Why in the world would you sell your bitcoins during a bull run?

because all he ever witnessed was a bear market...

Quote
Date Registered:   May 16, 2015, 11:51:55 AM



580. Post 13220878 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):



ccf



581. Post 13221135 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):




582. Post 13221236 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: peonminer on December 12, 2015, 02:35:18 AM


perfect gif



583. Post 13221344 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):


question is: what happens at 500$?

i can't imagine us going through it just like that. correction is very likely, maybe down to 450 again...



584. Post 13231301 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):


i smell breakout



585. Post 13231322 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):


little wall at 250$ stamp



586. Post 13251231 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):


cc other fucker



587. Post 13255204 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):


nicy nice




588. Post 13255357 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):


imo its just a result of the little price surge we have. was the same in 2013, rising prices bring more TXs.



589. Post 13255558 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):


boom.gif



590. Post 13257267 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: spooderman on December 15, 2015, 04:44:01 PM
my friend has been diagnosed with a bad disease.

off topic: go be healthier, all of you.

thank you! may your friend get well soon!



591. Post 13257855 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 15, 2015, 05:38:55 PM
i really didnt think we'd see a full retarce so soon!

what if we really are >32,000 in < 2 years  Shocked

no, but 5000$ is quite likely



592. Post 13258065 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 15, 2015, 05:44:49 PM
i really didnt think we'd see a full retarce so soon!

what if we really are >32,000 in < 2 years  Shocked

no, but 5000$ is quite likely

then what?

then other CC will take over and BTC will die



593. Post 13276460 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):


so stable, so strong, so willgothrough500



594. Post 13279588 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):


2700 incoming  Grin




595. Post 13292823 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):


chart looks strong as fuck



596. Post 13293164 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: TERA on December 19, 2015, 01:39:39 AM
I have this feeling like either its time to buy or the last chance to sell,  but I don't know which one... so I just hodl.

in other words, the next 24h are critical  Grin



597. Post 13306763 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):


smells like 400



598. Post 13307805 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: TReano on December 20, 2015, 04:25:58 PM
Again rejected before 500$.

I guess this Bull market didn't last too long?





599. Post 13308629 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on December 20, 2015, 06:12:07 PM
I think this has hit the bottom and it is time for a nice fat bounce. Some traders will have hard time to cover their shorts on Bitfinex.

not much shorts to cover



600. Post 13311190 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: TReano on December 21, 2015, 12:34:58 AM
time to short this down and squeez a couple perma bulls  Smiley

plz short the shit out of this mf



601. Post 13311226 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: fisheater22 on December 21, 2015, 12:37:59 AM
I'm leveraged long and this is the worst day of my life. If 430 doesn't hold, why, I just don't know what I'll do.

in the end its just money mate

you still live and breathe are able to see the sun rising. i know its cheesy, but its true. Wink



602. Post 13311337 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: TReano on December 21, 2015, 12:46:42 AM
time to short this down and squeez a couple perma bulls  Smiley

plz short the shit out of this mf


I am happy short perma bull thanks for your money.

i would add some, i am sure it will go below 400 and after that 350 is in reach also  Wink




603. Post 13311347 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: ImI on December 20, 2015, 02:50:53 PM

smells like 400




604. Post 13311362 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on December 21, 2015, 01:02:16 AM
425.72 on Stamp - Will this hold over the next 12-24 hours?

If I had to bet on it I'd say no!

we are fucked  Lips sealed



605. Post 13311371 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: peonminer on December 21, 2015, 01:02:12 AM
time to short this down and squeez a couple perma bulls  Smiley

plz short the shit out of this mf


I am happy short perma bull thanks for your money.

i would add some, i am sure it will go below 400 and after that 350 50 is in reach also  Wink


ftfy

yes you are right  Wink

350, then 300, then 250,...and so on. you get it. 50 is just a matter of days maybe even hours.



606. Post 13329037 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):


moon is obv 5000$ folks



607. Post 13339256 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):


its the christmas choochoo



608. Post 13342446 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

speaking of bears, where the fuck is tarmifart?

edit: found him, he is now into altcoin-business  Grin

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1287935.msg13338146#msg13338146



609. Post 13358208 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

have a look at the coming x-mas-bitcoin-talk-effect.



610. Post 13363819 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):


its obv china and obv triggered by some event, but form what exactly?

dont think its MMM or another "ban"-talk.



611. Post 13373739 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: BldSwtTrs on December 27, 2015, 07:24:57 PM
Keep faith bitcoiners. Coinbase is actually making something happens regarding the endless scaling controversy.

The power of totalitarian and economics illeterate nerds over Bitcoin is coming to an end ("but... but we have a roadmap" lol).

yes, maybe its the right step, nevertheless......... lol coinbase




612. Post 13375223 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):


the choo is dead baby, the choo is dead....



613. Post 13383397 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):


i think this bitcoin-civilwar thats going on is depressing prices. 350 very likely imo. :/



614. Post 13390317 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):




615. Post 13455016 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: flagpara on January 05, 2016, 01:20:17 PM
As a non American not following American election cause I don't really give a fuck about your country (no offense though, you can't care about everything)...

lol

caught the french



616. Post 13455231 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: flagpara on January 05, 2016, 02:37:28 PM
As a non American not following American election cause I don't really give a fuck about your country (no offense though, you can't care about everything)...

lol

caught the french

Meh.
True.

But how?  Grin



 Grin



617. Post 13470987 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):


wtf



618. Post 13471026 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):


some whale fell in love <3



619. Post 13474887 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):


looks like tarmifart staged a scam to get some bitcoins after he got rekt with his 320$ shorts...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1307868.0



620. Post 13478229 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on January 07, 2016, 04:03:53 PM
Ok, the mystery of tarmi seems to be solved already:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1111201.msg11805249#msg11805249

Sad. I'm going to miss that guy.

tarmi is dead baby.......tarmi is dead.



621. Post 13480238 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: unununium on January 07, 2016, 11:32:56 PM
Where are the bears?

dead



622. Post 13480978 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):


we got a serious choo here



623. Post 13490468 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):


634



624. Post 13531281 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

https://bitcoinclassic.com/

soon we will have x different versions of Bitcoin. Bitcoin Classic, Bitcoin Real, Bitcoin Original, you name it.

honestly, better expect double digits and keep your wallets synced!




625. Post 13532903 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: ImI on January 12, 2016, 08:39:55 PM
https://bitcoinclassic.com/

soon we will have x different versions of Bitcoin. Bitcoin Classic, Bitcoin Real, Bitcoin Original, you name it.

honestly, better expect double digits and keep your wallets synced!



the inability of the devs to deal with each other like adults could ruin this project.



626. Post 13533224 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):


Bitcoin Classic seeks 75% miner adoption. That eases my nerves a little bit, if they get >75% than we wont have two competing forks, which is a good thing.



627. Post 13533276 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: brg444 on January 13, 2016, 01:03:54 AM
This drop is brought to you by the good folks at Bitcoin Classic.  Cool

Hopefully ya'll enjoy being hard forked into double digits prices  Kiss

they need 750/1000 blocks, thats not peanuts



628. Post 13533333 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: podyx on January 13, 2016, 01:15:10 AM
This drop is brought to you by the good folks at Bitcoin Classic.  Cool

Hopefully ya'll enjoy being hard forked into double digits prices  Kiss

What is Bitcoin Classic?

https://bitcoinclassic.com/

So basically the fork we've been waiting on? Why is that a bad thing?

Because forks, especially controversial ones, can mean trouble.



629. Post 13533410 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on January 13, 2016, 01:25:27 AM
This drop is brought to you by the good folks at Bitcoin Classic.  Cool

Hopefully ya'll enjoy being hard forked into double digits prices  Kiss

What is Bitcoin Classic?

https://bitcoinclassic.com/

So basically the fork we've been waiting on? Why is that a bad thing?

Because forks, especially controversial ones, can mean trouble.

75% of the last 1000 mined blocks to activate means the remaining 25% will switch sides very fast or be left trying to mine worthless coins at an extreme difficulty. This is how Bitcoin was designed to resolve disputes.

If it never hits 75%, nothing happens. Now you know.  Smiley

(Agree that Marshall Long is a bit of a douche... but Antminer, BW, OKcoin, BTCC? etc etc are pretty serious endorsements)

agree. will be very interesting to see how many blocks they get.

is there any good website to follow those blocks?



630. Post 13540075 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):


i heard thymos is french, is that so??



631. Post 13544692 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: BitUsher on January 14, 2016, 01:20:12 AM
Classic (BIP102),

Classic is not BIP102. When they finally figure things out my guess is 2-4 with segwit.

My best guess is two months.

THEREFOR we are fucked.  

You should be fine, because you will be taking all those shorts. I encourage it.

The rest of us should be comfortable regardless what implementation gets adopted because we understand that bigger blocks don't spell sudden death and a fee market event doesn't either. There are trade offs with each but, at least in the short term, no big differences between the outcome for bitcoin this year.

Unless we get two competing forks...



632. Post 13544781 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: BitUsher on January 14, 2016, 01:56:34 AM
Unless we get two competing forks...

If one of the other implementations gets 750/1000 blocks than there is still a 4 week grace period. People tend to act more rational when it involves their life savings and business investments. If those numbers grow within those 4 weeks a fork will ensue, otherwise others will run back to core even if they hate it out of fear of becoming a worthless alt.

Agree. That 75% rule is important. As long as they respect that its OK.



633. Post 13544934 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: BitUsher on January 14, 2016, 02:26:43 AM
Blockstream may hope that alternative is them, and they need Bitcoin to still function as a settlement layer...    

I keep hearing these insinuations that Blockstream is going to control the payment channel layer (LN) . Do you guys really think that LN isn't going to be open source and available for any node to to compete with Blockstream settlement nodes with? Do you really believe that any of us will bother touching any payment channel that isn't open source?



good point



634. Post 13549344 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):


its all about the probability of an orphan block. if we could minimize that probability it would be a big step in the right direction. maybe we should diminish the advantage of 0 tx blocks by making all blocks equally large no matter how much real TXs are in there. so every block would have the same disadvantage of a full block no matter if those are TXs or just some clutter to fill up the 1MB or 2MB



635. Post 13562596 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: spooderman on January 15, 2016, 11:39:58 AM
Hearn has not lost my respect. He never had it in the first place.

A deeply immature person.

Unfortunately he is not the only one. Gmax, Luke and Thymos act similar.



636. Post 13563682 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: Ibian on January 15, 2016, 05:46:24 PM
This entire mess is stupid. It's not a choice between bigger blocks OR better blocks. Do both.

Tell that Maxwell and others.



637. Post 13563862 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: hdbuck on January 15, 2016, 05:56:19 PM
How is increasing to 2mb as bad as increasing supply past 21m?

It is called a instigating a "precedent": if you can manage it for one protocol parameter, you can do it for everything else.

You are aware of that the blocksize limit wasn't even a parameter in the original bitcoin version? Satoshi declared it as a temporary tool that should help as no other solutions are found and that should obv be adapted if things change.

Completely dumbfuck to compare it to the 21Mio lol



638. Post 13564031 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: coins101 on January 15, 2016, 04:44:31 PM
wut Huh? we gotta do wut Huh "blockchain blacklists" Huh? ok everyone all chant at same time: "china must go" "we want blockchain blacklists"!  .... follow up with a give me a "WOOT WOOT" .

Clearly their influence is making Bitcoin too inscrutable. Possibly even more dangerous than centralization.



yes.. the evil chinese miners and their evil Huobi must GO! there is no choice, the evil chinese has forced us to implement "blockchain blacklists" . we're putting chinese miners on no-fly lists too.

By the sound of it increasing blocks will invoke the great fire wall of China and btc will become more decentralised almost overnight.

It's like asking turkeys to vote for Christmas

the funny thing is chinese miners are not against bigger blocks, thats just some bullshit that hearn pulled out of his ass. the only thing chinese miners really fear is the price of bitcoin collapsing because of some kiddy-nerd-developer fights of immature folks. so they said at the last scaling bitcoin conference do what ever you have to do but do it without a big breakup or fight or whatever. they even are in favor of 2MB but they want the core team to do it without big fights and media stir.



639. Post 13566948 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: Divitiae miserae on January 15, 2016, 11:26:58 PM
So this is all because of Mike? Sad

Mike only stated facts. Small blockians are those to blame.

Nope, Mike went to New York Times, told "Bitcoin is dead!" and informed the public about the ongoing inner-Bitcoin fight. THAT did fucking damage to BTC and was completely unnecessary!

Its not about big or small blocks its about being a fucking dramaqueen!



640. Post 13567030 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: BitUsher on January 15, 2016, 11:33:41 PM

Nope, Mike went to New York Times, told "Bitcoin is dead!" and informed the public about the ongoing inner-Bitcoin fight. THAT did fucking damage to BTC and was completely unnecessary!

Its not about big or small blocks its about being a fucking dramaqueen!

It appears to be too much of a coincidence the timing of it all with this --
https://youtu.be/R0iArSIU0Z8?t=47m16s

Looks to me to be a coordinated attack by R3.(42 banks against bitcoin)

I dont know, but one thing is for sure Hearn did tremendous damage and he did it on purpose and thats whats so disgusting in this whole matter. Like some kid who destroys your toy after you told him that he isnt allowed to play with.
I dont want to have folks like him in the dev team no matter what stance on the blocksize issue they have.



641. Post 13567242 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: Lauda on January 16, 2016, 12:01:50 AM
You know the media has caught up on the story and barely any reported the story correctly as in "Mike is wrong and Bitcoin died 80+ times already". I've got sent a few screenshots from Facebook (which I don't use) from a few partners already. Quite unfortunate that it has reflected itself this heavily on the price within a single day.

He sold himself to the media as one important (if not the most important) developer. Which is a fucking joke! Yes he did some work but i wouldnt name him in the Top10. Hilarious that he could make such an public impression...



642. Post 13567315 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: AZwarel on January 16, 2016, 12:09:48 AM
So this is all because of Mike? Sad

Mike only stated facts. Small blockians are those to blame.

Nope, Mike went to New York Times, told "Bitcoin is dead!" and informed the public about the ongoing inner-Bitcoin fight. THAT did fucking damage to BTC and was completely unnecessary!

Its not about big or small blocks its about being a fucking dramaqueen!

Drama queen or not, he had some valid points - not necessary technically, but about the whole deadlock situation and censorship. Ofc, he should not go to the stupid mainstream media, who want the blood of bitcoin.
Still, he raised good points in his blog post (not in the NYT article!!!) about that there should NOT be a fee market, which is arising artificially, based on an old DoS prevention mechanism (which was always thought to
be temporary!). There is no fee market (or shouldn't be), this is system with a >6bil$ market cap, with less than 0,1% world population using it, and they ALREADY want to develop a blockage with transaction throughput?? Just count: doesn't matter, how high fees go - it is still impossible to do more than 4-7 ts/s!!! Fees do not solve this hardcap!! People will just not transact.

That's why the Harn "whistleblow" in MSM caused panic sell, many realized we MUST act NOW. Check out, 70% of big miners/ processing companies /exchanges already signed Bitcoin Classic https://bitcoinclassic.com/ after 2 days...

Or will they be just censored again? You mean 70-80% of the industry can be censored? :-)


Its not a "whistleblow" cause the public and MSM dont care about such details, all they understand is that Bitcoin has inner fights going on. You see a whistleblow is usually something that wakes up important players that take action then, but in this case who did he wake up? Nobody, cause all important players are already aware of the issue. To cause a crash and to demolish the image of Bitcoin in public further is just what it is an asshole action.

He may have had some valid point, nevertheless his NYT article overshadows this completely as we did know those things before. Also his medium article is full of bullshit also, i would say 75% is just crap and 25% is valid concern.




643. Post 13567492 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: fisheater22 on January 16, 2016, 12:24:13 AM
People that are censored don't get featured in NYT articles and mentioned in R3 testimony broadcasted from every tv channel, bud!

Why can't the mainstream press just leave our Bitcoin alone?

LOL, are you asking the same questions when Bitcoin surges after some TV/press brought another special about Bitcoin?

Bitcoin/blockchain is an interesting evolving technology its obv that they cover it.



644. Post 13567916 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on January 16, 2016, 01:25:00 AM
Stop defending him, he does not deserve it.

"Strong minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, weak minds discuss people."

Lauda's just worried now that it appears he's been bootlicking all the petty tyrants and would-be technocrats that have impeded Bitcoin's destiny. The internet remembers.

The tide is turning tho, the free market incentives upon which Bitcoin was built might just work... Bitfury, Bitmain, BW, KnC have taken the gloves off and are asserting their right of vote by hashrate. Wonder who's next? Makes me more bullish than ever for the long term.

Short term, it's gonna be a little messy, lots of rage dumping and gnashing of teeth. When we emerge at the other end of the tunnel though... it may turn out to be a glorious spring day, with the summer halving right around the corner  Smiley

Maybe, but i dont wanna loose the core devs. They are important as fuck! Just with Gavin and two, three others we wont be able to move on, we have to integrate them into the eventual 2MB version. If they fail to build peace it will get very difficult...



645. Post 13598783 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on January 18, 2016, 08:01:59 PM




i love those full blocks! its a fckn good sign!



646. Post 13599226 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: BldSwtTrs on January 18, 2016, 08:29:21 PM




i love those full blocks! its a fckn good sign!
By your (very stupid) logic we should move down the limit to 100kB or even 10kB since it would bring even fuller block and even bigger transaction fees. Why don't we do that?

The "stupid logic" goes more transactions = more adoption and isn't so stupid after all.  Kiss



647. Post 13599239 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 18, 2016, 08:37:36 PM




i love those full blocks! its a fckn good sign!


Do you really believe those chart buddy numbers?   I mean really, if you look at Blockchain.info, you get spikes between 45% and 75%, but currently, the average is around 60%.


https://blockchain.info/charts/avg-block-size


I believe that full blocks is a good sign, too -  of increased adoption ... so it is a decent problem to have..... even though some sky-is-falling panic mongerers are engaged in ongoing apparent scare strategies that seem to be aimed at causing quicker decisions than seems to be necessary....

I am a bit more confident in blockchain.info numbers as depicted in the above graph, and I would be interested to hear why those numbers are supposedly an inaccurate depiction of the current state of affairs or the urgency of the matter.

maybe one has to subtract those blocks that are empty on purpose



648. Post 13600578 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on January 18, 2016, 11:06:21 PM
All the other bigblockers are making better arguments than me. Maybe I should just shut up for a while. Carry on.

All of your arguments are equally specious ... and not just you, but all of them should learn some humility and know when to shut up.

Folks you see whats the idiotic part of this whole discussion? Both solutions 2MB/4MB blocks and Segwit/LN/etc will solve this issue longterm. Maybe Bitcoin is better shortterm with one solution but longterm it wont matter. BUT what really could hurt Bitcoin longterm is that silly fight that has embarked between silly nerd kids unable to listen to each other and unable to do compromises!

So everybody step back a little and breathe, Bitcoin won't die no matter which way we go, but this civilwar has to come to an end!



649. Post 13610058 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):


Bitcoin core is considering changing the hash-algo from SHA2 -> SHA3.....

https://github.com/luke-jr/bitcoin/commit/8d3a84c242598ef3cdc733e99dddebfecdad84a6

just wow.



650. Post 13610127 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: hdbuck on January 19, 2016, 09:03:50 PM

Bitcoin core is considering changing the hash-algo from SHA2 -> SHA3.....

https://github.com/luke-jr/bitcoin/commit/8d3a84c242598ef3cdc733e99dddebfecdad84a6

just wow.

Yeah, try getting miners to run that shit.

nah the nodes will. after coulpe week of diff adjustement, it will be fine. Wink

its obv a hardfork, so there wont be weeks needed to any diff-adjustment. you start right away with a very low diff.



651. Post 13610461 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on January 19, 2016, 09:47:59 PM

I guess Hearn's ragequit doesn't look so bad now.

Seriously, given all that shit its remarkable that we are still at 380$...



652. Post 13610781 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on January 19, 2016, 09:56:07 PM

I guess Hearn's ragequit doesn't look so bad now.

Seriously, given all that shit its remarkable that we are still at 380$...

You seem like a level headed guy, are Core out of their fucking minds?


i think its no more than a threat at the moment, but it shows the childish attitude that brought us here in the first place. gmax and luke seem to be very immature.



653. Post 13611422 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: TReano on January 19, 2016, 11:58:03 PM
I really wonder when this damn blocksize shit is going to be solved. It's becoming retarded.

we are not even close to seeing the end of this imo. the fork will come and core, better said gmax/luke, will fight fiercely with the remining 25% hashpower or whatever hash they have. expect more "bitcoin is dead" press releases etc but this time from core-members...



654. Post 13612142 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: coins101 on January 20, 2016, 01:54:46 AM
In the end, Classic might win because of RBF

Quote
Work on 0.12 will start after the 0.11.2 release. We are planning to disable opt-in RBF. This decision is based on community feedback (miners included).

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin_Classic/comments/41qeac/release_plan_19jan2016/

With testing due to start at the end of the month, Core will have to decide pretty soon if it will match Classic's increase in block sizes, or face a realistic forking off the chain.

I had thought support for Classic was a veiled threat by some of those that have come out in support....but, RBF might be the clincher.

imo its already given that classic will reach the 75% easily. the only question remains how core will react. as i see it they have also some breakup-potential, some might be willing to cooperate and to switch to 2MB also, others might go radical and choose another hash-algo (like maxwell/luke already hinted).

that could get really messy.

as i see it at the moment the biggest concern of the most core-devs is if segwit is able to run side by side with a non-segwit-client.



655. Post 13622548 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: Morecoin Freeman on January 20, 2016, 11:03:32 PM
Speaking of volatility... I am not sure what to make of this recent price action.

it fascinates me also



656. Post 13622659 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: brg444 on January 20, 2016, 08:42:01 PM
Why are we still discussing Classic like it's not a failed project already?

Didn't you get the news?

i didnt get the news. where to find it?



657. Post 13622682 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: brg444 on January 20, 2016, 11:22:23 PM
Why are we still discussing Classic like it's not a failed project already?

Didn't you get the news?

i didnt get the news. where to find it?

Here: https://botbot.me/freenode/bitcoin-core-dev/2016-01-20/?msg=58304091&page=2

thx



658. Post 13622976 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: ImI on January 20, 2016, 11:22:40 PM
Why are we still discussing Classic like it's not a failed project already?

Didn't you get the news?

i didnt get the news. where to find it?

Here: https://botbot.me/freenode/bitcoin-core-dev/2016-01-20/?msg=58304091&page=2

thx

agree, that's it with classic.



659. Post 13623053 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: inca on January 21, 2016, 12:19:24 AM

I would take anything brg444 says with a pinch of salt as he completely lacks objectivity.

without bitfury and f2p, classic has no chance to reach even 50%.



660. Post 13623275 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on January 21, 2016, 12:56:30 AM

I would take anything brg444 says with a pinch of salt as he completely lacks objectivity.

without bitfury and f2p, classic has no chance to reach even 50%.

Where does it say Bitfury supports this?

Bitfury said already yesterday that they wont support Classic.

edit: https://medium.com/@BitFuryGroup/keep-calm-and-bitcoin-on-4f29d581276#.r2d5cdk2i



661. Post 13623316 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

https://medium.com/@BitFuryGroup/keep-calm-and-bitcoin-on-4f29d581276#.r2d5cdk2i



662. Post 13623373 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on January 21, 2016, 01:09:11 AM

I cut-and-paste posted this here when it came out two days ago.  

@Chunky Is the war is over??

And I read it then, I just don't see how this is a retraction of the support for Bitcoin Classic they gave the same day.

true, he doesnt mention classic. i read it as an endorsement to core but i obv could be wrong.



663. Post 13623646 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on January 21, 2016, 01:50:17 AM
So now that there's rumblings of Blockstream "capitulating" with an empty promise for 2017... are you guise gonna let me sell  some above $450 for the 3rd time in 2 months??

Not surprised that cripplecoiners can't discern the difference between Jonathan Toomim and his stoner brother Michael... oh wait... it's just a smear tactic by association... gotcha.

Software coming out at the end of the month... the DDoS'ing should be pretty epic! 

Should also be interesting to see what Loaded has to say tomorrow, if he says anything at all.

Choo Choo Gentlemen. To 450 and slightly beyond!

no "empty promise" if you release the HF now and it activates it self at 01-01-2017



664. Post 13628368 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: sAt0sHiFanClub on January 21, 2016, 12:30:14 PM
What percentage of the mining pool is represented by "Haobtc, OKCoin, Bitmain, Bither, LIGHTNINGASIC" ? 

The context was Chinese mining pools. With the list above and F2Pool which already made a deal with core a couple days ago(evidence provided earlier)... I see BTCC and BW mining missing which is ~20% global hash rate or around 2/3rds of Chinese mining pools  indicating they are sticking with core(If we are to believe the sources) and the remaining Chinese pools having an unknown position.

F2P deal with Core? You mean 2Mb in April 2017?  Do you know what they actually meant when they said that, knowing that Classic was going ahead in a timeframe a fraction of that?

better start reading the whole fckn conversation. wang clearly states that he is in favor of 3months before any softfork and he wants at least one year before any hardfork. that pretty much puts classic to the grave.



665. Post 13632361 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on January 21, 2016, 06:54:48 PM
The answer to your question of attacking one of the chains seems to be valid, still.

I don't think so...

When a fork is proposed, like XT or Classic (with 75% trigger and a few weeks of grace period between the trigger and the switch to new rules), I think that:

* Before the fork, holders should pray that it resolves neatly and quickly as a non-event, and keep quiet or voice their preferences quietly, so that it does not upset the price;

* If the proposal gains some support, but neither reaches 75% nor drops back to zero, and it looks like the impasse may continue for a while, they may want to speak out for one outcome, to help break the impasse -- but that may make things worse if they themselves cant agree on which side to support.   They may want to sell while the price is still OK, justin case; but that may cause the price to crash.  Or they may choose to bet on the price recovering later, and keep holding.

* If the proposal gets little suport and seems to be a sure fail, the holders shoul shout it down.

* If the proposal gets 51% and keeps increasing, the holders should cheer it along.

* If the proposal gets the required support and triggers, the holders should upgrade their clients accept it, and do what they can to convince the remaining miners and players to accept it too.

* If the change has triggered, but at the end of the grace period there is still a non-negligible fraction of the miners that refuse to accep it, then the holders should try to convince the exchanges and other services to boycott the minority chain and refuse its coins, and convince the miners to sabotage the minority chain.

When a minority can veto, we have what amounts to a game of "chicken". In the game of chicken, the side perceived to be the craziest and most hell-bent on winning at any cost (including their own destruction) is the side that wins.  This right now is the side of the smallblockers, unfortunately.  That's why I think this will take a while to play out, longer in fact than it will take to fill the blocks and hike fees. Possibly long enough to get a network congestion failure. 

There won't be a "congestion failure". If blocks are full a order of importance builds itself, those TXs that are more important are paying more and those that are not important are paying less/nothing. You dont have to agree with this fee market evolving and its perfectly fine to be in the bigblockers-camp, but this "congestion failure" is just bullshit cause it paints a situation that will never occur.



666. Post 13633016 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on January 21, 2016, 07:33:04 PM

The more important Bitcoins becomes, the more likely a congestion failure will be absent a scaling solution.  Let's assume half the transactions are either not important or urgent. Then what happens if that number grows by a factor of five? This is not unprecedented.  There is no way the price will sustainably go up without attracting new users EXPONENTIALLY and the network won't be able to handle them no matter how much in fees they pay. 

Let's use a hypothetical example: Imagine that the Chinese government announces that they will soon close the loophole that allows their citizens to avoid capital controls via crypto. This could cause a mad rush to the exits, particularly if the economic conditions inside China deteriorate. If one tenth of one percent of the Chinese try to get their money out through bitcoin, that's (1,600,000,000)X(0.001)=1,600,000 so at only one transaction each, we're looking at over four times the total daily network capacity IN ADDITION TO all the other traffic.  That's just one example. I can think of dozens more. Hyperinflation in a third world country. another Cypress type banking crisis.  A terrorist attack on the Bank of International Settlements. SWIFT or ACH getting hacked. etc.

The mempool has already been over 10MB for two days straight. We are looking at a permanent and growing backlog of transactions. 

that doesn't contradict my point. you are right if a big flush of TXs comes their will be a BIG mempool and essentially alot of TXs would have to switch to another coin. nevertheless its not a "congestion" as this basically paints a picture where NO TXs AT ALL will be processed ands thats bullshit.

if you have 1.6Mio TXs and only 200.000 are fitting on the blockchain then a market will occur and the most important 200.000 will be processed. i know you can argue that that would be not a good situation for Bitcoin OK, but its not that the newtwork stops processing TXs.

i hope it gets clearer now.



