All posts made by michaelGedi in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread



1. Post 1859079 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.53h):




ok, on topic:

Here you can see the big buy wall at $50 that a large amount of people have put up in case the price drops while they are AFK.

After reading the forums all day - and a lot of "old hand" at that - it seems $50 is the most talked about bottom. Perhaps a psychological sticking point if you will.

This is my first attempt to read this chart publicly...


Also, could someone please tell me what the green line represents exactly?



2. Post 1860381 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.53h):

Quote from: annette786 on April 17, 2013, 02:42:01 AM
I'm worried someone will take them up on the offer and dump 15k BTC on the market. Even if it's a fake/bug wall, I'm still surprised no one has decided to test it. 30% of the people predicting the 24 hr low think we'll be below $50 within 20 hours.

So if no one will bite on the $70 mega buy out, they certainly won't be dumping if it slides into the $60 or $50s. At least for now the panic has left the room.


'tis a valid point.


probably for this reason alone we will not go below $50 my hunch is


with image - 1.11M dollars.... now what i want to know is if this is someone very rich who put that money into the system, or someone who sold a lot of coins at $260ish and now has all that to play with on Gox...? thoughts?




3. Post 1866558 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.53h):

Quote from: Richy_T on April 17, 2013, 06:06:58 PM
Has anyone actually looked at how often walls are eaten away as opposed to cancelled? I think the incidence would be very low.


let's imagine you're bobby big bollocks who put up the 1mil wall at 70 last night...

then your mate or team mate or whatever puts up a wall on the way up to 100... that wall on the way up to 100 wants to be eaten... and potentially vice versa.

Now I'm pretty new to this, but it makes perfect sense to me.

Especially if it drifts down the the low 80s again.... Sold at 90-100 ish, bought back at 80-90ish

is that logical?



4. Post 1866578 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.53h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 16, 2013, 10:32:22 PM
Wall Observer
A free service brought to you by the bitcoin community

Whenever there is a significant change in market depth, please update this thread with a new depth chart, and a good price chart with some TA is also welcome, feel free to comment on these if you have something to worth contributing, ( if your post is not at all TA it will be deleted )

Posting guild lines:
 Please lets keep this thread clean. ( I will be removing any off topic posts )
 Do not post random comments on this thread, unless it is directly related to the last wall update (ex. The 20K ask was was NOT sold into, it was removed after being tested)
 When you post a chart please use bitcoincharts.com, mtgoxlive.com, btccharts.com or bitcoinity.com


as requested, i have started a new thread.
this thread is now a self-moderated topic.
I will try and keep this thread clean, with only facts, current trends, past price movements, depth charts, etc.
I promise to not delete post simply because i do not agree with the bearish TA.

thank you for your input!


Quote
We needed more regulation around this bitch.

the rules of this thread is an attempt to keep this thread from having +1000 post when price is doing big moves, and instead relay important indicators during critical moments.
also when the market is more calm we can expect to see wall posts and TA price charts, back to back without any relevant chatting, making easier to analyze.
there are other threads where speculators can discuss their sentiment, just not here...

That 1000+ page thread was getting kinda useless.

How about bitcoinium.com pics? I can never get mtgoxlive to load Undecided

thats fine too,
I'm looking for quality charts or good TA bearish or bullish.

asking good questions example....

Interesting pattern I've noticed. It's been sort of bouncing downwards for the last 4 days. Is there a technical term for this sort of thing?



is also welcome here.


just don't be posting about your "FEELINGS" and you won't get delete.  Tongue



by the way adam, thanks for choosing the name "hardcore" I feel proud... that 1200 post thread was growing on me quite a lot though... but it's ok, we now have "softcore" lounge



5. Post 1869830 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.53h):

Quote from: Terpie on April 17, 2013, 11:40:32 PM
sorry for the off topic but

bitfloor stopped trading!!!!

"All trading is currently suspended.
 I am sorry to announce that due to circumstances outside of our control BitFloor must cease all trading operations indefinitely.   Unfortunately, our US bank account is scheduled to be closed and we can no longer provide the same level of USD deposits and withdrawals  as we have in the past. As such, I have made the decision to halt operations and return all funds.

Over the next days we will be working with all clients to ensure that everyone receives their funds. Please be patient as we process your request.

- Roman
founder - bitfloor.com"

Why I laugh when other people are screaming to move to other exchanges. Between bitcoin24 and now this, the smaller exchanges are just WAY more unsafe to store funds.


thank fuck I just withdrew all my coins from bitstamp... I already lost a lot of € in the BTC24 debacle... Now Bitstamp sounds like it may get swamped with new customers from gox - and their infrastructure is not ready yet!

They are a great service though...



6. Post 1870337 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.53h):

let's not forget:

http://www.bitcoin2013.com/

and

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2140782,00.html

among the other good news. Bitcoin-24 and Bitfloor are just teething problems that need to be pulled out because they were never going to keep up, I suggest.


... 30 days time it's picking up whatever happens in my opinion.

This is purely based on hunch, but I feel that "awareness" is only really just beginning. Let's hope the infrastructure grows exponentially so it can cope and the manipulators grow some ethical balls and get involved in business with all their coins and capital instead of just pumping up a volatile and unstable market to make money in the short term.


EDIT - I have no idea what I'm talking about I've been into Bitcoin for 10 days



7. Post 1878561 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.53h):

Quote from: fitty on April 18, 2013, 05:51:32 PM
i reckon the ddos might be linked to that failed attempt last night to push the price down, they lost about 15k coins with the sell off and walls eaten, maybe they're desperate for their coins back cheaply. Seems quite heavy attacks today.

now comes the big fake walls trying to push the price down in the lag, this is the time when i'd be happy for gox to stop trading, then the idiots doing this can't benefit

I don't understand why someone would want to keep the price down. There's clearly someone or a group of people keeping it below $100. They slammed 4-5k coins into the rally yesterday that reached 98.5 pushing it down to 93-94. Then put up 25k worth of asks from 94-100. Those weren't old sells, half of them were from 94-98.5 that was just eaten. We know those were real because 5-6 hours later half the wall disappeared and someone dumped 11k of coins in 15 seconds into the bid wall trying to push it back. They put up ask walls trying to keep it down at 87.

That failed but they're still heavily protecting 95-100. I just don't really see why.

1) It's greatly decreasing volatility.
2) It's stabilizing the price
3) The longer it stays here the more people will actually believe this is a legitimate value for bitcoins (I'm not saying it is or isnt) Which does make it easier to rally it up (above $100) and rally it back up when it goes lower (then $90). Hard to believe someone is investing 2-3-4M to cement the physiological value of BTC.

Very little of that has to do with greed or making money at least short term. If they were greedy or wanted to make money they would have let the rally run to 110-120-130 then slammed the coins into it then and made a lot more money. It was clearly a goal to keep it under $100.

Can it really be some white knight of Bitcoin trying to stabilize the markets? The only big player who has the coins, has the money, who cares about the long term health of Bitcoin and the market, is MtGox.

Clearly someone is manipulating the market. And their goal isn't making money, at least in the short term. I just can't really figure the why or who part out. =)




interesting. I would hazard a guess that if it was non altruistic manipulation, short term money gain is nothing compared to a nice bit of market stability to rebuild confidence across the board... Let the media coverage and new retailers consolidate and legitamise bitcoins... so that it grows... but maybe, later, then they can do their dastardly deeds Shocked



8. Post 1878587 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.53h):

Quote from: smoothie on April 18, 2013, 09:14:04 PM
$21M is still a crazy bid sum compared to the brief peak at $16M before the crash. I'm very surprised it's still rising.

Maybe a few of those 60,000 new Gox customers that signed up in early April still want coins? Nah... that couldn't happen!

Of course not. Let us believe it is a few investors who sent millions of $ to mtgox because they just want to manipulate the price lol.

So if they ever want to withdraw their millions of $ they can either wait many days to withdraw all of it or buy bitcoins and be done in one day.....lol

"It must be a manipulator!" Lol

Yes guys it is a few millionaires sending their cash to a Japanese based bitcoin exchange and NOT to buy bitcoins.

I love the failed logic of the many noobs here.

Rofl lol omfg hahaha

 Grin


but yeah...



9. Post 1879095 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.53h):

anyone noticed the large amount of 0.06 bids?


seems the 0.01s weren't working anymore?



10. Post 1879922 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.53h):

Quote from: nazgulnarsil on April 18, 2013, 11:41:16 PM
I dunno man, those seem like some pretty good lines.  What is that? 8 point brush in maroon with radiused ends?  Nice.


Smiley



11. Post 1880653 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.53h):

yeah...

not sure where this is coming from



12. Post 1891054 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.53h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 20, 2013, 02:24:11 AM
I really regret being so bearish at one point, sold on every bear trap and the 32$ bet. LOL bitcoin

but it felt good taking some money out, cavitex send the cash the following morning. cavitex rules, but they should lower the fees to encourage more day trading... 



well, better that than be one of these noobs chasing the technology bubble you just heard about, throwing down a big bid at $235 while you still don't know what you're getting into, very strongly consider selling as you watch it go to $268 because you know it feels like it's about to pop... you can just feel it... but wait... a bit ... longer.

Then everything crashes including Gox, (and Bitstamp for that matter, though no one talked about it for some reason?) and you have to go out for your birthday dinner with your family and watch a movie afterwards to be polite while you wonder what's happened to all your money.

Get home, sell out at a 40% loss, resolve to be smart and buy back in at the right time because you've learnt enough to believe in BTC. THEN, wait for it, buy back in at $65 on Bitstamp, arbitrage - Bitcoin-24. Sell at €55 BITCOIN-24 GOES DOWN AND ALL YOUR MONEY IS NEVER TO BE SEEN AGAIN.

Then buy back in at $77 and hope it goes up not down shortly before reading lucif's TA on the downward future.


Sorry, just had to get that off my chest Smiley

I'm actually quite enjoying it, but that's only cos I'm breaking even at this valuation.


PS - so much for the "hardcore" wall observer thread



13. Post 1891061 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.53h):




14. Post 1902143 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.53h):



stick to the point please guys...



15. Post 1933883 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

clearly these are people who own a computer and some money and don't have much more to do with their time than click buy or sell on gox.

it's not like they can take their money out of there anyways... this is why bitcoin will forever be unstable Smiley   ...everyone gets stuck in gox forever in an endless loop of buy and sell until gox shaves their fiat and coins down to infintesimal sizes that can't be traded or withdrawn, then keeps those too



16. Post 2024632 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

new name for thread:

rpietila movement tracker



17. Post 2024860 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 04, 2013, 12:32:45 PM
It showed he at one point had 13 BTC and 92k USD. No it does not prove he is a "super node" but it does show he is not a 100% troll. Knowing he bought 700 BTC would make me feel better about flying to Finland.

So you are coming after all...?  Smiley I was wanting you to come. I extended the stay to 5 nights (from original 3) for the same price. The weather is nice, and I managed to secure a white limo:



It is fine if this is sent to Smoothie wall observer thread. I submit.

stay SLIGHTLY on topic please:




I think you'll find observing walls much more interesting than your white limo rental



18. Post 2026425 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on May 04, 2013, 03:46:19 PM
1719.38   a few seconds ago   111.30


wow wow wow


bam



19. Post 2026638 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on May 04, 2013, 03:54:40 PM
1719.38   a few seconds ago   111.30


wow wow wow


bam

did not see this post?   most of the wall was eaten....  

EDIT: okay maybe you dont know what it means.

1719 was eaten in just one go... there were other goes as well...


I saw it yes, big move. Hence the "bam" Smiley



20. Post 2026703 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 04, 2013, 04:02:15 PM
I think the walls permit bitcoin to rise to $119 in a bold move. Afterwards I go to sleep and not post, and the general bullishness erodes, and the bears push the price back to $106. We will not see 100 ever again.

Damn, I was almost there!  Angry If rontus had been working (fortunately he only works about 50 hours of 168 per week, and generally not on Saturdays, and even of his working time, I only give him authority to sell short about 30% of the time, so this is purely of theoretical interest now) he would certainly have smelled the trend change and managed to sell about BTC430 at an average price of $113.2. Then I would have told him to buy back at $103 (he is better in selling but my buyback levels are more spot on).

The 42,500mBTC profit would have enabled our lifestyle for several days...

Well, from your "category list" it seems we are all supernodes... Cool!

Indeed we are. There are only so many bitcoins in the world, and a lowest class supernode is not a U.S. Administration of 100,000 skilled professionals, but an ordinary bloke who bought in any time before March 2013, and has some spare time, and knowledge of English, maths and history. Of course when we go up the ladder, there will be many rpietilas, and in the higher level Goat, MP and Winklewii.

Read the "supernode OP" for more info and comment where appropriate!

Quote
Anyhow, as I said earlier everything look very fishy - I see two options: a) you are delusional and not-very-smart folk who made some money in the wild Bitcoin ride we had lately (not so difficult, we went x10 in just a few months) and now you are riding your very own ego trip, or b) you are preparing a big scam flooding the community with your "i am so wealthy" thing

Why is it so offensive that I live in a classy hotel? The highest burn rate of $200k per month was last week, now I spend at about $50k per month. If I go home and eat noodles, my expenses still run at about $20-30k minimum, since I have staff. Most of the businessmen do, in the real world. Generally their expenses are much higher than mine. I am actually very stingy, compared to most of my friends.

If you think this is excessive for what I manage to accomplish, how about complaining about how your very own tax money is spent in Afghanistan with far less positive effect? I would say the difference is about 4 orders of magnitude, in other words 10,000 times more money totally wasted!

With a rather conservative price prediction for the following 3 months, I estimate a 100% per month increase, which would mean that per every BTC100, you make about $10k first month. A 3rd class supernode can quit eating noodles and start to live. A 2nd class supernode of BTC1,000 can do what I do, and I just await that the real big guys start to benefit the mankind with their stashes.

This is the reason I spend - to show that even a medium BTC-holder can do this! No reason to hate, rather you live up to your own standard, and I live up to mine. If you have at least BTC1,000 as I assume every 2012 or before has (unless he proves otherwise), you can do the same as I do, with ease. Why should I do all the work?? Every city needs at least one supernode, and I am here to help these becoming reality. It is one of the workshops in the summit.

Besides there is no "flooding of community". I post my theoretical observations to my own thread. Then I post my price predictions here, and every time I do, some April 14th troll speaks negatively of me. Then I correct the misunderstanding. In no way I am here to cause disturbance - the instant the OP wants me to go, I go - but we all know that actually a 3-month quarantine for all newbies is the real answer to the problem, pointing me is easy but not too smart.

Quote
BTW: what about an escrowed bet, so you can put your money where your mouth is? Willing to bet that we will be at $300k/BTC by the end of the year, as you predicted? I'm sure al lot of users in these forums would be willing to join this bet. It's a nice way of hedging - if we win you give us your money, if you win we are all rich anyway, you included, so why not? Cheesy

How about the following:
- You escrow 100 bitcoins for my 1
- You write a 2013 $100,000 call option to your bitcoins, so that I can buy them from you anytime, by just sending you $10 million U.S. Dollars
- If I do not redeem your bitcoins before 31. December 2013, you get my 1 bitcoin as I lose the bet

This way everybody profits. Even if you lose, you get $10 million, and the rest of your bitcoins are worth even more. If I lose, I only lose 1 bitcoin, and I still have a lot (and they were not that valuable anyway..Sad )

Quote
Wouldn't you mind betting repietila?

My middle initial is A.


listen - and I'm sure I speak for more than myself.

I don't give that much of a shit about your self obsessed bitcoin adventures.

you remind me of this guy: http://instagram.com/itslavishbitch#


now take your lavish life-style that I can only assume was originally funded by daddy's money, and your running bitcoin trade commentary to another thread please


NB - I don't like the ignore button personally as I like to see the conversation as a whole... just understand there is a time and a place, and that is in your own seperate thread


EDIT - I'd prefer to say no offence intended, but you need a wake up call



21. Post 2026758 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

anyone seeing these consistent 5btc bids going up, and 4.5 earlier...



22. Post 2030172 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

ooooohhhhh god... it's become reptilia observer thread again COME ON

Quote
All this is going to happen in 3 months, I have written it in my diary (link in sig).

It is almost as if nobody actually reads it

it is written



Quote


and this needed a +1

especially because if he is right, and BTC does one day reach $300k... well, this will be up on billboards everywhere



23. Post 2030433 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote
- The utility will grow factorially (factorial growth >> exponential growth(!))
- The spread rate is inversely correlated with the number of current user


Current users are not equal to current speculators



24. Post 2037078 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

does this 2 million dollar wall remind anyone of the million dollar wall that popped up shortly after the 2nd bounce after the crash...?  The one that popped up at $70, from which we didn't turn back until 160ish



25. Post 2040009 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):



try stay on topic please guys





26. Post 2040324 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on May 05, 2013, 09:03:18 PM
Oh right, walls...

So, about the 2 millions wall, when is it going to be lifted?

Smiley



27. Post 2041447 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

talk to the wall, because the err, wall ain't listening?



28. Post 2046901 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: hmmmstrange on May 06, 2013, 05:27:35 AM
All i know is rpietila has fun. No matter what he is doing, at least he's taking the bull by the horns and doing something..

We need more people in the world like him.

I don't think the world could possibly support more people like him...



29. Post 2046936 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 06, 2013, 05:48:24 AM

But please remember that at times, 40% of this thread is metatalk about me, and the raison d'๊tre of this thread is to observe the walls that the wallmasters set up. There are other threads available, if you want to discuss my fundamental research in an atmosphere of dignity, or contempt.





30. Post 2065441 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: oda.krell on May 07, 2013, 10:47:45 PM
No decisive movement yet, eh? Alright then, summary time. (sorry for the sloppy style, this is more or less stream of consciousness)

Ignoring the possibility of continuation of the horizontal trend (that'd be boring), what are arguments in favor of continuation of the correction, i.e. downwards trend (red line in my previous chart) vs. continuation of upwards trend (green line)

(1) forum sentiment: cautiously bullish ("I'll buy for sure when we get lower") seems to be quite prevalent

(2) post bubble, volume on the way down was significantly higher than on the way up. suggests selling pressure, but could also mean sellers are running out of ammo.

(3) EMAs: D1, H4 undecided (just crossed over from above), H1 still bearish, but tendency towards crossover from below.

(4) total trading volume (in USD) is maybe on the low end for what is necessary to support the long-term upwards trend. (pointed out by WackyWilly)

(5) re: converging trendlines, as pointed out by 100x, me, and others: post-bubble, bit more evidence for the downward trend (3 vs 2 points of contact)

(6) If supporting trend (green line in my chart) = January 9 long-term expon. trend, then we're a bit ahead, should be hitting 100 only mid-May.

(7) order book (yes, I know, fake walls everywhere): total bid/total ask: 105. average of price if all sold at current prices, all bought at current prices: 120.5

pro bull: 1, 7
pro bear: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.

