All posts made by tonico in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread



1. Post 3491667 (copy this link) (by tonico) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.20h):

Quote from: jojo69 on November 05, 2013, 07:06:47 PM
http://taoteaching.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/spinal_tap_but_it_goes_to_eleven1.jpg?w=300&h=168

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cak1xly8oUM



2. Post 3662023 (copy this link) (by tonico) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Historical highs and lows compared using rpietila's trendline:

      Date        Price  / Trend  = x%       (Factor)
Lows  2011-11-17    1.99 /   2.05 =   97.11% (1 /  1.03)
      2012-08-19    7.58 /  13.90 =   54.52% (1 /  1.83)
      2013-04-16   50.01 /  74.30 =   67.31% (1 /  1.49)
      2013-07-05   65.42 / 129.59 =   50.48% (1 /  1.98)
Highs 2011-06-08   31.91 /   0.67 = 4780.29% (1 * 47.80)
      2012-01-05    7.22 /   2.87 =  251.38% (1 *  2.51)
      2012-08-17   15.04 /  13.71 =  109.67% (1 *  1.10)
      2013-04-10  266.00 /  71.22 =  373.48% (1 *  3.73)
      2013-11-19  900.98 / 333.86 =  269.87% (1 *  2.70)



3. Post 3662575 (copy this link) (by tonico) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Biro Bob on November 21, 2013, 11:24:13 AM
Historical highs and lows compared using rpietila's trendline:

      Date        Price  / Trend  = x%       (Factor)
Lows  2011-11-17    1.99 /   2.05 =   97.11% (1 /  1.03)
      2012-08-19    7.58 /  13.90 =   54.52% (1 /  1.83)
      2013-04-16   50.01 /  74.30 =   67.31% (1 /  1.49)
      2013-07-05   65.42 / 129.59 =   50.48% (1 /  1.98)
Highs 2011-06-08   31.91 /   0.67 = 4780.29% (1 * 47.80)
      2012-01-05    7.22 /   2.87 =  251.38% (1 *  2.51)
      2012-08-17   15.04 /  13.71 =  109.67% (1 *  1.10)
      2013-04-10  266.00 /  71.22 =  373.48% (1 *  3.73)
      2013-11-19  900.98 / 333.86 =  269.87% (1 *  2.70)


This looks interesting - but what does it mean?

The average bubble is 3.12 2.7 times the trendline Wink

> x <- c(47.8, 2.51, 1.1, 3.73, 2.7)
> summary(x)
   Min. 1st Qu.  Median    Mean 3rd Qu.    Max.
   1.10    2.51    2.70   11.57    3.73   47.80


Edit: fixed typo.



4. Post 3662672 (copy this link) (by tonico) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: hannesnaude on November 21, 2013, 12:41:31 PM
Historical highs and lows compared using rpietila's trendline:

      Date        Price  / Trend  = x%       (Factor)
Lows  2011-11-17    1.99 /   2.05 =   97.11% (1 /  1.03)
      2012-08-19    7.58 /  13.90 =   54.52% (1 /  1.83)
      2013-04-16   50.01 /  74.30 =   67.31% (1 /  1.49)
      2013-07-05   65.42 / 129.59 =   50.48% (1 /  1.98)
Highs 2011-06-08   31.91 /   0.67 = 4780.29% (1 * 47.80)
      2012-01-05    7.22 /   2.87 =  251.38% (1 *  2.51)
      2012-08-17   15.04 /  13.71 =  109.67% (1 *  1.10)
      2013-04-10  266.00 /  71.22 =  373.48% (1 *  3.73)
      2013-11-19  900.98 / 333.86 =  269.87% (1 *  2.70)


This looks interesting - but what does it mean?

The average bubble is 3.12 times the trendline Wink

> x <- c(47.8, 2.51, 1.1, 3.73, 2,7)
> summary(x)
   Min. 1st Qu.  Median    Mean 3rd Qu.    Max.
  1.100   2.128   3.120  10.690   6.182  47.800



No, that's wrong. If by "average" you mean median and by "bubble" you mean the 5 highs you have included in your data set, then mental arithmetic shows that the answer should be 2.7. Your software gave the wrong answer because you entered ...3.73, 2,7) instead of ...3.73, 2.7)


Ups. Thanks, fixed.



5. Post 3673802 (copy this link) (by tonico) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: jatajuta on November 22, 2013, 11:27:38 AM
http://s9.postimg.org/mb2asn1q7/Untitled.png

In March 23 the H price was ~11% above the trendline and today it is ~127%. Bitcoin is a tiger, though.



6. Post 4428936 (copy this link) (by tonico) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.54h):

Quote from: macsga on January 10, 2014, 12:21:47 PM
Don't HODL your breath... Only your Bitcoins!!!

PS:
CCMF Grin

Someone please update the dictionary!
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=ccmf



7. Post 8239780 (copy this link) (by tonico) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.03h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on August 07, 2014, 06:10:08 PM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=723392.0

Interesting. Stamp using two banks now. Based on post #8, the former bank, unicredit, may have stopped taking deposits. This partially explains why total bid sum is recovering slower than in the past. I.e., no new deposits and some traders withdrawing from unicredit while they still can.

Looks like unicredit wants to end its relationship with Stamp. How long will the new banking relationship with Raiffeisen last?

According to this memo Raiffeisen tells their people to stay away from Bitcoin.



8. Post 8380137 (copy this link) (by tonico) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.05h):

Quote from: macsga on August 16, 2014, 11:31:57 AM
Maybe we have a reversal. Let's hope the volume supports this for a proper CCMF. Wink

Hodl !!!!!1 ?
Thanks. Forgot about that!

HODL!!!!!!1

One thing I don't understand.
Why choose the red color when shouting hodl as red is mostly associated with selling ?

Why not use green? It will be also good for people who don't want to rub their eyes every time they read this thread.

HODL!
I am a crypto-bear thinking bullish that's why!!!!

HODL!!!!!!1

http://i.imgur.com/HtQNoZP.png



9. Post 10096321 (copy this link) (by tonico) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.45h):

https://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/bitstamp/btcusd is working again



10. Post 10259504 (copy this link) (by tonico) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.52h):

http://i.imgur.com/pUMoSBD.gif