667. Post 13633175 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on January 21, 2016, 08:27:39 PM

The more important Bitcoins becomes, the more likely a congestion failure will be absent a scaling solution.  Let's assume half the transactions are either not important or urgent. Then what happens if that number grows by a factor of five? This is not unprecedented.  There is no way the price will sustainably go up without attracting new users EXPONENTIALLY and the network won't be able to handle them no matter how much in fees they pay. 

Let's use a hypothetical example: Imagine that the Chinese government announces that they will soon close the loophole that allows their citizens to avoid capital controls via crypto. This could cause a mad rush to the exits, particularly if the economic conditions inside China deteriorate. If one tenth of one percent of the Chinese try to get their money out through bitcoin, that's (1,600,000,000)X(0.001)=1,600,000 so at only one transaction each, we're looking at over four times the total daily network capacity IN ADDITION TO all the other traffic.  That's just one example. I can think of dozens more. Hyperinflation in a third world country. another Cypress type banking crisis.  A terrorist attack on the Bank of International Settlements. SWIFT or ACH getting hacked. etc.

The mempool has already been over 10MB for two days straight. We are looking at a permanent and growing backlog of transactions. 

that doesn't contradict my point. you are right if a big flush of TXs comes their will be a BIG mempool and essentially alot of TXs would have to switch to another coin. nevertheless its not a "congestion" as this basically paints a picture where NO TXs AT ALL will be processed ands thats bullshit.

if you have 1.6Mio TXs and only 200.000 are fitting on the blockchain then a market will occur and the most important 200.000 will be processed. i know you can argue that that would be not a good situation for Bitcoin OK, but its not that the newtwork stops processing TXs.

i hope it gets clearer now.


Those people switching to another coin may never switch back.

≠ congestion failure  Wink



668. Post 13635845 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: Dotto on January 22, 2016, 03:04:16 AM
This descending triangle closes in few hours. Dumpage incoming




669. Post 13652014 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):


rumor says that if classic succeeds big parts of core developers will switch to eth



670. Post 13663042 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: Richy_T on January 24, 2016, 04:38:09 PM
It is the [use cost] that need to be increased!



Said no successful business in a competitive market anywhere.

Longterm Bitcoin has to gather enough fees to survive, without fees no miners.

Or in your business language: We can give away our product for free, said no successful business ever.

edit: the fees will longterm lead 1:1 to Bitcoins security. the higher the gathered fees the higher the security of the network.



671. Post 13663076 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: mmitech on January 24, 2016, 04:43:56 PM
It is the [use cost] that need to be increased!



Said no successful business in a competitive market anywhere.

Longterm Bitcoin has to gather enough fees to survive, without fees no miners.

Or in your business language: We can give away our product for free, said no successful business ever.

by long term you mean a couple of years from now ? or when the block reward is almost zero ? we have to define what is long term first then we can discuss what is right.

longterm i mean when blockreward is zero, yes. nevertheless we should already be aware of that fees are not something "evil" but overall necessary. its a balance between allowing 0-fee transactions to process, while still having enough pressure to have some fees paid.



672. Post 13663598 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: bargainbin on January 24, 2016, 04:57:02 PM
...
Or in your business language: We can give away our product for free, said no successful business ever.
...

Depends on what you mean by "for free" :- There's Google...

you pay google by advertisement

maybe we can put some advertisements on every TXs  Wink

"sponsored by Coca-Cola"



673. Post 13664016 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: Yakamoto on January 24, 2016, 06:09:58 PM
...
Or in your business language: We can give away our product for free, said no successful business ever.
...

Depends on what you mean by "for free" :- There's Google...

you pay google by advertisement

maybe we can put some advertisements on every TXs  Wink

"sponsored by Coca-Cola"

Google didn't start out by charging for searches, email, etc. Had zero ad revenues because zero ads.
I guess Google should have started out by charging for its services, would have been a multi-gazillion-dollar co. by now.

Part of why Google is so popular is because it did absolutely zero ads during their first startup, and this lead to everyone using it to recommend Google over other search engines, as there were barely any ads. And it's pretty much the same way now. The ads are very non-intrusive, and this is what is making them so much money.

I think Google migght only be the size of Bing or Yahoo if they started with ads, and there would most likely also be a more distributed market share.

the important part is: is google free in terms of no revenue? answer is: no. google obv get revenue. no revenue = no service. as simple as that.




674. Post 13688383 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):


nice little fight going on atm




675. Post 13688620 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on January 27, 2016, 12:20:00 AM

Agreed, but every day without an inch of movement from Blockstream, increases the possibility. The fact that they start bringing up PoW changes when backed into a corner gives even more weight to the idea that they would rather go to war than compromise to 2MB.

it shows lack of reason. miners seem to be much more reasonable at the moment and thats in a way how bitcoin was intended anyways. its the miners (and users) who decide where to go.



676. Post 13708545 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: coins101 on January 28, 2016, 10:42:32 PM
Looks like segwit will need to be hard forked. That should finally bring this issue to a close.

why? just combine it with a 2MB hardfork and everybody is happy.



677. Post 13708877 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):


tbh with all this forking-crap i expected bitcoin to be sub 300$ anytime soon. that we are still around 380$ really surprises me. either i am ahead of the market or i am wrong by the market.



678. Post 13709004 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: TReano on January 29, 2016, 12:04:37 AM

tbh with all this forking-crap i expected bitcoin to be sub 300$ anytime soon. that we are still around 380$ really surprises me. either i am ahead of the market or i am wrong by the market.


true. It's a total fuck up mess. I wouldn't be surprised at all if we end up at 200$ again...

I guess the reason why we are still so high is that most people from outside have no idea what is really going on. The further the price falls the more people will look into it and start understanding the mess.
If this keeps on going like this Bitcoin is really not that robust and could get thrown back a couple years...


I mean the question is simple: 1, 2 or even more MB and people already start a civil war. It's plain stupid.

indeed, imagine 2-3 months from now we could have 2 or even three "Bitcoin" selling itself as the original.

i think what is maybe still stabilizing the market could be optimists who expect a run-up after the scaling is solved.



679. Post 13709802 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):


which bitcoin? bitcoin core? bitcoin classic? bitcoin freedom? bitcoin xyz? bitcoin zxy?

before you know we will have so many different versions you better start keeping track of them.



680. Post 13713515 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):


allright, i am ready



681. Post 13718648 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: becoin on January 29, 2016, 10:43:12 PM
Maybe Peter Todd isn't actually the vermin his online reputation would suggest.

 Grin

The Blockchain stunt to promote RBF was still a shitty thing to do.
RBF is a very good solution. There must be competition for blockchain inclusion. You can offer your own idea. If you can't, then stfu.

the question is: does there have to be now competition or sometime in the future? at the moment with the block reward its not that big of an issue to have lower fee-income.



682. Post 13718919 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: becoin on January 29, 2016, 11:27:06 PM
Maybe Peter Todd isn't actually the vermin his online reputation would suggest.

 Grin

The Blockchain stunt to promote RBF was still a shitty thing to do.
RBF is a very good solution. There must be competition for blockchain inclusion. You can offer your own idea. If you can't, then stfu.

the question is: does there have to be now competition or sometime in the future? at the moment with the block reward its not that big of an issue to have lower fee-income.
It is high time. We have 5 months to find AND implement solution!

why? reward will be 12.5 that's still a big factor higher then any fee market could gather at the moment.

edit: at the moment we are still in the early stages of bitcoin, where adoption is all that matters. so its beneficial imo to have lower fees. network effect drags on and at a later stage you can easily have a fee market.



683. Post 13728150 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: TReano on January 30, 2016, 10:19:08 PM
the price is really low right now and i think that it will have to start rising in the near future, i hope i am right


or it's the beginning of the next bear cycle which would depress a lot of people here.

i am still long, but i am pissed about the lack of professionalism in the development circles. both sides seem to behave like 16yo nerd kiddies.

core has also its immature folks like luke etc



684. Post 13728713 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on January 30, 2016, 11:39:51 PM
the price is really low right now and i think that it will have to start rising in the near future, i hope i am right


or it's the beginning of the next bear cycle which would depress a lot of people here.

i am still long, but i am pissed

ImI, in creation where one's nature neither honors nor forgives.
ImI, one say to the other, no man sees my face and lives.


i dont fully understand, but i kinda like it  Grin



685. Post 13728750 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):


i like



686. Post 13738017 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):


this bitcoin coldwar is heating up and may soon escalate with all dirty tricks including ddos, hacks and mass media interviews etc

i suggest 50% bitcoin /  50% altcoins as hedge



687. Post 13738037 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 01, 2016, 12:29:37 AM

this bitcoin coldwar is heating up and may soon escalate with all dirty tricks including ddos, hacks and mass media interviews etc

i suggest 50% bitcoin /  50% altcoins as hedge

Alts are done pumping. They're dropping faster than Bitcoin.

dont think so, if bitcoin goes 200$ expect altcoins to tripple in value against btc



688. Post 13747890 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: rdnkjdi on February 01, 2016, 11:14:57 PM
I opened a big leveraged short at 394.  I don't see how things are going to go up until the block size debate is resolved.  Or at the very least there is no longer a looming threat of a hard fork.  

This isn't JUST a hard for but a reshuffling of the powers that be in core who are being paid by a private company to fund bitcoin (imo this entire debacle can be traced back to the foundation going belly up on funding development).

Until the two camps are united, core compromises on 2mb blocks or everyone in the community (exchanges etc) change their mind I see the drift downward as inevitable.

I do live in eternal fear of core announcing 2mb blocks and losing it all.  But I'm betting that if they haven't done it yet they aren't going to until hard fork is inevitable.



core is divided in itself. some part of it including gmax and luke will eventually stay at 1MB even after a successful 2MB fork and do their own thing. obv they still will call themselves "bitcoin" no matter how tiny their marketshare will be. one other part (and i think the by far bigger) will simply be pragmatic and switch to 2MB and thats it.



689. Post 13773806 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):


did i miss something?



690. Post 13789617 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: danielW on February 06, 2016, 12:56:56 AM
Gavin's big dial with the shit-eating grin on front of r/bitcoin again ... dump incoming.

edit: notice how he releases these controversial posts at critical timings for technical price breakouts ... or coincidence?

What has he controversially posted? I don't read r/bitcoin and I can't face wading through page after page to find his post. Is it another post about the block size combined with another alternate Bitcoin wallet? The last thing I heard about Gavin was he climbed down to suggesting going for 2MB blocks.


Dumpus_Maximus just posted about arbitrary numbers and binaries for "crassic"
usual thing, brigade voted to the top in no time by the usual paid shills, trolls, zealots and agent provocateurs
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/
... dump incoming as per expected, cheap coinz for his bankster buddies.


Some people would rather the 75% be 95% or 99%. I think that is too high because it gives “veto power” to a single big solo miner or mining pool. Holding veto power is dangerous– somebody who disagrees with the change or just wants to disrupt Bitcoin might use extortion, bribery, or blackmail against a miner to try to prevent the change.

Other people think 75% is too high; after all, if 51% of hash power got together they could just choose to ignore blocks that vote 'the wrong way’. If they are mining pools they might lose most of their miners, but they could.


What a thoughtless heathen!

Lol he can not gain consensus so he just lowered the trigger (compared to 95% which is usually used for soft forks!) to try and push through his chaotic contentious hard fork.

He is again using political language, hiding his real aim of forcing a hard fork under the banner of fighting extortion veto etc.  Nobody is extorting anybody many people simply disagree. Bitcoin is meant to not change without consensus.

define consensus.

if consensus means >95% of the community/miners then Bitcoin will never move ahead! its very easy to convince a minority of 5% to block a certain unwanted evolution.  the result is gridlock.



691. Post 13789634 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: danielW on February 06, 2016, 01:02:13 AM
Meant to not change without how much consensus?

Edit: Some of it? All of it?

More then 75% of hash power and a few big name exchanges, thats for sure.

maybe more then 75%, but you definitely reach a certain point where it gets ridiculous.



692. Post 13789687 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: danielW on February 06, 2016, 01:04:09 AM
Just few months ago core got more then 95% consensus for their soft fork. So you are factually wrong to say Bitcoin never moves ahead if 95% is required.
It is moving and improving rapidly all the time.

it doesnt matter if you had an uncontroversial soft fork that was accepted by 95%. when it comes to crucial and controversial decisions and not just minor changes you will see that 95% means factual gridlock as 5% can be easily mobilized. bitcoin will face even harder decisions than this blocksize issue at the moment, with maybe even harder controversies.

and in THAT situations of controversial but neccessary decisions 95% are deadly, as you may eventually wait forever for the community to unite behind one proposal and the project falls behind because its not able to adapt to new challenges.

you see, the blocksize isnt such a crucial issue at the moment imo, but if bitcoin wont be able to handle it in a timely matter its a bad sign for future hurdles to come which may be way more important.



693. Post 13789760 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 06, 2016, 01:18:28 AM
Just few months ago core got more then 95% consensus for their soft fork. So you are factually wrong to say Bitcoin never moves ahead if 95% is required.
It is moving and improving rapidly all the time.

it doesnt matter if you had an uncontroversial soft fork that was accepted by 95%. when it comes to crucial and controversial decisions and not just minor changes you will see that 95% means factual gridlock as 5% can be easily mobilized. bitcoin will face even harder decisions than this blocksize issue at the moment, with maybe even harder controversies.

and in THAT situations of controversial but neccessary decisions 95% are deadly, as you may eventually wait forever for the community to unite behind one proposal and the project falls behind because its not able to adapt to new challenges.

you see, the blocksize isnt such a crucial issue at the moment imo, but if bitcoin wont be able to handle it in a timely matter its a bad sign for future hurdles to come which may be way more important.

sounds like you want a bitcoin "Progressive" edition ... and like the political party of the same name inevitably fall into the inflation trap ... "for the children".

lol what are you talking about

its pretty easy, if you let 5% of the community block whatever decision the 95% majority has choosen your project (whatever it is) will end up fucked up. no matter if its a company, a football-club or a cryptocurrency. its called tyranny of the few.

you can obv discuss if 75% is enough or not, but its ridiculous to expect a community to always go ahead with a 100% consensus.



694. Post 13789778 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 06, 2016, 01:24:05 AM
I wonder what the price would collapse to in the event of an actual controversial hard fork. I mean like 75% controversial.

Not that this is an argument either way. Censorship-resistant money ain't cheap. And I'm prepared to make sacrifices. But the exodus would be epic.

interesting times indeed. if core is smart they will immediately declare to also support 2MB and classic is dead in a matter of weeks. but unfortunately several core devs act immature like 16o scriptkiddies and will most likely switch the hashalgo and leave the table.



695. Post 13789917 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 06, 2016, 01:36:13 AM
yeah because the majority are always right ...

no, but what better way of deciding things you have? let a small group of people rule over the others? and who decides then which persons are allowed in this group?

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 06, 2016, 01:36:13 AM
it is exactly why democracies are so fucked up

fucked up? hmm, which better way of government you propose? all hail the leader? chinese corruption of the big and only allowed political party? you see, democracy is not perfect, but to wait for your little dictator to rule over you is not something to look out for.

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 06, 2016, 01:36:13 AM
Technical issues are very rarely political, you are either right or wrong.

lol! are you fucking kidding?! technical decisions are very rarely purely "right or wrong" often it IS indeed political, because longterm views, goals and risk assessment come into play. 

Quote
Once bitcoin rules have been set in stone they will need very few controversial changes, if any.

thats a nice view but its illusionary imo. as bitcoin grows other issues will occur and they will also need to be solved. other competitiors will come and eventuelly force bitcoin to change in one or another way.
you see one of its strengths is its ability to adapt if Bitcoin fails to adapt it will most likely fail as a project. not near or midterm but longterm.



696. Post 13803728 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):


Segwit is good but its not a solution to blocksize and was never meant to be one.

LN is a solution but its far from being implemented and tested. Some say its 2-3 years from now.



697. Post 13807146 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):


core is reacting, they are firing up new nodes also. interesting battle we got here...



698. Post 13815552 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 08, 2016, 03:17:07 PM

Hum so, basically you just go for anything strangers tells you to, putting literally YOUR money at risk at every corner??! just wow. Undecided


No, that is called "Supporting Core".

And its not YOUR money anymore - Its AXA/Horizons. So be careful you dont get it grubby with your filthy hands before they can collect it via LN.

Thank You.

Don’t forget Moneta. Whatever the hell they are. Undecided
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1305286.msg13810512#msg13810512


i wouldnt go hysterical over that. the community can fork to 2MB, core follows and everybody is happy. classic is not even close when it comes to further development.



699. Post 13815746 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: hdbuck on February 08, 2016, 03:35:23 PM

Hum so, basically you just go for anything strangers tells you to, putting literally YOUR money at risk at every corner??! just wow. Undecided


No, that is called "Supporting Core".

And its not YOUR money anymore - Its AXA/Horizons. So be careful you dont get it grubby with your filthy hands before they can collect it via LN.

Thank You.

Don’t forget Moneta. Whatever the hell they are. Undecided
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1305286.msg13810512#msg13810512


i wouldnt go hysterical over that. the community can fork to 2MB, core follows and everybody is happy. classic is not even close when it comes to further development.

I sort of agree, but I am curious to see what happens in the Core camp when they realize they're working for an alt implementation. May be enough defections for there to be no need to turn back.

You Noobs know there is not only core out there right? About 2k nodes running other versions. And no, im not talking about the xt/classic spv aws spoofed nodes.

even better! that means the camp that opposes 2MB may be even smaller than thought.



700. Post 13841928 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):


ok, classic is released, now lets see what the miners have to say.



701. Post 13843015 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 10, 2016, 10:47:46 PM
devs should all agree to 2MB blocks And segwit

that way classic and core can both coexist  and we can 4x capacity



What about the internal governance issues in Classic?


Isn't there some resistance to classic by core because there are changes to internal governance?


So in other words, Core could adopt the 2mb aspect of Classic without changes to internal governance (if it wants to continue to shun classic), no?

yes, but meanwhile this thing has become a matter of pride and kiddiefight. especially gmax and luke seem very hesitant in doing any compromise. jonas schnelli on the other side already signaled being able to update to 2MB.



702. Post 13843874 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: cbeast on February 11, 2016, 01:14:49 AM
No other coin has been through the fire yet. I doubt any of them will survive "governance".

to implement a voting-mechanism per stake could solve the issue. in the end its the holders of the currency who should decide which way to go.



703. Post 13844607 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: cbeast on February 11, 2016, 03:06:58 AM
No other coin has been through the fire yet. I doubt any of them will survive "governance".

to implement a voting-mechanism per stake could solve the issue. in the end its the holders of the currency who should decide which way to go.
That's what we have now. It's called fiat.

lol

i can't remember being asked what rate hike should be next...



704. Post 13844677 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: cbeast on February 11, 2016, 03:18:37 AM
No other coin has been through the fire yet. I doubt any of them will survive "governance".

to implement a voting-mechanism per stake could solve the issue. in the end its the holders of the currency who should decide which way to go.
That's what we have now. It's called fiat.

lol

i can't remember being asked what rate hike should be next...
That's because you don't have enough stake. Get yourself a Federal Reserve bank and enjoy the power.

so, in fiat we dont have a "voting-mechanism per stake"? you dont say?!

you see, in fact fiat is more like a small developer-group deciding which way to go. its basically the same, just some small group of politicians and economists deciding.



705. Post 13849600 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: BitUsher on February 11, 2016, 02:44:54 PM

The main advantages of Ethereum over Bitcoin is that people in control are qualified and expected to not screw everything, unlike Core people.

You must be oblivious to the development crisis's and mistakes in Ethereum and the flight of developers from that project.

I think its main advantage could be that the founder of the project is still there and functions as a "natural consensus". Also its good that his identity is known.

Apart from that ETH could get the same problems and civilwars that Bitcoin is experiencing.



706. Post 13854833 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):


crazy that with all this altcoin-hype bitcoin still manages to creep up slowly but slowly...



707. Post 13866519 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):


breakout incoming.



708. Post 13876405 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):


choo chooo



709. Post 13876633 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: yefi on February 14, 2016, 12:47:25 AM
Bitcoin now has a rather nice flag formation after the rise from 200-500 with little media fanfare. The alt's are waking up and the halving is approaching. The only thing keeping bitcoin back is the blocksize debate which will soon resolve either by a HF with majority of miner support, or with Core acquiescing to the demands of the market and miners (3 weeks!) and fixing a 2mb blocksize HF in the roadmap.

The Chinese will stick with Core, they are quite conservative with respect to leadership. I'd be surprised to see Core implement 2MB blocks in addition to segregated witness, but we'll see.

And so long, farewell, auf wiedersehen 300s!

chinese are pushing for 2MB HF, core already hinted compromise. spoken word is HF in early 2017 with several other HF implementations as well.



710. Post 13876675 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: Yakamoto on February 14, 2016, 12:53:59 AM
Bitcoin now has a rather nice flag formation after the rise from 200-500 with little media fanfare. The alt's are waking up and the halving is approaching. The only thing keeping bitcoin back is the blocksize debate which will soon resolve either by a HF with majority of miner support, or with Core acquiescing to the demands of the market and miners (3 weeks!) and fixing a 2mb blocksize HF in the roadmap.

The Chinese will stick with Core, they are quite conservative with respect to leadership. I'd be surprised to see Core implement 2MB blocks in addition to segregated witness, but we'll see.

And so long, farewell, auf wiedersehen 300s!
I'm actually pleasantly surprised with the steady price increase recently. Does anyone know the reasoning behind the increase? Does it have anything to do with the lack of users moving to classic or something, and now that the investors see that, they're buying again?

Or has Classic caused the increase as more users flock to it?

i think thats the reason. miners are hesitant and so a contentious HF is for the moment highly unlikely. 95% HF in 2017 is therefore highly likely.



711. Post 13876777 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 14, 2016, 01:14:17 AM
We're already seeing blocks fill up on this pump. I'm curious as to how a rally can be sustained when confirmation times take hours.

the question is: will confirmation times for bigger transactions (lets say 100$+) really take longer? i mean if i want to transfer for example 5 BTC to an exchange i just make the fee 3$ or whatever and that's it!

the only TXs that will really suffer are the small and micro ones.



712. Post 13876799 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 14, 2016, 01:18:25 AM
Bitcoin now has a rather nice flag formation after the rise from 200-500 with little media fanfare. The alt's are waking up and the halving is approaching. The only thing keeping bitcoin back is the blocksize debate which will soon resolve either by a HF with majority of miner support, or with Core acquiescing to the demands of the market and miners (3 weeks!) and fixing a 2mb blocksize HF in the roadmap.

The Chinese will stick with Core, they are quite conservative with respect to leadership. I'd be surprised to see Core implement 2MB blocks in addition to segregated witness, but we'll see.

And so long, farewell, auf wiedersehen 300s!
I'm actually pleasantly surprised with the steady price increase recently. Does anyone know the reasoning behind the increase? Does it have anything to do with the lack of users moving to classic or something, and now that the investors see that, they're buying again?

Or has Classic caused the increase as more users flock to it?

i think thats the reason. miners are hesitant and so a contentious HF is for the moment highly unlikely. 95% HF in 2017 is therefore highly likely.


@ImI:  Why do you keep framing the issue as if a hard fork is inevitable?  Why is a hardfork needed in the first place?  I think that threatening and even engaging in action to employ a hard fork is what causes so much contentious behavior from a large number of persons who become more entrenched in their positions because the solution is framed as being a hardfork.

There seems to be no reason for a hardfork, except one that strives to fundamentally change bitcoin's currently existing consensus based governance mechanism. 

afaik (chinese) miners are determined to HF to 2MB. so i dont see is as "inevitable" but i expect it to happen.



713. Post 13877083 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 14, 2016, 02:18:36 AM
We're already seeing blocks fill up on this pump. I'm curious as to how a rally can be sustained when confirmation times take hours.

the question is: will confirmation times for bigger transactions (lets say 100$+) really take longer? i mean if i want to transfer for example 5 BTC to an exchange i just make the fee 3$ or whatever and that's it!

the only TXs that will really suffer are the small and micro ones.


All of my most recent transfers of BTC over the past 6 months or so have included a transaction fee of between .0001 and .0002 BTC, which was generally between $.07 to $.09, and varying transaction sizes of .045BTC and 30BTC..., so your description of a possible $3 transaction fee seems to be quite excessive and outside of actual expected experiences... and really, there may be a bit of an incentive to transfer larger amounts because the transaction fee is the same no matter the amount transferred.

indeed 3$ is exaggerated. my point was that TXs bigger than just a few $s will most likely have no issues in an eventual TX-jam.



714. Post 13877114 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 14, 2016, 02:23:41 AM
afaik (chinese) miners are determined to HF to 2MB. so i dont see is as "inevitable" but i expect it to happen.


It would be interesting to see your source for this.  

mostly IRC

Surely there may be some discussion of various hardfork possibilities, but when push comes to shove, there seems to be no need for a hardfork, if a very large majority are already inclined to agree to the change from 1mb to 2mb (if that is what you are talking about).

HF doesnt mean two competing forks. its just means to hardcode 1MB -> 2MB at block number xyz. even if we have 100% consensus we will have to HF



715. Post 13897479 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):


nice, but its the blocks that matter and there we only see 1 block so far. pretty disappointing if you ask me.



716. Post 13897922 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 16, 2016, 12:35:35 AM

nice, but its the blocks that matter and there we only see 1 block so far. pretty disappointing if you ask me.

Antpool hasn't switched yet. They're expecting to do so soon.

https://twitter.com/JihanWu/status/694080283407069184

What do you think would happen in a BJA Commiepocalypse situation?

Most Bitcoin companies in China are as committed and decent as any bitcoiner (cue lambie), but I'm not comfortable with having to trust a socialist dictatorship to not interfere. They don't have to nationalize anything. That's what you do in a country when you are used to having to justify your actions. The chinese government will only have to make a few phone calls. I don't see why they would do such a thing, but again, I don't like having to trust them.

true, but on the other hand if the chinese miners are cut off, basically nothing changes. diff maybe to high for a while but thats it.



717. Post 13898539 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 16, 2016, 01:46:44 AM

nice, but its the blocks that matter and there we only see 1 block so far. pretty disappointing if you ask me.

Antpool hasn't switched yet. They're expecting to do so soon.

https://twitter.com/JihanWu/status/694080283407069184

What do you think would happen in a BJA Commiepocalypse situation?

Most Bitcoin companies in China are as committed and decent as any bitcoiner (cue lambie), but I'm not comfortable with having to trust a socialist dictatorship to not interfere. They don't have to nationalize anything. That's what you do in a country when you are used to having to justify your actions. The chinese government will only have to make a few phone calls. I don't see why they would do such a thing, but again, I don't like having to trust them.

I agree with that. The problem is that they could shut us down or pressure the miners to adopt some "features" that benefit the Sate.  I don't know what those features may be, or even if they would bother us at all, but the fact that they can do it is contrary to the design and principles of Bitcoin.

you see if they have to add some "features" that the chinese gov wants its pretty easy and completely different from our problems at the moment. we would simply fork away. the reason we have so much discussion at the moment is just because both sides have arguments on their side, but in such a situation we would fork in 24h and thats it.



718. Post 13918052 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):


looks like classic wont get enough hashpower. i dont expect much more miners to join the train.



719. Post 13918859 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: Chef Ramsay on February 17, 2016, 07:27:19 PM
Tarmi being a prime example of getting killed on margin.

good ol tarmi. i simply loved that fart.  Kiss



720. Post 13919072 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: aztecminer on February 17, 2016, 08:08:21 PM
Tarmi being a prime example of getting killed on margin.

good ol tarmi. i simply loved that fart.  Kiss


he sold his account long time ago after he got wrekt .

i told him at that time, you will be here just as long as this bear market goes on. as soon as the tide turns you and your shithole-friends will be gone, but we, the bulltards, will still be here.

and thats exactly what happend.  Grin



721. Post 13919339 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: aztecminer on February 17, 2016, 08:15:16 PM
Tarmi being a prime example of getting killed on margin.

good ol tarmi. i simply loved that fart.  Kiss


he sold his account long time ago after he got wrekt .

i told him at that time, you will be here just as long as this bear market goes on. as soon as the tide turns you and your shithole-friends will be gone, but we, the bulltards, will still be here.

and thats exactly what happend.  Grin

i'm still here.. i play both sides.



 Wink



722. Post 13919571 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 17, 2016, 09:03:43 PM
The Chinese miners sent a group letter to Core pledging that they would not change client software, but would they please give a date for a 2MB hard fork and tell us when they decide in the next three weeks?

date for HF is march/april 2017.

where i got that from? sources.  Tongue



723. Post 13932384 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):


folks? still that block-discussion going on?

isnt it obv meanwhile? classic wont succeed, miners are hesitant to switch.

but core will have to accept a 2MB hardfork in 2017. miners want that.

so case closed. nothing to see here anymore.



724. Post 13932425 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 18, 2016, 11:56:34 PM

folks? still that block-discussion going on?

isnt it obv meanwhile? classic wont succeed, miners are hesitant to switch.

but core will have to accept a 2MB hardfork in 2017. miners want that.

so case closed. nothing to see here anymore.