Hmmm... I don't like the way my own summary looks. My gut tells me we should be going up, but my little collection of evidence points to continuation of the correction.

/pseudoscience


6 could be pro bull no?... converging on 100, and next week is mid May

5 could change




31. Post 2065709 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote
re: 6. sure, pretty weak point, only relevant right now where we're a bit ahead.

re: 5. true. but, given current information, I'd say there's slightly more evidence for the downward trend than for the upwards one.

none of the points is really strong individually. I'm as undecided as anyone else here seems to be :/


yeah I think I'm just emotionally attached to the idea of this triangle closing to a nice upwards trend...

the TAs I've read on this forum are undecided between them. But the media stories and investment developments are slowly building, and I personally only expect positive news in the next month. I was talking to a bunch of bankers the other day, and heard some interesting anecdotes... at least some of the financial sector are paying attention.

I think it's worth betting up... especially considering the amount of money that seems to be waiting for "cheap coins" ... there are only so many cheap coins and only so many times you can raise your fellow cheap coin waiters to outbid them.





32. Post 2065714 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: dexX7 on May 07, 2013, 11:32:22 PM


qua?



33. Post 2071720 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

personally I'm not too interested in peoples life/trading plans being detailed on the wall movement tracker thread...

I also think quitting your job to trade bitcoin is pretty ridiculous - unless your were a successful trader before perhaps - but then why would you need to quit your job...



34. Post 2072020 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: oroboras on May 08, 2013, 12:50:34 PM
personally I'm not too interested in peoples life/trading plans being detailed on the wall movement tracker thread...

OK, sorry for interrupting the flow.

The walls are still there.....unlike the trades....


no worries, you're not as bad as reptile... but anyways I just wanted to voice my opinion.

In my limited experience it seems we are consolidating, a break out up or down in the next week or 2 is anyones guess but I bet up


Quote
You made me reflect about why i'm short on this market...

it will dip again, but how low I can't imagine, I'm just looking at other people's TA and market sentiment. I'm wondering if around $100 give or take $10 is a fair market price to settle on for a bit



35. Post 2072118 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: MickeyT2008 on May 08, 2013, 12:58:19 PM
personally I'm not too interested in peoples life/trading plans being detailed on the wall movement tracker thread...

I also think quitting your job to trade bitcoin is pretty ridiculous - unless your were a successful trader before perhaps - but then why would you need to quit your job...

Of all the bullshit that gets posted on this thread, someone explaining they're trying to make 3-4% a day trading, discussing price points they got into BTC, what price they're holding at now, their trading goals, is probably in the top 10% in terms of meaningful posts.

You disagree with the notion someone can make a living day trading BTC, so you're having a snarky response to even the discussion of it. Someone asked him, he answered. If the topic upsets you, stop quoting/talking about it.

People pop in with this "ZOMG I NEEDZ WALL TALK! TELL ME WHAT TO DO! TELL ME TO BUY OR SELL PLZ!!". Sometimes there's not much going on. A variety of topics gets discussed, it's a forum, people post stuff, if this upsets you it's time for a break, mmkay?


+1

It's not like there's much happening anyway, we'll all be on topic as soon as there is


point taken, I apologise.

It was less the discussion today but the return to a discussion... discussion about Bitcoin topics in general are all very interesting, discussions about an individuals plans less so... to me. If the majority group is cool with it I'll be quiet again.




36. Post 2075189 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: IVIasterZox on May 08, 2013, 05:01:43 PM




If you know what i mean..
A Shoulder-Head-Shoulder formation....


so - heads, shoulders, knees and toes?



37. Post 2075743 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: glendall on May 08, 2013, 05:54:36 PM
If you are "daytrading" I have some questions to ask. On average:
How often do you buy/sell?
Do you use one sized chunks (e.g. 100 BTC) or various sizes? How you decide on the amount?
For how long do you wait before admitting bad decision and buying/selling back with loss?
Are you using market orders? When?
Do you use API (bot/script) or web interface?
Do you use stop-loss?
What's your % gain since the 266 crash?

This might be more suitable in a new/alternate thread.

+1



38. Post 2080870 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: 100x on May 08, 2013, 08:20:43 PM
I have updated my recent analysis (I can see why you guys have so much fun with this line drawing business)



While the tone is rather playful  Cheesy, the general gist of the above chart holds some weight in my opinion

favourite TA post ever, thank you so much for this Smiley



39. Post 2086154 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote
Buying or selling now is just a gamble.

so basically as the market consolidates, everyone is waiting for the next move...

It's essentially a case of who takes the initiative first as far as I see it. The price is settling now and the vast majority are playing "wait and see".

The dumpers will have perhaps played their hands already... the DDOS-ing recently may well be an attempt to break the consolidation downwards and gain cheap coins, possibily as they are worried about the "green" outcome.


Considering the massive amount of media coverage and slowly turning positive spin, and the fact the whole world has either glimpsed or is watching Bitcoin, I think further growth is in order. On a slightly different note I also think it's time those sitting on coins they have been hoarding start to invest COINS in the infrastructure, it will do them and everyone else some good. I would also argue that a return to the January trendline makes sense considering the exposure that bitcoin has had.

I don't believe all the bulls have played their hands yet -

If you are one of the many on this thread waiting for cheap coins in the hope that the price will rise again afterwards, you should know exactly what to do. Buy now and establish the gradual uptrend, don't wait and see and either A - potentially be left behind, or B - allow the drop to happen and potentially establish a downtrend. The kind of impact this would have (discounting a possible massive fuck up on the side of MtGox and/or any other fairly catastrophic event that would affect the price in the same way) will be positive for bitcoin in the longer term. People are sheep and they need some renegade sheep to break out and follow - sheep bulls.

Of course, I'm looking at the possible outcome through my own rose tinted glasses. I want bitcoin to grow for a variety of reasons including my own personal gain. I'm tired of waiting for the perfect buy in point and I believe it may well be sitting right in front of us staring us in the face.

I'll be taking that "gamble" in the next 10 hours and then probably buying some ASICMINER shares to hold for the mid/long term.


Just some thoughts there that you may or may not find helpful or interesting



40. Post 2086460 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: blackreplica on May 09, 2013, 01:30:39 PM
How cool is it that the bearish highs and bullish lows have converged on the one month anniversary of the big crash from 266?

Mere coincidence or divine forces at work? Cheesy

divine



41. Post 2088566 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: sohd on May 09, 2013, 04:06:20 PM
Triangle closing in 1 hour?^^ http://www.sierrachart.com/image.php?l=1368115576935.png

which triangle is this? one since the crash or a shorter term one?

I've heard different estimates on the eta for the post crash...



42. Post 2092559 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: Dalib on May 09, 2013, 11:06:12 PM
Talk about no selling pressure. 2k BTC down to $110, and none of that 18k BTC between $113-$120 is interested?

No one is in a rush to buy, no one is in a rush to sell. We've found a price everyone can disagree on. Tongue

everyone wants to buy cheap and sell high, but 110 is not enough cheap buy and 113 isn't sell high Wink

 


I dunno what you are talking about, I personally prefer to buy high sell low - it keeps everyone else happy



43. Post 2100948 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):



fairly large bid walls back to 108 - a few big fakes in the mix?



44. Post 2101587 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):



where can I find the bid/ask sum charts guys?



45. Post 2101635 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

how big was the large buy at 0930 GMT that seems to have started this "break out"?



46. Post 2101678 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: fitty on May 10, 2013, 06:51:41 PM
how big was the large buy at 0930 GMT that seems to have started this "break out"?

About 500k.

500k what??!

EDIT - after some thought, you must have meant 500k USD



47. Post 2101754 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: KillaMarci on May 10, 2013, 07:01:43 PM
how big was the large buy at 0930 GMT that seems to have started this "break out"?

About 500k.

500k what??!

I'm guessing USD. If that was BTC then that would have triggered an explosion that would have blown out all the windows in Japan.

yes Smiley

see edit, haha...



48. Post 2101809 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: fitty on May 10, 2013, 07:03:22 PM
how big was the large buy at 0930 GMT that seems to have started this "break out"?

About 500k.

500k what??!

EDIT - after some thought, you must have meant 500k USD

*lol* Sorry yeah USD. Was between 4-5k BTC purchase. Followed by about a 2.5k BTC purchase. Some pretty big buys.


yes - I'm just wondering what happens if we start touching $116





49. Post 2102215 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):


anyone care to speculate what happens to all the orders from 80-90ish down to $10 if we don't start heading that way in the coming weeks?

My understanding, mostly from reading this thread filled with comments from bitcoiners who've been around longer than myself, is that cheap coins are wanted.


If cheap coins slowly become less of a possiblity, does this make expensive coins more attractive, or the price too high and fiat preferable?



50. Post 2102309 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Richy_T on May 10, 2013, 07:54:04 PM
This is starting to feel like the pre-bubble action. Consolidation, rise, consolidation. If we hang on around this price much longer, I'd expect another bump upwards.


yes, feels like a catch 22 here.

spent 24 hours considering all in at 113... looks like 118 is the new 113, perhaps



51. Post 2102366 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Richy_T on May 10, 2013, 07:55:17 PM

If cheap coins slowly become less of a possiblity, does this make expensive coins more attractive, or the price too high and fiat preferable?

If cheap coins don't materialize then the current price becomes cheap coins.


the reason I mentioned bitcoiners who'd been around longer than myself was in order to touch on gauging the possiblity of a certain price of coin just feeling too expensive.

e.g. If you've been around since $5 coins, this price is a bit ridiculous is it not? Considering it's still not widely adopted enough and we are still riding on speculation etc...

Also, if you cashed out on the way up at say 50, 90, 140 etc, then this price is not exactly profitable (in fiat terms) to buy back in. Unless you feel confident in the future of course. I guess that assumes profits haven't been made day trading and/or on the ฃ50-160 rally.



52. Post 2102437 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Rampion on May 10, 2013, 07:57:34 PM

anyone care to speculate what happens to all the orders from 80-90ish down to $10 if we don't start heading that way in the coming weeks?

My understanding, mostly from reading this thread filled with comments from bitcoiners who've been around longer than myself, is that cheap coins are wanted.


If cheap coins slowly become less of a possiblity, does this make expensive coins more attractive, or the price too high and fiat preferable?

I will just tell you something: we were buying $15 coins in January - and still placing our bids below spot to get "cheap" coins during dips.

Just 5 months later we want "cheap" coins in the $70s... Or.... Well... $90ish is cheap enough.

Take your own conclusions Cheesy

EDIT: if I was not clear enough, bitcoins are always preferable. Fiat's only use is to get cheap coins now that we can. Wink


ok, that's pretty clear Smiley

I guess there is also a value based on a kind of sentimental attachment as well. Bitcoins exponential growth has no doubt been greatly benificial for early adopters. I can see how this, and the further potential growth of bitcoin would be quite compelling, especially when added to the idealism that surrounds the coin (for some).


back on topic:




53. Post 2102536 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):


bots off on gox again?



54. Post 2102886 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Nightowlace on May 10, 2013, 08:28:01 PM

anyone care to speculate what happens to all the orders from 80-90ish down to $10 if we don't start heading that way in the coming weeks?

My understanding, mostly from reading this thread filled with comments from bitcoiners who've been around longer than myself, is that cheap coins are wanted.


If cheap coins slowly become less of a possiblity, does this make expensive coins more attractive, or the price too high and fiat preferable?

I will just tell you something: we were buying $15 coins in January - and still placing our bids below spot to get "cheap" coins during dips.

Just 5 months later we want "cheap" coins in the $70s... Or.... Well... $90ish is cheap enough.

Take your own conclusions Cheesy

EDIT: if I was not clear enough, bitcoins are always preferable. Fiat's only use is to get cheap coins now that we can. Wink


ok, that's pretty clear Smiley

I guess there is also a value based on a kind of sentimental attachment as well. Bitcoins exponential growth has no doubt been greatly benificial for early adopters. I can see how this, and the further potential growth of bitcoin would be quite compelling, especially when added to the idealism that surrounds the coin (for some).


I always stress that the whole "I missed the early adopters train" is BS. Anybody buying bitcoins today is still an early adopter. Look at the market, there are only $20M on the order book of the exchange that controls 80% of the market. The potential is HUGE, and we are at a very early stage. Understanding Bitcoins is time consuming. Buying for the first time is slow. Real economy is non existant, most of the revenues of BTC related business come from gambling, drugs or selling Bitcoin mining hardware. We are just at the gates of prime time.

I can guarantee you that those who bought bitcoins at $10 during the 2011 bear market where also repeating the same story about "early adopters". Just zoom out and look at the big picture.

+1

I also agree with you.

I would argue however that there is a large difference in sentiment towards bitcoin itself... the currency, the culture... the nostalgia and so on. I was wondering how this would affect orders and the tendancy towards buy back in at higher prices. When is too expensive...? - that sort of thing.

I certainly don't feel on a special train for non early adopters. It's just a fact. If I was there at the time, I probably would have left it behind to do something else. Only now is the TRUE potential being awakened and the rest of the world is watching, and even then, who knows. I am grateful to be involved in the experiment and very much hope it succeeds. Not just for my own personal gain (but that too of course).



55. Post 2103337 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: sve9mark on May 10, 2013, 09:19:42 PM

I think the best way to look at the big picture is to ask yourself whether bitcoin will succeed or fail in the long term. Right now the hype is crazy, and for every person saying the price is going up, another is saying its going down. Hence why it is trading sideways.... no one knows!

I've been reading the old threads in this category, and the biggest losers are not those who stayed in while the price plummeted, it is those who listened to the bears, sold, and walked away! If you believe in a bright future for bitcoin, your best bet is to support it by buying BTC regularly, and spending them regularly! Much the same as you would support a company whose stock you own.

The biggest tests will come when the price falls dramatically and everyone is proclaiming that bitcoin is dead. Will you hold your ground, and buy more, or will you run for the hills as many have done in the last few years.

I know he isn't the most popular guy around here, but Warren Buffett has it right: "Be fearful when others are greedy, be greedy when others are fearful".

Just my 2 cents.

thanks..

the big question - "either no volume, or very high volume"...

I think everyone recognises it's potential long term value.

I'm not entirely convinced of bitcoin itself being useful as money, yet. The volatility is too much of a headfuck.

Buying shares in BTC seem like a good idea to cover all the bases. Investing BTC in BTC, and gaining BTC dividends while being able to sell the shares for BTC at a later date. This adds an extra dimension of risk though.

I will however be heading to Berlin this summer so I'll go and check out the Kreuzberg bitcoin economy in action.


- excuse the off topic ramblings



56. Post 2104220 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: oda.krell on May 10, 2013, 11:01:27 PM

anyone care to speculate what happens to all the orders from 80-90ish down to $10 if we don't start heading that way in the coming weeks?

My understanding, mostly from reading this thread filled with comments from bitcoiners who've been around longer than myself, is that cheap coins are wanted.


If cheap coins slowly become less of a possiblity, does this make expensive coins more attractive, or the price too high and fiat preferable?

(aside: looks like I'm developing a habit to dig up older posts. oh well)

That's the million dollar question, I'd say. Here's a somewhat related observation I made during the last days:

Take the order book. (ignore for a moment the objection that some/many/all of the orders are fake). The last days saw a rather drastic increase of the bid sum/ask sum ratio (visualized nicely on blockchained). There's another calculation I make routinely, seeing how far the price would go in either directions if the entire bid sum or ask sum (or parts of it) were executed as market orders. Don't know if that technique has a fancy name (maybe 'market execution price'?), but it takes into account not only the order totals but also the price distribution.

Okay, here's the observation: the average of that execution price was rising even more sharply than the bid sum/ask sum ratio lately. Which means not only did more money enter the order book (and/or coins left it), but that order prices appreciated as well.

The conclusion I draw is that a big reason why we saw the current upward breakout is that a) new orders were placed (duh!), and b) buyers adjusted their existing orders after realizing that their overly optimistic price setting for entering the market won't be met anytime soon (less of a duh). And I suspect this trend will continue.

brilliant, thanks for the response. This makes sense



57. Post 2104232 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: fourkey2001 on May 10, 2013, 11:09:21 PM
117.61 to 118.35

so boring

dump all coins then and walk away, please?



58. Post 2104551 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=201240.0



59. Post 2104680 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Rampion on May 11, 2013, 12:04:04 AM

I would be surprised by too much action on this weekend.


wondering if we'll see a similar scenario to last weekends low volume climb



60. Post 2111981 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on May 11, 2013, 04:11:43 PM
We were at $165 post crash.

So the biggest risk to the market is everyone who bought in at $200-$260, who are just waiting to dump everything and exit? So wait, they rode out the biggest BTC crash in history, wait 3 months, just to sell at a loss when the price is getting back up to where they bought in? That seems like poor financial planning.

They dump coins, leave the market, people buy them up, it's not really that big of a deal. It's been going on daily for the last 2 months.

That discounts everyone who bought in at $200-$260 and are sitting on huge losses right now.  I'd assume most are looking to bail out of this market as soon as possible but have no choice but to pray for some sort of increase to at least minimize the damage.  If we should see a spike back to $160-$180, I'd expect a flood of selling at the peak as people cut their losses and run for the hills.  Don't think I need to specify what happens to the markets next...

I didn't say this was the biggest risk to the market, I said your comments don't take this into account.  No, it is not sound financial planning but I'd say those who bought in at $260, were not making a wise financial decision to begin with.  Unless of course they are planning to go long, which at this point in time, no one knows if it will be the greatest decision of all time or a flop.  But let's not pretend there isn't plenty of money that saw the huge rise and jumped in on pure greed, hoping to not miss the train and will look to cut their losses if they can.  That was my only point.

Do not worry $260 are quite cheap coins.

I hope you're right because I see everyone here as early adopters and then there are the prehistoric adopters.   Grin  I don't want ANYONE to lose.  This whole convo is simply a glimpse of the sentiment of some not buying or waiting for lower prices.

CASE STUDY - I bought in at 235. Pure greed. Before I even understood what bicoin truely was.

stop loss sold on the way down, luckily played the bounce from about $77 - $159... lost money in Bitcoin-24 fiasco, lost some profit in continued crashes after the $165 high.

BUT I'm not about to leave the market now that I know what bitcoin is... it's not about leaving the market and cutting losses... as far as I'm concerned once you are in you are in, once you understand bitcoin you have no real reason to totally leave the market. It's too much of a mental investment as well as financial.

After a month of chart watching, following news and learning more and more about the past and potential future of bitcoin, I decided that trading is not for me, it's a small part of the game. I just took 1/3 of my (now 25% up) money out of Gox via coins to Bitstamp and hopefully fiat in my account next couple weeks. The rest is all in, for the mid/long term. If Bitcoin-24 resolves it's banking issues and the market continues to price bitcoin lower, I'll use that money to buy more coins lower (as many people definitely want to do).

To me, unless you really think it's worth day trading bitcoin in the long term (which is probably the case for many in this subforum I know), that's the sort of thing anyone who's recently got involved with Bitcoin should be doing, making an investment and holding onto it, allowing the next 6 months to take it's course now that the world is paying attention and the infrastructure truely starts to develop.

Personally I'm emotionally and physically exhausted from my bitcoin discovery but there is no way I'm leaving the market, and this price seems fair... even if it drops to $50 it will most likely go up again anyway (touch wood). Even if it's not legitimised and the regulatory grey area resolved in the next 6 months, I'm sure there will be some use for it in the long run. But given the strength of the community and it's word wide nature, bitcoin will not fade away and I think many people should recognise that after having invested the time to understand what they are investing money in.

EDIT - having read a couple more of the recent posts in this thread, yes, it may also crash and burn into nothing, but how many of you thought that in 2011? From the media spin and the investments going on at the moment, I don't think it really will. Perhaps Im just trying to convince myself this risky investment is worth it. If that is so, I've done a good job.


excuse the long fairly off topic post



61. Post 2112167 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on May 11, 2013, 04:47:18 PM
 I don't want ANYONE to lose.  This whole convo is simply a glimpse of the sentiment of some not buying or waiting for lower prices.

Unfortunately I think that is the least likely outcome  Cheesy
But yes, the convo is a bit of the other side of why some of us are not buying now. A lot of people have been speculating as to why some may or may not buy, and that we would all chase after the train if we rally from here. Been hearing a lot of that the last few days.


1. because big players created feeling of fear and pain by pumping and dumping.
2. they will collect cheap coins now. No one was willing to sell before :-)

yes, but also irritated and disillusioned by the market for being so very easily led.

I am disillusioned by just how much manipulation is going on ... it has not cost me anything, but it gives me less faith in Bitcoin and raises the risk premium


what do you expect from an unregulated market populated with a fairly large number of intelligent members? EDIT - I mean: populated by a decent demographic of early adopters with large number of coins, who, if they decided they wanted to manipulate the market probably have the brains and the skills to do so.

how much manipulation do you think goes on in regulated markets?



62. Post 2113115 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):


just thought I'd mention that I'm confused by this talk of a "deflating" bubble, and the fact that bitcoin is essentially "deflationary".


Can someone please explain?



63. Post 2113498 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Richy_T on May 11, 2013, 07:00:27 PM
Yeah, but hindsight is also 20/20. I'm pretty sure (haven't done the hard maths, and probably won't cause it's the weekend) that if you start from the premise that you'll trade successfully only 50% of the time, buy and hold is a much better approach in the long run than trying to play the market swings.

That's also what I thought for a long time... until I read both Goomboo's journal and this (from Technical Analysis of Stock Trends - 9th Edition):
Quote
As may be seen in the following table, replacing the table from Chapter 5,
the Dow Theory continued to provide its user an advantage over the
unaware Buy-and-Hold Investor. From its original investment of $100 in
1897 the Theory investment would have grown to $345,781.94 by December
31, 2005, with the long trade still open. The table below shows the details,
including the post-2000 bust drawdown. To my mind this table is a powerful
demonstration of the power of methodical technical investing.
By contrast, the investment of $100, if bought at the low, 29.64, and sold at
the historic high
, 11762.71, in January 2000 would have grown to $39,685.03.

There's a big danger in comparing a model to historical data and assuming it will predict future performance.

The stock market is also a very different thing than it was in the 19th and most of the 20th century. Several orders of magnitude different.


there is also one enourmous "if"

If I'd been friends with Satoshi and mined loads of coins on my sisters laptop, then sold at the ฃ266 high... that holding strategy would have worked pretty well



64. Post 2113738 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on May 11, 2013, 07:29:08 PM
Reading many of these comments just reminds me of the blind, ideological and delusional thinking of the Napster cults.  Faith is necessary I get that but some of this stuff is just craziness.  The more I read these forums, the shorter Bitcoins lifespan becomes to me.  I''m currently at 2 years tops.  That's not because Bitcoin is not awesome, it's simply that too many people behind it are irrational and lack common sense and logic.  

I plan to make as much as I can off of it while I can, but my sights are already set on the "iTunes" of crypto.


what I'd like to know is as infrastructure does develop, who of the early adopters holding larger amounts of coins will actively invest their own profits, fiat or bitcoin into developing it further, and how many will just wait and see, while hoping to grow "richer". How many will just simply wait to "make as much of it as (they) can"...

I don't know much about ideological Napster cults, but I do know that they were onto something.


What bitcoin seems to be teaching the world is not "craziness", but yes, if it's not developed, and early adopters and those hoarding lots of coins do not actively participate in engaging with developing it's utility and infrastructure I can see it not lasting.

I know next to nothing about programming but I sense that it all needs a fair bit of work but this is not impossible. 


What would be interesting to see is that if it does only last "2 years", how the bitcoin will exchange, transfer or find new uses around that -end of lifespan- ... it's not like it can just drop dead.



65. Post 2120541 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Le Happy Merchant on May 12, 2013, 01:39:18 AM
I am speculating a solid dump by Monday and prices to go down to 80 ish

You really should just lurk more.

+1



66. Post 2120578 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):


I'm just wondering if the cries of "boring" are a negative aspect for bitcoin.

How many bitcoiners are now addicted to the excitement of fluctuating price? Personally I'm enjoying the calm... probably because I'm all in. But I know this will change at times, I just hope less so than the last 4 weeks.

I feel a fluctuating prices between 90-130 is a strong bet short/midterm for a variety of reasons and if there is not a large event that fucks with bitcoin... (unlikely right now). Mid/longterm steady rise... then another bubble or a catastrophic failure, bubble more likely.



67. Post 2120613 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Zangelbert Bingledack on May 12, 2013, 03:48:21 AM
I know this is the Wall Observer thread so it comes with the territory, but many or most people here simply seem over-antsy. Few humans are psychologically equipped to follow day-to-day price changes without freaking out and losing money because of it. The tendency is to start reading into every little thing.

+ A LOT OF NUMBERS


Thank your for the rational observation...


Seeing the comments on Friday, to the comments now, hillarious... this is still bullish price action (sideways), but due to lack of exponential induced excitement some people seem to get deflated...


Let it go guys



68. Post 2120637 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Jaques on May 12, 2013, 11:08:31 AM
people could sell just because of being bored ...

that would be some pretty ridiculous people



69. Post 2120644 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):


FUCK, just realised I'm spamming... sorry all, back to lurking...



70. Post 2121154 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

speculation - the return to 113 now is due in large part to the big buyer on Friday deciding to sell a few (less large) increments out again? The "breakout" they were either trying to induce or participating in hasn't materialised so they just want to play wait and see with everyone else?



71. Post 2124140 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on May 12, 2013, 07:07:33 PM
With the mother of all triangles that closed in the last few days, I think this is relevant:

Quote
Another point to remember — and one which does not conform at all
to the “coil” simile — is that the farther out into the apex of the Triangle
prices push without bursting its boundaries, the less force or power the
pattern seems to have. Instead of building up more pressure, it begins to
lose its efficacy after a certain stage. The best moves (up or down) seem to
ensue when prices break out decisively at a point somewhere between half
and three quarters of the horizontal distance from the base (left-hand end)
to the apex. If prices continue to move “sideways” in narrower and narrower
fluctuations from day to day after the three quarter mark is passed, they are
quite apt to keep right on to the apex and beyond in a dull drift or ripple
which leaves the chart analyst completely at sea. The best thing to do in such
cases is go away and look for something more promising elsewhere in your
chart book.

- Technical Analysis of Stock Trends

 Cry


to me that would be a brilliant piece of information, if it holds true.

tentative growth would be good for bitcoins legitimacy.

in terms of volume, during feb/march were there similar periods to the last 3 days?


in other news looks like manipulator/big player took about 1mil off the bid book somewhere



72. Post 2130921 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):



well, cheap coins are here... this is it, the moment you've all been waiting for Smiley



73. Post 2131135 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):


and positive and interesting news keeps flowing:

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1e7s1h/nextgen_broker_set_on_growth_path/

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=199424


Quote from: oda.krell on May 13, 2013, 12:29:09 PM
Here are the results of my recent (mtgox) order book calculations. As always, to be taken with a large grain of salt, since the order book is of course a primary tool for manipulation.

Apart from the obvious findings (rather big ask wall at 120; significant drop of bid/ask ratio over the weekend, from a peak of ~140 to ~120, now slightly going up again), the average of the 'all orders market execution price' is going up again, after going down about 10 USD over the weekend, indicating more bids/less asks and a better price composition. Finally, price composition in the range of the previous bid/ask totals also improved slightly, prices up about 2% compared to 12h ago.

Looks good to me. Word of caution though: with similar, in fact: even better values at the end of last week (my calculations showed a peak of the above values on the 10th), we barely passed 120, and not for long either. So I'm not exactly holding my breath that we're going to break 125 this week, although I'm not ruling it out either.

On the other hand, as I have posted multiple times now, as long as those metrics (and the related money flow metrics) don't substantially change in the coming days, I really don't see the potential for any sharp decline either.


sideways is bullish - cancelling out a deflating bubble. I remember jumping on the bitcoin bandwagon over a month ago and the argument was not so much about whether or not bitcoin was going to crash, but how hard it was going to "correct".

Maybe the correction is over?

*speculation*



74. Post 2131226 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: oda.krell on May 13, 2013, 12:50:19 PM

[...]

Maybe the correction is over?

*speculation*

I gave up on answering that particular question. Too many variables, too much uncertainty. My current lookahead is approximately 1 week, and not much further. And so far, indicators are good that this week will be positive or at least stable. That's good enough for me Smiley


haha, brilliant idea... let bitcoin provide the answer in the long run instead of trying to calculate it



75. Post 2131688 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on May 13, 2013, 01:26:57 PM


well, cheap coins are here... this is it, the moment you've all been waiting for Smiley

The fall will happen today. India (second largest economy) market fell like 500 points.. biggest in 5 years. Nasdaq and Dow will go down today....

people will want to recover cash by selling something to buy other stocks...(at their lowest price)

highest at peak is BTC...

so be ready in 2 hours for big sells

Pretty bad logic there. You move money into things of value, not the other way around. Don't try to catch a falling Knife...
The markets are up due to the Quantitative Easing funneling money into markets. They will print more but this can't keep up. Hence why BTC is up, a reflection of inflation (unlike manipulated gold/silver, which is only partially a reflection).

Money starts to move again in to BTC now.


Bitcoin is up because people saw the media attention and saw a way to get rich quick.  Nothing more, nothing less.

bold statement... I don't think anyone with a brain now will be expecting to get rich quick from bitcoin... I think there is more to it than that. It's a lot of effort to get involved in bitcoin. Once that (time and energy) investment is made, I doubt everyone will just "walk away" completely.

citing myself as an example. I came for the "get rich quick" I stayed for the "experiment" (yes I'm up a bit, but that could all dissappear if the experiment fails)



76. Post 2131892 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on May 13, 2013, 01:58:45 PM

I didn't say anything about people walking away.  Although if markets tank it's almost certain you will see people move out of risky investments and into safer things like gold.

My point, while apparently not clearly spelled out, was that the recent rise in bitcoin is simply from all the media attention.  Yes, die hard bit coiners view Bitcoin as a store of wealth but the rest of real world market investors do not.  They view it as a purely speculative and very high risk investment.  Nothing more.  Simply put, people are not going to run in masses to stash money in Bitcoin because people do not trust Bitcoin.  That time may certainly come, but that time is not today.

fair point, yes my "walk away" quote refers to general discussion elsewhere..

I totally agree re media attention, and from my perspective the continued media attention and slowly turning positive spin may change this issue tomorrow Smiley



77. Post 2132732 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: gizmoh on May 13, 2013, 04:13:50 PM
12 hour exponentials about to cross
What does that mean ?



you discover you are in the matrix.


but really, they could just touch and flatline?



78. Post 2133518 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):


oh shit...

it's become reptile observer thread again!



79. Post 2136283 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

considering we are at least 50% reptile observer thread for the time being.

two slightly unrelated comments.

A - he is definitely quite crazy, delusional, and considering the unclarified story, possibly paranoid. Lives in a type of lala land... I doubt anything got stolen and the whole story is based around a suspicion that something got stolen. Until this is clarified that is what I believe.

B - (this should be a nice ego inflating comment) - did anyone notice the volatility down recently, and the manipulation less??? Did anyone notice that coincided with a certain conference? i.e. someone was AFK for that period?

best wishes reptilia, but seriously, I don't know what to think about you... you are quite the enigma and I'd rather not be a part of your melodrama.



80. Post 2136401 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 13, 2013, 10:27:13 PM
best wishes reptilia, but seriously, I don't know what to think about you... you are quite the enigma and I'd rather not be a part of your melodrama.

Despite the fact that about $100k is scammed from me annually, plus I lost 1,100,000mBTC two weeks back and possibly more last week, the following statement is true:

"I have never possessed the private key to any less than 2,400,000mBTC nor any more than 35,000,000mBTC, at any time since the beginning of 2012."

I guess that puts me on the map. I think I was among the wealthiest people in the summit.


it's not about how wealthy you are, it's really not. That doesn't make you any more of a human than anyone else on this forum, or anyone outside it.

I think what you should be thinking about is, well, your thinking...



81. Post 2136931 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: BitcoinAshley on May 13, 2013, 10:48:08 PM
Despite the fact that about $100k is scammed from me annually, plus I lost 1,100,000mBTC two weeks back and possibly more last week, the following statement is true:

"I have never possessed the private key to any less than 2,400,000mBTC nor any more than 35,000,000mBTC, at any time since the beginning of 2012."

I guess that puts me on the map. I think I was among the wealthiest people in the summit.
it's not about how wealthy you are, it's really not. That doesn't make you any more of a human than anyone else on this forum, or anyone outside it.

I missed the part where reptilia claimed that being wealthy makes him more of a human, and I also missed the part where reptilia claimed that the ever-elusive "it" is about "how wealthy you are."

But I guess if we're in the business of refuting made up claims, it's all good.

It is certainly funny how rpietila makes a point of mentioning his wealth, sometimes in appropriate context, sometimes not so much. But it's even funnier how so many people get offended by it and make inferences that are entirely inaccurate. "Reptilia thinks he's a more sparkly person than me because he's a n.nth class supernode... wtf NO! I am going to respond to his post with a refutation of the claim that I just made up in my head! GRR!"

Yes and no. Thank you for your logical analysis.

What can you infer from his statement and his motivation for making it? What can you infer from his persistent desire to talk about his personal wealth?



What can you infer from my interpretation and my response? With regards to that, I would say you may have made some mistakes. I took no personal offense and made no comparison of his sparkly-ness to mine. I am flabbergasted by him though in many respects... absolutely blown away and totally confused about what goes on in his head.


I apologise for going off topic, but it's too much to ignore since his "return".

"it's" too much



82. Post 2136934 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on May 13, 2013, 10:51:05 PM
Guys, stay on subject please.


agreed, thanks for heads up



83. Post 2137296 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 14, 2013, 12:31:54 AM
Some people ...  just have to awake from their dream that everything is OK in their dreamworld.



84. Post 2142257 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: gizmoh on May 14, 2013, 10:41:27 AM
UK taxmen, police and spies look at Bitcoin threat

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/42ca6762-bbfc-11e2-82df-00144feab7de.html#axzz2TGEytQ2t

Bitcoin is a threat now!


This could be good news.

Bitcoin is taken seriously, and regulated bitcoin exchange is being considered in the UK.


Legitimacy...





85. Post 2144777 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):


any comments on the extremely thin bids on bitstamp?

I moved some coins there to sell to get some fiat out, as gox sounds like a long wait and expensive to get money back to UK.

Now I'm watching, waiting and pondering whether to use to buy more... but bitstamp looks a lot less solid than gox. Is that because a lot of Europeans are doing what I did?



86. Post 2145217 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: dexX7 on May 14, 2013, 04:10:51 PM

any comments on the extremely thin bids on bitstamp?

I moved some coins there to sell to get some fiat out, as gox sounds like a long wait and expensive to get money back to UK.

Now I'm watching, waiting and pondering whether to use to buy more... but bitstamp looks a lot less solid than gox. Is that because a lot of Europeans are doing what I did?

Bitstamp usually follows every tiny move, but sometimes with a price offset, but you can't say it's always lower or higher than Gox. But it gets interessting to look at walls. Bitstamps ask side is so much stronger which lead me to the conclusion, that people trading on Gox are using Bitstamp for faster cashouts. And the price oscillation (i.e. the range 115-120 right now) is a bit higher. Overall my experience is good and I like the lower fees + SEPA times + support (which is fast, but I didn't have any real problems yet).

yep my thoughts exactly.




87. Post 2146237 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):



still new verified customers on Gox coming in...


https://www.facebook.com/MtGox/posts/468728366544909



88. Post 2146378 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: molecular on May 14, 2013, 06:09:43 PM
still new verified customers on Gox coming in...

I recently had to verify my account. I'm hardly new. Registered 2011.


ok newly and the delete the "coming in" Smiley




whatever that means for price and money... heh






89. Post 2149637 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: fourkey2001 on May 14, 2013, 10:35:29 PM
This is a STATEMENT from the US Government to Bitcoin.  My advice being a US citizen and knowing the reach of the USG...Sell NOW or forever hold your piece.  This is going to get worse as the news reaches mainstream media.  By then, it will be too late.  I'm taking my profit and I'll watch from the sidelines. I'll buy back when the dust settles.  Good luck to all.

Agreed, many still don't realize the implications of this seizure, it is a start of a slandering campaign to stop 'financing' of bitcoin. The fight started sooner than expected.

I am selling now..

Will buy after conference. I do not want to be in JAIL or accused of terrorism or illegal work!

shut up fourkey with your down talking spam



90. Post 2149669 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

it does feel like a bit of a gossiping middle aged lady vibe in here all of a sudden Smiley


time will tell, until then we can only *speculate* right?




what happened when paypal stopped payments to gox? why did that happen?



91. Post 2149689 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: fourkey2001 on May 14, 2013, 10:40:48 PM
This is a STATEMENT from the US Government to Bitcoin.  My advice being a US citizen and knowing the reach of the USG...Sell NOW or forever hold your piece.  This is going to get worse as the news reaches mainstream media.  By then, it will be too late.  I'm taking my profit and I'll watch from the sidelines. I'll buy back when the dust settles.  Good luck to all.

Agreed, many still don't realize the implications of this seizure, it is a start of a slandering campaign to stop 'financing' of bitcoin. The fight started sooner than expected.

I am selling now..

Will buy after conference. I do not want to be in JAIL or accused of terrorism or illegal work!

...............

If you hold BTC now... you will probably be on US homeland security radar for illegal activities. More scrutiny at airports, and rest is all you know!