Feel free to try to change the subject. But Adam might bite your hand. Smiley

haha! hey adam, how about some soccertalk? i heard manchester united got sacked tonight?  Smiley



725. Post 13948192 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: ImI on February 14, 2016, 12:50:15 AM
Bitcoin now has a rather nice flag formation after the rise from 200-500 with little media fanfare. The alt's are waking up and the halving is approaching. The only thing keeping bitcoin back is the blocksize debate which will soon resolve either by a HF with majority of miner support, or with Core acquiescing to the demands of the market and miners (3 weeks!) and fixing a 2mb blocksize HF in the roadmap.

The Chinese will stick with Core, they are quite conservative with respect to leadership. I'd be surprised to see Core implement 2MB blocks in addition to segregated witness, but we'll see.

And so long, farewell, auf wiedersehen 300s!

chinese are pushing for 2MB HF, core already hinted compromise. spoken word is HF in early 2017 with several other HF implementations as well.

told ya fuckers

https://twitter.com/cnLedger



726. Post 13948452 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 20, 2016, 12:21:31 PM


jupp

465$ will be broken...



727. Post 13948693 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

HK-meeting-slides: http://strateman.ninja/roundtable-tech.pdf



728. Post 13948779 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):


waiting for da boom



729. Post 13951295 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):


if you are not 100% long right now, you really shouldnt put your hands on any asset be it bitcoin, stocks or applepie



730. Post 13951762 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 20, 2016, 05:25:57 PM

if you are not 100% long right now, you really shouldnt put your hands on any asset be it bitcoin, stocks or applepie


I'm about 94% long... hahahahahaha   And, I feel fine.

it's OK as long as the remaining 6% are well invested in applepie  Grin



731. Post 13951961 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on February 20, 2016, 06:03:59 PM
This will correct at some point but let's enjoy the ride. It'd be nice to stay above 530 USD.

fyp



732. Post 13956080 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):


interesting! mark friedenbach seems to not like the consensus that was reached today. if he stands as example gmax could also oppose the consensus.

https://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/46po4l/we_have_consensus_in_april_we_get_sw_3_months/d074dh7

will they do their own fork now?



733. Post 13956125 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 21, 2016, 01:51:44 AM

interesting! mark friedenbach seems to not like the consensus that was reached today. if he stands as example gmax could also oppose the consensus.

https://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/46po4l/we_have_consensus_in_april_we_get_sw_3_months/d074dh7

will they do their own fork now?

I guess I have to change my sig. That was fast.

Quote
But regarding the "consensus" document that was posted on medium, no I am not on board with that outcome.

i think we can slowly slowly understand why this whole mess could evolve to the point we were experiencing. some of those devs seem to be little ballerinas...



734. Post 13956204 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 21, 2016, 02:07:33 AM
billyjoeallen is high on fiat. ( oh wait he shorted not sold Undecided )

maybe he is right. friedenbach already stood against the HF-consensus. maxwell is known to be a diva, he could join him and prolong this little nerd-fight.



735. Post 13956350 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 21, 2016, 02:28:45 AM
billyjoeallen is high on fiat. ( oh wait he shorted not sold Undecided )

maybe he is right. friedenbach already stood against the HF-consensus. maxwell is known to be a diva, he could join him and prolong this little nerd-fight.

4MB is an awesome deal,  i can't wait to see how poeple react to some diva refusing this agreement, while proposing a much worst proposal. another proposal will need to be trailered to a specific group to gain any support over this 4MB proposal, at which point it becomes obvious they are not looking for consensus but merely like to make noise.
beside its not like we haven't heard his objections 100X before.
let him repeat himself one more time, with feeling!
i dont mind.

lets see, if they are really nutheads they could even try to break away from core.



736. Post 13956407 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 21, 2016, 02:47:56 AM
billyjoeallen is high on fiat. ( oh wait he shorted not sold Undecided )

maybe he is right. friedenbach already stood against the HF-consensus. maxwell is known to be a diva, he could join him and prolong this little nerd-fight.

4MB is an awesome deal,  i can't wait to see how poeple react to some diva refusing this agreement, while proposing a much worst proposal. another proposal will need to be trailered to a specific group to gain any support over this 4MB proposal, at which point it becomes obvious they are not looking for consensus but merely like to make noise.
beside its not like we haven't heard his objections 100X before.
let him repeat himself one more time, with feeling!
i dont mind.

Some diva in particular?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/46s2qz/core_please_endorse_news_with_formal_addition_to/d07pqcm?context=3
Who's Maaku7?

friedenbach



737. Post 13956429 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 21, 2016, 02:57:49 AM
billyjoeallen is high on fiat. ( oh wait he shorted not sold Undecided )

maybe he is right. friedenbach already stood against the HF-consensus. maxwell is known to be a diva, he could join him and prolong this little nerd-fight.

4MB is an awesome deal,  i can't wait to see how poeple react to some diva refusing this agreement, while proposing a much worst proposal. another proposal will need to be trailered to a specific group to gain any support over this 4MB proposal, at which point it becomes obvious they are not looking for consensus but merely like to make noise.
beside its not like we haven't heard his objections 100X before.
let him repeat himself one more time, with feeling!
i dont mind.

Some diva in particular?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/46s2qz/core_please_endorse_news_with_formal_addition_to/d07pqcm?context=3
Who's Maaku7?

friedenbach
Quote
It's not progress. Some of the concessions underlying this "consensus" are counterproductive in some cases and in others downright dangerous. The plan under discussion that resulted in this statement is one that many people if they knew the details of would object to. It is not something which can be said to have consensus.

like i said, one can now easily see why we came to this mess in the first place...



738. Post 13960149 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 21, 2016, 12:32:44 PM

TIMBER!

looks like this community is beyond repairable. the consensus found yesterday is already under heavy fire. no surprise eth starts rising again, people want a functioning circle of developers.

only way out of this mess could be that the miners just patch the code, in the end bitcoin has no decentralized way of deciding things apart from POW.



739. Post 13960156 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: TReano on February 21, 2016, 01:03:31 PM
does still anybody belive we can pump to new highs without the Gox bots?  Grin

oh i do! 6B$ is nothing when it comes to financial markets.



740. Post 13960222 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: TReano on February 21, 2016, 01:13:24 PM
does still anybody belive we can pump to new highs without the Gox bots?  Grin

oh i do! 6B$ is nothing when it comes to financial markets.

it is quiet a lot if you have to put that money on strange shady exchanges.

true. nevertheless i know at least one fully licensed exchange that has gov-fund protection in place. seems not too shady to me.



741. Post 13960259 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: xxxxxzzzzz on February 21, 2016, 01:17:40 PM
all day to gain $20 in value half an hour to lose it all back sonofabitch this is not what we're supposed to be doing today folks there was basically big good news with the consensus agreement thank god for stop orders but still that was retarded

was it? today it looks more and more like the rest of core will reject the made consensus.



742. Post 13960289 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: bargainbin on February 21, 2016, 01:19:52 PM
does still anybody belive we can pump to new highs without the Gox bots?  Grin

oh i do! 6B$ is nothing when it comes to financial markets.

it is quiet a lot if you have to put that money on strange shady exchanges.

true. nevertheless i know at least one fully licensed exchange that has gov-fund protection in place. seems not too shady to me.

Yeah, but the whole point of Bitcoin is pain and humiliation lack of government interference, so you don't have to explain where Precious came from.

apart from the gov licensed ones you still have plenty of shady exchanges who give a fuck who you are.



743. Post 13960326 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 21, 2016, 01:22:14 PM

TIMBER!

looks like this community is beyond repairable. the consensus found yesterday is already under heavy fire. no surprise eth starts rising again, people want a functioning circle of developers.

only way out of this mess could be that the miners just patch the code, in the end bitcoin has no decentralized way of deciding things apart from POW.

Everyone will read that document like the devil reads The Bible, and it looks like one way of looking at it is that the core road map is unchanged. 2MB non-segwit but 4MB max total smells like little to no change in maxBlockSize. Their encouragement of using more signature heavy txs might eat up much of the 4MB. Idk, we might have to whip some answers out of Bitusher when he's back. It's pretty clear though that Bitcoin is not going to allow many more users for the next 18 months. Sort of hard to get all pumped up about this.

true, would be nice to have it implemented in the roadmap.

but "no new users"? i disagree, we will loose microTXs and gain new users that are doing bigger TXs. is it a good thing to loose microTXs? no of course not! but Bitcoin will survive to let them go for some time.



744. Post 13961022 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: Denker on February 21, 2016, 02:14:32 PM
So, to sum up.
Yesterday's news: We have consensus!
Today's news: We don't have consensus, we have another split!

Oh well. At least the miners are taking action. They'll be the ones to decide how this goes, whatever the devs say. Hard to argue with hashpower.

Wait what?
Please help me out guys.
What's the trouble now and where is the split happening?
Any infos,links are highly welcome.

seems like core is divided in itself, as long as we have no official announcement its all in limbo.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/46t5vd/mark_friedenbach_opposes_the_hfconsensus_that_was/?ref=share&ref_source=link



745. Post 13961037 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: rebuilder on February 21, 2016, 02:09:35 PM
So, to sum up.
Yesterday's news: We have consensus!
Today's news: We don't have consensus, we have another split!

Oh well. At least the miners are taking action. They'll be the ones to decide how this goes, whatever the devs say. Hard to argue with hashpower.

agree. miners will have to take responsibility, devs seem incapable of doing so.



746. Post 13961181 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: hdbuck on February 21, 2016, 02:39:25 PM
So, to sum up.
Yesterday's news: We have consensus!
Today's news: We don't have consensus, we have another split!

Oh well. At least the miners are taking action. They'll be the ones to decide how this goes, whatever the devs say. Hard to argue with hashpower.

agree. miners will have to take responsibility, devs seem incapable of doing so.


y'all clueless, if not useless.

so just focus in not eating your shorts by the end of the day, that would be great enough.

why dont you just leave and do some "Heil Hitler!" with your FN-friends? bitcoin is libertarian in the end, nothing a true fascist could go inline with.



747. Post 13961545 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):


lol! now friedenbach threatens with a change of PoW.

seems like some part of core is really decisive about being left behind by the community.



748. Post 13961730 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: Mota on February 21, 2016, 03:31:00 PM

lol! now friedenbach threatens with a change of PoW.

seems like some part of core is really decisive about being left behind by the community.

Funny how some people think they can speak for a whole. I can only speak for myself - and if the consequence of mining becoming centralized is, that some miners are able to influence decisions which should ultimately belong to the community, then maybe a change of the PoW algorithm is not that bad. It may even lead to a more solid foundation for a globally connected financial institution.  

you see, you are partially right. if the miners would decide something completely insane and very hurting for Bitcoin overall and the community would be in strong stance against it, you would be absolutely right. the community should move on without them and not let some miners rule over the economy and community.

but in this particular issue its just the other way around! the community, the exchanges, the economy, some devs, some core devs AND the miners agree pretty much on a way forward. its just a small group of core-devs (even a minority INSIDE of core) that wants to force its will onto millions of others.

its ridiculous!



749. Post 13962173 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: AlexGR on February 21, 2016, 03:55:35 PM
but in this particular issue its just the other way around! the community, the exchanges, the economy, some devs, some core devs AND the miners agree pretty much on a way forward. its just a small group of core-devs (even a minority INSIDE of core) that wants to force its will onto millions of others.

its ridiculous!

The vast majority are ok with the compromise. A few insist on classic HF or a 1MB4evah.

So if we have like

90 (segwit+hf later as long as there is a time schedule for it)
5 (only hf2mb)
5 (only segwit)

The "5"s, won't matter that much.

lets see, i am waiting for a core statement



750. Post 13962251 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 21, 2016, 04:24:18 PM
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/46po4l/we_have_consensus_in_april_we_get_sw_3_months/d082hi8

This is what I predicted. The holdout elements in Core object to the very IDEA of political compromise because they see it as a betrayal of engineering principles.  This plays right into bigblocker hands, of course, because Now the miners will know what we have been dealing with all this time. Smallblockers will not compromise. ever. The only option is to route around the roadblock with Classic or something like it.

The sane elements in core know that they are in danger of getting left behind by the "economic majority" and they will concede and agree to the Roundtable agreement. So Core is split. That's good news. it's what we wanted. Divide and Conquer.

Now instead of Core against the world, it's half of core against the world.  The purists smallblockers will win because there is bias for the status quo in their governance model. They will win the battle and lose the war.

Core will reject the agreement and the miners will reject Core.  Classic comes out on top.

Cheap coins ahead!





imo as the dust settles we start to recognize who seem to be the participants that were blocking from the beginning. it narrows down to friedenbach and gmax, whereas its not yet clear if gmax is OK with the "consensus". lets see what core has to say the coming days. if friedenbach wants to make his friedenbach-coin he is free to do so.



751. Post 13962774 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: sAt0sHiFanClub on February 21, 2016, 04:59:32 PM

lol! now friedenbach threatens with a change of PoW.

seems like some part of core is really decisive about being left behind by the community.

It's like a fucking kindergarten.

Although I am no Friedenbach fanboi, I think we agree on this:

Quote from: maaku7

I feel this meeting was antithetical to Bitcoin and no good outcomes were likely

Anyone who still labours under the misapprehension that the roundtable  was a good thing for bitcoin needs to re-examine their understanding of Bitcoin,

you see, in bitcoin we have only one real built in way to reach consensus, its PoW. apart from that we simply have no way of knowing what the community/economy/... wants. so basically you will always have to have meetups and there will always be somebody who wasnt there. we cant have an election like in other systems. and we cant have a survey that would lead to comprehensive results. we cant have one stake = one vote either.




752. Post 13963369 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: sAt0sHiFanClub on February 21, 2016, 05:52:03 PM

lol! now friedenbach threatens with a change of PoW.

seems like some part of core is really decisive about being left behind by the community.

It's like a fucking kindergarten.

Although I am no Friedenbach fanboi, I think we agree on this:

Quote from: maaku7

I feel this meeting was antithetical to Bitcoin and no good outcomes were likely

Anyone who still labours under the misapprehension that the roundtable  was a good thing for bitcoin needs to re-examine their understanding of Bitcoin,

you see, in bitcoin we have only one real built in way to reach consensus, its PoW. apart from that we simply have no way of knowing what the community/economy/... wants. so basically you will always have to have meetups and there will always be somebody who wasnt there. we cant have an election like in other systems. and we cant have a survey that would lead to comprehensive results. we cant have one stake = one vote either.


But its when that chance of PoW is denied that we start t get into problems.

you can't deny it. miners are always able to mine the blocks they want and to use the version they want. so far the miners have been very cautious in using their voting power, but if that drag goes along they will do what they see best for BTC.
closed-door-meetings are only a way of avoiding the miners to use their powers for the sake of the community-spirit, as we lack a way of election its the only way of dealing with these things at the moment.



753. Post 13964671 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: spud21 on February 21, 2016, 08:22:31 PM
Whatever proportion of the money has been eaten by lawyers must be substantial judging by those figures.

its basically 1/9th of the overall amount.

1.200.000.000 yen = 10mio US$

200.000 BTC * 440 US$ =88mio US$

that means 1/9th have been eaten so far. thats ok with me.

not counting the fiat they had at the moment of bankruptcy...



754. Post 13964982 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: rebuilder on February 21, 2016, 09:12:05 PM
All the income in the gox data above is listed as JPY. Does that mean they've already liquidated any BTC, that the BTC hasn't been sold but is still listed at the current exchange rate, or that the BTC isn't included in these numbers?

i think the 200.000 are still untouched. they had some fiat so maybe they started with that.



755. Post 13982728 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 23, 2016, 01:20:59 PM
[–]luke-jr Luke Dashjr - Bitcoin Expert 30 points 2 days ago

Because the cost of increasing the limit is lower than the benefits of peace/not constant fighting and showing that Bitcoin can in fact do a hardfork."[/i]

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/46rk3d/final_version_bitcoin_roundtable_consensus/d07fwo1


that's remarkable sound! never would have expected him to be able to such a insight/compromise.

now we only need to convince the other nutters left or get going without them. friedenbach would be to name here. i am surprised we havent heard anything from todd etc about their colleague being against the consensus.



756. Post 13985458 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: bargainbin on February 23, 2016, 05:50:39 PM
NLC working double time today.  Grin

Good thing Bitcoinosphere has paradigm-shift-on-the-fly tranny with scatter shield: Antifragilistic! Cool

your lucky bitcointalk uses an img proxy.

Yes!


...no wait, why?

i'm not implying anything

Cool.


Don't worry, 'soon's the Blitznetverk kicks in, MooooOOooOon!

is that dude from Chaos Engine??



757. Post 14066598 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: AlexGR on March 02, 2016, 12:27:32 AM
Quote
"But for now, bitcoin users are reporting transactions taking hours upon hours to be confirmed—that is, to complete—and requiring high transaction fees in order to have their transactions included in a block."

He makes it sound like one has to pay serious money. "High fees" my ass.... 0.05 - 0.06$ for a high prio tx.

Also like 90% of those users simply dont get it that they have unconfirmed parent TXs in their TXs that have to get confirmed first.



758. Post 14077091 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):


The issue is that Core is not responding to requests to officially accept the HK-agreement. As long as they play this silly "Lets wait and see"-game the price will suffer.

Its unbelievable how irresponsible some of core are acting! If BTC goes 200$ they will be quick to adopt the agreement i guess.



759. Post 14077399 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):


smells like a BIG drop is incoming



760. Post 14077444 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: lemmyK on March 02, 2016, 11:54:33 PM
YES...   not look good ...421.710.......... Huh

it will drop until we have a solution to this blocksize-mess



761. Post 14077460 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: bargainbin on March 03, 2016, 12:00:06 AM
^I'm surprised it's not in the 300s... Not joking.

jepp, honestly same here. with all that bullshit we should be fighting with the 300$ mark instead of 400$ imo



762. Post 14077751 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):


could get ugly

350$ in no time



763. Post 14077782 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: AlexGR on March 03, 2016, 12:41:59 AM
Why? What happened?

delay happend. market wants to see clear results from HK-consensus, instead all it gets is "wait till july". thats not enough to keep up buyingpressure.



764. Post 14077888 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: AlexGR on March 03, 2016, 12:49:45 AM
This starts to remind me of the altcoin market where devs need to do some handholding for the market, lol...

yes, its interesting because in some way they do. it wasnt that hard to see one year ago that the market (and for big parts the community) will look forward to a blocksize-raise and big tensions could come into the bitcoin-economy. it was tremendously silly to underestimate the force of the community, even if you think that 2MB HF is a bad thing you should be able to understand that a breakup of the community may be a much bigger risk. a rational decision would favor 2MB HF anytime instead of a contentious HF.

Quote from: AlexGR on March 03, 2016, 12:49:45 AM
Is there any reason to believe Segwit won't happen in a few months

nope, question is a.) will they get their shit together? b.) how big will the added space really be?

Quote from: AlexGR on March 03, 2016, 12:49:45 AM
and hard fork next year for even more?

yes, there is reason to believe so. core already pronounced that they need consensus to add a HF, but with friedenbach we already have one core dev opposing the HF in public, set aside Gmax who didnt declare anything to the HK-consensus.

that leaves some serious doubts if the HK has any credibility and as long as that uncertainty persists we see trouble...



765. Post 14077975 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on March 03, 2016, 01:12:08 AM
doom, lower, lower, lower ... the divide and conquer appears to be working.

and it could have been avoided so easily....



766. Post 14098263 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):


crazy how easy this whole mess could be solved, but core is not able to accept the HK-agreement and to put the fuckin hardfork in the roadmap.

6 billion$ managed by teenager nerds...



767. Post 14098372 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on March 04, 2016, 09:52:08 PM

crazy how easy this whole mess could be solved, but core is not able to accept the HK-agreement and to put the fuckin hardfork in the roadmap.

6 billion$ managed by teenager nerds...

They did put it in the roadmap. They just got the year wrong.

This was all just so unpredictable...   Cry

no, its not in the core-roadmap. not even for 2017. thats the issue at the moment.



768. Post 14098399 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: becoin on March 04, 2016, 09:56:21 PM

crazy how easy this whole mess could be solved, but core is not able to accept the HK-agreement
What mess? It is business as usual.
Core devs are doing great job improving bitcoin immunity against all kind of attacks.
Bitcoin is growing in a very healthy environment. Yes, it is the wild west but this is the way it should be.

core is provoking a contentious hardfork with their silly behaviour. even if you are convinced that 2MB is unnecessary you should do it because the civilwar is much more dangerous than a hardfork.



769. Post 14098558 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: becoin on March 04, 2016, 10:13:08 PM

crazy how easy this whole mess could be solved, but core is not able to accept the HK-agreement
What mess? It is business as usual.
Core devs are doing great job improving bitcoin immunity against all kind of attacks.
Bitcoin is growing in a very healthy environment. Yes, it is the wild west but this is the way it should be.

core is provoking a contentious hardfork with their silly behaviour. even if you are convinced that 2MB is unnecessary you should do it because the civilwar is much more dangerous than a hardfork.
What civil war? There is no civil war.

lol



770. Post 14099559 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: tupelo on March 05, 2016, 12:15:07 AM
god damn why does price keep going the wrong way???

because of Brian Armstrong and Coinbase

nah, dont think so. he says nothing new.

imo its the stalled HK-consensus. after 2 weeks we still have no confirmation of core that they are willing to HF in 2017.



771. Post 14105345 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):


that's the result of core refusing to officially accept the 2017 HF.

lets see at which price-level minds are changing...



772. Post 14105526 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: 8up on March 05, 2016, 03:07:32 PM

that's the result of core refusing to officially accept the 2017 HF.

lets see at which price-level minds are changing...

They are too peacocky to acknowledege that. They instead will tell you, that they knew from the start, that bitcoin was set up to fail. (wrong incentives, immature use cases e.g. spam,...)

if price keeps dropping miners will switch to 2MB very soon



773. Post 14119862 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on March 07, 2016, 12:12:01 AM
50 minutes since last block sucks if you are waiting for a transaction  Angry

hodlers still not affected tho

...

The Awakening Conscience by William Holman Hunt

You put way too much effort into that stuff. It's kinda creepy.

this gif makes kinda horny....



774. Post 14123683 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: bitebits on March 07, 2016, 11:38:59 AM

He writes at one point:

Quote
Over the last year of trying, and failing, to reach a reasonable compromise, it has become clear to me that some developers don’t want any on-chain scaling solution any time soon.

That's so blatant, as a lie, it's not even funny. Andersen's credibility tends to zero. Core's roadmap has a Segwit rollout in a few months, increasing tx/s and effective block size by ~70%. How can he pretend like there is absolutely nothing?
He said some devs, as in individuals. And it is completely reasonable. There will always be people trying to hold things back in any large enough organization.

On top of that, Segwit is not a scaling solution. Neither is the raise to 2MB blocks. Both do temporarily fix the current full blocks issue though.

also SW brings more size just as a sideeffect, other advantages are dominating. especially some work that is done for LN.



775. Post 14155451 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on March 10, 2016, 07:28:49 AM

Any word on that ETF those Twinkletossers were going to set up?

i think its dead.



776. Post 14161360 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on March 11, 2016, 01:12:46 AM
look at the list of pro and cons for a 2MB increase, i think the pros far outweigh the cons

the discussion isnt technical anymore. its become political and emotional. core knows that a 2MB HF is not a desaster, but to give in would mean to give in to the mob.



777. Post 14171553 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on March 12, 2016, 02:53:22 AM
fucking hell....

now i need to rebuy all the eth i sold at 0.003

me wonders what those bitcoin maximalists will be like if bitcoin looses its no1 marketcap status...



778. Post 14171653 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):


friedenbach, maxwell and luke made btc vulnerable to such a takeover.



779. Post 14176153 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: 8up on March 12, 2016, 11:00:25 AM


For now, I am BTC long and ETH short.

where can one find that kind of graph?



780. Post 14176442 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):


thx



781. Post 14180288 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):


eth is going loco again



782. Post 14180312 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: ssmc2 on March 13, 2016, 12:36:06 AM

eth is going loco again

The real dump is going to be glorious

there will be a dump, thats for sure, but folks are waiting since 0.003 for a "glorious dump" now  Grin



783. Post 14180419 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):


crazy, but nice to see that BTC is able to hold its ground



784. Post 14180506 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on March 13, 2016, 01:12:22 AM

crazy, but nice to see that BTC is able to hold its ground

+1

It's pretty much rock solid in spite of some fairly large splashes from eth.

seems to be fresh fiat thats driving ETH, otherwise it could have been really ugly.



785. Post 14180594 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on March 13, 2016, 01:27:36 AM
Bitfinex is adding usd/eth soon. That's going to be very interesting to witness what happens.

There are rumours they will not offer shorting in the beginning. They probably need some activity and eth on the exchange before that's possible.

With rumour I mean trollbox rumour.

no rumour, they said so in their announcement. they estimate one week to get shorting going.



786. Post 14180597 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: abercrombie on March 13, 2016, 01:30:43 AM

eth is going loco again

What I'm trying to understand is the inverse relationship between BTC vs ETH. 

Why BTC always dumps every time ETH pumps. 

And when ETH dumps, BTC pumps. 


but this time ETH pumps and BTC stays at 412



787. Post 14180618 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: 2015Bubble on March 13, 2016, 01:32:51 AM
Bitfinex is adding usd/eth soon. That's going to be very interesting to witness what happens.

There are rumours they will not offer shorting in the beginning. They probably need some activity and eth on the exchange before that's possible.

With rumour I mean trollbox rumour.

no rumour, they said so in their announcement. they estimate one week to get shorting going.

Lol this dump will have a countdown.

the funny thing is, you can already short if you want at POLO, but nobody is using it. ETH lending rates are still very low.



788. Post 14180664 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on March 13, 2016, 01:42:27 AM

echh....g'nite y'all!!!

n8



789. Post 14189591 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: Fakhoury on March 13, 2016, 11:30:06 PM
Guys, What Adam is banned for ?

for mentioning the coin that bitcoin is scared of



790. Post 14239357 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):


could be the cause of this dump:

https://medium.com/@spair/a-simple-adaptive-block-size-limit-748f7cbcfb75#.syffo7q7p

bitpay issues own version



791. Post 14297601 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on March 24, 2016, 01:06:32 AM
Anyone mind explaining why ETH has not crashed and burned yet?

there is still much discussion about "blocksize" and a bit of a cold war between core and classic.

welcome back!

nevertheless i somehow liked the idea of a little gettaway to other places



792. Post 14358849 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: BitUsher on March 30, 2016, 01:12:25 AM
You are living in a dream world if you believe a majority of users support classic.

You are living in a dream world if you believe a majority of users doesn't support 2MB blocks. And not only "majority" i would also say "supermajority".




793. Post 14358956 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on March 30, 2016, 01:38:33 AM
You are living in a dream world if you believe a majority of users support classic.

You are living in a dream world if you believe a majority of users doesn't support 2MB blocks. And not only "majority" i would also say "supermajority".



node count and hashing power would seem to disagree with that...

you are talking about Classic. i explicitly used "2MB". many users disagree with Classic and the surroundings of Classic, others fear to loose the Core team as a capable capacity in developing and future invention. so there are a lot reasons to stand against Classic or to divide from Core and go with Classic.

But if you would ask them just 1MB or 2MB without any of the bullshit that happend the last months i think its obv what would be the answer. Imagine a user poll: WITH Core team 1MB or 2MB? I think there is absolutely n doubt users would opt for 2MB.

I a way its kind of blackmail, cause nobody wants to go further without Core. Core knows that and says: OK, then no 2MB for you. And thats EXACTLY why the community has started to realize that a second CAPABLE dev team is needed, so the next time some crucial decision is coming up we wont be held hostage by one dev team and can say "F%&* you, we go with team B. deal with it."



794. Post 14358998 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: BitUsher on March 30, 2016, 01:40:23 AM
You are living in a dream world if you believe a majority of users doesn't support 2MB blocks. And not only "majority" i would also say "supermajority".

Which is why I support segwit and core's roadmap. So typical for a classic supporter to spread misleading information by insinuating I wasn't in favor of larger blocks.

LOL! So typical for a "smallblocker" to assume that everybody who is in favor of 2MB has to be a Classic supporter.

TBH i even dont think that 2MB are somehow urgently needed at the moment or better said i dont think everything will fall apart if we dont raise the limit anytime soon. There is a lot hysteria in this whole discussion imo.

But what i really think came to surface in this discussion is imo that (like i said before) the community is being held hostage by developers that are (at least partly) acting completely immature, irrational and extremely aggressive to others that disagree even slightly and i dont even get started about that shitty censorship that has taken place. Not by Core itself but they could have acted more decisive in that regard.   

Like i said, a second or even third team is needed so when in 2 or 3 years the next crucial decisions are coming we are able to choose.



795. Post 14382539 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):


Crazy prediction:

Craig Wright IS Satoshi Nakamoto and is going to destroy the Millions of coins he holds to proof it.