I don't give a shit about US homeland security... I never plan to go to the states and I think you are just attempting to stir up gossip, you've been waiting for days or more for a price drop



92. Post 2149714 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote
http://pandodaily.com/2013/05/14/dept-of-homeland-security-freezes-accounts-between-dwolla-and-bitcoin-exchange-mt-gox/


Quote
citing an email that OkCupid co-founder Chris Coyne received from the DHS and posted in an online forum.


this story is some seriously bad journalism...


DHS did not contact him directing, and he posted his email from Dwolla on twitter... talk about rushing to get a story out



93. Post 2149730 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on May 14, 2013, 10:45:16 PM
Can't believe any of you have still not 'ignored' fourkey ... please stop quoting him  Wink

yeah fair point, I don't really like using ignore button as I like to know the general discussion



94. Post 2150099 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

A - this might not be everything everyone is speculating it is. Too much hype too quickly...

B - it might just be a move to spark negative media coverage... not the sort of massive crack down you are speculating about.


Can someone tell me what happened when paypal stopped taking payments and why?



95. Post 2150272 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

I wonder when everyone is going to calm down for a minute and take a deep breath until we actually know what the issue is here...

alarmist responses are really no good.







96. Post 2150397 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: relm9 on May 15, 2013, 12:01:10 AM
I wonder when everyone is going to calm down for a minute and take a deep breath until we actually know what the issue is here...

alarmist responses are really no good.






Just remember if the news is bad then it'll be too late to sell - if you are heavily invested in BTC it might not be a bad idea to sell some now and buy back in as there's a good chance it could be cheaper soon.


unfortunately I finally went all in recently and all in on ASICMINER shares.

It will take me 24 hours to get BTC off BTC TC.

By that time everyone may have calmed down.

If not, well, that's the risk I chose to take when I bought the shares.


Everytime I have sold BTC in recent dips I've come up worse.

Still up from the 50-160 double bubble though



97. Post 2151186 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 15, 2013, 01:42:28 AM
all this fear is so fail....

anyone that sold because of this new made a mistake...


I'm genuinely really sad about this

all the good news recently... fucking homeland security. I don't give a shit about homeland security...



98. Post 2160175 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: TsuyokuNaritai on May 15, 2013, 08:24:51 PM
This:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2013/05/15/the-feds-are-cracking-down-on-mt-gox-not-on-bitcoin/

Quote
It’s important to note here that Homeland Security is not cracking down on Bitcoin itself, just on how it’s being exchanged by Mt. Gox. This is actually good news for Mt. Gox’s US-based competitors, such as Seattle-based CoinLab and San Francisco-based Coinbase, Bitcoin exchanges that have registered with the Treasury Department as money transmitters and thus are in the legal clear to conduct Bitcoin <—> $ exchanges.


good, yes this is what I thought all along, but all the fucking FUD on this thread this time last night got to me after about 3 hours and I did some very stupid things.... now $300 down, luckily still in the same amount of coins.... will hold through any loose fingered crash that might occur as there is too much other positive going on for bitcoin alongside this (probably quite positive) setback...



99. Post 2160258 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: MAbtc on May 15, 2013, 08:34:51 PM
Don't be so quick to write this off..... this was likely just the simplest possible way to go after Gox. It doesn't follow at all that the feds don't have their sights on bitcoin generally, nor that we have seen the end of this in re to Gox, other exchanges or other operators like Bitpay for instance. Don't get all irrationally exuberant up in here! Wait and see, IMO.

not at all, just sick of it being one or the other... but let's stop being so conspiracy theorist...

big VCs risking all that money?? you think they wouldn't have looked into this right?



100. Post 2160422 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: samson on May 15, 2013, 08:41:00 PM
Don't be so quick to write this off..... this was likely just the simplest possible way to go after Gox. It doesn't follow at all that the feds don't have their sights on bitcoin generally, nor that we have seen the end of this in re to Gox, other exchanges or other operators like Bitpay for instance. Don't get all irrationally exuberant up in here! Wait and see, IMO.

I read somewhere else on this forum that Bitpay are probably in the same situation as MtGox with regards to this license.

Risky business, I'd hate to have my funds seized before they made it to a vendor !


source or that's just FUD/rumour...

the mtgox issue is very specific



101. Post 2160515 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: crumbcake on May 15, 2013, 08:57:29 PM
Don't be so quick to write this off..... this was likely just the simplest possible way to go after Gox. It doesn't follow at all that the feds don't have their sights on bitcoin generally, nor that we have seen the end of this in re to Gox, other exchanges or other operators like Bitpay for instance. Don't get all irrationally exuberant up in here! Wait and see, IMO.

I read somewhere else on this forum that Bitpay are probably in the same situation as MtGox with regards to this license.

Risky business, I'd hate to have my funds seized before they made it to a vendor !


source or that's just FUD/rumour...

the mtgox issue is very specific

Sorry, i know you're a serious guy & hate off-topic stuff in this thread, but there's not much to watch right now & I'll give you a bit of well-sourced FUD:
"Is Bitcoin a Ponzi scheme?
In a Ponzi Scheme, the founders persuade investors that they’ll profit. Bitcoin does not make such a guarantee."


Guess who's spreading this FUD?  That's right, https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/FAQ, the Bitcoin WIKI Cheesy


Smiley

gosh I hope I at least help someone profit!



102. Post 2160885 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):


if you're going to offer up 15million, you're going to do some homework...

the legitamising of bitcoin is already on the agenda for these investors



103. Post 2167325 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on May 16, 2013, 11:07:17 AM
No. The price is stable as all poor souls locked with FIAT in MtGox try to buy BTC a get the hell out of MtGox ASAP. And Mr. Karpeles' silence just worsens this.

And no, there are not many options left. International wire is quite expensive, SEPA takes several weeks to finish. So many just buy BTC as soon as it lowers a bit. Thats what you call "stability".

I think we are complicating things here, by "we" I mean you and a few others judging the severity of the DHS news.
First, regarding "not many options left" - that is just no longer true. MtGox is no longer the center of the BTC universe, though it is still too large. This news will actually help level things and probably open other doors.

Second, stability is a ways off. We are just starting the "government/banking" journey. This news was NOTHING. Really, they aren't even going after BTC. The reason being, there are no laws which allow them to do so. Governments at this stage are afraid to, and actually don't have a clue, as what to even define BTC as. I'm afraid, for them, it is just like Internet PII. They will just be too slow to react. The only thing they can hope for is to somewhat regulate it. The banks will push for that to a point. But, we are just too small to to much about. Stopping it, being that the world will likely support it (all the while having a float of less than 11 million BTC's) is not really an option at this point. It will continue to be attractive to too many people unhappy with the state of things.

Just look at the slowness of things. And, again, they are not even attacking BTC (maybe with words) but they are just making sure regulations are being followed. And the Dwolla Gox thing is really really gray. I mean MtGox spent, what? 25 million getting things in order in the last year for this? This screams of either being overblown or too little too late.

Anything is still possible, but unless the internet gets shut down or the like, we probably continue for months if not years before we see what can amount to anything huge. And by that time we will probably be too well established imo.

+1

yep, and if there is one thing I've learnt from spending too much time in the speculation forum, it's that this subgroup of bitcoiners are WAY too sensitive to news about bitcoin, positive or negative and they/we certainly thrive on every little bit of drama and enjoy taking things to extremes. The DHS issue is a grey area in the negative, on the other hand. VC investments and other developments are grey areas in the positive. Nothing is clear cut one way or the other



104. Post 2167327 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):


anyone noticing the perfect bounce along the 114 line for the last 2 hours?



105. Post 2167433 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on May 16, 2013, 11:22:38 AM
You overestimate the negative sentiment the masses have on financial institutions and governments.  Yes, everybody complains but most are content with what they have.  It's certainly not so drastic that people will go through the incredibly difficult processes of setting up wallets, getting money into the system, buying BTC and then finding a way to spend them, which we know are far and few between. 

Not to mention, Bitcoin is becoming a bad word associated with all things criminal much faster than it's becoming some "beacon of light" as it relates to currency.  It's highly volatile, it's clunky, difficult and confusing and it's absolutely vulnerable to far too many variables. Image is everything and Bitcoin is losing that battle.  It's attractive to diehards and high risk investors sure, but most of them have no clue what mainstream wants because they are completely out of the loop. 

Bitcoin is like Napster.  It has shown us the way but an "iTunes" is coming to do it right.  My guess is that's Ripple.  They have the advantage of being able to take the high road and separate themselves from the black market, money laundering stigmata that Bitcoin has developed, while still accepting Bitcoin as a currency.  This is good for Bitcoin and it's last gasp at mass adoption.  If the masses are more concerned with low transaction fees and ease of use, than they are having actual stores of wealth, the XRP will reign because an IOU will be sufficient. 




am I right in saying ripple has yet to prove itself in the wild?

Bitcoin on the other hand has a wealth of developers and investments right now working on developing the infrastructure, and the decentralised nature is inherently very important.


on the image issue, I think you are right to a degree, but images can change very quickly. Also if you look at fiat money for a minute, do people not use money because it's "got an image problem"? Because people use it to buy drugs?



106. Post 2171427 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: fitty on May 16, 2013, 12:03:40 PM
Image is everything and Bitcoin is losing that battle.

You've been here 3 weeks. Yesterday you informed us Bitcoin was illegal in almost every country. You've stopped quoting the Coinage Act of 1965? There's a reason your wife only let you buy 1.5 BTC, you're autistic and prone to wild flights of fancy.

You think this bump in the road is bad? Of course you do, you've been here 3 weeks. This was nothing.

My favorite Bitcoin growing pain was back in 2011 when Something Awful hacked the forum and trolled us with CosbyCoin. I suggest you slow down a little, stop educating us on how Bitcoin, Bitcoin PR, legal system, and life in general work. Take some notes, you'll learn a few things. Get back to us in a few months.







sorry to dig up a post several pages back but just catching up on today and:

A - thanks for this post, the cosby coin troll history has totally made my day Smiley
B - thanks for this post, newcomers like myself can benefit from this advice/reality check... someone talking with authority does not necessarily have authority (or if they do, maybe not  relevant experience to back it up)
C - Personally I might go back to lurking in order to "take some notes" and "learn a few things" rather than engage so much... it's probably more productive!



107. Post 2171793 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: fitty on May 16, 2013, 06:15:16 PM

Yeah some people flipped out when their Bitcoins were being "converted" to CosbyCoins. There's people who think Bitcoin is a ponzi scheme right now, back in 2011 it was hard to generate any creditability. And when the main forum gets defaced with CosbyCoins it was sorta hard to take it seriously. Lots of hacks, lots of stolen coins, exchanges disappearing, bitcoin wallet sites getting hacked, MtGox getting hacked, lots and lots of bumps in the road.

But like this most recent DHS stuff, MtGox gets their shit in order, everyone else checks how they do business, things get more secure, Bitcoin keeps on keeping on.




Sorry to say this but I'm laughing so hard at this story Smiley

at least they had a sense of humour haha


but yeah... my new investment took a panic induced loss the other day when the dwolla news came out... sold and later had to rebuy asicminer shares at a much higher price.... was not great, (and I'm a massive idiot for doing it).

In retrospect thinking about the sentiment on this thread at the time, after about 3 hours of keeping calm and staying rational, I had enough and took the precautionary step of cashing out the shares and moving BTC (with upto 24 hours wait for move from cold storage) to my wallet... and I now realise I was heavily influenced by coinseekers desperately negative rhetoric, and frozenlock's desperate and glee filled desire to buy cheaper coins... even nearly missed the 0.035 BTC dividend!

Quote
We don't need Bitcoin, Bitcoin needs us and with Ripple, it's going to all be possible.

Coinseeker's presence here just came clear to me. He is a full time employee of Ripple... Smiley



108. Post 2171832 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: 100x on May 16, 2013, 06:32:41 PM
Man, this thread has been a ride through the mud the past dozen pages..

I wish coinseeker and Risto the best, may they overcome their hardships in due time.

Seems like bitcoin is doing just fine  Cheesy

Keep on truckin' people!

Also, I would like to comment that it appears we are continuing as planned with the Great Consolidation phase I mentioned earlier:

I assert that my prior claim of the Great Consolidation occurring continues to be correct.

Unfortunately I don't have the hard data, but one thing I am amazed to see is large increases in liquidity. 10-20% movements are starting to require $5M or more. The market grows deeper my friends. Good news for all.

+1

did someone get rid of coinseeker or did he put himself into therapy as well?



109. Post 2171921 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 16, 2013, 06:49:52 PM
"I am currently detained in a psychiatric institution in Helsinki, because I need rest. My physical well-being is taken care of."
Edit: Do psych wards have wifi?  Smiley

That depends - currently I use my own equipment. But seriously guys, the whole idea is that this would be a period of rest for me. I have worked too hard, gotten irritated, and my behavior has not been up to the par. So now I will take a rest and mind my own business in calm quietness for days, weeks or months. They will tell me when I am clear to leave. Just forget about me, until I come public again. If everybody talks about me all the time, what difference does it even make whether I am here or not??

Quote
Roni Blomberg (rontus). Ambassador-at-Large of rpietila supernode in San Jose.

If somebody believes that I do not even exist, there is a good way to find out. If rontus does not appear to San Fransisco airport with flight SK3713 scheduled to land at 12:20 PST (in about 30 minutes from now, though I don't know or care if it's early or late), I am probably a bullshitter. If he does, but denies being my Ambassador-at-Large, I am a joker. If however he comes with Annina, who is a tall and beautiful lady, and they both tell stories about the Haikko Summit, and express their reverence towards me who sent them there (even though I was physically detained in an institution), you just have to believe me and leave me alone. Right? Please..?




ok, point taken. I apologise on behalf of myself and the other board members.

Please don't take anything that is written too seriously. After all, it's the protection of the screen and keyboard that allows forum users to be so open with each other. It also allows a certain kind of insensitivity that I know I and others can be guilty of.

Rest well and look after your head...



110. Post 2171933 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: ManBearPig on May 16, 2013, 06:48:27 PM


No I know much ain't happening, I just thought I'd attempt to derail the tangent.


these straight lines are - some kind of market making bot?



111. Post 2172941 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: fitty on May 16, 2013, 08:28:30 PM
Anyway, back on topic....  I wonder if this is now a return to the stability that we've had over the last few days, or is it the calm before the storm, as seems to be the norm with BTC?

feels like:

blast off postponed until further notice, reason: bad weather...

Rain? That works!

Ready... Set... RALLY!






poor girl behind her... Smiley



RE stability - I get this feeling people don't know what to think. No one really wants to play until they sort that out I guess?

All this great media coverage, and in particular the announcements in the last 24 hours! (webmoney, funding founders)... then there's the potential of some further developments post conference.

BUT the elephant in the room is the dwolla issue, any updates on that yet?



112. Post 2172986 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on May 16, 2013, 08:39:16 PM
rpietila - Hey brother, you keep on keeping on. Take care of yourself, get some rest and don't forget this is about change. Don't let the $$$ part stress you out. Our sites are bigger that that.

Heal up brotherman and enjoy this dream we call life,
It's about Sharing


also, I've been wondering if reptilia is actually right.

Maybe will (now) never see sub $100 again... not sure about the 300k part thought Smiley



113. Post 2174847 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):



the question is whether it's worth buying more on bitstamp with such massive ask walls...



114. Post 2174897 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: 01BTC10 on May 16, 2013, 11:55:02 PM
The general bitcoiner sentiment over the last weeks reminds me bipolar disorder.

100%



115. Post 2175017 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

all aboard, full steam ahead!!

yeah I bought back in with spare money... temporary weekend "wait and see" trade... I can see even if the mtgox spikes are due to people wanting to withdraw coins, there were a bunch of bidders with decent sized sums inching up over each other to buy back in and follow gox's trend...



116. Post 2176211 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote
Do the conspiracy theorists still have money? With minds as emotional as that I can't imagine they'll be holding onto it for long.


bodude loves his conspiracy theories...


you shoulda seen the posts about China Smiley


I'm not in it to trade anyways sir, not in the stricter sense... I prefer to engage in general market sentiment discussion to gauge longer term buying in and selling points etc. Maybe I will attempt to trade again if there is another bubble in the future, but the finer stuff that goes into day trading... too emotional for that.



117. Post 2176289 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):


ok... apples, all I can think about is apples now after seeing this:

https://btcglobal.net/


HEALTHY BITCOIN APPLES



118. Post 2180006 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):


meanwhile on bitstamp I doubt we're going about 115 for a long time



119. Post 2180395 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: needmorecoins on May 17, 2013, 01:11:55 PM
Hmm...nothing's changed with Gox/Dwolla?
So is there anyway to tell if this rally is because of the public's bullish sentiment, or because US gox users are converting their fiat into btc and hence causing a rise in price?



1+1 = 2?  


I mean, why not buy coins instead of fiat if there is a lot to be bullish about anyways... My only fear is that if gox news happens to hit bitcoin hard, plus some other negative news (who knows), how much of a dump will occur on exchanges like bitstamp with minimal bid walls.


For now I'm all in though Smiley



120. Post 2180482 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote
You're completely wrong though. If you want to make a withdrawal from MtGox you simply do a wire transfer.


walls on bitstamp are the largest I've ever seen them though...



121. Post 2182353 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

hmmmm, I trade on bitstamp, this smells a bit funny...

any new announcements re dwolla etc?



122. Post 2182409 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: Miz4r on May 17, 2013, 04:50:26 PM
hmmmm, I trade on bitstamp, this smells a bit funny...

any new announcements re dwolla etc?

What smells funny? The Dwolla thing just caused a lot of Gox users to dump their coins on Bitstamp and now we're stuck in a traffic jam. Just enjoy the cheap coins and if you're buying and holding who cares how long we're stuck in this traffic. Grin


yeah I bought in with some remaining money outside of my "hold long" position... so I'm wondering if Bitstamp will be sitting at 120 for a while (not enough cashflow in to eat up the $500k wall) as mtgox shoots up to the moon Smiley



123. Post 2182416 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: Rampion on May 17, 2013, 04:51:12 PM
is it normal that the $118 wall is showing up in all currencies on mtgox? I got the impression each currency had its own exchange

No, otherwise other currencies would have a too small liquidity.


not showing up on CNY... Smiley



124. Post 2182711 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):


I'm still excited about fresh green apples in the Switzerland of South America, "Bitcoin's honeymoon destination"  Smiley


https://btcglobal.net/info/why-uruguay



125. Post 2183519 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):


I thought the reason for the rise in price was that people were buying more? Smiley



126. Post 2183695 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: samson on May 17, 2013, 06:48:15 PM

Quote from: CNBC
This morning, Bart Chilton of the Commodity Futures Trading Commision said, about Bitcoin, quote:

"They don't exist. And I didn't want to regulate them. I didn't want to put the government's stamp of approval on Bitcoin."


Source: http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?play=1&video=3000169018

Excellent.

First they ignore you.....


hmmm, he's worried about talk of regulation legitamising the coin?? therefore backpedaling and trying to not even recognise it's existence?


EDIT - have not watched it, just read the quote...



127. Post 2185949 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):


bitstamp still looking pretty unhealthy... until those asks clear off one way or another, I don't see us following gox on any big upward climb.





128. Post 2186226 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: Abandon on May 17, 2013, 11:30:47 PM

bitstamp still looking pretty unhealthy... until those asks clear off one way or another, I don't see us following gox on any big upward climb.




That will only encourage people to leave them, to take advantage of arbitrage elsewhere, and that will make the sell wall mostly disappear, unless some people stubbornly sticky with them. I bought some routed from Bitfinex, so I can't transfer any bitcoin out to get a better rate. I hope I don't come to regret that, and that the wall disappears soon. Hopefully they get a good way to import dollars, that would help stabilize it, so long as there's people still left to fund their account through them.


I think that's pretty unlikely. These walls are probably mostly from gox... bitstamp has proved itself pretty reliable and reasonably liquid. I doubt these big sellers want to go anywhere else.



129. Post 2190284 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: solex on May 18, 2013, 10:46:27 AM
This "Get-out-of-Gox" yankee-rally won't last long Cheesy [emphasis added by Pzi4nk]

Is this a baseball thing?

It's more of an idiot thing.

A few vocal people who trade with 'pocket change' amounts of money can't make a withdrawal for 25 cents any more and this is creating a big problem for them.

They think it's causing a 'bank run' on MtGox - it's hilarious.

Dwolla = Dust transactions.

Indeed. The theory is that dwolla users (which is USA customers only) are converting their fiat on gox into btc in order to shift it elsewhere, hence artificially driving up the price, towing bitstamp and other markets upward.

However, major dollar buyers would use wire transfers and remain unaffected, so probably the theory is lame, and BTC was headed up anyway,



hmmm, ok I didn't understand dwolla completely, but there are some massive ask walls getting in the way on bitstamp at this time... they are relatively new. I for one will cash out via bitstamp if/when I need to purely for convenience... I guess maybe that's what the other guys are thinking



130. Post 2199985 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):



I think the simple issue with chartbuddy is that at the moment, with low volume and therefore not much to talk about, his contribution to the current conversation is off topic Smiley



131. Post 2205445 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):



why would anyone dump after such a bountiful amount of positive news?


I don't think it's going to happen... not on bitstamp or gox... it would be ridiculously stupid.


Bitstamp those selling at 119+ will not sell lower because they bought their coins on gox around that price, and there is not any easy way to market sell a lot of coins on bitstamp anyway... price matching is pretty shite (not sure if I'm using the right terminology but I'm sure you get my point). On top of that, the bids are too thin to handle enough of a dump.

Gox... well, it's become apparent that wires work and their other accounts are fine, and that DHS is not going to run in with a swat team and a minivan to take gox servers away from Japan.

I believe it's calm because everyone is playing wait and see... once people realise there is nothing really to see, and that the infrastructure is really truely being built now... the only way is up. I will assume the only question is whether there is enough new money to push it up very high, or if it's likely to be more stable and cautious (while possibly leaving bistamp behind until those with the biggest amount of coins staying unsold probably end up moving back to gox after they resolve their paranoia).


My limited opinion, but honestly I don't see any reason for anyone to be too shaky right now at all.



132. Post 2286898 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

re holiday - I would imagine that it's the time when you go and do stuff with friends or family? When you are obliged to step away from the computer and do things in real life? Smiley

also in the same vein there is often a "weekend slump" (apparently), the "long weekend" should help to account for this quiet also no?



133. Post 2287026 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on May 27, 2013, 05:05:42 PM
Starting to look bad from here...  Lips sealed

Since when cheap coins look bad?

Wink

Always. It hurts the coin.

No only when you are "all in" (which means you are broke and invested more than you can afford to lose)


I've been wondering recently what is "more than you can afford to lose"?

should there be a distinction between "more than you can afford to lose" and "an amount that you can afford to lose, but it's quite a large percentage of what you own"...?




134. Post 2287229 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on May 27, 2013, 05:14:30 PM
I've been wondering recently what is "more than you can afford to lose"?

should there be a distinction between "more than you can afford to lose" and "an amount that you can afford to lose, but it's quite a large percentage of what you own"...?

Well yeah, there is a distinction. That's why you expressed it differently.  Undecided


yes Smiley

..I feel the phrase gets thrown around a lot... personally more than I can afford to lose would mean I can't support myself if I lost it. I lost so much that I can't afford other things.


for someone else the same phrase will mean something different, e.g. if they lost their savings. They may still have their house and enough money coming in to survive and maintain a certain quality of life... the distinction is present but the phrase stays the same.

I'm enquiring more as to what a possible "standard definition" of the phrase should be.


e.g. I read some advice somewhere that it's not a good idea to have more than 5-10% of your assets in one investment. For those who subscribe to that practice, if they lost more than 11% then that would be their "more than they can afford".



EDIT - thanks for the other replies, typing rather slow today...

Rampion essentially covered what I've written here Smiley



135. Post 2287465 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: Rampion on May 27, 2013, 05:40:34 PM
definitely put more then you can afford to lose in BTC... trust me don't make the same mistake i made

Sorry adam, but that's bad advice. Bitcoin is a high-risk investment, and that's why it has such a potentially huge return. If you put more than you can afford to lose (meaning that your life would change significantly if you lose it, that you may not be able to pay debts, send your kid to school, etc.) you are just a nuthead or a pathologic gambler. Because at the end of the day, BTC is more a gamble than an investment.

ok fine, definitely put the MAXIMUM amount of money you can afford to lose.



There we have an agreement, my friend Smiley

I will say more: STOP buying silly things with your "spare" money, just throw it to Bitcoin!


yes, this has already been done of course Smiley

after webmoney, VC announcements and conference default stance changed to all in.

more BTC accepting vendors for day to day shopping in UK would be nice... those purchases would have to be far more carefully considered and wouldn't have to keep "spare money" around to buy food/drinks/travel etc...



136. Post 2287527 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on May 27, 2013, 05:55:30 PM
after webmoney, VC announcements and conference default stance changed to all in.

You won't be able to prop up the price then.  Grin


nah not unless I stop spending my spare money on food/drinks/travel etc... Smiley



137. Post 2290059 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

nothing to see here, just the (long weekend) slump... Smiley



138. Post 2330000 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

and bitcoin24 2.0 looks very promising... they even have a picture of a hot girl, who, if you look closely, may well be hotter than the gox lady ... clearly bitcoin is going up

https://twitter.com/Bitcoin24com/status/339859782972354561/photo/1




on a more serious note, I think the gradual turn around of the bitcoin24 episode is some pretty great news all round for BTC is it not?



139. Post 2330244 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: BitcoinAshley on May 31, 2013, 03:32:14 PM

Or maybe all those people will be saying "Oh no, an evil socialist government shut down my exchange, I finally got my money back so I can leave bitcoin for good! It is doomed! I am going to give up and let the terrorists win. Fiat 4Ever!"

How much faith do you have in the BTC-24 victims?  Grin Grin Grin


On the contrary, I think that the fact that the mix up did NOT lead to the banks taking longer term action in some shape or form is a positive sign for bitcoin as a whole and should instill more confidence.

There has been some discussion among BTC24 victims about continuing to trade with BTC24 when they get their new platform online, and considering the no fees policy (which may or may not continue) I can see that happening. Simon the whole has proved his intentions, but not his organisation skills or programming yet. The latter I'm sure he now has been rectifying by hiring more staff etc..

This will take some time though of course, first most money and BTC will be moved away from BTC24 before the new site launch, perhaps to return on promise of perks of new platform design and continuing no/low fees etc... plus the German populated trollbox that all those hardcore German geeks loved Smiley


Quote from: wonkytonky on May 31, 2013, 03:40:24 PM
bitcoin 24 accounts are free apparently .; thats 7milj euro to go somewhere Smiley

search for "BTC24 Limited" on facebook.. read it for yourself

This money is going home. It will hug with owners. They miss each other very much.


It would be more problematic, if there are any bitcoins there.

I think they could withdraw bitcions some time now..  (not sure though)

BTC withdrawals have been enabled for some time, they are still processing them, but a large amount have already left the control of BTC24.


I have some money I'm waiting to claim, I haven't decided yet whether to transfer it back to my account. Probably because I have already invested all my other spare money into BTC and have been counting that smaller sum as something I should probably treat as spending money in the coming months (when I get it back). Otherwise I would probably buy more BTC with it.



140. Post 2334223 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):


to quote someone in this thread after the crash.... this is the "white knight of btc"

I'm not selling



141. Post 2354202 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):


I keep listening to this tune on loop... I love it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7TuFy0fcuw&hd=1



142. Post 2358308 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):


the way I see it is it's just a bunch of pussies who couldn't handle the psychological impact of a big sell... perhaps the big sell was in part timed to impact on said pussies.

that doesn't mean it's not going down, but what exactly is the reasoning behind it? Just because the indicators say x doesn't mean you should act out x.



143. Post 2358453 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Chang Hum on June 03, 2013, 01:55:09 PM

the way I see it is it's just a bunch of pussies who couldn't handle the psychological impact of a big sell... perhaps the big sell was in part timed to impact on said pussies.

that doesn't mean it's not going down, but what exactly is the reasoning behind it? Just because the indicators say x doesn't mean you should act out x.

I agree but dicks need pussies to fuck so is it really a bad thing???


of course this is not such a bad thing. Without the yin, the yang is meaniningless...  without some down, what would up mean?

so yeah, up down action between dicks and pussies...




144. Post 2358593 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):


can someone wake adam up so he can continue his in depth analysis?

I want to know more about this Nov 1st date, and what his special project is... Smiley



145. Post 2359163 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: niothor on June 03, 2013, 03:35:56 PM
hmmm ,  everyone is bearish , everyone is selling , nobody is buying....

price is going up..

BIG SECRET BELOW
don't trust people on forums

I don't trust you



146. Post 2360453 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on June 03, 2013, 05:42:15 PM
My bet is that big players are waiting for support to grow in 118-120 region and then they will dump.


why?

because

A - big players already dumped? So if they did already they naturally would do it again.
B - because there is some real deep reason to be dumping right now that we don't know about?
C - just for jokes

or

D - because they think bitcoin is a fad and it's not on fire anymore, only a bubble: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7TuFy0fcuw&hd=1

or

E - because they believe lucif and the general "look at the 2011" past crew and expect a long downtrend despite whatever might be "different this time" https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=131065.msg2352736#msg2352736

or

F - something that I've clearly forgotten Smiley



147. Post 2360520 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

2 walls at 115 and 125 on gox, channel not filling in between, looks like a stand off between bulls and bears.

on bitstamp on the other hand, still the enourmous ask walls, seem to be slowly creeping down. Interesting that the last couple days have seen stronger bids though on bitstamp than in the medium term past.



148. Post 2360588 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: crumbcake on June 03, 2013, 06:11:22 PM

why?

because

A - big players already dumped? So if they did already they naturally would do it again.
B - because there is some real deep reason to be dumping right now that we don't know about?
C - just for jokes

or

D - because they think bitcoin is a fad and it's not on fire anymore, only a bubble: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7TuFy0fcuw&hd=1

or

E - because they believe lucif and the general "look at the 2011" past crew and expect a long downtrend despite whatever might be "different this time" https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=131065.msg2352736#msg2352736

or

F - something that I've clearly forgotten Smiley
Because they can't dump anything right now without the price dropping by 5 bucks right away?

you missed my point, I'm asking what their motivation might be for dumping in the first place.

The assumption that someone wants to sell a lot, and that the bids are too thin to allow them to sell as much as they want to at the price that they want to totally discounts whether or not someone might want to sell for a good reason in the first place.

A trendline broke, and there is SOME uncertainty in the air. But focusing on that discounts anything to the contrary.


Maybe the million dollar wall was rpetilia because he believed that price was great, maybe the sale that knocked us down was some guy who wanted to buy a nice car... who says there are more big whales desperately waiting to smash bitcoin to smithereens?

EDIT - yes, it's all about the trendline... after all, us humans do like to follow trends Smiley

perhaps a new (upwards) trendline will emerge that is less aggressive? who knows... it doesn't have to be some self fulfilling prophecy



149. Post 2362484 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: zemario on June 03, 2013, 07:09:17 PM
Hold on the motherfucking Bitcoin, he won't let you down, as he did not let down anyone with strong hands and cold mind since this baby was born in 2009

Don't be a pussy, Bitcoin will change the world, and the real winners in this game will be those who holded and increased their stashes crash after crash, bubble burst after bubble burst.

this, dude. this.

it's a revolution. a non-violent one. we can do it, we must.

the real winners are the people.

How do we get past bitstamps 130 wall though?



I don't think I've lolled harder on any post ever than this one Smiley  Cheesy Grin Roll Eyes Shocked Cheesy Smiley



150. Post 2369323 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: Jaroslaw on June 04, 2013, 03:03:03 PM
the end is near

http://www.wm-center.com/index.html
http://www.ecardone.com/index.html

so righteous...



151. Post 2380390 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

there was a rather large buy on bitstamp recently as well, http://www.coinorama.net/#


it took a chunk out of the ask walls.

I've also noticed that the bid walls are starting to solidify gradually on bitstamp now... including a larger than normal one at 120 forcing people to buy above it, and a decent size amount of bids around 100 that started to grow after the flash crash/big sale the other day


EDIT - can someone school me on what "chaikin money flow" measures?

EDIT 2 - so I googled... so yeah basically we know that the large asks at bitstamp stemmed from around the time of the dwolla incident and the loss of confidence in mtgox' ability to transfer money easily internationally. We also know that this ask wall is in part due to the fact if you want to cash out, bitstamps SEPA transfers and fees are quicker and cheaper.

This increased selling pressure is therefore totally understandable, but it seems to be gradually countered by increased bids... still massively outweighed by ask walls, but the ratio of money/coins on gox is still in gox favour.



152. Post 2380496 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: billington.mark on June 05, 2013, 04:32:20 PM


Forgive my stupidity but could you expand on what that chart shows and how the highlighted parts have significance?

http://stockcharts.com/school/doku.php?id=chart_school:technical_indicators:chaikin_money_flow


buying and selling pressure measured by this oscillator (of sorts).

basically above the line is good, below the line isn't. If you want the price to stay stable/increase.

I don't totally get it myself but that's the gist of my understanding.


EDIT - errr, yeah, see above Smiley



153. Post 2380615 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: sammel on June 05, 2013, 04:46:42 PM
so is it going up or down?!

 Huh


it'll do what you want it to, just use the force



154. Post 2405689 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

off topic: I remember seeing a "recommended fees" table somewhere online, does anyone know of this, can anyone send me a link?



on topic: if you zoom in on bitstamp, the bid walls look nice and healthy now.... just don't zoom out far enough to see those patient 130 ask walls... Smiley



155. Post 2406060 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

gosh... I get ready to sell x% and leave the profit as investment in ASICMINER, then I start reading the relentlessly positive r/Bitcoin....

http://www.thegenesisblock.com/bitcoin-london-draws-attention-of-mainstream-finance

so, I figure now is a good a time as any to take some profit from ASICMINER's recent explosion and wait for brighter days...  now the bids are looking very strong around $105ish on gox, and bitstamp just can't be trusted one way or the other - everytime you think it's going to drop, someone executes a massive buy, plus the bids closest to the price are all looking fairly healthy now as well.

question is, what's a good mid term exit point, something just below $115ish and hope for a bounce? hmm


I wonder what mr manipulator wants to do now...



156. Post 2406489 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

shits getting deep.

Some are holding coins in order to spend them later when it's easier and safer and they can buy the normal things they would buy in their everyday life without a second thought, and without having to change back to fiat... yes that doesn't account for the transactions now, but as merchants accept more and infrastructure develops, if the speculation does drive the price up, I am assuming people will want to spend their (now more valuable) coins... obviously this comment also doesn't have much to do with the transaction volume affecting the price on the exchanges now, but on that subject I will also put forward the idea that it may not have much impact on the exchanges, as day to day purchases of coins to spend coins would be inefficient, I will assume that many people already have large stashes of coins they might spend.... finally also bear in mind that some of the philosophy of bitcoin (for some people, and anecdotally a majority) is not to spend spend spend to drive a consumerist economy. As mentioned before, just because the economy is not full of high volume transactions, doesn't mean it's not living and breathing.

Stream of consciousness waffle here so take it or leave it Shocked



157. Post 2410987 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

anyone believe a bounce is coming, it's oversold and seems to have bottomed out for now.... or more likely we sit on top of these large bids for a while?



158. Post 2411005 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):


well Rampion, here goes... I'll be attempting your special technique of selling at the bottom to maximise (everyone elses) profits



159. Post 2411323 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

what happens when they cross on the all time chart?

do we get rich?



160. Post 2411442 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: BitPirate on June 08, 2013, 01:46:53 PM

what happens when they cross on the all time chart?

do we get rich?

I guess you were just kidding... but anyway, the crossing point is arbitrary, the two y axes have different scales... change them and they will cross at different points...

ah yes, thanks for clearing that up/correcting me guys... my maths is fairly rusty these days, so as I'm sure you can tell I didn't look closely enough at the axes

yeah I was kidding but also interested if there was any implication inherent in the structure of the graph

cheers



161. Post 2411665 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: sarc on June 08, 2013, 02:20:00 PM
It's a question. Doesn't seem like a difficult question though.  Cheesy

Why else would we need a 2 million bid wall at $105?

ah, yes I forgot, to a simpleton all questions look equally simple.



have a doughnut. And then think about freeing yourself.





you're loving the "free yourself" spam at the moment aren't you sarc Cheesy



162. Post 2411719 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

seems a spike in trading activity (recently dictated by "mr manipulator") triggers conversation in the thread... gifs, wall pics, discussion on the motivation of the "whale's" intentions.... and then some train of thought seems to always stream into an off topic, general bitcoin debate. It's quite interesting some of the time, but sometimes quite infuriating to read through all the bitchy posts.

I miss Doug Tanner's on point wall pic posts and short term triangles... I guess when the major volatility stopped his bots stopped making as much profit and bitcoin trading became less interesting.



163. Post 2411895 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: oda.krell on June 08, 2013, 02:43:16 PM
seems a spike in trading activity (recently dictated by "mr manipulator") triggers conversation in the thread... gifs, wall pics, discussion on the motivation of the "whale's" intentions.... and then some train of thought seems to always stream into an off topic, general bitcoin debate. It's quite interesting some of the time, but sometimes quite infuriating to read through all the bitchy posts.

I miss Doug Tanner's on point wall pic posts and short term triangles... I guess when the major volatility stopped his bots stopped making as much profit and bitcoin trading became less interesting.

Are you talking about me, you cunt?!?!

I'll scratch your eyeballs out!

wow, for a split second I didn't see the humour in your post and was ready to put my firewall up! Smiley



164. Post 2412856 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

made a sale during the mini bounce to 109.xx, now those bid walls are pretty big, but I don't know if I trust it to bounce again up to 110-115 to make another sale. I wonder if it's just going to be a steady stream of small sales into the bids, occasionally pushed down by 3k walls.