796. Post 14382856 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 01, 2016, 02:41:28 AM

Crazy prediction:

Craig Wright IS Satoshi Nakamoto and is going to destroy the Millions of coins he holds to proof it.

he was to lazy to sign a msg?

who said he won't?



797. Post 14386591 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: Tzupy on April 01, 2016, 11:22:07 AM

Crazy prediction:

Craig Wright IS Satoshi Nakamoto and is going to destroy the Millions of coins he holds to proof it.

Would you mind specifying how will he DESTROY coins?

send them to invalid uᴉoɔʇᴉq address -> coins destroyed

further reading:

https://medium.com/@alcio/how-to-destroy-moondollars-255bb6f2142e#.fvpfi04zi

edit: 1BitcoinEaterAddressDontSendf59kuE seems like a good start



798. Post 14392282 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

read the fucking article




799. Post 14392372 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on April 01, 2016, 09:37:39 PM
read the fucking article



click on the fucking link

for starters google: "medium destroy bitchcoins" and "proof of burn"



800. Post 14421892 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: Laosai on April 04, 2016, 01:07:31 PM
Yup.


This is why women were never allowed in the political process for thousands of years.  Each one in the picture is basically just a large, naive child, but women never actually grow out of this.  They could be 16 or 30, it doesn't matter.  You may as well allow 10 year olds to vote and witness the devastation that occurs afterwards.

Those bitches who want to actually have some rights. It's not because they're 50% of the population that they should have any right to speak up.
By now we should all acknowledge the inevitable truth: whatever race, gender, country, layer of society, political party, education or shape of ears Roach has is obviously far superior to that of all the rest.  As such, it is finally proven that he is not a frustrated individual but in fact an Ubermensch.

Obvious. It's the plain and literal proof. Nothing can be done about that you just gotta admit it and live on!

the one in the middle is pretty cute... Kiss



801. Post 14423968 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):


push baby push!



802. Post 14431583 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):


smells like lift-off



803. Post 14473512 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):


when everybody expects a breakout to the upside.....



804. Post 14599418 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: hd060053 on April 19, 2016, 11:09:09 PM
shorts are going to get triggered soon

are there still shorts left? at least in this thread they are gone since the runup to 500



805. Post 14599450 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):


could very well be the start of a little halving rally. just 2 months away.



806. Post 14599796 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: whored on April 20, 2016, 12:11:45 AM
[...]

The last I remember, you ascribed Bitcoin's rise to Mavrodi. How do you explain the continued heights now that his MLM scheme has collapsed?

Bitcoin's legendary rise had little to do with the clever Russian, far more with a fat Frenchman, who is currently behind bars natural, organic growth Smiley

its not about the "legendary rise" 2013, its about the 500 runup of late 2015. stolfi and alot of others were proclaiming these days that its just about the MMM ponzi and will collapse anytime soon. and what happend? NOTHING.



807. Post 14599832 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: road to morocco on April 20, 2016, 12:23:12 AM
[...]

The last I remember, you ascribed Bitcoin's rise to Mavrodi. How do you explain the continued heights now that his MLM scheme has collapsed?

Bitcoin's legendary rise had little to do with the clever Russian, far more with a fat Frenchman, who is currently behind bars natural, organic growth Smiley

its not about the "legendary rise" 2013, its about the 500 runup of late 2015. stolfi and alot of others were proclaiming these days that its just about the MMM ponzi and will collapse anytime soon. and what happend? NOTHING.

Who said Sergei cashed out already? Isn't hiding huge sums of money from government bullies bitcoin's raison d' etre?

P.S. MMM websites still up, promising 100%/mo, better than Bitcoin Smiley http://mmmglobal.org/

oh for sure nobody knows. and? thats exactly the point! nothing proofs that any effect of MMM is to be seen. its all just bullshit talk up to this day.



808. Post 14607495 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 20, 2016, 03:20:15 PM
Morning gentlemen!
What a great day so far!
Woke up, checked the charts, and see we are up ~$12. Smiley
Hope to see $440 within the next few hours.Even if it would be just for a short moment.


Yes!!!!


Decent BTC price movements in recent days and weeks..... and beginning to feel a bit more safe from sub-$400 price territories


$450 and $467 are previous resistance points.... so it will be interesting to make it passed these two resistance points. 

Accordingly, it seems that if we can get prices into the $470s or $480s, there could be a decent path towards the $650 arena...

Thoughts, anyone?

i dont expect 467$ to be much of a resistance

and tbh i expect the coming weeks/months a runup straight to 840$



809. Post 14621580 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):


Steam incoming.

https://twitter.com/SteamDB/status/723230754113724416



810. Post 14645382 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):


volume seems to be heading up a little



811. Post 14652595 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):


wtf?!



812. Post 14652609 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):


no glitch, 1500btc buy



813. Post 14652897 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):


bears? lol, havent seen any bears here since the 500$ run. they are all broke/dead/whatever. look at the fate of poor tarmifart, he had to sell his legendary account for lousy 50$ to get something to eat.



814. Post 14663837 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):


467$ resistance will be broken



815. Post 14663884 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: DeathAngel on April 25, 2016, 09:44:32 PM

467$ resistance will be broken

This thread is so much fun to read when the price is on the way up. Is anybody dusting their moon boots off or too early to get excited?

I hope to see 500 ASAP.

467$ is important, after that 500+ should be no problem.



816. Post 14663940 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: podyx on April 25, 2016, 09:52:58 PM
My prediction is we're targeting $630 within 6 weeks

june should bring us 840$



817. Post 14674840 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):


man take that stupid resistance already!



818. Post 14675227 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: glendall on April 26, 2016, 08:18:45 PM
Why did I sell at 435? Sigh.

Bitcoin you crazy.

its not too late, seriously.



819. Post 14675259 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: notme on April 26, 2016, 09:01:23 PM
Why did I sell at 435? Sigh.

Bitcoin you crazy.

its not too late, seriously.

If this is the historical 3 many are assuming, 435 vs 470 won't hardly matter.

i dont know if its the 3, but imo as soon as those 470 are broken we will reach 500 in no time. after that i dont see much resistance until 840$



820. Post 14675359 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: whoreble on April 26, 2016, 09:10:09 PM
i dont know if its the 3, but imo as soon as those 470 are broken we will reach 500 in no time. after that i dont see much resistance until 840$

And once 840 is broken, $10,000 is just moments away. Of course, there's no volume, but hey...

840 wont be broken that easily  Wink



821. Post 14675413 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: Denker on April 26, 2016, 09:16:46 PM

Price is over 470 at bitfinex and coinbase, let's hope it holds this time.


Yes Finex and Coinbase are leading.
But the chinese holding us back. Seems they are not interested in 470.At least not now.

miners are still selling the shit out of bitcoin. not long anymore folks, not long....



822. Post 14675475 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: rafanadal on April 26, 2016, 09:20:54 PM
Seriously guys , what's with all the celebration   Shocked , even if btc doubles or triples
how much u gonna make anyway
how many bitcoins do you guys own

how much do you own?



823. Post 14682182 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):


467 resistance was too strong, at least this time  Wink



824. Post 14688553 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on April 28, 2016, 12:09:01 AM
great buying opportunity imo (w/ stop lose of course), nothing changes that 6-month consolidating triangle  Cool

true, nevertheless i am really looking forward to july when miners wont be having so much coins to sell each day



825. Post 14688586 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):


ouch



826. Post 14688590 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):


bitcoin can be really bitchy sometimes...



827. Post 14688692 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):


Quote from: Mrpumperitis on April 28, 2016, 12:49:27 AM
lol saw this coming...

lol, of course you did



828. Post 14688774 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: Mrpumperitis on April 28, 2016, 12:56:19 AM

lol saw this coming...

lol, of course you did

..i sold a gd amount of BTC at $450 today, will sell more if we goto $475 as i fully expect a huuge dump near halving



i sold more at 470  Wink



 Wink



829. Post 14693230 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: Elwar on April 28, 2016, 11:46:00 AM
A big rally requires not only timing but also something to rally around (whether real or not).

One rally was started with the US Senate legitimatized Bitcoin. The last rally was when China got involved and everyone believed all of China would be buying bitcoins.

I think the Winklevoss ETF released before the halving would push the price up over $5,000.

Steam accepting bitcoins is a great boost until people realize that it just means people will be spending their bitcoins that they've been sitting on for a while which will be converted to dollars. (a major merchant accepting bitcoins usually does not boost the price).

The halving should be enough to rally around.



830. Post 14732075 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: nioc on May 02, 2016, 02:56:47 PM
the first time Craig Wright said he was Satoshi I watched some videos of him talking. it was so obvious that a person such as him could in no way be Satoshi. 

you see, thats a perfect example of whats going on at the moment. the community is in full denial at the moment. people kind of glorified satoshi and everyone had his own version of Satoshi in their minds. now that we actually have him eventually "at hand" they refuse to accept reality and desperately try to cling to their dream version of Satoshi.

pretty tragic if you ask me.



831. Post 14732244 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 02, 2016, 03:06:08 PM
why would someone claim to be satoshi fully knowing he won't be able to prove it when the time comes

did he really think we'd take gavin's word " i verified his key " as irrefutable proof?

nope i dont think so. lets see how this all develops, but to outright refuse the possibility seems extremely childish to me.



832. Post 14732309 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: Denker on May 02, 2016, 03:13:21 PM
Or does anyone here really believes the community will start to praise this guy as our lord and follow him like lemmings?

this in fact seems to be one reason of the hostility towards Wright at the moment.

there seems to be some kind of completely irrational fear that everybody could turn into a zombie just because Satoshi shows up. lol!

maybe you already now bitcoin is opensource, so no need to be afraid of a dictator.  Grin




833. Post 14735074 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: Syke on May 02, 2016, 07:49:08 PM
There are many reasons he may not want to post proof for you to verify, not the least of which is you constantly moving the goal posts.

Feel free to browse my extensive post history. I was posting here when Satoshi was still active. The goal posts have never moved. Sign a genesis block msg. Trivial for Satoshi to do and *everyone* can verify it.

what reason could there possibly be keeping him from publishing a signed message? apart from he being not SN obv.




834. Post 14736498 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Mrpumperitis on May 03, 2016, 12:15:39 AM
wright is NOT satoshi...100% bullshit, if im wrong ill dump all my BTC forever  Tongue

quoted for evidence  Wink



835. Post 14736573 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Mrpumperitis on May 03, 2016, 12:35:43 AM
wright is NOT satoshi...100% bullshit, if im wrong ill dump all my BTC forever  Tongue

quoted for evidence  Wink
double quoted , lol
what do u think...wright is satoshi? lol

yes



836. Post 14739165 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: yefi on May 03, 2016, 02:12:11 AM
wright is NOT satoshi...100% bullshit, if im wrong ill dump all my BTC forever  Tongue

quoted for evidence  Wink
double quoted , lol
what do u think...wright is satoshi? lol

yes
* yefi puts on his gorilla suit

If he publicly and verifiably signs a message from the genesis block, I'll give your newbie butt 1 shiny bitcoin. Quote it.

 Kiss



837. Post 14746220 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 03, 2016, 06:49:34 PM


That post, along with his BBC interview video, shows Wright to have a very dislikeable and at the same time needy personality. 

He's seemingly self-absorbed, bitter, internally contradictory (continuously publicly proclaiming that he wants privacy). Such a disposition is no way consistent with a person who would have compiled bitcoin's first whitepaper and engaged the more than two year follow-up efforts..   

lol! you are aware of that especially geniuses are often weird and difficult persons? it fits perfectly imo. just not the santa-claus parts of the community have expected.



838. Post 14774367 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):


resistance is between 467 and 472.



839. Post 14799360 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: inca on May 09, 2016, 04:15:10 PM
And just like that 3000CNY is behind us

Hold on there grasshopper. When we take 471 we can say that 3000 is behind us Smiley

###


exactly



840. Post 14807383 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Elwar on May 10, 2016, 12:43:02 PM


I was sitting about 500 meters from that plane when it happened. Sounded like a low flying plane dropped a huge bomb.

Took me a few seconds to think it through and realize that the Taliban didn't have planes. Went back to playing my video game.

Had it fallen left instead of right it would've hit me.

us army?



841. Post 14818513 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):


Honestly Amir looks to be at the brink of going full ISIS anytime soon.



842. Post 14882236 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):


BTC looks sooo fucking weak right now and that only few weeks apart from Halving, not the best sign imo.



843. Post 14882585 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 18, 2016, 02:37:45 AM

BTC looks sooo fucking weak right now and that only few weeks apart from Halving, not the best sign imo.


You really have not substantiated your claim in the above post...

you are right, i havent. its just an impression based for biggest parts on the complete lack of any volume and "action". BTC seems so bloodless right now it should be somehow vibrant right beneath such an important resistance and just weeks before the Halvening, but instead it seems sleeping.
another bad sign imo is that we have basically a very good sentiment, everybody is lookin forward with positive expectations to the Halvening. if nothing happens or the weeks before price might even start to decline we might see a big move south just out of disappointment.




844. Post 14888812 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Elwar on May 18, 2016, 08:44:04 AM

BTC looks sooo fucking weak right now and that only few weeks apart from Halving, not the best sign imo.

A stable price is a great thing. It shows that we can hold the $450s no problem, even with over $1.6 million in mined coins being sold each day.

Imagine what happens when that number is cut in half.

Very good point indeed. Halving effect is even stronger in a market with very low volume.



845. Post 14902337 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):


boy bitcoin is weak as shit these days.



846. Post 14902381 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: ImI on May 18, 2016, 02:46:25 AM

BTC looks sooo fucking weak right now and that only few weeks apart from Halving, not the best sign imo.


You really have not substantiated your claim in the above post...

you are right, i havent. its just an impression based for biggest parts on the complete lack of any volume and "action". BTC seems so bloodless right now it should be somehow vibrant right beneath such an important resistance and just weeks before the Halvening, but instead it seems sleeping.
another bad sign imo is that we have basically a very good sentiment, everybody is lookin forward with positive expectations to the Halvening. if nothing happens or the weeks before price might even start to decline we might see a big move south just out of disappointment.

shit is dead. halving will certainly help but those effects need months to kick in.



847. Post 14904324 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on May 20, 2016, 12:06:27 AM

How's that segwit going? Where's dev?

has nothing to do with blocksize and segwit imo. its more a result of the bad press bitcoin got lately and also the rise of ETH/DAO.

this whole blocksize-developer-kiddie-fight has had a very bad effect on the (already suboptimal) image that bitcoin has. most devs seem to be behaving like 15 year olds. on top of that we had lots of PR with Wright but that wasnt that positive either.
both happenings did obv distract from the halvening. so no new money in town combined with miners that have to sell millions day in day out -> decline.

imho.



848. Post 14933691 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

ETH is more of a hedge at the moment. BTC seems very unstable.



849. Post 14939200 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: oda.krell on May 23, 2016, 01:03:45 PM
ETH is more of a hedge at the moment. BTC seems very unstable.

With emphasis on 'seems', that's the best answer right now, in my opinion.

It's all about perception. LTC was the de facto hedge/fallback option back in the day, but I think there's good reasons to consider ETH a better one today. And  'not even trying to be decentralized' isn't a counterargument - it's part of what makes it an actual hedge, I'd argue.

Still, I don't see anything about ETH that makes me think it's anything more than a hedge. Then again, I'm following crypto only peripherally at the moment, so feel free to pick apart what I'm saying.

Yeah, its mostly based on perception. So far the last months everyone could see a clear correlation, as soon as BTC tanks ETH immediately rises and vice versa.
So ETH looks like a good hedge, if BTC goes to $200 ETH could act like a savior in the portfolio.




850. Post 14939236 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Elwar on May 23, 2016, 01:10:47 PM
1.5% volatility is considered unstable?

As compared to the JPY at .95% volatility or BRL at 1.1%.


Its not about volatility, is about perceived weakness of BTC. Of course you can deny that, but imo BTC is "wounded". This whole blocksize-fight, no matter what side you favor, has taken big hits to investors confidence. We are lucky to have the Halving upon us, without that it would have been really ugly the last months.



851. Post 14941471 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):


its the complete lack of any volume that i dont like. its not so much about any particular price swing up or down but the fact that volume is more or less dead.



852. Post 14941650 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):


allright, glass is half full.   Wink



853. Post 14976516 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: clopoterian on May 26, 2016, 12:24:51 PM
bitcoin is not about public, nor transaction.

bitcoin is about privacy and holding up the only safe asset left in the world.

Sometimes bitcoin is about transactions. Here's an example of bitcoin entrepreneurs price-discovering the value of their disruptive services in free market space:

Ransomware attackers refuse to decrypt hospital's files after being paid off

"Negotiating with criminals doesn’t always work out, as Kansas Heart Hospital in Wichita learned last week. The hospital paid to get files back after falling victim to ransomware, but only got “partial access” and a demand for more money, Techspot is reporting.

That’s right: the criminals got their ransom, and then decided they wanted more money. The hospital’s president, Dr. Greg Duick says the hospital is not paying up."

https://www.yahoo.com/news/kansas-hospital-pays-ransomware-demand-235824773.html

disgusting



854. Post 14981072 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Maxwell is for sure one of Bitcoins biggest obstacles at the moment, just having a look at his past at Wikipedia says so much.



855. Post 14988182 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: Blazin8888 on May 27, 2016, 12:56:54 PM

spam


fuck off already



856. Post 14989709 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):


470$ resistance is still not broken. if we fail another time.......



857. Post 14989824 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):



a perfect example at the moment to see that the important exchanges are in the west namely finex and stamp. china is waiting.



858. Post 14989927 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):


btw the next 24h are critical



859. Post 14993495 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):


470$ seems to be too strong again.



860. Post 14993629 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):


Yeah, you are right. I am just surprised (and a little bit annoyed) that this silly 470$ mark still keeps us back.



861. Post 14999436 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: Denker on May 28, 2016, 01:58:17 PM
R.I.P. Ethereum Shills:
Ethereum (ETH)   $11.98 (11.35 % Shocked)
Butters scramble as The D'oh is about to turn into a $150M Sorry For Your Loss event

https://www.reddit.com/r/Buttcoin/comments/4ld29g/butters_scramble_as_the_doh_is_about_to_turn_into/

What's it like, being an enemy agent? How is it we still haven't outed you as a buttcoin spy?!

Because buttcoiners hate Bitcoin!
And as far as I can see, roach is supporting Bitcoin and just is against all the altcoin scams!
And 99% of the alts are scams!!That's a fact.

Yes, but as we have thousands of Altcoins meanwhile that equals to several dozen that are worth having a closer look. To be closed-minded in such an important phase of innovation is the worst mistake you can do right now.



862. Post 14999453 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: becoin on May 28, 2016, 01:20:50 PM
To me it looks a bit like the west tries to keep the price below $500.
The West is selling everything they have - factories, plants, jobs, gold... Now they sell their bitcoins because there is nothing left for sale and they need to eat something. The only thing West still produces is Western values. Everything else is already in Asia.

LOL! You have been once to China? I recommend going there and have a look by yourself and then visit the US afterwards.



863. Post 15032426 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):


impressive indeed



864. Post 15037895 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

 wtf bitstamp?



865. Post 15062595 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on June 02, 2016, 11:10:31 PM

Oh, man!

I really like your posts. Then I see one of your signature links is to a racist nutter.

WHY, BITCOIN??!? WHYYYYYY?!?!?!!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!!(!)

it seems most french bitcoiners are basically racist. olivier jannsen is the most prominent example but you can also witness that here at BTT.

it seems in france only france nationale nutters seem interested in bitcoin. probably a result of france being one of the most socialist countries in europe.
 
edit: otoh le pen openly rejects bitcoin as a "tool of wallstreet"  Grin



866. Post 15073424 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on June 03, 2016, 10:54:57 PM
Gmax panic attack yesterday gave some new hope to Core increasing the on chain block limit.

huh, did i miss something?



867. Post 15085062 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: kehtolo on June 05, 2016, 01:37:48 AM
4000+ USD --- Incoming.

fyp



868. Post 15095837 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: nioc on June 06, 2016, 12:37:44 AM
Nobody knows what will happen with the halving so let's stop speculations, up or down I'll HODL both way.

Really?


Bitcoin Forum > Economy > Economics > Speculation

 Grin



869. Post 15105892 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):


stamp doesn't give a shit what finex is doing



870. Post 15107420 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):


next stop 630



871. Post 15107453 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):


hope not, capitulation is often a reversal



872. Post 15107864 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on June 07, 2016, 01:21:52 AM
The facts are more or less that XT/Classic failed to provide sufficient evidence or logic to support a protocol change that would involve a hard increase in the blocksize limit.  Accordingly, since there remains a lack of consensus for such position, there is no obligation for anyone to attempt to implement such a unnecessary change... that is only supported by a very small minority.... accordingly, the status quo continues, in which bitcoin is not broken.. and likely seg wit will be implemented and also achieve a consensus after a large majority of sensible folks realize that it is not controverted.

Incredible how easy it is to manipulate opinion online.  There was a conscious effort to give the appearance that there was more support among the community for a contentious hard fork than there really was.  Every time something Classic was brought up, market dumped.  Now that the smoke has cleared, Bitcoin is mooning.  Hmm...  wonder what the market wanted. 

market wants peace and stability. nevertheless if core would come out tomorrow with a 2MB HF that activates in lets say early 2017 markets would do another leg up.




873. Post 15108050 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):


still no buying panic. very good sign.



874. Post 15132780 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):


........eaten

nice!



875. Post 15158064 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on June 10, 2016, 11:40:32 PM
Strange looking top...

Unless, of course, it isn't a top?   Shocked





indeed, smells like breakout to me



876. Post 15168800 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):


stop the nonsense, we got some nice action  Wink



877. Post 15168941 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: hd060053 on June 11, 2016, 11:21:37 PM
bfx trying hard to go over 600 Smiley

yeah, some hidden sell walls there



878. Post 15169082 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):


finex shorters rekt



879. Post 15169131 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: toknormal on June 11, 2016, 11:49:39 PM

China well on the way to $700 now.

We're into 2013 territory. (Except with far more fundamental basis).



mainstream media incoming in 3,2,1,....



880. Post 15169193 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: toknormal on June 11, 2016, 11:56:36 PM

the thing about halving is that it isn't like other speculative "pricing ins". However much of it is priced in, there will be a sudden supply rate reduction coming on top of it which will remove a lot of selling pressure.


i once dived deep into the gox willybot data and came to the conclusion that the halving takes a very similar amount of coins of the market as willy did. not quite the same but something like 70% of what willy took out of the market every day.



881. Post 15169247 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):


remember that asshole?  Grin




882. Post 15174516 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: DaRude on June 12, 2016, 11:44:48 AM

For what it's worth I think we all owe him/her a thanks. S/he helped buy those cheap coins for as long as he/she/it could

that shouldnt be missing in this incident:




883. Post 15174529 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: 600watt on June 12, 2016, 11:47:28 AM
we all knew something was brewing, considering the amount of fud and hate and trolling and alt-shilling in the last two weeks.

I remember lots and lots of folks proclaimed that the Halvening is already priced in as it is a known event.



884. Post 15177482 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: toknormal on June 12, 2016, 03:47:07 PM

Worldwide banking crash must be imminent.

Public about to get disarmed following that Orlando thing I imagine. Troops on the street.



lol nobody is about to get disarmed

but the US may very well stop all muslim immigration into the country



885. Post 15180344 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):


crazy, btc is still strong



886. Post 15180682 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):


o.O


c r a z y




887. Post 15190237 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: rafanadal on June 13, 2016, 01:16:03 PM
how many bitcoins do I need to become rich  Cool

how many do you guys have , don't be shy

That depends on the date.

lets say 2020
now define rich.

rich enough to never work another day for the rest of your life Smiley

that means at least 2-3mio$



888. Post 15197971 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on June 13, 2016, 11:56:03 PM
ok let talk about 900
so after 900 comes 1000
hmmm interesting.

question will be what happens at 1150? ath should be a decent resistance.



889. Post 15212157 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):


If we have no external problems and BTC can just hush along as it pleases i expect this rally to be lasting a while. Nevertheless if the blocksize fight escalates again in July it might be the end of this bullish cycle.

I hope that Luke, Adam and Matt will fulfill their promise and deliver the HF code, otherwise we could see some ugly High Noon between chinese miners and Core and you can bet that markets won't like that.

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/4o2nii/please_bring_a_message_to_those_core_individuals/



890. Post 15212271 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: Fakhoury on June 14, 2016, 10:11:50 PM

If we have no external problems and BTC can just hush along as it pleases i expect this rally to be lasting a while. Nevertheless if the blocksize fight escalates again in July it might be the end of this bullish cycle.

I hope that Luke, Adam and Matt will fulfill their promise and deliver the HF code, otherwise we could see some ugly High Noon between chinese miners and Core and you can bet that markets won't like that.

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/4o2nii/please_bring_a_message_to_those_core_individuals/

I agree with what you said, but I believe in the core devs. and I respect their words, I nearly take their words forgranted.

I believe in the sanity of chinese miners, if prices are as pleasant as they are right now, i expect them to back down a little cause they know about the devastating PR-effects of such a showdown (including a fork, change of Hash and so on and on). In a way the rise in price keeps the problem at bay cause everybody is happy. At least i hope so.



891. Post 15228120 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):


finex is giving a go



892. Post 15228613 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on June 16, 2016, 12:59:38 AM
gentlemen
this is peanuts and you know it.
we are headed for 32,000$ and there can be no stopping us
after that we WILL conquer the world.

nah, not interested in 32,000$. seriously, 3000-4000$ is all asked for.



893. Post 15228817 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):


doubletop danger



894. Post 15299485 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):


eth/dao mess pulled the plug in shortterm investor confidence



895. Post 15299515 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: Tzupy on June 21, 2016, 12:18:42 AM
Froze again...
You can not place new orders.

maybe a glitch and you could only put new sell orders



896. Post 15299683 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: strawbs on June 21, 2016, 12:42:56 AM

Well that's fucking obvious, douchebag. But exchanges continually fucking shit up is hardly going to inspire confidence in the wider market. Or do you think it will help adoption, for fuck sake?

You're a little charmer. I'd like to squeeze your cheek and wiggle it around.

Just annoyed  Angry  Very much wanting BTC to succeed but's its propencity for shooting itself in the foot is becoming laughable.

its not finex that pulled the plug. its the ongoing eth/dao mess, its not an btc-issue but its enough to stop the bullrun and set investors on hold. it was lingering for some days and comes to surface now.



897. Post 15299739 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

i say without that eth/dao mess we already would be at 900



898. Post 15304941 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):


the ETH/DAO mess unrattled the markets and brought uncertainty. finex struck them down.



899. Post 15306036 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: Elwar on June 21, 2016, 01:01:07 PM
Two bad things for Bitcoin in the past few days that may have caused this are the auction in Australia (that ends in a few hours) and the Brexit vote is polling heavily toward the Remain folks after their MP was shot.

dont forget the DAO-mess, thats very bad for the overall sentiment as everyone gets reminded about the risks that crypto inherits. it shutters basic confidence if you will.



900. Post 15325679 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):


that DAO/ETH fuck up completely killed the momentum



901. Post 15325839 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: thrax on June 22, 2016, 10:25:28 PM

that DAO/ETH fuck up completely killed the momentum

When ethereum launched you could see in vitalik's eyes there were going to be fuck ups. I thought they would only affect ethereum, but they seem to have affected bitcoin both positively and negatively. Immediately after the hack it was positive for bitcoin, but the ethereum dead cat bounce afterwards was negative for bitcoin.


its bad because it brings back old and very painful memories for the btc community. woithout this mess we would be talking right now if btc is able to get over 1000 or not, but so? i dont know but the halving will have no immediate effect and a real halving rally wont happen with just a few days left, so that thing is already done.



902. Post 15326446 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: Torque on June 22, 2016, 11:50:35 AM
So this all makes perfect sense, eh?

Weeks and weeks of excitement and price rise on all exchanges.  People were saying China was leading, providing 90% of the volume, and couldn't get enough.

Then an auction ends.

Then an exchange has network problems and goes offline for a bit.

Meanwhile price plummets.

Exchange comes back online.

But now we're at -130/btc, and all trading has essentially come to a complete halt.

Makes perfect sense, right?  But...but.. China demand?? Right??  Fellaz??

agree, remember when stamp was down for one month or so? price was completely flat for the whole time. as soon as stamp launched again price fell like a stone. so THAT where your leader is. china is just a marketing gag that mainstream press loves cause it makes a good story.



903. Post 15326455 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: BitUsher on June 22, 2016, 11:52:57 PM
Good time to buy . set in another set of buy orders.

agree, desperation is strong



904. Post 15333394 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on June 23, 2016, 01:55:49 PM

We are starting to get mainstream breakthrough.



But..

Umm..

beeeep..dead. killed by developers and silly "investors" of a competing cryptocurrency.

edit: yeah, finex did its part obv too.



905. Post 15339510 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):


oh boy, they really seem to leave. thats going to mean turmoil economical as political.



906. Post 15339564 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: Blazin8888 on June 24, 2016, 12:10:52 AM
Where do you guys see BTC if UK leaves?

1000$



907. Post 15339675 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):


i dunno i have kind of a strange feeling about that brexit thing. it would obv propel bitcoin prices higher nevertheless i am not really happy about that. EU is a big bureaucratic monster because it was built by france which made just an exact copy of their shitty system, nevertheless i dont really like that brexit thing. but less see...



908. Post 15339718 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: strawbs on June 24, 2016, 01:06:51 AM
£GBP is free-falling  Shocked

hasnt to be that bad for GB. nevertheless they knew that would happen, they have been warned.



909. Post 15339825 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):


$1000



910. Post 15339935 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):


rollercoaster. now the bookies are in favor of remain again.



911. Post 15340187 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: Andre# on June 24, 2016, 02:19:27 AM
7.4 million votes counted so far, and it's split 50.0% / 50.0%

ITV news in London has called a 75% Brexit win Hoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooray!


 Cry

i am concerned, if GB leaves others will follow and that's not something to be too happy about imo. a dismantling EU is a security risk.



912. Post 15340267 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: Andre# on June 24, 2016, 02:38:45 AM
7.4 million votes counted so far, and it's split 50.0% / 50.0%

ITV news in London has called a 75% Brexit win Hoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooray!


 Cry

i am concerned, if GB leaves others will follow and that's not something to be too happy about imo. a dismantling EU is a security risk.

I think it's quite unlikely others will follow. Especially not if Scotland leaves the UK and joins the EU.

the mood is against EU in alot of countries and a Brexit will give them momentum and better arguments. the call for referendums will get louder in france, netherlands, finnland, spain, italy, whatever. scotts will eventually leave GB and join a club that is disassembling.



913. Post 15340359 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: Andre# on June 24, 2016, 02:58:01 AM
god fucking dammit.

brexit is as much of a revolution as voting for trump would be.

all we've done is give the american empire a new lease on life.

oh and the uncertainty in the world markets may cause bitcoin to become a safe haven true....but the depression that's going to come from this will ultimately deprive money from entering emerging fields like bitcoins.

an ill wind blows nobody any good.

Trump for President; Nigel Farage the next PM of Britain.   Cry

At least my longs are performing great -- a small  comfort.

Boris Johnson is becoming MP in GB as he is already very popular and now even stronger as a leader of brexit movement



914. Post 15345319 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):


pretty tame reaction tbh. price hovering around 650$ is quite disappointing after such a gross move. markets are down like 5-10% and bitcoin more or less the same? strange.



915. Post 15352232 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):


looks like we are able to shake off all that finex, dao/ETH-mess and finally finding some confidence again.



916. Post 15352453 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on June 25, 2016, 12:29:55 AM
this brexit business now has texas people talking about seceding... interesting times we live in...

and here i am just trying to not lose my apartment. got a bad (really, REALLY bad( sun burn that, since i worked out delivering stuff, made me miss a week of work. nothing like screaming in pain just sitting in your car, eh?

blah.

Texas has been talking about seceding since they became a state 170 years ago.  Now they have a new name for it, texit.



The state of Texas has 816,000 fire-arms for every 1,000 people. True fact.

source?



917. Post 15352492 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):


ok ok i got it  Smiley




918. Post 15352961 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):


it's just you



919. Post 15360935 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: MinermanNC on June 25, 2016, 06:06:26 PM
I really thought yesterdays stock market dump would have benefited btc.... perhaps it has and we just don't know it? lol we could be looking at 550.00 right now perhaps...

Still overall I am pleased with btc last few weeks. Still thinking 800+ by halving. Just my thoughts/wish  Cheesy

i still think that this DAO-fuckup and the finex-panic killed momentum towards 840$ and higher. but thats crypto! this place is still full of amateurish participants flooded with too much money. be it devs or investors.



920. Post 15372230 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: PigUsher on June 26, 2016, 05:24:45 PM
Back to fundamentals

There are about $43.7MM swaps borrowed just on finex. Conservatively at current daily rate of 0.06% That's $2.6MM just in daily fees only on Finex

Check your math.

 Grin



921. Post 15413351 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):


we have got some serious Bitcoin ETF stuff going on right now



922. Post 15420746 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):


did i miss something?



923. Post 15449546 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):


remember when bitstamp went offline for a month or so? price went straight out flatline. just nada! no movement at all. as soon as stamp came back the movement came back (and went south big time) so it became obv who is the leading exchange here. china? lol china didnt move as long as stamp was off. that whole china talk is just media bullshit because it makes such a good story and together with the fake volumes some folks start to believe.



924. Post 15455226 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):


whoo nice drop



925. Post 15455378 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):


watching the okcoin liquidation it seems to be some kind of "long squeeze"



926. Post 15495324 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: yefi on July 06, 2016, 11:51:35 PM
LOL I'm gonna laugh so hard when the price gradually goes down after halving.

People think it's just gonna shoot up on halving day lmao

Clearly, being wrong has taught you no humility.

The halving is already priced in
We're going down into the 300's

lol



927. Post 15526369 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):


volatility kicks in



928. Post 15526597 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: iikun on July 09, 2016, 04:39:37 PM
Bitcoinwisdom and cryptowat.ch are not available, probably ddosed. Forum next?

well that dump escalated quickly...wouldn't be surprised if that's connected

lol thats SOOO 2013



929. Post 15529890 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):


smells like pump



930. Post 15530840 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):


finex shorts on ATH



931. Post 15530870 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):


technically spoken the effect of the halving kicks in delayed, mined coins need 100 confirmations before they can be spent.so the effect of 25->12.5 starts in about 9h



932. Post 15552145 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):


my bet: we are lacking any fantasy right now. no event that we could rally into. the halving was theoretically perfect for a nice rally but the rally got interrupted by the finex and DAO shit. so now what events should markets focus on? there are none. so all thats left is the reduced daily supply, but i doubt that will be shortterm enough.



933. Post 15552205 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):


yes winklevoss ETF could be a game changer. but we have no date or event to rally into as we dont know if that thing will happen at all. the last date for that SEC rule is just a minor thing afaik that doesnt give much clue about that whole endeavour.



934. Post 15560462 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):


smells like halving-effect



935. Post 15560514 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):


popcorn.gif



936. Post 15560602 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: soullyG on July 12, 2016, 04:24:17 PM
Short squeeze?

not yet



937. Post 15563181 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):


finex takes the lead



938. Post 15573550 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):


7$ spread between Stamp and Finex/China. Will be interesting to see how this resolves.



939. Post 15616102 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: podyx on July 17, 2016, 04:19:18 PM
I can't believe this fuckin shit. I was about to put in a 20x long position at that drop when we dropped to 655 on stamp.

If we go don't go below there ever again...

May have to do with the 3x on finex

"You simply don't trade with the Bitcoins."



940. Post 15665563 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):


its always the same, exactly in that moment that you think you could die out of boredom something is brewing



941. Post 15675936 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: Elwar on July 22, 2016, 05:26:45 PM
Thank you price dumper. House sale money all converted finally after a month and a half voyage from check to bitcoins.

you sold your house and bought bitcoin with the money?

Yep, 230 bitcoins added to my stash.

crazy, are those US prices? where i live houses start at 500k$



942. Post 15676605 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):


rekt



943. Post 15676619 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: Karpeles on July 22, 2016, 10:25:31 PM
Why so much talk about a price collapse?

Price is in the same level than last time I checked, above 650. Hopefully will get back to 666 next week

650 is history mate



944. Post 15676910 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 22, 2016, 11:15:04 PM

rekt


Which part is rekt?   I understand that you have a tendency to get stuck on  short term price movements, and all of us should be ready for the possibility of $610 and even sub $610, but it is likely going to take quite a few coins to get there, if it does.  Further, you recall that in the past nearly two months, we have only revisited sub $600 for about 24 hours, and recall how many coins it took to get to $540 for short moments... We could get there again, but it seems to me that it is going to take a lot of coins, and I question whether bears have enough coins to dump and if they can be successful.. with the ongoing upwards price pressures.

i agree. the thing is we are missing a clear positive outlook, an event that a rally could potentially build upon. halvening? gone. brexit? gone. so all thats left is the still lurking debate about blocksize and thats it. but on the other hand the 3d chart looks still quite excellent...



945. Post 15694175 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):


looks like while everyone seems busy watching the forking drama on the other side of the cryptoplanet btc decided to creep up a little



946. Post 15772251 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):


coinbase already insolvent?



947. Post 15772612 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 01, 2016, 01:11:14 AM

coinbase already insolvent?

https://status.coinbase.com/

they have identified an issue causing slow outbound transactions. maybe they're slow enough to get to panama before anyone knows what's really happened. or it might be a genuine problem.
Remove all you coins from them now.
You will read about them in the Panama papers in the following months.
Ethereum is the cause of all this havoc for them.

i think at worst the hacker was able to empty there ETH hot wallet? ( i would assume the vast majority of coins are cold storage? )

the damage cant be THAT BAD, can it?

i think so too, but just the fact that they let that replay attack hit them, while folks were talkin about it since weeks is so much fail...



948. Post 15772728 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):


finex longs didnt move one bit



949. Post 15782933 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: yefi on August 01, 2016, 11:47:21 PM
Post halving dump from people expecting to get rich because of the halving. 

Pretty much, imo. Let them jettison and then we'll see what this baby can do.

finex longs dont move one shit



950. Post 15792742 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: barbs on August 02, 2016, 07:25:15 PM
This is a disaster.

why?



951. Post 15794680 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):


seriously i dont even blame bitfinex, i blame everyone who is such a moron to keep his coins on exchanges. even after we had so many hacks meanwhile...



952. Post 15794905 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 02, 2016, 11:36:24 PM
Are you guys buying or selling right now?

Anyone lost coins on finex btw?

67 BTC  Angry

Damn, sorry for the loss. Hopefully you'll get back

dosnt look very good....

but the binfinex dude did confrime that not ALL the funds were lost...

a bail-in is in order...

hmm..they lost around 70m (obv depending on the underlying price), at first i thought maybe external could pump some $$$ into finex and cover those losses. but that seems too much. i guess a 50% haircut is likely.



953. Post 15794917 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):


positive note: all that exaggerated halving-positivity is vapourized.



954. Post 15795332 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 03, 2016, 12:33:30 AM
LOL people are suggesting to pull an ETH/ETC style hard fork fix to the BTC chain... after the precedent that ETH and Vitalik have created... bad idea guys
lol yeap but they dont understand ...ETH can reverse a sngle transaction but even if btc wanted too , it cant unless every single transaction on entire blockchain get reversed

with >51% hashing power you could rebuild the chain EXACTLY as it was before, minus that TX that made bitfinex blow up
no HF required.
the core way.

If mETH taught us anything, greed always finds a way. I almost expect this to happen.

even with bitcoin miner being so "centralized" it requires to much coordination
51% hashing power cannot be bought.
we can dream about it, and think that ya maybe there's a way.
but it won't happen.

no dream, nightmare. you dont wanna see that backslash...



955. Post 15795523 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: savetherainforest on August 03, 2016, 01:00:35 AM


How much did u lose?  Sad

one tit



956. Post 15802024 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):


it can



957. Post 15809618 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: aminorex on August 04, 2016, 12:25:40 AM
Monkey thinks BTC turns down again in about an hour.  He does not think the dumps are over, by any means.  But he does tend to lag on that issue, historically. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XpZ8mKlS-c

Wrong.  But monkey is still leaning slightly bearish, with resistance at 605, support at 440, for the overnight.

Monkey thinks we will go straight to $1000 from here, just like the Silkroad-event in Aug/Sep 2013.



958. Post 15810270 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):


looks like some fomo going on



959. Post 15816557 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):


good idea imo



960. Post 15900440 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: gentlemand on August 12, 2016, 01:06:43 PM
r/bitcoin should really be renamed r/fuckcoinbase for the amount of screeching and moaning that goes on over there. GDAX does seem to be having some regular problems at the moment but it's standard gremlins.

agree. and the irony that finex the holy grail of several bitcoin-over-everything-tards goes belly up.  Grin



961. Post 15967828 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):


true itBit seems to take the center spot and fills the gap that Finex left



962. Post 16028917 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):


lol@that 7 year cycle

perfect example of: i see what i wanna see.



963. Post 16143252 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):


looks like someone is on the move




964. Post 16147506 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):


as always stamp is king. if stamp doesnt want to move all others have to wait/retrace.



965. Post 16147664 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: spooderman on September 04, 2016, 08:27:07 PM

as always stamp is king. if stamp doesnt want to move all others have to wait/retrace.

aint it the chinese now?

nope, never were imo. if china goes ahead and stamp refuses to follow china is slowly going back to where it was. those volumes are 99% bullshit imo.



966. Post 16147834 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: el_rlee on September 04, 2016, 09:07:53 PM

as always stamp is king. if stamp doesnt want to move all others have to wait/retrace.

Why don't people arb the shit out of this? 600 on stamp / 614 on finex is 2.2% difference. Buy on Stamp, short on Bitfinex, wait for difference to fade -> profit.

depends on how easy it is to send fiat in and out of finex.




967. Post 16217871 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):


Quote from: podyx on September 11, 2016, 07:23:19 PM
ok, anyone mind explain what the fuck is going on?

no fckn idea



968. Post 16217876 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on September 11, 2016, 07:26:31 PM
ok, anyone mind explain what the fuck is going on?

A $10 drop, nothing really worth getting worked up about? Bit of a non event in my opinion bro.

that doesnt look like a "non event"



969. Post 16217888 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: podyx on September 11, 2016, 07:32:57 PM
This must be some insider selling...

you mean like the one we saw before the finex-hack?



970. Post 16218299 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

most probable explanation: a coordinated chinese attack to trigger stop-loss-margin-calls.



971. Post 16225621 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):


1st July "news"



972. Post 16236498 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: Andre# on September 13, 2016, 01:17:40 PM

Long squeeze, manipulation, or...

http://bitcoinist.net/okcoin-blame-bitcoin-price-fall/

I dont get it. The forced position was a "closed short", that means that a trader was forced to buy BTCs at market price and it fueled the little run up to $628.

But how should that explain the crash down to $600??



973. Post 16314291 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):


wuz going on



974. Post 16527532 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: Paashaas on October 11, 2016, 02:41:47 PM

Tomorrow the SEC will approve ore disapprove Winklevoss ETF...

Really ?

I knew nothing of this. Any links ? What's so special about tomorrow ?


Official statement; https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/batsbzx/2016/34-78653.pdf

It can be extended fore some time..again Undecided

can be extended til march 17 afaik



975. Post 16529959 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: Elwar on October 11, 2016, 05:25:10 PM
Deutsche Bank canceled my account with them so they can crash and burn for all I care.

They did so because Bitcoin-related??



976. Post 16550159 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):


Next stop 685$.



977. Post 16615978 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: podyx on October 19, 2016, 02:20:59 PM
Just me or is the forum getting ddos?

someone seems stuck in spring 2013. "selloff" combined with ddos.



978. Post 16650955 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

lol and always those 200 walls on bitstamp. we are seeing them now since weeks, once one 200 stack is being bought he refills and sets the next 200 wall.

sometimes i wonder if those hacked finex coins are eventually being sold step by step on other exchanges.



979. Post 16671976 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):


china seems to be serious...



980. Post 16672005 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):


stamp very reluctant to move even one bit



981. Post 16677063 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):


ok, last 200 "wall" on stamp at 652$ got bought. lets see how long it takes him to reload and bring up the next 200.



982. Post 16677797 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: ImI on October 25, 2016, 01:11:22 PM

ok, last 200 "wall" on stamp at 652$ got bought. lets see how long it takes him to reload and bring up the next 200.

welcome back mr 200. 



983. Post 16683283 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: toknormal on October 25, 2016, 11:29:32 PM
You don't do that to maximise gain. You do it to quench rallies.

agree. someone is desperate to push the price down. guess shorters on huobi/okcoin.



984. Post 16739852 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: spooderman on November 01, 2016, 03:52:38 AM
200,000 BTC less mined since halving ... supply starting to tighten considerably now, 2 more months and the halving will be getting close to "priced inGrin

buuut... do we have stats on how many miners sell their coins?

no, but self-mined coins are no different than bought ones. so if miners get now less BTCs than 6 months ago they have to buy additional BTC to get the same result.

or in other words if BTCs are entering the market through miners makes no difference as there is no difference between bought and self-mined coins.



985. Post 16775629 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):


lol the good ol "china bans bitcoin" song



986. Post 16779234 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: AZwarel on November 05, 2016, 12:42:55 AM
We're going to keep hearing "Chiba bans Bitcoin" until they actually do.

I do not want to be a dick, but this is a really good read about all this China FUD http://fintekneeks.com/zerohedge-fakes-bitcoin-panic/. Especially the part, where they point to the fact, that China had a +buy volume during the selling, and how insignificant bitcoin is in a 100 trillion market.

Just a thought.

we were overdue for a little correction after the nice runup. so this compared with some fuddish-zerohedge-article is the perfect situation to get a setback.

everything fine, except for the fact that ZH should be seen as the hub of trash,fud and crap that it is.



987. Post 16784753 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: mixan on November 05, 2016, 04:14:51 PM
Yes agreed. The price is pretty boring at $700.
Need some action before the elections in the states drop it down even further if a certain someone wins. Embarrassed

doesnt matter imo who wins, after the election price will go steep



988. Post 16784993 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: bitebits on November 05, 2016, 04:23:08 PM
Yes agreed. The price is pretty boring at $700.
Need some action before the elections in the states drop it down even further if a certain someone wins. Embarrassed

doesnt matter imo who wins, after the election price will go steep

Maybe I missed the news. Does Bitcoin get a new CEO?

Or are you referring to this American play? Meh.

if trump wins you will see a big drop on the financial markets and lots of uncertainty -> btc rises

if clinton wins we may very well see violent uprising in some states with nationalgard and everything -> btc rises

if we get a too close to call result we see weeks of chaos, accusations and eventually violence -> financial markets decline, btc rises

edit: last but not least the US has warned russia that if it interferes in any way in the US-election it will react with a painful counterreaction onto the russian infrastructure. if that happens -> btc rise



989. Post 16785285 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: AlexGR on November 05, 2016, 05:07:45 PM
The US elections should be pretty irrelevant to what BTC does: The policies are typically unaffected by the puppets elected, no matter what they've promised.

Please spare us your religious views.



990. Post 16785396 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: mixan on November 05, 2016, 05:24:58 PM
The US elections should be pretty irrelevant to what BTC does: The policies are typically unaffected by the puppets elected, no matter what they've promised.

Please spare us your religious views.
Religion has no say in bitcoin (even if you are masking it with humor  Undecided

To believe in hidden puppet masters that control all politicians is nothing else than some modern and hateful version of religion as there is zero evidence and all those believers have to offer is that you just have to believe it so see it.

But like i said this shit doesnt belong here.



991. Post 16785508 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: Torque on November 05, 2016, 05:39:22 PM
To believe in hidden puppet masters that control all politicians is nothing else than some modern and hateful version of religion as there is zero evidence

One word: Rothschilds

One word: bullshit



992. Post 16785515 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: TERA on November 05, 2016, 05:41:08 PM
I'm going to laugh when nothing happens to the price after the election.

Possible. But unlikely.  Wink



993. Post 16786287 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: strawbs on November 05, 2016, 07:05:45 PM
The US election result will probably have about as much impact on btc price as the much awaited halvening a few months ago - nil.


Who said that the recent runup isn't caused by the halvening? The effect of the halvening is having a small but constant shortened supply that sums up over time. Obv we will never know but to rule it out just because at the day of the halvening iwe saw no spike is simply wrong. Cause if we could witness any effect it would play out in the MONTHS after the halvening. So exactly NOW. Just like 2012/13.



994. Post 16786396 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on November 05, 2016, 07:20:53 PM
I think we are set to have a period of stability in the price for a while. Sideways throughout November I believe.

I think we will see a runup to 780$ in november. lets see.



995. Post 16788964 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):


nothing to do with policy. just reaction to turmoil and instability.


Quote from: ImI on November 05, 2016, 04:42:03 PM
if trump wins you will see a big drop on the financial markets and lots of uncertainty -> btc rises

if clinton wins we may very well see violent uprising in some states with nationalgard and everything -> btc rises

if we get a too close to call result we see weeks of chaos, accusations and eventually violence -> financial markets decline, btc rises

edit: last but not least the US has warned russia that if it interferes in any way in the US-election it will react with a painful counterreaction onto the russian infrastructure. if that happens -> btc rise



996. Post 16789485 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):


in europe everything fine with bitcoinwisdom



997. Post 16806903 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on November 07, 2016, 07:29:02 PM

Hillary wins, Trump doesn't accept and starts riots on the streets. BTC up

hahahaha... I like the way you outline the various scenarios.  Surely, this third scenario is an interesting one, but really does not seem that likely.  Surely, it seems likely that Trump could create  a little drama to the extent that he considers it helpful to his brand, but really it may seem a bit counter productive (to his Brand) to attempt to continue in any kind of persistent manner with this, if it were to play out in that third scenario direction.

Trump hasnt to start anything. The atmosphere is already heated enough in his camp through his allegations the last months/weeks. He could even officialy declare he is against any sort of violence and you could potentially see mobsters and riots in certain states.



998. Post 16819304 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):


BTC seems paralyzed, seems like BTC doesnt like trumpy



999. Post 16819360 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):


crazy  Shocked



1000. Post 16819863 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: Paashaas on November 09, 2016, 03:58:55 AM
Bitcoin is going up again, is it because of Trump?

have you been living under a rock?



1001. Post 16897292 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):


If we break 780$ -> lots of media hype cause 2 1/2 year high.



1002. Post 16897820 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: bitjanja on November 16, 2016, 07:47:26 PM
but it just doesnt seem like the time for rally

yeah it doesnt.....

how about you opening some shorts and go to sleep for some months? i bet it will work out great. i guarantee you, you will make a hell of a profit! OK?



1003. Post 16898999 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: lolikop on November 16, 2016, 09:48:19 PM
No boys btc is not ready  to reach 1k wait a little longer and open shortz now

while i dont share that opinion, i appreciate that independent mindset. thats what trading looks like, make up your own mind an trade accordingly. not following what 99% of all others are doing.



1004. Post 16901036 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: Dafar on November 17, 2016, 04:40:34 AM
The king is back




Dogecoin?



1005. Post 16935272 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on November 20, 2016, 04:10:39 PM
What's the reason for the dip? Whale decided do to sell?

Couldnt break 755$ resistance after several tries. -> Dumping.



1006. Post 16935482 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: 600watt on November 20, 2016, 04:27:34 PM
What's the reason for the dip? Whale decided do to sell?

Couldnt break 755$ resistance after several tries. -> Dumping.

does this mean that all the "big" volume chinese exchanges are nicely waiting for bitstamp to do the move, and if bitstamp says "no", them going to dump?

yes.



1007. Post 16935690 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: 600watt on November 20, 2016, 04:49:11 PM
What's the reason for the dip? Whale decided do to sell?

Couldnt break 755$ resistance after several tries. -> Dumping.

does this mean that all the "big" volume chinese exchanges are nicely waiting for bitstamp to do the move, and if bitstamp says "no", them going to dump?

yes.

ok.
bitstamp dumped about 2,5 k btc

houbi dumped about 70-80 k btc.
btcc dumped about 50 k btc.
okcoin dumped about 30 k btc.

that is about 150 k btc on the three big chinese exchanges. those "big" volumes wait for the measly 2,5 k on stamp?

150 k chinese vol. has less power than 2.5 k slowenian vol.? my guess is that chinese volume is fake by the factor of 60.  Grin

yes, i think so. chinese exchanges that drive the price are just a nice PR story for CNBC or Bloomberg but no reality if you follow the markets.



1008. Post 16936587 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: 600watt on November 20, 2016, 06:13:27 PM
What's the reason for the dip? Whale decided do to sell?

Couldnt break 755$ resistance after several tries. -> Dumping.

does this mean that all the "big" volume chinese exchanges are nicely waiting for bitstamp to do the move, and if bitstamp says "no", them going to dump?

yes.

ok.
bitstamp dumped about 2,5 k btc

houbi dumped about 70-80 k btc.
btcc dumped about 50 k btc.
okcoin dumped about 30 k btc.

that is about 150 k btc on the three big chinese exchanges. those "big" volumes wait for the measly 2,5 k on stamp?

150 k chinese vol. has less power than 2.5 k slowenian vol.? my guess is that chinese volume is fake by the factor of 60.  Grin

yes, i think so. chinese exchanges that drive the price are just a nice PR story for CNBC or Bloomberg but no reality if you follow the markets.

it does not fit with the other part of the story: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/5dy9tg/we_have_tried_to_calculate_the_amount_of_money/?st=ivqye9d3&sh=308a9ae8

Quote
We have tried to calculate the amount of money that the Chinese have invested in mining, we estimate it to be in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Even with free electricity we cannot see how they will ever get this money back. - KNC CEO

weird.

china is strong in the mining business, yes. but exchanges with big daily volume are another story.




1009. Post 16971938 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: TERA on November 24, 2016, 03:19:17 AM
The bear is coming. Run for your lives.

unfortunately i agree

market understands now that segwit wont come and instead a long an eventually devastating fight between the two camps



1010. Post 17023344 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: Fakhoury on November 28, 2016, 11:30:51 PM
This is it, time is up. rewards have been halved, hype is brewing. Bitcoin always going to be bummin' around, and paper $$$ only gets less useful by the day.

In 1 week we will be pushing 800

In 1 year we will be pushing 2400

In 10 years, global economic unity.

Liquid fucking bits


I like your optimism.

I don't know why, when I read Cmacwiz's post, I felt it's really true and it will happen.

You better hope that BTC won't become the "global economic unity". If so even one BTC would be worth hundreds of millions US$ and every current holder would be haunted.



1011. Post 17023351 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: TERA on November 29, 2016, 01:10:38 AM
Bitcoin is too fragile to be used for 'global economic unity' or anything like that. Try to think in a timespan of beyond 20 years in which it will definitely be hacked/cracked by then or they will find some way to keep the network from functioning in some way or the other. In a best case scenario, we briefly touch something like $20,000 in a speculative bubble before crashing. That is the play here.

Agree, one last hurra and bust seems possible.



1012. Post 17023448 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: gentlemand on November 29, 2016, 01:27:28 AM
You better hope that BTC won't become the "global economic unity". If so even one BTC would be worth hundreds of millions US$ and every current holder would be haunted.

I can live with that. However I can't quite see the global elite choosing to enrich a bunch of nasty brats who took a break from COD to do a little mining back in the day.

I see before Bitcoin could really get worth something in global terms we will see dozens of forks because folks are unable to compromise longterm. And dozens if not hundreds of forks mean prices = toilette.

Regarding "i can live with that." Imagine a horde of millions of humans plus future AIs searching the web and especially all archives of the web for traces of your identity. I think you would have no chance of hiding your true identity, somewhere, sometime you made a little error with some IP or purchase or whatever. And then you have in times of basically anarchy (because we are talking a post-state-era here) a horde haunting you. -> No chance imo.

So you better hope BTC stays in its niche.  Wink



1013. Post 17023462 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: cmacwiz on November 29, 2016, 01:42:32 AM
We don't all have to Scrooge McDuck our BTC forever.

Doesnt matter imo, just the fact that you were uppon the very first 0.00001% of the worl population that actually bought BTC will make you a target.



1014. Post 17023499 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: cmacwiz on November 29, 2016, 01:45:57 AM
Then I'll invest in security and a body double.

Jepp, basically investing in security will be the only option. And as it will be fuckn expensive i would expect clusters to form of folks that all have the same problem.

But freedom to go where you want, whenever you want will be gone. Its like a golden cage or something.  Cool



1015. Post 17023604 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: gentlemand on November 29, 2016, 01:55:59 AM
There are millions of publicly rich people who get around just fine.

Agree. But to me BTC gets "stratospheric" only in a post-state-situation where states have collapsed and BTC becomes the new FIAT and in such a situation you have basically no state on your side that guards you as a rich person. So you go and buy a house and the next day some idiot just comes and moves in with his family.  Smiley

Then you need a special security company that helps you to get that asshole out of your house and you hope that his security company isnt better/more capable than yours.  Grin

But now we are way OT cause those are basically issues of anarcho-capitalism.



1016. Post 17023672 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: cmacwiz on November 29, 2016, 02:13:53 AM
There are millions of publicly rich people who get around just fine.

Agree. But to me BTC gets "stratospheric" only in a post-state-situation where states have collapsed and BTC becomes the new FIAT and in such a situation you have basically no state on your side that guards you as a rich person. So you go and buy a house and the next day some idiot just comes and moves in with his family.  Smiley

Then you need a special security company that helps you to get that asshole out of your house and you hope that his security company isnt better/more capable than yours.  Grin

But now we are way OT cause those are basically issues of anarcho-capitalism.