165. Post 2435132 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):


cool story bro



166. Post 2435149 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: momobitcoin on June 10, 2013, 10:51:25 PM
i think we can make a new high off this rally, 180 , and i think we can do it in 2 weeks time.

bears, prepare to shit yourselves

 Cool

You've been kind of on point lately, but this one is a bit far-fetched to me. I'll have to keep an eye on the charts as they develop.

Okay we got a triangle pattern forming and adamstgBit thinks it will break upward. At this time I am not convinced.


since Adam's drunken stoned lol-athon I can say I would not listen to a single prediction from him. Post count and moderator status do not a trader make.

oh but Adam, I do love your good vibes and random humour and I wouldn't change that for all the accurate TA in the world



167. Post 2440449 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: strawbs on June 11, 2013, 01:57:01 PM
Isn't that gambling, defined?  Some day traders do more than simply watch the price & ignore past performance etc.
...You only saw the massive swing from doubles to 250+ because of a huge influx of new players. If that phenomenon never happens again, you can completely forget about ever seeing $200B again, let alone higher.

+1  Couldn't agree more
So to rephrase it in a more positive light, aren't you also saying that all BTC needs is a huge influx of new players for a massive swing from the low $100B to $200B+ again?

Yes, I think so

...and this could well occur if there was more faith in the exchanges and greater liquidity. As your case study explains, it's hard to trust sending off x dollars to an exchange in Japan with (probably) 0 legal recourse if things go wrong, even if you do want to trade.

I would speculate that the amount of traders out there who are interested in taking a punt, but are holding back due to these issues far exceeds those currently involved. I can also provide my own anecdotal evidence of friends who had very little idea about BTC a month ago, even in the immediate time frame around the bubble, and now have read investment newsletters/articles or discussed with friends the possiblity of buying a few BTC as a speculative investment. This includes web developers and also a bunch of Goldman Sachs employees.


on a different topic slightly. I love reading comments from a traditional traders perspective, it helps put things in context. I also think that those used to normal markets may well be missing the instinct that early adopters may have for price swings and the general BTC market sentiment. Bitcoiners will know what is likely to affect market sentiment on a more fundamental level, as well as likely be more in touch with historical resistance points etc. While Rampion has claimed to have sold at the bottom several times, I still think certain elements of "old timer" wisdom can be very helpful.

This is my "holistic" take, as I've said in previous posts I'm no good at maths etc...



168. Post 2440842 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: strawbs on June 11, 2013, 02:39:38 PM

...and this could well occur if there was more faith in the exchanges and greater liquidity. As your case study explains, it's hard to trust sending off x dollars to an exchange in Japan with (probably) 0 legal recourse if things go wrong, even if you do want to trade.

I would speculate that the amount of traders out there who are interested in taking a punt, but are holding back due to these issues far exceeds those currently involved. I can also provide my own anecdotal evidence of friends who had very little idea about BTC a month ago, even in the immediate time frame around the bubble, and now have read investment newsletters/articles or discussed with friends the possiblity of buying a few BTC as a speculative investment. This includes web developers and also a bunch of Goldman Sachs employees.


on a different topic slightly. I love reading comments from a traditional traders perspective, it helps put things in context. I also think that those used to normal markets may well be missing the instinct that early adopters may have for price swings and the general BTC market sentiment. Bitcoiners will know what is likely to affect market sentiment on a more fundamental level, as well as likely be more in touch with historical resistance points etc. While Rampion has claimed to have sold at the bottom several times, I still think certain elements of "old timer" wisdom can be very helpful.

This is my "holistic" take, as I've said in previous posts I'm no good at maths etc...

Absolutely! That's why I joined this forum, to try to tap into some of that market sentiment. However, how significant is that sentiment now that the majority of trades (in terms of volume) are carried out by unsentimental conventional traders?


My guess would be that there is still a majority of BTC in early adopters hands (pre Feb 2013), but that is totally insubstantiated.

I wonder how many straight traders there are, as opposed to programmers/IT guys masquerading as traders Smiley    my understanding of the BTC universe comes largely from this forum, but I can imagine that there are a bunch of traders who don't post here or even grace us with their presence.

I also sometimes wonder about the larger manipulation, and what kind of ratio (at the moment) comes from early adopters who've been around playing the same old games since 2011 (Blitz mentioned something that other day about manipulation in the form of 50k BTC walls etc in the past), and what ratio comes from those with a few million to spare who have been involved only in the last few months. It's interesting that you say the price now is largely goverened by manipulation because traders have got involved.

I had fantastical idea the other day that these dumps were perhaps attempts to totally bottom out the market and provoke a downward trend, but then this massive 15k buy comes along and brings us right back up to 110... There's gotta be more than one whale out there right? I wonder if rpetila got excited about being sub 100 and instigated that big buy (just a bit of fantasy there... but he is a supernode after all Smiley). The big buys and sells can't all come from one player, but I do imagine there is one very active whale who has dominated a lot of these big moves... I just wonder how much.




169. Post 2462177 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

or breaking retarded laws...



170. Post 2467988 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: Miz4r on June 13, 2013, 09:49:23 PM
The whale who bought at 95 with slippage to 110 isn't going to be too happy I think. Will he cut his losses and sell? Tongue


I wonder if this was goat? was it a lambo's worth of coins that got bought?  Cheesy



171. Post 2468427 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

bottom calls?


I've placed quite low bids between 65-77 for now as I really don't want to buy more at this unstable time and have my "money I can afford to lose" sitting in ASICMINER which is currently going up in price. But if it goes that low I expect a fairly big bounce... we shall see



172. Post 2468531 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: niothor on June 13, 2013, 10:42:02 PM
You've had 4 years to buy cheap coins.

I want this heaven sent opportunity to continue  Grin

You want Bitcoin to lose 500 million in value just so you can buy a few cheap coins? Are you serious? I understand people are greedy but that greedy!?

People on this forum are looking forward to whole countries going bankrupt and you are surprised by this?

Of course , most people can't wait for another Cypress event.
Or a Yapan , or Portogoal one!


hopefully once the nations with hyper inflated currencies actually do clock on en masse and find easier entry to bitcoin or similar, the greedy speculators hoping for this will be a blip on the radar and said populations will find a truer utility, while the speculators can sell portions of their hoard. Then everyone can benefit.

From some perspective or another it's probably only a matter of time. I really pray something like this happens so that everyone can stop speculating about the possiblities and we can simply deal with what is true, and perhaps take some pride in it.

Obviously there is an element of greed in the desire for this to happen, but I think it would also feel quite satisying to know that you are selling you BTC to an Agentiyan or a Kennyan who really needs a deflationary currency, and in turn this sort of event would only bring some more speculators in and increase everyones the value of everyones holdings.



173. Post 2468565 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):


bitstamp going a bit bipolar



174. Post 2468573 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):



95 --> 103.5



175. Post 2468642 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on June 13, 2013, 11:00:16 PM


95 --> 103.5

1000BTC just sold says nope

my bad, 104... (on bitstamp)





176. Post 2982947 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

things are finally interesting....

half my (long term holding) shares in AM are dropping like a stone, all the rest of BTC profit and new buy back is rising after a nice buy back at 103 on bstamp.


time to throw my uneducated comments into the room again.


why would people not believe that we have hit the bottom, and all those wait and see-ers who got interested around the bubble time but wanted to wait for it to deflate and get cheaper no be buying around this kind of time? How long do you have to wait and see?


the main question on my mind, which I probably won't get an answer, is do I hold the 100% BTC from now until Tuesday 27th GMT as I'm going away on holiday and there is no way I'm watching the charts during that time.

very short term predictions welcomed (and new debate started perhaps....) seems rally on bistamp finally started and gox just needs to break 125 to allow further rise. Bid/Ask graph on blockchained looks good, but also looks like a slight reversal... let's hope it's short term?



177. Post 2983086 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

Quote from: Loozik on August 21, 2013, 11:38:16 PM
the main question on my mind, which I probably won't get an answer...

The rule of thumb is if you don't know what the market is going to do or the conditions on the market are abnormal, stay away from the market.


good rule, that would probably end up ruling out a majority of those involved in "the market"



178. Post 4437647 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.54h):

Quote from: Chalkbot on January 10, 2014, 10:05:31 PM


ok, let me just clarify, this model would have us at around $3000 or over in roughly 6months time? do you feel that's a fair calculation given the previous data points?



179. Post 4439584 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.54h):

uh oh, drinking again... I have a memory of last yeah sometime post bubble pop... something about a wall observer thread covered with lolling adam spam



180. Post 5038774 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: fonzie on February 09, 2014, 05:30:36 PM
I really appreciate that Gox has been dumping the shit out of Bitcoin in the last days.
But to be honest the trading processes that are going on over there look 90% made up and unnatural.


you look 90% made up and unnatural..



181. Post 5051821 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 10, 2014, 10:16:24 AM
Markets did not like that at all it seems.  They expected MtGOX to sink perhaps... but a flaw with the protocol that affects all exchanges

mtgox is passing the buck... they don't want to claim responsibility for the flaws in their wallet software so they've dubbed it as "it's not our fault, it's bitcoin's"



182. Post 5054612 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: empowering on February 10, 2014, 12:36:22 PM
This could be the biggest dip on the pure fud that we had yet. Maybe it could be avoided if Gox worded it better, but who knows, maybe it was intentional?

Now , you're starting to say some interesting things.

Who could have wished for a crash , and who could
have profited from it the most , probably the ones who could create one and who are in so much shit to actually need a flash crash. gox?

I wondered the same thing..





makes you wonder about the walls at 650 and 600 on stamp that just sat there and happily got sold into...



183. Post 5075181 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 11, 2014, 10:13:33 AM
is anyone having trouble withdrawing btc from stamp?

I did a btc withdrawal 1 hour ago, still nothing on the blockchain.

had the same recently, after waiting 15 mins for it to be processed I cancelled and tried again and it worked...



184. Post 5142135 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: gizmoh on February 14, 2014, 03:11:32 PM
Why havent gox prices begun recovery if its true withdrawals are coming back???

Its coming soon, just like a swift transfer from Tibanne co ltd.
We all know how deceitful Gox is..


withdrawals will be working again in 2 weeks, along with their new engine and litecoin trading up and running



185. Post 5145937 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Risto believes we still have another month and a half for the bottom to play out... just saying



186. Post 5186040 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.11h):

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on February 16, 2014, 09:37:47 PM
Don't be fooled! They're just trying to get access to your coins!
Ah yes, "them", our mortal enemy.
Also , our invisible no name unknown mortal enemy Smiley
Monday, Wednsday, and Friday are the Federal Reserve
Sunday is the Jews/Illuminati
Thursday is the Bitcoin Exchanges
Saturday is all Governments and Civilization as a whole

-- Tuesdays dead ? =)

Tuesday's gone with the wind


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJZRZL4qUC8&hd=1



187. Post 5236360 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):


so, what happens if the price levels out and the unit of exchange is used for the exchange of goods and services? who has lost? I'm geniunely curious.

The negativity surrounding bitcoin is only relevant if it declines in price. What happens if it sits still, for example



188. Post 5256344 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: yrtrnc on February 20, 2014, 11:30:59 AM

...some dumbasses have been stopping us at our front door and crying about their bitcoins, and as a result our frappuccinos had to be drank at undesirable temperatures, so we had to relocate MtGox to our previous office building...

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



189. Post 5265119 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

Quote from: FTWbitcoinFTW on February 20, 2014, 06:52:20 PM
Bitstamp is telling me my password is too old(I consider my password very safe, so do i really need to change it?? randomized with a couple big letters) and I need 2FA

What happens if I lose my phone?? Is the authentication key that they give me enough then?

my btc withdrawls work btw

Just telling you gently your password is maybe compromise on your side, so change it


Quote
Bitstamp has detected an increase in the number of reports of phishing emails which were also received by some of our clients. Our technical team responded by examining the threat and setting immediate security measures in place to prevent potential risks.

As a precaution we have also applied this security measure to your account.

If you have received any emails with suspicious content and have opened links or attachments we highly recommend that you immediately contact a computer expert.

While we appreciate that this comes as an inconvenience we are convinced that our security precautions are in accordance with your expectations in keeping your account secure.

If you consider that your system was not affected we kindly ask you to contact security@bitstamp.net to re-enable the withdrawal function on your account.

Please be advised that Bitstamp will never ask you to reveal your passw ord.

Thank you for your understanding.

Best regards,
Bitstamp Team



190. Post 5265771 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

Quote from: ChrisML on February 20, 2014, 07:24:19 PM
Jesus... I said it before, people will get hurt by this.

But this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=477423.new#new

I have been trolling aswell, but at the same time it's reality and that shit happens. Fucking shit gox.



****I honestly hope that he wont make radical decisions, nor others being hurt by this.


my immediate reaction is that I don't believe it and it's someone fishing for donations... such is the cynicism that's rubbed off on me in bitcoinland



191. Post 5281006 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):




192. Post 5391644 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 26, 2014, 03:44:04 PM
You have to understand who Mark Karpeles is. Look at his cat videos....



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81QkfGpHeyQ&list=UUAAgMYqyzm_kT2tgI3HPE2A&hd=1

and, his minecraft videos?? oh man things suddenly make a whole lot more sense!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1WvB2R4z1Y&list=UUAAgMYqyzm_kT2tgI3HPE2A



193. Post 5530894 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

re bitstamp email add leak and mtgox account holder database hack/leak...

Just received this email, someone in St Petersburg (perhaps) has been googling me today

comments?




194. Post 5531198 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: barbs on March 05, 2014, 07:18:02 PM
WWGD?

...


 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



195. Post 5531529 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: tailor on March 05, 2014, 07:34:35 PM
Quote
Your outright dismissal of the article is exactly the type of cultish behaviour the author is talking about - dismiss anything that doesn't fit the faith view.
Because we've read countless articles like that for 3 years.  These people obviously don't do research or they would understand that they are making very old arguments. What is cultish is to expect the same failed tactic to work this time. If you want to persuade us "cultists" of the error of our ways, then at least come up with a new argument.
If you're going to be a critic, at least be an original one.

That same argument could be used by any belief system dismissing an article pointing out the behaviour.


the way bitcoin seems to polarise opinion eventually these articles will be one of 2 things. Either these articles will be right or these articles will be wrong.

If they are right then there will be no need for an "original" critique.




196. Post 5534644 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: Wary on March 05, 2014, 09:48:59 PM
Have you checked your spam folder? Gmail for example has excellent spam filtering.

I've just checked mine. Out of 25 mails in the spam folder, 4 - from "MtGox"!

info@mtgox.com and accounting@mtgox.co also...


EDIT: oh and "news@bitcoinbreaknews.com" ... "mtgox return to customers the bitcoins!" I mean, come on



197. Post 6851715 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.45h):

yeah buying at $450 or below would have been a better plan... what is the likelyhood of it going back down that way again? Feels slim... and I've not even been following the discussion charts.

I bought back in at $575 at my lowest because I got impatient.

You've been very patient, just don't be too patient. Ultimately the choice is yours, but I've been telling my brother to buy since we hit $500.


If the predictions of anything above the last all time high are correct, well, to buy anytime now is potentially good for you really.



198. Post 6852538 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.45h):

one thing I question about these 4k-7k figures mentioned regularly is that they are becoming "common knowledge".

Yet the wall st big boys may have other plans, (they can read internet forums too you know)... ie, pump it way beyond everyones expectations and dump it well below. Just a thought



199. Post 9027357 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.17h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on September 30, 2014, 10:32:44 AM
Three weeks ago I went on holidays: price was around 470 and I was specting to surpass 550 from my return, which seemed even bargain at that 550 price. Instead, I find THIS INSANE PRICE.

Could someone explain me in 3-4 lines what the hell has happened in the last 17  days? Some major news or just 'normal' price fluctuation?

Whatever, I guess I will be purchasing 3-4 more bitcoins in this trend down... my wife is not going to understand this time...



You can't be serious that you would come to this thread to ask a serious question? 

As if you really have NOT followed any BTC news in 17 days? 

You must have better news sources than expecting a good answer in a thread, such as this - , no?

nothing actually happened except the price going up and down, and down more than up. Someone/some people got impatient with sideways, made a move, sheep jumped on board etc...

news wise it's only mostly good.



200. Post 9107391 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.21h):

Quote from: Ivanhoe on October 06, 2014, 06:32:06 PM
http://youtu.be/8cVlOWwsKgo?t=14m50s
Amir Taaki, goes ate shit thinks big on Keiser Report.

Anybody know where to buy that shirt? I need that shirt so bad.


he really has zero introspective abilities doesn't he...

he doesn't realise that no matter how passionate he is and how strong he feels about certain issues and ideas, legitimacy is important if you want to make impact and to have people listen to you. If you are going to purposely disregard the fact that people have programmed opinions and prejudices and not give a shit about how you come across because of that, you're just an idiot and you're shooting yourself in the foot and fucking with your big principles for the sake of very minor principles.... and everyone you work alongside and speak on behalf of.

as I type this he hasn't stopped... sounds like a high dude at a squat party Smiley



201. Post 10713878 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):


this bitstamp wall is a ballache... any thoughts on this?

I get the feeling it has the potential to hold back a further rally. Or, on the other hand, it's in place for gradual accumulation for the rally's continuation? I can't quite figure out it's intention...



202. Post 10717388 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):


someone want me to use their referral code on bitfinex?



203. Post 10717503 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: hodlmybtc on March 09, 2015, 10:03:52 PM

someone want me to use their referral code on bitfinex?

Sure, if you can tell me where I can find my code Smiley

no idea, just signing up now and it's at the top for a 10% fee discount... I might just google :/



204. Post 10724906 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: KryptoFoo on March 10, 2015, 02:02:38 PM
So nice when the price takes time to react, giving us all a chance to load up. I guess the masses are waiting for somebody to interpret the article and tell them this is good news.  Roll Eyes


edit: barry silbert just retweeted it, here we go!!!!


interpreting it properly would mean that it is not necessarily directly good news for the price of bitcoin.


EDIT: but all good PR for bitcoin is, indirectly, of course...



205. Post 10725285 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: oda.krell on March 10, 2015, 02:15:41 PM
So nice when the price takes time to react, giving us all a chance to load up. I guess the masses are waiting for somebody to interpret the article and tell them this is good news.  Roll Eyes


edit: barry silbert just retweeted it, here we go!!!!


interpreting it properly would mean that it is not necessarily directly good news for the price of bitcoin.


EDIT: but all good PR for bitcoin is, indirectly, of course...

Name of the startup: 21 Inc. ...

Total number of BTC ever to be mined: 21 million

It all makes sense now! They are true believers of the Church of Satoshi! /s

(EDIT) oh, nevermind, they actually say that much themselves >_<

yeah I heard that there are actually 21 guys called Satoshi working there, keep that on the down low though, insider info...