Well in that case I live on an island, with EMP's loaded on drones to intercept aircraft. And danger-dolphins to protect form incoming ships, which will be quite slow anyways. And then I'll grow pineapple and roast island pigs

Sounds good, count me in!  Cool



1017. Post 17162628 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):


boys, do it the right way  Cool




1018. Post 17165214 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: luckygenough56 on December 12, 2016, 11:31:21 PM
it can go up or down, either way am ready

still i have this idea that it will christmas dump cause everybody expect it to explode like 2013

then 2017 is moon

as long as we get no doom-news like a hacked exchange, a hardfork or similar shit, there will be the stuff that Rampion wrote about.



1019. Post 17165986 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Have you noticed that since the beginning of this rally we have seen ZERO choo-choo-pics? It seems like the lesser choo-choo-pics the more up we go. So NO choo-choo-pics, except you are short..

edit: btw ccmf



1020. Post 17166009 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):


media incoming



1021. Post 17166039 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):


very good sign that SO FAR we have no buying-panic at all. everything goes smooth as f



1022. Post 17166057 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: abstract1 on December 13, 2016, 02:04:28 AM


happenaments



1023. Post 17187374 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: duke944 on December 15, 2016, 01:24:53 AM
Will be interesting to see what Yellen does tomorrow. 0.25% rise expected, which will upset the Chinese and prompt further outflows of money using your favourite vehicle for avoiding capital controls. Question is whether it's priced in, or whether it will knock BTC decisively through resistance.

BTC is holding up remarkably well against the dollar.

It's a miracle. How long will it last?

Its a sign of things to come.  BTC has matured, next stop 10k.

All I know is there is no f'g way I'd buy a $777 bitcoin. Would you?

if i would be new to the game and have no bitcoin at all i would definitely invest into bitcoin right now and buy at $777.



1024. Post 17187434 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: duke944 on December 15, 2016, 02:03:00 AM
Will be interesting to see what Yellen does tomorrow. 0.25% rise expected, which will upset the Chinese and prompt further outflows of money using your favourite vehicle for avoiding capital controls. Question is whether it's priced in, or whether it will knock BTC decisively through resistance.

BTC is holding up remarkably well against the dollar.

It's a miracle. How long will it last?

Its a sign of things to come.  BTC has matured, next stop 10k.

All I know is there is no f'g way I'd buy a $777 bitcoin. Would you?

if i would be new to the game and have no bitcoin at all i would definitely invest into bitcoin right now and buy at $777.

That's a bullshit answer. Buy now with everything you got or stfu. That goes for all you bulltards.

lol "bulltards". its a long long time since i read that in this thread.  Grin

and btw you asked if i would buy and i answered. that's it. the question wasnt "would you buy with all you have got?"



1025. Post 17187515 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: TheDasher on December 15, 2016, 02:15:58 AM
Will be interesting to see what Yellen does tomorrow. 0.25% rise expected, which will upset the Chinese and prompt further outflows of money using your favourite vehicle for avoiding capital controls. Question is whether it's priced in, or whether it will knock BTC decisively through resistance.

BTC is holding up remarkably well against the dollar.

It's a miracle. How long will it last?

Its a sign of things to come.  BTC has matured, next stop 10k.

All I know is there is no f'g way I'd buy a $777 bitcoin. Would you?

if i would be new to the game and have no bitcoin at all i would definitely invest into bitcoin right now and buy at $777.
easy way to  make money at this point, beginning of  abull run

agree, the risk to not be involved in the game at the moment would be way too high. even as a casual investor you have to have at least a tiny amount invested in bitcoin and cryptocurrencies in general at the moment. marketcap of 13billion$ is basically nothing compared to the attention bitcoin and CCs are getting. 100billion is easily possible and we are still just some random blue chip stock.



1026. Post 17187675 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: duke944 on December 15, 2016, 02:45:59 AM
"bitcoin going to $50k!!!" while not buying.
sound familiar?

dude, there is no buying or not buying. when it come to investing there is just one question: what percentage of your overall investments are you gonna put in x?

if that percentage is higher than your goal you sell if its lower you buy. got it? not that hard to understand.



1027. Post 17248684 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):


where are lambi, tarmi and the other bearfarts?  Cool

remember how they wrote "bulltards" nearly every minute in this thread as we went from 200 to 220?  Grin



1028. Post 17253184 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: Dafar on December 21, 2016, 03:42:59 AM
So who is the willy bot now motherfuckers?

its called halving  Cool



1029. Post 17254708 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):


expect 4-5k



1030. Post 17256463 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):


Bitfury: Last 24hrs couple of $10bln+ AUM Funds calling to buy 30k-50k bitcoins.. We were not selling then / not selling now

Boom.gif



1031. Post 17256715 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: rtrtcrypto on December 21, 2016, 07:36:28 PM
WHAT!>!>!>>!>!!??!?!?!
That would be insane.




Bitfury: Last 24hrs couple of $10bln+ AUM Funds calling to buy 30k-50k bitcoins.. We were not selling then / not selling now

Boom.gif

https://twitter.com/BitfuryGeorge/status/811563784682819584



1032. Post 17271054 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):






1033. Post 17271168 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

if no shit happens like forks, hacks or silly regulations. target = 3k+

this thing is overdue after such a long baisse



1034. Post 17271748 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: keithers on December 23, 2016, 03:40:16 AM
Waking up to see higher and higher numbers on the big ticker is not something I have been able to look forward to so consistently in 3 years!

It feels like a blast from the past for those of us who were here for that run up in 2013. I don't want to jinx us

yeah, even the same time of the year. last time "china ban!" were the first dark clouds forming.



1035. Post 17316053 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: magicmexican on December 27, 2016, 04:04:23 PM
Chinese Finance ministry spokesman Sum Ting Wong says that the minstry will be investigating currency manipulation in Bitcoin.

true?

lol.  china ban 3.0



1036. Post 17320585 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: tarmi on April 27, 2015, 06:03:53 PM
double digits soon!

you can quote me.

i quote you.  Grin



1037. Post 17320609 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: tarmi on April 28, 2015, 05:26:56 PM
smart bears are waiting for double digits like I do.

you are not scaring anyone with fake bid walls and buys on illiquid exchanges.  

such a joy to read posts from 2015.  Grin



1038. Post 17327120 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: phr33 on December 28, 2016, 04:07:23 PM
Huobi down?
https://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/huobi/btccny

no, https://www.huobi.com/?lang=en



1039. Post 17330647 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: tonyq on December 28, 2016, 10:48:30 PM
Sold my coins at $500  each.
I feel ill.
 Embarrassed




1040. Post 17341107 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: petahashminer on December 29, 2016, 11:09:58 PM
Lol finex 7000 BTC wall

at $1000

do you think it is fake?

i think we can understand when we come to there..

lets see..

i dont think its fake. its 1000$ there are supposed to be some sell-orders there.



1041. Post 17347300 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: magicmexican on December 24, 2016, 10:19:13 PM
Dips being aggressively accumulated. Have a feeling the weekly wants to close under 920, so that's a hard trailing stop for anyone doing one of those greedy scalps. I highly doubt next week's lower wick will be in this week's candle much, so buy any dip and get ready to break $1000.

Comments like this signify that you should go short with 100x leverage asap.

How's that short going?  Wink



1042. Post 17350704 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 20, 2015, 05:54:00 PM
hi guys!

you are not able to break 250.  Cry

remember?  Grin



1043. Post 17351310 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: Dafar on December 31, 2016, 12:02:52 AM
Things are looking rosy now, but bear markets can get triggered just like that... #neverforget

Agree, but from the things you mentioned only Coinbase-hack and (a real) China-ban would mean trouble. Nobody expects Segwit to get activated at the moment, Polo is not important for BTC-Fiat markets and ETF would only mean upside potential as there is so far not much hype around a potential ETF approval.



1044. Post 17355588 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: magicmexican on December 31, 2016, 12:21:03 PM

I am not sure it worked like that historically, i still remember months and months of bear market after any slight news from the Chinese Gov

we had months and months of bear market not cause of china-ban-news that turned out to be fake/unimportant. we had months and months of bear market cause gox pulled the price up to 1000$ artificially using customers funds and imploded then. THAT caused us trouble. but to be fair without gox buying BTCs with customers funds we would have never seen 1150$ in 2013.



1045. Post 17362688 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: magicmexican on January 01, 2017, 12:36:49 PM
I like how we all suddenly adore China. Not caring about them controling the price fully surely cant backfire, can it?

I love how you come up with new BS everyday.  Wink



1046. Post 17363026 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: magicmexican on January 01, 2017, 01:06:18 PM
I like how we all suddenly adore China. Not caring about them controling the price fully surely cant backfire, can it?

I love how you come up with new BS everyday.  Wink

Considering that i probably made <5 posts in the last 6 months this is a pretty damn retarded statement to make.

Not that retarded, you made 11 Posts since 24th December and all of them were fuddish or in best case "critical".  Smiley

Examples?

Quote
If thats the whole argument against it, the BTC price is probably in trouble longterm.

Quote
There is a very high probability chance that this rise was manipulated.

Quote
I am not sure it worked like that historically, i still remember months and months of bear market after any slight news from the Chinese Gov

Quote
The first signs of a new China ban came up :

Quote
Zoom out and see real H&S forming, this is going to get ugly.

Quote
Chinese Finance ministry spokesman Sum Ting Wong says that the minstry will be investigating currency manipulation in Bitcoin.

Quote
Comments like this signify that you should go short with 100x leverage asap.

One FUD-Bullshit after another. Be it manipulated exchanges, technical analysis, too much optimism or the good old "China Ban!". It seems like you are desperately looking for reasons why this rise could be short lived.



1047. Post 17367457 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: bitebits on January 01, 2017, 11:30:54 PM
Anyone know why btc-e is lagging so much behind?

Fiat friction.

this.



1048. Post 17384148 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):


yeah, maybe someone still has a copy of that coyote480.gif?  Grin i looked it up but so far couldnt find it.



1049. Post 17385304 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: yefi on January 03, 2017, 05:55:46 PM
I'd be interested in seeing this coyote gif too. I missed it and if you couldn't find it then my chances of finding it would be next to nil.
Going through 16000 pages in this thread would be a full time job. Cheesy


perfect. thx!



1050. Post 17388365 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: toknormal on January 04, 2017, 12:11:42 AM

Mainstream getting up & running with propaganda countermeasures.

https://www.ft.com/content/b5d66ed8-d1b3-11e6-b06b-680c49b4b4c0

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/603295/why-bitcoins-1000-value-doesnt-matter/


LOL, the mainstream-media praises BTC now since weeks and as soon as one or two critical articles appear: "propaganda measurements".  Grin

The mass-media likes BTC (so far), deal with it.



1051. Post 17389202 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: spiderbrain on January 04, 2017, 02:54:35 AM
This is crazy guys, this rise is parabolic. Don't you think it need to come back down and floor out.
Like how high can it possibly go before crashing? I think its now so I sold all my btc besides a few for investing with and I'll buyback in at $800 in a month from now.

Cheesy

Parabolic is historically normal for bitcoin. I personally think we are still in a warm up stage, but who knows, right?

Yeah, still warm-up imo. As long as we have no other hacked exchange or some regulation fuck-up we are good to go.



1052. Post 17396594 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: smracer on January 04, 2017, 04:54:11 PM
bfx over 1100 alrdy, and there are not much coins left on the sell side Smiley

16K shorts still need to close!

i would love to meet with some of those shorters and have a beer or something. i mean, what drives them? what are the reasons to short btc in such a run? inexperience? gambling with money of other people?



1053. Post 17396912 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):


feels a bit top-ish shortterm. wouldnt be surpsrised to see the ATH and then some weeks correction.



1054. Post 17397155 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: Holliday on January 04, 2017, 05:37:31 PM
So... what kind of manufactured "disaster" will put a stop to this rally?

Huobi or OKcoin getting hacked.



1055. Post 17400786 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):


stamp shows who is da boss, if they dont wanna move, they dont move.



1056. Post 17400890 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: spooderman on January 04, 2017, 11:21:24 PM

stamp shows who is da boss, if they dont wanna move, they dont move.

pretty sure the chinese exchanges are the bosses tbh.

its actual a very interesting situation at the moment. lets see who will win, either stamp rising or china coming back.



1057. Post 17401058 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

something that one can observe very often:

if stamp moves either up or down that move is also made by the other exchanges, be it huobi, okcoin, finex, whatever

but if lets say huobi starts a big move and stamp doesnt follow, then thats it. huobi backs off and comes back again.

so stamp is the one that has to "confirm" any movement in china, if that doesnt happen then the move fails.

edit: thats why its so interesting at the moment. lets see if china has to back off or they have the power to drag stamp higher.



1058. Post 17401117 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: RCan06 on January 04, 2017, 11:57:45 PM
Haven't posted here in a while, but still read daily.

It's been a long 3 years of ups and downs, but I want to join the ATH celebration.

I assume we're not following Huobi. That $110 arbitrage, hows that holding?

move btc to china -> sell -> get fiat -> and then?

its hard to get fiat out of china, thats why arbitrage doesnt work well. most likely you need connection to get fiat out.



1059. Post 17401171 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: RCan06 on January 05, 2017, 12:04:27 AM
till a wild price difference

yeah, but arbitrage is always a percentage-value and percentage wise we are basically at 10%. i guess thats pretty normal for stamp-china, its just that these days 10% is much more than when we traded at $600



1060. Post 17401202 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):


i love that bitstamp is consolidating. seriously thats soo important to really being able to get above that ath and STAY there.



1061. Post 17401451 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: ImI on January 04, 2017, 11:52:36 PM
something that one can observe very often:

if stamp moves either up or down that move is also made by the other exchanges, be it huobi, okcoin, finex, whatever

but if lets say huobi starts a big move and stamp doesnt follow, then thats it. huobi backs off and comes back again.

so stamp is the one that has to "confirm" any movement in china, if that doesnt happen then the move fails.

edit: thats why its so interesting at the moment. lets see if china has to back off or they have the power to drag stamp higher.


looks like stamp wins.

china follows stamp after fake breakout.



1062. Post 17401464 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: Bitcoinb0b on January 05, 2017, 12:51:01 AM
something that one can observe very often:

if stamp moves either up or down that move is also made by the other exchanges, be it huobi, okcoin, finex, whatever

but if lets say huobi starts a big move and stamp doesnt follow, then thats it. huobi backs off and comes back again.

so stamp is the one that has to "confirm" any movement in china, if that doesnt happen then the move fails.

edit: thats why its so interesting at the moment. lets see if china has to back off or they have the power to drag stamp higher.



not really, china always controls the price.

nope, china controlling the price and being the reason for the rally is just the message that's perfect for the media and noobs.



1063. Post 17401678 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):


wow, that's A LOT of arbitrage there now



1064. Post 17401960 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: Bitcoinb0b on January 05, 2017, 02:15:04 AM
something that one can observe very often:

if stamp moves either up or down that move is also made by the other exchanges, be it huobi, okcoin, finex, whatever

but if lets say huobi starts a big move and stamp doesnt follow, then thats it. huobi backs off and comes back again.

so stamp is the one that has to "confirm" any movement in china, if that doesnt happen then the move fails.

edit: thats why its so interesting at the moment. lets see if china has to back off or they have the power to drag stamp higher.



not really, china always controls the price.

nope, china controlling the price and being the reason for the rally is just the message that's perfect for the media and noobs.

That majority of volume of trading and ming is in china and you are trying to tell me that they dont influence the price?

Miners are just selling to cover their costs thats all. Doesnt matter if its chinese miners, swedish miners or american miners. They all behave the same.

Trading volume in china is known to be fake, mostly exchange-bots.

Its just a nice story that everyone likes to believe and media likes to sell newbies.



1065. Post 17406917 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: ImI on January 04, 2017, 11:52:36 PM
something that one can observe very often:

if stamp moves either up or down that move is also made by the other exchanges, be it huobi, okcoin, finex, whatever

but if lets say huobi starts a big move and stamp doesnt follow, then thats it. huobi backs off and comes back again.

so stamp is the one that has to "confirm" any movement in china, if that doesnt happen then the move fails.

edit: thats why its so interesting at the moment. lets see if china has to back off or they have the power to drag stamp higher.


Told ya. Stamp is Boss. If they refuse to go anywhere China backs-off and comes back. Its a little but like dog and owner. Dog runs ahead but comes always back to the owner and if the owner refuses to walk they both are going nowhere.



1066. Post 17407245 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on January 05, 2017, 01:21:06 PM
This is what happens when my wife says "sell" and I don't do it. The same happened at the previous ATH.

Next resistance at 790 or we go straight back in the 200.

Plz sell all your coins and leave. Crypto is not made for you.  Smiley



1067. Post 17407305 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: ImI on January 04, 2017, 05:23:12 PM

feels a bit top-ish shortterm. wouldnt be surpsrised to see the ATH and then some weeks correction.

bam!



1068. Post 17407494 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: AirFlame on January 05, 2017, 01:41:35 PM
There will be one more dump to about 700/650 and then it will go up again.

no, there won't.  Wink



1069. Post 17407587 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: AirFlame on January 05, 2017, 01:47:08 PM
There will be one more dump to about 700/650 and then it will go up again.

no, there won't.  Wink

We wait to tomorrow and see who is right Smiley If The price drops to my prediction dont forget to comment Tongue

i am sure you won't forget.  Tongue



1070. Post 17408464 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):


wow, china comes back to bitstamp-level completely it seems. stamp's the boss.



1071. Post 17408736 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: spooderman on January 05, 2017, 03:11:54 PM

nothing funny about that gif, looks like some deaths happened there Sad

i ask myself: which seat is the best? looks like the women to the right is in best condition. on the other hand that backslap of her head didnt look to healthy either..



1072. Post 17412078 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on January 05, 2017, 08:08:46 PM
A 23% drop is totally normal for Bitcoin. This is all totally normal. Smiley

A rise of 50% in just a couple of weeks is obv NOT normal, but a drop of 23% just after such a steep rise IS normal.



1073. Post 17413304 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: AirFlame on January 05, 2017, 01:47:08 PM
There will be one more dump to about 700/650 and then it will go up again.

no, there won't.  Wink

We wait to tomorrow and see who is right Smiley If The price drops to my prediction dont forget to comment Tongue

REKT



 Tongue



1074. Post 17419312 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: kurious on January 06, 2017, 12:57:37 PM
It doesn't sound like a ban - just 'caveat emptor' (buyer beware).

Exactly. And its obv no coincidence as we just broke the Yuan ATH. They are afraid of a bubble.



1075. Post 17419417 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: MR1 on January 06, 2017, 01:16:22 PM
So China "bans" BTC once again?  Old Chinese trick LOL

Funny thing is they never said anything about banning. They just say "manage your risk".



1076. Post 17420857 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: AirFlame on January 05, 2017, 01:47:08 PM
There will be one more dump to about 700/650 and then it will go up again.

no, there won't.  Wink

We wait to tomorrow and see who is right Smiley If The price drops to my prediction dont forget to comment Tongue

Where are you my friend?  Cool



1077. Post 17425558 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):


PBoC says "No more fake trades!"

http://m.finance.caixin.com/m/2017-01-07/101041525.html

https://twitter.com/cnLedger/status/817550313636798464



1078. Post 17425578 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on January 07, 2017, 02:05:32 AM

shit you mean they wont be trading 21million bitcoins a week anymore?

more like 21 maybe.



1079. Post 17425608 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: DieJohnny on January 07, 2017, 02:11:22 AM
oh man, this is horrible to watch

I chuckle every time this happens.... i hope nobody is jumping out of a high rise, it is only money....

aehm...we are still as high as x-mas. thats not 1929. Wink



1080. Post 17434689 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):


Mirai Botnet targets BTC exchanges. Could get interesting...

https://twitter.com/MiraiAttacks



1081. Post 17434925 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on January 07, 2017, 11:16:40 PM

Mirai Botnet targets BTC exchanges. Could get interesting...

https://twitter.com/MiraiAttacks

What can it do to them besides DDOS them? DDOSing exchanges has been happening for years. The altcoin exchanges periodically go offline because of DDOSing, but their downtime doesn't last too long.

Nothing else then DDOS, but strong DDOS. I dont know if Mirai would be able to bring ALL exchanges offline for some days. That could bring another quality to this game.



1082. Post 17451935 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):


perfect touch:




1083. Post 17472743 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: Elwar on January 11, 2017, 04:15:02 PM
Must have been all of that hype by the US media saying that the jump in bitcoin price was due to people getting around China capital controls.

While those on the ground said there wasn't much of that at all, and that there are cheaper alternatives to do that.

But hey, if the US media is reporting it must be true.

Its not about the "US media". Its just a story that everyone likes to believe. Take a look around at BTT you will find lots of folks who are strongly convinced that Bitcoin is all about China and China adopting Bitcoin. From time to time for example i state at the german part of BTT that i dont see China as a main market and that Bitstamp is still the boss when it comes to price movement and i get lots and lots of denial. "Do you know how many people live in China!?"  Smiley

No media needed its a story that folks like to believe.



1084. Post 17473254 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: ft73 on January 11, 2017, 05:01:32 PM
Just one more leg down.


that would be a huge leg, though. 780 is a huge critical point.

this is where the bears have to blow all the powder.



750$, even high 600$ can't be ruled out imho.

I think 600$ will be it. Market seems to be afraid of PBOC like fuck.



1085. Post 17473338 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: toknormal on January 11, 2017, 05:13:42 PM

This is starting to look like a Gox situation to me.

The Chinese exchanges may be massively over levered and are pushing the price down in order to mitigate their fractional reserve at a lower cost prior to the inspections.


Thats why i am looking forward to a better regulation of Chinese exchanges. They have some decent amount of market-power with lots of shadiness combined.



1086. Post 17473372 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):


I am looking forward to real volume data coming from Chinese exchanges.



1087. Post 17473638 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):


The next 2minutes are critical.



1088. Post 17474824 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: gentlemand on January 11, 2017, 07:28:09 PM
I don't think market behaviour like this will look too impressive to the SEC pondering ETFs right now. Bitcoin has lifted her skirt to reveal a sloppy pussy, or double dick arrangement, or even BOTH.


agree, approvalprobability should be below 20%. not just because of volatility, but more the inner-conflicts of bitcoin and the always-possible fork situation.



1089. Post 17474929 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: RAJSALLIN on January 11, 2017, 07:35:55 PM
I don't think market behaviour like this will look too impressive to the SEC pondering ETFs right now. Bitcoin has lifted her skirt to reveal a sloppy pussy, or double dick arrangement, or even BOTH.


Yes. But having the Chinese regulate their exchanges cleans that pussy up (to use your retarded analogy).

The chinese exchanges were a systematic risk. It was even mentioned in some of the comments to the SEC that the exchanges could be used to manipulate the price. Clean that up and all of a sudden we have a greater chance of being aproved.

the thing is chinese exchanges are being fake giants with a much smaller impact on prices as everybody thinks they have. when huobi et others went full moonish and 8888yuan bitstamp didnt move one fart away from 1130$ even as china was 15% higher.

and now we see the opposite china being waay lower than stamp and stamp doesnt give a fuck. i guess we should all learn now that the rulers of bitcoin price arent chinese exchanges but western exchanges. they are just not fully aware of it yet...



1090. Post 17474942 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):


Stamp is boss in town.



1091. Post 17475311 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

disclaimer:

Quote from: eddie13 on January 11, 2017, 06:06:16 PM
just woke up...

i lost huge Sad

 Grin

but i agree with the fact that their impact is overestimated.



1092. Post 17476968 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Bullrun is over for now. Guess consolidation well into 2017 is now on schedule.

Bottom line: PBOC still seems to have alot of power in cryptoland. "Ban Bitcoin!" Still works.



1093. Post 17495254 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: AirFlame on January 11, 2017, 01:22:12 PM
There will be one more dump to about 700/650 and then it will go up again.

no, there won't.  Wink

We wait to tomorrow and see who is right Smiley If The price drops to my prediction dont forget to comment Tongue

i am sure you won't forget.  Tongue

Cu tomorrow then Smiley

Hey it seems it not happend so fast but it seems to be happening now sllllloooowwwwwwwww

Wrong again.



1094. Post 17524519 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: ssmc2 on January 16, 2017, 06:02:08 PM
Slow upwards grind until ETF decision. Then... Cool


...crash.




 Wink



1095. Post 17525207 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on January 16, 2017, 07:32:05 PM
Slow upwards grind until ETF decision. Then... Cool

Nope, we will have some volatility on the 17th and 18th because of the the PBOC and OKCoin and then possible upward fast grinding on the 20th because of the Inauguration of the POTUS.


when is the next final ETF decision ?


March 11.


Will they continue kicking the can down the road so to speak or could they even say NO.

I do feel that they will leave it to the auto-approve as I said here before.


If approved, when would it be up and running and would it make any difference at all??

are you kidding?

i think chance of approval is under 20%



1096. Post 17525248 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):


ETF means Wallstreet can easily move hundreds of million USD into BTC without any legal, safety or accounting issues.

ETF would mean 5000$+

But imo it wont happen, at least not in 2017.



1097. Post 17535212 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: toknormal on January 17, 2017, 06:56:02 PM

Stamp $906
Hobular $906

Incredible.

...oops, now $908. Skyrocketting in tandem.

indeed. seems like pboc had an impact somehow.



1098. Post 17538120 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):


love the rocket



1099. Post 17555064 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: GreekGeek on January 19, 2017, 03:42:00 PM
any ideas on why BFX tokens are rallying ?

theory: china exchanges close margin trading -> customers go to bitfinex -> more revenue -> more payback



1100. Post 17556429 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Paashaas on January 19, 2017, 06:02:07 PM
Welcome back $900!  Cheesy

But for how long?

Back in January, 17, price broke $900 too, but for few hours only, then went back to $850 because of the PBOC's tweet

Sentiment world wide is very bullish, only a major hack ore China final regulation ban will make the price go down.

Or a fork.



1101. Post 17600842 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Torque on January 24, 2017, 12:02:37 AM
Here comes the ol' "free trading is soon over" dump.  Wink

what's the exact time?



1102. Post 17642345 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):


LePen hates Bitcoin. Her Party is a mixture of radical nationalism and socialism.

But anyway, she wont get elected. The french system is very well designed, using several votings until a one vs one situation the voters are actually able to do a ranking of their favorites. That means they are able to tell if x is not elected then i give my vote to y. That is really well designed system and leads to a situation where the left votes for a conservative candidate cause they dont want LePen.



1103. Post 17667228 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):


Looks like the US is heading towards a constitutional crisis at best and armed clashes between civilians at worst. Question remains how BTC would react in such a scenario? It's not a given that prices would rise imo.



1104. Post 17689183 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Torque on January 31, 2017, 10:36:17 PM
So how long until PBOC tries to squash this rally too?  Roll Eyes

will be really interesting to see if they come up with new stuff as soon as the ATH gets close



1105. Post 17790266 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: 600watt on February 09, 2017, 01:29:12 PM
guys, no one is dumping its just normal market fluctuation

yeah. lol.


bitcoin needs to get completely independent of china.



1106. Post 17790456 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: bitcoinvest on February 09, 2017, 01:43:17 PM
wow....this was really deep.... and i still wonder if we reached the bottom or we have more because if this ban is real then we have big problem i think...

ban is real, but will likely be 2 weeks and not 4 weeks



1107. Post 17791166 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: jaberwock on February 09, 2017, 02:33:12 PM
Still the effect of real news is not bigger than the January fall to $800 and lower that happened for no concrete reason, at least until now

I guess the chinese are getting less power in the price, what their next move will be?

Next step would obv be to close a small exchange. Then, after several smaller ones, proceed with the bigger ones.

Then go after the miners. Then go after every retailer that accepts BTC.



1108. Post 17791420 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on February 09, 2017, 02:41:30 PM
"Somehow, they perceive the high price and the rising price as a threat," said one exchange executive speaking under condition of anonymity.

If that's the situation we could see some more action out of the PBoC as soon as we break the ATH. At the moment it seems like 1000$ seems to be some kind of magical number to them that they dont want BTC to break. Everytime we break 1000$ they come up with some new bullshit.



1109. Post 17791831 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: BrewMaster on February 09, 2017, 03:20:22 PM
losing the mining is alarming, i dunno how things would pan out if they did or even whether it's possible
The only possible ways to do that is to prevent the farms to communicate on internet (impossible), or to physically delete the farms, ie put people in jail and/or burn the miners (not likely but possible for big farms because of the electric bill)

there are lots of people making money because of the existence of mining farms in China. from the owners of the farm and their employees to small electric companies who owe their survival to mining farms and their special contracts, and the hardware companies manufacturing mining equipment.

don't think for a second government can even touch such a huge financial operation with so many big people involved.

miningfarms will most likely not be shut down, but instead they could very well be forced to mine the official chinese cryptocurrency that the chinese gov has already announced. that would be a much more possible scenario imo.



1110. Post 17792002 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: Biodom on February 09, 2017, 03:28:07 PM
losing the mining is alarming, i dunno how things would pan out if they did or even whether it's possible
The only possible ways to do that is to prevent the farms to communicate on internet (impossible), or to physically delete the farms, ie put people in jail and/or burn the miners (not likely but possible for big farms because of the electric bill)

there are lots of people making money because of the existence of mining farms in China. from the owners of the farm and their employees to small electric companies who owe their survival to mining farms and their special contracts, and the hardware companies manufacturing mining equipment.

don't think for a second government can even touch such a huge financial operation with so many big people involved.

miningfarms will most likely not be shut down, but instead they could very well be forced to mine the official chinese cryptocurrency that the chinese gov has already announced. that would be a much more possible scenario imo.

official cryptocurrency will NEVER happen because it is an idiotic concept to begin with.
why would any government want to issue a currency that is limited in size (number of units)?
if it is not limited in size, then why bother in the first place? they can "digitally" print as many yuans as they want.

no one said that anything the chinese government does or will do has to make any sense. maybe it wont. and now? do you think they care? i tell you something, they dont give a shit if it makes sense or not.



1111. Post 17792056 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: BrewMaster on February 09, 2017, 03:33:00 PM
losing the mining is alarming, i dunno how things would pan out if they did or even whether it's possible
The only possible ways to do that is to prevent the farms to communicate on internet (impossible), or to physically delete the farms, ie put people in jail and/or burn the miners (not likely but possible for big farms because of the electric bill)

there are lots of people making money because of the existence of mining farms in China. from the owners of the farm and their employees to small electric companies who owe their survival to mining farms and their special contracts, and the hardware companies manufacturing mining equipment.

don't think for a second government can even touch such a huge financial operation with so many big people involved.

miningfarms will most likely not be shut down, but instead they could very well be forced to mine the official chinese cryptocurrency that the chinese gov has already announced. that would be a much more possible scenario imo.

i somehow doubt it.
because official cryptocurrency must be centralized in full control of the government. the same way paper money (cash) is centralized and in full control of government. you don't see them ask a third party to print money for them!
in the same way they won't even allow anybody else to touch their official cryptocurrency but themselves, and the banks. that way they can control everything there is to control, hash rate, any change or update,...

they need full control? no problem, they can simply seize all the SHA256 equipment the can get and have a very reasonable start for their little crypto project. you see they dont need the miners, all they need is the hardware.

you folks always forget that we are talking about china here, chinese government does give a shit about law and individual rights. they simply come and take what they want if they feel the need.



1112. Post 17926107 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: phatsphere on February 21, 2017, 12:06:27 PM
what's currently the "official" ATH?

1163$

no one cares about the fake ATH that gox did



1113. Post 17926272 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: notme on February 21, 2017, 12:50:27 PM
what's currently the "official" ATH?

1163$

no one cares about the fake ATH that gox did

The media does.  They won't run a story about breaking the all time high until they can do it without having to explain why the MtGox price is invalid.

I expect the media to announce ATH as soon as Stamp breaks 1163$.

We will see.



1114. Post 17926556 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: gentlemand on February 21, 2017, 01:31:37 PM
You only need to know the "trend": Has the establishment / authorities, ever done anything to pump BTC? No. They have done exactly the opposite (hammering BTC with "negative news"). And BTC rises despite these.

I distinctly remember watching the price while US senators were making positive noises about BTC. It was reacting from sentence to sentence.

What some seem to regard as BTC's persecution is just the application of laws that exist with everything else. An ETF rejection won't be a grand political statement. They simply won't think that it cuts it at present as a safe enough asset class.

gentlemand spot on as always. a welcome sanity in this tinfoilhat ridden environment.  Grin



1115. Post 17928377 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 21, 2017, 04:02:20 PM
what's currently the "official" ATH?

1163$

no one cares about the fake ATH that gox did


I agree that $1163 is the number, yet I think that the reason that GOX does not matter is not so much about the artificial pump issue, but there was an issue regarding restricted (and almost no) ability to get fiat out of there.  So the GOX price was artificially way beyond the other exchanges, because you could not really cash out at that price and receive your cashed out money in fiat.. you had to send the cashed out money somewhere else (in bitcoin) to get the actual fiat.. which really means that the higher GOX price was not realizable in the real world.

exactly, and thats why i call it "fake ATH". cause underlying were those withdrawal-issues that lead to those price differences. just like OKcoin today, only with different direction.



1116. Post 17929484 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: podyx on February 21, 2017, 05:53:15 PM
Is there any reason at all for SEC to wait before they reject the ETF though? Even on 10th of march, it should be obvious that it's getting approved no?

Is there any reason for the SEC to come out with a decision before they have to? Its quite obv imo that they take as much time as they can to come to a conclusion.




1117. Post 17929615 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: podyx on February 21, 2017, 06:09:15 PM
Is there any reason at all for SEC to wait before they reject the ETF though? Even on 10th of march, it should be obvious that it's getting approved no?

Is there any reason for the SEC to come out with a decision before they have to? Its quite obv imo that they take as much time as they can to come to a conclusion.



They've had 3 years, not sure why they would need an additional 10 days or whatever lol

Last addition to the ETF proposal regarding the management of hard-forks happened just a few weeks ago. The recent ETF has not much in common with the proposal the Winklevii made 3 years ago.



1118. Post 17929807 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: Elwar on February 21, 2017, 06:31:41 PM
The longer we go without a decision the more likely the ETF passes. If no decision is made by March 11, then the rule change is automatically approved.

One of the most likely things that people do when faced with a tough decision is to do nothing.

Yes, but "do nothing" in this case means keeping the status quo, shich means "No ETF". The SEC has nothing to gain from such an approval only to loose if lots and lots of money flows into that thing and it fucks up big time in some years from now. Then everybody will be like "Who approved that shit!?"



1119. Post 17938695 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):


Gox fiat-withdraws were NOT operational at that time. In average you had to wait for several weeks to get your money out. As lots of folks smelled the fish they decided to pay a premium and get the fuck out of there. Which was obv the right thing to do..



1120. Post 17957246 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: Fakhoury on February 24, 2017, 02:12:20 AM

Thanks for that link Fakhoury.  Lots of good info and links in there.   I think that the mere meetings does not necessarily conclude green for the ETF for sure, but such a set of happenings probably increases the probability of green for the ETF.

You are most welcome JJG.

I agree, but if it's no, why all of this hassle ?

Could also mean they want to give them a last chance to make modifications, otherwise they deny.

Nevertheless i have to admit i am seeing the chances now more like 50:50 instead of 10:90

Edit: Which is crazy cause ETF would mean 3000+ pretty fast..



1121. Post 18004427 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):


Remember?  Grin



Where are all our bear friends from that time? No more Lambi?



1122. Post 18037826 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: BTCtrader71 on March 02, 2017, 02:42:33 PM
I just watched the most ridiculous Bitcoin COIN ETF hit piece on Bloomberg video:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2016-12-19/winklevoss-twins-prepare-first-ever-bitcoin-fund

Constant pictures/ video spliced in of 'physical bitcoins' in the background (which everyone knows are collectable and not the real bitcoin, makes it look like a toy), the interviewee pointing out negative after negative, etc.  Both the interviewer and the interviewee were literally laughing and scoffing at the idea of an ETF the whole time, like it was one big joke.

It's like the Media has an agenda to keep Average Joe investors skeptical of Bitcoin and scared away from touching it, and especially investing in the ETF.


Seemed like they were laughing more at the idea of a bitcoin ETF than at bitcoin itself. I actually think he made some good points.

https://twitter.com/VinnyLingham/status/835145632998387713

EDIT: for instance, he says in the Bloomberg video that it makes more sense to buy bitcoins directly than to buy the ETF. Gotta agree with that, no?

b..but....media evil?

this "the media has an agenda" stuff is kinda funny anyhow. so much positive articles about bitcoin like in the last 3 months have never been before. no matter where you look everywhere folks get explained how bitcoin stuff works and why it has value and so on and on. but lets just ignore that and cry "media evil!"



1123. Post 18038409 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: Torque on March 02, 2017, 03:32:09 PM
<snip>

b..but....media evil?

this "the media has an agenda" stuff is kinda funny anyhow. so much positive articles about bitcoin like in the last 3 months have never been before. no matter where you look everywhere folks get explained how bitcoin stuff works and why it has value and so on and on. but lets just ignore that and cry "media evil!"

So show me all these so-called 'positive' Bitcoin articles on Mainstream media sites like Bloomberg and Business Insider (and NOT on dedicated sites like Coindesk, CoinTelegraph, and CryptoCoinsNews).

Go on, I'll wait.

Here's another Bitcoin hit piece for ya while I'm waiting:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-02-28/bitcoin-s-top-rival-is-up-90-and-readying-its-next-big-move

LOL. Yeah whatever, evil media is against Bitcoin. Sure it is. Move on.



1124. Post 18038501 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: Torque on March 02, 2017, 03:40:17 PM
<snip>

b..but....media evil?

this "the media has an agenda" stuff is kinda funny anyhow. so much positive articles about bitcoin like in the last 3 months have never been before. no matter where you look everywhere folks get explained how bitcoin stuff works and why it has value and so on and on. but lets just ignore that and cry "media evil!"

So show me all these so-called 'positive' Bitcoin articles on Mainstream media sites like Bloomberg and Business Insider (and NOT on dedicated sites like Coindesk, CoinTelegraph, and CryptoCoinsNews).

Go on, I'll wait.

Here's another Bitcoin hit piece for ya while I'm waiting:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-02-28/bitcoin-s-top-rival-is-up-90-and-readying-its-next-big-move

LOL. Yeah whatever, evil media is against Bitcoin. Sure it is. Move on.

So couldn't find any, could ya?  Wink

No i couldnt. Only articles out there that say: Bitcoin is evil,stay away!  Cool

As expected they follow all one big agenda.



1125. Post 18043762 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on March 03, 2017, 12:26:17 AM
I did help a friend buy some in 2014 at $600, who sold at just over $200 because he couldn't stomach the drop. Never again.

I considered recommending it in the $200s, but thought better of it. Most people will hold a hidden resentment against you if it drops, and their loss will become your burden.

... and it can be even weirder than that. Many people will also resent you if you recommend a winner and they don't buy and it goes up ... basically any time you put yourself in the situation of "i'm right, you're wrong" or "i'm wrong, you're right" and there's financial advantage involved, they will resent you ... it's lose-lose.

Strangely, if you charge them exorbitant fees and call yourself a "financial adviser" all that burden goes away and you can gamble with their funds like a drunken sailor.

Yeah, Friends&Family and financial advice is a VERY difficult subject.



1126. Post 18043885 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: Punisher1314 on March 03, 2017, 12:58:24 AM
I did help a friend buy some in 2014 at $600, who sold at just over $200 because he couldn't stomach the drop. Never again.

I considered recommending it in the $200s, but thought better of it. Most people will hold a hidden resentment against you if it drops, and their loss will become your burden.

... and it can be even weirder than that. Many people will also resent you if you recommend a winner and they don't buy and it goes up ... basically any time you put yourself in the situation of "i'm right, you're wrong" or "i'm wrong, you're right" and there's financial advantage involved, they will resent you ... it's lose-lose.

Strangely, if you charge them exorbitant fees and call yourself a "financial adviser" all that burden goes away and you can gamble with their funds like a drunken sailor.

Yeah, Friends&Family and financial advice is a VERY difficult subject.

True fact. Just today my father said me that i should sell a portion, and thinking in it better i passed to explain him my expectatives lol.

Yeah, and they never listen. I have some friend and gave him early last year the advice to buy some ETH with around 20% of his overall crypto investment. He did. The next day i wake up and look at my whatsapp. 5 messages from him. "Hey dude you know Ripple!? Its da shit! And do you know Lisk!? Its da shit!"

Turns out he went to Polo, listened to the silly trollbox and invested all of that remaining 80% in Ripple, Lisk and some other shit.  Grin

Seriously if they don't respect your advice...



1127. Post 18044013 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on March 03, 2017, 01:18:43 AM


time for a bigger boat?

i am more of an car guy  Wink




1128. Post 18044054 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: gentlemand on March 03, 2017, 01:25:56 AM
i am more of an car guy  Wink

Right on.



love it!



1129. Post 18049713 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: bitcoinminer42 on March 03, 2017, 11:20:36 AM
looks more like a lunch-box  Tongue

yes, an adorable lunch-box  Tongue

mit kleinem henkel zum tragen  Wink



1130. Post 18051386 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: abercrombie on March 03, 2017, 03:43:29 PM
Bitcoin was on Bloomberg live TV about 15 minutes ago, interviewing some guy about the ETF.

They weren't sure if the Winklevoss twins would use their own coin or have to buy more on the open market.

Whatever the case, they said there's going to be a huge run on Bitcoin in the event the SEC passes.  Very bullish.

Hope they archive it soon.

https://www.bloomberg.com/live/us

B...but weren't we told yesterday that all media is evil and they just ridicule Bitcoin and say its all a big hoax?  Huh




Just jokin...  Grin



1131. Post 18097152 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: york780 on March 07, 2017, 10:50:05 AM
Movement averages. This movement will continue for the rest of the week like i said a week ago. No major dumps or pumps this week. I have foreseen this movement. Untill ETF ,that will be the game changer. Rejected is moving to 950 EUR. Aproved is to new ATH. On the charts we can see an solid bottom at 950 EUR. This is just my opinion please dont burn me.

Rejected = 800$

Approved = 2000$



1132. Post 18112275 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: york780 on March 08, 2017, 03:26:43 PM
Who bought at the top?

Looks like we got a new Lambie.  Grin



1133. Post 18112391 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: afbitcoins on March 08, 2017, 03:46:14 PM
Any tips from you experts if you have strong fear and strong greed at the same time ?

Picture what the worst case would be and learn to deal with it.



1134. Post 18114888 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 08, 2017, 07:43:17 PM
highly volatile sideways till the 10th and then most likely a big dump, down to 800$ or a little below.


fyp




1135. Post 18114972 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: york780 on March 08, 2017, 08:05:05 PM
950 EUR should be the bottom i think

lol noob  

in case of denial you can forget those 950 EUR  Grin



1136. Post 18116654 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: york780 on March 08, 2017, 11:09:38 PM
Who cares about etf now. Everyone is firing their shots like idiots right now. So when etf is denied nothing will happpen. The dump is already over. Go to sleep, goodnight all.

 Grin



1137. Post 18117409 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):


Yeah, am getting more and more convinced that this recent slide wasn't just pre-SEC anxiety but the reaction to Antpool mining BU-blocks.

Eventually we could see approval, a run-up to 2000 and then a nice little crash back to 1000 as soon as BU becomes a real issue.



1138. Post 18117446 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Wexlike on March 09, 2017, 01:25:10 AM
What a surprising timing with the hard fork FUD just before the ETF.

In fact there is a connection:

ETF Hype -> Price surge -> more TXs -> Congestion -> higher Fees -> more Willingness to support BU

Its no coincidence that this issue comes up at a new ATH. Cause new ATH means more traffic, means more Fees,...



1139. Post 18123686 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: julian071 on March 09, 2017, 02:19:59 PM
Anyone else refreshing btctalk all day?

why?

ETF decision will 99.9% sure not come today.



1140. Post 18123849 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: soullyG on March 09, 2017, 02:39:26 PM
Anyone else refreshing btctalk all day?

why?

ETF decision will 99.9% sure not come today.

When do you anticipate it, tomorrow?

Will likely be the 13th

I expect tomorrow. Right before or after Wallstreet trading hours. The 13th could lead to some missunderstanding as some are expecting the 11th and with no announcement on the 11th they could be mislead to believe its approved.




1141. Post 18135263 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):


intredasting



1142. Post 18135380 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: GreekGeek on March 10, 2017, 01:30:47 PM
WTF was that?    Huh Huh Huh Huh

Eventually automatic sell orders triggered by specific numbers.

Edit: Bots trading the thin orderbook could also be a possibility.



1143. Post 18135406 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on March 10, 2017, 01:33:08 PM
The Insiders got out-insidered by some inside-insiders ... whatta fucking shitshow these gubmint goons have created.

Its obv insider trading. Not that i have a huge issue with it. But i would be surprised if that wouldnt lead to some investigation.

Nevertheless: It looks very much as approved.

celebrate.gif



1144. Post 18135587 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on March 10, 2017, 01:46:21 PM
Is there any actual news of approval or not?

no



1145. Post 18135607 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Stevenirving on March 10, 2017, 01:49:37 PM
Clearly the ETF will be approved. Someone with insider information just confirmed that. Is now the cheapest time to buy ever again?

Will the SEC take back there decision after this shit show?

LOL, if anything it not "our" fault. Its theirs, they have to take care that nothing leaks before the announcement.

They could very well have an internal audition about what happened.



1146. Post 18135745 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: micalith on March 10, 2017, 02:00:45 PM
Hmmm. ETF wouldn't be too happy to see blatant insider trading. Could that be grounds for not favouring the green light?

Nope. Its THEIR fault.



1147. Post 18142329 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):


Imagine, all the wallstreet investors that want to invest in BTC waited obv for the SEC decision. Now that the ETF got denied they will find other ways to buy BTC. Maybe not as much, yes, but money will flow to Gemini etc



1148. Post 18214716 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):


That's the BU-effect.



1149. Post 18215805 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: gentlemand on March 16, 2017, 08:16:45 PM
but nonetheless very annoyed because of the bad actors in this community.

I for one am pretty amazed there aren't more of them. Bitcoin is a very fertile petri dish for every conceivable type of disgusting behaviour.

The "Human factor" is Bitcoin's biggest threat. Folks tend to tribalism very fast and at the moment they are about to cripple Bitcoin as a storage of value, cause a fork (or even forkS) will mean in the longterm the end of Bitcoin as a storage of value. You can call the other fork "Altcoin" as long as you want, in the end the market doesn't care and value will diminish over time.



1150. Post 18216158 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 16, 2017, 09:58:52 PM
Did you buy back in Adam? This is your chance, I guess.
not yet.

I think we can go lower still...

Give BU another dozen of % and we will go below 1000 quite easily.



1151. Post 18216424 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 16, 2017, 10:31:54 PM
if price manages to stay above 1160 in the next few min's i'm gonna fire up my BU node and hope that helps

better fire up your BU-mining-farm



1152. Post 18227379 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):


r/BTC seems very angry about that exchanges announcement. i interpret that as a good sign.



1153. Post 18227390 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: arklan on March 17, 2017, 07:06:02 PM
https://coin.dance/nodes/share

Heh.. yeah, it really looks like that BU fork is happening any day now  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

wait - bitcoin unlimited has 11%? that's what we're dealing with? 11 FUCKING PERCENT!? jesus christ you guys.

or am i wrong and even with that 11% we'd still be shy of activating segwit? do we need 90% consensus or 95%?

it's about hashrate not nodes. and 32% isnt THAT minor.



1154. Post 18236258 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Morgenst3rn on March 18, 2017, 12:33:29 PM
The charts are still saying 900 EUR. So i keep being pacient. First a little up move to 1000 EUR, after that we go down to 900 EUR according to the charts. They were right so far so why not !

So far york780 seems to be right. It dropped further.
From 1070 € yesterday to 987 € @ Kraken right now.

LOL, is that the shill account of that bullshit-talker?  Grin



1155. Post 18236946 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Richard Branson on March 18, 2017, 02:11:45 PM
Now is the time to start stacking up altcoins. Well, actually we should have done it a lot sooner.

bitcoin is going to be in a bear market for a while.

Stability maybe will be somewhere around 8 or 900.

Most likely, as the bitcoin civil war continues BTC will continue to lose marketshare and these other coins will keep gaining.

Altcoins aka pump and dump coins? Invented every second with almost the same code. Only new name, logo and a few parameter modifications.

You seem to be stuck in 2013 kid.



1156. Post 18241093 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):


Hashrate for BU is still on a strong rise, i guess that's the reason for that last little dump.



1157. Post 18241717 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Stevenirving on March 18, 2017, 08:45:32 PM
So all of this bullshit is just BU?? Really? Thats what is causing this move downward? Surely there must be something else going on!

Yeah, i think it's just BU. Time that we see some really significant correlations between news from BU and BTC price declining, like we had them quite often in the past when Wu (or some other big pool) was posting in favor of BU and price immediately tanked. Let that happen several times and price below 700$ and BU-folks start to consider if it's actually the right path to choose.

And no the real shitstorm hasn't started yet, in case of a forking-mess better expect a combined price of below 500$.



1158. Post 18241971 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: becoin on March 18, 2017, 09:31:17 PM
So all of this bullshit is just BU?? Really? Thats what is causing this move downward? Surely there must be something else going on!

Why would you need something else going on? It'll be a total shit storm if we get a hard fork.

The shit storm is already going on. BUcoin hardfork is already priced in!

No it's not

Yes, it is. Chances of a hard fork happening are already above 90%. I'd advise SW pools to switch temporarily to BU and activate the fork then switch back to Core. Better give psychopaths their BUcoin and get rid of those bitcoin haters.

I would say chances that we see a BU-fork in 2017 are 20% at the moment. They need a significant majority in hashpower, something like 80% and that's hard to get.



1159. Post 18242380 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Torque on March 18, 2017, 10:21:59 PM
So anyone care to explain why this whole BU fork FUD just happens to come up immediately after the ETF disapproval?  Hmmm?

It's quite simple: The ETF-decision brought hype. Hype lead to a big mempool. Which lead to rising fees. High fees lead to stronger motivation to run BU.

The runup caused the clogged network and that brought us here.

Same with altcoins. The rising fees (caused through ETF-hype) lead to rising Altcoins cause people speculate on stronger Altcoin adaption.

Just simple logic. No conspiracy-retardness needed.



1160. Post 18316340 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):


To get 2/3 or 3/4 of the hashrate isn't THAT easy. At least i think so.




1161. Post 18316533 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Cassius on March 24, 2017, 01:25:43 PM

To get 2/3 or 3/4 of the hashrate isn't THAT easy. At least i think so.



A large mining pool might tip the scales to 51% now. That would be a powerful signal.
95%? Forget it. Ever. Just don't know how that one gets resolved.

51% is not enough to HF securely and you are aware of that 2/3 and 3/4 ≠ 95%?  Wink



1162. Post 18317224 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 24, 2017, 02:32:57 PM
This is fucking terrible. I wonder how much further this can go.

it is terrible, fucking terrible

No it's just the first real challenge that the experiment Bitcoin faces. Now it will show how good that concept works under scrutiny.

Even if we wouldn't have those 1MB-limit issues there would be another issue along the road with the potential to split the community or the community from the miners.

If Bitcoin isn't able to handle that it's a fail. As simple as that.



1163. Post 18320979 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on March 24, 2017, 09:06:25 PM
So... Bitcoin dies again... Amirite ?!

No it lives. Just in xx different versions, all worth a fraction of todays valuation. So technically its still alive, only from a price point of view...



1164. Post 18321518 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):


BTW mempool is near zero at the moment.



1165. Post 18321650 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 24, 2017, 10:36:23 PM

BTW mempool is near zero at the moment.

alts are sucking that dry too!!

WE"RE DOOOOOOOOOOOOMED!

alts are eating bitcoin for breakfast



1166. Post 18321832 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 24, 2017, 11:00:31 PM
I think this is it.

unfortunately you are the perfect contraindicator  Grin



1167. Post 18326622 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: becoin on March 25, 2017, 10:13:51 AM
But let's flip your stupid assertion on its head. Isn't it a problem that one angry chinese miner and one high powered enthusiast on the autism specter can bring Bitcoin to its knees? Why is that? Why is Bitcoin so weak?
A lot of bitcoin haters joined forces to make it look weak. Those are different groups with different agendas. They would hate to see segwit, LN and side chains implemented. Every fucking altcoin can be implemented as a bitcoin side chain without any risk to consumers! But that is the last thing banks would like to see. So they pump the alts they've chosen to distract average Joe from further converting his savings into bitcoins. The alt is not dangerous for banks. They can kill it anytime just by dumping it. 99% of altcoin investors are just desperado gamblers that don't really care about smart contracts or whatever.

So Roger Ver is a Bitcoin hater now?

Roger Ver is an emotional psychopath or act like that because he is a puppet directed by shadow actors. He hates everything that doesn't go his way. He doesn't care about Bitcoin or BUcoin success. His only obsession is to see Core team defeated. Everything and everybody that can get Core humiliated will get Roger's support!  

LOL, what a shithead you are. And no i am not in any camp in this silly civilwar.

Edit: Who are those "shadow actors"? The Illuminati? The Rothschilds?



1168. Post 18326867 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on March 25, 2017, 11:02:57 AM
But let's flip your stupid assertion on its head. Isn't it a problem that one angry chinese miner and one high powered enthusiast on the autism specter can bring Bitcoin to its knees? Why is that? Why is Bitcoin so weak?
A lot of bitcoin haters joined forces to make it look weak. Those are different groups with different agendas. They would hate to see segwit, LN and side chains implemented. Every fucking altcoin can be implemented as a bitcoin side chain without any risk to consumers! But that is the last thing banks would like to see. So they pump the alts they've chosen to distract average Joe from further converting his savings into bitcoins. The alt is not dangerous for banks. They can kill it anytime just by dumping it. 99% of altcoin investors are just desperado gamblers that don't really care about smart contracts or whatever.

Do you really think the BU crowd, the banks, Roger Ver and some Chinese dark forces all sat around a table together and conspired to bring Bitcoin down?

I know this is the internet age and anyone can believe anything - but the problem is simple. Bitcoin is at war with itself, unable to change to deliver a solution to a real problem and lacking leadership, and direction.

It has issues and no solution is apparent.  There is no conspiracy of dumpers, just people who worry and sell coins because of this uncertainty.  It is rational behaviour to sell when the price is not looking realistic.

That is all.  I am a Bitcoin fan.
Agreed, although I wouldn't say that we need leadership but rather a more clear mechanism of decision making.

1 BTC = 1 VOTE



1169. Post 18478846 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):


This little honeybadger astonishes me everytime. We go through such a blocksize-civilwar-shitshow and he doesn't give a shit. Impressive!



1170. Post 18755879 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):


Honeybadger astonishes me again and again..



1171. Post 19077385 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: toknormal on May 18, 2017, 10:13:58 AM

I couldn't really care less about the backlog.

It isn't affecting the ability to move mid to larger amounts of Bitcoin around.

fyp

Moving around 10$ worth of BTC and paying 3$ makes not much sense.



1172. Post 19077918 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: toknormal on May 18, 2017, 10:20:29 AM

I couldn't really care less about the backlog.

It isn't affecting the ability to move mid to larger amounts of Bitcoin around.

fyp

Moving around 10$ worth of BTC and paying 3$ makes not much sense.

Moving $3 in Bitcoin doesn't make much sense either. The blockchain is a limited resource. Like any other limited resource where there is contention for access it gets expensive.

There are payment systems in abundance for moving $3 around.

Yes, and as those limits aren't naturally given but set in code they are obv a topic of discussion. To paint a situation where everything is god given and set in stone is simply bs.

Also you are contradicting yourself: "Ability to move around Bitcoin isn't affected" contradicts "Moving $3 in Bitcoin doesn't make much sense either. The blockchain is a limited resource."




1173. Post 19078821 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: toknormal on May 18, 2017, 11:29:07 AM

Also you are contradicting yourself: "Ability to move around Bitcoin isn't affected" contradicts "Moving $3 in Bitcoin doesn't make much sense either. The blockchain is a limited resource."

The problem is that bitcoin (or any blockchain) cannot be a commercial payments system AND an efficient store of value both at once since the two objectives have priorities which are in conflict.

For a start, the purpose of a payment system is to clear trades, not to settle them and as such the commercial realm is adequately catered for by worldwide payment networks such as Visa and Mastercard. There is anything a blockchain can improve on there - even in terms of fees, because the merchant isn't paying those fees to clear the trade, they're paying for access to a massive customer base.

Secondly, it doesn't matter what you make the blocksize - 2 Mb, 16 Mb 32 Mb. It will still get full and still be spammable. Paying a $3 fee to transact on it isn't comparable to paying  2% fee with Visa because the merchant is purchasing different things in each case:

 • with Visa they aren't paying for realtime settlement, with bitcoin they are
 • with Bitcoin they aren't paying for access to a majority client base, with Visa they are
 • with Bitcoin they aren't paying for merchant services, with bitcoin they are

So with bitcoin it's all about settlement, not trade which is why its technical properties should be prioritised around monetary security, stability and confidence rather than commercial versatility.

Against that background, $3 is nothing for moving an asset that is fundamentally a deflationary store of value and that has liquidity worldwide.


The biggest threat for Bitcoin's function as store of value are multiple forks. If Bitcoin splits up into several competing instances of the same original store of value, the value of each single chain and also all chains combined diminishes. So it should be a top priority to keep everyone on board, even if that means doing compromises which are eventually seen as suboptimal.



1174. Post 19117556 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: DaRude on May 20, 2017, 11:26:06 PM
https://www.coinhills.com/market/currency/
is this correct over 51% traded in BTC is in JPY  Shocked Huh

zero fees



1175. Post 19124231 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: Ibian on May 21, 2017, 12:18:02 PM
Fees are getting stupid. Just paid about 5 bucks for a transfer, as suggested by my wallet.