206. Post 10730782 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

my speculation: the walls are either someone making a point, some kind of manipulation attempt, or someone who can't withdraw all their coins at once (que rumour).

As far as money on bitstamp, the bids have not really changed much for a long time, I don't know what to get the data but I've been watching it for the last few months. In the last few days at least 3-400k has been added, just not near the top end of the bids.

Stream of consciousness here, but if bitstamp were to stay this way for some time, and the other exchanges rally say another 10% before a dump, wouldn't stamp then be the ideal place to collect coins at the bottom? Assuming the bottom ends up lower on stamp than other exchanges due to the lack of bids...



207. Post 10731220 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: uhoh on March 10, 2015, 11:03:36 PM


Well considering that Stamp have lost 17,000 coins (and a lot of trust in the process), that seems like the least likely explanation.


they gained my trust after that.



Mine too, as it goes. Still, it seems to have done them a lot of harm.

yeah, I've always used them, after btce exploded and before gox turned itself into a cheeseburger and frappucino mash. Recently moved my small stash onward as there is no telling if it will be possible to sell at the top of any medium term highs the way things are going. They've always been good to me with customer service, and I had trust in them. I'm just not sure if they are going to keep up. They "upgraded" after the hack, but it's not enough in my eyes compared to some of the very low volume options that may get noticed soon enough, or the ETFs an all that.

Sites with trading platforms accompanied by suites of other services like bitcoin linked debit cards are probably the future: https://anxpro.com/




208. Post 10735818 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on March 11, 2015, 11:08:19 AM
Continentals, listen up. Risk free* trade:

1. Buy BTC  in Euros on Stamp and Kraken
2. send BTC to BFX in Hongkong (takes ~ 30 min)
3. Sell for USD
4. Lend out USD for ~40% annual interest (that's what I'm getting)

BOOM! You're hedged against Euro devaluation AND getting a nice vig


* obviously there is risk in any trade
Where are you getting 40% interest on lending USD? And how?

on Bitfinex, go to "Total Return Swaps" page, offer USD swaps.  I'm currently getting 0.117% daily interest, which translates to (365 day in a year) 42.7% annual interest. Of course it may be higher because interest is compounded, but may be lower as the contracts are for 30 days or less and I may not get so much in the future. (I may get moar!)

I'm in GBPland so there is a first step that kind of gets in the way... so near, yet so far...



209. Post 10736076 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: camolist on March 11, 2015, 11:35:10 AM
finex hidden sell wall @ 293.7

seems so, there was a dump around that price of around 1000BTC a short while ago.

amalgamating various trading ideas here and adding my limited intuition to say we had a medium term top yesterday.

frustratingly pulled short sell orders at 299 and 304 due to infectious rabid bull fever.



210. Post 10736273 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: Trolfi on March 11, 2015, 12:12:45 PM
where is lambchop?

he's contemplating the fact that with the fall of AM there will be no one left to troll in the securities section, only repetitions of "I told you so". I feel bad for the little lamb.



211. Post 10737339 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: VergeltungsLamb on March 11, 2015, 12:30:56 PM
where is lambchop?

he's contemplating the fact that with the fall of AM there will be no one left to troll in the securities section, only repetitions of "I told you so". I feel bad for the little lamb.

He is not here: for he is risen, as he said. Come, see the place where the Lord lay.

This isn't even my final form...

more like




212. Post 10738510 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):




213. Post 10740381 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: medialab101 on March 11, 2015, 06:18:44 PM
700BTC to go on finex. I wonder if we can stay above this time.

< 5,000 BTC to go on Bitstamp. On a side note, they have been removed from the main menu on Bitcoinity  Grin


the wall has merely been reshuffled... what is of note is the the bids are up another 100k today despite increased buying



214. Post 10743667 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

I didn't see this troll session, but are you sure it wasn't just lambchops letting loose with sock puppets? He has photoshop skills, and if he got bored in the securities section (which has been fairly slow) I'm sure he'd be happy to pass his time in this thread...



215. Post 10744226 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):




216. Post 10749339 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):


Quote from: Fatman3001 on March 12, 2015, 11:59:11 AM
Epic dumps are not that epic anymore.

neither are the walls that epic these days in BTC terms....

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg1860117#msg1860117


ahhhh, those were the days...

...and I heard even further back before I was born, they had spectacular fun on gox pre 2013, throwing btcs around like confetti



217. Post 10749823 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: Newar on March 12, 2015, 02:05:03 PM

Epic dumps are not that epic anymore.

neither are the walls that epic these days in BTC terms....

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg1860117#msg1860117


ahhhh, those were the days...

...and I heard even further back before I was born, they had spectacular fun on gox pre 2013, throwing btcs around like confetti

Wasn't that wall like 40k at its peak? That one burned me hard.

~30k I think. It was fun.

ah yes:




I remember that moment with fondness: I'd bought in at 250, right before it crashed. Lost 30%, but the pump on the dead cat bounce that was coaxed by this wall was so extreme I doubled my initial investment by flying by the seat of my pants to the 150ish peak  Cheesy


EDIT: they said that volatility would die down, and it seems it has decreased since those days. I mean, look at this. 30% increase in a few hours...!



218. Post 10751785 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: uhoh on March 12, 2015, 04:48:05 PM
stamps resistance fading!

bought or moved?




219. Post 10751839 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

I just don't buy it, shorting with maximum leverage



220. Post 10755044 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: KryptoFoo on March 12, 2015, 09:58:51 PM
I do not like the IBM news, and have gone into capital preservation mode by closing my long for now. I'll wait to see if the market can shake this off:  I believe IBM not using bitcoin will be construed as a negative, or at least an excuse to take profits.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/03/12/us-bitcoin-ibm-idUSKBN0M82KB20150312

Edit: one post up, worst. gif. ever.  Cheesy


Just looks like a faster way for americans to get their dollars on an exchange to buy some bitcoin.

Yes, and it's worth saying that IBM may in the end give up on rolling their own once they realize theirs will not be as secure as bitcoin.

that's horrible news...

one question would be, do people then get to mine dollars at home?? Smiley

the other question would be, who the fuck is going to power the network?

it is the sort of thing that would take the easy to understand bits of bitcoin to the average user though, make their life easier, without shifting their paradigm in a way that disturbs the "natural order" of things. That way they can keep deferring responsibility to the benevolent rulers who watch out for them...



221. Post 10755105 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: KryptoFoo on March 12, 2015, 10:05:54 PM

why, the central banks can pay IBM to run the network of course!  Roll Eyes

Quote
If central banks approve the concept, IBM will build the secure and scalable infrastructure for the project.

ah yes, of course.. only skimmed it...



222. Post 10755767 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: Norway on March 12, 2015, 10:53:45 PM
IBM, do they still exist?

I remember the year 2000. I was working as chief programmer for a over-funded company wanting to make a "social interactive multiplayer online travel-game in the browser (flash)". I'm not kidding, I was sitting in a chesterfield chair while programming and running the development. The times were crazy! I made 100k USD a year! And I teached myself PHP/MySQL/Flash while working for them! (Getting paid while going to school, ha ha). I actually managed to make the game in time, and even make it a lot better than expected. But here I go, ranting about the good ol' days. What happened during this period was this:

The management knew that people from India were skilled programmers (for a reasonably price). So they hired an Indian guy, 50 years old, had been working for IBM in the states, now living in Norway. They hired him as my assistant without even consulting me, ha ha  Grin Crazy times....

I spent A LOT OF TIME trying to teach him Flash. After a while, I understood that this sweet, Indian guy could never contribute to the project. It was the day that I had to show him how to type the "$" symbol with a standard keyboard.

Long story short: Does IBM still exist?  Grin

is that a true story, bro? Smiley



223. Post 10761221 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: oda.krell on March 13, 2015, 11:02:56 AM
Based on my time here roughly 99% of people posting charts have literally no idea what they are doing & it's more often than not just what they want to happen.
They then go ahead & make a bull shit chart to try & convince themselves it'll happen.

Who are the successful/professional traders here?
I'd like to interview a few for a series. Obviously 'I once made $100 in a bubble' doesn't count.

No idea if they're up for interviews (or even like being mentioned in this context Cheesy), but from the top of my head, masterluc, RyNinDaCleM, windjc are all traders who seem to have had a strong grasp of the market, for a long time, together with what appears solid risk control.*

* There's more than those three, I'm sure, but they're the ones that came to my mind right now.

this guy oka.krell comes across like he knows what he's talking about, no idea if he's had any success though  Wink

also look up chessnut, he has an EW thread



224. Post 10761644 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: infofront on March 13, 2015, 02:34:59 PM
Chessnut gets more wrong than right.

I enjoy reading his analyses, and he seems to know EW really well. However, you're correct.

do you have data on his success/failures? or just based on looking at his posts?  Wink

I have no idea, but he is a trader to talk to on these forums at the very least


EDIT, oh and don't forget billyjoeallen, he claims he's up 60% this year   Shocked



225. Post 10762115 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on March 13, 2015, 03:13:09 PM
No I don't. I'm doing pretty well, but not that good.

ok my memory did fail me  Undecided

40%


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg10685081#msg10685081



226. Post 10762233 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):



Quote from: SkyValeey on March 13, 2015, 03:39:35 PM


EDIT: for clarity, he's playing a lute. He's a bear playing a lute...



227. Post 10763212 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

biased perspective: the dump was merely to get people warmed up for what's next. To instill doubt, to soften the ground, to tweak the indicators, grease the wheel, lube the dildo... you get the picture Smiley




228. Post 10776267 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

no the moment of truth is now...























no wait....

...NOW



229. Post 10781234 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: RistoReptilian on March 15, 2015, 03:41:04 PM
^What should *I* say? I was not promised $10k coins, they told me $300k coins were a sure thing!

YOU told me 300k a coin! why am I still waiting, that's like, 1000x away from here  Cry



230. Post 10781306 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: bank of bits on March 15, 2015, 03:51:56 PM
There's a wall in under 300$, let's see if we can cross it.




231. Post 10782926 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: kodtycoon on March 15, 2015, 06:52:12 PM
Why do all the bears keep saying that we didn't break 300 after X attempts? WE BROKE $300 ON BITFINEX!

If you say that one exchange doesn't count, then you can never reference Bitfinex interest rates, amount of longs, or shorts, if you clearly dismiss their price.

But Bitstamp matter most and we did not on Bitstamp that is why we still have doubt that it is really bullish or not.

HAHA funny....

the only reason it was broken temporarily on bfx was that some shorts got margin called or panic cancelled... so annoying as I had a sell order at 304.1 that was missed : Cry



232. Post 10783255 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):




233. Post 10784585 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: inca on March 15, 2015, 07:48:27 PM


Not sure what you are trying to show with your chart. If you are suggesting the RSI cannot support any moves higher I suggest you look at Nov 2013, it has already broken out according to your charting..

Edit:

If we are playing spot the pattern then perhaps we are back in september 2013..



1 - it's not my chart.

2 - my main point in posting it is that, if you are in the school of "the downtrends not over", then the upper bound of the channel in CNY terms is exactly what we have been bouncing off for the last few days of last week. There are a few in this thread that complain of chinese pied piper's no?

3 -If we play spot the pattern using this chart, assuming the downtrend is not over (which the chart demonstrates), shows that the RSI counts for something. To imagine there is anything like Nov 2013 on the horizon is a bit mental in my opinion.

4 - don't get upset if I question your position, it's not an attack, I just think players stand to gain a lot more by the downtrend not being over and I'm biased because I'm shorting.

Quote from: Afrikoin on March 15, 2015, 08:36:16 PM

the only reason it was broken temporarily on bfx was that some shorts got margin called or panic cancelled... so annoying as I had a sell order at 304.1 that was missed : Cry

Michael, couldn't let go of $2? $302 wasn't enough?

I don't sit there finger on the trigger, I placed the order in advance of course with the logic that if it didn't cross 305, it was going back down, and that logic was correct but 20 cents out!


EDIT: how do I make small pictures?



234. Post 10784683 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

the larger ask walls on bfx vanished for the "end of the weekend pump", read into that what you will



235. Post 10785407 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: inca on March 15, 2015, 10:08:50 PM
numbers...


1 - cool

2 - not sure why you are not defining the downtrend as being from the ATH and all subsequent lower highs. If we do so then it is already broken. But you are quite right the price may not be going up any time soon..

3 - we can agree to disagree on this one

4 - Certainly not upset! I dont trade with leverage. When there are players stuffing 120,000,000 dollars into stealth startups, the majority of which work/own major silicon valley firms then I would suggest you are wrong Smiley. I think the price is heavily engineered or manipulated. But expecting the price to drop below 160 dollars from a high of 1200 seems a bit silly now.


2 - I have no idea either. My trading is based on other people's charts and my limited experience on exchanges since April 2013  Undecided ... but when talking to experienced traders and after reading Kahneman's "Thinking, Fast and Slow" it's clear that I'm probably just as better or worse off in my approach than most other traders anyways...

3 - Yes and no Smiley of course it could pop up, but I don't think the current news will necessarily affect price that way, and we are missing a sudden china involvement and a gox bot to give us the crazy momentum.

4 - it's so easy to read everything everyone says on here in the wrong voice in your (my) head Smiley I just don't see major investment into these unregulated exchanges happening right now just because there is all this "good news" and positive spin from WSJ etc. As bitcoiners we are acutely aware of every item of media attention, but I don't see the effects of the recent cascade of positive developments affecting price in the way that people imagine it might, just yet. It's still early days in terms of big investment and greater adoption. I imagine you'll still only get the odd risk taker actually putting a small portion of their capital onto coinbase (still not liquid enough) or some other random slovenian or hongkong/taiwan/anon exchange...



236. Post 10785598 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: criptix on March 15, 2015, 11:54:10 PM

not sure what you guys were talking about, but this is really not a good basis for trading - actually it is a bad basis for everything ^^"

of course it's not a good basis, that would be ridiculous!!

don't worry about me man, I'm a pretty smart guy Cool



what you should worry about though, is your percieved notions of control over randomness. Skip to paragraph 10 for the lowdown.

http://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/london-life/the-thought-father-nobel-prizewinning-psychologist-daniel-kahneman-on-luck-9199162.html



on a related side note, have you fathomed how many people who "trade" bitcoin actually know what they are doing?



237. Post 10785609 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: dreamspark on March 16, 2015, 12:00:21 AM

4 - I just don't see major investment into these unregulated exchanges happening right now just because there is all this "good news" and positive spin from WSJ etc.

Good job we have Coinbase and the BIT GBTC then and Gemini on the way.

yeah, I'm just arguing that it's probably going to take a bit of time. I look forward to further developments Smiley



238. Post 10789461 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: Andre# on March 16, 2015, 11:45:26 AM

Lets agree to disagree.  Cheesy




239. Post 10790549 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

just reading "elliott wave principle" and came across an interesting point. Market reversals don't happen on high volume and with strong acceleration, they tend to happen when the extremes have finally been exhausted so volume decreases (imagine a bull run hitting it's peak, as we may have done now mid-term, the bull runs out of breath and gets exhausted).

Also key to note is that during final stages of bull markets before reversal, market participants when polled show demonstrably more optimism than at other times in the market. Basically the more you "believe" as a mass, the closer you get to being delusional and running out of steam, after that the law of gravity comes into action. The same would apply to the inverse. For example, once you lose everything, the only way left is up! Smiley



RE price, I think bitcoin potential price needs to be totally re-evaluated. For one, the market has matured and the crazy volatility of the past has been gradually decreasing. More importantly, Gox is out of the picture now, and all the previous predictions were based on sentiment and information that has been skewed by a skewed exchange.

Also important to note is that as price increases, the ability to affect the price by adding more money becomes increasingly difficult.



240. Post 10791687 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: inca on March 16, 2015, 03:48:35 PM
NLC probably banned for paedophilia references..

Long interest falling now 0.09%

Next an attack on 300.

To the guy shorting because sentiment is bullish - how would that have worked out in 2014? Smiley

in april 2014, swimmingly... Dec 2014, even better.

you miss the point about the fact that at the peak of a bubble, the sentiment is at it's maximum. This occurs just before everyone falls off a cliff together all hugging and telling each other how great they are Wink

my motivation to short is not just about betting against the bulls, but anyways...



241. Post 10791720 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: Bitcoiner_cph on March 16, 2015, 04:01:58 PM
WHAT???

I think most here can filter the sarcasm from the real comments.

Anyway, yes my spelling is bad, and I do not intent to correct it... take it or leave it...

yes I believe very much in Bitcoins and that it can end the corruption of the fiat system, no matter if you think free masons and illuminati have control over fiat or not!!!??

deleting my comment, and probably going back to lurking soon  Undecided




242. Post 10792320 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: inca on March 16, 2015, 04:21:00 PM
NLC probably banned for paedophilia references..

Long interest falling now 0.09%

Next an attack on 300.

To the guy shorting because sentiment is bullish - how would that have worked out in 2014? Smiley

in april 2014, swimmingly... Dec 2014, even better.

you miss the point about the fact that at the peak of a bubble, the sentiment is at it's maximum. This occurs just before everyone falls off a cliff together all hugging and telling each other how great they are Wink

my motivation to short is not just about betting against the bulls, but anyways...

The thing is you have to wait until the bullish sentiment is crazy ripe.
Otherwise you'll simply sell too soon...

Look at the 1w chart on bitstamp and point out any bubble we are experiencing. Trying to play the contrarian by betting against forum sentiment can work. But betting against positive sentiment after a 14 month bear market when the price isnt even out of the long term log down trend seems..risky.

it's very risky, but I'm putting my bet here as it will pay off more for me in the long run. My biased decision making has also sought out reinforcement elsewhere in the form of various other indicators. Please note I'm not an experienced trader Smiley

... but ultimately I think that it pays off more for the market movers if the downtrend is not over, various EW counts support this, I think that depending on how you draw your charts, we are on the upper bounds of long term trend resistance, and failing to break it so far with any force is key. A revisit to a higher low or an area that could be called a retest of the previous low would confirm an end to the trend, but on lower volume, with less force.

Also with regards to betting against the market, I don't believe we are in a bubble, I was merely observing something I read in a book today. I don't think I could call the sentiment for this recent rise "peak sentiment", but the fickleness of bitcoiners is something to be exploited and I think it's too much too soon. Tradeview is full of "long" charts and indicators pointing up, which can be read as adding to a certain euphoria, or can be read as just plain scary to be shorting.

Stop loss just above 305 so no worries Smiley


small edits...



243. Post 10792396 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: bassclef on March 16, 2015, 05:10:12 PM
so what do you think guys, will we see $300 this week?

There's still a chance this could break down and fill in below $280, which opens the door to breaking the rising bottom trendline at $260. However this is not what I think will happen (but many chartists are calling for it).