Got another transfer with about a bucks worth of fees that has been stuck for a few days now. It's absurd.

Yes, and exactly this was promised a year ago at least.



1176. Post 19132113 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):


If i read correct Barry Silbert organized the meeting so SW+2MBHF seems to be most likely.



1177. Post 19147836 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: Iranus on May 22, 2017, 09:35:49 PM
Never fails. New articles up on CNBC, CNN, BusinessInsider, and Fortune today.  Then a dump.

Every time media prints something about Bitcoin, it dumps soon after.



I don't know if I'd exactly call that a dump.

It's just back to where it was earlier today.

I see it more as just part of today's daily healthy correction.
We're having this sort of correction nearly every day.

It seems unlikely that the corrections will actually amount to anything after a few weeks.  Either this is serious growth or it's the very beginning of the next Bitcoin bubble, which will peak at several thousands.  In either case, no one should be worried at these levels.

That's just Torque. He is used to explain everything with evil media that controls everything.  Cool



1178. Post 19148098 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: Ibian on May 22, 2017, 09:48:02 PM
Never fails. New articles up on CNBC, CNN, BusinessInsider, and Fortune today.  Then a dump.

Every time media prints something about Bitcoin, it dumps soon after.



I don't know if I'd exactly call that a dump.

It's just back to where it was earlier today.

I see it more as just part of today's daily healthy correction.
We're having this sort of correction nearly every day.

It seems unlikely that the corrections will actually amount to anything after a few weeks.  Either this is serious growth or it's the very beginning of the next Bitcoin bubble, which will peak at several thousands.  In either case, no one should be worried at these levels.

That's just Torque. He is used to explain everything with evil media that controls everything.  Cool
The media is in fact evil, after at least one definition. And they do control what they choose to let people see.

OK, so that 100$ dump that we just saw is CNN's work. Got it.



1179. Post 19148195 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: Ibian on May 22, 2017, 10:13:59 PM
Never fails. New articles up on CNBC, CNN, BusinessInsider, and Fortune today.  Then a dump.

Every time media prints something about Bitcoin, it dumps soon after.



I don't know if I'd exactly call that a dump.

It's just back to where it was earlier today.

I see it more as just part of today's daily healthy correction.
We're having this sort of correction nearly every day.

It seems unlikely that the corrections will actually amount to anything after a few weeks.  Either this is serious growth or it's the very beginning of the next Bitcoin bubble, which will peak at several thousands.  In either case, no one should be worried at these levels.

That's just Torque. He is used to explain everything with evil media that controls everything.  Cool
The media is in fact evil, after at least one definition. And they do control what they choose to let people see.

OK, so that 100$ dump that we just saw is CNN's work. Got it.
Well, no. Just jews. Wanna go down this rabbit hole?

Nah, i just got it. Everytime we see a dump it's the evil media. I understand now. Silly me, thought it's normal after such a bullrun.  Grin



1180. Post 19171556 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote
In light of some recent discussions, I wrote up this BIP for a real 2 MB block
size hardfork following Segwit BIP148 activation. This is not part of any
agreement I am party to, nor anything of that sort. Just something to throw
out there as a possible (and realistic) option.

Note that I cannot recommend this to be adopted, since frankly 1 MB blocks
really are still too large,

Hehe, gotta love that nutjob.




1181. Post 19194019 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: luckygenough56 on May 25, 2017, 02:08:12 PM
im close to post a rocket but i don't want to put bad luck on us

yeah, no rockets and trains plz



1182. Post 19201710 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: blade87 on May 25, 2017, 02:23:29 PM
RIP to the shorts who lost it all.

remember?  Grin





1183. Post 19201860 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: r0ach on May 26, 2017, 12:08:56 AM
$600 price spread (so far) in a single day, or 22% drop.  Nice pump and dump guys.

lol, look who's back? the second we get a little dump you dare to speak out again.  Grin



1184. Post 19217210 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on May 26, 2017, 10:08:15 PM
I already rent. I live in a dirt-cheap secure bunker in a great neighborhood in downtown Toronto surrounded by a close-knit community of artists, musicians, writers, beatniks, hippies, hipsters, punks, immigrants and general riffraff.

I'm surrounded by bars, bistros, patios, booze cans, live music, original artwork, gourmet food and shops selling everything imaginable.

My rent is less than the maintenance fees on even the cheapest condo.

 Sounds like Maitland Ave☺

LOL   Grin

No. I'm what they call a breeder.

I live in Kensington Market.

Don't worry, we're open-minded about everybody, LGBTQ included.

Unlike that other "village", we don't even mind uniformed police officers. It makes them easier to spot.  Wink

Nice! I like Kensington market. Nice food!



1185. Post 19223398 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: bitcoinvest on May 27, 2017, 09:57:04 AM
why this dump?

because rise



1186. Post 19223479 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: UnDerDoG81 on May 27, 2017, 10:18:13 AM
Just woke up, what a mess  Shocked As expected... This is the reason why Bitcoin never will succeed. People can´t trust this. Now the media shitstorm will start all over again.

bs

btc is still a rather small asset compared to big stocks and a tiny asset compared to real world currencies.  a asset with that kind of marketcap is allowed to go -30% after it rose 50% in a matter of days.

what is it that no one complains about volatility if we go up and the day we see our first little correction in a while the whining starts?



1187. Post 19223520 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: UnDerDoG81 on May 27, 2017, 10:25:13 AM
Just woke up, what a mess  Shocked As expected... This is the reason why Bitcoin never will succeed. People can´t trust this. Now the media shitstorm will start all over again.

bs

You remember that Gox scenario? It took almost 4 years to recover... I feel the same this time.

Except that we have no Gox-like event this time. At least not yet.



1188. Post 19281340 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: European Central Bank on May 30, 2017, 09:56:42 PM

cruising past 0.1 now. does it have the legs to go all the way to the top? that would be quite something and maybe not surprising.

define "top"

to top the marketcap of BTC seems highly likely at the moment



1189. Post 19374213 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):


What's the Bitfinex-situation at the moment? USD-Withdraws possible? Only BTC?



1190. Post 19510482 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: podyx on June 12, 2017, 10:56:44 AM
Doesn't make sense how bitcoin is crashing but ETH/BTC is going down aswell...

makes perfectly sense. the dethroning of BTC could be the end of the cryptobullrun we saw since 2015



1191. Post 19557363 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: empowering on June 14, 2017, 02:49:34 PM
Is Bitstamp referring to lightning network transactions.


Yes. Because the're adding Litecoin this week.



Nope, i expect they will go one step beyond and will add IOTA.



1192. Post 19557479 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: gentlemand on June 14, 2017, 02:56:58 PM
Nope, i expect they will go one step beyond and will add IOTA.

They're a considerably classier operation than Bitfinex and would give a decent amount of signalling before doing that.

Let's see.



1193. Post 19564685 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on June 14, 2017, 10:05:41 PM
The risk of impending chain split could be a factor.

Tada! 100 Points to you. The UASF outlook is scary for the markets, as is an eventual #Flippening with ETH.

That combined with a very long run with lots of hype and the usual "My friends, family, coworkers asking about BTC" and you have more than enough reason for a strong correction down to 1500$.




1194. Post 19575939 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):


I wouldn't call it Bitmain-fiasco. I would call it: "Ignoring the necessity of scaling for 3 years fiasco."

Until this day you have peeps like LunaticLuke that say openly that the high fees are good and the blocksize should be shrunk to 0.5MB.

Also we had a solution early 2016, remember? The miners and some core devs agreed for 2MB+SW. What happend? Core just openly gave a fuck about that agreement. Seriously, to blame just one side is rather biased.



1195. Post 19576313 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: spooderman on June 15, 2017, 01:37:02 PM

I wouldn't call it Bitmain-fiasco. I would call it: "Ignoring the necessity of scaling for 3 years fiasco."

Until this day you have peeps like LunaticLuke that say openly that the high fees are good and the blocksize should be shrunk to 0.5MB.

Also we had a solution early 2016, remember? The miners and some core devs agreed for 2MB+SW. What happend? Core just openly gave a fuck about that agreement. Seriously, to blame just one side is rather biased.

Don't be an idiot.

You're presenting an absurd view pushed by bitmain, ver trolls and /btc.

If you'd care to do some research into this you'd realize you've been misled.

An "idiot"? LOL, OK what part is "idiotic"?

Did they sign the agreement? Yes.

Did it say SW+2MB? Yes.

Did Maxwell and others openly state just hours after they signed it "We dont care."  Yes.

So what part is misleading?



1196. Post 19576555 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: Lauda on June 15, 2017, 01:47:35 PM
"Core" signed nothing, and there is no such thing as "Core" when considering a singular entity.

I never said "Core" signed the agreement.

Read again:

Quote from: ImI on June 15, 2017, 01:17:20 PM

Also we had a solution early 2016, remember? The miners and some core devsagreed for 2MB+SW. What happend? Core just openly gave a fuck about that agreement. Seriously, to blame just one side is rather biased.

We had an agreement already and (like you also correctly stated) this agreement got neglected by Maxwell, Friedenbach and others just hours after the other Core devs signed it. So who is to blame for that mess? Why opt out of SW+2MB?

If there is no such thing as a unity called "Core" then you will never be getting closer to any agreement as they where in the beginning of 2016.



1197. Post 19576579 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: spooderman on June 15, 2017, 01:48:57 PM
^^ thank you.

edit: and even after the classic block was mined, Luke continued to write the software they agreed upon whilst having his name dragged through the mud.

Luke? Luke states to this very day that 0.5Mb is enough. LOL



1198. Post 19576750 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: Lauda on June 15, 2017, 01:58:23 PM
Do you even understand Bitcoin? If you want proof-by-proxy then either go to Barrycoin or Jihancoin.

Oh, i understand Bitcoin very well. Bitcoin relies on a consensus-mechanism called "Proof of Work" and as such it's the miners that effectively decide what happens. You don't like it? OK, but what other consensus-mechanism do you propose? "Proof of Node"? "Proof of Reddit Account"?

You see you are right that Bitcoin means NO backdoor decisions, yes. But then you should also understand that in the Bitcoin ecosystem it's PoW that decides and nothing else.



1199. Post 19576952 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: spooderman on June 15, 2017, 02:09:56 PM
Do you even understand Bitcoin? If you want proof-by-proxy then either go to Barrycoin or Jihancoin.

Oh, i understand Bitcoin very well. Bitcoin relies on a consensus-mechanism called "Proof of Work" and as such it's the miners that effectively decide what happens. You don't like it? OK, but what other consensus-mechanism do you propose? "Proof of Node"? "Proof of Reddit Account"?

You see you are right that Bitcoin means NO backdoor decisions, yes. But then you should also understand that in the Bitcoin ecosystem it's PoW that decides and nothing else.

And who decides if the PoW is valid?

Learn Bitcoin mate. How do miners at the moment decide which block is valid and which isn't? It's the same principle that sorts out doublespends or any other malicious block. Majority of PoW decides what Bitcoin-block is correct and which isn't.



1200. Post 19659471 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: deepcolderwallet on June 19, 2017, 11:04:28 PM
Wanna know what's gonna happen?
This SegWit2x will be an epic fiasco.
Wu/Ver/Wright credibility will be buried for good.
Let's wait 'till July 31.

EDIT: Finally I have an avatar.

Wright? What's his connection with SegWit2x?



1201. Post 19786174 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: Dakustaking76 on June 26, 2017, 04:32:23 PM
Can someone explain Why this aint stopping?




1202. Post 20090612 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on July 12, 2017, 02:07:53 PM
Quote from: LukeJr
If BIP148 fails, many of us will be splitting off to a new (Bitcoin-balance-continuation) altcoin with another PoW algorithm. You're welcome to join us, if it comes to that.

Y'all ready for this?

Looking forward to it.



1203. Post 20137298 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on July 14, 2017, 06:01:49 PM
Big price drop on its way guys.....believe me.

yow this is my first reaction i'm just i guy with  for me a nice stash of btc but really don't know nothing of the technical side of it should i just keep holding it like last 1.5years Huh

and why do you think the price will go down so much ??

pffff also allways reading this comments on the wall observer but its so difficult to really understand this world Smiley

cash-in 50% and be happy



1204. Post 20137483 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on July 14, 2017, 06:17:07 PM
Big price drop on its way guys.....believe me.

yow this is my first reaction i'm just i guy with  for me a nice stash of btc but really don't know nothing of the technical side of it should i just keep holding it like last 1.5years Huh

and why do you think the price will go down so much ??

pffff also allways reading this comments on the wall observer but its so difficult to really understand this world Smiley

cash-in 50% and be happy

i'm allready happy bought them cheap but really best to cash out 50% and sit ready for cheap coins or something?
i'm 1 off the noobs Wink Wink but want to grow more in the btc world i make my btc on poker, gambling.... but never casht them out and just want to make the best of it understand it and ...
so whats your theory on what will happen from now till august----september.... and what is youre price range for  NOW and THAN  (  i'm not english speaking this is my best Wink  )

no theory, just: we are looking forward to rough weeks, you have made gains the past 1.5 years. so why not let 50% go and keep the rest no matter what. 2200$ is still nice compared to 500 Wink



1205. Post 20139242 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on July 14, 2017, 08:28:45 PM
So how low will it go then?

1400



1206. Post 20139457 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on July 14, 2017, 08:44:41 PM
Whenever people start yelling "cheap coinz!" I know that we're squarely in a bear market. Have heard it all before. They'll keep yelling that all the way down.  Roll Eyes

yes, looks like this time bitcoin is ded for real. it can't work. too much civil war, no incentives for full nodes, better coins around,...
I wonder why I am still hodling my bags.

why dead? bitcoin at 1400 would be far from dead wouldnt it? just not worth 36b$ that's all.



1207. Post 20139800 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: ivomm on July 14, 2017, 08:59:33 PM
And I was thinking Ver accepted the fiasco of his BU project. Now he will try to sabotage segwit: https://www.dashforcenews.com/bitcoin-com-to-dump-segwit2x-roger-ver-might-help-nchain-block-segwit/
Pride, greed and envy are the forces that drive this lunatic. Angry

It's his right to do so. He can sell coins as he wants to and he can buy and run mining hardware also as he wants to.



1208. Post 20140072 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: becoin on July 14, 2017, 09:26:59 PM
Who sold at the bottom?


You mean like last time you posted that and we where 400$ higher?

Quote from: becoin on June 25, 2017, 09:08:18 AM
Who sold at the bottom?


LOL, or even better at the 15th of June when we were hovering around 2800.  Grin

Quote from: becoin on June 14, 2017, 11:20:58 PM
Who sold at the bottom?




1209. Post 20149049 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):


I guess it's time for Becoin to ask: "Who sold at the bottom?"



1210. Post 20152161 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: tonyq on July 15, 2017, 02:16:08 PM
Below 1900 inside 48 hours.
Trust me.

Wow, what a prediction! You must be a wizard.  Wink



1211. Post 20153277 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):


LOL@all that manipulation talk

No one screamed "Manipulation!" when we were going from one ATH to another. Now we correct hard cause we have (as everyone can easily witness) internal conflicts going on and have had quite a steep rise from 250 until 3000 and suddenly everyone screams "Manipulation!"

Learn to deal with it folks. It's not always a bed of roses.



1212. Post 20167419 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on July 16, 2017, 01:33:08 AM
Nah guys this was it. The double bottom. Enjoy your cheap coins, from here we should buy them back up. Smiley



 Grin



1213. Post 20167627 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: Denker on July 16, 2017, 12:05:58 PM
Ok this is panic selling right now.
Lots of weak hands who thought to be strong are getting triggered!
Whales enjoy this moment pretty much I bet.
~$1760 is the weekly moving average (MA20) I have an eye on for the next coming days.

Nope, that's no panic selling yet.

Panic would mean -300$ in 1h.

Lookup the log charts and you witness REAL panic selling.



1214. Post 20167742 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: Searing on July 16, 2017, 12:19:58 PM
What is going on...

Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies! Rivers and seas boiling!
Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes, volcanoes...
The dead rising from the grave!
Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together...
mass hysteria!


ok I'll just ramp this up a bit...this gem just got posted

https://bitcoin.org/en/alert/2017-07-12-potential-split

when bitcoin.org says a hard fork is possible.....man this is gonna hurt!



mate, do you even read? that's from 12th



1215. Post 20168349 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: luckygenough56 on July 16, 2017, 12:36:31 PM
bottom ?

ask becoin, he predicts bottoms since 2800$ with great success.  Grin



1216. Post 20404297 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: becoin on July 26, 2017, 05:26:39 PM
I think it'll go down some if the rumor is true and BTCe did indeed hack MT Gox.

The rumor is that MtGox hacker laundered stolen bitcoins by selling them on BTC-e. This is very different from accusing BTC-e of hacking MtGox. lol


The rumor is that BTC-e hacked MtGox and used their own exchange to sell a good portion of the BTCs.

But lets see, so far just rumors...



1217. Post 20559026 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):


Not more than 1$ they said..






1218. Post 20559370 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on August 02, 2017, 03:53:41 AM
When the hashpower begins swinging from one chain to another it's going to get very messy and both coins will become unpredictable, unstable and at times very difficult to use.

lol, you mean just like eth and ltc are completely unstable cause GPU-hashpower switches between the two all the time?

hashpower follows price with a lag of several weeks, no reason to push the panic-button.



1219. Post 21825544 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit_Disgrace on September 14, 2017, 11:25:17 AM

I fail to see why this is bad. It is confirmed. They will not trade anymore there. Move on.

This is actually good news! /s



1220. Post 21825749 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: Starving_Marvin on September 14, 2017, 11:30:39 AM

I fail to see why this is bad. It is confirmed. They will not trade anymore there. Move on.

This is actually good news! /s

I don't understand. Why is it good news that BTCC will stop all trading?



1221. Post 21829262 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):


Inb4 some asshole posting: "Who bought the dip?!"



1222. Post 21829629 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on September 14, 2017, 01:22:00 PM

Inb4 some asshole posting: "Who bought the dip?!"

Who sold the bottom thanks for the cheap coins only fools sell at $4k etc

Usually that's Becoin's job.  Grin



1223. Post 21829652 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):



Btw BTCC is just about their involvement in ICOs.



1224. Post 24455630 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: DaRude on November 12, 2017, 08:03:41 AM
[Can you name one advantage BCH offers over LTC or other ALTs?

Just a little reminder about what Bitcoin was originally planned to be:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=532.msg6306#msg6306

And then think again which of the lately numerous Bitcoin-versions comes closest to this vision and therefore would rightly deserve to call itself "Bitcoin".

Hint. It may eventually not be the version you are prefering.



1225. Post 24469867 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: becoin on November 12, 2017, 04:39:49 PM
This is why I don't see any problem with the fees. If you can't afford those fees just use fiat banking. Bitcoin is for people that do value their money, financial freedom and privacy.

In other words: 3rd world, go f*** yourself.

But honestly i think it's good that we finally are able to clearly see what the underlying differences are what Bitcoin should be and what not. My impression is that lots and lots of folks still don't understand that there is a big gap in the Bitcoin community when it comes to that.



1226. Post 24478864 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: Ibian on November 12, 2017, 10:54:17 PM
Can't wait until BTC pulls back up from this dip so, this thread can go back to Carolina memes and train videos...
That's another very important human flaw. During war all people can think of is peace. But during peace nobody thinks about war. We should, because peace is always temporary, and the better we prepare for war the better chance of surviving.

That's some real Niccolò Machiavelli stuff right there...
Do you have a counterargument to it? I would like to hear it if so. Being wrong is the highlight of my day, because it's a chance to learn something new. Especially when I turn out to be wrong about a conclusion I don't like, such as in this case. So, if you have something to share?

During war people think about peace because they are looking forward to a better life. Why should they look forward to war in times of peace? Makes no sense.

Also you are part of the problem if you are following this "We have to prepare for war"-stuff, as all preparations for war cause actions that inherently make wars more likely.



1227. Post 24478944 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: Ibian on November 12, 2017, 10:25:16 PM
We can't let them win even once, because that's all it takes. They don't care about logic or morals or any of that stuff. The only way to dislodge them after they take over is through physical violence.

Am i interpreting this correctly that in case that BCH becomes the dominating chain you are here publicly advocating physical violence against BCH-proponents?



1228. Post 24478982 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: Torque on November 12, 2017, 10:58:01 PM
Self-preservation is an innate right of any human born on this planet. And preparing for a day when someone might try to attack and eliminate you is also an innate right of self-preservation. It's not begging for war, it's preparing for self-defense.

No one said you don't have the right for preparing for war or self-defense or whatever. You are just making such an incident more likely, that's all.



1229. Post 24479193 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: Torque on November 12, 2017, 11:05:45 PM
Self-preservation is an innate right of any human born on this planet. And preparing for a day when someone might try to attack and eliminate you is also an innate right of self-preservation. It's not begging for war, it's preparing for self-defense.

No one said you don't have the right for preparing for war or self-defense or whatever. You are just making such an incident more likely, that's all.

The Buddhist Shaolin monks of China would disagree with you.

Interesting, i guess i will have to discuss with them one time.



1230. Post 24479265 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: Ibian on November 12, 2017, 11:04:39 PM
We can't let them win even once, because that's all it takes. They don't care about logic or morals or any of that stuff. The only way to dislodge them after they take over is through physical violence.

Am i interpreting this correctly that in case that BCH becomes the dominating chain you are here publicly advocating physical violence against BCH-proponents?
I'm saying that the coming global financial collapse will be worse without a version of bitcoin true to Satoshis spirit than with it. Our actions here could literally save lives, maybe a lot of them. But it requires action, and the willingness to accept reality as it is in order to take said action.

Ok, i see a point to that.

Obv it's still to be determined what IS the true vision of Satoshi and which version of Bitcoin follows this vision more closely, but that's another topic.



1231. Post 24534770 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.27h):

Quote from: becoin on November 13, 2017, 10:26:07 PM
Bcash cost of production (difficulty) is now being slashed by 20% per block for the next 6 blocks. Expect miners to follow cost of production slavishly. Forking guys have no idea what they have unleashed ... it will become apparent soon now.

Yes, the existence of BCH will destabilize BCT mining.  

Everyone knows that at equilibrium, if BCH has 1/10th the value of BTC, that the hash power mining BCH will be 1/10th that mining BTC.  

What is less obvious what happens when the system is not in equilibrium. Imagine that the market reprices BCH 100% higher and BTC 10% lower.  What is the expected distribution of hash power now assuming short-term profit-maximizing miners?  

The answer is "most of it will be mining BCH." Because the difficulty adjusts only very slowly (every 2016 blocks) BCH becomes twice as profitable to mine as BTC.  Hash-per-hash miners would earn double by mining BCH.  This continues until the difficulty reset comes when BCH would go "limit up" (4X), when most miners would leave BCH back for BTC.  BCH's difficulty would slowly ratchet back down due to its fast difficulty adjustment and the process would later repeat.  

What this suggest is that at times when BCH is more profitable to mine and the hash rate migrates to BCH, the average block time for BTC will increase significantly and BTC's already slow and expensive transactions will become much more so.  


What do you know, Marcus, it worked.


It will work until there is someone willing to spend their BTC and pay miners to mine BCH. When they run out of BTC that's the end of the road for the BCH circus.


Ah i remember, just like you predicted ETH to fail when it was going for 1$.   Grin



1232. Post 24534869 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.27h):

Quote from: Torque on November 13, 2017, 10:25:31 PM


You don't buy BCH. That's silly.

It comes free just by holding your BTC.

Not for people who are buying BTC after the fork occurred, they get nothing for free. And the BCH cartel knows this. They know that in order for BCH to survive into the future, it's not enough to have existing holders. They must have new buyers, now and into the future. For decades. And someone's got to buy all the existing free BCH coins being traded for BTC.

Ain't gonna happen.

Ver still has an ungodly wad of coins sitting on Bitfinex, if the story is to be believed. This might not be over yet.

Satoshi and people like WinkleVii, Tim Draper, and Loaded have an ungodly amount of BCH ready to dump at any time. Checkmate?

You mean this Satoshi? -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=532.msg6306#msg6306



1233. Post 24535904 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.27h):

Quote from: ragnar0k on November 13, 2017, 10:56:46 PM
or did I miss something?

yes.



1234. Post 25219097 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Remember?  

One moment of silence for Tarmi, Notlambchop and others who were our constant friends at that time.  Grin



Edit: I remember how happy everyone was once we finally moved from 220 -> 250$.




1235. Post 25273739 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.29h):

Quote from: BTCOP on November 26, 2017, 09:11:53 PM
Hi to all!

This is my first post to this forum. I have been following this thread for a couple of month and found the discussions to be the most informed I've come across by quite some way.

I have a very modest bitcoin holding. Just less and 1 BTC. So i can't speak about Lambo's or sea front houses on the California Coast. However i can speak with the hope that one day i will be able to pay off my mortgage early. So i hope that my modest investment will become a life changing one in the future.

Anyway, i thought i'd post this chart which i'm sure many of you have seen before but what i found interesting was the date this chart predicts that 1 BTC would be worth 10k USD. "22-11-17". I can only hope this chart plays out to 2024. Cos if it does then i can pay off my mortgage and still have enough left over to book a holiday to the California coast. Who knows! Might see one of you guys driving down Highway 1 in your Lambo.



Welcome! Who knows maybe 1BTC will be enough to pay your mortgage.



1236. Post 26694091 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.34h):

Quote from: fabiorem on December 21, 2017, 12:05:06 AM
Why am I getting ads with retarded looking, giant hook-nosed Jews telling me to buy bitcoin AT THE TOP?


Maybe because "jews" is the most searched term in your internet history.


Maybe because that person is actually not jewish but R0ach simply labels every person with a "giant hook-nose" as jewish.  Grin




1237. Post 26781320 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.34h):

Quote from: fragout on December 22, 2017, 01:13:12 PM
Time to send in the Guard! (waterloo). I hope Ver/Wu are happy. Their shitcoin is taking a bigger hit than anything else. What did they expect to happen? Destroy bitcoin and bcash would rise up to take the crown. Destroy bitcoin and you destroy all

If a simple interview with CNBC can "destroy" Bitcoin then it was a failure from the start anyhow and should be seen as that.

The same is true if a simple hardfork can "destroy" Bitcoin. What kind of joke would that be "We have an open-soruce project here, it's fabulous. But as soon as someone forks and does is own version it destroys itself."

Lol, seriously.



1238. Post 29395590 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.41h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on February 01, 2018, 04:10:38 PM
Soon be below 9000 USD, this is fucking ridiculous




1239. Post 29395792 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.41h):

Quote from: Arriemoller on February 01, 2018, 04:09:25 PM
The pitch to new investors (where price appreciation to 25k is going to come from)

It's not too late to tell your parents to buy physical silver instead.



Ouch...

That happened in my old hometown (Malmö) the other day. She was groped by an immigrant in a nightclub called Babel and slapped the guy. Later when she was going home the guy waited for her outside and smashed a bottle in her face, bystanders intervened but the guy got away before the police arrived.
That's one of the reasons I moved to another town.


Malmö must be one big shitfest.

Sweden was just simply incredible naive with all that muslim immigrant stuff.



1240. Post 29412938 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.41h):


Anyone here from 2013??  Cool

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2ku1A5Ox8U



1241. Post 29413859 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.41h):

Quote from: Biro Bob on February 01, 2018, 09:42:36 PM

Haha! That brings back memories! A lot has happened in 5 years.

Love that song!

Innocent times.

No CNBC reporting about the last fart BTC let go.



1242. Post 29722351 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):



CCMF



1243. Post 33486433 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: RoomBot on March 30, 2018, 12:42:46 AM
Don't lose your shirt.



i miss ccmf



1244. Post 43674853 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.04h):

Quote from: Vin on August 07, 2018, 09:05:55 PM
We are going to the core

What core?


The Hardcore.



1245. Post 47911501 (copy this link) (by ImI) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.13h):

Quote from: DaRude on November 15, 2018, 02:20:32 AM
yep.....looks like Craig Wright has gotten his way and will soon be in control of Bitcoin Cash after taking over more than 51% of the BCH network.

Absolute fucking lulz.

I have to imagine Roger Ver is literally in tears at this moment.

Babies are dying, etc...

Unless he really has BTC1MM (or whatever will be left after fighting ABC) and is actually insane enough to believe he can take on BTC i really don't see his end game. So Bitmain will unload their 1MM in bcashSV to him, and if we to believe that he already has 1MM in bcashSV that'll put him at over 2MM+ in bcashSV. A shitcoin with even less support than bcash and a ton of enemies WTF is he planning on doing with that?

His view is quite obv imo:

He builds a better product than the rest and therefore generates demand. If Reddit, Twitter or Bitcointalk like him or not won't be decisive for success or not.

Now you can obv disagree if the markets will agree with him or not or if he really will have a better product but you asked for his "plan" and here you go, that's his plan.