If you're not already in now, the lower risk trade would be to go long after $300 is broken and becomes support, confirming the break.

how much room do you think there is for a cascading effect of long margin calls if it breaks down to 260ish? This is basically what I'm betting on. Majority of bids in between 255-271, after that, re assess. Otherwise join the bulls above 305 and CCMF for a moment.



244. Post 10792833 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: bassclef on March 16, 2015, 05:47:17 PM
so what do you think guys, will we see $300 this week?

There's still a chance this could break down and fill in below $280, which opens the door to breaking the rising bottom trendline at $260. However this is not what I think will happen (but many chartists are calling for it).

If you're not already in now, the lower risk trade would be to go long after $300 is broken and becomes support, confirming the break.

how much room do you think there is for a cascading effect of long margin calls if it breaks down to 260ish? This is basically what I'm betting on. Majority of bids in between 255-271, after that, re assess. Otherwise join the bulls above 305 and CCMF for a moment.

It's possible though margin cascades are hard to predict. There might not be enough selling to even get us sub $280 at this point, though we might go there again due to low volume in general. When the market leaders are bullish and want to go up, watch them shake out the market downward as many times as it takes to clean out enough supply to do it while supporting certain price levels. They have both the bankroll and patience for this and it is a profitable thing to do as it fills their longs and builds retail shorts.

Those longs who are well capitalized would need sub $200 to get margin called, and that price is close to bear delusion at this point. I expect they would hold through, just as some of the well funded shorts are doing who allowed themselves to be trapped during capitulation. I expect they, on the other hand, are getting mighty nervous as their danger zone is in the $300s. Some of the bearish activity you see is likely groups of them protecting their positions--I saw this activity all the way up from the bottom--seems to work well enough until a whale with a pump bot comes along and decides to annihilate them.

thanks... for me the more I try to think like a whale the more I imagine they have more to gain by continuing the downtrend.




245. Post 10793592 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: bassclef on March 16, 2015, 06:29:12 PM
thanks... for me the more I try to think like a whale the more I imagine they have more to gain by continuing the downtrend.

They will continue in the direction of least resistance according to supply and demand. That is why after capitulation they began pumping instead of dumping. Fighting natural market forces is a good way to go broke, any market professional knows this. They won't do it. There is also a good chance that they can see both sides of the market and have insider connections--so they know when to mark the price up or down ahead of how much fiat is entering the exchanges and what kind of news is coming out.

They've tested the hell out of this price range and it resulted in an accumulation gradient of rising bottoms (likely by multiple competing interests). This is bullish. They see this. We will test downward as many times as needed to break $300. If it means that they hold most of the coins on Finex to do this, so be it. They will be distributed later.


I get your points. It's just considering the implication that the large actors are sufficiently stacked to change market sentiment completely (tweak indicators, create momentum, etc) wouldn't it be profitable to sell into a rising bull market if you feel with a degree of certainty that you can manipulate it down again? When the consensus targets are above an exit point you are happy with, you know they are going to continiously keep buying at your favourite point before getting exhausted. Let's assume 300 is that point, would roughly 100% gains (if for arguments sake their buy point was near the 166 bottom, and we discount the massive rebound to 315) or more not be sufficient for this whole exercise? The new "sustainable" bull market can come later when the institutions are properly set up and notable new money is flowing in.



246. Post 10794202 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: bassclef on March 16, 2015, 08:01:16 PM
...


thanks, makes a lot of sense. I'm happy to wait with them and observe, for now Smiley



247. Post 10795592 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: barbs on March 16, 2015, 10:36:21 PM
I never said they were.  Here we witness these two dudebros pissing it away trying to be great. They smoke too much weed and probably hang out with each other too much.

they ARE each other... imagine having to hang out with yourself all the time. Do business with yourself, relax with yourself, look in the mirror and see yourself, turn away from the mirror and see yourself again... shyeeet.



"we bought a ticket to space" (pleased look for themselves)  --- where's your stock answer of it's utility?Huh!! or at least potential utility... no one gives a shit if you are rich, WE can't buy tickets to space, yet.



248. Post 10796314 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

he's not in a rage he's just lolling... let the good times roll  Shocked



249. Post 10801335 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on March 17, 2015, 12:45:00 PM
Price tried to break down at least 2 times over the last 24 hours or so. Really impressive that we're not experiencing any major corrections as of now. Looking promising so far!

This. Traders who took long positions on Bitfinex are bullish and they don't feel to close their position right now.

http://bitcoinist.net/bit-first-publicly-traded-bitcoin-fund/


correct me if I'm wrong but when the market opens for these investments funds, is there a mechanism to short available? I haven't done my homework on exactly how they work so feel free to link me elsewhere Smiley

so basically my point is, when bitcoin or products derived from bitcoins' value become available to more mainstream financial players, what's to stop them shorting the shit out of BTC?



250. Post 10801513 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: pixl8tr on March 17, 2015, 02:35:07 PM
This is pretty dull

Ok, who woke-up the dumpers?



testing or pre-empting a drop to 260ish, I'm excited  Shocked



251. Post 10801551 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: spooderman on March 17, 2015, 02:28:40 PM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=992628.0

edit: what a touching story. Bitcoin saved the day Smiley

yeah I got pretty emo reading that, I've known lophie as a community member whose posts I respect for some time so good to see older members getting something back. What is annoying is the number of scams that over balance the scales when it comes to this sort of thing...

There is a really cute thread somewhere a while back started by a kid raising money for his dog to have an operation. The potential donors were quite rigorous requesting proof, and ultimately a few guys covered the entire costs and there's now a nice trail of photos and heart warming thank you posts and such Smiley



252. Post 10801581 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: inca on March 17, 2015, 02:41:47 PM
Not much follow through selling so far..

Hope you aren't getting bear trapped Smiley

so far... thank you sir, I hope you aren't getting bull trapped  Cheesy


Quote from: Bitcoiner_cph on March 17, 2015, 02:46:06 PM
The market finally woke up.

Its looks like an indecisive market, it could turn from bear to bull any sec.

you are full of insights, aren't you.... you





253. Post 10803248 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: trelelel on March 17, 2015, 03:57:15 PM



ha, where is this image from? seems great minds think alike  Cool

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=985352.msg10736015#msg10736015



254. Post 10804522 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: podyx on March 17, 2015, 07:39:52 PM
This goes well with my $268 target Cool


in just enough time to make a cool 10% bounce back to 300ish before a break down to despair  Cool



255. Post 10805572 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):



cos that's how we all live our lives, in a perpetual state of social networked paradise...  Roll Eyes



256. Post 10805608 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on March 17, 2015, 09:38:36 PM
...

Idk. Looks quite sad. He's texting to himself.

at 8:32 in the morning... Awesome!



257. Post 10806433 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 17, 2015, 10:57:55 PM
Stolfi, adding Blythe Masters to your list would give a little more weight to your (rather unconvincing) argument. ^

I missed the news about her, indeed.  But the list is very long -- of people who obviously do not believe in bitcoin, but still hope to profit from the Bitcoin phenomenon...


I've never really read your posts in detail, but have you thought to maybe venture into the grey area that often encompasses many big issues and ideas, instead of taking a generic binary "FOR or AGAINST" stance?

Basically it seems to me you committed to an argument long ago when you first looked into bitcoin, perhaps prompted by an article you read here or there, and now it's essential that you find the proof to demonstrate that you were are right. There's some kind of well known term for that swinging around somewhere Smiley

Do you have a scenario in your mind where bitcoin does succeed in some measure?

To be clear on my position, I've actually become more sceptical of bitcoins' success over time, despite the excellent news, but the revolution that's been set in motion will continue even if somehow bitcoin does not. What form that revolution will take will only become apparent as it happens - perhaps not the techno libertarian paradise that some believe, but then perhaps it will shake the very core of our centralised power structures.

Unfortunately "true believers" sometimes forget that criticism and debate are useful in smoothing out errors or searching for something better. In the case of the unbelievers, well, I think most of those types can't see past their blinkers to the simple fact that bigotry often comes from just aligning yourself with a particular group, school of thought or similar, as opposed to genuinely being against the idea or concept in it's essence. Note: I'm defining "unbelievers" as the extreme opposite of true believers, legitimate critics fall a bit further to the center  Wink



258. Post 10814459 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

longs not blinking...



259. Post 10815648 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):




260. Post 10817869 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

calling a conservative market bottom at 233  Cool



261. Post 10821532 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: lokijuyhtgrryryj on March 19, 2015, 11:17:29 AM
Good morning, gentlemen!  I bring good news!  NotLambchop and his ugly horse, Silverspoon (who is not even a part of the Mane Six--a totally irrelevant background pony who smells!) HAVE BEEN TERMINATED from lokijuyhtgrryryj LLC employ.

Having perused through their [frankly, offensive] postings, I was shocked and appalled by the depth of depravity those miserable miscreants have sunk to.
I assure you, gentlemen, Lamb & Horse will bother you no more.
Excelsior!



 Cheesy

forgive me masses - but I'm starting to come over to your side, sir  Undecided


please teach me the way, oh wise one

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHzSBccQqWk




262. Post 10822673 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

I have a hunch facepay is not going to kick off... I have this feeling that facebook and money just don't go together. It would feel weird to a user, at this time anyway. All they wanna do is look at stupid videos, pictures and comments, not deal with something serious like money. That comes on a different platform.

I wonder though what possible solutions there are to the problem of innate human laziness and inertia. I mean, bitcoin could be great an all, but do people really want to switch to some new innovative currency for transacting, when their iphone has it all laid out for them in traditional bucks format?

should I make a thread for this? has it been discussed already? (probably)



263. Post 10822688 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: ssmc2 on March 19, 2015, 02:16:44 PM
https://blogs.windows.com/bloggingwindows/2015/03/17/making-windows-10-more-personal-and-more-secure-with-windows-hello/

Yeah it's Windows, but this will be the future of security. Biometric wallets FTW.

"Windows Hello introduces system support for biometric authentication – using your face, iris, or fingerprint to unlock your devices – with technology that is much safer than traditional passwords"

Alohar!! http://www.techtimes.com/articles/34023/20150219/alohar-mobile-security-authentication.htm

(security is going to go beyond traditional biometric profiling ^^, for instance using machine learning to learn from the data collected by our devices and using that to build far more complex identification verification models from that data... going to be listening to our heartbeats eventually no doubt too, incidentally our phones will also turn into onboard doctors, as well as onboard policemen)

Very true. I remember reading somewhere about a device that was already able to monitor an individual's ECG waves as they are even more unique than fingerprints. This stuff is being created as we type.

that would be so sweet, especially when the tech comes bundled with zero day exploits and built in backdoors that lead straight to the NSAs data collection centre Cheesy



264. Post 10823153 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: empowering on March 19, 2015, 02:30:31 PM

Yup... afraid so, but then it is not exactly a case of "newsflash- shocking news just in, the NSA are watching, and apparently will continue to do so" and it is not as if Apple, inc applepay ^^ and all of the others,  are now, or will be in the future immune from this. Neither will it stop the evolution of the tech from occurring.

The tech is coming/already here, it is the way people accept it, or not, or get around it, or not,  that will determine how useful and or detrimental it will be to society. I am afraid that people will continue to sleep walk straight into it.


of course, it's a sarcastic comment I couldn't avoid as often the excitement around and infatuation with new technology forgets to check itself. As with any tool it's how you use it that is the key not the tool itself.

yeah... sometimes I just wish people would wake the fuck up  Smiley




265. Post 10825721 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 19, 2015, 07:28:40 PM
Jesus you've been away a while.

Yes, for some 100 pages of this thread...  Cheesy

it must be mind numbing most of the time reading through this thread as an academic... Even I've been considering terminating myself from entering this area after my recent abstention from my "only lurking allowed" rule. I'm sure there are some other more intellectually satisfying areas of the forum, and this microcosm of the community is probably not all that representative of the wider participants. I don't know exactly where you hang out though apart from here so maybe you've got it covered Smiley



266. Post 10825798 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: podyx on March 19, 2015, 07:44:55 PM
Things are looking dim.

I'm considering selling off all my bitcoins if we go below $250...


yep, breaking out down



267. Post 10827570 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

so let me get this straight, 700k went long on that spike to 269.5 on finex, and at about the same time 450k went short. I guess one could well have been in response to another. It looks like the long was a margin buy, did anyone see it?



268. Post 10827624 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on March 19, 2015, 11:29:23 PM
so let me get this straight, 700k went long on that spike to 269.5 on finex, and at about the same time 450k went short. I guess one could well have been in response to another. It looks like the long was a margin buy, did anyone see it?

There was a 5k wall placed at 250, minutes later it broke up into staggered walls, seconds later it looked like all 5k plowed into the asks.

sorry, yes I think I answered my own question... if the asks he bought were shorts, then, well, bla  Roll Eyes

still unsure of the motivation behind such madness... but there we go, does madness have reason?



269. Post 10827646 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: tarmi on March 19, 2015, 11:34:25 PM
so let me get this straight, 700k went long on that spike to 269.5 on finex, and at about the same time 450k went short. I guess one could well have been in response to another. It looks like the long was a margin buy, did anyone see it?

There was a 5k wall placed at 250, minutes later it broke up into staggered walls, seconds later it looked like all 5k plowed into the asks.



you are not telling it right.

someone borrowed another 1.3 mil, flashed it with a massive buy wall on 250, a lot of lemmings and whale kamikaze bought a lot of short positions.

that's it.

so it wasn't the spike to 269.5? or if it was, maybe a mis-click?  Cheesy



270. Post 10827686 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: tarmi on March 19, 2015, 11:40:58 PM
the spike were the noobs buying and going all in.

all in is the only way to trade though right?

I can't even read a simple sentence anymore, too much excitement, too little sleep. Holding this short as I think we may possibly jump off a cliff still, 6h on wisdom is telling me stories I want to hear  Cheesy



271. Post 10833318 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: damiano on March 20, 2015, 03:50:51 PM
There could be a possible dump on both btc/ltc.  There seems to be improvements on the ltcgear front and there is a slight chance we could be paid (for those who own ltcgear shares).  There's about 13-14 weeks of funds that could potentially be paid out and I know a lot of people need to convert to fiat.  In terms on how much can or could be paid out were talking in upwards of 2-4 million (possibly more).  I think the site is split on 50/50 btc/ltc payment

Keep that in mind

what's this to do with? can you link?



272. Post 10833444 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: SkyValeey on March 20, 2015, 03:57:09 PM
Soon dump. Bullish style is so weak... No energy, no hope...
1.1k Wall at btcchina won't help. We need 20,000 walls to be really bulllish imo.







273. Post 10841477 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: spooderman on March 21, 2015, 02:03:21 PM
who do you trust more regarding an accurate recollection of history? A larger group, or a smaller group?

everybody knows the answer is the smaller group  Cheesy



274. Post 10841625 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 21, 2015, 02:21:18 PM
who do you trust more regarding an accurate recollection of history? A larger group, or a smaller group?
As long as large groups can be easily influenced by the media, smaller groups.
But aren't smaller groups easily influenced by smaller media?  Cheesy

how small?




275. Post 10842525 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on March 21, 2015, 03:27:23 PM

I totally agree, it's just been a lot of bear grumbling here today so I thought perhaps you had something to add.

Although I see some of the signs of this going to smack to the ground, there are things that makes me feel like we are being played here.
If you look at the movement (http://bfxdata.com/combined/btc.php) from 20.00 to 24.00 on the 19th of March, which is followed by dead silence, that looks... And the sentiment at the time from everyone who is dead sure now was "WTF???", which tells me we might be staring at a trap, hopefully for bears.

Then again, I really want this thing to go through the roof so I am quite biased.



just to note: those scales are arbitrary, if you zoom out picture looks different



276. Post 10862787 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: bassclef on March 23, 2015, 06:02:44 PM
Long from $260 if anyone is interested. Holding steady.

Previous trades:

long $220-$290
short $290-$230
long $230-$280
short $270-$260
long $260-$255


Smiley



277. Post 10862804 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on March 23, 2015, 06:13:40 PM
Long from $260 if anyone is interested. Holding steady.

Previous trades:

long $220-$290
short $290-$230
long $230-$280
short $270-$260
long $260-???


but but it didn't go to <240 after hitting 290

edit unless you shorted 290 2 months ago... i c

very well done!

I believe that was after the 315 high



278. Post 10863497 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote
If a Bitcoiner is scammed and nobody is around to laugh at him is it still funny?

ElectricMucus - I was just thinking that the answer to that is yes, it is still funny if they are able to laugh at their own misfortune.



279. Post 10874641 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: bassclef on March 24, 2015, 07:43:43 PM
Sentiment-wise, the fact that the longs haven't really budged much may indicate that they are the strong hands in this case.

Strong hands = profitable traders, experienced chart readers, well-capitalized, logical, non-emotional
Weak hands = newb traders, gamblers, simple indicator-based analysis, panicky, easy to shake out


That's a biggie.

Good traders are good because they know how to manage risk. They won't risk 100% or their account on a margin trade. 50% is max, so if you have 10btc in your trading account you risk 5. That's a 15btc position if you're on 3:1.

My reading of it is all based around an interpretation of the bitcoin "hodl" philosophy. At this stage my understanding is most of the recent bull run accumulation was done 220s - 240s (I don't have a chart, but the one below might help Smiley )

There is a quote here, at the bottom of this thread:

https://www.tradingview.com/v/RyzPvDn8/

Quote
This can't possibly bode well with respect to the 236 support. It's bound to be tested over the next 7 days, and judging from how weak BTC has been in the face of almost all support, I don't have high hopes. But I'm not selling my long position yet because in my experience, it is right after that when the thing turns around and RIPS. So basically I have no idea what to do.


This, as far as I can read, is the sort of mentality most bitcoiners have. It fits neatly with loss aversion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loss_aversion


It also fits neatly with the fact that trading experiences, impatience and inability to trust ones decisions can all have a psychological toll (I know this from personal experience, as I'm sure most traders do from some stage in their lives).

I assume that most bitcoiners on the whole are not experienced traders, and they have had their past experiences mostly painted with success. The best strategy has been, by and large, to hold. These past lessons paint present actions. Also, psychologically the risk of securing a loss by selling is more damaging than holding on for the potential of future gains. In general statistically speaking people sell winners too soon, and hold losers too long.

I wonder what will happen around the 220 mark and below to all the longs. I noticed they twitching today at last...


In short I think you are giving the whales, and the masses, too much credit  Wink




280. Post 10907669 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.07h):

this thread used to be about walls, now it's about memes and trolls  Wink

still enjoy the odd visit though  Cool Kiss



281. Post 10915917 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.07h):

Quote from: Dump3er on March 28, 2015, 11:40:05 PM
@Dump3r

At least some care enough to lie about it.

Plz post some rockets and put me on ignore again!  Angry

how bout a helicopter?




282. Post 10919781 (copy this link) (by michaelGedi) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.07h):

Quote from: tarmi on March 29, 2015, 12:15:22 PM
well hello my friends.

my short from 255 is turning very profitable, again.

thank you bulls.